TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

outwrangle Archive

View 2 posts and 84 comments by outwrangle on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

IMHO it's better to err on the side of caution.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 06:13 AM
6

Children can not give consent bro.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 01:09 AM
-1

What kinds of activism have you done?
/r/MensRights04/04/12 12:55 AM
0

I wanted to make him feel bad for making you folks look bad.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 07:26 PM
-1

I'm actually just poking fun at him specifically.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 03:56 AM
0

No one is doing that. Stop it with the persecution complex.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 02:15 AM
-7

Yup, totally not a hate group.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 01:27 AM
-1

Are you seeing how much he is being upvoted? Even if he is a troll, are all the upvotes from trolls too?
/r/MensRights09/03/12 01:26 AM
4

I don't, but this guy has openly admitted to hating women. Are you really going to defend his shitty opinions?
/r/MensRights09/03/12 01:24 AM
-1

Why do you hate women so much?
/r/MensRights08/03/12 10:51 PM
2

Just use the singular 'they'. That's what I do.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 06:08 AM
20

Yet when feminists point out the existence of rape culture they get shunned. I wonder why that is...
/r/MensRights13/02/12 07:35 PM
31

How about proof that he was accused in the first place?
/r/MensRights11/02/12 12:49 PM
6

That's "minority" in the sociological sense. It's about more than just numbers.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 07:58 AM
10

Cis means "comfortable with one's own gender". Why isn't that a justifiable term to use?
/r/MensRights08/02/12 11:46 PM
4

SRS only links to upvoted posts, though.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 11:37 PM
3

No one said that men are to blame for patriarchy.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 10:06 PM
9

Bullying is the trigger, but not necessarily the cause. Depression is a lot more complicated than that.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 09:41 PM
3

That's because rape victims can be triggered by rape jokes. Murder victims, on the other hand, can not be triggered.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 09:33 PM
13

People that commit suicide are severely depressed. Severe depression is a form of mental illness.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 09:30 PM
14

Impacting the quality of Reddit is not against the rules. Furthermore, impacting the quality of a website is not a DDoS attack. A standard DDoS attack doesn't cause any damage to servers, either. Yes it does. It will overwhelm the server and cause it to shut down and this can (and often does) cause data to be deleted.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 05:06 PM
23

That's not what a DDoS attack is in any way. A DDoS attack is when you overwhelm a server with data and then force it to shut down. Changing the ranking on comments doesn't actually cause any damage to the Reddit servers, so it's not a DDoS attack. If it was a DDoS attack, we would have been banned by now. It's not like the admins are unaware of our existence.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 04:55 PM
23

No, it doesn't. Do you even know what a DDoS attack is? ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights08/02/12 04:44 PM
11

Here is the Reddit ToS. Please show me the part that says that being a "lynchmob" is against the rules.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 04:40 PM
12

How is /r/shitredditsays different from /r/worstof or /r/circlejerkmilitia?
/r/MensRights08/02/12 04:37 PM
9

When you call a person a dick, you are doing so because they show masculine traits. When you call a person a pussy, you are doing so because they show feminine traits. Do you not see how that is sexist?
/r/MensRights08/02/12 04:33 PM
19

As a SRSister, I hope SRS gets shut down. It would be the ultimate validation our point. On top of that, the ensuing shit storm that it would create would be amazing.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 04:32 PM
7

18% of women who earn degrees earn them in business Huh, that's interesting. Then again, aren't things like "accounting" business degrees? And, not to mention, the second my popular degree earned by women were in health professions and clinical sciences. I actually did mention that.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 04:30 PM
13

Try what? I don't understand.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 04:14 PM
21

They were saying that you're lying. Not telling you what to do. ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights08/02/12 04:11 PM
12

No. I don't think you're intentionally being sexist. The language itself is sexist.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 04:07 PM
9

Women graduate from university at higher rates (because they're held to lower standards) Yeah, they also mostly take art, nursing, and teaching degrees. Men, on the other hand, mostly take business, science, and engineering degrees. As such, men will have a harder time graduating than women. It's not because women are held to lower standards. It's because women are pressured into studying in easier fields by society. earn more for the same job considering seniority and expertise [citation needed…
/r/MensRights08/02/12 03:46 PM
9

I'm using the sociological definition of minority.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 03:24 PM
18

Actually, calling people dicks is sexist. It perpetuates the idea that men are aggressive (and is part of a dichotomy with "pussy", which perpetuates the idea that women are passive).
/r/MensRights08/02/12 03:24 PM
5

Does your world view have no room for nuance?
/r/MensRights08/02/12 03:23 PM
24

It's gone. Hindsight is 20/20, as they say. I shall sacrifice a SAWCSM to Tia tonight as pittance for my sins against the fempire.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 06:51 AM
25

I see what you mean. Yeah... that phrase is problematic. I can't think of a better way to phrase my point, though. I'm trying to say that suicide is not shameful and that it is not the easy way out. Sorry if it came across badly.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 06:31 AM
69

You think you've got everything figured out. To you, making fun of males is exactly the same as making fun of women. Never mind that males are the cultural default and that women are an oppressed minority. Your worldview is too black and white to allow for jokes about males. Also, I didn't know you used Reddit TJ! Asside from your sexist and ableist language you are actually a pretty smart guy. I bet if you actually think about it you'll come around to the dark side. Perhaps if you understood ou…
/r/MensRights08/02/12 04:30 AM
33

How many married men beat their wives? Sorry bro, marriage isn't proof of anything.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 04:26 AM
69

It's the result of mental illness. Succumbing to disease isn't weakness. "Pussy" is a gendered slur you sexist little shit. Not that you care, though. [something I said]
/r/MensRights08/02/12 04:23 AM
-1

Arguing with people on Reddit isn't "fighting". What have you actually done in your "fight"?
/r/MensRights06/02/12 05:07 PM
5

I wonder why people think MRAs are misogynists. Is it a feminazi conspiracy?
/r/MensRights04/02/12 03:08 AM
1

Fox News fucking nails it for once!
/r/MensRights30/01/12 11:18 PM
4

Hey, can you show me a specific example of our batshit? People always say this, but I never know what they're talking about. ;_;
/r/seduction30/01/12 11:00 PM
1

I don't care what you think! Now listen to me go on and on about how much I don't care! lol
/r/MensRights30/01/12 02:05 AM
4

Insults are the last defense of the out-argued. No wonder the MRM is not taken seriously.
/r/MensRights30/01/12 01:09 AM
3

Right, so it's perfectly fine for men to be a monolith but not women? You completely missed my point. It's not okay to treat either sex as a monolith. It's sexist when WBW do it to men and it's sexist when MRAs do it to women. You're a big fat hypocrite if you think it's okay to judge women as a group but it's not okay to judge men as a group. Exercise a little bit of self-awareness, please. There is going to be a backlash against feminism and feminists the likes of which you can't even imagine,…
/r/MensRights30/01/12 12:36 AM
5

Criticizing women as a group is sexist. Women are not a monolith. How can you be such a hypocrite? Any time that feminists criticize men as a group you're all up in arms, but it's somehow okay for MRAs to criticize women as a group?
/r/MensRights29/01/12 11:03 PM
-10

I'm sorry to interrupt the circlejerk, but... a classic "woe is me" female victim play. ... that is sexist as shit. Anyone can play victim. It's not exclusive to women.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 05:28 AM
1

I don't even understand the question. Look, is this going to take long? I stopped caring about this discussion hours ago.
/r/seduction14/01/12 03:27 AM
1

Atheism was a new idea once. Does that mean the burden of proof is on Atheists?
/r/seduction14/01/12 03:21 AM
3

Well, the burden of proof is on you. "What is" is not sufficient evidence.
/r/seduction14/01/12 12:23 AM
2

Come on, we just went over this. This is an Is/Ought fallacy. What is is not necessarily what ought to be.
/r/seduction13/01/12 11:39 PM
4

Oh, alright then. Be careful with phrases like this: Men are supposed to lead and to seduce from the first word to orgasm after orgasm. Because that really does sound like a declaration for how things ought to be. Men are expected to lead and seduce, but by no means are they supposed to. It is a far better way of finding sexual partners, though.
/r/seduction13/01/12 10:04 PM
6

I think you missed my point entirely. I'm just saying this appears to be an Is-Ought problem. You are saying that women are usually the ones who are seduced and men are usually the ones that do the seducing; I agree with you here. You then take that a step further and say that this is how it ought to be; that's what I'm arguing against.
/r/seduction13/01/12 09:55 PM
14

Yes, I really do think that gender roles are mostly cultural. I think that some women and men fall naturally into their gender roles and I think that some women and men have to force themselves to conform. That's why this community exists, really; /r/seduction is here to help men who are naturally sexual patients force themselves to be sexual agents. I really take issue with your idea that one gender is "supposed" to behave a certain way. The human mind is very plastic; almost nothing is hardwir…
/r/seduction13/01/12 09:25 PM
25

Men are supposed to lead and to seduce from the first word to orgasm after orgasm. That's only because our patriarchal society tells us so. Women can be sexual agents and men can be sexual patients. If we'd stop slut shaming it would be far easier for women to be sexual agents and if we'd stop virgin shaming it would be far easier for men to be sexual patients.
/r/seduction13/01/12 08:57 PM
10

What happens when someone from SRS makes their own bot to respond to your bot? You're going to start an arms race which will end in a huge Reddit shit storm, that's what. If that's your goal, keep it up, but know that it will probably end with bots being banned.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 05:38 PM
1

This is the first article I've read to the end for at least a month. Good stuff.
/r/seduction29/12/11 12:17 PM
8

When does no mean no? Do you just not take no for an answer?
/r/seduction29/12/11 08:47 AM
0

Aside from useless generalizations like "all women are human" and "all women are women" and "all women are made of atoms", what generalizations can you conclusively say are true? How do you verify that a generalization is true of a heterogeneous group?
/r/MensRights12/12/11 01:20 AM
3

The problem is defining what a "true generalization" is. If you say "all women X" then you are probably wrong.
/r/MensRights12/12/11 01:09 AM
2

All generalizations perpetuate hatred. It's like the generalization "All black people like friend chicken." It's not really a negative generalization (who doesn't like friend chicken), but it still perpetuates hatred of black people. Furthermore, no one likes to be generalized. It makes them feel like they are not a person at all and that they will be judged by their gender or their race or their sexual orientation before they will be judged by who they are.
/r/MensRights12/12/11 12:57 AM
0

Those evil feminists. Don't they know that sexism is over?
/r/MensRights12/12/11 12:29 AM
13

Generalizing women is misogyny. ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights12/12/11 12:23 AM
5

Next, ask him whether you can insert your finger. Hey stupid, it has to be non-consensual for it to be rape.
/r/MensRights11/12/11 12:48 AM
5

That is, quite possibly, the most stupid thing I have read today. I'm going to bed.
/r/MensRights10/12/11 08:08 AM
1

Penetration [...] without the consent of the victim. He's the victim, and he is being forced to penetrate her anus without consent. If you think like a lawyer, it makes sense.
/r/MensRights10/12/11 12:56 AM
21

I scored a 25% I never realized how these magazines perpetuate negative stereotypes about men. If I were a woman reading a men's magazine to try to learn about men, I'd think that they're all rapists.
/r/MensRights09/12/11 09:41 PM
2

Here's some more info from the University of Kansas website. It's an interesting perspective.
/r/seduction09/12/11 06:20 AM
0

Most western women feel entitled by this sick society to steal, lie, and commit serious fraud against their husbands and babies daddies Prove it and I'll admit I'm wrong. You can't, though, and that's why your a misogynist. Your world view is based on lies and stupidity.
/r/MensRights24/11/11 05:57 PM
0

I don't think that you can use a single picture on the internet to even judge most Western women. You'd have to have some stronger evidence before you can make a claim like that.
/r/MensRights23/11/11 07:26 PM
2

There's plenty of things wrong with being a bigot, but it's not like you can help it. It's a mental illness that you can't control.
/r/MensRights23/11/11 07:32 AM
10

Way to generalize all Western women based on a picture on Reddit.
/r/MensRights23/11/11 07:30 AM
1

Yes, but in order to look like the cartoon you don't have to abuse your body. It's a difference in goals. One is to be smaller than normal and one is to be bigger than normal. However, since being bigger than normal isn't unhealthy, the difference is pretty significant.
/r/MensRights02/08/11 11:41 AM
1

Yes you do. The women on magazines aren't real. They are Photoshopped cartoon characters with waists smaller than someone can healthily achieve. The only reason the girls on those magazines look healthy is because their rib cages and hip bones are Photoshopped to make them appear less skeleton like. In reality, to be as thin as a girl on the cover of a magazine, you must be dangerously underweight.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 09:38 PM
1

I bet 3/4ths of that "muscle" is actually fat and water retention.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 06:15 AM
1

To be as skinny as the girls on the magazine, you have to abuse your body and inflict long-lasting damage on it. To be as muscular as the guys on the magazine, you have to put in years of hard work, but you can do this while still maintaining good health. There is a difference.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 06:14 AM
7

I think that, deep down, they know it too. It's more fun for them to think that their fetish is the way things should be. From a psychological point of view, it's probably a coping mechanism to deal with the fact that they and their fetish are so vilified by their culture.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 06:06 AM
3

The thought of women controlling the world probably turns them on. Realism be damned.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 05:53 AM
3

People like to project their sexual fantasies onto other people. There is no mystery here.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 05:29 AM
2

The logical conclusion, then, is that black people aren't as good as white or Asian people. That's what you're saying, right? That, scientifically, black people are worse than white and Asian people (stupid, criminal, aggressive). What, then, should we do with them? Forced sterilization? Concentration camps?
/r/MensRights01/08/11 05:24 AM
1

I've heard of this program called "Affirmative Action." Perhaps you've heard of it?
/r/MensRights01/08/11 05:19 AM
1

I lost the game.
/r/seduction13/08/10 05:55 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter