TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

pauselaugh Archive

View 0 posts and 61 comments by pauselaugh on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-8

The reverse article exists: it is basically 99.99999% of all mainstream media, never mind the history of it. Do you really need some fucking examples of male chauvinistic media? I love how you come across like there is no "reverse" of that... ugh. ugh. ugh. So perhaps what you're seeing is an article that IS the completely fucking obvious "outrage bait" response to the history of women's portrayal. But keep reaching. PS > you linked to a dailymail article. You're aware of this, right? You just l…
/r/MensRights01/08/14 04:10 AM
1

What is the debate? Preferential treatment obviously bridges inequality. But it enrages those who are not recipients of the preferential treatment and undermines those who achieve things while being someone who might potentially have received it, or did receive it. Affirmative Action is a pretty good example of this -- how reverse discrimination functions -- so far... So what exactly is the debate? That males actually don't have privileges? That it's ok for maltreatment in other areas since cert…
/r/MensRights22/07/14 10:35 PM
12

I have to say, this inspired me: THE SETUP I went for a Run close to my house. After the run, I realized I needed to quickly go to the Grocery store to get few things for dinner. So I go to the Grocery store. I was in my running dress and shorts and I was completely drenched in my pits and all over my face and head and wrist bands. I stunk like I had been rolling around in dogshit. After I picked up all of my self-placating garbage I shovel in my mouth before, during and after wank sessions I ru…
/r/seduction18/07/14 03:59 PM
-1

I'd not refer to this as "self defense" it makes it sound like you're trying to justify it somehow. If someone initiates I will fuck them up as best I can. It's no longer defense if they hit you once and stop. It is offense at that point. Also, LOL at OP: Why is everyone asking if it's justified? followed with He has a right to defend himself doesn't he? WHY'S EVERYONE ELSE DOING IT I WANNA DO IT TOO
/r/MensRights18/07/14 02:20 PM
1

Yes, he wasn't right and he wasn't wrong. Perfect woman.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 02:10 PM
1

No. False accusations should not be protected in any way, shape or form. This is especially when you punish the accuser. What? Stupid, this would make prosecutors not want to help rape victims. Smearing != saying it. I never quite understood why it is "news" to show the name, however. I am for media blackout on the participants to never be named unless they allow it legally. However, wouldn't this also have to be available for the accused until all appeals are exhausted? Public shaming the guilt…
/r/MensRights17/07/14 06:56 PM
3

Yes, but replace "rape" with EVERY OTHER CRIME WHERE THIS HAPPENS and you see how it is fucking idiotic that it is being considered an issue relevant to rape specifically. Imagine you're someone who's been ________ , but you don't have much proof. You can accuse and possibly put a ________ in jail, but then you also risk being sued. I'm not saying that you'd be wrong to sue or anything, but it can encourage victims to stay quiet. It is just silly.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 06:46 PM
5

footage must exist: http://flatrock.org.nz/topics/education/adults_can_be_so_juvenile.htm has a photo. https://web.archive.org/web/20050801013238/http://kutv.com/topstories/local_story_210004013.html is the wayback machine for the original article.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 12:23 AM
-4

So outliers when gathering data don't exist? You can't argue that they are odd outliers. The narrative of the outlier is important to some people. I don't see the sense in denying the statistical anomalies as interest points. They are obviously interesting.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 10:57 PM
-10

Sorry, but how do you "over-report" rapes? Are you talking about false accusations? As much as you'd like to believe otherwise, you either report something or you don't. You cannot over-report something unless you are literally falsifying things that didn't happen. Not talking about the judgment of if something was a rape or not, but that they randomly occur or materialize out of thin air... Anyone with any amount of scientific credibility will realize that "over-reported" rapes are just the reg…
/r/MensRights08/07/14 10:53 PM
-4

So do you think entire countries have near 0 rapes occurring? Or is that just feminists spinning statistics as well? You don't find it odd that, most of the countries in Africa have similar rape frequencies, yet others (where women's rights are vastly different) have nearly 0? You don't find it odd that certain countries in Europe have ridiculously high rates and those are the countries that coincidentally have the most liberal communication and health services in the EU? And those that, again, …
/r/MensRights08/07/14 10:51 PM
-9

Believing the 1 in 4 number as fact has nothing to do with the incidence rate, so no, you're wrong. if 1 in 4 women are raped, and a school has 1,000 of women, that could mean that, gosh, there are 3,500,000,000 women in the world and that's 875,000,000 raped women and 0 of them are at any place. If you look at the DOJ statistics, all of the lowest "incidents of rape" countries just happen to be those where women have the least amount of rights and lack of a public voice (or even equality under …
/r/MensRights08/07/14 10:47 PM
0

Evidence of less rape becomes evidence of more rape. No. It isn't about "less" vs. "more" it is about ZERO vs. AT LEAST 1. It is really easy to disprove "never." Especially when all of the evidence points to it probably happening at least once. So that DOES show the trend of under-reporting, and could lead towards investigations where rapes that were not reported are found. Are you really trying to assert that outliers aren't good investigative prompts? If you take any group of schools which by …
/r/MensRights08/07/14 10:34 PM
-13

She was a depressive that had undergone ECT due to the severity of it with repeated suicide attempts. The context that you're missing is that in her area of the world, that is apparently not enough to lose custody of your kid. In that area of the world, a father can "vouch" that she was a good person who was troubled and that's enough to not punish someONE extensively. She's not going to be "roaming around having fun," which is what led her to the actions in the first place. Feel free to deconte…
/r/MensRights07/07/14 10:00 PM
2

They're making fun of it. It isn't real advice.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 04:21 PM
1

they should add "typically a man" to all words that are typically represented by men. atart with positions of power and prestige, that'd be lovely.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 11:49 PM
1

you could add a nationality or race to that definition and it would still be as true.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 11:47 PM
2

start it with "women have the privilege of..." then each bullet begins "...like this" i call bullshit on your neutrality. you could have franed each question as conparing the priveleges of men and women and it wouldnt be so obviously biased. but coming up with 48 obvious advantages women have is disingenous when you could come up with as many, if not more for men.... especially when any research would require contrast.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 11:40 PM
2

Hot tip: due to the gender roles in the world today, men are the popular providers and as such commit more crimes to provide. men are also perceived as needing to show their value/wealth which again feeds into that criminality. Or do we not think that poor black males in urban ghettos commit crimes for those reasons? Not sure how your chart has anything to do with "privilege" moreso that the residues of gender roles. Are you trying to assert that women are not imprisoned as much because they're …
/r/MensRights20/06/14 09:16 PM
-1

While I doubt "nobody was ever fooled" I'd say "nobody that matters at all regarding this non-issue was ever fooled."
/r/MensRights20/06/14 09:09 PM
1

Right and the point was that's not necessarily good: "unfortunately" "only" "likely nothing" is defeat language. If its worth pursuing, pursue. Don't attribute it to luck/fortune, don't diminish the response -- the response is what it is, it's not "only" anything, and don't leave it to probability "likely nothing." All that is the language of someone who is deflecting the perceived failure as a "nothing I can do about it" situation. That's all that I meant. Also, getting attached isn't necessari…
/r/seduction19/06/14 06:39 PM
11

Now, unfortunately, I've only got a few texts back from my "girl at the rock show," and likely nothing will ever come of it again. Stop, you're failing again falling back into old habits.
/r/seduction18/06/14 08:05 PM
1

Yes, you try to tie your shoes. Just because you are 100% successful doesn't mean you're not trying. Do you try to tie your shoes without bending over holding a coffee in one hand? Running a script on another human is also trying to run a script on another human. just because you've memorized your script doesn't mean it isn't an attempt at something. So yes, you try to sit at an angle. you try to touch them casually to try to be able to touch them. The entire angle is to NOT LOOK LIKE YOU'RE TRY…
/r/seduction18/06/14 06:43 PM
-5

Actually, the headline is about a culture where women are treated like property and are not even worth murdering over their religion. They kidnap and sell the women into slavery as their "good deed" to not fully desecrate their "godless victims" by destroying their property, the property of men. This is some complete horseshit reaching that makes valid concerns diluted in context of the 'cause.' Really? The news is not properly talking about the real story here, dead men? But I guess you'd prefe…
/r/MensRights17/06/14 09:39 PM
-4

Men are being killed due to the misogynist nature of the religious extremists in question... if anything the story would highlight how lowly they treat women, which is against your shitty "outrage."
/r/MensRights17/06/14 09:32 PM
2

demanding to know if the men inside were Muslim and if they spoke Somali. How is that gender neutral? Reach much? Militants disembarked and began shooting. At the Breeze View Hotel, the gunmen pulled the men aside and ordered the women to watch as they killed them, saying it was what Kenyan troops are doing to Somali men inside Somalia, a police commander said on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to share such details of the attack. Pulled the men aside and ordered the women t…
/r/MensRights17/06/14 09:31 PM
32

If you’re trying, you’re lame. Period. This struck me as completely ironic. But I'm sure you meant "appear to be trying." Because, you know, predetermining the angle you sit from her and timing on touching and various scripted ploys is precisely that.
/r/seduction15/06/14 07:19 AM
-3

Wrong. Bad title. They're both confidence. She will like me is a tad more egotistical and possibly narcissist or arrogant. Saying it doesn't matter might be a touch more passive aggressive or apathetic. But they're both different types of confidence in that you think you're valuable. The difference is that projecting your value onto someone else is pushy where using someone's valuation of you as either irrelevant (doesn't matter!) or your own gauge of if THEYRE worthwhile comes into play. How ab…
/r/seduction13/06/14 05:35 PM
-6

Guilty of assault, sure. Is flying a drone filming women at a beach illegal? Or is it just gross and shameful?
/r/MensRights12/06/14 11:17 AM
-1

I find it hard to believe you ever have a good day with all this bullshit running through your head. OH TODAY I WAS GOD MODE really? you sound like an islander parroting whatever religion the conquerers dropped off.
/r/seduction10/06/14 11:32 PM
11

Why can't you see both? Why is it one or the other?
/r/seduction05/06/14 07:26 PM
1068

So, first time meeting a girl. Let's call her A. WHY NOT A+? -Asian Dad
/r/seduction04/06/14 05:16 PM
18

why emphasize PRIVATELY OWNED? It's called a boycott / bad press push, that's how it works.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 09:18 PM
1

the quicker we realise there is no "big other" the better this ends up.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 08:38 PM
-9

if these actions were taken in other cases of school gun violence, they may have been prevented. after authorities get chastised by the media for not doing enough, we can't be surprised and say they're doing too much when they're following policies spawned from "public outcry." Not sure why this is a "men's rights" issue, either. The kid specifically named the father.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 08:36 PM
-1

Drawl? Always end every sentencent with "guh-hyup!"
/r/seduction30/05/14 08:54 PM
1

There's nothing wrong with quoting your imaginary impression of a generalized bogeyman.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 08:10 PM
1

Not really. There are plenty of established, popular voices that espouse the same sentiment that are worthy of debate. A random anonymous kids tumblr blog isn't exactly worthy of attention.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 04:12 AM
7

TIL illness can't cause misogyny...
/r/MensRights27/05/14 03:49 AM
2

No, read his shot and stop spinning it towards anti-woman. It was not ONLY anti-woman.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 03:36 AM
-3

they're way different than men, they only have 1 weird old trick to follow how to get any straight man you want as a straight woman: ask
/r/seduction26/05/14 05:47 PM
-9

Biased segment: In the first portion, he is holding her back and she keeps breaking away, he is restraining her. She also has a demeanor of anger in the first segment, and wanting to be "away." She says "get your hand off of me." In the second segment she just pushes him and when he's up against the fence then she starts keeping him down. His demeanor is "sheepish" like he did something wrong, hunched and cowering. He is not trying to get away, he is staying. Here's the difference: if he wanted …
/r/MensRights26/05/14 05:16 PM
-5

Bad analogy in multiple ways. Male lions do, in fact, go easy on female lions. They could destroy them in fights, but they don't.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 09:15 PM
0

This just in - someone draws a picture of already copyrighted material (dragon's lair "fan art") and then thinks someone else making money off of it should pay her. Why? So she can pay the artists who own the copyright to Princess Daphne?
/r/MensRights07/03/14 10:39 PM
1

nerd women into comics != status quo women into fantasy novels. its really just narcissism to think that anyone can summarise what 50% of the planet "really wants"
/r/MensRights01/03/14 02:59 AM
-1

teachings/curriculum != what 1 teacher says or things. Besides, is it inaccurate? I think it is a fairly accurate description of the way things work. The follow-up isn't "OH MY HOW PREPOSTEROUS!" but "So what is being done to change it since it is obviously unfair and what can I do?"
/r/MensRights26/02/14 12:30 AM
-17

Only in this subreddit would someone say "size and strength only means how easy it is to hit you." Some of us are large enough that a tiny gesture of minimal effort can devastate a typically sized female. Really, the part that's being glazed over is that laws were set up to give the smarter, weaker men rules + power where dumber, stronger men couldn't simply fight their way to the top of the social pyramid. Thus, laws protect and are for the benefit of these men who would never be so incined to …
/r/MensRights26/02/14 12:29 AM
3

The biggest problem is thinking of it as "getting a girlfriend." Aaaaaaand you're in the haven for "buy my advice" so I'm not sure exactly what you're expecting. If you do what you love, excel at it, the social circle and people - including women - will follow it. I think the "have sex because that's what starts good relationships" is bullshit, and why the divorce rates are where they are.
/r/seduction03/02/14 01:05 AM
-2

The argument only stands for morons who confuse biological relevance with social relevance.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 07:07 AM
-8

Getting a woman pregnant is a fallacy? Semantics much? I'm pretty sure if my sperm impregnated her, that is what is referred to as "getting her pregnant." I ask you, yes, so what about men? Try not to sound completely ridiculous when trying to state that a man has a right to something growing inside of a woman simply because they started the biological chain reaction.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 07:00 AM
-7

That's a pretty terrible comparison and twisting of the words. Deciding not to be a father = the social act of raising the child. Deciding not to be a mother as relevant to pro-choice = the choice to not gestate fully AND/OR the social act of raising the child. The apt analogy here would be the father somehow terminating the gestation as well. So no, it isn't a double standard on pro-choice. Men do not have as much of a biological investment as a woman giving birth, if any at all. Men's biologic…
/r/MensRights26/01/14 06:58 AM
1

Hugely generalized and stereotyped. I'm unsure what feedback you're looking for, or what the purpose of this is? Otherwise, sorry but I don't even go so far to think this is "arrogant, patronizing, and emasculating" rather vapid, uninsightful and simpleminded. I disagree with many if not most of your statements, and here's a real spoiler: if someone doesn't behave the way you're prescribing them to behave, then it won't work. They can't fake that, they can't practice it. So notifying people of w…
/r/seduction19/01/14 07:18 AM
26

meh, it could easily be a yearly reminder of "whew, i lucked out on this one." is the account of her abuse true? the defense said it was an accident. that doesnt sound too accidental.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 01:28 AM
3

tldr "u jely?" no, not really.
/r/seduction14/12/13 04:04 AM
-3

A lot of cussing also represents lack of vocabulary and inability to express yourself accurately. But at least you're enthusiastic about it?
/r/seduction14/12/13 04:03 AM
3

Well they're not called polite boys
/r/MensRights12/12/13 09:47 AM
1

i usually put my penis in her vagina
/r/seduction30/11/13 02:54 AM
3

All of this DOESN'T MATTER. As I read more and more, you're focusing on the wrong aspects. You were not denied due process so stop harping on it. Those proceedings are bullshit. The court can say "I think you're lying" and THE END. christy-v-mccalla had a kid expelled in his senior year due to a zero tolerance policy, he brought his bag to school, plopped it on a desk and out tumbled a whisky bottle, breaking. it went all the way to supreme court of LA, and they said he had due process. he had t…
/r/MensRights13/01/12 07:29 AM
2

I'm going to get all metaphysical and say we're all in the same position. You could sacrifice yourself as a martyr by devoting your life to directly fixing this injustice, but you don't, right? Drop everything you're doing, go to law school, and support anyone with this problem pro bono. Set the precedent. So, while I'm not acting, thinking or knowing anything about you, I've got no problems saying that I think the point here is that just because he's not "raising hell" doesn't mean he's "shrink…
/r/MensRights13/01/12 07:13 AM
3

you have to realize that this isn't "real law," its bullshit settled elsewhere. If he was really found guilty of this crime there'd be a lot more than "2 year suspension." Unfortunately in the straight world, that suspension is about as damaging as a real-law conviction. Very crude analogy, but think of the university as an overzealous moderator of some internet forum taking one user's word over another about harassment and kicking the alleged harasser out to "make the forum better." I don't mea…
/r/MensRights13/01/12 06:57 AM
8

I think it goes: "But I have noticed that during the most trying periods of my life there have only been one set of footprints in the sand. Why, when I needed you most, you have not been there for me?" The Lord replied, "The times when you have seen only one set of footprints, is when you creeped someone out with a bad religious icebreaking joke about me, bro. Not cool." Really though - the religious intro angle can be a huge immediate turnoff right away. Even if that's "your humor" I think you'…
/r/seduction06/12/11 07:56 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter