TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

paradigmarson Archive

View 6 posts and 77 comments by paradigmarson on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I think it would be good if you could try and discover a core identity you can keep stable, and then other bits of your identity you could adopt as 'this is my thing at the moment, I'll try and stick with it as long as possible'. It sounds like you've got a pretty decent idea of what men want and different types of men and women. Don't let anyone replace this with goody-two-shoes stuff. Sex kitten vs tradcon housewife is a good dichotomy, also look into K-strategist vs. r-strategist. I expect yo…
/r/RedPillWomen21/02/21 02:18 AM
1

I might have misunderstood but when you said his house girlfriend I thought the suggestion was... oh I got it wrong. Ignore that :P I take it this means housewife-girlfriend, rather than house girlfriend as in house fries, or girlfriend in this house and another girlfriend in his house in Singapore. I'm not thinking clearly lately so I'm just firing off half-baked thoughts and misreadings lol. Yeah I used to be a male feminist before it was cool lol (well, it's not really cool is it... before it…
/r/RedPillWomen21/02/21 01:47 AM
2

division of labour fun teasing plate dynamic open about expectations from the outset femininity gender roles explicitly accepted on pragmatic and not ideological / neurotic 'tradcon' loser communities (you're real tradcon, not a LARPer) Yes, this is completely red pilled. Anyone who says otherwise is a chump who doesn't know what they're talking about. Congratulations to you both.
/r/RedPillWomen21/02/21 12:49 AM
-3

Traits that have value to men are intelligence, general factor of personality (GFP), beauty and youth. These are genetic markers of health, fertility and motherhood. They'll avoid mentioning these things and talk about other traits in order to signal they're not garbage lol. Even if they're just drinking and whoring with contraception, they still instinctively are attracted to fertility/maternity markers. I think it's easy to over-estimate the sexual market value boost from career, hobbies and e…
/r/RedPillWomen18/02/21 12:15 AM
1

Horseshit, can't be bothered to argue, too busy slaying pussy.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/19 09:59 PM
6

I think what we're seeing is a kind of reactionary, masculinist gynocentrism emerging half-consciously from sociobiological facts: women mostly desire stable providers, female fertility is normal distributed, male social power is pareto-distributed, male sperm is cheap, so men have to be very competitive. Amazing how some women go from "I like masculinity and can trade up because I'm hot" to "All women are morally entitled to masculine men and men who aren't Prince Charming are pieces of shit". …
/r/MensRights27/04/19 10:54 PM
3

Some young woman believe these myths like "It's just a piece of skin, there's no point in it" and "It's dirty". Seems like some weird American ultra-puritan ideology is spreading to the UK. Much of the developed world is against circumcision. It's popular in the United States because of religious tradition, private hospital profit motives and social inertia (maybe related to men being forbidden to talk about sex-related stuff and men's issues!). But really, there are little advantages to it and …
/r/MensRights27/04/19 10:36 PM
0

Yeah it's the other way around in the US I think. Whereas over here in the UK, circumcised boys are the ones afraid of being made fun of. But of course, nobody finds out, because you cover your dick when you use a urinal.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 10:26 PM
1

Why this is problematic: creates cis-female-only space, permits cis-women to invade male space demands that trans-women use male space, making them feel unsafe wherever they go defaced/erased the word 'men' disabled person symbol is too small and marginal, crammed in as an after-thought
/r/MensRights27/04/19 10:24 PM
1

No, transwomen suffer from misandry too and are comrades. Interlocking systems of oppression ting.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 10:12 PM
18

Damn it, I've been beaten to it by aTVasshole in this very thread! There must be something to this. My intuition tells me it would resonate to a lot of young men and women! Messaging opportunity?
/r/MensRights27/04/19 10:06 PM
25

Damn it, you beat me to it! "Some of you may die, but it is a sacrifice I am willing to make." -- Lord Farquad, Shrek (2001)
/r/MensRights27/04/19 10:05 PM
103

"Some of you may die, but it is a sacrifice I am willing to make." -- Lord Farquad, Shrek (2001)
/r/MensRights27/04/19 10:03 PM
-4

It's all the fault of Lad's Mags and working-class men, fetishising women's breasts, which are totally non-sexual and not at all one of women's erogenous zones. Free yourselves from patriarchal ideology! UPDATE: I was being sarcastic! ^_^ See Poe's Law. Of course women get turned on by their own breasts.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 09:59 PM
1

Yeah, I've actually upvoted this because I'm torn on the issue myself. I just wanted to throw the idea in.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 07:02 PM
16

The modding in /r/Feminism is no accident; it's strategically intended to create an atmosphere of perpetual hate, agitation and Practical narrative. That's critical theory in a nutshell.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 01:13 AM
1

Of course they don't want to debate; they're critical theorists. Do you know what critical theory is?
/r/MensRights22/05/17 01:09 AM
3

Crowd-funded studies FTW then?
/r/MensRights22/05/17 01:07 AM
3

Our movement's lack of intellectual foundations. The feminists have critical theory and we have distracting pseudo-issues that don't address the systemic cultural and institutional biases that have been erected to destroy men. We're completely failing to criticize the rise of totalitarianism because: We don't recognize the social fact of the victim-status competition We're limited in our ability to recognize and speak out against personal oppression because men are supposed to be thick-skinned W…
/r/MensRights22/05/17 12:44 AM
1

+1 yep it's a strategic weapon developed by FemCrit Guy, we need to stop obsessing over obscure irrelevant court cases. Consider instead the pervasiveness of feminist ideology and the systematic shutting-down of male perspectives.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 12:40 AM
1

I think you and others here are over-emphasizing the role of the state and specific, verifiable issues in this. The real causes are cultural and engineered by feminist critical theorists -- the intellectuals who develop the macro-level strategy for identity-political warfare. I think the posts with fewer votes further down this page are offering far more insight into the real causes of oppression.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 12:32 AM
2

Internalized misandry. As a guy you're either a privileged perpetrator or a pathetic ball of weakness; the other half of the population are either strong independent women or victimized little doves. It's a murderous dichotomy. Men are made to feel guilty for their maleness and inadequately masculine at the same time by every other piece of multimedia or social interaction they experience. I grew up being afraid to imagine 'heteronormative' intercourse because I feared that not specifying consen…
/r/MensRights22/05/17 12:24 AM
1

Sure: aggressive rhetoric does not equal threat of violence. SJW's for example can be rhetorically aggressive using self-victimization, willful misinterpretation, taking the moral high-ground, interrupting and speaking over you in a higher pitch, etc. Argumentation as a strategy game lends itself to aggression. Outside intellectually virtuous communities, it consists of dishonesty, viciousness and depriving your opponent of the resources to launch a counter-attack: credibility and thinking-time.…
/r/MensRights09/03/17 12:24 PM
1

deconstruction in a nutshell!
/r/MensRights08/03/17 08:42 PM
8

Someone said that Jonathan Gordon [the male Hillary Clinton] was “really punchable” because of all the smiling. Male Hillary proves that those who show logical strength without having the dominance to back it up are hated: How dare you prove me wrong when you can't back it up with violence! This bias of course only works against men. Anyone who calls me a cucky beta, go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 08:17 PM
1

This video has shocked me because I thought what a sexist pig Trump came across as, particularly where he said approximately 'Is Secretary Clinton okay? I want you to be really happy! smug laughter'. Yet here, it becomes clear that male Hillary comes across as un-masculine and patronising, whereas female Trump comes across as -- well, to me aggressive and anti-social just like male Trump, but probably empowered and a role-model to most men and women.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 08:12 PM
2

Thanks, done.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 07:49 PM
6

The most important thing in a post like this is a link to the web page where you can do your part.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 07:46 PM
1

The magical theory of empathy is symptomatic of of gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights22/11/16 02:29 AM
1

And sexuality isn't even gender. Do you like in Russia or something?
/r/MensRights22/11/16 02:09 AM
2

Wow, what an excellent channel! This may become my new source of counterpropaganda to share with my Facebook friends. Facebook's anti-SJW have GOT to see this.
/r/MensRights22/11/16 01:58 AM
2

Your comment succeeds as education-signalling, but fails to refute my central tenor in posting to /r/mensrights: the article is propagandistic in intent and effect. The article's message is mostly normative: it is suggesting that these are bad things to be, accompanying the terms with pervasively negative images, descriptions and quotes. It encourages people to interpret the words as pejoratives. This is a propagandistic manipulation of popular word usage for the purpose of promoting misandry. T…
/r/MensRights18/11/16 05:04 AM
12

Kudos for doing content analysis of propagandistic soundbites. I wish I could upvote this multiple times. I'd like to do that sort of analysis with BBC Three feminist programming some time, as I think it's really hurting adolescent boys.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 04:43 AM
30

'Mansplaining' has two components: a man explains a male perspective to a woman he is patronising her, because women are more qualified by default on matters relating to gender It is a hallmark of feminist critical theory that the success of a social criticism is judged by how it improves the circumstances of women. Now this criterion governs the validity of a speech act in public discourse. Feminism is assimilating society into its little cult. Decisions are democratic if they are based on norm…
/r/MensRights18/11/16 04:18 AM
2

I'd say she fixed her vagina because you helped her see an important problem and overcome emotional barriers to fixing it -- perhaps not because she wanted to please you. Anyway, sounds like you've provided a very helpful and therapeutic bit of sound advice and it's thanks to TRP-thinking, not feminism.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/16 01:59 PM
1

Yeah, I can't see JupeJupeSound's post confirmed anywhere. I'd like to know what's actually happened on the basis of evidence. If your cops are responsible, I want to know; I don't want to speculate.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 11:08 PM
1

Indeed, but if they go really overboard with the self-deceptive masturbatory fuckwitticism, they will lose credibility and sanity and harm their own movement. Almost seems inhumane of me to suggest leaving them to it, now.
/r/MensRights06/01/16 02:28 AM
1

Largely, yes. It may not exactly count as coining the phrase. A google search reveals a few other people have used it, but really hardly anyone. Does it count as coining something if you bring it into popular usage? Maybe there was some half-irony in my use of the word 'coin'. Apart from that, I can't see any parts of my post where I wasn't serious. What makes you think I might be joking?
/r/MensRights06/01/16 02:19 AM
1

I can't see my logical error, if I have made one. Will now test with substitution. IF 'Murder is defined such that a person who incentivises it is guilty of it' -------------------------THEN------------------------- 'Rape is defined such that a person who incentivises it is guilty of it' This still looks like an unsound and deductively invalid argument to me.
/r/MensRights06/01/16 02:14 AM
1

As a Debian user, the name Ian Murdoch has always had a special place in my heart. As an men's rights advocate, I feel concerned about the possibility that he was a victim of misandry. Yet I am equally concerned that looking at this through the lense of men's rights could be problematic with regards to giving him the accuracy and respect that he deserves. If his death is a Men's Rights issue, it must be known; if it is not, that also must be known. Whatever our analyses, whatever our comments, l…
/r/MensRights06/01/16 12:30 AM
0

For many feminists this is spot-on, nicely and concisely done, thanks.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 03:15 AM
5

You expect me to fuck? No-no, Mr. Bond! I expect you to die!
/r/MensRights02/01/16 03:14 AM
1

Half-way through this post became hilariously insightful, thanks for cheering up my day. You should do stand-up comedy, if it wouldn't ruin your career.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 03:12 AM
1

The fact that the statement 'Crime M is defined such that a person who incentivises it is guilty of it' holds true when M is 'murder' does not prove that it holds true when 'M' is rape. You're spotting a principle that applies to all members of one set and applying it to all members of a superset.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 02:57 AM
1

Men's Rights attracts honest and clear-thinking people, who balk at false accusations and inaccurate labels. We wouldn't want to sink to the intellectual and moral level of those feminists who call everything 'rape' without thinking or in self-deception. I wasn't meaning to defend anything; I just correct inaccurate statements wherever they occur. I hope this doesn't harm the MRM; it is my hope that a level-headed and balanced worldview will make us better and more powerful as individuals and as…
/r/MensRights02/01/16 02:52 AM
1

Yeah, it's already a word... here its beauty radiates like the fiery steeds of Helios bringing light to the world of mortal men!
/r/MensRights02/01/16 02:44 AM
1

Adolescent boys learn in time After much damage and lost opportunities, they learn the follies of most feminism and at the same time become bitter and sexist towards women. That's in present society. The feminist propaganda and worldview is getting stronger (seriously, since 2013 it feels like it's increased eight-fold) and men are learning later and later. It is only a matter of time until they stop learning altogether. Besides, it would be better if boys weren't abused with feminist propaganda…
/r/MensRights02/01/16 02:40 AM
1

Yes, individual action is very powerful. By protecting ourselves individually as you suggest, we retain the power to voice our grievances and propose our solutions and minimise damage done by our enemies through doxing, slander, perversion of the course of justice, etc. We have places in society and should use these to protect the boys of today and men of the future from the tyranny of female privilege advocates.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 02:17 AM
1

Yes, psychoanalysis done well is handy. Done badly it's also handy for hate-speech, though tends to result in masturbatory ad hominem slinging until the user becomes a deluded fuckwit. If self-deceptive fuckwittery is what our enemies enjoy, let us leave them to pursue it!. :D
/r/MensRights02/01/16 02:10 AM
10

Method: Where male behaviour gives females privilege, psychoanalyse the males and complain that their motives aren't pure enough. Achievement is not toxic, everyone's primarily focused on their own enjoyment and looking for appreciation is also natural and healthy, especially by filling a niche where there is high demand and low supply -- advantageous for the seller and the buyer. I'm guessing this kind of sentiment results from some women expecting knights/saints of men, being disappointed and …
/r/MensRights25/12/15 03:29 AM
2

Just get used to the abuse. Our predicament is still reversible and now, as society is beginning to wake up, is our chance.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 03:18 AM
1

femsplaining, what a beautiful word.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 03:12 AM
1

I support both feminism and men's rights, where the movements are level-headed. Sometimes they are. I think basically-sane people need to distinguish themselves from the confrontational bigots.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 02:46 AM
4

I think many feminists go along with the opposition to the MRM due to pressure from other feminists and a generally confrontational, hostile atmosphere. I do get a pungent taste of misandry from most of the media, though. I think the rights of both genders are very endangered by this atmosphere. We need to promote sanity, liberty and understanding, especially among the new generation. Adolescent boys need to know that having sexual interests in women does not make them sexist or misogynistic; ri…
/r/MensRights21/11/15 02:37 AM
1

Even when feminists quote /r/theredpill in articles about The Red Pill? https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3spcda/cassie_jayes_the_red_pill_causing_confusion/
/r/MensRights14/11/15 01:41 AM
1

silly question: who/what is Milos?
/r/MensRights14/11/15 01:36 AM
1

In the core of our society are the Englightenment Values of liberty, reason and equality. Some leftists want to erode or pervert this classical liberalism. Lo, the Age of Darkness draws near! Wooo, be scared, be verry scared!
/r/MensRights14/11/15 01:32 AM
1

I don't think most people expressing concern here are concern trolls -- it's always worth being aware of the possibility though. Indeed, I wanted to respond to a misandric ad on Facebook earlier, but didn't out of fear of damage to my reputation. Fear of libel and slander has a chilling effect on expression.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 01:28 AM
1

We need to be hardcore, active and numerous enough to correct the inevitable tidal-wave of BS.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 01:25 AM
2

I agree with and support this distinction. Our group must remain positive and egalitarian.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 01:20 AM
1

Yep, I recently saw a man say "Don't you dare" to his girlfriend. I don't know what it was over, but for a moment, I instinctively saw him as an abuser. On another occasion, I saw a woman constantly mock her man in a way that wouldn't be acceptable if the genders were reverse. At first just thought it was hawt, because I've been conditioned to be a sexual masochist out of fear of vanilla penetration as rapey and male-power. Internalised misandry.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 01:17 AM
4

I liked the sense of exasperation at how gender is brought into everything and used as a basis for waging political war: I thought this emotion came across well. At the same time you seemed like a fairly easy-going guy, which helps with credibility. Suggestions: Provide a link to the advert and refer to it in the video (speech box?) Take the fil in landscape with appropriate aspect ratio. Get it level with your head and look straight ahead Divide your speech into clear parts. Use body language t…
/r/MensRights14/11/15 01:07 AM
1

From experience: all it takes is a middle-class crybaby to make a few phone calls and suddenly opportunities start closing up.The only times I've come close to being raped were when gradually mounting my bike in a quiet street, cross-dressing and when flirting with men called Victor. And now I just realise what a misandric (internalised) comment I've just made. I am ashamed, and yet proud to leave it here unedited as an exhibition of the kind of folly one should not imitate: 'men called Victor'
/r/MensRights14/11/15 12:47 AM
1

Will the public listen closely enough and think clearly enough to hear and understand the corrective distinctions between mensrights, theredpill and The Red Pill? Idiocy and the act of distinguishing are incompatible.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 12:39 AM
0

'Yeah well, that's just like uhh, you're opinion, man!' -- The Great Lebrowski
/r/MensRights14/11/15 12:36 AM
-1

I know boys are supposed to be messier than girls, but I think that may be because because girls are encouraged to have useful, empowering virtues like orgnisation and respect for their dignity and appearance, while boys are encouraged to by fierces and unemotional, which society also punishes as aggression and lack of empathy. So perhaps requiring all kids to be organised will actually help boys to up their game. That said, I can see what you're saying about how making disorganisation deviant a…
/r/MensRights14/11/15 12:27 AM
1

When I first heard about Movember around 2010, I did think 'fiddlesticks... the gendered cancer war has begun'. First there was a big push for breast cancer research, which felt like a microaggression against men by purposely excluding male cancer victims by making the charitable effort ineffectively breast-specific. As so many things were explained to my 12-year-old self, 'girls stick together': men can perish! :-) I can see where the feminists are coming from by calling Movember a 'microaggres…
/r/MensRights14/11/15 12:14 AM
5

If what she did was force two captives to have sex with each other, it would be clumsy to use the word 'rape'. How would you word it without being misleading? If you said 'she raped two capitves' it would sound like she was the one having the sex. For all I know maybe she was, maybe she wasn't; the article isn't clear. One could guess, since it mentions that it resulted in a stillborn, that it was stillborn because it was given birth to by a malnourished, abused captive (otherwise why mention it…
/r/MensRights13/11/15 11:04 PM
1

So you can call your male friends rapists and female friends sluts. I don't know whether it's more misandric (encouraging people to libel their friends with accusations of sexual molestation), misogynistic (slut-shaming for women indulging in consensual groping) or plain anti-sexual (suggesting that promiscuous drunken groping is shameful). Are they trying to troll both MRA's and the misandric feminists as some sort of publicity stunt? Is this the new thing in advertising? What the hell is going…
/r/MensRights13/11/15 10:52 PM
2

Find a misandrist and encourage them to speak in a way that alienates their audience. Provoke them without offending the audience yourself. Make them grow arrogant. When audience's distaste peaks, call the misandrist out on their bigotry. Quote the worst parts and don't let anyone forget them! Contextualize their hate speech within wider MRA narratives: vilification, unfair expectations, slander, discrimination.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 02:08 PM
1

Studying the MRM by unbiased sampling of its writings and taking notes, then using the balanced knowledge thus gained to formulate new rhetoric and prepare for making a credible case for men's rights in conversation
/r/MensRights08/11/15 01:58 PM
3

The very name is disgusting: imagine what would happen if someone made a 'good women' project. It implies that men exist to please non-men and should meet the desires of non-men. Also that the good man is a radical new thing being engineered, for all men so far have been bad.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 01:53 PM
1

The question is: will /r/TheRedPill receive enough coverage for these new connotations to the phrase to be significant in the public view?
/r/MensRights08/11/15 01:32 PM
1

I'm not sure I've understood you, perhaps I'm being stupid... most men's rights activists do not need the name 'the red pill' to see the importance of funding this film.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 01:30 PM
3

The title for this film is the political equivalent of tourettes. The absurdity of our feminist opponents' speech does not reduce its power. Our opponents are not weak or politically feckless; to pretend that they are is self-defeating.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 01:25 PM
1

The public do not check facts. They see what appeals to their insecurities and believe what they fancy. If our 'feminist' opponents can market a narrative that makes most men feel like heros of progress standing up to 'misogynists', the fickle, exploitable idiots (most men) will buy it in order feel like god's gift to women.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 01:18 PM
1

Our movement will gain publicity anyway, because men are becoming increasingly oppressed and this is unacceptable in an enlightened society. We would do well to ensure that our movement is presented in such a way that people with a smattering of honest inquiry about them will see that we do not espouse the bigotry that our opponents slander us with accusations of.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 01:05 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter