TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

oysterme Archive

View 3 posts and 142 comments by oysterme on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It depends what you mean by “leftist”. I have seen people in the Democratic Party which is left as far as Americans are concerned, but of course by worldwide metrics the democrats are not left. I don’t know what scale we are using. Regardless even if this sub was conservative I don’t see how it matters.
/r/MensRights28/02/23 02:37 PM
0

I’ve been a part of this community for 9 years. You don’t have to be pro capitalism to be in mensrights. This comment is also nonsensical given what I actually typed.
/r/MensRights17/01/23 10:29 AM
1

You should look more into the case at hand. This is an extremely common problem with the line-up methodology. It’s not all down to “one mean bitch” like how everyone’s implying here.
/r/MensRights17/01/23 04:48 AM
3

There’s a YouTube video about it https://youtu.be/WFRiDtUbeAQ
/r/MensRights16/01/23 11:35 PM
3

Those of us who actually know the case know that this wasn’t done maliciously. She was actually raped, but picked out the wrong person in the lineup.
/r/MensRights16/01/23 11:31 PM
1

Ok so just so everything is on the table, I don’t think testosterone turns men into psychopaths, and I don’t think that’s what toxic masculinity means, nor do I think that’s the more widespread definition. Now if you think that’s the more widespread definition, then that’s fine, maybe you’ve encountered that definition more often, but this is the first time I’ve seen toxic masculinity defined in a way that’s related to testosterone.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 03:10 PM
0

Right, but I never said testosterone was toxic.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 02:01 PM
0

Contradicts what?
/r/MensRights18/12/22 11:14 AM
0

Do you think “toxic masculinity” means “testosterone makes you aggressive and domineering”? I don’t see how what you linked contradicted what I initially typed to you
/r/MensRights17/12/22 11:01 PM
4

The idea is that there’s different stereotypes for men and women, and trying too hard to conform to the stereotype can backfire on either gender in different ways
/r/MensRights17/12/22 10:32 PM
5

I never said it was inherently male
/r/MensRights17/12/22 10:24 PM
6

Everyone knows that that is wrong unless you are a psychopath. That is why being overly loud domineering, violent, angry, and argumentative is not masculine. Well, I’m talking about stereotypes. Culturally there’s stereotypes about men where men are aggressive and women are submissive, men are violent and women are diplomatic, men are loud and women are quiet, men are blunt and straightforward and women beat around the bush, you can’t deny that these are stereotypes assigned to either gender. Th…
/r/MensRights17/12/22 10:22 PM
5

Ah right, I’m in a few conversations at once. So to begin with I think we need to nail down what an alpha male is. To be honest “alpha male” is not a term I like to use. It’s a malleable term that can mean any “leader” stereotypically male personality, from a “silent and stoic” Gandalf type, to “overly loud, domineering, and aggressive” depending on the situation. In the case of u/thrasher666bassist it was clear to me he was talking about the latter. This is why I didn’t remember actively bringi…
/r/MensRights17/12/22 09:56 PM
9

I think you might have me confused with someone else. I didn’t bring up “alpha males”.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 09:45 PM
9

I’m not sure what we’re talking about now. What’s this have to do with masculinity?
/r/MensRights17/12/22 09:39 PM
12

Too much pent up anger and trying to be dominant all the time can make someone emotionally or physically abusive to themselves or others
/r/MensRights17/12/22 09:13 PM
28

Yeah this is the issue as I see it. “Toxic” is a modifier on masculinity.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 08:22 PM
3

I don’t think she is armed. She said "they put a gun on me because I am homeless." That, along with "get me out of this fucked up place." Leads me to believe she is homeless, and someone pulled a gun on her, now she is trying to get out of that town.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 09:05 AM
1

That dudes a psychopath and it’s a fucking travesty that he has a platform
/r/MensRights02/12/22 02:29 AM
2

Ah I never saw the movie
/r/MensRights01/12/22 03:22 AM
2

Really? They straight up call it “rape” in the book
/r/MensRights01/12/22 03:17 AM
5

The World According to Garp
/r/MensRights30/11/22 07:29 AM
1

Don’t stress about this unless she accuses you. If she accuses you, lawyer up. She has no evidence. No sense worrying about it.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 11:39 PM
4

This needs to be said with a megaphone on repeat in this sub. The enemy of your enemy isn’t your friend.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 11:24 PM
2

Yeah I agree. He seems to glorify the past a little too much while also not understanding much about his past societies worked. His advice seems to be “ooga booga! ooga booga! let’s go back to monke” even though it’s 2022. Maybe he’s found an audience, but that doesn’t mean he’s a good person to listen to.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 11:23 PM
2

He says he will be able to work in a year, assuming he passes his interview 🙃
/r/MensRights27/11/22 10:42 PM
1

People in general don’t think sexism happens to men so that’s not a good barometer. If a woman advocated for wonton cheating on husbands and boyfriends there would absolutely be a backlash and accusations of misandry from sane people.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 07:11 PM
6

I’ve only heard of Andrew Tate through osmosis. I hope his persona is “just an act” because the way I heard it, he’s stuck in Romania because he got busted for sex trafficking and is in a Roman Polanski situation. I don’t know if that’s true or not. If I’m missing anything then feel free to link me
/r/MensRights27/11/22 07:06 PM
1

I know the struggle. DM me.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 07:04 PM
2

Buddy of mine’s wife (US citizen) works and he (UK citizen) stays home (US). His green card is being processed, which means he is legally unable to work until the govt receives the >40 pages of paperwork that proves his marriage to a U.S. citizen is real and that he is eligible for a green card and therefore able to work in the United States legally It’s a good thing governments are so fast and efficient! /s
/r/MensRights27/11/22 06:57 PM
1

Completely agreed. Also, didn't Sarkeesian say she contacted the authorities, anyways? Granted, this is something she typed on her twitter, but just because we haven't seen any news articles of police going after Anita Sarkeesian's troll(s), doesn't mean there is no investigation. Not all investigations end up in the news, least of all investigations concerning online harassment. She's also one of the most hated people on the Internet. It isn't terribly out of character for her to get death thre…
/r/MensRights02/09/14 08:18 PM
1

http://img.pandawhale.com/96445-austin-powers-K-gif-Imgur-Op5h.gif
/r/MensRights30/08/14 04:12 PM
1

I'm sorry, where are you going with this? What does this have to do with the woman at his work who takes out the garbage?
/r/MensRights30/08/14 04:29 AM
1

Well, engineering, politics, etc... You get the idea. Feminists are trying to get women to become scientists or leaders or whatever, and are completely ignoring OTHER male-dominated jobs liiiike... the undesirable jobs. Whether or not degrees are paved pathways to these jobs is besides the point. The feminist EFFORT is still there. So good on this lady for not picking and choosing where equality should apply, is all I'm saying.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 01:11 AM
1

By... taking out more garbage?
/r/MensRights29/08/14 02:59 AM
7

It's annoying when feminists try to get women into jobs like engineering, and they ignore that men ALSO outnumber women in the dirty jobs that involve garbage. Here's a woman who doesn't pick and choose where there should be equality. If she's capable of throwing out the garbage and actively wants to do her part, I say that's a good thing.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 05:25 PM
3

Sad reality is the "man getting hot in the crotch" idea sells. That's a big reason why this stuff exists in movies and TV. If you go around forcing companies to change their ways, even though this stuff makes money, then that goes against everything the free-market system is about. If you don't like crotch-shots, hit the companies where it hurts: Their wallets. Don't watch those movies or TV Shows.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 02:06 AM
2

Men's Rights = MR = Mister
/r/MensRights11/06/14 05:37 PM
1

Why did you pick "straight men"? The real equivalence would be gay men, yeah?
/r/MensRights02/04/14 02:42 PM
-1

Wow. You have just about the worst reading comprehension ever. Take your medal if it'll make you happy, though.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 09:31 PM
4

The translation is under each. Endives Biologiques -> Organic Endives Endives Rouges -> Red Endives
/r/MensRights26/03/14 08:12 PM
5

Princess implies female, no? But you're right about pirates.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 08:09 PM
0

Well yeah, there's a reason to take 6 different sideroads to get to the store (it's to get to your destination). But if there's one road that puts you exactly where you want to go, there's no real reason to take the sideroads now, is there? My solution is more efficient than yours, so it basically voids it.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 08:05 PM
1

Large would fit 100% of large-wristed people and small would fit 100% of small-wristed people.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 05:57 PM
2

when you look at the workplace death statistics where 95% are men, is your reaction that this is a natural phenomena where free individuals are choosing dangerous occupations and there is a natural tendency for men to favor them compared to women OR do you believe there is some oppressive cultural factor that should be corrected so that the gender ratio is 50/50? It's 93%, first of all. Secondly, I'd say although men do choose to take harder jobs, they don't make these choices in a vacuum. There…
/r/MensRights26/03/14 05:54 PM
0

Once again, two sizes. You don't have to give them a "girls" and "boys" label. It's probably more accurate that way, too. Some women have big wrists, and some men like me have freakin' toothpick wrists. Also, when's the last time something "economically beneficial" worked out for men? It's "economically beneficial" to keep gender roles in place, and look what that started.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 05:37 PM
1

This one resonates with me the most.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 05:31 PM
8

I fucking hate that mentality so much. It's because of people like Josh that so many sexual assaults against men go under the radar.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 05:29 PM
11

You could just have sizes. No reason to base it all off of gender.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 05:26 PM
5

The dog thing is fucking ridiculous.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 05:24 PM
1

With the genders reversed it looks like something straight out of The Red Pill. Except this is an actual thing that got published, and The Red Pill is just a subreddit. Scary.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 09:05 AM
1

Girls wear MLP backpacks all the fucking time. Who gives a shit if a boy wants to wear one? I say focus on the bully's behavior, not the bullied kid's behavior.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 09:02 AM
1

You would not catch many women standing naked with a sock over their vagina to raise money for cervical cancer. Only because there's nothing for the sock to hang on to.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 08:58 AM
43

Their earrings policy screams "gender policing", so it is sexist. Same goes for men and women's proper "roles" in your hospital.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 08:53 AM
2

I'm completely on the same page as you, honestly. It's a better life lesson for kids if you say "Hey, sometimes people wear certain clothes and its not a big deal" instead of outright banning those clothes.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 08:51 AM
1

I'm unfamiliar with the sort of man who is dying to post pictures of himself with a sock on his dick, but never got the right opportunity. And then, suddenly, they saw this testicular cancer thing and screamed "EUREKA!"
/r/MensRights26/03/14 08:46 AM
2

I fail to see how this helps with cancer. I know what you mean, but you could make the same argument for Movember.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 07:05 AM
1

Honestly? I wouldn't photograph myself with a sock on my dick unless it was for a good cause.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 07:04 AM
2

First, no one put a gun to these men's heads and forced them to take these pictures. Second, everyone on reddit has seen nudity before. How the fuck is this "offensive" and "humiliating"?
/r/MensRights26/03/14 01:24 AM
2

It is puerile attention whoring wrapped in the veneer of legitimacy by claiming it 'brings awareness'. "Bringing awareness", regardless of the means, can be construed as "attention whoring" if you try hard enough. "Attention whoring" is just a big fat internet buzzword people can say whenever they see ANYTHING personal made public on the internet. IMO, if it brings awareness to testicular cancer, its doing its job.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 01:21 AM
-1

THAT DOESN'T HELP.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 09:24 PM
2

Given your situation, what's your opinion on financial abortions?
/r/MensRights17/02/14 04:48 PM
0

Even if the fetus was alive, it's still not morally wrong to abort
/r/MensRights27/01/14 12:45 AM
1

The MRA movement is about as far left wing as you can get. Going to have to disagree here. The MRA movement has as many democrats as libertarians. See the survey for more.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 02:08 AM
1

Getting funding from the state.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 02:01 AM
1

I'd put "no" for that, since that shit is just justice.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 11:44 PM
1

Some people think the sexes are different, but they also think we should fix all the social issues as much as we can. You won't get 100% equality, but you'll get as close to equality as you can get. They think that's still important.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 11:19 PM
3

I asked my transgender friend "If gender norms were gone, would transgenders not exist?", and she directed me to this comic, which really helped me out.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 02:19 AM
5

Apex fallacy. Just because most inventors are men doesn't mean most men are inherently great innovators. You can't look at the top and apply it to the whole. Or does the apex fallacy not count when it backfires on you?
/r/MensRights07/12/13 03:35 PM
7

That's the most ignorant thing I've ever heard. "Wow, I'm so afraid of coming out of the closet. Better become transgender because that isn't stigmatized at all!" Really? Have you read about this stuff?
/r/MensRights04/12/13 04:17 PM
1

I think we're done here. Have a nice day.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 09:05 PM
2

Ad hominem. Wonderful. It takes two to have a conversation. You can take your own advice on the "stop replying" front, no? I also find it rich that you called me "whiny" when you decided to make the whole discussion about how women are mean sometimes. I'm cool having a discussion, but not about something offtopic. Who's the one with the reading problems again?
/r/MensRights02/12/13 07:19 AM
2

The beginning of this thread is about instances where feminists used the term "man up". I don't care about your anecdotes where particular women who may or may not be feminists said "man up". If you want to talk about women who hurt your feelings, go elsewhere because that's not the point of the conversation.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 11:25 PM
2

You're the one making the claim that they are, dude. Burden of proof is on you.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 03:30 AM
2

You sure those are feminists ideologues and not just women who are annoyed with a specific guy in their life?
/r/MensRights29/11/13 07:41 PM
1

Yeah, for beating and raping women. Not for pursuing feminine interests or hobbies.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 07:40 AM
1

Your first link uses the phrase "man up", however it does not use it to shame men for doing something feminine. It uses the term to redefine masculinity so it includes helping women. Difference. Your second link uses the phrase "real man", however, once again, it does not use it to shame men for doing something feminine. It uses the term to shame men who lie to, cheat on, and abuse women. Also, whether or not this is a feminist initiative is dubious. Its creators are an organization called "rela…
/r/MensRights29/11/13 07:36 AM
6

These days it's a feminist shame tactic You posted this comment in the EXACT SAME THREAD where a feminist explains in detail why this phrase is harmful. I have no words.
/r/MensRights28/11/13 09:30 PM
3

Fuck Warren Farrell! No hate speech on campus!
/r/MensRights28/11/13 09:24 PM
5

Fucking scum?
/r/MensRights28/11/13 07:54 PM
7

So wait, because someone helps a specific group of people, they're terrible because they're not helping everyone? Fuck you. It's not a zero-sum game. Helping one group of people isn't "negative help" for all the other people, and if you think so, then by virtue of being an MRA you are hurting women by your own standards. If I tutor students at my local elementary school, am I hurting all the people who don't receive my help? What are you talking about? This is just an excuse for you to get on yo…
/r/MensRights06/11/13 09:25 PM
1

Oh I see. I misread what you said. In your sentence I thought "they already rule the world" applied to "feminists" and not "men".
/r/MensRights23/10/13 05:59 PM
1

Oh, I see. Thanks for clearing that up. I thought the second incident was the same as the video that went viral. The whole thing is confusing.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 05:57 PM
2

Your analogy doesn't do that, though. Also, apex fallacy. Most feminists don't rule the world :P
/r/MensRights23/10/13 05:49 PM
1

Both were misidentified? Even the woman who reported the incident? Are there two incidents, too?
/r/MensRights23/10/13 05:37 PM
3

This analogy only makes sense if feminists are trying to keep men in charge of the world (men aren't in charge of the world, but an analogy about "keeping everything the way things are" doesn't really work.)
/r/MensRights23/10/13 05:35 PM
1

With you on how poorly it's written. The article also says "the second OU student was misidentified as the victim in the investigation" even though the misidentified student was the first student mentioned...
/r/MensRights23/10/13 08:40 AM
1

This might help both of us: The person who was misidentified as a rape victim is "Person A". The "another woman" who investigators are looking into is "Person B". The first two paragraphs in the article are about Person A, obviously. The third paragraph is about Person B, since it began with "another woman". I think only the third paragraph is about Person B. I took "No charges have been filed in the case." as a hint that they were done talking about person B, and were transitioning back to Pers…
/r/MensRights23/10/13 08:32 AM
6

I disagree. Investigators are looking into a claim by another Ohio University female student that a man allegedly sexually assaulted her in public on Court Street near Chase Bank between the hours of 1 a.m. and 6 a.m. on Oct. 12. The woman reported the incident the following Monday and since then, investigators have located and interviewed both the man and woman involved. This shows that it's a completely different woman altogether, yeah?
/r/MensRights23/10/13 07:22 AM
1

Do they really need fighting against? Tumblr repels anyone with an IQ bigger than their shoe size.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 03:30 AM
1

Personally, I thought all the points about transgenders were sort of iffy. A positive for women that there are less transmen implies that it's a negative thing for men that there are more transwomen. This gives off the vibe that being trans is inherently a bad thing. Here in the Men's Rights Movement, we want to be inclusive to all men, even people who identify as men despite what they've got between their legs. Then, there's the idea that "less likely to transition" etc... is a bullet point for…
/r/MensRights14/10/13 04:10 PM
5

Sociology major here. Sociology means "the study of people in groups", not "the study of one person and their life". We look at facts and figures all the time. Please don't lump us in with people on tumblr.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 03:51 PM
15

I'M UPVOTING AS HARD AS I CAN.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 09:09 PM
20

14 and 16 made me tear up.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 09:02 PM
1

Yeah, but fish don't want to be eaten. Women (or people in general) don't mind being in a relationship, right?
/r/MensRights20/09/13 10:58 PM
4

You're making us look bad.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 06:16 PM
2

Usually during a conversation, you respond to what the other person says.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 12:42 AM
2

I think a distinction needs to be made between Throwing actual babies in a dumpster after giving birth to them and Giving yourself an abortion and throwing the weird fetus whatever thingy away.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 11:06 PM
3

Did I say "he killed her baby" anywhere?
/r/MensRights10/09/13 05:07 PM
2

Well, I'm sorry, but I can't feel any sympathy for this guy. Maybe it would've been prevented if he had the option to not be a father (it also could have been prevented by some goddamn therapy) but to turn this all around and act like he's somehow the real victim is gross.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 03:21 PM
2

Why is that important?
/r/MensRights10/09/13 03:16 PM
9

First of all, it is possible to undo a vasectomy depending on how soon you decide to undo it. Second of all, the permanence of these two things is irrelevant. The point is the principle. Just because women get abortions all the time doesn't mean it should be okay to force a miscarriage on one who doesn't want one.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 08:23 AM
16

Yeah, no. I'm sorry, but I have to say something here. Maybe women get abortions all the time, but that's because it's their body. Someone else giving someone a miscarriage when they didn't want one is fucked up. Take vasectomies, for example. Lots of men get vasectomies. Those basically happen every day. Is it okay for a woman to force you to get a vasectomy against your will?
/r/MensRights10/09/13 08:05 AM
3

I could see why you call it complaining, but it absolutely has a purpose and a thesis.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 03:08 AM
1

You didn't even see the whole slide show! That's only slide 9 of the whole thing! According to this, psychopaths also act weird when they're drunk (who doesn't?), wet the bed after the age of five (because it's not like they could have a bladder problem or something), have crazy eyes (as evidenced by all serial killer's pictures in mugshots, because it's not like getting a mugshot taken in and of itself might rattle you and make you look a little crazy anyways) and are flakey. The icing on the c…
/r/MensRights07/08/13 02:03 AM
2

I'm with you. Suicide and attempted suicide are problems. I can't say for sure what this guy's issue is, but I do know that not every failed suicide attempt is for the sake of attention whoring. I'm giving him the BOTD. If we want to talk about how much of a terrible person he is, let's talk about how he has sex with his students and tried to kill his girlfriend, and leave the failed suicide attempt out of it.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 03:37 PM
2

If that was the impression you got from my comment, I'm sorry. That wasn't what I was implying. I was trying to make the point that men are discouraged from having active roles in their children's lives in the society we live in. They're allowed to be there, but actually playing and spending time to get to know your kid? That's met with scrutiny, strangers asking "Is this you're child?", etc... This is something that mothers simply don't ever have to deal with. Although men as a whole can take c…
/r/MensRights04/08/13 03:24 PM
13

Encouraging men to have active roles in their kid's lives? Uh... What's the problem, again? This is good for us.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 03:48 AM
1

Speaking of, nice screenname!
/r/MensRights03/08/13 03:00 AM
0

YOU'RE OUT OF YOUR ELEMENT, DONNY.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 03:42 AM
17

From my understanding, the term has to do with the ridiculously high standards society sets for being a man. For example: A REAL MAN has a girlfriend. A REAL MAN has a cool car. A REAL MAN makes this much money. A REAL MAN can bench this much. A REAL MAN has these interests. A REAL MAN has had sex with X number of people before he's Y age. A REAL MAN doesn't cry. If you can't fulfill all these requirements, you're not a real man. Men have all these standards they have to fulfill, and people wond…
/r/MensRights15/07/13 01:28 AM
1

Have they seen Mary Poppins?
/r/MensRights07/07/13 07:43 AM
-1

To be fair, even SRSers get banned from /r/feminism.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 02:32 PM
7

Oddly enough, Pru Goward is an open feminist.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 10:22 PM
1

I'm saying you won't INTEREST more male people to go into teaching by saying "But But Just Go Anyway!" You're misinterpreting what I'm saying. Male teachers who are interested in teaching are often turned down due to stereotypes based on stuff that's not happening to these men in reality. We're dealing with a subset of people who are already interested. I didn't say meet, I said know. I don't know acquaintances. I only know close friends and family members (and only certain family members - not …
/r/MensRights23/06/13 07:52 PM
1

So you don't think hiring more male teachers would break the stereotype because the "stereotype is not that old", and because of two false equivalencies (one with sharks, and one with gay sex). You plan on breaking these stereotypes through a vague, fluffy idea like "get people to know men as people", when I'm pretty sure literally every person on the planet has met at least one man who isn't a pedophile. And yet, this stereotype still exists. It's not working. We need to do more.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 06:51 PM
1

That's the only way to turn that "80%" into something like a "12%".
/r/MensRights23/06/13 06:41 PM
3

My point exactly! The more male teachers they see in a school setting, the less of a "big deal" it would be if more and more male teachers showed up later.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 06:36 AM
1

Or by abolishing the stereotype itself. Which is EXACTLY what I'm advocating! And where do stereotypes come from? Turns out they're aggregated by people and then perpetuated by society. The only way people stop buying into stereotypes is if they start seeing people doing things they didn't expect them to do (like men teaching children, for instance).
/r/MensRights23/06/13 06:17 AM
3

Do you have any sources for women "getting in the way" and men getting killed as a result?
/r/MensRights23/06/13 02:36 AM
4

Qualified or not? That sounds bizarre.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 02:25 AM
1

Regardless of how old the stereotype is, you change people's minds about these things by changing the society around.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 02:23 AM
5

I disagree. It's discrimination for only men to be sent off to wars where they can be hurt or killed. The "male-only military" idea only perpetuates male expendability and disposability. Women should be allowed in the military, too (so long as they can pass the qualifications, of course).
/r/MensRights23/06/13 12:59 AM
0

Or they just assume hard work is "the man's job".
/r/MensRights23/06/13 12:54 AM
1

Sure, I don't see a problem with that. Slight change of subject, would you be okay with a more-qualified woman prosecuting because a less-qualified man was hired to work on a fishing boat instead?
/r/MensRights23/06/13 12:47 AM
4

You'd prosecute for when a woman gets hired over a more-qualified woman? I'm sorry, I don't follow.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 12:28 AM
4

I see. I guess we disagree in terms of which problem would solve what problem. Do we change the pedophilia stereotype so that more men are involved in childcare? Or do we change how many men are involved in childcare to break the pedophilia stereotype? I'm for the latter, because I think changing the "men are pedophiles" stereotype would be a very tough undertaking. People believe stereotypes in the first place based on the messages they get from society. If people see more and more men in child…
/r/MensRights23/06/13 12:22 AM
3

Are there other ways to get men into those jobs besides getting men into those jobs?
/r/MensRights23/06/13 12:08 AM
5

Absolutely I'm the only one who thinks this? Or absolutely hiring more male teachers and nurses is a good idea?
/r/MensRights23/06/13 12:04 AM
27

Am I the only one who'd like to see more male Elementary school teachers and nurses? Elementary schools don't hire men often because "men aren't supposed to be interested in child care and if they are, they're pedophiles". Male nurses are made fun of all the time for not being doctors. What's wrong with being a male nurse or teacher if that's what you want to do? I think having more male teachers and male nurses might help break those stigmas. Maybe don't just grab random men for the job for the…
/r/MensRights23/06/13 12:01 AM
14

I think it makes it better. The stereotype is that men would do anything to sleep with an attractive woman. Absolutely anything. If he's turning down an attractive woman, it sends a much bigger message than if he was turning down an unattractive one.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 11:32 PM
21

It's always good when people realize that not all men are characters in American Pie.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 11:28 PM
3

Alright, I just never heard of anyone getting expelled in a school setting besides students.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 09:09 PM
5

The Deaf Community tends to avoid activities that might injure their hands.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 09:07 PM
7

There's a difference between vocalizing and verbalizing. "Vocalizing" is using your voice. "Verbalizing" just means to express yourself with words in general. Sign Language is a language, so using sign language is considered verbalizing, but not vocalizing.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 05:54 PM
1

The student would get expelled for raping someone who was in a higher position of power than them?
/r/MensRights22/06/13 05:48 PM
5

This is just a little thing, but I think having sex with your boss is frowned upon because it screws up the whole boss/employee dynamic for the company, not because it's considered rape. I also didn't know people weren't allowed to have sex with cops.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 03:41 PM
71

Quakers Gone Wild!
/r/MensRights22/06/13 03:32 PM
3

Exactly, they have to kill other people!
/r/MensRights22/06/13 03:24 PM
8

Let's be honest here, though. We're ONLY talking about murderers, so no matter how you slice it (pun intended) you're going to get some pretty scary results. Your 80% 12% statistic is one way to present the data, but you can potentially look at the inverse of it and say: "If a man commits murder, 88% of the time it's a friend, an acquaintance, a family member, a coworker, or a complete stranger. If a woman commits murder, 20% of the time it's a friend, an acquaintance, a family member, a coworke…
/r/MensRights22/06/13 12:07 AM
1

Stereotypes. Men are stereotyped as being these lustbeasts who can't control their urges, so that's why this sort of thing is seen as acceptable in our society. In our society, if you're a man, you're supposed to enjoy sex no matter what the context. Otherwise, what's wrong with you? Aren't you a real man who likes sex? etc... It's always nice when people come to the realization that not all men behave like the teenager in American Pie.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 11:53 PM
8

Actually, the London homelessness report does mention that 88% of homeless people are men. link
/r/MensRights21/06/13 11:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter