TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

pdoherty972 Archive

View 0 posts and 590 comments by pdoherty972 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I'm more referring to the overall things men vs women look for in partners. Men gain income/wealth and status as they age, which improves their attractiveness, as it's what women tend to seek in relationships. Men don't care as much about women's ability to earn money or their net worth.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 04:44 AM
1

Then the age-gap relationships wouldn't exist and we wouldn't be having this conversation... but here we are.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/26 11:12 PM
2

Who's to say the young person isn't the manipulator? They are, after all, the less-accomplished person whose primarily sought for their youth they did nothing to achieve, and are expecting in return to share in a lifestyle/status earned by the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/26 07:32 PM
1

Why would it need to be a sub for support? It's a sub to point out how often one subset of women (teachers) sexually abuse minors.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/26 06:40 PM
0

I find it unlikely that a decade+ age gap man isn't better-off financially. But even if that were the case, then clearly the woman sees something else she's getting in the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/26 05:33 PM
-1

r/teacherswhorape
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/26 05:32 PM
3

Ah, the women that are simultaneously "strong and independent" college grads out tackling the workforce, and also naive helpless victims of manipulation.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/26 05:31 PM
-1

Is it just as "gross" that these young women are trying to get access to a better standard-of-living they haven't earned, or get to where they're taken care of without a need to work? What's so magical or special about their "youth" that they did nothing to earn?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/26 05:28 PM
0

It's pretty nosy and busybody to try and criticize or examine these relationships at all, since everyone involved is a consenting adult. I think they're capable of determining what's in their own best interests.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/26 05:27 PM
1

Worse than toxic, the women (let's be honest it's usually) complaining could be portrayed as simply not liking that men's attractiveness tends to climb as they age while theirs diminishes. They enjoy their 20s and into their 30s with advantage in the sexual market place, and resent losing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/26 05:18 PM
–

But it's absolutely good that people point out the hypocrisy of women who themselves don't meet any reasonable standards that resemble what they require from men. For example a fat woman who eats a lot (and poorly) and doesn't exercise but excludes all men that aren't gym rats. Or who are retail employees making $15 an hour but won't date any man unless he makes $100K+ a year.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 04:48 PM
–

It's funny that women think men are more optional for them than women are optional to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 04:44 PM
–

News flash: sometimes kids are fuck ups of their own design without being (somehow) forced to be. The idea you want to excuse adults for their own choices is wild.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 04:41 PM
–

It's also absolutely more likely that in a dynamic where parents and kids aren't getting along it's the kids who are at fault. The parents are the ones who are at least 18 years older and have been working jobs and paying the bills. Far more likely that the kids are spoiled brats or not getting with the program (in all ways).
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 04:41 PM
–

I think it's more that he believes your standards are higher for men than you demonstrate yourself as a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 04:18 PM
–

And, if the opposite calculator (male delusion calculator) exists, it would find that almost all men are completely rational. For example they'd have almost no height requirement and would look solely for a woman in an age range, regardless of income, who isn't overweight. So the typical woman's delusional standards has her looking for men that less than 2% of the male population, but men's, I'm estimating, would be 25% or more of the female population.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 04:17 PM
–

Agreed. The average male height in the USA is 5'9" and that's taller than 97% of women already.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 03:59 PM
–

If only they thought it was a win, but these are the same women who lament their choices once they hit 35-45 years of age.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 03:44 PM
–

The tables have been inaccurately reversed because men are not equal to women in terms of dating. The flip side to that is women's sexual-market value has an expiration date and it's not that old. So women get to enjoy this power imbalance in their 20s and part of their 30s, but by then they're declining in attractiveness to most men, and men have been building their value through career/income, status and experience. It's all men from there on out.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 01:10 PM
3

When women are filtering out almost all men there's clearly a problem. Women aren't entitled or deserving of only the best, and I have no idea where they came up with the idea that men need them more than they need men. It's only in the last 60 years that women have had the chance to really have careers and compete. Maybe that's the issue - women as a whole are like teenagers or new college graduates, flush with their newfound independence/freedom (and making mistakes accordingly)?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 01:01 PM
5

and it says that "we're the same type of weird if: you think empire strikes back is peak star wars". empire and a new hope are objectively (i'll fight you) the best star wars movies. so that's in no way "weird". "Rogue One" enters the chat...
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 12:55 PM
2

If misogyny does, misandry does.
/r/MensRights10/07/26 02:44 PM
–

That isn't usually how it goes, though. What typically happens is she burns through her 20s and most of her 30s before 'settling' on a guy (who is actually in most cases the man actually at her level). Then she's resentful the rest of her life. This pattern is why we have a birth-rate problem and a divorce problem (at least among the non-religious, the religious having a very low divorce rate).
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 08:13 PM
–

Good luck getting Red Pill guys to understand this. One of the movement's biggest problems is a complete lack of theory of mind. They can't seriously entertain the possibility that women have internal experiences and motivations that differ from the narratives they've already decided are That sounds esoteric and not at all what's going on. I can't speak for others but it's plain to observe how women are behaving. Delaying marriage for college and a career, and wasting their youths chasing the to…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 05:39 PM
–

Yep and the inverse of that is what's being done to women with delusional standards that result in them sleeping with guys who will never consider them for long-term relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 05:37 PM
–

Somehow women's standards have changed within the last 60 years. Them getting "the pill" and joining college and the workforce has allowed them to override their prior mate-selection behaviors. To the detriment of themselves and overall society.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 05:37 PM
–

Well it's also fair to point out how delusional women's standards are, and how they're asking for things they come nowhere close to offering themselves. Evidence being very average looking women of near-zero accomplishments seeking rich and handsome men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 05:35 PM
–

That's because women are biologically-wired to seek a man who's capable of protecting them (capable of violence).
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 04:39 PM
10

Same thing happens in the USA. Boys for the last few decades are more harshly punished than girls for the same behaviors.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 01:41 PM
5

Yeah it's a real mystery why men are dropping out when they're expected to shoulder all the traditional male duties/expectations (approaching, paying for dates, provider in relationship, protection), while women provide none of theirs.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 03:26 AM
41

Now also ask "who is more misandrist?"
/r/MensRights26/06/26 09:26 PM
5

Rubbing their face in their own hypocritical stances is fun, indeed.
/r/MensRights14/06/26 01:36 AM
2

It's the movie 'Disclosure' with Michael Douglas and Demi Moore in real life.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 06:29 PM
7

Handmaid’s Tale and Fifty Shades of Grey agree
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/26 12:14 AM
2

So where did the "interrupting women" come from?
/r/MensRights28/03/26 02:40 PM
5

Exactly - doesn't clarify anything really. It's still a useless and gender-biased law. For a bunch of "girl bosses", women sure do still seem to require a lot of coddling and special protections.
/r/MensRights28/03/26 12:45 PM
1

Give us an example that would rise to the level of prosecutable.
/r/MensRights28/03/26 12:43 PM
1

Not quite equivalent. 170Ibs is average. 5'7 is below average by almost 1 standard deviation. What are you thinking an SD for height in men is, because 5'9" is average for US men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 02:55 AM
1

I didn't describe only looks. Did you even read the reply you just replied to?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 09:14 PM
0

It's different when they have differing strengths. I'm referring to people specifically seeking a partner for positive traits they themselves don't possess. Say, for example, a lazy and unproductive woman seeking a productive and energetic man. Most people would think that's hypocritical.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 08:40 PM
0

Pointing out delusional women thinking that, who they can sleep with means who they can have relationships/marriage with, isn't oppression.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 08:08 PM
0

Women have been forced into marriage for survival and we are finally several generations from that. And yet, despite this "progress", women are more miserable than ever, more are on psychiatric medications and diagnosed with mental illness, and attempt to unalive themselves at 2X-3X the rate men do. Almost like it's not progress at all...
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 08:04 PM
0

They're pushing back on the ridiculous double standard so it doesn't remain a feature of the dating landscape since it's non functional.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 07:59 PM
0

Like that woman who wanted to see what it was like to be a man and passed as a man for months or a year. Ended up unaliving herself due to how hard it was. Think she wrote a book on it prior.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 07:58 PM
1

Why do you think it's reasonable for someone to be seeking things in their potential partners that they themselves don't possess or do?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 07:57 PM
–

"Ladies, If you’re not attracted to 90-95% of men, you're a lesbian"
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 02:49 AM
15

Yeah but the term gay does actually just mean "same-sex attracted". No reason we need two different terms for the same thing just based on the sex of the person we're describing.
/r/MensRights05/02/26 02:47 AM
1

Can you give a hypothetical that would be something you're talking about that he would object to (given his stance and my elaboration of it)? Because I'm not coming up with anything, just your suggestion it would inconvenience or suppress her in some way.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 02:38 AM
0

What does "stands up for herself" mean in this context?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 08:54 PM
-4

You can describe it that way sure. Or you can say that a male/female relationship brings different duties/obligations in some cases to both parties and if she expects to have all her expenses paid for by his efforts then she should take a back seat in a lot of cases on decisions he's making.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 04:00 PM
-2

I think, following OP's initial post, that he thinks the relationship will be one where he's required to bring most of the finances and leadership to the relationship (sets and pays for dates, pays the bills, etc) so to him he probably thinks "why, if I'm the breadwinner and decision-maker, would I want a woman who something other than agreeable and who won't let me lead?"
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 03:51 PM
-1

I think he probably means she doesn't respond with drama to events or bring any unnecessary drama to the relationship/household. Not being demanding and combative also.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 02:27 PM
1

What's really ironic about this, is it's not even a compliment if a woman did want him for his "looks" since, unless it's associated with working out, his looks aren't a function of effort, they're just luck of birth. So, if the woman wants the guy for his hard-earned wealth, that's sort of more of a compliment since it's a reward for his plan/discipline/effort.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 01:48 PM
1

The older women also don't like the implication that the best men (in terms of career development, wealth, status at minimum) are attracted to young women (all men are!) and this arrangement (older man with young-20s woman) rubs that fact in their faces.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 11:34 PM
1

I think when people use "middle age" they're not referring to the literal middle of your lifespan which would include almost 20 years of being a child. I think they're referring to the middle of your adult years. So if someone is going to live to 80 and we start measuring from 20 they'd be middle aged at/around 50.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 04:46 PM
-1

The man also knows that his wealth accumulated over decades will last far longer than the looks the young woman (or a young man) is relying on.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 04:27 PM
1

20 year old women don't want middle aged or geriatric men the way these men want them And? The men want the youthful/beautiful years from them and they want the assets and better lifestyle of the men. It's called a transaction and it doesn't need to an exchange of identical things.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 04:24 PM
5

With the right attitude, one.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/25 01:46 PM
0

Men don't really care about women's income, because men are expected to always pay for themselves and usually a woman too, while women typically reserve their pay for themselves. So, in fact, to some men a woman who makes a lot can be a red flag since it might mean she'll be disagreeable and more likely to break the relationship up.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 08:47 PM
3

He's referring to the idea that women age out and become less appealing as they age (due to men seeking fertility/youth/beauty), and men gaining in value as they age due to them gaining careers, status, education and wealth/income (and men are fertile their whole lives).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 07:40 PM
2

I also love how some guys seem to think all they need to be attractive is height they were born with.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 07:38 PM
6

I see videos quite a bit of women going to clubs, speed dating events and even Home Depot looking for men and not finding any or complaining about not being approached; not sure why they'd be trying to avoid being approached if some/many are in that position.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 07:37 PM
14

That they've caused, while the whole time claiming women are downtrodden/oppressed.
/r/MensRights22/08/25 04:41 PM
–

I think it's less that women are raising their standards (though there's plenty of women delusionally doing that), and more that women are victims of their own success. What I mean by that is that access to easy birth control has enabled them to dictate when or if they become pregnant unlike in the past (which pushed many to get married sooner so as to not risk becoming unwed mothers). And women entered the workforce around the same time (1970s) which was both a blessing and a curse. They have t…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 11:37 AM
1

I'm not referring to cheating; I'm referring to a woman who mistreats her man because she thinks her looks are beyond what he normally would get, whose looks then fade and are replaced with nothing (skills, income, personality, loyalty). Meanwhile the man has been improving the whole time, if only in income. The mismatch she thinks existed is now flipped.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 05:47 PM
3

What happens as this woman ages and loses the sole thing (physical attraction) that she used to attract the man initially, and lord over him? Meanwhile the man has created his value and is likely a higher earner now than he was when they met. Sounds like a recipe for disaster.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 12:28 PM
2

Unfortunately I think it’s more basic than that- men remain viable as reproductive mates much longer than women. Well, sure, but that doesn't explain why women even past 35 still are attracted to men older than them. Which underscores that what makes men attractive gets better with age (all things being equal) but not so for women. Women just losing the ability to have kids, much less also their youth/beauty, means they're losing status/market-value every year, while men's value is increasing ev…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 02:02 PM
2

Difference is that women seek things of men that take time to accumulate and therefore more women are likely to want older men than vice versa. Which is why women get salty in these debates.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 03:44 AM
0

That's because women have deluded themselves into thinking they are competitive with men in every arena. It's also why the nuclear family has largely been destroyed and the kids that are born are being poorly raised in single-parent households. Feminism has done inordinate damage to society.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 03:31 AM
2

I only say this because the average woman already takes better care of themselves than your average man. No, they don't. More women are overweight/obese than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 03:26 AM
1

So somehow it's creepy for the older man but not the younger woman? He wants her youth and beauty and she wants his income/wealth or status. It's an even trade between adults. Both are getting what they want. Neither is 'creepy'.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 03:20 AM
0

He didn't say they were virtuous by abstaining from sex; they're virtuous because they pursued excellence, income and status and achieved it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 03:15 AM
5

And how does one compete with the memories or rose-colored imaginations of people they've been with that you've never met or known? Why would that be desirable for anyone, man or woman? This very thing is one of the reasons why people should be virgins when they marry. You can learn everything you need within the confines of marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 02:50 AM
2

And why is she entitled to anyone doing ANYTHING for her, even if those are things she could have done for herself? What a spoiled brat.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 01:52 PM
6

People did talk about Margaret Qualley's nudity in The Substance. But they used prosthetics and/or body doubles for her as well.
/r/MensRights17/03/25 03:06 PM
2

There's a lot more to live for than women. Seriously - find some hobbies, get on meetup.com and join some boardgame or RPG gaming groups, take some vacations, find a make roommate to split bills with and that's also someone to hang out with. Hang in there and try and keep things in perspective.
/r/MensRights16/02/25 04:44 PM
34

FFS - maybe he's a single guy without a spouse or kids and just wanted to go? If he's not doing something shady you really have no business accusing him of something. GTFO
/r/MensRights17/01/25 07:03 PM
2

Considering the vast majority of the time men have to pursue and be the one to ask women out that seems some convenient reasoning…
/r/MensRights14/12/24 08:39 PM
27

Problem is, these same women want the accouterments of traditional men but don’t provide the accouterments of traditional women.
/r/MensRights14/12/24 08:37 PM
7

AKA ‘a shit test’, where the woman purposely pushes buttons to see how the man responds.
/r/MensRights14/12/24 08:33 PM
4

Heaven forbid this woman pays for her own food. So she wants her own career, her own money, to be the man’s equal in all ways, but then wants him to spend his money on her? BS
/r/MensRights14/12/24 08:19 PM
15

And they’d never describe a male accused of raping a woman with any complimentary term. More female privilege.
/r/MensRights09/12/24 05:12 PM
196

What's with describing her as "glamorous"?
/r/MensRights09/12/24 04:03 AM
1

Sure. But to the extent that this pressure exists (and works) it should work BETTER/MORE in more-oppressive countries than it does here. But it doesn't. Which means western women are choosing these professions, despite being more free to do otherwise, and have no one (and nothing) to blame for it but themselves. Whether they choose the professions and working hours they choose from this vague and unquantifiable 'societal pressures' or from their own proclivities is irrelevant. Neither have anyth…
/r/MensRights26/11/24 09:08 PM
1

Not sure what your point is; when women choose different jobs, work less hours a year, etc, there would be no point in comparing their wage to any man not doing the same.
/r/MensRights26/11/24 04:16 AM
2

I'm not sure how you're confused. Take the Middle East countries. Do you agree women are more oppressed there? I'll assume you agree. Women are more represented in STEM field jobs/careers there than in Western countries. That's what I'm referring to.
/r/MensRights26/11/24 04:15 AM
1

By "all things being equal" I'm solely referring to relevant things. Time in the profession (without gaps), hours worked, education, experience/skills. When those are equal there is no pay gap.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 11:22 PM
2

No it's not society's fault or social pressures that have women choosing these fields. Women in western countries are freer than those in countries where women are heavily-oppressed. Yet in those oppressed countries women are closer to parity in participating in STEM fields, while women in Western countries opt for nursing, teaching, social work, accounting and other professions instead. If women being truly second-class citizens doesn't stop them from doing "men's work" in those other places yo…
/r/MensRights25/11/24 11:21 PM
2

The entire idea of a pay gap is looking at average pay for men as a category, versus average pay for women. That there is a significant difference there, is the whole idea of the pay gap. That's it. And why is that problematic? Women choose more often to enter lower-paying work. That's nobody's fault and not something society should care about or be trying to remediate. Men choose higher-risk and more-dangerous jobs and are compensated accordingly.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 02:37 PM
1

What he's telling you is that when all things are equal (education, time at a job, chosen career, and hours worked) there is no gap.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 02:35 PM
3

Miraculously, when you work less hours per year (at the same pay rate) you make less money.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 02:33 PM
1

Well the women’s choices is the only way they get the gap, which is because women are largely choosing the same sorts of jobs they did 100 years ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 04:36 PM
3

Google thought they were paying women less (due to women complaining) and did a company-wide salary survey and found out the women were being paid MORE.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 04:34 PM
1

Definitely because the only way you come to gap is of you average all women against all men, which ignores what professions or how many hours people work. In the same situation women earn the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 04:33 PM
25

Most of unrealistic beauty standards are imposed on women by other women Hot take: Most unrealistic appearance standards for both men and women are imposed by women
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 03:46 PM
1

Say, anyone 23 or older, with the older person being any age.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 03:04 AM
1

When is a person an "adult enough" to decide for themselves whether to trade their broke, but nice-looking ass, for an older person's somewhat-degraded looks but wealth?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 01:05 AM
7

Good points. I'm sure the gf and the women would have a different tune if the man was laughing and making "jokes" about how he would like to get with a hot younger pornstar with a huge rack. Even more so if he admired different aspects than her rack (since women know they can have surgery to gain that). If he was admiring her tight abs, or firm legs, they'd probably hate it more since they'd have to actually eat well and work out to compete/achieve that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 01:07 PM
0

Why is anyone assuming flaccid size means anything? The only thing you know about a flaccid peen is that it won't be smaller at working size. Some men are growers and some are showers. As for the insecurity question, it's odd when women throw that accusation, when if their man was ogling women and making comments about snuggling up their cleavage/tits, I doubt they'd like being called insecure for their response to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 12:56 PM
–

Get your passport and go to the Philippines or Thailand.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 11:46 PM
1

So stop pointing out hypocrisy when it's seen? So if men had equally toxic hypocrisy you'd tell women to ignore it and just accept it? Somehow I doubt that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 04:19 PM
0

Doesn't make it right, or not make women entitled hypocrites.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 03:12 PM
-2

I like how the best the guy can hope for is to simply pay for himself and she pays for herself. So the best he can hope for is what's actually right and fair; so he'll never be the recipient of a free meal like modern women who aren't traditional think they're entitled to.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 05:05 AM
2

Especially with how many women I read about that are pairing up online specifically to get free meals off of unsuspecting guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 05:02 AM
-1

Debating about whether or not it’s “fair” or right is pointless. It’s not about it being fair. You aren’t entitled to the time and attention of anyone and anyone reserves the right to stop talking to you/write you off for whatever reason. No matter how vapid, shallow or stupid. If you get written off for something dumb that sucks but thank god you didn’t waste your time on that person. Well, it does matter, since it's a double standard women seem to enjoy, where they declare themselves men's equ…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 05:01 AM
–

https://mainweb-v.musc.edu/vawprevention/lesbianrx/factsheet.shtml About 17-45% of lesbians report having been the victim of a least one act of physical violence perpetrated by a lesbian partner (1,5,6,13). Sexual abuse by a woman partner has been reported by up to 50% of lesbians (12). Psychological abuse has been reported as occurring at least one time by 24% to 90% of lesbians (1,5,6,11,14). Violence appears to be about as common among lesbian couples as among heterosexual couples (1,5). (whi…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/23 02:14 PM
6

men are more likely than women to kill someone for rejecting them. And lesbians (in couples) are the most violent of all, making up a huge percentage of domestic violence police calls.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/23 03:53 AM
–

Yep - comes up in every debate related to wages and the need to work (in any job). People constantly argue that the simple need to work in order to sustain themselves constitutes exploitation, which is of course nonsense. Sustaining oneself requires things; things that all take the efforts/capital of other people and for which you have to compensate them.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/23 02:11 PM
3

They'll just let in more immigrants via legal immigration channels to make up for any lack in the native population.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/23 10:12 PM
1

True, but those discussion areas were nothing like twitter, facebook, instagram and tik tok.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/23 02:23 AM
3

Few people had computers in the 1980s compared to now. The internet had next to nothing on it in the 1990s - it wasn't even available via ISPs until the mid-1990s. America Online and CompuServe were the main things online for most of the 90s. The nonsensical social media we have now? There was nothing like that back then.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 03:52 AM
1

Back when productivity was a function of worker effort or skill it made sense for wages to rise with it; but the productivity increases seen the last 50 years are coming largely from labor-saving devices employers have purchased and invested in.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 03:42 AM
1

Odd to believe that the person who had to achieve and accumulate wealth through work and adding value to others is the predatory one, when the other party in the relationship is relying solely on their age and genetics with possibly no effort on their part. Transactional isn't automatically predatory, so odd you'd say that; it just means each wants and gets something in return for what they're offering.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/23 03:21 AM
1

You're telling me how there can be myriad reasons for the younger or the older person to be in their relationship, but still you argue as if you can conclude that one of them is being exploited? I would think knowing there can be any number of possibilities and that both are adults willingly entering the relationship would end such conclusion-seeking.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/23 10:07 PM
1

It’s more predatory because in both scenarios the man still holds the wealth and power dynamic. The woman only has themselves. What power do they have with looks over the person with the money? None. The guy is aware what his money is doing. Getting them a woman that they want. I’m your example of what the man has over what the woman has you literally only mentioned looks 3 different ways. That’s how little they have to offer. So, if by your own admission the woman has so little on offer, is she…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/23 07:58 PM
1

The ones that get “called” out are men that make posts that make themselves seem predatory in nature in their post. Earlier there was a post of a man saying they wanted to date someone about 10 years younger and his coworkers called him out on it. Why is that predatory? Or, said another way, why is it more predatory for a guy to seek a woman 10 years younger (for her looks/youth/beauty) than it is for a woman to seek a man 10 years older (for his maturity/accomplishments/wealth)?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/23 04:07 PM
4

This is why some Western men are broadening their horizons even further, and leaving their home countries altogether.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 05:25 PM
–

And with the rise of discussion around mental health, women seek men who are emotional providers. Are you emotionally mature? Will you actually listen when we speak? Are you an engaging conversationalist? Are you funny? Do you have a hobby or passion outside of work? Have you processed your trauma in order to avoid dumping it on me? Are you self-aware? Do you love children and will be a good father to my kids? Will you treat me as an equal? Are you loyal? All of the questions you pose can equall…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/23 10:19 PM
6

It’s the harem thing (or an alpha lion in a pride) - one powerful guy can keep multiple women. Thing is, we don’t allow multiple marriages so that type of thinking doesn’t work in the modern world.
/r/MensRights24/01/23 12:08 AM
2

caste
/r/MensRights24/01/23 12:07 AM
1

It would also be a nearly equal amount of deaths between males and females if they included abortion deaths. So a wash and irrelevant to any whining about female deaths in particular.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 08:07 PM
1

Your point seemed perfectly clear to me.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 07:48 PM
1

Well the height preference is based on a presumption of the ability to protect which might correlate with height but not very strongly. Try putting some 6' guy up against, say, Conor McGregor who is 5'8". McGregor will annihilate them. Height is but one factor in a fight and no guarantee of success. As the saying goes "it's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/01/23 05:48 PM
2

Interesting stuff. Just pointing out how odd the preference for height is when it carries this obvious negative of dying younger. You'd think the preference is because height is a supposed indicator of health or good genetics but it's definitely neither. Which means we're left with "being taller than others makes you scarier/more-intimidating" which hardly seems that useful in a society so far removed from primitive daily survival tasks.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/01/23 03:11 PM
3

And then she can watch her 6’6” guy drop dead a decade earlier than everyone else. Maybe that’s her plan, to inherit from him? https://www.healthline.com/health/do-short-people-live-longer “A 2016 study of American men and women found a connection between height and cancer risk, as well as death from all causes. Researchers analyzed death certificate data for 14,440 men and 16,390 women aged 25 and up. According to researchers, an additional inch increase in height generated a 2.2 percent higher…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/01/23 08:04 PM
5

Short guys can be in shape is the difference. Sad you'd try and equate a woman letting themselves go to the point of obesity with height. Tall people also die a lot sooner. https://www.healthline.com/health/do-short-people-live-longer “ A 2016 study of American men and women found a connection between height and cancer risk, as well as death from all causes. Researchers analyzed death certificate data for 14,440 men and 16,390 women aged 25 and up. According to researchers, an additional inch in…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/01/23 03:54 PM
4

No, you need to discuss the actual hypocrisy inherent in women using the term while not allowing anything similar to be said about their gender.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 06:39 PM
2

It's part of body shaming terminology and should be off limits if equivalent terms about women aren't allowed. This whole thing is about the double standards of women, who expect to be treated with respect and would freak out if a similar term was used against them, but are fine doing this to men.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 06:38 PM
5

ugly chick energy
/r/MensRights30/12/22 06:24 PM
6

Haha - for real. When she's spouting off about climate change she's to be taken seriously as an adult. But if some 30 year old guy wanted to bang her he'd be a pervert because she's 'a child'. So the people laughing at her comment are in the "she's an adult and can toss insults like one" camp... right up until anyone hits her back for her body shaming, then she's a child again.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 06:21 PM
5

A lot of this "I'd love to discuss the hypocritical body shaming going on but that Tate guy sucks" being used to distract from the point.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 06:20 PM
3

Finding him a sympathetic figure is irrelevant to the situation being used as an example of female/society hypocrisy in using body shaming when it suits them.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 06:18 PM
2

'ugly bitch energy' - that way even skinny women can feel included
/r/MensRights30/12/22 06:15 PM
3

How can they be not be gender specific when they refer to anatomy only men have? If we make the term "smelly vagina energy" could we equally apply it to men?
/r/MensRights30/12/22 06:11 PM
14

Stop focusing on this guy that nobody knows - his situation is simply being used as an example of the hypocrisy of women using an insulting term against men where an equivalent term against women would be derided.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 06:10 PM
1

The Daria show rocks.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 05:29 PM
3

it is no longer a gender specific term Oh really? Have a lot of examples of women being called it?
/r/MensRights30/12/22 05:25 PM
12

Yes, it is about the energy. Why? Because the thing being mocked isn't that you have a small penis, but that you're acting like someone who's insecure about their penis size and trying to compensate for it. It's not shaming the penis size itself, it's shaming the ridiculous behavior some people exhibit when they try to compensate for their insecurity. Oh bullshit. The penis was chosen specifically for this. They could have used anything else. Low IQ, low income, low patience, etc. The fact it's …
/r/MensRights30/12/22 05:13 PM
8

Edit: I was also confused because "small dick energy" is never used for women. You'd think that it would be used more frequently to refer to women since it only mentions energies and not physical traits. It's almost as though the insult were actually about mocking genital size and the energy thing were just a cover. 100% on point.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 04:53 PM
5

Shut up, moron. The French are some of our longest allies and were key in us winning our independence from England. And the ones who gave us the Statue of Independence. Viva la France!
/r/MensRights30/12/22 04:52 PM
7

Society caused that. And terms like that are part of how they caused it. You act like short people had complexes about their height before society told them they should by ostracizing or insulting them over it.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 04:50 PM
6

The implication is that if he has a big dick then somehow his behavior becomes acceptable? And her insult was then wrong? Does possessing a big dick allow attitude/behavior that any other size doesn't? This is the inherent issue with the term. No idea how you can think it makes any sense or isn't a toxic shit term.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 04:48 PM
22

If it has nothing to do with dick size then why is dick size in the term? Why not "small brain energy" or something else?
/r/MensRights30/12/22 04:43 PM
8

And 5'8" isn't even short - median male height in the US is 5'9". Edit: here you go: https://www.healthline.com/health/average-height-for-men According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)Trusted Source, the average age-adjusted height for American men 20 years old and up is 69.1 inches (175.4 centimeters) during the years 2015 to 2016. That’s about 5 feet 9 inches tall. And a fun aside - every inch of height taller you are adds a 2.2% chance of death from all causes, and a 7.…
/r/MensRights30/12/22 04:41 PM
16

Or, even worse, suggest that it's because you're insecure because you're complaining about this very thing they did that gave you cause to complain.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 04:40 PM
1

Did you read the OP title?
/r/MensRights27/12/22 07:26 PM
2

Isn't the issue that feminists worked to remove all men-only environments and now that it's mostly achieved suddenly want women-only environments?
/r/MensRights27/12/22 01:55 PM
25

Very few areas have doubled during the run up. Most went up 30-40% over the last 3 years total. But even with that said, she may have bought 10+ years ago for barely more than $300-400K and the house has doubled over that period while she continually refinanced/cashed-out keeping her at owing $300K.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/12/22 08:13 PM
2

Who is forcing women? I think you're missing the point. The point is that there's a difference in each gender's difficulty if one of them decided to look for that.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 02:45 PM
1

Not sure how that invalidates they were super popular actresses while overweight.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 04:48 PM
0

Melissa McCarthy Rebel Wilson
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 04:29 PM
2

Women also should take the responsibility of not demeaning men who they aren't attracted to, this isn't exclusive to men, I just see men bemoaning the criticism they receive for having preferences more than women do because women are less likely to complain about "fatties" and "trannies" to the same extent, and women don't feel personally offended by men they aren't attracted to nearly as often. I see you didn’t spend much time on female dating strategies…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 04:09 PM
17

His point is it's far harder for a man to find a woman willing to work and keep him in the same manner as you're suggesting women should be free to choose.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 02:55 PM
21

That's probably it - it's a status symbol for her girlfriends to show she's so desirable she can do literally nothing and get by solely on her sex appeal.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 02:41 PM
2

Like extra tendons or something
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/11/22 08:34 PM
2

And I wonder if anyone but her has ever called her ‘clever’…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/11/22 08:24 PM
3

What's odd is your post reads like all women are above average and can have their pick - there are as many average and below-average women (in all regards) as there are men.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/22 01:52 PM
2

men who marry after age 25 get more protection than those who tie the knot at a younger age What does this even mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/22 01:46 PM
13

They are looking for real, not for play like they’re trying to say here. https://www.reddit.com/r/Bumble/comments/ykx2vz/first_time_london_user_here_34m_got_8_likes_in_2/
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/22 01:32 PM
2

They didn't say they graduated. Maybe they drove by a college once?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 03:31 PM
4

donning r/boneappletea
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 09:10 PM
-1

Excellent observation (if the grounds are indeed true).
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 08:41 PM
2

Interesting take…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 08:38 PM
19

Yeah no shit; that’s true of literally everyone. We’re all products of our decisions. She’s a dummy.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/10/22 07:04 PM
1

Somebody up above suggested this is a disguised ad for prostitution. Phrased so as to be plausibly-deniable.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/10/22 03:28 AM
4

Too true - roughly the same number as pro athletes that properly set themselves up for post-sports life.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/10/22 02:49 AM
2

Yeah, the guys capable of financially "keeping her" and letting her not work and do whatever, are the same ones who will kick her to the curb once she's past her expiration date.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/10/22 02:38 AM
1

Someone above said she didn't join him when he was "average Joe"; he was already a vice president and she was a secretary.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/22 02:02 PM
2

Or a narcissist.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 05:47 PM
16

I told my wife a month ago I’m not super horny right now cause she’s been so mean and degrading lately. This was apparently a huge mistake. Telling her she’s made me sad and feel unattractive by being mean is mean and she didn’t talk to me for two weeks Mission Accomplished
/r/MensRights14/09/22 04:27 PM
20

In several states you even lose the right to DNA paternity test your wife's offspring to make sure they're yours, so if you're "getting married for stability of kids" you're losing the right to guarantee they're even yours WTH? How can they prevent the testing to prove/disprove whether a child is even yours? So they expect any man that the woman points a finger at, that she may or may not have even had sex with, should be obligated to 18 years of child support with no recourse?
/r/MensRights14/09/22 04:15 PM
1

Every business is a "private establishment". That doesn't mean they can ignore rules/laws related to operating in the public, or create new ones in violation of the same.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 01:33 PM
1

The issue is that they’re trying to dictate behavior of other people based on they feel. That isn’t how being in public works. Being in public carries with it inherent risks that don’t go away just because you don’t like them.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 12:18 PM
2

So you think it’s reasonable for women to dress up provocatively, go to night clubs and then dictate who can look at them and for how long?
/r/MensRights26/08/22 01:01 AM
11

For a new twist, the guy should call the police on her for staring.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 04:07 PM
11

If you don’t want ‘unwanted attention’ you should probably stay in your own house; trying to police what other people look at while in public is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 04:00 PM
1

Any degree makes you more - some just make more than others. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2020/10/08/major-decisions-what-graduates-earn-over-their-lifetimes/ Median earnings of bachelor’s degree graduates are higher than median earnings of high school graduates for all 98 majors studied. This is true at career entry and mid-career. Here’s the chart of pay of high school and college grads salaries XX years after graduation: https://imgur.com/a/xB8FTap And the article I linked in the f…
/r/MensRights22/08/22 05:37 PM
1

But are Gen X, Millenials and Gen Z really worse off than the ones before? It doesn’t appear that they are, at least not wealth-wise. https://economistwritingeveryday.com/2021/09/01/who-is-the-wealthiest-generation/ When you graph the generations by wealth-per-capita (instead of simply adding the entire generation’s wealth together and comparing it to the entire wealth of other (differingly-sized) generations) this is what they look like: https://imgur.com/a/xTbH9CK “ Looking at the exact same d…
/r/MensRights22/08/22 03:46 AM
0

Houses are not the wealth we’re discussing. Not just because a house isn’t all that much wealth, but it’s especially not when a lot of people end up putting reverse mortgages on them or downsizing to get the cash out so they can pay their retirement home bills. Then add to that siblings splitting whatever’s left and there’s usually not a lot of wealth transfer there. No, we’re discussing people above that level with some actual invested assets (besides a home they live in). Even that level of we…
/r/MensRights22/08/22 02:30 AM
0

Not sure how far back it goes. Would it matter? Most US families, like mine, weren’t even here when slavery and other items mentioned were in effect. We got here in the late 1800s. https://money.com/rich-families-lose-wealth/ Indeed, 70% of wealthy families lose their wealth by the second generation, and a stunning 90% by the third, according to the Williams Group wealth consultancy. https://www.fastcompany.com/90372281/5-lies-youve-been-told-about-generational-wealth But generational wealth is …
/r/MensRights22/08/22 01:55 AM
0

70% of family wealth is gone in one generation, 90% in two. It’s a myth that parents generally create some familial persistent wealth. The ones who do are outliers, not the norm.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 10:00 PM
3

Same advice I received when getting teacher certified in the early 90s. "Don't set yourself up" was the phrase I recall. Don't be alone with any student, especially the opposite gender.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 10:16 PM
3

It wasn’t much before women got the vote that most men couldn’t vote either. Voting was largely for rich, land-owning men. There is no wage gap and hasn’t been for a long time, once you control for actual hours spent working, etc.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 04:00 AM
3

It seems a a bit hypocritical, yes, for women to only care about equal (or more) women in only good-paying and high-status fields, while ignoring that men do almost all of the dangerous, dirty and low status/pay jobs. And women aren’t downtrodden and never really have been. They’re already out-earning men in all the major cities and are graduating in higher numbers from college.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 07:54 PM
5

Your reply doesn't even seem to relate to what I said. And why are you "justified" in trying to hire people that are underrepresented? Why is that a problem that needs solving? If everyone has the same access to education and nobody is trying not to hire certain types of people, everything else is up to the individual to put forth the effort to acquire education/skills and apply for the jobs they'd like to have. A simple difference in numbers/percentages of applicants/hires/employees isn't itsel…
/r/MensRights14/08/22 04:08 PM
5

Because they're suggesting gender and gender-based outcomes are somehow more important than equal opportunity.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 04:00 PM
1

Why would you let them preferentially discriminate based on gender? How is that "progress"?
/r/MensRights14/08/22 04:00 PM
2

Conveniently, it seems females only strive for equal (or better) representation in the high-income and high-status fields.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 02:37 PM
1

Yep - it's the typical "oh, look, there's a disparity - it must be the result of discrimination!"
/r/MensRights14/08/22 02:36 PM
1

You summed it up perfectly. Expecting identical outcomes from every gender, race/ethnicity is dumb. Preferences and affinity alone will account for differences, even in a perfect scenario of equal opportunity.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 02:35 PM
4

And women are only interested in equal representation in high-paying fields. And sometimes not even there, if women already outnumber men in them (some medical fields).
/r/MensRights14/08/22 12:31 PM
9

Why wait? Women sue over things like this all the time and they don’t issue warnings first.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 02:59 AM
5

It is standard operating procedure for teachers. I was taught this in the mid-1990s when I was becoming teacher certified.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 08:48 PM
2

Misogynist for keeping the door open when alone with girls/women? That's called "not setting yourself up".
/r/MensRights16/06/22 08:48 PM
3

Agreed; it's essentially "mob justice" in action, or lynching.
/r/MensRights22/04/22 01:26 PM
1

They come here to troll and shame most of the times. Not to have their perspectives changed. I call that entertainment, or a “target-rich environment”. Bring them on…
/r/MensRights20/04/22 07:11 PM
2

And extremely weak if they can’t even field questions.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 07:10 PM
4

It certainly doesn’t foment agreement…
/r/MensRights20/04/22 07:09 PM
7

Yep - your position is tenuous indeed if you can’t even handle someone disagreeing or challenging any aspect of it.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 07:09 PM
3

Crazy how so many of those people believe they’re correct yet are so fragile in their opinions that the idea of anyone giving voice to a disagreement with them shatters their world. If you really think you’re right, you should welcome disagreements, because it’s an opportunity to change people’s minds. Instead they’d rather hide away in their echo chamber as if they’ve got everything figured out and have nothing else to learn or any new perspectives to entertain.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 07:07 PM
33

“they’re punching up” (supposedly). Despite men taking the lowest-paying and most-dangerous jobs, dying by suicide at higher rates, graduating college at lower rates… supposedly we still run everything, so bashing us is fine.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 07:04 PM
8

It’s in Starship Troopers… “Service guarantees citizenship!”
/r/MensRights20/04/22 07:03 PM
1

I was discussing individuals not households.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/03/22 04:44 PM
4

It's highly doubtful.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/03/22 01:05 PM
1

I'm pretty sure that $2M net worth at 37 is far beyond the top 3% as you're indicating. Of the entire population of Americans only 5-6% are at $1M+ net worth, and I have to think the 37 and younger crowd barely register in that.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/03/22 01:00 PM
2

Yep - check out those knees. You know those legs will never be trim because the size of her joints suggest she's going to always be large.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/03/22 01:17 PM
4

Even in this "best" picture those legs are pushing maximum tonnage.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/03/22 01:02 PM
11

Summary of passions: You spending money on me and spoiling me
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/03/22 09:32 PM
2

Likely because he’d be seen as an actual threat, while she’s seen as the powerless yapping dog that she is.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 10:43 PM
10

Right? Let’s put her in the UFC ring and see how she does - she can use her verbal powers on one of those guys.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 10:41 PM
8

Probably got a standing ovation.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 10:39 PM
27

It’s also no coincidence that she does it in a place where the man can’t retaliate. Would she do this in a dark alley to a guy she was passing? Doubtful. She’s the equivalent of a chihuahua barking at a lion on the other side of a chain link fenced area, where the lion can’t get to it. Much sound and fury, signifying nothing.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 10:38 PM
3

Yes, because like the Hulk, they’re always angry.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 10:35 PM
6

Odd how she thinks her story is in any way empowering or an example of desirable behavior. Is their goal to suggest or foster the idea that women should be boiling over with rage and that outbursts like this are a healthy or desirable thing?
/r/MensRights04/03/22 10:34 PM
4

She’ll think it’s “power” right up until she goes off in an unrestrained way like this and gets a fist in return.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 10:30 PM
19

I didn't say it was feminists causing the situation in Ukraine. I mention that even feminists, who ostensibly are for equality between genders, are ignoring or dismissing that men are the ones being made to fight/die in Ukraine. And instead are calling women and children the real victims.
/r/MensRights03/03/22 02:54 PM
2

Or crippled.
/r/MensRights03/03/22 02:35 PM
7

Which means you should be conscripting men and women, not just men.
/r/MensRights03/03/22 02:35 PM
3

And there isn't one.
/r/MensRights03/03/22 02:35 PM
3

But men get to lose the most.
/r/MensRights03/03/22 02:30 PM
2

They're only about equality of positive things; all the negative jobs/roles can continue to be held mostly/solely by men. The eternal hypocrisy of gender equality.
/r/MensRights03/03/22 02:27 PM
2

Self-preservation is a hell of a motivator.
/r/MensRights03/03/22 02:26 PM
3

I agree with protecting children, but have to balk at the suggestion of value. Kids are unexpressed/unrealized value. Some will end up being useful (maybe as useful as some current adults) but just as many or more will end up as useless as some current adults.
/r/MensRights03/03/22 02:25 PM
1

You could just have the guy continually donate sperm and artificially-inseminate all the women. The sperm will go a lot further that way.
/r/MensRights03/03/22 02:24 PM
3

Big difference between "focusing on women's issues" and "blatantly engaging in double standards and hypocrisy".
/r/MensRights03/03/22 02:17 PM
2

Including ones whose only contribution was posing in military garb while brandishing an airsoft rifle.
/r/MensRights03/03/22 02:17 PM
4

It's pure double standards. Everything good? Needs to (at least) be charged equally by genders. For example women already outnumber men in college degrees/enrollment. Everything bad? Men can keep it; women don't need to share equal burdens.
/r/MensRights03/03/22 02:15 PM
3

Unbelievable. The same women in there, unironically complaining about people using references to genitalia in criticizing Putin ("pussy", images of Putin as gay, "he has big balls" when complimenting, etc), and suggesting women are the real victims of war (because they see poverty or crumbling infrastructure) while men are the ones being injured/maimed/killed, are likely the same ones using terms like "big-dick energy". If they didn't have double standards, they'd have none at all...
/r/MensRights03/03/22 02:11 PM
5

I'm sure those distinctions will comfort the men wounded, maimed, or killed.
/r/MensRights03/03/22 02:01 PM
18

I'd be interested in your definition if you think mine is wrong. And then explain how your definition arrives at the current situation of men forced to stay and fight while women can opt out.
/r/MensRights03/03/22 01:58 PM
1

Nice
/r/MensRights03/03/22 01:41 PM
4

And, even if there weren't, they're equally-culpable for their voting which elected their representatives. You don't get special treatment because of the gender of your elected representatives.
/r/MensRights03/03/22 01:41 PM
32

Because it benefits women. Feminists aren't about equality/equity. They're fine with men getting the crap jobs and being the only ones going to war to fight.
/r/MensRights03/03/22 01:38 PM
8

Seems to all boil down to: If you're a man and straight, you have no one to blame but yourself for failure. If you're anyone else, we've got your back.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 03:44 PM
2

You're welcome
/r/MensRights01/03/22 10:12 AM
2

Yeah, one of these "warrior women" was posing with an airsoft rifle.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 01:49 AM
10

"We want (at least) half of all the GOOD stuff, but the crap can stay with men"
/r/MensRights01/03/22 01:49 AM
3

continent (2X) contingent
/r/MensRights01/03/22 01:48 AM
34

Yeah, so how about we have women past birthing age fight, say all women over 37?
/r/MensRights01/03/22 01:39 AM
12

I find these people are similar to the YouTubers showcasing their traveling/sailing lifestyles on the internet, funded by YouTube views/patreons. Once the gimmick/novelty wears off, their subscribers dry up, they're 5 years older with no job skills or experience. Then watch reality slam them like a Mac truck.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/02/22 05:34 PM
5

If the rolls of fat weren't enough to keep one away, the erratic use of sentence structure/grammar and vocabulary should.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/02/22 04:48 PM
4

Embrace the cat-lady lifestyle - it's almost inevitable for this one.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/02/22 04:58 PM
3

#ItsTimeForABailout
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/02/22 04:32 PM
4

Or, worse, they don't care whether men had that access or not. She's done, and that's all that matters, right?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/02/22 04:29 PM
3

Yeah, I don't think the poster you're replying to was disparaging Florida (or its women); he was noting that people from NY think anyone gives a shit.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/02/22 04:28 PM
2

Women like this are what prenups are for...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/02/22 04:26 PM
1

A loaner bowling ball at the alley... that's been used by everyone. "Sir, everyone's had their fingers in this one"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/02/22 04:24 PM
2

Sad that you equate a guy having good looks with the size of their schlong. I seriously doubt there's a correlation. Nothing sadder than a Chad with a tiny schlong.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/02/22 04:23 PM
3

"I wouldn't want to belong to a club that would have me as a member." -- Groucho Marx
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/02/22 04:10 PM
1

Wow, I'm sold. /s
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/02/22 04:09 PM
6

"Now that I can't have fun at will anymore, I'm a moral person!"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/02/22 04:08 PM
2

by pretending that they are puddy in the hands of men. putty
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/02/22 04:05 PM
6

I can only upvote so many times...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/02/22 04:05 PM
2

Truth in advertising is better, true.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/02/22 03:58 PM
4

And the ones who most-loudly discuss their families, kids, spouse and make it sound like they'd do anything for them, or that everything's great, are many times full of it. I knew a guy who talked like he was father of the year and was constantly on about things like this. His daughter ended up becoming a stripper and his wife slept around and they ended up divorced. Sometimes 'thou dost protest too much' is true.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/02/22 05:22 AM
6

"I'm sick of the games, since I've been doing nothing but playing them for the last 5-10 years..."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/02/22 05:19 AM
5

Does anyone even believe these are the same people in these two pics? WTH kind of filters is she using??
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/02/22 03:47 PM
2

Want a fun read related to this? Search for "skating through B school", an article that details that business-area majors are the least-academically-inclined, spend the least amount of time studying, and score LOWER on the business graduate entrance exam (their own major) than any other major.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/02/22 10:05 PM
5

And stray cats.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/02/22 05:29 PM
3

That's the same reason men can be friends and not judge the looks of their male friends; they're not interested in the same sex and their looks/fitness/weight don't matter to that relationship. But they DO matter when dealing with the opposite sex.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/02/22 05:29 PM
3

That second pic needs to go straight to r/fiveheads
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/02/22 05:25 PM
10

So you think she is black? But at the end doesn't she say she doesn't want black guys?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/02/22 05:23 PM
24

Too bad she didn't avail herself of it when it was presented to her, 12 years in a row.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/02/22 05:21 PM
15

Me, too... illiteracy has costs, people!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/02/22 05:21 PM
3

Send them a link to r/teacherswhorape
/r/MensRights04/02/22 12:15 PM
2

What lips?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/02/22 02:02 PM
2

Yep - a lot of women have what I call 'broken radar' and are attracted to the worst men, and ignore the ones that are good for them. She probably doesn't eat her vegetables either...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/02/22 02:02 PM
58

Black belt
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/02/22 01:42 PM
9

You can't handle me at my worst
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/02/22 08:09 PM
3

She looks like a man in the middle of transitioning.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/02/22 03:54 PM
1

Check this post and the entire thread out... $3,000 Euros.
/r/MensRights01/02/22 02:50 AM
1

How are you reading it? It's blurry if you zoom it. Is there an actual resolution version?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/01/22 02:09 AM
5

It's mostly men. How is that relevant?
/r/MensRights21/01/22 11:10 PM
2

Sad thing is they changed their correct position 180 degrees after mostly women made comments about how they should give them preference.
/r/MensRights21/01/22 11:04 PM
6

I know; I did. Because the breakdown location is a relevant factor and one that should be entertained as a reason to prioritize one breakdown from another.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/22 09:00 PM
11

And so are men and women (other than gender). Why should companies be allowed to prioritize one customer paying the same rate as another based on any criteria other than actual risk of the situation (where the car is broken down)? Somebody on the side of a highway taking priority, for example, over one broken down in a parking lot.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/22 06:23 PM
3

Right. A reason long gone, so let's drop it. Women wanted equality, and have it.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/22 06:07 PM
17

So it's fine to discriminate by gender but not skin color?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/22 06:06 PM
3

Hilarious you think it's more likely that men, en masse, make dumb decisions that make them far more often victims, than you think it is that women are sheltered from the consequences of making the same types of decisions that men make.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/22 04:14 PM
13

How they expect anyone to take them seriously as advocates for equality, when they only work to enshrine women into the best-paying, most-desirable roles in society, baffles me.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/22 03:32 PM
1

Asking the real questions.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/22 03:08 PM
7

Or it's society's tendency to shelter and protect women. Wonder which is more likely?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/22 03:00 PM
65

Same as always. Feminists only care when women aren't advantaged; they're not advocates for women being equal.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/22 02:58 PM
32

When asked if the motoring association makes no difference between a 'stranded white driver and a stranded black person', King initially said: "Of course we do, and we use common sense and prioritise white people but by the letter of the law we can't say that. Wonder if the same people asking for women to have preference would like that rewritten quote? I'm dubious.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/22 02:52 PM
8

That would be awesome and hilarious to watch the women's heads explode over.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/22 02:30 PM
3

And they, this woman's bio shows her to be a feminist. But here she is, asking for preferential treatment because of being female.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/22 02:27 PM
6

All the hard, dangerous and low-paying work.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/22 02:25 PM
13

Yeah the "real" feminists seem to only point out when they think women are being oppressed and couldn't seem to care less about areas women receive special treatment.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/22 02:03 PM
22

Despite the fact that men are 4x more likely to be assaulted by a stranger, and 3x more likely to be murdered. Which might well (at least partly) happen due to the fact that preferentially helping women has been more of a priority than helping men since forever.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/22 01:59 PM
15

She wanted preferential treatment for being a woman.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/22 01:58 PM
6

There's a lot more to "tech" than programming.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/22 01:57 PM
1

Yep - unfortunate typo in a post correcting a typo.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/01/22 01:15 PM
1

Yeah - ‘whom’ was a typo. I almost never use the word.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/01/22 01:14 PM
20

Title is wrong: it shouldn’t be “We have tingles for the risk averse guys” since that means they like guys whom AVOID risk. It should say the opposite since the guys who live care free and are irresponsible are who they have the tingles for.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/01/22 08:35 PM
1

Looks like I had a hyphen imbedded in the name - try again.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/22 01:02 PM
6

Looks like this might be it: https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/clr About 76 percent of public school teachers were female and 24 percent were male in 2017–18, with a lower percentage of male teachers at the elementary school level (11 percent) than at the secondary school level (36 percent).
/r/PussyPassDenied07/01/22 01:59 AM
12

Yeah - check out r/teacherswhorape - it’s almost all women, for some reason.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/01/22 08:53 PM
1

Western women are definitely hung up on the "even" 6 feet, which is an arbitrary "even number" of what is itself an arbitrary measurement (inches and feet) that we just made up.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 07:31 PM
0

It's because tall people die earlier, so we feel sorry for them and give them stuff so they can enjoy their lesser time on the planet.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 07:28 PM
5

Unmarried childless young women are already outearning men in most major cities.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/01/22 02:29 PM
14

I posted a comment on a thread about the supposed pay gap on LinedIn a few weeks ago. Not sure many appreciated me putting the record straight that once you account for actual hours spent working, same field, and same amount of experience, that any wage gap disappears.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/01/22 02:23 PM
2

People misuse literally like they misuse ‘low-key’. Both are irritating as all get out.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/12/21 03:59 PM
13

This one definitely is not hot enough.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/12/21 03:58 PM
2

Yes, how convenient for the women since women expect men to be the ones approaching 99% of the time.. Sit back while guy after guy "applies" to you (meaning they already deem you worthy - somehow just by looking and not even speaking to you), and then all the judgement lies with the woman from there on out.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/21 11:36 PM
1

Women do the same (slack off in relationships) but didn't have to abase themselves to get into the relationship, so I fail to see how they're still not being advantaged here.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/21 04:44 PM
9

Women have rejected these gender roles, en masse. Hence the disconnect.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/21 03:12 PM
12

Maybe you aren't aware, but women have rejected these roles. For example, expecting at least a 50/50 split on child-rearing activities.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/21 03:11 PM
2

So, basically, you're suggesting men suck it up and play the game that gives deference to women sitting on their asses, risking nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/21 02:45 PM
3

No wonder then why they don't wish to approach (since they know they abuse men who do the same).
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/21 02:35 PM
3

Not only do men face rejection, but in the current social climate, they also face accusations of being sexual harassers.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/21 02:35 PM
5

Telling them to "keep trying" is implicitly saying it's fine women to sit on their asses, passing judgment, and for the men to need to scramble to improve themselves to be worthy of their lazy asses.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/21 02:33 PM
1

Exactly. Your assets will be powering you traveling the world, donating to causes you cares about, and freeing you from the need to ever work for money again.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/21 02:32 PM
4

Why do men owe women effort to be better (likely better than the women)?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/21 02:32 PM
14

Maybe hers are, since she can't approach men? This is the era of female equality, right? Why is it women think they can keep all the beneficial trappings of when they were non-working, second-class citizens, and take all the benefits of being equal?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/21 02:31 PM
12

And women can't do that...?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/21 02:30 PM
7

What's odd is these women are simply chasing genetics. Genetics most of them care nothing about (since their goal isn't children).
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/21 02:22 PM
1

You can't see them through the haze of venereal diseases.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/21 02:21 PM
11

Apparently, women's jobs are to sit there, waiting for men to risk rejection by approaching them, then sit in judgment as to whether the man is even worthy of a date with her, and then, if accepted, enjoy the man paying for everything. Boy, it's good to be a woman in her world...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/21 02:16 PM
14

not even qualified to date What would this look like, the man and the woman? I'm curious what is making her such a prize that the guy needs to qualify.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/21 02:13 PM
21

Exactly. I'm amazed how women want to eschew themselves of all the negatives that women being second-class citizens entailed a century ago, but want to keep all of the benefits (men risk rejection to pursue them, men paying for dates/everything, men putting themselves at personal risk (in any sense) to protect/provide for them, etc), and think no one notices their hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/21 02:09 PM
11

Why is it the man's task to take on and resign themselves to being open to rejection?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/21 02:07 PM
17

“I expected to be making $100K a year by now”
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/12/21 06:53 PM
10

She thinks women are tired of paying for men!? Imagine how men feel. Women have their own money/jobs now and still expect to be paid for by men, simply for existing.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/12/21 05:37 PM
2

This is true and is also the reason why women are far more likely to be passive aggressive shits, who set traps for people. They have to undermine and use subtle manipulation to get what men can simply claim or directly confront about.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/21 04:48 PM
4

Not only certain traits but free stuff. Prostitute much? Why aren't women self-sufficient? Are they really proud of being leeches?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/21 04:45 PM
2

More like 1 in 10.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/21 04:43 AM
3

And it's the "best worst excuse" for why they're alone. Sort of like when you get the interview question: "what's your worst character trait?" And you answer "I work too hard".
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/12/21 02:42 AM
3

Similar to how the world's best women tennis players would get owned by any male state tennis champ.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/12/21 02:40 AM
6

Saying men are 'intimidated' by them just makes them feel potent and is an excuse for why they're alone.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/12/21 02:33 AM
1

Really? Because r/teacherswhorape seems mostly women teachers fucking/molesting male students.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/21 09:35 PM
1

She prefers the “spend inordinate amounts of money on me while dating” method.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 06:17 PM
1

Old (rich) men partaking of young women aren’t in it for the women’s genius-level conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 06:15 PM
1

So they can what? The old (rich) men aren’t dumb enough to marry them or put them in their will. So the gravy train will end.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 06:15 PM
2

Ah yeah - nuking my comment.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/12/21 02:21 PM
6

And the pattern repeats and she's blissfully unaware. Reminds me of the movie 'The Cutting Edge' where the figure skater female can't get along with any of the male skaters they recruit to skate with her, and she's convinced they're all the problem, not her.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/12/21 02:18 PM
4

I think this profile has been largely written to appeal to men. She thinks its going to appeal to men anyhow. You mean 'appeal to women'?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/12/21 02:10 PM
7

So you think someone who got Covid and then pneumonia as a result shouldn't have been counted as a death by Covid?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/21 02:02 PM
8

Covid kills less then cars and even the goddamn flu. What are you talking about? In the USA alone Covid has killed 788,000 in less than two years. How many flu deaths and deaths from car accidents do you think happen in that time period?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/21 01:49 PM
16

Most men of nowadays will die without contribute much to society. No inventions or discoveries. I'm thankful for the existence of men as a gender but I must judge individually. Isn't OP's point that women are disparaging the entire gender of men?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/21 01:46 PM
7

Sounds like anyone considering a LTR with any of the women in the OP would have done well to spring for a PI to tail the woman for a week. Could have saved a lot of disappointment.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/11/21 02:52 PM
2

What I said. A man can impregnate women in his 60s and 70s. Good luck finding a woman capable of getting pregnant then. Didn't Marlon Brando get someone pregnant in his late 80s?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/21 01:58 PM
1

You brought up the man's sperm first.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 07:49 PM
1

lol
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 07:42 PM
1

A man will be capable of getting a woman pregnant long after a woman is incapable of becoming pregnant. Nuff said.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 07:41 PM
1

You left it out, so one might think you only cared about the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 03:44 PM
1

sperm quantity That isn't the issue you think it is. It only takes one sperm.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 03:43 PM
2

Ofcourse there are women who Excel at things What do spreadsheets have to do with romance?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 03:36 PM
24

Woman says that men are intimidated by her. This is a lie. AKA "I'm a bitch and men can't stand me"
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 03:26 PM
5

When they said they were going to cover “men’s issues” apparently they meant issues caused by men.
/r/MensRights18/11/21 01:29 PM
2

Women can improve their value, like men can, by grooming well and staying fit/firm and at their ideal weight.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/11/21 03:39 AM
9

White-laundry flight! You’re gentrifying the clothes! Next thing you know all the darks are going to move straight to the dryer without visiting the washer first.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/11/21 03:22 PM
8

Especially when she can’t even afford her own and expects you to buy it all.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/11/21 04:06 PM
26

You: the best a man can be Her: Shows up
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/11/21 03:48 PM
1

Doesn’t it mean you qualify for the top 20% of women (who therefore also aren’t fat)?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/21 01:07 PM
3

The reason why a man would ask "how much do you weigh" when asked how tall he is serves the purpose of making a woman confront her own superficial standards. Yes, she put it in her profile that she does not want that question. But that only shows that she is well aware of the circumstances but simply does not care. So men should all just put ‘don’t bother asking about height, morons’ in their profiles…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/10/21 09:42 PM
6

the dude is probably top 10% yet the fat, pregnant, soon to be single mom is going after him. Worse; she’s actively vetting him to be sure he’s worthy, despite her complete lack of things to offer any man. Complete delusion.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/10/21 09:41 PM
3

Perhaps they think that given access to a larger pool they have every right to shoot for the tallest . They have the least dating pool, not the largest. If women will only ever date a guy taller than them, tall women have far less options (since they’re taller than many men).
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/10/21 09:37 PM
3

Yeah the old “swap in a pic of me from 15 years ago” trick.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/10/21 09:32 PM
2

Total shrew
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/21 09:02 PM
1

This goes both ways - not every man is pleased with/attracted to their women either.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/21 08:59 PM
9

I guess we’ll need to start using ‘big tits energy’ so they’ll understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/21 08:19 PM
36

They want you to always want them; that doesn’t mean they actually want sex though. They just know that you being attracted to them on a continuous basis is the core of their (feeling of) control over you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/21 08:14 PM
25

It's like she thinks men are sexually attracted to responsibility. This should be framed. LOL
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/10/21 10:15 PM
0

This. Somehow even when it’s just a person tangential to a story/situation, someone has to mention an unrelated list of things about someone who’s tall or strong. It’s odd.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 08:21 PM
2

I'd be more interested in what makes a bigger guy feel intimidated by a smaller guy. It might be because size isn’t what wins fights unless everything else is equal.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 08:18 PM
17

Yep - if they said that “black people were criminals because of something primal in their nature” all hell would break loose. But somehow it’s OK to say it about men in general…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/21 06:30 PM
13

Yeah, nothing screams “I’ve got my act together” like a single Mom scouring tinder for a partner.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/10/21 01:41 PM
11

https://wentworthreport.com/2017/01/08/rate-of-domestic-violence-highest-in-lesbian-relationships/
/r/MensRights14/10/21 12:45 PM
44

Bring up the fact that lesbian couples have the highest rate of domestic violence. And gay male couples have the lowest. And heterosexual couples are in the middle. Men are obviously not the problem.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 02:23 AM
1

Then, if both genders have replacements/surrogates, I guess we’ll see which really needs a companion more. I’m betting women. There’s a reason there’s such a thing as a ‘crazy cat lady’ and not a ‘crazy cat/dog gentleman’.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 07:34 PM
2

I can't see a woman ever being attracted to a guy who engaged in that kind of stuff. I think women are actually concerned that the men won’t care.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 07:22 PM
2

Ah yes, the “30K millionaires”…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/10/21 07:09 PM
6

Maybe because media (and everyone else) only focus on such violence when it happens to women, giving people the wrong impression of who is usually the victim?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 07:08 PM
7

Women are the most abusive. Lesbian couples have the highest rates of domestic violence and gay male couples have the lowest.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 03:54 PM
9

https://wentworthreport.com/2017/01/08/rate-of-domestic-violence-highest-in-lesbian-relationships/ Lesbian relationships have the highest violence/domestic abuse. The lowest is gay male relationships. Yet men are the issue somehow?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 03:53 PM
10

They aren’t - in fact women are the most likely to abuse, evidenced by the fact that lesbian relationships have the most abuse/domestic violence. Relationships with the least? Gay men. But, somehow, men are the problem? https://wentworthreport.com/2017/01/08/rate-of-domestic-violence-highest-in-lesbian-relationships/
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 03:52 PM
3

Thanks! Saving this tidbit as I can see this being useful in future debate.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/10/21 03:07 PM
6

Yes - a site for the 1% top earners is going to attract a lot of trash looking for a free ride.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/10/21 02:43 PM
3

Interesting - source?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/10/21 02:37 PM
4

Reminds me of the movie ‘The Cutting Edge’, where the woman was the problem, yet blamed each guy she’d skated with.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/10/21 02:29 PM
4

The lowest income bracket is 250K, which is like top 1-2% income? Wow.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/10/21 02:28 PM
4

Nobody asked Marie to carry radioactive crap in her pocket to show to people.
/r/MensRights13/10/21 12:44 PM
1

I guess she can enjoy her dating field of, what, 0.2% of men?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/21 03:09 PM
2

Same is true for guys - if they slept around also, they will then have more points of comparison and are more likely to find fault with the person they end up with. It’s to neither’s benefit that they’re ‘experienced’.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/21 03:04 PM
1

It’s more about her being something other guys will be impressed you landed. Like showing off your car. If the other guys (or girls) won’t be impressed you won’t be either.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/21 02:54 PM
1

Some people really are just that shallow and chasing those genetics to the exclusion of anything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/21 02:45 PM
1

Depends on what ‘better’ constitutes. Prettier/hotter isn’t worth much if it comes in the form of a mentally-ill stripper who steals from you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/21 02:44 PM
1

Yes - that’s why the joke about such guys constantly discussing their ‘glory days’ is a thing. They have nothing going on now, so it’s all they have that’s worth discussing.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/21 02:37 PM
3

Not sure why your wife being a virgin would be boring. Isn’t she going to learn everything you’d want her to know by virtue of being married to you? What possible benefit is there to her having played the field prior (or for you to have, for that matter)? Other than suggesting they may have discovered what they like/dislike (which is ridiculous since you can tell that simply by looking at and interacting with people without sex), I can’t see anything but downsides to either partner having been p…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/21 02:35 PM
3

Precisely. Which is more likely; some loose, unorganized affiliation of men conspire to keep women out of some fields… or women choose, of their own volition, to enter certain fields and avoid others?
/r/MensRights11/10/21 03:12 AM
6

Don't get me wrong, she is one of the most intelligent people I know, but sitting day in and day out, fighting with an inanimate object isn't what she wants to do. Yep this is it. Which is why we need to push back on the nonsense that women are somehow prevented from doing these jobs. They are choosing not to do them because of their preferences.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 04:14 PM
12

That male attitude is just sooo hard to overcome. Yeah, funny how it only stops women from entering the hardest fields that usually involve very little social interaction (the part women actually don’t like).
/r/MensRights10/10/21 04:13 PM
10

That’s ‘The Island with Bear Grylls’ show, right?
/r/MensRights10/10/21 01:26 PM
48

Agree that this is the answer - but they instead paint it as yet another example of the patriarchy keeping them down; apparently they’re all just too scared to enter male-dominated fields, and let that stop them.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 12:59 PM
75

To hear the female-apologists tell the tale, it’s because the patriarchy/society/peer-pressure has forced them all to take different jobs. Yeah, right.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 12:58 PM
3

How would today’s world be any better of a fit for women than 50 years ago was?
/r/MensRights10/10/21 12:57 PM
11

Amazing how desperate financial circumstances suddenly makes you less shallow.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/10/21 10:57 PM
7

She should have listened to the ghost of past and present…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/10/21 10:56 PM
27

Yes - somehow lumping men all together and admonishing them as a group for one of their behavior makes sense, but doing it to any other group (or gender) is wrong?
/r/MensRights05/10/21 04:16 PM
14

LARP = Live-Action Role Playing (larper = one who LARPs)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/21 03:59 AM
2

If you hear that, you should tell her lunch is on her.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/10/21 04:35 PM
10

This post AKA: I’ve done what I hedonistically felt like for a couple of decades; now I want someone to take care of me. In return I’ll pretend to love you and might not even cheat.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/10/21 01:24 PM
1

= having your own gravitational field
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/10/21 01:19 PM
1

Sort of like “having a treadmill” doesn’t mean it isn’t sitting there holding laundry, with you never using it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/10/21 01:18 PM
1

Maybe she’s a caretaker of some sort in exchange for cheap/free rent?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/10/21 01:17 PM
3

But that one… that one stayed up!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/10/21 01:13 PM
5

So accurate. Genius.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/10/21 01:13 PM
6

And letting them stretch the definition to be “anything North of average”. In return, every guy North of average weight needs to co-opt the ‘plus sized’ term from women. I’d love to see the responses to a guy who does that. Hilarity will ensue.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/10/21 01:10 PM
5

When did "curvy" start to mean "spherical"? “Yeah, I’m looking to get into shape… the shape I’m aiming for is round”
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/10/21 01:09 PM
16

A male lead for a Resident Evil reboot. A male lead for the Underworld movies. A male Mary Poppins (Peter Poppins).
/r/MensRights02/10/21 03:12 AM
3

But she cusses… a lot. Doesn’t that count for anything?
/r/MensRights02/10/21 03:10 AM
69

That’s not sucking up, I don’t think; it’s him agreeing with us that 007 is a guy and they should create new vehicles for women.
/r/MensRights02/10/21 02:22 AM
2

Idiocracy in reality
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/10/21 04:00 PM
6

A triple play!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/10/21 03:58 PM
5

Girls, this is what happens when you give birth at 16 years of age, and so do your kids. You become a grandparent at 40 years of age.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/10/21 03:57 PM
7

Just look at any modern movie or TV show where they took what used to be a male protagonist who kicks everyone’s ass and simply transplanted a woman into the role.
/r/MensRights01/10/21 02:27 PM
10

They’ve already far overshot equality. Women are underrepresented in dangerous and low-paying jobs, already make more money in large cities than men, and are graduating from college in higher percentages than men. How much better off do they need to become before they declare they’ve “won” and “are equal” and back off?
/r/MensRights01/10/21 02:26 PM
6

Which came first, women being oppressed, or women not contributing as equals? Now that they contribute as equals in most arenas of life they’re treated that way.
/r/MensRights01/10/21 02:23 PM
5

That seems an awful lot like ‘have your cake and eat it too’. So women are strong and their facade of weakness is a strength? So they’re strong despite some appearing weak (facade). And men’s strength is actually weakness so men are weak despite appearing strong?
/r/MensRights01/10/21 02:17 PM
3

While you’re up there… A less well-known one: “If you think <something you’re wrong about>, you’ve got another thing coming” The real phrase is: “If you think <something you’re wrong about>, you’ve got another think coming”. (As in “you need to think again because your first conclusion from thinking was incorrect). Example: If you think you’re going out with your friends with your bedroom still a mess, you’ve got another think coming…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/09/21 07:42 PM
12

Agreed. For example, I can’t tell you how many times I see people use the phrase “could care less”, when the actual phrase (and what they mean) is “couldn’t care less”.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/09/21 05:17 PM
5

Leftovers, anyone? No, thanks…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/09/21 05:15 PM
9

Code for: “I have tons of very strong opinions about many things that I have no education/experience/knowledge about”
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/09/21 08:45 PM
1

An excellent question. Maybe men have too much self respect? Women are out-graduating men from college and are outearning men in large cities when unmarried and without children. They have no reason to be out begging like this.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/09/21 09:09 PM
6

Sounds good to me! More on the women outearning men: http://content.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,2015274,00.html “according to a new analysis of 2,000 communities by a market research company, in 147 out of 150 of the biggest cities in the U.S., the median full-time salaries of young women are 8% higher than those of the guys in their peer group. In two cities, Atlanta and Memphis, those women are making about 20% more. This squares with earlier research from Queens College, New York, t…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/09/21 03:25 AM
2

complements
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/09/21 03:14 AM
3

And like you don’t feel any shame at getting pregnant and then asking for random guys to shack up and solve that problem for you? WTH?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/09/21 03:13 AM
4

Heck women are making their own money now - don’t feel sorry for them at all. Women are also outearning men in large cities (when they’re single and childless) and are graduating college in larger numbers than men. They don’t deserve any sympathy if their behavior is alienating good men.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/09/21 03:11 AM
6

Wow - crazy. Some women are just unhinged.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/09/21 03:03 AM
2

Catching bullets with your teeth…? Kiss my Converse! Great movie…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/09/21 02:58 AM
7

Which is based on men dismissing them/treating them poorly. To their minds that means “he’s confident of being a catch compared to me (since he cares so little about losing me)”. It’s like reverse psychology for dumbasses.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/09/21 02:47 AM
9

The “get a vasectomy” is the best. Hard to get trapped into having a kid when you’re shooting blanks. Best is don’t ever tell any of them that you’ve had one. Be funny to watch them try to trap you and you spring it on them.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/09/21 02:40 AM
9

My theory on why women like ‘bad boys’ is, not only do they like the excitement/danger of being around someone unpredictable, the mistreatment they receive from those men carries the unspoken message of “I can do better than you” (hence why they mistreat them). So, to the demented mind of these women that means “he’s a catch I can’t do better than”.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/09/21 02:38 AM
9

Big tits with a fat body is no benefit at all. In fact most heavy women have gross “big tits” that I wouldn’t touch on a dare. Yet they think it’s a bonus somehow. I used to know a wife of a friend who was heavy and braggged/mentioned her big breasts like they were a Good Thing(tm) and I just inwardly rolled my eyes. She also did the classic heavy person move of constantly insinuating that she was physically strong (like being large from being fat somehow makes you strong). Even to the point tha…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/09/21 03:12 PM
15

Yeah such horseshit. Like, if the world was populated solely by heterosexual women, you’d dress like that? No. No, you wouldn’t.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/09/21 03:07 PM
6

Why are we assuming anyone of any male status put the baby in there? It could have been any Chumly.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/09/21 02:56 PM
2

Only cooking, cleaning and childcare counts. Aren’t those things women “naturally enjoy”? /s
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/09/21 03:04 PM
2

Yep - women can steer a mower just like a man can. Or bag leaves. Or sweep the walk. Etc. They only like misogyny when it gets them out of things they don’t like, apparently.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/09/21 03:01 PM
1

The thing is, even if both work, if one earns double or triple the other that took effort and stress to accomplish (and likely has higher stress in the job to begin with). Women expecting to share household chores right down the middle while allowing a higher disparity in what they contribute are wanting to have their cake and eat it too. It’s like they want communism in contributing to the financials of the household (they gain equally from the higher wage of their spouse) but expect a democrac…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/09/21 03:00 PM
2

Yeah, forbid learning things through your own experience and introspection; we need a complete stranger to guide us.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/09/21 02:56 PM
1

“I gave my wife a rape whistle. Two weeks later she gave it back to me, saying: ‘it doesn’t work; I kept blowing it, and no one showed up’” — Rodney Dangerfield
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/09/21 02:56 PM
1

Women who think like this are in a way doing you a favor - if she has such a useless ‘standard’ what else is she dumb about?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/09/21 02:52 PM
1

Bingo - just made a similar reply before seeing yours.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/09/21 02:35 PM
1

What’s hilarious is most of these women who are so concerned about splitting household chores are the ones totally fine with the man being the primary earner, sometimes making double or triple what the woman makes. So, apparently it’s fine if the man kills himself gaining education/skills/experience/promotions/raises so as to gain a high-stress job that enables their entire standard of living and retirement ability, but not OK if he slacks on equally participating in household chores. Never mind…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/09/21 02:35 PM
1

Let’s not blame that entirely on her; the one who knocked her up and ran off caused it, too.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/09/21 02:30 PM
1

NoTHiNG iS NoRMaL; DeViaNCe iS STReNGTH!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/09/21 02:19 PM
2

ROFL! That last sentence/paragraph had me reaching for a tissue I was crying from laughing so hard.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/09/21 02:09 PM
2

Gaelic I think, so Irish.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/09/21 02:01 PM
1

A question she should have asked herself 1,000 times, and which would have altered her course if she paid attention. Reminds me of the movie ‘The Cutting Edge’ in which a figure skater woman continually has issues with the men assigned to skate with her, blames the men in every case, when she’s the problem.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/09/21 01:46 PM
1

Especially not below…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/09/21 03:24 AM
5

Unfortunately, I'm not. I had done the first visit where they drill down and (I thought) killed the root. The dentist had used a lot of novacaine and I was numb for hours after that first visit. So when I went to the next appointment where they finish things off I figured it was basically tidy up and do an impression for the crown, so I told him he overdid the anesthesia the first time and to skip it this time. He responds with: "I'm game if you are..." and proceeds to work. But oh no, there was…
/r/MensRights14/09/21 06:20 PM
4

Not every man gets his hands cooked while a heck of a lot of women have to endure the pain of child birth. And nearly all of them ask for, and receive, drugs for it. What's your point?
/r/MensRights14/09/21 03:35 PM
27

Pain tolerance of women, my ass. I had a root canal with no anesthetic. The dentist said that's above child birth. And, as you mentioned, these 'tough women' are the first ones to howl for an epidural as soon as birth contractions start.
/r/MensRights14/09/21 03:34 PM
1

What you said is that the only reason they do it is because we care, which is patently ridiculous. If we all didn’t care that wouldn’t make their casual misandry and double standards disappear. For the same reason it’s ridiculous to insist that men did it to women for generations only because they responded negatively to it.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 01:17 PM
1

Pointing out that it’s an unfair hypocrisy is still worth noting. How many offenses against men would you like to pretend don’t exist?
/r/MensRights11/09/21 03:51 PM
4

It’s great to not GAS about it, but there’s still a double standard. Ignoring it keeps you from having an issue but it’s still hypocritical that society embraces it.
/r/MensRights11/09/21 02:25 PM
14

Not only is the topic idiotic, but so is calling overweight women “plus-sized”, but leave men with the normal/less-complimentary label.
/r/MensRights11/09/21 02:08 PM
2

Objectification is apparently only wrong when men do it to women. When women do it, it’s great (somehow). Evidence: Current TV, movies and books where the men are shirtless or showing their butts. For example the recent movie Reminiscence, where the sex scene has Jackman half-naked and the woman fully-clothed.
/r/MensRights11/09/21 01:55 PM
2

Always cracks me up when I hear women mentioning height like it means something. I’m like “yeah that 6’4” and 75 cents will get you a Coke out of the vending machine”.
/r/MensRights11/09/21 01:52 PM
4

That’s the point; women advertising their dating standards are lauded as legitimate. Men advertising their dating standards are shallow or pigs.
/r/MensRights11/09/21 01:51 PM
23

I think he’s suggesting that women feel free to advertise their dating standards on social media, but if a man did the same he’s lambasted for it.
/r/MensRights11/09/21 01:50 PM
11

That’s genius. I love it!
/r/PussyPassDenied07/09/21 10:35 PM
1

I’m a r/lostredditor
/r/PussyPassDenied05/09/21 04:26 AM
0

How is the database in the hands of the Taliban? Was it written on Post-It notes?
/r/MensRights05/09/21 03:23 AM
1

It’s the image in the OP. Not sure what you’re confused about?
/r/PussyPassDenied05/09/21 03:23 AM
1

Oh really? What do you imagine a good exit would have looked like? Spell it out. Because knowing the Afghan military isn’t worth a crap there isn’t an exit that would have stopped this. And barely a dozen US lives lost isn’t some debacle. We’ve killed over 100,000 Iraqis and Afghanis in the last 20 years.
/r/MensRights05/09/21 03:04 AM
1

It was getting pretty highly-specific about back and foot rubs. Not sure how a list dictating favors for her in return for him doing what he wants (that requires nothing from her) is “romantic”.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/09/21 10:09 PM
1

Obviously I was referring to more than just this tweet. But the tweet does speak to the issue - would you be as accepting of the tweet if the genders of all parties were reversed? I suggest not. And the tweet would receive a lot more attacks.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/09/21 01:58 PM
1

It happened 6 years ago.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/08/21 03:26 PM
4

“blind sexism”? He didn’t call her that without context (blind); he called her that because she’s literally an example of female (and in this case wealthy female) privilege.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/08/21 03:19 PM
11

Australian guys call each other that every day and twice on Friday nights.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/08/21 03:15 PM
0

Similar - I was in jury selection years ago (not chosen for the 12) for a case of a woman who shot and killed her boyfriend. She got 15 years probably out in 7. So 10 for manslaughter sounds about right, although getting out after barely 1 year isn’t.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/08/21 03:14 PM
3

Well, the sub does exist to point out instances of women finally not getting preferential treatment.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/08/21 03:13 PM
1

More power to you, OP!
/r/PussyPassDenied20/08/21 07:22 PM
2

Are you lost (do you know what sub you’re on)?
/r/PussyPassDenied20/08/21 07:06 PM
3

If it was unacceptable to ogle women because it set them up for unrealistic expectations and objectified them, then the same is true for women doing it to men.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/08/21 06:08 PM
1

Wow - I’m convinced by your insightful reply. Not. https://impactingculture.com/overcorrecting-the-objectification-of-men-in-film/ Before we get too far into this, let’s talk about cinema’s history with male objectification. I think we can all agree that women have taken the brunt of on-screen objectification and sexualization (women are partially or fully nude on screen three times as often as men). However, just because it happens to women more doesn’t invalidate the fact that it also happens …
/r/PussyPassDenied20/08/21 05:36 PM
3

Do tell… https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/understanding-the-erotic-code/201608/misandry-the-invisible-hatred-men
/r/PussyPassDenied20/08/21 05:28 PM
3

I guess you don’t remember the recent Gillette ad shaming men for doing something similar? It was just a couple of years ago. And that’s just one example.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/08/21 04:40 PM
3

If you haven’t noticed how it’s become unacceptable for men to do this while women are doing it (as well as in movies/TV/advertising) I’d say you aren’t paying attention.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/08/21 04:38 PM
3

It would be nothing if women didn’t routinely try to shame and cancel men for doing it.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/08/21 04:08 PM
1

Stop focusing on whether the kid said it or not. Whether they did or not the Mom is the problem here. Either it happened and she needs to stifle and not encourage that crap attitude, or she made it up in which case that, plus she’s a POS.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/08/21 03:57 PM
3

They think that now that they’ve stopped men being pigs (or at a minimum reduced it and made them ashamed) that they get to be the pigs.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/08/21 03:56 PM
10

You don’t find it odd that women, who complain vociferously about men objectifying women, then go on and do it themselves to men?
/r/PussyPassDenied20/08/21 03:55 PM
3

Yes, but irrelevant to the core point of the hypocrisy of women complaining for decades to get men to stop or at least feel bad about objectifying women, but women do it.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/08/21 03:53 PM
4

But the double standard in place says women should and do complain about it when women are the ones being “body shamed” or objectified.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/08/21 03:52 PM
1

Kind of beside the point of the woman objectifying men and being totally fine with it, but would be among the first to complain when women are.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/08/21 03:50 PM
3

It’s in every movie and TV show (objectifying men). EDIT: Just saw another example last night in the movie Reminiscence. In a sex scene the guy (Hugh Jackman) gets shirtless for “doing it” but the woman stayed fully-clothed.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/08/21 03:43 PM
1

No because that still only benefits the women. What percent of the time do you think the normal “guys asks out” happens the other way around? Nearly never.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/21 11:37 PM
1

https://www.menshealth.com/trending-news/a19541024/you-might-be-sex-offender-and-not-know-it/
/r/PussyPassDenied13/08/21 12:34 AM
2

Yeah. Just needing to pee when not near a bathroom can have lasting repercussions. It really shouldn’t be lazily treated the same as actual crimes.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/21 09:17 PM
3

It’s kind of dumb - people get busted for peeing outdoors somewhere and end up on the sex offenders registry.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/21 08:59 PM
1

If they simply want to leave a relationship they could do so; letting yourself go to pot over the course of years is kind of an odd way to go about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/21 08:35 PM
1

I’m not sure what monogamy has to do with my point though - it was more to do with the inertia it seems women (and men) have where it takes them losing an existing relationship before they start to improve their physical selves (lose weight, get in shape). That doesn’t imply their existing partner was undesirable; just that they didn’t care enough to maintain the existing relationship and didn’t realize they needed to change until it was too late.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/21 08:30 PM
4

Yep - totally. And a lot of fun, I’d bet. I’m way past that age and been married a long time, but it still sounds fun to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/21 08:28 PM
1

I guess I’m just easy to please…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/21 08:26 PM
6

Does it for women, too. Amazing how many women who let themselves get way out of shape to the point they lose their marriage/relationship suddenly start working out to become attractive again. I’m like “why did it take you losing it to realize and do this?”
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/21 04:04 PM
2

I believe it. The level of entitlement is crazy.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/21 03:58 PM
9

I didn’t say you should care but it is one of the benefits.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/21 03:54 PM
2

Haha If you’re the only one calling yourself ‘a catch’ you probably aren’t.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/21 03:52 PM
1

Bingo. You don’t get rich by wasting money all the time.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/21 03:52 PM
3

What’s ‘tacky’ about reasonably-priced food and a clean/fun environment? I wouldn’t want to date someone who thought they were ‘too good’ for Applebees. And I don’t even go to Applebees, but once in a blue moon (not one near enough).
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/21 03:50 PM
2

It’s all the $30K millionaires. They need pretentious, apparently, or it’s not worth having.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/21 03:49 PM
1

As if her meeting the literal base standards she expects every guy she ever dates to meet is reasonable.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/21 03:44 PM
1

Agreed - it should stay below $50 IMO.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/21 03:43 PM
2

Same with audio gear.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/21 03:43 PM
3

You don’t become a millionaire by pissing away money.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/21 03:42 PM
2

Yeah forget this nonsensical/antiquated idea that men must pursue women and women have no income so men must provide. I’m sick of women acting like it’s 1910.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/21 03:42 PM
1

Gonna have to try that…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/21 03:41 PM
3

Nothing. Only to spoiled douches (which includes women) who aren’t happy unless the cost for a meal causes actual financial pain.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/21 03:40 PM
2

I like Chili’s.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/21 03:39 PM
2

How convenient (whoever asks out, pays) since society has long-since established that it’s the man’s job to ask the woman out.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/21 03:34 PM
10

It still costs less to have two adults in one household over each maintaining their own. That’s one reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/21 02:56 PM
1

“Guess…. but guess well”
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/21 02:50 PM
3

So she’s saying it’s better to err on the side of believing a lying woman who lies and says she was raped? Despite the fact it could ruin the innocent guy’s life? No. Protecting innocence is far-more important than punishing guilt. This is the same reason John Adams said: “It is more important that innocence be protected than it is that guilt be punished, for guilt and crimes are so frequent in this world that they cannot all be punished. But if innocence itself is brought to the bar and condemn…
/r/MensRights28/07/21 06:00 PM
5

Funny how people who have a head of height think they’re invincible to people shorter than them.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/21 03:45 PM
1

They think being a virgin is always the result of being undesired by women and not a choice.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/07/21 06:12 PM
1

Terrorists blow themselves up for the unlikely prospect of virgins in the after life (as a reward for blowing people up).
/r/PussyPassDenied16/07/21 05:56 PM
8

Yeah, women are dirty/disgusting enough without exposing them to actual dirty chores (the message these people are sending by accident).
/r/PussyPassDenied16/07/21 05:53 PM
5

But police will not prosecute her as 'it may keep others from coming forward. It’s exactly this type of horseshit that will make people question it when women accuse. This should be rectified by prosecuting her to the full extent possible.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 03:11 PM
1

Women are out earning men, so “as a woman” she should pay her own ridiculous bill.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/07/21 01:50 PM
3

Wonton behavior Delicious? wanton
/r/PussyPassDenied27/10/20 02:19 PM
-1

What would a gender studies assignment be looking for by sending her to find a male Subway worker to make her a sandwich? Does this somehow prove the patriarchy is gone? or that it still exists?
/r/PussyPassDenied13/10/20 09:35 PM
1

r/murderedbywords
/r/PussyPassDenied13/10/20 05:25 PM
22

I’m betting you being on the couch made her think you’d be out cavorting with another woman or otherwise cavorting without her.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/08/20 01:59 PM
3

SJW cognitive dissonance on display. “Kill all men” = OK “Kill all men, including this SJW icon” = brain fart
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/20 12:24 PM
51

Which is why they only want to be equally-represented in jobs that are high-prestige and pay well. Not in the dangerous, low-paying jobs that males dominate.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/08/20 04:33 AM
1

There is no such stereotype of good-looking people being smart, however. It’s in fact the opposite. Ditzy blond. Dumb jock. Etc.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/08/20 05:58 PM
1

How is assuming that attractiveness indicates higher intelligence the “default hypothesis”? It’s not even true anecdotally. Hence the common “attractive but dumb as a box of rocks guy/girl” in TV and movies.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/08/20 02:21 PM
1

Feel free to cite sources - you’re the one making claims.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/08/20 01:53 PM
1

And I’m saying there isn’t even a correlation or else it would be readily evident in the actual world.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/08/20 01:51 PM
1

Not even sure what you’re suggesting or asking here. Are you suggesting taller people are more psychologically healthy? Why would that be?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/20 07:30 PM
1

Uhm, I didn’t claim that, and I highly doubt it’s true. Both because attractiveness has nothing to do with intelligence. And because attractive people get things handed to them (playing life on easy mode) a lot, so they rarely are inclined to exert themselves intellectually, personality-wise, or skills/career-wise.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/20 07:29 PM
1

Thing is, in many cases, I’m betting that she’s picking that trait because it’s one she knows other women seek and will approve of.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/20 02:37 PM
19

Nice image - ROFL I’m picturing creepy crawly things all over it.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/20 01:40 PM
2

Agreed - someone simply suggesting ‘it’s a troll’ as if that means it should simply be ignored, allows it fester as some people will think it’s something to be taken seriously and agreed with.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/20 01:23 PM
1

Agreed - it’s an odd thing to obsess over since it literally does nothing productive in the world and isn’t an indication of skill or intellect.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/20 01:10 PM
1

If she doubles down after getting that smackdown then she’s even dumber than we think.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/20 01:09 PM
1

What a self-absorbed douchebag.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/20 01:08 PM
1

Way to miss the entire point of the thread.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/20 01:07 PM
1

Please... so now you’re trying to convince us that the preference for height has come from series of useful traits? I’d think if that were even in the vicinity of being true, we’d see it reflected in the success or skill of tall people everywhere. But guess what? There is no such correlation of height and skill/success. Other than what could be created by the preference itself (eg taller or prettier people getting hired more easily/readily than others, etc).
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/20 01:05 PM
1

And both skin color and height are equally useless. Unless you play basketball or stock the top shelves of a grocery store.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/20 01:02 PM
1

Fearing the guy will feel that way is still fallout from women’s preference for being ‘dominated’ by tall guys (or whatever it is).
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/20 01:01 PM
-1

Best genetics isn’t equal to height though; an hourglass figure is (since it represents child-bearing hips). Taller people die sooner. Good genetics are things like good skin, clear eyes/teeth, overall symmetry of body features, etc.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/20 12:59 PM
0

Yep - height has zero actual functional benefits in the modern world. Women using it as a preference point are ‘thinking’ like they’re in the Stone Age.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/20 12:58 PM
5

Yeah, she might want to lookup the definition of ‘feminism’. If she thinks it means she can be misandrist she’s incorrect.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/20 12:56 PM
1

Shorter people can also: Drive small sports cars Be fighter pilots
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/20 12:55 PM
2

Nothing. The same woman who would choose someone over something as stupid as height is the same type of woman who’s so shallow she’d find some other showstopper wrong later. Plus she’s probably an insufferable douche of a personality, and likely has no charm or education/skills.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/20 12:53 PM
1

You wish. It would a lot closer to accurate to say women are stuck in the caveman days, where it was assumed you were healthier or better able to hunt if you were taller.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/20 12:52 PM
5

It’s basically right at the average male US height of 5’9”. And, remember, height is a bell curve so being at the average means roughly half are taller and half shorter.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/20 12:51 PM
1

Right. Edited to clarify. https://www.healthline.com/health/average-height-for-men#u.s.-height
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/20 12:49 PM
2

It isn’t though. 5’9” for men is average. https://www.healthline.com/health/average-height-for-men#u.s.-height
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/20 12:47 PM
1

Right - some dumb round number (which like you note isn’t a thing in anything but ‘feet’).
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/20 12:45 PM
2

And what’s funny is what they call short is likely near the average. The average male in the USA is what, 5’9”? Yet they would call any male under 6 foot (why that round number matters is beyond me) ‘short’, even if that means they’re at or above average height.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/20 12:44 PM
3

And what’s weird is height has zero actual use in the real world. It’s not representative of strength, intellect, competence, or even genitalia size. The only benefit is you can reach things higher up on the shelf. Oh, and taller people die sooner.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/20 12:39 PM
1

First I’ve seen it, so I’m glad it got reposted.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/08/20 10:29 PM
1

oof
/r/PussyPassDenied31/07/20 08:29 PM
3

no nothing Hmmm OK What else do I need to know?
/r/PussyPassDenied29/07/20 04:49 PM
2

Maybe he’ll let the young girl stay and just kick out the skank?
/r/PussyPassDenied29/07/20 04:25 PM
3

WTF has she ever done for him? Besides cheat on him and lie to hm about being a father, I mean... What a waste of skin she is/..
/r/PussyPassDenied29/07/20 04:23 PM
0

I have the same response when people discuss that they’re getting “their degree” (instead of “a degree”) like it’s already tagged for them, just waiting for them to pick it up.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/07/20 04:16 PM
1

I’ve been to Dubai (on the way to/from India) and stayed there a bit - I’m not sure why anyone would want to go there for vacation. Other than the spice stalls and gold souk, which are cool, I’m not sure I see the appeal. It’s the desert.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/07/20 04:14 PM
1

Except you’re probably at work 40 hours a week and I don’t need to work ever.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/20 05:01 PM
1

Well, with that perspective nobody but the 0.05% will ever be able to stop working. So hopefully you enjoy your drudgery! Me, on the other hand, am about to breach the multi-millionaire threshold (200k away) and have already stopped working.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/20 04:37 PM
1

That’s silly - rich people can have health insurance with maximum annual out of pockets, too. Coughing up $10K in a year because of an illness isn’t even going to register for someone with that kind of money. And, at $30M dollars your safe withdrawal rate (at which you’ll basically never run out of money) is $1,200,000 a year. To suggest that this is the beginning of “rich” is ridiculous. I’d suggest anyone over $1,000,000, who can now withdraw $40,000+ a year in perpetuity, and never work again…
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/20 03:55 PM
1

You think it takes $100,000,000 to never work again? It happens way earlier than that.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/20 02:22 PM
0

That still doesn’t explain what strength has to do with it - they’re still just moving their own body weight, as I mentioned. In the game they’re not even allowed to touch each other.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/20 10:46 AM
1

But you’re at a loss to say how?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/20 02:51 AM
1

What does strength have to do with basketball? All they’re doing is moving their own body weight and a 1 pound ball.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/20 02:18 AM
3

If it’s just an “extra advantage” it wouldn’t be as prevalent as it is. At the rate seen in the NBA it’s almost an absolute requirement. And I agree that horse racing/jockeys is the same thing.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/07/20 09:41 PM
7

You’re really going to argue that the sport doesn’t favor height? Aren’t 95% of NBA players over 6’6”?
/r/PussyPassDenied23/07/20 07:14 PM
3

I’m referring to height. Anyone who is exceedingly tall has a huge advantage in a game whose only goal is to put a ball into a hole 8 or 9 feet off the ground.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/07/20 05:41 PM
1

This is kind of what happened with the Boeing 737 that crashes all the time - they offshored development to India.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/07/20 05:16 PM
1

They want to short circuit actually troubleshooting and go straight to the solution. It’s equivalent to having broken your arm in half and instead of fixing the issue just moving your arm into some semblance of where it should be and calling it good.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/07/20 04:55 PM
1

Yep - displacing skilled and qualified people in the name of creating racial equity in outcomes is unfair to the white people who worked hard to get where they are. Why should it be OK to sacrifice their individual lives in order to address racial issues in society?
/r/PussyPassDenied23/07/20 04:43 PM
-6

This is a reason why basketball is a dumb sport. Not only is it abstracted from any/all skills relevant to reality but it also favors heavily a particular body shape/type. Any sport where body type ‘X’ automatically has a huge advantage is a poorly-designed sport, IMO.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/07/20 04:33 PM
3

So, basically if 2013’s blind skills test isn’t getting us the women/minority outcomes we want, let’s just go straight to packing them in, regardless of talent? Kind of cute that they assumed the 2013 blind auditions would result in what they wanted automatically.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/07/20 04:31 PM
5

Two issues: “girlfriend“ doesn’t entitle you to jack even if you were married, unless he deposits the inheritance to a joint account you aren’t entitled to Jack (based on my USA state’s policies)
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/20 02:38 PM
1

That cover must be the way he poised her dead body after he found out she was trying to ruin him for no reason.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 08:51 PM
2

She already reacted when she triggered on him saying happy men's day.
/r/MensRights22/11/19 01:17 PM
2

She's not a US citizen
/r/PussyPassDenied24/02/19 04:07 PM
9

Ok get busy obscuring and posting!
/r/MensRights19/02/19 03:20 AM
1

Yep - hilarious watching women just a couple of weeks after the Gillette BS tripping over themselves to object exactly like men rightly did, after telling men they were silly to object.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 02:09 AM
10

"Women are the equal of men in every regard, but we still expect you to be subservient in relationships and courting"
/r/MensRights31/01/19 09:41 PM
6

Yep - little wonder. Women sit back and simply judge the efforts of others.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 03:00 PM
4

You expect to become a millionaire driving trucks? Autonomous trucks are a thing and are likely to wipe that job out of existence in less than 10 years.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 02:59 PM
3

Like only white people can be racist. Both are nonsense.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 09:44 PM
2

I think it's mostly because gamers trend male, and males would rather look at hot women than men.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 03:39 AM
2

It's so PC to be male, yet advocate against males. Sickening and hypocritical.
/r/MensRights12/07/18 03:27 PM
29

Yeah - sort of how women/feminists advocate for equal representation on high-paying career fields, but couldn't care less that men are massively over-represented in dangerous and low-paying jobs.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 04:41 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter