TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

papyup Archive

View 0 posts and 14 comments by papyup on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-9

I don’t see why anyone in this sub posts her stuff. She’s asserting everything without evidence; it can be dismissed without evidence, too. Maybe we can focus on actual male advocacy instead of complaining about every misandrist influencer?
/r/EverydayMisandry13/07/26 01:04 PM
-4

Sorry but in this case, she’s right and you’re wrong. Bro you’re defending rapists and calling for more “access to consensual sex” (what does that even mean?) to reduce rape? Do you realize how abhorrent your argument is?
/r/EverydayMisandry08/07/26 11:24 AM
23

What comic is this from? lol What an insane projection. When I see my wife treat herself, I don’t assume it’s because she just doesn’t give a shit about me or the kids. Instead I’m just happy for her. Look, it’s a normal human thing to wonder about the inner thoughts of others. Sometimes our insecurities, or just feelings of burnout, can lead us to assume others (like our spouses) just don’t care as much about us or the family as we do about them. People of either sex do this. But I’m really con…
/r/EverydayMisandry04/07/26 01:38 AM
2

Why’d you cross out random names and such in a public article?
/r/EverydayMisandry01/06/26 01:28 PM
42

This subject really bugs me. And you’re absolutely right, of course. I spent 20 years in active duty. Men are always the primary victims of war, and we are forced by gunpoint and kidnapping to be the perpetrators. Yes, I volunteered, but that was because of society’s expectation that I should. And because it gave me benefits like healthcare, living wages, education benefits, and the ability to buy a house. Without the “honor” aspect and the only path forward to supporting my future family (anoth…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/26 09:09 PM
7

Really great post. Honestly I wouldn’t so much be interested in a relationship-focused book about how men are abused by a partner. Instead I’d be interested in a book that shows how men are abused by the system, i.e., society itself.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/26 01:27 PM
15

Whenever someone builds a building for you to live in, it’s always a man. Not all men, but always a man.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/05/26 07:06 PM
9

It means non-white men who are young enough for school.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/05/26 12:21 PM
1

Fair question — but I don’t think so. Not in the popular mind at least. Someone reads the headline “40 civilians killed in airstrike,” but many will doubt it. “How do we know they were civilians? What if there were troops there and only a few unlucky civilians were killed?” Same person reads the headline “35 women and children among dead in air strike” and they instantly know — those women and children are innocent and this was either a deliberate atrocity or horrible mistake. I’m not arguing th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/26 06:16 PM
-24

Yep, that’s a real issues caused by society’s lower valuation of men and boys. “Women and children” is not that. It is a statement used to inform the public that non-combatants are being killed. You are missing the point of the phrase. It’s PR framing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/26 09:55 PM
-8

Nice false equivalence. You know there’s no difference between the races, but there’s a substantial difference between men and women, and men and children. You may not like it, but pretending not to understand that the overwhelming majority of combatants are men is not helping anyone’s cause here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/26 09:42 PM
-24

I know. I spent 20 years in the military and I’ve deployed to combat. I get how it works. I’m not saying it’s “right” — but there’s no way around it. If you want to communicate that war is bad and that civilian deaths are occurring, you focus on the indicator: non-military age males dying. That means women and children. Omit the men from the equation
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/26 09:18 PM
-49

While I feel the same way, there is still a reason to use it in war reporting: “women and children” pretty indisputably shows that non-combatants have been killed. If men are included in the count, then the assumption most people will make is that combatants were killed. And there’s no way to change that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/26 08:58 PM
1

What does “made to penetrate” mean? How is that even possible? As a man, I can’t imagine the circumstance that leads to it. I’m asking out of ignorance, not snark or malice.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/26 11:12 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter