TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

person_w_personality Archive

View 20 posts and 266 comments by person_w_personality on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1630

Discriminationperson_w_personality/r/MensRights08/06/21 10:55 AM
320

Vulagismperson_w_personality/r/MGTOW23/05/20 03:16 AM
209

person_w_personality/r/MGTOW21/09/20 07:31 AM
165

person_w_personality/r/MGTOW30/05/20 10:08 PM
106

Anti-MRMperson_w_personality/r/MensRights15/12/20 11:56 AM
96

articleperson_w_personality/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/20 11:54 AM
59

Anti-MRMperson_w_personality/r/MensRights19/06/21 09:59 PM
56

Social Issuesperson_w_personality/r/MensRights27/02/21 01:23 PM
45

War on Menperson_w_personality/r/MGTOW21/07/20 07:06 AM
45

War on Menperson_w_personality/r/MGTOW13/07/20 03:27 AM
44

Anti-MRMperson_w_personality/r/MensRights13/03/21 01:13 PM
40

person_w_personality/r/MGTOW28/10/20 05:10 AM
28

Anti-MRMperson_w_personality/r/MensRights19/03/21 07:43 AM
15

person_w_personality/r/AntiFeminists30/11/20 05:14 AM
9

Anti-MRMperson_w_personality/r/MensRights15/03/21 12:56 PM
8

person_w_personality/r/MGTOW19/05/20 09:37 PM
1

False Accusationperson_w_personality/r/MensRights23/06/20 04:58 AM
1

person_w_personality/r/AntiFeminists30/11/20 05:10 AM
1

Anti-MRMperson_w_personality/r/MensRights13/03/21 12:58 PM
1

person_w_personality/r/AntiFeminists30/11/20 05:09 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

These are the same kind of people that objected to the idea that women use more resources than men and that saying women should have less kids because it's better for the environment to have less kids is misogynist and victim blaming. "But Carlsson Kanyama said: “I’m surprised more studies have not been done about the gender differences in environmental impact. There are quite clear differences and they are not likely to go away in the near future.”" "The EU’s green deal was criticised last week…
/r/MensRights21/07/21 10:00 AM
6

Some of the disparity between anti versus more pro abortion views of feminists back then versus feminists today can be reconciled by how even for first wave feminists, seeking more privileges for women (like the tender years doctrine) was never about increasing wellbeing of children, but how early feminists realized that they needed to initially frame seeking privileges for women in terms of how it would help children and how they could easily convince others of this with the argument about how …
/r/MensRights20/06/21 01:39 AM
9

True and that's the case no matter what political party they belong to. Their recent rhetoric about things like "unpaid emotional labor" and how women should be compensated for housework and have accommodations provided to them for "birthing the next generation" is proof of this. Many of the liberal feminists also have tradcon type views but don't like how the rhetoric in often outwardly socially conservative tradcon spaces is expressed and believes it doesn't give women enough credit or that su…
/r/MensRights20/06/21 12:18 AM
2

A good way to fight for men is to support your local men's rights organization (the National Coalition for Men being an example) that has a track record of results, donating to them if you can and emailing them whenever there are new anti male policies on the horizon so they can be made aware and start to engage the necessary resources to keeping these policies from being enacted or (if already in existence) further entrenched.
/r/MensRights16/06/21 12:39 PM
7

What you will find is that in such a competitive world as today is that there is no guarantee of long lasting male friendships. Men do best in loose coalitions (with no future guarantees of continued camaraderie) working toward a common goal with a defined obstacle or enemy. That is sadly what I've found to be the reality. Today that common goal is men's rights and the enemy is discriminatory laws against men.
/r/MensRights15/06/21 02:11 PM
1

No advocacy group is going to resolve this when women and their white knights make up a majority of the population, unless there is a change of heart to replace gendered rights with non-gendered human rights. It doesn't matter how insurmountable the odds seem. Laws have been changed before that defy mob rule and prevailing media narratives. You need to push for them and take action and it's a long uphill battle. But continuing to do nothing or retreat and try to make do with what you have will r…
/r/MensRights15/06/21 12:03 PM
1

[removed] Assigned Flair: MAAALES
/r/AntiFeminists15/06/21 11:51 AM
1

It would not be difficult to crash the system, especially if Justice is being used to criminalise men for women's subjective feelings: it simply couldn't cope with an overwhelming surge. However, this would involve sacrifice because you can be sure there would be a Tiananmen Square type retaliation where the true perceived value of men would be openly demonstrated, even though that would likely spur a revolution. It would be easy to put down any revolution and the government would have no proble…
/r/MensRights15/06/21 10:44 AM
1

There is no use being skeptical when, until some time ago, stopping periods was also deemed impossible. Why is it that women's nature can be stopped but not men's? I'm not stopping you or discouraging you from taking it as improved medicine with cabergoline as an ingredient becomes available but I'd be skeptical myself of taking products with cabergoline specifically when there are multiple side effects involved and talk of how "Do not take cabergoline if you are allergic to medicines derived fr…
/r/MensRights14/06/21 11:20 PM
1

I've seen radical feminists on purplepilldebate and subs like femaledatingstrategy justifying male disposability by citing passages in the bible where god had commanded people to slaughter all the men of other tribes but leave fertile women alive.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/21 11:12 PM
2

Why? Because you think people can't care enough to do it? No, more just because simply it seems too good to be true and I'm skeptical of such claims. Just search "Cabergoline multiple orgasms" on google, and see the sheer wasted potential. One of the first links I saw was this https://alphanow.com/cabergoline/, which mentioned the variety of side effects and how people that are allergic to certain funguses shouldn't use the product. It does seem to be effective in reducing prolactin and higher l…
/r/MensRights14/06/21 11:10 PM
39

Yes definitely, there is even a recent example of men being pressured to protect women against another man that simply acted strangely on a flight https://archive.is/j1bUZ
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/21 11:02 PM
3

Cabergoline ELIMINATES refractory period. It exists, there is a way, it's not a yet-to-do thing, but no one cares to better the formula. It's faced as an unexpected side effect, nothing more. I have heard even men that consider themselves dependent on having relationships saying they'd be able to deal better with loneliness with they were able to have an unlimited refractory period and lack of tiredness after ejaculation. Still that such a drug exists to do this almost seems too good to be true.…
/r/MensRights14/06/21 10:59 PM
2

Your post definitely gave me something to think about. One issue not discussed enough (because it's more of a personal matter and understandably has the potential to be embarrassing to talk about) is how dependent men are on sexual satisfaction from someone else (and hence how they need to pander to others to meet this) because of the short refractory period from when they "do their business" alone. This can't be easily denied when there is so much interest from men in how to "last longer" or ma…
/r/MensRights14/06/21 10:37 PM
5

No that won't work in the long term. People that won't play (like MGTOW) are still falsely labeled male supremacists by organizations like the Southern Poverty Law Center (who have advocated for male disposability) for simply saying unflattering things about women and their main sub to discuss things is quarantined because of one incident (where a navy coastguard simply browsed the mgtow sub many times from their workplace and in unrelated news expressed interest in going on an uprising against …
/r/MensRights14/06/21 04:10 PM
1

The mods of that sub remove anything that is pro men's rights or men's issues.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 08:16 AM
8

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/mktl1e/the\_reddit\_admins\_clarify\_that\_that\_theyre\_fine/
/r/MensRights14/06/21 08:11 AM
1

The current government. Considering that men make up most of the police deaths and that cops like anyone else are more inclined to use force and treat male suspects harshly it wouldn't be surprising. Any single males that showed disobedience would be portrayed as terrorists trying to hold food and supplies hostage and starve women and children, with that being used a further reason for "cracking down" on single males that in such a situation would practice civil disobedience and demand their sha…
/r/MensRights11/06/21 06:32 AM
1

Long Read: I admire your resolve but individual actions like that can still be easily thwarted by things like riot police, and we know that men face higher deaths from the police already than women (https://www.statista.com/statistics/585149/people-shot-to-death-by-us-police-by-gender/), so in the case that this policy becomes institutional the government wouldn't hesitate to use lethal force to stop civil disobedience. Institutional actions are required to stop these bigoted organizations from …
/r/MensRights10/06/21 06:00 AM
2

When you donate next tine for disaster relief fund... Be aware of this fact. Very good advice. Didn't think this also extended to donations to disaster relief funds but this is something to keep in mind. That and MRAs starting a charity meant to help men left behind in these disasters now that the government is seriously considering neglecting in its role in helping half the population. People can say: well men have no choice now but to be self sufficient and realize no one is coming to save the…
/r/MensRights09/06/21 07:06 AM
-2

This has nothing g to do with women being the reproduction limiter. Nothing at all. Sadly this notion that every disadvantage men face compared to women being because they are somehow biologically less valuable has become all too common as a way for people to try and cope with how men are discriminated against. It's the acquiescence to this narrative (originally pushed by PUAs like Chateau Heartiste, who had ulterior motives of wanting to limit male competition and promote war between groups of …
/r/MensRights08/06/21 10:08 PM
37

Many feminists try to whitewash history by saying "women and children first" was just a phrase in popular culture and propaganda but the fact that men had higher casualties than women in disasters where rescue was involved speaks for itself. But these recommendations by feminist organizations are essentially cementing "women and children first" into official government disaster rescue policy.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 11:43 AM
54

Only if the men and boys are accompanying them. Most likely only if the men and boys are their children. Basically "women and children first".
/r/MensRights08/06/21 11:29 AM
2

Discrimination against males that aren't in romantic relationships is mainstream now. I wish there weren't so many reminders of it around but it's everywhere. I care much less now about the flak I'd get for expressing my discontent at it though. Things like this should never just be accepted or only talked about in a matter of fact defeatist way.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 11:27 AM
121

Pretty much Dr. Alessandra Jerolleman, associate professor of emergency management at Jacksonville State University, echoed the importance of incorporating caregiving and childcare into conversations around natural disasters and their impacts on American women. “They’re incurring a lot of additional time costs at a time when everyone is also under a great deal more stress,” Jerolleman said. She encourages states who receive BRIC funding to be intentional and transparent about what populations ar…
/r/MensRights08/06/21 11:24 AM
3

The good news is that men are allowed but only if they are with a woman. No single men. They do help single women though. I am disgusted by how everyday there is more evidence of society openly showing how much it disdains the average male. It makes it very difficult to care about any other issues society demands everyone care about.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 10:05 AM
4

There was talk of the draft being reinstated in January 2020 during the time of ramping up of tensions between the US and Iran. And when politicians say all options are on the table they are also referring to the option of drafting men.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 09:34 AM
1

Your thread title had me in the first half not gonna lie
/r/MGTOW08/06/21 09:27 AM
9

It says the video was taken down by the uploader but not by youtube. Usually if a video is removed because of violation of terms of service it will be explicitly stated how that was the reason. The person that uploaded that video or someone close to them might have seen this page and taken it down in response although that's a pretty quick time period for that to happen. They still might re-upload it under a different name at a later point in time because it's not uncommon for that to happen aft…
/r/MensRights31/05/21 09:30 AM
2

Also if you go to the edit conversation history for pages like that for the slanted MGTOW article, you see that they basically accept any bias from hitpieces reported in media as factual because if it was reported by a "reputable" or "trustworthy" source it is judged to be true.
/r/MensRights22/05/21 10:15 PM
3

Good luck, but remember that some degree of anonymity is important after seeing what can happen with people targeting you when you make yourself the face of a push for men's rights like the late Marc Angelucci did. Don't feel pressured to be the sole face or voice of a movement.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/21 02:00 AM
1

No I think that is putting too much onus on the man. Sometimes it's not clear that the female friend is engaging in leechiness until much later on because some men naturally do think that that they can be friends with women and only think this leechiness and unreliableness of female friends occurs in misogynistic fantasies of failed men. But it does happen to some guys even if they do vet. If it didn't there wouldn't be a pattern of guys noticing the one-sided nature of many friendships between …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/21 12:11 AM
1

I was referring more to how there are men that want to be friends with women, but that other men and women are socialized to see men and women being friends as more of a one-sided relationship where the male friend is expected to give and listen but no reciprocation or hearing problems is expected from the female friend lest request from the male friend for reciprocation be considered sleazy. This appears to be common (I don't think it's just a matter of personal experience) and IMO that is one …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/21 09:04 PM
1

Unpopular opinion: some of the advice while PUA sounding is for a reason - many men that are friends with women don't get the full experience of friendship or treated like a friend but instead get used as an emotional outlet, where the relationship is completely one-sided and your role is just to carry out favors or listen to their problems while you are expected not to bother them with your problems. You can then say set boundaries to make it clear this isn't acceptable, but when you do that ma…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/21 08:04 AM
1

If you are a man and you don't like these laws you should leave the UK and consider other places. Out of all the countries the UK is one of the countries where a lot of anti male legislation is come up with and enforced the most.
/r/MensRights28/03/21 10:27 PM
1

Elliot Rodger did and had his lack of success with women as his motive for his attack. However the review by Futrelle asserts that Alek Minassian had the motive of inceldom behind his attack and that he was an incel, when Judge Molloy herself declared that Alek Minassian didn't meet the definition of being incel.
/r/MensRights17/03/21 09:29 AM
1

This isn't the first time the mask has slipped with them either. https://np.reddit.com/r/IncelTear/comments/jbre2w/apparently_not_being_anually_celebrated_with_a/ https://np.reddit.com/r/IncelTear/comments/jbe9xq/?utm\_content=title&utm\_medium=post\_embed&utm\_name=99204e0a79f6421facdd6345c2beac04&utm\_source=embedly&utm\_term=jbe9xq Still they claim they aren't bullies. They are bullies in denial.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 02:15 PM
3

The organization responsible for this proposal, "Girls Who Code" are calling it a Marshall Plan for Moms initiative though. But yes if there was ever a way of showing how feminist organizations are just fighting for more privileges for women and trying to make dramatic comparisons between women in the first world world and people on the edge of daily suffering this is a clear example.
/r/MensRights28/02/21 12:19 PM

Which is why some of the most effective ways to get your message across are not through social media platforms where you post your face and make your personal information part of your identity (like instagram) but posting about these things on discussion boards (that don't require you to post any personal information about yourself) in order to raise awareness. A common criticism is that MRAs are keyboard warriors and not really serious because many don't do real world activism and show their fa…
/r/MensRights27/02/21 11:16 PM
2

It's amazing to see the contrast too. This proposal is brought up allegedly as a reaction to women losing jobs during the covid pandemic. But what has been the response to men that have lost jobs in the past and during this pandemic? Talk about how jobs aren't coming back, that those men would have to make do with less opportunities in a changing world. Assistance? Vague references to jobs programs maybe being put in place in the future. Any financial assistance would only be contingent upon par…
/r/MensRights27/02/21 11:02 PM
1

Disappointing but not surprising that this measure was only taken after women were told to also be suffering from loneliness. But to be fair what exactly is such a ministry going to do (as the common refrain would be for not creating such an office to address men's issues)? The article says that "The Japanese government also announced the creation of an “isolation/loneliness countermeasures office,” which will be dedicated to issues including suicide and child poverty — which have also increased…
/r/MensRights25/02/21 08:38 AM
4

Want an advice OP? Get out of the UK as soon as possible. This.
/r/MensRights20/02/21 07:09 PM
1

There is a promising lawsuit pending by the National Coalition for Men (NCFM) that will be challenging the sex selective military draft https://ncfm.org/2021/01/news/uncategorized/national-coalition-for-men-ncfm-petitions-us-supreme-court-for-justice-in-landmark-civil-rights-case-to-overturn-the-current-men-only-military-registration/ I don't plan on creating a green screen picture because I believe anonymity is a good asset especially in tense times like this where men's rights are casually par…
/r/MensRights19/02/21 10:22 PM
1

Don't fall for biologically reductionist arguments that dismiss problems men face as just nature or just being how it is. A lot of people argue that men are less reproductively valuable than women and don't bear children so they are not as important. Or that nobody cares about men anyway so it's pointless to advocate for men's rights. It's also good not to get too dismayed at the challenge of pursuing equal rights for men. Many of those that argue that will chime in about how equality is a lie a…
/r/MensRights19/02/21 09:30 AM
1

Not surprised. Joe Biden has always been a feminist and has been big on pandering to women.
/r/MensRights19/02/21 09:22 AM
1

The Second Sexism by David Benatar
/r/MensRights19/02/21 09:19 AM
2

Yup. If men talk about how life is taking a toll on them and people are making it hard for them they are told to stop whining, shut up and to stop being so sensitive.
/r/MensRights19/02/21 09:17 AM
1

Because men allow themselves to be held to those standards instead of fighting with those that shame them and enforce those standards.
/r/MensRights19/02/21 05:13 AM
1

No even the people saying that still hold men to higher standards than women and see hatred of women as worse than hatred of men. It may be more popular among some guys to make fun of some more extreme feminists now compared to in the recent past but that's about it.
/r/MensRights19/02/21 03:31 AM
1

menslib is a joke.
/r/MensRights19/02/21 03:27 AM
2

It gets way worse anytime you point out double standards that are in favor of women. To the point you will be shamed, misreprsented and people imply that you are a bad person that deserves to be imprisoned. You don't have anything to prove. If this argument wasn't at a job you can literally pull a "No U" and walk away.
/r/MensRights19/02/21 03:27 AM
24

Will you stand this? Yes because it wasn't my actions that did this.
/r/MensRights19/02/21 03:24 AM
2

True. And then the part about "ladies" with the women in the poster holding their heads up high in an arrogant way like they are royalty while the man conscripted against his will is portrayed as a whimsical horndog for not being gentlemanly. I really hope these ideas don't return and I'm glad more guys have moved past this tradcon frame of reference.
/r/MensRights12/02/21 08:24 AM
11

Subreddits are more polarized than ever. If you don't agree with what's being said you get downvoted and often people insist on arguing with you. If you are interested in discussing men's rights, that isn't so much a problem specific to women's subs as it is to subs that aren't men's rights related.
/r/MensRights08/02/21 04:59 AM

You accuse me of being a troll and a shill when you regularly post in r/wordnews, r/news and r/politics and have derailed this thread by focusing on aspect about a particular nation (China) rather than how a nation is getting fixated on trying to masculinize its male population and how their aims may not be completely altruistic. Furthermore I don't like any governments. Be they in China, Russia, North Korea, Latin America, UK, Canada or the US. That your first instinct is to try and make this a…
/r/MensRights07/02/21 08:17 PM
3

Breadtubers...
/r/MensRights07/02/21 08:11 PM
3

Vaush is smart but at the same time really fucking dumb. He has delusions of grandeur and a slobbering fanbase that hangs onto his every word. He's just another dumb grifter.
/r/MensRights07/02/21 08:10 PM

Not even close as I am not paid to post at all and my stance was not pro China in the slightest. It is recognized by both western countries, countries in Asia and China that the Chinese have ambitions to expand their military. I didn't say whether this was a good thing or bad thing. Merely that it just is. At this point you are just trolling. u/goodmod u/iainmf
/r/MensRights07/02/21 07:55 PM

So because governments view women as needed to be ready to make children then men should be bound to fighting in wars? That makes no sense at all and is just motivated by a need to punish men as a group for what the government and other people in positions of power have decided for women and their designated social role. To say that China has to gamble on war now because of the one child policy is also a very anti-male way of viewing things and ignores other factors. China has many other reasons…
/r/MensRights07/02/21 07:37 PM
1

Very good points. It's only fitting that feminists obsessed with blaming men easily find another way to blame men for something in fact mostly spearheaded by women.
/r/MensRights06/02/21 02:57 AM
1

Some might say that's intentional
/r/MensRights01/02/21 02:16 AM
3

I think female dating strategy, they are so delusional that they are hilarious, they should stay so we can have some female psychopaths to mock I respectfully disagree. TruFemcels was banned for much less. https://www.reddit.com/r/FemaleDatingStrategy/comments/eklpz4/braindead_males_and_pickmes_alike_are_just_loving/ https://www.reddit.com/r/FemaleDatingStrategy/comments/iiqgmi/why_we_avoid_5050_men/ https://www.reddit.com/r/FDSExposed/comments/ih0l9w/man_doesnt_meet_required_standard_fds_euthan…
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/21 09:48 AM
156

You shouldn't necessarily think this is done out of genuine concern for the wellbeing of males. It's most likely for the sake of bragging rights and having a physically strong military that can be used when needed. The same thing can be said for when nations like US and Russia fret about men not being strong enough. The only time when society worries about men is when they aren't "functioning" in a way to be useful to society. Because government and society see most men as tools and taxpayers an…
/r/MensRights29/01/21 01:27 PM
3

Don't do that. That could get this sub banned for brigading.
/r/MensRights28/01/21 04:22 PM
1

Well the reciprocal insult would be to call the guy a virgin then. Because if you want to get technical about it, while the driver had a sign insinuating the VP was a whore, the sign didn't say anything about her genitalia, whereas the angry reddit comments did insinuate bad things about the size of the driver's genitalia and by extension guys with small genitalia.
/r/MensRights28/01/21 11:59 AM
1

It's not really hypocrisy in my view because one is shaming directed at people that are public figures and one is shaming a guy shaming politicians. I don't see why people in the comments would give the person with the jacked up car and crude anti Joe and Kamala sign a taste of their own medicine unless they feel so inclined to defend politicians. The person that drove the attention getting car and put up the crude sign was looking for attention but redditors on that sub chose to get mad at him …
/r/MensRights28/01/21 11:48 AM
2

It's trashy for sure to have a sign like that but the difference is the person driving that car is a private citizen while Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are public figures. And public figures should not be immune from criticism or shaming because that's implicitly what they signed up for and had to accept when they took the job of managing a country. So it is a low blow but because it's directed toward politicians it's just politics. If someone dick shamed or fat shamed (like how is directed towar…
/r/MensRights28/01/21 11:18 AM
2

And was banned once before until radical feminists threatened how they would take the banning of their subs to the media if reddit didn't unban those subs. https://archive.is/OdSAv, https://archive.is/CAmb9, https://archive.is/g7FPz, https://archive.is/9wjGm, https://archive.is/O6ikt
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/21 10:37 AM
3

There is literally a sign that literally says "say no to joe and the hoe", they are literally calling the president's wife a whore yet you're mad that some of the comments say little dick energy. How interesting... The "hoe" probably refers to VP Kamala Harris and how she had an affair with Willie Brown before.
/r/MensRights28/01/21 10:29 AM
3

You have no evidence of my hatred. Saying that women have no regard for most men is not hatred. And many women that were on the frontlines were there because that's how they participated in the war effort, not because they necessarily cared for the young soldier's suffering. Reconciliation between men and women isn't the goal of this sub. The goal of this sub is to advocate for men's rights. And the women who bash men today know what they are doing. They are not blinded by hatred but it is more …
/r/MensRights28/01/21 09:35 AM
1

Cannibalistic Humanoid Underground Dweller https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Chud See definition from June 09, 2019 more specifically.
/r/MensRights28/01/21 12:15 AM
13

You can be mad at the elites that forced men to die in wars and women for furthering the notion that their suffering is more important than men's suffering. It doesn't have to be a choice between either one. And many women have no regard for most men as seen by how many ads bashing men and 'humor' bashing men appeals to women and how this is essentially an open secret among advertisers. This isn't the elites doing. This is just women acting in their own self interest with no regard for men.
/r/MensRights27/01/21 11:25 PM
4

They seriously come off as trolls and a lot have even admitted to trolling MRAs in this way because they find it amusing to just dismiss whatever MRAs have to say.
/r/MensRights27/01/21 07:16 PM
1

uses the word chud unironically So glad the chapotraphouse subs got banned tbh
/r/MensRights27/01/21 07:15 PM
2

r/IncelTear mod btw https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTear/about/moderators/?after=4156427109
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/21 02:09 AM
9

The thing is it's fake headlines but not from a source you'd expect such a headline from like the sun or the dailymail, but a more formal source like cnbc.
/r/MensRights12/01/21 08:10 AM
3

I agree that at least US, Canadian and Australian politics wise, gender issues are increasingly being split among partisan lines https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/10/2020-polls-gender-gap-women-voters-trump.html https://www.macleans.ca/politics/ottawa/the-biggest-divide-in-canadian-politics-men-vs-women/ https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/RP9798/98rp03
/r/MensRights12/01/21 01:19 AM
1

What a surprise that again mensrights subs are being attacked by the one of the same subs OP mentioned https://np.reddit.com/r/IncelTear/comments/ks6f98/whenever_people_try_to_tell_you_that_mens_rights/
/r/MensRights07/01/21 06:42 PM
13

The same mod made a celebratory post and pinned it when the mgtow sub got quarantined.
/r/MensRights07/01/21 04:24 AM
2

More examples of what OP is talking about. No mention of rape or advocating violence to women yet the people that originally posted are insulted and belittled for their feelings. https://np.reddit.com/r/IncelTear/comments/jbe9xq/mras_exposing_themselves_online_again_yall_aint/ https://np.reddit.com/r/IncelTear/comments/jbre2w/apparently_not_being_anually_celebrated_with_a/ https://np.reddit.com/r/IncelTear/comments/kdsm0p/i_found_this_on_meme_center_and_it_gave_me_a/
/r/MensRights04/01/21 09:59 PM
2

The old mod of r/IncelTears came back and didn't like the direction the sub was going and made it private.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 09:52 PM
2

r/IncelTears was made private by the original mod of that sub after he felt they were going overboard on mocking people.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 09:37 AM
1

Reminder that several mods of IncelTear have been suspended within the last year alone https://reddit.com/u/koneko-dono https://reddit.com/u/koneko-desu https://reddit.com/u/egg_on_my_spaghet https://reddit.com/u/LostRivers https://reddit.com/u/BrazilianSigma
/r/MGTOW03/01/21 03:33 PM
1

Don't donate to wikipedia. They have proven to be biased on social issues https://thecritic.co.uk/the-left-wing-bias-of-wikipedia/ https://www.investors.com/politics/commentary/conservatives-wikipedia-liberal-bias/
/r/MGTOW03/01/21 03:28 PM
2

It would simultaneously be mocked as a gathering of losers and portrayed as a worrying and disturbing trend of extremism taking to the streets.
/r/MensRights31/12/20 12:54 AM
2

This is reddit we're talking about tbh at this point it's to be expected.
/r/MensRights28/12/20 07:51 AM
2

It is but it's not changing any time soon. On the contrary things still appear to be trending in the opposite direction.
/r/MensRights28/12/20 07:50 AM
3

During the Columbia University rape accusation case it was thought that it and other such cases of false accusations and the improper handling of these cases by the universities would cause relationships and sex on campus to decrease. With the exception of a few publicized sensationalist articles about this in the media, actual experience on college campuses show this expected decrease never really occurred or was willingly pursued by male college students. While this issue would indeed end if m…
/r/MensRights24/12/20 05:22 PM
2

In politically polarizing times like this it's only natural such moves like this would be made to erase any policies put in place during the previous administration imo. Regrettable because I think it was widely agreed on by many supporters of men's rights that the Trump administration's tightening on due process for college sexual assault cases was a step in the right direction.
/r/MensRights24/12/20 05:18 PM
1

it’s woman and mainly society’s fault. This is true. Look at all the subs mocking incels, mgtow and MRAs and what they all have in common is that they hate to admit that women and society have a lot to do with why incels and more generally, men that complain about women, exist. They hate the idea that society would be blamed for what they see as individual failings of unsuccessful men and they see themselves as self appointed defenders of the status quo in society.
/r/MensRights21/12/20 01:10 PM
2

Also part of the problem are traditionalists that claim how advocating for men's rights is for weak men.
/r/MensRights21/12/20 01:07 PM
3

They also have masstagger to show who posts in "problematic" subs without even having to look through your post history. The masstagger provides information about which "problematic" subs you browse so someone can hone in on that and try to call you out and shame you with very little effort on sleuthing on their part.
/r/MensRights19/12/20 02:57 PM
4

That's why people in these spaces have recommended keeping separate alt accounts if you feel the need to post in other more neutral subreddits. Frankly there doesn't seem to be much use in posting in many of those other non men's rights/issues related subreddits imo.
/r/MensRights19/12/20 02:56 PM
1

It's a shame how that site is apparently associated with the dollar shave club, which provided a cheaper alternative to more expensive razors and had some funny commercials.
/r/MensRights19/12/20 02:50 PM
2

I'm old enough to remember the actual "traditionalism" that younger guys can only read about in (heavily feminist-influenced) history ("her story"?) books. And to me, the amount of men willing to put up with women, has never been lower. Sure, some such men still exist. But when women got the bright idea to kill baby boys in the womb, to ensure voting supremacy by having more women than males, they unbalanced an already precarious, tipping, unsteady situation. Look at marriage rates. They've been…
/r/MGTOW19/12/20 02:48 PM
1

Perfectly said. For all the talk of men being radicalized by alternative media and online websites it is never pointed out how in the opposite direction many women are radicalized by the mainstream media to believe there is a war on women and that all men are out to hurt women and keep them from advancing in life.
/r/MensRights18/12/20 02:08 PM
2

You know the type of radicalization people complain about with men getting angry at the mistreatment they believe that they get? This is just that but with the sexes reversed.
/r/MensRights18/12/20 08:11 AM
1

Out of the frying pan and into the fire. The grass isn't always greener.
/r/MensRights18/12/20 08:07 AM
3

That's their bias in favor of women speaking.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 10:21 AM
1

Of course. People are competitive by nature if they see something to gain.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 06:08 AM
4

True. Too many men are always at other's throats or looking for a reason to pick on men they see as weak, unmanly or "whining". Unfortunately men don't have an in group bias like women do and can't easily advocate for their self interests as effectively as a result.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 06:06 AM
9

Singapore is the same country that has mandatory male only conscription and required service in the army right? Absolutely despicable.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/12/20 05:57 AM
2

Because of guilt by association. A navy coastguard that wanted to arm up and take action against "jews" was found to be browsing this sub daily from his work computer and this sub was implicated as extremists by the dhs. Also an article came out that tallied all incidences of "problematic" words on this sub since it's creation like "rape" without taking into context the use of those words (ie "false rape accusation" was tallied as no different than "rape", complaining about a woman that harmed a…
/r/MGTOW17/12/20 05:55 AM
1

They are pushing a narrative. They don't care if it makes no sense. https://www.thedailybeast.com/why-young-men-of-color-are-joining-white-supremacist-groups
/r/MGTOW17/12/20 05:48 AM
2

They are laughing about your post right now on the IncelTear bullying sub. But your point about giving women the "silent" treatment IRL is pointless if women are still going to easily get other men to do favors for them and men will still chase after them and give them special treatment, which you can't control. But to ignore women and give them the silent treatment for your own peace of mind is not a bad idea.
/r/MGTOW17/12/20 05:41 AM
2

Oh I agree with that but again this isn't a dating sub. I was just saying while marriage is a big risk there is still some lesser risk involved in relationships as a whole but it's up to the individual to decide if that risk is worth it.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 03:31 PM
1

what risk lol ? getting cheated on its not like its the end of the world i'd argue its better when the girl cheats since you now will leave and you wont waste ur time with and continue searching for a better person i know cheating can be bad and heart breaking but its not that big of a 'risk' It can still leave you emotionally ruined and unable to function normally and unable to get over it. That's the risk.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 02:39 PM
1

yeah the standards are a lot higher for men today you need to be 6'0 tall ( 90 percentile of men ) and have a 6-7 inch dick ( which is 95 percentile ) but they ignore the fact you can still get women and healthy relationships despite that That depends on what your definition of a health relationship is in all honesty. But again that's up to the individual to decide whether or not it's worth the risk if they feel they don't meet the minimum standards but want to date anyway.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 02:03 PM
1

there isn't really a big difference 11% vs 10% taking in consideration that its easier for women the numbers should be WAY higher if women and men were equally able to have sex ( like women its very easy for them it get it ) the numbers of cheating husbands will skyrocket Again I don't think the official statistics tell the full picture and they can be faulty because they rely on the assumption that men and women will be truthful about how much they cheated. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/bl…
/r/MensRights16/12/20 02:01 PM
1

tbh if feminism is hated by lots of people but they arent willing to take action this will make it easier for men who want to take action and if no one is joining femenism but people are actually turning against it its a win Not necessarily. Just because no one is taking feminism is seriously doesn't mean they will be any more open to hearing out men's issues. and also why is no one on this sub taking action at least the mods should make a twitter account post some stuff about men's right and we…
/r/MensRights16/12/20 01:57 PM
1

yeah i agree but this doesnt mean they will cheat i mean as i guy its easier for me to rape a girl and get away with it does this mean i will ? That isn't comparable at all. A woman cheating doesn't come with many if at all any legal risks and is not a crime. A woman cheating is also a consensual activity that she agrees to do with another person even though it is a woman is behaving immorally by cheating. And if women have an easier time getting sex than men and are cheating more than ever http…
/r/MensRights16/12/20 01:30 PM
1

tbh hatred is hatred it leads to the same results which is feminism is bad and no one is taking it seriously They say they don't but words and actions are two different things. People who say feminism is bad still largely very much do favor advancing women's rights over men's rights or think that men's rights is also stupid and pointless. IMO simps are the people who are trying to fit in ( example dummbass men who hate on men's day on twitter by saying EveRy OtHeR dAy iS MeN's DaY ) Definitely b…
/r/MensRights16/12/20 01:08 PM
1

there is actual life long marriages but its not that common because IMO 90% are selfish and bad people I don't necessarily disagree. anyways there is a study showed that 14% of married women cheats meanwhile its 24% of married men who cheats https://perspectivesoftroy.com/men-cheat-women/ I don't buy these statistics however. Many people can lie on surveys. Plus women have an easier time on average than men in getting sex so it really doesn't make sense that less married women cheat than married…
/r/MensRights16/12/20 01:03 PM
2

You kind of don't want to know but https://np.reddit.com/r/AntiPinkPill/comments/jsdqau/pink\_pill\_girlincels\_love\_to\_hang\_out\_in\_a\_place/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/20 01:00 PM
2

i was called simp twice after some guy commented on my post that women are sexually mature children which is obvious hatred and i told him that this is wrong Well yes you being called a simp was uncalled for and so was the comment that women are sexually mature children by that person. That doesn't belong in a men's rights setting. i wouldn't say very because i got upvoted but yes there are few people that are bad Well it used to be way more tame but guess what? This sub still got a lot of hatre…
/r/MensRights16/12/20 12:55 PM
1

That's superficial hatred by people that want to fit in and say how feminists go to far because it's trendy to do that and to fit in. They claim they aren't feminists but they uphold all the principles of feminism and come down way harder on misogyny than misandry. They are very accepting of the notion of men sacrificing their lives for women and the man having to have the burden of performance. They don't necessarily believe women should have to sign up for selective service in order to vote. T…
/r/MensRights16/12/20 12:50 PM
1

and the other half talk about how women are cheaters who will 100% cheat and that relationships arent real because men take turns with women and she will cheat eventually They are jaded from their life experiences. And imo depending on how you define cheating (emotional affairs, straying) they aren't necessarily wrong about many relationships ending with a woman cheating or other men not respecting the boundaries of other men's relationships and marriage not being worth it. ie "She has a bf/husb…
/r/MensRights16/12/20 12:48 PM
1

tbh lots of people here are mgtow which is known to have some ideas that hate women If by hating women you mean complaining about them then yeah but that sort of attitude doesn't come out of nowhere. It comes out of having negative experiences with women often in family court and divorce. and is most likely incorrect i never really seen a guy gets called an incel ( unless you're dealing with sjws ) I see it all the time. Along with the term "neckbeard" https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comment…
/r/MensRights16/12/20 12:37 PM
1

But I prefer reading and criticizing an article that way to just giving a value judgment and considering that final and enough. I very strongly disagree with that. The author's confusion mixing up prehistorical, historical and current situations and things like the influence of religion in instilling values like sacrifice is the least of my concerns in what this article brings up. I did read through the article and tried finding any place where there was more of a neutral stance but didn't find …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/20 08:56 AM
1

Virtually everyone I've talked to believes ending a patriarchal society would significantly benefit both men and women. Patriarchy is a misnomer and an application of the apex fallacy. https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/ibe3gp/what_is_the_apex_fallacy/ It applies to a system that supposedly benefits all men but that simulataneously men are harmed by but implies that men are the ones in power. It neglects men that have been in subordinate positions that are not in places of p…
/r/MensRights16/12/20 05:05 AM
2

Who is "they?" Aside from some internet "owned sjw compilations, I've never met a feminist who doesn't care about men's issues and doesn't see men's emotional issues as something that should be fixed. They meaning feminists online and IRL. They don't really about men's issues unless it's presented in a context that they approve of. That's why such people object to r/mensrights but not r/menslib, the latter of which has tightly controlled discussions on issues facing men that is presented in a fe…
/r/MensRights16/12/20 04:59 AM
1

Also just seems to have a few things that are fighting more so for men rather than just the good of people in general. What I mean by that is hating everyone else instead of seeing how men can improve as a group. (it'd solve 99% of our issues.) There's nothing wrong with fighting for men when feminists are mostly fighting for women and the rest of society doesn't really see men's issues as a concern. You can't expect people in a losing position not to advocate for their self interests as a group…
/r/MensRights16/12/20 04:33 AM
1

But every feminist I've talked to cares about helping men's rights, only that a decent amount of men's rights activists seem to only care as a way to discredit women's issues. They say they care but their actions don't show it. Feminists and feminist organizations chalk up most of the problems men face to toxic masculinity and attitudes of men without recognizing that a lot of those attitudes stem from expectations put on men by women and society and not just men themselves. They say men should …
/r/MensRights16/12/20 04:27 AM
1

If 90% of feminists fought for men's rights then men's rights advocates/activists wouldn't even be a thing. And feminists are mostly talk when it comes to men's issues like conscription. It was the National Coalition for Men (NCFM) that brought a case to end sex selective military conscription, not feminist groups like the National Organization for Women (NOW).
/r/MensRights16/12/20 02:55 AM
1

and i hate this because now people see men's rights as an incel movement They would see it that way regardless of how careful you are not to seem "misogynistic" (a catch-all phrase used to silence any discussion about the issues low status men face) and insist men's rights are a group for unsuccessful, loser virgin males. Before the term "incel" became popularized as an insult many people in men's rights groups were attacked as loser virgins.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 02:52 AM
1

What does this sub do that is comparable to what feminists do? And where is your evidence that those that do that are mostly incels?
/r/MensRights16/12/20 02:49 AM
9

How fucking evil and biased do you have to be? The worst part is that I always see people lauding r/menslib as the right sort of men's right subreddit. Usually mocking/"watchdog" subs like IncelTear and subredditdrama, the latter of where one of the mods of menslib is an active participant. Which should say enough really.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/20 02:47 AM
1

Yes I believe congress is acting on the negative public opinion about dolls and robots. The unofficial consensus on issues now often becomes public policy later on. If we could normalize sex dolls to the public via PR, then this wouldn't be an issue? It won't be easy in a country with so much traditionalist inclinations as America and there will be a lot of people opposed to normalizing sex dolls as degeneracy and anti human/anti family and unnatural. Both sides of the political spectrum particu…
/r/MensRights16/12/20 02:16 AM
1

1)It is absurd to use a correlation between dolls and child pornography as a basis to make the dolls illegal. Those dolls are nothing but human sized barbies with a hole, and the barbies are both legal and advertised to children. Also, I wouldn't be surprised if that correlation is both very low, and its data unreliable. Plus, legal pornography itself probably has a higher correlation to the use of child pornography than dolls or robots. That matters little in moral panics about sex dolls and ha…
/r/MensRights16/12/20 01:51 AM
1

Again, a quality sex doll company will make a hefty profit and I wasn't talking about child like sex dolls in the first place. I don't think there is much objectification involved as a lot of other things that are much more objectifying out there, sometimes even promoted (empowered young lolis on OnlyFans come to mind for example). The issue is that now that there is a precedent for regulation of sex dolls even if it is deemed to apply to a certain type of sex dolls (child sex dolls) it is much …
/r/MensRights16/12/20 12:57 AM
1

You seem to come back all the time to the rude way the author writes about deaths and killings in the past. Yes, it is not a style I especially like either. But is there not some truth in it? And doesn't the author at least make a difference from feminists endlessly lamenting eternal male privilege? I don't think so. For one the idea of a tribe being able to survive if it loses a lot of its men but not women is imo based on faulty, short sighted thinking that ignores the effects of inbreeding fr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/20 12:46 AM
1

It's not really a problem what some may think about this (if anything, that speaks a lot of those that think so as they don't want certain men to manage well?). Already laws have been put in place that could be used as a precedent against this. See the CREEPER act https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/8236/text?r=3&s=1 ​ Plus, there is so much money to be made making quality sex dolls it could become its own new emerging industry. Artificial wombs on the other hand is a great s…
/r/MensRights15/12/20 04:19 PM
1

Please note that by incels and involuntary single men the author is probably not referring to just official self proclaimed incels but single men that have expressed displeasure at women and society, which many MRAs have. So I don't think the article is referring to just talking about and shaming and mocking self proclaimed "incels". See the part where "men's rights advocates" are mentioned. This article does more than misses the point. It muses on and downplays the past death of men in war and …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/20 04:17 PM
1

The problem is such people would object to that too because fundamentally they cannot bear seeing low status probably unattractive (to women) men managing well. It makes them insecure to not see such men in a state of constant distress.
/r/MensRights15/12/20 04:08 PM
1

Apparently you don't appreciate a lot of modern humor, which is often a lot more violent and cynical than this. Not on this issue no. I don't think it's a thing to joke about while writing an article about this kind of social issue. It sets a bad precedent. I still think the article is interesting because the author, unlike most feminists, sees some very real problems as being real, but is too drenched in feminism, IdPol and political correctness to even dare think about the right solutions. Man…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/20 02:48 PM
1

Thanks for sharing and raising awareness. Now write to the journalist, to the editor etc. If you were only going to do one thing, that bet thing would be to write to them, and not post here. If you are going to do both great. But DONT just post on here. This is an echo chamber, everyone agrees.... now share that to others Journalists do write back and editors do take things seriously. Journalists and editors don't always take those complaints seriously and often use those complaints as a way to …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/20 02:30 PM
1

The article has a contemptuous tone that imo goes past sarcasm and irony. Whether this is true or not, reading this as advocating mass killing is simply missing irony, sarcasm, cynicism or what you may call it. Of course, I disagree with him that feminism plays no role in the exclusion of men. I don't think it has to be as severe as advocating mass killing to show this article is misandrist. Making light of or downplaying the past mass killing of men in wars and saying there's no real way to do …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/20 02:22 PM
1

Sad thing is this article was written by a male. You'd think it would be written by a bitter female radical feminist. Also more disturbing is that the place that this piece was published in is the American Affairs, which describes itself as a quaterly journal of public policy and political thought. American Affairs appears to be a rightwing journal connected to the ideologies propagated by the intellectual darkweb (IDW; American Affairs is described as connected to Trumpism in the link below but…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/20 02:06 PM
8

The way that it is talked about how men that have problems in the current system (incels being the most "infamous" example) should be shamed but that also the way of how incels and unsuccessful men at large are simultaneously portrayed as threats to society that won't easily be dealt with and seem to hint that this is necessary to do. ​ "Of course, all these men who weren’t reproducing did not just disappear into the ether. They cleared forests and dug ditches, plowed fields and laid bricks, the…
/r/MensRights15/12/20 01:46 PM
1

The part about incels and how they should be shamed and the lackadaisical way the article talked about men being sacrificed in the past and how it's not as feasible to do that today came off to me as misandrist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/20 01:43 PM
19

ridiculous how much they lie gets repeatedly. ethnics are over represented in incel spaces. Which isn't surprising given that ethnic men are generally rated lower by women than white men. Exactly. What people do by making these lazy blanket statements is trying to pigeonhole some woke narrative into a complex social issue. It's like when this article was published https://www.thedailybeast.com/why-young-men-of-color-are-joining-white-supremacist-groups They adopt white supremacist ideologies tha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/20 12:14 PM
23

Discussion about what to do with 'excess' males have become disturbingly common in the last few years. https://archive.vn/lrwrH https://archive.vn/m1R2q https://archive.vn/pzkW4 As has falsely conflating men that oppose sex selective conscription with rightwing extremists and incels. https://www.rsis.edu.sg/rsis-publication/icpvtr/incels-and-terrorism-sexual-deprivation-as-security-threat/ "Others take on a slightly different but equally misogynistic flavour, such as the sentiment of how militar…
/r/MensRights15/12/20 11:58 AM
27

Talks of what to do with 'excess' males have become disturbingly common in the last few years in the media. https://archive.vn/lrwrH https://archive.vn/m1R2q https://archive.vn/pzkW4 As has falsely conflating men that oppose sex selective conscription with rightwing extremists and incels. https://www.rsis.edu.sg/rsis-publication/icpvtr/incels-and-terrorism-sexual-deprivation-as-security-threat/ "Others take on a slightly different but equally misogynistic flavour, such as the sentiment of how mi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/20 11:55 AM
1

It's chalked up to racism and nothing else. Meanwhile most of the hatred and racism non white males have historically faced has been instigated by sexism and out-group misandry toward other groups of males. See lynching of black males for supposed rape allegations and demonization of Asian males as rapists during World War 2 as just a few examples. Drumming up hatred against another group of men as abusers of women has always been a tactic used to justify discrimination, mistreatment, hostility …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/20 04:25 PM
3

Relevant post https://np.reddit.com/r/antifeminists/comments/k4etrm/bias\_against\_mens\_issues\_within\_the\_united/ Credit to u/DeepIsland8373
/r/AntiFeminists01/12/20 06:31 AM
2

Feminists still do see use for guys that are traditionally masculine to their dirty work and accomplishing violence by proxy onto men they don't like. Feminists demonstrate this through their actions even if they deny it by words.
/r/AntiFeminists01/12/20 05:21 AM
4

r/fdssuperfans right? Yeah one of the founders of that sub who used to have a bluepill tag on purplepilldebate sub also said they actively monitor reddit for mentions of their sub.
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/20 11:40 PM
1

No usually they know what they are doing even it doesn't seem logical. It's about social dominance and shaming/silencing the opposition. And in any case they don't afford their opponents that fall back excuse of mental illness, so echoing their words back at them: mental illness is not an excuse to be an asshole.
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/20 12:35 PM
7

Still worth mentioning even back then that wasn't something given by women to every man. Just more men than now and of course looks standards for men were lower than now.
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/20 08:18 AM
1

reddit admins caved and unbanned banfemalehatesubs and blantantmisogyny after pressure from radical feminists where the radical feminists"threatened to alert the media about reddit's misogynistic banning of feminist subs and protection of misogynist subs". https://archive.is/OdSAv, https://archive.is/CAmb9, https://archive.is/g7FPz, https://archive.is/9wjGm, https://archive.is/O6ikt
/r/MensRights30/11/20 06:17 AM
6

I'm all for equality Many feminists don't seem to be though https://psmag.com/ideas/how-mens-rights-groups-use-the-rhetoric-of-equality-to-punish-women
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/20 05:25 AM
5

Backup in case comment gets deleted https://archive.vn/uvuZh
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/20 05:18 AM
1

Here are the authors Raffaello Pantucci is a Senior Fellow and Kyler Ong an Associate Research Fellow at the International Centre for Political Violence, Terrorism Research (ICPVTR) of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. ​ I have posted about this too https://www.reddit.com/r/Pro_Male_Collective/comments/jrb559/paper_smears_males_in_asia_that_dislike_sex/ https://www.reddit.com/r/ProMaleCollective/comments/j7zlgq/paper_smea…
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/20 03:29 AM
2

But Vice did feature those opinions primarily in an attempt to try and score a win for their side. And they have consistently made articles mocking males https://www.vice.com/en/article/evez7m/finally-a-new-emoji-to-mock-men-pinching-hand-emoji-update https://www.vice.com/en/article/9kqqn3/whats-the-deal-with-mens-rights-activists-and-asian-fetishes It does matter that the article comes from Vice. They shouldn't be given any legitimacy when they've proven to be biased.
/r/AntiFeminists28/11/20 01:25 AM
1

LVM = low value male HVM = high value male
/r/AntiFeminists27/11/20 12:35 AM
1

Vice is trash and the farthest thing from an unbiased media outlet.
/r/AntiFeminists27/11/20 12:33 AM
2

That sub was one of the subs that like banfemalehatesubs, got unbanned after radical feminists "threatened to alert the media" about reddit banning their subs https://archive.is/OdSAv, https://archive.is/CAmb9, https://archive.is/g7FPz, https://archive.is/9wjGm, https://archive.is/O6ikt ​ Also the person in that screenshot posts on IncelTear and is a balloon fetishist. These are the people that feel entitled to lecture you. https://np.reddit.com/r/IncelTear/comments/hx41rq/the_blackpill_is_compl…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 09:15 PM
2

Yeah "manbaby/manbabies", "manchild", "small dicked", "loser" (an insult almost never used that much against a woman), phrases like "entitled white males" (really they mean all males but it's politically savvy to couch attacks on males as attacks on white males; see how much hate ethnic males get if they don't toe the feminist line). A lot of those "progressives" just attack whoever the media and special interest groups like the SPLC want them to attack or declare as spreading "hate".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/11/20 08:35 PM
1

It's understandable to want the favor and approval of other people but trying to prove you are the exception and one of the good ones is imo a futile one-sided type of approach to life. I think it would leave anyone with self respect feeling awful that they allowed themselves to be taken advantage of and used as a token 'model citizen'.
/r/MensRights15/11/20 02:42 AM
3

It isn't worth the effort to keep being in the company of people like that who force you to always walk on eggshells and be on the defensive. That kind of friendship will end up taking more of an emotional toll on you as time wears on and it can eventually lead you to realize some of the worst in people and be unable to move on from feeling betrayed or used. It's one thing to joke with friends but it's another thing to hang out with people that make the focal point of many conversations talking …
/r/MensRights14/11/20 05:25 AM
3

If they won't stop and insist on upholding double standards then you should consider getting better friends. It's also a possible indication that they'll think nothing of throwing you under the bus when they feel you are no longer needed or necessary. https://www.newsweek.com/feminists-gender-stereotypes-feminism-math-men-study-979310
/r/MensRights14/11/20 05:16 AM
4

And his plan is to turn back protections on the due process and rights of male students made during the Trump administration https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/biden-wants-scrap-betsy-devos-rules-sexual-assault-schools-it-n1247472 ​ This despite the contrast between Biden's statements on this issue and what he himself said when faced with sexual assault accusations. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/joe-biden-when-a-woman-alleges-sexual-assault-presume-she-is-telling-the-truth/…
/r/MensRights14/11/20 03:07 AM
2

Men that don't register with selective service are ineligible to receive financial aid, ability to have a job in the federal government and are at risk of fines and imprisonment if found they failed to register before they turned 26. https://www.sss.gov/register/benefits-and-repercussions/ And anyone assigned male at birth has to register too which means even trangsender women have to register. https://transequality.org/issues/resources/selective-service-and-transgender-people
/r/MensRights14/11/20 03:01 AM
3

EDIT: Biden already promised a return to campus kangaroo courts as well. Not surprising given his track record on this issue. https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/04/03/joe-biden-college-campus-sexual-assault-226481
/r/MensRights14/11/20 02:56 AM
3

Because they can get away with it without losing their jobs or social prestige.
/r/MensRights02/11/20 08:07 AM
2

Like many subreddits I think it's full of posters that deliberately try to antagonize each other and try to seem more woke by putting others down and acting like they know more about current societal and sexual issues than others.
/r/AntiFeminists01/11/20 01:49 AM
1

I don't think they deserve the title of "lady" tbh
/r/AntiFeminists29/10/20 02:30 AM
5

Yes they only notice white cisgender men. They show their implicit bias against other groups of men when trying to paint all of their opponents as white cisgender men.
/r/MGTOW28/10/20 07:25 AM
0

https://www.businessinsider.com/gender-equality-hurts-some-men-jobs-economy-congress-us-women-2020-9
/r/MensRights28/10/20 05:00 AM
1

They never can.
/r/MensRights28/10/20 04:57 AM
1

Part of it is probably because they feel excluded and insist on copying it instead of making an original version or name for a similar space. Part of it is probably to piss off the people in the original male space by co-opting their concepts, terminology and phrasing and using it against them with the genders reversed. ​ Nevertheless it isn't surprising that the media having a pro female bias would be so quick to apply one-sided criticism only to the original male space while cheering on or lea…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/20 08:28 PM
1

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2019-06-women-longer-men.html "While women may live longer than men, they report more illnesses, more doctor visits and more hospital stays than men. This is known as the morbidity-mortality paradox (that is, women are sicker but live longer). One explanation is that women suffer from illnesses less likely to kill them. Examples of chronic non-fatal illnesses more common in women include migraines, arthritis and asthma. These conditions may lead to poorer health, b…
/r/MensRights17/10/20 10:48 PM
2

This isn't the first time referring to men as a surplus has been brought up so casually. It really shows the misandry of a lot of people in the media and how they have no regard for men's lives. http://archive.vn/B6FAQ http://archive.vn/m1R2q
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/20 08:22 AM
1

Some of it is biological but a lot of is because women have an easier time in life than many men and with way less stress.
/r/MensRights17/10/20 08:14 AM
3

Well said. He is just another grifter.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/20 08:08 AM
1

Melmagazine also defends femcels and female oriented copies of manosphere groups but demonizes the original male oriented groups.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/20 08:07 AM
11

And I'm getting tired of melmagazine in all honesty.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/20 08:06 AM
3

Because the alternative is sadly liberals that purport to care about social justice but mock and refuse to even understand the problems of unsuccessful men. Don't get me wrong both groups don't care but rightwing groups at least pretend to care long enough to hook men into their fold and that fools a lot of desperate guys.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/20 08:06 AM
2

Because men are easy targets for bullying. Society never really changed. They looked for a group it was okay to harass and men fit the bill.
/r/MensRights16/10/20 11:05 AM
6

https://np.reddit.com/r/IncelTear/comments/jc1nfj/some\_jerk\_complained\_about\_his\_girlfriend\_being\_a/
/r/MensRights16/10/20 02:57 AM
1

Actually it's worse than that. Feminism has absorbed ideas dogma from Critical Theory. They believe that 'facts' are not as important as the 'narrative' because the only thing that matters is the oppression of women. It doesn't matter that something is true, it only matters if it contributes to women's oppression, or liberates women from oppression. In fact, any opposition to this idea is seen as contributing to women's oppression and therefore needs to be stopped. It is really quite insane that…
/r/MensRights15/10/20 03:21 PM
1

http://np.reddit.com/r/IncelTear/comments/j96os0/screw_dem/ Liar. This is what you call trolling?
/r/MGTOW15/10/20 02:42 PM
1

It's generous of you to give use the word "lady" to describe them in all honesty.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 09:59 AM
5

He is saying if you think the solution is not having a draft at all then what have you done to fight to end the male only draft then?
/r/MensRights29/09/20 09:55 AM
3

Tradcons and feminists are two sides of the same gynocentric coin.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 09:54 AM
7

You either man up as they say and move past the bullshit or if you are that fucked up and are considering suicide then consider making society right and offing the cunt that put you into this situation so she doesn't do it to some other guy down the road. He has the option of suing her for damages he has incurred to his life as a result of her lying. It may or may not be successful but at least he would have shown he had tried to prove his innocence. Also offing someone solves nothing and only g…
/r/MGTOW21/09/20 02:36 PM
25

What makes me suspicious is that the employer fired him for taking a single day off. I don't think that happens... It can I think. Like women employers usually have someone lined up ready to take your position. Imo it's the side effect of a hyper competitive society.
/r/MGTOW21/09/20 10:47 AM
66

Whether or not this story is true stories like this happen all the time. When you are a male, people are there for you until they aren't.
/r/MGTOW21/09/20 07:32 AM
2

I think it stands for r/Whereareallthegoodmen
/r/MGTOW209/09/20 04:01 AM
1

He sounds like the kind of person to throw you under the bus when convenient in order to keep his reputation.
/r/MensRights15/08/20 03:00 PM
5

Reddit admins clearly see femaledatingstrategy as a counterweight to what they view as "misogynistic" reddit subs and so are allowing it to stay up. Even so there is stuff like this and this that gets posted on that sub.
/r/MensRights27/07/20 09:27 PM
2

Reminder that radical feminists "threatened to alert the media about reddit's misogynistic banning of feminist subs and protection of misogynist subs." if the banfemalehatesubs sub wasn't unbanned. https://archive.is/OdSAv, https://archive.is/CAmb9, https://archive.is/g7FPz, https://archive.is/9wjGm, https://archive.is/O6ikt Meanwhile banmalehatsubs is still banned even though banfemalehatesubs is unbanned and despite how banfemalehatesubs is a BlackPillFeminism ban evasion sub.
/r/MGTOW27/07/20 01:12 PM
1

Suspect released a manifesto where on page 97 he said of the men's rights movement: "I don't belong to that group of whimps and whiners." https://heavy.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/CyclopediaUpdate2.20.19.pdf?fbclid=IwAR2fM1k_hZFw_5EyBRY3UZQsRDbvQW-vBKmUkOyrQBoQLEPUpLAsrn-MH8o
/r/MGTOW22/07/20 02:17 AM
1

This is even before factoring how the fact that the alleged suspect is a former men's rights attorney and also might have murdered the son of a judge looking into the Epstein case is being used to smear MRAs rather than focusing on the other connection to Epstein.
/r/MGTOW21/07/20 02:09 PM
2

The event of a judge's family member being allegedly murdered by the same man that murdered Marc Angelucci in the same way (a man dressed as a FedEx person) and the connection of the judge to the Epstein case is suspect. I am thinking they are going to try to pin blame on MRAs rather than look into the Epstein connection. And I'm not one to entertain every conspiracy theory, but what are the chances that things like this aren't just coincidences?
/r/MGTOW21/07/20 01:53 PM
3

I agree with the not sticking your neck out part and will only spread the word anonymously and to those who want to listen.
/r/MGTOW21/07/20 01:37 PM
7

They will still try to target you regardless, as seen when the SPLC declared that MGTOW was a male supremacist group in 2018. Goes without saying but support internet freedom and privacy laws that prevent corporations and governments from gaining more powers to spy on citizens to prevent 'hate speech' in order to prevent organizations like the SPLC from having more incentive to go after people they dislike. As of now neoliberal identity politics oriented Democrats do not appear to be interested …
/r/MGTOW21/07/20 01:13 PM
5

Remember to keep up to date with this case and never stop speaking out when people misrepresent men's movements. Do not just blindly accept the argument that men are biologically disposable and that it is pointless to stick up for men's rights. Do not feel forced to fight a war on behalf of a country you feel does not care about you. Even if these communities are gone, just remember these are still things you can do.
/r/MGTOW21/07/20 12:39 PM
4

Styx has a vendetta against MGTOW probably. It pisses him off for some odd reason. That or he is deliberately trying to stir up the attention and ire of MGTOWs to get more views on his videos. Or maybe it's both of those reasons.
/r/MGTOW21/07/20 12:29 PM
3

If this a case of a deranged person gunning down a public figure, Valerie Solanas (a woman) shot Andy Warhol. Don't underestimate women's capacity to do harm to men, it has been men's downfall.
/r/MGTOW21/07/20 11:29 AM
8

He believed that men's rights organizations and people that worked at them were co-opted by feminists. Thats prob why he killed that other attorney. Maybe he was right. How? If anything this is a huge setback for men's rights. Marc Angelucci was a very effective men's rights attorney that participated in Cassie Jaye's Red Pill documentary.
/r/MGTOW21/07/20 10:12 AM
13

The SPLC has still labeled MGTOW has a male supremacist group and has gone after MRAs for questioning men sacrificing their lives for women in the Aurora Colorado theater situation in 2012 and also branded the NCFM a male supremacist group. The thing is no male is completely safe and as long as people continue not to speak out against those who lie about the men's rights movement things will surely continue to get worse.
/r/MGTOW21/07/20 10:10 AM
4

There were so many dismissive comments about Mr. Angelucci's death on the original dailymail article with the sarcastic sentiment of "what are the chances a man killed him? LOL" Already on the r/mensrights sub there are people talking about how this is evidence there are too many extremists in the men's rights movement although those comments have less upvotes than other comments.
/r/MGTOW21/07/20 10:08 AM
1

I don't think so. At least as far as Marc Angelucci and the NCFM are concerned, they were making a lot of progress in getting cases challenging the selective service male only draft challenged, a milestone for men's rights activists that have otherwise not had any big IRL accomplishments such as overturning of feminist laws.
/r/MGTOW21/07/20 10:04 AM
2

np.reddit.com/r/FemaleDatingStrategy/comments/htqqog/true/ The IncelTear post misrepresenting the post on this sub: np.reddit.com/r/IncelTear/comments/hu6vjw/holy_fuck_that_title/
/r/MGTOW19/07/20 08:42 PM
1

Heads up: np.reddit.com/r/IncelTear/comments/hu6vjw/holy_fuck_that_title/ np.reddit.com/r/ITears/comments/hu7273/it_conveniently_crops_the_part_where_the_woman/
/r/MGTOW19/07/20 08:10 PM
5

To everyone wondering why this was even posted, look at how expected it is for males to put themselves at risk and give up their lives for the opposite gender that questioning this puts you under scrutiny by groups like the SPLC.
/r/MensRights15/07/20 08:02 AM
1

If it does turn out that this was not just a random incident but politically motivated, the perpetrator(s) should be punished to the fullest extent of the law and tried under federal not state law so that there is no chance of them avoiding state exemptions to the death penalty if found guilty.
/r/MGTOW14/07/20 07:45 PM
1

From The SPLC has labeled the National Coalition for Men as a male supremacist organization: "The Southern Poverty Law Center has been critical of the National Coalition for Men’s efforts, writing that it and groups like it “distort or cherry-pick statistics to indicate female privilege, blame women, or create false equivalences between the oppression of men and of women, rather than simply seek to advance the cause of men and fathers. “Groups like NCFM use litigation to challenge what they perc…
/r/MensRights14/07/20 06:58 PM
9

Remember when they went after MRAs for questioning men sacrificing themselves for women in the Aurora Colorado incident? https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2012/08/03/men%E2%80%99s-rights-activists-disdain-men%E2%80%99s-sacrifice-colorado-shooting
/r/MGTOW14/07/20 07:43 AM
12

News of his death is already being overwhelmed by conspiracy theories and skipping out on acknowledging the good work he did and the fact that the investigation into the culprit in his death is still ongoing. It's sad but this is what happens when you spread news about a men's rights activist untimely death to the wider populace that only cares about seeming more woke than others and uses the murder of a man to push theories instead of grieving.
/r/MGTOW14/07/20 06:50 AM
0

The mainstream media loves to fearmonger and talk about how there is a war on women, building up suspicion of men. There is so much talk about men getting radicalized by alternative media narratives. Where is the discussion about women getting radicalized by mainstream media? Because that also occurs just as much when they are told to believe that men are putting them at risk and passing laws that restrict them.
/r/MensRights14/07/20 05:06 AM
3

What politicians voted to instate these tax breaks? The least you can do if you are in Britain is to not vote for them.
/r/MensRights14/07/20 05:03 AM
11

The SPLC has labeled the National Coalition for Men as a male supremacist organization. Remember when they labeled the Family Resource Council a hate group and somebody went and tried to kill people there? And don't the SPLC have a lot of money donated to them by tech companies? "Why the fuck they don't get shut down with lawsuits is beyond me." They have enough money to get a lawyer to argue against those lawsuits.
/r/MensRights14/07/20 05:02 AM
2

The SPLC has labeled the National Coalition for Men as a male supremacist organization. Remember when they labeled the Family Resource Council a hate group and somebody went and tried to kill people there?
/r/MensRights14/07/20 02:11 AM
2

Didn't flair this as War on Men when I first posted this so it must have done so automatically.
/r/MGTOW13/07/20 06:12 AM
8

I mean speculating about whether a third party like the state might have been responsible for the murder of a prominent men's right lawyer one day after his death can still dismay a lot of people and drive defeatism even if it is not the intention to do this. While people vow to fight and say what comes forth is a mass awakening after the untimely death of prominent figures like this, I have found the the opposite to be true. People say one thing and then do the other. Sudden deaths of prominent…
/r/MGTOW13/07/20 06:01 AM
9

The murder occurred on July 11 just a day ago. I know it is hard to hold back from speculation, but it only drives defeatism, despair and being too overly cautious. I think it's good to wait to see if there is more information that will come out soon as to the motive of the killing, an investigation is currently ongoing.
/r/MGTOW13/07/20 03:34 AM
3

If male disposability supposedly developed because the lives of individual women are more important to the continuance of the species than the lives of individual men, then, from a cold "evolpsych" perspective, shouldn't it reverse after middle age when women can no longer bear children but men can still impregnate? This to me is encouraging, as it suggests to me that there is a stronger social component to male disposability and the empathy gap than the most pessimistic among us might admit, wh…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/20 08:04 AM
1

You wouldn't tell this kid, "You're not entitled to people's friendships". lol I have heard similar phrases like that being said to me when I was growing up as well as toward other lonely kids (mostly boys, unsurprisingly). The expectation that if you are male you can expect...nothing is well ingrained in students by the time they have gone to public elementary schools for a few years imo
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/20 07:48 AM
1

I assume you are able to view it now? Did you get the dm? It's been a while since I posted that.
/r/MGTOW205/07/20 12:35 AM
3

A pattern I have noticed: they don't ban all 'problematic' subs right away. Oftentimes they let things stagnate and monitor the number of visits to the sub from other more mainstream subs. I don't think this sub is out of the clear yet or ever will be. When a lot of people from mainstream default subs start coming and saying things like "you guys aren't so bad" and people in the quarantined or due to be banned sub let their guard down, I've seen that the banhammer comes down shortly after. Didn'…
/r/MGTOW29/06/20 11:24 PM
8

A pattern I have noticed: they don't ban all 'problematic' subs right away. Oftentimes they let things stagnate and monitor the number of visits to the sub from other subs. When a lot of people from mainstream default subs start coming and saying things like "you guys aren't so bad" and people in the quarantined or due to be banned sub let their guard down, the banhammer comes down. Didn't people say that prior to the quarantine of this sub, there were a lot of outsiders coming in asking questio…
/r/MGTOW29/06/20 11:23 PM
2

I think we should stop blaming the society and start by naming the real problem: male apathy. Society does by in large promote male apathy, but I agree with you, there is no use being defeatist when it is not warranted. The NCFM has challenged the selective service act only applying to men after a texas court challenged the constitutionality of that law, which in itself is a big milestone given how seldom it is for men's rights issues to make progress. And yes, change does start with every man. …
/r/MensRights27/06/20 10:06 AM
3

With that logic, woman who already birthed enough children and not interested in birthing more is not valuable than men. Post menopausal women are not more valuable than men, rather they can be a burden. Exactly, but you never see this argument addressed by people who say that man are biologicaly disposable. All the more evidence that male disposability is a cultural and social phenomena that does not have to be a reality.
/r/MensRights27/06/20 09:53 AM
6

There is also evidence that suggests male disposability is a result of social conditioning, not instinct. Yes! I am completely against biologically reductionist arguments use to argue why male disposability is natural. Many of the customs of sending men to war were not universal and enforced to the same standard. Evidence of this is seen by how chivalry and sacrificing your life for a woman that is not in your family is more a characteristic of anglo nations rather than places in Asia, a possibl…
/r/MensRights27/06/20 09:52 AM
2

Yeah voat became even worse off than bitchute pretty quickly. I think ruqqus might have a chance to take off with a wider audience because I saw on the WRD sub that ruqqus now has a mobile app for android. There's already talk of preventing ruqqus from becoming another voat clone on the site
/r/MGTOW25/06/20 10:34 AM
8

The problem with these alternative platforms is that they never fully taken off in the same way and fail to gain enough users that content is uploaded daily, or become swamped with people ranting about nazis like bitchute and Gab. De-platforming works, especially with centralization of social media services. Though I heard that if ruqqus had a phone app it would be more likely to take off.
/r/MGTOW25/06/20 10:10 AM
10

Fortunately, people are fickle and platforms seem to be relatively short lived. Reddit will be another one of those soon enough. idk they said the same thing about Facebook and Twitter and they'll start going strong for almost a decade now
/r/MGTOW25/06/20 10:03 AM
3

You can't reason with them. I got copy-pasta'd on bluepill subs and flamed for my previous post, Don't give them that much credit, as you said they flat-out refuse to engage in any real discussion. and I responded to some but they flat-out refuse to engage in any real discussion. Why'd I respond? Just to make the point, and also to organize my own thoughts better as I wrote them out. No use responding to them when they try to bait you, but OTOH if you don't reply when people mock you it can make…
/r/MGTOW25/06/20 07:20 AM
2

*hypocrisy And yeah I posted this before at the antipinkpill sub but I'll post it again: You know you are superior when you have to make a meme about a group that hasn't even made a thread about you for more than one month https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/search/?q=wgtow&include_over_18=on&restrict_sr=on&sort=new
/r/MGTOW24/06/20 05:57 AM
4

The only reason I've found out about these two is that someone there would mention my u/ name and I'd get a notification. Clear violation of reddit rules against harassment, not that it will be enforced but you can always report the users who did this. Although they'll probably make a big deal of that too.
/r/MGTOW24/06/20 05:54 AM
2

Losing because all the terms and philosophical outlooks that only low status males had previously talked about (Briffault's Law, male expendability, cuck, soyboy, simp) have been assimilated into the wider culture in a way that still puts the blame on weak ugly males rather than women, absolves women of any fault ("it's just their nature"), and has normalized categorization of males into worthy vs. non-worthy categories (alpha vs. beta; like it or not, society sees any man categorized as the lat…
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre24/06/20 12:58 AM
1

Okay
/r/MensRights23/06/20 05:37 AM
1

Source of text in screenshot: np.reddit.com/r/IncelTear/comments/hd24l3/female_hate_sub_megalist/
/r/MensRights23/06/20 05:17 AM
4

If I remember right the chapotraphouse sub on reddit was quarantined after rightwing site breitbart did a story on it. https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2019/08/07/reddit-quarantines-far-left-chapo-trap-house-over-violent-threats/
/r/MensRights23/06/20 04:16 AM
1

As much as I can relate to the sentiment that a man can feel used and discarded after a woman feels she has no further use for him, I think the term 'disposable' should be reserved for more extreme cases (for example men being shipped to the front lines and dying in war while women are free to stay out of combat), otherwise the meaning of 'disposable' gets watered down and is more likely to get co-opted by PUAs.
/r/MGTOW18/06/20 05:20 AM
1

I'm able to view it without confirming email. Dm me if you want to know what I did.
/r/MGTOW217/06/20 12:43 AM
47

We are both Indian. ​ She called me racist saying that I was stereotyping people. This man might be about to experience an emotional roller coaster of a lifetime
/r/MGTOW01/06/20 01:28 AM
2

I think it was posted on the PurplePillDebate sub during a recent purge week but then taken down. FDS seems to hate men that are around the same age as them the most.
/r/MGTOW31/05/20 10:03 AM
1

I don't really pay attention to "red pill" salesmen anymore, they have admitted that a lot of their confidence trickster lifestyle coaching only works for a certain type of guy that women already find at least a bit attractive and that other guys that have always struggled with women cannot pull off being "alpha" and are better off pulling "beta" game on single mothers. As other people on these boards have said before, it's not just ignorance, it's also arrogance, because they proclaim to know w…
/r/MGTOW31/05/20 10:02 AM
5

"Let's see what you look like." "With looks like that, I doubt women care that you are going your own way." You are right, no arguments when these people debate mgtow, just insults and shaming tactics.
/r/MGTOW30/05/20 11:59 PM
16

That's debatable, but he doesn't look like the worst for someone his age either. Apparently you have to look a certain way in order for you to express opinions about women online that are not completely positive
/r/MGTOW30/05/20 10:56 PM
1

In response to your points 1.Probably true on issues like marijuana, gay marriage,but when it comes to the policies put forth, most of them seem to appeal to tradcons and the religious right (people that are all ready married) (for example, no stimulus check for people behind on alimony payments, loss of alimony deduction on taxes) https://www.marketwatch.com/story/new-tax-law-eliminates-alimony-deductions-but-not-for-everybody-2018-01-23 https://www.yourdailyjournal.com/news/93797/stimulus-chec…
/r/MGTOW23/05/20 06:48 PM
2

Not an original notion, even among politicians "Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat." - HRC https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/503123-women-have-always-been-the-primary-victims-of-war-women
/r/MGTOW23/05/20 06:08 PM
18

And when has that benefit of the doubt ever been extended to the MRM, mgtow, incels, or any other male oriented group online? This subreddit practically got quarantined because of guilt-by-association because vice reported on a us navy person that was planning an attack and cited this sub as inspiration.
/r/MGTOW23/05/20 06:25 AM
2

Yeah the more reasonable of radical feminists would tune out then. The less reasonable of them would prob double down and accuse you of blaming women and saying it's proof that sons hate their mothers. Can't really argue with such people (radical feminists), only point them out.
/r/MGTOW23/05/20 06:20 AM
3

True, but they would likely counter by pointing to the worst that men have to offer (robbers, rapists, terrorists)
/r/MGTOW23/05/20 05:46 AM
6

I didn't mean to say that harm would outweigh benefit from new technologies, although with all new technologies there are always unintended consequences that many inventors may not have forseen. I have a passion in it and believe it should be a big part of our future. If I had a lot of money I'd start a business in one of those industries. I feel like there's more benefit than harm. I feel there's also a huge market and need for it. I also feel it's highly lucrative. Plus it's a fun and innovati…
/r/MGTOW23/05/20 05:45 AM
3

And women are ruining the western world by voting for their own invasion from the third world Women, in general, do not seem to show a preference for third world men. Contrast how many women say they want to be the white man's whore versus how many want to be the afghan man's whore on social media. The incel community is majority ethnic and "justbewhite" is a common theory. Prostitution might slowly become legal, but recall that under conservative trump admin bipartisan legislation has cracked d…
/r/MGTOW23/05/20 05:13 AM
15

Maybe but don't try to invest all your hopes on that. Many predictions for the future have not panned out as a lot have hoped (space colonies and widespread flying cars may ring a bell)
/r/MGTOW23/05/20 05:10 AM
14

Regardless whether women do or do not crave violent and aggressive men, this post on pinkpillfeminism explicitly defended "forced slavery". Again though, not all that surprising considering feminists ally with racists and traditionalists when convenient for them. So much for the feminist quip that"scratch an MRA, find a racist/fascist".
/r/MGTOW23/05/20 03:49 AM
2

Yeah especially when posts like this are made on pinkpillfeminism: https://www.reddit.com/r/ITears/comments/goxvf7/context_on_pinkpillfeminism_post_justifying_men/
/r/MGTOW23/05/20 03:37 AM
39

I have never seen users on this subreddit say a fraction of what this user on pinkpillfeminism said and yet this sub is quarantined because of guilt-by-association and prevalence of "hateful" keywords. Also see context of this post:https://www.reddit.com/r/ITears/comments/goxvf7/context_on_pinkpillfeminism_post_justifying_men/
/r/MGTOW23/05/20 03:33 AM
5

These same subs criticized r/mensrights posts during the time MRAs were regularly called out on reddit and sometimes posted about arranging meet-ups between MRAs and feminists to stir-up drama. btw the subs you are referring to in your post are troll subs, so them talking about you does not necessarily indicate that you are taking "the most Flack when you are directly over the target."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/20 08:17 PM
1

Other than how this sub was quarantined due to both people mining it for "hateful" language and publishing a report on it, I recall this sub being quarantined because some navy guy cited this place as inspiration for an 'uprising' he was gonna carry out and also mentioning his dislike of jewish people. That in mind, it does not make a lot of sense to focus on judaism and the talmud when I am highlighting in this post that the people attacking your philosophy certainly aren't as anti-hateful as t…
/r/MGTOW20/05/20 01:00 AM
2

I'm not hating them back, just showcasing some comments from the people who seem to especially have it out for your philosophy (I remember this same guy was mocking guys who lost money to angry mgtow's crypto schemes). Just made this post to show that for as much as they accuse you people of being bigoted and hateful there are plenty of examples of that on their side of the aisle.
/r/MGTOW20/05/20 12:50 AM
2

Maybe but I think the people like these commenters in the screenshot are just out to mock people and come with whatever justifications it takes to attack people they don't like. Their own life doesn't necessarily have to be bad
/r/MGTOW20/05/20 12:38 AM
1

The thing is the responses from the anti-mgtow people have been dominating in the comments section and likes/dislikes, so they probably feel emboldened to go after your philosophy more now. Pretty hard not to respond to them when they start telling lies and associating some people's affections with sex dolls with pedophilia and extending that conclusion to this group like some of this guy's videos have done. The person who posted this is not explicitly promoted by youtube (probably because of th…
/r/MGTOW20/05/20 12:30 AM
1

Never helps because they just mock you and take what you say out of context. Part of me is hoping that the users that posted these comments see this and come to this place to respond so people can see what they're about. Haven't heard one unique, valid argument from them (that isn't adapted from co-opting ideas of this group to make fun of it) since this group was first getting attacked in 07. They are also increasingly falling back on the "you are ugly so everything you say is invalid" argument…
/r/MGTOW20/05/20 12:22 AM
3

Society: 'It's both and there is no contradiction. If you question this you might as well stop denying you are a misogynistic extremist.'
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/05/20 11:36 PM
1

The guy hosting the channel is non-white himself. They are getting "replaced" even in their own groups
/r/MGTOW19/05/20 11:28 PM
2

fr though, on reddit people constantly bring up mgtow when man vs woman issues come up. I have even seen people on "hatewatch" subreddits saying to spread the acronym so more people know about it, some of them are completely obsessed (although they would ironically say the same about this group)
/r/MGTOW19/05/20 10:41 PM
2

They're pretty hateful too, saying things like "mgtow vermin". See this guy's other comments on other videos. He claims he does not hate mgtows, but likes to lmfao at them (sure...). It is not that they are afraid, I agree with them when they say that. But they feel entitled to shut down discussions, else they think you deserve mockery and scorn. Too bad, it does just the opposite. And they would be better versed if they learned to argue in good faith instead of constantly putting up strawman ar…
/r/MGTOW19/05/20 10:03 PM
2

This guy (Don Shots) doesn't even see the irony in grouping incels and men who were divorced in the same sentences. And suddenly it's men's fault for getting left by their wives and they should have known better. Like it just comes down to: stop talking (even though I am going out of my way to intrude on your discussions on semi-anonymous message boards), and simps are bad, but we are not the simps, you are (because you are not doing as we tell you to; you are not entitled to speak). "Incels in …
/r/MGTOW19/05/20 09:59 PM
2

From the manufacturing imaginaries byline, probably a subtle jab by the vice writer trying to mock the MRAs complaining and bringing awareness to what the writer considers non-issues and implying that the MRAs are trying to live a lifestyle steeped in victimhood. (an internet search suggests that apparently imagineries are an actual term used in sociology). In other words, par for the course action by journalists priming the reader to dismiss any issues a group has that the writer is criticizing…
/r/MensRights15/05/20 08:29 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter