TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

pasapprivoisee Archive

View 0 posts and 132 comments by pasapprivoisee on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Frankly, we should just trade Alberta and Quebec for NY and California already. (With little pockets of exceptions.)
/r/MensRights01/09/13 06:02 AM
1

Uh, you aren't actually positing that 50 Shades of Utter Shite is feminist fiction, are you?
/r/MensRights25/08/13 06:09 AM
3

If we treated woman the way we treat other males there would be no feminism Please tell me you see the irony in this statement.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 06:07 AM
2

I think that's supposed to be humour. I mean, it's not funny, so I'm not positive, but my hunch is it wasn't meant to be taken literally.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 04:26 AM
1

Well men could work at McDonalds for their sucktacular wages, but good luck living on those. I'm not about to claim anything other than if the gap needs to be filled, it will be by the person most motivated to do so.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 03:30 AM
2

Oh, I don't have a car so stop stealing from me to build roads. My house hasn't been on fire, so stop stealing from me to build firehouses. (I sincerely hope I do not require a /s.)
/r/MensRights14/08/13 03:21 AM
5

What an incredibly stupid piece. What would be the point if the majority of assaults are from people they know (and are likely locking themselves IN with them) and aren't restricted to nights?
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:40 AM
-4

You mean like during WWII when they "manned" the factories?
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:36 AM
1

York University is in Toronto.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 06:56 AM
2

Uhm, no. Testicles -> ovaries. Boobs are inconvenient heatsinks that sweat like a son-of-a-bitch in hot weather. I thought I wanted them for years, and then I got some. Why no one tells you this when you are relatively flat-chested, I don't know. Thank dog they're the first things to go when you lose any weight at all.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 06:30 AM
-1

Nevermind. Tired and dumb. (I meant the argument I started and then deleted. Not the post.)
/r/MensRights13/08/13 05:49 AM
1

Because it doesn't matter why he changed his mind -- only that he did. Even if she had bad breath, or an offensive tattoo that put him off, the point is he no longer wanted to have sex with her and at that point, no means no. Reason is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 05:33 AM
1

No one, if they didn't have to, would do them. There are jobs that suck and anyone with insufficient motivation will avoid them. I don't know any men who feel compelled to go work on a crab-fishing boat or an oil-drilling platform in the ocean -- and I would say that is because I am lucky enough to be of a certain socio-economic echelon as are the men I grew up with. If you have enough options, the dangerous jobs aren't first choice, regardless of sex.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 05:30 AM
1

cough spermbanks cough Make enough money to have live-in help and that obligation goes out the window. And if you don't want kids, it gets streamlined even further, I guess.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 05:26 AM
1

A child on their own isn't going to last long.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 05:22 AM
0

I have no idea how I misread that as "traditional dinner roles." And even with the "roles" spelling, a giant dinner roll appeared in my mind. I think I need sleep.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 05:43 AM
1

Why?
/r/MensRights12/08/13 05:14 AM
1

And, as demonstrated during war time, they will do it.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 05:12 AM
1

War time doesn't actually bear that out. Women tend to simply view work as work, not "men's work" and "women's work". Anyone given the option, will take the least sucky job available, not just women. If there are no men, women also won't be taking time off to take care of families. Just throwing that out there.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 05:09 AM
1

If a woman changes her mind at any point along the way it doesn't matter WHAT the reason is. Why should it be different for men?
/r/MensRights12/08/13 04:56 AM
3

His snatch.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 07:33 AM
0

Some of you seem confused by the term "freedom of speech". I don't know about where you are, but here in Canada, it doesn't include death threats -- even on Twitter. This just seems like a case of the squeaky wheel getting the grease. :/ ETA: Our law is based on British, so I'd imagine it's not legal there either. http://yourlaws.ca/criminal-code-canada/2641-uttering-threats If someone hits the "report" button, you should be happy that that's all that happened.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 02:53 AM
4

Are they allowed to skip the bullshit festivities or is attendance mandatory? Most of these things I've been expected to attend were excruciating. Maybe take some consolation (I have no idea why I typed "compensation" first) in that. :(
/r/MensRights01/08/13 04:56 AM
0

Then we aren't actually arguing, because it's still for me.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 04:53 AM
1

Just any and all men? Not really. Maybe I'm odd like that, but if I don't have a target in mind, I dial it back.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 04:52 AM
0

No rationalizing needed. I like sex. I like it with damned hot men, who are very much in demand, purely for the sex and no other reason. It's not about buying a house together, or any other such stereotypical "needs". It's a straightforward exchange of athletic sexual energy. Why complicate it?
/r/MensRights01/08/13 04:49 AM
1

Did you even bother reading the rest of the comment thread?
/r/MensRights01/08/13 04:45 AM
1

How often would that actually happen, though? Most men would go their entire lives never having to do any such thing, and yet 100% of women weren't allowed to do basic things like actually OWN the property she was "going into debt" over.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 04:40 AM
-1

But the bottom line is it's still for me. If I don't want to be treated like a secretary when I go to a conference, I don't wear an outfit that might lead you to think I am an admin assistant. It's still not for your benefit in the end.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 06:16 AM
1

Odd question since the bottom line is that if the man in question is attracted to me (i.e. I dressed to appeal to him), it still benefits me (i.e. sex happens). So me, by way of him. I don't see this as an either-or.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 05:28 AM
0

It was only suggested that it wouldn't happen. Why wouldn't it? If he is the sort of person to rape you, he isn't the sort of person who would attack in this particular way?
/r/MensRights31/07/13 04:29 AM
-1

To be fair, if I get dressed up for a date, it's for the benefit of exactly zero men I will encounter between home and said date.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 04:26 AM
1

My guess is they'd be standing stupidly like dogs at a closed door, waiting for you. Seems like it would be obvious that they expect it.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 04:03 AM
1

Well, that's kind of outdated -- especially on a business lunch not a date. I suspect if a woman was the sort who expected it, you could tell by her hovering beside the chair refusing to sit down. I have a male friend who refuses to go through doors when I open them (I live by the "s/he who gets there first holds it" rule that has nothing to do with the sex of the person holding or being held for). A lot of this shit needs to go by the wayside and be replaced by general good manners. /grumble
/r/MensRights31/07/13 04:01 AM
3

Go by the upvotes.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 03:54 AM
1

I'm going to regret this, but: what percentage of women do you think were on sinking boats vs. the 100% who couldn't vote, own land, etc.? Other than that, sure.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 03:43 AM
1

90 times? How is there even a baby left? How is this not attempted murder?
/r/MensRights27/07/13 05:50 PM
3

I'm looking for anything in your story that justifies: a very capable and qualified female Commander
/r/MensRights24/07/13 06:15 AM
9

Correct answer to ruin their night: You aren't that pretty. (Consider yourself forewarned: That will probably result in a whole world of tears and bitchiness -- it may not be worth it.)
/r/MensRights22/07/13 05:53 AM
3

I don't even get why they would do that. It's just weird. Why piss off your clientele?
/r/MensRights20/07/13 06:54 AM
1

Indeed. Or wait until you KNOW the person and make an informed decision.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 02:21 AM
2

And he's not? The whole concept of marriage needs to be rethought.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 02:19 AM
3

I tend to concur, and I'm female. I have yet to see anyone under 50 marry someone in a logical fashion. Love turns people into abject morons, and it just seems that that is not entering into a contract "of sound mind". It's a wonder that it EVER works.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 05:08 AM
3

Tight young snatch, you say? http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Crime/2013/06/19/20914246.html
/r/MensRights08/07/13 04:57 AM
11

You know, people also miscarry. If you marry someone strictly because she's pregnant, you are an idiot.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 04:32 AM
3

Parse Error.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 09:43 PM
2

"...it's just a man saying what men think women are really thinking..." FTFY
/r/MensRights06/07/13 07:46 PM
1

I was just thinking that we're talking about a hypothetical woman here, and already she's a bitch. Good luck getting any sane women to look twice at him. He's ONLY going to end up with a self-fulfilling prophecy.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 05:58 PM
-3

"Likely drawing less viewers" is something you are pulling out of your ass. If you can find stats saying that, I'll gladly give you the argument, but considering I, as a non-follower of the sport, can name four times as many current female players off the top of my head as I can name male players, I sincerely doubt you are right.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 05:52 PM
1

Innocent drunk yelly guy?
/r/MensRights06/07/13 05:32 AM
1

You've never taken a self-defense class, have you? That's a standard tactic.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 05:29 AM
1

I'm comparing the determination to see things change. Can you imagine where we'd be if throughout history people backed down because someone yelled at them?
/r/MensRights06/07/13 05:25 AM
4

And much like women don't know which man will turn out to be (not "turn into") a rapist, you can't possibly know which woman will turn out to be unduly paranoid.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 03:04 PM
-2

And that would prevent what from happening, exactly, if a guy was actually dangerous?
/r/MensRights05/07/13 03:01 PM
7

And even knowing that men are more likely to get injured would do what for her state of mind mid-incident? How is this relevant.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 02:59 PM
-1

Really? It has nothing to do with the current North American fear culture that there are terrorists and rapists behind every mailbox?
/r/MensRights05/07/13 02:57 PM
13

Yeah, random drunk guy on the street doesn't learn that this woman is paranoid from the first encounter and starts harassing her. Uh. WTF are you thinking? Oh yeah, DRUNK guy. Are you still drunk? Really, you post it on reddit so that others can commiserate? You'd have to be a complete doofus not to call him on this behaviour.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 02:55 PM
0

I'm with you. The Toronto Maple Leafs suck, but they still draw full capacity crowds and bring in the $$.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 02:46 PM
17

Not much of a secret considering it is the first additional result when you type his name in. One of the items leads to this article: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2227482/Russell-Joslin-Suicide-BBC-reporter-said-ex-Radio-1-DJ-Liz-Kershaw-threatened-aggressive-phone-calls.html
/r/MensRights05/07/13 02:38 PM
14

And in the sixties people trying to get rights for blacks were murdered. Maybe being yelled at isn't so bad.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 08:13 AM
3

Consent three hours ago isn't necessarily consent now. Trust me, there are a great many things a man can do to completely annihilate his appeal. Plus this article says she had passed out: http://www.pantagraph.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/bloomington-man-convicted-of-sexually-assaulting-woman/article_2d2e6e58-be95-11e2-b23a-001a4bcf887a.html
/r/MensRights05/07/13 07:52 AM
4

But that kinda stops at the point she passes out. At the VERY least, he should have waited until she came to. Finding it hard to sympathize here.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 07:47 AM
1

I go by "whoever invites, pays." It's what we do in business, and I see no reason why that shouldn't work just fine outside that scope. It especially works when you are inviting someone out who might be tight for cash at the moment; they don't have to worry about what they're ordering (within reason -- I don't know that I'd stay friends with someone who took advantage and ordered a lobster just because). I'm kind of annoyed when male friends (and strictly friends) refuse to honour that.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 05:28 AM
5

I'm female and I have thought that. I don't want kids, so I don't actually have to get on that hamster wheel.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 04:52 AM
1

I've never had a man tell me off for it, just take the door and refuse to go through. Many, many times.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 04:46 AM
1

I experience the same thing in reverse (men not going through when I hold it) so, it's not limited to women.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 06:55 AM
1

I'm with you. It's just a matter of not having been raised as a guttersnipe. If I get to the door first, I'll hold it. It does, however, annoy me when men refuse to go through first.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 06:54 AM
3

We've built an entire culture based on fear and this is only one facet of it. I'm not really sure how people can be told there are terrorists living next door every single day, and not start eyeing every person around themselves with suspicion. "Well, he doesn't look like a terrorist, maybe he's [this type of criminal] instead." It's a symptom of a very sick society, and heartbreaking that the response/outcome is to fracture community even further, which is exactly the goal. I'm not positing who…
/r/MensRights01/07/13 04:18 PM
2

So, which one treated you like a second class citizen? The retarded man or the bully? At least be consistent.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 04:07 PM
2

Can we analyze Cosmo articles too? Sheesh. The whole magazine is full of shit articles. Who reads it?
/r/MensRights01/07/13 03:59 PM
1

Did we even read the same thread? "Im not a baby sitter, and i dont have kids. Why the fuck should i baby sit some drunk irresponsible whore?" "I'm sick of this metaphor because it essentially turns any person that can't get it up without half a bottle of scotch into a rape fetishist." (which one of you needs the alcohol, exactly?) "But God help you if you suggest she shouldn't get drunk." "As the saying goes 'Bad planning on your part does not constitute and emergency on mine.'" And myriad more…
/r/MensRights20/06/13 04:02 AM
-1

Again, would it be better if the women in question are roofied? For the record, I have stopped drunk male friends from doing stupid shit -- it's called being a decent human being.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 04:59 AM
0

The car driver wasn't drunk, she was. And yes, it was her fault for getting drunk and getting in the car, which would have made exactly zero difference to me when they found her body the next day, which was a very likely outcome of her drunken decision. The point of the ad is that the (sober) people around can stop shitty situations from happening. Would it be different if she had been roofied? Is it okay to intervene then? Is there really a big fucking difference to how you as an observer would…
/r/MensRights16/06/13 04:57 AM
2

I've been wondering why any woman would want to have the ability to have a child a year for 60 years.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 04:27 PM
-2

I lost 15lbs rapidly once (due to depression) and the third glass of wine in as many hours hit me like a freaking truck where usually I was fine with that amount. So yes, you can get unintentionally drunk. Also, as a woman who GOT IN THE CAR WITH a drunk friend because I couldn't get her not to, and we got taken down a back road, and who managed to talk us out of the situation (even though I was ready to strangle him with my purse strap as the only other way out), I don't feel a whole lot of sym…
/r/MensRights15/06/13 04:23 PM
4

Reasonable women pick up Cosmo once when they are 14 and don't buy it again.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 02:14 PM
1

I had a coworker who absolutely refused to go through a door before a woman. Which was really irritating when I got to the door first, and as is my habit, held it for whoever is with me (e.g. him). He would just flat out refuse. Sometimes, he would appear out of nowhere when women would approach a door, just to open it for her. (Don't ask me; I have no idea where he'd be hiding or why he felt compelled to do it.) He wasn't going through said door, either. Now, I'm sure he thought it was charming…
/r/MensRights11/02/13 11:09 PM
1

So, you prefer women with no self-esteem. Good to know.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 11:01 PM
5

Yeah, I smell troll (which is ramping up my snark) but anyway... Those things that are playing over and over in your mind? Those are about strangers, say, on the subway. Those women, they're the ones you have no right to blah blah blah, they're not objects for your amusement, they're simply on their way somewhere. This woman MARRIED YOU. She clearly is into you. How do you know? SHE MARRIED YOU. Here's the difference: Me - you don't get to ask for sex. Your wife - probably expecting it at some p…
/r/MensRights29/01/13 07:11 AM
2

Yeah, I was thinking that too. "Shouldn't they be happy about this?"
/r/MensRights29/01/13 06:47 AM
13

So, she decides to take him out and gets hurt as a result. I'm sorry, I'm supposed to feel sorry for her WHY exactly?
/r/MensRights29/01/13 06:27 AM
8

I don't get why people are arguing which is more wrong. Wrong is wrong, degree doesn't matter. It's not like it's a zero sum game; they're completely independent acts. It's not like by having more of one, there will be fewer of the other. There can be a state where there is NONE of either -- and that ought to be the target. They're both wrong. The End.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 07:48 PM
5

Frankly, telling most men that they have "male privilege" would be like Oprah telling poor white people in the Appalachians that they have "white privilege". While it is absolutely a legitimate phenomenon, it is not something they are going to recognize as benefiting them directly. Sure, there are things that they won't get hampered from doing strictly because of their race, but those are typically things they aren't going to get within a mile of experiencing anyway, so they cannot recognize thi…
/r/MensRights27/01/13 05:38 PM
6

Yeah, it says "encouraged to apply" not "are the only ones eligible".
/r/MensRights25/01/13 07:45 AM
1

Actually, on second reading, perhaps they are well-matched. "I probably pushed her while trying to grab the wallet, but I don't remember very clearly." Yeah and there's a big gaping hole at the beginning of this tale that makes me wonder what other details are being left out. She should not have hit him - AT ALL - but my spidey sense is tingling.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 07:30 AM
2

I am just stuck on why men marry women like this. Or, for that matter, why women marry the dickheads they do. Or, fundamentally, how women like that don't end up with some of the jackasses (male) that are out there so they are evenly matched. People aren't gremlins -- they don't magically turn into a whole other species with the flip of a switch. You've gotta see signs of this stuff long before it gets to this point. Please tell me this dude is getting a divorce.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 07:22 AM
0

I was wondering about that too, and then I found this article that clarified, sort of (on page 2): http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/55373764-78/achane-adoption-bland-child.html.csp He's still a jerk in my books (really, you can't call your pregnant wife for weeks at a shot?) but at least it wasn't four months before he bothered to inquire, and he was still holding up what he thought was his end of the bargain. She gave birth 2 weeks early (which, frankly, he should have been in touch enough to …
/r/MensRights09/01/13 04:54 PM
2

Canada does not.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 07:21 AM
3

Oh, trust me, I have a fair number of female friends who do this. Earlier I made a comment about not dating the same woman over and over (in different bodies) because I have told those female friends that they need to stop dating the same guy over and over. I think part of the problem is that the men who are hearing "this time I want to meet a nice guy" are chasing the women who say that -- who only say it because they date assholes. I think if you actually have to say it out loud, rather than t…
/r/MensRights09/01/13 06:30 AM
2

I'm going to get severely burned for this but here goes: There is a world of difference between a genuinely kind and caring man, and a "nice guy". For starters, every man I've met who has used that phrase to describe himself has caused me to wonder who told him that. I could tell myself (and you) that I'm hotter than Raquel Welch in 1968, but that wouldn't make it true. Genuinely caring and awesome men are still perfectly capable of standing up for themselves, and don't put their own desires on …
/r/MensRights08/01/13 11:24 PM
3

Argh. No there aren't steps that are going to work with all women ever all the time. Women are people. People are complex. Not only do the same things not appeal to the different women, it may not appeal to the same woman at two different times in two different sets of circumstances. Need a specific example? I had a bf who once insisted on doing this thing with his tongue when we kissed that did zero for me, but apparently his last gf went wild over it.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 07:47 PM
1

I would agree, except we have countless examples of articles, TV shows, advice columns, and women themselves telling men that there are "steps" to getting a date. Yeah. Does it involve buying 10 DVDs and taking a weekend course? Did you find it in the back of a comic book? (and I say that as a huge fan of comics currently awaiting the new issue of the Dr Who-Star Trek crossover) You're being ripped off, the same way that when you call the 967 numbers, it's not the playboy bunny on the commercial…
/r/MensRights08/01/13 07:42 PM
3

We've had years of conditioning to watch for signs in women. There isn't a shortage of messages raising awareness of the issue in women. There is a dearth of messages getting the word out about males (of all ages) being at risk.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 08:27 AM
8

Especially since he has no man bits.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 05:36 AM
6

Well, in this case I'm going to have to go with the fact that it's countering very common misconceptions -- the publicity is around women and their problems with self esteem, probably going back to Karen Carpenter blowing the lid off it. Sometimes you really do need to focus on one sex.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 05:34 AM
1

The weird thing about reading this thread is it appears that certain men think that if someone sneaks into my apartment, climbs on top of me, pins me down, and whatever, I'm not supposed to yell "rape" until what, there's penetration? He ejaculates? At what point in their minds does unwanted sex become rape?
/r/MensRights07/01/13 07:54 AM
1

Realistically, as a female, I think I'd expect women to listen when I told them such a thing, not so sure a guy would. I think I'd have to figure out a way to spill the drink rather than just randomly approach him. (My first thought was ask the bartender to replace the drink and make sure it doesn't come off as random floozie buying him a drink. That could just end up in a drama that would take too long and may or may not succeed. Whereas spilling it, kinda ends it.)
/r/MensRights06/01/13 09:36 PM
1

The more you do to hair, the more it's going to cost. The base, on the other hand, should be the base, male or female. I know men with frosted tips (than dog that boy band hair is going) and all manner of special techniques used. I'm not comparing a military style buzz cut with coming in with a photo of whatever celebrity and asking for that look. I'm talking trim vs trim, we pay more. Afro vs Afro -- sans stuff being shaved into the side. Males who play sports are definitely at risk of injury -…
/r/MensRights06/01/13 06:36 AM
1

Do people actually have a choice, if it comes down to it? If you want health insurance (I'm Canadian, less relevant here), you pay for it.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 06:24 AM
-3

We already regularly pay more for haircuts, dry cleaning (call it a "blouse" not a "shirt" -- even out of the same fabric -- and it's nearly twice the price? really?), and a host of other services. If the actuarial tables worked out to paying more, women would. And not going to the doctor for annual check ups just means conditions are farther along when they're discovered, so not really a saving when they're more expensive to treat.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 04:50 AM
1

I'm so with you. I think marriage should be thrown completely out of the realm of the legal and back into the social/religious. If you want to declare a beneficiary/dependent, it should have nothing to do with whether or not you're having sex with them. If you want to declare to the world that you are going to love someone forever, it should have nothing to do with getting tax breaks. If you want to sponsor someone coming into the country and are willing to front the $$ and go through whatever o…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 04:33 AM
3

Not just harpies. I don't want kids, and when you don't want kids, that whole husband/marriage thing is not so appealing. What's wacky is I'm perfectly fine with imperfect arrangements in dating, right up until the marriage proposal. (There've been several -- I'm old ;-) I could probably have stayed in at least two of those relationships indefinitely, and possibly forever, had the word "forever" not actually been injected into the mix. Suddenly all the little things I'm usually willing to overlo…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 04:28 AM
0

Meh. You know how in the 60s men were criticized for having long hair and the only people who could make it stop was men growing their hair out and saying "fuck it" until the stick-up-the-ass sort got used to it and shut the hell up? And how the only people who could make it acceptable for wearing pants was the sort of women who said "fuck it" and wore pants until the stick-up-the-ass population got used to it and got over it? Well if you want to wear a skirt, you're just going to have to get a …
/r/MensRights05/01/13 03:57 AM
7

This is going to end in divorce sooner or later. It may as well be sooner, for the sake of his sanity.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 12:43 AM
3

L'enfer, c'est les autres.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 11:29 PM
3

Can we be honest, here? People who game the system are assholes, male and female. If you go to a landlord discussion site, you'll hear stories about nightmare tenants who destroy property and hold out to the last possible second, going from place to place doing the same thing over and over again. The sort of person who would do what the OP talked about is the sort of person who would use whatever other tools are at hand (including the law) to abuse you. It's not the exclusive domain of women -- …
/r/MensRights04/01/13 10:56 PM
2

I dunno. I see the "8 Zillion Reasons Beer is Better than Women" thing all the time and am not particularly concerned about it. Kinda wish it were on t-shirts, then I could tell who the lushes are at a glance. ;-)
/r/MensRights04/01/13 07:03 AM
1

24/7? People notice it in coworkers -- which is a much less intimate situation.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 03:49 PM
1

I've been seriously angry with people, and never would I have taken it out on an ex's pet. You have to have it in you to do that to an animal, in order to do that to an animal, as it were. I could see killing a rabbit if I were starving and it came down to it, but out of spite, nope. This is a far cry from chopping all his ties in half or something else involving and inanimate object.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 05:53 AM
7

I don't find the concept acceptable whether it is males or females doing it. It'll get hacked and there will be all sorts of whining.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 05:17 AM
3

You become a sociopath (antisocial personality disorder) through socialization, and reading his latest post, sounds like she meets at least three of these. Callous unconcern for the feelings of others; Gross and persistent attitude of irresponsibility and disregard for social norms, rules, and obligations; Incapacity to maintain enduring relationships, though having no difficulty in establishing them; Very low tolerance to frustration and a low threshold for discharge of aggression, including vi…
/r/MensRights03/01/13 04:46 AM
5

Yeah, depending on how bad the person I am with is behaving, I may or may not suddenly have to go feed my dog (I don't have a dog), but I'm certainly not going to be available in the future. It's not all about how sweet the person is towards YOU, you have to watch how they interact with people they don't think are important. I have the same policy about racist jokes and anything else that gives away how they interact with the world.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 04:41 AM
4

Oh great, his kids are with her. Surely this has got to level the playing field.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 04:22 AM
2

I think the whole damned population needs to be better informed about personality disorders and the seemingly sudden prevalence of them. Parents should be getting their kids help rather than ignoring the dead animal skull collection.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 03:52 AM
13

Sure, people's taste in books and movies might change. People may evolve or read something that inspires them to seek a new career or life path. They do not wake up psychopaths, though, unless there is a head injury or something else physical and obvious.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 03:48 AM
2

Because criminalizing the selling has been so successful in the past? Seems like a reasonable thing to try at least.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 02:45 AM
36

I have to ask it, even though it's going to get me downvoted to shit -- if it makes any difference, I have the same question of women who are in the same position. How the hell do you end up married to someone who would do this? She's a fucking monster -- anyone who would take out their anger on a helpless animal is. People DO NOT just wake up this horrible randomly one morning. This is not something they can hide. There are signs. It may not be the MacDonald triad, but there are signs nonethele…
/r/MensRights03/01/13 02:40 AM
2

Oh ferfuxache. I'm fairly feminist-leaning, and it annoys me to no end when this shit is what bogs people down rather than actually making a plan of action to move forward. (That goes for the Mens Rights Movement too -- do you want to sit and bitch about stupid stuff, or do you want to get shit done?) Nice that this woman felt alienated by Tolkien, but that's hardly all women. Hell, a few years ago my (then) 15 yr old cousin got tickets to the LotR musical for his birthday, and he took me -- his…
/r/MensRights31/12/12 09:01 PM
3

I hope she lives in terror of this coming to light every single day. And I hope one day it does.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 05:32 AM
1

Something stopping you from protesting? Someone has to start it -- why make it someone else' problem? Make a facebook event and invite people. That's how I've ended up at the last several protests I've attended.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 04:50 AM
0

You realize you aren't making a very good case for giving men custody or even the strength of the nuclear family, right? You might want to reserve blaming things on single mothers to cases where the father was actually out of the picture.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 02:58 PM
7

They got divorced in 2009. So a dad's influence up to the teen years counts for nothing?
/r/MensRights28/12/12 08:02 AM
1

That's in the "Even if" bit, which I took to be about disputing that there is a whole subset of people celebrating her freedom, and that subset correlates to some group of feminists. Simply put, no matter whether for the usual reason or that loopy one, most people are not glad she's free.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 06:31 AM
2

"Put on your big girl panties" is the closest equivalent I've heard.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 09:18 PM
1

Hrm. I never imagined myself agreeing with someone named "Cockpuncher". Unless you truly are prepared for the possibility that as she moves into freedom with you, she might discover freedom from you as well.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 08:40 PM
1

Except she wasn't arguing with you, she had already agreed with the premise. You thought it was an argument for your own reasons. And since I am also female, you'll probably take this as an argument too, even though I think she deserves an additional penalty for domestic assault. Anyone, male or female, who assaults their partner deserves an aggravated charge because it is even worse than assaulting a stranger.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 08:27 PM
1

Some people opt not to hit others because they weren't raised by wolves -- you know, just because they're decent people. But if you need the deterrent, that works too, I guess.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 06:49 PM
17

Are these reasonable terms on her part at all? Not in the least. You know how MRAs get angry when other people ask them how they ended up with the sort of women who would do the shit they do without seeing any signs? Well here's a big RED FLAG. Don't ignore it.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 04:49 PM
2

Seriously. And the fact it doesn't even list sites that are, frankly, sausagefests, really invalidates the entire thing.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 07:44 AM
1

Out of curiosity, do you think the creepy ones REALIZE they're creepy? I've got to assume they aren't all doing it intentionally? (Not that I'm arguing that what you've said is false -- more of an addendum than a counterpoint.)
/r/MensRights09/06/12 07:36 PM
2

Coworkers? Depends how creepy/random the approach is. It never ceases to amaze me how men want to effectively jump straight to "let's get drinks and hop into bed" bypassing saying "hi" a few times and getting women's radar. I'm not sure how someone can fail at saying, "Hi." Hi -> conversation -> grab lunch -> if apparently interested, then ask out. Unless you are super-hot, in which case you can probably jump straight to the drunken sex. Edit: I take that back. I can think of a particular person…
/r/MensRights16/05/12 08:06 PM
1

I'm confused. Why do you all seem to think it is better to ignore it than, say, keep a closer eye on the situation or ask the player if there is an issue? Do we have to jump immediately to "call the cops"? Do you guys have no concept of middle ground at all? When dealing with kids, isn't it better to err on the side of caution than have Graham James running around?
/r/MensRights16/05/12 04:56 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter