| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Hypothetical Scenario. Officers come in to your town and offer a chance to avoid a forced circumcision. Offer a number of days that you agree to labor to avoid circumcision. If you offer less than theaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand? | /r/MensRights | 26/03/14 10:10 AM |
| 7 | Females are in cahoots against usI appreciate that you take the time to post this highly comical satirical content to this sub, especially considering how tight your schedule must be with all the social injustices that you must fight with your tumblr blog on top of the every day hustle of being a teenager in the middle of puberty. | /r/MensRights | 23/03/14 10:39 AM |
| 1 | Belgium bans a wide range of sexist speechAs far as I understand it, the law will be gender neutral. I am not a fan of censorship of any form either, so yeah, we can agree that this is one of the weakspots of "positive" freedom. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/14 03:23 PM |
| 3 | Whoa: 4 questions socially engineered to confuse and garner a certain answer.i don't see how this is missleading either. if you answere yes to one of those questions, you are a rapist. even the one that involves alcohol makes clear that the other person does not want to have sex but is incabable of resisting because they are too drunk. it is also made clear that only a small group of people admitted to the vast majority of rapes, so it is not demonizing men either. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/14 02:46 PM |
| 1 | Belgium bans a wide range of sexist speechi didn't come up with it, it was probably a european person though :). i don't think the reason why it is called positive and negative is to devide it into good and bad, but has another reason. i am too lazy to read up on that right now though. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/14 11:53 AM |
| 4 | Belgium bans a wide range of sexist speechThere are different kinds of freedom, positive and negative freedom. The concepts are really hard to explain and english is not my first language, but roughly negative freedom means that there are simply no restrictions placed on an individual. This is what people in the USA have in mind when they talk about freedom. Positive freedom means the freedom of others, which means an individual is not allowed to have a negative impact on others because that diminishes their freedom. This is the "europe… | /r/MensRights | 22/03/14 09:32 AM |
| 2 | MRA.hilarious... | /r/MensRights | 21/03/14 06:05 AM |
| 4 | What do you guys think of this article?calling this an article is pure flattery. | /r/MensRights | 21/03/14 02:30 AM |
| 3 | Friend of mine reblogged this, does anyone know if this stat holds any validity?well since this number changes constantly (1 in 4, 1 in 6, i also read 1 in 8, make up your mind already) and there is no source provided what so ever, the good old rule "what is assumed without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence" applies here. also people that avoid the ocean because they are afraid of shark attacks are probably idiots. | /r/MensRights | 21/03/14 12:06 AM |
| 3 | Crap like this bugs me so much.but it is common knowledge that more women than men work part time for example. so if you just look at the average income that does not tell you anything as the group with more part time jobbers will obviously have a lower average. i am not saying that anyone who believes in the wage gap is a complete idiot, but i think people should learn not to jump to conclusions when presented with statistics. you can find a statistic to support any claim, it is a matter of asking the right questions. maybe … | /r/MensRights | 19/03/14 07:45 PM |
| 4 | Crap like this bugs me so much.well they don't use their brains though. obviously there are a multitude of factors that can lead to a difference in average income between women and men with the same education, instantly jumping to the conclusion that it is because of discrimination is idiotic. what do those people think happens? the employer giving the guy extra money because he has a penis or what? that is probably the least possible cause i can think of. | /r/MensRights | 19/03/14 07:24 PM |
| 3 | I am having a discussion about an article on why women should be scared of men. Would like some opinions.point out that the vast majority of men never harmed anyone and do not intend to do so at any point in their lives. holding individuals accountable for the actions of other members of the same ethnic or social group is purest bigotry. | /r/MensRights | 19/03/14 05:33 AM |
| 3 | Thunderfoot reacts to feminist "Ban Bossy" campaign.I guess it's a matter of opinion then. Maybe you are right about what he is trying to do with this sakresian thing, but I don't like how he shows the clip so many times, one time would be plenty enough, especially because it is an out of context half sentence that does not really provide anything of worth for the viewer. If you like his way of editing, fine, but as i said, the repetion of certain short clips make them seem brainwashy to me and I can't find much of useful information in the video… | /r/MensRights | 16/03/14 06:33 PM |
| 3 | Thunderfoot reacts to feminist "Ban Bossy" campaign.i'm not in disagreement with his views, but i think he presents them very poorly. he does not give you information to form your own opinion, he just gives you his opinion with little snippets of material that he plays again and again without real context. his arguments are not good at all, like i said the whole part about sarkesian was just a strawman, he did not prove at all that she wants to change video games because she personally does not like them. he just took a tiny part of a video in wh… | /r/MensRights | 16/03/14 05:16 PM |
| 3 | Thunderfoot reacts to feminist "Ban Bossy" campaign.he always repeats every point he makes a thousand times. thats brainwashy... its ok dude i got it the first time, no need to make the exact same argument like 20 times before moving on. maybe he just wants to have longer videos but is not able to produce enough relevant content and the brainwashy impression is just coincidence, either way the videos are bad. why watch a 15 minute video, that contains information you can sum up on half a page of text. the rest is just his personal opinion over an… | /r/MensRights | 16/03/14 04:34 PM |
| -18 | Thunderfoot reacts to feminist "Ban Bossy" campaign.his videos are too brainwashy to my taste, also the anita sarkesian part was a huge strawman argument. which he repeated like 20 times... | /r/MensRights | 16/03/14 01:17 AM |
| 1 | Walking the streets at night as a woman.meh, i am a guy that's over 6 feet tall and when i see a couple of drunk guys walk towards me at night in a neighbourhood with not the best reputation ( i happen to live in one of those), i cross the street. not because i necessarily think they are gonna mug me or something, but being careful is never bad. why take chances when you can just avoid trouble all together. | /r/MensRights | 10/03/14 09:50 AM |
| 6 | If your going to complain about International Women's Day...no one here complains about women's day (as far as i can tell), we just complain about the lies that are frequently spread on occasions like this, like the wage gap myth or the sourceless "women own only 1% of the worlds property". also we are well aware that there is a men's day, but thanks for the reminder anyways | /r/MensRights | 08/03/14 08:18 PM |
| 14 | Women's Day Opposer's 'The Reason it Exists': Using every argument in the stereotypical radfem handbookthe claim is so ridiculous, you have to feel stupid even saying something like that. i bet women in the USA alone own far more than one per cent of the worlds property. it is so ridiculous you have to be a complete moron to believe this bullshit, every person with an ounce of common sense can determine within a second that it is a lie. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/14 01:26 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter