TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

p337 Archive

View 0 posts and 18 comments by p337 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

From the company POV, it makes sense to retain good employees because the next person they hire could be a dud, or hurt productivity in some insidious way. If it takes a month to replace you (not to mention training), and you generate X revenue for the company per month... the math may indeed work out that a raise is better. Plus, a raise can buy loyalty... at least short term. I think there are lots of arguments for why a company would want high employee retention... but it may not matter for s…
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/20 12:30 AM
6

Changing jobs isn't easier imo. When you change jobs, you basically have the same discussion to negotiate a higher salary anyway. Asking for a raise can be as simple as noting your accomplishments, citing market value with real data, and asking for more. They may still say "no" but asking should be pretty straightforward. That being said, I think to maximize your income, you have to do both.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/20 11:28 PM
1

Ok.
/r/MensRights21/11/09 10:21 PM
0

I never trolled anyone... I wanted to see a rational discourse about Men's Rights Issues in this subreddit, and it has utterly failed to deliver. A large percentage of the posts I see here are about women doing bad things. Do you deny that? Women doing bad things is, at best, tangentially related, and, at worst, simply misogynist. I don't know what makes you think I am uptight or a feminist, or why you consider feminist a pejorative (at least any more than 'Men's Rights Advocate' would be pejora…
/r/MensRights20/11/09 10:25 PM
-1

Ok. I'm done. I lasted for a long time... but this is absurd. unsubscribed
/r/MensRights19/11/09 07:54 PM
-4

It wasn't a pile on originally. The guy pushed him away at first... then things escalated and it became something else. The majority of people were trying to break up the fight, not hit the guy. So the dogpile thing is not true. You are looking at this from a very different point of view than I am. You seem like an intelligent guy trying to make this into a men's rights issue. I don't know what would happen if the host was a man. There probably wouldn't have been any slapping. But the issue was …
/r/MensRights05/05/09 12:50 AM
-4

You are deluding your self if you think this is an issue of self-defense. If you are confronted by a threat, you are going to slap it? You think that is going to disable the threat? I'd like to see how this works for you when someone breaks into your house, and you sneak up and slap them. Was he justified in slapping her back? I suppose he was. He got slapped, so he can slap her back. But it should be broken up before it turns into an all-out fight, shouldn't it? You should not want either party…
/r/MensRights04/05/09 11:38 PM
-1

Thanks for the response. I watched it again to try and see what you are saying. This is how I saw it... She yells at him, and hits him, which is of course, wrong. He retaliates and hits her back. This is not self-defense... this is to respond to an insult. I am not saying it was uncalled for, but you cannot call slapping, "self-defense." Slapping is more of an insult, or a show of dominance. Now here is the part I think you missed (or ignored). The guy who slapped makes steps towards her, and is…
/r/MensRights04/05/09 11:30 PM
-3

Can someone explain the Men's Rights issue here? She slapped him... he slapped her back... he was restrained because he appeared to be out of control. How was this supposed to go down? Down-voted and ignored. Not surprised.
/r/MensRights04/05/09 12:23 PM
1

So it wasn't an exaggeration at all? I would ask if you had a link to someone saying that, but it doesn't really matter. I'll take your word for it. You have to admit that both of those arguments are pretty crazy though.
/r/MensRights06/04/09 03:50 PM
1

I thought that summary was a joke...
/r/MensRights06/04/09 03:26 PM
2

Cause, of course, there is someone making that argument.
/r/MensRights06/04/09 03:25 PM
-4

Really? That clip from SNL was offensive? Not amusing?... arguably... but wow... that seems a little bit overly sensitive. He asks if it would be acceptable for a man to grab a woman like that... I don't know, but it sounds pretty funny too. Now, why would Opera focus on abusive men as opposed to women? Hmm... her audience is by a vast majority, female[1]? She can do her show however she wants, and it makes the most sense to focus on abusive males. Are you really trying to mandate what a person …
/r/MensRights25/03/09 02:02 AM
3

By and large, men don't want to do these jobs either. Anecdotally, everyone I know went into manual labor jobs because of circumstances they didn't want. Whether they aren't very smart, or 'something' happened that made it the best choice... I have not witnessed a person who wanted to be a ditch digger. Women are not pushed by society to be physically strong, while men are. That is the Men's rights issue here. It is a lot less accepted for a man to be physically weak, but it is almost expected f…
/r/MensRights01/03/09 02:46 PM
2

Be better than that. Where does cynicism get you?
/r/MensRights01/03/09 02:41 PM
1

The question is, "why aren't feminists fighting for the right to do a job no one wants to do?" If the definition of a valid question is one that has an answer then, yes, that is a valid question... sure. But the answer is pretty simple: Because they do not want them. And the fact remains, they can get them... and have them... so, to me... that makes the question invalid. Edit: I suppose you are right... it is a good for starting a discussion... My worry is that the discussion would be unnecessar…
/r/MensRights01/03/09 02:41 PM
3

Maybe bashing wasn't the right word, I'm not going to argue word choice. I only mean that this kind of argument serves only to be divisive, and is likely to lead to instigating perhaps harsher comments.
/r/MensRights01/03/09 07:58 AM
5

This is kind of divisive, isn't it? Besides that, there are various orginizations dedicated to women in construction and mining. I didn't find one for logging, but that is beside the point. This is about men's rights just like the people who say, "Well how come there is no WHITE entertainment television?" are arguing about equal rights for white people. It is just pointless bitching. EDIT: Ok.. that last line was a little rude, I'm just trying to say... you can advocate men's rights without bash…
/r/MensRights01/03/09 07:22 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter