TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

partymammal Archive

View 0 posts and 24 comments by partymammal on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Didn't realize you were from the third world. Sorry your life is shit.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 05:58 AM
1

Good for you.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 01:15 AM
1

Nah, I just realized how retarded all you MRA SJW's are. There is no way to reason with any of you because you're all a bunch of bigots. Listen to you with your homophobia. You sad sad man.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 08:08 PM
1

Whatever you say man, I'm over all this MRA retardedness. Go have fun with the rest of the retards. You fool ass SJW. Go back to your shtty life in buttfuck loserville, ya quack. You're the reason MRA will always be seen as a fringe movement of loonies.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 02:32 PM
1

Lol I wonder how much you suffer in life cause of your ignorance
/r/MensRights18/12/14 02:14 PM
2

Mhm, whatever you say :)
/r/MensRights18/12/14 03:10 AM
1

Lol that was actually good. Good laughs
/r/MensRights18/12/14 12:30 AM
1

He won't understand cause his head is too far up his ass. He bit hard on the MRA shit and now he's a full blown SJW. This describes I sizable portion of these morons.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 11:52 PM
0

Oh and no, she was targeted for working at a military school. The media is dumb for having put her sex into it, and all y'all are dumb for wanting the same.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 11:36 PM
-1

Probability is a logical basis. That's why statistics and the study of, exists. My claim about some stuff being right is more sound than any claim about all or none of it being right. Don't forget about soundness.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 09:24 PM
-1

Whatever you say Einstein. Have fun at Harvard with your PhD.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 09:11 PM
0

Irrelevant.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 06:21 PM
2

In other words, targeted for being affiliated with the military.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 02:28 PM
-1

You dont see it as one of those things, so it must be true. You buffoon. You see it as one of those things, so it must be true. You retard. Did you even read and absorb the point that was being made? The point is that the sex of the impacted people is being effaced. This is the essence of 'male disposability'. We are not claiming that they were targeted by the Taliban because they were boys. We dont have enough information to make that claim one way or the other. Your claim is valid but not as s…
/r/MensRights17/12/14 02:11 PM
1

They were not targeted for being boys. They were targeted for being the sons of soldiers. Read the articles
/r/MensRights17/12/14 02:00 PM
0

What a contribution to the discussion. You sure are something special.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 06:03 AM
3

Why were the girls targeted? Because they were girls. (Because rape and child wives) Why were the boys targeted? Because they were at a military school. (Because the government runs a military school.) One of the two is suffering solely because of their sex while the other had a case of wrong place at the wrong time. Use logic.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 05:48 AM
1

Nah, you're trying to make it about MRA. You did that when you brought it here.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 05:34 AM
-4

I agree with some MRA stuff but this is excessive. It doesn't make any difference if they say children or boys because them being targeted had nothing to do with their sex and everything to do with where they were, a military school (according to some Pakistani fellow above). Usually when girls are targeted by extremists groups it has very much to do with their sex. Cause you know, mass rape and child wives. Like I said, some MRA stuff is reasonable, but I don't see this as one of those things.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 05:24 AM
-1

This seems a bit pedantic
/r/MensRights17/12/14 05:11 AM
0

When it says feminists, you can take that as more than one feminist or all feminists. My problem is obviously with the possible misconception that all feminists believe what the writer claimed. Engage that computer your talking about.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 10:31 PM
1

My comment was not a commentary on the content or substance of the argument at hand. Merely pointing out that the title is misleading. Which it is. I value accuracy in what I read because it gives credibility. Making your writing sexy by not being precise says to me that the writer might be stretching or embellishing something else. I would like to see posts consisting of writings by more credible sources so MRA doesn't look like a bunch of 13 olds too stupid to realize what sounds like truth an…
/r/MensRights02/12/14 09:50 PM
-5

Your title and the title of the article are misleading. Each claimed 'feminists' as if numerous believed this. Only two said anything. Both titles should say "a couple of feminists"...
/r/MensRights02/12/14 10:37 AM
-2

I don't think all of those statistics are relevant to MRA.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 10:26 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter