TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

pacmatt27 Archive

View 0 posts and 1,425 comments by pacmatt27 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,425 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
11

Lucky little kid bring sexually abused and likely suffering from psychological dysfunction for the rest of his life? Fuck off.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/10/21 12:25 PM
7

Yeah same. But a lot of actors and actresses may have spent 5, 10, 20 years looking for a break. Desperate people are easy to take advantage of. I'm not saying it's right, I'm saying people don't think right when they're desperate.
/r/MensRights18/10/21 12:21 PM
-4

I think while, yes they absolutely should not take the job and should report it... You also have to realise that these people are powerful and can not only grant you opportunities in a highly competitive career, they can also destroy your well-established career by having you blacklisted. That's not an easy choice to make. It's the right one but it certainly isn't easy.
/r/MensRights18/10/21 05:22 AM
1

Nobody's "mind-boggled" by it and nowhere did it say they were pocket knives. Carrying weapons is illegal in this country. That doesn't mean we're afraid of them or "sheltered", it means only a certain sort of person carries them and that sort of person is a criminal, because it is a crime. The lad who was murdered by said criminals was also a criminal himself, as he was carrying a knife. Were it not illegal to carry knives, I wouldn't be surprised if people did. However, the only people likely …
/r/MensRights10/10/21 10:43 PM
1

It's illegal in this country. Everyone knows that and doesn't carry knives as a result. If you are carrying a knife, then you're probably intending to stab someone with it.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 12:15 PM
2

Well that's basically what I said. Paying for your time makes an unpleasant implication... If that's how you want to conduct dating then you better make sure the payment is worth it.
/r/MensRights07/10/21 04:34 PM
10

I mean tbf they all sound like garbage. All carrying knives. All trying to hurt each other. I don't see how this is a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights07/10/21 03:06 PM
5

Idk. No dates I've been on have had this as an expectation and, if they did, I'd refuse and never see them again. However, I did say this to a colleague once and she said "No, if you ask me out on a date you're paying for my time". A couple of the other girls agreed. I laughed in their faces. They single still.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 12:55 AM
3

I've been thinking this recently after struggling with a group I'm forced to interact with for occupational reasons. There's nothing progressive about them. They don't do or say anything controversial or forward-thinking. They complain about things other, smarter people have raised and offer no solutions because it's safe to do so. It costs them nothing because intersections feminist ideas are mainstream. That, by definition, is not progressive. They're not right- or left-wing. They're cowards.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 12:51 PM
1

He just keeps doubling down on the madness, it seems.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 09:19 AM
1

This was a whole lot of cope This was a whole lot of meme to cover up the fact that you have no real response. what is it you think makes you ‘successful’ with women? That I get laid a whole lot by hot girls when I'm single and find it easy to establish healthy relationships with hot girls. That’s most loser guys’ bar for success Says the loser who blames women for his lack of success. I’m sure she just swoons at your action figure collection and gets wet at how much of an ‘ally’ you are. Well w…
/r/MensRights26/09/21 09:13 AM
56

That's not "deliberate manslaughter", it's a premeditated murder, like the title says.
/r/MensRights19/09/21 08:13 AM
6

OK, is your vulva intact you fucking smartarse? Or is being a pedantic wankstain in absence of an argument your only way of feeling superior? Good, we don't need people like you breeding and chopping up their kids' genitals out of some perverse desire to have "aesthetic baby dicks". Try again. Edit: Lmao, just seen your profile. What a joke of a human being.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 02:49 AM
27

Do it then.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 02:46 AM
3

If I remove your clitoral hood is your vagina still intact? Stop defending the mutilation of children you fucking pervert.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 02:45 AM
6

Your point is invalid. Your penis is not intact. Go be angry about it elsewhere, nobody is interested in your defence of mutilating children, you pervert.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 02:44 AM
5

Well not really since, in lots of cultures, FGM is something that women voluntarily undergo. You're talking a lot of shit in this thread and all you do is show off how little you understand this subject.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 02:43 AM
9

Nah you're not intact cos part of your dick was cut off.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 02:35 AM
3

Hey if you wanna mutilate your kids and be a piece of shit, that's your decision man.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 02:34 AM
15

Nah you're just wrong.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 02:32 AM
36

Most of us had no choice That's entirely the point, you should have. and I doubt many of us regret our circumcision. Of course not. Firstly you don't know what you've lost, so you can't regret it. Secondly regretting it means accepting that your parents mutilated you and all the conflicting emotions that brings. Not an easy task to ask someone to do. Thankfully, nobody is asking you to do that. What they're asking you to do is not initiate irreversible, cosmetic, medical procedures that have har…
/r/MensRights17/09/21 10:20 PM
-5

Nor should you...
/r/MensRights17/09/21 10:10 PM
13

Because it has been normalised in America. You know that. I'm not sure this approach will help get people on side. It comes across as a little patronising (even if that's not your intent) and is likely to make people feel stupid. People who are made to feel stupid will become defensive and reject your position out of emotionality, it won't get you more allies.
/r/MensRights17/09/21 10:03 PM
30

Upvoting for visibility, /u/zogins, this may help.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 11:50 PM
1

In all honesty I’m probably worse looking and still probably have more experience, and with more attractive women than you or most men do. Doubt. Also sad that you'd bother trying to brag to a stranger on the internet. Tell me you have low self-esteem without telling me you have low self-esteem. I also realize that a more attractive guy who understands the same things I do So... Nothing? what goes against what much of traditional dating advice preaches What exactly is traditional dating advice t…
/r/MensRights16/09/21 11:39 PM
2

Shut up, bot. Water is wet.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 10:40 PM
-1

Women not wanting to fuck a man doesn’t get magically get solved by him visiting a hooker. It's not exactly magic. Prostitutes will have sex with you for money. If what you want is sex and you're too incompetent to attract a partner, that is a solution. If you don't like that solution, find another. Which is mostly still a crime as a man btw. Actions have consequences. In other news, water is wet. The irony in this is that there is a generation of men being brought up on the feminist principles …
/r/MensRights16/09/21 10:35 PM
-1

Yeah but I'm not talking about seeing it being used on reddit. I've seen it used elsewhere, I don't think it is that unknown. But we're using vague terms like commonly used and well known so my understanding of them may differ from yours.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 06:07 PM
-5

You mean like, you? You're judgmental of bunch of humans you've never met or talked with How am I? I'm saying nobody is that unattractive... If I'm being judgemental I'm judging people positively? Weird. you have this Incel mindset yourself. Again, how do I? I'm not entitled, I'm not in denial. I know my values, my flaws, I work to better myself and my life. You're making a lot of weird assumptions here. Why do you have to imagine Incels as the worst that humanity has to offer I don't, I literal…
/r/MensRights16/09/21 05:03 PM
-2

Yep. And?
/r/MensRights16/09/21 04:56 PM
1

How on earth would you know that?
/r/MensRights16/09/21 04:56 PM
-24

Unlucky, those are your options but you do have options. Sounds like an excuse to me and a missed point. Dude is saying that incel is a mindset, which it is. Very few people are so repulsive that they can't attract a partner of any kind (because, thankfully, equally repulsive members of the opposite gender exist). The issue here is of entitlement and denial. Incels feel entitled to a certain quality of partner without putting in the necessary work to attract them and develop/maintain a relations…
/r/MensRights16/09/21 01:24 PM
6

Idk about you but I've heard of incels for years and I'm English.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 01:12 PM
-2

How am I? How is voluntarily agreeing to get a vaccine which could save my life and the lives of my family "being a retard and letting people tell me what to do all the time"? How is one instance of me choosing to do something you did not in line with what you just said? I didn't have to get the vaccine. I chose to because all research available indicates that it is safe and effective. My choice keeps me and those around me safe and has caused me no harm whatsoever. What's actually retarded is b…
/r/MensRights16/09/21 11:11 AM
-4

Don't be a retard. Get yourself vaccinated.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 07:22 AM
6

Socialism 1) has absolutely nothing to do with this and is 2) a good thing that Americans have been brainwashed to hate.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 07:16 AM
2

It's not that hard. Most people in my country do it. Mum and dad work from 9-5, kids are at school from 9-3:30. Usually there are after-school clubs to take care of the little ones until 5 and when they're old enough they get home and do homework before the parents get back (ideally).
/r/MensRights04/09/21 07:06 AM
1

Because the person made it quite clear that he was talking about the two extremes of the bell curve when it talked about intelligence just above, where it specifies that men are also the most stupid ones. Two different commenters mate. The second clarified a point that the first wasn't making. it's said in quite an awkward way since it's said along with strength and intelligence, which are both higher on average No it's said in a wrong way. Men have no advantage compared to women when it comes t…
/r/MensRights04/08/21 08:09 AM
6

I don't know why you're being downvoted. There is no evidence at all to suggest men are more intelligent than men (except, as noted above, that males have a flatter bell curve and occupy the extremes more than women). The average IQ for males and females is 100. Source: I am a psychologist and worked for several years in neuropsychology (my job was literally measuring people's IQ following brain injuries).
/r/MensRights04/08/21 12:05 AM
6

I guess, out of the two genders, it seems society should teach women not to rape then, if that's your excuse.
/r/MensRights21/07/21 10:45 AM
5

*shitty women and sad men
/r/MensRights18/07/21 07:20 AM
17

Because egalitatians also support women's rights and they don't exclusively support women's rights, which feminists do.
/r/MensRights11/07/21 11:34 AM
2

Give me my $20.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/21 08:55 AM
4

You're getting downvoted because women rarely take the initiative to invite men out to dinner, so this usually just reverts to the default of men always paying.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/07/21 02:26 PM
12

Yeah he's so cringe for expecting an adult he barely knows to pay for her own food.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/07/21 02:25 PM
7

Give me $20, manlet. You're so obsessed with my height. Are you a 5' balding micropenis as well as being broke? Still waiting on my free $20. Why aren't you giving me $20? Is it because that's an absurd request or is it because you're worthless? Those are the options. Which is it?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/07/21 02:22 PM
10

Don't give a shit. Give me $20 you broke-ass skank or you're a worthless human being. I don't get why you think you can get away with not giving a random stranger $20 for doing absolutely nothing. You must be a real manlet.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/07/21 02:19 PM
5

And you need to pay for your own food, you broke-ass skank.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/07/21 02:15 PM
11

Give me $20 for free. What? You're insulted I would ask that? Why? Give me $20, you broke-ass hoe. If you don't you're not worth my time.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/07/21 02:15 PM
3

Nobody. And I paid for them myself cos I'm not a broke loser.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/07/21 02:13 PM
4

I didn't. Pay for your own food, you broke-ass skank.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/07/21 02:12 PM
2

Nobody, love. Pay for your own food, leech.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/07/21 02:07 PM
5

Yeah it couldn't possibly be that you're fucking wrong. Again, one of us is single for a reason. The other is not. No, they don't. I know because I'm a man, have a bunch of male and female friends and I live in reality. They occasionally ask men out but 9/10 the male takes the initiative because that's how dating works.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/07/21 09:30 AM
9

Women do actually ask men out. No they don't. On the rare occasions they do there is absolutely no expectation that we're getting paid for. Stop lying. You may enjoy fuck-culture, but I'm interested in things like dating and romance Love, I have a girlfriend. Clearly one of us is better at this than the other. Be up front when you ask them out about what your expectations are, and go from there. No. If you go into a date not expecting to split the bill, huge red flag. Bye. Never getting a second…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/07/21 09:12 AM
15

Nah dog. Unless you wanna be treated like a prostitute you pay for your own dinner. Women don't ask guys out and I'm not paying for your broke ass to get a free ride. Pay for your own dinner and, if you can't afford it, say so and we'll go somewhere else (or nowhere cos you're fuckin broke and can't handle your money).
/r/PussyPassDenied02/07/21 08:24 AM
11

No, one of them is treating the other like a responsible adult. The other is a broke-ass leech who wants some random guy to pay for her food because she's got a pussy. No thanks. Maximum bullet-dodging from this hero right here.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/07/21 08:22 AM
10

Lmao, the broke ass bitch who can't afford to pay for her own food is calling someone else broke for not adopting another child. The mental gymnastics. Pay for your food, you fuckin skank.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/07/21 08:18 AM
6

No I'm pretty sure that you should assume that you pay for what you eat. You're a strong independent woman who don't need no man. There has never been a moment in my life where someone has said to me "Do you want to go out for dinner/drinks" and I've assumed that to mean they are paying for me. Y'no why? Cos that's an assumption entitled twats make.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/07/21 08:17 AM
2

Malpractice and murder are both abstract concepts that require some sort of moral judgement to be true. If you murdered someone and there was no evidence, you're still a murderer. If you committed malpractice and there was no evidence, you still committed malpractice. You're suggesting that not having a conviction doesn't make you a murderer and I don't agree in the slightest. Killing an innocent person makes you a murderer, regardless of conviction. You just weren't caught.
/r/MensRights31/05/21 09:08 AM
3

Yes. Just because you can't prove intent doesn't mean it wasn't there. That's like saying "Are you still guilty of murder if you're not caught?".
/r/MensRights30/05/21 05:51 PM
1

They are either on business trips or moving constantly for work. Yeah so that's a red flag, y'no? It doesn't mean they're a shitty person, it means they're not good relationship material. But I also don't really buy that they slept with tons of people because they were busy moving around for work. If your life is that hectic, you don't really wanna be going out every night meeting people or trying to arrange dates through apps just to fuck people you barely know. Shit takes effort. But, like you…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/21 10:32 PM
1

Some people don’t want a long term relationship And why don't they want one? Why does having lots of sex mean low self esteem? Sex is enjoyable and, believe it or not, some people have lots of sex because they enjoy it I do believe it. Despite popular notion of redditors, I also like to fuck. Lots of sex with random strangers is usually a sign of poor self-esteem because getting partners at your own level of attractiveness usually takes work. If you've slept with lots of people you're either ver…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/21 04:04 PM
2

"someone who is focusing on their own personal growth while not being abstinent." Idk about that. Focusing on your personal growth while fucking a bunch of different people? Unless people are throwing themselves at you it takes a fair bit of work to seduce a new partner who's only interested in sex. Yeah but that's a lot of assumptions isn't it? How many people do you know who are healthy, together and psychologically well who go around banging random people? I say this as someone who has slept …
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/21 03:53 PM
3

Cos it suggests several things: 1) You're not stable enough to have a long-term relationship 2) You have low self-esteem 3) You make poor decisions 4) You might have diseases Y'no, it's a bit of a spectrum but past a certain point it becomes a red flag.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/21 02:35 PM
13

Preach sister. They're both equally a sign of poor self-esteem!
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/21 02:22 PM
6

It's kind of a negative thing tho.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/21 02:21 PM
0

So have I but if you think that's how normal people try to have sex with women then you are soon to be in prison.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 05:19 PM
0

There is tons of material man, come on. There's loads of transcripts of him talking about women in absolutely inappropriate, misogynistic ways. Look I'm left wing but I don't subscribe to this whole identity politics bollocks but saying Donald Trump isn't misogynistic is just silly. He freely admits to being predatory and sexually harassing women.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 04:49 PM
2

Haha, fuckin right. Class career though and you get to take the moral high ground a lot which is a nice bonus!
/r/MensRights07/05/21 03:11 AM
2

I do, don't worry! Super boundaried with my work to prevent head explosions. And likewise to you. I know from my colleagues that nursing can be exhausting!
/r/MensRights07/05/21 03:05 AM
3

Ah fair. Reading into it too much then. Haha, I've just had some weird interactions as a male psychologist. Definitely a... Strange position to occupy.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 03:02 AM
3

Oh no, I assumed you didn't mean physically. I'm assuming the guys don't mind and it's all good-natured. I was just thinking though, I actually really don't like it when people do that to me and neither do lots of other guys. Can feel a little patronising. I guess like... Y'no if there was a female mechanic and all the lads were like "Wow aren't you good at this?" she'd probably be a bit like "Yeah, shouldn't I be?". But, like I say, probably just reading into it more than I should 🤔
/r/MensRights07/05/21 02:58 AM
6

I'm a male psychologist, very female-dominated career... Just curious what you mean by petted? There are a couple of connotations that may not be super well-received by a lot of men.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 02:42 AM
-5

Come on...
/r/MensRights06/05/21 11:30 PM
2

Because she's cute, smart and successful. Ego is a powerful thing. Obviously got to the point where she believes she can have and do whatever she wants and got slapped hard by reality.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/04/21 11:04 AM
2

Not even close to comparable.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/04/21 11:02 AM
6

Sure, he is. But having an affair is nowhere near comparable to attempting to frame someone for kidnapping and attempted murder.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/04/21 11:01 AM
3

We can and do. That's why these women are on dating apps, single and not getting partners. Because they suck.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 05:42 PM
4

No it's not. It's not exactly moral but it's not cheating.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/21 01:17 PM
28

Are you here to learn or change people's minds? Because you're going to achieve neither with that attitude.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 08:02 AM
7

She's not even slightly a feminist.
/r/MensRights01/04/21 01:43 AM
10

Applies to men, applies to men, applies to men, how are periods and cramps oppression, you have access to sanitary products, applies to men, applies to men, you have access to education, what about maternal health, doesn't happen in western societies, applies to men, applies to men, you have more opportunities than men, not in western countries. He can say that, actually. All the issues women face, men also face, and then we have issues on top of that. The only area where I would legitimately ag…
/r/MensRights01/04/21 01:25 AM
0

I'm not the one crying about title case.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/21 11:58 AM
0

I'm not the one crying about title case.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/21 09:49 PM
0

I'm not the one crying about title case, child.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/21 08:01 PM
0

Says the illiterate braindead child who can't parse simple sentences without flying into a maddened rage if they don't adhere to his autistic standards of grammar. Get a real hobby, you self-obsessed prick.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/21 06:24 PM
0

Says the child picking fault with grammar because he has nothing better to do with his time.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/21 05:32 PM
0

I'm not the one who doesn't recognise title case, moron. You're a moron, moron. Moron moron moron moron, moron?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/21 03:27 PM
0

It is title case, dumbass. It's just not used properly. It doesn't fucking matter though, does it, dumbass?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/21 03:22 PM
-3

It's Called Title Case, You Dumb Idiot.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/21 12:56 PM
1

Right but he did respond to the guy who did with specific reference to pimps, so it's implied that he's addressing this point specifically.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 08:15 PM
1

So, never then, since pimping is never moral? I mean I feel like it's kind of a weird thing to say "We should respect the moral pimp, even though he doesn't exist". I just don't really understand why you would do that unless you're trying to virtue signal your support of sex workers.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 01:57 PM
10

This one is super effective, I find. People absolutely lose their shit when you bring this up.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 01:45 PM
0

Was with you until you tried to suggest we should respect people who prey on and exploit vulnerable people to make money off their desperation - usually through brainwashing, physical violence and chemical reliance.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 01:42 PM
13

Dude stfu. Nobody is here for your religious bullshit and your opinions on what constitutes rape, they're here to discuss evidence.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 01:39 PM
12

Which privileges are those, exactly?
/r/MensRights18/03/21 02:03 AM
10

So if a male pornstar was asked how he lost his virginity and he said he raped a girl in a movie theater because he "wanted to fuck and she kept saying no", you'd be like "ahhh idk let's give him the benefit of the doubt"? Don't be a fucking clown.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 12:02 AM
-1

Off you pop then.
/r/MensRights17/03/21 10:58 PM
0

Let's be honest, absolutely everyone would ignore such a stupid law. They barely stayed home when there was an actual plague, killing everyone. Fucked if they think some fragile housewives' fantasies are going to keep fellas from leaving the house.
/r/MensRights17/03/21 10:57 PM
2

Oh, of course. It's alright. If it's annoying then at least people are paying attention. Might look into that later! Thanks!
/r/MensRights17/03/21 08:24 PM
2

You're absolutely right. It's very easy to say "Well they won't do it, so I won't" or "They behave this way, so I will". No person has ever made an impact on the world by blaming others for their misfortunes, or hiding away from risk and difficulty by living in a bubble. If that's what you want, fine. But your walls will shrink around you and life will be small for you. If that's not what you want, act like the great men and women our world has produced in the past. Hold onto the virtues that ma…
/r/MensRights17/03/21 08:18 PM
-3

Yes, real men. Not pathetic children who want to act like the pathetic children from the feminist movement. Be courageous, take responsibility for yourself, make positive changes in the world. Alternatively, take the advice of people above and be a sheltered, irresponsible coward, too afraid to take risks and live your life. I mean, really, if that's all you took from what I said, "man up", this conversation is over. At no point did I say not to be scared, at no point did I say not to be lazy. F…
/r/MensRights17/03/21 08:14 PM
7

Hush, nutcase.
/r/MensRights17/03/21 03:19 PM
-5

No it's not. People are starting to change their views on this and the more people speak, the more people will understand. If people already listened, we wouldn't need to be speaking up about it.
/r/MensRights17/03/21 03:18 PM
-9

No, that's just regressionist and pathetic. Forward progress has always been made by the brave, not the weak. Anyone reading this, don't listen to the previous two commenters. Don't be like third wave feminists and blame all difficulties on a faceless monolith that will never change. And don't be like MGTOWs who are too cowed by past experiences to bother facing hardship again. Real men, just like real women, are kind, brave, strong, just, wise and skilled. If you have been hurt, speak about it …
/r/MensRights17/03/21 03:16 PM
22

Gross. You have a mullet.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/03/21 09:39 AM
0

Patently untrue. Can we not say things as stupid as this. People already don't take men's rights seriously.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 01:28 AM
3

Exactly my point. It's all pretty similar.
/r/MensRights25/02/21 01:19 PM
5

I can, it's not that bad. Just block them.
/r/MensRights25/02/21 08:38 AM
12

They're similar unless you include prison statistics. From what I understand, sexual assaults against men do dwarf those against women if you include that data.
/r/MensRights06/02/21 11:12 AM
1

You have a small dick for saying that. Do you see how this tactic is unhelpful?
/r/MensRights28/01/21 03:41 PM
0

Yeah except that's not what you said, originally, is it? You obviously don't enjoy monopoly, you just said it isn't a challenge or exciting. It often turns people on to board games, as well and behaviour like yours is a barrier for people entering the hobby, it may just put them off completely (nearly did for me). And maybe it's not turning people off, maybe some people just don't like board games. All of the above can be true. Regardless, the only time I have ever heard people who are into boar…
/r/MensRights25/01/21 05:21 PM
0

Again, getting pretentious about board games isn't a good look, mate. I know there are better games out there, I just don't feel the need to be a knob about it. I find it hilarious that you accuse me of being insecure when you can't tolerate people around you enjoying monopoly. It doesn't make you cool, shitting on people who aren't into your hobby playing games they enjoy. "I don't know any serious yo-yo masters who think cats cradle is an impressive yo-yo elite move. Look how hard I'm compensa…
/r/MensRights25/01/21 03:06 PM
5

Lmao. I love whenever someone mentions monopoly some board game elitist has to come out and say "monopoly isn't a serious board game". None of them are mate, they're board games.
/r/MensRights25/01/21 12:16 AM
16

I'm sorry you said straight instead of heteronormative, I'm going to have to cancel you.
/r/MensRights25/01/21 12:11 AM
1

It can and is.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/21 11:25 AM
18

That is the saddest thing I've read today.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/01/21 09:13 AM
1

It's bad parenting. Good parenting is actually putting in the effort and teaching your child how to navigate the world.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/01/21 09:48 AM
1

I've done neither of those things, I explicitly said it's fine if you've slept with lots of men. I'm explaining why the dynamic is different and why some people might see it as less of an achievement if women sleep with lots of people vs men. It doesn't require the same effort.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/01/21 09:30 AM
1

I know you'd feel better if that were true but it's not. Maybe you'd like to start again without insulting me and you can tell me where you think I'm wrong?
/r/PussyPassDenied31/12/20 11:53 AM
4

It is but it's a double standard for a reason. The two things aren't the same. Personally I don't really mind how many people my partner has slept with (as long as it's not something ridiculous like in the hundreds). But yeah, the dynamic is very different. Women tend to be the gatekeepers of sex, it's very rare that women try to seduce a man and he's in the position of saying yes or no. It happens but not often. So if you've slept with lots of people as a woman, you've said yes a lot (which is …
/r/PussyPassDenied30/12/20 01:52 PM
4

That was the joke, you tit.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/12/20 11:06 PM
2

No, the point is that Facebook is banning some forms of hate speech and not others. It's not about whether hate speech should be banned, it's about applying such bans, where they exist, equally.
/r/MensRights05/12/20 09:32 AM
14

Right but if you're selectively banning some forms of "hate speech" and not others, that's worse than a blanket ban or no ban at all.
/r/MensRights04/12/20 10:00 AM
1

Not really.
/r/MensRights17/11/20 02:18 PM
2

Yeah, I do. I know exactly what it is and the difference between that and what it claims to be. Saying you fight for equality while you only push for preferential treatment for women is a bit of giveaway.
/r/MensRights15/11/20 06:01 PM
1

Yeah, they are.
/r/MensRights08/11/20 05:37 PM
1

Sorry, are you trying to have a civil conversation or waste my time? The two are mutually exclusive. Stop wasting my time.
/r/MensRights08/11/20 11:28 AM
0

Then stop wasting my time.
/r/MensRights08/11/20 10:13 AM
3

I didn't do it for congratulation. You asked me what I did and I told you. It is not for you and it is not for me. Because you haven't actually done anything, have you? You've apparently written some letters and been to some protests. Neither claim has any context behind them. I have no idea what these letters or protests are and it genuinely sounds like something tangentially related that you turned up to, rather than something you have actively fought for. And, even if you have done something …
/r/MensRights08/11/20 01:00 AM
2

Even if the abortion issue is about religious beliefs there legally can’t and shouldn’t be laws banning it as we have a separation of church and state in the US. Yeah except America is terrible at that. Regardless, it doesn't have to be framed as a religious argument to work. Unfortunate but the government is corrupt as fuck. You could argue that there is a moral dilemma regarding ending life but what about cases of rape pregnancies, dangerous pregnancies where the mother will die, etc. That mor…
/r/MensRights08/11/20 12:33 AM
0

You said you were leaving, so fuck off, you petty coward.
/r/MensRights08/11/20 12:14 AM
1

Shocker, can't even stick to your own words.
/r/MensRights08/11/20 12:13 AM
0

You said you were leaving, so fuck off, you petty coward.
/r/MensRights08/11/20 12:00 AM
0

Why? You said you were leaving, so leave. You aren't getting the last word in, you petty coward.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 11:53 PM
4

The first things that come to mind are abortion Why do you think access to abortion is a right you deserve? Many would dispute that. I wouldn't, personally, but that is a very complex issue and it's not about being a woman, it's about religious beliefs. Secondly there would be absolutely no equality in granting women the right to abortion without similar reproductive rights being granted to men. This is actually anti-equality without comparable male rights being granted also. access to birth con…
/r/MensRights07/11/20 11:50 PM
1

Go for it, now stick to your words and fuck off.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 11:26 PM
0

Yes, and it means there aren't plenty. It could mean none or it could mean any amount that isn't plenty, you insufferable tit.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 11:25 PM
0

Please do.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 11:23 PM
2

It's called being a tosser.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 11:23 PM
1

Fuck off then.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 10:31 PM
1

K, bye.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 10:26 PM
2

Never said that. There's plenty you can do, you just don't want to be alienated.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 10:26 PM
4

You wish! Slap some more shit on your face and we'll see if we can work with what you've got.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 10:13 PM
1

It's not an ad-hominem. Refusing to take responsibility for your movement is cowardice, coward.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 10:13 PM
3

Yep, and I have enough nobodies wasting my fucking time while I'm trying to polish my pork sword right now. There is no evidence to the contrary. She has not been removed. The blogs, they do nothing! D:
/r/MensRights07/11/20 10:11 PM
1

Some MRAs are misogynistic, does that make the entire MRA movement bad? If enough of them exist that it damages the movement, yes. Take responsibility, you coward.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 10:07 PM
0

So what you're saying is you're a simpleton?
/r/MensRights07/11/20 10:06 PM
1

Feminism. It's not though. They're not fake feminists, they're the ones in charge of the movement. You are complicit in their actions. Take responsibility.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 09:59 PM
3

I'd rather not, Tumblr is a pile of shit full of nobodies. And Amber Heard has lost no contracts and plans to litigate against Deep again. Again, when feminism does something instead of claiming to do things, I'll change my mind.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 09:58 PM
1

No, every organisation that has largely negative effects is bad. Like feminism, or Russia, or child traffickers.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 09:54 PM
1

Yep. Quite a bit actually.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 09:54 PM
6

Even is sadder is that I already have! Nooooo! K, I'll use it to wank while we argue.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 09:51 PM
1

K.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 09:50 PM
1

Feminism. Yes, which is why I don't define myself as one.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 09:50 PM
2

Cringe
/r/MensRights07/11/20 09:49 PM
5

Fine, disregard that one since it's convenient, I'll drop it. What about reproductive rights? Don't see you mentioning that one. No, what have you actually done? You've written some letters and done some volunteer work at somewhere which is both genders. What have you actually done to help men? I want some examples. I'm doing a lot more than that, lol. I set up a group in my area for men experiencing mental health difficulties and social isolation to give them somewhere to meet new people and do…
/r/MensRights07/11/20 09:49 PM
5

You are indeed. Now go away.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 09:41 PM
1

Nah, just the people who are. Got nothing to add? Then fuck off.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 09:40 PM
2

Well if the actions of the organisation don't fit the definition, I will do exactly that.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 09:39 PM
1

I think you can do that yourself, without my help. Unless you're a simpleton.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 09:39 PM
3

Well if progress isn't equality then it isn't really progress is it? Don't really care.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 09:38 PM
1

So nothing? They've done nothing except claim men are responsible for men's suffering. Fuck off. Also, in my feminists circles we hold each other accountable for toxic behaviour all the time. Like putting other women down for falling into traditional gender roles or hurting men or body shaming or whatever. So you shame each other for not toeing the line? Sounds like brainwashing. Also, yes society is ingrained with misogyny. No it isn't. Also if you're implying feminism is a marketing ploy I'm n…
/r/MensRights07/11/20 09:38 PM
3

Point missed.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 09:32 PM
5

Yeah cos those are the things I'm referring to ;)
/r/MensRights07/11/20 09:31 PM
5

They have no reproductive rights and women receive preferential treatment in courts. The sidebar has more. That's great. You ever feel like doing anything about it or just saying it's an important issue? Cos I don't actually see any feminists doing anything about it.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 09:31 PM
4

Yeah you can claim that as much as you want. I could say a pile of shit is perfume but it isn't.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 09:29 PM
5

Just behaving like feminists do. It's irritating isn't it? When you start actually investing some effort in helping men, I'll stop comparing suffering. Since, apparently, we have to fix all the most important issues first and all of those involve women making shit up.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 09:27 PM
1

I wish I could too but you keep irritating me. Got plenty. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 09:25 PM
7

I'd call myself a femminist. Femminism means equality between sexes. No it doesn't. Clue is in the name.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 09:24 PM
2

Yes, plenty. Have a look at the sidebar.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 09:24 PM
8

So do men on paper, in theory Except they don't. Oops! most feminists, myself included, think Amber deserves as much punishment as she would absolutely be getting if the genders were swapped. Shame most feminists are doing fuck all about it then, isn't it?
/r/MensRights07/11/20 09:23 PM
2

Terry.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 09:22 PM
1

I'm not sure if you are aware, but there are many different sub-groups under the feminism umbrella. Very aware and they all share the same ideological foundation which is fundamentally oppositional and anti-male. This can be seen in the rhetoric, terminology, foci for change and data-collection methodology. Not interested in repeating the same discussion points again, I've done it several times now. BLM has strong anti-white elements and suffer from the same issue. You are responsible for your m…
/r/MensRights07/11/20 09:21 PM
3

K.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 09:17 PM
1

K, bye.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 09:13 PM
4

They really do represent the majority and those in powerful positions within the movement. Those who effect change are absolutely not interested in equality. If you call yourself a feminist you are complicit with their agenda. End of story.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 09:12 PM
1

Try again.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 09:01 PM
1

I am. Next.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 09:00 PM
3

Maybe because 90% of the responses are not from the people I actually asked. They're people trying to "educumacate" me about something I already understand better than they do. I asked two individuals for their perspective, not you for yours. Now fuck off until you have something useful to contribute.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 08:57 PM
3

Nah, I do. I'm just not willing to patiently sit there and let you lie through your teeth. When you want to talk, let me know, cunt.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 08:52 PM
4

No, I see what is actually there. Yeah, that's bullshit. When you want to discuss this like someone with integrity would, you let me know.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 08:47 PM
1

Yeah fuck off.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 08:44 PM
2

I oscillate wildly.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 08:42 PM
3

When I see any attempts to achieve equality I will change my mind.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 08:42 PM
2

Ain't it? "I'm done with you" - continues for two more hours, providing nothing but insults.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 08:33 PM
4

If you CAN read, but can not grasp the concept of another human being suffering for being the gender they are No, I can grasp it. What I'm suggesting is that isn't what's happening. These are shithole countries where everyone suffers regardless of gender. And, for the record, not understanding something wouldn't make me a hypocrite, it would make me dumb. I have never once argued with any of your claims. You have though. Shall I quote you? Please show me where in the world men suffer from habitu…
/r/MensRights07/11/20 08:32 PM
4

No, I'm talking about men's experiences. My experiences of feminism are unique and my own. Men's experiences of feminism are ill-informed social and legal policies that have diminished their rights and cultural identity, while advancing the position of women. Great, good for you, you're blind. Next time you have a chat with them, ask them what they've actually done to help men, aside from posting shit on facebook and reddit.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 08:21 PM
2

So then all catholics should account for the rape of priests Lol. Yes, absolutely. They are members of an organisation that has permitted and facilitated the rape of children, are you serious? Of course they should be held accountable. Were they aware? Did they do anything to stop it? If not, why not? These are absolutely questions we should be asking and they should absolutely bear some responsibility for it. All Christians should account for white nationalists and terrorists who attack people …
/r/MensRights07/11/20 08:18 PM
6

I can read them, they do not suggest what you are claiming. I'll wait until you wish to continue. I do, off you fuck.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 08:13 PM
2

We are less likely to be promoted because companies assume we will take more sick time to take care of children. More maternity leave, I assume you mean. And, shouldn't you be? You work less. Should a woman who takes nine months off per year for three years get promoted over a woman who doesn't? Having children means you're out of work. That's unfortunate but what do you suggest we do? Promote people who are not the most qualified because they got knocked up? Let them ascend to a position they a…
/r/MensRights07/11/20 08:10 PM
6

You are not a source, you are an anecdote. One piece of data. The data suggests that they do.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 07:57 PM
5

None of those actually show that women suffer unequally in these countries though, do they? They just show that women suffer. Whoopdeedoo, I know that. Everyone does. I didn't dispute any of the things you've said about women's suffering. What do you think you've proven? I'd also suggest that cherry picking articles which support your position is not a very hard or convincing thing to do... Which is why I'm not wasting my time doing it, lmao.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 07:56 PM
7

No, it's not my experiences, it's men's experiences. We can, but feminism does not aim to achieve gender equity. We can, feminists don't.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 07:53 PM
3

Ok but can you actually show me any rights men have which women don't in developed countries? Y'no, ones that aren't total shitholes. Can you give me real examples of what feminism can actually do to be of value? Not parroted rhetoric and a gross misunderstanding of human history.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 07:50 PM
6

Fuck off then? I've done pretty well today actually. You try the same, you cowardly little cunt :)
/r/MensRights07/11/20 07:47 PM
6

Denser, now shut up and listen to your betters. Please show me where in the world men suffer from habitual and societal genital mutilation at the hands of the other gender. Couple of things to unpack here. Generally FGM is performed by females. In those countries where FGM is practised, MGM is also practiced by equally incompetent people in equally unsanitary conditions leading to equally severe complications. So the countries I'd show you are all of them. Please show me a society where a man is…
/r/MensRights07/11/20 07:45 PM
15

You do know that in all of those countries men face similar issues, right? It's not because of sexism, it's because those countries are shitholes.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 07:39 PM
1

K. Make sure you leave your feminist theory at the door!
/r/MensRights07/11/20 07:37 PM
7

I can be dismissed like that if you're too cowardly to engage me, sure. It doesn't bother me because I know I'm right. And, contrary to popular belief, being right (not what you feel) is what matters.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 07:36 PM
3

I can't m8, covid-19.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 07:35 PM
7

That's fun. What are you doing to eradicate toxic gender norms perpetrated by women? What are you doing to eradicate toxic behaviours perpetrated by women? Could you even tell me what those are, out of curiosity? Because no feminist I've ever asked has been able to. Cos, and correct me if I'm wrong here, what it seems like you're doing is actually behaving like every agent in the world is somehow a representative of the patriarchy, hellbent on oppressing women. Films, games, television, science,…
/r/MensRights07/11/20 07:35 PM
4

I don't think all women are. I think most women are fairly normal, like most men. Some are arseholes and some are sound. Feminists, I'd say, are largely tossers - male or female. Nice try though, now fuck off.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 07:13 PM
13

Lmfao, no it isn't, get a grip.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 07:08 PM
-1

There are plenty of feminists that aren't extremists. Not anymore. I suggest we all try moving away from this "feminazi" narrative and realise we're all working towards the same goal. I'd love to, if that were true.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 07:07 PM
6

There are multiple different branches of Feminism. Please don't patronise me. I'm more than aware of that. The type you're probably referring to is radical feminism which is more anarchist in nature. Wrong, I am referring to mainstream third wave feminism, which is the most popular form of feminism at present. Most Feminists you'll meet in real life literally just want equity for genders Wrong. Most feminists I meet in real life are hypocrites with a startling lack of awareness of male issues, a…
/r/MensRights07/11/20 07:06 PM
14

There are still some legitimate areas where women don't have equality. Which? I'm not saying there aren't but I am a little curious on where you feel women do not have equality. Many of the common talking points are not as straight-forward as they appear. It's a difficult problem, how do you push for equality in those remaining areas without legitimizing the bad parts of modern feminism? I'd start by not approaching it from a feminist perspective. Their ideology is just so, a political, sociolog…
/r/MensRights07/11/20 06:58 PM
1

“Same, tired, misinformed bullshit” sounds a lot like a person making a decision on the entirety of a thing from a very small sample size. No, it sounds like an assessment of high-profile feminist talking points from my perspective. This one case is not indicative that women lie about abuse. The stats don’t support that women often lie about abuse. No, false reporting statistics suggest that people lie about crimes on a regular enough basis that we need to be careful about prosecution, slander a…
/r/MensRights07/11/20 06:46 PM
30

Women have equal rights though. And they have more rights than men. Feminism is and always has been a female advocacy movement. I can see that as a necessity in past decades but I don't see why someone would identify with it now if they genuinely wanted equality. It's becoming more and more clear that prominent feminists want women to feel weak and frightened, not powerful and strong. They want to make everything a victimisation and an oppression, to avoid becoming irrelevant. To take no respons…
/r/MensRights07/11/20 05:59 PM
3

I don't associate with them because many elements are hateful. I do not label myself as a men's rights activist, I'm an egalitarian. It makes perfect sense.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 05:53 PM
5

Why not start with reproductive rights? Women have access to state-provided birth control in many countries, they have the right to terminate pregnancies, give children up for adoption and face no consequences, they can commit paternity fraud with no repercussions or refuse to notify the father. Men have absolutely no such rights. Until recently women had the right to automatically be granted custody of children. Since the change they still receive preferential treatment in custody disputes (tho…
/r/MensRights07/11/20 05:43 PM
10

You may not consider them feminists but they constitute the power and backbone of your movement. They're the ones who influence legal and social change. If you say you're a feminist, you admit complicity with those individuals. Also, how can you be a feminist without subscribing to patriarchy theory, exactly, and all that it entails? And the thing is, you say they're not real feminists, but they are. They hold the ideals feminism has always held. At its heart, feminism is a female advocacy movem…
/r/MensRights07/11/20 05:32 PM
2

No, it's not, you patronising wank. I work in psychology which is female-dominated and is full of self-proclaimed feminists. I used to be a feminist and stopped because they blatantly weren't interested in equality. No feminist movements focus on male issues, they just bleat on about the same, tired, misinformed bullshit which pale in comparison to a lot of male issues.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 05:17 PM
9

I am not. I have done. Those sub-sections who are for genuine equality are complete non-entities as far as political and social change are concerned. What is frequently used to divide groups? Calling a spade a spade? I don't think so. If we are going to be subjected to laws and social policies, fought for by feminism, which put men at a significant disadvantage, I will ask why feminism is not interested in equality. Why divide? What a stupid question. Feminism is literally about division and con…
/r/MensRights07/11/20 05:05 PM
10

Please do.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 04:56 PM
-1

No, it still makes sense, you just don't agree.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 04:56 PM
9

Feminism is not man hating That's an interesting point of view, considering all of the terminology and theory is set up to paint men as the enemy and women as the heroes (or victims, they seem quite confused on whether women are powerful or weak). The clue is in the name, feminism. For more examples see: patriarchy, toxic masculinity, rape culture, mansplaining/manspreading. BLM also has a very large white-hating component but whatever, this isn't about race. To conflate feminism with man hate, …
/r/MensRights07/11/20 04:54 PM
1

Not sure how to phrase that question more simply.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 04:45 PM
18

Egalitarian.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 04:44 PM
12

I asked it of two people who proclaimed their identification with the group. If you can't tolerate questions on it and get defensive when you receive them, that's your problem.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 04:43 PM
22

No, they're not and it's not a strong term. Feminists permit the spread of an ideology that openly treats men as hostile entities and pushes an agenda of securing more and more power and privilege for women while removing it for men. If you identify yourself as a feminist you are suggesting that you are accepting of that agenda. You, as an individual, may be interested in equality but that is not what feminism is.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 04:42 PM
0

Just curious how you can identify with a movement which has essentially become a hate group?
/r/MensRights07/11/20 04:29 PM
43

Just curious how you can identify with a movement which has essentially become a hate group?
/r/MensRights07/11/20 04:29 PM
8

You can't claim it isn't feminism when it is the dominant form of feminism.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 09:49 AM
2

Perfect word to describe this tosspot.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 03:37 PM
1

I don't recall sneezing.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 03:35 PM
0

Again, maybe if you were less of a cunt you'd have an easier time convincing people. Who knows?
/r/MensRights21/10/20 03:09 PM
2

1: Gr8 joke 2: "Utterances", lol. Everything you've said implies your ego is fragile and I've employed no fallacies, friend. 3: Cry more, prick.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 03:04 PM
0

I mean if you keep getting insulted all the time, maybe it's just that you're a prick? But if I had a fragile ego like you, I'd want to believe it was others who were wrong. For sure.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 02:52 PM
1

Spot on. Maybe in future you could incorporate that into your enormous (but empty) cranium and stop speaking like a complete wanker when you're clearly an idiot. Keep taking notes if it helps.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 02:45 PM
0

No, I'm describing your verbosity as verbosity. Google the word if you don't understand;). It's present in all of your comments and that's why you come across as a pretentious moron. It has nothing to do with your argument, I'm addressing your communication style. You could make the same argument and not appear a total dickweed but you seem incapable of doing that. That is correct. As I said, call it trolling if that protects your delicate ego. It doesn't make it untrue.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 02:42 PM
0

Ah, the old "I am rubber" defense with a bunch of verbosity, attempting to justify that you aren't, in fact, an utter moron. Again, it's not an ad hominem because I'm not disputing your argument. In fact, it's pointless to dispute your argument because you're an ignorant tit. What I'm saying is that you're not as smart as you think you are. That is my argument, so it can't be an ad hominem; I have no other argument. Call it trolling if that protects your delicate little ego but it doesn't make i…
/r/MensRights21/10/20 02:13 PM
0

Since my argument is that you're an idiot, that isn't actually true.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 01:53 PM
1

Jesus christ, you're thick.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 01:39 PM
0

That's correct. Felt you ought to know you come off as a pretentious moron.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 11:45 AM
1

It's not a counterpoint and I'm not the guy you replied to. I'm just telling you, you're not as intelligent as you think you are.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 10:46 AM
1

You are less intelligent than you think you are.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 09:30 AM
2

If you think you're in any way capable of fighting a man on even footing, you're a fool.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/10/20 02:17 PM
3

Or male dominated fields that they don't want to work in. Any equality for refuse collection, construction, iron mining or lumber production? No? Whyever not?
/r/MensRights29/09/20 12:08 PM
1

Vomit. "Positive energy" while accusing someone of being mentally ill for disagreeing. Does your cowardice know no limits? If you reply again, stay on topic
/r/MensRights27/09/20 02:59 PM
1

It's not a defense, you toad. I'm telling you that you don't understand your enemy and so you can't solve the problem. Morals are always subjective and I would not be friends with such a dishonest coward.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 02:57 PM
2

Vomit. "Positive energy" while accusing someone of being mentally ill for disagreeing. Does your cowardice know no limits? If you reply again, stay on topic
/r/MensRights27/09/20 02:00 PM
2

Might I recommend therapy? You may not, and you would do better than to attempt such a transparent ploy to win an argument. It's pathetic. Lol. I may be wrong tho, since your just a stranger on the internet and I know barely anything about you. Correct, in fact you know nothing about me. If you reply again, stay on topic instead of suggesting your opponent is mentally ill for disagreeing with you, moron.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 01:52 PM
1

Toxic masculinity isnt subjective, masculinity is subjective. I didn't ask you to define masculinity. I asked you to clearly define toxic and non-toxic masculinity, which you failed to do, claiming it is subjective. Now you say those concepts aren't subjective? Which is it? And, if they're not subjective, clearly define them. Degrading women for being women is not a subjective example of masculinity, Arguable, but I don't think the vast majority of men have a problem with that concept. What we d…
/r/MensRights27/09/20 12:47 PM
1

Sounds like you're assuming a lot about people's motivations for their actions. Sounds like you're evading the question of what you define as toxic and non-toxic by claiming it's subjective, because you know I'll be able able to pin you down. It also sounds like you're dictating what is and isn't manly while condemning others for doing the same. In fact, what it really sounds like is hypocrisy and poorly veiled attempts to coerce people into behaving the way you want them to and not the way they…
/r/MensRights27/09/20 11:06 AM
2

Why am I trying to clarify a term used to shame and belittle people? Isn't that obvious? If we're to be non-toxic I would like to know how that can be done. That requires clearly defining the term, otherwise it's open to subjective interpretation and abuse. Tell me what constitutes toxic masculinity and we can consider how to resolve the problem. Better yet, tell me what constitutes positive masculinity so we can embody it. But you can't, can you? It's just a "loose social construct", meaning yo…
/r/MensRights27/09/20 09:48 AM
2

So it's subjective and undefined? Because what one person may see as negative another may see as positive. If that's the case then it's a meaningless term, only useful to shame men we dislike into conformity.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 09:42 AM
6

So when is masculinity toxic or non-toxic? Clearly define the terms. I'm not saying you're defining me as toxic, I'm asking you to understand the terms you use so that you can then help me to understand them... And I don't think that you do.
/r/MensRights26/09/20 01:13 PM
11

No, describe what a non-toxic male looks like. How do they behave? What values and ideals do they hold? What qualities do they demonstrate? How can we fit this image of non-toxicity? Apparently you're suggesting that it's someone who never negatively affects anyone ever? Surely you must know that is preposterous. And you must also realise that no human, male or female, has ever achieved that? At the same time you must also realise that you just said the only view of masculinity which is harmful …
/r/MensRights26/09/20 01:08 PM
16

No, if you're going to use the term toxic masculinity, describe non-toxic masculinity. Clearly define the terms or they have no value. Alternatively, we'll stick with what you've just said and say that anyone using the term toxic masculinity is holding myself and others back and, therefore, they are wrong.
/r/MensRights26/09/20 11:02 AM
12

So what does non-toxic masculinity look like?
/r/MensRights26/09/20 10:39 AM
1

But the literature is firmly on my side here. No it isn't, because you're arguing with my position that this is not a technique that will brainwash people. If you agree with my position, then why are we conversing? That was how this started. Someone claimed it was a technique to implant the idea that women are good and men are bad into someone's head by the use of a spelling error. That is obviously ridiculous and completely unsupported by science. We can argue if it was deliberate or subliminal…
/r/MensRights04/09/20 08:56 PM
1

That's not a technique. You've just jumbled some psychological terms together and used them to argue that this typo is going to embed propagandist ideas in someone's subconscious. That is ridiculous. What you'll recall could just as easily be "they spelled women wrong" or "I met my wife in that lecture" or "I loved that sandwich". This is pure toss.
/r/MensRights04/09/20 05:03 PM
1

Then what would you call it, because it's not schema incongruence. It's a spelling error.
/r/MensRights04/09/20 04:56 PM
1

Again, what technique? This is a typo and so far I have seen no evidence for typos being able to embed ideas in someone's subconscious.
/r/MensRights04/09/20 04:54 PM
1

I'm studying for my doctorate in clinical psychology. Lots of things that are "super well-established" among laypeople are myths, particularly when it comes to psychology. Subliminal messaging is not well-evidenced. I've never seen any convincing evidence for its use either.
/r/MensRights04/09/20 09:13 AM
1

Schema incongruence is not the same thing as subliminal messaging.
/r/MensRights04/09/20 09:11 AM
-1

Noticing a mistake is not evidence that the mistake will embed the underlying message in your subconscious. The previous commenter asked for a scientific paper that evidenced this and none was provided.
/r/MensRights04/09/20 09:10 AM
15

Not a scientific journal So a shorter response would be "no".
/r/MensRights03/09/20 08:12 PM
1

No, I've been here a while, thank you. I just don't see what point you were making because it was poorly communicated.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/20 05:25 PM
-4

Everyone has morals and ethics, they just may not align with your's or society's. This is America's problem, really. Everything is so black and white, there's no room for nuance because everything in the country is so simplified. There is a huge difference between an average person who comes from a stable home and got a decent education and someone who comes from an ethnic group who were killed en masse and live in poverty. The psychological impact that alone (not that it's the only factor) is m…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/20 05:07 PM
1

So?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/20 04:56 PM
6

No it's not good to embrace because it isn't true. Being a self-absorbed narcissist who believes you deserve the same things as actual royalty is why these people are so entitled. They aren't getting treated like a queen because you aren't one. And you aren't a king. You're just some random dude. Accept yourself and believe in yourself, not that you're a bloody monarch and deserve everything without earning anything.
/r/MensRights29/07/20 07:11 AM
2

I've already done so and you've ignored it. So I do have better things to do than repeat myself ad nauseum. Goodbye.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/07/20 12:17 PM
2

More ignorance. No thankyou. You can re-read my comments and respond to what I actually said, rather than what you want me to say.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/07/20 12:07 PM
2

No, I've taken part and my point is clear and obvious. You're just unwilling to attempt to understand. It looks like I'm repeating myself because you're not actually listening to my reasoning. I'm not going to engage while that is the case.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/07/20 11:56 AM
1

I do. There is no debate in this. Only a clown would try to suggest that it isn't demeaning to everyone involved. Think whatever you like. As I say, go do porn, encourage your children to do porn. I'll enjoy wanking about your terrible family.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/07/20 11:41 AM
2

We're not going to agree and this discussion is pointless while you continually miss the point. I'm not responding to that massive wall of text, I have better things to do. If porn isn't demeaning, go do it. You'll make loads of money, way more than you do now. Applaud your son or daughter for participating in a gangbang, praise them for spending their time being covered in cum by strangers. What a proud, inspiring image. Jesus christ. What's the betting that you don't? 100%. Why? Cos it's demea…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/07/20 11:31 AM
2

No, it's not, as I explained. It's weird because it's demeaning. If that work was something to be proud of, it wouldn't be weird to show your family. Not at all. But sex isn't my job and I should be able to discuss my work and show my family. If I'm not able to do that, maybe there's something wrong with my job. If your job is porn then maybe it's because your job is taking a human, loving experience and demeaning yourself by monetizing it. Selling your flesh for the entertainment of horny stran…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/07/20 10:09 AM
1

Well it tells about what your immediate idea of porn is. No, it doesn't. As I explained. many would feel awkward about their family and friends watching their porn videos (which would be pretty weird) Oh is that maybe cos it's demeaning? Cos I don't feel awkward about showing my family and friends my work... Maybe it's cos my work isn't demeaning.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/07/20 09:04 AM
2

Not really, no. Unless you'd be proud of having your genitals flapping about so your family and colleagues can see them I'd say the whole thing is pretty demeaning. If anything it says that you're naive and stupid for thinking that porn is ever not demeaning to everyone involved. We just ignore it because we like wanking.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/07/20 08:28 AM
2

Well they didn't say that tho, did they? They said that her slut body is made for this. Since she is fucking random people for money she is a slut. In this case, saying her body was made for her job is a compliment. It's like telling a scientist his/her mind was made for research. The only way it's demeaning is if being a sex worker is something to be ashamed of... Is that your argument?
/r/PussyPassDenied16/07/20 08:18 AM
1

Idk about you but I'd find it pretty demeaning if someone spat in my butthole, filled it with dong, recorded it and then published it online for the entire world to see!
/r/PussyPassDenied16/07/20 08:08 AM
1

Mmmyeah unfortunately it is. Again, deluded.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/07/20 06:41 PM
1

No I'm saying referring to anyone based on their sexual status is either ok or it isn't. Men don't appreciate strangers commenting on their dick size and women don't appreciate strangers telling them their bodies are made for fucking. Lots of people enjoy their partners saying both. Either you keep your mouth shut about others' bodies or you don't tell others to be silent. It's not a complicated idea. Which is ironic really because you've totally missed the point while maintaining your delusion …
/r/PussyPassDenied15/07/20 06:12 PM
0

Not all of us have to imagine girlfriends mate. Don't worry, we all get lonely sometimes!
/r/PussyPassDenied15/07/20 05:55 PM
1

As do lots of women. What's your point? I mean, realistically this woman is a pornstar. It is her job to fuck for money. Telling her she's a slut whose body was made for this is like telling a scientist "You're a genius and your mind was made for this". It is a compliment, if you're literally a whore.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/07/20 05:14 PM
-5

Sure was!
/r/PussyPassDenied15/07/20 12:04 PM
5

To be fair a random person coming up to me and telling me I had a big dick would be met with confusion. I'd be offended that they thought it was appropriate to speak to a stranger like that and chose to sexualise me. My dick is none of their business. I imagine most men would feel the same unless they 1) knew the person and 2) felt attracted to them. Likewise, if you fulfill those two conditions, lots of women enjoy being degraded like that during sex. Men and women aren't as simplistic as you s…
/r/PussyPassDenied15/07/20 10:47 AM
-10

You ain't hanging with the right girls. My gf would love that.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/07/20 10:18 AM
0

The issue people have is that middle-aged people generally have a lot more life experience and wisdom than their younger counterparts. They also have more power and their age gives them authority. How many times have you done something because an older, more powerful person told you to do it? Now imagine you have mental health difficulties and they're housing you. Now imagine they're an international celebrity. Now imagine they're incredibly wealthy and married to an even bigger celebrity. Would…
/r/MensRights15/07/20 10:00 AM
2

No, the second meaning exists in all English speaking countries and most people do understand the difference just fine. It just doesn't make sense to say ephebophile because a large proportion of the population doesn't know what that is. Whereas everyone knows what a paedophile is.
/r/MensRights06/07/20 06:09 PM
1

Lol, what? Firstly those are two totally different things. The use of what you consider an inaccurate descriptor is not the same as a miscarriage of justice. Secondly, there are two meanings of the word. It's not incorrect, it is the alternative meaning. You understand it, I understand, everyone will understand it. Nobody's sitting here thinking "What, so she fucks pre-pubescent children? I thought he was 15?". That means the word is being used correctly because of its alternative use in common …
/r/MensRights06/07/20 03:27 PM
2

Paedophile has two meanings now. The technical meaning and the layperspn meaning. Most people don't know what an ephebophile or a hebophile are. They know a paedophile is someone who has sex with children. While that remains the case, people will describe anyone who has sex with an underage person a paedophile. You can get mad about it and change nothing or just accept it.
/r/MensRights06/07/20 11:35 AM
1

They're not particularly fine and that could be easily explained when the change is made.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/06/20 01:27 PM
1

Maybe she wouldn't have accused him if getting caught lying means 20 years in prison.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/06/20 06:31 PM
10

Evidence that the person intentionally made a false accusation. Usually texts or witnesses that show the accused made their claims maliciously.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/06/20 04:16 PM
5

People tend to think everyone is about as smart as them on average, and they overestimate their own intelligence. So, probably not. Used to work in neuropsychology and the amount of people close to a learning disability saying they were fairly smart was rather high.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/06/20 11:30 AM
1

Yes there is. It's called international law, which is what the human rights act is part of. The UN doesn't give a shit about your constitution. The right to free speech is enshrined in the human rights act. Please learn to follow a conversation.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/06/20 01:09 PM
1

It is not a human right to bear arms. If it was, you couldn't deprive "mentally defective" people (btw, really horrible, pejorative, outdated term) of the right to bear arms. No, I'm not talking about convicted felons. Regardless, even convicted felons can just pay someone without a conviction to buy one for them. I can blame the government for providing firearms to civilians because civilians are irresponsible morons. I can blame them for not following the methods of other countries which are p…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/06/20 12:44 PM
1

Yes, it is. You can't just say something is an opinion and make it immune to challenge.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/06/20 12:33 PM
2

Not really... You can tell because it's called "being a cunt" and not "responding appropriately".
/r/PussyPassDenied19/05/20 10:02 AM
0

Yes, all good examples of things that aren't acceptable opinions and qualify as hate speech.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/20 07:13 AM
1

Lol. No I don't. Nobody I know has ever been the victim of gun-related crime because it never happens here. So why would I have a personal stake in it? What you're misinterpreting as emotionality from the topic is actually just irritation at your blind ignorance. I've rebuffed every argument you've made and yet you remain steadfast in your commitment to allow irresponsible people to own guns and to make policing gun ownership utterly impossible. Your argument makes no sense and you have failed t…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/05/20 10:24 PM
0

People have a human right not to have violence incited upon them or to be victims of prejudice due to protected characteristics. If you want to drop N-bombs and say we should kill all Jewish people then, no, the UK is not for you.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/05/20 10:12 PM
0

Same as literally all other countries then. Are you gonna keep going, you human toilet? Or are you just gonna keep providing idiots with ways to kill innocent people?
/r/PussyPassDenied14/05/20 04:40 PM
0

Keep it to one chain, fuckwit. Sorry that I'm using actual facts instead of my feelings. That must be frustrating for you.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/05/20 03:46 PM
1

Aww bless him. The gun toting fuckwit has gotten angry. Again, what I'm telling you is my ability to by a gun is 1) irrelevant and 2) not actually impeded in any way because you won't find records of my mental health difficulties on file. Oopsie. You've just sold me a gun. Next time you sell a gun to a murderer, let me know how thorough your background checks are, you bigot 😂
/r/PussyPassDenied14/05/20 03:34 PM
-1

Yeah freedom of speech doesn't entitle you to override other human rights, unfortunately.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/05/20 02:47 PM
1

Yes we do. It's called the human rights act and overrides any national laws.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/05/20 01:08 PM
1

No but that is a huge part of the issue. The fact that it is completely legal for random civilians to carry firearms is a massive problem because it makes enforcing carrying laws impossible. And that's to say nothing of the fact that people with no criminal or psychiatric history are not, by default, responsible gun owners. That's a daft supposition and it gets people killed (and, ironically, casualties of firearm violence are more likely to be gun owners themselves). Take the UK for example. Ov…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/05/20 12:48 PM
1

My president is a prime minister and people call him a stupid fuck every day. Nothing happens. Next.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/05/20 12:37 PM
1

I'm sorry, you're making a complete balls-up of this. I'm not suggesting the system should be foolproof. I'm suggesting it should be somewhat effective. There are countless models, far more effective, that you could easily draw from but you don't. That is what I am suggesting, that you notice and rectify your inadequate, crappy system as best you can but you refuse because you have been brainwashed. You have at least 300,000 people known to have acquired a firearm and then used it to harm or kil…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/05/20 12:18 PM
0

Well it's weird because in Europe that's almost exactly what happens. There is virtually no gun crime because guns are all but outlawed... For exactly the reason we see in America. Innocent people are shot and killed every day to the point that America is almost as violent as Somalia. Lmfao. Obviously I don't expect it to be the case that a firearm is never discharged irresponsibly. Yet somehow, me saying "Your system is not effective and there are countless models which you can use which would …
/r/PussyPassDenied14/05/20 12:06 PM
1

7% of that figure is 20,000 people. 20,000 people slipped through the net of your "extensive" background checks. Not to mention the fact that they clearly aren't fucking effective if 287,000 people can just get them via different means. Dipass.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/05/20 11:45 AM
-1

No I look at the effectiveness of background checks and whether or not guns end up in the hands of responsible people in America. They do not. The background checks that do exist are inconsistent and ineffective. You literally have to be the biggest moron to see that your gun control strategies are total shit compared to the rest of the civilised world.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/05/20 11:24 AM
0

Oh yeah it's so extensive. That's why numerous people with psychiatric histories have managed to purchase guns legally and criminals find it so difficult to get firearms. Guess I must be mistaken. There mustn't be anything wrong with American firearm legislation. Perhaps the statistics about violent crime in America are wrong and it's not just below fucking Somalia.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/05/20 11:07 AM
-3

Well I would because there are basically no background checks. Not that I'd want to because I'm not a coward. I'm always quite amazed at how weak some people on this website are. You have no valid response to what I've said so you stalk my post history so you can make a completely irrelevant personal attack? Am I supposed to be so ashamed that I'll suddenly concede that you're correct? That young children and innocent adults aren't being murdered because I was depressed years ago? Reflect on you…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/05/20 10:38 AM
-6

I have freedom of speech which is why I'm free to tell you that American gun laws are retarded. Every last one of you is responsible for every innocent child who dies because some spastic bought a gun with basically no vetting. So, no, the rest of the world won't sit down. We'd be laughing at you if it wasn't for kids being shot during fingerpainting. Children, even American ones, don't deserve to die. The sooner you realise that you've been brainwashed and all these stories you're told about fr…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/05/20 10:22 AM
9

Or currently when she is already cheating on him.
/r/MensRights14/05/20 12:03 AM
-1

Yes but you actually didn't.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/05/20 02:35 PM
-2

*Worked in neuropsychology. I'm studying for my doctorate now, petal. You seem insistent on demonstrating your inability to read.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/05/20 07:34 AM
0

Sure ya did, champ. If you had the ability to take part in this conversation you'd notice your boyfriend called me an ignorant liar before I huwt his feewings.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/05/20 06:42 AM
1

No, I just told you how that study does not support your claims at all. Not that I should have to since I've forgotten more than you've read on this subject. Again, define what you're measuring properly or don't bother. Of all chess players approximately 15% are women and, of that 15%, the majority aren't likely to have as much experience as their male counterparts. The fact that 2% of the top players are women makes sense when you also account for the fact the male cognitive bell curve is sligh…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/05/20 03:27 AM
-2

Yeah so I used to work in neuropsychology and there isn't "truckloads" of evidence for men's brains being structurally predisposed to tactical and strategic awareness. Men do better in strategic games? I mean, christ, what are you even measuring there? I'm not even bothering with that until you make that more clear. Bear in mind you have to define the game, adjust for gender ratio and individual experience, qualify performance metrics... And even then, you're measuring their skill at that specif…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/05/20 03:05 AM
0

True, I can witness it second hand in you. Perhaps I should take notes.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/05/20 02:19 AM
2

Imagine being this much of a pussy lmaoooooooooo
/r/PussyPassDenied09/05/20 01:46 AM
0

No, someone's calling you out for being spineless. Trying to be a big boi when your opponent is hundreds of miles away but failing to do so in person does not help your cause.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/05/20 11:44 PM
0

I mean, that says it all. You think I'm trying to be tough by saying I'd challenge someone academically? What kind of loser thinks something like that takes courage? Grow a pair of testicles or do what you do best and keep your mouth shut.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/05/20 11:29 PM
0

Mens brains appear to be structured in a way that predisposes them to better strategic/tactical awareness. Absolutely no evidence for that whatsoever.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/05/20 11:03 PM
0

Not everyone is a coward like you.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/05/20 10:53 PM
3

That is absolute nonsense.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 02:49 PM
3

Hard disagree. If you're a ham planet who fell out of the ugly tree and you mock men, particularly those seeking equality, it's pretty reasonable to assume your position is borne of bitterness and hatred of the opposite gender. Also, you aren't obligated to show people who stoop to insults and mockery any decency. You aren't better than them for doing that and nobody is going to be swayed by your passivity. If someone attacks you it isn't a moral victory to stand there and take it. That's what m…
/r/MensRights28/04/20 08:33 PM
1

Don't bother. There's no basis for it in science.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/20 09:02 PM
2

Another response that makes no sense. Perhaps if you learned to communicate like a grown-up instead of a widdle boy you'd have some ability to function in this conversation. Would you like to start again without being a petulant little cunt and making assumptions about people you don't know? Or shall you continue to embarrass yourself, boy?
/r/MensRights16/04/20 11:28 AM
2

you can’t boy someone when you’re acting like a angsty teen trying to tell grown men how the world works More irony from the little boy. if you’re not a zooming as 90s and over child why the hell are you arguing about there not being a time when people could be human? This sentence doesn't make any sense. What's my agenda, boy? What is it I'm trying to achieve, little boy?
/r/MensRights16/04/20 11:08 AM
1

No you don't. Lol. You don't know my age or anything about me and calling me presumptuous after that is ironic to the point of idiocy. How have I told you your experiences are invalid, fuckstick? I've told you that your beliefs are stupid. There's one child here and it's the one who thinks covering people in piss is somehow the ideal. Boy. We can continue when you stop your petulant ignorance.
/r/MensRights16/04/20 10:22 AM
0

That sounds like a great time to be alive. Everyone covered in piss. It sounds so much better. Let's go back to that. Look dude, you don't know shit about me. I know you think you do, but you don't. What you did as a child is really not relevant here because a child doesn't understand the wider world around them. Which is why you don't understand that freedom to act however you wanted was not true then, just as it isn't now and has never been. Time to grow up and face reality!
/r/MensRights16/04/20 08:42 AM
3

No you literally just don't understand my argument at all. I've explained it twice and you don't get it. And now you're being a judgemental little bitch so thankyou for proving my point anyway. The live and let live crowd truly is a bastion of calm, rational action. You insult someone because you don't understand what they're saying. Lol. "I make gut judgements but I hardly ever voice them" - voices it immediately afterwards.
/r/MensRights16/04/20 07:59 AM
2

No there wasn't. That's complete nonsense. That time no more existed in the past than in the present. Calling someone a son of a bitch does and has always depended on context; the speaker, the tone, the receiver, the place. Were there? When was this magical time? Was it the time when the germans were exterminating Jewish people or when the whole western world was enslaving black people? Longer ago, when we lived in shitty mud shacks or more recently when you were called a communist for having li…
/r/MensRights16/04/20 07:57 AM
4

I don't think that you understand what I'm saying.
/r/MensRights16/04/20 07:46 AM
7

No, I know some of us are. But the "days where people lived and let live" never existed. Humans have always been judgemental and tried to control those around them. Wishing for them to return is like wishing for the days of the robots to return. It doesn't make any sense.
/r/MensRights16/04/20 07:39 AM
6

Those days never existed.
/r/MensRights16/04/20 07:18 AM
7

A crime because a sexual offence is a crime, you spacker.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 07:57 PM
22

Guy with long hair here. I shower every day. You don't need to shampoo every time you shower. I wash my hair once every three or four days, I still shower.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 02:37 AM
1

Ah good plan! I don't know as much about the US pathway tbf but knowing where you want to end up will help in getting good experience and choosing classes. Good luck!
/r/MensRights11/04/20 11:06 AM
1

I'm currently studying for my DClinPsy now, after which I will be a fully qualified clinical psychologist. The DClinPsy is slightly different to a PhD, many of my cohort already have PhDs or Master's degrees. It took me five years to get accepted onto it following my bachelor's which is a bit longer than some but not as many as others. Average is between 3-5 years, I'd say. It's a good plan but it is very competitive, in the UK at least. Where are you from? Is it clinical psych you want to go in…
/r/MensRights11/04/20 01:46 AM
3

Copying this from a response I made to someone else: You can get into pretty decent paying careers with psychology but most don't. That's the reason for the low pay. Most psychology graduates don't work in the field. Clinical psychologists, educational psychologists and those that go into business can earn quite a lot. Because it's such a popular degree, however, being successful requires a massive amount of commitment and a high level of competition. Source: am a psychologist.
/r/MensRights10/04/20 12:17 PM
41

You can get into pretty decent paying careers with psychology but most don't. That's the reason for the low pay. Most psychology graduates don't work in the field. Clinical psychologists, educational psychologists and those that go into business can earn quite a lot. Because it's such a popular degree, however, being successful requires a massive amount of commitment and a high level of competition. Source: am a psychologist.
/r/MensRights10/04/20 12:15 PM
3

Yes that would be lovely. Maybe the clouds could rain gummy bears and diabetes could be curable and we could all live in golden mansions made of stars. In reality, however, women take men's money in divorces guilt-free. They show no signs of stopping and have never shown any signs of stopping in all the years we just placidly let them. So, if they're going to continue doing that, men should show them how it feels. If they want to stop, I'm sure men would be happy to agree. It's not about wanting…
/r/MensRights07/04/20 11:13 PM
1

This is the same mindset that feminists have whenever a women rapes a man and excuse it as "well since they always rape women it's only fair women rapes men a little" It's not even a little bit similar to that. I don't think that it's fair that men get screwed in court It is if women do too, that is what fairness is. Everybody being treated equally. I also don't want women screwed in court Neither do I. But, if they insist on screwing us, we can screw them back and see how they like it. It's eit…
/r/MensRights07/04/20 11:11 PM
2

Yes and while it's still happening to men it should be happening to women. That is equality. When it stops happening to men it will stop happening to women. Do you not understand what equality means? It doesn't mean men suffering to be "better people". That's what we've done for millenia and, in case you hadn't noticed, nobody cares anymore.
/r/MensRights07/04/20 07:18 PM
8

How is it? This is equality. If you want to do this to men, then it's only fair that women are treated the same.
/r/MensRights07/04/20 07:11 PM
1

No, she is responsible for herself you fucking toad. Otherwise Andy Dick isn't responsible for himself either and we have to go back in a long chain of endless causality and the big fucking bang is responsible for Hartman's life and death and all of our actions. She shot him. She is responsible. Andy Dick is a cock who gave a drug addict drugs and was then a douche about it. That's the end of it. He got his head smashed into the bar for being a twat, he bears no responsibility for her actions, o…
/r/MensRights28/03/20 05:00 PM
1

Lmao, what do I have to confront? Andy Dick is an asshole and deserved to get his head smashed into a bar. Hartman's wife, and only Hartman's wife, is responsible for his death. Stop blaming a man for the actions of a woman.
/r/MensRights28/03/20 01:10 PM
1

Because it's a wall of text containing nothing but you being a psychopath. No rebuttal required.
/r/MensRights27/03/20 09:14 PM
0

Ok nutter.
/r/MensRights27/03/20 11:26 AM
3

I mean, Andy Dick didn't shoot Phil Hartman in the head, his wife did. Andy Dick gave a drug addict some drugs, he deserves to have his head smashed into a bar. I feel like in this sub of all places we probably shouldn't hold a man responsible for the actions of a woman. *She* lost control of her life, *she* didn't take responsibility for it and get help and *she* shot an innocent man in the head while he slept. Andy Dick deserved to have his head smashed into a bar but let's not forget who did …
/r/MensRights26/03/20 08:36 PM
13

What makes you say that?
/r/MensRights26/03/20 02:57 PM
4

Or don't get married to a mentally unstable drug addict.
/r/MensRights26/03/20 02:39 PM
11

"Lovitz then smashed Dick's head into the bar" Seems fair.
/r/MensRights26/03/20 02:38 PM
6

He was being sarcastic.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 10:09 AM
24

It's just two words, man up.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 10:07 AM
3

That's the joke.
/r/MensRights12/03/20 07:13 AM
10

Some people find mutilated dicks nasty but whatever :)
/r/MensRights03/03/20 08:44 AM
3

Nah, I know. I was kidding.
/r/MensRights29/02/20 11:19 AM
51

Sure you can. Leave the country.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 05:42 PM
3

Yeah until he jams his fist into your kid's asshole which now needs reconstructive surgery cos they can't shit and a psychologist cos their dad was chill with letting a known paedophile live next door. Congrats, you're a retard and ruined your child's life. Would you like to play again?
/r/MensRights30/01/20 10:05 PM
0

The gratification is the penetration you're recording. The recording is a part of that act which your partner would not consent to if they were aware. Context of a sex act is part of the act and an act in it's own right depending on circumstances. While someone may consent to having sex in their bedroom, tricking them into having sex in a public space is sexual assault because they did not consent to witnesses. Tricking them into recording it is sexual assault by the same token because they did …
/r/MensRights30/01/20 03:26 PM
0

It is performed by both parties without the consent of one of them and absolutely is for the purpose of sexual gratification. Let's put it a different way. I have recordings of your wife, mother, daughter and/or sister having sex. My motives are consistent with my personal values and, as such, are irrelevant. By your logic, that is acceptable to you?
/r/MensRights30/01/20 03:11 PM
1

Yes it is.
/r/MensRights30/01/20 02:53 PM
0

Recording the two of you not touching is not recording you having sex, is it?
/r/MensRights30/01/20 02:52 PM
0

It clearly says coercing a person to engage in a sex act against their will. Recording a sex act is also a sex act in itself.
/r/MensRights30/01/20 02:52 PM
1

Nor does there have to be. Nor is there anything about choking, anal sex or insemination. All of those are specific sex acts that require consent in order to perform, same as recording the activity.
/r/MensRights30/01/20 02:48 PM
0

Yes it should.
/r/MensRights30/01/20 02:47 PM
0

No I didn't though. They're all there in the definition. You don't have to satisfy all criteria, it clearly says "or".
/r/MensRights30/01/20 02:46 PM
0

From your own article (emphasis mine): Sexual assault is an act in which a person intentionally sexually touches another person without that person's consent, or coerces or physically forces a person to engage in a sexual act against their will. This fits within that definition. Coercing someone to engage in recording sexual activity on video by not allowing them informed consent. Oops, you're wrong.
/r/MensRights30/01/20 02:37 PM
0

You can film it. You can ask for consent to film in order to protect yourself. If she says no, you don't have sex. But you don't want to do that. You want to have sex... So you don't ask in case she says no. Congrats, you are a sexual predator. If you're so frightened, stick to your values. Record every interaction and don't have sex unless you have her consent to film. Let it play out. Obviously you won't, cos nobody will say yes and you'll end up alone. Obviously men getting charged for rape c…
/r/MensRights30/01/20 02:27 PM
1

Yes it is.
/r/MensRights30/01/20 02:11 PM
1

No it doesn't. Ask for consent, if you don't have it, you can't record. If you go on to record anyway, it's creepy and fucked up. But that requires you to sacrifice your own sexual gratification for your principles and you are not prepared to do that. That's what's fucking creepy. You're all principled and moral until you can't cum, then you'll do whatever it takes. That's fucking sad and you need to reflect on that. You are making this harder for men everywhere by behaving exactly how feminists…
/r/MensRights30/01/20 02:11 PM
0

Yes he is. Recording someone having sex without their consent is sexual assault.
/r/MensRights30/01/20 02:09 PM
0

A man illegally recording someone without their consent while they participate in sex. Don't try and make it sound ok, say exactly what it is. If you want that insurance policy, you ask her. If she says no, you don't record it. Whether or not you proceed to have sex is up to you but advocating for "discreet" (illegal, immoral and predatory) recording is fucking disgusting.
/r/MensRights30/01/20 02:08 PM
0

I do find it quite ironic that people so opposed to feminism like to emulate feminist strategies so completely. OP is advocating sexually assaulting innocent people, recording them naked engaging in sex acts without their consent, and this is equality? This is done on the assumption that they may at some point accuse you of sexual assault themselves (a risk which is extremely low). You would criticise women who suggest that because some men rape, all men should be feared so why are you behaving …
/r/MensRights30/01/20 02:05 PM
1

okay, now being iamverysmart. No man, I'm stating facts. You want to bring up my character, so we'll discuss my character. You don't want to talk about it then don't bring it up. Wait for it, may be. Pretty sure I won't. But maybe! Either way, I'm not letting fear turn me into a sex-offender. You can, I'm not. Looks like if any of women out of 37 get some benefit of accusing you, I will rather take their side now. Good for you. I'm pretty sure they won't though. You always seems to be okay will …
/r/MensRights30/01/20 11:38 AM
1

In all cases, both parties get fucked. I know that. Again, you are misinterpreting what I'm saying and discussing something completely off point. I'm not addressing this again. Women too exploit pics or videos of men they fuck. Never said they didn't. Now, if they do, it's illegal. Good news for everyone. Correcting your perception. Because that is also important. No but you're not correcting my perception because you've misunderstood my perception. Except that video recordings exonerated men of…
/r/MensRights30/01/20 11:27 AM
1

Because you went about women getting fucked. Men is also getting fucked there. You're misinterpreting what I'm saying and making a tangential, irrelevant argument about something I'm not even suggesting. Men get fucked, women get fucked. Sometimes men are recorded getting fucked. Sometimes women are. In this case you would be recording a woman fucking/getting fucked by a man. Always talk as if men are the persons doing it, as if women are not equally active participants. Again, arguing with a po…
/r/MensRights30/01/20 11:08 AM
0

Sex is not something men do to women. Women equally do it to men. And both genders actively participate in that act. Yeah not sure what point you're trying to make here. If you're recording someone without their consent, you are recording them having sex. That is not an acceptable thing to do. Mostly, in current environment only men suffer. Women get a free pass on false accusation after wilful orgies. Yes, at the moment we are. Which is why we need to continue trying to raise awareness and conv…
/r/MensRights30/01/20 10:43 AM
1

It won't happen as long as we permit that behaviour. I'm sure neither you nor I would advocate that such an event is acceptable but many are undecided or disagree on the subject of rape and due process. It's an emotionally charged issue with a lot of real victims not receiving justice and a lot of innocent people falsely convicted. The problem is a deeper one and there is no easy answer. So what do people do? They try to simplify it to reduce effort. Believe all women or record all your interact…
/r/MensRights30/01/20 10:30 AM
2

I mean... As it should be. There are plenty of valid issues on this sub but this is not one. All sexual activity should be consensual, including obtaining video recordings of someone in a vulnerable, explicit act. In the context of the Cyprus case, there is an issue of false claims and difficulty defending yourselves from accusations. That's true and that needs attention... That doesn't mean that things which are clearly dangerous for society should not be prohibited by law. The application of t…
/r/MensRights30/01/20 10:21 AM
3

The average feminist does absolutely nothing to address male inequalities until challenged on the subject. Then all they'll do is pay lip service and say "Yes that would be good if someone - not me - did something about that".
/r/MensRights18/01/20 11:25 AM
1

Why are you both assuming I wouldn't call out a woman for the exact same thing? You two are just as bad as the whiny feminists you claim to hate. Building strawmen then crying that these phantoms you created are being mean to you.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 03:44 PM
1

No, there's absolutely no point to lots of things you do... And yet...
/r/MensRights16/01/20 03:12 PM
2

Yeah it took loads of effort to look on your profile and see that your most recent post (a month ago, as you say), is you whining like a bitch because people don't see you as masculine - which you aren't. Petulant is not the same as petty, darling. I'm very petty, not very petulant. I am but a mirror, Lethn. I return into the universe what the universe gives to me. When I see a twat, I present a twat. Edit: Never claimed to be mature. I'm not.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 03:03 PM
0

God, when he gave me the ability to detect weakness and cowardice. Not only is that not manly, it's not even womanly.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 03:00 PM
1

No it's how I look to you, you being a whiny child. I am consistent about it. Pls learn to read good. I'm not interested in your opinion of me to be particularly honest. If you don't want to hear why you are a detriment to the movement, it doesn't hurt me. You aren't making a simple comment, you are misrepresenting someone who is offering minor changes to argumentation so that it is more effective. If you actually care about reproductive rights you would do well not to be such a petulant shit ab…
/r/MensRights16/01/20 02:58 PM
0

Having a dick doesn't make you a man. It makes you a male.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 02:27 PM
-1

And where do I ignore what women say? Where have I given my opinion to you on statements women make? If a woman said something like this I'd say she was self-absorbed and overly emotive. Just like a man. Maybe stop making assumptions about what people are saying and they wouldn't sound like cunts. What I'm asking is that people use sound argumentation rather than their feelings to convince others. That applies to both genders but I don't see a woman doing that here, I see a man. When I see a wom…
/r/MensRights16/01/20 02:19 PM
1

I never said it was acceptable for women to be selfish? I said if you want to convince people you have to get them on board and not alienate them. If you talk about murdering babies that will irritate some people and they won't help you. If you talk about your own self-interest that will irritate some people and they won't help you.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 02:05 PM
16

Men need reproductive rights but I'd maybe consider reframing this in a less antagonistic way? People are unlikely to be convinced by emotive, self-interested language. It might be more effective as what men or people need, rather than you or an individual. And people disagree very strongly on the abortion side of things, especially when you start talking about killing babies. That will alienate pro-choice people. If you want as many people as possible to support male reproductive rights it has …
/r/MensRights16/01/20 10:05 AM
9

It's not though. One needs to have leverage to apply force. Some ham planet cat farmer doesn't have any leverage to try this shit. Converesely, nobody with leverage needs dating strategies because they have value already. These are human toilets trying to delude themselves into believing that the reason they're single is poor strategy and not poor quality.
/r/MensRights08/12/19 05:30 AM
3

No I accused you of not being calm because you immediately became defensive when I pointed out that no uncircumcised men would choose to be circumcised. You began insulting my penis and making personal attacks straight away, after you had told me to calm down for no apparent reason. Just think it's ironic and idiotic. Yeah, your parents disfigured your cock with a knife. I'd say that fits the bill. Lol... Social benefits? You can't participate in this discussion without screaming like a nutcase.…
/r/MensRights02/12/19 04:23 PM
3

Wow. So... You're so calm about this that you stalk my profile and attack me for having a mental health condition (totally unrelated to my beautiful, intact penis) because you can't confront the fact that you've been mutilated. Again, the foreskin is necessary and there are no benefits to circumcision unless you have phimosis. You were mutilated by your parents as an infant.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 04:16 PM
2

Actually it protects the glans from infection and abrasion, provides mechanical lubrication during sex, has thousands of nerve endings which increase sensitivity and protects your glans from becoming over-sensitised which further reduces penis sensitivity. It looks weird to you because your mutilated penis is what you've seen your whole life. It's called the mere exposure effect. Unlike you, I am calm because, unlike you, my parents didn't cut off part of my dick for no reason when I was a helpl…
/r/MensRights02/12/19 04:10 PM
3

Of course you don't have complaints. You have nothing to compare it to and had no choice in the matter. You have to justify it otherwise you have to confront what was done to you without permission. What's interesting is not how many circumcised men are ok with it (it will likely be most for the reasons above) but how many uncircumcised men would choose it for themselves with no medical reason. The number is negligible.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 03:48 PM
1

I guess if you have no self respect, sure.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 11:53 AM
-1

Bit embarrassing for you.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 04:22 AM
1

I've read a lot more than you and I would like you to explain your position. Yes, we are done, that's what I said. Don't reply unless you have something useful to contribute.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 10:33 AM
3

Dude..I said most not all. And how do you know that? Our biology is different. Please explain to me how our biology makes this acceptable? I work in healthcare but you're obviously an expert and I must have missed this somewhere. I'd love you to share your knowledge. If your SO touches your penis while asleep and you freak out and start ranting about consent you have issues bro. No, if that happens then I didn't consent and if she or anyone else doesn't like that it's their problem, including yo…
/r/MensRights06/11/19 12:25 PM
0

Sorry, have you spoken to most men or are you saying you enjoy having your genitals touched while asleep? Cos I don't and I know plenty of dudes who don't. I also know a lot of women who do like it. Stop making assumptions and judgements based on your limited worldview. I mean, fuck, you even claim he didn't feel victimized with no information to support that idea. It's one thing to say consent culture has created a bunch of snowflakes but the rest of what you said is either baseless or unsuppor…
/r/MensRights06/11/19 10:36 AM
8

Why engage with you? There's nothing less rational than smashing your head into a brick wall. You're not prepared to change your mind so why waste effort?
/r/MensRights04/11/19 06:31 PM
22

Whynotboth.png
/r/MensRights14/10/19 04:45 PM
1

Yeah you really don't understand the realities of adoption at all. Not only are you wrong (despite no actual stats being provided) but you're also very naive. Maybe work in a mental health service for looked-after children for a while and see if you still think it's a good idea.
/r/MensRights07/10/19 10:27 PM
-7

Plenty of people want to adopt children. No they don't. There are plenty of children already up for adoption that will never have a loving home. You want to force more children into that life?
/r/MensRights05/10/19 10:28 AM
3

I remember that episode. What's even more ridiculous is that the character is encouraged by their colleagues to be with the person who raped them as a child. Absolutely fucked.
/r/MensRights23/09/19 07:50 PM
54

He was pointing out your no true Scotsman fallacy so I think a woosh is appropriate here.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 09:26 AM
2

Again, it's not the same. You chose to put yourself in that position and could go home at any point, as you admit. Choosing to go without something is not the same as being forced. Deciding not to eat gluten does not make me gluten intolerant.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 11:38 AM
1

This really isn't the same thing as being homeless. What a ridiculous thing to say. It's like saying going camping means you're homeless, or going on holiday makes you a citizen of that country.
/r/MensRights09/09/19 10:02 PM
5

So it's not that tough then?
/r/MensRights09/09/19 05:33 AM
21

If her answer didn't impress you that's concerning. What if something happened and you were unable to continue in your career?
/r/MensRights06/09/19 10:17 AM
123

Might wanna start being sexually active now, first!
/r/MensRights23/08/19 12:41 PM
5

In fairness to them, they are playing against teams who are actually good.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 07:16 AM
7

Not really. They're not as good. They're already paid unfairly high and complain that they don't get enough. If they really want, we can make it truly equal and see how they like that.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 07:13 AM
7

Those that have are finding that they're underpaying men.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 07:11 AM
3

I can't... That's weird :/ ... Unless your mom's hot, then it's cool.
/r/MensRights28/07/19 02:36 AM
1

No you can't but the other person doesn't know you can't.
/r/MensRights27/07/19 12:01 AM
9

Some people appear to be awake when they are not. I sleepwalk on very rare occasions. My eyes will be open and I will respond. Absolutely possible that his partner thought he was awake.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 07:48 PM
7

Implied consent is a thing.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 07:47 PM
15

I know you're joking but if I spent a whole afternoon making those pieces of shit I'd destroy them and myself with fire.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 03:53 PM
1

I am grown up. I'm an adult man who has met adult women. Shame you can't say the same. No, you can't. What you can do is jam your fingers in your ears and say "lalala, I'm not listening". You're certainly welcome to do that but it won't stop me challenging you and you will lose the argument. You will also lose at life because you will remain an unhappy, lonely sexist. Life is too short. Leave your basement, speak to a woman without being an asshole. Maybe learn how periods work. Idk, just stop b…
/r/MensRights10/07/19 11:28 PM
1

Hey Mr. Psychologist, how likely is it that a person with some serious mental issue might concoct an identity where they are a successful professional, and then consistently use that identity to post on the internet over a long period of time? Extremely unlikely. The prevalence of delusional beliefs is extraordinarily low and generally not consistently present every day over a period of over five years. Those beliefs also don't materialise ID cards with my name and job title on them. A better qu…
/r/MensRights10/07/19 11:20 PM
1

Your inability to dispute what I'm saying does not constitute muddying the discussion. Both myself and others feel that what you said was sexist. Regardless, you can't stop me from challenging you, and you won't. Pointing out that someone might disagree with you regarding your own mom is not a controversial statement No, what was controversial was that you said you've never met a hardworking woman and implied that the other person's mother did not work hard because she is a woman. Now... Maybe y…
/r/MensRights10/07/19 11:11 PM
1

One random person who for years has repeatedly stated over and over that his one and only profession is a psychologist. You can check my post history if you like (I wouldn't though, I'm an awful human being), I even posted my ID for someone once! You should maybe base your assertions on evidence from people who actually know what they're talking about, not sexist observations made from a paucity of experience. I have met far more women than you ever will. Not just because of my profession but al…
/r/MensRights10/07/19 11:06 PM
1

Great, and now we're talking about mine because they conflict with yours. And, since I undoubtedly have far more contact with women in every possible setting than you do, my observations outweigh yours in terms of validity. Now that you know women work hard, we can put your stupid theory to rest. :) My female dominated field is psychology. I am a psychologist.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 10:05 PM
1

If I said "your mom might be a [insert a bunch of offensive insults here]" then you'd have a point. I just said people might disagree with his biased opinion of his own mommy. Irrelevant. The implication was that she didn't work hard and that implication was based on nothing other than the fact that she is a woman - your earlier comment said you have never seen a woman work hard. Well I have and I am telling you, you are sexist. You can't use people you are so close to as examples. Yes you can. …
/r/MensRights10/07/19 10:02 PM
1

If you want to make a point about hardworking women you need to pick an example other than your mommy. I work with hundreds of women and my field is dominated by them. They generally work as hard as the men, as far as I can tell, including the ones I dislike and don't respect. Many work harder (though sometimes less efficiently) and others don't work as hard. On the whole, they do their jobs well. There's your example. Now fuck off and stop being a pedantic sexist.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 09:54 PM
2

I can read just fine thanks. How about a little demonstration? You might be a colossal fuckwit. It's hard to tell but you just might be the biggest dickhead in the world. You might not be, of course. Some would even say it's impossible to tell. But you definitely might and we can't discount that potential reality. Do you see how language often carries an implication? Does it seem like I'm open to both possibilities equally there or does it seem more like I think you're a subhuman piece of shit? …
/r/MensRights10/07/19 09:49 PM
4

No, you need to accept that you're sexist and using equality as a mask for your hatred of women. People like you are why this movement is failing. You can't just claim people who worked with his mother would disagree that she was hardworking based on no information other than she is 1) a woman and 2) this guy's parent. Well, you can, but it makes you a fucking sexist twat. I work with almost exclusively women and some of them work extremely hard - harder than I do. Some give the impression of wo…
/r/MensRights10/07/19 09:35 PM
3

Easy. :(
/r/MensRights10/07/19 09:32 PM
1

This is from the UK but I'm certain we have the same rules.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 12:35 PM
9

I feel that being a dad, calling someone your son- that's taking about a relationship with another person. That refers to everything that rolls up into being a parent. That is what you feel. Many do not. I have absolutely no interest in raising a random person. Part of the excitement of having a child, for me, is making another human being who is the union of myself and my partner. I also want some part of myself to live on after I'm gone... Not just my words and actions but an actual part of my…
/r/MensRights03/07/19 01:43 PM
13

To be fair, I honestly can't say with all certainty... But I imagine those memories would be tainted quite horribly. I'm prone to intrusive thoughts as it is and I know infidelity is a massive trigger for me due to past experiences. See... It's not just that the child isn't mine. If I'd agreed to it then maybe I wouldn't mind and we could have a cool relationship... But I didn't. Every time I looked at the boy I raised for eight years I would see the woman I loved having sex with someone else in…
/r/MensRights03/07/19 01:23 PM
18

Except he may not consider the child his child... Adoption is nice and all and if you value that bond - great. Personally I have zero interest in raising another man's child. It's a huge investment in time and money, one many would not choose and would absolutely resent if tricked into doing so.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 01:00 PM
1

Because there is nothing to dispute AS YOU HAVE ABANDONED YOUR FUCKING ARGUMENTS YOU STUPID PRICK. Good girl. Off you pop. I win.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 11:38 AM
0

Again with more insults Yes more insults because you are fucking irritating me with your persistent inability to engage in honest discussion. I've already agreed that I am now choosing to insult you, you oversensitive little bitch. I've disputed all of your points and you still use them I'm still using them precisely because you have failed to dispute them, you colossal dipshit. All you do is go "What about this irrelevant thing? So you're saying this thing which you obviously aren't and have re…
/r/MensRights18/06/19 11:35 AM
0

Again you keep insulting me whole claiming you aren't. If you consider a description of your behaviour an insult then maybe you need to stop behaving so poorly. At this point the insults alone have completely destroyed what little validity your argument held. Stop making excuses. Your emotions have no bearing on whether or not what I'm saying is true. I'm sick of hearing about them and they are irrelevant. Stop acting like a child. I haven't abandoned a single one of my points and bring them bac…
/r/MensRights18/06/19 11:20 AM
0

You claim I've abandoned all of my points, which is just untrue Then where are they? Why are we discussing the validity of the generalisation rather than whether generalisations are acceptable? Oh yes, because you abandoned your points and stopped discussing them. said you didn't insult me while insulting me in the same sentence I haven't insulted you. Either you are a liar or you can't follow conversations, since you have misrepresented what has happened in this one. You can pick one or the oth…
/r/MensRights18/06/19 11:09 AM
1

Again I'd rather deal with that than risk getting raped or violently assaulted. Living in constant fear of that is damaging too, as well as the treatment by custodial staff. All I said was that women don't have it harder in prison. I didn't say they have it easier. Both are hard, in different ways. Personally I'd probably choose to be in a female prisoner rather than a male. Some would not. But both would definitely suck. Hm, I can imagine that tbh.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 09:12 AM
0

So I simply mention something else and that must mean I lost? No, you simply dropping every point you have and then moving onto an irrelevant topic means you've lost. If you don't address what I'm saying and bring up tangential issues I'll take that to be abandonment of your position. I'm not interested in discussing other topics that are not relevant. And again, insulting me makes your argument seem less valid. It may seem less valid but it isn't. Your emotions aren't facts. And again, I haven'…
/r/MensRights18/06/19 09:08 AM
2

I mean, I don't know about you but I'd rather be called a cunt or have my possessions stolen than be raped or have my legs broken. I'm not saying it's not bad but let's not compare the two. Pretty sure being raped or nearly murdered is fairly emotionally damaging too. I'm a psychologist too, though I haven't worked in prison settings.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 08:58 AM
0

You did lose the dispute. You were unable to defend your idea that people should not use generalisations so you've moved onto a different topic - whether or not the generalisation is true. That was not part of our conversation so you are starting a new one. That means you have abandoned your previous position because you lost it. Very few eomen I've met actually duscourage men from doing those things, and in fact often ENCOURAGE it. Speech and behaviour are two different things. I've known women…
/r/MensRights18/06/19 07:56 AM
0

The initial claim is that women care more about things like bake sales, buying presents and cards and doing household errands and don't allow men to do it because they don't believe men can do it effectively. Therefore they inadvertently make themselves primarily responsible for household labour by disallowing men to participate. I didn't make that claim, so I have no burden of proof. Subjectively, I agree. Anecdotally, that seems accurate. I have heard many women say they don't trust others to …
/r/MensRights18/06/19 07:45 AM
1

OK, so they're "just awful" to each other. How often do they rape or seriously physically assault one another? And can you provide statistics? If you don't have any to hand I'll research it myself.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 07:34 AM
0

I don't need to. You haven't backed up your statement. I can't dispute an argument that isn't presented.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 07:32 AM
0

I don't need one. All you said is "It's not true". All I am required to say is "Yes it is".
/r/MensRights18/06/19 06:53 AM
0

Unnecessary to provide a better one.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 06:30 AM
0

It's not.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 06:26 AM
0

Yes, I'm insulting people who do not know what a generalisation is. They are stupid and I'm perfectly comfortable with that. Don't tell me what I want. If a person cannot participate in a conversation with peers then they don't belong in one. They should spend their time engaging in more appropriate activities, like bathing in mud or barking at passing cars.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 07:42 PM
0

You don't wear an argument on your sleeve. That's a heart. I've not thrown insults at you. I've said that if you don't understand what a generalisation is then you don't belong in a conversation. The same way that if you don't understand what an anecdote, analogy, argument, question, fact, statement, opinion, correlation or agreement are you don't belong in a conversation. If that applies to you, you are stupid. Hopefully it doesn't. I assumed it didn't but now I'm questioning that assumption.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 07:24 PM
0

And a lack of argument at all makes yours infinitely better. See, we can both do sarcasm except only one of us is accurate, since I didn't insult you. Unless, of course, you are a moron who doesn't understand what a generalisation is? Please don't inadvertently make yourself the target of my derision, the world doesn't need more idiots.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 07:13 PM
0

No they can't, not unless they're perceived by an imbecile. I'm not adapting my speech to suit the lowest common denominator. If a person needs to have addenda to instruct them not to take generalisations as immutable facts about an entire demographic, then they are too stupid to function in the conversation and do not belong there.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 07:06 PM
14

It's funny cos it isn't.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 02:24 PM
3

That's because it is a generalisation. Blanket statements aren't dangerous and if a person is too stupid to understand they don't describe every single individual of the class then they aren't equipped to participate.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 11:16 AM
8

It's not required. If people can't understand the concept of a generalisation that's on them. It's not necessary to go "not all of this group but an unspecified proportion" every time you make a generalisation.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 07:58 AM
4

At no point in that comment did he say it represented all women.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 07:54 AM
7

And she's welcome to pay for that child if she chooses to keep it. Since we have no choice whether she does or not, we have no responsibility for her decision. We should be able to choose whether or not we want to help.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 05:48 AM
-1

Yeah and those people are dumb.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 02:42 AM
30

People with ASPD ("psychopaths") rarely, if ever, feel guilt.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 04:32 PM
0

I'm really not sure what you're trying to say.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 09:23 PM
1

When did I characterise it as made up? We are here to talk about gender issues, not race issues, not intersectionality of race and gender. Nobody here (or most other areas of society) would argue that white people have it harder in society than black people. They generally don't - especially not with the criminal justice system. The goal of the men's rights movement is not to increase awareness of issues affecting black people. It is to raise awareness of issues affecting men. In this case, the …
/r/MensRights01/05/19 09:17 PM
8

It is because she's a woman though. You're introducing an additional factor which is race. A white man would have been punished more severely than a black woman. A black man more severely than all of them.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 04:55 PM
2

I mean it happens plenty in the US, lol.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 04:49 PM
15

I mean... It happens plenty in the US. To the point where there are cases of boys held liable for child support for a child of rape, when they are the victim.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 04:36 PM
13

Well... No... She's absolutely not a knockout. She has at best an exceedingly mediocre figure that is out of shape in this photo. There's no muscle tone visible and she's chubby. Add that to the fact that her face is a fucking war crime, she's a piece of shit rapist and these articles are a massive double standard that she'd support and I'd say it's chill to rip on her a bit.
/r/MensRights30/04/19 04:04 PM
19

*There's always those people that she literally rapes.
/r/MensRights30/04/19 03:57 PM
3

Oh, no, you are certainly trying to debate (or argue) with someone. You're just losing, so now you claim you were never taking part to save face. How sad. He's not misguided, you are. He's not scrambling, you are. He understands that reddit is not the government and is absolutely correct in deeming that utterly irrelevant to the topic of conversation - which is whether censorship is useful or morally right in any setting by any party. Censorship is not only immoral but also ineffective. He is co…
/r/MensRights29/04/19 10:11 AM
3

1) I'm not the guy you were arguing with and I'm telling you he's right. 2) Your final comment was the misguided efforts of someone with nothing to say but the compulsion to speak. You have lost the argument. 3) It was an argument on reddit... Which you lost. 4) I have one, she's lovely. Not all of us store their self-worth in vaginas, though. So this really is irrelevant, you clown.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 09:59 AM
6

Why not just say "I concede defeat"? It would have taken less time.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 07:08 AM
2

Really poor analogy.
/r/MensRights21/04/19 02:53 PM
1

Oh, bless you. It would be easier if I was, wouldn't it? You need to work on your grasp on reality.
/r/MensRights26/03/19 12:43 PM
1

Already do, and I'm not so oversensitive about it that I completely miss the context of what the person is saying. I don't crave the feeling of being insulted so badly that I will seek it out when there is none. My initial comment was intended to highlight the fact that dyslexia affects writing as well as reading, because the person I was responding to didn't believe it did. If you're insulted by that, then you need to fucking grow up. I'm sorry, are you my patient? No? Then I have no responsibi…
/r/MensRights26/03/19 06:53 AM
1

Yeah, again, you're not being respectful of others. You're being a histrionic little pussy. There is no flaw in my logic and your behaviour is certainly not going to convince me.
/r/MensRights26/03/19 06:47 AM
1

Are you trying to suggest that texts from dyslexic people are generally written with the same quality as non-dyslexic people? If so, your disorder is a fantasy. The implications of that aren't good for you.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 05:21 PM
1

It's not a generalisation. It's specific to you.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 05:12 PM
1

Pretty dismissive and rude but whatever. Keep being bitter if it suits you.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 04:59 PM
10

Why is it?
/r/MensRights25/03/19 04:50 PM
2

Hm... As a psychologist I wouldn't advise anyone turns off their emotions. Better to learn how to accept and manage them. Your experiences shape you and have value in their own right, even if they are painful - especially if they are painful.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 04:39 PM
1

Yeah I'm not going to be kind to someone who is actively damaging discourse around sexual harassment - a serious problem that deserves serious treatment.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 10:41 AM
1

If you think loser is foul then you haven't been on the internet for very long. And perhaps I want to be hurtful? Getting wound up about someone being called "cute as fuck" and calling it sexual harassment is an absolute joke and makes a mockery of serious cases of harassment. If this person thinks that statement is problematic then they are an idiot and deserve to have their feelings hurt. Stupidity has and will always be met with pain. Helps one learn not to be a dumbass in futute.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 10:38 AM
1

It wasn't a mistake. I meant what I said.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 09:19 AM
1

You are a loser. It's not that you're being considerate of others, you're making a fuss of something that is a complete non-issue. Get your priorities in order - AKA, have a fucking day off.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 09:18 AM
23

Absolute nonsense are they. It's a legitimate question. Nobody cares about IMD and you expect people who feel neglected and overlooked to sympathise with individuals they perceive to hold much more power and privilege than them? You would never see anything like this on IMD and it's so sad. A colleague recently asked me if I feel ashamed to be a man when we were talking about how the media demonises men. I hadn't been asked that before and I realised that I was. At least emotionally. I understan…
/r/MensRights25/03/19 09:04 AM
0

Have a day off you fucking loser.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 08:24 AM
1

You ever read a text from a dyslexic person?
/r/MensRights25/03/19 07:02 AM
8

What about shuffle aggression?
/r/MensRights16/03/19 12:58 PM
1

I did want to edit my comment to say fully automated but too late now. It's incredibly unrealistic to say full automation is possible at all in most of those fields. I also don't think you'll ever see a robot surpass a human psychologist. There are way too many very small things that a robot couldn't account for. Twitches of the eye, hesitations, uncomfortable seating shifts that will often tell you that something is wrong. Your own leaps in reasoning because your empathy has led you to the answ…
/r/MensRights14/03/19 04:11 PM
1

It makes it an improvised weapon. Its primary purpose is not as a weapon - unlike a fucking gun. There is a very clear and obvious difference that you're ignoring in order to be a pedant so don't lecture me about ignorance. Your distinction is irrelevant to the discussion.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 04:02 PM
-4

No, they're not. Using a sock as a weapon doesn't make it a weapon. It's still clothing, you're just using it as a weapon. A cheesegrater doesn't become a shoe just because you strap it to your feet.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 01:00 PM
17

Female-dominated careers like psychology, medicine, teaching, nursing, biology and so on can't be automated so... That's total nonsense.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 08:38 AM
-13

Not really. Since 1) America doesn't have a massive problem with cars being driven into crowds and 2) cars aren't weapons, they're vehicles. Not saying it's a great solution but it's not the same thing at all.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 07:47 AM
1

Lol. Hateful? It's pathetic, I'd say the same to a woman and plenty of men here call it pathetic too. I actually am not so learn to fucking read.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 03:55 PM
-1

I mean it basically is, you're just splitting hairs because you don't like the fact that you're in the wrong. MGTOW are a bunch of pussies who have trust issues because they extrapolated bad experiences to the entire population. It's like women who say men are rapists because a single man raped her. There's literally no difference and you wouldn't hesitate to rage at a feminist who said that men aren't worth the risk because too many are rapist trash. Grow up. People are assholes. People. Not me…
/r/MensRights08/03/19 03:49 PM
-1

The person who has sworn off them because one woman was a bitch.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 03:42 PM
1

And you sound like a cunt who misrepresents what people are saying.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 03:39 PM
0

Yeah, except I do, to both. Don't assume that you know me.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 07:34 AM
1

Hah... Ah, I told them I disagreed quite strongly and I didn't back down from it. Tbf I get on with them all most of the time and it's easier to change their minds if they get on with me too.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 07:33 AM
-2

Oh, I'm not saying it isn't. Just that responding to that by assuming all women are evil is... Hasty and somewhat unhealthy.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 07:29 AM
0

Except I'm clearly blaming her for being abusive? Not that my point was about who's to blame at all. My point was that distrusting all women because of one woman's actions is not healthy... And we criticise feminism for doing the same to men. Let's try to be a little bit better?
/r/MensRights08/03/19 07:26 AM
7

I'll go do stuff, like dinner or a movie or whatever, but I'm not paying for them. We can have fun but I'm not paying for a grown-ass adult who has a job.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 02:32 AM
4

Yeeah, I don't believe that for a second. Some would. Majority? Hard doubt.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 02:30 AM
11

One of my colleagues legit recently said: "If a man asks me on a date, he'd better be paying. I've sacrificed my time for him and my time is worth a lot." Completely oblivious to the fact that there are two human beings in that equation and nobody is forcing her. I shudder to think of the poor man she ends up with. I told her and two other colleagues that I categorically refuse to pay for women on a first date. I have never and will never do it. First date is split down the middle. If I see a fu…
/r/MensRights08/03/19 02:26 AM
-23

Or you could recognise that she was abusive and all people can be abusive. Just a thought. If you want to spend your life never having companionship, go for it, but distrusting everyone because some people are assholes isn't a fun way to live. It's also one of the main things we don't like about feminists here.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 02:21 AM
2

Just break your arms, too, and have sex with your mom.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 02:57 PM
2

Props for admitting you were wrong... Not just about this but about anything at all. A feat few can accomplish!
/r/MensRights27/02/19 02:35 PM
3

Lol, no it isn't. If their opinions affect public policy, which they do, it doesn't matter whether I care or not - I will still be affected by it. Doing nothing and failing to challenge it means those people will not confront their opinions and will persist in their efforts. Policies are determined by public opinion, that's how democracy works. The prevailing belief will shape social policy because politicians succeed based on their popularity with the public. I'm under no illusions that I can c…
/r/MensRights19/02/19 04:32 PM
2

I never said I didn't care, I do. Well, you keep not engaging and see how that goes. Seems to be working well so far.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 02:38 PM
3

Hypocrisy isn't exactly a basic word... And it is quite awkward to spell.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 08:13 AM
17

Not according to feminists. Legitimately defend yourself from sexism -> fragile. Tell them you don't care what they think -> macho bullshit. There's no moderate area because, to them, men are the oppressors.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 08:12 AM
5

I like the thought of these faceless berserkers.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 08:09 AM
3

Yeah, I'm just saying since most women feel they can be rude without response, I've started being rude back. It's only fair if both parties agree to the terms.
/r/MensRights18/02/19 08:09 AM
0

Jesus. You've won here mate.
/r/MensRights18/02/19 07:31 AM
2

Well that's the thing. I'm 6'5" but I have short friends and I hate seeing people treated like this cos if it was my friends I'd be sticking up for them. So... I'm fine if a woman wants to say "I'd prefer someone taller". That's fair, up to you! Only... It's only fair if we can go "I'd prefer someone who wasn't so fat".
/r/MensRights18/02/19 07:26 AM
4

They'll know when you meet them :/
/r/MensRights18/02/19 07:06 AM
2

So why say it's uncivil?
/r/MensRights15/02/19 10:03 PM
3

Not really. She doesn't deserve a romantic partner if that's how she treats them. She deserves to be alone until she learns compassion - which may well be never if she's capable of being so utterly heartless.
/r/MensRights15/02/19 06:22 PM
15

So if I gently, but firmly, tell you that you are in fact an asshole, is that civil? No. Don't be ridiculous. The primary question everyone is asking is "Am I a shitty person?", if the answer is yes, you can't be civil about it - especially not if you want to explain why. The person who responded to this asshole did so in a perfectly acceptable way, it doesn't warrant censorship. She is a foul human being and deserves to be told so. She needs to be told so for her own wellbeing and that of every…
/r/MensRights15/02/19 10:39 AM
13

No, my point is not to bend the rules. My point is that the rules make no sense and are impossible to properly enforce.
/r/MensRights15/02/19 09:26 AM
7

I just wanted to say to you and /u/vicsj that it's wonderful that you're both so supportive to your fellas. I think a lot of men on here, sometimes myself included, just feel very tired of having to tread so carefully. A lot of my ex partners have suffered all sorts of abuse and I never thought anything of being there for them during times when it got to them. I felt comfortable holding them while they cried, talking about it with them, trying to understand it and help in any way I could... And …
/r/MensRights15/02/19 09:04 AM
7

You're a good egg!
/r/MensRights15/02/19 08:53 AM
60

How are you supposed to be civil when honestly discussing whether or not someone is an asshole. If they are, one of the requirements is that you imply or explicitly state that they are an asshole and give reasons why. This woman's behaviour is inhuman. I don't think it's uncivil to state that.
/r/MensRights15/02/19 08:51 AM
0

And yet you've stopped now.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 06:46 AM
0

It's hard not to when you keep telling me how big it isn't.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 07:55 PM
0

Are you indicating the size of your penis or...? I'm confused.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 04:44 PM
1

Cry more, god-botherer.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 06:46 AM
1

Cry more, god-botherer.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 11:28 PM
1

So it both was and wasn't part of his argument? Interdasting.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 06:58 PM
1

No, dickhead, you said it wasn't even a part of his argument. Not only can you not read, you also can't write.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 06:25 PM
2

Except research says they are better off. People shouldn't be having kids and getting married if they don't understand the responsibilities involved and a loving pair of married parents is better than divorced, obviously. But divorced is better than a pair of married parents who fucking hate each other. Dumbass.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 02:38 PM
2

He literally said it was. I feel that as religion is being replaced with politics, young people are forgetting about this
/r/MensRights10/02/19 02:36 PM
-1

At least I'm not a deluded twat with an imaginary friend.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 04:34 AM
-3

Lmao. Go fuck yourself, you preachy bitch.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 04:24 AM
5

Lmao. Gtfo with that religious bullshit. Two people who hate each other staying together cos they'll get smote if they don't is worse than two people divorcing and doing their best to raise their children.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 03:24 AM
8

Tbf that is an affidavit in pursuit of an arrest warrant, so... I don't think it is being dropped.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 01:54 PM
3

Sorry, no. You can't claim that it's a problem with masculinity when it's women who are reinforcing it. You can't say "Oooh, this hot pile of masculinity is so toxic, I wish it would stop" when you're squatting there pumping it out like a bad curry. A societal problem, maybe. I'd accept that. A cultural construct whereby men are forced into behaving a certain way to avoid chastisement from others (male or female). Yep. That seems acceptable. It has nothing to do with masculinity though, does it?…
/r/MensRights03/02/19 04:14 AM
14

I tend to find women do that more to men than men do to other men. So, it's toxic femininity really, isn't it?
/r/MensRights02/02/19 05:26 PM
1

No, what you've done is try to dictate to everyone here what their relationship decisions should be by goading them. Why else would we care if she's fucking someone else? He's welcome to her. That is my point. It's not personal to me, I'm saying "Why would any of us want that? That's not a desirable quality. If you want that, go for it. We don't." Now take your patronising, inane prattle and give it to someone else. You have nothing to offer, your advice is shit and one day you're gonna get take…
/r/MensRights01/02/19 06:08 PM
1

Yes but it isn't hundreds of years ago. It isn't 60 years ago. It's now. And for the last 40-50 years women have been legally entitled to equal pay. Women my age have absolutely no excuse to expect a man to pay for them. I have zero interest in a woman like that. When I require dating advice from you, I will request it. If you want to bite that bullet, go for it. I don't.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 07:05 AM
1

I say, old bean, when I require logic and dating advice from a spineless quim I shall request it. This is a person who believes her very existence is worthy of financial compensation. (I'm inclined to agree but I fear she has the recipient all wrong.) I have absolutely zero interest in someone so self-absorbed.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 04:51 PM
5

I will forgive you this time, and this time alone.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 04:13 PM
8

Yeah, you bite that bullet mate. $60 for a fuck, $2,000 per year of companionship, $100,000 to lose your kids and home in the divorce. I'll stay with the lasses who pay for their own meals ta.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 04:10 PM
8

It's bumble. Like tinder but the girl has to speak first.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 04:07 PM
2

Like... Honestly, probably all of them.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 01:40 PM
1

Yes but could we actually have some statistics so that we can challenge it more effectively?
/r/MensRights30/01/19 01:32 PM
2

I mean I just made my argument you cockfondler. It's not my fault you didn't notice it while you were busy fondling cocks. Yeah, you must have.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 03:39 PM
1

That is an argument you dipshit. Women are just as necessary to providing services as men because they are approximately 50% of the workforce. An insult attached to an argument is just an insult. An insult in lieu of an argument is an ad hom. Learn yo fallacies bruh.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 12:50 PM
1

Yeah, women are about 50% of that infrastructure too, dickhead.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 12:09 AM
0

Cool story.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 12:07 AM
-1

Not really getting my point, are you?
/r/MensRights24/01/19 05:11 PM
1

Either fuck off or answer my question, I don't care which but by the end of this you'll have done one. I'm much more patient than you are, I can promise you.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 04:52 PM
1

I've found this with making the first move romantically. After a certain amount of failures you just brush it off and go back home alone to end your own life. Source: Am a ghost.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 04:09 PM
-1

Jesus, you're an idiot. I don't even know where to start because everything you said was so stupid.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 03:59 PM
-6

The women side would probably have slightly better medical services... And education. So it wouldn't be great for us either.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 03:21 PM
9

It seems like you're not understanding that we have the grace not to portray your gender as inherently toxic by using terms like toxic femininity. If you want, I could invent a constellation of well-researched traits that correlate highly with females and ask your gender to do something about it. Passivity, neuroticism, deception, baby-murdering. How would you like it if I said there is a deep problem with female culture? That toxic femininity leads women to become emotionally unstable wrecks wh…
/r/MensRights22/01/19 01:05 AM
7

Yeah, I've got my head kicked in and been raped. I'd rather be raped. I also think it's very flippant of people to suggest that men's physical strength allows us to feel less vulnerable in these situations. Almost every man knows not to get physically aggressive with a woman because it can land you in deep shit. So if you push her off or, worse, hit her... You may well be going to prison. Same way that women might feel any resistance could be met with violence, we fear that any resistance could …
/r/MensRights21/01/19 01:17 PM
1

Either fuck off or answer my question, I don't care which but by the end of this you'll have done one. I'm much more patient than you are, I can promise you.
/r/MensRights20/01/19 12:51 AM
1

You require evidence to support the idea that you shouldn't respond to words with a physical attack? Yes. Look up your local legislation around assault because that's what you'll be found guilty of after you're arrested. The circumstances which would protect you from such a conviction are very limited and generally restricted to preempting an attack.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 04:37 AM
1

Uh, they really are.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 03:48 AM
1

Yeah those situations are so rare as to be negligible.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 05:28 PM
1

Either fuck off or answer my question, I don't care which but by the end of this you'll have done one. I'm much more patient than you are, I can promise you.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 09:16 PM
1

Either fuck off or answer my question, I don't care which but by the end of this you'll have done one. I'm much more patient than you are, I can promise you.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 08:45 PM
1

Either fuck off or answer my question, I don't care which but by the end of this you'll have done one. I'm much more patient than you are, I can promise you.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 04:08 PM
1

Either fuck off or answer my question, I don't care which but by the end of this you'll have done one. I'm much more patient than you are, I can promise you.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 06:48 AM
1

Either fuck off or answer my question, I don't care which but by the end of this you'll have done one. I'm much more patient than you are, I can promise you.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 08:51 PM
1

Either fuck off or answer my question, I don't care which but by the end of this you'll have done one. I'm much more patient than you are, I can promise you.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 03:15 PM
0

Either fuck off or answer my question, I don't care which but by the end of this you'll have done one. I'm much more patient than you are, I can promise you.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 12:41 PM
17

Doesn't matter if they agree or not. They're wrong. It doesn't need to make them happy and we shouldn't care about making incorrect people happy. What we should worry about is doing the right thing. If that upsets some people, fuck them.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 08:53 PM
21

There is one solution and that's the system we have in place. Innocent until proven guilty. It sucks but it's better than punishing innocent people.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 07:53 PM
1

Either fuck off or answer my question, I don't care which but by the end of this you'll have done one. I'm much more patient than you are, I can promise you.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 03:35 PM
3

I'm sorry that you're simple and I hope that one die you'll die.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 02:34 PM
3

So when I asked if you're simple, the answer was yes?
/r/MensRights01/01/19 02:23 PM
7

Again, she only has to do events like this 67 days a year.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 01:18 PM
9

Again, she only has to do events like this 67 days a year. Not that hard. You're really not understanding this.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 12:42 PM
16

Oh my god. Even if you account for days he doesn't work it's not going to sextuple the figure. He would have to work only 67 days a year for his pay to equal more than hers per day.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 11:57 AM
36

I mean you're comparing a fee for a special event to a salary. Are you simple?
/r/MensRights01/01/19 11:41 AM
-1

Either fuck off or answer my question, I don't care which but by the end of this you'll have done one. I'm much more patient than you are, I can promise you.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 06:43 AM
1

Either fuck off or answer my question, I don't care which but by the end of this you'll have done one. I'm much more patient than you are, I can promise you.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 06:41 PM
1

Either fuck off or answer my question, I don't care which but by the end of this you'll have done one. I'm much more patient than you are, I can promise you.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 03:26 PM
1

Either fuck off or answer my question, I don't care which but by the end of this you'll have done one. I'm much more patient than you are, I can promise you.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 02:07 PM
3

You are pardoned!
/r/MensRights29/12/18 08:16 AM
1

Either fuck off or answer my question, I don't care which but by the end of this you'll have done one. I'm much more patient than you are, I can promise you.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 05:39 AM
1

Either fuck off or answer my question, I don't care which but by the end of this you'll have done one. I'm much more patient than you are, I can promise you.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 05:12 AM
1

Either fuck off or answer my question, I don't care which but by the end of this you'll have done one. I'm much more patient than you are, I can promise you.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 04:46 AM
1

Maybe if you were a psychologist you wouldn't make yourself look so dumb. Either fuck off or answer my question, I don't care which but by the end of this you'll have done one. I'm much more patient than you are, I can promise you.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 04:25 AM
1

Maybe if you were a psychologist you wouldn't make yourself look so dumb. Either fuck off or answer my question, I don't care which but by the end of this you'll have done one. I'm much more patient than you are, I can promise you.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 04:16 AM
5

No, I know what he's trying to say. He's just not very good at communicating it and it comes across as trite.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 04:15 AM
1

You appear to be having drastic mood swings. My mood has been consistently irritated by you. Nice try though. Maybe if you were a psychologist you wouldn't make yourself look so dumb. If you truly want to end the conversation, just stop responding. That's all there is to it. If you are finished, simply stop posting. Again, I'm not willing to let you think your behaviour is acceptable. Either fuck off or answer my question, I don't care which but by the end of this you'll have done one. I'm much …
/r/MensRights29/12/18 04:12 AM
1

Nothing political about that sentiment.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 03:50 AM
1

That's not what bipolar is but nice try. Well, since you're not fucking off, you can answer the question, can't you? Either do that or fuck off.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 03:49 AM
1

I never said I was finished. I said I wanted you to fuck off. Again, do you want me to list every opinion I have regardless of relevance to the conversation, yes or no? Answer the question.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 02:50 AM
1

Again, do you want me to list every opinion I have regardless of relevance to the conversation, yes or no?
/r/MensRights29/12/18 02:07 AM
1

Perhaps if I repeat it in enough different ways you'll understand. Again, do you want me to list every opinion I have regardless of relevance to the conversation, yes or no?
/r/MensRights29/12/18 01:46 AM
1

No, what I've done is describe to you how your accusation is nonsensical and you've ignored me. Because you keep responding to me but saying nothing. I'm not content with allowing you to think your behaviour is acceptable. You don't really know why you're upset with me, you just know you're upset about something. Take a leaf from your own book, petal.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 01:31 AM
11

Makes no sense.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 01:30 AM
10

Then they're not weak?
/r/MensRights29/12/18 12:47 AM
1

You've literally just devolved into saying whatever metaphor you think is appropriate in lieu of accepting the fact that you've stumbled into a conversation you don't understand and made a ridiculous claim. Fuck off and bother someone else.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 12:40 AM
1

Yes, except you've led me to a cesspool.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 12:30 AM
1

I'm sorry, what are you hoping to achieve? What possible assistance could a thick fuck like you hope to offer? You think because I don't state every opinion I have on every topic I'm interested in that I've somehow prioritised this one over all others? I was speaking about the subject at hand. When you asked about another, I told you. That's how conversations work you clattering mongoloid. Learn how to think and then come back when you've stopped shitting your pants in confusion.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 12:58 PM
0

No, sugar. Your need to protect the female while completely ignoring the male is very telling. Reddit seems to have a very conflicted opinion of me. Surely as a psychologist you should know that sometimes it's not what you say... ...it's what you don't say. Surely as a non-psychologist you'd be better served not speaking about things you don't understand? But you go on thinking you are impervious to implicit bias. After all, that is the nature of it, to not realize we are biased about some thing…
/r/MensRights28/12/18 12:41 PM
-2

Yet you didn't mention it until asked. I haven't mentioned a lot of things you haven't specifically asked about, would you like me to list them all? That isn't how conversations work, my friend. That indeed makes it complicated. No, it doesn't. Why would you be so focused on the female and ignore the male unless provoked to do so? Because that was the subject of the discussion. Please try to keep up. Also I'm pretty sure I was focusing on alleged victims of rape, male or female. Unbunch those pa…
/r/MensRights28/12/18 12:27 PM
4

The same. Not super complicated.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 12:18 PM
-5

Oh, you did.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 11:28 AM
-12

Yeah, you're not in charge. And I skipped it all after the first couple of sentences because I'm glad you're not in charge.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 11:02 AM
8

However, they can give their input as to whether the student requires the provision of special services. To a degree. They can say "X is seeing us for Y and has been for Z amount of time - this is our understanding of the impact". They can't say anything more. However, in my opinion the alternative would be for the police to make the determination. Except they're not qualified to do that. At the end of the day, what I'm saying is that simply making a claim should not entitle the student to anyth…
/r/MensRights28/12/18 08:19 AM
12

Again, I disagree. Counselors, therapists, psychiatrists and psychologists are not detectives. It is not their job to establish whether or not a crime has been committed or that an allegation is credible. It is their job to support those suffering from mental illness. I might as well say here, that I'm a psychologist. It's not our place to say whether or not something did or did not happen as a person describes (in fact, chances are always more likely that it did not, since memory is a bit dodgy…
/r/MensRights28/12/18 07:34 AM
17

The minimum threshold should be exactly what I said - contact with counseling services and evidence of a filed police report. In my university I'm fairly sure that would have been the threshold but... That was 5 years ago and I am British.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 07:15 AM
101

Well... No... I don't agree there. If the individual has some contact with the school's counseling service and requests mitigating circumstances pending an investigation it's fair to give them some leeway with assignments. It does incentivise making false claims, to a degree. But taking that away would punish actual victims who are really struggling. The correct response is conduct proper investigations and not to punish a student before they have been proven guilty.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 06:46 AM
1

Not yet, but compared to other systems of government it hasn't really been attempted properly and under what would be considered ideal conditions. More accurately, though, a better answer is there has been no single communist state. Dictators have always seized power and overthrown them immediately after the revolution process was complete. It's not really fair to say it was ever communist to begin with. It was always a dictatorship with propaganda machines claiming it was communist. Again, comm…
/r/MensRights27/12/18 08:28 AM
-8

A dictatorship is, by definition, not communist. Marxism and communism would inherently be against the suppression of free speech by a powerful ruling class. It's literally the antithesis of their agenda.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 03:10 PM
5

... I can get on board with the last part.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 08:10 PM
2

Oh... My brain.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 08:09 PM
5

A hole is a hole and a penis is a penis. It's not gay to put your penis in a hole. But it is gay to have a penis in your hole. Duh.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 08:08 PM
6

PICTURES OF TRANSEXUAL JUNK PLS OR GTFO. Yeah it's kinda weird to ask someone for proof of their gender or degree on the internet.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 08:06 PM
7

I mean that's just total bullshit. This isn't the place to be a sexist cunt.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 08:05 PM
1

Dude literally nobody cares.
/r/MensRights19/12/18 05:53 PM
2

I don't think I'd ever be seeking a job from you but I didn't mean your approach to finding work. I meant your attitude in general.
/r/MensRights19/12/18 10:10 AM
15

I would not hire you.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 11:24 PM
0

Is asking a question sexist now lol. If that question is what value do women have, then yes. Yes it very fucking obviously is. Lol. You use the same tactics. Get proven wrong in debate and then cry like a sore loser and call your opponent things. Uh, no... That's not the same tactics at all mate. Calling you sexist isn't then sexist itself. I'm a man. You've not proven anyone wrong. Your position is so obviously retarded that I see no value in trying to engage you. If you can't see that already …
/r/MensRights16/12/18 01:22 AM
-1

More than you, you sexist cunt, lol.
/r/MensRights15/12/18 04:19 PM
0

That's not what you said though.
/r/MensRights15/12/18 02:20 PM
1

I mean, they do have value aside from that.
/r/MensRights14/12/18 07:38 PM
3

Even they know that there is no other value to a woman than her vagina. Uh, no.
/r/MensRights14/12/18 07:36 PM
2

Does he look like a bitch?
/r/MensRights14/12/18 07:35 PM
10

Feminism at its core is trying to get equal rights for men and women Completely untrue. Next to no focus on serious men's issues while undue significance placed on trivialities. Feminism has initiated or contributed to no major efforts or movements to improve anything men care about that I can remember at all. They have, however, done so for movements that actively harm men. This subreddit is an advocate for the times men's rights are lowered and wants Equality as well Often fails in the same wa…
/r/MensRights04/12/18 04:50 PM
19

Feminism is inherently misandrist though. It's based on a flawed and unfalsifiable interpretation of reality that necessarily places males in the role of oppressors and females as either victims or liberators. It's obvious in the language - patriarchy, toxic masculinity, feminism itself. The movement requires conflict between genders as part of its ideology. With no monolithic enemy then feminists are forced to accept that power, not gender, is the issue. To argue otherwise is naive.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 04:35 PM
3

I am white and I also do not wish you were born a long time ago. ​ Or myself, really, because diseases. Particularly syphilis.
/r/MensRights01/12/18 06:23 AM
1

I hope I'm not wrong because your emphasis has totally missed the point. Either you don't know the argument or you're just stupid. I'd prefer the former.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 04:48 PM
1

Feel like you don't know what that argument is...
/r/MensRights13/11/18 03:25 PM
2

Well, at this point the claims you've made are that: 1) The percentage of women who are "unstable, hysterical, ideologically damage feminists or manipulative" is higher than the percentage of men who are rapists. 2) Women create and drive moral panics. 3) Women are more likely to be manipulative, abusive etc. So, in terms of what particular stats would suffice I'd deem this sufficient to respond to each claim, respectively: 1) Crime statistics detailing the percentage of males who are sexual off…
/r/MensRights12/11/18 10:03 PM
1

Stats or gtfo.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 04:01 PM
1

I think you're confusing moral neutrality with selfishness. Neutrality would be either acting randomly or hardly acting at all. What you're describing is looking out for yourself, at the expense of people around you, because of irrational fear. If you wanna go all alignment chart on it, I'd say that pulls more towards neutral-evil... Like a watered-down mercenary. Good people get by in life just fine and I would argue it's not stupid to be a good person. Your time here is short and a comfortable…
/r/MensRights12/11/18 02:30 AM
1

It's not rudeness to tell you that you failed to provide what was requested. No, I wouldn't. And dark triad is psychology, not sociology. So is the phenomenon cited in your irrelevant paper. I would know, I am a psychologist, lol.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 11:03 PM
1

No it's not. Crossing the road is not unavoidable, you just deem the rewards worth the risk. If you wanna be a coward and let someone die in front of you, then do so... But don't pretend it's not cowardice.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 11:01 PM
1

No, I'm sorry. What I asked for were statistics detailing the percentage of men who are rapists and the percentage of women who are "unstable, hysterical, ideologically damaged feminists or manipulative". What I did not ask for was a paper which is a quarter-century old that describes a phenomenon which is completely irrelevant to the subject at hand. Since you have failed to provide adequate stats, your alternative option (as previously stated) is to get the fuck out.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 05:57 AM
0

Yeah, it is your bad, so it is nonsense. Litigation privilege is also not applicable. Why do you keep bringing up things that are obviously not appropriate to the subject at hand? Litigation privilege would stop a sworn statement being used in a defamation suit... But if they said anything about it to anyone outside of court you can sue them. And they likely did.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 02:50 AM
1

I can't, it's dumb. You're just gonna stand there and watch an innocent woman die on the negligible chance she might be nuts? And even if she was nuts, it wouldn't actually matter because you're not at risk from her accusations.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 02:05 AM
1

It's completely without merit and replaces reason with fear.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 02:04 AM
0

K.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 02:03 AM
1

Do you say that when crossing the road? Because being killed by a car is more likely.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 02:02 AM
0

K.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 11:28 PM
-1

Nonsense. Stop responding to fearmongering or this movement will go the same way as feminism and nobody will respect it.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 11:27 PM
-1

Utter bullshit. The answer is obviously yes, you muppet.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 11:26 PM
1

Irrelevant.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 11:25 PM
1

Jesus this is pathetic.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 11:25 PM
1

A defamation suit where someone has falsely accused you of sexual assault when you have witnesses able to attest otherwise would be easy to win. Winning would require the defendant to pay your legal fees. It's worth doing it. If you really can't afford it, then you don't have to but I'd still say it's worth taking that negligible risk to prevent someone's death.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 11:23 PM
1

Stats or gtfo.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 11:20 PM
-1

What does moral superiority have to do with anything? Plenty, since the pursuit of equal rights is a moral issue. This is common sense risk management. Common sense risk management would suggest that that a negligible risk of accusation is insignificant compared to a high risk of loss of life. Men are not obligated to take risks for those who have repeatedly seen this service as a lever to destroy us. Women are not obligated to take the risk that men are not sexual predators. But they should, be…
/r/MensRights10/11/18 11:19 PM
2

At what point was it established that only non-professionals are subject to sexual assault accusations? The rest of your argument hinges on that assumption which is untrue so I won't address the rest.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 11:13 PM
0

Nonsense. Qualified immunity wouldn't apply to an individual who is accusing you of sexual assault.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 11:09 PM
-2

Point is, as a man, never perform any kind of CPR to a woman, and never use the excuse of fear of sexual harassment allegations. So, I work in healthcare and am CPR trained. Ima go right ahead and completely disregard this. I'm not a coward who will let an innocent woman die because I'm a pussy. I'm not going to allow myself and others to become victims to fearmongering and I'm not going to use the same twisted logic feminists use to imply all men are rapists. Look after your fellow human being …
/r/MensRights10/11/18 09:14 AM
6

You're not obligated to continue at all, not that it would matter. You can stop at any point for any reason.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 09:11 AM
2

You'll be protected from legal repercussion. Public opinion is a different matter.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 09:08 AM
1

I mean, it has never been attempted in reality. What has been attempted are fascist dictatorships claiming to be communist.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 09:07 AM
3

Except many of the people who die will be innocent... So that wouldn't work at all. We'd just have a lot of dead women. That'd devastate our species which would be a Darwin Award for you, really.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 09:03 AM
7

That is literally the exact same argument radical feminists use to suggest that all men are potential rapists and should be killed. Do you not remember the poisoned m&m's argument? At this point you are no better than them. Sort yourself out.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 09:01 AM
0

No, dumbass. I'm saying they can't be dead if they're not dead. Those who attempted to sacrifice themselves and failed by continuing to live can disapprove all they like. If they want to devalue their own lives compared to women's, that's up to them. We're not going to praise them for it, however.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 08:49 AM
2

Well... Not strictly in terms of the survival of the species. You don't need men as much as you need women. That's just an unfortunate biological fact. I'm not saying men are unnecessary, they're not. Nor am I saying they're less valuable than women. I'm just saying if you had to kill half of all men or half of all women... You should definitely pick men or your species is going to be devastated. Not only by the deaths of the men in that generation but the severely reduced birthrate. 1 man can i…
/r/MensRights10/11/18 12:15 AM
0

I feel like you don't really have a grasp on this discussion, do you?
/r/MensRights10/11/18 12:13 AM
0

In which case they didn't sacrifice themselves and it doesn't apply.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 06:34 PM
1

Eh, technically no. You need fewer males than females to repopulate. That's why males are soldiers. Societies that let women protect everyone would have died out. Women can also build pretty much anything men can these days, they just don't want to. But that's a societal value which I didn't dispute.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 06:30 PM
2

Some are. Some aren't.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 06:29 PM
10

Ok, that's too far so back it the fuck up. This is not the place for your hatred. Also why did you create an account today just to say that?
/r/MensRights09/11/18 10:14 AM
1

It doesn't matter. They're not alive to disapprove because they sacrificed their lives for no reason.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 10:11 AM
-1

Even in the face of death men are sexist. So are women for allowing them to do that. Men are equally valuable to society Yes. and the survival of the human race. Eh, technically no.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 10:10 AM
1

I bet you many would have taken the bullet for another man. But they didn't, so you're wrong.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 10:07 AM
5

Way more.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 10:05 AM
8

Nobody's demonizing heroism. They're saying that it's dumb to sacrifice your life for another's purely because of their genitals.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 10:04 AM
2

Do you think their instincts are socially constructed? Yes, lol.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 10:02 AM
2

What you've just said is nonsense.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 10:00 AM
23

I'm sorry but what world do you live in where there are "plenty" of women who would take a bullet for a man they've never met before? That is delusional.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 09:53 AM
1

Ikr? Now fuck off, you bigot.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 09:48 AM
0

Would if I could find it!
/r/MensRights08/11/18 08:57 AM
3

Oh it may well be perjury... I'm making no comment on that because I couldn't say with any authority. Just noting that perjury is pretty difficult to prove because it requires proving someone's state of mind.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 08:17 AM
3

Testimony from ten minutes ago is not as useful as hard facts. Not a lawyer but I am a psychologist and eyewitness testimony is complete crap. I could manipulate you into believing two very different narratives about an event if I get to you soon enough after it happens. It's as simple as asking how fast two cars smashed into each other vs what speed they were traveling when they connected.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 10:55 PM
4

A charge of perjury requires proof that you knowingly made false testimony. Proof of inaccuracy is not enough.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 10:54 PM
5

No, dickhead. You're doing this wrong and you're no better than the women "feminists" you seem to hate so much. I mean wtf is this complete cuntery: When women have accomplished what men have, then they can have a fucking opinion that matters as much as men’s does.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 12:37 PM
1

Then they made a mistake but they didn't forget their jacket. They chose not to bring one after being reminded. Nah, it's not infantile. Bring your own jacket if you want one. If you don't bring one and it gets cold you're not having mine.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 05:00 AM
2

Ok but the issue isn't that they forgot their jacket. No adult forgets to bring a jacket. They intentionally don't bring one. I'm not covering for someone else's poor choices. The same way I wouldn't expect or ask my partner to give me her jacket if I chose not to bring mine. That's my own fault. Really you're just enabling this childish mindset that they aren't responsible for their own choices.
/r/MensRights29/10/18 11:24 AM
5

And she said "Feel free to smack the cunt" so I'm pretty sure it's safe to say she expected some level of aggression.
/r/MensRights17/10/18 06:59 PM
1

I don't care?
/r/MensRights13/10/18 02:22 PM
2

What, how does the fact that he hates certain races for no reason make his opinion on a racially sensitive issue less valid? Are you fucking joking? Call me crazy but I'd see that as a pretty big source of bias. I'd posit that if he's willing to hate other races based on propaganda he's more likely to believe negative propaganda about other races. Such as, I don't know, propaganda about grooming Muslim gangs?
/r/MensRights13/10/18 01:50 PM
1

But men aren't aware of the past, that's the problem. Because one man disagrees with your worldview, you assert than men, collectively, do not understand history? That's one big fucking leap. Let me ask you a question, were men in the past privileged or not? Not particularly. What makes you think they were? Most people in history have lived quite shitty lives. Men and women. How can you quantify suffering? Did women in the past need to go and fight in wars? No. Did they need to do all the back-b…
/r/MensRights13/10/18 02:50 AM
2

It impressed me. I enjoyed it very much.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 02:37 AM
3

Except I'm explicitly not suggesting that and you are. I love how you drop every point you make when they're challenged and just move on to another. It's as if you win one you've won the argument. You don't. You've lost every point you've made and your position is weak and untenable. Just reconsider your argument and leave.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 02:38 PM
1

Most of the remarks still apply to you even if you are a woman.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 01:13 PM
3

How am I unwilling to have any empathy for women? I did not live in the past, clearly, because I am alive now. Had I, I might have supported them. We also know a lot more about discrimination and equality than we did in the past. We have historical examples of how it affects people and what we can do to change it. In the past, we did not. Saying it happened in the past is not an excuse for allowing it to happen now. If anything, it is even more of a reason for us not to allow it to repeat. Your …
/r/MensRights12/10/18 01:12 PM
15

why on Earth would it be reasonable for you to expect ANY woman today to not dismiss your experiences or the privilege you believe women hold today? Maybe because we're not living in ancient Egypt, we're living in the present. Only the present matters when discussing who is currently a victim of discrimination. It doesn't stop being discrimination just because the target group used to be a different one. Revenge isn't justice. Your point hasn't gone over anyone's head, it's just completely irrel…
/r/MensRights12/10/18 03:17 AM
6

Feminism hasn't existed forever... Unless my understanding of history is wrong it has barely been around for a century.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 03:14 AM
21

No need to be sorry unless it's you who's doing it to us. Just do what you can to help and we'll do what we can to help you.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 03:12 AM
3

No it's not. Right in this context means correct, not morally right. Might makes right means if you disagree, I punch you until you stop disagreeing. If your society tries to impose laws on mine, mine invades yours and destroys it. It can be used to impose morality but that's only part of the overall idea that physical or military strength determines who decides what happens. Might (strength) makes right (the winner). Whether or not it's moral is... Questionable. Although it's certainly arguable…
/r/MensRights11/10/18 11:13 AM
1

No, that is the point you are making, not the point I am making. No, dipshit, that is the point the person to whom you responded was making. Hence your inept stumbling. Where were you cunt? Directly after you, notifying you of your stupidity. There's more to it than whether you have genital A genital B for many reasons. Name literally one, fuckface. The law should not care whether you're white, black, Asian, straight, gay, bi, trans or any other fucking thing, including male or female. Obviously…
/r/MensRights06/10/18 12:23 AM
2

Oh so you're a dickhead? Stumbling into a chain, making dumbass remarks then getting pissy when someone corrects you? We all know there's history and context behind it, jackass. The point is that a crime is a crime and it doesn't matter what someone's genitals are, they should be treated equally.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 04:56 PM
2

No, there isn't. The rest of what you said isn't really relevant. A crime is a crime, regardless of which gender commits it.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 01:13 PM
1

A bunch of people coming out of nowhere specifically to do nothing else but oggle you is threatening and rapey, yes.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 01:10 PM
1

You're a cool lady. Thanks for being cool to us.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 04:32 AM
1

Ah, ok. My money's on no consequence.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 03:47 AM
13

So no actual consequences then? She's just banned from a few buildings?
/r/MensRights05/10/18 03:34 AM
1

It is tho.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 03:33 AM
4

Props for knowing what Io is.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 03:32 AM
1

Not really.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 03:31 AM
6

There's a difference between her just being there (and you all collectively noticing) and one of you specifically going out of your way to round up other men to go out of their way to go and stare at her. The former is fine, the latter is fucking pathetic, incredibly inappropriate, very threatening and all-around rapey.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 03:29 AM
5

As a man, I've found that's a fairly successful tactic for us as well. Just keep reversing the genders. "Man it'd be so weird if a guy did that" over and over and over until they get that they're being fucking rapey.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 03:28 AM
3

Hmm... That is 20 years old and the sources are even older, so it's a bit out of date now. But I can't really see why it should be any different now. Thanks for the info!
/r/MensRights28/09/18 06:00 PM
6

I would very much like to see that source too. That'd be some damning evidence.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 01:56 PM
11

*who gives a shit. Act responsibly or accept criticism for not doing so.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 01:54 PM
2

Also, not sure if you actually wanted advice on how to help... But you could join a caring profession or volunteer for a mental health charity and help run support groups for victims of DV if it's something you wanted to do!
/r/MensRights26/09/18 08:05 AM
2

In my experience, the kind of feminists who talk about these issues only ever do so when raised by someone else in response. However, they seem more than happy to discuss and advocate for women's issues at the drop of a hat. Again, though, I acknowledge that the majority of feminists do not have the power necessary to influence much. That's kinda my problem with feminism. I have literally never seen a prominent feminist discuss men's issues in a way which is useful or helpful to us. While the ra…
/r/MensRights25/09/18 04:39 PM
3

Many who call themselves feminist would be... But none of those people are powerful enough/willing to do anything about it.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 12:29 PM
1

Nah man. You're not the boss of me. I can do what I want. Defend your position or fuck off.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 06:32 PM
0

Yes, and I'm saying that example was overly specific and weird. It sounded less like he wants equality and more like he wants to torture women. Particularly with the language used... It was too intimate. If he'd said "We shouldn't allow men to be tortured while we protect women", fine. No issues there. But "we need to hear bones cracking, blood-curdling screams"? It's fucking creepy.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 09:41 AM
1

Yeah I know what it is dude. I'm saying your example was overly specific and violent. It's creepy. Sounds less like you want to fix a problem and more like you want to torture women.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 09:38 AM
1

I said that, then later admitted that I did read it. It also wasn't out of ignorance so much as laziness because you wrote a fucking essay which was filled with nonsense. But I did read it, ultimately, because my lack of ignorance overrode my laziness. So, defend your position or fuck off. I got ya. So, in your book, this is ok: "1 + 1 = 2, you are a cunt-face; the grass is green, you are the stupidest fucking piece of shit in existence, etc" Got it. Also, yes.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 09:34 AM
0

No response. Bless you. They're not ad hominems if there's an actual argument interlaced with the insults. They're just insults. Good job on the fallacy fallacy. Defend your position or fuck off.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 08:37 PM
-1

Those are literally direct quotes.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 06:38 AM
1

Lol. Like I'm fucking reading that. Get a grip. You're ignorant and arrogant and use your biased worldview to justify your biased worldview. Sad. Edit: I did read a little... I went out 3 times to a restaurant this year, and that was to Subway, and even then, I bought the daily special for $3 or $4. I have 3 pairs of pants, and 5 pairs of shirts, one pair of shoes for work. I eat oatmeal every day at work. I buy a big cannister of it for $1, and store it at work, and make the oatmeal in the micr…
/r/MensRights21/09/18 06:35 AM
-1

Again, the person who's creepy is the one saying we need to break fingers and hear screams. Not the one suggesting that, actually, maybe we don't.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 10:20 PM
-1

It's called a weirdly specific and overly violent example... And it's a bad one.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 10:19 PM
-1

Yeah, I'm definitely the creepy one for thinking we don't need to break anyone's fingers and listen to them scream.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 10:19 PM
2

Nah, you don't though. And you kinda have a warped view on the world if you think most people with $10 in their bank account have gotten that way by buying huge TVs and stupid shit. They've probably got that way by having to rent a place where there are jobs, buy a car, keep it fuelled, buy food (y'no, to eat) and other things which constitute staying alive. I'm a professional at an early stage in my career. I cannot do all those things and save simultaneously. My job isn't bad. It's not the hig…
/r/MensRights20/09/18 10:15 PM
-3

No, he's creepy because he talks about "needing" to break a person's fingers and listening to their screams. He's creepy because he made turned a conversation about social policy into some weird, military, torture-porn, fetish thing. The language is overly intimate, detailed and violent for the setting. That's what's creepy. I have no disagreement with the underlying message, necessarily. I'd say I agree that lots of men are overly protective of women. I don't think, however, that we "need" to b…
/r/MensRights20/09/18 08:50 AM
-1

You're... Kinda creepy.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 05:00 AM
3

Maybe you and your friends should do something about it then. Y'no, instead of letting your feminist peers shit all over men while they pay lip service to "equal rights". Cos, until you do, we're probably gonna call feminism what it is - a female rights movement.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 04:58 AM
5

Tl;dr: A person who doesn't understand poverty.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 04:48 AM
1

So? It's correct. Again, if you don't believe that everyone has the right to an education, if they want it - that they don't have the right to try and better themselves - then you're a bigot and a moron.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 04:49 PM
1

Nah. If you can't see that males and females should have equal access to education regardless of vocation then you're a bigot and a moron.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 01:32 PM
0

Nah. If you can't see that males and females should have equal access to education regardless of vocation then you're a bigot and a moron.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 03:11 AM
1

That's a separate issue and one that also requires addressing. It doesn't invalidate the argument that males and females should have equal access to education.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 01:38 AM
0

Nah.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 01:17 AM
0

No, instead, I told you not to be a sarcastic wanker to people who are answering your question and you said "No.", because you're an arsehole. Oh yeah, you're so ok with it that you go "Waaaah, why is everyone downvoting my 'facts'? Can't they see I'm a genius?". Yeah but I'm not a little bitch like you and I won't complain.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 11:57 PM
-1

Tell me, how are you different from a feminist again?
/r/MensRights08/09/18 02:36 PM
0

Not crying. Again, just explaining that if you continue to behave passive-aggressively, people will continue to dislike you.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 02:36 PM
1

That's a separate issue and one that also requires addressing. It doesn't invalidate the argument that males and females should have equal access to education.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 02:31 PM
0

Not a feminist. Contain yourself, child.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 02:30 PM
1

So... Given that I'm not a feminist and already do that, you have to concede my point?
/r/MensRights08/09/18 02:29 PM
1

So... Given that I'm not a feminist, you have to concede my point? Oopsie. Silly hypocrite made an incorrecty assumption!
/r/MensRights08/09/18 05:58 AM
1

Tell me, how are you different from a feminist again?
/r/MensRights08/09/18 05:57 AM
1

Tell me, how are you different from a feminist again?
/r/MensRights08/09/18 05:56 AM
1

Necks, breasts, thighs and feet are all non-sexual parts of the body that nevertheless can have sexual sensitivity. Once again, no part of my argument has ever hinged on sensitivity. But, since you mention it, you cannot cause an orgasm solely by touching someone's neck, thighs or feet. Except maybe in excessively rare or anomalous cases. independent of reproduction, obviously, as is feeding the young. I suppose birthing the young is independent of reproduction, too? Or conceiving the young? Is …
/r/MensRights08/09/18 05:52 AM
1

Not a feminist mate. Just don't like bullshit from either side. That's the problem with both your groups. You're a bunch of lying hypocrites. You don't want equality, you just want to further your own agenda.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 05:39 AM
1

Not a feminist mate. Just don't like bullshit from either side. That's the problem with both your groups. You're a bunch of lying hypocrites. You don't want equality, you just want to further your own agenda.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 05:38 AM
1

Tell me, how are you different from a feminist again?
/r/MensRights08/09/18 05:37 AM
1

Tell me, how are you different from a feminist again?
/r/MensRights08/09/18 05:37 AM
5

Oh, ok... Sorry, I thought this was a place where we wanted equality. Apparently we only want it when men are suffering... Tell me, how are you different from a feminist again? One of us is definitely full of shit and it's this hypocritical tosser called /u/Ghlhr4444.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 04:41 AM
-4

Ok... Keep crying like a little bitch when people try and help you to understand why your posts are shit.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 04:38 AM
-8

Then learn.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 04:31 AM
6

Yeah, it does when we're talking about whether or not that percentage is large enough to matter. 16.5% is a large difference. It doesn't matter what unit we're talking about, it's a noticeably large difference. Especially when the difference should be 0%.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 04:29 AM
1

Cow udders are literally breasts used to feed calves you dumb cunt. A quote from you. Who's lying now, ya silly tittybasket? :D Udders and breasts serve the EXACT same function of feeding the young. Incorrect. Mammary glands produce milk and nipples deliver it. The rest of the breast is completely superfluous to that task, otherwise women with A-cup breasts would produce less milk than women with B-cup breasts and so on. No other great ape has overdeveloped breast tissue like humans do. The reas…
/r/MensRights08/09/18 04:23 AM
0

Except it is. If I offered you a 16.5% raise to your salary would you tell me that it's too small to make a difference, so you don't care and don't want it? No, I didn't think so.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 04:13 AM
4

And that's fine. It's a report with an internal comparison and all the data clearly presented. Again: you asked why it was being downvoted and I told you. Don't get sarcastic with me because I answered your fucking question.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 04:11 AM
1

You presented two articles. If you have more which give a clearer picture, present them. You asked why it's being downvoted, I'm telling you: because it's not an accurate comparison and the data is not there. What you posted isn't useful or scientific.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 03:43 AM
1

Specifically how the fuck are those characteristics relevant to the present discussion you complete piece of shit? You said udders are breasts. They aren't. They're different organs with different functions. Now suck your thumb and calm down, you're drooling on yourself.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 03:40 AM
6

Probably because it's not a direct comparison. Sampling methods may differ which may inflate or deflate estimates - for example, the age ranges are not stated in both. The article saying 264 million children don't go to school seems to suggest it's a larger problem for females but... The data doesn't seem to be there to properly discuss it from either or both of those articles.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 03:38 AM
8

16.5% more is a fairly big difference.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 03:33 AM
23

Or he could've just said what he did because it's fine?
/r/MensRights08/09/18 03:31 AM
1

No, I am not, because thinking on your level would require me to already be a moron at the point I suffered severe brain damage and lost a large chunk of what little cognitive faculties I had.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 03:29 AM
1

... And are located on the stomach, and there's one instead of two. Not that it really has any fucking bearing on the discussion but I'd say they're pretty large biological differences you gibbering twat. The hint is in the name, fucknugget: breasts - udders are not on the breast.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 03:28 AM
1

Ironic... Doesn't understand something so accuses his opponent of being stupid. That is a pattern of yours though. It must be upsetting being so frightfully confused all the time. No wonder you're so angry.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 03:17 AM
1

Weird, that also seems to coincide with when you're wrong.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 01:25 AM
1

You cry a lot when you're wrong, don't you?
/r/MensRights08/09/18 01:05 AM
1

Women do not have orgasms when feeding their babies you complete creepy incel fuckwit. Yeah, they do. The biological function of feeding babies is unrelated to the sexual pleasure of having them stimulated by a partner Nope. It ain't. and feeding babies is OBVIOUSLY completely unrelated to the act of conceiving a baby Not really. You can't feed something that doesn't exist. You are literally too stupid to have a discussion with. Fuck off then. Cow udders are literally breasts used to feed calves…
/r/MensRights08/09/18 12:48 AM
1

If you can't distinguish between feeding babies and pounding vag, you're probably mentally retarded. I don't think I said that breasts are associated with pounding vag'. I said they're associated with sexual reproduction - one of the consequences of which is babies you fucking Muppet. Is a milk bottle a sex toy? Anything can be a sex toy if you're creative enough. Do you think women have orgasms when feeding their babies with their sexual breasts? They sometimes do, actually. They also have orga…
/r/MensRights08/09/18 12:27 AM
1

Someone needs to have "the talk" with you if you're not sure how sexual reproducfion and babies are related. Still, no other animals have breasts like humans. They're an evolved organ selected by sexual attraction.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 12:15 AM
1

I have literally never said that sensitivity makes something a sex organ? It being a sexually dimorphic body part primarily associated with sexual reproduction does - i.e. breasts, vaginas, penises, testicles.
/r/MensRights07/09/18 11:31 PM
1

That doesn't make them a sex organ, dipshit. Feet are for balance and necks are for turning your head. Next question.
/r/MensRights07/09/18 11:19 PM
1

Yeah cos necks and feet aren't fucking sexual you absolute mongoloid. How are you so stupid?
/r/MensRights07/09/18 11:07 PM
1

No, which is why we freely cover necks and feet where necessary, you spanner. Necks we generally leave bare because we need freedom of movement. Full face helmets are to protect your life. Some would suggest staying alive is more important than communicating as efficiently as possible. After all, one can't communicate at all while dead. What happened to you to render you unable to comprehend basic aspects of human nature?
/r/MensRights07/09/18 03:55 PM
1

Yeah but you're a racist coward so I don't have to do shit because I've already won.
/r/MensRights06/09/18 06:04 PM
1

Wow. So you know your opponent automatically wins if you go on a rant about Jews, right?
/r/MensRights06/09/18 05:56 PM
1

The media and your money. Next question? Answer me. How does it feel to be that much of a coward?
/r/MensRights06/09/18 05:44 PM
1

Yeah but you could answer the question. How does it feel to be a little pussy who gets tricked into being a racist through fear? Like... If it honestly feels good to be used by people who want to exploit your sadness for profit then... Lol... You do you!
/r/MensRights06/09/18 05:29 PM
1

Yeah, the independent is a rag. Anyone with any sense knows that. But you didn't answer how it feels. How does it feel?
/r/MensRights06/09/18 05:24 PM
1

Why didn't you listen when I said go back to Brexit? We don't want you here. Like... Honestly... How does it feel to be so gullible that you'll fall for a new scare tactic every six months? Do you not get tired of being constantly angry and afraid?
/r/MensRights06/09/18 05:14 PM
1

Yeah, they do though. Ever heard of a smile? Are you legitimately retarded?
/r/MensRights06/09/18 02:36 PM
0

Cos you can't cover something up if it needs to be visible you fucking cretin.
/r/MensRights06/09/18 11:04 AM
2

Yep, cos they're essential for communication. Last I checked, tits aren't.
/r/MensRights06/09/18 10:46 AM
2

Ugh... Go back to Brexit you cretin. Edit: Ladies and gentleman, it's my great pleasure to introduce /u/skewbuh, the raging anti-semite: The media you say? You mean the media that's overwhelmingly ran by jews? Money you say? From a financial system that's overwhelmingly ran by jews? Very interesting. But you're smart, so smart you'll understand correlation doesn't equal causation. My question is if this group is less than 1% of the population doesn't it seem strange to you that they're so dispro…
/r/MensRights06/09/18 07:14 AM
3

Was she attempting to have sex with the minor, though?
/r/MensRights06/09/18 07:11 AM
3

Pretty sure shy people are ok with exposing their shins. There's a reason society isn't ok with it and it's because they're sexual.
/r/MensRights06/09/18 07:09 AM
1

Whataboutism isn't a word. I think unless you're willing to treat it as a crime when everyone does it then it isn't a crime. If a woman did that, it wouldn't be treated as a crime. So I don't see why I should care. It's a double-standard so I honestly don't give a shit about metoo unless you've already established equal treatment for both genders.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 11:08 PM
5

And my point is that until you're comfortable demonizing women for the same crimes you can stop doing it to men.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 11:02 PM
1

To us, not to everyone. That's the point.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 10:56 PM
1

Really minor, insignificant difference... Especially given that paedophile has come to mean "anyone attracted to those under the age of consent". That's not its technical meaning but it now has two. Stop crying about nothing.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 09:09 PM
6

Did it? Cos I'm pretty sure if a woman behaved the way he did nobody would give a fuck.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 09:05 PM
2

Ah yes... Right. I dunno why but my head must have skipped over that part.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 09:31 AM
1

Yeah but... Why is that relevant?
/r/MensRights29/08/18 06:17 AM
1

Oh, I see. I thought you were saying she does that to her son.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 06:13 AM
3

Uh... What?
/r/MensRights28/08/18 10:35 PM
6

Maybe call social services and report her for neglect and emotional abuse because it sure sounds like that's what she's doing.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 10:34 PM
6

*couldn't care less
/r/MensRights27/08/18 03:17 PM
1

If you can't read my comments properly I will not repeat myself. I will consider you leaving or admitting you are wrong as a signal that you have accepted that I am both correct and a shining, victorious thunder god. Until you decide to conduct yourself like an adult I'm just going to respond with this message: You're a cunt. I win.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 11:31 AM
2

That's not me, it's a bot, dipshit. If you can't read my comments properly I will not repeat myself. I will consider you leaving or admitting you are wrong as a signal that you have accepted that I am both correct and a shining, victorious thunder god. Until you decide to conduct yourself like an adult I'm just going to respond with this message: You're a cunt. I win.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 02:16 PM
1

If you can't read my comments properly I will not repeat myself. I will consider you leaving or admitting you are wrong as a signal that you have accepted that I am both correct and a shining, victorious thunder god. Until you decide to conduct yourself like an adult I'm just going to respond with this message: You're a cunt. I win.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 11:12 AM
1

If you can't read my comments properly I will not repeat myself. I will consider you leaving or admitting you are wrong as a signal that you have accepted that I am both correct and a shining, victorious thunder god. Until you decide to conduct yourself like an adult I'm just going to respond with this message: You're a cunt. I win.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 08:50 AM
0

If you can't read my comments properly I will not repeat myself. I will consider you leaving or admitting you are wrong as a signal that you have accepted that I am both correct and a shining, victorious thunder god. Until you decide to conduct yourself like an adult I'm just going to respond with this message: You're a cunt. I win.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 05:46 AM
0

If you can't read my comments properly I will not repeat myself. I will consider you leaving or admitting you are wrong as a signal that you have accepted that I am both correct and a shining, victorious thunder god. Until you decide to conduct yourself like an adult I'm just going to respond with this message: You're a cunt. I win.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 10:55 PM
0

If you can't read my comments properly I will not repeat myself. I will consider you leaving or admitting you are wrong as a signal that you have accepted that I am both correct and a shining, victorious thunder god. Until you decide to conduct yourself like an adult I'm just going to respond with this message: You're a cunt. I win.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 09:58 PM
0

If you can't read my comments properly I will not repeat myself. I will consider you leaving or admitting you are wrong as a signal that you have accepted that I am both correct and a shining, victorious thunder god. Until you decide to conduct yourself like an adult I'm just going to respond with this message: You're a cunt. I win.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 01:28 PM
1

If you can't read my comments properly I will not repeat myself. I will consider you leaving or admitting you are wrong as a signal that you have accepted that I am both correct and a shining, victorious thunder god. Until you decide to conduct yourself like an adult I'm just going to respond with this message: You're a cunt. I win.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 10:23 AM
1

If you can't read my comments properly I will not repeat myself. I will consider you leaving or admitting you are wrong as a signal that you have accepted that I am both correct and a shining, victorious thunder god. Until you decide to conduct yourself like an adult I'm just going to respond with this message: You're a cunt. I win.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 10:19 AM
1

If you can't read my comments properly I will not repeat myself. I will consider you leaving or admitting you are wrong as a signal that you have accepted that I am both correct and a shining, victorious thunder god. Until you decide to conduct yourself like an adult I'm just going to respond with this message: You're a cunt. I win.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 10:16 AM
1

If you can't read my comments properly I will not repeat myself. I will consider you leaving or admitting you are wrong as a signal that you have accepted that I am both correct and a shining, victorious thunder god. Until you decide to conduct yourself like an adult I'm just going to respond with this message: You're a cunt. I win.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 10:12 AM
1

If you can't read my comments properly I will not repeat myself. I will consider you leaving or admitting you are wrong as a signal that you have accepted that I am both correct and a shining, victorious thunder god. Until you decide to conduct yourself like an adult I'm just going to respond with this message: You're a cunt. I win.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 10:12 AM
1

If you can't read my comments properly I will not repeat myself. I will consider you leaving or admitting you are wrong as a signal that you have accepted that I am both correct and a shining, victorious thunder god. Until you decide to conduct yourself like an adult I'm just going to respond with this message: You're a cunt. I win.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 10:11 AM
1

If you can't read my comments properly I will not repeat myself. I will consider you leaving or admitting you are wrong as a signal that you have accepted that I am both correct and a shining, victorious thunder god. Until you decide to conduct yourself like an adult I'm just going to respond with this message: You're a cunt. I win.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 10:11 AM
1

If you can't read my comments properly I will not repeat myself. I will consider you leaving or admitting you are wrong as a signal that you have accepted that I am both correct and a shining, victorious thunder god. Until you decide to conduct yourself like an adult I'm just going to respond with this message: You're a cunt. I win.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 10:11 AM
1

If you can't read my comments properly I will not repeat myself. I will consider you leaving or admitting you are wrong as a signal that you have accepted that I am both correct and a shining, victorious thunder god. Until you decide to conduct yourself like an adult I'm just going to respond with this message: You're a cunt. I win.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 10:10 AM
1

Before you ramble on with more nonsense, give me one example of a rape accusation that you only of that doesn’t have an accuser attached to it No. Because I never once stated that accusations are made unintentionally. See this is the problem. You don't read the comments you respond to and further cement yourself as a colossal moron.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 09:59 AM
1

If I'm such a pea brain why can't you read or respond to anything I say?
/r/MensRights22/08/18 09:57 AM
1

NO I AM NOT YOU FUCKING IDIOT. I HAVE SAID THAT REPEATEDLY BUT BECAUSE YOU ONLY READ THE FIRST SENTENCE OF MY COMMENTS, YOU DON'T KNOW THAT.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 09:56 AM
1

And just for the record, I literally only read the first sentence of every one of those comments. And you're proud of that? This is why you're utterly failing to see how wrong and how stupid you are being.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 09:56 AM
2

“No it isn’t”.......um yes it is. To say something is unintentional means it wasn’t intended. THE FALSEHOOD WAS UNINTENTIONAL. THE ACCUSATION WAS NOT. That’s 4 comments you’ve made and you’ve destroyed your argument in the first sentence every time hahaha. Interesting that you have consistently failed to demonstrate how. No need to even read the rest let alone debate it with you Is that because you are incapable of either feat? I’ll help you out champ. I’ll give you an example Now let me help yo…
/r/MensRights22/08/18 09:54 AM
1

No, it doesn't prove your point. Your intent was to falsely accuse me and that was plainly evident. Regardless, this is not a court of law, you dipshit. Saying ‘we have to make sure’ that it “wasn’t an unintentional false accusation” is just stupid The concept of assumption of innocence is stupid to you? Well... I guess that means we can accuse anyone of anything and jail them for it then! You're a rapist. Go to prison. I falsely accused you. I go to prison too. I was falsely accused! You go to …
/r/MensRights22/08/18 09:46 AM
1

Because you see enemies in anyone who does not agree with your precise worldview. The slightest hint of disagreement and you already began to insult me. You could have engaged me with civility, but you didn't. Now we're left in a position where you are so angry about nothing that you are unlikely to take a step back and reassess the situation. You will achieve the opposite of what you hope for with this behaviour. Fewer people will agree with you and more people will oppose you.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 09:40 AM
1

No, you aren't. Accusations don’t arise without someone’s direct intent to make an accusation Again, nobody but you is saying that is the case. it’s you that needs to brush up on some very basic definitions, not me Such as? That’s the first thing you’ve said, so I don’t even need to read let alone argue the rest. Read: I have realised I am wrong and cannot function in this discussion. I will, therefore, proceed to pick and choose any area where I (incorrectly) feel I may be able to discredit you…
/r/MensRights22/08/18 09:38 AM
1

The concept behind toxic masculinity is narrow and flawed. It's poorly defined and is manipulated to indicate any undesirable behaviour in the current topic of discussion. It generally ignores the idea that masculinity as a concept is enforced by both genders and that women, and feminism, play a part in sustaining it. It also ignores the toxicity inherent in femininity. Both behaviour patterns are a result of mating behaviours which, to some degree, benefit the majority of individuals (while als…
/r/MensRights22/08/18 09:34 AM
1

Way to dismiss the issue of false allegations and excuse the bastard false accusers I'm not dismissing it. I'm suggesting that you familiarise yourself with the idea of intent, as it is essential to understanding culpability and criminal responsibility. I'm excusing nobody. If someone knowingly makes a false accusation they deserve to be punished. you are disgusting and you are a huge part of the problem And you are the reason the MRM is seen as a bunch of irrational, hysterical, drama queens. Y…
/r/MensRights22/08/18 08:42 AM
1

yeah because allegations and accusations just turn up without anyone doing a thing Oh man... Don't know how many times I'm gonna have to say this. Nobody is suggesting that except you. so you’re a male feminist Nope. I'm an egalitarian.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 08:37 AM
1

So it was completely unintentional But it wasn't, it was quite plainly intentional. As expected, you're incapable of having a civil discussion because you cannot support your argument without relying on insults. Didn’t get a rise out of you eh? Then why did you mention it. Because it's a petty, ineffective, unproductive, childish way to conduct a discussion. If you are an educated adult you should be ashamed of yourself. If you're an uneducated adult I suggest you go back to school and better yo…
/r/MensRights22/08/18 08:35 AM
1

The point is, once again, that the term “unintentional false allegation” is implying that it’s an accident. No it isn't. It implies nothing other than the fact that it is unintentionally false. You're the one conflating that with an accident. The two are similar but distinct. I made my point the first time and it wasn’t to you. Yes, you did, and I'm telling you that your point is wrong. Toxic masculinity, mansplaining etc is as stupid as making excuses for false allegations by using the term “un…
/r/MensRights22/08/18 08:32 AM
2

Only if it's not unintentional. But you refuse to believe they exist for no apparent reason, so we're unlikely to further this conversation in any meaningful way. What do the concepts of toxic masculinity and male privilege have to do with your confusion around intent and mistakes? I'm also a man. Just in case you weren't aware.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 05:53 AM
1

Yes, you stated it, but it was a lie. The entire intent was to elicit an emotional response - one I didn't give you. Don't flatter yourself. No, it's not a cop out because in this case it's a lie. If it weren't a lie I'd forgive you. Let's also not forget that you have utterly failed to defend your point against anything else I've said here. Unintentional false accusations do exist... You just want to pretend they don't for some reason.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 05:50 AM
1

You did say it was an accident and you are, in fact, the only person who said accidentally. Nobody else in the thread said people accidentally make false allegations. They said, sometimes, people may unintentionally make false accusations. They may believe it is an accurate accusation at the time even though it may not be. This could be for a whole host of reasons, as stated above. That's not an accident but it is unintentional. Like people accidentally make false accusations. That’s a good one!…
/r/MensRights22/08/18 12:02 AM
-1

Saying it's unintentionally false is not the same as saying it's an accident. Edit: I am a victorious thunder god.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 12:54 PM
1

Men have been strong since before the first houses because we went out and hunted. Yeah, which is selective breeding. Men can go out and do dangerous tasks because men dying won't stop you from repopulating while women dying does. Any societies that let women do the dangerous work would have died out because women can only get pregnant every nine months. It limits population growth. In populations where men die more often, that's not really a problem because men can impregnate multiple people in…
/r/MensRights08/08/18 01:54 PM
2

Me, personally? Yes. A feminist? No.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 10:10 AM
1

Why should a dictionary definition be focused on Western countries and not the world at large? I guess I didn't get the memo. It shouldn't. It should be factual and the addendum "typically against women" is not factual or integral to the definition. It is an opinion and, at best, a commentary on the current situation. However, since it's not demonstrated that sexism typically occurs towards women, it's incorrect and ironic. What I was saying was that in a given discussion - say one about western…
/r/MensRights08/08/18 08:23 AM
1

Not everywhere. Which is what I was referring to. Right but in order to discuss "everywhere" you need to define where we're discussing because there are probably examples of sexism towards men everywhere else too. Again, in the historical example I gave, there were no laws in place initially and both men and women were victims of sexist and unfair role allocation based on their reproductive organs. Regardless of that, do you think it's helpful to bring up "everywhere" in a discussion where peopl…
/r/MensRights08/08/18 07:58 AM
1

Well, that is a case of sexism. You don't require a great deal of strength to carry and fire a gun. The instances during which strength is a factor in warfare have been limited for quite a long time now but still only men are required to fight in some places. I'd also say, I'd rather have ten thousand weak warriors than five thousand strong ones. I'd rather have ten men and five women in a squad than ten men. Good tactical awareness is that numbers wins when all other things are equal. All other…
/r/MensRights08/08/18 07:51 AM
6

What are you hoping to achieve by insulting people here? Do you think people are going to see that and change their opinions which, often, have been formed by decades of abuse and neglect? Or, rather, do you think they'll see that and find their voices dismissed, again, feel vindicated and become further entrenched in their beliefs?
/r/MensRights08/08/18 07:45 AM
2

But you haven't provided anything at all. I don't think it's fair or verifiable to say that women are generally the victims of sexism more often. I think it's more accurate to say that both men and women are victims of sexism in different (and often opposite) ways. Take a historical complaint that women didn't have the right to work. A valid one, certainly. But the opposing position is that men are forced to work to support their families. In modern, western countries, women are now legally prot…
/r/MensRights08/08/18 07:41 AM
8

Oh aye... That's the problem. Still, you have to admire the cunning. If there's an enemy, there's a fight. If there's a fight, you need a weapon. What better way to sell feminism than to convince people it is the only available tool to fight a non-existent threat to their wellbeing.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 05:00 PM
8

The guy you're talking to knows this and is agreeing with you. He's just clarifying her argument - incorrect as it is. As he says, in order to convince people you have to be as accurate as possible with your rebuttals. Even then, you will struggle.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 12:23 PM
100

Lol... Thought you were serious for a sec.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 11:36 AM
1

No true Scotsman.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 01:42 PM
1

That's wrong, actually. People telling the truth generally get angry because they know you're full of shit and trying to hurt them. People who are lying generally get upset and panicked because they know you know.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 09:54 PM
-1

Your opinion is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 07:34 PM
1

They should be praised. It is absolutely expected but if nobody else is doing it then those who do should be praised or nobody will join them.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 09:07 AM
1

Hmm... As much as I can understand the irritation, there are two sexes, not genders. Gender is not a biological term but a psychological one.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 09:05 AM
5

Lol... Waiting for the collapse of society is not a waste of time but trying to achieve progress is? Weird way of looking at the world. Glad everyone isn't like you.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 08:53 AM
0

Then you're pro-life and necessarily cannot accept a position in which women have the right to an abortion. Now you're forced to consider a world where parents have unwanted children all the time. Those children grow up with bitter adults who try their best to shoulder a responsibility they never wanted. Hell, while you're at it, why don't you argue for abstinence as birth control, since that's the only 100% effective method. Look how well that works? Oh shit, it doesn't, because people get stup…
/r/MensRights19/06/18 11:34 AM
3

No, it is not. You might want to look at it that way, but it just isn't. It's about the rights of a child, who had no say in how it was conceived, or by whom. Bullshit is it. Outlaw abortion if that's the case. Being terminated is much worse than simply not having a father. I don't even speak to mine anymore because he's a piece of shit. Does that mean I should also accept death as an equal or preferable fate? Of course it fucking doesn't. It's about equality. If a man has no participation in th…
/r/MensRights19/06/18 07:08 AM
6

So you believe abortion should be outlawed as well, then? I think terminating a potential life could be considered equal (if not far less moral) to altering the course of that life. Who's to say having an unwilling father would be better? This isn't about your personal views about what is and isn't moral to do about an unwanted pregnancy. This is about equality. If you're willing to offer one party the sole choice about whether to have a child then the other party should have the right to abdica…
/r/MensRights18/06/18 09:54 AM
1

No true Scotsman. What have mainstream feminists movements done to combat inequalities men face in any significant way? Bonus points if it's something that doesn't directly benefit women.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 01:49 PM
2

If it's any help I once had a discussion like this with a colleague and she was quite unpleasant about it. Scoffing at me and trying to get the others in the office to join in and gang up. I stayed calm and tried to gently offer my points. She wasn't horrible, like... Just you could see she was angry. Bit stressful cos we'd been on good terms before that. I left feeling a bit shit and like maybe I was wrong. Came back the next day and she apologised. Said she'd thought about a lot of stuff I sai…
/r/MensRights14/06/18 01:35 PM
1

That last question blew me mind. Nice observation.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 01:31 PM
12

What have "true" feminists done to promote equality for men recently that doesn't also directly benefit women?
/r/MensRights13/06/18 03:47 PM
6

Right but my point is that people are demand more and more legal privileges and rights for women when they are already equal (if not superior) in the eyes of the law. While I'm more than willing to accept that women face social and cultural inequalities I would argue the same is true for men. I'd say the inequalities are different but what do you propose to do about it? If you legislate cultural privileges you become a fascist aiming to control how people think and behave outside of reasonable b…
/r/MensRights13/06/18 11:58 AM
10

Name one legal right that one sex/race/religion has that others don't. In fact, really I can only think of one: reproductive rights. Men have none and women have absolute control up to a certain point of development. Aside from that, everyone has all the same legal rights.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 07:55 AM
7

I work in the NHS, we're banded on an incremental scale. An entry-level position for any given band will pay the same regardless of any factor. If you were hired, you are qualified. Each year you work for the NHS you get moved up an increment within your band until you reach the top of your band. Different level positions have different bands to reflect the qualifications required. You don't really have a chance to negotiate. The only time I've seen is where someone doing the same role as me was…
/r/MensRights13/06/18 07:52 AM
10

You're making an assumption that those men in power act to further the cause of men in general. That's what patriarchy in feminist theory means. The issue with it is that powerful people don't care about their gender 90% of the time. Those men at the top are acting to reinforce and maintain their power through wealth and status. Those who benefit from their actions are generally those similar to them but only in the most salient way, which is wealthy. Many wealthy men benefit from it but so do s…
/r/MensRights13/06/18 07:44 AM
26

Then complained about it. If I was an aspiring actor and a producer who was rumoured to take advantage of young men invites me up into her hotel room... Hmm... I'm pretty sure she's gonna try to have sex with me. I mean, if you don't understand the context of that situation then you're a vulnerable person who has no business going anywhere alone.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 07:41 AM
13

Yeah but the point is that if you physically defend yourself against a woman - the way you might against a man - you will be demonized and punished. It's irrelevant that he can fight off those three woman (even I, a pretty skinny dude, could fight off three average women). It's irrelevant because he is not permitted to raise his fist against them. Nobody will come to his defence for the same reason. Nobody will care because they, like you, believe the lack of self-defence implies consent. It's s…
/r/MensRights12/06/18 09:08 AM
2

Ain't it!
/r/MensRights07/06/18 10:55 AM
1

I think it's the case in England (where I'm from) and certain parts of the USA. I can't remember exactly off-hand but a lot of places legally class rape as specifically penetrating another human being with your penis. Or... Words to that effect. So, a man can rape a woman (or another man) but a woman can't rape anyone. She can only sexually assault them.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 10:52 AM
1

Psychology is a life science. Not a humanities subject.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 07:30 AM
3

You're delusional. Take some time to reflect on all this.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 07:17 AM
8

How is it tearing women down to say "you don't need congratulating for this". Nobody congratulates me for being a strong independent man. It is the baseline expectation of me and I'm punished when I waver from it. I would say... Neither are ideal. I think men deserve a bit more acknowledgement of their virtues and women need a bit less reinforcement of theirs (so that it is equal).
/r/MensRights02/06/18 10:54 AM
1

Make me.
/r/MensRights31/05/18 07:29 AM
1

No, it's an attraction to children. Hebephilia is accurate for this woman but, since it's never used for males or females, paedophile is appropriate. A man who did what she did would be called a paedophile. This isn't a sub that advocates for stringent use of grammar, it's a sub that advocates for equality.
/r/MensRights31/05/18 05:34 AM
4

Not a paedophile tho apparently :D
/r/MensRights31/05/18 12:22 AM
48

No, they're both paedophiles.
/r/MensRights31/05/18 12:21 AM
1

To be fair, most laws aren't really deterrents. At least not to the people interested in breaking them. Psychologically speaking, criminals don't really think about the consequences of their actions. That's why they commit crimes. The legal system is best employed as a quarantine and rehabilition device, not as a deterrent and punishment device. That is, if you want to reduce crime.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 04:59 PM
12

Well, since (in many places) it's not legally classed as rape to have sex with an unwilling man... Only women can lie about being raped. However, both that and the petition should be changed so that they are equal.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 04:51 PM
8

Yeah, if you're a moron.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 11:35 AM
19

Yes but men and boys are all rapists. That little boy is going to rape all the girls there and the mothers too, obviously.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 02:35 PM
0

I ain't tryna be sexist You may not be trying to be sexist... But the fact remains that you are. bro I don't mean like a sociopath Your responses give me the distinct impression that you are biased in your judgement of what constitutes a sociopath. Killing is not a glorious or heroic thing. It is a sad, frightening affair that should only be done when absolutely necessary. I really hope you never have to find that out for yourself. Women are naturally stupid as they often lack reason due their e…
/r/MensRights25/04/18 03:47 PM
11

Physically weaker and nobody is cut out to be a killer. You need a considerable amount of mental conditioning to do it effectively and, even then, risk severe mental ill-health as a result. Men are women are equally intelligent (though there is a slight gender split where men are better with non-verbal reasoning and women with verbal reasoning). If you're just here to be sexist, we don't want you. Edit: Lol. Kid went full retard. Never seen someone actually get banned from this sub.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 02:28 PM
2

Sending your mother's murderer to jail won't help you get over her murder. Receiving compensation from a burglar won't make you feel any safer in your home. Sending a violent criminal to prison for assaulting you won't make you feel any better either. Oh wait. Yes it will. It won't erase the pain but it'll help you believe that society wants to protect you and keep you safe. It'll help you know that most dangerous people are locked up and, ideally, being rehabilitated. Achieving justice for a cr…
/r/MensRights17/04/18 05:33 PM
1

What you said in this comment is perfectly reasonable. What you said before, however, was: but we get skanks claiming rape 40 years after ffs You can't expect to say that with no qualifiers and not have people pull you up on it. Anyone can claim that someone raped them. Not everyone can expect justice. But, for some people, they had no choice but to wait twenty years because they didn't know what happened to them as a child was rape. You can't expect a child to challenge an adult and bring them …
/r/MensRights17/04/18 03:55 PM
5

Wouldn't make a difference if you did. Statistically, it still is... It's not common at all for mass shooters to be female. Still, the question remains why is it a problem for those individuals, specifically, rather than the solution being those individuals are the problem.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 10:36 AM
2

Nobody cares what you think though. Isn't that clear?
/r/MensRights22/03/18 04:52 PM
0

*Cumtwat
/r/MensRights16/03/18 12:24 AM
27

Not quite. See, it's not just that it's not her fault, it's actually his fault for antagonising her and attempting to inflict his patriarchal will on a strong modern woman. It's not enough to just say she did no wrong, you also have to praise her while degrading the victim.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 07:12 PM
2

Those two will never agree with you. I will never agree with you. Nobody in this sub will ever agree with you. Fuck off and reassess your life you poisonous cunt.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 06:26 PM
2

Those two will never agree with you. I will never agree with you. Nobody in this sub will ever agree with you. Fuck off and reassess your life you poisonous cunt.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 12:20 PM
2

Those two will never agree with you. I will never agree with you. Nobody in this sub will ever agree with you. Fuck off and reassess your life you poisonous cunt.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 11:05 AM
1

None necessary. There was none presented with the assertion.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 11:02 AM
2

Men are tough, though. They're not acting tough, they are tough. They're strong, resilient and steadfast. That's what toughness is. Toughness and compassion are not mutually exclusive and I'm sure you'd be the first to parade around saying women are tough. I think this is part of the problem with the whole concept of toxic masculinity... Feminists don't understand what most men think of as masculinity. You hear us say men are tough, strong and brave and you think we mean aggressive, physically s…
/r/MensRights11/03/18 04:08 AM
7

This is one of the biggest problems with feminism and is a throwback to the origins of the movement. All of their terminology is inherently antagonistic and sexist. If you used that kind of language towards any class other than white males people would be appalled. But apparently it's ok to be a disgusting, racist, sexist prick if it's against white men. We have all that privilege I've heard so much about.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 04:01 AM
2

I also agree with the men. The "voting population" doesn't agree with you. Those two will never agree with you. I will never agree with you. Nobody in this sub will ever agree with you. Fuck off and reassess your life you poisonous cunt.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 03:57 AM
2

Hmm... It seems you've missed the point.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 03:51 AM
2

Incorrect.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 03:46 AM
6

That's not how this works. That's not how any of this works. If you don't thank them for five shots, they'll make sure next time it's six. If you do thank them, next time it might only be four.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 03:22 PM
7

In fairness, that woman sounds like an utter dipshit.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 01:11 AM
2

How about I'm not talking about that specific person, I'm talking in general. How about stop being a pedantic twat when you know exactly what I mean. How about stop correcting my grammar when "you" is commonly taken in informal speech to mean "a person". How about either add something to the discussion or shut up. We could all do things differently sometimes but we often don't. I could use a word which changes almost nothing about the message I was delivering to suit one random person on the int…
/r/MensRights21/02/18 03:17 PM
2

No, I didn't. "You" was meant informally. Feel like it's a bit clumsy to say "one should make a formal complaint" in this context but whatever. Doesn't change the actual message behind what I said.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 02:47 PM
2

Then challenge it. Make a complaint that your teacher is not qualified to hold their position as an academic because they are unwilling to consider sources that disconfirm their beliefs. If the university does nothing, your university is shit and your degree will be worthless. In that case, leave the university.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 12:52 PM
1

I'm pretty sure raid level is how sweet the loot drops are.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 08:44 AM
3

They can. As long as you use facts and a good argument you can't be marked down. If your university is employing lecturers who will mark you down for disagreeing with them then you need to either challenge it or find a new university.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 08:43 AM
3

You might not but we shall.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 11:53 AM
1

It makes sense when you think about the dominance hierarchy. Eh... It would but it doesn't in humans. They differ slightly. Most apes have nowhere near the size of social group we do. Even as early humans we had larger social groups. This meant, while we started off with a dominance hierarchy, things started to change quite quickly. Because it was harder to keep track of each individual male, those less dominant realised they could mate through being sneaky fucks, basically. They could use charm…
/r/MensRights07/02/18 12:24 AM
2

What didn't you understand about "a wealth of evidence from reputable journals"? As far as I remember, Bustle and Livescience aren't journals, let alone reputable. Nor, for that matter, does two cherry-picked articles count as a wealth of evidence. See... My degree education actually gives me the ability to do what we call critical evaluation. Money well spent! Keep trying though, this is funny.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 08:18 PM
1

No worries! Tbf testicular cancer has a very low prevalence and mortality rate. So you're right there... We were just talking about prostate cancer, which is far more deadly.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 08:12 PM
3

Lmao. Oh, "science" says I'm wrong does it? "Science", of course, being an unsourced opinion piece by a playwright in psychology today. I have a first class degree in psychology and am a practicing psychologist. Humans are hard wired to be serial monogamists. Until I see a wealth of evidence from reputable journals proving otherwise I'm gonna disregard your useless rag. Its very normal. In fact the period for which it is bearable is approximately 18 years. After that it takes a lot of effort. Wh…
/r/MensRights06/02/18 08:08 PM
7

Actually they're hard-wired to be serial monogamists but that isn't really relevant to this discussion. Edit: For anyone interested in actual science there is lots of evidence suggesting that there are specific neural structures that are involved with limiting sexual attraction towards non-partners when people are in love. Plenty of research also shows production of neurochemicals that initially promote sexual arousal, infatuation, then trust, nesting and bonding behaviours later. It's a complic…
/r/MensRights06/02/18 07:17 PM
4

Than what narrative? There's no narrative there, there are statistics. The number of nurses available is more related to frequency of disease not mortality. That argument doesn't hold. Lower prevalence means fewer specialist nurses necessary. The issue is about access, not raw numbers. If 10 nurses treat 100 breast cancer sufferers and 1 nurse treats 10 prostate cancer sufferers, that's fine... But the article is claiming that isn't the case. The article states that there are nearly half the uro…
/r/MensRights06/02/18 06:47 PM
17

Except this discussion is about prostate cancer which is equally as deadly as breast cancer. 11,433 deaths in 2014 from breast cancer with a 78% survival rate as of 2011. 11,287 deaths in 2014 from prostate cancer with a 84% survival rate as of 2011. UK statistics only.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 04:54 PM
3

Yeah absolutely. Mine was just an example. It's just bad logic to draw conclusions from simple correlations like that.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 02:39 PM
2

Right, but the length of waiting period likely has no impact in and of itself. Sexual partners might be an indicator but, again, it's more probable that too is a correlation with something like emotional instability or risk-taking behaviours which negatively impact relationships. Sorry to be picky but I'm a psychologist and broadly saying waiting period or raw sexual partners are predictors divorce rates is a bit... Simplistic.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 02:35 PM
18

I don't think that necessarily means that period spent waiting prior to marriage is the causal factor. It's probably more likely that those with a higher number of sexual partners are less able/less willing to commit to a single partner.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 12:29 PM
0

I hope you eventually learn how to speak English.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 07:53 AM
0

No, because the word 'toilet' hasn't been used to mean 'ostracise' over many years across many people. I'm sure it has, incorrectly, mind you. Likewise, I'm sure y'all has been used to mean something other than you all but that doesn't make it the case any more than it makes toilet mean to ostracise. Maybe if you try hard enough you can say "Man, we totally toiletted Joe, he was just too much of a douche" and make it common. But, not likely. I'm sure I could. The real question is, why would I wh…
/r/MensRights23/01/18 12:04 AM
1

Nope Conversely, yes. Nope See above. Well, that is true. I'd set a New Year's resolution to not engage with negative people on the internet this year. Looks like you're a failure in more ways than one. Thankfully, my new year's resolution was to increase my petty interactions with dickheads, who have such low self-esteem they can't handle a simple correction, and engage them until they crawl back into their holes like the troglodytes that they are. I don't actually care what you do. You keep sa…
/r/MensRights22/01/18 11:57 PM
1

Yeah, cos you're a model example too. Incorrectly corrects someone then throws a hissy fit when your mistake is highlighted. At this point, nobody is reading our conversation. Nobody cares about what I'm saying but you. My opinions on your grammar have nothing to do with the men's rights movement, nor would I care if they did because I'm not an MRA. At this point, you're just embarrassing yourself. Clearly you can no longer function with the original discussion so you want to mire me in some oth…
/r/MensRights22/01/18 11:46 PM
1

but it is not. It is tho. Hence the apostrophe. That is certainly the origin of the contraction, but the contraction is now a 'word' on its own with a modified meaning compared to what the original "expanded form of the contraction" meant. I mean, by that logic I can say toilet means to ostracise and any time I'm questioned on it then I say the word has taken on a new meaning. It's nonsense to excuse bad grammar. Y'all means "you all". The fact that you use it incorrectly doesn't change its mean…
/r/MensRights22/01/18 11:40 PM
1

Why respond then? Yeah it shows that I think uneducated people like you fuck their sisters. Feel like it was pretty self-explanatory.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 11:37 PM
0

That's not a regional dialect, it's shit grammar. "All y'all" means all of you all. If your region is heavily uneducated that would make sense but it's not a dialect, it's just poor English.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 10:53 AM
0

Ino, fuck me amirite? God forbid you'd want to sound like anything other than an uneducated pillock who fucks his sister.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 12:11 AM
0

No. I do know them and what I'm saying is colloquialisms aren't proper grammar. "All y'all" is a tautology because "y'all" already means "you all". If you use y'all to mean anything other than everyone in a group then you are wrong, lmao. Jesus christ. Way to reinforce the stereotype that you're all morons.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 12:10 AM
1

I'm not from the south, I just know how to speak English. All you all doesn't make any sense and is not correct. You all or all of you is correct, regardless of dialect. Really, if you want to speak like that then go for it, but expect to pulled up on your grammar.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 07:46 PM
0

No, that's bad grammar. If you say y'all it means you all which means the entire group. If you don't mean the entire group you're using the contraction incorrectly. All y'all is a tautology and is grammatically incorrect.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 03:56 PM
0

"All of you all" is not a regional dialect. It's shit grammar.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 01:56 PM
1

Y'all is already "you all". So that would be all 5 already. Fuck you would be one to five people, fuck all of you or fuck y'all would be all 5.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 06:04 AM
2

Huh... Cool. Thanks! That's really interesting to learn.
/r/MensRights22/12/17 10:44 AM
1

Is that real? That'd be a smasher of a counter-argument.
/r/MensRights22/12/17 10:29 AM
8

Uh... I'd say we're probably more moderate than Americans tbf. It feels like you can say more over here without everyone kicking up a stink unless it's genuinely racist/sexist.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 07:58 AM
1

You have absolutely no idea how to follow an argument and you won't get any more from me.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 12:23 PM
0

You have absolutely no idea how to follow an argument and you won't get any more from me.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 11:11 AM
1

You have absolutely no idea how to follow an argument and you won't get any more from me.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 01:35 AM
0

K.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 08:17 PM
0

Gr8.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 06:41 PM
1

Sound.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 05:56 PM
0

Cool.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 04:58 PM
0

Brilliant.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 04:53 PM
1

K.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 04:53 PM
1

No, you aren't.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 04:46 PM
0

Wow what a great argument I guess I'll hang my head in shame. Don't really care what you do. it appears I'm just wrong. Yes.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 04:14 PM
1

You have absolutely no idea how to follow an argument and you won't get any more from me. Soz. Missed this one.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 02:44 PM
0

You have absolutely no idea how to follow an argument and you won't get any more from me. Soz. Missed this one.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 02:44 PM
0

Yeah that's because you're wrong. I just explained what it actually was. Ur welkum.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 02:32 PM
0

That tends to happen when idiots jump into a conversation, ignore the preceding context and ask redundant questions that have already been answered multiple times.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 01:36 PM
-1

Depression itself isn't a valid excuse for either. What is a valid excuse is a loss of control over one's actions as determined by a judge and jury of peers. If a man was in the same circumstances he deserves the same leniency.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 07:54 AM
0

This is fucking pointless.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 06:59 PM
0

Lmfao. It isn't. A court, including a judge, a jury of peers, a defence attorney, a prosecutor and expert witnesses have determined that the circumstances of the murder were enough to mitigate her sentence. Argue that the same leniency be applied to men - I agree. Wishing death on someone who was received a reduced sentence simply because you find the crime itself abhorrent solves nothing. This crime should never have happened.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 04:38 PM
-1

I never said I wish she dies a slow and painful death. No, you butted in when I responded to someone who said they wished this woman die a slow and painful death. If you ignore that you lose all context from my comments. Do you think that a man should only get a year for murdering his wife because she was cheating on him, as it made him temporarily unstable? How about someone who murdered someone under the influence of PCP or something? I think you need to holistically assess each individual cas…
/r/MensRights30/11/17 04:15 PM
1

You have absolutely no idea how to follow an argument and you won't get any more from me.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 03:25 PM
1

You have absolutely no idea how to follow an argument and you won't get any more from me.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 03:25 PM
1

You have absolutely no idea how to follow an argument and you won't get any more from me.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 03:24 PM
-1

I mean it's a barbaric, moronic solution. But ok.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 03:23 PM
-1

No, it doesn't. No, I wouldn't, as much as I may want to. There are better options.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 01:06 PM
1

You have absolutely no idea how to follow an argument and you won't get any more from me.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:41 PM
0

You have absolutely no idea how to follow an argument and you won't get any more from me.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:40 PM
0

You have absolutely no idea how to follow an argument and you won't get any more from me.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:36 PM
0

You have absolutely no idea how to follow an argument and you won't get any more from me.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:34 PM
0

Ok? So? That is what should have happened and wishing she dies a slow and painful death is not productive. Also people can become temporarily unstable and lose control of their actions. Then later show remorse. It's not that complicated. Ok. Call it practical if you like. Dm, it's still the correct course of action.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:33 PM
1

You have absolutely no idea how to follow an argument and you won't get any more from me.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:28 PM
0

You have absolutely no idea how to follow an argument and you won't get any more from me.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:28 PM
0

You have absolutely no idea how to follow an argument and you won't get any more from me.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:19 PM
1

You have absolutely no idea how to follow an argument and you won't get any more from me.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:18 PM
0

You have absolutely no idea how to follow an argument and you won't get any more from me.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:17 PM
0

Yes they should, as has been my argument the entire time. That is compassionate.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:16 PM
1

You have absolutely no idea how to follow an argument and you won't get any more from me.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:15 PM
0

You have absolutely no idea how to follow an argument and you won't get any more from me.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:15 PM
0

You have absolutely no idea how to follow an argument and you won't get any more from me.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:15 PM
0

You have absolutely no idea how to follow an argument and you won't get any more from me.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 11:16 AM
0

You have absolutely no idea how to follow an argument and you won't get any more from me.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 11:16 AM
0

You have absolutely no idea how to follow an argument and you won't get any more from me.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 11:16 AM
0

You have absolutely no idea how to follow an argument and you won't get any more from me.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 10:57 AM
0

You have absolutely no idea how to follow an argument and you won't get any more from me.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 10:45 AM
0

You have absolutely no idea how to follow an argument and you won't get any more from me.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 10:32 AM
-1

Well... Actually no... Those men should be treated with compassion, like women are. The key to equality isn't avenging mistreatment but raising everyone to the point where they aren't mistreated.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 10:23 AM
0

You have absolutely no idea how to follow an argument and you won't get any more from me.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 10:19 AM
1

You have absolutely no idea how to follow an argument and you won't get any more from me.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 10:16 AM
0

You have absolutely no idea how to follow an argument and you won't get any more from me.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 10:01 AM
0

Is it a perfect system? But it's not even a functional system... As you admit. Lock them up, offer no rehabilitation, then let them go into a worse environment than before. Guess what happens? They reoffend. Prevention is more important than punishment and your way achieves nothing.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 08:48 AM
0

Read the first sentence and stopped because I realised after your last comment that you are the one responsible for the vast majority of retarded replies I've received. You have absolutely no idea how to follow an argument and you won't get any more from me.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 08:45 AM
1

What do you do, then, when murder has already been committed by a mentally ill individual. Examine how this person was failed by mental health provision and make sure they are treated. If it was temporary "insanity" then they likely are not going to have a particularly easy time dealing with the guilt of murdering their own child. Put them in a secure unit and try to help them. I feel like that should be very fucking obvious to anyone with half a brain. That's what they all say Then why the fuck…
/r/MensRights30/11/17 08:44 AM
1

You have no business restraining my emotions or anyone else's for a start. No, that's your business, so fucking do it. You're an adult, not a child. You're theory of IT applying to men and women while very noble and egalitarian of you, isn't how it is in real adult land. I'm sorry... Are you trying to convince me or do you just want to mock me? I tell you I agree with you and you patronise me? Fuck off you sad twat. You get pretty emotional for someone telling other people not to get emotional. …
/r/MensRights30/11/17 08:13 AM
1

Oh ok so we just wait until a mother murders her child. Then imprison her. Great solution. All those dead babies will be grateful that... They're... Not at risk anymore? Or are you saying that mothers who are considering murdering their infant child are in a rational enough place to stop and go "Ooh but I might get caught and sent to prison for this... Based on that one woman's story." Lmfao. See we've saved a shit load of kids from death already. Please never ever be in a position to make decis…
/r/MensRights30/11/17 08:09 AM
0

Except that won't do anything cos someone murdering their child probably isn't thinking very rationally you thick cunt.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 08:05 AM
0

90% of the prison population probably should be released. I wouldn't want to make a good member of a career that routinely promotes liars and corrupt individuals to power. Lmao. I'm not an intellectually dishonest person and I'm not interested in lying to secure popularity. I'll stick with my career ta.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 08:05 AM
0

No, they're really not. I could equally argue that you're conflating rationality with emotion and muddying the water with intentionally spurious arguments. If a man is about to stab your wife and you shoot him in the head that is perfectly rational. If you murder him because your wife slept with him that is emotional. If you're frightened that you will be judged for having a child out of wedlock then that is emotional. If you're frightened you won't be able to pay for a child on your own that is…
/r/MensRights30/11/17 07:57 AM
1

Lmao. Did I at any point excuse any of that? At what point in my argument did I say any of that was ok? If I'm saying justice is not vengeance what in the world makes you think I find those things acceptable? Jesus fucking christ. My argument is to restrain your fucking emotions for two minutes and think critically about every crime. Not just this one individual's. It applies to men and women and I'm getting pretty fucking sick of restating that over and over.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 07:07 AM
0

Then you're a moron. Imprisoning this woman will not deter her from hurting someone in the future. Whether it's an inmate or upon release. Imprisoning this woman will not stop another unwell individual from hurting someone in the future.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 07:00 AM
1

Would you say the same about a man who killed a baby Lol. Yes. Of course I would. Doesn't usually stop people from labeling such men as the fucking monsters they rightly are. I don't remember any part of my argument excusing that behaviour. We can't tolerate murder as a society, no matter how mentally ill the murderer may be. No, we can't. But punishment is a poor deterrent for crime, especially among the mentally ill. Prevention is the best solution to crime.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 06:59 AM
1

I'm not excusing anything. They should be treated by mental health services rather than imprisoned if they are mentally ill, though, yes.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 06:56 AM
1

None of those are rational. You could have had an abortion if any of those were applicable and the first is not your decision to make. Euthanasia is illegal, justified or not.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 06:56 AM
0

Lol. Punishment does not cure mental illness in women or men. Jesus christ.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 06:54 AM
1

I'm well aware that there are usually mitigating factors and that is exactly my argument. It is an argument that applies to males as well. I do not believe she should be treated with compassion because she's a woman. I believe she should be treated with compassion because she's a human being. What she did was horrible and unforgivable. However, if there is a legitimate reason it happened, like mental illness, then perhaps we should be discussing that rather than stroking our hate boners. Agreed.…
/r/MensRights30/11/17 06:53 AM
1

Fine. Then charge her with obstructing justice.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 06:49 AM
1

No.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 06:48 AM
0

But you're arguing that the cause for that is that they are arguing mental illness was responsible for behaviour. People can temporarily become unstable then later show remorse and understanding of their actions. The fact that she lied and concealed the crime does not mean she wasn't temporarily out of her faculty.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 09:57 PM
1

No they can't but this does raise a good point which is that laws are social constructs and so is mental illness. However, there are plenty of cold, rational reasons to kill an adult human (they are threatening your life or that of your family) or to steal (you are starving to death). There are few, if any, reasons a mother would kill her own child unless she was in severe mental distress. It is, obviously, a complex issue but my point and that of the original poster is that if this is a legitim…
/r/MensRights29/11/17 09:24 PM
-5

Really poor understanding of insanity pleas.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 09:18 PM
-2

Thankyou for saying this. Despite the downvotes you are absolutely correct. Justice is not revenge and people are forgetting that.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 09:17 PM
-3

would you accept that? No. Nor do I accept this. If she is mentally unwell why was she not being seen by mental health services? Where were the safeguarding referrals? Why was she allowed care of a child she might harm? What I'm saying is why was this allowed to happen in the first place? We're too late. There is no solution now because the child is fucking dead forever. If her mental health was in question, prison is not a solution and more people are likely to be injured or killed either by th…
/r/MensRights29/11/17 09:12 PM
1

Nor do I need to. A mentally well person does not murder their infant child. Lmao... Jesus christ. It's not an allowance to murder you moron. I'm saying if there is a mental wellbeing issue then simply imprisoning the person is useless. If you want to stop children from dying, think critically you fucking twat. If you don't, bung her in prison and be done with it.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 09:08 PM
1

No you couldn't. There are plenty of rational reasons to kill an adult human being.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 09:05 PM
1

Yeah, again, evil is a pointless, reductive word used by people who have zero ability to empathise or think critically and rationally. It's laden with emotion and is just a veil to disguise the fact that you're angry and want to punish someone. I'm angry too, I want to punish her too. I'm a human being. I don't have to act on my emotions.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 09:03 PM
-1

I mean. Nobody kills their baby if they're mentally well. Lmao.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 08:19 PM
-8

Well done for failing to engage with this topic in a rational manner. Feel proud that you are perpetuating a system which does not provide adequate help to individuals before a crisis - merely punishes them after an infant child is dead. Enjoy your justice boner. Blood is on your hands.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 08:15 PM
-20

Would you say this is the behaviour of a mentally well individual? I mean... I won't forgive the behaviour, nor do I have to... But murdering an infant is not something a healthy human being does. Evil is just a word people with no empathy use to excuse revenge. As an example, heard of post-natal depression? One of many symptoms is fantasies or psychotic features that predispose new mothers to killing their newborn baby. Labeling this as evil does nothing to prevent future harm to children. That…
/r/MensRights29/11/17 07:28 PM
6

Nice contribution.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 10:38 PM
2

Haha, not to worry! Happens to the best of us. Curse you homophones, curse you to the very depths of hell.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 11:07 AM
2

Just so you know it's "allude". Elude means to escape, generally through speed, stealth, cunning or misdirection.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 08:28 AM
3

Dude... It was clearly an example. There's plenty of info detailing exactly what you're asking in the sidebar.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 12:59 AM
1

Except that isn't my argument. Lol. Calling someone retarded because you don't understand what they're saying isn't exactly smart either. Let's put it a different way. Can we or should we regulate people's hormones to reduce aggression? No. Right. So blaming hormones is pointless especially given the fact that the vast majority of people can suppress emotional urges caused by hormones. Saying "I has estrogen therefore I can behave like an asshole" is as ridiculous as saying "I has testosterone s…
/r/MensRights13/11/17 09:51 AM
1

Again, the original poster was arguing from a deterministic position, that hormones caused violent behaviour. The simple presence or absence of hormones is not the issue. Now can you kindly fuck off unless you have something other than pedantry to offer?
/r/MensRights13/11/17 06:33 AM
1

No I haven't. If you have anything relevant to add please do so soon because I'm getting tired of this.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 10:54 PM
1

I'm well aware of all of that and never stated otherwise. Your comments are adding nothing to the discussion. The original person to whom I responded was blaming violent behaviour on hormones. Again, this is not reasonable otherwise we would all behave violently. Most individuals are able to suppress the urges caused by high levels of hormones. Those who don't are the problem, not the hormones themselves. If you have anything relevant to add please do so soon because I'm getting tired of this.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 08:55 PM
1

But it's a poor explanation. That's like saying men are abusive because of hormones, while neglecting that many man are not abusive but have the same hormones. Hormones cannot be the cause. The cause is a lack of personal responsibility and impulse control. Men are taught to control their feelings (but not resolve them) better than women are. That's the issue.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 11:36 AM
2

"Reasoning" is a strong word.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 01:18 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter