TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

paxNoctis Archive

View 0 posts and 65 comments by paxNoctis on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Ok. Good to know.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 07:52 PM
2

I'm solving this problem by not having any sons. Gin and X-box is then new fiddling, dontchaknow?
/r/MensRights01/07/13 05:37 PM
2

She doesn't need the man, just his money, house, car and other possessions.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 05:33 PM
5

More than anything else it was watching this happen to my friends that drove me into the lifestyle I have today. So I guess I owe them all thanks! Except most of them are not allowed to talk to me anymore because I'm a bad influence (ie: I enjoy my life).
/r/MensRights28/06/13 03:41 PM
3

Because watching one try to use logic just makes the whole surroundings descend into nervous laughter.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 03:36 PM
23

First they laugh at you, "lol, like men need rights". Then they fight you, <insert all the stuff your describe here>. Discredit, FUD, attack the source. They can't argue many of the points raised with logic, so they shout you down, remove you from the debate, do anything they can to stop people from listening to you. Then you win.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 06:13 AM
6

Women and girls being belittled is irrelevant to this case. Is it horrible? Sure. When it happens should I get upset and bitch about it? Absolutely. Does it need to be brought up in a case where boys raped another boy and the media refused to call it rape? No. This incident has nothing to do with women, with feminism, with women being belittled. The fact that some feel the need to bring up these topics in this particular story is an example of bias. I don't go into reddit stories about females b…
/r/MensRights20/06/13 08:35 PM
6

Except that no one outside the blogosphere will even call it rape. If a bunch of guys tie up a female and finger-bang her ass, it's rape (of course it is, why are we even talking about it?) but do it to a boy and it's "sodomy hazing"? My ass.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 06:32 PM
1

You are even worse than a RadFem.....there is no arguing with people like you, and I won't do it. Because you can't. Your faith-based "thinking" (and there aren't air-quotes big enough to convey my thoughts on using that word for you) folds at the first sign of actual logic. Argument requires structured, critical thinking backed by citation, something you've shown not a single lick of evidence that you're actually capable of. Every time some gnarled piece of the tangled mess that is your brain g…
/r/MensRights12/04/13 03:04 PM
1

You three hours ago: Hitler was an Atheist You now: Hitler was a Catholic Me in my last post: just because someone is something doesn't mean that thing they are is responsible for what they do. All christians who murder someone aren't doing it in the name of god, many of them are just batshit crazy. You attempting to construct a strawman from my statement turn it into: Hitler was a Catholic, therefore Nazism was Christian which is literally the opposite of what I said. My original post addressed…
/r/MensRights12/04/13 06:29 AM
0

You: Hitler was an Atheist Wikipedia (emphasis mine): Hitler stated in a speech to the people of Stuttgart on February 15, 1933: "Today they say that Christianity is in danger, that the Catholic faith is threatened. My reply to them is: for the time being, Christians and not international atheists are now standing at Germany’s fore. I am not merely talking about Christianity; I confess that I will never ally myself with the parties which aim to destroy Christianity. Fourteen years they have gone…
/r/MensRights12/04/13 03:28 AM
0

If you go hang out on an Aspie forum (I'd rather not link bomb them and have a bunch of strange redditors show up and trash their forums, but you can search for them pretty easily) and observe how the word and it's abbreviation "NT" are often used. "NTs are always...", "You sound like an NT", "The problem I have with NTs is," etc. etc. It's a label whose main purpose (not for everyone, but like all human communication I'm generalizing here) is to identify a group of "not us" people and say bad t…
/r/MensRights11/04/13 10:48 PM
1

This pretty much describes any relationship that involves kids, even if they are biologically yours.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 09:31 PM
-1

Yeah I finally figured out what it meant the other day and had to bow out of the thread I was in lest my disgust with the term go nuclear. The bastardization of language is one of the largest ways that the current problem we all have emerged. Political correctness and the idea that you just change labels has all kinds of mental effects on peoples' relationships with concepts and abstracts. It's very much a newspeak kind of phenomenon. It effects how you can think and reason and how you perceive …
/r/MensRights11/04/13 08:37 PM
3

I try not to get into ideology wars in this particular sub (we should all be united by the things we agree on rather than the things we don't here), but you started it mate. Eugenicist thinking is a FEMINIST ideal, not an MRA one. So Francis Galton was a feminist? You're inevitably thinking of Margaret "kill the black babies" Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, but Eugenics was old thought by the time she got her hag hands on it and turned it into the abortion industry. It originated as an ex…
/r/MensRights11/04/13 06:38 PM
1

Are you a classic liberal (basically a libertarian who allows for a slightly larger State than your typical anarcho-capitalist libertarian), or a modern liberal (a Leftist)? The term "liberal" means two, completely different and mutually exclusive things. It really helps to clarify which you're talking about.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 05:17 PM
4

But logically, where do birth rates need to shrink? Yes, having fewer people on the planet might be a good thing, but do you want your highly technical, scientific, western civilizations having fewer children, or your hut-dwelling, super-religious people? Your average, educated and productive member of western society is not having a ton of kids, it's the technologically stunted and highly religious cultures that are. What happens to the human race when the smart people stop having kids because …
/r/MensRights11/04/13 05:15 PM
3

Hmm, that whole "hot sauce in the used condom" thing I read about a few days ago is sounding better and better.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 03:18 PM
3

I'm not sure I agree with you. First, from Wikipedia's "Degrees of murder in the United States" (on the Murder page): First degree murder is any murder that is willful and premeditated. Felony murder is typically first degree.[5][6] Second, with actual NYS statute that defines First Degree Murder (125.27) is this, A person is guilty of murder in the first degree when: [...] (x) the defendant acted in an especially cruel and wanton manner pursuant to a course of conduct intended to inflict and in…
/r/MensRights04/04/13 11:32 PM
4

Never a bad idea, even if you fail or the market changes or you decide you don't like it, its the kind of experience you'll be glad to have forever, win or lose. Best thing I ever did, so you should totally do it :).
/r/MensRights03/04/13 04:16 PM
1

Female "scientist" LoL.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 04:12 PM
8

Sorry mate, but this is pretty much corporate life in my experience. I've been straight up told by the owner of a company I worked for how "easy" it would be to fire me vs. the horrible, unperformant woman we were trying to fire because, "You're a white guy, no one cares". You can try to fight it (not aggressively really or you'll lose faster) but it's a losing fight every time. The law favors them, corporate culture favors them, the products of our "education" system favor them, there is just t…
/r/MensRights03/04/13 04:10 PM
1

There's significant overlap but in my experience, a classic liberal will allow for the existence of a slightly larger (but still "limited") State that respects the other tenets. From a practical point of view most pragmatic libertarians are fairly close to classic liberalism and vice versa.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 04:53 AM
7

I'm a liberal, in the sense of classic liberalism. From dee wiki: Classical liberalism is a political ideology, that emerged as a response to the Industrial Revolution and urbanization in the 19th century in Europe and the United States.[1] It shares a number of beliefs with other belief systems belonging to liberalism, advocating civil liberties and political freedom, limited government, rule of law, and belief in free market. I am behind all of those things on a personal and political level, s…
/r/MensRights03/04/13 12:27 AM
57

I feel like I'd receive a forking, and not the enjoyable kind.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 04:05 PM
203

Next year we need to do a Dudes With Dongles convention in the convention center next door.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 03:03 PM
1

hy·per·bo·le (/hīˈpərbəlē/) Noun Exaggerated statements or claims not meant to be taken literally. Synonyms exaggeration - hyperbola - overstatement
/r/MensRights28/03/13 06:05 AM
1

I've so often wished I was gay. Anyone who has any doubt that being gay is intrinsic need look no farther than me. If it was possible to will oneself to be attracted to men, I'd be super-gay right now.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 06:01 AM
4

It looks stupid from our perspective because we assume it has either goals that resemble ours, or goals that are compatible with ours. If you assume the goal of any state is to perpetuate and protect itself while ensuring cash flow, it's actually quite smart, not stupid. Evil, yes, but not stupid.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 05:59 AM
6

The Adria Richards Drinking Game: Take a shot every time some form of the presently-meaningless word "diversity" appears.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 05:55 AM
4

I suspect it's the weasel one, but what really astonished me was the latter part of the message where they basically said they reserve the right to do the same thing. I expect a company to do just about anything they can get away with to slash benefits, but to have a "we just might do the same thing to you," section of the e-mail was a bit... chilling.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 03:09 PM
5

Odd that it seems I've grasped more on the topic in a single google search (according to you), than you have, given that even your definition of the term "linguistic philosophy" is incorrect. It's funny that the wikipedia entry for Political Correctness has a whole section on Linguistics, full of references to linguists supporting or in opposition to the concept. Funny also that the criticisms section includes several philosophers whose work could be considered centered on linguistics. You've so…
/r/MensRights21/03/13 05:54 AM
3

An idiot? My goodness, what wit you have. Did you learn that in a book? Because I seem to remember this guy Skinner and this other guy Chomsky writing a bunch of crap about how language relates to behavior and perception (oh look, there's even a school of this discipline called behaviorist linguistic theory). Up until recently it was a fairly well accepted stance that language limits thinking ability. A great deal of linguistic theory surrounds the notion of how language relates to the processin…
/r/MensRights21/03/13 05:24 AM
16

If a guy had done this I would have called him a stupid twitter dick. I don't buy the sissy, PC, postmodern debate that says we should all hold hands and speak in bland, neutral language. Good argument has punch, zing, life. It angers you if you disagree with it, it gets you pumped if you agree with it. Conceding to use the neutered language created by intellectual midgets is losing before the conversation even starts. Bitch/Dick are gender-versions of the same basic term (a person of a particul…
/r/MensRights21/03/13 03:21 AM
14

Absolutely not unfortunately. It's a big shop and they're not exactly into even quasi-controversial PR. The only official policy is we don't reimburse conferences anymore. The next 3 paragraphs were a dry description of this incident with a warning that the company reserves the right to take action based on things said at a professional conference, even if you attend it on your own dime.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 07:21 PM
38

Any male who uses the word "creeper" in a non-ironic way pretty much just gets erased from my personal respect-o-sphere.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 06:31 PM
178

My company came down with a policy today basically rescinding all programming conference reimbursement and including a note that basically discourages engineers from going to these conferences. In talking to coworkers, most of them are disgusted, and the prevailing opinion is that going to a conference now entails more risk than benefit. Good job, stupid twitter bitch.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 06:02 PM
8

Catherine Comins, Vassar College Assistant Dean of Student Life in Time, June 3, 1991 There are PDFs of it on the internet, but I'm playing SC2 in other monitor and can't find.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 01:03 AM
7

I believe you mean: Fork. This. Bitch.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 12:50 AM
8

"Do you actually believe this garbage" is a logical condition in which you allow only two possibilities: 1) The person you're talking to is an idiot who believes "garbage" 2) The person is deliberately lying for some reason and does not believe "garbage", making them a deceptive asshole. Thus, your statement leaves only the option that the poster you're replying to is either an idiot or an asshole. Furthermore, the person wasn't making a declarative statement, he was making observations about ti…
/r/MensRights15/03/13 09:03 PM
9

Did you have a point here other than a paragraph of (apparent?) sarcasm and an ad hominem/appeal to common knowledge fallacy?
/r/MensRights15/03/13 08:56 PM
33

This is pretty much the moral of every story.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 07:10 PM
1

Oh I definitely agree with the points you raised, but I feel it's a correlation vs. causation thing (as you adroitly pointed out).
/r/MensRights21/02/13 01:05 AM
1

Actually I blame John Dewey, for pioneering the anti-intellectual, anti-conceptual "teaching" system used by teachers today, that provably doesn't work for anything but training a generation of uncreative factory drones. Seriously, the guy who set the standard by which we train and measure educators said this: “The mere absorption of facts and truths is so exclusively an individual affair that it tends very naturally to pass into selfishness. There is not obvious social motive for the acquiremen…
/r/MensRights20/02/13 10:52 PM
-1

If you want to get a good grade, you will do a presentation on what a vile hate group MRAs are for perpetrating the Patriarchy and trying to keep woman down as undercitizens. Call it a "rapist training movement". If you don't want a good grade, then why bother actually putting time and effort into a presentation that will only get you a bad grade? Go get a meth addict to buy you some Johnny Walker in exchange for a few things of sudafed and get hammered!
/r/MensRights31/01/13 01:02 AM
1

I love how our troops have to fight wars ever since they started sending TV cameras into warzones (so, right about Vietnam). If you're not going to fight a war, don't send troops. If you're going to fight a war, send troops, but no journalists. Being sensitive to the enemy is not how you win (if anyone can be said to "win" a war) any damn thing.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 11:51 PM
1

And they actually, boldly as hell, list it as a benefit of the proposed system. Damn that pesky right to legal representation...
/r/MensRights29/01/13 10:23 PM
13

For "human rights"? Not really. Whose going to hire a Doctor of Human Rights, other than a university to have him teach more human rights courses?
/r/MensRights23/01/13 07:20 PM
1

Ahh, the old "I hired that hit man in self defense" legal argument. Wait, there is no such legal argument. The fact that he retains custody of the children speaks fairly well (but not conclusively) as to the veracity of his defense. I find it unlikely that a family court (which tends to give custody to the mother all things being equal) would choose a heinous, abusive man over his abuse victim for custody if there were actually evidence.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 12:47 AM
1

If you adjust for personal choices (ie: compare people in the same job title, seniority, length of service, leave-taken over the years, hours worked per week and job duties) it effectively disappears, becoming statistically insignificant and even showing women out-earning men in certain fields. If you lump everyone who works full time together and average them, you get the .77 figure. Basically, men and women get paid the same for the same job. Women are statistically more likely to take easier …
/r/MensRights22/01/13 11:53 PM
2

"Sometimes"? Unless it's a STEM degree, isn't this pretty much all the time in college?
/r/MensRights22/01/13 10:30 PM
3

Because psychologically the "other party" is completely innured to compliments, as they receive them from people of the other sex all the time, and indeed has come to associate the aura of subservience and complimentary politeness as the natural order of things. Insulting behavior couched in humor (creating an ambiguity for the other party that they're not used to) creates tension, and if there exists other ingredients for attraction (ie: you're well maintained and not hideous and stinky), that …
/r/MensRights22/01/13 10:23 PM
0

Even if I treated that source as credible... Okay, I'll bite even knowing I shouldn't. According to a study published in the American Law and Economics Review, women currently file slightly more than two-thirds of divorce cases in the United States.[73] Link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divorce#Statistics Citation: Brinig, Margaret; Douglas W. Allen (2000). "These Boots Are Made for Walking: Why Most Divorce Filers are Women". American Law and Economics Review 2 (1): 126–129 If you'd like to re…
/r/MensRights22/01/13 10:16 PM
2

I can't speak to your fiancee, but she reminds me of an ex. What I figured out (and this changed my approach to relationships entirely, for the better), is that by giving her anything I could to make her happy (like: "I feel like I'm constantly trying to please her, buying things and what not, and just doing whatever she asks and it's never enough") and expecting reciprocation. Thing is, what you get when you do that is contempt, not love (not from everyone of course, but from a non-trivial perc…
/r/MensRights21/01/13 06:56 AM
8

With your hypothetical tacked on (they don't report you) I would have sex with a drunk or high person -- I'm not a professional at determining someone's level of mental intoxication. I've had sex with various girlfriends while they were stoned and drunk -- sometimes you can tell sometimes not. If someone is unconscious, they're unconscious. There's no determination that needs to be made, no judgement call involved, so of course not. If someone is so drunk or high that it's obvious they're only n…
/r/MensRights19/01/13 05:01 PM
4

I'm sorry but if PMS is a valid legal defense, "Bitch-had-it-coming" should be too.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 04:45 PM
5

So at a sufficient level of intoxication, I can't consent to driving my car, it just happened to me. If intoxication nullifies consent, drunk people can't be held accountable for anything they do. Murdered someone? Wasn't me, I never consented or intended to do that, it just sort of happened.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 04:38 PM
2

Is it really "self-harm" if you can wake up and call take-backs on the sex you (general you here, not you, as in you) drunkenly consent to and have it become rape? Sounds more like "other-harm"
/r/MensRights19/01/13 04:37 PM
1

Whatever the chick says happened happens. Pretty much the same thing that happens if only one of them is drunk, or if none of them are drunk.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 04:32 PM
8

Dworkin's Postulate.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 01:40 AM
5

You won't convince her, you won't win, and you'll get a failing grade, and possibly end up with a "creeper", or "rapist" stigma that will follow you throughout your education. You may find yourself turning down available sexual contact because you wonder if she's setting you up because she's heard from a friend of hers what a lecherous piece of shit you are because you said some stuff a feminist disagreed with (actual likelihood will probably be fairly low, but you'd be an idiot not to worry abo…
/r/MensRights17/01/13 11:37 PM
7

The 25,000 euro-bucks don't hurt either. The amount of... god it's almost evil, in the comments on this article is astonishing. It's like people actually think uncovering lies and recouping huge, life-altering losses is a bad thing and a crime that needs to be justified.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 10:09 PM
3

My body, my choice, your wallet. The More You Know.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 12:11 AM
2

To be fair though, I was responding to the request: I would really appreciate it if [...] anyone would link me to [...] anything that says false rape accusations don't hurt anyone. Thanks! Your points are reasonable, but the quote is kind of what was requested. Speaking in gross generalities as this quote does is disingenuous, and she probably didn't mean it that way, but since every other side seems quite happy to take generalities said by their opponents and blow them up to be federal cases (h…
/r/MensRights10/01/13 05:11 PM
8

http://www.avoiceformen.com/women/no-means-no-sure-whatever/ Here's the highlight: Men who are unjustly accused of rape can sometimes gain from the experience. Catherine Comins, Vassar College Assistant Dean of Student Life in Time, June 3, 1991
/r/MensRights10/01/13 01:57 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter