TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

pajeebajeerajee Archive

View 0 posts and 36 comments by pajeebajeerajee on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

From there, we can actually solve problems instead of making wishes. This is not really true, as the scientific literature on attractiveness says that what women find genuinely attractive (arousing) in men are almost entirely genetic factors of physical attractiveness. Not how fit you are, how well dressed you are, how great of a conversationalist you are, what you do for a living, or how much you make. Those might make a person like you, but they don't and can't make a person attracted to you. …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/19 04:57 PM
2

No sources and into the trash it goes. Back up every claim with a non-survey source or GTFO. But I remember reading years ago that if a woman I remember reading years ago about martians being real. Get a grip.
/r/BlackPillScience10/10/19 08:34 PM
2

No I understood it. There is literally nothing to "get" outside of sexual reproduction and the things that surround it as a sexually reproducing animal. If you can't get a lifelong stable marriage genetically, you can't get anything of any real value, to yourself or anyone else. This is objective fact.
/r/BlackPillScience27/09/19 09:11 PM
1

Source? If you make a claim you need to provide statistics and evidence to back it up. This is the science subreddit for the blackpill, not your nutty idea playground.
/r/BlackPillScience26/09/19 10:26 PM
1

If I wanted to land an equally attractive woman, with little bagguage. These women are all married by their mid-20s at the latest to men of a similar age.
/r/MGTOW24/09/19 10:58 PM
4

Statistically you are an extreme outlier then. Why should an extreme outlier be considered in a rational analysis?
/r/MGTOW24/09/19 10:55 PM
3

That's not at all the same thing. Unstable variables like wealth means you are genetically incapable of having women attracted to you, which requires only two genetic factors: height and masculine facial bone structure. Resources/wealth are for pretending to have women interested, but are much more unstable and you are basically buying prostitutes at that point.
/r/MGTOW24/09/19 10:54 PM
7

No, this is nonsense. The behaviors he described most married men will describe in their wives. Unless 90%+ of women have clinical NPD, its simply not true.
/r/MGTOW24/09/19 04:44 PM
12

Its not just fertility. Its also the fact that if a woman wasn't willing to bet on a man when he was still struggling, she obviously isn't actually capable of loving him and that's bad news for anything long term. When a woman gives a man her own age her most youthful and carefree years (20-25), he knows she actually loves him for him because he has not made his way in life yet. When she shows up at the finish line, he knows she's basically a glorified prostitute. Most men cannot be loved by wom…
/r/MGTOW23/09/19 11:48 PM
1

Its not shit in water/air/food or lead and mercury or aliens. Lack of regular physical exercise is the primary cause.
/r/MGTOW23/09/19 08:55 PM
3

She has that many followers because she's hot as a result of genetics. There is no secret to getting a following if your channel is something practical like auto repair. Just make good videos.
/r/MGTOW22/09/19 03:14 PM
3

Men's standards for women are variable, women's standards for men are not. And they are genetic standards. Height and facial bone structure are the determining factors of attraction for women, regardless of their stated values. Everything else requires those two criteria be met first. You can't be the man in high demand, you are born it or you are not.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/09/19 01:47 AM
2

What counts as liberal is particular to a society's culture. As the other respondent pointed out, nudity was normal to them so having lots of it wouldn't be liberal with respect to their culture. It would be normal/within the scope of their traditional behavior.
/r/MGTOW21/09/19 06:27 PM
41

Women are the sexual selectors, so not really. It feels nice to think so though.
/r/MGTOW20/09/19 07:47 AM
0

Not really true. Only about a quarter of first marriages between educated white men and women in the US ever end in divorce. The fact of the matter is, most people get to have happy life-long marriages and the people here on MGTOW are the exception, which is why it will never go mainstream. The ideas here function as a means of rationalizing the fact that we get only one life and some people get to live it happily with their spouse while others do not.
/r/MGTOW19/09/19 03:34 PM
3

Women naturally appear to age 1.5x faster than men once 30 comes around. Its due to differences in skin composition between and women. Its basically signalling to future men that she is not youthful anymore and to stay away.
/r/MGTOW18/09/19 11:13 PM
1

You are literally your body. The fleshy brain that makes all the choices is the same one that produces the impulses that you are suggesting should be shunned. The impulse to not engage these other impulses is itself just another impulse produced by the same brain.
/r/MGTOW18/09/19 03:50 PM
1

I'm sorry you have so much hate inside you. That's a pretty blatant irony because this is such a nasty and incontestably hateful thing to say to someone. Our higher values speak to our individual character more than anything else. You were taught these by other people, they aren't your values. They were crafted by communities for other ways of life. Old software still running that needs an update. However, if the expression of my individual intelligence, morality, ambition, spirituality, creativ…
/r/MGTOW18/09/19 03:40 PM
6

Who is her and what is someone supposed to be getting? Collecting things is not a life. Life is only found in other people. Sexually reproducing organisms have one purpose, to sexually reproduce.
/r/BlackPillScience17/09/19 04:17 PM
21

And women's sexual desire (as measured by ability to orgasm during intercourse) is determined entirely by looks, primarily by height and face. Thus your ability as a man to have a stable loving marriage in your life is determined at conception by the genes you got for the length of your leg bones and the shape of your face bones.
/r/BlackPillScience17/09/19 03:59 PM
7

This is nothing new. It will never change. The tide never goes out on things like this.
/r/MGTOW17/09/19 03:01 PM
9

When the game is over the King and the Pawn go back in the same box. Your higher values are as meaningless as your lower desires. "Higher values" are just those values that are pro-social and exist for the benefit of others, chiefly women. If you live by them, all you are doing is building a better world for women to carry the babies of men who are not you in. Basically you are building a better world for other men to nut in beautiful women.
/r/MGTOW17/09/19 02:56 PM
11

This isn't true. If he's physically very attractive it doesn't matter who he is. He could be a layabout who plays video games all day if he is tall and handsome and she would pay all the bills for him.
/r/MGTOW16/09/19 02:52 PM
3

Most attractive men are losers just like most unattractive men. Most women are chasing attractive men who aren't CEOs. Its hardly relevant that a few hundred attractive men out of 100 million + are CEOs.
/r/MGTOW16/09/19 12:32 AM
1

Why are you speaking if you're not a man?
/r/MGTOW12/09/19 12:12 PM
5

Yes it is. If they can land him. The reason they don't marry these guys is because most of the time they can't, he moves on.
/r/BlackPillScience11/09/19 07:14 PM
7

They are willing to forgo this if they can get a very attractive mate. Lots of women are willing to be the primary breadwinners for extremely physically attractive but otherwise deadbeat men.
/r/BlackPillScience11/09/19 07:13 PM
2

The social aspects would be downwind, so to speak, of any other markers like scent. Scent would betray hormone levels independent of behavior, and would be more reliable.
/r/BlackPillScience11/09/19 07:11 PM
2

This presupposes that he is correct, which itself promotes an echo chamber of a new kind. There is no evidence that mice are in fact using body language.
/r/BlackPillScience11/09/19 07:09 PM
1

Yep. That's his point. Everything noteworthy.
/r/MGTOW09/09/19 05:22 AM
3

Of course, I only mean that the 10% most attractive men have it as easy as the 10% least attractive women, which is quite a bit easier than it is for the rest of men.
/r/MGTOW09/09/19 05:16 AM
5

Christianity worships women and creates obedient men. Also, fate doesn't even out.
/r/MGTOW09/09/19 04:26 AM
24

but men are born with nothing. About 10% of men are born with good looks and height that allow them to find a place in society without having to achieve much.
/r/MGTOW07/09/19 09:48 AM
0

Why is virginity so important to you? You're like the guys that go around calling women sluts for not being virgins. Yuck. This virginity obsession with you guys is gross. Also, which part of Texas are you from cowboy?
/r/MGTOW06/09/19 03:37 PM
2

No, each person falls for the other at their own pace. I know that you aren't able to empathize with other people because of your biology, but men don't fall in love the same way women do. Men fall in love with the person, not the prospects. Men can see that when a woman really wants a man, she chases him like there's nothing that can stop her from before date #1, and if she's trying to use him as a backup/wallet she waits to see what he can offer.
/r/MGTOW06/09/19 12:04 PM
3

No sources, no facts.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/19 02:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter