paynetrain37 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
7	The Alpha Male is the Leader Because she’s right and the whole premise of the article was absurdly stupid. Maybe the subreddit shouldn’t make dummies Endorsed Contributors that can’t fathom why people would want to see Drake other than for sex.	/r/TheRedPill	20/06/23 02:27 AM
1	One thing I've noticed about this trans pushback thing is I don’t even know how you could say this with a straight face. Blatantly untrue and ignorant analysis. First, it’s not like this “trans pushback thing” is new. I remember being in North Carolina in 2015-2016 when the anti-trans bathroom bill was sparking national headlines. In ‘07, gender-identity protections in the Federal Employment Non-Discrimination Act had to be removed because Bush threatened to veto the bill otherwise. And basically the whole 20th century was super transphobic, it just di…	/r/MensRights	08/04/23 07:12 PM
0	I'm not half a free house and everything that comes with it. This group complains all the time that women are here to leech of men for free/cheap housing, meals, clothes, etc. Then a woman comes along who is financially independent and waits to move-in until it’s right for the relationship and not just out of economical convenience. But this group still complains. I don’t get it.	/r/MensRights	17/02/23 11:03 PM
4	Fiancé’s sister ruined Christmas while wearing pro abortion sweater. Good thing she didn’t wear a hat saying she doesn’t support the Catholic Church routinely harboring child predators. Woulda really messed up your day	/r/MensRights	27/12/22 02:13 AM
5	Fiancé’s sister ruined Christmas while wearing pro abortion sweater. Rights are a 24/7/365 thing. You either have them or you don’t; therefore, people tend to talk about them 24/7/365. If you don’t want to talk about it, don’t take away women’s rights. Or, just get thicker skin. You’re losing your mind over a t-shirt.	/r/MensRights	27/12/22 02:07 AM
2	Should we allow in this sub men who don't reason logically. If so, why? You didn’t build any civilizations. You’re sitting here moaning on Reddit about people not being logical enough. Not exactly the definition of strength.	/r/MensRights	26/12/22 10:33 PM
-1	This post was massively downvoted on the TrueOffMyChestSub. It seems that the vast majority of people who commented were women, so I wanted some men's opinions on it to see if I'm an asshole. You can’t say that men are responsible for controlling their sexual impulses and then immediately blame women for those sexual impulses. People can and should live their lives how they want. Men wear what they want and women also have to control their “natural sexual impulses” in the same way. It’s really not that hard.	/r/MensRights	18/12/22 07:25 PM
-22	A post from our favourite sub (sarcasm) about why men should not try to defend themselves against physical violence of women. barely any good points which also contrdicts themselves. It’s amazing how triggered these MRA subs get. All she said was that the response should be equal to the initial aggravating action and that she’s upset when she sees a video with “such an insane overreaction in that moment.” Seems pretty reasonable. Her example was a man who gave a girl a concussion over a light slap, and a woman who was skull punched when she had her back turned and was walking away. Who is out here trying to defend something like this? There’s also the other element to this, …	/r/MensRights	12/12/22 02:21 AM
23	Why her body count matters What’s so disappointing is that most people will see all these links and assume that OP is well-researched and correct in what he’s saying. I have a life and therefore don’t feel like going through all these articles, but let’s go through the first 3: Article 1: lists about 20-30 different variables that all can affect your likelihood to cheat. Its research shows men are more likely to cheat than women, and that race, religion, alcohol consumption, satisfaction in the relationship, whether they …	/r/TheRedPill	02/12/22 01:01 AM
-2	Speaking as a leftist, radical feminism and radical LGBT and gender ideology have nothing to do with the left. Ugh TERFs are so annoying. Go hang with JK Rowling	/r/MensRights	05/11/22 06:02 PM
-1	“If you don’t like Taylor Swift you’re a sexist” You gonna link to the post/comments?	/r/MensRights	03/11/22 06:33 PM
1	"The patriarchy" You haven’t bothered to read anything I’ve sent you so far, so I’m not sure why you’d want more research on topics like the glass ceiling. You’ll just say anyone who studies these things is a joke and then assert that we live in a matriarchy.	/r/MensRights	01/11/22 12:24 PM
1	"The patriarchy" No surprise here. You’ve now devolved into your true state - mediocre insults while frothing at the mouth because you have no arguments to support your beliefs. What a life!	/r/MensRights	01/11/22 11:22 AM
1	"The patriarchy" Ya I loved how you think an article from the American Conservative is more credible than literally all of academia (aka people who spend their entire careers studying these things and publishing peer-reviewed research). Your propaganda piece claims we are living in a matriarchy and yet never defines what that is. Strong start! Then it just goes into 3 main points that supposedly prove “women are crushing men in nearly every major metric.” It says women get more college degrees, hold more overall…	/r/MensRights	01/11/22 03:45 AM
1	"The patriarchy" Oh boi you’re a real mess out here. Idk how many times it needs to be said to MRA groups, but patriarchy doesn’t mean that most/all men are in power, just that most/all that are in power are men. As for women being excluded from these positions, we know that there were explicit exclusions for these powerful positions going back for several centuries. Only in recent decades have we started to see changes in the explicit laws of the land, but there are still plenty of implicit biases that discrimi…	/r/MensRights	01/11/22 02:29 AM
3	This shows the mentality of feminists well and clear reasons why men should be against it. I don’t really understand the point of posting a Reddit comment thread where no comments have more than 2 likes. If it showed how feminists thought, then don’t you think feminists would have all come in and liked the comments?	/r/MensRights	01/11/22 01:08 AM
1	"The patriarchy" Ok so here’s these simple Google searches: 4.8% of Fortune 500 companies have women CEOs (source) Federal judges in the US are almost 2-to-1 male (source) Women are only 28% of Congress and 31% of elected state legislators (source) Women are only 22% of top leadership positions are universities (source) I find it so funny when people like you say “Google disproves all this” and then don’t provide any sources. I’ve also never heard anyone call Harvey Weinstein a feminist, and the only people who …	/r/MensRights	31/10/22 10:38 PM
-1	I’m just disgusted by this whole thing. India only allows for abortions up to 24 weeks, instead of allowing women to have full autonomy over their bodies. That’s why abortion wasn’t an option. I also don’t think you realize that her parents culture is a product of the patriarchy. It’s also really easy to say online “if their family is this bad, they don’t deserve you” but it’s something entirely different to know you’ll be disowned from your family over this. I know you think it’s “not a big deal,” but to 98% of people, it is a big de…	/r/MensRights	31/10/22 10:24 PM
-25	Yeah, I should care about how 'my presence' makes a woman feel. What did I ignore that is so crazy that deserves a critical post?	/r/MensRights	31/10/22 06:01 PM
-36	Yeah, I should care about how 'my presence' makes a woman feel. No one would care. Although I really don’t know of any women that just run up on guys as they’re jogging at night and go “Hey beautiful!” but I do know tons of examples of guys doing that. Or the flier could have been written gender-neutral. Wouldn’t care. Nobody is getting bent out of shape over this except MRA groups looking for an excuse to get upset. That’s literally all this flier is trying to prevent. I’m a guy, and I can’t even fathom being so sensitive that a simple flier like this makes…	/r/MensRights	31/10/22 05:44 PM
-38	Yeah, I should care about how 'my presence' makes a woman feel. I don’t understand why all these dudes are getting bent out of shape over this. It’s just saying that if it’s night and there’s a woman walking/jogging, then don’t run up right behind them or make comments. Have we never been outside at night before? Does anyone want some random stranger trying to come up to them at night? Don’t we all get a little nervous if that happens? This PSA is just saying some pretty commonsense things that help everyone feel safer, and this sub is acting like men are lo…	/r/MensRights	31/10/22 05:34 PM
-18	I’m just disgusted by this whole thing. If there really was female privilege then she would have been allowed to get an abortion and wouldn’t have fear of being disowned by her family based on whether she’s had pre-marital sex and with whom. This is classic patriarchy in action.	/r/MensRights	31/10/22 05:13 PM
2	Uk government advert Here, here, and here are all parts of broad as campaigns to talk specifically about domestic violence conducted against men. And there is a stigma around all genders about reporting domestic violence/abuse. That’s why it’s an underreported crime. But you’ve not given any reason to believe that men are equal victims as women, while all the existing data says that this is a gendered crime disproportionately affecting women.	/r/MensRights	28/10/22 11:55 AM
2	Hi everyone. We’re about to have a discussion about patriarchy in my college class, and I’d like to know what my best arguments against patriarchy would be, and which arguments would show there are instances which there is bias against men. Thanks! If someone wanted to know why the earth is round, they could look to established academics whose entire careers revolve around understanding the particular topic at hand. And since there’s consensus in that field about their conclusions, there’s tons of peer-reviewed, published literature showing exactly how and why they came to those conclusions. And if the only way you could find arguments to disagree with established academic consensus was random Redditors in hyper-specific forums; then yeah …	/r/MensRights	28/10/22 02:26 AM
1	Hi everyone. We’re about to have a discussion about patriarchy in my college class, and I’d like to know what my best arguments against patriarchy would be, and which arguments would show there are instances which there is bias against men. Thanks! The fact that you think a civil, academic discussion on a topic like patriarchy speaks to how easily you get triggered over this topic. People have civil discussions and respectful disagreements on this topic everyday. The only reason you can’t is because the topic triggers you. Sorry bud! I don’t make the rules, I’m just telling you how it is.	/r/MensRights	28/10/22 02:00 AM
-5	Hi everyone. We’re about to have a discussion about patriarchy in my college class, and I’d like to know what my best arguments against patriarchy would be, and which arguments would show there are instances which there is bias against men. Thanks! You snowflakes are so upset and I don’t understand why. Nobody is tone policing, just making dummies look dumb. OP is walking into an academic discussion on gender and he’s the only one who wants to make it a full-on debate. But even if it was a debate, you don’t go in with pre-conceived notions of what you believe before looking at the evidence. Debates are for people who know what they believe and why, and they debate to convince an audience of their position. This clearly isn’t OP’s situation…	/r/MensRights	28/10/22 01:34 AM
-6	Hi everyone. We’re about to have a discussion about patriarchy in my college class, and I’d like to know what my best arguments against patriarchy would be, and which arguments would show there are instances which there is bias against men. Thanks! Why you so triggered mate? You’re a random Redditor. You clearly don’t respect a PhD. OP stated he has a belief that he wishes to hold before even going into a discussion, and that’s why he came to Reddit. I’m just stating the facts of what OP said. Even if everything you said was true, it wouldn’t change the fact that OP is going into something with his mind made up BEFORE finding the arguments to support his conclusions. That’s the exact opposite to how education should be done, and I think ev…	/r/MensRights	28/10/22 12:37 AM
-11	Question people don't ask when discussing the female and male gap in crime. What’s the point of your comment? The original comment is saying nagging needs to be made a crime so that we have similar percentages of women going to jail as men. And I think that’s freaking dumb. When we see more men being arrested than women, the answer isn’t to throw women in prison for nagging. If the same laws are being applied unequally, then we look for justice to be applied more equally. If the laws are being applied unequally, then we should look at why more men are committing crimes …	/r/MensRights	28/10/22 12:23 AM
-5	Uk government advert I’d say the majority of advertisements (and language more broadly) is male-normative. We’ve just become so used to masculine pronouns/imagery that it doesn’t even register to us. The fact that seeing something targeted to women sticks out as like “oh hey wow that’s weird” is a testament to how pervasive the male-as-default perspective is. And then I don’t quite understand the point you’re making in the 2nd paragraph, but yeah if there was an issue where 3/4 of victims were men and the government…	/r/MensRights	28/10/22 12:02 AM
-14	Uk government advert I don’t understand getting triggered by this. In the UK, 73% of all reported domestic abuse crimes are against women and 93% of sexual offences are committed against them (source). It’s a 12-second ad about an issue that overwhelmingly affects women…I don’t know why you’re so concerned about this.	/r/MensRights	27/10/22 10:37 PM
-10	Question people don't ask when discussing the female and male gap in crime. “Sure, I’m aware that 80.1% of solved violent crimes are committed by men, and that 73.8% of all those arrested are men, but if women were prosecuted for telling their husbands to not leave their dishes in the sink, then we’d see a lot more women in jail.”	/r/MensRights	27/10/22 10:17 PM
-14	Hi everyone. We’re about to have a discussion about patriarchy in my college class, and I’d like to know what my best arguments against patriarchy would be, and which arguments would show there are instances which there is bias against men. Thanks! “Hi all, I’m about to go into a classroom taught by a PhD professor and learn some things. I have a pre-conceived notion of what I believe; however, I don’t personally have any reasoning for why I hold these beliefs, so I’d like to appeal to random Redditors to confirm my pre-existing biases. Reddit seems like a much better place to learn than college. Thx”	/r/MensRights	27/10/22 10:00 PM
0	When talking about consent— Why doesn’t the discussion extend to consent to have my child. And now you’re talking about custody/support over the kid after a woman has gone through delivery. You’re stunning.	/r/MensRights	27/10/22 02:45 PM
0	When talking about consent— Why doesn’t the discussion extend to consent to have my child. If it’s a woman’s body, woman’s choice, and a woman’s consequences then why would a guy be able to dictate whether she does or doesn’t carry her pregnancy to term? You were trying to argue that men should control whether a woman carries a pregnancy to term, and instead you’re just showing exactly why men don’t have the final say once a woman has already gotten pregnant. MRA groups never cease to stun me with how dumb their members are. First, you’re talking about pre-pregnancy and having condoms…	/r/MensRights	27/10/22 02:40 PM
0	When talking about consent— Why doesn’t the discussion extend to consent to have my child. Birth control is the act of preventing pregnancy. So what you really mean is that you want men to be able to force women to carry/terminate a pregnancy? Because that’s the only possible explanation for what you can mean when you say “birth control rights post sex.” Why shouldn’t a woman be able to have control over her body, especially when men have ample affordable birth control methods available to them “pre sex” (as you would call it)?	/r/MensRights	27/10/22 01:47 PM
0	When talking about consent— Why doesn’t the discussion extend to consent to have my child. They’re pretty much as effective as birth control pills. The only 100% effective birth controls are going to be surgeries (tubes tied or vasectomy), but that’s true for both genders. But that doesn’t mean men don’t have access to effective birth control. They absolutely do.	/r/MensRights	27/10/22 01:19 PM
0	When talking about consent— Why doesn’t the discussion extend to consent to have my child. You’d be closer to having a point if men couldn’t go out and get a cheap condom that’s highly effective at preventing pregnancy. Men literally do have access to pregnancy prevention far cheaper and with far less side effects than women who are using things like an IUD or birth control pills. I don’t even understand how someone can make your point while keeping a straight face.	/r/MensRights	27/10/22 01:07 PM
-13	According to these feminists on this post, we are not allowed to go overseas and seek out women and open our options. they want us to be stuck to their ways . smh You’re telling me that you’d rather fly to a different country to predatorily get a marriage than to just talk to another woman? Men can and do talk to women all the time, both on dating apps and in-person. You act like this is hard.	/r/MensRights	27/10/22 03:48 AM
-15	According to these feminists on this post, we are not allowed to go overseas and seek out women and open our options. they want us to be stuck to their ways . smh If you actually read the comments, nobody cares about whether you want a “traditional” woman (whatever that means). The problem they’re talking about is when men from 1st world countries go to these areas where they can prey upon women who have nothing, marry them because these girls are desperate, and then the women are fully dependent on them because otherwise the guy will divorce and the woman will lose her green card. That’s pretty predatory. The United States has 350 million people…there’s …	/r/MensRights	27/10/22 03:01 AM
0	Question OP out here getting 3rd degree burns from how bad he gettin flamed!	/r/MensRights	25/10/22 09:49 PM
1	How Multiple Accusers Create “Almost Insurmountable” Cases for Harvey Weinstein and Danny Masterson Nooooooooo. Y’all are not out here trying to defend Harvey Weinstein. And then you’ll complain later that everyone treat MRAs like a joke.	/r/MensRights	25/10/22 04:05 AM
10	Does anyone else find the new Old Spice commercials offensive towards men? I think you need to learn to chill. They’re just trying to make a joke about a soap smelling super nice but being designed for men. I don’t think the commercials are funny, but it’s just a for-profit company trying to sell a soap based on the idea that their girlfriend won’t be able to get enough of it.	/r/MensRights	25/10/22 12:15 AM
-2	Radical Feminism is Incel Culture for Women Love how OP now thinks he understands all feminists (or radical feminists if he’d prefer the term) because he went on one bad date. You really can’t make this stuff up.	/r/MensRights	22/10/22 01:35 PM
0	"The patriarchy" Without fail, no matter how many statistics you can provide about how power structures are run by men, this subreddit never fails to bring up that more women are in HR and then assert that this means actually women run the world. It’s honestly embarrassing to overlook all the gender disparities across society and just pretend that HR is more important that CEOs, politicians, judges, engineers, management (across all fields), university deans, and so forth. There’s a reason that as you blindly as…	/r/MensRights	21/10/22 05:43 PM
1	"The patriarchy" Women didn’t have the right to vote guaranteed until 1920, it was legal to discriminate pay until 1963, women couldn’t even take out a credit card in their name until 1974. There actively and openly have been systems for decades and centuries in place excluding women from these positions, and the effects are still felt today. We even still see plenty of sexism today that ultimately serves to keep women out of leadership roles, and you’re welcome to read more about it in the workplace, or you’re …	/r/MensRights	21/10/22 11:57 AM
-2	"The patriarchy" Ah yes. Let’s not listen to the PhD professor of history at a major university who has written an entire book on this specific topic. Let’s instead listen to a random Redditor who claims “bias” but can’t give an example of where an expert in this field is wrong. It must be hard to live while being this stupid.	/r/MensRights	21/10/22 05:31 AM
-6	"The patriarchy" I presume you’re referring to the a-historical belief that women are the reason the 18th Amendment was passed. This is not true, for so many reasons. Feel free to read more if you’re actually interested.	/r/MensRights	21/10/22 03:28 AM
0	"The patriarchy" From 1787, all states except New Jersey banned women from voting. Women in NJ were only allowed to vote if they were single and had 50+ pounds of property. This rule was rescinded in 1807, when voting was restricted back exclusively to white males. In the lead up to the passage of the 19th amendment, some states (mostly out West where they needed to attract women) did allow some women to vote in some elections, but let’s not pretend that this is revisionist history to say women couldn’t vote bef…	/r/MensRights	21/10/22 03:23 AM
0	"The patriarchy" It’s honestly just being willfully obtuse to argue that a pattern seen in all the power structures across government, private corporations, and the nonprofit world is “narrow in its viewpoint.” And you seem to be reverting back to the idea that patriarchy means that most/all men are in power. Anyone talking about patriarchy acknowledges that it harms men as well. Take your prisoner / war casualty example: Our patriarchal system thought women were weak and needed protecting by a man. This puts wo…	/r/MensRights	21/10/22 02:22 AM
0	"The patriarchy" So now you’re having a different argument. Instead of saying patriarchy doesn’t exist, you’re saying it doesn’t matter because women could vote men out of office if they wanted. Patriarchy is a system of power, which is far more expansive than simply involving our democratically elected politicians. The majority of the power positions I named are not elected democratically, and instead appointed by those already in power, who tend to want to uphold the status quo. But when it comes to elected po…	/r/MensRights	21/10/22 02:08 AM
0	"The patriarchy" Well, practically speaking, women are excluded from positions of power. That’s why they aren’t Fortune 500 CEOs, judges, politicians, university deans, etc. Women have been excluded from these positions of power for centuries, and we continue to see a system that creates a glass ceiling around positions of power.	/r/MensRights	20/10/22 10:22 PM
1	"The patriarchy" Ummmmm no it’s not. That is a system where men hold the power and women are largely excluded from it.	/r/MensRights	20/10/22 09:41 PM
-4	"The patriarchy" How could you possibly argue that men don’t hold most all of power structures? Most politicians are men, along with 2/3rds of judges. 92% of Fortune 500 CEOs are men, which are the most powerful companies on the planet. Most leadership in academia are men (74% of governing board members are men). Men make more on average than women make on average. You can’t argue this. By any metric for power, men dominate the US power structures.	/r/MensRights	20/10/22 09:36 PM
-14	"The patriarchy" Even if you have never had anyone explain this to you, you could do something crazy called googling it. You’d get this: A system of society or government in which men hold the power and women are largely excluded from it	/r/MensRights	20/10/22 08:06 PM
-18	"The patriarchy" I’ve read the other comments…nobody has even attempted to seriously address the concept. I can’t even tell if you think the definition of patriarchy is incorrect or if you think that most of the power is held by men. You’re incomprehensible.	/r/MensRights	20/10/22 07:33 PM
-24	"The patriarchy" I don’t think it’s difficult to understand patriarchy just means a system where all/most of the power is held by men. This is objectively true for countries like the United States, and absolutely has not been “disproven multiple times.” I think a lot of men get triggered by this because they think patriarchy means things are peachy for all men. It doesn’t. Patriarchy doesn’t mean that most/all men are in power, but it does mean that most/all in power are men. It’s important to acknowledge this b…	/r/MensRights	20/10/22 07:11 PM
3	We are fighting a war without any support. I just need to rant. I apologise if that’s not allowed. It must be difficult being this dumb. I cited data stating that out of the 200 largest companies in Australia, 14 have women CEOs and 186 have male CEOs. And you think that bringing up one of the companies with a female CEO somehow debunks that statistic? It’s also clear you don’t have a clue about the lawyer pay gap either, because women lawyers in the private sector make 23% less than male lawyers in the private sector. Finally, I feel the need to just refer you to what I said earlier: Patriar…	/r/MensRights	19/10/22 04:57 PM
3	We are fighting a war without any support. I just need to rant. I apologise if that’s not allowed. Med school: it’s true that gender balance in med school has been achieved for a few decades (not 60%, but right around 50% every year). But when you look at positions of power in medicine, only 28% of medical deans and 12% of hospital CEOs are women. So when we’re talking about power, that’s women being in a back seat. Law: there’s still a huge pay gap between male and female lawyers in Australia, and less than 25% of senior management in law are women. There’s no way to make an argument that la…	/r/MensRights	19/10/22 01:15 PM
-7	We are fighting a war without any support. I just need to rant. I apologise if that’s not allowed. I really can’t get past how thick your skull must be. For ALL Issues with HR (gender included), the CEO has more control over than the HR department. If HR pushed these gynocentric policies and hired a bunch of unqualified women into roles over qualified men, then the companies would lose money and the CEO would hire new HR staff. You also can’t make the argument that I’m ignoring the 99% of normal people when it’s statistically shown that the average working woman makes far less than the averag…	/r/MensRights	19/10/22 06:01 AM
0	We are fighting a war without any support. I just need to rant. I apologise if that’s not allowed. Ok so politicians and Fortune 500 CEOs don’t affect your life, but the HR department at that Fortune 500 company does affect your life. Totally makes sense. Only 20% of the top 200 universities have female leadership, so they aren’t controlling universities. Working women makes less money than working men on average, so if you look at money then again; the power is over with men. Women are only 1/3 of the judiciary and 4% of all Supreme Court justices to have ever served, so again, they really a…	/r/MensRights	19/10/22 05:44 AM
-7	We are fighting a war without any support. I just need to rant. I apologise if that’s not allowed. Historically, women certainly haven’t gotten all these great laws in their favor. From being banned from joining the military, not being allowed to own a credit card, or even being allowed to be a bartender, they’ve faced legal discrimination. But maybe we’re talking about the present day. Ah yes! Like when men decided that abortion shouldn’t be a protected right in the United States. That was a very pro-woman decision. And then I don’t really feel a need to explain to someone that the CEO has m…	/r/MensRights	19/10/22 05:30 AM
-6	We are fighting a war without any support. I just need to rant. I apologise if that’s not allowed. A matriarchal society would be one where the positions of power are held primarily by women. Given that, may I ask what you’re smoking? I mean seriously. Women aren’t dominating politics, they certainly aren’t CEOs of all the Fortune 500 companies. They aren’t taking the high-paying jobs…we know that’s men too. This doesn’t mean men don’t have problems, or that there aren’t men who have bad lives. But come on - there’s no possible way you could make an argument that society is matriarchal.	/r/MensRights	19/10/22 05:02 AM
0	After submitting more than 12,000 resumes to over 4,000 job adverts ...(researchers) found that male applicants received around 40% fewer call-backs for roles that are typically dominated by females than women with identical qualifications and experience The article literally said men get 50% more call backs in male-dominated fields than women. This isn’t some sort of anti-man discrimination, it’s just a discrimination via status-quo. Female dominated industries want females, male dominated industries want males. Simple as that.	/r/MensRights	17/10/22 09:30 PM
-4	I would argue men like this guy do far more damage to other men than feminists do 100%. Matt Walsh pushes one of the most toxic versions of masculinity out there. And let’s be clear - Matt Walsh is the figure that these MRA groups want. Openly pro-patriarchy, explicitly anti-feminist, and he has a lot to say about what men should be like. When people talk about toxic masculinity, just think of Matt Walsh. Because he promotes the idea that there is a narrow definition of what men should look, think, talk, and act like. It’s not descriptive based on what men are, it’s prescript…	/r/MensRights	17/10/22 07:52 PM
-4	Why do so many men continue to blindly endorse the notion that feminism is about equality, despite overwhelming objective evidence to the contrary? So you would have preferred schools not teach what bias is and how to mitigate it? Or to not be able to distinguish between a factual argument vs. an emotionally charged one? What are you getting at?	/r/MensRights	14/10/22 10:36 PM
2	What are some things I can do to help homeless men specifically? Vote in the midterms for candidates who will expand social services so that we have adequate funding for those who need help, raise the minimum wage to keep people out of poverty, and fight for better regulations in the rental market so that people don’t get priced out of affordable homes.	/r/MensRights	13/10/22 07:41 PM
0	What is the difference between third and fourth wave feminism? It is scary that some people will read this and think it’s historical. First wave feminism was not talking about manspreading. It just…wasn’t. It is true that first-wave feminism prioritized voting rights above being added to the Selective Service. Crazy that they’d want a say in the political figures who determine what wars they go before focusing on the idea of the draft. It should be noted that feminism is the reason that women are even allowed in the military. This wasn’t allowed until 1948,…	/r/MensRights	13/10/22 04:26 PM
5	What is the difference between third and fourth wave feminism? It really is going to depend on who you ask. There isn’t a consensus on what 4th wave feminism is, if it has already happened or if it’s something that will happen. 1st wave - centered around women being able to get the right to vote. 1850s - 1920. It certainly advocated for many other things, but the right to vote was the most central to the movement, and once the 19th Amendment was passed, feminist movements splintered a lot. 2nd wave - 1960s-1980(ish). Focused on overturning the idea that wom…	/r/MensRights	13/10/22 02:06 PM
-3	I literally can't go online in almost any regard without seeing sanction, celibrated belittling or straight hatred of men.. Starts off with an AITA post being posted in a similar group, leads me to shit like this. the irony of rule 3 of the hate group would be comical if it wasn't so messed up So when you say that “she deserves far worse than what she got,” what exactly do you think she deserves?	/r/MensRights	12/10/22 01:27 PM
-25	The gender part of African slavery you don't know hear about in school: men were more enslaved, female slaves were freed more, and some slave owners were women. If you’re looking at slavery and going, “Gosh! That really sucked…for men!” then I think you’re missing the point.	/r/MensRights	11/10/22 11:52 PM
-27	I literally can't go online in almost any regard without seeing sanction, celibrated belittling or straight hatred of men.. Starts off with an AITA post being posted in a similar group, leads me to shit like this. the irony of rule 3 of the hate group would be comical if it wasn't so messed up Well I’m glad we agree it’s abusive behavior. It’s so crazy of me to just quote what was in the post. But it seems you have discovered a truly enlightening truth - this guy could have done something bad to his wife, and also there can be other people who do bad things as well (unless of course these women are deaf). It’s a truly shocking insight.	/r/MensRights	11/10/22 08:37 PM
-39	I literally can't go online in almost any regard without seeing sanction, celibrated belittling or straight hatred of men.. Starts off with an AITA post being posted in a similar group, leads me to shit like this. the irony of rule 3 of the hate group would be comical if it wasn't so messed up Is that really your defense of the guy here? That maybe in some world he’s deaf, forgot to mention that when he went through his health issues, and only yelled at his pregnant wife that she needed to stop acting like a child…all because he didn’t know how loud he’s speaking? Give me a break.	/r/MensRights	11/10/22 08:28 PM
-148	I literally can't go online in almost any regard without seeing sanction, celibrated belittling or straight hatred of men.. Starts off with an AITA post being posted in a similar group, leads me to shit like this. the irony of rule 3 of the hate group would be comical if it wasn't so messed up And by normal human emotion, you mean yelling at your pregnant wife until she’s in tears.	/r/MensRights	11/10/22 07:54 PM
1	Imagine the opposite 100% of standup comedians get heckled, particularly the smaller you are. You think there’s any female comic who hasn’t gone through this exact thing? Amy Shumer got heckled by a drunk guy about her body while she was taping a special. I’m not saying it’s right for heckling or sexual comments to be made at any comedian (man or woman), but to act like this only has ever happened to male comedians is so stupid.	/r/MensRights	11/10/22 05:52 PM
0	A movie about #MeToo from the perspective of a female perpetrator Ok so let’s say I agree with your assessment of what the #MeToo movement was about. It’s anti-male and doesn’t talk about female perpetrators enough You’re right now complaining about a movie THAT TALKS ABOUT A FEMALE PERPETRATOR of sexual harassment/coercion. And your post is about how you’re upset that they chose a female perpetrator and not a male one. Had they chosen a male perpetrator, then you would have used your same argument of saying “#MeToo is an anti-man movement and they only ever p…	/r/MensRights	10/10/22 06:30 AM
1	Men are not all on the same team. Men oppress men. Feminism has this assumption that men don't oppress other men. (A short commentary on the trivialization of man-on-man violence) And you don’t see any hypocrisy or double-standard in your analysis here?	/r/MensRights	10/10/22 03:57 AM
1	Susan G Komen: proof that feminists don't care about either gender. It’s unfortunate that some people never learn how to read. I guess 2 sentences is too much…	/r/MensRights	09/10/22 10:13 PM
0	Susan G Komen: proof that feminists don't care about either gender. The Susan G Komen foundation takes in donations and one of the things it uses donations for is to lobby the government for more research funding. It does not fund the research directly, but it funds lobbying, which affects the budget for research.	/r/MensRights	09/10/22 10:01 PM
0	Men are not all on the same team. Men oppress men. Feminism has this assumption that men don't oppress other men. (A short commentary on the trivialization of man-on-man violence) Are men seeking successful or attractive women encouraging women-on-women oppression?	/r/MensRights	09/10/22 09:55 PM
1	should men Cry? For those who don’t understand what the phrase “toxic masculinity” means, Matt Walsh is a perfect example. Crying is a normal human emotion, and people like Matt who want to stigmatize it and make you feel inferior for doing something that 100% of humans do is extremely toxic. It’s unnatural to just bottle up all your emotions to the point where you never even do something as simple as shedding some tears. Men deserve better. We deserve to be able to feel emotion and not be shamed by the Matt Wa…	/r/MensRights	09/10/22 03:46 PM
3	Men are not all on the same team. Men oppress men. Feminism has this assumption that men don't oppress other men. (A short commentary on the trivialization of man-on-man violence) That in fact is another example of feminism explicitly saying the exact opposite thing of OP’s straw man post. I’m so glad you understand!	/r/MensRights	09/10/22 04:23 AM
0	Susan G Komen: proof that feminists don't care about either gender. I don’t know if you’ve ever followed something called “the news” at any point in your life, but that is not how the US federal government operates. And the original post is saying that this breast cancer research is being done specifically so that men die from other cancers. If that money came from some other area of federal funding, then it would still invalidate the point of this post.	/r/MensRights	09/10/22 04:16 AM
5	I'm sick of double standards This is 100% just stereotypes you have in your head. I hear all these things said about both genders	/r/MensRights	09/10/22 03:43 AM
0	Susan G Komen: proof that feminists don't care about either gender. No it’s a breast cancer organization trying to get funding for breast cancer research. Do organizations that lobby for prostate cancer research do so because they hate women and hope they die of breast cancer?	/r/MensRights	09/10/22 03:05 AM
0	Men are not all on the same team. Men oppress men. Feminism has this assumption that men don't oppress other men. (A short commentary on the trivialization of man-on-man violence) Feminism doesn’t assume that men don’t oppress other men. In fact, quite the opposite. Terms like “toxic masculinity” describe how men harm other men, and it’s something that feminism tries to help with, which is something that would help men oppressed by other men.	/r/MensRights	09/10/22 02:46 AM
-4	Susan G Komen: proof that feminists don't care about either gender. You act as if there’s this huge conspiracy that an organization focused on addressing breast cancer is trying to get federal funding as a way to make sure men don’t get treatment for prostate cancer so that more men die. This isn’t a “fixed pie” kind of thing - if all types of cancer research had the kind of awareness and support as breast cancer, then all cancer research would get more federal funding. This isn’t some anti-man conspiracy theory. This is just an example of an organization that h…	/r/MensRights	09/10/22 02:36 AM
0	Why is it that anytime a man voices frustration with anything in regard to Men’s Rights it is suggested he “hates” women? It’s because that’s what 95% of Men’s Rights groups/convos devolve into. Look at any of the threads in this sub. They follow the same pattern: someone posts about a problem facing men, and then everyone immediately starts freaking out about how feminism is ruining the world and no one actually talks about the initial problem. These “feminists” are somehow so dumb/incompetent that it’s almost laughable, and yet somehow they’re extremely powerful and can control the discourse well enough to put me…	/r/MensRights	09/10/22 02:08 AM
0	The patriarchy paradox Well you never even tried to answer my counter-points so I assumed it’s because you have a room-temperature IQ. Or should I say “Yiu” have a room-temperature IQ.	/r/MensRights	08/10/22 06:03 AM
0	The patriarchy paradox Your post is littered with typos and grammatical mistakes, not to mention the the core argument - that privilege is actually a merit thing. Try to be smarter when you’re being stupid.	/r/MensRights	08/10/22 05:52 AM
-1	The patriarchy paradox No I read it and it was dumb. The pseudo-historical analysis was atrocious. The patriarchy didn’t begin in hunter-gatherer societies, as you seem to believe. Those societies tended to be far more gender-egalitarian than what we see today. But the bigger problem is that you seem to be confusing the idea that a system benefits men on a whole with the idea that it benefits ALL men in ALL situations. The concept of a power/privilege based hierarchy is talking about what’s happening at the top of the…	/r/MensRights	08/10/22 05:48 AM
-5	The patriarchy paradox I like how you start by pretending like the idea that the patriarchy is an absurd idea and then immediately acknowledge that it exists and that you think it’s justified. Why not just come out and say it? Why not just say, “Yeah men get positions of privilege/power bcuz…” Also, the idea of trying to justify that someone has a position of privilege based on merit is absurd, and definitionally incoherent.	/r/MensRights	08/10/22 04:06 AM
7	A movie about #MeToo from the perspective of a female perpetrator Let me get this straight…this movie is about a woman who uses her position of power to coerce other people beneath her into sexual relationships that they otherwise wouldn’t engage in, and you’re upset because they made the movie about a woman who’s doing this and not a man? Doesn’t this subreddit always complain that men are the ones who are portrayed in a negative light? And then now instead of making a movie about a man who does this, they pick a woman to be the one who leverages her power to…	/r/MensRights	08/10/22 03:09 AM
9	r/purplepilldebate once again showing how apathetic it is to men’s issues in general smh Why don’t you focus on the top comment that got a ton of likes and awards where the commenter listed like 10 things that would genuinely help alleviate many of the problems that the Men’s Rights community talks about instead of scrolling down to the bottom to find some 3-like comment that makes you upset. IT feels like you just wanted to get upset at the responses instead of focusing on the thing that the community uplifted as the preferred response. If you have issues with that response, then t…	/r/MensRights	06/10/22 02:09 AM
3	Being blasted by feminists for suggesting being an incel is more complicated than the environment Did you make an entire post just because you got in a huge Reddit argument with 1 person? Who cares? It’s Reddit…you can always find people who disagree with you. What’s the point of posting about it?	/r/MensRights	04/10/22 02:29 AM