TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

peachesgp Archive

View 0 posts and 123 comments by peachesgp on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
29

Unconfirmed, but it also doesn't necessarily mean she didn't lose her job, as she may have.
/r/MensRights12/06/20 02:29 PM
0

No, it isn't a hypothetical exception to a rule, it's you making up bullshit and pretending it's a rule when it's really just a lackwit making shit up. Has to be a rule to be an exception to the rule.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/20 09:27 PM
0

I'm a married dude that's never been on Tinder. People aren't as married to their phones at all times as you'd like to imagine.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/20 09:26 PM
0

If you're saying an absolute statement, as the poster is, there aren't grades of truth to it. In the bulk of cases, absolute statements on human social behavior are not logical.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/20 07:56 PM
1

Since when is asserting that all women are phone addicts logical?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/20 07:47 PM
20

You feel bad for me because I know that women sometimes don't go on Tinder for 2 hours? Seems like a waste of pity, even if it is inexhaustible.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/20 06:32 PM
80

Or they're not on Tinder in those 2 hours, you know, because that's a thing.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/20 05:16 PM
2

People don't play scrimmages with an eye solely on the score line. You play scrimmages to work on tactics that you don't understand. We've already been over this. Winning doesn't matter, it is to analyze tactics and if they will be effective or not in games where winning matters.
/r/MensRights31/07/19 12:36 AM
2

Scrimmages by their nature are not competitive games. It is where you try out things from practice to see how it works in real game scenarios. It is funny that you keep trying that angle after making it obvious that you don't know a single thing about soccer, but don't let that stop you from having a dumb opinion.
/r/MensRights31/07/19 12:26 AM
1

Isn't entertaining to you. You should remember that entertainment is a subjective matter. You should know better than to assume anything. There are pictures from post-match with them happily posing for pictures. That doesn't sound like a team that took the scrimmage seriously, despite your assumptions based on nothing. It is funny how you keep lowering the age just to try to make a different argument. It was a U15 team, which includes 15 year olds. You should stick to facts rather than assumptio…
/r/MensRights30/07/19 11:54 PM
1

Scrimmages are to put it in practice in a non-competitive setting so you can see if the things you've been doing in practice work without doing it in a competitive game. You've already made it clear that you don't know a single thing about soccer, even if you're trying desperately to cover it up.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 11:52 PM
-1

The fact is it wasn't a situation where they were playing to win and the final score is irrelevant. The fact is that your whole argument hinges on irrelevant garbage because you don't have an argument that can actually stand on it's own. Sorry about your abject failure to understand the topic at hand. Better luck next time, maybe you'd do better at counting to 10 or something.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 09:56 PM
1

Which makes it all the more likely that they were targeting weaknesses and trying to alter tactics some.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 06:58 PM
0

It doesn't matter if you care. Facts don't care about your feelings, buddy. The final score of a scrimmage is irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. Sorry your entire argument hinges on something that's irrelevant.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 06:03 PM
1

Could have been tactical changes, a change in formation, defensive shape, etc. Why are you trying to speak on a sport that it seems that you have no understanding of?
/r/MensRights30/07/19 05:16 PM
-2

No, because the result doesn't matter. It's working on things like a change in tactics, or the refinement of existing tactics. Have none of you actually played a sport before?
/r/MensRights30/07/19 04:36 PM
-5

I don't feel that you understand what a scrimmage is for. It is not a competitive match which you're trying to win. It serves to work on particular things.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 03:47 PM
-6

It's weird how much people are trying to make of a scrimmage.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 03:28 PM
7

I wouldn't let anyone touch me with a third party's severed arm.
/r/MensRights05/07/19 12:29 PM
1

That's some rando making up a theory.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 10:50 PM
15

Could also have to do with what they would be charged with. He steals cheese, she steals a phone. The disparity in value could make them different crimes.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 10:50 AM
0

Blah blah blah more inane nonsense. Sorry I didn't bow to your ignorant conspiracy bullshit based on nothing but your paranoid delusions.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 11:27 PM
1

No, because people with knowledge of the actual situation say you're wrong. You say you're not because conspiracy theory based on nothing. It doesn't take much intelligence to figure out how those are different.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 11:19 PM
-6

You are telling the truth, just about that you have a totally unsubstantiated theory.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 06:02 PM
15

No, it doesn't. If you think that was an unbiased accounting of reality then you are all too biased yourself.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 05:50 PM
-11

Unless you have something meaningful that goes against that allegation, I'm just going to go ahead and dismiss your crackpot theory based on nothing.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 05:50 PM
7

You're missing one thing about her motivation: she did not originally wish to be identified. Based on that your theories about why she would have said anything are at best highly flimsy.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 05:29 PM
41

That is a heavily right wing biased reading of events.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 05:27 PM
2

I didn't say shit before this actually. She stood to gain nothing when she came out, so casting doubt based on that she could gain money is again, totally and completely baseless. And you did suggest that, so stop this begging the question garbage where you try to say you didn't suggest what you did. Also, this is not a criminal trial but a job interview. Innocent until proven guilty need not apply.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 03:46 AM
2

And yet she's getting threatened by a massive group of people. Doesn't sound like someone whose popularity skyrocketed.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 02:13 AM
1

But even if she stands to gain money, she intended to be anonymous and thus would never have seen a penny, so using that as her original motive has absolutely no merit whatsoever.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 02:12 AM
2

Do you have some sort of evidence of her political activism?
/r/MensRights28/09/18 02:11 AM
4

You're a character.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 10:04 PM
1

Hey, I could be an extra trying really hard not to be conspicuous.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 07:00 PM
-6

But it is a crime if a woman abandons her child.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 09:58 AM
11

And yet here you are not showing any evidence to the contrary. You're just begging the question while having nothing substantive to offer to support your "questions" Troll elsewhere or start offering anything of any value.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 07:46 PM
9

https://www.law.umich.edu/newsandinfo/features/Pages/starr_gender_disparities.aspx Also your suggestion of her remorse is laughable. As is quite evident this sociopath feels none.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 07:41 PM
9

Women, especially mothers do nor serve the time that men do for the same crimes. Also what possible context do you feel there could be? The child deserved to be beaten with a slotted spoon? Self defense?
/r/MensRights27/12/17 07:27 PM
1

Sufficient mental issues that she would violently beat a small child. She should not be allowed near any child, let alone be allowed to care for one.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 07:23 PM
10

Seems appropriately directed at unrepentant abusive scum.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 07:22 PM
1

Did I say anything about racism? You're gonna need to learn to be a bit less sensitive. And not just one comment but several here made it really plainly evident that you are not a mentally nor emotionally well adjusted human.
/r/MensRights23/12/17 12:20 PM
2

It's telling that you fight so hard for your "right" to be rude. Doesn't change that there simply isn't a need for it.
/r/MensRights23/12/17 02:18 AM
4

He's definitely not mentally stable. It's kind of funny how most alt-righters I see here on reddit are the most oversensitive folks.
/r/MensRights23/12/17 02:16 AM
3

Then explain how what she's doing is in fact not sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 11:30 AM
32

Well, you see, women just can't rape people, only men can do that.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 02:03 PM
1

Who hurt you to make you such an awful specimen?
/r/MensRights01/09/17 11:29 AM
9

It's ironic that you call someone else disgusting then advise that they kill themselves. You're garbage of the lowest order.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 03:26 AM
5

I would say it seems that she hates anyone criticising her and you've shown nothing to suggest otherwise. One would think that your distaste for her throwing "misogyny" around carelessly would make you think twice about carelessly throwing around "misandry"
/r/MensRights20/08/17 04:42 PM
2

I don't see anything there that makes her a misandrist. I see a lazy person that doesn't like to be told to do shit. Nothing you've said makes me think in the slightest it is motivated by hatred of men. Stop trying to make someone gossiping about you seem more grandiose than it is. I've worked with plenty of male gossips too.
/r/MensRights20/08/17 04:28 PM
6

social group, gossip, men-hating. It is the end of paragraph 2.
/r/MensRights20/08/17 04:07 PM
8

I don't see at all where you're getting this "man-hating" from. She doesn't like you, that doesn't make it misandry.
/r/MensRights20/08/17 04:01 PM
6

Ok. And now they arent. Support equality. Don't support gender superiority, which is all feminism is now.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 09:58 PM
7

I'm not sure if you're crazy and like to try to antagonize people or are actually anti-feminist and trying to provide others with a reason to hate feminists.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 03:41 PM
38

Drunk people can't consent. If the roles were reversed everybody would cry rape.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 11:21 AM
5

They'd say the root of the raping, murdering, and what have you is toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 11:36 AM
2

I feel like this is fake given that she's saying there's a picture of them going at it on Facebook and I'm pretty sure they don't allow porn. That said, I hope this isn't even theoretically getting positive attention.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 11:58 AM
41

I wish I could stop harassing my vet.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 06:09 PM
2

Fun fact: a kid in my home town got killed by a snow plow walking to school one day.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 07:44 PM
2

What? You've failed to assess what I said at all. The only thing that "loses" here is logic and reason.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 11:32 PM
3

That is unnecessary. I'm saying what was correct 30 years ago may not be correct now, thus making that irrelevant unless this Facebook post was from 30 years ago, which I find highly unlikely.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 11:30 PM
1

Your citation may well be valid but a study from 30 years ago about current issues is hardly relevant.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 11:27 PM
1

Because she felt threatened any maybe had feelings for him and felt that she could change his negative behavior?
/r/MensRights28/02/14 03:18 AM
2

If he had it and, as she stated, tended to pull it out during arguments and just hold it then she has some damn good reasons to get it out while they're getting divorced. It isn't really a stretch to say that an individual could fly off the handle during an argument and do something stupid. Plus she could easily argue (and may have actually) she felt threatened, too much so to actually do anything about it before.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 02:33 AM
4

Should be is a different conversation. It is illegal. Should is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 12:33 AM
16

That's true, but I think he's a moron who has only himself to blame for leaving a weapon that he owns illegally with his wife who would like to divorce him. It is his fault entirely, not the wife's. Don't leave ammunition lying around.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 02:48 PM
20

So we're going to say that it isn't his fault for having a gun illegally?
/r/MensRights27/02/14 02:18 PM
1

Just sounds like someone who doesn't understand an adult relationship.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 02:28 PM
1

It doesn't actually say that she covered up evidence, he took the car and got it cleaned. Title is misleading.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 04:06 PM
3

Well, it's also important to note that the man was convicted and the woman is simply accused at the point where these screenshots come from.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 01:37 PM
1

Because he has a share to pay for the care of the child which he helped to produce.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 12:42 AM
1

My parents are divorced. My mother makes a good bit of money, that should not absolve my father from having to pay his share. Just because she can pay for everything doesn't mean she should have to and be able to put away less money for her own retirement, that would be entirely unfair to her.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 12:36 AM
1

No, it isn't. If she already paid the rent out of her disposable income since he hadn't paid when he was meant to and eventually he gives her the money then she can't pay the rent again with that, it should go back into her disposable income it came from for her to spend.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 12:35 AM
7

So you think that any and all money parents earn should go towards bills and children?
/r/MensRights23/08/13 03:49 PM
48

Yeah if the child's needs were already met through her using her spending money on the kid then that's fine, she's just bought something she wanted with the spending money she should have already had.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 01:45 PM
-1

A farmer can scan their fields using an agricultural UAV, plough the field, sow the crops, harvest and process the crops and sell them to a store all without any humans being involved at all, Exactly how many farmers do you know who are rich enough to afford that kind of technology?
/r/MensRights21/08/13 02:33 PM
1

I think it's very situational for if it's ok. Strangers - If the two parties are similar levels of drunk and want to bone, go for it. If one is sober and the other is drunk, not cool. In a relationship - as long as you've had sex before all bets are off. I should say that I don't drink and my fiancee does but I'm not really interested when she's been drinking, just doesn't appeal to me.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 02:32 PM
0

How is this that at all. If she wants to fuck someone else that is up to her. Her husband does not own her. Nor would she own her husband and it is similarly his prerogative to leave her. Dumbass.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 12:07 PM
2

She is entirely allowed to decide who she fucks. It is also a man's prerogative not to raise a child that is not his.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 02:36 AM
-6

It isn't real. If it is on 4chan it didn't happen.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 12:31 PM
0

Probably not as much oversight but if the administration found out the teacher would be fired, not sent to jail.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 09:40 PM
2

So I'm not the only one who didn't know who the guy who took a knee in the front was.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 01:33 PM
1

kyriarchical? Is that actually a word?
/r/MensRights29/05/13 01:13 AM
-4

I can't say I pity her. The law is what the law is, don't bang 14 year olds if you don't want to get in trouble for banging 14 year olds.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 01:54 AM
7

Yeah that's what I was thinking, the second set of statistics seem skewed based upon the fact that there are far more fatherless homes than there are motherless, thus one could expect children in single parent homes who exhibit bad behavior would be more likely to be fatherless. It'd be interesting to see it account more for that discrepancy.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 02:10 PM
106

Well I think in general it's the polite thing to do both for men and women to do. I've broken up with girls and been broken up with, you can't always really give a reason though.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 02:42 PM
29

People use that term too loosely, more like extortion than anything.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 01:14 AM
1

More or less "fergevaltiger"
/r/MensRights19/03/13 10:55 PM
1

Yeah personally I have no issues either way. We don't need a 50/50 split across every profession and all positions in existence. There will be a disproportionate representation in some cases based on a variety of factors. So long as one of those factors isn't gender I'm good with it.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 05:32 PM
1

Yeah I can't say I'm in the latter category but it definitely depends on the context.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 01:23 AM
5

I have to say to an extent I'm with him. I don't expressly avoid games with female player characters but if it gives me the option I go male 100% of the time. Games that give you the option tend to be role-playing to some extent. I can't get immersed if I'm playing a female character in that context.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 12:59 PM
5

Doesn't always work beard has been let go for too long in my case. It has assumed direct and total control.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 02:36 AM
12

Men with beards are always rapists, that's a fact. Source: I have a beard.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 11:27 PM
4

Everything on 4chan, and especially /b/ is a lie. Everything.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 01:41 AM
1

If we've never had any sexual contact and you say I raped you then there is no way you unknowingly filed the report.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 04:32 AM
1

Well, if she's helping him out like that when he broke his arms it's an unfair criticism to call herself a bitch.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 03:32 PM
44

Some folks might complain that this is unfair, politically incorrect, rude, or otherwise an inappropriate or wrongful criticism Some folks will say that it's just /b/.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 05:36 PM
1

Frankly it is selfish. She doesn't seem to want to do it due to some sort of issue if she's crying during the fact. He's then going well, although I don't have a problem with going down on you I'm just not going to do it since you can't do that for me.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 04:34 PM
2

There is no such law that I'm aware of, although there isn't really a big real estate market there. People pretty much buy a house and that's it, they've no intention to move again. It will be interesting to see how Japan handles this crisis and what other countries can learn from what they do right or wrong.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 06:01 PM
3

You are correct, but an increase in the birth rate certainly couldn't hurt. A lot of Western countries have Japan to look at for what our future holds in terms of population. Maybe not the US at this point but countries like Germany have looming population issues as well.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 05:43 PM
1

Well, in Japan it is understandable where they are experiencing a serious population crisis and could use some random babies.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 04:58 PM
2

Rugby is violent too. Don't make like this is the only violent sport in existence and given that he had no history of violence outside of the game that I've heard a peep about your argument is simply silly.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 08:05 PM
2

.. a Canadian speaking out against violence in sport? Do they not love hockey?
/r/MensRights03/12/12 08:03 PM
2

I have to wonder how much sport itself played into it. How much was frustration boiled over from the poor season the Chiefs were having. I do love how the team handled it though, no moment of silence for him, he doesn't deserve it.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 08:00 PM
-3

So you're opposed to any cosmetic surgery?
/r/MensRights29/11/12 05:14 PM
-2

In the details, but similar comparison in that you shouldn't perform them in your home with random knicknacks.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 02:40 PM
2

Pretty sure I'm actually supposed to rape her. That's how it's supposed to go.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 03:46 AM
1

Hopefully the sperm bank will be paying that child support.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 02:59 PM
2

Magna Carta is a British document.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 11:06 PM
2

Joseph Gordon-Levitt absolutely must be on that list.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 03:43 PM
3

That's fucked but we don't have a lot of further information to judge wether this was based upon gender.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 11:43 PM
10

So you're saying that Poles would be ill advised to do any time traveling?
/r/MensRights14/11/12 10:13 PM
2

He was the director of the CIA and they're sifting through documents and emails that went between them to ensure that he didn't divulge any sensitive materials. I heard something about that she made a comment during an event in Colorado recently that there was no way she should've known without having been told by someone with access to sensitive information. Unfortunately I can't recall exactly what information was put out there, but it is a concern. It's not a mens rights issue, it's a nationa…
/r/MensRights14/11/12 05:13 PM
15

That's what you think.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 03:16 AM
3

Well, yes and no. I'd say that the people taking "feminist studies" courses probably already have at least a feminist leaning, they're not likely becoming feminists in these courses, just getting their ideas confirmed.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 04:59 PM
1

War of 1812? The Brits sort of burned our capital city.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 03:44 PM
2

Bush in that article I already linked, saying that if Iran develops nukes it would lead to world war 3. It doesn't matter if it's sabre rattling, it's still a threat. If I say I'm going to punch you in the face it doesn't matter if I'm sabre rattling or not, it's still a threat.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 03:35 PM
2

Saying "if you do that thing you want to do we'll invade you" is a threat.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 03:30 PM
1

Doesn't mean it's not threatened. I never said it was a realistic possibility, just brought up how Iranians would feel about the US sabre rattling and suggesting that they should bring democracy to Iran when we took their democracy away.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 03:25 PM
1

How about this then, the suggestion that should Iran develop nuclear weapons it would lead to world war 3. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/18/AR2007101802394.html That tickle your fancy?
/r/MensRights23/10/12 03:21 PM
1

Try George Bush's memoirs, beyond just the "democracy" rhetoric he admits there that he strongly considered a preemptive strike against Iran.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 03:10 PM
1

Realistic doesn't mean that it wasn't talked about during the Bush administration during that whole axis of evil thing.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 03:03 PM
2

There certainly was in the Bush years, there was a lot of talk of invading Iran to "bring democracy" to the people like we did in Iraq.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 02:53 PM
2

But regardless if you're Iranian and you're sitting there hearing American rhetoric about bringing democracy to Iran you're a bit suspicious given that we ruined it last time they had a democracy.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 01:18 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter