TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

pansimi Archive

View 0 posts and 33 comments by pansimi on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

the feminists want to impose consequences on their enemies for the enemies' thoughts/actions but do not want to face consequences for their own actions I agree that they want that. I agree with the massive majority of the arguments you're making. But how is sex work relevant to this?
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/21 02:52 AM
1

Women who are promiscuous are less likely to be in successful relationships. Why should we assume that promiscuity is what leads to worse relationships, rather than the simpler explanation that those inclined to engage in promiscuous behavior are less inclined to stick to long term relationships to begin with (or at least less inclined to do so with most elligible partners, maybe if they find someone special)? That's a question these studies have never answered.
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/21 01:44 AM
0

I'm not asking you to agree with feminism, I'm not a feminist, I just don't see feminism as inherently relevant to sex work. if you are fucking stupid enough to think that there is 0 chance of negative social repercussions If someone were to say "if you think that speaking up as a conservative is going to go without severe social repercussions, then life is going to be difficult for you," you'd object, I'm pretty sure. Is it right for people to get unpersoned from social media, and even banking …
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/21 07:44 PM
1

But when a woman chooses to do that, her value diminishes in front of men as she can be easily bought, exploited and has no self-respect. There's probably tons of complication I'm not seeing, but I've just never understood why people see promiscuity as an inherent sign of lack of self respect. I can see reasons why people who lack self respect would do it, and different reasons why people with strong self-esteem would do it. There are whiny fuckboys and then there are confident playboys, and I'd…
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/21 03:27 AM
0

no male would like to be associated with a sex worker in public Why is that? Is this disdain for sex workers natural, or is it itself the result of indoctrination? If the kid isn't taught to hate her, I don't think he will. I think we can overcome this hatred with simple critical thinking. I get being anti-feminist, but not being anti-sex work. Feminism legitimately yields discrimination against men, in the courts and in the workplace and even in everyday life. But what in the world does sex wor…
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/21 02:49 AM
0

That's why I don't do things that could get them expelled from school. Who expects their children to get expelled from school over their own entirely legal job, rather than the behavior of their children? Inb4, "only fans was the only way she could support her kids!" False. It was the easiest way to support her kids. Okay, it was the easiest way to support her kids. Your point? It's not illegal, it's not a career which inherently hurts anybody, and it certainly doesn't seem like a strong basis f…
/r/AntiFeminists01/03/21 02:40 AM
-2

When did I say a parent shouldn't take care of their children? She clearly did her best to take care of hers. Aren't you taking care of your child by sending them to a good school, anyways?
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/21 11:02 PM
0

Now I'm just interested in what a "homeschool community" is and how to find them. I don't have kids yet, but have plenty of time to have them, and hopefully will do so in the near future, so this seems like a really good option to be aware of. It's not worse, it's as bad. Maybe this is just from growing up with a Christian (not catholic) parent, but it seems easier to instill common sense that makes one critical of a religion that still values sense to an extent, than to instill the kind of comm…
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/21 09:41 PM
3

I still fail to see how catholic indoctrination would be worse than the outright denial of observable reality for the sake of politics which goes on in a dangerously growing number of public schools. Which probably makes homeschool the best option, to be completely fair; but not everyone can do that.
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/21 09:16 PM
2

Onlyfans ≠ job. If it can pay for private school, clearly it's worth something. Have a little fucking respect for your son for fucksake. How does her behavior demonstrate disrespect? Raising a child well and putting them through a good private school seems quite respectful to me. And these are the things parents are supposed to think about before doing stuff like this. What makes it good for the school to react so severely to something which wasn't actually hurting anybody?
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/21 07:40 PM
-11

Why are you blaming the mother for the potential mental health problems and not the actual bullies?
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/21 07:35 PM
1

Private schools outperform public schools. If you can afford it, then you probably want to send your kids there, because even Christian indoctrination isn't as severe as that faced in public education nowadays. It's easier and less consequential to reverse if it were to become a problem than the public variant.
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/21 07:32 PM
-14

How do you damage the well-being of your children by sending them to private schools which tend to outperform public ones?
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/21 07:29 PM
3

Short answer: intersectionality. Long answer: the more "minority" or "diversity" boxes you tick (biological sex, sexual identity, sexuality, race, ethnic group, immigration status, ability, religion, etc), the more that these people value you over other people. It's discrimination, but because it's "reversed" it's okay. Kinda like the Nazis thought it was okay to discriminate against the Jews because they disproportionately represented the 1% in Germany and therefore were considered greedy and t…
/r/MensRights10/02/21 01:09 AM
4

At the very least, they should make it easier to sue for damages if someone has their life ruined due to an unsubstantiated rape claim like that.
/r/MensRights23/04/20 09:51 PM
0

If the rape accusation proves unsubstantiated, what else is it going to be?
/r/MensRights23/04/20 09:38 PM
12

Given how infrequently that any existing law against false allegations are enforced in the case of false rape allegations, this is clearly necessary.
/r/MensRights23/04/20 08:38 PM
1

She probably thinks she's making a smart point where, if anyone criticizes her, she can just say "if you care about bodily autonomy, why are you against abortion?" Ignoring that an unborn child is its own human body for the sake of being smug.
/r/MensRights16/04/20 10:36 PM
44

But if you're a man, someone threatens you through your car window with a gun, you drive away from them in fear, and then accidentally kill a woman in the process, that's apparently first degree murder.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 12:42 AM
13

They changed school to cater to girls, they can change the tests too...or just make tests stop counting with "adversity scores" and things like that.
/r/MGTOW10/02/20 06:03 AM
4

Either they're scared of being accused of sexism and having their own reputation attacked like this guy was; or maybe they simply don't want her working at a different place and being free to do this to another innocent guy who isn't quite so well prepared to fight back.
/r/MGTOW09/02/20 09:02 PM
7

I'd be completely fine with these jokes if we could make the same jokes about women. I love self-deprecating humor and dark humor. The only reason I can't do so in good faith is the ridiculous double standard that means jokes at the expense of women are bad, but only jokes about women (or any other "protected class" for that matter).
/r/MensRights05/11/19 05:48 AM
1

It's a troll. It's basically saying women can't be "equal" without extra handouts, and doesn't let women buy actual property. They're the same company which triggered millenials and socialists, they're smarter than just outright catering to feminists.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 06:21 PM
1

Men put in far more dangerous and life threatening work. Women are far less likely to die while taking care of a child than men are at the workplace from stress alone. Men choose more dangerous work that pays better, because we're more likely to take risks for greater reward. I wholeheartedly advocate for women applying to more of these jobs to earn more money for themselves, but in the end this topic is irrelevant when it comes to equality under the law. Men can can be stay-at-home dads. That's…
/r/MensRights01/05/19 04:42 AM
1

I think you misunderstand me. Regardless of child support law, I'm against abortion. Murder is never the answer to a problem. Both mother and father do work to raise the child, so "your body gets used for work" goes both ways. But women get "Safe Haven" laws. They can legally drop a baby off at the front doorstep of a police station or any other similar place, and abandon it, with no legal or monetary consequence. Men do not get this freedom, they are roped in with child support. So the fact tha…
/r/MensRights01/05/19 03:41 AM
12

Freedom to abortion shouldn't be equated with freedom from child support, one involves a life and the other involves monetary responsibility. Two completely different issues. The actual privilege women get is "Safe Haven" law, which allows a woman to relinquish guardianship of their child with no legal or monetary strings attached. Women literally get the exact opposite of child support requirements. Why do women get the freedom to relinquish responsibility for their children, but men don't?
/r/MensRights01/05/19 12:37 AM
9

By what metric?
/r/MensRights16/01/19 11:23 AM
1

I'm biased in favor of the facts. Different factors contribute to both situations. Men spend longer in prison, mainly due to human biological tendency to favor women. We are more likely to see them as vulnerable, as victims, as less accountable for the actions they've committed. That's nobody's fault, that's just our natural reaction. And it can manipulate even the most hardened of judges. Black people do commit more violent crime. FBI statistics prove that they're responsible for disproportiona…
/r/MensRights14/01/19 09:35 PM
6

A giant prison industrial complex + a system that profits off of putting people behind bars + American prisons being about storing people and not rehabilitation Definitely agree anti male and anti black bias in the courts Anti male yes, anti black no. Black overrepresentation in prison is caused by increased violent crime rates compared to other races, and tendency to be repeat offenders which leads to more severe sentences. Factor for those variables, and we're not distinct from any other race …
/r/MensRights14/01/19 11:27 AM
0

Being held down and tortured by being choked by dirty, unwashed, potentially diseased fingers for about an hour, having your throat torn up by the fingernails, can't be violating and traumatic? It's not exactly a realistic situation, but it's one of the closest nonsexual analogies I could think of to rape. Most people just beat the crap out of you, which is also traumatic and potentially violating. I don't think a quick grab of any part of the body should be court-worthy, unless it occurs repeat…
/r/MensRights07/01/19 07:47 AM
-8

My personal solution would be for there to be no such thing as "sexual assault" or "sexual harassment." Rape is just assault that happens to be of a sexual nature, ditto for harassment, and should have to meet the same standards of harm as those crimes do when sex is not a factor, for them to be actionable by court. If somebody forcibly shoves their fingers down your throat or forcibly shoves your hand into their mouth to bite it, that's assault, a standard which rape of either gender meets by d…
/r/MensRights07/01/19 06:42 AM
39

Because most people that claim they're for women's rights tend to instead be for female privilege and against men's rights. Nobody here is against equal rights for anyone, it's when people pervert that virtuous advocacy in favor of blatant discrimination that we get pissed.
/r/MensRights09/12/18 12:15 AM
3

Should have just said he identified as a female, then there would have been no problem whatsoever.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 08:53 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter