TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

pembinariver Archive

View 0 posts and 48 comments by pembinariver on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
69

Maybe the comment "Well of course it's mostly women, it's PR!" meant that it was the type of work that naturally draws women rather than men? I have an IT background and most companies I've worked for were over 90% men, and nobody thought that was strange.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 03:13 PM
6

I don't believe we can know for sure. Any polls are likely to be biased, and guaranteed to be incomplete. Furthermore, I feel it is irrelevant. Regardless of whether 1% or 99% of rape claims are false, we must actively fight against both false rape claims, and rape.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 02:18 AM
35

I don't see how one crime should "supersede" another. If drunk driving is really bad, should we not post speed limits anymore? Both campaigns have their merits. This poster is making a very important point about a very severe crime (false accusation) that is very prevalent. Other crimes can have their own posters.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 07:23 PM
11

I believe that a large factor in the custody disparity is the public perception that mothers are the natural parent. Just getting the idea of fatherhood into people's minds will make a big difference in the long run.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 10:28 PM
77

My wife doesn't drink, but I do. TIL she is a serial rapist.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 05:48 PM
7

I believe it has something to do with the idea that boys are worse-behaved than girls, so the cartoonist is implying that all boys need drugs to make them act like girls.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 04:54 AM
3

Correct me if I'm wrong, but would a prenup even have helped her in this situation? She had no assets to protect. The money she earned while married belongs to both of them.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 03:52 AM
3

She hasn't been sentenced yet, as far as I can tell. Let's not be too quick to jump to conclusions.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 02:27 AM
6

I guess this is similar to the notion of "never talk to the police". The more you say, the more likely you are to lose your case (guilty or not). By stringing her along, you get her to say more which can only improve your defense.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 04:52 AM
45

I've never understood the notion that, according to comedians, men are more useless than women when sick. It does not match up with my experience in the slightest.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 04:10 AM
6

There are different kinds of FGM. WHO defines type 1A as the removal of the clitoral hood, which I've been told is very similar to circumcision. I do not have nearly enough information to back up that claim, but if it is true then a person should not be able to argue that male circumcision is morally superior to type 1A FGM.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 05:48 PM
2

Can anyone tell me what the typical penalty would be if she is convicted for the crimes with which she has been charged?
/r/MensRights23/12/13 07:29 PM
-24

I see no problem with the term. It is discrimination, going in the opposite direction that people would normally expect discrimination to go. Just like driving in reverse. It's still driving, just in a non-conventional direction.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 06:52 PM
0

https://www.google.ca/?gws_rd=cr&ei=NWyrUpnfK8PEyQGJ0oGQBQ#q=premeditated
/r/MensRights13/12/13 08:22 PM
32

2nd degree murder sounds like a fair conviction. She killed him deliberately, but we have no evidence that it was premeditated.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 02:04 PM
1

About 2/3 through the article there is this link: http://feministire.wordpress.com/2012/05/20/there-was-no-lack-of-buyers-swedish-sex-trafficking-trial-concludes/ I think that's what OP is referencing.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 04:23 PM
33

That was my first thought. If you're not allowed to LET someone drive, how are you supposed to stop them? Forcible confinement? Theft of their keys?
/r/MensRights07/12/13 11:41 AM
10

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman
/r/MensRights05/12/13 07:34 PM
2

IANAL, but I think lawsuit sums are often determined not by the magnitude of the transgression, but by how much money the defendant has. Maybe that is so the defendant actually feels the pain and learns their lesson. If a billionaire gets sued for $500, they are not likely to change their ways.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 12:36 AM
19

I was under the impression that consent can legally be revoked at any time. I'm not sure a contract would protect a man from a rape accusation. Also, I don't think contracts are valid if signed while intoxicated.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 04:03 AM
6

Fight or flight. When you are in danger, you fight if you think you can win; if you don't think you can win, you gamble on running.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 03:03 AM
19

HR has a say in the hiring process? That has not been my experience in any company I've worked for. I have never met someone from HR before being offered the job.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 05:26 PM
1

There is no need for such animosity. Firstly, I said that it would work in theory, not that this would be the actual result. Secondly, just because a business has never thought of something doesn't mean it is not a good idea. I've worked for big business and government, and they are equally incompetent. Thirdly, I am sure there are plenty of insurance companies that provided coverage for temporary and/or permanent birth control for men and/or women before the government mandated it.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 03:14 AM
1

Ah, I didn't know you paid extra for kids. Thanks for the clarification.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 08:54 PM
5

I live in Canada, so I don't know the actual cost of healthcare, but I would expect that a child would cost the insurance company far more than $5,000. The insurance company has to pay not only for the pregnancy checks and the birth, but also for all of the child's doctor visits for the next 18 years.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 08:46 PM
24

In theory, if your insurance company gives free birth control then fewer people on your plan will have babies and your insurance rate will drop. Better for everyone. I have no idea if the numbers check out in reality, though.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 02:37 PM
10

I'm not sure that it can. The normalcy of the event should make it not degrading. Like a prostate exam - I would not consider it degrading because it is done professionally and it is necessary.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 11:02 PM
4

Yeah, that's just good sense. Always meet in person to make sure the person is not a rapist/kidnapper/murderer. Things happen to both men and women.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 04:32 AM
29

I think that is a different story. After the story about Natasha Foster, the article mentions two separate stories, about Lindsay Gorman and Potts Sneddon. The one about Potts Sneddon mentions the mother being the driving factor.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 06:27 PM
216

My hat is off to this judge. Properly identifying the man as a victim, acknowledging that releasing this man's name could cause significant damage. We need more people like this in positions of power.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 05:05 PM
5

Against whom? Wouldn't you have to prove who put up the sign?
/r/MensRights07/11/13 03:29 PM
6

Perhaps not a Men's Rights "issue", but definitely information relevant to our movement, and therefore belongs in this sub. The reason I consider myself a men's rights activist is due to institutional discrimination against men. Men have their children taken away from them by the courts and by law enforcement, and I believe that this happens because of the common belief that women are better than men at taking care of children. I hope that counter-examples like this will help to change the publi…
/r/MensRights25/10/13 10:11 PM
17

It disproves the notion that women don't do things like this, and that is an actual belief held by some.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 10:05 PM
27

I think so too. I went to a very small school - my graduating class was 12 students - and all of us went to college.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 03:18 PM
48

This is excellent news. With women feeling the same pain, we have a chance at improving a broken system.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 03:57 PM
1

I don't think the article was saying that the policy was bad, it was just explaining the policy to people who aren't from Sweden.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 01:48 PM
105

Correction: It's only unfair when women are underrepresented in something that they desire. I don't hear any women complaining about the low numbers of female coal miners.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 01:29 PM
4

Yes, I have heard that argument many times. I think it's ridiculous - since when should a boy be comparing his penis to his father's? - but it is in fact a common argument.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 05:11 AM
13

I have never brought it up, but I have heard roughly 10 mothers in my life explain that they had their sons circumcised so that he would look like his father.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 05:08 AM
6

Good work on the part of the police department. Now, if only the courts would treat false accusations seriously...
/r/MensRights03/09/13 05:46 PM
1

That too. It is possible that the actual rate of male rape is somewhere around 80%. We would never know under our current society.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 01:21 PM
4

No. Even if a woman individually is more likely to be raped than a man, that does excuse the fact that no attention is given to the males. And it definitely does not excuse those who claim that it doesn't happen at all.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 03:52 AM
5

Hebrew enslavement had nothing to do with the pyramids. Even if you take the Bible literally, it says that the Hebrews made bricks for the Egyptians. They pyramids are not made of brick.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 07:00 PM
2

Because cattle are much easier to protect than sheep. Strong and courageous people became shepherds, those without such fortitude became cowherds.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 06:07 PM
13

"Schonfield said false rape reports are extremely rare and hopes this unusual case will not dissuade women who were actually assaulted from coming forward." I've never understood this logic. Why would a conviction like this dissuade someone from filing a truthful report? If you actually were raped, you know for certain that you would never be convicted of filing a false report - the standards for proof are far too high.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 07:35 PM
7

It may come to the point where, if a woman refuses to have sex recorded, you had best not have sex with her. It is sad how everybody's sex lives have to be damaged by false rape accusations.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 09:37 PM
1

I live in a rural area of Alberta, with a significant conservative christian population. The attitude of both men and women in my area does lead somewhat toward traditional roles. My wife works in town while I work from home and watch our daughters (ages 2 and 4), and this seems to amuse a lot of my friends and neighbours. People call me "mom" as a joke. However, that's about as far as it goes.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 10:21 PM
8

It doesn't say anywhere in the article that the male consented to any of the physical contact. So, she raped him.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 03:32 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter