Wrong. Beauty matters for men just as much as for women. If man is old and rich, he can get a lot of young sugar babies, aka legal, long-term prost*tutes, but that doesnt mean he is desirable. He is being used for money, as a customer, nothing else
Tbh Imagine geniuenly wiaiting for those years just so you can have first relationship since elementary school (in my case not even that) JFL. Im probabily going to rope by then.
Sure, but she can also spend money of guys she is hookin up with. Yes, that scenario you proposed can and will happen, just a lot later in womens life than even most oofy-doofys would expect. Maybe like when she is in her late 30s-mid 40s. And ofc she will not have sex with her oofy doofy abused dog sperg husband, she will still find guys on side.
Not going to happen anymore because women have far more options in working and carrer devwlopement, since they are outnumbering gyus at universities. But tbh this is good thing, and I say it as a male. You may call me cuck, but Id rather be single forever then to share a household with woman who doestn find me atractive amd just uses me for my resources
Maybe not later in life idk, but in youth i would say yes. You also have to count in that women take height into consideration relatively more than men. This isnt me saying that "women only want 6'4" chad", but compared to men the care abt haight much more.
Not really. It just states a theory that the closer you are to either extreme level (0/10 or 10/10) in looks, the less a "objectivly likeable personality" ,lets say, plays a role in your dating live. So if a 10/10 "harmonymaxxed" 6'4" supermodel is, lets say, high functioning autist, his dating chances, and especially hookup chances are way, way better that, lets say 5/10 5'11" super outgoing fun guy. And that if you are super ugly deformed 5'4" guy no matter how much fun and nice you are, your …
