pedal2000 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Idk if this belongs here but watch him end her whole career Maybe you're unaware, maybe not. JP is spouting off: https://climate.nasa.gov/causes/ "In its Fifth Assessment Report, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a group of 1,300 independent scientific experts from countries all over the world under the auspices of the United Nations, concluded there's a more than 95 percent probability that human activities over the past 50 years have warmed our planet." It is entirely inappropriate for him to have such an opinion if he respects the science…	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/11/19 07:59 PM
1	Idk if this belongs here but watch him end her whole career He's voice an opinion that flies in the face of all respectable data sets on climate change. It speaks volume about his opinion for the scientific method. If he is talking out of his ass about climate change then why would I trust him on any other subject outside his wheel house? This isn't 'he has an opinion on a nuanced subject with multiple view points'; it's 'this is an area of very settled science that he is taking a stance which is objectively incorrect and directly opposite to the science…	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/11/19 07:19 PM
0	Idk if this belongs here but watch him end her whole career His publications all overlap into psychology, which is his sole specialization. He is regularly critiqued for entering fields he has no qualifications in. A very very easy one to point to is his views on Climate Change: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jordan_Peterson#Climate_change ""[y]ou can't trust the data because too much ideology is involved" Literally thousands of scientists in the field disagree with him. He is speaking WELL outside the scope of his practice and this is on something well k…	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/11/19 06:38 PM
0	Idk if this belongs here but watch him end her whole career Sure. He misquotes studies and gives them meaning they don't support. He gives opinions on subject matter way outside his scope of expertise. Whenever he is pinned down he tries to argue that his nuance was misunderstood. He is heavily influence by catholicism and traditional roles (woman in kitchen) that have been outdated for decades. Some of his opinions as a result are just bigoted (and also unsupported by evidence) eg: his video on same sex parents where he says they're as bad (or worse) th…	/r/PussyPassDenied	02/11/19 12:38 PM
-6	Idk if this belongs here but watch him end her whole career He's hilariously a nut job.	/r/PussyPassDenied	01/11/19 10:35 PM
-9	Female Australian senator accuses a male senator of making a misogynistic insult. He responds by documenting 26 examples of her making misandrist insults in the senate. Except almost none of her insults, while offensive, are misandrist.	/r/MensRights	19/07/18 02:48 PM
2	Google Fires Ph.D Biologist/Engineer For Claiming -- "On average, men and women biologically differ in many ways. " Ok, but do you understand why having someone in management who believes that anytime a woman freaks out it is because of biological imperatives that they can't control & therefore are inherently less reliable (but not individually necessarily so) might be an issue for a company trying to hire on merit? He's basically saying "Women generally are X therefore all women should be treated as though they are Y."	/r/TheRedPill	09/08/17 02:48 AM
4	Google Fires Ph.D Biologist/Engineer For Claiming -- "On average, men and women biologically differ in many ways. " Ok... but he basically implied any woman dealing with stress poorly (which happens regularly to both sexes) is "Neuroticism (higher anxiety, lower stress tolerance)." I don't think he would ever treat women equally or fairly in the workplace if he was interviewing them, in charge of them or dealing with them. An outburst from a woman VS the same outburst from a man would be rationalized away as 'biological differences' that 'she couldn't control'. His point was lost when he showed he couldn't po…	/r/TheRedPill	08/08/17 02:12 PM
1	University offers the first ever scholarship for men, in Vet Science a course with over 90% female students. The feminists have a furious meltdown Did you read the article? The concern was that after school, Vet's are mostly male and/or men hold most of the higher positions in the field. The fact that it is currently a female dominated class does not mean the profession is like that so the concern is that they are trying to fix a problem in the class that will hurt the profession's gender equality as a whole.	/r/PussyPassDenied	12/02/17 03:13 AM