TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

pastel-forest Archive

View 3 posts and 150 comments by pastel-forest on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Sorry I'm not clear on what the double standard is in this case specifically
/r/MensRights26/09/21 08:59 AM
-1

Would you not be working anyway? Like we're you just going to have those 18 years off work?
/r/MensRights22/09/21 02:39 AM
2

If abortion was universally legal, free, accessable and destigmatized, this could work. You would also have to figure out how to manage the many cases where women don't know they are pregnant until they are in their third trimester or even actively in labor, which happens a lot.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 02:36 AM
0

If you genuinely believe that, why not live as a woman?
/r/MensRights22/09/21 02:33 AM
2

The state will end up financially supporting the child, so you will be paying for it anyway. You just lose out on a relationship with your child.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 02:31 AM
2

Women hold all the power? I seem to remember that a man has to be involved at some point during conception. Plus there are plenty of states where abortion is functionally not legal.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 02:28 AM
1

May be a dumb question, but why get married if you're afraid of doing so?
/r/MensRights12/07/21 03:48 AM
1

I thought you guys were the ones who wanted women to be the primary caregivers. Sexes are different but equal right?
/r/MensRights07/05/20 09:10 AM
3

Is there an example of someone going to jail because they can't pay? Curious to know more.
/r/MensRights08/04/20 07:06 AM
2

If the woman is looking after the child it makes sense that she would not have time to work to provide for the child. In cases where the parent is out of work, they do not go to jail. Sentences are only handed out for people that willfully ignore court orders, despite having the resources to pay for child support.
/r/MensRights08/04/20 12:12 AM
3

Well if not supporting the mothers, do you think children should at least deserve healthcare, education and housing etc?
/r/MensRights07/04/20 10:51 PM
18

Then the state would end up paying instead.
/r/MensRights07/04/20 06:11 AM
-5

No it's the other way around. It's not all traditional masculine behaviours. It's certain trad masc behaviours that are antisocial or cause social issues
/r/MensRights28/08/17 04:19 PM
3

At least where I live, even if the wife wanted to stay home if is no longer financially viable due the cost of living.
/r/MGTOW25/08/17 02:07 AM
2

And what about the number raised by single dads?
/r/MGTOW25/08/17 02:02 AM
2

Doesn't that make you a slut, and your wife a loser if you go through with it?
/r/MarriedRedPill17/05/17 03:39 PM
2

Totally agree
/r/MensRights08/05/17 09:27 AM
2

A plan by who?
/r/MensRights28/03/17 02:02 PM
1

If you're a kindhearted person with a good personality and social skills you probably don't have to worry about someone just marrying you for money.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 02:12 AM
1

Single men can also adopt/ use a surrogate and receive welfare for their child
/r/MensRights07/11/16 08:15 PM
1

test becker
/r/MensRights07/11/16 08:14 PM
0

It's only weighted against men because they tend to make more money. As far as I'm aware it's not a gendered law. If you think prenups don't work why are they still extremely popular? Why would anybody bother if they were always thrown out.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 08:10 PM
1

I'm not sure what legislative change you want to make here. We already have prenups which are totally legal and acceptable. Do you want to stop people of a certain wealth level from being able to marry without one?
/r/MensRights07/11/16 07:59 PM
2

Just write a goddamn prenup and it can be any percentage you want
/r/MensRights07/11/16 07:58 PM
4

Then don't get married, or sign a prenup. Nobody is forcing men into this.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 07:56 PM
1

Men could use an egg donor/ surrogate though.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 11:07 PM
1

Exactly
/r/MensRights06/11/16 11:04 PM
4

It's not like men are obligated to donate sperm. In Australia you don't even get paid for doing it so there's no financial incentive
/r/MensRights06/11/16 12:58 PM
20

Yeah I guess the rights of the child outweighed the rights of the donor, I can see how that logic could eventually apply to child support payments :/ typically I think children of sperm donors already have two legal guardians (either gay couple or infertile heterosexual couple) so I hope it's not too much of an issue.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 11:14 AM
18

I see your point. I guess hopefully this would be stipulated in a contract. But it could affect men who have already donated
/r/MensRights06/11/16 11:08 AM
5

This is in Australia
/r/MensRights06/11/16 11:07 AM
176

I don't think there's any legal precedent for having to pay child support this way.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 09:49 AM
3

This could benefit women too really. What's that saying that goes like "if you're not paying for a service, you're the product"? Yeah no thanks.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 09:47 AM
1

Is it based on gender or attractiveness too? I know some places do have the blanket male/female cover charges or is it one of those places where only hot girls get in free?
/r/MensRights06/11/16 09:44 AM
0

Most workplaces are rigid structured environments
/r/MensRights11/10/16 07:40 AM
1

So why don't you or some other men do something about it
/r/MensRights11/10/16 07:37 AM
1

Women are like this too, just not around men. 'Your shoes cost $100? Mine cost $150','you work 40 hours a week? I work 80!', 'you're a size 8? I'm a size 4'
/r/MensRights11/10/16 07:35 AM
2

Yeah sorry my bad, forced was too strong of a word. I guess I was meaning that they got pregnant so couldn't go into high powered careers but it's still a choice. Thanks for that info :)
/r/MensRights07/10/16 04:11 AM
2

Someone correct me if I'm wrong but I had thought that the number of GRADUATES (not accepted students) was equal- a lot of women drop out of college or never persue a career in their field, one reason for that is having to become a housewife/mother.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 12:37 AM
14

DV industry..?
/r/MensRights05/10/16 10:10 AM
1

In the sense that a women will hit less hard than a man would.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 01:15 AM
2

That's true. And the pain men suffer shouldn't be swept under the rug. But one of the core tenements of men's rights is accepting the physical differences between men and woman (which is contrary to some feminism). Men and women have different physical strengths and abilities to withstand a hit. A man at full force is going to do a lot more damage to a woman than the average woman could do to a man.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 01:24 PM
-3

If you hit them back just as hard it's all fair, but most women can't hit that hard (relative to a man)
/r/MensRights28/09/16 12:33 PM
1

It looks like he was hit from the front or side?
/r/MensRights28/09/16 12:31 PM
-6

Awww... You're no fun ;) get your logic out of here!
/r/MensRights05/09/16 02:55 PM
3

Excellent observation
/r/MensRights01/09/16 12:12 PM
0

Charities keep records of donations you know.
/r/MensRights21/08/16 02:16 AM
0

I don't why she'd make up something that can be very easily disproven
/r/MensRights20/08/16 12:57 PM
0

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2016/aug/18/amber-heard-donates-divorce-settlement-charity-abused-women?CMP=fb_gu So what if it was made 2 months ago? Just goes to show that you made a totally incorrect assumption.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 11:32 AM
1

What evidence do you have that she is a gold digger? If it was about the money, why did she donate it all to charity immediately after receiving it?
/r/MensRights19/08/16 05:11 AM
0

I don't see what gold digging has to do with it, she donated half of the settlement to a children's hospital and the other half to the American Civil Liberties Union
/r/MensRights19/08/16 05:10 AM
1

She literally donated 100% of what she won to charity.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 05:09 AM
1

Most women aren't either luckily.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 07:20 PM
0

Yeah. I'd like to think this photo is also seen as bullying, it's a little cruel.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 02:57 PM
2

Can't men pull the same thing? She was staring at my manly parts, it's a hate crime because I was harassed for my gender?
/r/MensRights14/08/16 01:19 PM
8

It's completely shallow, but I think it might have a lot to do with attractiveness (as well as gender). The kind of dudes publicly rubbing themselves on a fat girl at a party probably aren't going to be conventionally attractive as these girls are. Like if it were ridiculously attractive guys and woman that was miles below their league, it would probably be considered funny. By most people anyway. But I see where you're coming from.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 01:14 PM
0

What stake do the mods have in it though? Why would they do it?
/r/MensRights07/08/16 06:13 AM
1

I think the fact she's going after it is more indicative of her own flaws rather than being a fair representative of all women. There's no way the court will accept that, if it did I'd be outraged b cause that is a clear gendered bias, but plenty of insane people make legal claims, because of the kind of people they are, not because of their gender, race etc
/r/MensRights04/07/16 10:55 PM
2

what's concern troll?
/r/MensRights04/07/16 02:45 PM
1

that's completely fair yeah but I mean it's not about systematic oppression against men it's about an individually terrible person
/r/MensRights04/07/16 02:45 PM
6

Males often do it too, 'she was asking for it', 'she seduced me' etc. Assholes in both genders.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 07:23 AM
-12

Is this a men's rights issue? If it was a black man trying to get the money from a white woman, you couldn't assume it was because of their demographic. There is equal numbers of awful people within both genders. I'm fairly certain the court won't rule in her favour anyway.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 07:21 AM
1

Interesting, thanks for that.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 10:52 PM
1

What is the social flow of resources you're talking about?
/r/MensRights22/06/16 12:13 AM
1

If I'm putting on makeup and dressing nicely because I'm going to work or to a party, that doesn't mean I want harassed on the way. Your argument there doesn't even work because women get harassed even while wearing no makeup and baggy clothes. Wouldn't it be easier just for men to stop verballing harassing women? Why does that trump women's right to not be harassed? Also, I am aware not all men are are dangerous, but ones who go out of there way to talk to you when you're clearly busy are obvio…
/r/MensRights22/06/16 12:04 AM
1

Agreed, studies in that area would be valuable.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 02:45 PM
1

I would disagree with that dichotomy, I'm all for ending violence against men, and don't know any feminists myself that would actively encourage violence against anyone.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 01:02 PM
2

Good point
/r/MensRights21/06/16 09:57 AM
11

Not sure what this has to do with men's rights. Wouldn't touch this case with a ten foot pole if I were you.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 04:58 AM
1

Women wouldn't mind being treated nice, offered sex etc. The problem is people can't handle rejection, and become violent when women say no. This is why they would rather not deal with creepers at all. Celebrities have security, so there's less danger, and also it comes with their job, they basically get paid to do it.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 04:56 AM
3

I agree with the sentiment that avoiding pointing out the flaws of other cultures or religions for fear of being called racist is weak. If your arguments are good enough and you make logical steps, you should be fine. One thing that irks me about the feminist movement is the ladder of oppression (brown= oppressed) that oversimplifies societal and political structures, like the ones seen in the middle east right now. I'm with you all there. Apart from that, how do you actually expect feminists in…
/r/MensRights21/06/16 04:49 AM
4

Check out the Armchair psychologist over here. Had nothing to do with blacks not having access to education or publicity of their views, right?
/r/MensRights21/06/16 04:39 AM
1

I think the article says it well itself actually. IS is not just oppressive to women, but to any man who opposes their ideology too. Doesn't really make sense to go in there to save one gender over the other, I see it as a human rights issue not a feminist issue.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 04:37 AM
-1

I would respectfully disagree that women have equal treatment in western society (not saying of course men are above women in every regard, men face many gendered challenges too). For example, fair maternity leave, abortion rights, treatment to do with prosecuted rape cases (many rape kits are never tested), street harassment, higher rates of sexual assault all need to be addressed domestically. I agree that international problems need to be addressed too. But it's hard to think about how you wo…
/r/MensRights21/06/16 04:32 AM
2

unlike feminists, we are trying to sort out our shit in the west first. Sorry but can you clarify here? You're disagreeing with the idea that feminists should operate internationally but also domestically. Where do you think they should be exactly?
/r/MensRights21/06/16 03:42 AM
2

Doesn't fit the extreme men's rights narrative
/r/MensRights21/06/16 03:03 AM
2

Agreed, plenty of young men getting radicalised, just as sad.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 03:02 AM
1

I have heard a few stories like that, there we're not feminists though, iirc they were young teenage girls who got manipulated into joining. Don't think many women are going there for real ideological reasons.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 12:37 AM
3

I have heard a few stories like that, there we're not feminists though, iirc they were young teenage girls who got manipulated into joining. Don't think many women are going there for real ideological reasons.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 12:37 AM
0

There are plenty of Islamic feminists tackling their own societal and cultural problems. Self determination is extremely important and it's not for western feminists to barge in when they haven't lived the culture and don't understand it. it's not like radical Islamic leaders are even going to begin to listen to females anyway, you're setting them up for an impossible task. By the same logic, why aren't men's rights activists taking on radical Islam, where I'm sure there are some ideas you won't…
/r/MensRights21/06/16 12:09 AM
12

What Exodus of women to the west to join the Islamic state? I've heard of more men going to join IS than women.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 12:03 AM
1

That's awesome, congratulations! What's your field of interest? I bet the males in your course must have really wanted to be there given they are going against the grain. I know plenty of females who are in the area just because they think they have to be, or because they don't intend to get particularly high marks, and will enter social work or human resource management. Nothing wrong with those careers but they don't necessitate top class academic achievement.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 01:26 PM
1

That is in Sweden, correct? Teaching isn't as female dominated there, it's a very respected career and not just seen as women's work. I know personally that there are male centric scholarships for things like teaching, nursing at my university. I think men should also be encouraged into fields like sociology and psychology (I say that as a female psych undergrad) because it's overly dominated by females. Not sure if men have been systematically discouraged from these jobs by women though, or the…
/r/MensRights14/06/16 12:45 PM
2

They do exist for fields where men aren't the majority, like nursing and teaching
/r/MensRights14/06/16 08:12 AM
1

Thanks for clearing that up :)
/r/MensRights04/06/16 04:11 PM
2

Lol considering how much bisexual men are accused of actually being gay and the stigma around it, you might be in the wrong subreddit
/r/MensRights04/06/16 04:11 PM
2

What has she done to be called a gold digger? Sorry if I'm missing something
/r/MensRights04/06/16 04:10 PM
2

Thought she was bisexual not a lesbian but I could be wrong.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 06:10 AM
3

I thought it hadn't gone through the courts? Didn't the judge grant her an AVO?
/r/MensRights04/06/16 06:10 AM
1

Thats for this list man, a very interesting read. Appreciate the fact checking
/r/MensRights04/06/16 04:26 AM
2

What are the tax benefits?
/r/MensRights04/06/16 04:22 AM
5

I'm all for calling out Heard's potentially manipulative behaviour IF she is found to not be a victim of abuse. Until then, why come to any conclusion? Men's rights are important but there's a big issue of being taken seriously. Using terms like gold-digger, crazy and rug-muncher is sinking to the level of "all men are pigs" sjw idiots. Edit: she donated all her money gained from the settlement to charity but keep saying she's a gold digger, ok
/r/MensRights04/06/16 04:20 AM
2

What do you mean by rug-muncher?
/r/MensRights04/06/16 04:17 AM
1

yeah, I think that's in the best interests of the children.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 03:56 PM
1

It's an interesting idea though. I mean the mother can relinquish care of the child at any point, so shouldn't the father have the same right? In that he could just stop paying child support whenever he wants. Isn't that the same as when the child is born, the mother has the right to give it up for adoption and the father should have the right to give up monetary support.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 12:51 PM
2

I appreciate your honesty chicken-mcfuckit :) haha
/r/MensRights29/05/16 12:49 PM
2

do you have a stat on custody allocation that takes into account gender differences in choice of actually wanting the children? I've seen that men are awarded custody less frequently but some of that is down to their personal preferences. The same reason why the wage gap exists, because of gendered choices.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 12:25 PM
2

for one thing the guys who can afford to pay can also afford lawyers. In australia at least i know that child support can be agreed upon by the parents and the law doesn't need to intervene. Which has both positives and negatives.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 06:00 AM
1

That's ridiculous that it doesn't change based on income. damn
/r/MensRights29/05/16 05:31 AM
5

Question that is a bit tougher: my dad stopped paying child support for my sister and I for the reason that he had to take care of his new family. He pretty much fit into the stereotype of these welfare moms, bragging on Fb about expensive things he's bought, getting a new phone, new car, holiday every year etc. Its not like my sister and I were an accidental pregnancy, we were a family and my mom and dad were married for 8 years, and we have a relationship with my dad. So do you think he has th…
/r/MensRights29/05/16 01:44 AM
-3

Also agree. My dad owes thousands in child support and spends it on new phones, new cars, new big screen TVs, holidays. He's definitely not in jail
/r/MensRights29/05/16 01:40 AM
3

Isn't child support calculated as a % of your income? So it should be a reasonable amount. If you're unemployed you don't have to pay. Can someone explain it? I'm not from the states sorry :)
/r/MensRights29/05/16 01:35 AM
1

Where does 'whore' even come into it, honestly? The language used in this thread is astounding. Plenty of reasonable people but still those who couldn't care less what the story is about, just chomping at the bit to call women whores, bitches, worthless gold diggers. Its a disgusting rhetoric that makes mra's seem not better than sjw's who say all men are pigs, rapists etc. There is a place in men's rights for reasonable intelligent debate. One of the same issues I see brought up again and again…
/r/MensRights29/05/16 01:26 AM
1

Thats what he signed up for when he married her. Its easy enough to get a prenup.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 03:43 PM
2

if your wife abused you would you not want some kind of compensation? Especially knowing Depp is a celebrity and will likely get off easily.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 11:53 AM
3

You make some good points there I appreciate your response. I guess my issue is that people are necessarily jumping to conclusions before all the evidence is laid out.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 09:03 AM
0

We both know that's a ridiculous thing to ask, but for one, Depp hasn't denied it and she was granted an AVO
/r/MensRights28/05/16 08:44 AM
7

Her statement that he abused her. Previous partners statements that he was an abusive alcoholic. Physical markings of violence. What evidence do you have that supports the fact he never abused her.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 08:21 AM
4

I don't know what to think either way yet, could go either way. But it's disgusting to assume she's just a whore or a scammer simply for reporting (alleged) abuse. If the allegations are true, what is she supposed to do? Everyone is going to label her a gold digger anyway, what are the options for a someone who has a rich spouse to report abuse without being shamed for it.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 08:11 AM
1

Perhaps the are referring to themselves or comments they received? For example I would expect the n-word would be tweeted out more by black people but that doesn't mean black people are more racist.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 07:57 AM
1

What evidence do you have to make a conclusion either way? Especially when his ex partners have said he was abusive and an alcoholic, even when they have nothing to gain from that statement
/r/MensRights28/05/16 07:37 AM
-4

Didn't he abuse her? Maybe not the best example to use for men's rights. Especially if the court rules that it was abuse, this will reflect badly on men's rights.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 07:14 AM
-1

This isn't r/whiterights buddy
/r/MensRights27/05/16 02:45 AM
-1

If you can't surpass someone that's being systemically discriminated against for generations, whose first language isn't English or whose parents were immigrants, maybe work a little harder. You don't deserve anything handed to you because you had all the privileges and gave a mediocre effort.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 11:54 PM
2

I've seen plenty of outrage over that, ESPECIALLY from women. But there's nothing to be discussed there. She is a vile human, no one disagrees. Here there's room for debate and conversation, there's value in discussing it.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 12:59 AM
-42

Many Schumer fans aren't feminist.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 12:09 AM
-8

does that take into account the amount of time women spend time with children vs men? Or the fact that women are primary caregivers and have more access to children?
/r/MensRights17/04/16 11:30 AM
1

In America white people commit more acts of terrorism than Muslims....
/r/MensRights15/04/16 10:16 AM
-1

No... there is no element of fear or judgement by gender at the barber. Unlike the gym
/r/MensRights15/04/16 10:15 AM
-5

It's not like men commit more sexual assaults, is it? It's not about not liking the group, it's about feeling safe.
/r/MensRights15/04/16 07:13 AM
-4

Unless you not being able to look at women while you're at the gym a 'punishment', I don't see what you mean? Just go to another gym?
/r/MensRights15/04/16 07:12 AM
0

sure, i have no problem with male-only gyms.
/r/MensRights15/04/16 07:10 AM
-22

Wouldn't need them if there weren't men who either go to the gym to leer or make gross comments at women. Or worse.
/r/MensRights15/04/16 12:36 AM
3

But women should also be able to buy cheap no-fuss underwear man, its not things 24/7.
/r/MensRights15/04/16 12:35 AM
0

Why would you be afraid of women?
/r/MensRights06/04/16 01:13 AM
2

I don't know a single person who would consider this normal. The people doing it don't consider it normal, they are doing it because the know it's outlandish.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 04:03 AM
2

Why do you think that is?
/r/MensRights13/03/16 06:55 AM
1

By the same merit, should men in college feel as though they can't get ever get drunk?
/r/MensRights04/11/15 02:00 PM
11

...was the judge a feminist? how are you blaming feminism for this.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 03:27 PM
7

You clearly didn't read the article and jumped to conclusions. It was the father trying to get him circumsised, the mother was trying to protect him.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 12:47 PM
1

that would be me :)
/r/MensRights29/05/13 12:24 PM
1

great :) sent you a PM
/r/MensRights26/05/13 02:24 PM
1

why not?
/r/MensRights26/05/13 09:34 AM
1

so...A license to sex. And how many parents of 15 year old's would not allow them to take that test anyway, so it would still be rape.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 01:33 AM
1

I know they don't always lack the capacity, age, it's just an oversimplified way of measuring capacity to consent. I completely agree it's a flawed system but it's not practical to evaluate directly the cognition of a person each time prior to them engaging in sex.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 04:24 PM
1

I think it's not so much physical development as mental
/r/MensRights20/04/13 02:47 PM
1

well in the UK, it's 16 which is where this is from. What would you suggest as an alternative?
/r/MensRights20/04/13 02:00 PM
1

You raise a good point, and we can't assume either way.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:49 PM
1

So if one party is under 18, as long as the other person is within say 4 years then it's ok in the eyes of the law. It could work I think the '18' rule just tries to over simplify the process for everyone.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:46 PM
-2

but it means a varied cognitive ability and the fact that she doesn't have the ability to give consent byt legal definition.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:34 PM
0

But this was in the UK, not USA. They have to draw the line somewhere, though I agree punishment is too severe.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:33 PM
1

where do you suggest drawing the line instead? At what ages??
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:32 PM
-6

I'm 17 and I would honestly consider it statutory 'rape'. It's kind of a situation where you have to draw the line somewhere. They probably shouldn't have been having sex if there was that musch distrust between them anyway
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:30 PM
1

ok, I didn't assume this was in the US. In a lot of countries the age of consent is 16
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:28 PM
1

18 isn't the legal age of consent, it's 16.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 10:43 AM
-23

how were you not guilty?
/r/MensRights20/04/13 10:42 AM
5

Brilliant!
/r/MensRights26/12/12 03:02 AM
3

Yes! Thank you. This makes great comparisons.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 03:01 AM
6

I've hesitantly already broached the topic with her...though I know going into detail with it might cause controversy. Especially since she is quite sexist herself (we only have 2 males in our class... they get picked on by her a lot for no other reason than being male. I've been keeping a list). I know it's quite unconventional but honestly I would not be happy doing something that didn't need doing/ I wasn't interested in. My library doesn't have that book unfortunately. I've been trying to ge…
/r/MensRights26/12/12 03:00 AM
13

Thanks fot this. I've only recently even been introduced to the men's rights movement and I am appalled at the lack of awareness there is about it..and I am constantly reconsidering my viewpoint on gender issues and how much my actions/ ideas in the past may have been sexist. I'm only young but I wish my eyes had been open to this sooner. Definitely illuminating the way I phrased that... And yeah. Feelings are not a great basis for law. This is related to a lot of anti-male rulings in regards to…
/r/MensRights26/12/12 02:54 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter