TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

perpetualvictim Archive

View 0 posts and 14 comments by perpetualvictim on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Hahha, ok. It just makes me chuckle; some women are sometimes internet models the way some men can be internet tough guys, and it turns out their modeling was a few pics on SuicideGirls, and they find a way to work it into every conversation.
/r/MensRights08/01/11 01:50 PM
1

I understand your concern, but there's just no way the state should have the right to drag in whomever they like whenever they like for DNA testing. We're going to just have to agree to disagree about this. If the man wants the test, fine. But if it's mandatory, the woman could name endless numbers of men who could be the father, they could all be tested at their own inconvenience and possibly have their DNA on file, then. It's just not right; it's too much power to give the state over men.
/r/MensRights08/01/11 01:58 AM
2

Ok. Imagine two scenarios, then. The first: a gay couple has a child by a surrogate. they don't want to know which one of their sperm actually conceived the child. Should they have to be made to take the test? Ok, say the woman is a prostitute. The guy she says is the dad, is not. She then list 15 other possibilities who could be the dad. They should all be dragged in and tested against their wills? 35? 50? I think we're just going to have respectfully agree to disagree about this. There's simpl…
/r/MensRights08/01/11 01:56 AM
1

I have no idea, but if he doesn't, he shouldn't be forced to. It's an invasion of privacy, and his choice. I agree that it would be ideal if he did, but forcing medical tests is just not something I would ever agree to on principle. Just as a slippery slope fallacy, it would be incredibly practical to have everyone's DNA on file for a variety of reasons, but I would never want that to be mandated, either.
/r/MensRights07/01/11 04:34 PM
1

Same answer here. THe problem with making it mandatory is that it doesn't allow for any men who might not want the test, for whatever reason. That's our private right, not the government's right. We might just have to agree to disagree about this, because there is no way I'd want to force a man to take a test he didn't want to in that way. I don't think my counter-solution is unreasonable.
/r/MensRights07/01/11 12:02 PM
1

What if, for whatever reason, he doesn't want one? I'm against forcing the man to take a DNA test if he does not want to.
/r/MensRights07/01/11 12:00 PM
1

No offense, but I think it's rather funny that you felt the need to include that you were allegedly a "fashion and promotional model" as a credential for speaking about the gaze. And an alleged model in the SCA? The mind boggles.
/r/MensRights07/01/11 02:00 AM
0

I'm newbsauce. What's wrong with Gizmodo?
/r/MensRights07/01/11 01:57 AM
1

Yeah, that is annoying, but it doesn't have a lot of upvotes, at least.
/r/MensRights07/01/11 01:46 AM
3

Well, ngram goofiness aside, the problem is that there's almost no legitimate platform in real life to discuss men's rights. It's legitimized in fringe groups on the internet, but there's really very few settings in which men talking about these things in real life wouldn't be considered whatever adjective: bitter, whiny, crybaby, dateless virgins who have no idea how to be men, whatever shaming language you like. It's not acceptable in most activist groups, it's not a university topic, and it's…
/r/MensRights07/01/11 01:36 AM
1

I don't think they should be automated by the state; that's a needless intrusion of privacy. But I think anyone who suspects any problem should have reasonable affordable access to testing systems, subsidized by whatever health care plan they have in proportion to doctor's pregnancy tests, etc.
/r/MensRights07/01/11 01:22 AM
0

I don't really understand. What institution is this for? What is the study? The methodology seems really slapdash. Is it just to compile a list - I really hope no one is going to try and garner any kind of conclusions from this.
/r/MensRights07/01/11 01:12 AM
4

Huh? I find these kind of calls for support distasteful, and that's really not the general sentiment of that thread at all. People are telling him to talk to her, to try separating. The one poster who flamed him saying his sex addiction ruined his family was downvoted, so were others. Some posters think it would be fine for him to get sex on the side if his wife agreed, and she sounds like someone who might. The thing people dislike is that he already had an affair and is well pleased with himse…
/r/MensRights07/01/11 01:02 AM
1

Society of Chubby Ahistoricists ;) http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Rennies
/r/MensRights06/01/11 11:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter