TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

pannerin Archive

View 1 post and 43 comments by pannerin on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Social Issuespannerin/r/MensRights03/02/17 08:40 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

I was talking about the result at the time of implementation. 1850s. "The doctrine originated in the nineteenth century as a child-protective reform intended to elevate the interests of children above fathers' common law proprietary rights in children." You are going to have to seriously explain why the doctrine did not achieve such a goal in that era. I have no idea what you mean here. You probably don't think Caroline Norton was a feminist, and you should think of her as a victim to her husban…
/r/MensRights03/02/17 08:07 PM
0

Yes, the law took kids away from men and gave them to women. And you think that's bad for men. But was the result better for children or not? Father's rights activists have to ensure that their proposals will result in better or no worse results for children, or there will be no support from the public for change. Already they have to contend with feminists who believe that their proposals would harm DV victims. You don't seem very interested in the outcome of children in divorce suits. Is that …
/r/MensRights03/02/17 05:23 PM
0

I'm not saying that feminists are pushing for more male teachers. I'm saying that nobody is going to get more male teachers when education budgets are being cut. Nothing would change even if feminists were to put their back into it. I don't know what feminists are pushing in K-12 other then STEM. But obviously they think girls remain discouraged from careers in STEM, and that women need to be part of the technological revolution, to be at the table of the advances so that progress for our people…
/r/MensRights03/02/17 05:16 PM
0

No, the first article really doesn't say anything new that (female!) teachers haven't been saying. And just because a conservative says something, doesn't mean that a liberal would believe otherwise. I'm going to need better evidence than that, though I can find that by myself at my own time. And Karl McCartney's refusal to accept that his councillor's tweet in 2015 is sexist is sexist by itself. He also thought that same-sex marriage would lead to polygamy and child marriage (???). He also thou…
/r/MensRights03/02/17 04:45 PM
1

This is all in the backdrop of reduced funding for education. When there are funding cuts to education, it is impossible to ask for incentives for male teachers. Teachers already are struggling to keep afloat, and you want to dump another burden for them. Misdiagnosis affects girls too, who don't get diagnosed at all! It is impossible to expect change in America when basic support for teachers is absent. That's not a failing of feminism.
/r/MensRights03/02/17 03:33 PM
1

tender years doctrine So why was the tender years doctrine needed? It recognised that the primary caregiver tended to be the mother, that the child would be closer to the mother. Men would simply remarry, and the care of the child dumped on the new wife. Where else did the idea of the evil stepmother come about? A new carer still isn't necessarily a good thing for children. Women had no rights to their children beforehand. At a time when it was an obligation to stay at home and take care of the …
/r/MensRights03/02/17 02:43 PM
1

That's what you get for being in a field with great job opportunities and positive prospective growth. People have always tried to take on higher paying jobs at all costs, whether or not the jobs suit them.
/r/MensRights03/02/17 02:29 PM
-2

This is after the best efforts at making all things equal. Why else did the number shrink? Someone else posted a comment acknowledging that the five percent is real, go start from there. The metrics you use have a lot to do with the care penalty, or unpaid care work. Why do women have the disproportionate burdens of caregiving, for kids, for the house, for the infirm and the old? Women don't prefer to shower a parent with severe dementia or to discipline a child in trouble. Women who become stay…
/r/MensRights03/02/17 02:09 PM
1

Well, feminism is about educating women about the bias they have with regards to their gender in their own life too. And men definitely have some dictums on the appearance of women. Historically, girls wouldn't be allowed to wear pants, because of men. We see makeup being a requirement in the workplace for women, because men think a woman is sick when she's without makeup. So women think makeup is required to look presentable.
/r/MensRights03/02/17 02:04 PM
1

Well, that certainly doesn't set her up for a financially responsible life ahead. The sexist idea that girls should have lots of clothes harms them later in life. Worse is that you can always get whatever you want, that you can get it just by asking someone for it. Feminists would be interested in resolving such messages to young girls.
/r/MensRights03/02/17 10:56 AM
-8

You don't see any benefits with more male teachers or nurses? MRAs are the ones blaming feminist female teachers for scoring boys more poorly! MRAs are the ones saying that men are being emasculated in media, leaving children with no male role models. Male teachers are your very opportunity to give children some male role models. MRAs are also the ones saying that men get shafted in custody arrangements. Because men aren't the usual caregivers, the kids won't be as close with the father, so that…
/r/MensRights03/02/17 10:47 AM
8

Depression and suicide is your main message in your post. Your title tells us that your post is about a response to critics of traditional gender roles. The first thing you say is that such critics usually blame traditional gender roles and toxic masculinity on depression and suicide on men. So what else do you expect people would respond to? Especially when you're simply wrong? We are talking about fairer outcomes in divorce courts, and that's a push back against the traditional idea and gender…
/r/MensRights03/02/17 10:28 AM
2

It's convenient to ignore that boys who are more well behaved in class get graded better too. Or would you like to blame feminism for cuts in recess and physical education? After all, that takes away an outlet for youthful rambunctiousness. It's difficult for children to sit at desks for a lecture. Students who struggle against the restrictions of usual teaching models get labelled disruptive. Teachers won't like them so much, would grade them more harshly. This isn't something the feminists did…
/r/MensRights03/02/17 10:10 AM
-4

The article is meant to promote Time to Talk Day, 'intended to encourage people to speak out about their mental health and end widespread stigma.' And talking about your problems is the focus of the various forms of talk therapy, a frontline option when treating depression. When we talk about decreasing funding to mental health care, we need to be more creative to fill up the gap. Hence, this program. Talking about your problems, and telling people that you have problems helps. Maybe more men co…
/r/MensRights03/02/17 09:48 AM
3

So a yearly survey in the UK says that boys receive 20% more pocket money than girls at younger ages, increasing to 30% from 11 to 16. But parents spend more on girls. The fact remains that this bias means that boys get more opportunities to figure out financial decisions independently, while girls are reliant on others to buy things for them, and to make financial decisions for them. So if you subscribe to the stereotype about women being shopaholics, maybe it's because they never had to learn …
/r/MensRights03/02/17 08:55 AM
-9

If you think the wage gap doesn't exist, you're twisting the facts. Last I checked, a 5 percent wage gap between men and women remains a wage gap even if 77 cents on the dollar is misguided. 5 percent is a huge number in aggregate not to be dismissed. Meanwhile, a new survey in the UK says that boys receive 20% more pocket money than girls at younger ages, increasing to 30% from 11 to 16.
/r/MensRights03/02/17 08:47 AM
1

Obviously the person you replied to was thinking about OP's belief that more men are killing themselves then last time when no. The suicide rate has been the same, completely missing the point about divorced dads and their higher suicide rates. Yet you probably misread the intention of that post.
/r/MensRights03/02/17 08:36 AM
1

Eh, it's always good to talk about what's going on in the world as they come around. High rise developments versus existing residents, drug use on the radio, consumer boycotts. And The Talk shouldn't be a one time only thing either, you give more information as your children get older. Consent starts with 'we don't touch people unless it's clear that they welcome it.' Playing with your friend's hair, going in for hugs, even dogs you meet on the pavement. It's part of raising polite and respectfu…
/r/MensRights29/11/16 09:31 AM
3

Children are exposed to sexualised media frequently. If you see characters getting it on intoxicated, or criminal cases on the news, that's an opportunity to feel out how your kids think about consent and whether you need to correct beliefs learnt elsewhere.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 08:15 AM
1

part 2 Men aren’t going to put much into the healthcare system in LDCs. Tax collection for the poor is barely practiced when it’s like squeezing blood from a stone. Whatever clinics available are either free or heavily subsidised for the poor. Of course women won’t leave the husband if they don’t have a better deal lined up, not necessarily in terms a richer man as you may believe, but in the lack of skills she has to make a living for herself, because her parents couldn’t afford to pay for both…
/r/MensRights01/09/16 05:12 AM
1

I spent at least a hundred words trying explain to you that there is no contradiction, that women are the main laborers and men are the owners who get to decide how to sell what the women grow. Why are you ignoring what I say? Men are already the owners of the farms, so they know how to run the farm. I already mentioned that we don’t have to be looking at making women the best farmers, but equipping them with the knowledge their husbands already have. So we don’t need to train the men, we need t…
/r/MensRights01/09/16 05:11 AM
1

part 2 No, I don’t have to give you a source, and I don’t have to give you further evidence. You can google that sentence yourself, find the reference or citation yourself, and read that study yourself. Is it that you are too lazy to google, or you can’t tell that that’s a copy pasted sentence? No, I read your comment on HIV. As I state in my previous comment, there remains strong misconceptions on how HIV is transmitted and how condoms work to prevent transmission despite a few decades of free …
/r/MensRights31/08/16 03:32 PM
2

I don't understand. I gave you too much to read? I did not enjoy getting up from my typing haze to see how much I've copypasted with the aches to show. I gave you a summary? I can’t believe you would think my last paragraph was a summary of this issue, a summary of what I can see about you and what you shouldn’t do perhaps. Women can be given opportunities to work within the village or at home. Women already are the main laborers on farms, so they can use their education to improve methods to sh…
/r/MensRights31/08/16 03:32 PM
1

When families can't afford education for all, they pay for the boys first since they are seen to be the future breadwinners for the family, and education can mean that they get paid more. While girls usually are required to complete household chores or take care of their younger siblings, also limiting their time to study in the first place. In sub-Saharan Africa 60% as many girls as boys attend primary and secondary schools, but more drop out at secondary school. The literacy rate of women is t…
/r/MensRights30/08/16 02:45 PM
0

What? If 74% of new HIV infections are for girls, 26% are for boys. Men don't get pregnant, so they don't die from childbirth.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 05:18 AM
2

Other data points include: two-thirds of the global illiterate population are women. Globally only 55% of women participate in the workforce compared to 70% of men, and some of this is due to legal restrictions on employment, inadequate opportunities, or lack of childcare. The vast majority of women worldwide who have the potential to contribute more fully in the labour force live in emerging and developing nations, which means that their families are earning less than they could be. In the deve…
/r/MensRights29/08/16 12:38 PM
0

Fuck you. Fuck all of you. Trudeau is supporting the ONE Campaign, which fights extreme poverty and preventable diseases primarily in Africa. And it is a sexist issue. "In 2016 half a billion women still cannot read, 62 million girls are denied the right to education and 155 countries still have laws that differentiate between men and women. Girls account for 74% of all new HIV infections among adolescents in Africa, and 40% of women on the continent suffer from anaemia, which results in 20% of …
/r/MensRights29/08/16 12:15 PM
-18

The younger sister was 14 when she diddled herself in front of the boy while the 16 year old was with them. That remains different from Kenneth Walker who was 37 when he tried with his hebephilia. Kenneth may have been deaf and required an interpreter, but that doesn't mean he was as profoundly deaf as the women. There are different shades to deafness just like with blindness. He also had his sentence cut by several years in March this year. Well anyway the MALE defense lawyer for the women also…
/r/MensRights22/08/16 03:54 PM
1

You can think that the Clintons have been lying to the Americans for 20 years straight and that Hillary's motives for doing what she has done are irrelevant or directly criminal. Personally I do believe that Chelsea Clinton isn't Bill's. But to say that she's the devil incarnate and a cuck? These are real-life statements made at the RNC right now, and Breitbart is definitely much worse. There is zero respect for public discourse here.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 04:38 AM
1

Breitbart is a website that can control what its contributors post. Milo is a figure with more influence than anyone in BLM. BLM has no mother organisation, completely online structure, no opportunities for training.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 04:34 AM
0

You can't really hold a decentralised movement to task. I think what you can go after is whether the rallying calls have been too strident, and when 'leading people' (they don't really have that much influence here) have been irresponsible when handling the mob mentality. It's like Occupy Wall Street, except that there are fewer opportunities for constructive consensus building and training for sustainable change.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 12:19 AM
2

There's nothing wrong with believing that small government and fiscal conservatism is a good thing, just be ready to judge things on a case by case basis. But when a website is populated by people who think that gay people are abominations, that trans people are crosdressing child molesters, that Hillary is the devil incarnate and a cuck, then boy...
/r/MensRights21/07/16 12:10 AM
0

Yeah, that doesn't work out for real dog owners and their dogs. It's great to have recourse if you get attacked thanks to poor handling.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 03:50 PM
3

He did tweet 'If at first you don’t succeed (because your work is terrible), play the victim. EVERYONE GETS HATE MAIL FFS' Maybe he tweeted other stuff, but whatever. It doesn't matter whether you think this tweet is bad enough. When you are a public figure with a fan base, you need to be careful about tweeting an opinion on anything with even the slightest hint of negativity. Your fans are ride or die, and if you have modeled vulgar and reactionary behaviour for your fans, they are going to act…
/r/MensRights20/07/16 12:34 PM
3

Visiting Breitbart is like stepping into a time machine where commentators flood articles and say the worst things about anything vaguely progressive. The moderation has a clear conservative bias which is completely counter to what they will be saying about Twitter now. Private companies have no requirements on preserving freedom of speech, something that Breitbart understands with its routine deletion of comments that disagree with the average commentator on there. You can't have your cake and …
/r/MensRights20/07/16 12:10 PM
1

If you think that there is zero merit in power + prejudice, which is for better or worse accepted in this course, you should leave. If you can't accept differences in thought and engage in it to come to an understanding, you're just as bad as the trigger warning everything safe spacers. It isn't 'my way or the highway' here.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 05:52 AM
2

Well maybe this hypothetical friend has wanted to 'just take' someone. Anyway you should know your friend and decide your approach accordingly
/r/MensRights23/06/16 07:12 AM
3

I don't find this at all offensive. If homegirl doesn't want the baby or an abortion, you need to help her. Get free help by adoption, find a cheap midwife, be the damn midwife, dump the baby at the hospital. If homeboy is eyeing a drunk woman, tell him to look at that other bored woman, give him some good non-rapey porn etc. You gotta look out for one another. If some asshole tells you not to do something you weren't going to do anyway... why do you need to do anything
/r/MensRights22/06/16 02:52 PM
1

lol, OP reposted in the same thread. way to be deceptive
/r/MensRights22/06/16 01:43 PM
-5

Did he hit that woman or not? Doug's own article states that Johnny was awake for days with anxiety. Doug is really not helping Johnny's case here; if Amber provoked him at night, it doesn't seem unreasonable that he would hit her. Did he hit her? In the court document his bodyguard was stated to have coaxed him to stop, but not pull him off. Did the bodyguard witness him hitting her? So if he hit her, did she provoke him intentionally to get a reaction? His bodyguards will give their statement,…
/r/MensRights30/05/16 07:58 PM
1

No, that instagram pic has her damn hair over her right eye, the same eye she's bruised over when she was at the courthouse where her restraining order was granted. Well, ROs are granted most of the time. Why can't she go out to get her mind away from things? Bruises take time to develop, and she doesn't have the redness since she takes cares of her skin. Amber claims to have sought discreet settlement on Tuesday. They could have obscured the request somehow, but whatever. Johnny's divorce lawye…
/r/MensRights29/05/16 11:03 AM
1

As a gossiper just like we are doing here, I would think it means something
/r/MensRights29/05/16 03:54 AM
23

I went straight to Dlisted, best gossip site with sane Disqus commenters. So she claims she got hit the day after the death, called the popo and declined to chase Johnny down. She could be a bitch and a goldigger but she also could be a victim of domestic violence too, but there were people who doubted Denise Richards. Johnny isn't the most stable dude anyway; used to trash hotel rooms.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 10:32 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter