oxyderces Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	What are the core things you need to believe to be TRP? Right, that's the idea. It would have to be interesting enough to keep us both occupied but flexible enough to let us have other hobbies ;) Have you done it before?	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/11/14 03:14 PM
1	What are the core things you need to believe to be TRP? Mostly established things they'd do to serve me/be submissive, I think, with established rewards if applicable. Coming up with creative ideas on how to dominate someone can be terribly fun, but is kind of a strain when you're running up against, like, a work deadline or something.	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/11/14 01:47 PM
1	What are the core things you need to believe to be TRP? I'm gonna have to find someone who is into roleplaying a 24/7 equal relationship sometime. lol As much as I enjoy it 24/7 D/s would bore me after awhile unless there were systems in place to keep upkeep to a minimum when I'm distracted by something else. The idea is certainly appealing.	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/11/14 04:41 AM
5	Guys shorter than 6'0 need Red Pill more than not, even though Blue Pill and Feminists will disagree, and contradict themselves by dating tall men. You've still got a limited range of positions, though. And I'd much rather the other party only exert himself in one way. Commensurate torso length also makes other activities easier :D :D	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/11/14 05:15 PM
1	What are the core things you need to believe to be TRP? Vanilla sex devoid of power play and situations where I'm telling someone willing and very eager what to do.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/11/14 05:03 PM
7	Guys shorter than 6'0 need Red Pill more than not, even though Blue Pill and Feminists will disagree, and contradict themselves by dating tall men. Happy to serve the Reddit cultural norm!	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/11/14 04:19 PM
2	No incentive to be feminine Hmm, I'm very curious, is there a general or consistent trend of women in more affluent classes working less? I'd say there's a general/consistent trend of the affluent classes working less, period, because they can get away with it. :) It also really depends on what you think of as working. There's many examples of European women in the nobility after the cult of domesticity began keeping busy, even with children -- covertly influencing politics, patronizing the arts, assisting their mates, etc…	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/11/14 01:54 AM
6	Guys shorter than 6'0 need Red Pill more than not, even though Blue Pill and Feminists will disagree, and contradict themselves by dating tall men. I sincerely wonder if we inhabit parallel dimensions sometimes.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/11/14 01:48 AM
1	No incentive to be feminine Yes in the US and Europe. One of us first worlders does more environmental damage than a family of third worlders.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/11/14 12:52 AM
3	No incentive to be feminine The dual-income reality of today makes it hard for anyone to play that role even if they wanted to. Poor people were never playing that role. Poor women always worked. This ideal of "feminine, self-sacrificial mothers" is the province of the monetarily privileged and it has always been that way.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/11/14 12:51 AM
4	Guys shorter than 6'0 need Red Pill more than not, even though Blue Pill and Feminists will disagree, and contradict themselves by dating tall men. <33333 short dudes. You can have sex standing up god dammit! Commensurate torso height has so many advantages! Why is this so hard to understand?! (Obligatory I am thin and conventionally attractive disclaimer because apparently my point is invalid otherwise) I do understand that there's a studied bias, but overweight people have sex all the time, and for what it's worth, neither of my short boyfriends ever had a problem getting play.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/11/14 12:44 AM
1	I have nothing against weight lifting, but what is this single-minded focus of equating muscle mass with the essence of manliness? Let's be clear: I'm specifically saying that the dudes from 300 and Chuck Norris don't have reason to be in a discussion regarding what women find attractive, and the examples I presented counter your thesis that "muscular > not muscular." None of those males I presented were overly muscular. The dudes from 300 are. Let's say there are both enough women who go for the androgynous type as well as enough who go for the muscular type. Let's bring up feasible examples of muscularity before we contin…	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/11/14 01:50 PM
2	What are the core things you need to believe to be TRP? That's cool. I'm similar. I get immediately turned off when I perceive an act as submissive.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/11/14 05:30 AM
2	All pills, what are your most controversial (on this sub or in the real world) opinions on sex, gender, attraction and relationships? Men are generally speaking much more feminine, empathic, and sensitive than they allow themselves to be, and their vehemence about gender roles is usually overcompensation, since the price for expressing this femininity can be very high. Men are also generally much more submissive than they let on -- they're just performing gender. Even when they're dominant, men are often quite preoccupied with a woman's pleasure. They've just convinced that females are inherently submissive. If they could get …	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/11/14 05:20 AM
1	What are the core things you need to believe to be TRP? Perhaps the concept of masculinity is universal, although how it is expressed may not be. I triple-dog-dare you to try to find a single characteristic of masculinity that is universal. Go for it. Viz. the underlying semantics or meaning of masculinity is universal: that males are put by nature to be the more competitive sex. No, that doesn't work, either. There are cultures where masculinity is associated with calmness, centeredness, rationality, and peace. Recall that in most denominations, Chr…	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/11/14 04:20 AM
2	[Post update/movietime] The thrilling conclusion of "Why feminism is facing a backlash" or "Who wants to see a grown man cry? ;D Predictable; fulfilling the MRA libertarian social demographic stereotype quite nicely, so case in point.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/11/14 12:12 AM
1	I have nothing against weight lifting, but what is this single-minded focus of equating muscle mass with the essence of manliness? This thread is going to become a martial arts bitchfest in 3... 2... 1...	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/11/14 12:07 AM
1	I have nothing against weight lifting, but what is this single-minded focus of equating muscle mass with the essence of manliness? Whatever works. As long as women would pick the guys from 300 over young Chuck Norris, you'd have great incentive to look more like the former than the latter. Do you honestly think 300 or young Chuck Norris are held up as any kind of paragon of male attractiveness? Here, here, here, here, here, are examples from the media of characters successfully crafted to be attractive to women. Fantasy characters are a helpful rubric since they're controlled to a greater degree, but attractive actors are C…	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/11/14 12:04 AM
1	What are the core things you need to believe to be TRP? Do you have any hang ups about submission, or do you prefer to be dominant? You go first. What's your answer to this question?	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/11/14 11:51 PM
2	What are the core things you need to believe to be TRP? TRP is masculinity, something you are directly opposed to. You want to feminize it covertly. Friendly reminder that manly men used to dress up like this. Friendly reminder that courtly love and chivalry was about being so beta you couldn't touch the object of your desire yet did pretty much anything you could that would benefit her from afar. Friendly reminder that in the contemporary era, in China, being soft-spoken and shy is fine as long as you are a dutiful son/husband/family member and that…	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/11/14 11:50 PM
4	[Post update/movietime] The thrilling conclusion of "Why feminism is facing a backlash" or "Who wants to see a grown man cry? ;D You're living in a libertarian fantasy dreamworld. Here's the truth: we are far more affected by social forces than you think. And the idea that one isn't makes you more susceptible to those social forces, not less.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/11/14 02:13 AM
3	[Post update/movietime] The thrilling conclusion of "Why feminism is facing a backlash" or "Who wants to see a grown man cry? ;D Teacher bias has been shown to favor girls, reddit was ablaze with such a study last year. Uh-huh, that's what I implicated. And do you really think if the genders were reversed and girls were getting higher marks in standardized tests while languishing behind in grading all through their schooling life we would be bothering with such minutiae? Sure. We're making a gigantic fuss about "schools failing boys," after all. It came on the heel of the replication crisis in psychology. If you want more…	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/11/14 02:09 AM
3	[Post update/movietime] The thrilling conclusion of "Why feminism is facing a backlash" or "Who wants to see a grown man cry? ;D lmao, and? And, like, giant portions of the field of sociology disagree with you. Umm you don't seem to get it. Girls getting better grades on all subjects including maths when they are based on homework in large part proves that girls put more effort than boys even in the fields that they are less likely to choose than boys. Even GCSEs saw the same pattern until homework was removed from the maths exam. That's one corner of the analysis, but there's a lot more going on here, including potential…	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/11/14 01:19 AM
2	[Post update/movietime] The thrilling conclusion of "Why feminism is facing a backlash" or "Who wants to see a grown man cry? ;D Holy lord, that's fascinating. I mean, ~500 people isn't really significant to the movement as a whole imho, but still. Thanks for the link.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/11/14 12:48 AM
1	Male Submission: inherently destructive to the male? Just here to note that you didn't actually engage any points. :)	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/11/14 12:45 AM
5	[Post update/movietime] The thrilling conclusion of "Why feminism is facing a backlash" or "Who wants to see a grown man cry? ;D You have a rosy view of stereotype threat itself. I don't have a "rosy view," I've got the field of sociology. As for girls stop doing maths, they already do more of it than boys in school, that boys do better despite a verbal disadvantage atop it only shows how much better they are. Actually, girls currently make higher grades than boys on all subjects through their school years; boys tend to do better on standardized tests. This is a pretty complicated topic and, in my opinion, completely soci…	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/11/14 12:42 AM
2	[Post update/movietime] The thrilling conclusion of "Why feminism is facing a backlash" or "Who wants to see a grown man cry? ;D How do millions of people overcome "stereotype threat" every day? To judge by the studies on the subject, they're most successful when society isn't reminding them of those stereotypes.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/11/14 12:38 AM
3	[Post update/movietime] The thrilling conclusion of "Why feminism is facing a backlash" or "Who wants to see a grown man cry? ;D Why on earth would a gay man be red pill? Serious question.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/11/14 12:38 AM
2	[Post update/movietime] The thrilling conclusion of "Why feminism is facing a backlash" or "Who wants to see a grown man cry? ;D You have a very permissive idea about what a relationship is because you even talk about sucking dicks alongside your girlfriend in group sex. So it's really hard for you to turn around and talk from a moral high ground about another man shamelessly displaying a mere shirt that depicts half-naked sexy women on it. Uhhh, no. Appropriateness is based on context. Presumably, powerkick does not suck cock alongside his girlfriend during group sex in an interview. I don't think it matters much in any …	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/11/14 10:23 PM
5	[Post update/movietime] The thrilling conclusion of "Why feminism is facing a backlash" or "Who wants to see a grown man cry? ;D If telling girls they suck at math makes them stop doing math instead of rising to the challenge to prove everyone wrong they are already unconcerned with achievement and greatness from the outset You have a rosy view of how stereotype threat is overcome. We also tell men they're less empathic, and they're less empathic as a result-- if you stop telling them that, they become equally empathic to women. We operate unconsciously, not out of sheer willpower; that's a libertarian fantasy.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/11/14 10:22 PM
1	Male Submission: inherently destructive to the male? After reading some of your other replies to other posters, particularly RedPills, which were quite well written and rather interesting, I have to say, I was expecting a big better than this. What you've written here is an orgy of fallacies making hot passionate fallacy love with other. That's really somewhat witty; please accept a nod for me on that front. lol If you support the notion that testosterone increases status seeking behavior, opposing the notion that it would also increase aggression…	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/11/14 09:29 PM
1	Should prostitution be legal? A question for RPs, BPs, everything in between and beyond. I think we all feel that way about the other side of this debate. I have faith you'll pull through.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/11/14 09:21 PM
1	Male Submission: inherently destructive to the male? My understanding of this is the result of a lifelong survey of history and anthropology. I probably won't have time, and I'm honestly not well-inclined to make a cited effort for someone who won't read a book. I really do suggest you educate yourself, though, it's quite satisfying.	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/11/14 01:11 PM
1	Male Submission: inherently destructive to the male? Why don't you believe testosterone level is responsible for greater status seeking behavior in males? This is a shift in topic. Keep in mind we're discussing "inherent male dominance." But, I'll be charitable at this bit of sloppiness since I see how one would link status-seeking to the issue. For one thing, as I said, the testosterone issue is complicated by the fact that females are substantially more sensitive to it/efficient at using it. It's still quite valid to point out that men have more…	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/11/14 01:04 PM
1	Male Submission: inherently destructive to the male? No, actually, there have been studies even newer than yours (Princeton -2011) that do support the scientific fact that testosterone increases status seeking behavior in general, whether that's attained via aggression or mutually beneficial dealings. No, actually, status-seeking behavior is distinct from aggression. There is not a drect link between testosterone and aggression; there's a link between tesosterone and status-seeking, and that can just as well take the form of the opposite of aggres…	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/11/14 03:57 PM
1	Male Submission: inherently destructive to the male? http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2029601 Your study is over two decades old, and, as my link (and other studies) aptly show, our cultural neuroses over testosterone have an enormous influence on behavior-- much more predictable than testosterone itself. Given that, it would be absolutely vital to know if any human subjects knew they were being treated for testosterone before assessing their behavior. That's an interesting perception of men you have there. Patriarchy's a hell of a thing! Unlike…	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/11/14 03:08 AM
1	Male Submission: inherently destructive to the male? Shit testing is testing fitness, unconscious quizzes and tests And I'm telling you that dudes have done that to me. demanding demonstrations of love/marriage tests nothing. It certainly tests relationship strength.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/11/14 04:31 PM
1	Male Submission: inherently destructive to the male? That's the definition of shit testing, but by all means, keep moving those goalposts to secure your worldview.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/11/14 04:09 PM
0	Male Submission: inherently destructive to the male? if a male dom starts abusing his female sub legally in a lot of places she can kill him and get a way with it And yet, most rapes aren't reported and for all of the backlash against rape/domestic abuse we still have a culture that encourages all women to develop an ironclad case of Stockholm Syndrome. I totally agree that male domestic violence is ignored but I've seen enough shit pulled by maledoms to know you're underestimating how bad it can be if the community isn't really good at policing i…	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/11/14 03:57 PM
1	Male Submission: inherently destructive to the male? That was the entire end of my first relationship, dude. He got insecure and wouldn't stop demanding demonstrations (up to and including promises of marriage) from me.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/11/14 03:53 PM
0	Male Submission: inherently destructive to the male? Testosterone is not linked to aggressive behavior note: "those test subjects who believed they had received the testosterone compound and not the placebo stood out with their conspicuously unfair offers" The perception of testosterone (aka constructions of masculinity) is what leads to men being domineering assholes. Actual testosterone leads to status-securing cooperative offers. Also women have less testosterone than men but are way more sensitive to it and efficient at using it	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/11/14 03:45 PM
-1	Male Submission: inherently destructive to the male? fuck no, just look at tall the numerous stories of submissive guys basically broken down as a bitch. Where are you finding these? And are they really any worse than the countless stories you hear about male/female D/s relationships turning abusive? Because that happens a lot. BDSM is full of protocol because power encourages abuse.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/11/14 03:45 PM
1	Male Submission: inherently destructive to the male? Male bodies are built for dominance (or at least to compete for it). Why wouldn't their minds be built the same way? God give me patience. So is it equally apparent to you that having a bigger brain means you're smarter? That's intuitive, right? And that was something people thought a century ago: that men's bigger brains made them smarter. And the clear conclusion is that because blue whale brains have a good 12 lbs on ours, they are the sapient masters of the deep and we should bow doooooown P…	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/11/14 03:34 PM
3	Male Submission: inherently destructive to the male? I've read some of those studies, and they categorize "submissive" and "dominant" in a highly idiosyncratic way to get the results they want. I'd love to see an example of this. The definitions I've seen took female submission a lot further than "passive partner," and likewise took female domination further than "woman on top." Just goes to show that TBP attracts women with hangups about their BDSM kink. lol I have no such hangups, I assure you	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/11/14 03:23 AM
2	Male Submission: inherently destructive to the male? Then why do I keep running into armchair political scientists who are TRP? Tell them to knock that off for me, lol.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/11/14 03:21 AM
1	Male Submission: inherently destructive to the male? Most of this nonsense is done on a subset of WEIRD. And if your theories held water at all -- lacking in nuance, complexity, or insight as they are -- they'd apply to WEIRD as well. YOU'RE the one making claims about all men and women here :) And I mean, if you'd really looked at a drop of anthropology you'd get even more evidence against them, so yeah, get snug in that grave you're digging.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/11/14 03:18 AM
0	Male Submission: inherently destructive to the male? Yes it does. lollll. Tell all of those submissive men we're talking about -- 50% of all men at some point, as we've established-- that they have an "inherent desire to dominate." They really don't want to be at the feet of a dominant woman. Seriously. You know better than them, 'cause you're a mindreader. No you're, I pointed out something else. If you were talking about something other than capacity for politics and mental aptitude, you made a non-sequitur O:) can women even academia? History s…	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/11/14 11:12 PM
5	Male Submission: inherently destructive to the male? Firstly, it must be understood that I may or may not personally believe the opinion I am writing. That's fine, but you're talking a lot of incoherence and I'm trying to get you to spell it out. While what you said regarding the last 50 years is correct, one can also not forget the last several thousand years of human history all around the globe, with 99% of all societies being patriarchally based. Are you familiar with the Stanford Prison Experiment? If so, look it up. Consider that the male ad…	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/11/14 11:04 PM
5	Male Submission: inherently destructive to the male? Ah yes, this never happens. Nope, it doesn't. Show me a review of solid neuroscience or the door's that way. Can you seriously believe that the hulk hogan wouldn't dominate the little lady? We're talking about capacity for politics. Elizabeth I could think circles the size of the elliptical orbit of Saturn around Hulk Hogan. Politically, she'd dominate the fuck out of him. Women can do whatever men can once men have taught them how to. And there's a reason why they shouldn't. lolololol. Can you …	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/11/14 10:57 PM
7	Male Submission: inherently destructive to the male? An argument against male submission I am aware of is that with the male have a larger muscular and endurance capacity then women, he is most logically suited for more demanding work and greater positions of power. This assumes a psychological dimension of "domination" to accompany the (typical) larger musculature which has simply never been established. It does not follow, furthermore, that being suited for "more demanding work"* means that one has more than the political capacity of a gnat. Com…	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/11/14 09:58 PM
5	Male Submission: inherently destructive to the male? TRP does not even have the slightest coherent inkling of a theory about what will help society flourish. If a male is submissive, knows he is submissive, pursues submissive relationships, and is happy and productive in submissive relationships, how is that not "flourishing"?	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/11/14 09:26 PM
-1	Male Submission: inherently destructive to the male? I know right? :p	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/11/14 09:25 PM
4	Male Submission: inherently destructive to the male? I believe the sexual order would be argued to be the sexual strategy form which the rest of modern, successful civilizations use to garner strength and power form their populations. Traditionalists would make this argument. I have a hard time disagreeing, even if it makes me a bit uneasy. Look at the might and power of Western civilization. On the grand scale of history this is insane...I'm typing on a damned magical device for God's sake! And Western civilization made this magical device well a…	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/11/14 05:39 PM
8	Male Submission: inherently destructive to the male? Half of all men have this fantasy, as I said. Certain studies show more males with submissive fantasies than females. That's not aberrant by anyone's definition.	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/11/14 05:32 PM
3	Male Submission: inherently destructive to the male? I just have no idea how to respond. It goes against all of my experiences as a sexual human being!	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/11/14 05:31 PM
14	Male Submission: inherently destructive to the male? Male sexual submission is an aberration of the sexual order, Articulate how it is even possible to be a "aberration of the sexual order." Half of men have submissive fantasies. Memes in patriarchal cultures that support the idea of woman as ruler of the household (if not politics) and praising uxoriousness are common. This is not an aberration. A male sub is subverting his natural role as a strong provider and protector to his woman, Males have hardly played this role uniformly throughout histor…	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/11/14 04:38 PM
1	One overlooked reason why female agency is not useless? How can you people spend so much time and effort discussing something that has been established thousands of years ago? Because it's extremely complicated and not simple. For instance, the castrati singers of old were considered to be legendary lovers. None of that makes any sense from TRP perspective.	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/11/14 07:25 PM
1	One overlooked reason why female agency is not useless? I don't need to give a defense of the assertion, look at the TRP. They clearly complain about it. That's one of the reasons BPers get their panties in a bunch. I suppose you think "immaculate conception" doesn't need a defense, either? If you're going to make an argument with someone who doesn't agree with your premises, a buzzword doesn't suffice. This is argumentation 101.	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/10/14 04:07 PM
1	One overlooked reason why female agency is not useless? I didn't say this is female solipsism, I said this warrants a complaint about female solipsism from TRP. And you gave absolutely no defense of that assertion, which is the question at hand. People making statements like this will just cause them to grow more. Not sure what you mean by this. Just because you don't like how the words make you feel, doesn't makes them any less true. How I feel has nothing to do with what I said, dude. I was making a rational argument, and again you're relying on a …	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/10/14 08:16 PM
5	Is the disconnect cultural? Ancient Greeks, Romans, Vikings, and also modern cultures that are still very macho, and not to speak of the prisons - being top isn't seen as gay or shameful (or at least not as much), being bottom however totally is. The Greeks considered being a bottom a legitimate rite of passage while young and the Vikings explicitly didn't necessarily give a fuck when their women slept around. Norse women had a lot of power and a lot of respect and homosexuality was, while a potential topic for insults, a …	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/10/14 03:22 PM
1	One overlooked reason why female agency is not useless? Which means, this is a case they consider female solipsism that they do not like. You didn't explain how it was actually wrong. You used so-called "female solipsism" as a stand-in to say "this is a case of wish fulfillment" without explaining it. Like a true believer, you used a concept as self-explanatory. This is dangerous. Female solipsism is a fact. It means that women do not know what it is like to be men because they do not have the experience. This is undeniable. It's perfectly deniable. …	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/10/14 03:16 PM
1	BPs but especially Redpill Women, have you ever cheated on or dread gamed a man with Aspergers? How and why did you do it? Did you enjoy it? No. Find someone you trust and love them well. Have you looked into Cognitive Behavioral Therapy?	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/10/14 11:20 PM
1	One overlooked reason why female agency is not useless? I'm pointing out that this is a quasi-religious use of a concept in place of a proper analysis. This isn't an argument or a debate, it's a statement of fact. "Female solipsism" is not a fact. It is a concept, and it's one you need to defend, and, in the very least, explain how it relates to the topic at hand. It is not self-apparent in the slightest.	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/10/14 11:07 PM
1	One overlooked reason why female agency is not useless? Nobody who isn't throat-deep into TRP even understands what you're talking about. You're projecting onto her, claiming this is "solipsism," rather than articulating a point, and that's just intellectual laziness. I don't believe in the premises of your jargon and neither do most blue pillers, so "female solipsism" doesn't mean a thing as an argument.	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/10/14 08:58 PM
1	One overlooked reason why female agency is not useless? It's not even slightly relevant. Don't use one word as a stand-in for an argument.	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/10/14 08:51 PM
1	One overlooked reason why female agency is not useless? I get a little trickle of TRP self identified guys in my inbox being awkwardly interested based on how I sound. I get this too. I go full-on booksmart feminazi on Facebook one bored workday and I get three messages saying hay girl.	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/10/14 07:33 PM
1	One overlooked reason why female agency is not useless? When RP complains about female solipsism, it's stuff like this. lol jargon non sequiturs	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/10/14 07:31 PM
1	One overlooked reason why female agency is not useless? I'd believe being a brassy dominant bitch is a turn on for a small minority of guys, there is a fetish for male subs, much more than I'd believe intelligence is giving them butterflies. Then why will men, historically and in contemporary society, pay a premium for a smart, educated prostitute? Fuck, even the ancient Greeks had this (the hetairai).	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/10/14 07:29 PM
1	The aging issue/problem in Sexual dynamics You're hamstering, honey. My dear, I'm the one with citations. You're just confessing your proclivities on the internet. Being bi, I've no real need for TRP anything -- I could shack up with a sexy lady, if I weren't already in a LTR! Fyi, LMGTFY ≠ "fact." Correct. If you are patient, the site will lead you to facts. I have the faith that you can stop spinning that wheel long enough to sort through the quite easily accessed data somewhat critically! Marriage/LTR statistics of marriages/LTRs that…	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/10/14 07:32 PM
0	The aging issue/problem in Sexual dynamics It's theater; you can invent anything you want in theater. If you can't separate theater from reality, you're going to have very big problems with life. This is trite. Theater doesn't portray stories with no relationship to reality -- if it did, we would not be interested. If porn were that divorced from reality, people would jack off to dinosaurs. There isn't a direct relationship with what people like to what they pursue, but this is also the case in the OKCupid data that has been cited in thi…	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/10/14 06:34 PM
1	The aging issue/problem in Sexual dynamics I'll give it to you straight: porn ≠ reality. Porn is a component of reality and the objective findings are far more plausible than your rant about what you find attractive :) Why would a man search "mature" when, at any point, he could search for a fresh young 18 year old? Straight men don't like cougars any more than they like obese women. It's a fetish at best. If it's a fetish, it's a remarkably widespread one. Searches for those topics were usually in the top 5. Normal people that like to r…	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/10/14 05:58 PM
1	The aging issue/problem in Sexual dynamics I'll give it to you straight: boys that like older women like young-looking older women. "Milf" and "mature" are very popular search terms for porn -- not far behind searches for younger women, according to most metrics, and sometimes exceeding them in certain states/countries. Young men, by objective measurements, absolutely show plenty of sexual interest in older women. :) I'll give it to you straight: boys that like older women like young-looking older women. People like people that look attr…	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/10/14 05:42 PM
2	Are the majority of gender dynamics due to patriarchy rather than biology? This book has plenty of pertinent information and, in particular, a fascinating article on gender relations. Here is a more specific example on the fluidity of roles, even where they are present. The topic is easily researched. It's a complex topic, but the tl;dr is that less-rigid concepts of property means that concerns are elsewhere, and there just isn't the constant "hamstering" of female "inferiority" to justify social stratification. It's not that hunter-gatherer societies were ideal -- I'…	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/10/14 04:44 PM
2	The aging issue/problem in Sexual dynamics I'm not speculating on anything. I think the fact that women are unaware of basic facts about their anatomy is a tragedy. More awareness can only help us in having better sex! The female erection is not the same thing as the male erection, it's not inspired by the same things, it's not the same. You said "women don't get boners." This is, physiologically, false, and there are psychological implications as well. it' not relevant to my point about what inspires erections in MEN when viewing WOMEN …	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/10/14 04:14 PM
2	The aging issue/problem in Sexual dynamics That is not a male boner equivalent It's an engorgement of erectile tissue due to arousal. It's quite similar to the male boner. The size of the clitoris is actually comparable: it's just internal. how about an NSFW on that I don't believe anatomy is NSFW. and as an old married woman my getting laid efforts are doing fine, nice attempt at an insult though It's sad that you don't know basic things about your anatomy, and defer to the male erection as sexual arbiter of all things. I'm sure sex wou…	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/10/14 03:26 PM
2	The aging issue/problem in Sexual dynamics Thank you for bringing this up. This is widely available information, very pertinent to TRP, and yet somehow does not make its way into any of their theories. :)	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/10/14 03:07 PM
0	The aging issue/problem in Sexual dynamics Out of curiosity, are there any studies backing this up? I can see the heuristic value of wife goggles -- i.e., it seems to refer to a real concept backed by anecdotes -- so this is more curiosity than a [citation needed].	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/10/14 02:51 PM
1	The aging issue/problem in Sexual dynamics I definitely find most single (and technically therefore "available") women from the age 35 forward to be gross and unattractive. ~swoon~ More for me and the boys who like cougars :) I like younger women too, but older women are often so much more aware of themselves sexually -- female bodies are complex! -- and as such they're often a lot more fun to please in bed. So glad gay people don't have the age hangups that straight people do.	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/10/14 02:45 PM
1	The aging issue/problem in Sexual dynamics That's a flaw in the data; other studies have shown that men will prefer what they perceive to be an attractive women over unattractive ones, regardless of age. (For instance, they preferred a perceived-to-be-beautiful 37 year old to 20 year olds they considered homely.) With OKCupid, they are very likely to be swayed by cultural norms regarding aging, since the age of the person on the profile is very prominent. Also, this is Quickmatch ranking, not who they actually message. They're more reali…	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/10/14 02:44 PM
2	Are the majority of gender dynamics due to patriarchy rather than biology? Why are existing hunter-gathering societies largely patriarchal? Many hunter-gatherer societies are quite egalitarian. It's true that they are sometimes not devoid of sexism, and often contain a (usually flexible) concept of division of labor, but even those are not usually patriarchal in the sense of institutionalization. Contemporary hunter-gatherer societies have also been influenced by agricultural ones through trade, etc. Also, societies historically have not been as patriarchal as has been…	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/10/14 02:27 PM
1	Would you consider it good advice for a woman to advise another on the risks of investing, heavily financially and emotionally with an alleged former "player" or "pua" type? My point is that "LMV" means something very specific; TRP has specific ideas about what "value" they are referring to.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/10/14 06:13 PM
1	Would you consider it good advice for a woman to advise another on the risks of investing, heavily financially and emotionally with an alleged former "player" or "pua" type? I was pointing out that she said basically the same thing RP people say. Your values being very different, I'm sure that her definition of "useless" isn't quite what you mean by LMV.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/10/14 05:01 PM
2	Are the majority of gender dynamics due to patriarchy rather than biology? When did the Patriarchy develop? Post-agriculture. Why is it so common in otherwise disconnected cultures? Why is racism so common in otherwise disconnected cultures? Because we by instinct trust people who look similarly to us. That says nothing about the biological "inferiority" of other races. Patriarchy is easily explained by sex differences, i.e., men are stronger than women and don't bear children. That, in and of itself, explains things handily without any psychological component, i.e., g…	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/10/14 04:46 PM
1	Are the majority of gender dynamics due to patriarchy rather than biology? Do you consider the "popularity" of PIV to be largely due to the patriarchy rather than biology? The emphasis of that sex act to the exclusion of others is probably due to patriarchy, but I think there is probably a biological component to it. On the one hand, lesbian porn is astronomically popular with women, most of the time for the simple reason that it portrays sex acts that are not PIV and involve an emphasis on female pleasure. On the other hand, actual lesbians typically enjoy penetration…	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/10/14 04:40 PM
1	Would you consider it good advice for a woman to advise another on the risks of investing, heavily financially and emotionally with an alleged former "player" or "pua" type? Of course. It utterly astounds me that TRP can think that male promiscuity is not a problem for most women. What the hell did they think Don Giovanni was about?	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/10/14 04:29 PM
1	Would you consider it good advice for a woman to advise another on the risks of investing, heavily financially and emotionally with an alleged former "player" or "pua" type? Low value men. Don't twist DeliriousWoman's words to fit your TRP jargon.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/10/14 04:28 PM