TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

paket Archive

View 0 posts and 48 comments by paket on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Yes, how many of them actually applied and were turned down? Surely we couldn't have come this far with something as pervasive and as evil as the Patriarchy(tm) and not have scads of rejected applications. Or any other actual evidence of such.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 10:11 PM
4

Has anyone ever asked the women in gender studies programs why they didn't go into STEM fields? Has anyone ever looked into how many women have actually applied to STEM programs? Anyone???
/r/MensRights02/05/15 08:53 PM
2

I think TRP is a counter-reaction to an educational system, media and government dominated by feminist ideals. By the time a young man graduates from high school, he is likely to have had at least one teacher who has hated him and has dedicated her life to the suppression of his innate boyish tendencies. Quite likely more. Some young men mistakenly project their anger that arises from this to all women. Some feminists do this too. How many stories have we heard of a young woman who received some…
/r/MensRights19/12/14 04:02 PM
2

If someone leave their car doors unlocked and is robbed, would you say that it was not in any way their fault? If someone is at risk and does not take basic measures to protect themselves, are they at fault?
/r/MensRights04/10/14 01:38 AM
5

Of what? Feminists advocating for zero-tolerance programs?
/r/MensRights29/03/14 02:04 AM
2

said no feminist ever Perhaps not, but they do advocate vociferously for zero-thought tolerance programs that would ensure that it would happen.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 11:46 PM
1

I doubt if I can, to your satisfaction at least. It seems to me to be mass outrage sparked by words that intended well but poorly chosen.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 07:15 PM
2

That is a good thing, IMHO. Not banning, that is. Free speech, not becoming an echo chamber, exemplifying a difference in conduct from SRS et. al., etc.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 07:13 PM
10

I don't see a difference. If anything, the feminist-driven 'slutwalk' is more exploitave than corporate advertising. Models and designers are paid, very well in some cases, while protesters are not. The protester's aim is to advance an ideology, one that has been sold to them using false information and emotionally manipulative language.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 04:43 PM
1

This "softening" has been going on for decades. Nothing new here.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 09:07 PM
2

Because feminism is based on a logical fallacy, faith and misplaced anger. Feminists look at the people who have wielded power throughout history and incorrectly conclude that they did so because they were men. Yet, for every man who had power, how many didn't? How many peasant men lived for every king or noble? How many male farmers, miners and sailors died while eking out a meager living, trying to provide for their families? How many men were killing in battle, used as cheap cannon fodder? Fe…
/r/MensRights01/02/14 06:43 AM
3

To expand on that a little, how about the privilege of being able to use sexism as a thought-terminating cliche to shut down any dissenting opinions?
/r/MensRights21/01/14 04:37 AM
3

Generally speaking, North American society welcomes and accepts female sexuality while it condemns male sexuality. Female sexuality is prized while male sexuality is a commodity. If a woman wants to put up a cowboy calendar in her cubicle, the reaction will be smiles and titters, especially if she is middle-aged and single. Now imagine a middle-aged single male posting a bikini calendar. He would be viewed as a lecher, deviant and a predator. This attitude is expressed very well when a woman is …
/r/MensRights18/01/14 05:22 PM
7

...which are irrelevant and unnecessary. Individual capabilities and decisions that are made are important, gender is not. Is there an echo in here?
/r/MensRights04/01/14 06:29 PM
16

It always has been irrelevant Sparky.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 05:19 PM
14

This. The only thing worth discussing are the abilities of those people and the decisions they make. Gender is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 05:03 PM
2

That is fantastic. Patriarchy theory == original sin. Deserves to be "a thing" around here.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 12:22 AM
19

Also completely devoid of left-handed west coast bagpipe tuners. Outrage!!!
/r/MensRights02/11/13 05:53 PM
7

You might as well ask "Are unicorns or leprechauns extinct?" How can something be "dead" when it never existed in the first place?
/r/MensRights29/09/13 06:39 PM
0

Well, you certainly have put a lot of words into my mouth that I never said. misunderstanding what people mean when they say "it's my body." No, not at all, just going by what the words mean. The slogan doesn't say "it depends on my body" or "it is inside of my body". The feminist argument states that the fetus is part of her and therefore she can do with it as she pleases. Myself, I'd as soon weep over my taken tonsils or my absent appendix as snivel over those abortions - Julie Burchill A fetu…
/r/MensRights27/09/13 08:28 AM
2

I have no problem with people being pro-life, but at the end of the day, I make the decision for my body. Unfortunately, the its-my-body argument is a complete non-starter as a justification of abortion. A fetus is genetically distinct from the the mother. It's not your body, not according to the best science we have. It may be inside of you but it's not part of you. The feminist notion that a fetus can be terminated and discarded like a fingernail is widely accepted because activists have been …
/r/MensRights27/09/13 04:01 AM
35

Just out of curiosity - has there ever been any studies done on the numbers of women applying to these fields?
/r/MensRights18/09/13 07:50 PM
3

Sometimes I think she gets overworshipped in Canada because Canadians are subconsciously insecure and desperate about having a culture of their own. The whole Tim Hortons thing. As a Canadian, I should downvote but I can't due to factual accuracy. You could add lionization of our health care system. And hockey.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 02:46 AM
4

That is not helpful. It exhibits the type of attitude that many feminists smear all of us with and your post just gives them more ammunition. The best thing you could do would be to delete your post, the sooner the better.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 05:20 PM
5

I applied for a small business loan and was told that unless I could find a female or visible minority partner, I would be turned down.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 06:14 AM
3

Ideally, we should be making those decisions based on scientific and medical criteria. Unfortunately, we just let those who shout catchy slogans the loudest decide.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 06:09 AM
7

In my experience, I've found most young women (<40) to be extremely self-centered. First they were disney princesses, then they were favoured by crusading elementary-school teachers, then they were taught by their womyn's studies prof that their sense of entitlement was justified. They are products of a twenty-year indoctrination program that has been honed over the course of fifty. It is sad that you lost your friends. A central tenent of the so-called "progressives" is that everything must be …
/r/MensRights28/06/13 04:31 PM
0

Let me get this straight: white privilege is undetectable by the bearer and is, according to you, independent of the circumstances of one's life. Also, according to you, the less actual evidence for its existence, the more certain it exists??? Look - I really don't want to come across as rude, but are you listening to yourself? White privilege is the invisible boogeyman the left trots out in an attempt to justify their own biases.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 11:08 PM
2

No I don't know OP. No I have not personally witnessed how he has a white male has benefited from white privilege. The how. on. earth. can you say he has benefited from anything when, by your own admission, you are completely ignorant as to the circumstances of his life? I encourage you to read: White Privilege: Unpacking the invisible knapsack Explaining White Privilege This is White Privilege I read those, as I have others. Thanks for the links. I find it incredibly telling that the author of …
/r/MensRights20/05/13 07:44 PM
3

What you can and should understand is that these laws, which represent consistent application of institutionalized and structural racism have primarily benefited white men and have created what is commonly called white male privilege. I have a couple of questions questions about this that have been bouncing around my head and I was wondering if you could clear them up for me: Do you know the OP personally? How long? Have you personally witnessed how he has benefited from white male privilege? Ca…
/r/MensRights20/05/13 01:01 AM
17

It is truly frightening that some people actually believe that.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 12:51 AM
3

Grief doesn't act rationally, nor does it manifest the same way in different people. He may be in shock or it may take time for the full emotional impact to sink in.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 10:11 PM
4

This broad is obviously batshit-crazy, but this post is a godsend for us. When people ask what is wrong with feminism or try to portray it as harmless to men, we can not only point to this post, but the sycophantic comments. This post and the comments are a perfect example of what feminism has become and why it must be opposed. It is also a shining example of what NOT to do. Let's not follow in her footsteps and try to use her tactics - that will drive people away. This post shouldn't be buried,…
/r/MensRights03/02/13 04:54 PM
3

Even if the aim was to find and punish the "lines of oppressors", skin colour is a terrible way to do it. First of all, most people couldn't afford slaves; statistically speaking your average Caucasian is more likely descended from slaves, servants or peasants than the slave-holding class. Slavery itself doesn't break down evenly along racial lines - some sources state that there were more Irish were enslaved in the early New World than Africans. Not only is their basic premise of inherited culp…
/r/MensRights10/12/12 02:24 AM
6

What does it matter whether or not men as a group are oppressed when it is evident that men as individuals clearly are?
/r/MensRights10/12/12 02:01 AM
7

The fight for men's rights is more accurately thought of as the fight for human rights. Equality. One set of rules, one set of policies. Maybe feminism was as well, once upon a time, but it is no longer.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 03:20 AM
-4

That would be the exception, not the rule. How many babies are born every day without complications? What is the survival rate for pregnancy?
/r/MensRights05/11/12 03:36 AM
-7

risk her life and go through a pregnancy Pregnancy cannot be reasonably described as "risking" her life.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 08:50 PM
5

IMHO, accepting the term "homophobic" is yielding ground. A phobia is a fear; a person who is generally referred to as 'homophobic' is not afraid of homosexuals, but either disagrees with or dislikes them. A very active, very vocal lobby has managed to re-define the term 'homophobic' to include these people, which is imprecise and inconsistent with other uses of the term. This is a favorite tactic of the feminist lobby as well and neither should be accepted.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 05:45 AM
0

Plus. He's 17 and working with warehouse workers. If he wasn't catching shit for this it'd be something else, his glasses, his clothes, his hair, whatever. Being called a pussy or questioning of your manhood, for better or worse, is standard issue bullshitting for young men. It's a pecking order thing, hopefully your bro knows that 'fuck off' is as good answer as any. This, this, a thousand times this.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 10:02 PM
10

I consider myself to be a "classical" liberal, ie what liberalism was when it actually concerned itself with the rights of individuals. Key principles: people are individuals not just group members and deserve to be treated as such. freedom as a default government intervention/activity only when absolutely necessary.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 03:33 AM
2

Harrison Bergeron. It's supposed to be satire, not inspiration.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 06:47 PM
11

In case you forgot, we used to own women like property. No, "we" did not. Unless there is a member of our community who is a hundred years old, none of us have "owned" a woman. As soon as you make a statement like that, you are playing their game, on their field. As soon as you allow them to ascribe absolute qualities (and guilt and responsibility) to individuals based on what group they are a part of, they have won. That is how we got into this mess in the first place.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 05:07 AM
2

Rape culture is a bit of social fiction that feminists invented to justify their anger and prejudice against men. It doesn't exit in reality.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 10:29 PM
0

Because "it's my body" isn't a valid argument for abortion. From the moment of conception, a foetus has it's own DNA, distinct from the mother. That proves, conclusively, that it is a separate and distinct organism. The only reason that a woefully inadequate argument like 'it's my body' is accepted is due to the feminists screaming it at society for decades. It is a living example of the maxim that a lie repeated loudly enough and often enough will be accepted as truth.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 05:46 PM
2

Why did the mother allow her barely 13-year-old daughter to be alone, unsupervised, with her boyfriend?
/r/MensRights31/07/11 02:57 PM
3

Myth: Being male confers some special, mystical privilege.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 05:17 AM
10

Move out temporarily so she can 'have some space and then we can work things out' Be accused of abandonment two weeks later Loose everything There is no 4
/r/MensRights03/09/10 05:12 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter