TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

pajoorajoo Archive

View 0 posts and 31 comments by pajoorajoo on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

You might as well get down on your knees and lick the last droplets of jizz from your white master's cock lmao
/r/BlackPillScience03/02/20 08:25 AM
2

Why would American men be in Asia?
/r/BlackPillScience03/02/20 08:25 AM
1

https://imgur.com/a/77e59QR
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/01/20 10:20 AM
3

Being fat is a choice, being genetically physically unattractive is not. Fat women are not good people because of their behavior, incels are not good people because of their genetic looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/19 09:36 PM
1

Not to mention the genuine cause of incel issues, genetic factors of physical attractiveness. But yes, personality is genetic and stable throughout the lifespan. This idea that personality is something you work on is nonsense. Its mostly a narrow range of possible behaviors modified by how others treat you on the basis of your looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/19 09:35 PM
2

Should men take responsibility for the fact that they got into relationships with women who weren't lifelong nymphomaniacs? Yes, if they want a lifelong nymphomaniac.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/19 11:21 PM
2

Personality is stable throughout adulthood. The kind of man who does not do housework equally is always that kind of man, whether or not he starts off the relationship doing more housework. Its a woman's job to figure out what kind of man has that personality and avoid him if she wants a partner who will do an equal share of the housework. Own your decisions rather than complaining about them.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/19 11:18 PM
1

This is the main cause of male isolation early in life. Most men are not physically attractive enough to have women fall for them, so they have to acquire status (money/professional attainment, etc.) before women will pay attention them. This is why men fail to find partners early in life. Women have their eyes glued to the 5 (formerly 20) most attractive men out of 100 while they're young, and most of these guys will end up settling down with someone they meet in high school or college. When th…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/19 11:07 PM
2

Its because a person's behavior defines who and what they are. If a person is a casual sex person, they're not really a commitment/marriage person. Its not a judgement, its an observation about them. Failure to make this observation is why the divorce rate is so high. Women who aren't suited for marriage are getting married to desperate guys who overlook observations they should be making.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 11:19 PM
1

"promiscuous/experienced women are worthless undatable scum (who I still want to fuck)." Isn't that what they are calling themselves by behaving a certain way? Observation can never be misogyny, hypocrisy, or anger.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 11:17 PM
11

Nah, its fine to judge people for their behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 11:16 PM
6

Imagine thinking a guy is rational because he engages in biology denialism. You think we're magical fairy creatures, and he confirms your belief, so you feel he's rational. What a laugh.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 09:17 AM
6

Its implied that she dictates his schedule.
/r/MGTOW17/11/19 01:38 AM
1

80% of men in the US are below 6'.
/r/MGTOW15/11/19 03:11 PM
1

This is largely not backed up by statistics. Ugly tall guys bad at conversation typically have much more success than handsome skilled shorter conversationalists all statistics considered. The favor dating apps did was reveal this. Anecdotal reasoning is for women.
/r/MGTOW15/11/19 03:10 PM
4

No problems with women liking taller dudes, it's just what they do. They go so far out of their way to pretend they don't have this preference to win arguments though, its rather weird. Trying to live in two realities.
/r/MGTOW15/11/19 04:35 AM
2

Not entirely true. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/226002?journalCode=ajs https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1016/j.jmhg.2005.04.016 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5463019/
/r/MGTOW14/11/19 09:28 PM
1

That or they're going on about Jesus and making a show of how committed to God they are. Fake as fuck. If you have to declare your love of God for all to see you're a pretender trying to score social brownie points.
/r/MGTOW14/11/19 07:45 PM
7

I’m not trying to bash on trad cons There's no need to go easy on them. Trad con is a retarded position to take and they're women worshipers through the institution of marriage
/r/MGTOW14/11/19 04:11 AM
17

Only liars, cheaters, and other lowlifes would doubt that it was a happy ending.
/r/MGTOW14/11/19 04:03 AM
21

This means the frustration and anger felt by many incels toward others may be an unavoidable and involuntary neurobiological response to social abuse by non-incels. Thus the correction lies in correcting the behavior of non-incels.
/r/BlackPillScience14/11/19 02:11 AM
9

Without proper selective pressure there is no direction for us to "improve in" in a functional way. Natural selection is purely sexual selection for humans now.
/r/BlackPillScience14/11/19 02:06 AM
1

do fucked up shit Like cheating on your wife?
/r/MGTOW13/11/19 09:11 PM
3

The lack of effort that she feels she now has to put in should be an issue. Otherwise she wouldn't perceive humor in this. A joke is always at someone's expense.
/r/MGTOW12/11/19 10:02 PM
4

Yep, if anything the ability to produce the basics needed to survive is outpacing human population growth faster than it ever has in history. The carrying capacity of the planet is chugging along better than it ever has before. We're not headed for a life-ending catastrophe, maybe for some minor discomfort in already uncomfortable poorer countries. The bacteria in the petri dish have zero innovative capacity and are purely subjects of nature. Humans have incredible innovative capacity.
/r/MGTOW12/11/19 04:44 PM
3

Artificial wombs will take this exclusivity over child having from women, but men will still be the gatekeepers of commitment.
/r/MGTOW10/11/19 10:33 PM
1

Being taller and stronger prior to industrialized agriculture would have been a disadvantage due to the need for more food to sustain such a person.
/r/MGTOW10/11/19 09:19 PM
5

The evidence points to frequency of orgasms in women being primarily affected by how attractive her partner is, and not any sexual techniques/practices, and women are obsessive about size. Size of everything is pretty much what determines attractiveness to women.
/r/MGTOW10/11/19 01:26 AM
1

The peer reviewed replicated literature on this shows that genetic features of physical attractiveness are what determines whether or not women are interested, not things like working out. Its a nice fantasy though. Fit men get laid if they are already genetically attractive.
/r/MGTOW08/11/19 06:07 PM
3

How are physical/sexual things a "deeper level"? Are your referring to the depth of her orifices? What are "commitment issues" in scientific terms? Any replicated peer-reviewed studies to support the existence of these "commitment issues" in men who refuse to provide financially for women? Why not have someone there for you no matter what? So you support the abolition of divorce? No backtracking, no matter what means under any and all circumstances. real intimacy Remove the woman's biological se…
/r/MGTOW08/11/19 01:22 PM
4

Doesn't matter how much he makes since relationships are about love and she should just want to be with him for him. lol
/r/MGTOW07/11/19 07:03 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter