TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

perpetual_C000009A Archive

View 3 posts and 30 comments by perpetual_C000009A on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
15

This is similar to the "Piers Morgan" strategy - of publishing falsehoods, and refusing to apologise when they're demonstrated to be false - and even going so far as to claim that it was the truth and suggesting it had opened a can of worms for the government to deal with. To find oneself at the same level of integrity as Piers Morgan, is surely the sort of thing that would make Silverman take a long, hard look at her life.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 08:22 PM
3

I think it's more of a splintering. Some feminists have gone to such extremes that it's a turn-off for other feminists or would-be feminists. Some feminists are immune to any feeling of discomfort from, or awareness of, cognitive dissonance. They wilfully proclaim that women are independent of, or superior to men; don't need men, don't want men - and then later claim that women need preferential treatment in things like military draft, spousal maintenance/alimony, employment law and custody batt…
/r/MensRights26/02/15 10:25 PM
4

Agreed. Nice try, Nige; but I'll keep my right to work anywhere in the EU I choose, thankyouverymuch.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 11:35 PM
5

It's a Guardian "Comment is free" blog. It's not actually their newspaper, which does have a tendency toward both the left wing and severe spelling and grammatical errors. Their "comment is worthless" blogs contain roughly equal measures of facts, reasoned arguments and rockinghorse shit.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 11:06 PM
2

On the very link we're discussing, there are links to the case of Keeley Horrocks, who falsely accused her lover of rape when she wanted to get back with an another boyfriend. She got two years. A more recent case is that of Rosie Dodd, who also got two years for falsely accusing three men of raping her because she regretted the orgy. And there's the case of Leanne Black who made five false rape allegations over an eight year period, and like the others above, was given a two year stay at Her Ma…
/r/MensRights27/06/14 07:53 PM
1

I read about this yesterday, and iirc the article said the police force had to pay the compensation.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 01:49 PM
1

Personally I agree that the victim is not at fault for being raped. What if he/she did not know what they were imbibing? What if their drink was spiked or they lost their insulin? It might be stupid to knowingly put oneself in such a position, but to take the car analogy mentioned elsewhere, my brother left his windows down and car unlocked and was "shocked" to find his car stereo player missing an hour later. Was he stupid to set himself up like that? Sure. Does this absolve the thieves of any …
/r/MensRights06/05/14 09:57 PM
2

She said the British media was responsible for "negative and over-sexualised portrayals of women", with some websites and TV channels dealing in the "marketisation of their bodies". Pretty damning accusation. Sounds like she must have researched the matter very thoroughly... Ms Manjoo said she had not looked at the websites, but had been "constantly" told about them by people she met on her visit. Oh.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 04:16 PM
2

Why isn't this on the Government's own petitions site? Presumably it's the government who are being petitioned here.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 12:56 AM
6

I think they take angles that are populist when their readership demographic is considered.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 12:24 AM
1

Thanks. I didn't think it fell under tort law. I'll go read over whichever books I have failed to understand.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 09:33 PM
–

So, that would make it both legal and unlawful, but not illegal?
/r/MensRights06/01/14 11:33 AM
3

Courts have previously ruled that child maintenance payments cannot be recovered. So, yeah, you're gonna be out of pocket. But I originally posted the link to an article about that case in response to "paternity fraud is legal". Which it clearly isn't in England and Wales.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 02:30 AM
3

While looking for the court transcript (it isn't available), I happened to find a solicitor who blames Mr Rodwell for having the paternity tests in the first place. Astounding!
/r/MensRights06/01/14 02:22 AM
–

According to the article, the damages awarded were decided as if he'd had two children who'd died: Roger Terrell, his solicitor, told the newspaper: “The court treated it as akin to bereavement, awarding a similar sum to the one you would receive if your child died in an accident.”
/r/MensRights06/01/14 02:08 AM
–

because paternity fraud is legal. Depends where you live.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 08:56 PM
10

Presumably the posts have been deleted?
/r/MensRights05/01/14 08:45 PM
2

Indeed. I can't find any of the modern-style sentencing guides which would cover this time period. At the time, the legislation was the Sexual Offences Act 1956, which has since been largely replaced by the Sexual Offences Act 2003. The 1956 act originally stated the penalty for the attempt of rape would be seven years. This appears to have been changed to a life sentence in 1985. He will not have been granted any discount on the sentence, like he would have done, had he falsely confessed to the…
/r/MensRights02/01/14 11:02 PM
18

Life sentence for attempted rape? Even if he were guilty that's insane. I wonder if any of it has to do with this: Mr Nealon's lawyer, Mark Newby, confirmed his client does have previous convictions for sexual offences. But he said Mr Nealon had served his sentences for these, committed in the 1970s and 1980s in Ireland. BBC News - Freed Victor Nealon in plea to reopen attempted rape case For anyone interested, here's the press release from July 2012 when his appeal was referred to the appeals c…
/r/MensRights02/01/14 01:01 AM
1

Also, the sample size (one couple and one control couple) would not have any statistical significance. I think it's called the "p value", but this is pretty far out of my field of expertise.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 08:20 PM
0

It was on my local radio station this morning, reported in the news! I thought it was amusing. I guess it's a bit like the April 1st RFCs that the IETF publish.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 03:20 PM
3

Here's the press release at the BMJ.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 09:43 AM
1

I was doubtful of the author's claims, but hey, if the Internet tells you something then it is surely beyond question.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 12:24 AM
7

Unfortunately, that's just the abstract. The full study is behind the paywall. The fully study was the first thing I looked for after seeing the Daily Mail article.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 12:57 AM
1

I would hope that a legal dictionary was a little more verbose for the definition. You are absolutely correct that legal definitions belong in legal dictionaries. I suspect that media organisations would look at legal definitions so as not to be sued, and would therefore avoid using the term "rapist" to describe a female. Therefore, when the lexicographers look at how the word is used, they will find it mostly used to describe males, on account of timid legal departments. I'm not sure if a woman…
/r/MensRights07/10/13 09:29 PM
1

Good point. The legislation I linked to is for England & Wales. However, the legislation is similar for Scotland and Northern Ireland, and also requires the defendant use a penis to penetrate in order to be guilty of rape. I rarely bother mentioning that England & Wales legislation != British law while online, unless the forum is predominantly UK-centric or there's an important difference to be aware of.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 09:06 PM
9

You mean if a man is forced to penetrate a woman? Assuming it's the woman is the one doing the forcing, it isn't termed as rape under British law. If a woman forces (or tricks) a man to penetrate another unconsenting person, then the woman may be guilty of accessory to rape, even if the man is not guilty of rape. This has actually happened before. It's 2am here now, so I'll have to dig out the relevant case law tomorrow. EDIT: The case I was thinking of was DPP v K and B. A fourteen and an eleve…
/r/MensRights07/10/13 12:57 AM
5

In British law, rape requires a penis is used to penetrate. There is another offence, called Assault By Penetration, which applies to penetration by other body parts or objects. It's in the Sexual Offences Act 2003. Like rape, sexual assault by penetration is punishable by life imprisonment, although the offence of rape has much more extensive sentencing guidelines.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 11:39 PM
7

I guess that was an oversight...
/r/MensRights29/07/13 01:57 AM
1

It looks like they're having some impact.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 01:30 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter