TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

pahncrd Archive

View 0 posts and 387 comments by pahncrd on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Hmm, I guess one can't rely on anecdotes. I suppose a lot of it might depend on geographical location.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 07:39 PM
11

Most men (and women for that matter) will help a man out too. Most people are generally decent when given the chance.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 02:27 PM
70

At the very least she could simply ask someone politely for some help instead of acting as if she is entitled to personal servants at every turn.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 05:58 AM
1

While it's troubling that so many reject clear scientific evidence, creationism isn't necessarily the same thing as young earth creationism.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 02:40 PM
1

I think you are talking passed each other. Arakin, you are making a reasonable statement about how our system of capitalism works, and VagMaster, you are making a personal moral claim.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 11:52 PM
2

I never had a father (that I knew), only an extremely abusive mother. I admit that I am jealous of your awesome father. I work hard to instill a sense of self reliance and self discipline in my children. I give them choice, even when it would be easier to remove choice, so that they can learn to resist impulse and make difficult decisions, because I know it will only get more difficult.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 01:39 AM
51

You did well because your dad made some good contacts, worked hard and got lucky. It could have easily gone south. That said, nothing ventured, nothing gained. Lucky or unlucky, I doubt any of it had to do with you being white however. I also grew up extremely poor, and I was on my own and homeless from the ages of fourteen through eighteen. I have struggled most of my life, and while I am very far from rich, I am an engineer making a respectable living. While it's possible I avoided institution…
/r/MensRights24/12/13 02:53 PM
2

They do not deserve help.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 06:24 PM
2

Agreed, but what's to be done about current college age men? It doesn't have to be AA, but we obviously have quite a few socioeconomic issues to address.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 04:40 AM
2

Heh heh, phenotypes are sneaky.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 07:00 AM
6

Coercion requires the use of force or threats. That said, and while the girls were certainly not without blame, the boys were out of line in their behavior for violating the trust of the girls sending the pictures.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 11:45 AM
2

I understand. I learned a lot by avoiding mistakes that other people made. Granted, I made a lot of my own mistakes. I didn't mean to give you crap, it's just that people seem to get it in their head that all mistakes can be avoided, but they cannot. If there is one thing men need more of in the western world, it is empathy. Not complete dismissal of agency, but empathy, understanding and a chance at redemption.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 02:46 PM
2

I hope you are thankful for your parents and/or mentors, because I guarantee you didn't spring out of the earth with those forward thinking skills.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 11:58 AM
21

The boy could've eaten anything except McDonalds. It was his choice to not eat. From the sound of things, going without a meal would have been good for the child's attitude in this case. It isn't at all a good thing to reward such tantrums, as it only encourages further awful behavior.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 07:40 PM
1

Was it really a viable social choice that you could stay home with the child?
/r/MensRights07/10/13 10:31 PM
14

If anyone hasn't seen The Hunt, I suggest it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hunt_(2012_film) Lucas is an average member of a small, close-knit, Danish community. Being a divorcee who is struggling to maintain a relationship with his son and having lost his former job as a secondary school teacher, he is facing some difficulties in his life, and resorts to working at a kindergarten to make ends meet. Yet he enjoys wholesome interaction with the children, and there seems to be a silver lining w…
/r/MensRights16/09/13 06:34 PM
12

It's hard to be a reasonable centrist when politics is all about polarizing people. You aren't alone though.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 03:54 PM
3

Yep, men are expected to just take all punishment that comes their way, give all of their money to everyone else and never complain about any of it. So much privilege....
/r/MensRights30/08/13 05:31 PM
2

Thanks for the compliment. I didn't feel like you were attacking me. I have very clear expectations, but I encourage free thinking. I want my children to understand the need for my rules, and not simply blindly follow them. That can be difficult sometimes when there is a rule that they aren't mature enough to understand yet, such as why I won't allow them to do their homework with their friends (too much answer sharing, not enough thinking and I like to put the information they learn into contex…
/r/MensRights27/08/13 04:37 PM
2

I'm a fairly firm, but very fair parent. I'm always willing to hear my children out when they have concerns or problems. I've found that being reasonable with them tends to breed reasonable behavior. I don't beg them to behave, and my orders aren't generally requests, but I will offer explanations. I would never pull that shit where I try to turn my son into an effeminate drone, and neither would my wife of 13 years. Keeping quiet in the car is a safety issue and I am very clear to my kids' frie…
/r/MensRights27/08/13 04:11 PM
2

Yep, pretty silly shit.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 01:16 PM
13

Alright, since it is almost bed time for me, I'll give you the quick version. The reasoning is that MADD pushes legislation that is meant to curb moderate social consumption of alcohol, as opposed to focusing on the high blood alcohol levels that most often contribute to deadly collisions. They are very strong supporters of sobriety checkpoints, which are not only unconstitutional, but are also extremely poor at actually catching DWIs (especially when compared with more traditional methods metho…
/r/MensRights27/08/13 04:09 AM
12

The war on drugs is prohibition. Although, I am sure you meant alcohol prohibition. The alcohol prohibition movement was started by women so that they could win the fight against corporations for their husbands' money. Men, just as they are now, were seen as nothing more than walking wallets. It was eventually championed by people with an even more disturbing agenda. Of course, the alcohol prohibition movement is still alive because of the efforts of MADD and other anti-freedom groups.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 03:25 AM
61

To be fair, I expect both of my children to be reasonably quiet while I am driving. I have both a son and a daughter.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 03:19 AM
-1

Religion is a choice (to an extent), the rest is not. It is much like political affiliation. I couldn't care less about religion, right up until it screws with my life or scientific understanding.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 03:42 PM
1

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 06:07 PM
3

The woman should be in prison. If you had hit her with a hammer, that would have been attempted murder, and you would likely still be in prison. I'd be extremely concerned about her hurting your child at some point. She obviously has no problem with murder.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 04:16 PM
1

I won't say you are wrong, but having a kid can be extremely awesome. It just sucks that the family court system is so screwed up.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 04:10 PM
17

FFS, the guy was trying to get away and she kept hitting him. What was he supposed to do? If you throw a punch, you'd better be damned well prepared to take one too.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 12:24 AM
1

Please re-read both of my missives. I think you are projecting ingrained prejudices onto me without understanding the theme of my rhetoric. It is a better understanding of the inner workings of our bodies that will allow us to more efficiently and effectively tackle health and fitness obstacles. I will say again, I think that attempts at self-improvement, both mental and physical, are worthy endeavors.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 07:37 PM
0

Now, I know it can be difficult to be open minded on a subject that such as this, which gets internalized to a great degree, but hear me out. That's generally the old way of thinking. Much like how people used to think that consumption of animal fats should be avoided and margarine was more healthy. I don't know what your training/education is in, but do some research into pharmacokinetics (especially at the liver), enzymatic synthesis and the roles of the endocrine system. If you want a brain b…
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:44 PM
1

I hope it can help people, however, it is fallacious at its core, and hardly science of any kind. We already know of several genes related to obesity/fitness, and also of the complexity of hormonal interactions that contribute to body type. This isn't even bringing into account the way that different calories from different sources are metabolized. That said, self-improvement of all types, physical and mental, are worthy endeavors, regardless of starting point or predispositions.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 10:40 PM
13

Tbh, that seems to be about appropriate for ass grabage.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 04:50 AM
2

Men are still expected to be providers and their time and money is always expected to belong to others. That's the classical masculine view that I believe he is referring to. Men are always expected to live for everyone else.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 08:29 PM
11

I don't think he was bringing legality into it. He was making a point that the person's espoused tenets forbade him from taking the actions he was taking. I'm not sure that the specific passage mentioned actually means that Christians shouldn't preach though, but rather that they should see prayer as a very private thing that one should not seek to be seen doing. Edit: Thinking about it, Mathew 7 would be a far better argument against what the preacher was doing. Not that he deserved to be assau…
/r/MensRights07/08/13 02:27 PM
20

That's about what I thought. It's easy to see the societal double standard.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 07:23 PM
19

The question is simple. Was it okay to do to both males by females and females by males?
/r/MensRights30/07/13 06:48 PM
18

Are you saying it is okay to do it to either men or women?
/r/MensRights30/07/13 05:52 PM
45

There are a fair number of women that fantasize about being taken roughly for coital interaction. That doesn't mean it is okay to assume it of someone. I'm agreeing with you mind you, but some people want things that they wouldn't necessarily admit, and yet it is still wrong to start taking away peoples' ability to consent, whether male or female.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 05:51 PM
6

Nah, they can even do take backs for days afterwords and that makes it rape retroactively.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 05:30 AM
1

Hmm, I'd like to think we are reaching for civility more than domestication. I'd like to.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 04:37 AM
2

Rape and murder can be said to have foundations in biology as well (look at ducks, dolphins and chimps). Are we not civilized though? At the very least, is egalitarianism not a worthy goal?
/r/MensRights19/07/13 04:35 AM
27

That's an awesome judge.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 04:31 AM
2

Only authoritarian leftists support this shit. There is such a thing as the old school freedom loving progressive, that just wants an effective balance between economic classes.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 09:43 PM
2

If it was a black guy emailing her, that would legally constitute rape.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 02:27 PM
1

I also frequent /r/politics. That doesn't mean I agree with everyone there. The way I see it, females are deemed as delicate flowers, which isn't fair, but men are deemed as disposable tools. Oppression exists for both genders, with only a few people at the top really escaping that oppression. I don't know how many times I have been told to "man up", but it was always because someone wanted something from me that I didn't want to give them.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 04:21 PM
2

I am an egalitarian and humanist, and unfortunately, /r/humanism is a slow subreddit.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 04:16 PM
6

They're anecdotes, so I am not sure you would find them intellectually satisfying. However, things along the lines of women and children being allowed to escape dangerous situations first, or crimes being more heinous if they include the death of women and/or children. https://www.google.com/search?q=women+and+children&oq=women+and+children&aqs=chrome.0.57j60j65j0l2j5.2427j0&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 To be fair, I think a lot of these attitudes also infantilize women and limit opportunities for e…
/r/MensRights28/05/13 03:54 PM
5

I don't believe in your basic premise that the reason women haven't been/aren't in combat roles is because they've been seen as too valuable. I never said this. While I do think society does value women/children over men, and finds them less disposable, I wasn't asserting that as the reason why women were not allowed in primary combat roles. I can't speak to any peer reviewed studies on the subject of male disposability, I have certainly been exposed to a million anecdotes regarding the greater …
/r/MensRights28/05/13 03:47 PM
5

I have no problem at all with women serving in any role that they can show basic competency. I think perhaps that if women are allowed to die for corporate wars as well, then maybe our society will start to pay closer attention to why we are wasting the lives of our troops.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 03:32 PM
4

Have you ever seen god bless america? It reminds me of Falling Down in a way.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 03:27 PM
2

I was just messing around man. ;)
/r/MensRights21/05/13 01:45 PM
1

Hey, why the python hate? It's not all I use by a long shot, but it's great for system test automation.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 05:07 AM
3

Accountability and individual responsibility are important traits as men/women, but collaboration is by far our greatest strength as humans. That's what next gen star trek had to say to me, and it still hits home.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 05:05 AM
37

I've never seen quite such an accepting lot as engineers. Either you have the passion and aptitude or you don't. Gender, race and other ancillary factors don't come into it. Engineers need to collaborate with other engineers that know their shit. Other than basic communication skills, not much else matters.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 05:49 AM
15

I'm not sure what's wrong with senior software engineers making six figure salaries. It's actually not all that easy and scrubs fall out of the game quite quickly from my observation. (/test engineer)
/r/MensRights20/05/13 05:46 AM
1

That's for sure. It reminds me of the Japanese hatred of Koreans, even though most Japanese, except for the Ainu, probably migrated from Korea.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 05:33 PM
1

Italians aren't white?
/r/MensRights18/05/13 04:15 PM
20

I was being hyperbolic, not literal.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 03:05 AM
32

The judge will probably just chalk it up to male privilege driving the feminists to their actions.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 12:44 AM
2

That's certainly my experience at least.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 04:36 PM
16

Indeed, and many will be religious again by middle age.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 07:37 AM
3

A lot of feminism is quite authoritarian, much like neo/social conservatism, I do not find it to be a progressive ideology in current form.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 02:04 PM
1

Maybe, maybe not, I don't think there is anything inherently positive about ignoring family in the pursuit of more money. That said, no doubt she enjoyed the lifestyle his ambition provided.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 12:43 AM
3

It wasn't right of course, and the mother should see jail time, but hopefully he can still salvage a relationship with his child. At least he wasn't cuckolded and then still put on the 18 year hook.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 02:26 PM
5

You should at least live a little before you die. Even moderation is best adhered to in moderation.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 04:51 AM
3

You might try egalitarianism, it makes more sense as a long term ideology.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 01:55 AM
1

Because she is a female and either has higher testosterone than average females (which is possible) OR she is extremely talented. Talent is natural aptitude and would include higher than normal testosterone production. I agree with you otherwise.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 05:50 PM
2

While I have lived in a few southern states, I used to live in southern Missouri, and that was probably the worst as far as ignorance goes. I lived in an extremely rural portion of the ozark mountains in a town of about 10 people (somewhat near a town of about 200 people mind you). It was not uncommon to actually see someone that looks like this... Farmer Fran ... drinking moonshine they just dug up, while feasting on some squirrel or other roadkill. The school was all one room, and ass paddling…
/r/MensRights09/12/12 08:32 PM
3

Well, in the south, the people in urban areas tend to skew more reasonable and less slack-jawed. At least from my experience of living in various parts of the south. Going out into the rural areas can be a crap shoot though.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 07:14 PM
5

He allegedly "chocked" her.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 01:37 AM
5

A lot of women don't like the idea of being caught out on their paternity scams.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 03:44 AM
17

I'm sorry, but we can't just put people away without proof. That's beyond authoritarian.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 07:26 PM
6

Texting is awesome. I like being able to think my responses through and get to conversations when I have a chance or care to. I'm 33 and not shy, and while I enjoy talking to people in person (it's okay to do other things and be silent for a while in person until something comes up), I fucking loathe talking on the phone. Most of my time talking on the phone is spent just trying to either end the exchange, or continue the exchange in person or through email/text.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 03:37 AM
6

It isn't all that uncommon if you look around google. There are plenty of posts online by women looking for advice on how to conceive in a clandestine way when their significant other isn't interested in having children. Poking holes in condoms, not taking birth control pills correctly and/or simply lying about being on birth control are common techniques for deceitful conception. Check out the case below where a man received oral sex, and his ex-girlfriend kept his sperm in order to get pregnan…
/r/MensRights18/09/12 03:06 AM
5

I get your point, as the general trend of family law in all states has been to increasingly screw over men, but some states are worse than others when it comes to the sheer exploitation of men. It is abhorrent how they have brought back debtors prison, force men to support children that aren't their's or were conceived via deceit (women saving sperm from condom or lying about birth control) and how they force men in some cases to literally pay more in child support than they make, just because t…
/r/MensRights18/09/12 12:55 AM
18

Sometimes that doesn't work because of common law marriage and other hangups. You can't get oral pleasure (from a woman) as she may keep the sperm and impregnate herself, making you liable for 18 years of payments. Even not having sex sometimes fails, as you can be on the hook just for taking on a fatherly role for a child. Additionally, if a woman claims you as the father on a birth certificate, whether the child is yours or not, you may still be on the hook for payments, especially if you don'…
/r/MensRights18/09/12 12:18 AM
4

I was reading somewhere that it is actually men that are more often searching for love when going outside of marriage, and that women will more often seek strictly physical relationships. It is possible I suppose. I wish I could remember the source so I could share it.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 08:04 PM
-5

No one can be vigilant against everything. That sentiment reeks of victim blaming and of the "just world" mindset. That's not to say that reasonable precautions shouldn't be taken.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 08:24 PM
-1

Make-up is lies. ;)
/r/MensRights21/08/12 10:46 PM
3

Ah, thank you. :)
/r/MensRights15/08/12 11:34 PM
2

Everyone has different preferences, but we never know who it will be that completely changes our life. It's all well and good that we try to make checklists of features we want in the person we love, but in the end it doesn't matter much when your true love enters your life and blows you away.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 11:13 PM
7

Okay, this is some sappy shit, so if you don't like sappy shit, don't believe in true love, or are dead inside, do not read this missive. I love my wife with every gram of my being. She saved my life and my soul (broad idea of soul). I had a tough life up until I'd met her (homelessness from 13 years of age after years of physical abuse, ducking the hyper-fundamentalist and abusive foster homes, and I was forced to do things, for horrible people, that I am not proud of in order to eat/survive) a…
/r/MensRights15/08/12 11:08 PM
2

I'm not sure why you were down-voted for just stating your opinion. Anyway, I think there is a constant societal pressure to feel bad about ourselves. I just wanted to make sure my wife knew how much I love her natural breasts, and while I would love her regardless of her breast size, I prefer the natural look and feel of what she has. Besides, there is a small, but significant danger that sensation or sensitivity could be effected, which is far from a chance I am happy about taking. I want my w…
/r/MensRights15/08/12 10:20 PM
1

Call her, she is (consciously or subconsciously) seeing if you are actually interested (she may have her own esteem problems). No more than once though. Make a single obvious attempt to contact her, and then wait.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 09:17 PM
3

My wife thought about breast augmentation, but thankfully I talked her out of considering it. I love her natural b-cup breasts, and breast augmentation would be messing with something I love.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 09:15 PM
2

Actually, I am for a more effective and intelligent justice system for everyone, not just women. Perhaps you misread my missive, but I was saying that I would like to see men get the help they need and not be railroaded into death sentences when their only crime was being batshit insane. I don't believe in a two tiered justice system, depending on gender, so I don't think your label applies. When looking at the state of crime, punishment and mental illness support, I think we should be looking t…
/r/MensRights10/08/12 09:15 PM
2

While I certainly acknowledge that there is a major difference in the "justice" received by males and females, this is a deeply disturbed person, and whether male or female should be in an asylum for however long it takes. When looking at the state of crime, punishment and mental illness support, I think we should be looking to more fair treatment of men as opposed to harsher treatment of women.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 03:31 PM
0

Possibly, it has all of the makings of a modern urban legend, but I could certainly see it happening (the part about only the man being arrested).
/r/MensRights09/08/12 09:18 PM
9

Sure, you should be allowed, and while it won't be surprising when you walk home naked, the fault still lies with the people that stole your suit. Just because a crime is easy, doesn't make a person any less at fault for committing it. However, it is good to advise people how to deter criminality.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 08:38 PM
6

Unfortunately reddit can't tell the difference between a hitler based ad hominum and a reductio ad absurdum You are on reddit, so apparently part of it can. There is no single entity of "reddit". It is an ocean of people, of which you and I are a part. So saying that "reddit is this" or "reddit is that" doesn't really make sense.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 05:38 PM
2

Not really, as the religious parents are trying to force genital mutilation on someone that cannot possibly give consent. This is them trying to exert their religion on others in a violent manner. The parents can do anything they want to themselves, but they cannot force genital mutilation on others. In other words, the parents have freedom over their own bodies, and the baby has freedom over his own body. It is up to the child to decide whether circumcision is important to him when he comes to …
/r/MensRights15/07/12 09:28 PM
5

Indeed, and the amounts they require for child support very often don't represent reality, such as assigning support according to what the judge thinks a man "should" be making and not how much he is actually making. It's asinine.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 08:39 PM
94

Yeah, just remember to not rape anyone today. I was going to rape someone, and then I remembered those posters and it reminded me that rape is wrong.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 09:59 PM
3

True that, unfortunately tribalism is a strong force.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 09:57 PM
5

I agree, we need to separate fringe members from mainstream, but it just becomes "no true Scotsman" at some point. It isn't even just a problem with female feminists, as there are male feminists that get their jimmies all rustled at the thought of mrm. Personally, I don't dislike women in general, and I take them on a case by case basis just like men. Hell, I've been married in a very equal relationship with the love of my life (we've been together since high school) for twelve years now and I h…
/r/MensRights29/06/12 09:38 PM
12

Personally I get REALLY insulted by the posts in here about men who have been fucked over by an ex, and use that behaviour as the standard for all women. Most of the time, the complaint is simply that we shouldn't live in a society that enables and encourages that sort of behavior. That alone is enough to attract vitriol from feminism though.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 09:30 PM
3

Women overwhelmingly prefer men that are already successfully mated, so a ring isn't going to be much help necessarily.
/r/MensRights10/06/12 07:03 PM
8

It is genital mutilation regardless of friendly names we've grown up with. We wouldn't put up with non-consensual removal of the clitoral hood on baby girls, because it is genital mutilation. Sometimes people need to be reminded that the male analogue to clitoral hood removal is removal of foreskin and is also genital mutilation. Non-consensual genital mutilation is wrong regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights09/06/12 11:46 PM
11

Non-consensual male genital mutilation is a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights09/06/12 09:28 PM
1

I see your detector is working. :D
/r/MensRights07/06/12 10:11 PM
5

Remember, nothing is an illness or disability unless it can easily be seen. Depression, ADD, bipolar and all other mental diseases are all fake. Also, so is any non-visible physical ailment. The only people on disability should be people missing limbs.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 01:46 AM
24

I am all for men's rights, but one thing bugged me on that list. I don't think anyone should be able to force a person to carry a child to term. It would be nice if we had third party receptacles that could house and allow gestation of fetuses, but as it is we have to rely on the bodies of women. So long as that is the case, we have to rely on women to willingly provide their bodies in order to bring children into the world. Otherwise, it is a woman's choice to terminate and cease allowing use o…
/r/MensRights03/06/12 02:06 AM
8

Not all female circumcision requires removal of the clitoris. That's only the most severe that is practiced, and yet all forms are illegal, just as all forms of non-consensual male genital mutilation should be illegal.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 06:05 PM
6

There are several types of female circumcision. Some are more severe than others.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 06:02 PM
6

So removing the clitoral hood should be equal in penalty to removing the foreskin? Both actions are roughly equal in their physical mutilation. If so, yes I agree.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 06:01 PM
5

Can you imagine the fox news and right wing shit storm if he became the black guy that legalized reefer (and therefore allowed jazz players to steal white women with their mexican monkey weed)?
/r/MensRights18/05/12 11:34 PM
3

Well, if we put everyone in prison, that will really reduce prison crime (per-capita).
/r/MensRights18/05/12 11:31 PM
1

Maybe we could transition via a "don't ask don't tell" sort of policy.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 11:29 PM
2

Indeed, they would make it illegal for all citizens to masturbate if they could.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 11:29 PM
6

She brings up a valid point. There is a place for child support and alimony. The problem is that our family court system is extremely unfair about it. Alimony should never ever be more than half of what a person makes in a month (for any reason, no matter the situation), and it should always be adjusted according to what he/she actually makes and not what he/she is capable of making. In addition, new income streams (such as from getting re-married) need to be considered. Being married to a perso…
/r/MensRights17/05/12 01:11 AM
1

Probably not, but not a whole lot of people can really nail it either.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 02:51 AM
9

Perhaps, but there is certainly a danger in diluting the meaning of rape in the way that some feminists have.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 01:42 AM
4

Being a mother is the hardest job in the world. Being a decent parent, especially when poor, is actually pretty damned hard. This goes for mothers and fathers both though. Edit: I am not saying it is the hardest job in the world (it's pretty damned far from the easiest), but it is certainly quite difficult to do things right every hour of every day for however many years it takes. I think it is one of those things where one side overestimates the importance and difficulty and the other side unde…
/r/MensRights09/05/12 01:40 AM
6

Interesting and certainly accurate.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 07:17 AM
3

You know, a lot of women have rape fantasies. Does that make it acceptable for me to say, "As inappropriate as this girl's rape was, there's a lot of women out there that wish it had been them?" I don't think this would fly with genders reversed.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 07:13 AM
1

Yeah, our media does a good job of making everyone afraid all of the time. Men in general are an easy target when they aren't making everyone afraid of minorities, atheists and terrorists.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 10:35 PM
1

Oh, it is certainly an American thing. Christian fundamentalism and misandry are our main exports.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 10:27 PM
4

It's not that rare (certainly not in the USA). If you are a man, try interacting with a child in public in any number of ways that would be acceptable for a woman and then see what happens. Even acknowledging and smiling at a child will get a man strange and suspicious looks. Just being a man around where children play is sometimes enough to require explanation. I've been a stay at home dad at times and have had to point out my children and have them tell people that I am their father to avoid b…
/r/MensRights06/05/12 09:53 PM
16

I believe he means the hypocrisy that allows people to find it funny for a man to be raped continuously over a 36 hour period when they would not find a woman being raped for 36 hours to be all that funny. Maybe it cannot be fathomed by most, but I would be incredibly upset if I was raped at gun point. Would I be able to find true justice in a society that thinks my plight is hilarious? Would I even try to seek help knowing I would be laughed at, ridiculed and not be taken seriously?
/r/MensRights03/05/12 03:39 AM
16

Just playing devil's advocate, but what should her penalty be?
/r/MensRights01/05/12 04:12 AM
4

Most women know exactly what they are doing in their manipulation of men.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 05:43 PM
3

It's a civil matter is it not? Isn't she open to litigation from him for slander?
/r/MensRights19/04/12 11:11 PM
1

I'm interested in what length of sentence would best deter others from making false rape allegations.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 10:27 PM
3

I sure as shit don't feel like I am at the top.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 07:45 PM
9

I just think it depends a lot more on the person than on their gender. That's always the case on the level of the individual, but something can certainly be stated in regards to macro-statistical levels of social behavior. The individual is difficult to predict without first hand experience, but large groups tend to follow certain behaviors more often than others, in at least a correlative manner.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 06:38 PM
9

Or lots and lots of money.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 06:35 PM
9

It's one of the the many ways the patriarchy presents itself... I'm sorry, but if a girl doesn't know why she is getting in free, then she is host to some epic naivety. Hell, it is as naive as the OP not knowing why men get charged more for getting into parties and clubs. If you aren't getting charged, it means you are the product. Whether a woman wants to be involved in such a business is up to her.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 09:04 PM
1

Yeah, some people are jerks.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 06:01 PM
2

Do the churchies that follow christian corporal punishment do so in the name of MRA? I think that any proof of that is quite slim. However, hostile feminists that believe in violent assault on the patriarchy do self identify as feminists, and are not strongly enough ostracized by the rest of the movement, much like radical christians are not ostracized enough by the moderate christians. You keep saying that the movement isn't this or isn't that, but that isn't decided by any one person. It is de…
/r/MensRights02/03/12 04:19 AM
3

Good luck.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 09:39 PM
8

There are prominent feminists that are very hostile, but where are the prominent men's rights advocates that push spousal abuse? edit: Corrected for content.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 02:37 PM
10

I love how they kept trying to push her battered wife syndrome, as if that forced her to throw her lover under the bus in such a manner.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 02:35 PM
1

Fair enough, I was being lazy. :3
/r/MensRights28/02/12 04:22 AM
3

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.0830s1079.x/abstract This alone is enough to make me want to avoid automatic male genital mutilation. Mutilation for religious reasons seems quite strange in the first place, as it is mutilation of the bodies that their god(s) created. We wouldn't tolerate automatic removal of the clitoral hood in baby girls, which is directly analogous to foreskin removal, so why do we allow baby boys to be mutilated? It should always be an adult choic…
/r/MensRights26/02/12 07:16 AM
3

This is what sucks, the people that practice genital mutilation don't even bother to learn the facts about it. Male circumcision is equivalent to removing the clitoral hood for a female. In both cases it is completely unnecessary and causes more problems than it solves. It causes permanent scarring and often causes disfigurement in males. It effects orgasm and causes premature ejaculation in males, along with unhealthy dryness and many other sexual issues. Sexual & Psychological Complications Th…
/r/MensRights25/02/12 05:41 PM
21

Holy hell, ten years seems a little excessive regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 05:22 PM
3

Reddit is generally better than any other site I've been to, when it comes to controversial issues. The criticisms and clarifications are almost always near or at the top.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 05:33 AM
2

I think a progressive mind is a better way of stating it. A progressive mind will be open to new experiences and the plights of others. I have seen many liberals that are just as authoritarian as social conservatives and whom shit all over freedom just as hard.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 07:15 PM
19

Authoritarian liberals piss all over our social progress. Liberals can be authoritarian just like social conservatives, they do not vary in mechanism, just in the content of their message. I despise most authoritarianism pointed towards the common man, and both sides look to limit my freedom by force.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 07:13 PM
1

For the sake of feminist statistics, undoubtedly. All of the cited statistics I have seen are self reported and any claim of sexual assault of any kind is normally counted as rape for the sake of the survey. It's asinine and makes it seem as if rape is a foregone conclusion for women, while at the same time painting men as villainous by nature.
/r/MensRights22/01/12 06:26 PM
1

Sadly yes, staring is considered sexual assault by a large portion of feminists for the sake of statistical analysis. http://www.commerce.wa.gov/site/261/default.aspx While it is true that rape by a stranger is a form of sexual assault, it is vital to include the wide range of unwanted sexual contacts that many people experience in our definition of these words. Sexual assault can include child sexual abuse, rape, attempted rape, incest, exhibitionism, voyeurism, obscene phone calls, fondling, a…
/r/MensRights22/01/12 04:41 AM
2

Sexual assault includes many non-rape actions such as tickling, fondling and staring inappropriately. Rape is sexual assault, but not all sexual assault is rape.
/r/MensRights21/01/12 12:02 PM
6

The number comes from a study of sexual assault on campuses done by Mary Koss in 1985 for Ms. Magazine. I was born in 1985 and I’m a young graduate student. How can this study be relevant to today’s college students born in the 90’s? More notably, I found this interesting critique of the study by Christina Sommers of Clark University. She notes that the study asked students: Have you had sexual intercourse when you didn’t want to because a man gave you alcohol or drugs? An affirmative answer was…
/r/MensRights21/01/12 02:20 AM
4

I like how she brings up the 1 in 5 sexual assault statistic, but sexual assault isn't rape, and is (if I remember correctly) all self reported statistics.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 10:46 PM
10

It should never be an option for anyone unable to pay. Only in cases where a person has plenty of money but is in contempt of their court order to pay.
/r/MensRights15/01/12 09:55 PM
2

Indeed, it should only be a civil matter.
/r/MensRights05/12/11 07:16 PM
2

Well said, and that is exactly why the blame isn't so easy to distribute. Besides that, blame is completely unproductive. All it can do is make people even more reluctant to change.
/r/MensRights20/11/11 08:25 PM
5

What about religious influences, and influences that suggested that there were medical and hygienic benefits?
/r/MensRights20/11/11 06:31 AM
18

Genital mutilation was a routine institutional practice that was performed on almost every male in the US for a long time. It was just standard, which makes it even more heinous in a way. Who is to blame? The entire system.
/r/MensRights20/11/11 03:37 AM
1

Oh certainly, no argument there.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 07:31 AM
2

That actually seems pretty reasonable, whether male or female. It was just a picture, it wasn't sex, and it was to a 16 year old, not a 7 year old. I think probation at most would be appropriate even for sex, for male or female, so long as authority isn't abused.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 02:01 AM
2

It sucks that women cannot get their scrotums hacked during arguments?
/r/MensRights07/11/11 02:26 PM
11

I'm with you on th eoutrage, but come on, it still isn't okay to murder. That is as bad as justifying murder because of stated or perceived domestic violence.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 08:38 AM
5

If she was contractually obligated to pay a portion of the rent, and you can prove that in writing, take her ass to court just for the principle of the matter. After she finally got the restraining order the second time, that absolved her from rental responsibility according to op.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 08:36 AM
8

Seriously, you could have ended up in jail from nothing more than her word and the word of your "friend". Then they probably would have pushed you for plea bargain, and considering that you had both of them against you, your best bet might have been to take it and merely be a sex offender for the rest of your life. The system is fucked, along with all systems everywhere it seems more and more.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 08:34 AM
22

She took him to court for "child" support... and WON. That's shitty. Don't dare to try and bond with any child at all, because you will end up supporting him/her for upwards of 18 years regardless of relationship to the mother or child. Men are walking wallets I guess.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 08:32 AM
15

How do you know he didn't? Did you actually see the court or read the transcripts? Why do you assume that he didn't beat her up regularly when the prosecution couldn't debunk that claim? Innocent until proven guilty, still important. It was, that's why she was tried for murder and not let off the hook> immediately for self-defense. Duh. Duh... duh... duh... derppy duh. You aren't interested in debate I see. Begging the question at all levels. As I've already proven, simply being in the front sea…
/r/MensRights26/10/11 08:05 PM
25

Fuck, how do you know he did? Shouldn't the assumption be that he never beat her, until there was proof to the alternative? Seems kind of hard to kick someone's ass in the back seat while driving. Especially considering if he didn't try to fight off her stabbing, which I couldn't find any details about. Domestic violence is one of those things that there is almost never any need for actual evidence before assuming the worst. In addition, many such relationships have partners that are both abusiv…
/r/MensRights26/10/11 07:37 PM
12

Seems like a weak joke.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 01:54 PM
1

I'm not sure how long you have been married, but having been married to my true love for eleven years, I'm going to have to disagree. It is quite possible to put each others desires on equal footing and base decisions on what is reasonable, or by who feels more strongly about a given subject. My wife and I aren't enemies, nor are we rivals, we are two parts of the same entity. Perhaps not everyone can live that way, since not everyone can give up self in order to become completely bonded with an…
/r/MensRights21/10/11 01:53 PM
24

I don't even get the cow thing. Like women have evolved from just being used on farms?
/r/MensRights21/10/11 01:24 PM
1

It is possible to be a peer with your spouse without being a rival.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 01:22 PM
7

Obviously it is the fathers fault for starting the custody battle.
/r/MensRights19/10/11 12:15 AM
1

Also, don't take on anything that might be considered a fatherly role for a child. Best not to even look at or interact with any children or single mothers.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 03:48 PM
5

Making a distinction between my wife's money and my money is fucking weird. We have been a team against the world for 12 years, we only have our money and our problems. If you cannot be a one hundred percent cohesive unit with someone simply because you couldn't imagine ever being apart, then marriage probably isn't the way to go. I did have the luxury of finding the love of my life in high school, and everything we have we worked toward together. We share all of the ups and downs as one. I gues…
/r/MensRights14/10/11 11:05 PM
6

I'm sure part of it is a general disinterest in marrying a woman that is a used up husk of a human that has nothing new to explore intimately with her lifelong partner. I've been married for almost twelve years, and while I didn't want to marry a virgin, I sure as hell wouldn't want someone that has been everywhere and done everything already, as joint erotic self discovery (an important part of pair bonding, whether people want to admit it or not) would be non-existent.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 11:37 PM
8

FeministMath eh? Amusing.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 11:32 PM
12

The rebuttal I have heard is that because women spend more time with their kids, incidents per hour of time with the kids shows men being more violent. This is just what I read online when looking for stats on it. It struck me as use of creative numbers manipulation to cover up the problem.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 03:00 PM
10

They don't want men raping them with their eyes.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 09:17 PM
9

Automatic genital mutilation shouldn't be a first world problem at all. Once people are adults, they can mutilate themselves in whatever way they please, however, removing partsof childrens genitals is child abuse most foul and has lifelong effects on sexuality.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 03:45 AM
7

That's the least relevent argument ever. Genital mutilation is child abuse, and physical child abuse in most cases is already illegal. It is only male children that are allowed to have their genitals mutilated. Would it be okay to remove a child's outter ears just because they can still hear without them?
/r/MensRights06/10/11 03:41 AM
2

This article clearly ignores many important socioeconomic factors in current society, one of which is the large-scale outsourcing of manufacturing and IT jobs that were typically filled predominantly by men. Indeed, all so more money could be funneled to the top and away from the middle class.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 07:45 PM
8

Indeed, there is no dignity being a part of the working class anymore, and so many men are wondering why they should bother working retail for a pittance.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 07:43 PM
11

Not until you fix marriage. They need to also provide those challenging and lucrative jobs they want us to have. The reason so many of us are saying "fuck it" is exactly because our prosperity has been chopped up and sold so that the top 1/5th can control greater than 4/5ths of the wealth. What's the fucking point when every new job is fucking retail.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 07:39 PM
5

Mutilation - an injury that causes disfigurement or that deprives you of a limb or other important body part. http://www.google.com/search?gcx=w&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=define%3A+mutilation I like how your avenue of argument is to attempt to belittle and insult, while looking to redefine words to match your beliefs. If someone over the age of consent decides that they are religious, then they have the option of circumcision for religious reasons (or any reason whatsoever). Would it be okay to…
/r/MensRights04/10/11 01:34 AM
3

The problem is that you didn't have a choice whether your genitals were mutilated or not.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 12:24 AM
6

Freedom to mutilate the genitals of male children, but we are not free to own our bodies and minds. It's a strange world.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 12:23 AM
3

Defence witness Jacob Eden, who was a sober driver that night, said there was "nothing accidental" about the kick. Miss Stewart was running towards Patterson "as if she was going to punt a football". She meant to hurt him, he said. Seems like there would be enough to at least charge her.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 07:02 PM
22

I don't think that is what is in question, rather the problem is that the female perpetrator received no charges whatsoever for her sexual assault.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 10:41 AM
3

Gladly. :3 Still, it makes sense to me to have the genetic father be responsible instead of getting off scott free while screwing over some hapless victim for twenty years.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 01:00 AM
0

I guess it is too much to ask that Lotharios support their own damned children.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 11:00 PM
21

Facebook seems to be a reflection of the public at large. It amazes me that the same species that can bring us the internet and immortality (just wait a minute) also has such a high percentage of derp per capita.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 08:23 PM
6

Still, I'm more of the belief that it should be okay for anyone and everyone in a public setting, not just for women taking pictures of men.
/r/MensRights25/08/11 12:51 PM
12

Men were going through shit at the same damned time. Just different shit. It was only a few men at the top that were in control. Genders had stronger roles, but the majority of men were still extremely oppressed, working in squalid conditions for meager pay and being expected to destroy their bodies in the process with no regard to their minds at all.
/r/MensRights13/08/11 01:10 PM
3

Right, I saw that too, but he said... in the US if you have an IQ over 130 you are automatically disqualified from entering the police force in most places. ...which I couldn't find any information about. I could certainly see it being true, but I just can't find anything about it being ubiquitous among most law enforcement departments.
/r/MensRights03/08/11 05:20 PM
5

Not sure about Canada, but in the US if you have an IQ over 130 you are automatically disqualified from entering the police force in most places. I don't suppose you have more information on this? That would suck.
/r/MensRights03/08/11 03:31 PM
5

It's funny, I think the best thing I can do is to become a cop myself. I am prepared to put my rhetoric where my mouth is and enter POST this coming spring. Maybe that's what a lot of us need to do. Stop leaving police work to bullies.
/r/MensRights03/08/11 01:50 PM
3

I really wish feminism wasn't associated with socialism. A little socialism can be a good thing and help ensure a balanced set of economic classes in a society. Check out Germany for more information. However, this, this is just crap. That was compensation for an injury. It makes sense that it should be used to pay for the fallout from the injury. The utility of the funds is such that that should have been the only purpose.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 09:58 PM
1

I hope he enjoys his unemployment compensation. Mass has decent healthcare though doesn't it? So hopefully he won't have to necessarily go completely bankrupt trying to save his wife.
/r/MensRights02/07/11 05:37 AM
7

Thus, to all men who complain about paying child support for children they did not want, the simple advice is, "Shut up and put on a condom. And dispose of it yourself." Also, don't get raped. How was her raping that guy just a misdemeanor in the first place? Fucking hell.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 04:27 AM
2

Indeed, that's what I am thinking. They might not have even known what they were doing was wrong, since they were punishing evil in their crazed and manipulated minds.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 04:06 AM
1

...he tried to have sex with her at her house while she slept, according to police reports. Okay, so he tried to have sex with her while they slept in the same bed. Sounds like he woke up in the middle of the night horny and decided to try and maybe get some sex off of her. She then woke up and rebuffed him. That seems like pretty standard sex proposition/rejection to me. Unless he tried to actually stick his dick in her before she woke up. There's no telling if she seemed interested before full…
/r/MensRights30/06/11 03:38 AM
5

I suppose it might be possible to equate chivalry or feminism to Manson.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 03:27 AM
3

Sure, but from the perspective of the person attempting suicide, they are trying so hard to get attention communicate and are unable to. They finally find that the only way to get any sort of reaction is to attempt suicide. What sucks is that we are so disconnected that sometimes that is the only way to make someone, anyone, take notice.
/r/MensRights24/06/11 08:30 PM
3

Then he'll be the one in jail for not having enough money.
/r/MensRights17/06/11 05:23 PM
4

What's funny is that it is really all authoritarianism on both sides. That's one of the reasons I don't agree with much of "liberalism", as it is just as authoritarian, but just has different goals. Liberals can be just as authoritarian and anti-freedom as social conservatives, which is a damned shame all around when trying to create a balanced dialog. Shit and then Corporate libertarians are supposed to be all about freedom, but then espouse corporate authoritarianism, which still doesn't allow…
/r/MensRights17/06/11 08:11 AM
21

It's a joke my friend. :3 These are all arguments made by "Just World" proponents that seem to think that all poverty and negative economic forces are the product of poor people being lazy. It is the sort of thing I constantly hear from socially conservative Christians, as to why they shouldn't help the poor, vote for a better healthcare system or be anything but horrible and calloused.
/r/MensRights17/06/11 01:56 AM
11

Indeed, he was just lazy. Once you grow up and get out into the "real" world, you will see that.
/r/MensRights17/06/11 12:57 AM
27

Why didn't he just pull himself up by his bootstraps and take responsibility for his success. :p Obviously it was his own fault for not being rich.
/r/MensRights17/06/11 12:10 AM
31

Indeed, he went too far. Hardly far enough to be considered a bad parent forever though, whether male or female, assuming it wasn't a pattern of behavior.
/r/MensRights17/06/11 12:01 AM
14

I just can't stop molesting everything I see. Hell, I'm molesting your post right now! :3
/r/MensRights13/06/11 10:32 PM
-2

Having sex with a drunk girl is rape? Ah, cute little females can't be responsible for their own actions I guess. How drunk does a girl have to be for her to be able to disavow all responsibility for her actions? .08 bac?
/r/MensRights11/06/11 05:50 PM
2

Why are you letting the discussion become about this stupid crap?
/r/MensRights09/06/11 07:49 PM
-1

So it's that kind of party eh?
/r/MensRights09/06/11 01:02 PM
6

The point was that his entire world view had been shattered, not that he was trying to escape paying for a child.
/r/MensRights31/05/11 06:03 PM
3

Well said.
/r/MensRights31/05/11 07:28 AM
1

I know, it's really messed up.
/r/MensRights31/05/11 03:53 AM
8

According to the state, it is better if some man, any man, whether it is his child or not, pays for the health and welfare of a child. Otherwise the state might have to do it, and folks, any time there is misery institutionally thrust upon people, it is always about money.
/r/MensRights31/05/11 02:33 AM
6

Assuming her husband wasn't aware of the event, she is worth less than shit for cheating on him, and I hope every other man she ever sees is pre-warned of her infidelity. She should also be fired for abusing her authority. If she had just found five random guys on the street that would be one thing, but she used her position to put the event together. That said though, no actual crime against the state took place here.
/r/MensRights26/05/11 01:32 PM
-11

I think that the bulk of the punishment should be civil. Let them have their wages garnished for the first ten years of their working life, after a few years in prison of course.
/r/MensRights04/05/11 01:35 PM
-19

Maybe, but we should be thinking about how long it will take to rehabilitate and reintroduce a citizen that has something valuable to add to society. Not simply doling out punishment for the sake of punishment. Not that I think they need to be coddled, but losing five years of their freedom seems adequate and plenty of time to regret what they did. Course, I believe the maximum sentence for anything should be 20 years (think about who you were 20 years ago, it was a completely different person),…
/r/MensRights04/05/11 01:33 PM
6

Indeed, words and symbolism are two of the most powerful social motivators we have. Control the language and you control the debate.
/r/MensRights28/04/11 07:55 PM
1

Not so crazy in the land of the crazy.
/r/MensRights19/04/11 03:09 AM
1

Indeed, it is a perverse sense of entitlement that drives people to kill in circumstances such as what was described.
/r/MensRights02/04/11 10:48 PM
2

So I guess she cheated on him and was using the good old rape excuse for infidelity claim?
/r/MensRights26/03/11 06:03 PM
19

That's completely different and makes child support sound somewhat more reasonable in this case (not completely though). He should get full visitation as well though, if he wishes it. The other mother needs to be on the hook too if ever she isn't around at any point. There is something about autonomous couples getting child support from a third party that sort of grinds my gears (especially when they make more money). I imagine that the lesbian couple fancied themselves as fully autonomous and c…
/r/MensRights10/03/11 01:23 AM
20

Somebody has to fight our corporate wars for profit.
/r/MensRights08/03/11 11:33 PM
3

Does anyone else hate the word sexting? It is one of those buzzwords that authoritarians love to throw around in order to illicit a specific emotional response.
/r/MensRights05/03/11 10:07 PM
0

I find a lot of women hit their most sexy in their mid to late thirties when they have really become women. Note, my wife is 29. :)
/r/MensRights28/02/11 10:17 PM
11

I know what connects them. They are just a different flavor of authoritarian.
/r/MensRights28/02/11 06:17 AM
21

We need a better way of differentiating those of us that just want equality under the law, a reasonable social safety and healthcare net, freedom from moral judgement (beyond our natural rights) and protection from oligarchical interests looking to rule over us.... ... and whatever the fuck these people are. I don't see them as any different from social conservatives that seek only to control others through force.
/r/MensRights28/02/11 12:34 AM
7

More human garbage. At least this one got taken to the curb.
/r/MensRights25/02/11 08:07 PM
1

Indeed, or at the very least could see themselves behaving in such a way and wanting to get away with it.
/r/MensRights17/02/11 07:01 AM
9

It's a lot about fairness. A woman gets to know 100% that her child is hers. Men deserve the same privilege. The days of wanton cuckolding need to end. Women can still make their reproductive choices, but at no point should they get to sponge a man's time, love, attention and money while keeping up the utterly false pretense of passing on his seed. Unlike most, I do not see dishonesty to be a healthy part of love or relationships. The very second that a person decides to do something like this, …
/r/MensRights16/02/11 11:51 PM
0

You've got to look at things practically. Does it cost more to run these people down and determine whether they are working under the table or not, or to jail them or any other action the government might take.
/r/MensRights05/02/11 12:48 AM
2

Wow, yeah, poor people are all just lazy. Send em to jail, that'll help bring costs down. Maybe you should just be glad for the gifts that your life has been blessed with, and drop the universal contempt for anyone less successful than you are. It is not a just world. Yes, debtors prison does actually exist in a manner. Since judges can easily abuse contempt of court, they very often do in order to enforce payments with jail-time.
/r/MensRights05/02/11 12:45 AM
3

What about the abuse of seriously broke dads?
/r/MensRights05/02/11 12:41 AM
4

Yes it is, it has become the method for all sorts of people to be sent to debtors prison.
/r/MensRights05/02/11 12:40 AM
2

Yeah, though they can throw you in jail for consumer debt as well, if they get you on contempt of court for not cooperating with their ridiculous demands. The whole practice is asinine.
/r/MensRights05/02/11 12:38 AM
3

I'll hit a man in a fair fight. Or if I think he's gonna start a fair fight. So you will hit a guy that you think is about to start a fair fight? Isn't that just a sucker punch? :3
/r/MensRights03/02/11 08:14 PM
8

That's a great way for a guy to end up in jail here. :(
/r/MensRights30/01/11 05:58 PM
1

Who said anything about cheating? Perhaps his girl enjoys the company of the occasional woman in the bedroom.
/r/MensRights30/01/11 05:49 PM
2

He has to prove intentional misconduct by law enforcement.
/r/MensRights28/01/11 08:06 AM
6

I'm actually pretty great with math (EE senior after all) but very poor with money. It is due to impulsiveness caused by my ADD. Luckily my meds help, but for a long time I just didn't know what it was about me that caused me to be so impulsive. I could go for short periods with being perfectly responsible, but my impulsive would always work its way out in the end. Someone not suffering with a mental defect cannot really understand as it is a difference in the basic way we think about these sort…
/r/MensRights09/01/11 01:43 AM
2

I think it might be about finding that happy place between virgin and jaded.
/r/MensRights07/01/11 08:27 PM
9

In a society where all of self worth is based on entitlement, this sort of behavior is unavoidable. I'm glad that the proper person got punished, and I am not victimizing her specifically (I think we are all victims), but what she did is a product of the entitlements drilled into her head by decades of media and commercial interests. The fact that she "deserves" a perfect life and a wedding and that she can do anything she wants to get them. Those sorts of entitlements end up becoming the justif…
/r/MensRights06/01/11 12:19 AM
1

She is kind of pretty, but I don't find her especially sexually attractive. Weird, but I just don't find her, or many models all that sexy in comparison to women that are down to earth and know what it is to toil, know pain, know compassion and can keep up in a debate with me. I find beauty in a lot of women that wouldn't hold up under the scrutiny of societies perceived preferences, and yet, I find them unbelievably sensual. Course, my wife is quite pretty, and I didn't end up with someone unat…
/r/MensRights20/12/10 08:38 PM
2

Humanist?
/r/MensRights16/12/10 05:27 AM
0

EDIT: What I meant was, there is nothing supporting her claim, is there?
/r/MensRights03/12/10 09:19 PM
12

No shit, we were fucking mutilated. Makes it difficult to have a happy attitude about it.
/r/MensRights28/11/10 11:28 PM
16

It's his windfall, not that of his cheating ex-wife.
/r/MensRights22/11/10 06:47 PM
8

I completely believe that it would be fair for every child to be paternity tested by default as a preventative health measure (and since so much fraud by women exists). Seriously, I hate these women who want to commit fraud and relegate a man to slavery for the next couple of decades when he is not even able to pass on his own blood. People can argue that genetic relation doesn't matter, but why not just pick a man at random then? This attitude wreaks of whorish entitlement. It is the idea that …
/r/MensRights09/11/10 03:58 AM
3

A dog licking his balls isn't hurting his bitch.
/r/MensRights07/11/10 04:28 AM
22

I will say that I am disgusted by one sort of behavior at least when it comes to divorce. That is when a woman (usually a woman, but sometimes a man) starts getting some on the side while enjoying all of the financial/practical benefits that her husband provides, only deciding to leave her husband after months or years of making him support her and likely the other man's/mens' children as well. Just as soon as a woman decides she is going to look elsewhere, she is bound ethically to give up the …
/r/MensRights07/11/10 12:40 AM
3

I wouldn't have wanted to marry a virgin, but there is certainly something to be said about experiencing at least a few exclusive sexual activities together in order to help solidify the relationship. Everyone's dynamic is different. I've been happily married for over ten years, having gotten married just out of high school. Neither of us were virgins, and I was glad for that fact. However, there were many firsts we were allowed to experience together that helped solidify our relationship. We we…
/r/MensRights07/11/10 12:31 AM
2

At least you can play it off as being drunk and having it be weird with her being your friend and all.
/r/MensRights06/10/10 08:07 PM
6

Now she thinks you suck at sexing. That sucks.
/r/MensRights06/10/10 07:38 PM
4

This is all IMO. Still, overall, the current trends show women finishing vastly more degrees, especially those of PHD level. From my observation, it is obviously a system tooled for female needs and attitudes and so that along with many other factors lead to a severe drop in male graduates and basically stack the entire system in in favor of female achievement as opposed to male understanding and methods.
/r/MensRights26/09/10 04:56 AM
8

No woman worth marrying would give a crap and would want you to be secure and certain. I've been married for ten years now and I could ask for a paternity test right now and she would just shrug and tell me to do it if it would help me feel better. She thinks it's bullshit that guys aren't allowed the same biological security and at least some decision making like women get by default. Any woman worth being with is going to put your security, health and happiness at least at the same level as he…
/r/MensRights16/09/10 10:38 PM
1

You want authoritarianism, and that's fine. I don't believe in it though. I've already told you why it is a bad idea and why it wouldn't work. I suppose it is easy to want to push for authoritarianism on people that you don't like. That's how it has gotten such a foot hold here. Having harsh prison sentences and 24 hour surveillance would cost way more money than would be saved, and espousing that shows what your true motivations are. You just want to enforce this because it makes you mad regard…
/r/MensRights24/08/10 03:53 PM
1

Let me make myself crystal clear. I agree with your underlying sentiment. It sucks to see hard earned money squandered on luxuries for others when the money is supposed to be for one's children. However, adding extra layers of complexity isn't a great idea. Who decides what is acceptable? You? A highly politicized committee? Will you dictate the specific brands that people can purchase? Why you would want to bring forth more authoritarianism into the world, I'll never understand. You cannot legi…
/r/MensRights23/08/10 09:44 PM
3

Great, so the state would decide, yeah, no thanks. Besides, like I said, they would have to expand and create an entire new branch dedicated to enforced morality, and after all of that money wasted, in the end, it wouldn't do anything other than make you feel good. Nah, I'm not too keen on giving the state more worthless sweeping powers dealing with perceived morality.
/r/MensRights23/08/10 06:57 PM
5

So you'll have the abuses decided by the people that are paying and are probably looking for petty reasons to get back at their ex? Seems like a recipe for disaster. There has to be things that simply aren't abuses that the paying spouse would report just to get back at the other parent, so it will be required to have someone that decides what is and isn't abuse. Also, one gigantic hole in this is that they can still buy all of the shit they want with any money that isn't assigned to the debit c…
/r/MensRights22/08/10 10:02 PM
1

Can't, unless of course you can sponsor my work visa. I am a senior electrical engineering/ computer science student and I currently work for a small software company in colorado. Let me know when I can start. :D
/r/MensRights22/08/10 07:50 PM
6

Who enforces it? Who pays for the enforcement? Who decides what is acceptable? What happens if a person breaks the rules? Who investigates and attempts to prosecute and/or defend? Who fits all of the bills? It is just too complex, and besides that it gets into some dangerous territory when we have the government decide what is and isn't acceptable use of money from any source. Spending of money is a very significant form of expression. Enforcing particular ideals can only damage that expression,…
/r/MensRights22/08/10 07:41 PM
2

I will never ever understand what breaks in a parent that allow these things to happen. I would die to protect my children because the idea of their suffering and screams is enough to make me sacrifice anything. What happens to people? Insanity I suppose.
/r/MensRights17/08/10 08:20 PM
3

Four hours of the worst hell I had ever imagined. Though I suppose you might also count the hours previous to the incident that I had to spent curled up in pain on the floor wondering what I might be dying from. _^ All in all a very interesting experience. Even years later not everything works right in the plumbing back there.
/r/MensRights16/08/10 06:55 PM
4

I got constipated once and felt like I was giving birth. Don't ever spend three days eating nothing but steak, cheese and opiates.
/r/MensRights16/08/10 05:14 PM
2

I've saved children on two separate occasions for total strangers and they were more worried about being caught being bad parents than anything else and didn't seem to give two craps about the fact that I just saved the life of their child.
/r/MensRights04/08/10 02:37 AM
2

Possibly. I am generally on the side of lighter sentences in general (though mostly for non-violent crimes), but if this information is correct as presented, it is a very light sentence for her stabbing a guy in the dick and watching him bleed out because she doesn't want to wake her son, even though there is a (loud) party going on. She felt entitled to watch him die. She is so self centered that she felt that she had to stab him just because she got caught. Like I said, this is only if the art…
/r/MensRights03/08/10 06:58 AM
3

While I think they should be put to an easy death if they cannot be dealt with otherwise, I don't think they need extra torture. As far as I know there is a significant genetic component along with problems with early childhood development that leads to offenders having not much more choice of being attracted to children than genetically gay guys have of being attracted to men. Mind you, if I caught one with one of my children I would immediately kill him, however I would end it quickly and weep…
/r/MensRights03/08/10 06:53 AM
3

There would be no end of hearing about it for weeks.
/r/MensRights03/08/10 06:49 AM
6

If there was any justice they would be put in with the men. Okay, not really, but they are some seriously fucked up women. It probably has a lot to do with the sense of entitlement that they grew up with.
/r/MensRights03/08/10 06:48 AM
4

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irregardless :P
/r/MensRights03/08/10 06:47 AM
2

I was going to post something similar. Machismo always strikes me as highly pathetic. A man knows he is a man and acts accordingly, not censoring himself to avoid the judgement of others. A man will fight with you until the end and will cry with you all night if you lose a loved one. He is sincere in all things and loves as deeply as anyone possibly could. He will fight when he has to, but never just to prove his manliness. He will place himself in harms way at a moments notice and without thoug…
/r/MensRights17/07/10 05:36 PM
5

If your marriage consists of finding the person to blame, it might already be over with.
/r/MensRights16/07/10 12:20 AM
2

Ignorance is fine. What bothers me is willful ignorance. I always reserve the right to be wrong. If presented with new information I reexamine my beliefs as needed (and have drastically changed my beliefs quite a few times over the years). However, the willfully ignorant simply become more entrenched and aggressively obstinate when information is presented to them that contradicts their beliefs.
/r/MensRights15/07/10 04:44 AM
8

Money talks, and they have to shit on someone to be able to get people to watch and buy their moronic wares that are shown between shows. It is just bullshit of the highest caliber and will continue to damage men and women both for decades to come. Fuck MTV and fuck the entire culture that has to turned to men to shit on now that it is no longer proper to shit on anyone else. I wonder what the morons would do if they actually had to treat everyone with the same general amount of respect. Their h…
/r/MensRights10/07/10 06:07 AM
16

"There are situations that may not necessarily fit a criminal definition, but women are still left with the same feelings of guilt and shame, of being abused or being uncomfortable. It is called remorse for poor decisions. The only person they have to blame is themselves. I've felt uncomfortable for sexual decisions I've made in the past. If only there was someone I could have prosecuted for my lack of judgment at the time. The woman that said that is like some sad parody of what a woman is.
/r/MensRights07/07/10 02:33 AM
4

In exactly equal measures regardless of workload right? That's the bologna I was told in one of my bullshit required womens' class.
/r/MensRights01/07/10 07:43 PM
16

From my experience, it is that women have been raised to feel 100% entitled to have it all, not just desire it. If they don't obtain it, then there is a patriarchy to blame.
/r/MensRights01/07/10 07:38 PM
3

I would stop her slap with a mere look and then do a motherfucking flip kick into her chin launching her into the air. Then I would spring into the air after her and do a forward flip ax kick, which will cause her to be lodged many meters into the ground. FUCK YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!
/r/MensRights30/06/10 02:39 AM
7

Bologna... my body is not who I am, it is merely a machine that I would be willing to alter in any way that I see fit in order to match the self that exists in my mind.
/r/MensRights22/04/10 07:29 PM
4

That too! However, the tools are still relativity crude. I would rather Ghost in the Shell type cybernetics and be able to choose our appearances like we might choose our clothes to define who we are. It is a major shame that we are so judged by superficial traits that are well beyond our control.
/r/MensRights22/04/10 01:48 PM
7

Good for him/her. We are but malleable shells and should be able to be on the outside whom we are inside.
/r/MensRights22/04/10 01:37 PM
1

Yes, it is wanted by the woman looking for a meal ticket, much like people wanted to keep African slaves until we finally closed up that hole. ;)
/r/MensRights05/04/10 01:20 PM
1

I know who shouldn't have to pay! Nobody should have to support another man's child against his will. That is simply slavery. First of all, it is the woman's decision to get pregnant, and again her decision to cheat. So she is responsible for the baby's life and happiness, not any random guy she duped that has no relation to the child. Men raising other men's children against their will or knowledge has been one of the great injustices against men for all time. We live in a society fully capable…
/r/MensRights05/04/10 01:36 AM
1

Not to mention accidentally sexing with their siblings. :o
/r/MensRights02/04/10 05:34 AM
9

DNA tests should be mandatory under the guise of making sure the nurses give the parents the correct baby, to remove the possibility of the man being brow beaten into not having the paternity test done. No one should be tricked into eighteen years of extreme servitude for someone other man's child.
/r/MensRights02/04/10 12:57 AM
10

Perhaps, I think it still makes a strong argument against the notion that "women get on with it" in comparison to men.
/r/MensRights25/03/10 05:52 PM
7

What's this!? Private citizens stealing from banks? That is completely illegal... only the reverse is allowed.
/r/MensRights05/03/10 08:54 PM
10

... out of a cannon, into the sun.
/r/MensRights02/03/10 01:59 AM
13

Indeed, she just wanted to push her displeasure of her world view being challenged... because she is a cunt.
/r/MensRights02/03/10 01:27 AM
2

Certain drugs do that to me (both prescription and illicit). But also, sometimes it just doesn't happen and that's okay with any partner that understands you.
/r/MensRights02/03/10 12:46 AM
8

If this is a guide to life.... done and motherfucking done! Fuck you society!
/r/MensRights21/02/10 07:01 PM
15

Rich men with their rich wives creating horrible conditions for poor men that had to support their poor wives. I don't see how it is men hurting other men so much as it is the haves exploiting the have-nots.
/r/MensRights17/02/10 11:01 PM
3

At least there is the threat they might. :P
/r/MensRights15/02/10 03:55 AM
1

How many times does someone have to beat you before you have a right to kill that person ? 3.5 times.
/r/MensRights14/02/10 11:10 PM
2

I'd rather more of that then the fire and brimstone punishment policies here in the US. Course, it would be nice if it was equally applied to men and women though.
/r/MensRights13/02/10 08:53 PM
3

My bad, deleted.
/r/MensRights04/01/10 05:54 PM
3

He didn't want custody.
/r/MensRights31/12/09 06:19 AM
6

Things are never so black and white. It is as bad as the social conservatives that use welfare queens as an excuse not to want to have food stamps for the food insecure. Or perhaps it is like those that deny the good inherent in a universal healthcare system just because someone scummy might possibly get help. Some people are jerks and they abuse the system. Also, family law is broken and massively skewed against men. However, child support isn't necessarily a bad thing. It just needs to be more…
/r/MensRights31/12/09 12:20 AM
16

So, I've been a house husband at times in my life while going to school full-time. Have any of you ever actually tried running a family of five household and all? It isn't all soap operas and bon bons, I'll tell you that much. I've had many jobs that are tougher, and many that are quite a bit easier. The hardest part about it though, is that you always have to be on. There is no off the clock time.
/r/MensRights29/12/09 11:07 PM
-6

...and here I thought that only gays made a mockery of marriage. EDIT: I guess I need to adjust my sarcasm emitter. >_<
/r/MensRights27/12/09 04:49 PM
14

What a horrible travesty. Just another shitty person gets the world handed to her while a good person and loving husband/father gets his ass handed to him. This world is so fucked that it makes your (ex)wife look like a virgin in comparison. I am honestly and truly sorry that you have to deal with others destroying your life in such a complete fashion. Is there hope?.. yeah, maybe... though in the same position I can't say I would be able to recover quickly. I can't imagine how hard this must be…
/r/MensRights22/12/09 04:30 AM
10

..and a male officer assaulting a female officer? I will be the first to admit that there are significant differences between males and females, but I am curious what you would think of that.
/r/MensRights17/12/09 10:46 PM
18

Yeah, all Canada needs is more victimless crime laws to oppress and fine people over. This sort of thing is always retarded to the extreme. Are they going to shift from the war on drugs to the war on male masturbation?
/r/MensRights23/11/09 12:11 AM
10

Yeah, judges don't have a problem with sending a child's parents to prison for years at a time for possessing a small amount of cannabis but when it comes to being cuckolded by a another man through the actions of a she-demon, it is all about the childrens' best interests. The system is crap.
/r/MensRights22/11/09 02:26 AM
2

Thank you!
/r/MensRights21/11/09 02:04 AM
1

So... what happened next?
/r/MensRights21/11/09 01:51 AM
1

So... what happened next?
/r/MensRights20/11/09 11:42 PM
4

People and companies discriminate against poor people and unattractive people all of the time. Where is their affirmative action? I dare say that they receive much worse treatment than any gender or race in particular.
/r/MensRights11/11/09 10:32 PM
1

Those things are only criminal if we make them so... which puts constraints on capitalism. Naked capitalism has no such constraints applied which is what I do not agree with since it is, by its very nature, exploitative. Like I said capitalism with social constraints makes the most sense from a societal standpoint. You can talk about private property all day long and how the super rich morally deserve what they have as compared to the people born into poverty that only ever deserve poverty, but …
/r/MensRights06/11/09 07:56 PM
1

Naked capitalism invariably leads exploitations such as child labor and obscenely long hours, corporate negligence and other human rights violations. The people that need to start playing fair are the people at the top. They game the system and then act indignant when the working class gets pissed and start to work on building up their own leverage. I doubt many socialistic people actually want equality in the manner that you are implying. I think it is an unfair assumption. Personally, I just w…
/r/MensRights06/11/09 06:34 PM
1

Right, but the law is whatever we make it. It is all relatively arbitrary. The problem we run into is that having a huge gap between the bosses and the wage slaves makes for a miserable country. It has been the case for much of history that the rich have extreme leverage over the poorer working classes. It is natural for business to extract as much money as possible at all times by any means. The problem with that is that it tends to pull the wealth to the top in an accelerated fashion removing …
/r/MensRights05/11/09 11:26 PM
1

Systems that focus on equality in the results rather than the rule of law are all like this. What do you mean by rule of law? What is so great about the rule of law? As a person with socialistic leanings, I don't have any interest in forcibly requiring everyone to make the same wage. That is just silly and certainly can't be lumped in as a goal of any liberal ideology. I just don't want corporate interests to be able to control my life anymore than I want the government to, so I believe in playi…
/r/MensRights05/11/09 08:43 PM
4

Is this Marxism? This seems more like gynocracy.
/r/MensRights05/11/09 06:37 PM
6

I have never in my life met an HR employee that isn't a complete and utter whore sucking cunt. There might be a nice and professional HR person out there, but in my experience they have all been petty, bitchy and shitty in every aspect of their being. If they have a heart, it is as black as pitch and as hard as the center of a neutron star.
/r/MensRights03/11/09 10:29 PM
1

I think that enough for an education might be a reasonable compensation as opposed to lifelong support.
/r/MensRights30/10/09 05:56 PM
1

I think it has its place, but like many other things it is often abused. For example, allowing a wife that has helped run a household in abject poverty while her husband works his way through the corporate ladder only to be dropped for a hot secretary once he finally makes it big probably deserves some compensation for her diligent and sincere work for her part of the marriage.
/r/MensRights30/10/09 05:15 PM
13

This sounds like a parody of itself.
/r/MensRights30/10/09 01:46 AM
2

Uh huh... you're just trying to trick me out of all of that young ass. I'm not falling for that again.
/r/MensRights22/10/09 05:06 AM
2

As long as girls sport an amygdala, the majority will be seeking out the cock at least a few days a month. ;)
/r/MensRights22/10/09 01:45 AM
2

More nubile girls for me as I age?
/r/MensRights21/10/09 10:17 PM
27

Male race? I don't think race means what they think it means.
/r/MensRights10/10/09 07:18 PM
5

What the fuck is wrong with people?! I'm serious... how can people actually think like this? Have they ever had an actual relationship in their entire lives? My guess is that there is some seriously deep and substantial self loathing that is going on if she actually believes the shit coming from her mouth.
/r/MensRights09/10/09 01:19 AM
3

I also want the "battle" to end. The division between the sexes is all manufactured because when we work together we are happy, and if we are happy and don't have these distractions then we start to pay attention to other things... scary things that need immediate attention.
/r/MensRights26/09/09 05:10 PM
3

You'll see... I used to think the same way. I used to wonder what my wife did all day. Now that I am finishing up my EE degree I am the primary care provider and I am lucky if I have a couple of hours a day for study and homework. It is no foolin' when I say I would rather be working.
/r/MensRights18/09/09 01:06 AM
1

I suppose it would depend on which family and which full time job. However, I can only assume you have never had to do it, otherwise I cannot imagine that you would be so dismissive of it. I go to school full time and I am the primary care provider. The child care, errands and domestic stuff is not easy to keep up with. It may be easier then bucking hay all day or something, but it is certainly as hard as just about any desk job, and many service and retail positions. Frankly, I'd rather be work…
/r/MensRights18/09/09 01:04 AM
0

Child rearing, daily errands, food preparation and house cleaning/upkeep is more than a full time job. Not everyone that stays home is just being lazy (some I'm sure), and they often work their ass off to keep the family running smoothly.
/r/MensRights18/09/09 12:31 AM
5

Agreed... Of course, I'm sure the way many feminists justify it, is that the man caused her to have an affair anyway, so he should still pay. What hogwash.
/r/MensRights18/09/09 12:28 AM
2

You realize I was being sarcastic right? I know it is hard to guess tone from text sometimes.
/r/MensRights14/09/09 09:32 PM
6

Wow man, that sucks. I'm glad you made it out in one piece. :D
/r/MensRights14/09/09 07:46 PM
7

It is probably just a sharp rise in acknowledgment occasionally that women can commit domestic violence. Women are just sweet little victims of the patriarchy. It isn't like they commit more violence (and other abuse) against their own children than men. o_0
/r/MensRights14/09/09 04:06 PM
2

Indeed, improvement of the patients' health obviously taking into account such things as starting point, age and genetic predisposition, even if I didn't get it across initially. Having a static health metric for everyone would be absolutely retarded. I was making a point about intention though. Their is no desire to exact any positive change but only to punish at every opportunity possible and in all cases. I'm not even saying we need to do that, merely that if it is really that big of a deal, …
/r/MensRights14/09/09 01:18 PM
6

I feel like Western justice focuses far too much on the notion of revenge Absolutely... most social conservatives (and libertarians surprisingly) that I meet are all about doling out punishment and not about improving society. I had one talk to me recently about how he wants to ticket people if they are on government health care and they eat junk food. First of all, I believe in freedom (plus that is anti-capitalist which is hilarious coming from someone that obvious enjoys performing fellatio o…
/r/MensRights14/09/09 05:55 AM
3

mmm... opiates....
/r/MensRights12/09/09 02:41 AM
22

The hatred that I speak of firmly remembers that women are women, usually wonderful, great, and grand. And men are men, often conspiring, violent, and manipulative. BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!!!!!!! I don't know about you, but the most manipulative people I have ever met are female. What a fucking joke. This woman needs some perspective... seriously. I don't think things are quite as easy on this side as she seems to think they are.
/r/MensRights11/09/09 01:38 AM
1

Can't legislate against stupidity. Hey, speed balls are fun and all, but damn... This is why we need realistic education on drugs instead of teaching abstinence only education. That way people would be less likely to go off the deep end. We should start being truthful about what sorts of circumstances lead to the really fucked up looking people that we see that get addicted. Because once somebody tries a drug and the world doesn't end, I imagine they tend to overdo it in a lot of cases. Instead …
/r/MensRights10/09/09 11:42 PM
0

Opiates do not make people behave like this. If anything opiates make a person mellow out and play some video games. This is a tragedy to be sure, but the headline is just looks like another sad attempt to justify prohibition. Prohibition is not justifiable.
/r/MensRights10/09/09 05:12 PM
2

You've given me a lot to think about. Thank you.
/r/MensRights07/09/09 08:36 PM
2

Great, thank you for the information. I am for mandatory testing but I do not believe it would be constitutional, as it would force persons to undergo a medical procedure. Fair enough, though aren't police allowed to take genetic material just laying around and run all sorts of tests on it? What I mean is, if the tests are done using waste from the pregnancy, then there shouldn't be any need for consent in the first place. At the very least this could be done by default as a part of the record k…
/r/MensRights07/09/09 08:23 PM
2

This used to be the rule because before DNA testing marriage was used to determine paternity. I believe only Colorado holds on to this rule, which is indeed messed up. (Edit: On this point, there is a much more complicated analysis used in other states involving the case where a man suspects a child is not his, but says nothing at its birth and raises it for years. The question is whether he has waived the issue and become the child's father, regardless of biology, by acting like the child's fat…
/r/MensRights07/09/09 07:53 PM
5

So, a woman can lie about birth control, hide a pregnancy from the man and then sue for child support after the child is born. He will have not at any point been aware that there was a decision to be made. Is this correct? At what point was he able to dissolve any financial responsibility to a child he never wanted? The current laws seem very "gotcha". I am curious if you actually think it if this sort of thing is fair since you have seen a lot of cases I'm sure, regardless of what the law books…
/r/MensRights07/09/09 07:24 PM
4

This isn't about child support but rather ensuring unquestionable authority in all cases. The police don't care if he was right or wrong, only that they had an authority that needed to be obeyed without question. This sort of attitude has shown up in every single contact with law enforcement that I have had and it is also the case with anyone I have known that has had to deal with law enforcement whether they were guilty or not. Not exactly scientific, but I have observed enough of that sort of …
/r/MensRights04/09/09 03:25 AM
14

This seemed pretty obvious to me. Women tend to be more driven by emotion and passions of the moment because of their amygdala, especially during ovulation, or they tend to do these things as a passive aggressive attack on their husbands, that is, at least from my general observations anyway. Obviously not all women behave in this manner, just that they have a greater tendency to do so statistically speaking.
/r/MensRights04/09/09 02:09 AM
1

Maybe she is looking to finish the job so that the baby can't testify.
/r/MensRights03/09/09 05:28 AM
2

He should probably suggest a series of trips to the Grand Canyon, the Himalayas, the Amazon or perhaps a tour of alleyways in Dubai. Then things would probably work themselves out just fine. ;)
/r/MensRights22/08/09 08:56 AM
2

Drugs aren't bad necessarily and neither necessarily are those people that use them. Nothing like decades of hard-line prohibition to muddy up ethics. Other than that, I must say, nicely played.
/r/MensRights15/08/09 11:32 PM
3

This woman had no need to injure this man as grievously as she did, however this is just another one of those situations where a shitty person should probably expect shitty things to happen to him/her. I don't know why it ever comes as a surprise. When you're an asshole or alternatively human scum with no regard for anyone else, there is always going to be that person that is going to be unstable enough to fuck your world over.
/r/MensRights07/08/09 05:59 AM
0

I think it is a bit beyond humiliation, at least for the wife. I imagine if you find out your spouse resents you, has betrayed you, is that selfish and that however many years you were together were a complete lie, it can rip your whole life out from beneath you and it has very long term negative effects that can effect quality of life. It isn't quite just humiliation. I didn't say they had the right to what they did. Not in the least. Just that people who are shitty shouldn't be surprised when …
/r/MensRights04/08/09 04:59 AM
2

My reaction would be the same whether the victim was male or female, but I completely agree that the "justice" system is rife with double standards and it sickens me.
/r/MensRights03/08/09 11:46 PM
-1

Yeah, many women can get a lot of dick if they want it too, but it isn't okay to do if they are in an exclusive relationship (and they may not want to anyway, out of self respect or since it takes time to properly learn your partner in bed). If a person in a exclusive relationship starts getting a wandering eye, they can either break it off, work out a compromise (It is reasonably common for women to like the idea of multiple people in bed or they may even like women to some extent), or deal wit…
/r/MensRights03/08/09 09:00 PM
-6

~shrug~ What they did was illegal, and it was violent, and it was wrong, but if he wasn't such a horrible human being in the first place that wouldn't have happened. Unfortunately there isn't a law against being asshole scum so often vigilante justice is the only thing left. If a person is that much of a piece of shit, they might expect to get their comeuppance some day too. It isn't okay to destroy other peoples lives because of selfishness. So yeah, he pretty much had it coming.
/r/MensRights03/08/09 08:32 PM
-8

I can't say he didn't have it coming. He got off easy, at least he isn't going to have any permanent damage.
/r/MensRights03/08/09 06:37 PM
0

These are exactly the people that put us in this mess. They denied us a decent health care option they are responsible for the state that our country is in today. Well.... mostly... ;)
/r/MensRights31/07/09 02:23 PM
3

"Yes! Yesss!! Oh, let me taste your tears, mm, your tears are so yummy and sweet…Oh, the tears of unfathomable sadness! Mm-yummy you guys!”
/r/MensRights19/07/09 10:00 PM
11

I only wish I could see that girl having her little breakdown once she realizes the enormity of what she has done. She gave up the love of her life so that she can try and chase some asshat around for child support. To think, if she hadn't gotten pregnant, he might not have known for years. Good thing he found out she was a whore before he had kids with her. This way he can have a completely clean break once he is ready to move on. I wonder what illness she had that he wouldn't touch her. :D
/r/MensRights19/07/09 04:06 PM
10

""And I want the Real Man President to surround himself with other Real Men, like Rumsfeld, and Ashcroft, and yes, Rice (who is more of a Real Man than those asswipes Colin Powell and Norman Mineta). I want our government to be more like Dad—kind, helpful, but not afraid to punish us when we fuck up, instead of helping us excuse our actions. I want our government of real men to start rolling back the Nanny State, in all its horrible manifestations of over-protectiveness, intrusiveness and “Mommy…
/r/MensRights11/07/09 06:51 PM
3

Seriously WTF? "The sad truth, I think, is that men - who, frankly, have been pretty disastrous for the world in the past century or so - have messed up. And everybody knows it. And this fact has seeped into every part of our culture."
/r/MensRights15/06/09 04:57 PM
2

We're in the wild. We just happen to be really good at making hives and burrows.
/r/MensRights15/06/09 04:55 PM
2

Pretty easy to research. http://deltabravo.net/custody/tenmyths.php
/r/MensRights06/06/09 01:15 AM
5

Not really.
/r/MensRights05/06/09 07:46 PM
3

NO!
/r/MensRights31/05/09 11:46 PM
2

Compulsory paternity tests on every child born. Every father should be allowed to be as certain that a child is his, as the mother is.
/r/MensRights08/01/09 11:54 PM
6

It sucks that most of the women weren't charged. If they were men, they sure as hell would have been.
/r/MensRights08/01/09 02:40 PM
1

It is true, and the vast majority of people are very miserable as well. It usually stems from a misplaced sense of priorities and is often accompanied by an extreme sense of entitlement as well.
/r/MensRights02/01/09 10:08 PM
0

I don't suppose they can be. I can only really speak from personal experience, however, everything else in life pales in comparison. I weep for the cynical, insecure, defensive and loveless. It seems that Money and success are only fulfilling to one who has never experienced true love, openness and reciprocated vulnerability. I wouldn't trade the feeling of waking up in my wife's arms for any amount of money or success. I suppose that value systems vary, but I wonder if a person can really feel …
/r/MensRights02/01/09 10:05 PM
0

I don't suppose they can be. I can only really speak from personal experience, however, everything else in life pales in comparison. I weep for the cynical, insecure, defensive and loveless. It seems that Money and success are only fulfilling to one who has never experienced true love, openness and reciprocated vulnerability. I wouldn't trade the feeling of waking up in my wife's arms for any amount of money or success. I suppose that value systems vary, but I wonder if a person can really feel …
/r/MensRights02/01/09 10:03 PM
0

If two people are together for anything but love, they are both doing it wrong.
/r/MensRights02/01/09 03:30 PM
0

Just another whore that got less than she deserved.
/r/MensRights22/12/08 09:25 PM
0

Just another whore that got what she deserved.
/r/MensRights22/12/08 09:24 PM
14

I think that if a woman becomes pregnant through dishonest behavior, such as lying about birth control or saving sperm to inseminate with, then the father should be allowed to sign off on the pregnancy completely.
/r/MensRights15/12/08 01:37 PM
2

It could be argued that religion is a choice, and therefore open to ridicule.
/r/MensRights13/12/08 02:38 PM
3

Having one woman in my life is complicated enough. There is no way I would want to be vulnerable and give that much power to a second woman.
/r/MensRights04/12/08 02:46 AM
1

Stupid homonyms, always fooling my spell checker. Thanks for the correction. :D
/r/MensRights26/11/08 09:55 PM
9

It's from Cosmo, that's why it is so vacuous, sexist, and lacking in insight.
/r/MensRights26/11/08 05:16 PM
3

What about men who are kind of a dick, but gentle at heart, masculine and muscular, along with being intelligent and resourceful. What does that do to your fucking theory.
/r/MensRights24/11/08 02:43 AM
7

Paternity test for every child at birth... BOOM!... problem solved. It is not that fucking complicated.
/r/MensRights13/11/08 04:33 AM
9

I'm sure it was his fault though. ~sigh~
/r/MensRights11/11/08 03:21 PM
4

Yeah... not that it will happen. Feminists will call it misogyny and cry if women aren't allowed to dupe anyone they want out of child support.
/r/MensRights11/11/08 06:11 AM
8

I was confused by your suggestion of maternal testing, until I remembered that sometimes children are switched at birth. Also, I completely agree.
/r/MensRights11/11/08 12:51 AM
3

Seriously, I was rooting for Hopkins the whole time also.
/r/MensRights17/10/08 10:37 PM
2

Whom do I sue? Can I sue the nearest christian, muslim or jew?
/r/MensRights25/09/08 09:15 PM
1

Yes yes, circumcision sucks, all the uncircumcised can feel very superior now. If only my mother had been as informed as you are, then I wouldn't have to be a shell of a man. /sarcasm
/r/MensRights25/09/08 01:01 PM
9

Poor indoctrinated fool. I really do feel badly for him.
/r/MensRights23/08/08 11:13 PM
7

Except for number three, the options are basically out of my control. As far as number three is concerned... no. However, if it was compulsory it would eliminate the awkwardness involved, as any woman, whether righteously or not will become defensive because of such a request. Fathers certainly deserve that certainty.
/r/MensRights17/08/08 06:34 PM
17

Three things... First: Marriage contracts should come in different time increments, such as one year, three year, five year and ten year commitments. The lifetime commitment should not be allowed until after completing the ten year commitment. Second: The person that causes the dissolution of the marriage contract through infidelity or violence should be financial liable for the remaining years in the contract, which can be applied retroactively in cases that infidelity is revealed later. Third:…
/r/MensRights17/08/08 03:19 PM
2

Your sarcasm has amused me. Well done... now dance. ~clap clap~
/r/MensRights09/08/08 10:18 PM
10

With a population this large and distributed, women have no more biological importance than men, as the population isn't capped by the number of women available but rather by social and economic pressures. The young women are no more important to our future than the men.
/r/MensRights09/08/08 01:30 PM
1

I really think we need more specific names for sexually criminal actions and not just lump everything under sexual assault, which can include everything from uncomfortable staring to going family style on a co-ed with barbed dildoes.
/r/MensRights03/08/08 01:47 AM
2

Agreed, even 50 victims sounds made up, much less 150.
/r/MensRights03/08/08 12:19 AM
1

Exactly, our culture in general is destroying all of us.
/r/MensRights21/07/08 10:42 AM
2

Why was she trying to hide sex with her boyfriend? How very strange.
/r/MensRights19/07/08 08:20 AM
7

There really needs to be some reform. This sort of thing should never ever happen. In fact, the way I see it, the paternity test should be mandatory at the birth of every child, I figure if the women is allowed to be certain that the child is theirs then the man deserves the same right.
/r/MensRights12/07/08 09:26 PM
8

I'm sure some very angry people will come in and cite some erroneous data about how only 1 or 2% of rape accusations are false, however, every single rape story I have heard first hand turned out to be one of the following three situations; A) A girl who already had a boyfriend and did something while drunk that she later regrets, or B) A girl looking for attention, or C)Girls who really like having a sexual assault story to make themselves part of the feminist college girl's club. This is just …
/r/MensRights29/06/08 08:55 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter