TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

pandasashi Archive

View 0 posts and 117 comments by pandasashi on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

It isn't though. It's accusations (plural, from different women across state lines, years apart with no knowledge of each other) paired with actions and reputation. And what do you think he's guilty of? Being an asshole? That's literally all he's been found guilty of. Not rape, or else he'd be in jail. So the public decides if you're an ass, and they've decided that this guy is, in fact, an ass. That's not the courts job. People don't need proof not to like you.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 05:25 PM
-1

We aren't even talking about legal justice you moron. We're talking about social and moralistic justice. No one is trying to put him in fucking jail. They aren't in a courtroom. They're fencers representing their country in organized sports in the Olympics and the rest of his team is showing that they do not consider him a good representation of team USA and wish he wouldn't be there. There is a massive fuucking difference and not one fucking time in all my replies here (I know you read them all…
/r/MensRights01/08/21 05:20 PM
0

Another genius!
/r/MensRights01/08/21 05:14 PM
-2

Lol way to just repeat the same dumbass point that I addressed in my lengthy reply while simultaneously ignoring all the points. You want me to leave because I don't agree with you and I'm challenging your ideas and you don't like it, a tell tale sign of a brilliant genius. /s
/r/MensRights01/08/21 04:47 PM
-1

What evidence would convince you, exactly? A confession? Cause that's literally the only surefire way to prove sex crimes. So anyone who hasn't admitted to a sex crime is innocent, got it. And sure, maybe the schools CAN expell him for no reason, teammates all over COULD just hate him for no reason, he COULD just coincidentally get accused of the same shit everywhere he goes by different people who know nothing of each other or the accusations, he COULD just be the unluckiest man alive. Or he's …
/r/MensRights01/08/21 04:44 PM
-2

Most good rational people do. This sub is just a really bad echo chamber of sad, scared men now. This shit used to be about discussing custody battles and sentencing and stuff and now it's just a sub to bash women and defend assholes just because they haven't been "CoNvICTeD"
/r/MensRights01/08/21 04:34 PM
-11

Lmfao am I, though? Funny cause I've been to as many schools as this guy, likely played on just as many teams and lived in several places in the last decade and I'm even older than this guy, I've had drug problems and STILL not a single accusation, none of my teammates ever ostracized me and I never made the news. Coincidence maybe, my time might be coming up...or I just don't rape girls, idk. You seem to think the former is more likely, I do not. The smell of shit follows shitty people. I'd lik…
/r/MensRights01/08/21 04:32 PM
-2

Great mentality, chief.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 04:04 PM
-5

Yeah, I unsubbed from here today. Not enough critical thinking, evolution or constructive discourse here anymore. It's pretty much just a incel pit now from what I see.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 03:54 PM
-3

So you want to lower yourself to their standards while screaming about how stupid and hateful and unjust they are. Good plan. 👍
/r/MensRights01/08/21 03:47 PM
-3

Exactly. This sub is very fucking dumb in its blind crusade to believe all men and vilify all women sometimes. They forget to slow down and think the shit through for a minute. It just makes them look bad and hurts their cause even more. People need to be more selective in who they support. If we support this asswipe because "HeS NoT gUiLTy" but then he ends up going down for it later and turns out he was a rapist the whole time, we lose credibility the next time we support someone who might act…
/r/MensRights01/08/21 03:45 PM
-11

Have you stopped to think how bloody unlikely it is that this one guy, over several years, state lines, teams and campuses gets accused of the same thing over and over again? Get real.. there's a reason no one wants him there and his team hates him. Why wouldn't the allegations be truthful? Like, give me one reason any of them from 6 years ago, before he was anyone other than a normal guy, wouldn't be truthful. Especially when it's very likely none of the women who accused him had prior knowledg…
/r/MensRights01/08/21 03:41 PM
-33

Right...cause being found not guilty yet definitely means he didn't do it... /s Funny how this sub hates the justice system and how it differs from moralistic justice when it comes to many things like custody and false imprisonment as well as different sentences for the same crimes as women but then hide behind it and completely agree and stand by it when it comes to things like this. I don't fucking care that technically and legally speaking, he isn't yet guilty. The legal system is broken and …
/r/MensRights01/08/21 03:30 PM
-5

So you didn't look into it at all, cool.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 02:44 PM
-41

Dude, just look into it. The dude has numerous allegations dating back several years, over different campuses in different cities. All of which happened before he was anybody at all. If you really think he's innocent just because he isn't in jail, you should reevaluate some things tbh. There are plenty of examples of people who were treated poorly and ended up being innocent, this guy just isn't one of them and that's crystal clear, looking at it objectively.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 02:43 PM
0

God, you're thick. Like, impossibly thick.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/20 03:41 PM
1

Again, no.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/20 12:47 AM
2

I got you. Reading comprehension isnt reddit's strongsuit, sometimes it needs a little help. I'm with you though, I'd rather spend my 20 on a real experience with someone on the same wavelength.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/20 11:28 PM
0

No he didnt. They said they wouldnt date someone who prefers to spend 20 at a shit chain than spending that 20 dollars at a local restaurant whith better food and environment with the added benefit of trying something new and supporting local. That isnt the same thing at all. Preferring cheap chains over quality local says a lot about the type of person someone is. You can still like applebees and still rather spend your money elsewhere. Learn to read words for what they are without filling in t…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/20 11:13 PM
1

He was literally saying to go elsewhere at the same price point where the food is 10 times better with a far nicer atmosphere than a cheap chain restaurant. Stop morphing what people say.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/20 10:59 PM
1

Yikes
/r/MensRights30/04/20 08:44 AM
1

You clearly did cause you didnt understand before and now you do. See my other comments for more, I'm done explaining simple things to dumb, emotional people that dont want to think.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 05:07 AM
2

Seek help dude.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 11:24 PM
-1

It never works like that when it comes to the allocation of resources though. During medical emergencies, it's never whoever got there first, its who needs it more right now. Triage systems exist because of a lack of resources, the same way our current legal system operates. If we had enough doctors to treat everyone all the time triage would not exist, the same way that if we had enough resources and funding to help everyone and stop every crime, certain issues wouldnt get turned away/not prior…
/r/MensRights29/04/20 11:11 PM
-1

I'm literally arguing the opposite of what you (somehow) interpreted from my post. That's impressive. I'll dumb it down for you. Men bigger, stronger. Woman smaller, weaker. Fight, man win. Woman no hurt man. Man hurt woman bad.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 10:55 PM
0

In my example, I meant that there are two separate disputes happening at the same time, not that a man and woman were fighting and who do you help. I mean you are the only cop around (to highlight lack of resources) and there are two disputes. One is a man beating a woman, the other is a woman beating a man. We agree that both are in the wrong and should be punished, but the reality is the resources dont allow that to be the case. Therefore, you need to prioritize the most at risk cases which te…
/r/MensRights29/04/20 10:44 PM
1

Wow you're emotional and erratic. You replied to my comment, then copied it and posted it twice, replying to yourself, on a separate comment of mine in the same comment thread. Then replied to my original comment multiple different times with different half assed attempts at an arguement. Are you okay? You genuinely dont understand the difference between ignoring, and not prioritizing. That is not at all my arguement. You're just inept at understanding what you read and are far too emotional to …
/r/MensRights29/04/20 10:29 PM
2

What are you on about?
/r/MensRights29/04/20 10:16 PM
3

I think you replied to the wrong person.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 10:05 PM
1

Size and strength are independent. They often go together, but they dont need to. Either way, that's a separate debate. Police ignore a lot of things, not just this. They only have a finite amount of resources, and it is never enough to take care of everyone and all problems. When you're given little resources and told to use it to make people safe and maintain order, you need to asses risks and prioritize where you allocate those resources.no one wants domestic abuse, but it is a fact that if t…
/r/MensRights29/04/20 09:51 PM
-17

'It can' is a different statement than 'it is'. Yeah a woman can shoot a guy in the head and the cops should take it seriously, but we all know that the overwhelming majority of domestic abuse is not that. In every other case, which is literally almost every single case, a man is never in the same danger as a woman. A man is not in the same immediate danger as a woman. He posses more tools to save himself than a woman in that moment. You have to know that if things escalate, the man is in a bett…
/r/MensRights29/04/20 09:09 PM
-14

I'm not reading any of this fanatical bullshit based on your very first sentence and all the bold text. I can already tell you dont want to have a logical discussion. As for your Mexico comparison, lol. It is completely unrelated. Like, completely. You have to look at the source of the deaths, not just the raw death numbers. Again, all of that is completely unrelated. If you want to have a conversation, you need to chill and collect yourself and stop firing at the hip with so much unrelated, emo…
/r/MensRights29/04/20 08:56 PM
-1

Yikes. Real life is not the internet. immediate safety greatly outweighs reputation.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 08:45 PM
-6

It's not about responsibility. It's about immediate danger. I'm mostly referring to the stat that men are ignored when it comes to reporting domestic abuse. If you have two men fighting, one is 200 lbs, the other is 130lbs, these two men are not on equal footing and one is in far more danger than the other. So if you're a cop and you have to chose between helping a woman being beaten by a man and a man being beaten by a woman, you would be a fool to help the man considering the woman is in far m…
/r/MensRights29/04/20 08:33 PM
-2

Nope.no one should hit anyone. I didnt say anything that implied the contrary so not sure why you're asking that. It is also very rare for a woman to be both bigger AND stronger than her male partner so what's the point in even bringing it up?
/r/MensRights29/04/20 08:17 PM
-68

So do you guys actually expect the police to treat men being beat by women the same as a women being beat by men? Do you actually think those are the same thing and posses the same risk and consequence to the person being beaten? Are you really all THAT scorned, bitter and irrational? Is this what this sub has devolved into? This dumb shit gets posted every single day here.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 07:27 PM
39

Dont have to look at foreign countries to see this. Even here in north america men pay twice as much for car insurance
/r/MensRights06/03/20 07:35 PM
-2

Haha wrong on both points, thanks for the free session though
/r/MensRights29/02/20 01:13 AM
-5

Maybe. Not where I am though
/r/MensRights29/02/20 12:44 AM
-14

Pretty much, yeah. I've replied to too many of this guys garbage to keep doing it. He clearly has a couple extra chromosomes
/r/MensRights29/02/20 12:14 AM
1

So? Shove a qtip in your ass and that qtip has DNA on it, does it need a passport now?
/r/MensRights28/02/20 08:34 PM
1

Ok have a good day
/r/MensRights28/02/20 08:24 PM
-2

Lol now you're changing your tune. You think "killing" a grown human with a life, consciousness, friends, family, a job, assets and goals is far better than killing something that has yet to become anything meaning it's a cluster of biological matter with zero human qualities? Very few people ever recover from the type of coma that you pull the plug for, and the ones that do are never the same and carry real disabilities so I would absolutely want to be let go. similarly to how a child who canno…
/r/MensRights28/02/20 07:14 PM
2

You can unplug me if you're my legal guardian, resulting in my death, yes.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 06:48 PM
-50

Nope.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 06:46 PM
1

No, they have no eyes, no hair and no conciousness. You throw food away that is more alive than 25 cells
/r/MensRights28/02/20 06:45 PM
1

Dumbass...we unplug people in comas all the fucking time.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 06:43 PM
-8

Lol this guy is so painfully dense and toxic it's mind boggling. Hey op, you're the first one that should abort (or have been aborted now that I think of it) it's really too bad you dont believe in it.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 06:40 PM
-3

God you're toxic
/r/MensRights28/02/20 06:38 PM
-49

Yes you can. You can forfeit your parenthood and not pay child support in most cases. That means you have no contact with the child and are not its father. If you want to stay the father, thenyou have to pay to support it
/r/MensRights28/02/20 06:35 PM
1

And taxes people like never before while telling us hes helping the lower and middle class. This idiot needs to go, yet we somehow still voted him back in
/r/MensRights07/01/20 08:27 PM
0

Yes, hea allowed to have that opinion (even though that's not remotely close to what we're talking about), but they arent allowed to go out and do it.
/r/MensRights18/12/19 05:58 PM
1

No, that's not how science works. Terrible example since autism is almost completely genetic and not linked to environmental factors, like the effects on night shift workers.
/r/MensRights18/12/19 05:40 AM
2

Keep thinking you make sense, chief Are you trying to imply that my IQ is so low that it is a particle?
/r/MensRights18/12/19 02:36 AM
1

That's not even a sentence. Are you trying to say something?
/r/MensRights18/12/19 02:07 AM
1

Cheers! You're right about the circle jerk around here. When I initially joined this sub, it was far more reasonable than it is now, but the incels, sexists, and extremists around here have pushed most of them out. They stifle real conversation which does nothing but hurt the cause they're so aggressively 'fighting for'. Sadly, the way the online world works these days is like a collection of hivemind sects that refuse to budge on their views. No one tries to understand or empathize with the oth…
/r/MensRights18/12/19 01:56 AM
2

No it isnt. Like, at all.
/r/MensRights18/12/19 01:47 AM
-1

In most cases it is worse. I never said circumcision isnt bad either. I dont think anyone should mess with anyone's genitals until they can make the choice on their own. That being said, it is overblown like crazy here and people tackle it the wrong way..
/r/MensRights18/12/19 01:41 AM
-3

Like...lmao where does the nonsense end?
/r/MensRights18/12/19 01:02 AM
-10

Most of the guys here just want to cry about something and victimize themselves to further push their agenda. (Same way a lot of women in the feminist movement cry about rapes that hardly qualify as harrassment). This subject is way overblown here
/r/MensRights18/12/19 12:23 AM
-9

Is he not allowed to have that opinion? There are also other benefits other than the cleanliness aspect. I dont think it should be done to non consenting children, but buddy is allowed to not be upset about it
/r/MensRights18/12/19 12:20 AM
9

Who in the world told you that circumcision causes autism?
/r/MensRights18/12/19 12:17 AM
1

I do all the time and get downvoted and attacked by a gaggle of incels. I cant even keep up with it now.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 05:47 PM
-2

That exact thing is starting here too. The reasonable ones are leaving and the morons are reproducing. Prob means it's time to go onto the next one until the same thing happens
/r/MensRights09/12/19 06:32 AM
-1

Unfortunately, a very loud portion of this sub are misogynistic apes that babble on about dumb shit just like third wave feminists do. That being said, there are still some that are rational and stand up for what is right and equal. The rest spout on about unimportant, propaganda nonsense.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 06:27 AM
1

None of what you said makes any sense. Anyways, have a good life. It'll help if you try to be less miserable and bitter
/r/MensRights04/12/19 03:47 AM
1

Divorce happens for a multitude of reasons and hardly has anything to do with this. Women can divorce a man for his money just as easily as she can divorce him for his infidelity. One is his fault, the other isnt. She could be running off with someone else or he could have turned into an abusive alcoholic with no ambition. The divorce rates indicate nothing. The only pattern you see, is yours. Look up confirmation bias. The only real constant in your experience is you, so I would hazard to guess…
/r/MensRights03/12/19 08:51 PM
-3

Not true at all. They're a vocal minority on the internet. Real women are not like that irl. You have a few here and there but they're rare in the grand scheme of things. By talking like this, you sound exactly like the femnazis you hate so much and do nothing but fuel their hate for men and prove their points about men. You're a detriment to men's rights the same way femnazis are a detriment to women. No one takes yall seriously
/r/MensRights03/12/19 07:49 AM
-4

They're incels, just ignore them. They're too dumb to understand that they are literally the same as the feminists they hate so much
/r/MensRights03/12/19 07:45 AM
1

Who hurt you? You havent stated any facts. Look up the definition of the word fact
/r/MensRights26/11/19 06:32 AM
1

Who hurt you? You say you're not paranoid, then go on to say the most paranoid shit I've ever read lol Icel wasnt even meant as an insult, it was a descriptor, you mutt.
/r/MensRights25/11/19 11:22 PM
1

Ahhh right. You are an example of the minority on the men's side. Toxic, paranoid incels are not the majority of men. Toxic, femme-nazi, tumblr-bulldykes are not the majority of women. Do you understand, or do you need a picture book?
/r/MensRights25/11/19 08:09 PM
2

What?
/r/MensRights25/11/19 07:17 PM
56

That's because it is a tiny minority. They're loud, but they're a tiny group of assholes
/r/MensRights25/11/19 04:14 AM
-16

My mans needed some mushrooms Lol at the downvotes...most of yall need some too
/r/MensRights22/11/19 11:12 PM
2

The person more fit for the job should do the damn job. That's why the man goes. Hes better equipped to deal with it
/r/MensRights16/11/19 06:44 PM
5

Any labor job as well as things like firefighting. Like, come on man
/r/MensRights16/11/19 06:15 PM
1

Nowhere did I say we should allow circumcision or any kind of genital mutilation on anybody
/r/MensRights09/11/19 06:53 PM
0

Yes?
/r/MensRights09/11/19 04:51 PM
1

Yeah, get ready to get downvoted by all these biased baboons that are fighting me on this. One of them is even adamant that a foreskin is equivalent to a clitoris in terms of sexual enjoyment and importance lmfao
/r/MensRights03/11/19 04:37 PM
1

Lol sure
/r/MensRights03/11/19 02:24 PM
1

This whole thread is why. It gets you nowhere. Cutting baby dicks is bad enough and theres enough to say about it independently.
/r/MensRights03/11/19 02:04 PM
0

That's what I'm saying. Its skewing the numbers to make the issue look less bad, meaning the percentage of girls getting their clits cut off is higher in reality if you exclude voluntary piercings. Anyways, I've said all I can possibly say and I'm exhausted with this discussion that is literally proving my initial point that you won't get anywhere by comparing the two
/r/MensRights03/11/19 01:51 PM
1

If you take all the fgm, and average them up, its overall worse than mgm. That being said, any mutilation of anything on anybody needs to be banned; infant or adult. Everything I could possibly say on this topic, I already have in this thread
/r/MensRights03/11/19 01:39 PM
-1

Nahh, we arent talking about that. If anything just makes my point stronger, indicating that the amount of actual fgm done in barbaric ways without consent is even higher than the stats indicate since the stats are skewed to include body modifications.
/r/MensRights03/11/19 01:29 PM
-1

Completely irrelevant and doesnt count as fgm in the slightest in regards to this conversation
/r/MensRights03/11/19 01:11 PM
1

Not really...we keep going around in circles. We already mostly agree but you keep trying to get me to contradict myself to win the arguement or some shit. Got better shit to do and already said my piece
/r/MensRights03/11/19 12:59 PM
1

Lmao ok. I suggest watching one of Jordan Peterson's talks where he describes needing generalizations to get anywhere in conversation. Sure as hell isnt 'misinformation by proxy'. I already addressed the biology aspect specifically
/r/MensRights03/11/19 12:43 PM
0

There it is. My entire point. You just said it. We need to stop comparing them and just look at it as genital mutilation. Absolutely no need to make the male female comparison. That's what I'm saying.
/r/MensRights03/11/19 03:35 AM
1

Lol it isnt misinformation. It's a generalization which is needed in conversation if you want to get anywhere. Almost every woman on the planet needs her glans to orgasm. Almost every circumcisised man on the planet can orgasm.
/r/MensRights03/11/19 02:06 AM
1

And they have no way of knowing the accuracy of that stat unless theyve personally gone and inspected every woman in Asia and africa. I know what a clitoris is. We both know that, in conversation, when someone refers to the clit, they're referring to the glans.
/r/MensRights03/11/19 01:45 AM
0

Like. Literally grade 6 sex ed. Or speaking to any woman. Or common sense. You are a special type of dense
/r/MensRights03/11/19 01:33 AM
0

My main point, before this blew out of proportion, was that it matters how we discuss the issue of circumcision and tackling it as it's own issue is better than comparing it to FGM. It is plenty fucked up enough that we dont need to bring up fgm because, as you can see, comparing it quickly devolves the conversation into disarray. It is too easy to dismiss it as not as bad as fgm to have a real meaningful discussion about it. A lot of people still think that circumcision is an okay thing and com…
/r/MensRights03/11/19 01:05 AM
0

Where in Africa and how many boys compared to the extremely vast majority of circumcisions that happen as babies? If you need a source to explain to you why a clit is more important than foreskin after I literally just laid it out for you, then you need to go do some googling for yourself cause I have no clue how to even look up such a retarded, asinine question. Yeah I understand it's a mens rights forum. I also understand that this sub more than likely came to be as a counter to all the 3rd wa…
/r/MensRights03/11/19 12:52 AM
0

There's a reason that made the news. (Because it isnt very common at all due to the illegality of it in America)
/r/MensRights03/11/19 12:39 AM
0

Show me where I said I agree with circumcision. I disagree with it and believe it should be banned. My entire arguement is that it's not the same as many forms of female mutilation. You're arguing points I havent made. I even said we should stop both in the very comment you replied to.
/r/MensRights03/11/19 12:28 AM
0

Wrong again. Circumcision is absolutely not equivalent to cutting off a clitoris. It just isnt. Equivalent would be chopping your fucking glans off, dumbass. It also isnt as psychologically damaging seeing as almost all men that are circumcised, have the procedure done before they can know or understand anything. Compare that to, often times, teenaged girls being held down and cut with a bush knife. It also doesnt affect sex life nearly as much as not having a fucking clitoris. 60% of women CANN…
/r/MensRights03/11/19 12:17 AM
0

We have absolutely no way of knowing the percentage of any of it. But we know about some of the atrocities that happen and we know some of them are worse than others. Similar comparison is when people say an unwarranted slap on the ass is sexual assault and violent back alley gangrape is sexual assault, therefore they're the same. Circumcision doesnt take away the most sensitive part, it removes the skin around it, resulting in numbing of various degrees (very rarely full numbing). Cutting a wom…
/r/MensRights03/11/19 12:01 AM
0

What the fuck are you even saying? Do you even know what a clitoris is or how it works? I'm assuming not since you seem to think your foreskin is more valuable than a womans clitoris.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 11:34 PM
0

I fully agree with this. There is a difference between saying "boys should be protected under these laws" and saying "fgm is banned but circumcision isnt, they're the same thing and should both be banned" This is what I've been trying to say. The first is a far more productive comment/discussion
/r/MensRights02/11/19 11:23 PM
0

You're an idiot and not worth talking to if you think cutting off a clitoris isnt more harmful to someone's sex life than cutting off foreskin
/r/MensRights02/11/19 10:58 PM
1

Yeah. That's my point though. It is a broad term and people tend to think of the worst. Which is why it's easy to dismiss circumcision when people compare it to the worst aspects of fgm. I understand why they both werent banned at the same time. There is also a geographical difference along with the religious factor (they go hand in hand, in a sense). But in today's discussion, if we want to have any chance at banning it we should just tackle it independently; theres plenty to talk about without…
/r/MensRights02/11/19 10:41 PM
1

I believe that for the sole reason that female genital mutilation includes such vile acts as gathering a group of young girls and cutting off their clitoris' with a barely sharpened machete, one after the other, is enough for them to not be in the same discussion. When the western world made fgm illegal, it was due to the violent, awful shit. Not the little pin pricks. This is also a big part of the reason circumcision is still not vilified, because it's nowhere near as barbaric as SOME of the f…
/r/MensRights02/11/19 10:08 PM
1

Nowhere did I say I think it should be allowed to continue occurring. I dont. All I'm saying is it's disingenuous to compare the two and to say they're the same when one is notoriously more barbaric than the other
/r/MensRights02/11/19 09:40 PM
0

The countries that do this shit to women are not the same countries where circumcision is popular. Circumcision is popular in far more modernized/westernized countries. Fgm is done in the third world, namely africa and the middle east, where they oppress the shit out of women. It's purely a geographical thing. So no, it doesnt happen nearly as much to boys in that way.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 09:30 PM
0

Yeah cause that's what the majority of the fuss is about. /s
/r/MensRights02/11/19 09:11 PM
-1

It's pretty common knowledge that female mutilation happens predominantly in third world countries and usually by religious fanatics and most male circumcision is done in the western/christian/Jewish world, which tend to be more modernized and cleaner. You're telling me that cutting off a womans clitoris doesnt fuck up her sex life more than cutting foreskin? The equivalent would be cutting off the tip of your dick. The equivalent going the other way would be cutting off a womans clitoral hood a…
/r/MensRights02/11/19 09:00 PM
-5

It isnt the same. Most female mutilation is done with bush knives with no anesthetic or antiseptic/sanitization at a much later age by fucking warlords in a captive situation. Often times completely removing a womans enjoyment of sex and sometimes even preventing them from ever having sex at all. Most male 'mutilation' is done in a clean hospital environment with proper tools at an extremely young age, avoiding the majority of the traumatic aspect of it by a healthcare professional. And doesnt a…
/r/MensRights02/11/19 04:37 PM
-9

This sub ties the two together literally every time it is brought up. My irl conversations tend to be a bit better but reddit is retarded with this stuff
/r/MensRights02/11/19 02:57 PM
-11

We would probably make more ground on this topic if we stopped comparing male circumcision to female genital mutilation. It isnt the same thing and we all know it. We need to address it properly and responsibly if we want to see real change. Edit: y'all are idiots for downvoting this. Learn what the function is for, you baboons
/r/MensRights02/11/19 02:20 PM
-7

Ok chill
/r/MensRights02/11/19 02:19 PM
1

But but but muh male privilege!
/r/MensRights23/10/19 03:45 PM
5

They're waiting for that one gender fluid, asexual, trans chinese to apply to fill their equal opportunity slot
/r/MensRights15/10/19 06:06 PM
2

Feminists. Using silly ass backwards logic or stretching any issue into a sexist issue
/r/MensRights13/10/19 10:50 PM
-1

Amen. Glad someone said it. We shouldn't sink to their level of pettiness
/r/MensRights13/10/19 03:02 PM
0

Are you a childish, argumentative twat that needs to have the last word in all facets of your life or just on the internet?
/r/MensRights02/03/19 07:28 AM
0

Straight up. If you're that picky, you have to expect the other person to be that picky and two people that are that picky will never find each other because they dismiss others because of mickey mouse bullshit like small tits. You need to learn to love the differences in people and learn to love other things about them and if you dismiss them too quickly, you dont give yourself the opportunity to. When I was a young, inexperienced, silly boy with all kinds of expectations, I thought I would set…
/r/MensRights02/03/19 07:27 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter