TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

penicillamineWilson Archive

View 0 posts and 32 comments by penicillamineWilson on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
13

Going by the world’s standards, most women prefer intact. But women who were raised and live in a particular culture that mutilates newborn males will be accustomed to societal norms, with tragic consequences, as America shows. Just let the man decide when he’s an adult. The outcome will look better.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 09:22 PM
2

But it doesn’t say where the foreskins are coming from explicitly. The foreskin belongs to the child, so American parents would at the very least have to give explicit permission to donate it in the form of a contract (similar to organ donation). They might even be entitled to financial compensation, I would think, if it was then sold for profit to cosmetic companies.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 08:57 PM
4

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/penis-facial_n_5b02df5be4b0463cdba4a6fa This article only mentions South Korea. If American babies’ foreskins were being used, at the very least I’d imagine the parents would have to explicitly authorize that.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 08:51 PM
10

I have. Seems you need a refresher. The foreskin is the embryological equivalent of the clitoral hood, although the foreskin contains far more sensory nerves than the clitoris itself.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 08:18 PM
7

I didn’t say you have Stockholm. I don’t have any issue either with your aesthetic preferences. That’s all subjective. But there are many objective problems with neonatal circumcision beyond what we’ve talked about (eg. increased risk of SIDS). The reasonable thing to do is postpone until adulthood. It’ll be easier and safer that way to boot.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 08:15 PM
9

Just trying to save the next generation of American boys from having the most sensitive part of their penis cut off without their consent. Not an unreasonable thing to ask.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 08:07 PM
3

Conclusions from the study I linked to: “In conclusion, circumcision removes the most sensitive parts of the penis and decreases the fine‐touch pressure sensitivity of glans penis. The most sensitive regions in the uncircumcised penis are those parts ablated by circumcision. When compared to the most sensitive area of the circumcised penis, several locations on the uncircumcised penis (the rim of the preputial orifice, dorsal and ventral, the frenulum near the ridged band, and the frenulum at th…
/r/MensRights30/09/20 08:02 PM
10

Completely false. The foreskin is the most sensitive part by far. Here’s the study again. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17378847/
/r/MensRights30/09/20 07:55 PM
12

The foreskin has been shown to be the most sensitive part of the penis. Removing it further desensitizes the penis as the glans becomes damaged over decades of abuse. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17378847/ Just let men decide for themselves as adults. That’s the only reasonable option. It’s also safer and has better aesthetic outcomes.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 07:52 PM
4

If you prefer it, do it as an adult. It’s safer and the aesthetic outcomes are better.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 07:44 PM
11

I hear this all the time and, to be honest, it sounds like a poor attempt at downplaying. Not a convincing argument.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 07:43 PM
7

There are different types, many on par with male circumcision.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 07:41 PM
5

Just let men decide when they reach the age of consent. What’s so hard about that?
/r/MensRights30/09/20 07:40 PM
12

The one I linked to was a test of sensitivity in a laboratory setting using a monofilament under rigorous, controlled conditions. The online news article you linked to referenced two flawed survey studies and one study by circumfetishist Brian Morris. But when it comes to survey studies, circumcision has been shown over and over again to reduce sexual pleasure in men and their female partners. The first two studies below alone had a combined n of almost 7,000. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/233…
/r/MensRights30/09/20 07:36 PM
8

It has negatively affected your penis. You’re missing out on a huge part of the pleasurable sexual experience.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 07:24 PM
13

100% false. The foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis and circumcision removes it. With the foreskin gone, the glans becomes damaged and desensitized. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17378847/
/r/MensRights30/09/20 07:23 PM
11

Cognitive dissonance about the fact something bad was done to their penises.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 07:11 PM
27

Yes, these men are trying to avoid cognitive dissonance. If you want to be a men’s rights activist, you cannot be pro-circumcision. We need to drive these men out of the movement.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 07:04 PM
15

The foreskin is the most sensitive and erogenous part of the penis. It’s far more sensitive than the glans, which by the way becomes dried out, keratinized, and desensitized after circumcision.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 06:59 PM
5

All of those skin creams come from South Korea and are made using South Korean foreskins.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 06:09 PM
-3

Nope, those foreskin products are only made in South Korea using South Korean foreskins. Edit: Don’t know why I’m being downvoted, this is the truth.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 05:50 PM
11

What’s funny is ass-hats calling themselves men’s rights activists but being pro-circumcision lol.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 04:50 PM
17

That’s a disgusting and ignorant thing to say.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 04:20 PM
15

I’d like to see all insurance companies stop covering it. Medicaid too.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 04:08 PM
9

Many parents need to understand that it’s easier to just let the man decide. Even if someone is pro-circumcision, it’s safer and leads to better outcomes to do it as an adult.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 04:06 PM
17

An MRA who is pro-circumcision is dumb as shit. Get the fuck out of the men’s rights movement.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 04:03 PM
14

Nope, those are all myths. Calling yourself an MRA but being pro-circumcision is a contradiction in terms. It sounds like a joke.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 04:00 PM
11

No one recommends male circumcision. All of the conditions you listed are rare and easily treatable. It’s all a myth.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 03:59 PM
34

I think all parents need to know that it’s absolutely possible to choose to be circumcised as an adult male. I get the impression a lot of parents either don’t know that or think there’s a risk of greater complications if you do it as an adult.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 03:47 PM
91

Why the fuck can’t parents just let males make this decision for themselves when they come of age? Complications are less and aesthetic outcomes are better when you do circumcision as an adult.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 03:27 PM
103

Male genital mutilation and female genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 02:30 PM
236

Could the situation be any more hypocritical between MGM and FGM?
/r/MensRights30/09/20 01:56 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter