paintingcook Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Innocent man narrowly avoids 99 years in prison after ex-girlfriend fabricates claim. She WON'T BE CHARGED. This IS a claim for non-sexual assault. She said he broke into her home and sliced an X into her chest with a box cutter.	/r/MensRights	17/11/18 04:55 AM
1	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings Just so i can know, give me a reasonable equivalent of what you think circumcision is as bad as in terms of a hand. How much of a hand would you have to remove from an infant to be as bad as a circumcision in YOUR point of view?	/r/MensRights	08/11/17 12:05 AM
1	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings Just so i can know, give me a reasonable equivalent of what you think circumcision is as bad as in terms of a hand. How much of a hand would you have to remove from an infant to be as bad as a circumcision in YOUR point of view?	/r/MensRights	07/11/17 11:34 PM
1	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings Just so i can know, give me a reasonable equivalent of what you think circumcision is as bad as in terms of a hand. How much of a hand would you have to remove from an infant to be as bad as a circumcision in YOUR point of view?	/r/MensRights	07/11/17 11:31 PM
1	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings The function of a penis is to excrete urine, and to transfer sperm for reproduction. Circumcised penises (at any age) are still capable of both those things. Circumcision doesn't interfere with penile function. I agree that it changes the structure, but that is its purpose.	/r/MensRights	07/11/17 11:21 PM
1	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings It is impossible to provide proof of a negative absolute, and I don't need to. You are arguing that it should be illegal, it is currently legal, ergo you have to prove that it should not be. I think it should be legal, I don't have to do anything to get my way, I have my way.	/r/MensRights	07/11/17 11:16 PM
1	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings You aren't working very well at it, you only have 3 peer reviewed sources discussing your actual point in a list you claim has 34	/r/MensRights	07/11/17 11:10 PM
1	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings You still only have 3 sources in a list of 34 that talk about your actual point	/r/MensRights	07/11/17 11:06 PM
1	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings Sorry, 3 is the same as 21 which I listed in my summary, I miswrote in the list	/r/MensRights	07/11/17 10:53 PM
1	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings You aren't even replying to me. You are just copy-pasting a bunch of stuff I'm betting you didn't even write in the first place. Also, I have never said I am a proponent of circumcision, just of choice. Kind of like i am not a proponent of abortion, but i am a proponent of women having the right to choose. I was just pointing out how poorly you arranged your 8 actual sources into a list of 34. I was originally just pointing out that they guy who wrote the OP piece was a biased and untrustworthy …	/r/MensRights	07/11/17 10:48 PM
1	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings 1- study of women's preferences, not really relevant. 2- Not a peer reviewed study 3- study of adult circumcision 4- found that circumcised men take on average ~40 seconds longer to ejaculate 5- repeated 4 link and then a non peer reviewed article 6- study of adult circumcision finding it causes erectile disfunction 7- not peer reviewed articles 8- neither peer reviewed nor relevent 9- no link 10- not a peer reviewed article, not relevent either 11- not a peer reviewed article 12- not a peer rev…	/r/MensRights	07/11/17 10:08 PM
1	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings I looked at the research you provided. The only compelling work was on ADULT circumcision, which is not what you are arguing against. Have YOU looked at the sources you linked?	/r/MensRights	07/11/17 08:44 PM
1	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings But i'm open to learning otherwise. However, so far the only compelling data I have seen have involved adult or adolescent circumcision. Which seems to be a very different matter, but if an adult wants to be circumcised, I think you would agree they should be able to have it done.	/r/MensRights	07/11/17 07:55 PM
1	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings Adult women do that as a form of plastic surgery fairly frequently from what I understand. I don't think the choice should be denied to them.	/r/MensRights	07/11/17 07:51 PM
1	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings No, I'm unable to find any compelling evidence in my own experience to condemn the practice. But i'm open to learning otherwise. However, so far the only compelling data I have seen have involved adult or adolescent circumcision. Which seems to be a very different matter, but if an adult wants to be circumcised, I think you would agree they should be able to have it done.	/r/MensRights	07/11/17 07:41 PM
1	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings Those are all cosmetic functions. The vital function of genitals is reproduction.	/r/MensRights	07/11/17 07:37 PM
1	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings I think you, like many trolls, have a deep seated need to have the last word in online conversations.	/r/MensRights	07/11/17 07:37 PM
1	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings You know how the tobacco industry funded studies of lung cancer connections to smoking are untrustworthy? The same reason why this guys "findings" are incredibly suspect, beyond the fact that he DOESN'T PROVIDE ANY.	/r/MensRights	07/11/17 07:36 PM
1	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings Why are you associating with someone like that?	/r/MensRights	07/11/17 07:33 PM
1	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings Cosmetic meaning not vital to the performance of the function for which something is intended.	/r/MensRights	07/11/17 07:32 PM
1	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings I'm sure you know best	/r/MensRights	07/11/17 07:28 PM
1	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings You don't think your comments through very much, do you?	/r/MensRights	07/11/17 07:28 PM
1	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings Well, if I see any I'll be sure to let you know.	/r/MensRights	07/11/17 07:26 PM
1	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings So... You are saying I'm right?	/r/MensRights	07/11/17 07:25 PM
1	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings You seem to mistake cosmetic function for vital function.	/r/MensRights	07/11/17 07:24 PM
1	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings And where is that?	/r/MensRights	07/11/17 07:23 PM
1	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings We weren't arguing. Calling me a Pretty angry kinda person IS an ad-hominem attack. Does that mean you are saying I won the non-argument?	/r/MensRights	07/11/17 06:22 PM
1	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings You seem to spend a lot of time thinking about the genitals of infants.	/r/MensRights	07/11/17 06:18 PM
1	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings What has been demonstrated in most of these studies is that circumcision causes pain. That is really obvious. What you seem to be arguing is that the level of pain and trauma inflicted by circumcision is sufficiently high to warrant banning it entirely. I disagree with that. I think it is on par with parents having their children get a tattoo (a bad decision but something that is within their rights, and should be within their rights in a free society).	/r/MensRights	07/11/17 06:17 PM
1	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings You seriously misunderstood my point. I am not arguing in favor of circumcision. I am saying THIS GUY is biased and untrustworthy, especially on this topic and his methods were UNETHICAL.	/r/MensRights	07/11/17 06:07 PM
-1	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings The author is an anti circumcision activist, who was forcibly circumcised at the age of 8. I think that forcible circumcision on a child old enough to understand what is happening to them is worlds different from circumcision on a newborn. I think the author wants very much to PROVE that circumcision is wrong in all cases because of what was done to him. I think if his data proved what he says it did that he would gladly have given up his job to be able to publicize it and the fact he let the da…	/r/MensRights	07/11/17 03:58 AM
1	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings No... Approval for any study involving live test subjects. The researchers here did not have any moral high ground, and the author is very likely being dishonest in his account of the hospital's response. Also, if the author really felt the results showed clear evidence that circumcision is tantamount to abuse, and they chose to value their job over publicising the evidence, then they are an awful human being. They almost certainly had very poor evidence supporting their hypothesis, and knew it.…	/r/MensRights	07/11/17 03:23 AM
1	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings Maybe because MRI studies can be used to show that dead fish respond to photos of social inclusion and exclusion. Analysis of MRI studies can show you whatever you want to see if you aren't being very rigorous. If the researchers couldn't be bothered to get approval from an ethics committee then they probably weren't being that scrupulous in their analysis methods either. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/scicurious-brain/ignobel-prize-in-neuroscience-the-dead-salmon-study/	/r/MensRights	07/11/17 02:38 AM
1	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob I'm a research Chemist, there's lots of little pauses through my day.	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 10:01 PM
2	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob BING!!! ANOTHER POINT!!! I bet you respond again, so far I'm like 6/0	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 07:24 PM
3	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob BING!!! ANOTHER POINT!!! I never said you thought the initials stood for roommate. SAD!! go on mittens.	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 07:23 PM
2	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob BING!!! ANOTHER POINT!!! And you prove me right again! Also, its not my job to google things for you. #callbackburn	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 07:12 PM
5	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob I'm important enough to keep you responding! And you keep showing yourself wrong. Your initial post was entirely made of quotes from the complaint, nothing from the evidence or ruling. and when confronted with that, you claimed that the defense was unreliable because the guy was guilty. Which wasn't the outcome. SAD. You also misinterpreted the initials RM to indicate the girls roommate (who you should have known was gone at the time) instead of the roommates friend. You then attempted to argue …	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 07:11 PM
2	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob BING!!! ANOTHER POINT!!! Right, sure you will. You "letting me off the hook" would just be an admission of defeat, so there is no way you won't respond again. BTFO	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 07:06 PM
4	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob Can't even get my username right when you're trying to insult me. /u/Tre1798 is right, Mittens. SAD!	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 06:54 PM
2	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob Bing! another point for me! That doesn't even support your statement! Try not to suck so bad next time! Care to play again?	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 06:52 PM
2	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob Bing! Another victory for me! Judging by your post history you are a troll who says whatever they think will get a negative reaction. Thanks for playing! Whoosh!	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 06:24 PM
2	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob By my analysis YOU are obsessed with winning, and attention, and are very low energy! SAD! And I win when I keep you responding.	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 06:06 PM
2	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob I'm replying to you too, and i'm not getting upset by any of this, so i'm not being trolled. As an aside, why are you addressing a third party? At this point you and I are the only ones who will ever read these. I'm sure the flabby comment stems from one of your own insecurities.	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 04:38 PM
2	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob Why thank you!	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 03:16 PM
3	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob Why do you keep talking to me then, friend? You seem very eager to "win" by getting the last word. Is that a self worth problem?	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 02:38 PM
3	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob Right and you agreed. Or do you not think I was trolling?	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 02:22 PM
3	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob So, you therefore agree that what YOU did was ALSO trolling. Or else you don't think what either of us did was trolling, since we were doing the same thing (lengthy arguing to no real purpose). Thanks for admitting it.	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 02:20 PM
3	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob The lengthy, sustained arguing rather than ignoring the request is what was trolling. Not the initial refusal to give the source.	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 02:13 PM
3	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob You spent all morning arguing against nearly EVERYONE who replied to you rather than give a curious poster the link you had already found. That is pretty textbook trolling. You exploited it, as you say, to get attention. Which is sort of what trolling is about, but it is negative attention and the desire for attention even if it is negative is typical of narcissistic personality disorders. So from your point of view, you definitely "won", but from mine and (judging from the comment scores) the r…	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 02:04 PM
6	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob This is the internet, and cowardice and bravery are nonexistent here. As for lacking integrity, your selective citation of the source material has already been shown by others more invested in the case than I. I am not invested in proving you wrong. I was invested in convincing you that the definition for one word was not what you thought it was, but i am definitely not invested in that anymore. Now I am just enjoying wasting your time. I have failed at many things, this is not one of them. Argu…	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 01:42 PM
5	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob Yes, referring to me as cowardly to try and discredit me is exactly ad hominem.	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 01:24 PM
5	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob You didn't dismiss it, you argued against it. Also, why do you keep engaging in ad hominem rhetoric?	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 01:11 PM
5	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob Then why did you argue against it??	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 01:06 PM
7	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob That is exactly what I said (with source i cited https://www.google.com/search?q=citation). You responded in dissent. Ergo, you argued.	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 01:02 PM
4	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob I did mention it first, but you did argue the point.	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 12:57 PM
9	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob You provided a link to A definition so did I, so did others. Nuff said. LOL	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 12:15 PM
7	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob You argued the definition of citation, I didn't MAKE you.	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 12:13 PM
9	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob But it was what you and I were discussing. This is fun	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 12:03 PM
11	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob You,provided a link that agreed with you and argued that it was a complete definition and that the other definitions were therefore wrong.	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 12:02 PM
10	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob You were also arguing the definition of the noun "citation"	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 11:56 AM
9	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob Other people provided more complete definitions from Cambridge and Wikipedia that you ignored. Only accepting sources that agree with you is selective and wrong.	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 11:54 AM
10	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob You ignored all the definitions from reputable sources provided to you by others. That was selective.	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 11:50 AM
33	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob You were being pedantic. You knew what everyone meant asking you to cite your source, even if you (Incorrectly) thought their definition was wrong.	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 11:49 AM
38	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob You had already looked it up. We were just asking for the link you already had. And you were being an ass about it.	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 11:42 AM
12	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob No, I said YOU were (and are) wrong and the dictionary definitions you selectively cited are incomplete.	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 11:41 AM
67	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob Providing a reference to your source is YOUR work. So, yeah YOU should stop being so lazy.	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 11:39 AM
6	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob Riiiight	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 11:37 AM
46	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob I was trying to get you to do the right thing. Then I gave up.	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 11:36 AM
14	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob You're not making yourself look better or less wrong.	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 11:33 AM
95	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/massachusetts/madce/3:2015cv30097/170695/117 Because u/PIG_CUNT is a giant douche and won't cite his sources even when requested	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 11:32 AM
97	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/massachusetts/madce/3:2015cv30097/170695/117 Because u/PIG_CUNT is a giant douche and won't cite his sources even when requested	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 11:31 AM
–	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob Of course you made it up. Your a troll	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 11:20 AM
19	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob I don't think I'm making myself look bad And I am a dork	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 11:17 AM
37	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob But the reference I cited wasn't the Google result for "define citation" it was the Google result for "citation". And since both results have definitions that include quoting a source, but one result has additional information, it can be understood that they do not disagree with each other. The dictionary form definition is less complete.	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 11:16 AM
24	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob Would you please give the case number?	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 11:10 AM
–	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob Popular consensus is on my side. But you should stop making up sources.	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 11:08 AM
19	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob Scholarly works with unattributed quotations are rejected for publication because an unattributed quote is not acceptable as a citation.	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 11:05 AM
45	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob https://www.google.com/search?q=citation "A "citation" is the way you tell your readers that certain material in your work came from another source. It also gives your readers the information necessary to find that source again, including: information about the author. the title of the work." You searched for something different than I said.	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 10:56 AM
24	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob To be a citation you gotta give the case number so we can look it up ourselves. Nothing requires that you don't make up fake sources either. Would you please give the case number?	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 10:51 AM
34	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob A citation includes a quote or paraphrasing but that is only part of what a citation is. That's why the definition says "as in a scholarly work."	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 10:49 AM
30	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob That's still not a citation. Would you please give us the case number? So we can know you aren't making quotes up or quoting the wrong case?	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 10:46 AM
87	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob A "citation" is the way you tell your readers that certain material in your work came from another source. It also gives your readers the information necessary to find that source again, including: information about the author. the title of the work. From: Google search result for "citation". So I am teaching you something. Your welcome.	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 10:44 AM
37	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob No, citing a source means providing bibliographical reference for your source. Quoting a source is just quoting a source.	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 10:41 AM