TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

oy_gevalt Archive

View 0 posts and 48 comments by oy_gevalt on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No. Some of his points and concerns are valid, but many of his conclusions are totally unreasonable bullshit. Having "valid" concerns does not make him correct, though.
/r/MensRights18/10/11 09:51 PM
1

Also, I just commented to you about alcohol abuse, etc. You're giving A LOT of personal information which can be used against you by your critics, enemies, etc. Your height, weight, law school, and your belief in Men's Rights, etc. If you're trying to be anonymous, it won't last long.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 04:51 AM
2

Yeah, I see. The term "troll" can mean different things. I guess I thought you were saying he's a poorly-conceived anti-RM sockpuppet or a some kind of pro-RM flame-warrior. Butmaybe hes just a dick.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 10:22 PM
1

I understand. But, since I wasn't at the circus with OP I don't know which kind of nut-shot was being used: intentional or accidental.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 07:23 PM
1

Hey. I'm not responding to your post, except to say thanks for being disciplined and thorough in your responses. It is a big long, but I did read it and I appreciate informed commentary like this. So, cheers. Specifically, I think you address some of the pitfalls of internet commentary by intentionally insincere, message-twisting trolls and game-players who would not get away with those techniques in conversation. It's often difficult to call them out on it because they're shape-shifters.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 04:46 PM
2

Wait, is he a troll or just an asshole?
/r/MensRights16/10/11 04:39 PM
-2

This guy's an unfunny, unnuanced loudmouth asshole. He globs together judicial mistakes and absurdity from one state with cultural and media perceptions from cable television. The two do not compare. His media and sociological critique is not precise enough because he has no appreciation of nuance or subtlety. He rants on and on and on without any appreciation that if he were leading the institutions or organizations he resents, he'd be an asshole dictator. He DOES NOT represent men's rights, at…
/r/MensRights16/10/11 03:57 PM
1

Women who badger, insult, defame, manipulate, and emotionally abuse their mates are much more common than those who commit domestic violence. I've never suffered that myself, fortunately, so I cannot comment on how it happens. One reason is the average physical difference between the genders. So, I hope she will address that in her documentary.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 03:43 PM
1

I agree with this: Women positively reinforce negative behavior in their reproductive prime, and then lament about where all the nice guys have went when they are old and dry down there. Women often neglect realistic romantic opportunities with good people by prioritizing romanticized, lusty opportunities with unrealistic people. They often "reward" protypical alpha-male crassness when they do so. Consequently, more people mimic that behavior. But I don't agree with this: This is womans purest, …
/r/MensRights16/10/11 03:33 PM
0

That depends if it's intentional or not. If a teenage girl kicks a male in the nuts, it can ruin his reproductive future. Not funny. Not shtick. If a child accidentally swings a wiffle-ball bat into his father's nuts, that can be funny.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 03:19 PM
1

You hurt your cause with every word you type.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 03:13 PM
2

But that picture you provided is not the standard of beauty. That's runway modeling, which is run by homosexuals and women in New York, Paris, and Milan. They use those women to display their clothes and the women have the basic features of beauty, but not healthiness, viable child-bearing appeal, or other traditional indices of beauty. So, in that sense I dispute that the photo you chose is the standard of beauty. A voluptuous, curvy, yet even petite, perky, and "cute" cheerleader is much more …
/r/MensRights16/10/11 02:14 PM
1

I know that. It's a typo you pedantic, nit-picking grammar-nazi piece of shit. You are incomprehensibly pathetic.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 11:20 PM
1

Know thyself: actually explain things to people instead of blaming them for not understanding your cryptic and frankly unsupportable conclusions. I use to have sympathy for you in this post when you claimed the Mods were being unfair and bad managers. Now, I don't. They might be bad, but I simply don't care.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 10:07 PM
1

I'm not trying to save face. I think you're bonkers because your political views about leftism and feminists are based on lies and bullshit. I don't need excuses to lash out for you given that the foundation of your concept of men's rights is quite frankly so absurd. And, consequently, that you do more harm than good to the MRM.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 09:39 PM
2

Being proud of white or Euro culture and being a racist are totally different things. A person could be one or other, both, or neither. Being a racist is bad. Prioritizing Norwegian culture or white, middle-class culture over black, urban culture isn't necessarily racist. It's just a sociological preference in terms of values, lifestyle, culture, music, food, etc.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 09:19 PM
2

Neither men nor women would tolerate your irrationality. But only a woman is engaged to you, correct?
/r/MensRights15/10/11 09:09 PM
2

You are fucking delusional. Sorry to say it, but your marriage won't last because a woman wouldn't tolerate such bullshit that you spout off. Then, you'll blame her when she dumps your sorry ass.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 07:54 PM
3

You have nothing to teach. Your notion of men's rights is based on the false assumption that leftists and feminists have ruined society and made things impossible for men to live in. That is the most assinine bullshit I've ever heard. Rather than men taking responsibility for the circumstances of their own lives, you want to blame leftists and feminists? Give me a fucking break.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 07:11 PM
2

Go fuck yourself. It's no wonder that the mods ignore you. Rather than explain what you're driving at, you call people idiots and children when they disagree with your unproven assumptions and irrational conclusions. No, seriously. Go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 07:05 PM
3

Well let the men choose whatever lives they want. I agree with you that men need to pal around with men, hunt, fish, etc. But they have to find that in themselves. As to hate, whatever man. Child payments and alimony are a problem for men who want to run away from their families, but those men have to find a different way to commit to their obligations as men and as fathers while still choosing more fulfilling lives for themselves.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 06:48 PM
2

Your life is about you. You choices are about you. You can prosletyize to the world with your misogyny and your rather unconvincing blaming of leftists and feminists from anywhere you want. If people don't recognize whatever gospel you think you're selling, so what? Let them fuck up their own lives and be emasculated. They won't toughen up or find a conversion experience unless they realize it on their own. Impossible is nothing. If you or they are unwilling, then you and they are chickenshit. P…
/r/MensRights15/10/11 05:54 PM
5

No, it's not irrelevant. What's supremely relevant is that you're too chickenshit to actually embrace whatever personal life choices you value so much. If you want to a be a lumberjack and live in a cabin, go fucking do it. You have the choice. Not choosing to live in nature and "be a man" or whatever is your choice. If you choose to be an suburban-dwelling, emasculated misogynist who blames leftists and feminists for changing society... and then REFUSES to change his own life to live in the man…
/r/MensRights15/10/11 05:48 PM
6

You can chop wood and live on the land now. You can get a cabin in the woods, till your land, and learn survivalism now. You can enjoy nature now. It's your choice to participate in the modern world AND THE INTERNET WHICH YOU'RE ON RIGHT NOW. If you want to be a Luddite, you're doing it wrong.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 11:45 AM
8

These are your political views? You want to return to some bullshit mid to late 19th century world? You are fucking delusional if you think you want to live in that world or that economy. Or, for blaming "feminism and related leftist ideologies" for "destroying" civilization. Who taught you this shit?
/r/MensRights15/10/11 02:02 AM
2

Dude. Don't do that.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:57 AM
1

I don't know what "facts" you're referring to, but that's beside the point. Actually, I'm sure some of your "enemies" would probably say the same thing about you. And where does that get the conversation? Because they might say you cannot learn, you are unwilling, you are willingly ignorant... etc.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:49 AM
1

I wasn't trying to group them together. I've never seen your posts before so I don't think that you have an antipathy towards both feminists and women. Just trying to piece it together from what I'm reading. Sorry for misconstruing. As to disagreements, well, you should at least try to be understanding of disagreement. Calling people wrong and stupid gets YOU, the conversation, men, women... nowhere. It's not just unproductive, it's counter-productive. That said, I saw some of the other posts ab…
/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:41 AM
1

But how were "their" issues ignored? (As if they don't share many concerns with hetero men). They could post or comment before.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:33 AM
2

Ok. Like I said, this is the first I'm hearing this. But, I think there may be a legitimate ideological difference among people here. If someone disagrees with your brand of fighting for "mens rights," they may think that it's because it's unproductive in the long term. Or, that they disagree with an overt antipathy towards women and feminists as being counter-productive. Whatever the difference, I don't know. But, I'm pretty damn sure that "leftism/pc" is a gross oversimplification of whatever …
/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:30 AM
2

But what is that?
/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:25 AM
2

Ok, but I'm not sure I understand. Why is he a Mod if he's just there to stifle things? What's his point in doing so?
/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:17 AM
3

This is the first time I've heard of any of this. If what you say is true, then it seems like they might be stone-walling, gaslighting, or trolling you to piss you off and drive you away. So you'll stay out of their hair and stop calling them out for being incompetent. That's how shitbirds act. They use passive-aggressive manipulation because it's the only control they have. Sad, really.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:01 AM
2

I agree 100%. Lawyer. Get a tape recorded record where she admits to lying to you. (Ask the lawyer to ensure it is legal to do so in your state).
/r/MensRights15/10/11 12:36 AM
1

Statistics are cold and meaningless. Seeing Americans and Iraqi bodies burned, tortured, and destroyed tells us the real cost of war. If you've ever been to a meatpacking plant, you might not like the process. If you saw those images of aborted fetuses, you might think twice about having an abortion. That's why the images are effective: they tell us what's really going on.
/r/MensRights02/10/11 01:07 PM
1

Yes, inform people who are on the cusp of making the decision. Actually, animal rights activists use images of dead and dying animals to communicate their message. So, you support them protesting at the supermarket with gory signs. Anti-war protestors also believe that by not showing how gruesome war is, Americans find it easier to support. In both case, the ignorant person is more blissful and less reasoned in his decisionmaking, because he does not have adequate visual proof of the trauma of a…
/r/MensRights01/10/11 10:10 PM
1

Those people are mean-spirited assholes animated by a Christian desire to outlaw abortion. I understand pssvr to be saying that abortions are gross and objectionable, but should be legal. Communicating that abortions are gross and objectionable may communicate to some people the gravity of their decision. It's doubtful, but not outside the realm of possibility.
/r/MensRights01/10/11 10:06 PM
2

It's simple because it's true. Not all women do it, but many do.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 07:26 PM
-1

Those are all very compelling stories, but few of them related to gender in my opinion. I ascribe men's failings to their personal failings (sloth, depression, addiction, stubbornness, irresponsibility, etc), and not to gender norms or law which you assert to have so disturbed the fabric of society that men are being shaken out. If men don't have the the gumption to break with the stresses that either patriarchy or matriarchy places on them (I don't care which is being blamed or analyzed as caus…
/r/MensRights30/09/11 02:51 AM
3

Then fuck him?
/r/MensRights30/09/11 02:28 AM
2

Just wondering. Shouldn't you post this to TwoXChromosomes or a similar subreddit geared for women? Because it's women and their agency you're talking about.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 02:09 AM
1

Well his choice sucks. It's not something he can undo. He'll figure that out when he gets divorced. To save his ass, you should fuck her before he gets it done, then tell him. Then he'll thank you.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 02:05 AM
13

That's not about gender, that's about class and personal wealth.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 01:59 AM
1

Honestly, a lot of it is just griping and some well-repackaged misogyny (thus, making it vague and palatable). I suspect that most of the men frequenting this subreddit have been been wrongly accused, have had their reputation unfairly tarnished, or have some other axe to grind. So, don't worry about it much. The problem isn't testosterone, it's the Internet: anonymous people making unsupportable claims in a comfortable place. Aka, a circlejerk.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 01:57 AM
1

Is the guy Jewish, Muslim, or a Christian who believes in the need for circumcision? Because this woman making demands on him... she's not going away. It won't get better from here. Stop him at all costs. Even if means getting a circumcision first to show him how brutal it is.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 12:19 AM
3

You're not the villain. Sex is part of a relationship. If she's not turning you on, then the relationship suffers. Easy as.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 12:15 AM
2

Who said that men are the primary on this one? It's well-known that women hate on women openly and gossip publicly about every else's business. At salons, in the dorm, at the coffee house, wherever.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 12:13 AM
1

Did you read the link? He was joking. http://www.reddit.com/r/reddit.com/comments/ktmcd/im_currently_deployed_in_afghanistan_ever_since/
/r/MensRights29/09/11 10:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter