TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

petellapain Archive

View 3 posts and 639 comments by petellapain on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
41

Question For Womenpetellapain/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 04:44 AM
24

Question For Womenpetellapain/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 11:53 PM
12

Question For Womenpetellapain/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 05:46 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The only men having casual sex are having all of it because they are the absolute top men who are drowning in options. Average men are not having casual sex. They are in monogamous relationships or getting nothing at all. So this claim can only apply to an extremely small fraction of men who are actually getting laid like women can. Sure. Top tier men having casual sex with average women all fighting for him will treat those women like what they are: Average. This is seen by women as abuse
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 04:13 PM
1

Claims based on nothing but hot air and contempt for men. Ignored
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 04:25 PM
2

Political misogyny isn't real. No actual men are like this outside of migrants that you vote to be brought here. This is just a new made up classification used as an excuse to hate on men and depict them as evil monsters. Its all so tiresome
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 04:36 PM
0

I said sex, not approaching for an opportunity. Sex is mutually pleasurable. You cant argue that. Argue with what people say not made up gibberish
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 07:13 PM
5

Prostitutes do provide connection beyond a hole. Only people who condemn or never tried it think that it's just paying to hump a bored woman whos watching the clock. Most arrangements are simulations of relationships. And before you say its not real or its transactional, tell that to the beta bux who lost his approved relationship immediately after he hit hard times. Its all transactional anyway. For the average man who will never experience lust from a woman, paying is preferable to being settl…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 10:11 AM
6

It feels good to arrive at this conclusion early and enjoy pay 4 play in abundance over pining after women or doing the clown act with no results
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 10:05 AM
0

Sex is mutual pleasure. A man giving or spending money on a woman is unidirectioal . Thats why its worse
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 10:03 AM
1

What do you think the stats about zoomer women will prove? Who's point will those stats vindicate, yours or mine? Even if the ratio falls to 70% or 60% , I say most women want to and will eventually be mothers. Despite generations of antinatalist influence and pressure to be a girlboss, women still overwhelmingly choose motherhood.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 08:03 PM
1

Fair enough
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 07:58 PM
0

85% of women eventually become mothers. You are in a bubble.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 07:19 PM
0

I don't have to brainwash or convince anyone. I am not interested in controlling what women do. I am not even stressed about falling birth rates. But I enjoy stating obvious realities that shatter the minds of redditors. It amuses me. Women's biology is real and inescapable. Avoiding motherhood while acting like mothers to pets and other people in their lives to sate their instincts is an obvious maladaptation, aka a flaw. If observing this is misogyny, the term in functionally useless. Women ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 07:17 PM
-1

Women have common flaws. Noticing these flaws is not misogyny. Your argument boils down to cynicism, pessimism and outright denial of basic and extremely common familial bonds that permeate all civilizations. Just because zoomers living in crowded cities are isolated, socially maladjusted and nihilistic about everything doesn't mean those attitudes reflect wider societies. Most people still want to pair up, make more people and experience love. Calling that cringe and cope doesn't erase it. Just…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 05:20 PM
-2

The benefits of having children that you simply chose to ignore or reject as invalid: 1: children provide a target for womens innate maternal instincts. Without children, women treat pets or even peers as offspring to coddle, manage and dote over. Its overbearing and sad. Better for her to just make a person like she was designed to. Care in old age. Ideally, children raised by a loving mother grow up and take care of her in her old age. This is preferable to a nursing home full of strangers in …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 03:13 PM
–

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 07:35 PM
1

Promiscuity is not the problem. Womens behavior and who they are throwing it back for is the problem. A good example is that podcaster akassh Singh who's wife openly talks about how hot other men are in front of him, declares she wants to have an orgy with her friends husband because hes so hot, brags about how she had a roster of white frat boys in her college days. All while mocking her husband and complaining about his genitals. Humiliating and in no way beneficial to him even though she's ve…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 07:30 PM
1

Oh, so when you said men shouldn't ask women about their sexual past, you just meant you didn't want a man to ask you specifically about it. Your personal discomforts don't map onto everyone else in existence. Plenty of people have no problem talking about such things
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 10:07 AM
1

If a man asks, its because he wants an answer. Who are you do decide what some random couple talks about? Why is this relevant to the original claim that relationships are not a transaction of sex for commitment? This just feels like off topic yapping
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 08:44 AM
1

Neither of us will provide sources. We are both just spouting opinions. I won't bother to add a source for stating obvious things like human motivations or water being wet.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 11:59 PM
1

Point1 counter: men and women both knowingly enter relationships with the notion that he is getting sex and she is getting commitment. They have done this in large numbers for most of human history, regardless of what progressive people think they should do Point 2 counter: men bombarding women with questions about body count has nothing to do with the over all motivations behind why people enter relationships. Its a non sequitur. Point 3 counter: men might not get the sex they want. Women might…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 04:14 PM
9

This is all okay to desire and even makes sense. Its just a shame they require it and seem to lack the capacity to want normal men as they are at any reasonable range. I might desire a 9 with an hourglass body who's a gamer and a mens rights activist and also enjoys racist humor, a low body count but insatiable for only me somehow. But I accept such a contradictory woman is a fantasy. I can accept and even live with a typical feminist minded woman with air headed lefty opinions about anything, a…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 12:35 AM
5

Not enough to bother thinking about it. And the ones that do, don't want it from average guys. They want it with the hottest possible guys available to them
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/26 06:52 AM
3

Just don't pay. Just don't get used. Just don't do anything. There are people who live this way. They are called terminally online. Actually operating in the physical world among other people required putting one self out there to some degree and trusting others to not take advantage. Telling people to just not do anything is useless insight
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 07:49 PM
8

I searched for the great benefit in this very post and couldn't find it. Spending money on women who sit on their phones? Planning and setting up dates to have to navigate barriers and set boundaries? They might be nice looking in person? Did you relate to any of them? Was even a single one charming or pleasant? It might be time to admit that the very idea of dating is no benefit to men or women
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 02:18 AM
1

Yes. It will never go away. The only thing that goes away is the options or leverage to enjoy that variety.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 10:04 PM
2

A lifetime of observing who women cling to vs who they say they want. Seeing who women lust after vs who women appreciate in non sexual ways
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 05:47 PM
-1

Women don't feel sexual attraction for wholesome respectful men
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 12:47 AM
-13

This sounds great. But I can't believe you feel attracted to a man like that. I'm sure you could love and appreciate him. But never lust after him, which is important
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 01:40 AM
0

It's common for people to pretend to have no idea what extremely common things are in order to gaslight you. This is one such example
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 08:55 PM
1

It's a perfectly useful term that highlights a real problem that men should steer clear of. This idea that it will somehow backfire makes no sense because women aren't being ran through by normal sesnisible men. It can't stop if it never began. Men should steer clear of women who get ran through by Chad and then try to settle down with normal men for financial and or emotional support plus illegitimate child rearing. That's what the term ran through is about
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 11:01 PM
1

There's an easy way to disprove this. The dating delusion calculator. Selecting for a woman of from 18 to 50, any height, any or no income, any race, not married, non smoker, non obese. This nets 15% of women in the US. Take the stat with a grain of salt. But most men will go for this
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 01:26 AM
3

There's another big difference. The ratio of excluded men is much much greater now. To the point where it will be more than an abstract inconvenience
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 11:24 PM
1

Enough of this. Quit trying to make straight guys act gay. It's not going to catch on. Save it for the yaoi books
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 10:41 PM
1

Making up evil intentions and projecting them onto other people can be fun. But don't get carried away
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 12:29 AM
-2

I'm speaking your language
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 08:42 PM
0

No,it's because of the stuff I said, not the stuff you just made up and put in my mouth.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 08:41 PM
1

They are exploiting male lonliness and libido. Porn stars contribute to a larger industry and also physically have sex with a man so at least someone is getting off. They get a pass. Doesn't have to make sense. That's my goon logic
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 08:27 PM
0

The women themselves are worse and expect more. That's the failing. The latest batch of women have no domestic skills, think listening to a man in oppression, weigh more than men, won't have kids until late 30s, and only bring college debt to the relationship. Wanting better men is not wrong. Being bottom tier as a woman while wanting better men is wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 12:58 AM
1

Classic backhanded woman compliment. Now, back to sitting on my human furniture slaves whom I have no empathy for
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 11:13 PM
1

I actually like women's innate vanity. Like when they take and post pictures of themselves constantly or adjust their appearance in the mirror. Their preoccupation with fashion, makeup and adornment. It's very female and different from how men think to the point where it is charming. Dimorphism is hot
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 11:12 PM
2

Men and women are going to do what they can get away with. We are long past believing that anyone is being ethical. You can objectify women all you want if you are rich and hot enough. Women will require you to do so, in fact
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 09:04 PM
3

This is never going to be anything more than cope. Lack of decent relationship options doesn't make being single good for men starved of touch and connection, which is any sane man who isn't a monk. Both male and female internet gender war sides try to convince their infantry that attrition and isolation so preferable to being together. This is getting to be like claiming starvation is better than having a messy kitchen full of junk food and dirty dishes. No. Having food is better. Having someon…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 07:17 PM
10

Women do not want to date. They want attention. Matches on apps and messages they don't respond to is attention. Getting chatted up at a dating event is attention. They are getting what they want. You aren't. They win.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 03:08 AM
2

Of course men want companionship. Charming, pleasant companionship. Flirting, curiosity, warmth, validation. Not nagging, "challenging"(constant snark), tension, emotional manipution, passive aggression. Men's experience with women will determine whether they think the companionship is worth the trouble
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 03:06 AM
4

If the attraction is mutual, two people are in eachothers league. If not, someone is outside of the others league. It's not complicated just because some people have insane takes about it. Simple math makes sense even though lots of people are bad at math
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 01:57 AM
2

Women don't have to generate attraction, so they are not in a position to declare what does and doesn't work. They can hardly diagnose their own attraction to men who abuse them. Men are on their own in this regard. Experimenting with mindsets and failing is still preferable to listening to women about attracting women
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 09:03 PM
1

You don't. I already disagreed with the premise of the post. But I understand what the goal was
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 09:00 PM
4

Shallow women don't just exist. They comprise most women. Such that there's no need to distinguish them from mythical non shallow women
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 02:47 AM
8

The goal isn't walking away with the upper hand. The goal is attracting a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 02:45 AM
2

This just leads to sterile interaction. Desire, tension and polarity have to also be present when approaching women. Otherwise you end up with a platonic friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 02:45 AM
3

Pointless experiment. 100 other experiments show decent looking normal men with pictures of them being wholesome and normal, no glaring issues, zero matches. Even more experiments where women design male profiles they think women will like and get no matches
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 10:59 PM
1

This has the cadence of ai, but they are valid points. This is also why a man always has a small dick and never could last or never gave her an orgasm according to the ex only after a nasty breakup. The sex was amazing when she was in love. After she hates him, it retroactively becomes terrible
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 10:32 PM
3

Incredible how an obscure internet ideology based on falsehood managed to bring a fake behavioral pattern that no woman adhere to into mainstream discussion, all while women presumably chose good men as partners the whole time. Does that seem even remotely plausible to you? Are you going to pretend that, while using reddit, you have no experience on tik tok and other apps seeing women complain about wanting to be taken, wanting men to be mean, ignore them, or have tattoos and criminal tendencies…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 10:29 PM
–

This was so specific, personal and mean-spirited I thought it was Lilith of Babylon at first lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 10:10 PM
2

Yet you are aware of how commonly women openly express their attraction for bad men. Unless you are isolated in a bubble of just your bi friends who only like good people, and you just aquired a smart phone yesterday with no prior knowledge of intenet discussion of sex, dating and relationships for the last 20 years. That's the only way you could act surprised to hear women are attracted to bad men. Not you specifically. Not your special wholesome bi friends. Women in general
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 10:07 PM
20

Just because something is offensive doesn't make it false. Even if I wasn't an unapologetic gooner male, I could dispassionately observe the porn industry, sex work, strip clubs, general male response to seeing a woman's body or body parts and conclude that male sexuality is much more visual and straightforward than women's. Women's sexuality is more conditional. That's why most of them get off from books that establish absurd power dynamics with giant evil rich monster man who magically has a s…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 10:00 PM
2

"My personal experience invalidates this known pattern" is the most consistent non argument women make. You might like a sweet man. You might even know a second woman who loves a sweet man. But you and I both know and have seen so much universal expression of female revulsion of sweet men that it's impossible to ignore the rule for the exception. Not talking about fake nice guys or weirdos. Women explain men that are perfect and thoughtful and yet their panties are dry and they crave abusive exe…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 09:49 PM
2

Humiliation and abuse is exciting and addictive. Flowers and morning texts are boring and gross. It's not a matter of right and wrong. It's about what works and what doesn't
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 11:10 PM
10

Courting and simp behavior is repulsive to women as demonstrated by how women consistently lose interest and desire for men who do it. Men want to treat women well. Women require men to treat them poorly in order to get turned on. It's a lamentable situation for everyone
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 10:21 PM
1

The question was specifically about being penetrated, not sex. Obviously you know this but I'll spell it out. Since men have the dick and women have the snatch, penetration is something that is good when the man is doing the penetrating, to a woman, who is being penetrated, by the man. Go ahead and pretend not to understand or say 'but what about this other orientation'. My answer remains the same
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 10:18 PM
-1

It's good for women, bad for men. Yes, double standards. Yes, unequal
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 06:36 PM
–

Every mainstream reddit sub will validate your views on how immense an issue is misogyny and how terrible men are. There are a hand full of subs where people disagree. That small handful of subs is what you take issue with. Amazing.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 03:35 AM
–

If patriarchy is simply men's ability to form governments, do things and build things, aka power, how exactly can anyone fault the patriarchy for existing. It's asking men to either not exist or not be capable of having agency just because they naturally posses a greater ability to navigate reality relative to women through no fault of their own. Even if patriarchy exists by definition, it is pointless to condemn or oppose it. Men will never not being bigger, stronger, with male brains compelled…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/26 09:01 PM
1

One year as a mid and I would be financially free as a woman. I've seen what men pay and I know how to cash in on thirst. The only reason all woman 5 and above aren't wealthy is poor business sense
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 01:41 AM
15

Why are people obligated to believe that men can be evil enough to rape, but women could never be evil enough to lie? This isn't a problem about confusion or mixed up terms. The fact is that women can and have lied to destroy men. Its as real an occurrence as men raping women. Both sexes can be evil. No, you don't have the ability to tally up exactly how many more or less of one sex is vile in order to win an argument on reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 04:47 PM
–

Because marriage material means not loved. It means tolerated for practical reasons. Thats why dudes complain. Its an insult
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 04:39 PM
–

Just be an extremely extroverted dj party host with a drug addiction that will cut your lifespan short, bro Its reasonable for ordinary men who don't live flashy lives to also want love.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 03:00 PM
–

There's got to be something in between 1000 concubines and 1 used up wife. I think the modern guy fantasy is to have participated in hookup culture at least a tenth as much as most women do, then settle down with a woman who is his looksmatch. Thats reasonable, yet impossible for most men
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 02:57 PM
1

If you read the thread, you'd know I was literally referring to a body part, not a woman. You had your own preconceptions and filtered what you saw through those. Common when arguing from bad faith. You won't manage to police how I use words or prove anything by calling out a single out of context comment from an unrelated thread. I never claimed sex work was sunshine and roses. It has its problems and draw backs. What I said was that its the only system that works. Its far better than standard …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 10:41 PM
1

So you dug through my history to read back a comment from a random discussion. To prove what exactly? If you don't know what you're talking about, you don't have to resort to reddit snark. You can just be silent
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 10:30 PM
–

You could replace fat with any other adjective and you would still be correct. Every type of women has an easier time getting sex and relationships than the equivalent type of man.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 10:23 PM
1

Spoken like someone who doesn't actually know what sex work is like between providers and clients. And possibly no knowledge of the vast difference in physiological reaction to sex vs masturbation. You may not be in a position to talk about this at all
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 10:22 PM
2

There should be cultural shame around the humiliation ritual that is standard courtship in the modern age. Sex work is the only thing that actually functions properly. Clear transactions, no getting used, no situationships no friendzones. Removing shame around sex work will allow men and women to be more honest about what they really want and need from eachother
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 10:18 PM
0

It needs to be destigmatized as well. After the culture of shame and condemnation around it is gone, men can get their needs met and go about their lives without having to sneak around in shame
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 07:07 PM
8

Your definition of 'anything' is rigged so that nothing they did counts even when evidence of their actions and efforts are right in front of you. Your intentions here are purely to annoy, not understand or discuss anything
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 06:53 PM
6

If I documented the immense endeavors that they put forth in that time period into a comment, no one would read it. You were going to dismiss them no matter what they did. You never had any intention of understanding mens issues or what was done about them. You wanted to be spiteful on reddit. Thats easy enough without pretending to be concerned
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 06:42 PM
8

What you are showing is that you knew mras actually did do a lot for mens issues, even though you claimed they never did. And now you just want to argue more about nit pick details and semantics. Every single time
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 06:39 PM
18

Mras went hard in the paint in 2013 through 2016. Large conferences. Government petitions . Viral campaigns about divorce law, suicide, and other mens issues. They were mocked relentlessly, condemned by mainstream media. Earl Silverman famously ended himself after a years long endeavor to establish the only mens shelter for domestic violence in existence but was demolished by feminist activists. The world loudly responded to organizing for mens issues with vitriol. So it died out
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 04:26 PM
9

The Effect of Cosmetic Surgery on Sexual Self-Esteem: Attitudes toward Body Image and Well-Being in Married Women - PMC https://share.google/QpUCyT1xRzB7Meqv9 I never cite sources here because no one actually changes their mind about anything. But here you go. Drastic changes to physical appearance radically change people's sense of well being. Less anxiety, greater motivation to live better. Waking up in chads body would instantly solve 90% of average man's problems and make him happy
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 11:46 AM
24

There was a post yesterday asking where women want to be approached. Most women replied that they didn't want to be approached at all be men they didn't know. Only men they were familiar with. Those men will also be rejected, but they aren't allowed to be hurt by it because then the women will claim the man had ulterior motives all along. Do you get it now? Its rigged. If you are not Chad, women have decided that your genetic line must end and you must live untouched until you expire.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 11:15 PM
2

I got nagged by a mod for mentioning appearance on this thread. Apparently that is called "looksposting" and isn't allowed outside of predesignated spaces. So I can't even explain anything further without getting banned. Sorry
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 11:07 PM
6

We fundamentally disagree on this. We both know of examples that confirm our biases. Theres no way to reconcile this
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 04:37 PM
17

The existence of hard definitions aren't relevant when people using the words so commonly retool them however they see fit in the moment. There are no official word police to ensure people use words correctly. So most often, people use these words in inconsistent ways. Like calling hot guys confident no matter what they do and calling confidence arrogance when displayed by someone they dont like
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 04:36 PM
11

You replaced what I said with bizzare gibberish that in no way relates to what I said. I never suggested putting on a show in the moment. I am declaring that the behavior does not matter. Being physically hot matters. Behavior is used by women as a justification later when asked why they liked a hot guy
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 04:22 PM
5

You are assuming women use words with hard definitions and concrete rules in mind. Any adult understands that women communicate vibes and feelings, not hard facts or definitions. Especially when talking about attraction. They use the same words men use to convey very different things. An average hieght, visually unremarkable man with adequate grooming and hygiene will utterly repulse a woman if he behaves with the body language and attitude if a tall hot guy with top tier genetics. But because w…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 04:16 PM
13

None of that is relevant in the context of men approaching women. Women don't actually judge confidence, competence or any of it when choosing men. Thats my point. It is most important to be hot. The justification for liking the man will be made around that single factor. If the hot guy struts around and looks people in the eye, confidence becomes the retroactive reason women give for wanting him.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 04:10 PM
14

Just approaching a woman in a friendly flirty manner. Confident when Chad does it. Gross when Eugene does it. Same words same body language different result
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 02:04 PM
–

Observing the misdirection and gaslighting over this subject is eye opening. What seems to be happening is women perceive the behavior of hot guys to be attractive. They call this behavior confidence. Without connecting that behavior to the hotness, women say they like men who behave in that way. So non-hot guys emulate that behavior. But Without the hotness to accompany it, it no longer is perceived as attractive by women. Lacking any self awareness, women must then redefine the non-hot guy's b…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 01:01 PM
5

Of course its a lilithpost. Half way through the sentence I could sense that comically unhinged tone. I must always point out that anything remotely unfriendly said about women as a group without endless caveats is nuked by mods, but you can declare the most brain rotted things about men after listening to tik tok airheads moaning because Chad didn't like their insta reel. This isn't even possible to debate because it's too senseless to be falsifiable
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 09:22 PM
–

Thats the expected dynamic in passport bro relationships and all normal non western confused progressive relationships. Men want to be providers and aren't interested in womens money
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 06:31 AM
15

Ai has made reddit debate even more insufferable than it already was. You can instantly tell when someone is using it
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 09:50 AM
1

Thats a huge reach with a lot of assumptions and no data. Its not possible to prove or disprove. Everyone is on social media telling eachother all sorts of things. Men included. Men are telling other men to get ripped and rich like Andrew Tate. Doesn't mean its happening. Women telling women to get the bag and reject men isn't necessarily translating to irl results. Male sexelessness has risen, im saying its not a direct result of women comissersting online. Its due to other factors like both se…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 08:13 PM
3

Women's social circles of other women and male sexlessness are completely unrelated. Can you stay on topic
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 07:58 PM
3

Wow. Guys with no friends problem is that they don't have friends and aren't good at making friends. Another galaxy brained take from the infamous Lilith
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 07:00 PM
3

Man its crazy what deranged pablum mods allow to get posted. I wouldn't care if not for the fact that my posts always get censored and I dont say anything nearly as unhinged as this
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 06:52 PM
1

Most men have the self awareness to know where they rank physically and how women will respond to an approach from them. They are also aware that women want to be approached not only for potential relationships but also for the opportunity to reject men and boost their own ego. This humiliation ritual is not something men are interested in participating in
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 06:51 PM
5

That distinction is shrinking to the point of irrelevance. Women's brains are fried by apps. They are more awkward and introverted than generations before them. Their natural instincts for heard unity can't overcome modernity
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 06:47 PM
–

If you can't see how every single woman, including low quality women, having high standards could ever be a bad thing, you haven't given it any thought at all. Even the most surface level examination of such a principle would immediately reveal problems. You didn't put any effort into this post. But because its flattering to women, mods will allow it. Here is an obvious example of why all women having high standards would be a bad thing: it leads directly to isolation of both men and women who a…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 03:29 PM
13

Women finally stopped calling themselves the table and now you want them to refer to themselves as the finish line? Enough. Hot young women are attainable by top tier men. Average women get average men. As long as everyone agrees, things won't collapse. When average women demand top tier men or nothing, it all unravels. That simple
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 08:45 PM
7

Any theory that doesn't factor womens behavior into the equation isn't a serious theory. Women aren't just experiencing things. Modern dating isn't a phenomenon that is acting upon women as passive victims of it
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 09:29 PM
–

We are still not quite at the point where its that bleak. Almost half of zoomers aren't dating, but the 4 generations before them still pair up at a high rate. Clearly both sexes offer enough to merit the trouble despite the internet frying everyone's brains and turning them against eachother over vapid topics like icks and flags
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/25 11:11 PM
1

Even when given the olive branch of "both sexes suffer", some people of both sexes will still say "but we have it worse and the other sex is trash". There will always be mean and obstinate rage baiters especially in this space
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/25 11:07 PM
–

I would accept any of those if I thought women had the capacity to hold up their end of the bargain( they don't and you know it)
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 10:34 PM
3

Whether she has access to him has no relevance to what she is attracted to. Billions of women lust after celebrity men they will never meet. This isn't even a bad point. Its an anti-point
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 01:48 AM
3

Ill bite. Assuming you aren't dead from the waist down, you enjoy some sort of smut. The guys in your smut are hot and dangerous. You could not fantasize and get off to anything else. In fact, no woman has even thought to write erotica about an affable everyman who asks permission to kiss the female lead. Women feel the need to argue this because being like everyone else in any way makes them feel diminished. There's nothing wrong with it. Even when you want intimacy and connection, you want it …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 01:47 AM
0

No contradiction there. Its a tall hot dangerous confident guy who texts you back. Don't be obtuse. I can keep adding traits but its the same type of guy. Not average. Not short. Not timid. Not boring. Zero women want that guy no matter how unique and different from other women they are. You understand my point
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 01:43 AM
1

I am, by virtue of the most basic pattern recognizing abilities, the spokesperson for all women. Yes. When i tell you that you want a tall confident man who texts you back, I am speaking for you. You can argue for the sake of arguing. But it doesn't change reality
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 08:56 PM
0

I am, by virtue of the most basic pattern recognizing abilities, the spokesperson for all women. Yes. When i tell you that you want a tall confident man who texts you back, I am speaking for you. You can argue for the sake of arguing. But it does change reality
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 08:56 PM
7

All of those different types of women need sleep and water to survive. Just because people can vary a bit doesn't mean they are endlessly unique. Everyone overlaps to some degree. All of those types of women want a man who is taller. None of them want a homeless down syndrome man. Some generalizations are obvious and true. All of these women, regardless of how special they are, want a very narrow type of man
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 08:54 PM
14

The cornerstone of all dating advice is helping average and below average men cope. Thats all it is. Nothing these men do or don't do will generate attraction in women but this obvious fact has to be supressed for some bizzare reason. The average man shouldn't cold approach, or join hobbies to try and date, or try to flirt in his social group, or start out as friends, or anything else. None of that will be effective because he is average and average is now repulsive to women. The first thing he …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 04:16 PM
9

Both the spring break women and the shut in knitters have the same sexuality. They both react the same way to the hot dangerous guy and the average guy. So the other differences are irrelevant in this contexts. Billions of women one type of sexuality. Zero women crave average men sexually. Its not a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 01:47 PM
2

Nobody googles anything anymore. This insistence that men shouldn't have birth control because they won't use it is a desperate gambit to prevent them from having the access and options that women have. Its not women's business to decide how many men will or won't use it. It is as much mens right to it as it is womens right to have access to the pill or the dozens of methods they have, whether women decide to use it or not
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 01:42 PM
1

If all men refused or dropped out, there would be no trial data. You just like to dump on men, but in reality men are generally sensible to opt into a side effect- free bc. Women will shriek bitterly about it, not because men are proven to never try male birth control, but because women desire unilateral control over reproduction. If I wanted to be as cynical as you are, I would say its because women want to be able to lock men into parenthood, using the state to forcefully clean resources and k…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 04:05 PM
4

Can you complete that thought? Which men? Why do they walk away? If they had the option to switch of their infertility with no side effects, would they do that, or just keep making kids and walking away? Are you assuming men are just evil morons who want to make kids and leave them?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 05:34 PM
6

You probably mess with it on all sorts of other ways. Micro plastics, modern diet, proximity to devices that send various waves through everyone's body. Unless you are going out of your way to optimize sperm production all the time by living off the grid, there is no escape. If you are sexually active and don't want to constantly risk making kids, there's no reason not to take the easily reversible off switch procedure
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 05:32 PM
10

Why would men, who buy condoms in the millions and suffer catastrophic financial loss if they impregnate a woman since they have no reproductive rights, choose not to take a minimally invasive procedure with no side effects that switches fertility off for a decade.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 03:48 PM
3

I have known about vaselgel since 2014. Disapointing that its still in the trial phase. Of course I would take it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 03:42 PM
1

Women don't want men to be honest about their intentions. They want control over mens intentions. Unattractive men should have platonic sexless friend- favor doer intentions. Potential husbands should have generous intentions to be devoted and wait potentially indefinitely before holding hands. Chad should be forward and ravish women immediately
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 10:33 PM
7

So far, silicone dolls can't simulate body temperature, a heart beat, spontaneous realistic interaction and other human womanly charms that cause a woman's company to be nourishing on a physical and psychological level. Its worth mentioning that men need loving women who are not terrible, not just any women Oh also offspring
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 10:26 PM
–

That last post was a wild, old english manifesto. It had too much style and audacity for the mods to allow it. Things have to be boring and inoffensive here. I liked the post by the way
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/25 10:26 PM
–

He definitely ran his rant through chat gpt and told it to give it a Shakespeare high fantasy tone and make it sound over the top. Its meme bait
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/25 06:01 PM
–

God tier copy pasta. Too bad no one has s sense of humor around here
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/25 05:16 PM
1

Money. Attention. Resources. Favors. Protection. Status. A position in a company. Fame. A role in a film. Depending on the man, a woman can gain anything she can dream of by sleeping with him. This is extremely common. Possibly even more common than women gaining things by any other means
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/25 02:50 PM
-1

Women are kinda fried beyond saving unfortunately. They are convinced average men are beneath them and that relationships are oppression. Men can at least get passports and pair up with foriegn women that haven't been raised in this bizzare culture. Its the only option left
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 09:44 PM
2

Because womens behavior and actions bear it out over and over. Genuinely good men look like betas and clowns because of how their women treat them. If women treated good guys well other men would envy their relationship and want to emulate it. Women themselves admit they love their beta good guys but struggle to desire them sexually. Men aren't imagining that
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 11:57 AM
1

Another example wherein being hot negates all of this. Hot guys can be selfish, uncooperative and antisocial. Still going to be drowning in women. Average guys must be selfless, kind, healed, gone through therapy just to still get left on read because he gives women the ick
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 09:47 AM
4

Bad men as in abusive and violent men are rare compared to the vast majority of men. But when you use woman power to broaden the definition of bad to include toxicity, which is just anything that inconveniences you in the slightest, then all men become bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 11:34 PM
1

Easy. Women fear mens collective force. Women don't fear the average individual man's force. No contradiction
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 01:01 PM
2

Not everyone wants to do anything. But men obviously have to choose what they want and then do what's required to get it whether they want to or not. Adulthood 101
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 06:32 PM
0

The world exploits male sexuality, it doesn't cater to it. Showing men sexy women for a price a la strip clubs, only fans etc is using male sexuality to glean resources and attention from those men. Catering to male sexuality would involve some degree of gratification; ie actual sex. This definitely isn't happening on any large scale
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 06:30 PM
3

Clown behavior that even modern American women will despise you for deep down. The only game in town is the passport bro game. Don't bring them back to the states either. Live abroad and wife up a foreign. Make lots of kids. This is the only viable win state for a man who wants to avoid extinction
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 05:58 PM
0

I am saying its worse because the rates of marriages, birthrates, and men approaching women are all dropping rapidly. Everyone who uses apps hate it. Everyone complains about dating. You've never heard a person in the last 10 years say they are having a good time looking for love. Thats because it sucks for almost everyone. The people pairing up happily have become the minority
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 04:58 PM
0

You could be forgiven if you are new to the sub. But no one talks about lgbt stuff. Here, it has widely been understood and assumed that the conversations and debates here are about straights and only straights. Subs for non straight dating are very clearly marked with rainbow stuff. Why? Because thats the way it is. Vast majority of people are straight and they don't want to make a wall of text specifying that they are referring to the majority every time they say something
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 02:07 PM
3

Because its not relevant to the subject. This sub is not about everything. Its about heterosexual relationships and dating. So its a given that when someone talks about dating they are speaking from the perspective of straight people and not all that other stuff
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 01:34 PM
6

Dating in the sense we are talking about has only been around for a century and a half. The selling and arranged marriages were not dating. It wasn't a thing yet. Starting from the mid to late 1800s till now, right now is the worse time
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 01:10 PM
15

You take things to such a cartoonish level that I could never get away with. All my rage bait disingenuous posts get nuked by mods, but you get to post slop like this multiple times a day and get high engagement. Im honestly jealous. When men say they can't be vulnerable, they mean getting caught crying even once in front of their woman causes an irreversible drop in sexual attraction that the woman herself will openly admit to
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 07:47 PM
0

If average men were getting laid no one would have a problem with it. The problem is women are getting piped a lot by very few men and then hiding it to appear chaste. Its the lie compounded with the lopsided distribution of tail that causes resentment
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 02:15 PM
1

None of this moralizing and feelings changes that video games are a business and appealing to the men who buy them leads directly to success while appealing to the non existent modern audience leads directly to failure <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 12:27 AM
1

The evidence can be right in front of you but you would refuse to believe it. Thats your prerogative
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/25 01:37 PM
1

The success of games like stellar blade along with the failure of games like concord demonstrate this is false. Men and women both like hot women. Angry man-hating feminist hr hags spurned both male and female gamers by filling western videogames with ugly women and then closing down studios with mass layoffs after those games flopped. All the receipts are out in the open
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/25 11:39 PM
11

Men are referring to what women do, NOT what they say. Women might say things like the bar is on the floor or all they want is a man who isn't a [explitive]. What women do is reject, ghost or pass on men who are all green flags, get the ick over something trivial, and become hopeless femsimps for hot dangerous guys. There are too many examples of this such that it is universal
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/25 05:45 PM
11

All the self improvement stuff does is give you a slight advantage during first impressions since you will look more put together. If I were still trying to be a normie (I just hire pros now) I would just maximize interacting with women. Everyday, build contacts and be around them. Initiate with strangers. Get the reps in. You gain social proof. Shed the loner haze and all of that access eventually yields one or 2 women who will join you in bed. The issue with this method is its a ton of effort …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 09:38 PM
1

Responding to you is like clicking on an ad about winning a free ps5. I'm the fool for engaging
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 09:01 PM
1

You are proving my point. This is exhausting. Essentially you find the worst examples of male behavior to justify vilification of other men who aren't really a problem at all. You conflate different types of men into one composite of villain. The guy who likes hentai is not the guy who doxes or harrasseses women. Own the fact that you just dislike men no matter how bad or good or neutral they are
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 08:26 PM
1

You simply diverted attention to other things. This doesn't invalidate my claim that women demonstrate hatred for male sexuality. As to your claims about men defending men when bothering women, I won't deny or argue it. But it's not relevant to this particular post
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 04:37 PM
1

Women demonstrate their hatred for male sexuality when they find men who aren't bothering women or doing anything that could harm or annoy women even indirectly, invade their entertainment hobbies because they have fictional hot women in them, call the men gooners and predators, and take action to censor and sanitize that content. Thats a major example of outright hatred of male sexuality. All while those same women nut to morning glory milking farm smut novels
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 02:06 PM
-2

Relationships are already transactional. Non passport bro relationships are in no way more noble or morally just. To Americans aren't in a relationship out of wholesome goodness or whatever either. Where does this argument even come from
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 01:08 PM
4

I bothered to spout my opinion like everyone else. I didn't mean posting anything was fruitless. I meant giving lengthy explanations to you because you demanded it was fruitless
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 08:04 AM
5

I have in the past. It was fruitless. I have nothing to gain and im not a character out of the little rascals who can be baited by 'betcha can't do it' taunts
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 08:59 PM
4

I put varying degrees of effort from post to post. We both interact now and again. I will not always provide lengthy explanations. Especially to you, who is notorious for aggressively misinterpreting everything men say.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 08:47 PM
10

I lifetime of having eyes and ears. People are seriously lacking in life experience it seems
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 04:16 PM
13

It is also said by anyone who casually observes women's dating habits, regardless of whether they are seeking superficial or any other type of woman
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 04:03 PM
3

On this sub, it's appropriate to establish that sex is a high priority in dating for men. It's not the reason men do everything all the time. It's just relevant to the debates on this sub. It's especially neccessary to remind women how important it is to men since women take it for granted that men want sex while also selectively forgetting it or not understanding that it's a part of what a man want from them while courting
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 09:43 PM
1

Demonstrably and hilariously false
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 08:44 AM
1

I will add another element to make my point relevant: male libido. I thought it went without saying. But men desire sex more frequently and are to some degree shaped by their pursuit of sex as a top 3 priority after immediate survival and food. Getting it is extremely rewarding for men. Getting regular can lead to taking it for granted, but it's still far better than struggling to get any. Such that claiming guys who get laid aren't even enjoy the sex itself is necessarily wrong. Men's bodies ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 09:39 PM
1

That sounds contradictory. If the thrill is what the guy was looking for, than he really does like casual sex. Sex with the same person multiple times becomes not casual and thus not thrilling. Even so, the man wouldn't trade this life for the average chump who isn't getting any. The men who can get laid are not envious of the men who can't, ever
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 07:12 PM
65

The reason men place so much value on sex is because they have 15 x more testosterone and produce a massive about of sperm which contributes to a much higher libido and a far more frequent desire for sexual release. All other theories are yapping
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 07:09 PM
-2

Men are less affected, but admitting this does not serve women, so you won't find any agreement on this subject. It serves women more to insist that there is no difference between the sexes, regardless of evidence to the contrary
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 04:27 PM
9

Same place as everyone else on reddit. Anecdotes and general observation
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 09:04 AM
-2

I didn't say every man can successfully channel libido. That requires some degree of self governance. But obviously men vary at this. Plenty of high libido men are not mindless gooners. They focus on improving themselves and building families or businesses or whatever else. Without the libido they would be low energy, unmotivated
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 09:14 PM
7

That's because of looks. I will not elaborate because it will be considered unkind. I will say that just because a woman is easy to bed does not mean every man necessarily will want to do it again
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 09:11 PM
-3

Women's productivity does not match that of men's. It's not even close. Men's libido is uniquely tied to humanities advancement. Women can organize files and thrive in a cubicle. The sky scrapers, rockets and ai is built overwhelmingly by men
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 09:08 PM
13

We might be talking past eachother here. When I say getting nothing out of it, I mean literally never getting laid. You might think i mean having sex and feeling used or empty like women. Thats not the case with men. Again, a small minority of men are actually hooking up. For those men, its awesome. The other 90 percent of men are getting nothing as in not hooking up, getting left on read. Blue balls. Celibate. Nothing
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 07:13 PM
2

You're looking at a single aspect of a multifaceted element like male libido and unilaterally deciding it must be eliminated. This is immature and undercooked thinking. Male libido also contributes to creating, building, and obviously reproducing. If you are anti natalist amd nihilistic than there's no point in saying so. But almost no one sees it your way
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 07:11 PM
2

Desire needs to be integrated, not eliminated. It has been channeled into motivation and creativity. Without it, men lose all zest. Its not worth eliminating entirely just because it is inconvenient to get hit on
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 06:11 PM
4

Because people aren't robots that do and say exactly what you think makes sense. Everything people say and do is filtered through years of social influence, ego development, trauma, avoidance and other factors. You are no exception
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 06:09 PM
6

What do you mean by do it? Get rejected at bars? Swipe on dating apps and get zero matches? Probably due to biological drives and desperation. But participation is drying up gradually so guys are finally giving up over time.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 06:07 PM
50

The few men who can actually participate in hook up culture enjoy it. The other 90% of men resent it since it does nothing for them
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 04:45 PM
4

Good write up. Even though it doesn't prove anything outside of that particular site, its yet another example of a redpill 101 principle. Over decades of these examples from various niches and clusters of women, there's never a single group of women who all want submissive men. Its always the same thing
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 01:22 PM
2

It's more a matter of convenience and variety. I can land an average chick with game. I could never land multiple 9s at will no matter how much game or courage I have. But I can just pay to smash 9s. It's great btw
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 09:19 PM
5

There's a lot of info here, but gaining weight is the primary barrier to you getting a relationship if everything else stayed the same. If you look like a woman and are in public, men will find you and try to court you even in 2025. You not rejecting them is another matter entirely
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 03:15 PM
0

2 completely different types of men both somehow shooting themselves in the foot for having opposing values about promiscuity
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 10:48 PM
1

Most women don’t understand men or even themselves for that matter (and therefore by extension, the true nature of women), because they have low self-awareness and truth preference. They understand other women in so much as how other women are manipulative because they have some self-awareness of their own manipulativeness, but beyond that are generally ill qualified to speak. Their all encompassing consumption with their feelings makes them passionate and self-absorbed, but insufficiently analy…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 03:56 PM
12

Angry hot guys get women. Spiteful hot guys get women. Boring hot guys who don't know how to have fun and connect get women. Ugly guys with no temper who have fun and good social skills are celibate. People will write whole essays attempting to deny this.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 08:27 AM
11

Applies to hot guys only. What you were experiencing was women fishing for attention from you, not necessarily being into you
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 07:10 PM
1

The burden for women is very high when they are actually attracted to the man they are with and are trying to keep him. Since this scenario is so rare and most women in relationships are merely using men they are luke warm to as placeholders, it seems like the burden is low or non existent. The distinction between these different sorts of relationships is important
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/25 08:38 AM
3

Women don't care and have no reason to do anything about it. They'll just hold out for the best men or be alone. The best men have no incentive to make dating more fair for average men. Average men have no leverage to do anything about it. Explain why it should be addressed and by whom
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 07:13 PM
–

The average western men earning 50k annually are wealthy by global standards. Plus men aren't interested in 50 50 relationships until its imposed on them by secular feminist rules that foreign women don't push. Its only for western women who compete with men for jobs and try to be girl bosses. Otherwise men are happy to be the breadwinner. In every way, pursuing foreign women is the best option for western men. Whether the men relocate or bring the women back. Foreign women aren't raised in the …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 06:10 PM
–

Good point. Thats why getting a passport is the optimal strategy. Foreign women don't need to be convinced to change. They are already compatible with normal western men
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 11:24 AM
2

Being attracted to anything besides a hot guy is a status symbol for women. Unfortunately, it's never true.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 07:28 PM
4

Alright everyone this person is scared and finds these discussions scary and wierd. They also confirmed that all "normal" people don't think or talk about this stuff because of how wierd and scary it is. Let's pack it up and shut the sub down. All we needed to do was touch grass. Nothing to see here. Is that the reaction you were hoping for?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 11:01 AM
4

You know an alpha and a beta when you see them, yet claim they don't exist. Why. You even had one in your own story to prove they don't exist
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/25 08:04 PM
4

Using outdated studies and statistics to pretend that most people are having okay dating lives and getting into relationships in the face of clear reality is worse than being autistic. None of these surveys or numbers apply to 2025 and its very obvious
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/25 10:27 AM
20

Men who put in a great deal of effort come across as clowns now. The internet exasterbated this. Endless posts of try hard men getting mocked, screenshotted, their women admitting to having cheated while laughing about it, women saying they crave the guys that don't care about them.. it all has a compounding affect where it seems ridiculous and pitiful to be a man who puts effort into courting women. It seems cool to be a man who is elite in some way and attracts women effortlessly
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 02:52 PM
1

Correct. I dont have charm or looks or confidence. But I have money. It works for me. Many men who do have charm or confidence are proud of it and feel like they need to remind everyone that they get what they want by those means. Good for them
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 08:35 AM
-2

Realest post on reddit. This is perhaps why I find it so easy to hobby overseas. Some guys exchange charm or game. I just exchange usd
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 07:10 PM
1

I don't. But you're probably using me as a stand-in for capital M Men [registered trademark]. Another sloppy reddit debate habit. Women's standard are extremely high and they can't just decide to lower them. Nor can men force themselves to require top tier women when they truly just want an average woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 04:38 PM
1

Men cannot shift their standards any more or less than women can. This notion is beyond useless to the discussion. Men and women want what they want. This won't change. What both men and women can change is how desirable they can be as individuals, to a limited degree
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 04:34 PM
1

Let's imagine that we're actually true. The inverse still isn't true. Ugly guys cannot become attractive to you because of their behavior. Ever
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 09:48 AM
7

This is irrelevant even if it's true. The fact is that being good or being bad does not factor into dating success, period. Being hot vs being ugly does.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 04:45 PM
–

You call men calling out women's bad behavior a hate group. How are you so self unaware as to your own projection
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 09:27 AM
15

Women started dozens of hate groups against men over things as trival as spreading their legs on public transit or liking fictional busty women. You can't be serious
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/25 10:27 AM
1

I always thought women could easily dominate the world if they were willing to use sex strategically on men in their lives that they weren't attracted to, aka the good/ average/ boring simp ones
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 05:39 PM
–

Women are artificially funneled into work as much as if not more than they are artificially barred from it. Most industries suffer from an obligation to hire and inclued women where men would perform more efficiently due to equality laws. Women's reliance on men is artificially reduced if anything. Outsourcing mens protection and labor to the government that operates mostly on mens tax dollars to subsidize Women's relative comfort and saftey, leading to women thinking men are obsolete. Its brill…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 05:36 PM
–

It wasn't a death sentence for countless thousands of generations when people were pairing up for survival and practicality rather than lust
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 06:50 AM
7

There are very few men running around ruining it. Women's inherent neurosis compells them to have laser focus on the extremely rare hazardous men and then blame the masses of average harmless men for the dangerous world they made
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 08:53 AM
1

You just can't help yourself
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 03:49 PM
0

Filter out the worthless personal attacks if you want anyone to pay attention to a word you say
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 08:27 AM
1

You know damn well men aren't the ones who need to be told to settle for average. Men act like getting an average chick is a comeup. Women find average men repulsive
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 09:00 AM
16

Obviously the question is for when women are interested, not when they aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 09:20 PM
8

An attitude shift probably
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 09:18 PM
1

Willing to disagree
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 07:06 AM
1

Women want tall men. It's not a choice. They can't force themselves to like short men. They may or may not be honest about it according to the situation. Short and average height men should accept this and not put themselves in a position to be a nuisance to women
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 09:44 PM
1

You're not truly meeting anyone by interacting on this subreddit. But if that's what you meant, I can see how your conclusions are so heavily warped
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 12:41 PM
1

Thats not average and also not how logic works at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 12:40 PM
1

Agreeing with me isnt the issue. The issue is that you insist on focusing on me instead of the subject of the post
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 02:37 AM
1

They can't do better so they settle for eachother. Its that simple
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 11:53 PM
1

No it isn't. Its what redditors do when they don't have an argument. Responding to me about the post instead of making baseless personal aspersions is how communication usually works
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 10:25 PM
1

Im not the subject of the post. You're making it about me instead of arguing the points in typical reddit fashion
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 09:40 PM
2

How can these guys never go outside yet also be avoided by non shallow people who can sense how bad they are? How are you meeting plenty of these guys if they never go outside? None of these guys are real, are they? They are made up
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 09:38 PM
5

I think I get your point. But I still think you're wrong about who they chase and why. Also I don't think there are non-shallow women. I could be wrong, it just seems like a myth. Looks matter to absolutely everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 03:41 PM
5

Irrelevant to the discussion, but go off
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 03:37 PM
10

I disagree that unattractive assholes want shallow women. Those guys, like most guys, want virtually any woman. They become bitter due to a combination of rejection, years without any validation or physical affection, and seeing other guys getting women regardless of bad behavior. That turns into resentment of women. Not shallow women. Women in general. Unattractive men are getting nothing. If they were getting something, they wouldn't be turning it down to chase shallow women. Thats not at all …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 02:25 PM
1

17%... huge chunk. Bit of a reach. But ill admit when I'm wrong. There was data on it after all
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 02:11 PM
35

There's always too much conflating of different types of people for these debates to ever be coherent. Nice guys are in no way the same people as anti woke commentators who call entertainment gay and lame. But here they are being conflated. Heels vs baby face for example openly leans into being a loud mouth asshole. No one including himself would suggest he's a nice guy. So why is he being lumped in with the type if guy who is nice and claims women only want bad boys. Its 2 completely different …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 02:10 PM
1

Made up with no possible way to prove or disprove
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 03:53 AM
11

This conflicts with the widespread demand for birth control and women's rabid obsession with securing abortion rights. Not only are women having a lot of sex outside committed relationships, but they demand unprotected sex because they absolutely require getting nut in, so they also need to be able to terminate the life that results from their wanton lust. Men will not be gaslit into thinking women are sexually mysterious or closed off or discerning or any of that flattering misdirection. Women …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 10:35 PM
–

The tea app leak that showed the women vs the guys they were dragging confirmed this to be a myth. Women are as chopped as men if not more so
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 10:58 PM
1

This is the kind of razor sharp insight lilith of Babylon wishes she could come up with about men
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 08:29 PM
26

Men like friendly attentive women because they just like women by default. Men think that if they want a woman to like them, they should just be more friendly and attentive to her. Women like successful ambitious men. Women think if they become ambitious and successful themselves, it will make (top tier) men attracted to them in the same way
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 11:12 PM
10

Almost engaged sincerely with this post until I saw it was Lilith of Babylon lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 09:45 PM
1

Its not just online. Its universal in real life
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 08:53 PM
1

Developing a cool personality won't increase the number of tall hot wealthy monogamous men who only want these women. What women want will still be out of reach
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 08:05 PM
2

People will come up with any bizzare scheme besides the obvious solution: become a passport bro
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 08:03 PM
2

You have the most consistent delusional takes about men on this sub. There should be an award for this. The sheer density of how obtuse these takes are is impressive. Where does it even come from. Men broadly desire all or any type of women, not a niche subset of dysfunctional ones. Women are picky and men are thirsty. Only you could fail to see that and conjure up this elseworlds version of reality where nice guys are rejecting anyone while pursuing toxic women
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 03:34 PM
2

Industrial grade cope. Gen z women are brain fried harder than anyone before them by social media and porn, both literary and visual. Real normal men do not interest them. They aren't some new special sexuality. They are straight and dry as a dessert because their minds are nuked by modernity
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 09:18 PM
1

You know thats not true. You know less people are dating specifically because women find most types of men beneath them. There would be no debates if this weren't happening
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 04:33 PM
2

Women try to create soft men but then only select the ones who resist for dating and sex. There's no contradiction here. Women's behavior is the only contradiction
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 04:27 PM
3

An average man with a stable job, a modest social circle, good grooming and hygiene, no red flags and no criminal record... is repulsive to women. Not the crazy ones. Not the ones with daddy issues. Not just the ones yapping on tik tok. All of them. These men are not wanted. Passports or rot.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 09:08 PM
1

This take is mired in rhetoric and it misses the point of hiring a pro. Its got nothing to do with value. Sometimes men just get horny, and no, their hand won't always be enough. Married men and men who have no problems dating also hire pros. Men's sexual appetite is not good or bad. It just is. Women who want cash fulfill a market need. Thats all there is to it
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 08:28 PM
1

I will not elaborate. Anyone who finds out a 40 year old never had a relationship will assume there's no hope for them
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 10:11 PM
–

Yes. You finally figured it out.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 07:57 PM
–

You're still treating individual men like official ambassadors of the redpill like its a parliment or some kind of institution with a charter instead of what it is, a set of ideas. You're stuck in low level thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 07:50 PM
1

The red pill was never developed to detect bad men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/25 07:24 PM
6

Did it ever occur to you to apply this logic to women's issues? Instead of actually assessing the context of why women earn less, the entire nation wrote multiple laws into existence that make it illegal to pay women less. Then went further to try amd bend reality to make income equal, completely ignoring the context of women quitting, retiring early, choosing easier cozy jobs and generally not obsessing about earning as much as men. Context never matters for women's issues. We all just have to …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 11:34 PM
7

Average men are no more moral than top 10% men. Its just more fun for women to be treated poorly by hot guys than by average guys, and women's behavior proves it
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 09:05 PM
5

Major conflating going on here. Women aren't complaining about the bottom 80% of men. They aren't dating those men. Women are getting burned and used by top 20% men and blaming it on the bottom 80% due to irrationality.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 06:48 PM
2

Zero. I pay for play. Cold approach is for clowns or chad
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 01:01 AM
0

Aggressively misinterpreting my words wastes your time and mine
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 06:44 PM
2

The point isn't that it's some revelation. The point is that it is bad to be cruel to average men
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 08:03 PM
–

Girl scouts should subsidize them like how the NBA subsidizes the wnba
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 07:58 PM
1

Bait failed
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 05:35 PM
1

You don't really want that wall of text. Its easy enough to find out what I'm referring to
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 05:23 PM
1

I don't want society to provide anything. I want ot to stop placing barriers, regulations and red tape around mens natural ability to thrive
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 04:00 PM
1

Nothing is the case everytime and these outlier sensational instances don't demonstrate anything relevant to the general trend of men getting better experiences abroad. Men are still far better off leveraging usd and passports to date globally over struggling in the states. They can get scammed at home but with worse options and less incentives
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 03:16 PM
1

Its a mutual trade off and it works for the participants regardless of how sneering onlookers frame it. If it wasn't beneficial for both parties they wouldn't keep doing it over and over willingly
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 02:05 PM
14

Men are making it difficult for women to date? Lol. Lmao even. This cannot be a sincere take after the chopped man epidemic nonsense. Women think most men are ugly and lame and are only interested in devotion from impossibly rare top tier guys. Be delusional, get clowned on, blame men. Rinse repeat
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 08:38 PM
–

What else is there. Men value non relative men as a sort of family too. What other type of way is there to value others
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 01:56 PM
–

Men can value unattractive women as platonic friends in some rare scenarios. Some women are funny or cool enough to be around while not arousing lust in men. Those women are valued in that rare way that women seem to covet
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 01:14 PM
–

Women get to enjoy both, men don't. Of course you can't empathize with men on this. The idea that women are empathetic is a myth
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 12:33 PM
1

My orgasm. Im a bad person.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 04:58 AM
7

Maybe zoomers see what millenials got for all their troubles living that lifestyle and it doesn't seem worth the hassle. Can't blame them
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 05:13 PM
11

I've been arguing about this for years and people just pretend its not happening or say its a good thing. And somehow women's smut novels remain uncensored so they can indulge as much as they like while men's entertainment gets sterilized
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 07:03 PM
5

Now you know
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 08:47 AM
4

I do agree that men have to bare a burden of performance just to experience a crumb of attention relative to women. But thats also why I think successful men ought to enjoy their options if they have them. The superhuman endeavor of becoming attractive to women just to pick a middle aged mid is clown behavior. Chad has a harem because he can, as he should. Everyone else can struggle for scraps
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 09:42 PM
4

The cure for all of this is for the man to be 6'4. All of these gripes seem to melt away
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 02:32 PM
0

Doesn't add up. Something isn't being said. You either never go anywhere to be seen by women, or are downplaying interest. A man who looks as you describe is getting signals from women daily if he is out and about
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 09:22 PM
9

Humble brag. Just say you're tall and white. Most men don't experience this. Why rub it in
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 10:52 PM
3

No mention of height, probably tall. Its not complicated
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 10:50 PM
8

I chose my words carefully but you read them recklessly. Barring strict repression means women who are forced or pressured into being chaste through culture or religious methods. It is not in a woman's nature to be chaste. It's a social contraint placed on women in certain times or regions
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/25 10:44 PM
9

Incorrect. We understand there is no dichotomy. There are no pure chaste women barring strict repression. There are just women. Women will bust it open for a hot enough guy given the circumstances mitigate risks. Women will make good average guys wait. Hot guys enjoy the best of women. Good average guys suffer want
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/25 09:58 PM
4

Mating is zero sum. One side wins and one side loses. I want my side to have the advantage. I dont care about fairness. White knights bad, pick mes good. There is no contradiction
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/25 05:55 PM
5

Stiff socially awkward wierdo who wears my little pony shirts and likes Andrew Tate will effortlessly slay if he's 6'6 with an athlete body and chiseled features. An average guy with a perfect personality will get starfish love while his girl daydreams about the first guy. Personality cultivation nets diminishing returns in 2025. Not worth it
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 01:22 PM
2

Men don't view "feeling safe" while walking alone at night as a benefit. That doesn't stop women from reminding them of their male privilege constantly
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 01:05 PM
1

Nobody shames men for wanting sex? Really? Nobody calls men gooners, thirsty, or even misogynist for merely expressing lust in the mildest forms? You've never seen that before? You can't think of any examples of men being condemned for staring at a woman bouncing in gym attire, or enjoying scantily clad women in fiction? None of that ever happens. Amazing that I imagined all of that
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 09:40 AM
4

I don't think about gay men. If that was meant to be a gotcha, I don't shame gay men or contribute to any stigma about what they want
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 09:37 AM
3

Which men? Where? It's a scenario you made up. I'm missing too much context to get where you're coming from with this. Did some guy tell you that a man who helps a woman on tinder escape an abusive ex was a good person? Are you the tinder woman lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 10:03 PM
2

No, should it be? Was that the point of the question? A way to frame it as goodness would be to make it so the woman asks for shelter without offering sex. A man who agrees to that could be considered good. I wouldn't because I'm not good
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 09:55 PM
1

The ratio would have to be culled to 10 women per 1 man in order to bring about reasonable balance. Male genocide is not a solution. Dating doesn't need to be fixed. It doesn't even need to exist honestly
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 09:51 PM
3

Your perception of average is warped. You think Ryan gosling is average. Average and below average men are invisible to you. You see women hooking up with hot guys and your warped perception makes you think the guys are average. This flawed perception colors all of your opinions on dating
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 09:50 PM
-1

You've demonstrated a fundamental lack of understanding men. Not your fault if you're young. But men don't consult with the patriarchy about which women they want. They follow their instincts. Their instincts make them want most women besides the morbidly obese or disfigured. There's no top down mandate about which women men are allowed to desire. That's an absurd notion that could only be conjured on reddit. Regarding men who whine that they can't get women, whichever women you think they shoul…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 09:47 PM
1

Not a good Samaritan if I'm just exchanging shelter for sex. That said, sure. Free average snatch. Cut her loose the moment she brings any problems with her
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 09:35 PM
0

Stop lying. Be honest about enjoying casual sex with hot men and not wanting to touch average men. Stop shaming men for wanting sex. That's what anybody is supposed to do
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 09:29 PM
7

Most women are having as much sex as they want, most men aren't. Im not comparing frequency and amount directly because the sexes want different things. I'm comparing desires being met. A woman who doesn't have sex because she's not interested is not the same is a man who wants it and can never get it
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 07:30 PM
5

The problem is not women's feelings. That was never the problem. The problem is the set of lies and misdirection that women use to try and make average men feel shame and guilt for wanting the same sexual abundance that most modern women and 1 percent of men experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 06:56 PM
1

People latched onto you saying love wasn't a concept. You have to make posts airtight or you'll be tormented here
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 01:34 AM
2

This post needs a bit of refining because people are misunderstanding the point. People always experienced infatuation, especially in adolescence. Whats changed is marrying based on those feelings rather than for practical reasons. In times past everyone had to pair up to survive. But now people can easily survive while single and wait around forever until they feel a spark with their soul mate. Which is why so many people stay single indefinitely
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 09:19 PM
2

Impossible to debate your personal opinion of redpillers. Most of them seem far more secure than non rp men to me. Neither of us have data to back up what's our own personal perspective. Its seems like you just wanted to dunk on rp now that it no longer suits you for whatever reason
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 09:01 PM
2

The halo effect will not be dismissed so easily. It is woven into the fabric of social discourse and integrated deeply into everyone's instincts. Better to acknowledge it than deny it
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 11:41 AM
0

Its a universal experience every average man has been familiar with for multiple generations before the internet existed. It won't be gaslit away that easily
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 04:56 PM
6

Everyone conflates undesirable with bad. That's the just world fallacy everyone makes
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 04:55 PM
-2

This fails to include women's tendency to use unattractive men as orbiters, errand minions, listeners and other one sided relationships. Women have a place for all men. The average and below average guys just won't enjoy theirs
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 04:53 PM
1

Air tight post that preemptively nukes all midwit retorts. Expertly done. Worthy of multiple video essays
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 12:38 AM
66

Sounds amazing. The sexes are different. More news at 11
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 03:21 PM
1

Hope you get your reddit gold for that one
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 01:15 AM
2

May your respect keep you warm at night
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 01:15 AM
1

I dont need to be alone, I get foreign women. You should be alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 01:14 AM
0

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 01:13 AM
1

I never said they weren't. I said it was ass, you can't disagree because the whole sub Is founded on it. You're stuck on level 1 thinking it sounds enlightened for a redditor to tell other people on reddit to go out and live life. I literally travel the world and date in other countries. Its my whole shtick. It sucks in the USA, Its great elsewhere
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 01:11 AM
7

Its great for women outside of neurotic feminist influence
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 01:08 AM
2

Sucks but not men's problem just like male loneliness isn't women problem. Share top tier men
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 01:07 AM
3

All hetero relationships are, so what
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 01:06 AM
3

Irrelevant to the post. Dating is ass in the states and everyone now openly admits it. You've never heard a person say they enjoy the dating scene in 2 decades. Men have an escape, traveling to places where its still fun and enjoyable to interact with women
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 01:06 AM
-5

Doesn't work the same or western women would be doing it in equal numbers. Western men are the best there is. Inverse for women
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 01:00 AM
6

Its still possible for guys who get a damn passport. Western women are cooked though
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 12:41 AM
2

Most honest and straightforward women in existence. Respect the hustle. God bless whores. Unironically
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 04:39 PM
11

You're so close to seeing how women's role privileges them over men. Trying the male role leaves you feeling used and burnt out... what could this mean??
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 09:51 PM
2

Consider interacting with men irl for a big suprise. They ain't fuckin
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/25 08:46 PM
3

Historically and demonstrably false. 40 % of men reproduce. The majority of men are only able to find partners under strict monogamous structures that rigidly enforce gender roles. As soon as freedom emerges, people revert to tournament mating schemes with a few male winners and mostly male losers
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/25 07:41 PM
12

If money is so important and literally everyone needs it to survive, why are most people so poor? Because importance doesn't correlate with abundance
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 04:17 PM
8

There is exactly the correct amount of emphasis on sex, given humans are a sexually reproductive species and are wired to fixate on the subject along with other necessities. There have been efforts to de-sex people for centuries and none of them ever worked. People will always think and talk about sex alot. Forever.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 03:50 PM
–

I'm sure men say things like that. My point is it doesn't deserve to be responded to in good faith
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 07:07 PM
–

Why would anyone respond in good faith to this. If I said I discovered that all women want an 8 ft tall billionaire criminal male feminist who's dominant but also not toxic, it would not justify good faith responses. Its very obvious trolling and deserves nothing but trolling in turn
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 04:52 PM
-1

I prefer women be apolitical or share my politics. But she can be a raging lefty as long as she doesn't pester me about it
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 04:27 PM
8

Everyone will be on their phones or being autistic. There's no going back to how things were
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 10:40 PM
1

So all the guys who have given up or never put any effort into this strategy, who are just being themselves and living their lives by default, must be swimming in compatible mates... oh wait. They are also just as alone as guys who use the wide net strategy. All the guys trying and not trying are failing. Hot guys are succeeding. Always have always will
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 10:38 PM
8

That sounds like a fantasy. Was that supposed to be bad?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 04:34 PM
1

Without generalizing gender it would be impossible to have a coherent debate or even discussion on gender. If every single observation had to be burdened by caveats and parenthesis about 'not all' or 'sometimes in my personal experience', every discussion about gender would be prohibitively tedious. When someone asks why men dont approach anymore, they understand its a generalization. They know it doesn't mean zero men ever approach. They can use basic reasoning to know it means the frequency of…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 12:19 AM
–

2 fold incentive. Goal 1 is to humble brag. Act like it's effortless which makes the person sound like they are desirable. Goal 2 is to keep unsuccessful men in the pool, which makes successful men look even more desirable by comparison
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 12:01 PM
1

5 and 6 are essentially not dating. What would be the point. Other than that, concessions can be made if she's physically attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 11:28 PM
–

Couple hundred bucks for a ticket to Colombia or dr for cheap 9 out of 10 bombshell romp
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 11:24 PM
–

Literal hoes are a blessing. P4p is legitimately a good lifestyle for men who can't pull
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 06:13 PM
2

Hundreds of thousands of women read review and soak over stories about getting railed by monsters. https://www.goodreads.com/shelf/show/monster-romance
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 08:41 PM
–

So many flaws with this. Donation doesn't guarantee spreading genes. It won't even boost average men's chances. Men have to attach their info to their donations. Women aren't choosing sperm from average height, average income guys. They choose the same way they choose on tinder, tallest, hottest, richest. The other thing this glosses over is the human need for intimacy and affection. To just stop dating and donate seed is not a solution. I still say the passport protocol is the best option that …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 04:07 PM
13

Tall hot guys who are boring, rude and awkward still drown in snatch. Next.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 08:30 PM
11

Countless best selling smut novels marketed exclusively at women in the shifter genre suggest otherwise
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 08:23 PM
–

This would mean men wearing lifts, padding out their shoulders, using hair systems or surgery to hide thinning, makeup to sharpen features, clothing that tapers and enhances physique. When women discover mens real face, body, height and hairloss beneath the illusion, they will wretch. Women can get away with clown face makeup, pushup bras, heels, butt lifting pants, swimming body suits and other trickery because men are conditioned to accept some level of visual deciet from them. This doesn't wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 03:17 PM
11

Women don't hold onto trauma or desires from childhood onwards? That is such a universal human thing. You can't be serious
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 02:28 AM
2

It is a big deal for the reasons illustrated in the original post. Direct approach is only allowed for men who are already extremely attractive. Average men must be expert social strategists to evade icks
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 02:26 AM
–

Depends on last orgasm. If its that day, barely any reaction or thought besides "nice". After 1 to 2 days, its a lingering stare. After 3 days, mental undressing. After a week, hiding erections. This is why nofap is a problem
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 10:27 PM
3

6 ft is common and unreasonable because of how rare it is. Less than 15% of men last I checked. 6 figures is also common and unreasonable when the average income is around 50k annual. College educated is common and unreasonable since women fought to outnumber men in higher education but didn't consider that this means there will necessarily be less eligible men to pair up with. Requiring all 3 as a minimum borders on delusional
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 12:39 PM
4

To have sex. You couldn't truly be struggling with this one. What were the alternative reasons
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 02:47 AM
3

Better life > longer life. Women keep their work horses alive and productive longer. This is not necessarily something to strive for
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 09:46 PM
1

Stop going out of your way to ignore the passport option. It works. Do it
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 01:38 AM
3

Men aren't lonely because women won't keep them company. Men are lonely because mens spaces are routinely invaded, co-opted and eroded by women. Inb4 "what spaces". Boy scouts. Gyms. Sports. Videogames. D&d. Anything full of men talking shit and being edgy gets hit with the hr scrub eventually
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 02:56 AM
33

Historical revisionism of mgtow is disgraceful. It was started by divorced fathers raked through family courts, not broken hearted simps. And it can't be doomed. It can't fail. It wasn't a game with a win or lose state. It was a decentralized network of men discussing the abandonment of societal systems that take men for granted. Warning men to avoid entangling themselves in legal contracts that favor women, avoiding wasting money and attention on dates that aren't enjoyable, rejecting anti male…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 01:00 AM
2

What the hell is a good number? 10 percent? 25 percent? Is it worth men disregarding what they have learned about hypergamy to seek these women out?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 09:19 PM
1

Strong premise, atrocious argumentation
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 09:03 PM
5

Its just the male equivalent of 'women don't owe men sex just because men are nice or buy them things or take them on dates or directly express sexual interest '
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 02:24 AM
-2

Yes. Just like women want attention and dates but don't feel they owe a man sex if they get those things, men want sex but don't feel they owe women a relationship if they get it
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 02:23 AM
6

Women do seem to presume that men sleep around and womanize alot. At least they accuse men of this. Even though most men aren't getting any ever and beg and scrape to get one woman to be with. So yes women behave as if they are oblivious
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 10:51 PM
1

Crazy how none of this is required in Colombia
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 10:33 PM
4

Do you at least acknowledge that its as easy as you want it to be, and not the same for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 08:48 PM
2

Equality does not exist between men, nor can it or should it exist between any individuals, much less a broad group like men and women. The premise that equality should have ever been strive for is purposefully nebulous and unachievable. It is not only faulty as a premise, it a rhetorical weapon used to smear groups as oppressors. You will counter that equality under the law is fair and good, yet you would have to acknowledge that this can't be the case. Since women require reproductive rights u…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 04:16 PM
1

Its so easy to mention that selective service is unfair then brush it off, as all feminists have done for decades. If it was really something feminists wanted changed they'd screech until they got it like all their other privileges. Male genital mutilation is legal and done to most infant babies in the states. You'll just say there's religious and hygiene reasons for it and wave it away like the draft, but you asked so I answered. Why do I need to make a whole list that you'll just dismiss anywa…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 04:04 PM
-1

Its not a matter of understanding. The premise is faulty so I reject the statement entirely
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 01:39 AM
3

No. There are just times when I can tell the request isn't genuine. They weren't confused. They didn't find anything I said difficult to understand. They wanted to troll
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 01:32 AM
2

You could have asked anything but you went for murder and rape. Is is your nature
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 01:22 AM
4

I should never speak casually. I should always fill every statement with footnotes and caveats under the assumption that every redditor has no choice but to warp anything they read into a bizzare screed instead of employing simple reading compression. 100% my fault
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 01:14 AM
1

You veered off topic into a ditch talking about murder and rape, as any redditor should
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 01:12 AM
3

Yes. I can always count on redditors to take things to the most absurd and incoherent conclusions. Thats exactly where I was going with this. Screenshot this and repost it everywhere
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 12:54 AM
1

Word for word what I typed.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 12:49 AM
1

As if anyone on this sub is juggling a harem of women and needs to be told to stop being greedy. What drove you to make such a silly declaration
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 12:31 AM
8

There are laws in place to mitigate the unfairness towards women. But none in place for men. Women seek provision. Alimony laws force men to provide after the relationship ends. Men seek sex and affection. No laws force women to uphold that role in or outside of the relationship. Nor should they. If dating is truly to be unfair and amoral, all laws and obligations put on men must be abolished.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 12:29 AM
2

2025 hookups are for top 1% chads only. No, you don't know a guy who has hookups easily. He's made up.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 12:21 AM
1

3rd date, no sex
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 05:48 PM
1

No possible way to know what most people are doing. But you called someone incel on reddit so that means you win
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 04:45 PM
1

And yet womens behavior demonstrates that they very much need to get with men and get piped raw. They view it as a human right which is hilarious
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 04:11 PM
9

Womanese: he was great but there just wasn't any spark/chemistry American English: he wasn't hot and hyper masculine, so I wasn't turned on by him
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 02:42 AM
1

Nice guys, and guys in general, are not in a position to pick and choose. As far as who they gravitate to, they orbit a far greater variety of women than the reverse. The 'women only go for jerks' trope cannot be reversed. Both sexes don't do it. There is no nice girl equivalent that nice guys are overlooking. Both types of women are repulsed by him. This post was doa
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 02:39 AM
3

Nice guys are more vilified than ms13 members. Its embarrassing to see nearly everyone shit on men whos great sin is being agreeable and timid, projecting all manner of dishonest agendas, entitlement and abusive motives on dopey clueless men. The fact is women appreciate the attention but simply aren't turned on by these men
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 02:07 AM
1

Korea is way ahead of us. Both sexes having cosmic standards only leads to no one getting together. It doesn't solve anything. Although simping would decline, which is good
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 02:00 AM
1

Talk about hyperbole. Why is getting nut in raw and then terminating the offspring such an obsession for women. Most men don't even have opportunities creampie women so much that they constantly yap about reproductive rights(which men don't even have). Apparently mens nut is a sovereign female right
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 01:40 AM
2

Instead of replacing what I type with a ridiculous caricature of a position, consider that I meant what I typed
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 01:35 AM
2

Any adult male human is a real man. The term can be weaponized or politicized to hell and back. Ultimately people understand what a man is
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 10:01 PM
2

You're such a good person.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 02:06 AM
5

You're bp so you're taking everything women say at face value. All the supposed manipulation and abuse is usually just a hot guy who said he wasn't looking for anything serious not calling back. Gotta learn to read between the lines
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 02:02 AM
19

Literally just pair up with a fellow 5 instead of a 9. All these crafty shape shifting abuser men are just hot guys. Its not complicated
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 01:45 AM
3

Sure. All these terms had power back in 2018 but now its all water off a ducks back. Don't forget that I'm also a chud incel neckbeard twerp cuck etc etc
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 01:39 AM
3

Might have been a great argument 60 years ago when there were any women at all living like that. Housewives are extinct
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 01:36 AM
2

You're poking around looking for the slightest mistep in what I type to attack because you can't engage with the substance of what I'm actually saying. Expert reddit debate tactic. Ignored
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 01:35 AM
5

Terrible strawman that's never been uttered by a single man, even the in the darkest corners of the redpill space. How can anyone even begin to talk about anything honestly around here
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 01:23 AM
1

Unironically this. Although you'll be screeching about it when it finally happens even though it has nothing to do with real women
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 01:18 AM
1

Classic "this broad statement doesn't apply to me personally therefore it can't be true" airhead logic. Don't hurt yourself thinking about it
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 01:18 AM
1

I guess that somehow nukes whatever I was talking about. Seriously, people just say anything with no sense of how to stay on topic
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 01:16 AM
2

Yeah that must be it 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 11:49 PM
3

Same reason anyone gets upset that someone doesn't want to date them for any reason. Dating isn't fair. Not my problem. If I was falsely accused, I wouldn't bring it up. If I find out a woman was embroiled in an accusation, I'm out. Dont care about fairness. I'm not a good person
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 11:34 PM
2

No. Women don't push men out of dirty difficult and dangerous jobs. Men are still left with the most miserable and hazardous ways to make a living. Thus they continue to earn, provide and maintain civilization while women take over cozy office jobs. While paying more in taxes and getting less out of the system.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 11:28 PM
2

Simple answer is it can be better so it will be better. There's no stopping it and no reason to want it to stay bare minimum when it could be better
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 11:22 PM
2

I don't know why you're so insistant on finding bare minimum substitutes. Tech is going to advance and men will eventually have lifelike love bots. The sooner the better
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 11:15 PM
3

Only men are net tax payers. Women recieve more than they pay in the form of benefits and assistance. So when I say, government, its essentially mens money. Women may or may not be qualified for jobs. This is irrelevant to the fact that companies are required to choose women over men to meet artificial quotas, thus pushing men out of the market
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 11:12 PM
2

Absolutely not. Not worth it in the slightest. You'd have to make this more difficult by making Sally extremely hot and really into me for some reason. If she's just some woman, there's another woman without that baggage attached elsewhere
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 11:07 PM
2

I didn't say that. Thats a nearly incoherent statement that doesn't follow from anything I typed
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 11:00 PM
1

A real man would engage with your bait. Im a fake man. Oh well
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 10:50 PM
-3

Low effort, loaded smug bait question. Didn't take. Mayne next time
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 10:32 PM
-3

You decided to attack me personally because you felt threatened by a observable fact that I stated. Sort yourself out.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 10:28 PM
-1

I'll remain standing. Companies have openly stated their goals to hire women and reject men for no other reason than to promote artificial equality for decades. Government funded (mens taxes) programs designed to take jobs away from qualified men and give them to women. Mens resources are directly used to disenfranchise men for women's convenience
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 10:27 PM
1

No. Actual tactile sexual experience is orders of magintude more intense and rewarding than jerking to a screen. Its not even in the same universe and men on mass will never settle for just screens. At best screens are a supplement. Robots will heat up, have an artificial heart beat and breathing to simulate proximity to another human body. This something that people wither away and die without. Even though it's not as explicitly evident as starvation or dehydration, lack of human touch is debil…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 10:24 PM
-1

A start. Once they get put into robots that can put out, we will finally achieve gender equality
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 09:58 PM
5

All pills except black push the idea that personality and behavior can generate attraction independent of looks. The only pill that tells the truth is banned here. Curious
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 09:50 PM
-8

A direct result of men being artificially handicapped by academic and government programs. If left to merit and skill, women could generally not provide for themselves. A similar artificial way of replacing womens role should also be instituted for men
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 09:46 PM
9

If this were true, top tier hot guys with lots of attention and options would behave like the average woman. But they don't. They act like men. Their behavior is different, not necessarily better or worse, but still very distinct from women. If men and women are in identical situations, their behavior still varies from one another due to different biological drives, different brains, different combinations of hormones and neurotransmitters, and different bodies. Trying to diminish or gloss over …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 04:32 PM
2

Real post award. The goal was always to filter non hot men out entirely. Thus was the passport protocol developed. Its average men's only hope. There is no sense in trying to date domestically
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 05:19 AM
1

Rates of homicides and assaults decreasing. Not subjective feelings of danger. Something that's actually measurable
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 03:37 AM
1

Again, reality can't account for womens neurosis. Women will worry and scurry around like frightened deer no matter how safe they actually are. What exactly is anyone supposed to do about it besides complain about the fact that the world isn't perfect and that all bad things haven't been eradicated
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 02:39 AM
2

Biology will sort out losers even if societal structures don't. There's no tricking women into thinking short, poor, weak, low status men are hot
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 01:17 AM
6

You're conflating your own personal experience and neurosis with the wider world and history of violence. Worldwide inatances of violence, including homicide and assaults are decreasing. They have been steadily decreasing for decades. This doesn't matter when you are personally being attacked, but its important to be accurate and avoid hyperbolic language as if women are in more danger than ever. They are actually safer statistically than ever before in human history
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 01:12 AM
3

Yes, going to ignore those because your argument boils down to as long as anything bad happens to women anywhere on earth you can always claim women are the overwhelming victims of reality even when the rate of all of these terrible things is on a historical decline worldwide. Not worth factoring into the broader subject of who's bodies are respected more
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 12:13 AM
3

I wasn't giving life advice. I was referencing commonly held opinions. Where are those opinions expressed? On social media! "B-ut social media isn't real" in the context of talking about opinions is a complete non sequitur
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 11:36 PM
5

You're currently on reddit right now. Why even say anything at all here. Nothing anyone says here is "real". Whatever that means. But I knew that would be your response, which is why I added real life experiences too
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 11:28 PM
4

Men have a more grounded estimation of average than women do, by orders of magnitude. Men are not rejecting women or selecting exclusively for supermodels. Men pursue 5s with embarrassing enthusiasm. Tall in shape men routinely pair up with round women and consider themselves lucky to be getting some. Women by all metrics are the unreasonable gender when it comes to rating themselves, men, and managing their expectations
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 11:27 PM
8

Any tik tok ever made about women's dating woes. Any viral video street interview with any woman. That stupid balloon popping dating game on YouTube. Talk shows in the 90s. Any workplace environment where women talk about dating. Any bar where the girls are out. Right beside you at this very moment there's probably two women yapping about how broke and not hot men around them are. Anywhere women are found talking about men, they are saying most men are undesirable. You've never heard women say t…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 11:23 PM
-1

Women are far safer than men, due mostly to men's instincts to prioritize women's safety over their own. Speaking broadly about people as a whole, not anecdotes about serial killers. These arguments always boil down to the fact that anything bad ever happens to women ever proving that women are in a crisis. It's impossible to even falsify
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 11:18 PM
1

Women don't use that exact term, but will express the same sentiment when a space is overwhelmingly male. Your response will be something about women feeling unsafe, which doesn't refute my point. Im correct about this, regardless of justifications
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 11:16 PM
7

Apex fallacy going hard in this response. Rare massive men being respected out of the sheer reality of their size is not reflective of respect for the male body in general. Thats a case by case basis. By that logic elephants and whales are respected even more than any man. Mens bodies are generally considered disposable and a nuisance. "This place is a sausage party" is an example of the common notion that too many men just being somewhere is a drag. Send them to war or to maintain sewers or som…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 10:21 PM
11

Average height and weight, average income, average education level= repulsive to average women. Not debatable. Women very openly and proudly declare this to be the case
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 10:02 PM
1

They are still far better off than single men in the west getting no matches, no attention, no affection. I don't claim its perfect. It is far better than being stuck in the west. Thats not even debatable
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 06:10 PM
1

Not for everyone. Specifically for single American men
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 06:01 PM
3

Daily reminder for all single American men to drop everything and put all effort into developing a remote skill, acquiring a passport, and moving to passport bro approved countries for dating. It is no longer an option. It is the only path.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 05:18 PM
1

Telling men to become tall doctors just to have a chance with an overweight post fertile woman is beyond cruel. It doesn't sound genuine, even if it's based on a few real anecdotes. Men should pursue the best options available to them just like women do. What people like to avoid acknowledging is that men can find far better options in other countries
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 03:49 PM
1

Women should not lower their standards. They are ruined beyond repair. Men should travel to places where women naturally have reasonable standards(average woman pairing with average man)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 03:44 PM
0

Yes, they were. Because a common working man could fulfill the conventional masculine role to a greater degree then than now. A woman could look up to a common working man then. She can't now. He makes less, owns less, and is more diminutive
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 05:31 PM
1

False. Society as a whole made the average person less attractive. It could make them more attractive. Individuals didn't grow to distain one another on a mass level for no reason compared to generations ago when far more people were attracted to one another. A hundred years ago men had no access to brain frying online porn, they are far more compelled to go out and interact with and pursue women with heart eyes. Women were not making lists of requirements that only the top 10 percent of men ful…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 05:08 PM
–

This sub isn't about platonic relationships and that isn't wants being discussed
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 11:00 PM
–

So what. Whats the actual point of mentioning any of it
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 10:07 PM
–

Every single woman misreades what I type. I didn't say not lusting after men was dehumanizing. I said the expectation for men to accept a life devoid of affection, touch or validation without negatively reacting in any way was dehumanizing. No one is demanding your lust. Thats not the point of what I said at all
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 10:06 PM
–

Historically, men are responsible for vast improvements to women's lifespan, health, safety, comfort and happiness. You're welcome
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 09:42 PM
–

I didn't say women dehumanize men by not desiring them. Re read my statement very carefully. I chose my words deliberately for a reason. I don't think women owe men desire and I never claimed as much
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 09:37 PM
–

Its a normal human desire that all humans have, yet women expect men to... I'm not retyping my whole comment again..it either makes sense or it doesn't
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 08:30 PM
–

The greatest threat to women's autonomy is women's own neurosis and social pressure
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 07:38 PM
0

Anything can be framed in a way that makes men seem inferior. If men didn't pursue women or demanded they be old fashioned, men would be called sexist. When men adapt and accept women rejecting old gender roles, men are called dependent on relationships
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 07:37 PM
-3

Men are more adaptable to women's changing roles than women are to men's. This is why men have generally continued to pursue women who don't cook, clean or want to be mothers, just to be in a relationship. Women, by comparison, have lost all desire for men who don't initiate, provide or fulfill conventional masculine roles
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 05:49 PM
3

Rule 3, 6 and 8 are broadly used to curtail how men discuss their desires, expectations and experiences.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 05:46 PM
4

Thats the plan
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 04:50 PM
0

Most women are average. Since average women now expect top men, they can manage flings with those men but not commitment. This leaves average women bitter and alone, blaming men. Meanwhile average men are alone the whole time. The end result is mostly alone bitter average people and a few top men who are living their best life. Thats why its a problem. If average women lower their standards to what is rational(average men) people will pair up and have families, not be bitter and alone, and overa…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 04:50 PM
3

Dating discourse is a zero sum game. Women are currently winning and men are losing. Womens expectations all fall within acceptable parameters of discourse( they set the rules so its okay). All of mens expectations fall withing the toxic, harmful and oppressive margins of dangerous speech that must be censored, denounced and sanitized. This is reflected in the very rules of this sub. The entire apparatus is built to favor women. The objectification of mens utility will never be acknowledged as a…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 04:37 PM
–

My solutions don't require anything of women, but they are always banned when I post them
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 04:32 PM
–

Women seem to expect men to respond to a lifetime of social and sexual rejection with a shrug of the shoulders and moving on to live life devoid of affection validation and physical touch that every human craves every day of their life without reacting negatively in anyway. Women have difficulty registering men as human beings.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 04:31 PM
2

In my simp days, an average looking pleasant woman to be a best friend. Now, a rotation of professional 8s and 9s for bedroom activities, nothing more
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 12:38 AM
1

Gradual process of extending rights, privileges and freedoms to women without the responsibilities or obligations to go with them. Started in the late 1800s and slowly spiraled out of control. Simple human oversight. It never occurred to anyone that womens freedoms and rights must be tethered to responsibilities the same way mens are
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 01:27 AM
0

There is one bar. Nice is at one end, attractive is at the other. Zero sum
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 01:23 AM
2

Those were not "good guys". They were hot guys who women rationalize as being good. There was no deception. Actual good guys are average looking and thus repulsive.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 10:02 AM
–

Men will be called losers no matter what. Still works for securing a mate and a family
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 09:59 AM
4

I don't think abusers are obvious, I just know good guys are very obvious and that those guys are rejected in the cruelest ways by women. So I feel nothing when those women chose secret villains and get burned. Sucks to suck
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 02:19 AM
–

Aquire passport, find a foreign woman. Thats the only viable option but it's extremely effective
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 02:12 AM
2

The people who eat the meals at a restaurant are the real chefs. Thats how you sound
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 08:44 PM
1

There's nothing wrong with it. Its human nature and it serves an important function. What's wrong is denial or blame shifting. Better to own it. Any healthy human naturally wants to look appealing and find a mate. Its not a patriarchal conspiracy. Its just the way things work
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 09:29 PM
1

Vanity combined with aversion to accountability is a potent combo. Of course its mens fault that women want to be appealing. Even though both sexes are preoccupied with being attractive to the opposite sex, its victomhood when women are affected by it
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 07:09 AM
1

Dual mating strategy. She wants one for companionship, the other for sex. This is 2014 era redpill basics
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 07:04 AM
2

I'm on board. Our grand children might benefit from a more stable market
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 10:15 PM
3

Failure to properly understand redpill lessons has been a disaster for gender discussion. Dual mating strategy based on cycle is old news. Women want both depending on phase
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 10:10 PM
2

These are generally good for men to do. But the sheer volume of simps will not allow it to cause any meaningful shift in womens behavior
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 10:06 PM
1

If you could snag any average person from any generation and bring them here in a time machine, they would not fare better in the dating market. There is not something special about these newer generations that make them bad at dating. Environment is the sole issue. Old generations weren't stoic therapy goers who learned to live themselves first. Thats new age bs that places all the blame on confused young people who were born with brain killing smart phones in their hands and further socially f…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 09:02 PM
0

Man works and provides financially, fixes things, repairs things, kills intruders. Woman cooks, cleans, raises kids, defers to man about big decisions. This is not possible in America because 2 incomes are required to survive. Also gender roles have been vilified here for over 3 generations so most people are uncomfortable and confused about abiding by them. Even if a couple tries to do it, it will unravel if they are surrounded by secular modernist peers calling the man a tyrant and the woman a…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 03:11 AM
-1

I can't remember if its a banned subject here so I can't elaborate beyond saying its the best option for the average American man
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 10:25 PM
-5

Conventional gender roles willingly adhered to. That simple. Not possible in the west, which is why I'm a radical ppb activist. Its the only way
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 05:34 PM
4

Lack of incentive. Thats the sole factor preventing it. Why would I meet a woman in person. What are the rewards/ benefits. Based on experience, the results range from akward stiff interactions, to instant incompatibility. Meeting in person doesn't solve the issue of extreme incompatibility between the sexes
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 05:21 PM
0

You're personalizing this, I couldn’t possibly be referring to you because I don't know you. I'm talking about women in general. You must know there's a major difference. Most women are very judgemental about men's sexuality and its tiresome. Men could care less how horny women may or may not be. It doesn't equate to more sex. Current generations are having less sex than people in the 1930s. Men definitely aren't the ones who loss interest. The reason is entirely woman based.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 05:19 PM
1

No one has a problem with women being horny. The problem is how women weaponize sex, demonize and attempt to suppress male sexuality while demand theirs be celebrated. Women shift seamlessly from sex goddess whos needs match or eclipse men's to trembling victims who wish men would stop sexuailizing fictional women, condemn men as porn addicts, call men creeps for wanting sex on the first date, on and on it goes. Women can gush about the types of men that turn them on, focus on height, status, in…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 02:24 AM
3

Boys scouts
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 02:20 AM
1

The ones who don't deserve a political movement and government handouts. Their new gender is at the very top of the victim hierarchy
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 02:18 AM
5

Position 1:A man is not owed sex from a woman. No matter what he says or does, no woman is required to reward his behavior with sex or a relationship. A man could in theory do everything right, dress grooming on point, good job, voted correct, respects women, funny, confident. Any number of women can reject him simply for arbitrary reasons he has no control over. He can get rejected for endless times. Its not women's obligation to be with him. This man is not weird or bad or a creep. Position 2:…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 02:16 AM
3

This is a very specific certain thing, namely attracting a woman. Attraction is not guaranteed no matter what a man might do. Therefore it must be possible for a man to do and say all the right things and still be rejected by any women he approaches. Yet somehow he is still at fault. Until women are willing to admit how important genetics and looks are, they must adhear to this paradox
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 02:09 AM
13

The idea that if a man is a virgin in his 30s something is wrong with him and the idea that no woman owes a man sex no matter what he does are contradictory. Nearly 100% of women hold these two contradictory beliefs
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 04:20 PM
2

Its nothing to do with manipulating or controlling naiive women. Thats all a projection. The fact is younger women are just more appealing by every metric that men measure a mate
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 01:38 PM
6

I like all these posts flaired question for men because I'm able to comment for a change. Successful women have never been intimidating. They are simply inaccessible to men below them, unwanted by men at their level or above them. Its no ones fault. Human nature is unfair
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 11:52 PM
2

Men judge other men on their standards as much or more than women. There is no collective consensus on whats reasonable. Besides that, most men can't even afford standards because they have no options anyway
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 11:49 PM
–

They are too far left. They are emotionally cold. They are ungrateful towards men in general. They are rigid in their stances on things, most of which are unreasonable. They seem to despise conventional masculinity unless it is coming from another woman or an extremely attractive man. Overall they are just not pleasant.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 11:43 PM
0

The general response to the post, not you alone
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 04:10 AM
2

They swatted the olive branch away with extreme prejudice. They don't want to build bridges They want to be angry
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 03:55 AM
–

Your desire to eliminate roles comes from a short sighted self centered view of your own personal inconveniences. It doesn't take into account the vast millions of people who thrive under and like these roles and the countless people who suffer when these roles are eroded. For example most women now complain that no men are conventionally masculine and dating sucks because men don't approach or pursue women according to their ROLE. Women want men to fulfill their gender role and when modern men …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 03:34 PM
1

The friend zone is a nebulous set of social conditions that help women gain maximum attention and utility from the most amount of males possible while allowing women to maintain plausible deniablity. It thrives in its vagueness. Denying its existence is a fundamental aspect of its utility. It can't be identified or called out without the accuser becoming maligned as a creep/loser/entitled. Here is how the friend zone functions: Due to lack of telepathy, men must rely on social cues and body lang…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 03:58 AM
–

Literally Noone tells anyone they can't choose a career due to sex. By the time a person is looking for a job no one is having a childish conversation like that. Real life is not like those stupid feminist commercials where girls are forced to wear pink because of the pAtRiArChY
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 11:44 PM
–

Amazing how anything gets done in Latin America if boys do nothing at all but play video games. Smells like bs. Doesn't matter how often something needs fixing. Men have roles just like women. You'll dodge the point all day no matter what
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 11:42 PM
–

Calling rules tyranny just to reframe it doesn't make it any less unhinged. Lazy word play. Bait rejected
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 11:40 PM
1

Site even one single example instead of combining redpill and conservative into the same hypothetical person even though the 2 groups clearly have opposing views and then calling the non existent combination a hypocrite
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 11:04 PM
–

Unhinged take that you don't even live by in your day to day life. Bait rejected
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 10:43 PM
–

Even if your upbringing was worse than the beginning of Harry Potter, it's an extreme anecdote that doesn't reflect how anyone else grew up. If anything as many boys could recount being treated the reverse. It sounds more like favoritism than gender roles. Gender roles would be the boy doing out door chores and being made to fix things. Your alleged experience just sounds like you were the step child
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 10:43 PM
–

Your brother did chores and you only saw what you wanted to see to fuel your Cinderella level victim complex. You both did homework chores and recreation growing up. You don't need to slander your own family to prove a point on reddit
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 10:25 PM
1

Limiting choices is neccessary for all aspects of life and everyone doing whatever they want with no cultural guidelines creates utter choas. It is a childish desire that fades away at the slightest encounter with any responsibility or life advancement
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 10:23 PM
2

'Just don't date [topic]' can be used to dismiss every single topic on this sub. It's not useful advice. They ask to find out why it's happening, not because they don't know how to avoid the type of person
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 01:58 AM
-2

Because one is valued more than the other
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 01:52 AM
3

Try it and find out. Have a lawyer present
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 01:49 AM
1

It irreversibly ruins social dynamics. For most men in most circumstances the answer will be no. This hurts and is not a simple matter to shrug off. In situations where the man will see the woman again, there will forever be the underlying fact that she rejected him floating around them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 09:07 PM
–

These bans are only ever directed at what arouses straight men. All the lgbt and female oriented smut are safe
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 09:03 PM
1

People still do lots of things that are not good for them. They go to college even after it has been largely revealed as a debt scam. Marriage is a similar thing. It's an old tradition that grants status and cultural acceptance at great financial cost
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 09:02 PM
1

This isn't a matter that women are ever going to look at favorably. Men just have to go after what they want without worrying what women think.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 09:00 PM
8

It's a trash method, but it is still the primary method now
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 08:37 PM
2

Its an old mgtow fantasy but Artificial wombs mixed with sufficiently life like robots would cause men and women to decouple on a mass scale. First in secular countries where the sexes already barely like eachother but are compelled to suffer one another for sex and offspring. More traditional countries would hold to the old ways for a bit longer but eventually it just won't make sense anymore
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 08:36 PM
2

Misogyny is being defined here as anything bad happening to a woman, but misandry isn't. Otherwise all wars would be framed as misandry and the death toll of so called misandry would eclipse anything done to women. Feminist argumentation is always manipulative and dishonest. No exceptions
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 08:29 PM
6

It's important to note that every single rule, including gender neutral ones, can be reframed as "trying to control women's bodies". This is a non starter
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 08:24 PM
-3

They aren't arbitrary. They serve important functions and the goal is to attempt to fill the role as best one can, not fit the role perfectly
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 08:21 PM
-2

This isn't done though. So why oppose a made up problem. Unless you mean some foreign country. In every modern country boys and girls are taught together in schools to develop the same skills. And for at least the last 4 generations societal messaging has been under near total feminist control such that girls are being sat in front of Legos while boys are made to wear pink in the hope that they'll become interchangeable
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 08:19 PM
2

Zero. P4p life only
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 08:15 PM
22

The the year of our lord 2025 It is not appropriate to express interest in a woman at work, at the park, in the store, or even a bar anymore. Swiping on apps is the only acceptable option. Dating apps are real life now. The point was to filter out most men. It worked.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 08:10 PM
1

Which redpillers. This thing where people take something one redpiller said, contrast it with something a completely different redpiller said, then act like they discovered a scandalous hypocrisy is so tiresome. Some guys enjoy the decline, other different guys lament it. So what
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 07:27 PM
1

I will not jump around from subject to subject getting pelted by questions. I will not address all your points here. I only meant to point out that talking politics with women is fruitless particularly in the context of dating. This post will not be an extensive political debate
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/25 04:31 AM
1

Notice how I said rainbow messaging pushed onto kids, and you countered by telling me how you and your family are respectful to lgbt people. Completely talked past my point, which is all too common in left v right debate, as rare as it is. Being mean or cruel to lgbt people isn't a right wing policy. They very specifically insist that the messaging not be pushed on children. There's zero overlap and no room for misinterpretation, yet all you heard was ' I'm mean to gay people because their exist…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/25 02:26 AM
0

Wild to hear dems suddenly care about 401ks and the economy now that there's a market drop they can solidly blame on orange man. To be clear I'm talking general politics, not what happened in the last few days. In general , normal men aren't going for open borders, rainbow messaging pushed on kids, wasteful government spending, dei, and other cool lefty policies. They don't vote like women. They vote like men. When it's time to date, they are required to hide this
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/25 01:34 AM
0

Not an option. Women are not open hearted about men's politics. It's either agree with her or no deal. So men must fake it and move on after she finds out he's secretly normal
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 09:15 PM
2

Mostly shrug and bear it. Happy wife happy life is a male phrase for a reason
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 06:34 PM
5

None of this is evidence based. It's all casual reddit conversation, not a courtroom case, not an academic essay. Evidence is only demanded when you disagree. When you like what is said you don't demand a source
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 04:43 PM
4

Miserable = it doesn't feel like a fantasy out one of her smut novels. Women now leave relationships out of boredom. If that's the new meta, so be it. No reason for men to commit in the first place
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 03:46 PM
1

I plead the 5th, mod
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 03:07 PM
0

I only seem defensive because you're on the offensive regarding the term. I think it's fine but you attribute extra sinister aspects to it just so you can make it seem like a criminal act. You make up definitions to tack onto it so that no one can accept or embrace it without being condemnable
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 04:08 AM
2

You make these statements as if they are self evident axioms but they don't even sound like how anyone actually behaves. What does the fetishizer do when their sex object starts talking? Shriek and wonder why it can move and talk? What does an interaction outside of sex look like? Is the fetishizer telling the victim to stop acting like a person because that's not their role? What's the worse that will actually happen
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 03:53 AM
2

All of that can be true while still understanding that the fetishee is still a person. The way fetishizing has been defined by whatever egghead psych experts is whats reductive, and probably not even provable
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 03:36 AM
3

That's a bold assumption to make. Why does the existence of a fetish necessarily mean the person is callouse to such an extreme degree
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 03:20 AM
5

Yes, because the overall difference is negligible. Except the woman who doesn't fetishize me will want less sex and more yapping. So now that I think on it, it's better to be fetishized than not Worrying about being desired just for sex is a strictly female conundrum. Men have to worry about never being desired for sex. So a man being fetishized is the opposite of a problem
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 03:16 AM
1

P4p is actually part of a perfect and balanced lifestyle after you get past the social stigma
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 06:28 PM
1

I didn't want to get mired in politics but you asked. Assume straight men are right wing and hiding it. This should be a forgone conclusion but it doesn't have to mean the end of relationships
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 06:14 PM
0

They've done a passable job so far in the responses
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 06:08 AM
1

Men can listen to a woman bleat about her sovereign right to have men nut inside her raw then chop up and vacuum the inconvenient offspring and tell men they should have no opinion with no womb even though the very concept of male reproductive rights doesn't even exist. Men just nod and shrug it off. Men can overlook women voting for open borders and then lamenting at how inexplicably dangerous and grimey big cities are and how groups of men who don't speak English follow her around. Surely ther…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 06:04 AM
1

This is helpful. I'm seeing some patterns and can understand what's happening better from these answers
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 04:40 AM
0

Because men largely endure women's politics. But the endurance is one sided. That's why.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 04:15 AM
1

That was a wild ride
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 04:12 AM
1

values short sighted tax breaks over reproductive freedom for women. That's sort of what I mean. Not an actual point the other side ever made and not at all how they think. It's neccessary to mutate anything they say until they become unrecognizable caricatures. Only then does it make sense to say they are simply unfit for dating. It's the only way the divide can work
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 04:12 AM
1

Short for aspergers. Internet slang for someone who misses social queues or doesn't read between the lines
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 04:05 AM
1

Political disagreements among the masses are never that deep. They are typically trading talking points provided by corpo news outlet a or b. Or smug buzz slogan coined by commie influcer or maga influencer. It's never a philosophy battle. No one's reading and digesting philosophy then debating it with their significant other. They are working surviving and killing time. So letting it erode relationships is a waste
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 04:03 AM
1

It doesn't need to be the norm. It just needs to happen often enough to be a thorn in the side of older women, which it is. If it was so rare it wouldn't be the subject of talk show panels, podcasts, viral social media posts and casual conversations. People do it, other people see it and yap about it
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 12:50 AM
1

You missed the last part. It's not that serious. It's just a question for women on reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 12:47 AM
1

I think the can't we agree to disagree thing is something guys say for the woman's sake, since women are the ones who will end things over political disagreement, not men. A man is often happy to overlook lefty views from a woman as long as they can get along about everything else. Discussing the views at length will only escalate tension. Political discussions are only stimulating and fun when the other person agrees with you. Otherwise it's a fight
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 12:46 AM
1

The political divide itself isn't really what causes the rift. It's more the caricaturization of the other side. If I truly believed that right wingers were what the super villains the internet and news headlines portrayed them as, I'd think women were right to avoid them. Actually talking to them in real life reveals them to mostly be demoralized liberals from the 90s.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 12:43 AM
1

My point stands. It's talked about often enough to be a universal gripe
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 10:16 PM
0

You'd have to go out of your way to never notice women calling out Leonardo Dicaprio for only dating women 24 and younger. He's only the most famous example of it such that it became a meme. In general women routinely chastise men as creeps and manipulators for pursuing younger women while those young women are mocked as gold diggers. It's a ubiquitous aspect of public discourse that is referenced in all forms of media, talk shows, social research and casual conversation. Somehow it slipped past…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 09:35 PM
0

So far I'm finding most women surprisingly reasonable except for politics. This could be the great filter for a large number of American men since last election clearly demonstrates men are leaning more right than even past generations
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 09:31 PM
1

Sounds fair. Good luck. After 6 figures, men start getting attention and it goes to their head
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 09:26 PM
1

I didn't expect to see answer that I'd like but this was close. Possibly even based
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 09:16 PM
0

He is probably above the minimum standard then. Maybe my original question was misunderstood. Essentially I'm asking about the metrics of a man that would make you go "he'll do"
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 08:07 PM
1

Fair enough. This informal survey doesn't apply to you. Most people are having lots trouble and defining minimum standards could help illuminate things
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 07:45 PM
1

Just don't be a dick could mean anything or nothing. A tepid, mild mannered kiss ass is not a dick, but he certainly wouldn't rouse any attraction in you. Same for a mopey sad sack or a very loud but polite bafoon. There has to be some range of personality that is acceptable
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 07:44 PM
1

Think about who last made you feel the spark. Where did he fall on these metrics?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 07:41 PM
2

Im doing my best not to be judgey but damn 100k lmao. Average still hovers around 50k for American men. Otherwise these were specific which is more helpful than the other responses that say these things don't matter
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 07:40 PM
1

I suppose the only way to answer these is to think about the worst men you have gone for, and see where they ranked. Since no one makes lists of stats
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 07:38 PM
1

Do you sense that your female associates have similar minimum requirements, or do they seem higher/ lower than these?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 07:35 PM
1

I decided to ask about minimums rather than the ideal man because I wanted to see what women belive they are willing to lower their standards to, as per the popular phrase 'the bar is on the floor/ in hell'. I wonder if the men at or below the bare minimum requirements are really all that bad or undatable. Or are they just the vast majority of normal men
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 07:33 PM
0

Its apparently not going out of fashion rapidly enough for older women to stop complaining about it. As long as there's some old guy somewhere with a young hottie on his arm, there will be inordinate outrage
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 07:30 PM
0

I think to the degree anyone is fascinated by musk, it's because of the image he has built as a super genius, not his wealth. Plenty of dorks with no fan base are rich. That said, it rules out a lot of guys. The political divide is the biggest reason why men and women aren't getting together; more than money or superficial preferences. This response was helpful
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 07:29 PM
0

Specific in some areas, a bit too broad in others. Still a bit helpful
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 07:24 PM
3

Im certain I won't. But my goal wasn't for favorable answers, it was for genuine answers. The more brutal the more valuable
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 07:23 PM
1

This might just be a difference in how men and women communicate and perceive things. We have to be able to speak to one another so some grace is required. Men will very often approach matters like dating and relationships like a problem solving exercise or a game that can be won or lost by mastering various rule sets or mechanics. This approach will put women off since they have different brains and rely more on intuition, but it's still worth attempting to have these discussions
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 07:22 PM
1

They have been more down to earth than I expected, although I'm skeptical of how many women say certain things don't matter that I suspect very much do matter. I won't call any bluffs on this post though. It's an informal survey, no wrong answers
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 07:18 PM
0

The grand scheme behind this post is to better assess women's ability to express what they are actually attracted to. So I would expect them to imagine a man they would want to go to bed with. I don't believe sex is earned, although it can be weaponized
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 07:16 PM
2

Pay attention to actions, not reddit posts. In real life, enough young women are paired up with older men that it's been a contentious topic for multiple generations. It it was never or rarely happening it wouldn't be something so often condemned
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 05:49 PM
15

Obvious cynical answer is that women don't make great friends. Guy friends can talk shit, help you move, pitch in for food and beer, be funny, disappear for 6 months and come back like it's nothing, swap offensive jokes. All factors that make them ideal friends. Low maintenance, no expectations, good times. This is not the case with women generally speaking
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 02:20 AM
6

It is as legitimate a term as it is functional in conversation. Everyone knows what is meant when they hear the terms. They can picture the type of man, and put most men they see into either category fairly quickly.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 01:33 AM
6

Almost no men expect virginity anymore. 5 is considered a low count now
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 11:40 PM
6

If you want it that way you can at least admit it isn't low risk
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 02:57 PM
7

Men aren't demanding results. They were at least hoping not to be fired, arrested, and publicly shamed. Since these are the modern consequences for communicating sexual interest, it is no longer low risk for men to do so
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 10:13 AM
8

You're volunteering way too much information now, you can dial it back. We are in different stages of life so it makes sense to do things differently. All this weirdness about being touched makes me wonder how he got to have multiple kids.( joke, you don't have to go into why touching is bad for a 4th time)
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 09:28 PM
3

It's a good thing your touch can't be considered creepy no matter when you do it. 8 minutes or 8 weeks. By the way whoever that guy is definitely wanted physical intimacy way before that and waiting 8 weeks is borderline cruel. When the time frame is soley in women's control its absolutely miserable for men. The more I hear the more relieved I am to have discovered dating overseas but that's another subject
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 07:29 PM
9

You are speaking from a position of female social privilege. You don't have to initiate physical touch. The guy you want has to know when and how to do it to you. If he never does, nothing happens and it's his fault. Don't act like you never want a guy to touch you or that you would be any better at figuring out when and how it's appropriate. You don't have to initiate so you never have to worry about that. All you have to do is enjoy when a guy does it with perfect timing and style and call all…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 06:33 PM
-1

Due to lack of telepathy, people's rely on social cues and body language, because asking directly is a certified ick. Women have built a paradoxical set of cues that can be interpreted as simple friendliness or the green light to flirt. This is on purpose. It puts the burden on the man to decide to escalate to flirting so she can reject or accept advances depending on her mood, all while maintaining a position of passive innocence. " She flips her hair and smiles at every one, but also that was …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 06:20 PM
14

Due to lack of telepathy, people's rely on social cues and body language, because asking directly is a certified ick. Women have built a paradoxical set of cues that can be interpreted as simple friendliness or the green light to flirt. This is on purpose. It puts the burden on the man to decide to escalate to flirting so she can reject or accept advances depending on her mood, all while maintaining a position of passive innocence. " She flips her hair and smiles at every one, but also that was …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 06:18 PM
26

When the nice guy attempts to flirt or express sexuality, he instantly becomes a creep. I've watched this happen to unlucky guys right before my eyes. There's nothing more uncomfortable than seeing an amiable platonic duo collapse into accusations of creepiness after the nice guys makes a tentative step into a knee touch or a suggestive joke that morphs the friendly woman into a repulsed victim. Nice guys are not doing and being everything wrong. It's time to stop putting 100% of the blame on th…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 04:51 PM
8

Men must center foreign women. This is the ultimate solution for men suffering in the west
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 02:57 PM
0

They take those risks to the tune of many millions of stds and unplanned pregnancies a year. Also they aren't doing it with most men. They are doing it with the few men who do have Status or money. That's a time tested rp factoid. It all makes perfect sense
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 06:00 AM
-3

Money. Favors. Attention. Manipulation. Validation. All the reasons women very loudly and openly claim to engage in sex. Such that it's a common trope for women to claim they faked all the orgasms after a breakup just to spite her ex
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 03:55 AM
0

The desire for sex, like food, never goes away. A mans stomach can be full and balls empty today, and tomorrow he will want food and sex again. If you are referring to the natural decline of libido with age, men will just gradually lose desire for frequent sex. I'm not sure what other type of answer you're searching for
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 10:08 PM
-4

Personally I'm no longer interested in bonding. Even a satisfied woman can change on a whim for any or no reason. It's enough for me to get mine when I can
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 10:02 PM
2

Because my sexual and mate selection desires are not logical. Logic is a mechanic used in certain contexts, not 24/7 like a robot. Even the most logical person lives day to day based on instincts, preferences, biases and emotions.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 06:32 PM
0

It's not a myth. But it's also not important enough to men to go out of their way to get women off. Men are accustomed to how effortless and guaranteed their own orgasms are. So women by comparison seem fussy, disconnected from their own bodies, and over reliant on the other person, toys, state of mind or other factors to achieve orgasm. Sucks to be them
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 05:30 PM
1

I think another male advantage is that the act of casual sex is far more gratifying and nearly always results in male orgasm, whereas so many women complain about feeling used afterwards, not orgasming, only doing it to gain favor/ attachment/ material gain. Sex is more consistently good for men. It's only good for women if she's in love or the guy is extraordinarily hot/ good in bed
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 01:01 PM
2

People do believe that they are entitled to these things regardless of what they say online. Most human behavior boils down to that principle. Actions > words
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 04:16 PM
–

2014 era copy paste shaming language doesn't net up votes anymore. Actual arguments are the new trend. He made legitimate points.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 02:59 AM
0

Women's value is in their ability to make more people. Men's value is in their ability to be utilities. A man is a loser when he has no job. A woman is a loser when she makes no people
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 10:23 AM
4

Femininity has zero utility. Men have to be a utility or else they have no value. Femininity is a group of luxury traits that only potential child bearers can afford to possess
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 06:48 PM
2

Women despise weak men. The need to be superior as a man is born out of the sheer contempt that women feel toward men who are inferior. These inclinations are not developed in a vaccum
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 06:45 PM
47

Nothing about gay relationships proves anything about hetero relationships. Premise was dead on arrival
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 12:56 AM
1

That's a bit of a stretch. Men didn't stop women from working. Women couldn't work because every job was dangerous and physically demanding until after the industrial revolution. After there were offices and factories, women swarmed the work place. The idea that men ever arbitrarily banned women from working is a myth. Except for in the middle east maybe
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 08:24 PM
1

I made some pretty basic, ordinary claims. You can dismiss them if you want. My investment in this exchange couldn't possibly be lower
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 02:57 PM
0

Your mistake was protecting a value judgement on what I said and getting angry about it. I merely observed what has changed and how people have reacted, not whether it's good or bad. Chill out
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 02:51 PM
0

Everyone is making shit up. Its all anecdotes and observation. This isn't a lab or an academy
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 02:49 PM
0

I don't present evidence. Its a reddit sub not a courtroom. It's my opinion. Men and women were segregated for much of history. No i won't link a source. It's common knowledge. Only recently has everything from their work to their education and social spaces been co-ed. The result is that they have become disillusioned with eachother.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 10:43 AM
-1

We were never meant to yap at eachother, especially at length. We were meant to pair up and reproduce. Now that couples just vibe and become pet parents, they are finding out they have very little in common
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 01:42 AM
2

Made up premise that no one ever expressed. Redpillers don't ascribe morals to evo psyche. Those morals are projected onto their assertions by others. Attractive men have so many options that monogamy is impractical for them. Average and unattractive men have little to no options, so they must value a single woman and be thankful for monogamy. Its not about good or bad. Its people acting based on their circumstances
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 09:00 PM
–

Most women don’t understand men or even themselves for that matter (and therefore by extension, the true nature of women), because they have low self-awareness and truth preference. They understand other women in so much as how other women are manipulative because they have some self-awareness of their own manipulativeness, but beyond that are generally ill qualified to speak. Their all encompassing consumption with their feelings makes them passionate and self-absorbed, but insufficiently analy…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 03:57 PM
1

You will never hear these two seperate ideas from the same account. The only way to conjure up hypocrisy is to take two seperate ideas you might have seen from the red pill spaces and attribute them to a single hypothetical person.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 11:24 PM
1

For the right among of karma, any type of person is on reddit. I'm the president, ama
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 05:32 PM
1

Busy parents. Business owners. People in relationships, with big social circles. The wealthy, etc
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 05:17 PM
3

Any redditors. Reddit creates a unique mix of mutual distain where everyone thinks less of one another for the mere fact that they are on reddit. The more active the more loathed. It is universally understood that no one who is winning at life or of any significance is on reddit. And if they are, they are lying for karma
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 03:19 PM
2

Awful "fix" for huge swaths of the male population to live their entire lives without physical touch, affection and sexual relief. People who have this in abundance take it for granted and tell other people they should just be happy without it. Borders on evil
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 11:56 AM
2

The problem is not really in telling guys to be considerate or have manners. The problem is actively obscuring what does cause sexual attraction in women. Mothers should sound like Andrew tate. They should be hounding their sons to get rich, fit, dominant, competitive and capable of physical violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 02:09 PM
32

The fact that most men understand is that nearly 95% of them will never experience this level of immediate lust from any woman. Men don't have the leverage to select from women who are hot for them. Women are physically neutral or repulsed by the vast majority of men, leaving only financial or emotional reasons to get involved. This is why the entire dynamic is skewed heavily in favor of women
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 08:15 PM
22

The rat utopia experiment playing out. Both sexes losing interest. Population decline, etc
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 05:39 PM
1

We can go round in circles. Bottom line is dating is better for men outside the states by every measure that men value.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 12:47 AM
6

This is a disingenuous script used to deter men from traveling. There is nothing more inherently trustworthy about western women compared to women in other countries. All hateful myths about foreign women being mercenary scammers are ironically perpetuated by other women who pretend to champion feminist principles. You'll say anything to win a reddit argument, but the reality of men traveling for dating is that it is so exponentially better that they never go back to dating in the west.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 02:14 AM
3

Wild. I don't suppose either of us can prove what we've experienced so all I can do is agree to disagree
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 01:24 AM
2

Honest with a phone full of dudes in their dms. Treating me like an equal human while expecting me to uphold masculine traditions like initiating everything, paying, being chivalrous but not too chivalrous, confident but sensitive, blah blah everything talked about on this sub. I've had my fill of western women's honesty and equality. I discovered the passport bro stuff in 2020 and the dishonesty of foreign women equals amazing treatment that keeps me coming back
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 01:23 AM
2

We might have different definitions of all those words because in my travels I never met slave minded or subservient women. I don't go to radical Islamic countries. Women all over the world possess the same level of agency and variation in personality as western women, without the cynicism, latent contempt for men and general disdain for femininity that is found in western women. But the beauty of the world is that I can travel and you can enjoy what the west offers.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 01:19 AM
4

If you think non western women think they are only good for childbearing and other weak minded stuff, you haven't been anywhere. Non western women work, vote, drive and all that stuff, just with more pleasant attitudes and a greater regard for the men around them. But if pop culture references mean that much to you by all means live it up in the states
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 01:10 AM
2

The struggle is that you aren't hot for the guys you are dating. They might be fine people, but there's no animal attraction. If there was, there wouldn't be any haggling about how many dates it takes to get in bed. You'd be all over eachother. Most dating woes can be boiled down to lack of mutual arousal. When only one or neither person is wildly attracted, everything is a red flag, an ick, a confusing issue, an annoying double standard, an essay long theory, etc. When attraction is high and mu…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/25 12:04 AM
1

Those laws and most other laws would exist be enforced by government. I won't claim to be an expert on legality, I just think government should be limited to dealing with those sorts of things and not all the other stuff it gets into
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 12:41 AM
1

I thought I did specify. Small Government, not no government. Law enforcement. Protect rights. Thats it. I think people have a hard time conceptualizing getting things done without government oversight until they do it. In some cases we only ever had government overseeing something like road building, but this doesn't mean people could never get something comparable done without government. There are many endeavors people are able to achieve without government. Eventually they figure out solutio…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 02:53 AM
3

The more physically attractive, the less effort is needed to keep conversations going. Applies to both sexes. Average looking people resent having to put in more effort because it covertly confirms what they dread, they simply aren't hot.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 01:14 AM
0

Guys don't want sex for ego or validation. This is projection. Guys want sex because they are horny and sex feels good. This is a simple fact that women have a hard time grasping.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 12:14 PM
3

You're listing problems that currently exist and aren't solved by government as a reason why my system wouldn't work. Did you read your own sentence before you posted it? I already said government would function to maintain law. That covers contract disputes. Infrastructure can be built without government taxing you, poor central planning and pocketing money. Why are you so desperate to be fleeced
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 12:07 PM
1

None of these factors were ever arbitrary rules to exlude women for no reason. Who could work a job back when the only jobs required intesne physical labor and risk? Only a strong and capable person, aka a man. And not any man just for having a dong. A strong and capable man. How did one aquire land? By showing up and asking for it after displaying their junk? No. They settled it, killed for it, defended it, and worked the land. After Civilization is sufficiently modernized such that cushy offic…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 10:36 PM
1

Your assumption that hospitals and other human services can't exist without bloated government institutions is flawed. Problem solving, humanitarian programs and sustainability can all be achieved without currupt beurocracy. Government overseas these things terribly. The fact anythings done is more often inspite of government, not because of it
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 10:21 PM
2

Merit based economy and acedemic system. No subsidies, no government mandated equality. This alone will balance dating and relationships between men and women. No government welfare. Flat 10 percent tax across the board. No loop holes or complex write offs. 10 percent. That's it. Charity and welfare made by churches or community groups. Government enforces law and protects rights. Nothing else. No government schooling, medical or rescue. Only police, and courts. Nothing else needs to be enforced…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 09:41 PM
2

First post from lilith that I can actually agree with. You managed to be rational and leave out the usual contempt for men. You can actually get your ideas across to men if you speak like this more often. Something to keep in mind for future posts. I've always thought that the problem with tate and freshfit types is that average men start to try and act like those guys without being famous jacked millionaires. Average guys don't get to talk about exercising options with a harem of women while ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 03:46 PM
2

It's not dead because a woman can be a doctor and live a good life. That was possible under patriarchy. Patriarchy is dead by definition of our systems not being strictly male governed or set up to grant men any advantages over women what so ever. Zero laws exist for the sake of men specifically. Numerous laws in place soley to grant women more options, benefits and protections. A patriarchy was never defined as a system where women couldn't do or have anything whatsoever. It was defined as rule…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 01:43 PM
2

Patriarchy is indeed dead, but this was a poor argument to demonstrate that fact
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 01:12 AM
-2

Ah, I should make sure she comes while also managing my own erection and timing my own orgasm. Shall I brush her teeth and file her taxes for her while I'm at it? This is my point. Are women allowed to participate or what
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 04:01 PM
–

Agreed. Also, I think men being obligated to last longer should be met in the middle with women being obligated to climax quicker. If men need to numb themselves, do breathing exercises or use other methods to defy their natural biology, the least women can do is figure their own body out and make sure they can nut within a reasonable timeframe
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 10:01 AM
2

Trp acceptance of the brutal reality of mate selection often goes ignored by those attempting to paint them as hypocritical. No redpiller advocates for women to pick losers. They typically advise men to self improve and compete for hot women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 01:45 AM
6

Because this particular sub isn't about generic healthy living advice. It is about dating and sexual relationships. So whenever generic healthy life advice as given as a method for gaining sexual relationships, it is frustrating
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/25 05:49 PM
5

Christ, it was a hypothetical game show challenge with a prize and everything. We don't need all the post modern gibberish gumming up the works, sheesh. It's not at all serious
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 10:35 PM
6

You couldn't even bring yourself to be a sport for this hypothetical situation. We get it, a man who needs even the slightest hint in the modern dating environment deserves to rot alone. That's not the point
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 09:16 PM
2

You're sorry that I'm not more reactive to rage bait. I'm over it. In 2025, rabbid misandry rolls off the back
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 06:37 PM
3

It's more of a problem because men's drive to reproduce has a more polarizing affect on civilization for better or worse compared to women. When men have a fairly high expectation that they can find a mate and make a family, they can be utilized to build, fight wars, protect, maintain, and be good cogs in a machine. When they have nothing to gain and no hope, they can become unruly and destructive. Whether or not women can find mates and start families does not affect civilization nearly to the …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 06:36 PM
2

You're way too far down the man-bad rabbit hole to talk to in a sane way so I'm out
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 06:30 PM
2

Oh, you're that far gone. I will not engage further
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 06:29 PM
8

The guy isn't real, it's a thought experiment. But sure, let's say he has problems and needs your help. The prize is a million bucks. You gonna turn your nose up or try to make him a chad
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 06:28 PM
1

I was fishing for more specific insights than the usual put yourself out there and be lucky stuff. Particularly from women's perspective
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 05:24 PM
6

It is a more pronounced problem when it affects men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 05:22 PM
1

If you really succeeded, it is a million dollar skill
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 05:21 PM
4

There is certainly more involved than going to places and being seen, especially for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 05:21 PM
5

I'm not talking about sex broadly, I'm talking specifcally about giving women orgasms. And I'm not even claiming anything unreasonable. I just think you're overstating how simple it is. I don't want to get stuck on that since we aren't going to agree
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 03:14 PM
1

This is comparable to me saying making gourmet food is easy because I've had many cooks prepare amazing dishes for me. They just feed me what I like and it's great every time. Therefore I can say it's simple
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 03:06 PM
2

It seems simple on your end because you are receiving. Im not making excuses .I'm stating that it is complex and difficult, not impossible. You aren't in a position to argue that unless you are giving women orgasms as a man
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 02:45 PM
3

If it were easy, everyone would be good at sex. I think it is both difficult and complex for everyone who isn't bragging. Of course being on the receiving end of pleasure is easy. It would be interesting to see how a woman navigates maintaining something like an erection while knowing how to touch and please another person until orgasm, but that's a conversation for another post
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 02:25 PM
0

I just said what the point was. It's to see what women think and if their ideas of what men should do align with the reality of who gets into relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 02:20 PM
5

Astonishing self awareness that runs counter to modern dating advice wherein men are encouraged to listen to women
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 01:57 PM
4

That last part requires success with women to obtain, which creates a bit of a paradox. Only a guy who was always attractive or a male porn star will have the opportunity and means to get good at sex. Besides that, it's solid advice. The goal of the post is to see if womens words align with what they actually go for. It seems to have gotten better. I see more women able to plainly state that going to the gym and having a nice body is important compared to years ago
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 01:54 PM
1

I think the fundamental problem men struggle with is knowing that women are dtf for a hot enough guy, and that guy isn't him. This makes a man feel like a clown if he's trying to be a genuine person who wants to court a woman in a sweet way, which many men want to do anyway. But in the back of their head, they feel they are being punished by being made to wait since a convict with face tattoos is rearranging the guts of the woman who tells him it's not all about sex
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 01:31 PM
3

The burden is on you to prove there was ever a time where men didn't seek approval from women. In every generation, men did what they could to seem more appealing to women. They dressed to turn heads, wrote poetry, danced, made music, killed other men, built palaces for women, etc. Modern men didn't develop this need out of nowhere. The methods of gaining approval may have changed, but that's only because literally everything about the way everyone does everything changes over time.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 01:08 PM
3

This could lead to some very unflattering realizations about differences in intelligence between the sexes. People like to use that outdated bell curve graph to conclude there's more male idiots and eggheads, which everyone finds fair and inoffensive. If we ever made a new bellcurve based on current data, or made chess championships co-ed, the results would have to be censored. And we all know why.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 01:03 PM
3

I thought i was being generous with 6 months. I increased it from 30 days before posting. People go from app matches to situationship in a matter of weeks
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 12:58 PM
2

There is no actual guy. It is just a thought experiment to see what women think navigating dating as a man is like, and if they could guide a man's behavior all the way to getting a gf. There are no wrong answers. It could be in a small town or a city. Or mars
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 12:45 PM
3

Initiating is step 1 out of 436. Could you guide a man all the way to getting a girlfriend? What if $1M was on the line
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 12:42 PM
20

This is mostly solid general advice that falls short of sealing the deal. Now that he is eligible, how is he asking a woman out? How is he gauging interest? How will he decide when to initiate intimacy. Does he ask, or does he read signals and act. This is the tricky part. Prize money is lost if she bails and makes a tiktok about him saying men are cringe.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 12:39 PM
2

If you could win a million by helping him get a gf, how would you go about politically activating him so that he becomes attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 12:34 PM
10

This might have been true a decade ago. It is now impossible to ignore average men are alone. They are not bad people, but it is far more difficult to form relationships than it was years ago
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 12:32 PM
5

I did say a woman of his relative measure. Its not a man searching out of his league
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 12:29 PM
2

For a million bucks
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 12:28 PM
1

Nothing about the post suggests women are a monolith. And this example comes with a hypothetical million dollar prize specifically because I don't expect a woman to want to help a man in this way for no reason. My goal is to find out what women would have a man do to actually succeed getting a girlfriend. Not all women, one girlfriend.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 12:26 PM
2

It's not a request from me personally. I want to see if women's theories on what makes a man attractive correlates to the type of guy that actually gets with a woman in reality
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 12:18 PM
-1

Up to the woman he gets to define the relationship. As long as they bang it counts.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 12:16 PM
2

Husband is an insult. It means a man would be an ideal candidate to work and provide for a woman. No one is saying that luigi guy is Husband material. They want his D. That's a compliment
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 10:06 AM
5

Men bear the burden of attempting to read the room and getting it wrong. The advantage will always be in women's favor here. It's not fair. It never will be
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 01:12 AM
11

Always add "unless you're ugly or short"
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 01:10 AM
–

I'm not even sure what your point is anymore. If it's really that hard to imagine a woman would ever send mixed signals on purpose, then don't believe it. Easier to assume all the men are autists and all the women are innocent
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/24 02:39 PM
–

Again, projecting robot-like logic into humans who behave out of emotions and instincts. The majority of things people say, do and put effort into defy reason and befuddle onlookers. The internet is full to bursting with live footage of it. But a woman leading a man on just to reject him pushes the boundries of belief for you
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/24 01:30 AM
2

I'm not going to pretend to be an egghead with charts and beakers. Reddit is nothing but people spouting opinions. Especially on this sub
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/24 01:26 AM
–

I didn't say "just". She's getting dolled up and going out anyway. Toying with men is a low effort diversion a woman can do at any time in any environment. The scenario you describe is all too common. The goal is attention and validation from women and men. The hypothetical woman gets all of that while also putting men down. It's not difficult or complex
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/24 12:46 AM
–

Easy. Why do women browse tinder, collect matches and never go with any of them. Why do they chat with guys and then ghost them. Because humans are not logic machines that only do the most rational thing. Humans, particularly women, are driven by arbitrary emotional whim. There is nothing far fetched about deceiving and humiliating a stranger out of boredom or to have a fun story
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/24 12:05 AM
-1

A lifetime of observation and pattern recognition
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/24 12:02 AM
-2

Men derive a greater sense of accomplishment and purpose from being breadwinners than women. They are more suited to it, IF they have a woman and children at home depending on them. When so many people are single, both sexes find it exaughsting amd pointless. When the roles are reversed, the woman begins to resent and lose respect for the men depending on her income, no matter how good a father/ home maker he is
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/24 09:57 PM
1

Crazy how all these revelations that went viral in pua mgtow spaces an actual decade ago are still catching men by suprise in 2024. I long for a time where this stuff is common knowledge. All the stuff laid out in old redpill blogs should be fundamental knowledge for men by the time they turn 18
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/24 09:49 PM
–

Women use body language to lure men who know how to read it in, just to reject them. It's a common, toxic ego killing sport for them. But most people are unwilling to conceive of the angelic sex being petty or malicious in any way. So any man who suffers this treatment must only have himself to blame
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/24 09:44 PM
0

Its a solution that eliminates the need for this sub. So of course you find it threatening
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/24 12:17 AM
-1

I think a universal hard rule must be set to eliminate this tiresome back and forth. Men plan and pay for all dates period. Women put out at the end of all dates, no exceptions. If anyone isn't comfortable with that, don't date. The end. All confusion eliminated
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 09:30 PM
-1

Couldn't help but answer when the post explicitly asks lesbians not to answer lmao god bless you
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 05:49 PM
-1

They are similar enough to be used interchangeably
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 03:56 PM
-1

Actually yes, choosing a friend is a reward for their behavior towards you. Any friendship that's worth a damn is rewarding. You don't make friends by being unappealing to people
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 03:54 PM
5

A man can update his wardrobe, take up a dozen hobbies, go to therapy, shower and get a haircut while doubling his respect for women. After all this he will still be told he is not entitled to so much as a kiss on the cheek from anyone ever. That's the magic of bluepill advice
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 08:20 PM
–

You don't wear revealing clothes at home alone where no one will see without taking selfies. No woman does. This fact alone obliterates the argument. Women do not walk around in their apartments in sports bras, yoga shorts, cameltoe leggings, ect. They wear baggy flowy over sized clothes that maximize comfort and function. The booty, cleavage and camel come out only when it's time to be seen
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 01:43 PM
1

Just replace desperate with ugly and you have a universal truth
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 11:44 PM
3

Wrong order. Red pillers generally start out as men assuming the best about women, pining after women who seem sweet and wholesome. Only after experiencing some nuclear rejections or seeing those women cling onto abusive criminals for dear life do men begin to see women in an unflattering light. Only after these events do red pill ideas take hold
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 11:29 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter