TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

pen0rz Archive

View 0 posts and 8 comments by pen0rz on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

All valid reasons. I didn't say it was dumb or anything that that rule was in place. I've never heard of him being a bad father, abusive, or anything like that so I was just stating that I was wondering why that mandate was there.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 07:59 AM
3

She's the one with primary custody. I'm guessing it's because she's based in L.A. and the kids go to school there. He only has custody 7 days a month and when he does, the nannies have to be there. I'm just wondering why that it is. Both requested joint custody, btw.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 07:34 AM
4

They're both rich and they both work so it's a good thing that neither requested child or spousal support. That's the way it should be. The only thing I think is weird is that when the kids are with Marc, the nannies have to be present. They didn't exactly explain why that is.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 07:26 AM
0

Yes, it's true that in some cases, people are limited to certain types of jobs because of where they live. But that's why I said that this is more of a low income problem. If there are only limited jobs available in a few industries in the area where you live, you can move somewhere else. If you have an education, you can get a job that isn't risky. Low income people may not have the means to move elsewhere and they more than likely will not have either the education and/or the necessary skills …
/r/MensRights13/06/14 02:12 AM
0

No one is pushing anyone towards risky jobs. No one is pushing anyone towards non-risky jobs. They're choosing those jobs. People sign up to those jobs knowing the risks and they're okay with it. Those that aren't okay with the risks won't take a job like that. You're acting as if the majority of the working male population works in risky jobs and there are only like 1 percent who work in white collar jobs. EDIT: I'd also like to add that men working in risky jobs might have to do more with soci…
/r/MensRights12/06/14 11:46 PM
1

It depends on the length of the marriage and it's only truly permanent in rare circumstances. I don't remember where I read this but this woman got married at like 23, had some credit card debt, and had a low income and then about 10 years later, she got a divorce. By this time, she was loaded and making significantly more money than her husband and she had to pay 7k a month to her ex for five years. Up until I read this, I didn't even know this could happen, which is why I'm totally getting a p…
/r/MensRights10/06/14 08:35 AM
1

Yeah, I figured. I was just stating that this is something that is already happening in California. I should've said that this should be extended to states where this isn't already law.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 08:01 AM
3

In California, the spouse that makes the most money, regardless of gender, pays alimony to the spouse making the least unless you have a prenup. This is how it should be in all 50 states.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 07:42 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter