| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | A new logo for this Subreddit? | paul4er | /r/MensRights | 26/03/14 03:56 AM |
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | A new logo for this Subreddit?I agree that it is a good thing to focus on men's issues, and that a forum is indeed necessary specifically for men to address such issues, especially so given that I fervently believe that much of contemporary Western political dogma has become disproportionately in favour of women post-feminism. However, ultimately what is best for men in the long-run is what is best for society as a whole (and vice-versa) . There is a danger (and I see it in some here) whereby male-only group-think can kick i… | /r/MensRights | 26/03/14 10:16 AM |
| 1 | A new logo for this Subreddit?I think you should get a better logo as in the title link. Some other suggestions could be along the lines of: http://thumbs.dreamstime.com/z/yin-yang-male-female-symbols-1821300.jpg The yin-yang sign better communicates the complimentary benefit that both men and women bring to society. I think it would allow a greater audience to pay more attention to men's issues, and not simply dismiss it off-hand. I see the following problems with the current logo: The large male arrow puts main focus only … | /r/MensRights | 26/03/14 03:58 AM |
| 1 | How you can help make our subreddit better... though in the example linked the female sign is at the top. Probably should reverse that to imply the goal is readdressing the balance from the male perspective. Or maybe just leave the female at the top as that highlights who seems to be thought of first in terms of "rights" at the moment? | /r/MensRights | 25/03/14 11:58 PM |
| 1 | How you can help make our subreddit betterI think you should get a better logo along the lines of: http://thumbs.dreamstime.com/z/yin-yang-male-female-symbols-1821300.jpg The yin-yang sign better promotes the complimentary benefit that both men and women bring to society. I think it would allow a greater audience to pay more attention to men's issues, and not simply dismiss it off-hand. I see the following problems with the current logo: The large male arrow puts main focus only on the male, and not what the ultimate goal should be. Som… | /r/MensRights | 25/03/14 11:45 PM |
| 1 | So apparently there's a Men's Rights club at my school nowThe problem to me is that an equals signs makes something which is multi-dimensional over-simplified into a single dimension. Men and women's worth overall may be equal but that plasters over a complex interaction where womens' worth is indisputably more on certain aspects/dimensions of life and mens' in others. | /r/MensRights | 15/03/14 02:14 PM |
| 1 | So apparently there's a Men's Rights club at my school nowLike this: http://thumbs.dreamstime.com/x/yin-yang-male-female-symbols-1821300.jpg | /r/MensRights | 15/03/14 02:09 PM |
| 1 | So apparently there's a Men's Rights club at my school nowSelfish gene theory? | /r/MensRights | 15/03/14 02:08 PM |
| 1 | So apparently there's a Men's Rights club at my school nowIndeed. It also makes sense given that there are vastly fewer Caucasians on the planet than any of the other major classifications. | /r/MensRights | 15/03/14 02:07 PM |
| 1 | So apparently there's a Men's Rights club at my school nowPerhaps a male-female variant of the yin-yang symbol should just be used for this sort of thing. Gets the message across within getting into mathematic notation! | /r/MensRights | 15/03/14 01:59 PM |
| 2 | So apparently there's a Men's Rights club at my school nowInteresting, but I still don't think it is quite right, as it still implies men and women are the same and you are just going to get into arguments on which one comes first! I was thinking more that we need something like and equation such as in Boolean logic whereby Men ^ Women = 1 (where <sup>=</sup> Boolean AND and 1=true). However, Boolean logic is not correct either as is too black and white for something complex. I think it needs more something along the lines of notation from set theory. … | /r/MensRights | 15/03/14 03:20 AM |
| 2 | So apparently there's a Men's Rights club at my school nowYes, there is a lot to say and debate on this topic in general that it really deserves a thread of its own rather than being buried here. It indeed to me relates more to tackling social justice warriors in general (and as far as I'm concerned these are a greater concern to me than feminists, but I see that feminism is the weak spot that when challenged can unravel the rest of this uncritical cultural Marxist thinking). (in my local part of the world, for example, we have much more serious issues… | /r/MensRights | 15/03/14 02:01 AM |
| 3 | So apparently there's a Men's Rights club at my school nowI was going to suggest the approximation symbol too, but something about it still does not convey what is meant accurately. I distinctly remember using a triple line for equivalence in mechanics computations which I need to explore again, though for some reason that is not covered in that Wiki article. PS: I'm an engineer and programmer too, just someone with more of an interest in applied mathematics than pure mathematics so never cared too much about the more esoteric symbolism of pure mathema… | /r/MensRights | 15/03/14 01:29 AM |
| 0 | So apparently there's a Men's Rights club at my school nowWhy is the equal sign used? Equality is a nonsense fallacy as two things which are different cannot be equal. Men and women are COMPLEMENTARY and should have equivalent complementary rights under the law. Could more accurate mathematical/logical symbols be used to summarise this relationship? I am not a mathematician, so perhaps someone with a deep background in that field could help out. Does the triple bar (≡) not mean equivalence, and would this be a more suitable symbol, is there a better sy… | /r/MensRights | 14/03/14 10:17 PM |
| 5 | Feminist politician Harriet Harman just got destroyed in an interview by the BBC (her biggest ally!). Essential viewing!Most of the comments on the photographs of women in bikinis in the Daily Mail are actual made by, and printed for the consumption of, OTHER WOMEN (as is also the case in most women's magazines) . Women who, behind the front, are really arguing to boast about which one of them has the most powerful route to manipulative power i.e. their bodies (youthful fertile female commenters sneering at those with out-of-shape unhealthy bodies, and not so healthy nor fertile women sneering at those who do hav… | /r/MensRights | 25/02/14 04:25 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter