TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

pevans05 Archive

View 2 posts and 32 comments by pevans05 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

So do you not mind if other men are possibly doing the same?
/r/MensRights04/11/14 07:18 AM
14

Ahhh..this guy KNEW he was going to get some shit for this! Preface: This is not so much a comment looking for replies of heated debate (my views are often left of center for mra's) as it is me rambling trying to understand all sides of the equation here. First off, that stock photo is fucking terrible. I really like how he says that drunk women are rarely considered jerks thereby shirking the responsibility for their behavior. I think the main issue here is around consent. This is what is pissi…
/r/MensRights24/09/14 08:51 PM
1

That link provides such an important context to this thread, unfortunately it will likely go unnoticed by the majority in this sub.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 02:08 AM
1

Is this a trap? Cuz this feels like a trap.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 07:20 AM
1

Don & Peggy know best
/r/MensRights18/09/14 07:10 AM
2

How dare you bring Mamma June into this!!!
/r/MensRights14/09/14 04:05 AM
-13

That's an extreme example. Does that mean you think women are the same as the kkk? It's just good business and common sense to serve as many people as possible. You're missing out on an entire demographic. It's fine if you want to specialize in "men's haircuts," not all women will want that, but if someone does there's no harm in taking their business. And who says it's a one time sale? If that woman received a haircut she liked, she would be likely to be a repeat customer. Using your analogy, t…
/r/MensRights04/09/14 07:29 PM
-14

So, in order to make money, they have to refuse customers? I don't think you know how businesses work..
/r/MensRights04/09/14 05:28 PM
-14

It's a head of hair, who gives a shit? It's discrimination that they refuse to provide service to someone who is asking for something they specialize in.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 04:50 PM
0

Patriarchy is a concept, a way of thinking, and a structure in our society. It is not "everything bad is men's fault," it is the fault of those who participate in it. It is those who believe people should be one way or another. It is those who think like this and are in power. It is those who think like this and create laws in our society, make legal judgements, and who treat others in accordance to whether or not they fit the mold. Are there women who participate in patriarchal beliefs? Yes. Ar…
/r/MensRights26/08/14 04:07 AM
-4

A lot of men's issues are a result of patriarchy. And it's feminists like her who are fighting for men. It would be helpful if there were more men fighting with feminists for equality. But that can't happen when you ignore those who are on your side and simply write them off as full of shit.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 11:53 PM
-3

it's nearly pointless trying to rationalize with people in this sub. it seems to be a requirement that you hate women/feminists, even if they agree with you.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 11:43 PM
1

But isn't that true for anything, really? There are peaceful religious people, and then there are extremists willing to kill themselves and others for their beliefs. Both may believe in the same God, but you shouldn't associate the few terrible with the largely peaceful.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 08:08 PM
-4

How is everyone missing the part where she says feminism is about equality?? Feminism is just a response to patriarchy. Patriarchy represents those rigid gender roles and expectations, one of those being mocking weakness in men. The presence of the word patriarchy shouldn't signal you to discredit everything else she is saying. She is trying to unite.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 08:03 PM
1

I don't think you understand what she was saying. She says the reason that abuse towards men isn't taken seriously is because of a dominant belief in society of hating weakness in men. Patriarchy is the valuing of masculinity over femininity. She's on our side, yo.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 07:57 PM
2

I wanted to post this article to see what all of you think. Some points for discussion: The author believes that as a general rule men objectify women regularly and publicly. She asks is it unfair for women to objectify men and by doing so, does that lower women down to men's level? Do you agree that women are objectified? Are they held to higher beauty standards than men? Suppose you agree that men objectify women, is it fair and how would you feel, as a man, to be objectified? Have you been ob…
/r/MensRights22/08/14 07:45 AM
1

I agree for the most part with some of the points you are making. However, I think the article also brings up instances of where a woman's perspective would have been important. As far as Kotex, I think the fact that they created a new ad that makes fun of older ads seems to reflect the idea that when men were in control, their idea of what a woman wanted to see or how she experienced her period was based on what men thought a woman felt. The article also talked about the makeup company that did…
/r/MensRights09/08/14 10:00 PM
0

I just find it interesting that in a company whose product is designed for a woman's vagina that all of the executives who were calling the shots were men. Could it possibly have been a terrible idea to get one qualified female executive's perspective on the matter, seeing that women are the largest demographic purchasing said product? At the very least, as the article alludes to, it could have been beneficial to have a woman involved in the marketing department. edit* : Just wanted to point out…
/r/MensRights09/08/14 06:33 AM
0

i'm not so sure about the efficacy of having a quota, but i do think it's important to be aware of gender dynamics in top positions in companies. here is a graph of the gender makeup of companies whose products are largely marketed to women. It was from this article which discusses how for a long time Kotex (as in the tampon) was run by men.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 09:04 PM
7

wasn't he winning an award for best shirtless performance?
/r/MensRights14/04/14 06:41 PM
0

it now says this: "Rule 1: No homophobia, biphobia, transphobia, racism, serophobia, or sexism of any kind." so..win?
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:54 PM
1

i've been meaning to unsub from r/lgbt for some time now, this seals the deal. if they can't include misandry in the sidebar, then they shouldn't include misogyny, or just write something like, "no hate speech."
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:52 PM
2

it's not about choosing to believe the only female child. its about believing the person who was actually molested, allegedly. and as far as moses, the same could be said about ronan. he has nothing to gain, and yet he supports dylan. this isn't a gendered battle.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 07:31 PM
1

you can't have sympathy for the fact that Woody went on to marry her adopted daughter?
/r/MensRights08/02/14 07:25 PM
1

it's less about being nice and aiming for reconciliation as it is showing how insanely hurt you feel about being accused of molesting your daughter and how hurt you feel for your daughter who believes this to be true. i didn't get any of these emotional responses from his letter. which i think if i were in his place, i would be livid and completely distraught and a million other emotions and that would be reflected in my writing.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 07:18 PM
-1

I've tried not getting too invested in all of these recent "open letters." And I can't say that I've fully delved into all the details of this family's life. However, for some reason or other I feel inclined to believe Dylan. Woody's letter is focused on the detailed rejection of specific events. Perhaps, he is tired of the public accusation of his life, but his letter lacks the passion one would feel from being hurt himself through all this. It seems like a too well edited letter. And there is …
/r/MensRights08/02/14 07:01 AM
3

A lot of the comments in the r/funny discussion of this image argue that Barbie is presented as an everywoman, whose life and career are attainable. Whereas he-man is posed as more of a fictional superhero type and not necessarily meant to be imitated. Therefore men aren't pressured with the same form of body image expectations. While I think it is possible to argue this distinction in favor of women, there are examples outside of he-man which pose similar pressures on men.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 06:47 AM
1

wiseass
/r/MensRights24/07/13 05:36 AM
1

you're still misusing the word gender. gender relates to how we express ourselves and how we want to be seen. sex relates to what genitals we have.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 06:44 PM
4

care to expand on the blank slate theory and how it was debunked?
/r/MensRights21/05/13 09:08 PM
2

i hadn't seen it on here yet, so it's new to me.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 10:06 PM
1

i think it frames the issues in a 'men versus women' light. i'm more for gender/human equality. and while i understand and support many feminist issues, i think this downplays many of the very real issues that are discussed here in men's rights and makes them seem foolish. i was just curious what others had to say as well.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 10:05 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter