TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

overworkedThrow_Away Archive

View 0 posts and 87 comments by overworkedThrow_Away on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Ok, and? What does your deflection prove?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 03:47 AM
1

I bet you don’t want repulsive women either Correct - and?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 03:43 AM
1

You also want "him" to be Chad - ugly men being interested in your company is a no go
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 03:32 AM
2

Marriage is first and foremost a business agreement. Imagine marrying a woman who talks like this lmao I think I see the reason why "high value" men don't want you. I mean, other than the fact that you only want Chad and he has a billion other options
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 03:22 AM
1

Absolutely ridiculous. Women want the best looking men. They don't give a fuck about "status". If a good-looking man is "low status", he's a "diamond in the rough", a "lone wolf", or whatever other bullshit. Being "low status" only hurts you when you're unattractive. Jeremy Meeks is a literal fucking felon - he was bailed out of prison by women because he is good-looking. He then married a billionaire heiress and he's living his best life. A lowlife criminal with 0 status.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 03:15 AM
3

Being social doesn't mean you're good-looking and can get women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 03:12 AM
1

Only 15% of men ages 18-35 didn't have sex at all in 2022, which is the most recent data we have. Your "data" is self-reported claims from men. Do you have any evidence that the 85% of men who claimed to have sex in the past year weren't bullshitters who were just too ashamed to report the truth?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 03:11 AM
1

Yeah that’s the thing about life - it’s like super unfair. I know that sucks, but just like a land whale isn’t going to get a 666 football player, you’re not going to get a supermodel. Know your lane and stick it. Not a valid comparison - ugly, undesirable women can and do secure men who are way out of their league for both casual sex and relationships Why are you always crying about women and their “delusional standards for Chad” but then think you deserve Jennifer Lawrence? a.) I don't like wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 02:35 AM
6

A. Most younger Gen Z women in their early to mid 20s are dating older men in their 30s B. There is a lot more younger women who are bisexual/lesbian than is being reported or C. A mix of both. None of the above. The answer is D) Those younger women are fucking Chads they meet off dating apps or in person and not committing because they feel they will be able to settle down and find a beta provider when they're done having their fun Most young men are single and not having sex because they aren'…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 02:25 AM
9

finding that both male and female participants tend to assign positive traits to women, with female participants showing a far more pronounced bias. 1.) Women ascribing more positive traits to other women could easily be an instance of in-group preference 2.) Men ascribing more positive traits to women could be an attempt to curry favor with women in the hopes of securing a partner or sex (basically, simping) 3.) Both groups see women as less of a threat (for what should be obvious reasons), so …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 02:20 AM
5

Just validation and desire - it’s not creeps, weird messages, asking “wanna fuck” or “nice tits.” It’s all the validation in the world! Which may sound just super desirable to someone who has never experienced it, but it’s gross. It's "gross" because you're getting it from men who are unattractive ("creeps"). That’s how women feel about being offered sex by unattractive men in really overt and disgusting ways. Fixed. Again, it's "disgusting" because it's coming from ugly men. 6'5" Chad doesn't c…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 02:09 AM
0

"I think I have problems" is not the same as "I have problems"
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 01:28 AM
–

It's not quietly considering someone of less value to your goals of a committed monogamous relationship that's the problem. They're garbage because they use their soapbox (social media especially) to bully women into submission. [...] It's group think. It's rallying and promoting in large groups that "she belongs to the streets" to push upon women short men are undesirable by the greater society to see their own value or be valued by greater society as lesser Women do this exact same thing to ph…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 10:20 PM
–

So men can be absolute human garbage and that's their right, sure. What makes them "absolute human garbage"? Considering a woman less desirable because she has a high body count? What makes them "human garbage" for that? Is a woman "absolute human garbage" for considering men less desirable based on their face, height, body, etc?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 09:54 PM
1

Yeah.....you don't get to decide what matters to anyone lol. ? Here's you one post ago, thinking you have the right to decide what matters: Sooooo this just proves that both personality and looks matter...... If I don't have the right to decide what matters, neither do you. So stop speaking? You've lost the argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 09:52 PM
1

Sure you are, you're not wealthy buddy, Whatever you need to tell yourself, reddit kid. You're a loser. I don't need to prove anything to you. At the end of the day, you have to work for a wage and I don't
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 09:50 PM
1

Because I'm wealthy and retired, I can afford to spend my time how I want. It's not my fault you're broke. Skill issue?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 09:37 PM
–

Dude I’m good looking and 5’8ft and had trouble till late college. good-looking 5'8" I have some bad news for you. short wear lifts This is not socially acceptable to do, and once you've secured attention from a woman, they will have to come off eventually and she will realize how short you are. The bigger the lifts, the worse it will be when they come off. facial broke structure plastic surgery (extreme case). Yes, that's correct. But nobody gives "get cosmetic surgery" as advice because the ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 09:36 PM
–

If she has sex with a million men and women and is just twerking all over the place, that's her happiness that she has every right to pursue. Okay. And if men consider her to be less desirable because of those things, that's their prerogative too and they have every right to it. Autonomy works both ways. Her value doesn't disappear in any way with anything sexual that she does. I don't care if she let's guys do the really humiliating stuff, doesn't matter. We passed the dark ages folks, we've ev…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 09:33 PM
–

Because it is. The poster's observations above are not "blue pilled" at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 09:25 PM
–

Men have no one to really get good advice on how to date and succeed in this realm. Because no one wants to accept that the "advice" they have to give men is entirely useless in 99% of cases. If I say lose weight, get a good haircut, and learn to dress properly, Most guys who aren't getting dates have problems with their LOOKS. Their facial bone structure, their height, they have hair loss, etc. They have immutable traits that make them undesirable to women. Telling them to take a shower and get…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 09:24 PM
1

Sooooo this just proves that both personality and looks matter...... If your "personality" matters only when you're attractive, then it doesn't matter at all. What matters is whether you're attractive or not. No need to twist yourself into a knot trying to get around that simple fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 09:21 PM
1

he'll constantly misquote you and speak with his emotions. The irony is hilarious - I can count the number of posters on this board who have produced actual evidence to substantiate their viewpoints on a single hand and still have enough fingers left over to hold a fork. ALL bluepillers argue with their emotions.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 09:19 PM
1

All this states is that before women move on to other attributes men have they must first find them physically attractive and thats common sense. That doesn't mean that being physically attractive is all that matters. "All this states" is that physical attraction is a requirement. "Personality" theory is blown out by the study. Read it, but this time not through the lens of bluepilled bullshit ideology. Men with the most desirable personality profiles were rated more favorably than their counter…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 06:22 PM
1

? What concession? You failed to substantiate your argument, devolved into condescension and gaslighting, then asked me a dumb question, which I answered. Parroting my line back at me doesn't make you the winner. Imbecile.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 06:18 PM
1

I asked you a question. What's the point of being in a relationship if you're convinced that it's fake? That is a question for people looking for or in relationships. I don't date and am not interested in doing so
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 03:53 PM
0

having the same objectives in life, being able to get along, no cheating, idk lol this is ridiculous, you don't need a study for this lol Proof that any of this shit matters more than looks I'll do you a favor and give you an example of what substantiating your worldview looks like https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40806-017-0092-x Prior research investigating the mate preferences of women and their parents reveals two important findings with regard to physical attractiveness. First, da…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 03:51 PM
0

Coming from a bluepilled bullshitter lol
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 03:49 PM
1

Or, more likely he likes her. And she likes him. And you're angry as fuck about it. Sorry, but your opinion doesn't make for facts. "Your opinion isn't a fact - but mine is!" Nah, fuck you. You lost.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 03:47 PM
1

I accept your concession. Thanks for playing. Better luck next time.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 03:46 PM
1

You've just said that your friends have a spouse that disagrees and finds people attractive that you don't. Claims to disagree and claims to find people attractive that aren't attractive. It's just as likely that he doesn't have any better options and settled for what he could get.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 03:39 PM
1

Because entering a relationship with someone doesn't prove they're attractive. It only proves that someone entered a relationship with them. If that person could press a button to make their partner better looking, would they? If the answer is yes, they acknowledge they are with an unattractive person. Same goes for men - if a woman could press a button to make your face better or make you taller, it is factual that you are unattractive. There exists a discrete set of features such that women wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 03:37 PM
1

Again, attractiveness is entirely subjective. This is simply wrong, and I can kind of see why everything you post is so foolish now - it's the usual "beauty is in the eye of the beholder" cope. Doesn't work that way. Beauty standards didn't come from nowhere. There's not a multibillion dollar industry called modeling for nothing. If attractiveness was subjective, every man should be able to secure a harem of women as easily as 6'5" good looking men do.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 03:34 PM
1

Yes, when they're objectively unattractive. I think I see what you're going for - no, if someone's wife is ugly and their spouse doesn't think so, that doesn't make them "not ugly", it makes their spouse wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 03:32 PM
0

That's not a study. Still waiting on that citation.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 03:31 PM
1

No
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 03:31 PM
1

Are you telling me that you've never found someone else's girlfriend/wife unattractive? ? What does them being someone's "girlfriend" or "wife" have to do with them being attractive or unattractive? Are you saying you think only attractive people can enter commitment? I don't understand what you think the "gotcha" here is
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 03:30 PM
1

Facial bone structure + height
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 03:29 PM
1

Literally none of what you said substantiates that "average" attractiveness exists. "Most people" having xyz feature does not mean xyz feature is attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 03:25 PM
1

4/10 facially, so yes
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 03:24 PM
1

"Average" doesn't exist. If you're NOT attractive, you're unattractive. It's that simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 03:23 PM
1

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 03:23 PM
2

Not a study. Still waiting on that citation.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 03:16 PM
1

Buddy, actors and athletes literally get clowned for their height all the fucking time.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 03:12 PM
1

[citation needed]
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 03:10 PM
1

Correlation of studies with observable social trends and reality
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 03:08 PM
1

There's people who are used because they are literally the most average. The most average skin type, the most average nose, the average height (5'8 I believe, so there's a lot of women without 6ft men and very happy) the most average hair colour etc. average is exactly that. Average. This is a dumb answer. What is "the most average skin type"? What makes a skin type "average"? What makes a nose or hair color "average"? You do realize those things vary massively across population groups, right? Y…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 03:07 PM
2

? What are you talking about? Here is what you said: And most women don't think most men are unattractive. Average doesn't equal unattractive. Both those statements are wrong. That is all I am saying. Who is "upset"?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 03:03 PM
1

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 03:01 PM
1

So are you superficial as well? Yes. And?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 03:01 PM
1

"Actual studies" don't rely on self-reports from Timmy. "Trust me bro" is not scientific evidence. I'm not about to cite a dozen studies to refute your "studies" because I don't need to - your study refutes itself by virtue of being unfalsifiable bullshit
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 02:58 PM
1

No, we're not going to "compare data sets" because your "data" isn't data, it's claims from people who could be bullshitters. Come back with REAL proof, ACTUAL evidence, then we can compare studies.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 02:54 PM
1

That's right, no. I don't date women I don't find attractive or women I do find attractive. And? What's your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 02:52 PM
3

Correct, it's the actions that do. Seeking meaningless sex is a behavior of a shallow, desperate to get his dick wet, sad man. What makes one higher quality is not indulging in hedonism. No, this is the pill bullshit. It's you passing off your redpill manosphere opinions as fact. Bullshit lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 02:52 PM
1

Then your sample size is trash. Meanwhile the sample size you used as your "evidence" was 1319 people who CLAIMED that they had sex in the past year lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 02:51 PM
0

If self-reports are the only source, we can only rely on statistical data regarding matches and preferences/requirements, as well as observable trends in reality. Again, self-reports aren't valid proof because anyone can say anything and it's not falsifiable.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 02:39 PM
5

high quality man PUA manosphere bullshit. "High quality man" simply means good-looking and tall. Everything else is just redpill gobbledygook that is on the level of astrology. Character traits do not make anyone "high quality".
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 02:37 PM
1

Women just care if a men is a little taller than them. They don’t care if a man is taller than 6’0” This is provably false https://imgur.com/mIISuVy https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=895442 Height matters for both men and women, but mostly in opposite directions. Women like tall men (Figure 5.4). Men in the 6’3 - 6’4 range, for example, receive 65% more first-contact e-mails than men in the 5’7 - 5’8 range. In contrast, the ideal height for women is in the 5’3 - 5’8 range, whil…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 02:36 PM
-2

Then don't expect men to accept your "boundaries" just because you got pumped and dumped by Chad before. That's female entitlement.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 02:31 PM
1

I don't date, period. I am only interested in casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 02:30 PM
-2

Well let’s see: Almost 80 percent of men have stated that gage has sex at least once in the last year. (Chart 3) https://ifstudies.org/blog/is-the-sex-recession-over Source: self-reports from the General Social Survey. You will excuse me if I don't consider men claiming they've had sex at least once in the last year to be concrete evidence of anything And the rate of sexless men has been in decline since 2018 and now more women are reporting to be sexless in a year than men (chart 1) https://ifs…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 02:29 PM
-2

Still waiting on that citation
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 02:23 PM
0

Do you believe there's literally just ugly and good looking? It's not what "I believe". It's what reality is. "Average looking" is nonsensical on its face. What specific feature(s) are being averaged? Ok, who do you think is attractive? Not who "I" think. We can answer this question objectively using the Golden Ratio. Beauty is about geometry.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 02:14 PM
1

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 02:11 PM
1

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 02:11 PM
3

The literal companies that run the apps. You're trying SO hard to Socrates your way out of observable reality. It's embarrassing.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 02:05 PM
1

We also do have data on who hooks up and who gets into relationships that doesn't fit this narrative so well. Post it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 02:04 PM
2

There is loads of data out there debunking 90% of the redpill. Post it. Don't write a novel-length post. Post the evidence. If there's "loads" of it, it should be easy for you to produce, right? Note: telling users to "just google it" or "do your own research" is an admission that the "evidence" doesn't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 02:03 PM
2

Whilst real life is more 50/50, [citation needed]
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:59 PM
3

At some point you I want quality women Fixed. I don't want "quality" women. I want to have casual sex with many different women that I am attracted to and who are genuinely attracted to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:56 PM
4

If most women find a guy unattractive, then he is unattractive. Short men are unattractive to women, and that only becomes more true the shorter they are. Therefore, short men are unattractive. It's very simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:54 PM
3

"Average" does not exist. You either are attractive or you are unattractive. "Average" is a sugarcoated way to say "you're not attractive".
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:53 PM
1

So what if it is for casual sex? Do you think calling 80% of men below-average in terms of attractiveness is somehow less bad if the women are looking for commitment?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:51 PM
0

[citation needed]
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:51 PM
-1

Attractive doesn't mean attractive depending on who's talking! Average means average. 1.) Attractive means attractive. No idea what you were thinking when you typed that first sentence - it's literally gobbledygook, self-contradictory rhetorical nonsense There is no such thing as "average". You are either attractive or you are unattractive. "Average" is code for "not attractive".
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:50 PM
-1

If there is a looks threshold, then personality is subordinate to looks and therefore does not matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:48 PM
0

Ok? The average man in the US is under 6'0" and women call short men gross and ugly all the time. So what?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:47 PM
3

Nothing about actual sex and dating. Do you seriously believe women were having sex with the 80% of men they found unattractive?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:45 PM
4

Do you believe "communism" would make women attracted to men considered physically undesirable, e.g. short men, ugly men, balding men, etc? Need to know how delusional you are on a scale of 1 to brainwashed
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:41 PM
1

Looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:40 PM
2

Who cares? Do you seriously think 20 year olds are looking to "dAtE" single mothers?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:40 PM
-3

woman has a bad experience with men and now approaches relationships differently, Woman worships Chad who treats her like shit, now she takes her damaged self and demands to be worshipped by less attractive men who she now suddenly deems worthy of her attention after being used and discarded by Chad
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:39 PM
2

Disregard all their nonsense about Chad, it’s simply bitter ramblings from disgruntled males. Disregard all the studies, massive amounts of social shaming of physically undesirable men, etc etc. It's simply the bitter ramblings of disgruntled "males".
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:35 PM
1

No, they should be criticized for marrying at all. Marriage is a joke.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:34 PM
1

it’s a problem to those who face it. "It's a problem that I get so much validation and desire all the time" is such a privileged viewpoint
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:27 PM
5

Tinder downloads and paying users are falling because most of the users are men and most men know by now that women are only looking for the top % of men on the apps. It was always the natural end point of apps, but it's not because of "profits" or the companies "intentionally making the app as shitty as possible for men that don't pay". It's because women only want attractive men and judge all but the top % of men in terms of looks as being undesirable, so those men were never going to get some…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:24 PM
6

"Capitalism" isn't the reason women only swipe on attractive men. The apps aren't "flawed". They are a reflection of the real-world sexual marketplace, a truly free market where oligarchs (physically attractive men) get the lion's share and the rest are left fighting for scraps. "Communism" wouldn't fix this. "Communism" won't make women desire ugly men, short men, balding men, etc. This is the problem I have with political ideologues, especially Marxists. They make their political ideology thei…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter