TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

paradisepickles Archive

View 0 posts and 47 comments by paradisepickles on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Wait is your child a boy or a girl?
/r/Divorce_Men07/07/21 04:42 AM
4

Dude... you’ve got to find a way to stop thinking about shit like that. It eats at you.
/r/Divorce_Men22/02/21 06:01 AM
0

Your ex might be shitty, but... feminist propaganda? Weird.
/r/Divorce_Men21/08/20 07:29 PM
0

Or maybe no one gave a shit in your divorce because they never liked you? Jeez. Please don’t generalize the experiences of other people.
/r/Divorce_Men21/08/20 07:29 PM
1

F
/r/Divorce_Men18/06/20 07:30 PM
1

What do you hope to get out of it? Do you think it will benefit you to file? Don’t worry for a second about how filing will impact the AP. Any consequences the AP faces will be because of THEIR actions.
/r/Divorce_Men20/01/20 08:44 PM
2

Oh wow... the deli guy got me! I was such a big fan too (was...am! He's awesome). lol thanks for sharing, laughing this early on a chilly morning is kinda nice.
/r/MensRights06/07/10 01:55 PM
–

I asked for some chicken fingers at the store the other day, and the guy told me they were all out. All they had left were chicken thumbs.
/r/MensRights06/07/10 07:44 AM
–

"The subreddit for female-oriented discussions both serious and silly."
/r/MensRights05/07/10 12:52 PM
–

That thread is on r/worldnews. What does that thread have to do with r/2xc? edit 2: HAHA, thanks ladies. I got banned from r/2xc for this I can't find what thread that screen shot is from. Is that somewhere on r/2xc? I have not seen where you were banned. I would very much like to see what exactly caused that to happen if you could please show me. I don't doubt you, but I do not understand how your claim and the links you provided match up. Yeah, you ranted on r/2xc outside of that subreddit, bu…
/r/MensRights05/07/10 12:43 PM
3

lol what? That never crossed my mind. I just don't like speculation (particularly of sensitive subjects that tend to get folks riled up).
/r/MensRights26/06/10 11:34 PM
–

You think, you don't know. The OP could have thought the same thing. Where is some proof? Speculation gets us nowhere.
/r/MensRights26/06/10 09:41 PM
–

This makes two victims in support, I suppose. Actually I would expect most rape victims who have reached some levels of understanding what happened to them (court included) to support defendant anonymity. They likely know a great deal about the sorry legal system from their own efforts; they have probably seen both sides. Victims are made out to be dirty sluts who were asking for it and are probably lying about the whole thing anyway (because they wanted to get the accused in trouble or somethin…
/r/MensRights18/06/10 02:27 PM
1

I'd like to see more anonymity in most criminal cases. We see 'innocent until proven guilty' tossed into the wind every day with news cameras and reports. I signed the petition that was posted here the other day. I do have to wonder how far is too far with anonymity though. What action is taken against those who leak information (intentionally or otherwise) about a defendant?
/r/MensRights16/06/10 12:05 PM
2

That doesn't sounds stupid at all. The human body can react to physical stimuli even when the brain is angry, scared, and otherwise adamantly against the reaction. The body is able to divert blood to the genitals even when a guy isn't thinking about it (or REALLY doesn't want it). Females can and have reacted similarly. The vagina may become lubricated, nipples can be at attention, the whole nine yards. Much shame and self-blame is experienced by rape victims because of this very thing. Thoughts…
/r/MensRights09/06/10 06:36 AM
1

I have always carried an extra set of clothes on hot/humid days as well as particularly rainy ones. I don't know suits, so I'm not sure if you could go about carrying one or stashing an extra in your office without it getting wrinkly. Is there a chance that you could wear something more casual while you walk to work and change upon arrival without looking unprofessional?
/r/MensRights09/06/10 01:50 AM
–

If one definition is going to mention 'woman,' why change it to 'person' for the second entry? Why not have women all the way down? Or women, then men, then transgendered all in separate definitions? I don't think I'm alone in thinking that they should get it right the first time and just keep going with getting it right. Then again, I am a stickler for accuracy with these kinds of things. If the definitions as well as their order were controlled by some kind of user submission/voting system I w…
/r/MensRights07/06/10 05:27 PM
1

Thank you!
/r/MensRights07/06/10 03:48 PM
–

Wow. A definition in a dictionary is one thing, but what the hell can male victims do in the UK? Is this a substantial issue on your side of the pond? Dictionary.com is an American-based company. Even if they weren't, agh.
/r/MensRights07/06/10 03:45 PM
–

Many people do not know or do not believe that women can rape or that men can rape non-females. Many people understand that these acts can and do happen. I live in the US, and as far as I know every state's laws concerning rape define it in gender neutral terms. My opinion as well as the opinion of many people here is that these definitions are false. If dictionary definition is based on opinion I plan on sharing mine.
/r/MensRights07/06/10 03:40 PM
1

I'm not confused, and I'm glad you understand that my concern was one of relevance and not accuracy of content. The great thing about reddit is that we all get to share our opinions. I happen to find relevancy important, and I think that reddit thrives on it. I also think that a lack of relevancy combined with blanket statements sounds particularly idiotic. That's just my opinion.
/r/MensRights07/06/10 10:44 AM
–

Dude. The brainwashing shit is what I'm talking about. Your first comment. The first reason I thought you sound like an idiot. Your response to a bad definition was that it's "amazing" to you that feminists are "happy to reinforce the socialised-condition whereby women are victims and men, perpetrators." Unrelated because the only thing connecting feminists to the definition is that some of feminists don't think men can be raped. A lot of people don't think men can be raped. That attitude existe…
/r/MensRights07/06/10 09:36 AM
–

Okay. One more time. The OP posted a definition. You posted about hypocritical feminist jerkwads. The posted definition did not mention anything that you mentioned. That is how what you said and what the OP said are not related. Of course there is a problem with how rape is perceived in society, and the sorry dictionary definition that the OP posted makes light of that. The part about crazy bitches being crazy bitches is loosely related (unless you have inside info about the dictionary being run…
/r/MensRights07/06/10 09:13 AM
–

Again? Man. All I am saying is that your arguments had nothing to do with the original post. You ranted on about something that sometimes happens but that was not at all related to the post. That sounds idiotic to me. Hooray for opinions. I never said that you were wrong. I was never arguing against you. I just thought what you said sounded stupid.
/r/MensRights07/06/10 05:11 AM
–

Not too close to home, I just think that your original comment sounds ridiculous. You related a shitty definition (and nothing else) about a shitty thing to brainwashing feminist hypocrites. Have you seen the Daily Show parodies of Glenn Beck? Yes, what you said about feminists is true in some cases. Yes, the definition that the OP gave sucks. The two are otherwise loosely related and you sound foolish for saying anything but. Also, why not look up rape in the dictionary? Let's fix the problem n…
/r/MensRights07/06/10 02:41 AM
–

Thank you so much for the link. Dictionary.com, wtf? I hope more folks here read this and send a message. Actually, do you mind if I make a post asking for people to write? Or would you like to?
/r/MensRights06/06/10 10:43 PM
1

It usually is, but the technical definition is important. Agreed though, it can be confusing.
/r/MensRights06/06/10 10:42 PM
1

Awesome thanks. I'm not sure how the electronic editions work, but do you know if it is the current edition? I don't have a mac and I'm not sure how to find the most current one either.
/r/MensRights06/06/10 10:41 PM
–

lol what? You sound like an idiot.
/r/MensRights06/06/10 09:37 PM
–

Where is that definition from? The publisher of whatever dictionary you're looking at needs to be contacted. If they get a lot of people calling/emailing from this post they may be inclined to change it. Info please! Also, if it is in print form, can you tell me the edition? There's a chance that the company has realized that rape is not gender dependent and updated their definition in newer editions. I don't want to call unless the current edition is incorrect. Some good news: as far as I am aw…
/r/MensRights06/06/10 02:48 AM
1

I don't understand. Did they respond normally? I hope so.
/r/MensRights02/06/10 08:57 AM
9

The wife will be serving her own two year sentence. She'll just do it later, when she isn't pregnant. Her last child (the one she and her husband neglected) was born prematurely after a complicated pregnancy, so maybe suspending her sentence isn't the worst idea.
/r/MensRights29/05/10 10:29 AM
0

I have an organic final to study for, but I just stumbled across this admittedly cute song during a quick break. Worth a look imo, I laughed once or twice :). TED talks can be searched by length... great for procrastinating with the quickness. The video contains two songs, the relevant one is about three minutes long and is played first.
/r/MensRights28/04/10 08:25 PM
2

Okay, I see what you were getting at. Those are the 'usual suspects' that I consider too. I guess I just focused on your comment saying: Do you think they could have done because yeah, they could have done it either way. Your concern is for the future: what these women will get These women are assholes and what you call 'feminism's protections' may impact them later, but their crime was not 'protected' when they committed it. Read ya loud and clear. I agree that some women do not pay the price t…
/r/MensRights28/04/10 06:13 AM
1

I just came back to this and I wanted to say something else. I was absolutely not defending those who make false rape accusations. Actually, I was in full support of those criminals being brought to justice. I was only making light of the fact that too often real victims are unable to see their rapists brought to trial. This is an issue that both men and women face, albeit for different reasons. Both the abused and the falsely accused are victims. Fuck, man, how could anyone defend someone who f…
/r/MensRights28/04/10 12:16 AM
1

That sucks. Although... maybe these kinds of comments have something to do with it :P: Hey, I believe in Equality. I'd hit back and kick them while they are on the ground until they can't get up! And then I'd kick them both one more time to make sure they understand Really though, stinks that you got banned from sharing ideas. :(
/r/MensRights28/04/10 12:06 AM
4

I'm not sure exactly what protections you are referring to, because my idea of the usual suspects don't apply here. That said, well... yeah, they could have beat the guy up despite the fact that feminists exist. Men can batter women, women can batter men, humans have a bit of an awful violent streak. These women's ability to harass their victim relied on their destructive 'teach him' attitudes, handbags, miscellaneous pasta, feet, fists, and saliva. If you were referring to the fact that the man…
/r/MensRights28/04/10 12:01 AM
1

If that is what is relevant to you, you must agree that a more accurate title for this post would be something like: "That'll teach him to be rude" - Another example of how some feminists are only interested in one-sided equality. Even if the title was this or similar, the article addresses two asshole women who battered a man. They don't claim to be feminists.
/r/MensRights27/04/10 05:22 PM
2

That is a tart accusation considering that you have only seen one other comment of mine. I'm pretty sure this is my second 'lengthy' comment here in r/MensRights. Two comments does not constitute a reliable pattern. I may be wrong about past comments, but searching through reddit comment history is awful. Is there a better way to do that other than the 'next' button? I'll give you that finals week has been stressful (maybe I'm subconsciously looking for people to disagree with?), but my upvotes …
/r/MensRights27/04/10 05:16 PM
5

That fairly detailed assumption isn't mentioned anywhere in the article. You could be right though. No reason is given as to why he didn't fight back. Some other possible reasons include... some men were raised to never hit a woman and have no idea what the VAWA is. Some people refuse to fight back in any physical confrontation. Where do multiple water bottles come from on an elevator anyway (and why was there pasta?!)? He might have been throwing those things fast! Water bottles can have surpri…
/r/MensRights27/04/10 04:55 PM
3

Yes of course some feminists act differently than feminism is defined. That is true of feminism as well as other social rights groups (including men's rights). This truth, however, does not validate the OP's claim of 'feminisms one-sided equality.' The definition of feminism exists as is, and it does not involve one-sided equality. I love me some science, but until the books are officially rewritten the current definition stands. This might seem rather black and white, but delineation is importa…
/r/MensRights27/04/10 04:43 PM
2

I'm in support of MensRights for most all that goes on here. Raising awareness, discussing issues, huzzah I love it. But this? What? Feminism is not about one-sided equality. It is defined as the theory of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes and well as organized activity on behalf of women's rights and interests. Feminism is about equal rights. I'm sure that a lot of folks here on MR have heard this. Equality of the sexes and not female superiority is the name of the game.…
/r/MensRights27/04/10 02:32 PM
1

That is a solution of mine as well. In addition, I never, ever blame her/him for it or assume that they are lying. When I say 'let's work on it' I mean just that. I'm going to work on myself and everyone I know. Victims have it rough (particularly when the victim is falsely accused), and just as false claims can ruin one person's life, when the charges are justified the rape victim's life is likely shattered. Far too many casualties! Something that I want to mention is that your comment was, in …
/r/MensRights11/04/10 12:03 AM
3

I would like to say first that I am not saying this to try and minimize the falsely accused's horrifying experience in any way; please understand that. Everything that they have had to go through is very real and deserves to be recognized as such. I am only comparing the legalities of the situation with the DA to something that women (who are actually rape victims) must also face to get their day in court. I only wish to highlight flaws in our legal system (US) that lay a profound burden on emot…
/r/MensRights10/04/10 12:31 PM
10

Thank you so much for posting this. Despite understanding some of the dangers inherent in mens' breast cancer (under diagnosed because many men do not think they are susceptible, etc) I had no idea that federal funds spent on screening for cancer that is known to affect people regardless of gender could be gender-biased. I am a woman, and I subscribe (is that the correct term for +frontpage?) to MensRights because I am interested in human equality, reading about it, and hearing what the reddit c…
/r/MensRights09/04/10 07:15 PM
2

That sounds a lot different than, "People are too uptight about their bodies." Hooray silly! :) Edit: comma
/r/MensRights23/03/10 08:37 PM
4

I'll be as uptight about my body as I please. That is not for you to decide for me. That said, it does seem that they were trying to go for camaraderie. It also seems that they missed their target.
/r/MensRights23/03/10 07:54 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter