TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

pdrt3 Archive

View 5 posts and 115 comments by pdrt3 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Why not test all children on earth EXCEPT your own children?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/20 03:49 AM
1

Why are you making these shit posts. What if he hit it with a rubber?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/20 03:31 AM
1

Hell no.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/20 01:12 AM
6

Regardless of whether women think it or say it, there is a real difference in how they act between these two types of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/20 01:11 AM
3

I would even argue that this is what the future looks like for at least 50% of betas.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/20 01:06 AM
2

It happens in real life. I've seen it with my own eyes.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/20 01:03 AM
1

Basically read this reddit post and decide which one you want to be: https://www.reddit.com/r/relationships/comments/3qo7gj/my_boyfriend_28m_feels_bad_because_i_28f_told_him/?utm_source=amp&utm_medium=&utm_content=post_body
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/20 12:53 AM
1

I already agreed that it doesnt work out in primitive societies (I stated that in the comment that you responded to). I said that the only situation in which these beta males are no longer needed is when that "grunt work" can be done by AI. Automation and AI are already doing their work. I'm not talking about replacing doctors, lawyers, or even truck drivers. I'm talking about retail workers, fast food workers, cashiers, etc. How many workers do you think Walmart employs for their retail stores?…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/20 01:48 AM
5

what if she fucked you late because she wanted to convey she wanted an actual relationship? What I'm about to say is going to sound weird, so take some time to process it. Guys don't want to date girls that want to date them. Guys want to date girls that want to fuck them... that also happen to want to date them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/20 09:19 PM
30

I think society will move towards a situation where most people never get in long term relationships. Alphas will pass around the women. Women will constantly go from alpha to alpha for sexual needs and go to other women for social needs. Betas will get nothing sexually and will interact with other betas for their social needs. Men and women will become mostly separate other than the interactions between alphas and women. This was a problem in past civilizations because betas were needed to do t…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/20 06:28 PM
5

You never have to worry about this if you do the following: Expect that your partner performs all sexual acts you want, regardless of it they've done them before. If they don't, find someone else more sexually compatible.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/20 05:21 PM
1

I'm talking about inherent nature of men and women in choosing sexual partners. Sure, most people in LTRs are having sex. But they aren't still choosing sexual partners -- they've already done that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/20 12:42 AM
3

By polygamous I mean having sexual relations with many woman. Not actually being married to many woman. I agree that multi-marriage is not common.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/20 11:52 PM
3

The way it generally happens is that alpha men get a soft harem of women through apps like Tinder.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/20 11:24 PM
2

Breathing makes up the bulk of life. Like 85%. Why aren't you talking about that instead of sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/20 11:13 PM
7

I'm not talking about LTRs. It's not hard to understand: Man's Nature = Polygamy Woman's Nature = Hypergamy LTR (AKA compromise) = Monogamy Also I never said which one is more moral.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/20 10:42 PM
6

Men aren't hypergamous. Consider the following scenario: Guy is fucking Average Girl. Hot Girl comes along. Guy starts fucking Hot Girl. Would he still continue to fuck Average Girl as well? Yes. More is better. In comparison: Girl is fucking Average Guy. Hot Guy comes along. Girl starts fucking Hot Guy. Would she still continue to fuck Average Guy as well? No. She's now turned off and slightly disgusted by him.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/20 10:29 PM
14

There is nothing to explain here. That girl is simply an extreme corner case. Maybe she's hooking up with another dude and doesn't want him to find out.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/20 05:04 PM
5

Love is inversely correlated with attractiveness. In other words: Betas love the most Women love somewhat Alphas don't love at all People saying men "love more" are imagining relationships between betas and women. People saying women "love more" are imagining relationships between alphas and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/20 07:04 AM
9

1) The fact that they're going to a prostitute means they're long past caring about that ego shit. 2) Ok so they go see more prostitutes. So what. 3) These men haven't been able to get laid their whole life. Why would they worry about something that has never happened and probably will never happen?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/20 03:59 AM
43

More like, unattractive people are less likely to block/ghost.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/20 06:31 PM
1

zero side effects.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/20 10:00 PM
2

I've been on Fin/Min since I was 19 and have not lost much/any ground since then.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/20 09:39 PM
3

I think a lot of people fail to consider what extremely high-end VR simulations will do for society. I'm talking about pixel perfect VR with a full haptic bodysuit. I can honestly imagine a future where, much like breastfeeding today, sex will basically become optional in relationships just because both the man and woman will have so much better sex through VR simulations than with each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/20 03:16 AM
21

You overestimate how attractive the top 20% of men are. Remember, that is just 1 in 5 guys. At least some of the top 20% are willing to string along pickmeishas for sex. "Chads" and "Alphas" are more like top 3-5%. These men will not fuck bottom 20%.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/20 07:43 PM
24

pickmeishas are bottom 20% women giving free sex to top 20% men. simps are bottom 80% men giving free attention to top 80% women. they are not compatible.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/20 07:20 PM
3

Not interested in debating edge cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/20 06:57 AM
7

Regardless of whether you took the opportunities or not, all men are acutely aware of the select group of men that have these opportunities and whether or not they are part of that group.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/20 06:47 AM
12

The issue with casual sex isn't the number of partners, but the kind of guys that have casual sex. Men know that casual sex isn't just sex with random guys. It's sex with a select group of guys. They know that, in most cases, they were not part of this group of guys. So when a girl has been with lots of guys in the past, men connect the dots. They realize that she's basically willing to choose them for a relationship in spite of their attractiveness rather than because of their attractiveness. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/20 06:07 AM
2

You may not realize this but your love is a lot more conditional than you think.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/20 08:37 AM
13

Most situations in which I've seen men and women be platonic friends are: The man is already married or in a relationship. The friendship is bounded to a certain context (e.g. work-only friends). The man is much more attractive than the woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/20 06:56 PM
1

Unironically: Internet strangers. Whether its on one of my many reddit accounts, discord, or elsewhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 09:13 PM
1

Well that's fine but I was originally debating your point that equal amounts of money means equal amounts of power. This is not the case because woman have the inherent power of sexuality. Literally the whole point of all past civilizations were to offset the power imbalance of sexuality by creating an opposite power imbalance of money. In societies where money became balanced, the imbalance of sexuality causes power to fall into women's favor, resulting in only top men getting anything. This is…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 07:43 PM
2

I'm saying men should always have the option of either having sex with their partner or watching porn. Therefore: In cases where their partner is willing to have sex at the frequency the man wants, then the expectation that they don't watch porn makes sense. But in all other cases, it is not fair to not expect men to not watch porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 07:16 PM
1

My point was that men provide money and women provide sex. You said men also provide sex. I'm saying women don't care about that part very much. You said if she doesn't care about that part, why doesn't she leave. The answer is because men still provide something, which is what I said originally: money.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 07:12 PM
3

Banning porn is also entitled. I'm sure you wouldn't understand though. Also, I was exaggerating the blowjob part to make a point.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 06:52 PM
2

ok that is reasonable then. i dont think most woman can say the same though, so in their case i would say that they should not be against porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 06:25 PM
3

Wow I'm very jealous of your relationship...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 06:12 PM
-1

Ok, maybe I'm exaggerating, but you get my point. There was an expectation in traditional societies that women would please their men whenever he desired even if they weren't in the mood themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 05:35 PM
3

I really feel like most women in my circles do not value sex with their man as much as you do (UMC, everyone makes 250K to 500K+ in their early to mid 20's). All the women I know are career women who place huge value on financial success and have probably had many extremely attractive men interested in them. Also, being in big city in California, I guess most people I interact with are very superficial. Part of me feels like what you describe is a unicorn-like scenario... maybe I'm just jealous.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 05:32 PM
3

Yeah and men had complete control of their wives to do any sexual act on demand for those 10000 years as well. Times have changed.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 05:02 PM
2

That's not a problem with OnlyFans. That's a problem with social media in general. Whether it's money, subscribers, follower counts, it can all be very addictive. I don't see why OnlyFans is the bad guy here. Surely if a streamer was struggling and then a few hundred bucks started rolling in from twitch, they would double down and spend even more of their time on the platform? Same with youtube, or any of these other platforms. What makes an OnlyFans subscriber any different from a Twitch subscr…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 04:04 PM
1

Sex for women isn't much. I mean unless the man is very very attractive? I don't see why it would be anything special if its available literally at the tap of a button on Tinder.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 04:00 PM
3

Most girls dont start OnlyFans as a career. They see it as a few extra bucks every month and could maybe grow into something more. Very few girls, if any, are "financial slaves" to the success of their OnlyFans.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 03:53 PM
2

What? Do you want your SO to stop masturbating entirely? Are you willing to give him blowjobs on command?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 03:48 PM
1

I come from UMC circles where most of that stuff is paid for. Furthermore, I find that higher income brackets tend to be a bit more traditional. Like I said before, no decently attractive smart woman I know would want this deal because they are all used to very successful men and likely don't see the things you listed as work. Maybe if they were 35+ and at their last straws? Not sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 03:33 PM
2

Were you a virgin before meeting him? What's your n count?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 03:28 PM
1

In the past the power balance was that the men would provide the money and the woman would provide the sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 03:26 PM
0

What are your incomes? Maybe the circles I run in are too traditional, but I absolutely cannot imagine this, like the other commenter said... A woman coming home from 8+ hours of work at a high-powered job, taking her husband out in a car she had to save and pay for, to dinner and and foot the entire bill at the end, then go home to a house she had to diligently save and pay for, and then at the end of the day he rolls over and asks for a BJ? I simply cannot imagine it. No decently attractive sm…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 05:48 AM
2

I agree with this. The only situation I see this working out is when the woman is very unattractive and the guy is a huge beta that literally does everything he can outside of provide income.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 05:43 AM
1

Top 20% isnt nearly enough to drop panties. Maybe top 5% with a big dick.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/20 06:53 AM
1

Ok I was just throwing shit out there that is valuable in general. I agree it is not necessarily valuable in a relationship, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/20 06:52 AM
0

The question "what makes you valuable" implies that you state something that you have that very few others do. If we're just going along with "feel-good" points that make you a good person but anyone can else can do it, what's the point of the question?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/20 11:09 PM
2

That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that if it something that anyone / most people can have, it's not really valuable. It's more like a bare minimum requirement.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/20 11:06 PM
-1

None of that stuff is really valuable, it can all be gained with maturity. Real value comes from things you have that few men have / can attain. Great height / looks, a successful business, a well known expert in a field, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/20 04:47 PM
4

Lmao. Men will spend their life denying that "men are trash". It's obvious that most criminals and rapists are men, though. That is why they protect their daughters from them. Does that mean they are no longer denying "men are trash"? What?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/20 02:28 PM
1

I don't want to be responsible for another guy offing himself either. There are plenty of fish in the sea. No reason to mess with a taken woman unless you're desperate.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/20 07:20 PM
2

You have it the wrong way around. Non committed LTRs are a bad deal for the woman. She's giving sex in exchange for no commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/20 06:50 PM
3

As a guy, I would not do 1 just because I don't want to potentially deal with her crazy SO. I would do 2abc. Why should she retroactively feel bad about sex with someone that she consented with? Unless she was only doing it in exchange for the promise of future resources. But if there is mutual attraction and then things break off later, the sex is still beneficial for both parties at the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/20 06:47 PM
1

This. Most guys aren't top 20%. Most guys still marry. Therefore, most of the time, wives are attracted to their husbands primarily for their personality, character, humor, etc. Not their looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/20 05:51 AM
1

That's exactly what I'm debating, though -- I'm saying that the "other things" don't matter when you're in a man's early 20's, despite TRP suggesting that you focus on them. Essentially what I'm saying is that in man's early 20's, things are much more aligned with the "blackpill" than TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/20 03:17 PM
2

Read my follow-up comment where I clarified what I meant.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/20 02:48 AM
7

Yeah actually, what I meant to say was genetics. In a man's 20's, a good amount of his attractiveness comes from genetics. This becomes less of an issue as time goes on, where he can make up for it with hardwork. RP types tend to think hardwork trumps all, so this would go against their world view.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/20 11:46 PM
3

What? You're saying top tier men are the ones that are going to die off?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/20 10:55 PM
11

The problem with RP acknowledging this fact is that it would then have to acknowledge that looks matter quite a bit. In their early 20's, most women do not care about your money, or if you have a job, or if you have a house, or if you have a car, etc. So looks become a much bigger factor.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/20 10:54 PM
22

Controversial opinion: The definition of a "nice guy" has been broadened to the point that almost every guy that doesn't get sex from women is considered a "nice guy". Don't get sex and you're not angry about it? You're too much of a nice guy. Don't get sex and you're angry about it? You're a nice guy. Don't get sex and you question it at all? You're a nice guy. Basically the only way for a virgin to not be a nice guy is for them to pretend they have sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/20 04:48 PM
1

Wouldn't money / status disprove this?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/20 01:49 AM
10

Women are innately more valuable. But there is a difference between innate value and earned value. Men are able to earn more value, which is precisely why male gender roles are more important.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/20 05:51 AM
17

I think losing attractiveness will cause both genders to potentially lust after others. The major difference is in the other things: - losing job - losing status - becoming emotional - being too available etc. As a man you always have to be on your toes and make sure all of these things are always in order.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 06:33 PM
5

So that they can have sex with the woman. If the woman is stronger than them, the woman will go have sex with other men instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 06:22 PM
1

No, that's why you see complaints about men just using women for sex. If women only had sex with guys they actually wanted to have sex with in the first place, rather than guys they are willing to have sex with in exchange for commitment, then this wouldn't happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/20 01:00 AM
0

That is literally what I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 07:55 PM
1

This is why women should stop fucking men just to try to get commitment. Only fuck men that are hot enough for the sex itself to be worth it, and then see where it goes from there.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 06:54 PM
1

Pretty easy to solve: Is the guy hot enough for sex alone to be worth it? Then fuck him. Is the guy only worth fucking if he'll commit to you? Then make him wait.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 10:56 PM
2

There are only so many hot guys. The # of women that want a committed partner exceed the # of hot guys willing to commit. BB will always be a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 08:24 AM
1

Move to silicon valley.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 08:22 AM
5

I can agree with you there.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/20 03:12 AM
2

I think there are 3 categories: They spend your money You each make your own money You spend their money Everyone dislikes the 1st. We agree on that. Some (not all) women would prefer the 3rd, but realize that the 2nd is more practical. Most men outright prefer the 2nd. That's the difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/20 03:01 AM
3

The beta test: Imagine your girlfriend wasn't in a relationship with you and she saw you on Tinder. Would she swipe left on you?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/20 01:00 AM
1

We can keep most of them from dropping out completely by occupying them with porn, video games, and weed. The minority that do completely and utterly drop out of society society (less than 10% of all men) can be replaced by automation.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/20 09:19 PM
2

I don't think that is the case. In the past, when those men rebelled, society would crumble. This is because "Economic Output" was the same as "Human Output". So without those men, society fell apart. Now, with automation, those men are no longer needed. As long as we can control and/or distract (e.g. video games, porn) them, we can continue to have a functioning society.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/20 08:53 PM
1

Nothing needs to be done as long as we remove their ability to wreck havoc on society. This is why I mentioned control and/or distraction. I am purely speaking in terms of relationships. Women will be harmed economically by automation but not in terms of relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/20 06:19 PM
1

That's not what I'm saying though. I'm debating the point that "disadvantaged men is never healthy for society". That was the case back when society needed them, because without them, society would no longer function. Due to automation, society no longer needs them. So it is not particularly bad to have a bunch of useless men, as long as they are controllable and/or distractible.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/20 05:28 PM
1

I disagree. It used to be the case that society needs average men to move forward. That was the case when Economic Output = Human Output. That is no longer the case as automation takes over. Now all society needs from average men is to not blow it up. This is a very different problem that can be solved with tighter control and distractions (porn, video games).
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/20 04:41 PM
13

Most men won't be getting into relationships in the future. At this point women really don't need most men and as the gap in college degrees widens, this will likely continue to be the case. I think that the future is one where most women get their social needs met through other women and their sexual needs met through top tier men. Children will be mostly raised in single parent homes. Top tier men will rarely commit even in their 30s, 40s, and beyond. Average men will mostly be lonely or form …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/20 07:08 AM
6

Dutch is to Netherlands as American is to USA. Dutch is the name of the people.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/20 07:01 AM
3

Is this not more like option 2?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/20 06:13 AM
2

This is more like option 4.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/20 05:57 AM
2

I'm not saying that's what I want, I'm using as evidence that sex is not a biological need; In the past only the kings of the village had sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/20 04:45 AM
0

What percentage of you and your friends have gotten laid? I agree with 2.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/20 04:30 AM
2

Why is sex a human right? Biologically speaking, during primitive times something like 1 in 17 men had children. As there was no birth control during those times, we can assume that means only 6% of men had any sex at all. Surely the other 94% of men didn't just kill themselves or something... otherwise who would have done the hunting and gathering, who would have fought in war, who would have constructed the pyramids, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/20 03:47 AM
1

I don't think that's an option anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/20 03:35 AM
1

You edited your comment after I posted. I don't see how you can ban casual sex, but ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/20 03:17 AM
3

I have a feeling your last sentence is a paradox.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/20 03:02 AM
4

This question isnt about casual sex, but about sex in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/20 01:46 AM
11

This is basically option 2. It is real, but not a big problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/20 12:30 AM
1

That's a cool anecdote, but simple statistics will tell you that there are far more wealthy guys than wealthy girls. Some (read: the majority) of these guys will have to date down, and navigate the potential gold diggers that come with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/20 12:17 AM
1

The problem is that a wealthy girl has no reason to get with an equally wealthy guy. She could easily seek even wealthier. So the wealthy guy has to date down, but at the same time, he has to be careful of the gold diggers.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/20 11:43 PM
1

The average woman brings more to the table than the average man. However, the average woman doesn't pursue the average man, she pursues men far above average...
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/20 06:06 PM
3

thats the boomer definition of a boomer get with the times
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 07:11 PM
3

Literally all of the regulars here are married/ltr 28-40yo people.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 06:48 PM
1

Why are women so afraid of men who cheat on them?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/20 03:21 AM
1

Guys who get sexual interest from women wouldn't be using a sexbot in the first place, so your point doesn't really stand.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/20 09:48 AM
1

I personally think it would be very difficult to attract a woman that I am not significantly more successful than. I feel like my ambitious personality is what I have going for me, and when you take that away, I have nothing to distinguish myself. Perhaps I'm the exception in this regard?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/20 09:50 PM
1

I feel like for most men, their achievements are their main attracting factor. Sure, some men have the physical attractiveness to pull women that are more accomplished than themselves, but these men are pretty rare (they are the 1%, the ones that tinder actually works for, etc). That's why it's so hard for me to believe that all of these men are supposedly earning less than their SO's...
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/20 08:53 PM
1

I'm actually curious how most of you guys have girlfriends/wives that make equal or more than you. It's hard to imagine a woman that makes the same amount of money as me even remotely being attracted to me, much less a woman who makes more.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/20 08:36 PM
1

Lmao. Women are not like men. They aren't instantly sexually attracted to the vast majority of guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/20 06:18 PM
1

Lmao aziz is a 2/10 tho. The guy in question is more like a 6/10 objectively (more attractive eyes, muscular body, styled hair, etc). Aziz's face looks bloated and round.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 05:00 PM
1

you didn't answer the second part
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 04:25 PM
1

I'm not this person. What does getting a wife have to do with being desirable?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 04:25 PM
1

So a girl has never saw a good looking "ethnic" guy and wanted to fuck him? Amongst all of the 100s of millions of girls in the US?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 03:48 PM
1

Let's say this guy was born and lives in the U.S., and that is where is $500K job is as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 03:47 PM
1

This is not me, it's hypothetical. Let's say this guy didn't have money. Then what?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 03:46 PM
0

Funny how most people assume this is me... I'm not this person at all. Why would you say they couldn't? What qualities does a man have to have in order to be desired for more than their money?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 03:45 PM
1

Let's say this guy was born and lives in the U.S.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 03:40 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter