TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

phoenician_anarchist Archive

View 1 post and 1,953 comments by phoenician_anarchist on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
457

Social Issuesphoenician_anarchist/r/MensRights09/06/23 04:02 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,953 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Sex is determined by gametes. Yes. The gametes are the reproductive cells. X and Y are chromosomes.
/r/MensRights25/01/25 06:01 AM
35

You probably won't find much love for intersectionality here, though there are a few; You might wish to take a look at /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 06:18 PM
29

You are only just noticing? 🤣
/r/MensRights23/01/25 03:20 PM
6

Basically, the early, default configuration of a human foetus is female. If we were to assign a sex at conception as per Trump's executive order, all of them would be female. This old rubbish again? smh. And, of course, they bring the old "biological non-binary" nonsense too. There's nothing wrong with the definition, this won't change anything, and this article has to be the dumbest thing that I've read this week.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 08:13 AM
1

???
/r/MensRights22/01/25 03:30 PM
1

So it's more than just "gender roles" then? Can you see that this would also apply to the military? If they only took the best of the best then they would all be men. How would this be any different than these "traditional" "gender roles" that you disagree with? If it's called the 'handicapped league', instead of 'women's league', they wouldn't be asking for the same pay claiming gender discrimination. Of course not, they call it "able-ism" and claim that wheelchair basketball is just as "valid"…
/r/MensRights22/01/25 02:45 PM
0

And why aren't they?
/r/MensRights22/01/25 02:02 PM
0

"Men and women are different" is the very idea on which laws that discriminate against men are based. Right. Is your problem with the biased laws or fundamental biology? Why does the Universal Declaration of Human Rights [...] I know that the UN isn't a government, but they occupy a similar space. [...] not protect fatherhood along with motherhood? Given that that section is about "health, well-being, and medical care" it's most likely about pregnant and/or nursing women, not mothers in general,…
/r/MensRights22/01/25 02:01 PM
0

Of course, you can't provide an actual argument so you resort to hostility... Do you know why women's sport leagues are a thing? I'll give you a hint: In the majority of cases, there is no men's league; just "open" and "women's".
/r/MensRights22/01/25 01:41 PM
0

Your problem seems to be with the government and not the fact that men and women are different (and they are, no matter how much people would claim otherwise). "Abolishing gender roles" is far more harmful as it actively reject basic facts about reality; If you walk down that path, you invite nothing but insanity and evil. Your vision of what the world would be like without "gender roles" is absurd.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 07:16 AM
10

I would think that "something behind the theory" suggests that there is some nugget of truth to be found, not that the people pushing the theory are mentally impaired. Woke projection is basically a given, considering that solipsism seems to a prerequisite to being woke. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights21/01/25 05:40 AM
100

No, no, it's "the left", or "progressives" or "sjws" or "the woke" or "commies" or whatever name were using to describe these people today. Feminism is simply one expression of the underlying philosophy. And Feminism has always been hateful, ever since the beginning.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 11:49 PM
46

No, it's generic; Anyone (and everyone) is supposed to relate to the character and the events, bigger target audience -> more money. Given the direct reference to skin colour and the reaction... If it were written about any one group in particular, I wouldn't say that it was "men". see also: cold reading.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/25 07:33 PM
4

Why? They will never listen, they haven't so far. A glorious waste of time that I'm going to have to pass on.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 07:00 AM
19

"Patriarchy" is a phantom invented by Feminism to act as their Devil, "gynocentrism" is something that Feminists abuse in order to push their ideology. (and neither of them have anything to do with tabula rasa)
/r/MensRights16/01/25 06:41 AM
14

T ommy R obinson, a lot of places filter his name. He seems to be the only one who is willing to talk about the topic so, naturally, the media/government paint his as some big evil to cover their own backsides. In this case, he was the first to go and look into it and quite possibly the reason that we know she lied. He even put out a video chatting with Mo sharing his side of things, and they seemed to be on quite friendly terms for someone who is constantly tarred as a mega-racist islamophobe..…
/r/MensRights08/01/25 09:38 PM
16

Reminder: You don't hate journalists enough. Not only do none of the links actually go anywhere (they know no-one will click on them) but the article is written in such a way that a reasonable person might think that all of the men that she accused were "asian" when this is not the case. The first few men she accuse were white/English and no one cared (#believewomen and all that) and it's only after she accused an "asian" man that people cared (after it came out that she was lying, of course), p…
/r/MensRights08/01/25 07:30 PM
55

just because certain crimes have a higher male-on-female ratio somehow that invalidates and negates male victims It's worse than that, a lot of the things that they complain about (e.g. domestic violence, sexual abuse) are actually pretty even, it's just that no-one cares when these things happen to men and/or are done by women. (and they will even pull the old "why do you have to make everything about men" when you point this out) You can't argue with cult members and expect anything other than…
/r/MensRights31/12/24 02:45 AM
5

Note: Given that this is 2024 data, the current conflict will likely have exaggerated the difference (Israel is also a tiny black smudge) though I do believe that they had a decent gap even before. I'm not sure that this would really be a surprise to many people here, considering that this is all of the same rhetoric that Feminists use in the west... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights14/12/24 03:20 AM
7

Sure, if you consider "masculinity" to be the shallow mockery of masculinity that women have came up with. You know what else is a good predictor of "male loneliness" and substance abuse? No father, no male role model, being treated as if you are the source of all evil, etc. note: "traditional masculinity" is just a re-badge of "toxic masculinity"; the same arguments apply.
/r/MensRights10/12/24 07:32 AM
1

Thank you for proving my point. 🤣
/r/MensRights08/12/24 11:30 PM
13

Because no-one else will talk about it? Because the people here generally aren't collectivists? Because the majority of the time that people go on and on about "male on male violence" it's simply a way to dismiss male victims, continue to blame men for everything wrong in the world, and deny the agency of women? Why don't you go onto a Feminist forum and ask why they care so little about lesbians who are sexually/physically abused by other women?
/r/MensRights08/12/24 10:34 PM
17

Not my words, the other users, and yours. 🤡 edit: the old reply&block after being called out, who could have seen it coming
/r/MensRights03/12/24 03:56 PM
19

🤣🤣🤣 The vast majority of women support the vast majority of feminists principles even if they don't call themselves feminists. And what would those principles be? You might support some of them too, like equal rights for example.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 03:50 PM
34

And what would those principles be? You might support some of them too, like equal rights for example. Equal rights? A principle of Feminism? 🤣 edit: Feminism is not, and never has been, about equal rights. They don't care about equality, they don't care about rights, they don't care about women, they just hate men. This isn't cherry picking some bad examples, it's the very foundation of the ideology. Just because people have fallen for the lies that doesn't change the truth. I can't reply to an…
/r/MensRights03/12/24 03:37 PM
1

Teaching people how to act in an emergency does not increase the chance of an emergency happening. If the situation would have been avoided otherwise, then it could. To be clear, the "situation" they're talking about is walking home from school. No, the situation that they are talking about is potentially being attacked when walking home, why else would they be nervous in such a way that self defense lessons will help? They even mention the rise in violent crime against women/girls in the articl…
/r/MensRights02/12/24 03:37 PM
3

The girls they quoted said they felt more confident about what to do in a potentially risky situation. That's a good thing. Not if they aren't actually capable of handling the situation, it isn't. Cute story, but it's irrelevant. There's a difference between being nervous and being at a severe physical disadvantage.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 02:32 PM
5

It doesn't matter how good your situational awareness is if you misjudge your ability to handle the situation. Going from "this is a risky situation, I should avoid it" to "this is a risky situation, but I can handle it" without actually increasing your ability to handle the situation is very bad. Did you read the article?
/r/MensRights02/12/24 02:01 PM
23

This is a good topic to highlight the double think and insanity. Could have played the old "buzzword bingo" in that thread 🤣 Also, these "self defence" classes can actually be quite dangerous, by instilling a false confidence in women (and especially girls) they might have the impression that they can actually defend themselves against someone twice as big and three times as strong (or a group of them) and end up putting themselves in an unnecessary amount of risk instead of avoiding such situat…
/r/MensRights02/12/24 12:22 PM
3

Didn't you get the memo, they've changed the name, it's assisted dying now. 🤣 I think that if they have to change the words to make it more palatable, that says a lot about what they're trying to sell...
/r/MensRights01/12/24 05:18 PM
17

Do they? What's more, it's not something a woman would do. Plenty of women do this, along with something very similar to this where they will pivot the conversation to talking about themselves and an experience that they have had which they believe to be similar (it often isn't).
/r/MensRights01/12/24 02:31 PM
7

Sure, just lie down and roll over, why bother standing up for what is right, fighting against evil, or defending the defenceless... Just give up. Why not be wrongly accused by them? Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour. Vade retro satana! You cannot convince me to look the other way as you spread your wickedness.
/r/MensRights30/11/24 10:26 AM
9

"the left" always go on about how they care about men too, yet their "solution" to men's problems is to blame men and masculinity for everything wrong in the world. Why do you think this will be different? This is a common theme with "the left"; They live in an upside down fantasy land where everything is back to front. They embody everything that they claim to oppose and blame everybody else when their "solutions" only make things worse.
/r/MensRights29/11/24 10:26 AM
73

When we improve men’s health, we know that the benefits can ripple through families, communities, societies and the economy. This will transform the lives of men, but also their wives, mothers, sisters, partners, mates, neighbours, children, teachers and doctors. Yeah, fuck helping men for their own sake, help them because it will benefit other people, especially women! They just can't help it, can they? I'd be surprised if this turns out to be anything other than yet another "patriarchy hurts m…
/r/MensRights29/11/24 10:16 AM
32

Unless there are measures in place, the electricity grid will go down and then society as we know it will collapse. Pretty much everything requires electricity these days and bringing the grid back up from a cold start is difficult to say the least. It would likely take years to recover.
/r/MensRights27/11/24 05:53 PM
14

They need to articulate where the biased subjectivity comes into play. Coursework. I don't know which country you're in (England here), but you probably have something similar, just with different names. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ The exams are done in a block at the end of the year and are marked by the exam board, coursework is "in-classroom" work done over the year and is marked by the teachers. Both scores are put together for the final result. The justification for increasing the emphasis on coursework is t…
/r/MensRights27/11/24 06:27 AM
2

You really don't understand the difference? Definitely brain damage... smh And there's the usual "you're full of hate" and "get therapy", can you lot not just admit that you were wrong when someone calls you out? Is your incredibly inflated ego that fragile? =P
/r/MensRights24/11/24 06:23 AM
3

An extra percent? You really don't see the difference? If the chance of a man being falsely accused of rape as x%, that would mean that x% of men have been falsely accused. It's either "the chance of a man (who has been accused of rape) being falsely accused" or "the chance of an accusation being false". I've spoken to non-native speakers from a bunch of countries across the world, but this mistake is something that I've only recently observed (and exclusively with Feminists and similar ideologi…
/r/MensRights24/11/24 05:54 AM
6

No. You make the claim, you provide the proof. I won't hold my breath. And if you're going to lie to me, can you at least have the decency to use the language properly? the chances of a man being falsely accused of rape is about 2%-10% [...] What you meant to say was: The chance of a rape accusation being false is about 2-10%. Those two statements are incredibly different, but you'd still be wrong though, 🤣🤣🤣 I don't know where this type of brain rot comes from, but it is rather indicative of th…
/r/MensRights24/11/24 05:28 AM
4

> y’all > proceeds to blindly regurgitate Feminist rhetoric that has been shown to be bullshit repeatedly Every time... 🤣
/r/MensRights24/11/24 04:50 AM
9

🤣🤣 🤡 If someone brings up statistics from the '90s, or from the UK, why should I care about the current FBI definition? Especially since the FBI's definition is for gathering statistics, not actual law. There are many places where the law is certainly not neutral and this is what people are complaining about, who gives a fuck what the FBI says when were talking about the law in other countries? I've not seen people deny that the current FBI definition is neutral, just that it's ambiguous (which …
/r/MensRights23/11/24 10:48 AM
13

In 2013 the FBI introduced a new gender neutral definition of rape [...] So... When Feminists cite statistics from before this time, i.e. when they used the older definition, should we pretend that the new definition applies? And what about jurisdictions that don't adhere to the FBI's definition, e.g. the UK, should we pretend that the FBI has some kind of authority there? (I'm no expert in US law, what impact does the FBI definition have on the laws? I believe that laws vary from state to state…
/r/MensRights23/11/24 06:01 AM
1

I'm not the one claiming ownership of an entire ideology. If you want to call yourself a Feminist, don't be surprised when people associate you with other people who also call themselves Feminists. Your opinion of what "real Feminism" is means nothing compared to the actions of people who actually have power and authority.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 04:32 AM
1

And who are you? What influence do you have over the laws being made and how they're enforced? The ideas and beliefs of those Feminists are far more important than yours. It's great that you think that you believe in "equality" but, compared to the many Feminists who actively fight against the rights of men and push for anti-male legislation... It doesn't exactly mean much. I do not hate men. And yet you support Feminism.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 02:41 AM
1

you're under the false assumption people are rational consumers Am I? Which part of my comment was even about marketing? I was talking about Feminist ideology.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/24 02:24 AM
1

OK. Why should the additional cost of making a product pink be passed onto everyone else instead of the person who bought the pink thing? Who do razor handles and soaps need to be pink anyway?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/24 02:18 AM
7

y'all God damn it. [...] whoever this is gave us an olive branch [...] One single person is not capable of extending any token for the entirety of an ideology. at least wait for the shit to start spewing first Shit was already spewed with OP. The subject of an "AMA" is supposed to be something special/unusual, neither "woman" nor "Feminist" fit that description, especially when "woman" and "Feminist" are the sole descriptors! The arrogance. smh. OP didn't even give a little introduction as a sta…
/r/MensRights22/11/24 12:36 PM
46

The pink tax is an absurd idea. If they two products are exactly the same (as they usually claim), then why would you willingly pay more for no reason? If they are not the same, then why should they cost the same?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/24 11:59 AM
6

Insight into what? Men's rights? Sure you would have more luck if you were the one asking the questions, no? these links might me helpful, albeit somewhat old at this point https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/wiki/faq https://www.reddit.com/r/rbomi/wiki/main As the other user mentioned, you may wish to do some research into Feminism because it is not, and never has been, about equality. They don't even care about women, they just hate men. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights22/11/24 08:30 AM
9

Why do you think you're so special that anyone cares for your opinions in particular enough to justify an AMA? Are you going to pretend that all of the people with power and authority who call themselves "Feminists" have co-opted and perverted Feminism, aren't actually proper Feminists, and that you are the true and honest "real Feminist"?
/r/MensRights22/11/24 07:09 AM
37

“Gender-based violence can be any form of violence that has a kind of gendered or sexed aspect to it. So a sexual assault on a man is clearly gender-based violence.” He added: “Domestic abuse against a man is gender-based violence because the gendered aspect of it, the gendered expectations in the relationship, direct and give meaning to the behaviour.” So they're using the same Feminist definition of "gender based violence", i.e. rape and domestic violence. smh. The plan will work with male vic…
/r/MensRights21/11/24 10:27 AM
5

An appeal to the dictionary definition? How 2014 of you. Feminism is built upon a foundation of anti-male sentiment, lies, and propaganda. They don't care about women or their rights, they just hate men.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 08:20 PM
5

OP has never posted here before, aside from posting the same "story" which was (rightfully) removed. Given the rest of OP's history (a lot of which is nsfw stuff, and some rather anti-male comments) I don't think OP actually cares all that much about the rights of men, but rather, has fallen for the propaganda that this sub is just about misogynistic "incels" who hate women. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights20/11/24 08:01 PM
1

What do you expect from someone with pronouns in the bio? 🤣 "internalised x" isn't a thing, it's just a way to blame everyone else for your thoughts, ideas, and beliefs.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 07:57 AM
3

The way that you intend for something to be received, and the way that it is received, are also two different things. I know such a concept is difficult for Feminists and other commie types to understand, but you can't actually dictate how other people perceive reality. You'd think that the people that constantly complain about optics, public perception, and "media literacy" wouldn't consistently pick phrases and buzzwords that require a "oh no, we didn't mean in like that" disclaimer. The asser…
/r/MensRights17/11/24 03:16 PM
6

Karen Straughan's "those aren't real Feminists" copypasta? No links, but she mentioned a lot of things.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/24 01:10 AM
1

"Access Denied"
/r/MensRights17/11/24 01:00 AM
69

"cry more" has always been a rude/callous dismissal of someones complaints.
/r/MensRights16/11/24 10:28 PM
9

This type of thing (dumb phrase being repeated ad nauseam) is second only to essaying in the "left can't meme" list. 🤣
/r/MensRights16/11/24 09:18 PM
3

You typed up a whole lot of words there, yet said absolutely nothing. Good job. 👍 A Man who chooses nothing as his purpose has chosen nihilism. There is no purpose to life, nor is there any meaning; Man's purpose was to bring glory to God, but, alas, God is dead. your opinion is nothing and you do not matter I'm glad that you agree. =P You have quite the shallow perspective from your rather cynical point of view; You may wish to do something about that. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights16/11/24 08:21 PM
19

As usual, her insecurity is actually men's fault, and she has to make this everyone's business like it's some kind of fetish. This isn't anything new, either, just going to leave this here... https://www.thegreatwallofvulva.com/ (there's even a shop! 🤣)
/r/MensRights16/11/24 04:49 PM
54

100% this was written by a middle aged woman larping as the popular girl she wished she was when she was at school... 🤣 It's just more of the typical Feminist tripe from the guardian. Every time, over and over again, always the same. You could take out the references to Biden/Harris and say it was from 2016 and it would still fit. You could even take out the references to Trump and say this was written about any male politician and it would still work. boys want to do things without girls? misog…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/11/24 04:23 PM
5

While it is true that saying "toxic masculinity" does not mean you imply all masculinity is toxic [...] No, that's what they mean, don't fall for their lies. Even if you want to be charitable, the phrase does imply that whatever they're talking about (usually being violent/abusive in some way) is some kind of masculinity. It's just another bludgeon that they used to beat men with. To continue the pointless analogy: Imagine if everyone kept saying that you were bad at playing golf, and, when you …
/r/MensRights15/11/24 08:31 AM
8

Your post probably got reported because this is common "genre" of post that most people are sick of reading over and over again. "what do you think about <Feminist ideology that has been repeatedly disproved>? is it real?" Most people here are not Feminists (and there are a fair few that aren't particularly fond of Feminism, either), so of course they don't believe in their ideology. What answers do you expect?
/r/MensRights15/11/24 08:04 AM
53

Hoping for that white knight in shining armour to rescue them? They don't actually believe what they're saying, that's why they contradict themselves quite often.
/r/MensRights15/11/24 07:45 AM
3

Some people believe in the "blank slate" theory, which takes the position of 100% "nurture" in the "nature vs nurture" debate. They also believe that we live in a society that was made by men, for men, at the expense of women. When you combine these two, you get the idea that any difference between men and women is done explicitly for the purpose of oppressing women. This is also why they refer to any disadvantage that men face, or and advantage that women have, as "Patriarchy backfiring".
/r/MensRights14/11/24 03:20 PM
0

If she would agree to such a deal, sure, it's just surrogacy at that point. But, it's not a right, nor is a surrogacy agreement even enforceable in many (if not most) jurisdictions. I think surrogacy is even just completely illegal in a good few countries too because it's seen as essentially purchasing a child and akin to human trafficking.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 03:12 PM
0

This analogy is stupid. The purpose of sex is to make babies, just because it's also fun and science has given us many ways to mitigate the natural consequence, that doesn't change the facts. The purpose of me having kidneys is not to keep them warm for you. If women are so concerned about the physical effects of pregnancy, then perhaps they might take some responsibility for themselves and their actions and utilise some of the scientific advances that were made specifically for this situation. …
/r/MensRights14/11/24 02:52 PM
4

It's an unfortunate situation, but there is nothing that he can do. This is why you do your best to avoid "accidents" and discuss the possibility before hand. What solution would you propose to this situation?
/r/MensRights14/11/24 02:39 PM
0

obvious bait is obvious... OP has no prior activity in this sub and is repeating a common lie, that "men's rights" is anti-abortion and wants to turn women into breeding factories.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 02:27 PM
9

Here's the thing, no-one is discussing this with you, because they know you're not here to discuss anything; You've already decided that you're right about everything, after all, and no-one here is going to be convinced by your schoolyard level "arguments", petty insults, and projection. Even a blind man could see that you have your head stuck so far up your own arse that you cannot even conceive of anything outwith the confines of your own rectum. You know nothing about this place aside from th…
/r/MensRights14/11/24 01:48 PM
3

The thing that you have to understand with these LLMs (they're not even remotely "intelligent", they don't have "views", etc.) is "garbage in, garbage out". The training data was largely scraped from the internet, so the output it about what you would expect from some mainstream internet forum, i.e. a general anti-male sentiment.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 01:21 PM
12

See what I mean? 🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights14/11/24 01:14 PM
8

That's probably because everyone can tell that it wouldn't make the slightest difference. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ There's a reason why people call you lot "NPCs", you just keep repeating the same lines over and over, never changing (aside from the occasional patch), no awareness of the self or your surroundings... https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/wiki/faq https://www.reddit.com/r/rbomi/wiki/main https://www.reddit.com/r/mensrightslinks/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MRRef/ https://www.reddit.com/r/Male_Studies/
/r/MensRights14/11/24 01:03 PM
19

Yay! petty insults, cult rhetoric, and bullshit statistics that mean nothing, my favourite! It is rather amusing how worked up you lot get when someone dares to disagree with you. Okay something original. What part of that was supposed to be original? 🤣 🤡
/r/MensRights14/11/24 12:45 PM
21

Could you at least put in some effort and come up with something original? You could be replaced with a random phrase generator and no-one would notice. "no u", "haha, can't get laid", "you craaazy", "women are oppressed"... smh
/r/MensRights14/11/24 12:19 PM
5

They say that violence against women is systemic because they have decided that this is the case. Similarly, violence against men is not systemic, because they say so. The "system" that they are referring to is The Patriarchy, ( / male hegemony) but it's more generalised, e.g. cult "system" Feminist male hegemony BLM white supremacy Queer Theorists hetero-normativity Marxism capitalism (It's all cut/paste ideology just with different chrome. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯)
/r/MensRights14/11/24 12:07 PM
18

They still haven't fixed their SSL cert, but now I'm also getting a 400 bad request! Is this a chat gpt hallucination, or do I need to break out the old vpn? (going by the text in the OP, again) At least this survey actually seems to have provided the question set, but, as usual, they are expanding the definition of "rape" to the point that it's meaningless. (this is why they don't usually share the questions, btw). And these number still don't mean what they're trying to make them mean if they …
/r/MensRights13/11/24 10:48 AM
51

Deliberately provoking someone with the intent to "defend yourself" is not self defence, nor should it be. I don't think "hate crimes" are a real thing, but this is certainly some kind of assault/battery. I wouldn't consider this a double standard when it comes to self defence though, just more of "women can do no wrong". People trip over themselves to come up with some excuse for women's wrong-doings, yet men's actions are usually examined in isolation without context.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 10:10 AM
55

Most likely, it would have been 1.70 for everyone because safety regulations, then a bunch of women probably complained because women are shorter on average so the requirements were relaxed for women. Same thing happened with firemen, policemen, infantrymen, etc. Anything which has some physical fitness requirement usually has a lesser requirement for women, even if it has a negative impact on the safety of others (sometimes even to the degree of costing lives).
/r/MensRights13/11/24 10:01 AM
11

0.05 meters is 1/8 inch for people using the imperial system. 5cm is approximately 2 inches. Edit: Assuming you are looking at pilots? What's the difference when they are sitting down? I have absolutely no idea if there is a difference in genders between upper and lower torso length. Do you? Between men and women? No, I doubt there is any significant difference. OP is talking about height though, for which there is a difference (funnily enough, the difference is roughly proportional to the heigh…
/r/MensRights13/11/24 09:47 AM
4

Her claim, her evidence. The Suffragettes in the UK certainly didn't oppose shaming young men and boys into throwing their lives away (whilst they themselves likely did fuck all to help the war effort ¯\_(ツ)_/¯) see: white feather campaign.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 09:32 AM
0

Yet you cared enough to reply two days later? 🤣🤣🤣 👋🤡
/r/MensRights13/11/24 09:23 AM
7

How do you even measure something as subjective as stress and burnout? At best you can measure self-perception. I have no doubt that women perceive themselves to experience higher stress, I also don't really care for the "competition" tbh ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights12/11/24 05:18 PM
17

"men abused, women most effected" The reason why we should care about men has fuck all to do with women, and, imo, if you abuse someone to the point that they snap and kill you, you kinda deserved it (and it isn't murder). Also, I'm pretty sure that abuse victims (especially men) are more likely to kill themselves than to kill their abuser, but good luck finding those stats again 🤣
/r/MensRights12/11/24 08:54 AM
1

I meant physiognomy. The word has moved beyond it's roots and become somewhat "generic", though I suppose "reverse physiognomy", where the character informs the appearance, would be more fitting. Or perhaps even just "the uniform of the cult". ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Neither are quite right, but aposematism is usually used in the context of animals and is far from an conscious decision, does the mimic even know the significance of his colours?
/r/MensRights12/11/24 08:25 AM
14

The 2% was pulled out of thin air by a Feminist, the FBI number was 8%, not sure where this 10% comes from. The "false accusation" numbers are generally for "provably false" cases, not merely "lack of evidence" as many Feminists will claim. Given how difficult it can be to prove that something didn't happen, I'm kind of surprised that the numbers are this high.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 08:06 AM
14

Why stop there? Since Feminists are all about "the pendulum swinging", make it female only for a while to make up for all of the time that it was male only, it's "their turn" now. This will also deal with one of the common excuses that they use when asked why they don't sign up voluntarily, the fear of sexual violence from male soldiers (because, you know, lesbians don't exist and women are never violent). And if they complain, one need simply remind them that there hasn't been a draft since the…
/r/MensRights12/11/24 07:56 AM
32

IIRC They even gave one to a guy that was on his way to receive his Victoria Cross. 🤣
/r/MensRights11/11/24 09:19 PM
80

[...] a young lady with green hair, a backwards camo hat and a large, spiked septum ring [...] physiognomy strikes again 🤣
/r/MensRights11/11/24 09:03 AM
166

Because the people who do evil such as this have a large overlap with brain dead (and also evil) commie types. she didn't vote for trump she's a woman therefore, women didn't vote for trump therefore, men are responsible for trump trump is orange hitler therefore, men support orange hitler edit: It's the same as the abortion "bans", they blame men alone despite men and women being pretty evenly split.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 09:01 AM
0

So you don't actually have a point then? And it's not "ironic" when reddit won't hesitate to ban "problematic" subs, unless you're going to suggest that this sub is comparable to those seemingly dedicated to spreading vitriolic hatred of men. That would be missing the point anyway, the comparison wasn't between "men" and "women", but "on reddit" (the "vocal minority") and "irl". The "women" part is simply relevance to what is currently happening, i.e. the meltdowns.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 07:34 AM
4

Not a single thing you've written backs up the initial claim, which is quite impressive. It doesn't even back up the implied claim, it's just another "no-one tried to kill you, you're still alive" post. I'm also curious why you insist on using the quote marks around the word feminism every time. It's either to present Feminism as some imaginary entity that isn't real, or to suggest that they aren't "real" Feminists. Or maybe both, 🤣.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 05:01 PM
7

[...] 77 cents on the dollar [...] - Obama Yeah, no-one important cares about Feminism, totally not influencing government policy at all... Consider that: FGM has been made illegal in the UK three times, yet no-one would dare to even refer to infant circumcision of boys as "mutilation" never mind proposing legislation against it, a number of police forces have publicly announces their anti-male biases, the current law defining rape in such a way that it can only be committed by a man is actually…
/r/MensRights10/11/24 04:54 PM
142

Again? When have people not blamed men and "the youths" for everything going wrong?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/24 03:00 PM
22

I want to ask this group your feedback on how gay men can best support the men's rights movement [...] Same way as everyone else, no-one cares that you're gay. Just not being anti-male is good enough, tbh, ¯\_(ツ)_/¯. Heres a big list of general stuff, the specific examples are a bit old but the ideas are still relevant. link Just knowing about this stuff is doing more than most people ever will, be prepared for no-one to believe any of this and outright dismiss you as some conspiracy nut and exp…
/r/MensRights10/11/24 09:05 AM
132

Why is it always the same "I won't have sex with you if you don't do what I want" with Feminists? Do they really think that sex the only thing that women have of any value? 🤣 And, of course, if we really lived in this "patriarchal rape culture" that they claim we do... They're implicitly admitting that they don't even believe their own bullshit!
/r/MensRights09/11/24 03:13 PM
3

If you're going to quote a title, do it properly. I think women on Reddit are complete garbage and do not represent reality as much as they like to make us think that’s the case OP was talking about the type of women that frequent reddit (most likely referring to 2x specifically) and pointing out that they are a (rather) vocal minority. Not really "bashing women"...
/r/MensRights09/11/24 03:08 PM
8

Be better. Opinion rejected. I thought that this sub was about men's rights and equality. It is. You see, the thing about open internet forums that anyone can join and post in, is that anyone can just join and post here... There's no end of low-effort, shit-stirring, or "false flag" posts, report them and the mods will sort them out when they wake up. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ There are also post like this one; the "I saw a bad thing I'm not going to provide proof" posts, the "I'm leaving even though I wasn't a…
/r/MensRights09/11/24 02:34 PM
13

Women's rights are on the line in America. Which ones? The "right" to be the sole arbiters of who is and is not considered to be a human being? The "right" to dictate how others perceive reality? The "right" to endanger the safety and well-being of others because not doing so hurts their feelings? Or perhaps any of the rights that they have over men? Now is the time to prove we are better than them and fight for their rights. Feminists have made it very clear, time and time again, that they do n…
/r/MensRights08/11/24 10:43 AM
4

Feminism to me, and by dictionary definition [...] And that's where you will lost the majority of people. I'm sure someone will paste Karen's post about "real Feminists", or you can look it up yourself ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ The core belief of feminism is “equality of the sexes”. Even your "dictionary definition" disagrees with you. I do think there’s some stuff here people don’t understand or at least don’t try to understand, and that’s not a jab, that’s my opinion from what I’ve seen. I hope that, one day,…
/r/MensRights08/11/24 07:30 AM
0

If you were invited to talk about a particular topic, then talk about that topic. Don't go pulling a bait and switch, especially when you know that everyone will just see this as "oppressors taking the spotlight away from an oppressed minority" and "men always have to make everything about them". It will achieve nothing and reflect poorly on the rest of us. I know personal experience is super important to reach people [...] It's not so much "personal experience" as it is "emotion"; What you are …
/r/MensRights08/11/24 06:22 AM
4

Sounds like you've already found some evidence yourself. This idea (that porn leads to behaviour) looks to be another instance of the "hypodermic needle model of media influence", anything that counters that will likely also counter this. Feminists (and the like) seem to struggle with "correlation does not equal causation" almost as much as "per capita". 🤣
/r/MensRights07/11/24 02:59 PM
1

sure, doesn't mean that there aren't plenty of low-effort posts that do get removed though... mods can't be everywhere at once and some other low-effort post slipping past doesn't mean that a different one shouldn't be removed. If you got a problem with the mods, send them a message or something.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 01:18 PM
1

You edited as I was writing, I wish reddit would say something when that happens. Would you not say that those two posts are extremely low-effort? Posts like that get removed all of the time.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 01:07 PM
1

So i blanked out for another post and it also got removed. Well you did kinda mis-characterise what the tweet said. Are you surprised that it got removed? Plus other people who haven't posted any twitter screenshots and just wrote statements regarding democrats also got removed. Like I said, unless you have links there's not really much that I can say. Mods might just be a little pro-active right now, considering that reddit admins seem to constantly be looking for a reason to ban this place; A …
/r/MensRights07/11/24 01:02 PM
2

Your post history only shows two posts for this sub, both simply screenshots of twitter. Such low-effort posts usually get removed, especially if you don't blank out the usernames. Unless you have some links to offer, this doesn't look like a "don't criticise the democrats" type censorship thing. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights07/11/24 12:51 PM
6

Not sure that you need robo-Jesus to tell you this, considering that monks exist and priests have the whole celibacy thing going on... 🤣
/r/MensRights04/11/24 11:52 AM
2

My political position is that reducing politics down to a small number of generic labels is utterly pointless.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 02:05 AM
2

I know how to get around it, I just don't want to. SSL certificates exist for a reason, and they've been around for so long that I just don't see any excuse for mis-configuration these days. Since you're willing to forgive their mistakes, am I right? If I am, then there is no need for me to read the full text.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 01:27 AM
3

Link gives a "privacy error" for me, so just going by the text provided... If they have only gathered data for male perpetrator/female victim, then they cannot claim that the reaction is based on sex; They would need to show that this only happens for this particular configuration and not, e.g. female perpetrator/male victim. This "mistake" is so common that there must be some name for it, alas, I do not know what it is. (they will call it "whataboutism", of course, but this is actually a legiti…
/r/MensRights03/11/24 01:49 PM
15

[...] survey data on leisure-time physical activity [...] So this wouldn't include manual labour, which men are more likely to do? I can see the difference between "manual labour" and "manual labour + exercise" being smaller than "no exercise" and "some exercise". I don't think the results of this study mean much, tbh. To critics who accuse men of stay in the gym unnecessarily or bro culture The correct response to this is fuck off. Why should I care what someone else thinks about my choice of l…
/r/MensRights03/11/24 12:10 AM
6

There have been more than a few "men's charities" that have said similar things, yet pushed the same old anti-male rhetoric that blames men and masculinity for everything. If that is the case, then this is not "a good thing". I'm also generally not a fan of the idea of using women to lend credibility to an idea and then applauding them for doing so... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights02/11/24 05:34 AM
6

Now, when they say "male victims of domestic violence"... Does that include victims of female perpetrators, or are they part of the "but it's other men!" crowd?
/r/MensRights01/11/24 11:41 PM
3

Have you forgotten what happened to the library of Alexandria? 🤣 Personal archives are the way to go; Save what you can (and organise it!), you don't need to host it publicly but that would be more useful. Having everything in one place is more convenient but represents a single point of failure.
/r/MensRights30/10/24 03:50 AM
27

Usage of the term "reactionary" should inform you that their opinions are worthless. The behaviour confirms this. Mute/ignore/whatever it's called on twitter and move on. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights30/10/24 03:38 AM
65

"yet still an incredibly small percentage of men" They act as if "but always a man" is some kind of comeback to "not all men" but it just isn't. They're still using the actions of a small minority of men to judge and tar men as a collective, and it's still bollocks. On top of that, it's only "always a man" if their twisted definitions (constructed specifically to exclude female perpetrators) are used ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights29/10/24 09:45 PM
3

Just as with the pink tax, if the products are the same aside from the colour and marketing, just buy the cheaper one, problem solved. And if they aren't the same, why should they cost the same? Either way, cosmetics and luxuries are not important and you don't need them; This is why I gave the example of food (an actual necessity).
/r/MensRights29/10/24 05:46 PM
20

Just as dumb as the "pink tax" stuff. If you really want to make some "blue tax" argument, go with the food; Men need approximately 10% more calories than women an average.
/r/MensRights29/10/24 04:37 AM
4

Why delete the post though? I don't get it... And debating is only possible when both sides have the willingness to accept that they might be wrong, you can't "debate" someone who believes that they possess the unquestionable truth. I read the (unnecessarily long) introduction of the linked dissertation, not only does it push the usual Feminist rhetoric as if it were fact but it's been editorialised to hell and back to the point where it is rather worthless, and even if it wasn't a dissertation …
/r/MensRights27/10/24 06:26 PM
17

Didn't get answers you were looking for on your previous post? https://undelete.pullpush.io/r/MensRights/comments/1gae6t2/what_is_the_legal_history_of_rape_from_ancient/ But I have a gut feeling that it is another example of revisionist history, so can anyone provide a source detailing all about the "Marital Rape Exemption" and its true history of law and rulings in cases as such. Their claim, their burden to provide proof. Even your quote mentions "mutual matrimonial consent", implying that it …
/r/MensRights27/10/24 04:23 PM
31

Sounds like the usual "start with the conclusion and work backwards with a copious amount of circular reasoning" "study" that will be abused by ideologues to justify their bullshit with an appeal to authority.... Not really the kind of thing that you need a "counter study" for.
/r/MensRights25/10/24 12:22 PM
148

Not only is it sexist, but it's not even a rebuttal... smh When Feminists (and others) use the actions of a very small percentage of men to justify their hatred of all men, "not all men" is a valid response (even if it is often poorly executed). For them to point out that the incredibly small group of men is made up of men doesn't actually change anything. It's also wrong, because it's not always a man, they just turn a blind eye when it's women. "not all men, but always a man" is just another t…
/r/MensRights21/10/24 07:21 AM
1

I refuse to believe that you are this stupid.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/10/24 11:36 AM
24

Same reason that they despise Christianity, men's social clubs, video games, etc. "opium for the masses" In order for socialism to exist, they must destroy everything else that isn't part of their cult such that you are wholly reliant on them. It's controlling and abusive behaviour that should be seen for what it is.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 12:17 AM
65

The theatre scene? The one where a bunch of vampires did this "play" about vampires where they stripped some woman and turned her? (or did they just kill her, I can't remember...¯\_(ツ)_/¯) I must admit, that's one of my favourite stereotypes about women... 🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights17/10/24 11:49 PM
4

No, the set out to prove that Feminists didn't have a negative view of men, and they failed. Did you actually come here for an honest conversation, or are you just here to shill and defend Feminism?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/24 11:43 PM
27

True, but not material. Of course it is, I expect this type of thing to be neutral in tone and not editorialised. It sets the tone (/ primes the readers expectations) for the rest of the text, it's a persuasive writing technique that doesn't belong here... What do you mean? It disproves H2. All that they have shown is that Feminist women don't have any more of a negative opinion of men that non-Feminist women, it doesn't disprove the claim that Feminists have a negative opinion of men as non-Fem…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/24 01:03 PM
24

Thank you. I don't understand why people force acronyms to be real words, it just makes it hard to find out what it means... smh
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/24 12:49 PM
61

In six studies, we examined the accuracy and underpinnings of the damaging stereotype that feminists harbor negative attitudes toward men. Already showing bias, a great start. In Study 1 (n = 1,664), feminist and nonfeminist women displayed similarly positive attitudes toward men. This is not a contradiction. Study 2 (n = 3,892) replicated these results in non-WEIRD countries and among male participants. Confirmation of the not-contradiction. (also, anyone have an expansion for that acronym? goo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/24 09:51 AM
4

[...] fact check this [...] Fact check what, exactly? They haven't even pretended to post facts, it's just pure opinion.... The first "response" concedes the point. 🤣 [...] the state has a history of infiltrating progressive and radical spaces to sow dissent [...] Typical projection; Feminists and other woke types do this quite often (except poorly, because they glow). Another related tactic that they use is to post bullshit with an alt, take screenshots with their main, and then make posts on o…
/r/MensRights15/10/24 09:26 PM
49

"letting women and children on first" You mean, letting them skip the queue? Does he not know which country he's in? 🤣 The attacker obviously didn't either... smh This is what people mean when they say Britain (esp. London) is no longer British; I never would have imagined something like this happening here when I was young.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 07:27 PM
1

How so?
/r/MensRights12/10/24 09:30 PM
0

Have you not been paying attention? I'm not a communist, (and I'm not particularly fond of them.) 👋🤡
/r/MensRights11/10/24 12:46 PM
1

Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck... but, with the fourth answer i am very confused. How, exactly, does women not being allowed to drive in Saudi Arabia impact women in the west again? Do you have a point to make, or do you just want to attack non-white cultures? It's quite an old meme now, perhaps it's time for it to be retired? 🤣
/r/MensRights11/10/24 03:27 AM
11

I think it's more so that there is a section of the "fan fiction" crowd that will make gay fanfic of any and every male character, whether they're actually gay or not, because they have some kind of fetish for gay men. See also; women who go to gay bars...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/10/24 03:04 PM
3

Answer 1: You can always trust a communist to conflate wealth and power, and to not understand basic logic and statistics. 🤣🤣🤣 Answer 2:You know that repeating something over and over again doesn't magically make it true, right? Answer 3: Women used "no uterus; no opinion"; They hurt themselves in their confusion. Answer 4: Why are you so racist? 🤣
/r/MensRights10/10/24 01:57 PM
6

"Toxic masculinity" is the new "radical Islam" I would like to disagree. Radical Islam is based on actual Islamic beliefs taken to the extreme; All of the justification for their actions can be found in the quran and hadith (go read). "Toxic Masculinity" has fuck all to do with masculinity and was decided upon by a bunch of women.
/r/MensRights06/10/24 08:22 AM
6

Government owned media Tax-payer funded. They don't own it, they just steal money from the people to pay for it because no-one would pay for that trash voluntarily 🤣 Inability to shut off service for non payment How does television in the US work? Do you only have the "paid for subscription service that you need special hardware for" type? We also have that, but for a lot of the channels (not just the BBC), the signal is just broadcast and anyone with a receiver can pick it up, same as the radio…
/r/MensRights29/09/24 04:44 PM
179

[...] sexual assault [...] [...] hypermascilinity [...] [...] sexism [...] [...] rape myth acceptance [...] It sure is a good thing that all of these terms have well-defined meanings that we all agree on and that haven't been manipulated to hell and back for the sole purpose of pushing propaganda to attack and demonise men and masculinity for no other reason than enacting bitter vengeance against a perceived wrong-doing that someone else did to someone else sometime in the past...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/24 03:18 AM
4

Traditional, or "traditional"? Most of what is being pushed as "traditional" is actually quite modern. Effectively a straw man to justify certain ideological positions.
/r/MensRights27/09/24 04:02 AM
3

If rape were to be a serial offense then the number of rapists would be less than the number of rapes, perhaps by quite a bit. Yes. If a rapist does 10 rapes, you can still only put one rapist in prison; Feminists would take these numbers and claim "only 10% of rapists go to prison" and demand that 9 more "rapists" also go to prison.
/r/MensRights26/09/24 02:38 PM
1

Feminism was never about equality, it's always been special privileges for women without any of the responsibilities that men had, and they justify this by claiming to be fighting for "rights" and "equality" You should actually look into the "first wave" Feminists (and women's "rights" advocates from before then, too) if you think they are the "sane" and "reasonable" type. Edit: Also, the point of my comment was to say that "radical" is not the same as "extreme", as most people seem to think. Ra…
/r/MensRights24/09/24 08:37 PM
5

"Feminism" and "women's rights" are not the same thing. Don't go changing the topic and act as if we're still having the same conversation because you can't answer the question. One of the problems with Feminism (and others) is that they just call everything a "right", even when it isn't (and cannot be) one, and then when they face criticism they fall back on the "we're just fighting for human rights!" bullshit...
/r/MensRights23/09/24 10:47 PM
6

im just curious how feminism should look like to be acceptable Why do Feminists need my acceptance? I don't care what they look like, most of the common Feminist beliefs (see above) are derived from a fundamentally incompatible philosophy. I don't accept the premise that we live in "a man's world" that was set up by men, for men (The Patriarchy) and that women have been oppressed since the dawn of time until Feminism liberated them in the '60s.
/r/MensRights23/09/24 10:04 PM
2

8 years ago Yeah, I probably watched that when it came out. You're not going to sell me on Feminism with ancient videos of outliers.... Just because they were "better" than most Feminists at the time, that doesn't mean that they were good.
/r/MensRights23/09/24 09:23 PM
4

Not personally. 🤣 She was one of the "good feminists" back in the day, calling out some of the "SJW"s, right? I can't remember much of her specifically, but a lot of those "good feminists" still believed most of the same ideas (well, the important ones), they just didn't call it "patriarchy".
/r/MensRights23/09/24 09:02 PM
36

Radical People keep using that word... If they believe in "the patriarchy", think that "male domination" is a thing, campaign against "old boys clubs", push for "women in boardrooms", etc. then they are a "Radical" Feminist. That's pretty much all of them, no? There's even plenty who don't call themselves "Feminists".
/r/MensRights23/09/24 06:44 AM
11

Paywall. As far as I understand, rape in general is more likely to be a serial offence, which is something that Feminists exploit as they often conflate "number of rapes" and "number of rapists" in order to construct part of their "rape culture" narrative.
/r/MensRights22/09/24 07:33 AM
5

[...] while women remain overwhelmingly the victims of rape, men and women have roughly equivalent 12‐month rates of sexual coercion and unwanted sex [...] Yes, the "misogynist" position is that men's consent is also a thing that matters, where those fighting for "equality" only care about women's consent. Feminists (like Koss) fight to keep "rape" as a label that only applies to female victims of male perpetrators * in order to present sexual violence as a women's issue (caused exclusively by m…
/r/MensRights19/09/24 02:04 PM
18

[...] disprove the claims [...] No. If you like to provide a specific claim, along with the evidence that they have provided to support the claim, then I'm sure people here will point out the flaws, but don't expect someone to just read through 16 pages of bullshit... From the title and abstract alone you can see that they are coming from a position of ideological bias. No further consideration necessary.
/r/MensRights18/09/24 12:55 PM
7

And you've already resorted to personal attacks and insult, thanks for conceding 🤡 🤣🤣🤣. (Also, I was referencing the Feminist meme that "only 2% of rapists get convicted", is that reference too old now?) what do YOU outside of what the data shows us think it would be? I don't know, I can't know, that's the entire point. You can't say "8% are provably false, therefore 92% are true", it doesn't work like that. Some amount are proven true, some amount are proven false, most of the time only two peo…
/r/MensRights07/09/24 12:08 AM
20

Vigilante justice is not justice. You shouldn't blindly believe anything, especially if you're going to murder someone over it. If you're talking about the false accusation numbers, the 2% was pulled out of thin air by a Feminist (i.e. bullshit), the 8% was the FBIs rate of provably false accusations (not just "not proven true" as Feminists often like to claim). You cant just invert that and say that 92% are true, in most cases, unfortunately, there isn't enough evidence to say one way or the ot…
/r/MensRights06/09/24 10:01 PM
2

“Men will fuck anything” is GOOD No. Men should have some fucking standards. When you use "their language" they don't care that you are "reclaiming" it, you're just reaffirming their belief.
/r/MensRights06/09/24 09:37 PM
13

It would be interesting to see as no-fault divorce was only recently snuck in for the UK during the lockdowns (2020). The suicide rates are not only higher than lockdown levels now, but also higher than pre-lockdown. It's hard to speak to the effects of any one thing in isolation, though, so I doubt that you will get any solid answer one way or the other. (and, of course, anyone who says otherwise is trying to sell you something) In 2023, suicide rates for males (17.4 deaths per 100,000) and fem…
/r/MensRights02/09/24 10:53 PM
3

You never mentioned "traditional beliefs" (or conservatives) in the OP. You simply condemned criticism of Feminism, and so I justified criticism of Feminism. I know that they're not the only group who support these laws, but, that wasn't the conversation that you started. For this reason alone, you do not deserve a response. For instance, gender-neutral rape laws isn't a product of feminism. No they aren't, but I don't have a time machine that can take me back to when these laws were first imple…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/24 06:36 PM
23

Men's Rights Activists often focus too much on anti-feminism and too little on equality [...] What if Feminist is the source of that inequality? As you say, there are still Feminist groups fighting in favour of laws that deny male victims of domestic violence and sexual abuse...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/09/24 06:56 PM
6

[...] UFC fighters are four times more likely to be arrested for domestic violence [...] Arrested does not mean guilty. It may well be true, but part of that will be due to the perceptions of "fighting men" being inherently more violent leading to people being more likely to presume guilt. Four times as likely as ... ?? MMA fighters are nearly four times more likely to be arrested for domestic violence than NFL players. Ok, so how does this compare to the average man? Or even lesbian domestic vi…
/r/MensRights30/08/24 03:04 PM
5

Women would not have ever gotten the right to vote that way. The Suffragettes were not good people. In the US, they were racists bemoaning the fact that black men could vote while white women couldn't (and generally quite anti-male too); In the UK, they were domestic terrorists who killed and maimed innocent people. * I, personally, don't want to be like the Suffragettes. Slavery would never have ended that way. Slaves did not end slavery; The British Empire ended slavery (much to the dismay of …
/r/MensRights29/08/24 01:27 PM
53

"the men's rights movement" doesn't exist. There are many individual groups which are focused on specific issues, most of which are very local. We don't have the political power and national presence that comes with being backed by almost every government and major global corporation. A handful of domestic violence shelters here and there, the occasional (actual) equal rights case, a little more attention to fathers rights... It's hard to get anything big done when you're actually the underdog f…
/r/MensRights28/08/24 08:57 PM
10

On the off chance that you're not a troll or an idiot... "They're not real Feminists" usually comes after someone points out widely help Feminists beliefs, usually of the "anti-male" variety (e.g. claiming that all men are inherently violent/abusive/rapists/etc.) , in an effort to reject criticism. (hashtag) "Not all men" is usually said by Feminists to pre-emptively reject criticism of their anti-male sentiments (usually claiming that all men are inherently violent/abusive/rapists/etc.). So, in…
/r/MensRights27/08/24 06:27 PM
1

👋🤡
/r/MensRights24/08/24 01:54 PM
2

The word "civilization" is defined as ... At this point I would stop caring about anything that followed because I know it's going to be some bullshit, 🤣🤣🤣 (also, does civilisation not also assume some kind of state/nation concept along with laws and taxes, and some kind of social "class" system?) Well, guess what? Women invented that! No she didn't, it was Chairman Mao! Chairman Mao invent everything! Western imperialist capitalist pig dogs stole inventions to discredit and suppress the Chinese…
/r/MensRights24/08/24 01:32 PM
2

woke != average left leaning... is your mask slipping? They split the world into two groups, claim that the "other" group is doing X which is a bad thing, and propose the solution of "now it's our turn to do X" instead of, you know, not doing X because it's bad. Of course, the "other" group was never doing X in the first place, they just saw it that way because it's what they would do if they had power. Feminists think that men have a pro-male bias and set up a system that discriminate against e…
/r/MensRights24/08/24 12:45 PM
2

I believe OP's target audience is normies, so they're never going to be too spicy. He also used to post primarily on LWMA; IMO, they often seem to be "left wing" first and "male advocates" second.
/r/MensRights23/08/24 10:29 PM
1

But of only part of "the system" is actually the problem, is it really a "systemic" problem?
/r/MensRights23/08/24 10:29 PM
-1

If we can point to something specific and say "look, here is the problem" then what value is there in ignoring that and blaming some general "systemic bias", especially when it isn't "the system" that is causing the problem?
/r/MensRights23/08/24 10:17 PM
89

It's not "systemic bias", it's female teachers. I doubt I'd ever find it again, but there was some research a while ago (done by Feminists!) where they noticed that girls got worse scores when judged by male teaches, so, naturally, they claimed patriarchy, etc. and set out to prove this by removing any identifying information before the work was marked. The scores that girls got from the male teachers didn't change. The scores that boys got from the male teachers didn't change either. Turns out …
/r/MensRights23/08/24 01:58 PM
2

if If. If. This is the problem. If 5% of men were violent rapists I could understand people being cautious, but that isn't the case. The logic isn't the problem, it's the assertion that 5% of men are violent rapists.
/r/MensRights22/08/24 10:47 AM
100

'It's for like baby strollers and it's closer to the entrance so it's a little bit more safe for mummas and babbas,' one person wrote. Has Australia not invented "parent and child" parking yet? Or are all women in Australia just perpetually mothers of young children? Or perhaps Australia has yet to comprehend the concept of "fathers"? It's not for "mummas and babbas"; It's for women. It says so on the fucking sign. This is your brain on post-hoc rationalisation.
/r/MensRights22/08/24 10:34 AM
76

How to respond to “who set that system up?”? Dismissal. It's irrelevant. If something bad happens to someone, is it any less bad if it happens to have been done by someone who shares some immutable characteristic? e.g. Should we just downplay/ignore domestic/sexual violence within gay/lesbian relationships? The kind of people who say things like "but who set the system up?" are not looking for a conversation, they're just looking to be right. They are almost always not worth wasting your time an…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/24 10:24 AM
49

This space has always been known as “woman-hating” [...] It is in Feminism's best interest to present "Feminism" and "women" as if they were synonymous; This is not the case. Like I stated in the original post, I agree with feminism’s roots, equality for both men and women. This idea of "Feminism's roots" that you have been sold is a fantasy that is used to justify "modern" Feminism and deflect any criticism.
/r/MensRights22/08/24 07:10 AM
56

Welcome. Don't let the small number of people who will inevitably be somewhat hostile or aggressive to discourage you, they're mostly just angry at Feminism ( and be prepared to learn more about Feminism here than you ever knew, 🤣 ) Something to note; This isn't just some "anti-Feminist" space, the only reason that Feminism is ever mentioned here is because they constantly attack the rights of men. It's more of an "anti-anti-men's rights" position.
/r/MensRights22/08/24 06:05 AM
0

This is absolutely nitpicking because regardless of how you fucking call them, men are accepted by feminists! Except their not though, as evidenced by many Feminists considering men to only be mere "allies" and not Feminists proper. But sure, run away and pretend that you're not wrong ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ edit: Why is it always the reply&block instead of just blocking? Always got to have the last word, I suppose, that;s how you know they were right! 🤣🤣 [...] difference between a feminist and an ally [...] …
/r/MensRights21/08/24 05:18 PM
0

Feminist or ally So allies aren't Feminists then? You're drawing a distinction between the two (as most Feminists do) after denying the distinction, this isn't "nitpicking definitions"...
/r/MensRights21/08/24 03:04 PM
0

Allies are people who don’t call themselves feminists, but support feminists ideologies. So they're not "Feminists" then?
/r/MensRights21/08/24 06:05 AM
12

One side prioritises women at the expense of men; The other side demonises men at the expense of women. Some people still pick "the lesser of two evils", presumably because it's easier than fighting two enemies at once.
/r/MensRights20/08/24 12:55 PM
9

The majority of feminist would absolutely like to have men as feminist "ally" [...] So not a Feminist proper then? The majority of Feminists seem to draw a significant distinction between "Feminist" and "Feminist Ally". The author of the article may even be such a Feminist.
/r/MensRights20/08/24 04:47 AM
10

Except the Feminist stereotype of masculinity is basically "violent, abusive, rapist", none of which (in my opinion) is particularly masculine. They aren't observing men and noting common traits, they are declaring certain traits to be "masculine" because that it what fits into their ideological world view. (see also: conformity to masculine norms index)
/r/MensRights19/08/24 03:39 AM
23

‘Positive masculinity’ is showing signs of becoming a buzzword in the media. This sounds like a positive turn of events, but will the term ‘positive masculinity’ end up meaning ‘less masculinity’, perpetuating a more subtle version of the tired old ‘toxic masculinity’ narrative? Yes. This is the purpose. It is the exact same narrative but with a different coat of paint. don't do X, X is toxic, do Y instead vs. don't do X, do Y instead, Y is positive
/r/MensRights19/08/24 03:29 AM
1

That doesn't make any sense; just because they both have the attribute of lacking consent doesn't mean there's no difference between them. I mean, babies aren't asked for their consent to have their diapers changed or to be aborted, either; would you class THOSE with ear piercing? Who's this? That's right, it's you! 🤡 You're the one who broadened "non-consensual cosmetic surgery" to "non-consensual anything" (i.e. you changed the subject). Don't act like I brought up the baby out of nowhere! 🤣 T…
/r/MensRights17/08/24 06:19 AM
2

I'm not the one trying to reframe this. 🤣 Non-consensual cosmetic surgery is wrong. Change my mind.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 04:17 AM
-2

🤣 This isn't some pointless diversion (like lobotomies) or presenting some "ideal", it's to pin down your position and prove a point; If your concern is the harm then, if there were no harm, you wouldn't object to non-consensual cosmetic surgery. Here's another one: Is it OK to walk up to a stranger and cut their hair without their consent? After all, cutting someone's hair doesn't cause permanent damage, the hair will grow back. edit : I'll take the block as an admission of defeat and conceding…
/r/MensRights17/08/24 04:10 AM
2

I understand what you mean but the damage must be stated. Sure, also make them watch a circumcision and listen to him screaming first, before they're allowed to have their own son circumcised. I don't think it's relevant to the morality though. Consent matters but it's viewed as if it were beneficial so it's like a parent consenting to an important surgery. I see this as a different issue. I'm pretty sure this is US specific, right? The only time I've ever heard about the "benefits" was from Ame…
/r/MensRights17/08/24 02:21 AM
0

unnecessary cosmetic surgeries Is cleaning a baby an unnecessary cosmetic surgery?
/r/MensRights17/08/24 02:11 AM
-1

Just going dodge the question, then? smh
/r/MensRights17/08/24 02:05 AM
2

Suppose medical science advanced to the point where a circumcision could be performed risk-free, painless, and even in a completely reversible fashion... Would it become less objectionable to perform an unnecessary cosmetic surgery on a non-consenting individual?
/r/MensRights17/08/24 01:17 AM
1

They're both unnecessary cosmetic surgeries that are often performed on children. Do you really not see the difference between wiping a baby's arse and cutting off pieces or making holes? just because both inflict pain doesn't mean they're morally equivalent The pain is irrelevant, if it was completely painless (even risk-free and somehow reversible) that wouldn't change anything. Performing an unnecessary cosmetic surgery on a non-consenting individual is wrong.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 01:10 AM
0

op: A is wrong because consequences, B is not wrong because no consequences me: the consequences are irrelevant, they're both wrong because Y also me: they're both barbaric Did I fuck that up that badly, or is it just because this is a sensitive topic? This conversation is not actually about circumcision, but the difference in attitudes when compared to SRS (or not, since OP dodged that in favour of ear piercing, 🤣)
/r/MensRights17/08/24 01:07 AM
5

Yup.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 02:28 PM
31

Maybe it’s real, maybe it’s not. But let’s assume it’s real. Your first mistake; If they make the claim, they need to provide the proof. The "wage gap" (much like most other Feminist claims) belongs in the same category of claims such as "the average house cat weighs about 40kg"; Absurd on it's face, no need for further consideration. What is your response to a feminist that tries to claim men are paid more than women for the same jobs? Either: " [citation needed] " or " so why don't all of thes…
/r/MensRights16/08/24 02:15 PM
-3

Who said I was apathetic? Why don't you come back when you've learned the basic comprehension skills required for this "meaningful conversation" which you desire?
/r/MensRights16/08/24 01:48 PM
-2

[...] just because they both have the attribute of lacking consent doesn't mean there's no difference between them [...] In terms of right and wrong, there is no difference. [...] babies aren't asked for their consent to have their diapers changed [...] Not in the same category. Not a cosmetic surgery, action vs. inaction, child neglect is wrong, etc.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 12:59 PM
19

I'm gonna have to disagree with this once here; there isn't really any difference between circumcision and ear piercing. I'm not a consequentialist, so I don't care in the slightest that one has worse consequences than the other. The issue is consent. It's very simple. If you insist on playing their games, you will lose. Also, I don't understand how people can think "let's force a metal spike through a smalls child's ear and make them cry in pain so we can hang shiny things from the hole" isn't …
/r/MensRights16/08/24 11:54 AM
30

Y'all every time... There are some things that aren't worth even considering, never mind responding to; This is one of them. Notice, she doesn't deny the existence/normalisation of misandry, she says that it isn't normalised enough, wishing death upon men in general. This is a purely hateful individual lacking in the slightest shred of empathy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/24 07:55 AM
10

You should focus on female perpetrators, not male victims, otherwise you'll only achieve half-baked equality. For example, in slide 6 you reference the Sexual Offences Act 2003. Did you know that this is the new and improved gender neutral version? The old law was specifically male->female (and strictly vaginal penetration) but they updated the law to be "gender neutral" and recognise male victims. I've seen Feminists claim this change as a win for equality and proof that Feminists actually do c…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/24 01:46 AM
-15

5 day old account, "as a woman", virtue signalling... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights15/08/24 12:33 PM
2

In the USA, "Native American" means something totally different. Yes, I know, that was intentional. Just as there is a difference between being Welsh, and having been born in Wales. Wouldn't your last prime minister, Sunak, be considered a second generation immigrant? If his parents were not British, then yes... do you think I would have given a different answer for some reason?
/r/MensRights10/08/24 07:35 PM
2

If the US considered anyone born there to be legally "American", that's up to them. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ People still make quite the distinction between "American" and "native" though... And a fair few Americans seem to care about their non-American "cultural heritage" too. The BBC article says that man was born and raised in Wales. In ZERO definitions of the word "immigrant" does it apply to him. Second generation immigrant. Wales doesn't possess magic soil that erases cultural background and turns everyb…
/r/MensRights10/08/24 08:20 AM
2

Welsh man If a second generation immigrant is considered to be a native now, is the average American considered "native" too, seeing as they are many more generations deep? [...] online hooligans spread misinformation [...] It wasn't "misinformation" that made people think he was (an extremist) Muslim, it was the fact that he stabbed little girls at a Taylor Swift dance thing... (and the way that the first thing the media did was to deny any terror related motivations, 🤣)
/r/MensRights09/08/24 06:52 AM
4

so, like a 7 out of 10?
/r/MensRights08/08/24 04:56 PM
5

How high are you right now?
/r/MensRights08/08/24 04:40 PM
4

I'm not a collectivist.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 04:34 PM
17

Now the guardian cares about men? 🤣🤣🤣 The right calls them ‘economic migrants’; progressives respond by focusing on women and children. I know France is a shithole, but is it really bad enough to claim asylum? People crossing the channel from France are not "coming from Iraq", they're coming from France. Refusing to call them "asylum seekers" or "refugees" is not the same thing as completely ignoring them... But they say they're asylum seekers so we have to just believe them! #believeasylumseeke…
/r/MensRights08/08/24 04:17 PM
6

Is English not your first language, or is this just how people speak these days?
/r/MensRights24/07/24 09:43 AM
8

???
/r/MensRights23/07/24 07:01 PM
1

It's not worth pointing out that people are being manipulative and lying by omission? Have you never hear the phrase "x women a week are killed by a partner or former parter"? Then they quote a much smaller number for men, "proving" that domestic violence is worse for women. This is how we get to "more women are killed by male partners"... And the condescending attitude doesn't help your point, it just makes you look like a dickhead.
/r/MensRights23/07/24 01:06 PM
16

Who is more dangerous. As a gender. Is it women? Yes. Women are far more dangerous due to the fact that most people will blindly believe whatever women say without question, even more so when the woman in question understands how to leverage this fact. How much blood has been shed solely on the word of a woman?
/r/MensRights23/07/24 12:54 PM
1

You're missing something far more simple; "killed". They don't say murdered, they say killed, this includes self-defence and occasions where the victim snaps after years of abuse (they understand this concept, but they call it "battered woman syndrome" and act as if it only ever applies to women) and leave the listener to assume that "killed" == "murdered". Then there is the second part of the usual construct "by a partner or former partner"; They don't say it explicitly, but leave it to the lis…
/r/MensRights23/07/24 12:32 PM
1

15f 🤣 Given that you are a child and seem to be new here in general ("first post" 8 days ago), I'm not surprised that you haven't seen much "action". Stick around, pay attention, and have a little patience...
/r/MensRights22/07/24 08:13 PM
15

Feminism != Women.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 01:23 PM
4

If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 11:59 AM
2

Already removed. Some subreddits automatically ban you for posting here, I don't know those ones do, or if there's some word filter that got you, but you could try with a different account maybe?
/r/MensRights21/07/24 11:49 AM
3

You'll be waiting a long time, they removed your post. You might try /r/AskFeminists? I'm sure there was another one focusing on the academic side of things, but I can't remember the name.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 11:23 AM
3

I'm not sure you'll find many sources or support for Feminist academia here, have you tried the various Feminist subreddits?
/r/MensRights21/07/24 11:11 AM
14

Reminds me of how far too many lesbians don't actually like women, they just despise men. (and they wonder why there's the association between lesbians and Feminists 🤣) It's the same old collectivist "historical wrongs" narrative, plus some more bullshit. They claim that masculinity (via toxic "masculinity" and homophobia) is hostile towards effeminate men (which they expand to all gay men via the "homophobia is misogyny" argument) so they are now justified in their hostility towards all masculi…
/r/MensRights21/07/24 11:03 AM
3

It was more to do with label feminist. I went through her Twitter account and couldn’t find anything. Think the Telegraph focused on two of her books and used the feminist label in a clickbait fashion. Her stub of a wiki page says that she has a PhD in women's studies, and all of her "selected works" are either explicitly Feminist or "gender is a social construct". I don't think it's unfair to call her a Feminist. Her book Boys, girls and achievement : addressing the classroom issues archive.org…
/r/MensRights20/07/24 09:46 AM
4

I read that as EFF chief first, was a little confused 🤣 I'll be steered by the evidence That's what they always say. Just "trust the science" guys! All of the "experts" agree! Speaking to Tes as part of the How I Lead series last year, the EEF chief said she carries with her a commitment to social justice, transparency and equality, diversity and inclusion wherever she goes. Doesn't look good, ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Any particular reason that you thought "Feminist professor to lead shake-up of national curri…
/r/MensRights19/07/24 07:43 PM
24

I can give you examples of what they’re talking about if it helps. Maybe you should have done that in the OP 🤣 I think a good part of it is the same as when women take everything as misogyny because they believe that everything happens to them simply because they're a woman and there's no other possible reason...
/r/MensRights19/07/24 05:30 PM
2

Sorry, I don't think lying to people is an act of aggression ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I wouldn't be surprised if the reason why manipulative behaviour has been thrown into the "aggression" category (and why lying is considered emotional coercion) is to manipulate the statistics, dilute the actual aggression, and obscure the fact that women are significantly more aggressive; It wouldn't be the first time something like this has been done. (also, they put having sex with a child in the post-refusal section, some…
/r/MensRights19/07/24 08:49 AM
4

[...] men perceive equality as unfairly disadvantaging men. Define equality, because if you're talking about quotas then they're right. [...] men also have an in-group preference, and I have seen studies that demonstrate the same thing you're describing in reverse [...] Any links?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/24 07:14 AM
4

It's kind of like Catholics and Protestants; They share 99% of their beliefs to the point where a random person on the street probably couldn't tell you the difference past whether they like the Pope or not, yet both sides decry the other as not real Christians...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/24 06:59 AM
40

I've seen a couple posts in this sub about it, it's probably not mentioned elsewhere because most people don't care about misandry (or even think it's a real thing).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/24 05:25 PM
128

I find it interesting to observe the similarities between the way trans women are treated by TERFs and the way that men are treated by radical feminists. That's because it is the same. As you mentioned, TERFs think transwomen are just men pretending to be women. They treat transwomen the way that they do because they think that they're men. TERFs are still Feminists after all...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/24 04:36 PM
8

(line graphs? my guy, 🤣 bar charts!) Slide 2 says "aggression rates between the sexes are now equal" yet on slide 7, millennial women are ~70% (no intercourse) and ~90% (intercourse) more likely to use pressure or force than men, and ~148% more likely to use physical force after being refused... 🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights17/07/24 03:53 PM
26

Is it even cleaner though? I assume circumcised men still wash their cocks... right? If this is just more bullshit "science" then I don't think it should be implicitly validated, rather rejected for what it is.
/r/MensRights16/07/24 04:00 PM
4

le reddit atheist, hurr durr magic sky daddy, iamverysmart, tips fedora, etc. or, in modern terms; trust the science, all of the experts agree, we're on the right side of history, everyone who disagrees with me is basically Hitler, etc. Such a site has the potential to be great, but the kind of people that the site would attract just ruin it. A small child could "bust" a lot of pseudoscience, it's not a particularly great achievement, 🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights16/07/24 05:19 AM
42

"what right do men don't have that women have?" A fair trial, equal treatment under the law, innocent until proven guilty, etc. Varying depending on jurisdiction, of course. And these are supposed to actually be rights, unlike things like "societal perceptions". I believe transforming "rights" into "issues" might help the movement in the long run. Can we have both? So, shouldn't we find a less polarizing terminology? I think the change is actually more polarising, somewhat diminishing the import…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/24 09:04 AM
7

For example, what should I make of the womanizer who sleeps with one woman after another until one of them finally sexually assaults him (such as by ignoring his request for protected sex and forcing him into unprotected sex) or who gets himself too drunk to defend himself while passed out? The first two words that pop into my mind in such scenarios are 'contributory negligence.' (not calling it rape, eh?) The same as you would make of a promiscuous/drunk women who gets raped??? Prior actions do…
/r/MensRights14/07/24 06:23 AM
6

You are far too obsessed with your penis and sex
/r/MensRights14/07/24 05:02 AM
5

Just another NPC. These "points" have been countered many times over, but we're still waiting on the latest dialogue patch to drop. ~ Men actually get custody when they seek it. One; Survivor bias. (which he later goes on to claim isn't a thing, along with denying any court bias, preferring to blame men like a good little Feminist.) Two; "custody" in this case can refer to any level of custody, including the extreme of "one weekend a year". Further, presenting this as "when fathers actually seek…
/r/MensRights14/07/24 04:58 AM
0

Transcription: No the problem is, men have FAR WORSE problems than women. Start listing things women get over men and vice versa. Doesn't take long to figure out. This commenter claims that men have worse problems than women. His example of this is custody cases which is ironic because men are actually favoured in custody cases, they just don't seek it very often. The statewide sample of attorneys who responded to the family law survey had collectively represented fathers seeking custody in over…
/r/MensRights14/07/24 04:42 AM
9

First time I read, I thought, "where do you live where 6 foot is just average height" 🤣 You are far too obsessed with your penis and sex, my dude, your penis is not the problem here...
/r/MensRights14/07/24 04:27 AM
2

Perhaps I was a little hasty, but if OP can't see how stupid the idea is... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ The moment OP starts making up bullshit, Feminists are just going to turn around and say "see, we told you it was all bullshit" and they will use that to paint everything we talk about with the same bullshit paint... It is a losing strategy that is not even worth consideration.
/r/MensRights13/07/24 04:45 PM
-9

👋🤡
/r/MensRights13/07/24 08:39 AM
-1

Who has ever won by signing his own death warrant?
/r/MensRights13/07/24 07:53 AM
13

From now on we need to copy the feminists in their strategies. Every issue now primarily affects MEN and every issue is primarily caused by FEMINISM, no matter how shaky the proof is. This is what they already accuse us of doing, why play into their hand and give them ammunition? I'll be sticking to facts and reason, thanks.
/r/MensRights13/07/24 06:58 AM
5

If we live in a Patriarchy as described by feminists, in which the system was setup by men for the protection / benefit of men at the cost / oppression of women.. then why would this system EVER allow women the right to vote or any other rights? Psychological manipulation. By allowing women insignificant gains it gives the appearance that their actions are actually effective, thus distracting them from performing any worthwhile actions which would eventually lead to the overthrowing of the Patri…
/r/MensRights13/07/24 02:21 AM
1

Yes, let us accept the hatred and vitriol directed our way without question or resistance... 🤡 men can absolutely be victims of rape and they are harassed as well. Never said they weren't No, she just heavily implied it... never ONCE did I say men don't know what it's like to be harassed, I said these are experiences men may not understand we have In other words, men don't know what it's like to be harassed.... I don't hate men. Of course she doesn't hate men, she just doesn't think they can be …
/r/MensRights12/07/24 04:09 AM
1

It's not like they can use this to push for tougher restrictions on knives or guns, is it? Not a policeman like the Everard case, so no "defund the police", and he was foreign either, so blaming immigration is out of the window too. The only "moral panic" that I've seen is from the usual suspects, but they don't seem to be gaining ground... It's also funny how the LWMA user went for the "blue eyes" angle and not skin colour, 🤣🤣
/r/MensRights12/07/24 01:47 AM
7

It's always B, with "women and children" being presented as a unusual case, i.e. the "killed" are expected to be men.
/r/MensRights10/07/24 05:23 AM
19

During World War I, British women used the White Feather movement to shame men into joining the military. Not just British women, but Suffragettes too, some of the "first wave Feminists"... The best one was when they gave a feather to a guy who was on his way to receive his Victoria Cross. 🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights09/07/24 04:48 AM
10

Projection and double standards? From Feminists? No way! I can't say I've ever had this problem, but all of the accounts of women who complain about this "orgasm gap" don't half make it sound like their own fault... I have a hard time caring about this "issue" in the slightest, tbh.
/r/MensRights08/07/24 11:11 PM
6

The biggest problem with the men's rights movement? It doesn't exist. There are many "factions" which focus on single issues (e.g. bloodstained men), but they're largely isolated and disconnected from each other. There is also a significant divide between "left wing", "right wing", and "fuck politics", causing further fractures within "the movement". No cohesion, no organisation, no movement. And then there's the dominant narrative along the lines of... I believe, ideally, within the context we …
/r/MensRights07/07/24 07:26 PM
6

???
/r/MensRights07/07/24 06:24 AM
11

A lot of them don't align with modern women. The difference is not as large as you imagine it. And I'm not placing them on anything it's just the truth. We can only hope for progressive and greater future if we can protect the people who actually don't get to say in any of this but still suffer. Women are not children, nor are they angels. Stop infantilising women and denying their agency, they have just as much of a say in all of this as men do, if not more so.
/r/MensRights07/07/24 06:16 AM
14

You should take women down from this pedestal you've placed them on, especially the "traditional" ones.
/r/MensRights07/07/24 05:53 AM
1

And we are not the only people here... What about new users, or people from outside who don't believe that it happens?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/24 10:45 PM
4

This is not an example of Feminist failing to advance equality, it's users on a public forum openly spreading hateful rhetoric that would not be tolerated for any other group of people. Shining a light on this behaviour is something we should absolutely be doing, especially when there are so many who would deny that this even happens.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/24 09:56 PM
5

This isn't two users on Twitter, it's two users from the subreddit "two x chromosomes". Another reason why the rename was dumb...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/24 09:51 PM
1

Why would people even think about accusing women of lying? I, personally, think that women are people too. Sometimes people lie about things. see also: every lynching. There is also some fuckery going on there where "not blindly believing every woman" has translated to "accusing all women of being liars"... Plenty of sperm is stockpiled in the banks. AFAIK there is a shortage of sperm donors...? I doubt there is anywhere near enough to last "a century or so" 🤣
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/24 09:48 PM
12

Raping toddlers is a traumatising experience for them, sure, but at least they can't get pregnant; Rape is worse when it happens to women! Do these people not realise the logical extent of what they are saying? Disgusting doesn't even begin to cover it... Maybe this one is a bit too spicy? 🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights05/07/24 05:15 PM
126

Many (if not all) of the issues that are presented as "women's issues" (e.g. rape, domestic violence, etc.) actually aren't, it's just that no-one cares when these things happen to men.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 08:36 PM
3

I don't think that the implication is intentional, even subconsciously; A lot of people don't seem to be able to speak properly anymore. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ An example that I ran into the other day was "women vote more than men" to mean "more women vote than men". smh
/r/MensRights03/07/24 08:13 PM
8

👋🤡 Edit: Now that I'm blocked, I shall respond 🤣 It is exceedingly clear that /u/Pastor_Dale is mocking the idea of abstinence as a method to reduce the risk of STI transmission, presumably due to being a raging sex pest who can't control himself and simply must fuck any disease ridden whore he comes across. as evidenced by the "witty remark" and condescending sarcasm. I did not mention abstinence, bringing it up only to speak against its efficacy is a strawman argument. (what a surprise) Never …
/r/MensRights03/07/24 07:04 PM
10

So actually we should all practice abstinence then. ORRR now hear me out…we can take all measures to reduce negative outcomes. You have contradicted yourself within a single sentence, yet you call my comment illogical? 👋🤡
/r/MensRights03/07/24 06:49 PM
15

Don’t you like to follow the science? An appeal to authority, how nice. You know what also reduces the risk of STI transmission (and is a lot more effective at doing so)? Condoms.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 06:21 PM
17

No, that’s dumb. No, that false equivocation is what's dumb. Why is it that people always have to resort to fallacies in order to support infant circumcision? Do you not have any actual arguments to support your position? We are the parents and we get to choose what’s best. You are exactly the kind of person who should not be given any kind of power or authority over another living being. Want your son to have a less attractive dick, go for it. An obsession with the attractiveness of your son's …
/r/MensRights03/07/24 06:11 PM
15

Good for you, but it's utterly irrelevant to the fact that it is an unnecessary cosmetic procedure often done without informed consent to some of the most vulnerable and defenceless.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 06:05 PM
-1

It's like when people self identify as "far right", or "reactionaries", or "capitalists", etc. it just makes them look dumb.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 05:45 PM
28

Looks like monkey brain stealing words without understanding them. They seem to be adjacent to the trad-con larpers, wanting "traditional" men while performing a shallow imitation of a "traditional" woman. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights03/07/24 03:46 PM
19

"red pill women" 🤣🤣🤣 I read through some of those comments, they sound just like every other typical woman, condemning "un-masculine" behaviour and demanding that men conform to whatever ideas give them the tingles... OP, I wouldn't care to much about the opinions of anyone over there (or women's opinions on masculinity in general tbh)
/r/MensRights03/07/24 03:37 PM
3

This is absolutely glorious, thank you.
/r/MensRights02/07/24 02:49 AM
1

So they can provoke a response and say "See, this is why we need Feminism!". There phone [...] Where phone? (I'm sorry 🤣)
/r/MensRights02/07/24 02:27 AM
6

archive link Today's at-home chefs are [...] more likely to be men. A higher proportion of American men — 43 percent — are cooking [...] 49 minutes a day [...] By contrast, 70 percent of women cook these days [...] [a]nd they're spending 71 minutes a day cooking [...] TIL 43% of men spending 49 minutes cooking is more than 70% of women spending 71 minutes cooking... Top notch journalism! (also, in my experience, many women who do cook, can't actually cook, and it takes them longer to do anything…
/r/MensRights02/07/24 02:27 AM
4

Only read the abstract so far, but it sounds like major bullshit. The authors of this study are either stupid (e.g. students first study) or intentionally manipulating the findings to support their presupposed conclusion. Gender inequality and sexist behaviour is prevalent in almost all workplaces and rampant in online environments. Already starting with a biassed position. We hypothesised that female-initiated disruption of a male hierarchy incites hostile behaviour from poor performing males w…
/r/MensRights30/06/24 06:09 PM
2

Link please? We haven't got to the part of the future where I can click the citation on that wikipedia screenshot 🤣 How are they measuring skill? Being on an e-sports team? I 100% believe that anyone on an e-sports team will be "less hostile" towards protected groups...
/r/MensRights30/06/24 03:08 PM
4

What the fuck are those figurines? Why are they babies??? Or if you’re jogging or cycling past a woman, make sure you always call ahead saying “left” or “right” so you don’t surprise her. Because someone behind you yelling "LEFT!" won't be a surprise at all! (Also, "hood down, hands out" is still referenced in Rule #7. Can't even cover their tracks right 🤣)
/r/MensRights26/06/24 09:27 AM
4

The red/blue pill metaphor (choosing between harsh reality and blissful ignorance) is from The Matrix; a film which pre-dates pretty much the entire modern internet. "Black" and "white" is the same concept applied to "pessimism/nihilism" and "optimism", highlighting that this is somewhat of a choice (i.e. You have chosen to "doom scroll" and take in the negativity).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/24 05:12 AM
4

I remember watching that video when it came out (9 years ago? was it really that long?); I thought it was a bit overblown at the time, 🤣 I miss when the internet was just cat videos and flash games...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/24 05:06 AM
39

I'm not sure "incel" is the word you're looking for; Depression, nihilism, "black pill"...? And being on subs like these does me no favors. Opening my eyes to the sheer amount of bullshit (for I don’t know what else to call it) is just… depressing. The internet will do that to you, maybe log off and take a break for a while? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/24 08:43 PM
8

nah, it's just manual approval, it's been that way for a while (maybe always?)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/24 08:12 PM
1

Ok, now, how do you reconcile that belief, and your identity as a Feminist, with the many examples of Feminists (e.g. Koss) not only downplaying the effects of female perpetrators (especially against male victims) but also campaigning against female perpetrators being recognised as rapists by law?
/r/MensRights20/06/24 03:07 PM
5

I believe that rape can happen to anyone, regardless of gender. Now comes the tricky one... Can rape be done by anyone, regardless of gender?
/r/MensRights20/06/24 02:44 PM
5

Assuming that you'll deflect all criticism of Feminism with "Well, I'm a Feminist and I don't believe that", or "They're not real Feminists", etc. as usual... What puts you (or any of your "Feminist" friends) in a position of authority to dictate what "real Feminism" is over the Feminist academics manipulating data and putting out cooked "studies" in order to support their bigoted ideology, the major/national Feminist organisations that seemingly do nothing but spread anti-male rhetoric (justifi…
/r/MensRights20/06/24 02:42 PM
16

(one of the leaders of their party literally says woman should not search for work as they, according to him, by nature possess a lower IQ.) So, the guy has an opinion that you don't like...? Is he planning to implement laws based on this opinion? "not hearing opinions that I don't like" is not a right, nor should it be. The majority of rape victims are female. [...] Only if you define rape as something that only men can do, as opposed to a neutral "non-consensual sexual intercourse". The male-s…
/r/MensRights17/06/24 11:50 PM
44

Feminists are people that fight for the rights of women [...] Such as? Can you answer that without resorting to "in the past", "in the middle east", things that aren't actually rights and never could be, or things that are not exclusive to women? [...] (as there are still many unequal things in our society regarding gender equality) [...] There sure are, but probably not in the way that you imagine... [...] female sexists are people that literally hate men. Given that Feminism is build on a foun…
/r/MensRights17/06/24 08:46 PM
0

Nothing waits for me in life, nothing waits for me in death, I dont know where to go. Go for a walk, it usually helps. I'm not sure you'll get much useful advice from strangers on the internet, good luck ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights16/06/24 02:57 AM
2

Do you think people would be more likely to solve the riddle if the surgeon on the plane was a woman, and the father was the surgeon in the hospital? OP gave an opinion, I returned one; The standard of proof on both sides is equal. That which is presented without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. Unconscious bias is pseudo-science at best, the main "test" that everyone seems to point to (Implicit Association Test) doesn't actually test for, or prove, what it claims to, and the creators…
/r/MensRights13/06/24 06:46 AM
1

OP asserts that the stumbling block of the riddle is the unconscious bias that surgeon==man, I disagree. I also disagree with the assertion that everyone holds the same unconscious biases. Unconscious bias is the entire discussion, no?
/r/MensRights13/06/24 06:03 AM
-2

You might want to read my comment again and actually think about what I wrote... I know both of the parents are surgeons.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 05:49 AM
3

You're also more likely to be in contact/spend time with someone you know, than a complete stranger. Has the data been adjusted for this? This is not the only logical error with this either; The chance of any individual even wishing to cause you harm is incredibly small, even if friends/family were twice as likely to do so.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 02:44 AM
-7

... I see that I was right to dismiss you outright. 👋🤡
/r/MensRights13/06/24 02:38 AM
-1

"unconsciously assumed"; opinion rejected. "a surgeon and his son take a flight. the flight crashes and the son is the only survivor. when he gets to the trauma centre the surgeon working there exclaims - I can't operate! this is my son! How is this possible?" the riddle is only a paradox because the audience subconsciously assumes that the surgeon refusing to operate is a man. once you realize that the son's mother is also a surgeon everything makes sense. No. "A surgeon and her son" would have…
/r/MensRights13/06/24 02:20 AM
53

A lot of women seem to think that they're already perfect, why would they need self-improvement content? For too many people, "self improvement" and "better person" are synonymous with "feminine". They hold women as the gold standard and see men and boys as defective rejects who need to be fixed. see: therapy, the education system, etc.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 12:32 PM
7

if the statement is valid for men in general, then the statement is also valid for the subcategories thereof. Specifying a sub-group generally implies exclusivity. If I say "I like red apples." people will assume that I only like red apples, otherwise why would I specify red apples? Likewise, if I were to say "I don't like apples" in the general sense, who is going to think that I'm an apple-racist that segregates apples based on the colour of their skin and that I harbour a special dislike for …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/24 09:37 PM
2

I'm not comparing men and women here or acting as if "both sides" suffer similarly. OP asked about women, I'm talking about women, men are not relevant to the point aside from the difference in the rate of occurrence.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 09:03 PM
10

As cliché as it is; the double-edged sword. Consider a female stand-up comedian: Poor delivery can completely ruin a good joke. If a female stand-up with poor delivery is shielded from this criticism and constantly told that "she is great" and that the critics are just "haters, trolls, and misogynists" then she will not even know that she could improve and is "robbed" of being a better comedian. You can say the same of your example in that constantly excusing women's poor behaviour and immoralit…
/r/MensRights06/06/24 08:14 PM
14

Do you really want there to be women heavily involved in discussing how society is supposed to treat us? I'm more interested in peoples ideas rather than their genitalia. see: the male Feminist.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 08:05 PM
8

I think the answer of yes/no is a matter of perspective, you could just as easily give either as an answer, and your "proper retort" can easily be countered. Alice: Men are stronger than women on average. Bob: You mean white men? Alice: No-- Bob: So you're saying white men aren't men? Alice I meant men in general, race is irrelevant. Again, people tend to be on board with the racism bad thing, so they are more apt to grasp onto this point by way of the racial element. Unless they subscribe to th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/24 07:44 PM
4

I believe it is also currently considered "hate speech" in the UK too, for the reasons you mention, but all that I found from a quick search was an article titled "Should We Protect Animals from Hate Speech?".
/r/MensRights06/06/24 07:16 PM
-1

American? How comes you lot call it a "pound sign" anyway? I suppose it's better that calling the symbol itself a "hash tag"...
/r/MensRights06/06/24 06:59 PM
15

And the gynocentrism? Treating women as if they are perfect angels that are always right and can do no wrong? The refusal to acknowledge that women can perpetrate domestic violence and sexual violence? It might be mostly Feminists at the moment, but I doubt much (if anything) would change if every Feminist in the world suddenly disappeared tomorrow...
/r/MensRights06/06/24 06:35 PM
9

what disadvantages do women still have in today´s western society? Given that when Feminists are asked this question they almost always refer to the things in the past or on the other side of the world, I can understand why some are inclined to believe the answer to be "none". Personally, I think the way that women are denied the fullness of their humanity and treated like retarded children is a pretty big disadvantage, but I guess that depends on your perspective. This is one of the main reason…
/r/MensRights06/06/24 05:15 PM
55

Also, I suppose men are less than human according to this logic because the term "males" has not been policed. Haven't you been paying attention? Men are pigs, dogs, savage beasts, etc. Such language has pretty much always been excused and defended. When did the word female become taboo? When people who believe biology is a social construct were allowed to take over the institutions. Does the "me too" movement only apply to women? Not sure what it has to do with the rest of your post, but, did y…
/r/MensRights06/06/24 04:24 PM
20

But it's only toxic masculinity when it negatively affects women though. There is an unwritten rule, where any form of masculinity that doesn't negatively affect women, is treated as a gold standard form of masculinity most meb should strive to get. Doesn't matter how toxic or rigid this form of masculinity is to men, if it don't hurt women, then it's ok. So this is pretty much what "positive masculinity" is. Are you only just realising why the "toxic masculinity" narrative is a load of rubbish?…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/24 01:00 PM
2

In my opinion, the user is likely either a troll, mentally impaired, or both. Not worth the attention. W: [...] The average man is not a serial killer, neither a rapist, nor a necrophiliac. [...] e: Just curious though, you would be okay your daughter or wife wandering around a park at night? [...] Starting off with an idiotic response that is becoming all the more common, betraying the perspective of e [note 1] and shifting the goalposts. The response from W is perfectly reasonable: Let me know…
/r/MensRights06/06/24 12:14 PM
18

You can still shame someone who has been silenced, in fact, it makes it much easier when they can't defend themselves. This is probably the most insidious aspect of censorship and the banning of people from public discourse (e.g. twitter), tbh.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 11:12 AM
3

You're close, but not quite, they've decided that certain acts (e.g. domestic violence) are "(male) violence against women and girls" regardless of the actual reality of the situation. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/tt95qm/supporting_male_victims_of_crimes_considered/
/r/MensRights06/06/24 10:44 AM
54

You missed the best part of the "analysis", OP! [...] there are up to 4 million perpetrators of violence against women and children [...] with one in 10 people being victims, who are mainly women or children. One in ten people are victims of "violence against women and children" with the majority of these victims being women or children. 🤣🤣🤣 There's also the fact that these statistics are unmatched; You can't draw any meaningful conclusion without data for male victims and female perpetrators.
/r/MensRights05/06/24 01:17 PM
22

I want to know what do you guys think of these studies? If they're anything like the others, bullshit and cope. I remember reading one about happiness and marriage which claimed that married men were happier than single men; They recorded "recently divorced" in the category of "single".
/r/MensRights04/06/24 12:12 AM
192

while this does make sense [...] Does it? The claim seems to be based primarily on records of 81 Korean eunuchs from over 100 years ago. smh. The study cited even mentioned that there isn't a significant difference for castrato singers, vs other singers, which is (likely) a more direct comparison which is actually worth something.... The article just reads as if it were written by some man-hating, antinatalist, castration fetishist. Just what I would expect from the guardian.
/r/MensRights02/06/24 03:04 PM
166

Israel/Palestine is current thing now, mainstream can only hold one thing at a time. all this talk about how women are being r-worded and what not in the middle east, but nothing about the men being forced to die for a war they don't want to fight in. This also, mainstream doesn't care about men.
/r/MensRights01/06/24 03:15 PM
42

Nah, if anything, they're even worse then. Also, you seem to think talking a lot is the same as communicating? It doesn't matter how much they speak if they say fuck all in the process ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights01/06/24 07:29 AM
119

I mean, women are bad at communicating. They're absolutely dreadful at it... Who else could you ask a simple yes/no question and get back 10 minutes of irrelevant fluff that doesn't even come close to answering the question? 🤣 Pretty much any of the "common knowledge" that women are better at X is major cope and probably the inverse of reality.
/r/MensRights01/06/24 05:25 AM
18

By Courtney E. Martin How could I have know that this was written by a woman simply by reading the headline? 🤣 Seems to be yet another ad for a book written by a woman (A 'ms', no less!) pretending to care about boys because she's a mother to a son and trying to fix masculinity even though she doesn't have the slightest clue what masculinity is. (and they somehow managed to make it about race, less that half way through, ffs) Woke man-hating bullshit being pushed even by people larping as "chris…
/r/MensRights30/05/24 03:56 AM
50

Old definition? It's the current one, it's still defined in terms of penetration which excludes the vast majority of female perpetrators.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/24 04:06 AM
3

Obvious troll is obvious... smh I am curious though, why do you even bother to post such blatant bullshit? The comment is right there, you even quoted the relevant part! Why bother replying to a comment that everyone can see wasn't even made? And if you're going to correct someone, it's probably best if you're not also wrong. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights26/05/24 12:51 PM
7

The "toxic masculinity" rhetoric is one of tools that Feminism uses to attack men by claiming that things like homophobia, domestic violence, rape, emotional repression, etc. have anything to do with masculinity. As for not being helpful, most posts like yours aren't exactly looking for help here, forgive me. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ These two are a rough rundown of the general points, (they may be a bit out of date by now? I don't know who updates these) https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/wiki/faq https://ww…
/r/MensRights26/05/24 09:01 AM
29

https://archive.ph/Jz5l4 Archive link which bypasses the paywall/sign up requirement. Does he think this will increase his chances of winning? The mandate would require 18-year-olds to choose between either a full-time placement in the armed forces or cyber defense for one year, or volunteering in their community for the equivalent of one weekend per month for one year. A whole year, or 24 days...? isn't the choice usually more balanced that this? I wonder if the "recruits" will get any decent b…
/r/MensRights26/05/24 02:35 AM
5

You seem to just be going through this thread and accusing everyone of being women... Do you have anything of relevance to add? Reading comprehension is a great thing. Yeah, it is. Perhaps you should work on that. 🤣 👋🤡
/r/MensRights26/05/24 02:10 AM
1

Have people never heard of Shakespeare? Do people actually think that I am actually calling the OP a woman? smh Also, I'm not arguing against getting a vasectomy, I'm arguing against getting a vasectomy for a stupid reason without doing any research. Why would this necessitate that I be a woman?
/r/MensRights26/05/24 02:04 AM
19

Pronouns in bio; Who would have guessed? Which is why I guess it just made me kind of sad to see so many being unsupportive of feminism cause they feel shunned by it. Feel? Feel? Quite a few people here, and many prominent men's rights figures were shunned by Feminism, some have even faced violence and abuse for speaking in favour of men's rights, this is not a matter of "feeling"... People here disagree with Feminism because they actually know what it is beyond the surface level and propaganda …
/r/MensRights26/05/24 01:39 AM
1

The lady doth protest too much, methinks.
/r/MensRights26/05/24 12:50 AM
7

The point being that it is a serious decision that should not be taken lightly. (note, for anyone playing along at home, he also just completely ignored the possibility of chronic pain 🤣) [...] the ONLY way to avoid getting your life destroyed by the family court system or a woman is by getting a vasectomy Not true; You could just not have sex, or pick better women, or use contraceptives. Going straight for vasectomy is stupid. (and there are many other ways a woman can fuck you over, vasectomy …
/r/MensRights26/05/24 12:44 AM
15

For anyone considering a vasectomy, do some actual research and don't blindly take advice from an internet forum... Vasectomy is permanent sterilisation, and anyone telling you otherwise is full of shit; A "reversal" doesn't mean what you think it means (they can "fix" the vas deferens, but that doesn't mean everything will work again) and there's no guarantee that that will even be successful. Do not rely on being able to change your mind in the future. Another factor to consider is the common …
/r/MensRights26/05/24 12:30 AM
19

IIRC, There was that one case in the US where it went to court and the judge rules that by leaving the sperm-filled condom behind (discarded in the bin) it was a gift and she could do whatever she wanted with it. Legal precedent that sperm jacking is perfectly acceptable in at least one US state. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights25/05/24 02:36 AM
4

I still think that it has less to do with male hate and more to do with women having bad experiences with men and no experiences with bears. It's not hatred it's just the fear of being with a man who they have heard are capable of doing psychopathic things. The individual women themselves may or may not hate men, but the underlying rhetoric certainly does. That is the problem, these women and the responses are just symptoms. Take what they're saying and replace "men" with "jews"; If it sounds li…
/r/MensRights23/05/24 09:26 PM
33

A bit late to the party for the old "it's not a big deal, why do you care", no? Only 31% of women picked the bear [...] "only" Feminists lose their shit over "1 in 5", but but 1 in 3 is a minority that isn't worth making a big deal over? [...] 53% of 18 to 29 year old women picked the bear [...] Of course, the demographic most indoctrinated has the highest number, this is far more important because it suggests that "bear" is not the natural choice for women, but a result of the ideology being pu…
/r/MensRights22/05/24 08:10 PM
31

Intimidation: Women aren't stupid, they know that they won't win a fist fight against a man, that's why they use weapons, violence by proxy, etc. Isolation: This is a stereotype of a controlling woman. The only time I've seen a man "isolate" a woman was by expressing his disapproval of her going to a nightclub and drinking with all of her single friends... Economic control: Not only have women always worked, but they still controlled the finances and made the spending decisions. Personal power: …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/24 06:51 PM
2

MRA's generally support default 50/50 because they think fathers are important and the relationship between father and child is just as important; Most of the Feminists that talk about it seem to either be "old school" Feminists, or they see childcare as a burden that is imposed on women by the Patriarchy and not it's men's turn to "take accountability". The women who pushed for the Tender Years Doctrine, etc. have been claimed as "(proto) Feminists" on many occasions. The why is important, more…
/r/MensRights19/05/24 05:37 PM
2

That feminist complain about sentencing disparities- Brock Turner is one I recently saw a bunch of women complaining about because he got 6 months, despite violently mangling her insides to the point where she had to have surgery and will most likely be unable to have kids again. And I see you guys post horrific ones all the time, like some girl cutting a man’s penis off. Also horrific. Soooo, some people get off lightly, some of them are men, some of them are women, and you call this a sentenci…
/r/MensRights19/05/24 04:12 PM
3

You can't "both sides" Feminism and men's rights, unless you know very little about either. For example - you mentioned family court, 50/50 custody benefits women as well and many feminists support this. Sole custody going to women was pushed for by women, yet they present this as some enforced gender role. [...] increasing men’s accountability to their children as parents not just providers. Men are already held to a higher standard. Many men choose to walk away from their children (and some wo…
/r/MensRights19/05/24 04:03 PM
2

When did I push feminism? I didn't say you did. I said that other people do, and their posts are similar to yours. I even gave you an out! You are making accusations because you are butt hurt about my beliefs. You lot really are little more that NPC characters repeating the same dialogue over and over... smh
/r/MensRights19/05/24 03:49 PM
16

And even if i was, I would not leave behind hints on purpose like how you just described. No-one leaves "hints" on purpose, they slip and betray themselves. We often have people coming here who have never engaged with this community and make posts similar to yours, to push Feminism etc. and just waste everyone's time. If this was not your intent; lurk moar.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 12:37 AM
29

People here want to pretend that the "patriarchy" doesn't exist, simply because of its name. Of course, the problem with the idea of a secret shadowy cabal that somehow controls and influences society yet at the same time is made of people who are inferior is the name. There is a reason that "men kampf" is/was a thing; If you take most of what Feminism says about men, replace "men" with "jews" or "blacks", and everyone can see it for what it is. Whatever you call it doesn't matter, the concept i…
/r/MensRights19/05/24 12:12 AM
2

Are any of those on TikTok? AFAIK everyone mentioned in the OP puts out TikTok/YT Shorts content, and this seems to be the extent of the internet for some people ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights17/05/24 11:49 PM
1

All the big men's rights activists on youtube that i have seen range from either being extremely misogynistic or hyper traditionalists that believe men aren't aloud to show emotion or some dumb shit like that. Hopefully this time we will get some examples. The only big ones I've seen are folks like fresh and fit, whatever podcast, pearlythings and those are the extremely misogynistic highly bigoted alt right podcasts that make money off humiliating uneducated young college aged women. ... ... -_…
/r/MensRights17/05/24 11:43 PM
1

👋🤡
/r/MensRights17/05/24 09:23 PM
0

we just went over that self-harm is not the intent to harm the self... You decided that, I disagreed. is anger a cause of murder or correlated with murder? It can be. Crimes of passion have nothing to do with anger, hence the term crimes of passion not crimes of wrath. Passion is nothing but intense emotions. Because people have committed murder as as result of overwhelming joy... Passion is largely uncontrolled (enough that you might murder someone, it used to be a partial defence for this reas…
/r/MensRights17/05/24 08:26 PM
0

[...] self-hatred can cause the same action in men (insert punching mirror trope) [...] Yes, hence "typically". But again, the primary intent with that action is not self harm. [...] anger is not why ppl commit murder. Not that murder is relevant to the conversation, but have you never heard of a crime of passion? Self-hatred can cause sef-harming behaviors but is not the only reason. Did I say it was? You are unironically doing the thing you think is bad btw. Are you sure? [...] if a women gets…
/r/MensRights17/05/24 07:49 PM
-1

For pretty much all of the people that I have spoken to who have done things which are typically thought of when "self harm" is mentioned (e.g. cutting), the emotions that they were having trouble dealing with were usually cause by, and directed towards, themselves in one way or another. Punching a wall (or a punching bag, etc.) is typically a result of someone (or something) else as the cause of the emotion, and is expressed "outwards". Sometimes people scream into a pillow, or something simila…
/r/MensRights17/05/24 05:31 PM
2

Some men have more ready access to a punching bag or something similar (boxing gym, etc.). This serves the same purpose and is just as effective (probably more so), but without the harm (well, a significantly lower risk). Therefore, we can conclude that the purpose of the act is not the harm, but "venting" anger. The harm is merely a side effect.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 05:28 PM
-15

I wouldn't call it self harm, who punches a wall for the purpose of hurting themselves? It's for the purpose of dealing with anger, no? And no mention of "self medication"? Another self destructive behaviour that can be a sign of depression in men that is usually ignored or misrepresented. Feminists referring to this as an expression of "toxic masculinity" is also interesting. If he didn't do this, but instead "bottled up" his anger, they would also call this "toxic masculinity". Just another ex…
/r/MensRights17/05/24 02:42 PM
15

I never said that I consider Wikipedia to be an authority on anything. Yes you did. You used the wikipedia excerpt to back up your claim that MGTOW is misogynistic. Why would you do that if you don't consider them to be an authority on anything?
/r/MensRights16/05/24 07:47 PM
8

Wikipedia is not a reliable source... smh
/r/MensRights16/05/24 07:44 PM
24

A rabbit? You should have gone with one of the big child-eating dogs, all of the same bear logic would still apply. 🤣 Edit: I think someone got real upset over this thread, blanket downvotes and reddit cares spam, 🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights15/05/24 01:49 PM
17

It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt. Hard pass for me, and I doubt you'll find much sympathy here...
/r/MensRights14/05/24 06:21 PM
1

jackiechanwtf.jpg
/r/MensRights14/05/24 03:40 PM
3

/r/iamverysmart 🤣 Your have described indiscriminate sexual promiscuity and ideological cults, not homosexuality. And you don't seem to understand what deontology is; Your example was consequentialist, good job. 👍
/r/MensRights14/05/24 02:07 PM
2

Typical NPC gaslighting. Any further conversation with this man (if that is indeed the case) is nothing but waste. I don’t agree with you, and I don’t trust your sources. Something that I've noticed more frequently is that some people don't seem to understand how sources work, i.e. they would think that "https://www.mentalhealth.org.uk" is your source, as opposed to the actual sources with are the NHS and the ONS. Likewise, nothing posted here could ever be true because this is a "hate group"...…
/r/MensRights14/05/24 01:47 PM
16

The usual ones are: 2s -> "Two Spirit" lgbt, i'm sure you already know q -> "queer" i -> intersex a -> "asexual" but they can all change depending on the weather ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights14/05/24 12:03 PM
4

"2s" is at the front now? You know, there's a reason they added the +; "lgbt+" is much easier to say than "lgbtqqia2sfndap" and constantly having to keep on top of things to ensure you always include the newest identities... This really doesn't have anything to do with men's rights, and your "explanation" is severely lacking.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 11:58 AM
4

Topgunnnerr really could have made something of a point of he'd linked me to that line or provided any sort of evidence. That is stunningly inept of him to leave that on the table. You ask too much of a low-effort troll 🤣🤣
/r/MensRights11/05/24 06:07 PM
19

Thanks, I only saw bits of someone reacting and wasn't really paying attention, but it looks like I didn't miss anything... She certainly seemed a bit "cluster b", but that isn't really proof that she's lying. From the OP I thought there was something new that was a bit more concrete.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 05:55 PM
15

Maybe this full grown adult had permission to feel up this drunk kid. For those who are playing along at home, this is the construction of a threat narrative. This user is exaggerating his agency, and downplaying hers in order to present him as being more of a threat. He was also drunk, and she was 18, not a "kid" (I think he also said he thought she was over 21 on account of her having been drinking at the event?). (and by both accounts, she was reciprocating, i.e. implicit consent). No-one see…
/r/MensRights11/05/24 05:48 PM
9

She didn't claim he grabbed her breast that I can see. Last I heard, she did, but only after being very vague at first, and after he admitted he touched her stomach. Then she went full on breast accusation (also claiming that he admitted to it, even though he didn't ¯\_(ツ)_/¯). From what I've seen (clips here and there, none of these people can say anything concisely) she doesn't seem to be a particularly reliable narrator, maybe I'd even go so far as to say when was being incredibly manipulativ…
/r/MensRights11/05/24 05:39 PM
72

For those of us who haven't been following along, would you care to give a summary and share this proof?
/r/MensRights11/05/24 03:40 PM
26

I see no issues with men having a guys night together [...] To any sane, reasonable, person, there isn't any issue. The Feminist Patriarchy narrative is neither sane, nor reasonable. [...] under these conditions they want a women there to monitor it A Feminist, it doesn't need to be a woman. (see: OP, men voted to open the club) Feminism is not about equality, it's about power and control (and also a bunch of insanity). Same with any other oppressor/oppressed narrative.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 01:15 PM
17

It feels like the dominant class keeping the less powerful class down is viewed differently in society than the less powerful classing keeping the dominant class out. Yes, because the group of people who aren't allowed to have things to themselves are the "dominant class". I don't think anyone here accept this Patriarchy "theory", you're wasting your time. [...] is women next to you at a club or women learning how to canoe with you really that devastating [...] Devastating 🤣🤣🤣 Nice try. The cont…
/r/MensRights11/05/24 01:03 PM
50

They don't want to "empower" women, just tear down men. (I guess, technically, they view these two things as being the same, so it's a matter of perspective. see "zero sum game")
/r/MensRights11/05/24 01:02 PM
60

~Slide 4. They think these male only spaces are what create and perpetuate "The Patriarchy". Women only spaces are then promoted in order to give "privilege" and "power" to women.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 12:51 PM
60

So why are male only spaces so vehemently opposed... Feminism. I'm sure someone has the Sally Miller Gearhart quotes to hand, the ones about how male bonding is dangerous and how the male population should be reduced to help prevent it? It's a pretty core concept within Feminism, seeing as it's part of the whole "Patriarchy" thing (getting a trim and shave in a male-only barbers is one of those secret patriarchy meetings that they always talk about 🤣). It's not new by any means, and it's done in…
/r/MensRights11/05/24 12:48 PM
43

It's part projection, part something else (you ever just, completely forget a word? smh) A lot of people don't really care so much about accusations of "sexism" or "racism" anymore because they've been way overused, but they still have a strong emotional reaction to "rapist" and "paedophile". They're not necessarily sincere in these accusations, it's often just to paint the target as "undesirable" and encourage others to condemn them. There's also an element of control too, most people will inst…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/24 11:17 PM
6

Petty insults and nonsense, naturally. If you can't defend your points, why bother making them in the first place? You're just wasting peoples time. 👋
/r/MensRights09/05/24 10:33 PM
6

🤣🤣🤣 Most of it is your post, I didn't really say all that much. Have you ever heard of credibility? 🤡
/r/MensRights09/05/24 10:24 PM
7

Let me start by saying that I haven’t been on this sub for a while. Your history doesn't show any interactions here at all before today... I hope you're going to be more entertaining than the others. I have definitely seen SOME out right sexist men on here. Of course. This is an open forum with no membership plan, there are all sorts here. Report any misogyny to the mods, if they don't know about it then what do you expect them to do? And it didn’t help that most comments were full of men encour…
/r/MensRights09/05/24 10:11 PM
10

So as said , every tiny aspect of a life of a feminist as been run in the background by men, despite nobody force those women to not do those job ! The Patriarchy. According to Feminists, the Patriarchy actively prevents women from performing these jobs, via "social conditioning" and "gender roles", in order to make women subservient and reliant on men. (see: gilded cage) A lot of them truly believe that women could (and would) do everything that men do (but better), if only they were allowed. Y…
/r/MensRights08/05/24 04:43 PM
2

🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights08/05/24 04:04 PM
6

"I don't like the way the girls scouts are; The boy scouts needs to change!" I wish you all well and hope that y’all grow up one day to be real men and not some whiny little bitches. You lot just can't help it, can you? Do you really have nothing other than petty, childish, attacks? 👋🤡
/r/MensRights08/05/24 02:48 PM
8

The Girl Scouts don’t really teach leadership well in my opinion so that is why it isn’t recognized. So fight to improve the girl scouts instead of demanding that the boy scouts accommodate girls. lol downvote me all you want but this subreddit is filled with a bunch of man pussies. A lot of y’all are just afraid of the truth. Good luck being mad at another sex your entire life. Shaming language like this is the reason why people are downvoting you. You attack others instead of defending your po…
/r/MensRights08/05/24 02:17 PM
1

It's presenting "not demonising masculinity" as something to do for the sake of society, not for men's own sake. Red flag.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 11:31 AM
3

The Man/Bear question explained Naturally, if someone disagrees with you, it's because they just don't understand. Women are the ultimate source of knowledge and truth, after all... This question seems to make many of you extremely angry for reasons I cannot understand. It's because most who answer this question paint all men as inherently violent and abusive (and more so than a bear), and most likely also rapists. If you can't understand why people (not just men) don't like this, then you are b…
/r/MensRights08/05/24 11:13 AM
0

Except I didn't, and I'm not, and I wouldn't, and I don't need to. The only person who seems to have trouble understanding things here is you... People are downvoting you because you're fighting demons that don't exists and you look like a clown. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights05/05/24 01:39 PM
4

My brother in Christ... You're chasing phantoms. (for real, I'm not fucking with you here) It was a dumb joke, and even if it wasn't, a charge of hypocrisy has absolutely nothing to do with what I believe.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 08:01 PM
16

Which upside down alternate universe did you come from? You seem to reading a lot of things that I did not write (even implicitly). Perhaps you might have some anger issues of your own? You're clearly implying that little shit is a "misogynist" [...] Nope. I'm quite clearly calling him a hypocrite.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 01:02 PM
43

He also (I think around 16) had an argument with his mom and slapped her, then he went upstairs, came back down and smacked her again. And he calls you a misogynist, because... you don't want to see women get beaten up by Mike Tyson? 🤣 Sounds like depression to me, tbh. Kind of tricky because there's not really a single solution that works for everyone, (especially since most of the guidance surrounding it is in the context of women). IIRC Zuko was angry because he saw himself as a failure and w…
/r/MensRights04/05/24 08:30 AM
49

No shit. Turns out, demonising people and them demanding they do your bidding isn't very effective... who'da thunk it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 06:59 AM
11

[...] the fear women live with [...] The paranoia? [...] and having to risk their lives because of men [...] How so? instead of making this about men [...] They made this about men... Are men not allowed to defend themselves? [...] this should be a learning moment to know about the kind of world women live in [...] Yes, they live in some made up fantasy land where they think men are more dangerous than bears... [...] which we will never understand as men [...] Why? [...] but the least we can do …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 06:37 AM
4

By the same "logic" that they use to claim bears are "safer", a stranger is "safer" than a family member. (most rapes/assaults are committed by someone that the victim knows)
/r/MensRights02/05/24 04:55 PM
1

[...] brown bear [...] And all of the other types of bear? I'm no bear expert (the only bears we have in England are gay 🤣), but I know some of them are more aggressive than others, right? [...] most of these are when the bear feels threatened. And how, exactly, do you know how the bear was feeling? Male violence against women is incredibly common and not sensationalised nearly enough. On average, two women per week are murdered by their partner or ex-partner in the UK. There's a reason why they…
/r/MensRights02/05/24 04:46 PM
1

The validity is questionable, and enough of Feminism's claims (that are supposedly backed by science) have been complete bollocks to the point that I would have to read theses "studies" in detail, and, tbh, I have better things to do right now. [...] enough anecdotal evidence [...] Which is basically worthless for any fact finding mission. Medicine was built on one type of body. Medicine is built on many different "types of bodies", from multiple species. Is it men's fault that they're more will…
/r/MensRights02/05/24 04:06 PM
3

This claim that women's pain isn't taken seriously is actually very easy to counter with Feminism! They claim that men are socialised into hiding/ignoring pain/illness in order to not seem weak (because Toxic Masculinity) and will, therefore, refuse to see a doctor for pretty much anything unless they are forced to. From this, you can conclude that the average severity of a man's complaint when seeing a doctor will be higher, so they're more likely to be treated as having a more serious complian…
/r/MensRights02/05/24 05:09 AM
4

How does this affect Men's rights? Things like this are used to push legislation that prioritises women in order to redress the claimed discrimination. If, however, it is not true, then this will only cause discrimination against men.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 04:27 AM
9

I’m not condoning sexual assault or denying the validity of 97% of women that have been assaulted. You think 97% of women have been assaulted? Or are you OK with denying the validity of only 3% of the women who have been assaulted? Long story short we went back and forth and her point was that she would rather take the slight chance of her survival with a bear than a man and I respect her opinion. My brother in Christ, she despises you. You might think she likes you, and that you're "one of the …
/r/MensRights01/05/24 11:20 AM
12

I think men are definitely socialized in ways that hurt us [...] Such as? [...] I don’t use the word toxic masculinity because it demonizes masculinity and men [...] If you want to keep the rhetoric but change the name, you're going to have a hard time... Attacking masculinity is the whole point, it doesn't matter what you call it.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 04:33 AM
7

The link I posted to an X tweet [...] There you go, reddit admins are cancer and this is "harassment" these days, so the mods have to play along. The mod comment even tells you explicitly. Submissions about Facebook pages or Twitter must be screenshotted with names blanked out.
/r/MensRights25/04/24 12:35 AM
73

I think it is absolutely fascinating that women can "fake an orgasm" and then not have any idea why he keeps doing the same stuff every time, while she continues to essentially lie to him about what gets her off... 🤣🤣🤣 [...] why does the blame seems to be pushed onto men? Because Feminism is everything that they claim to fight against. In this case, they view sex as something that men do to women, where women are mere passive objects. This means that men are responsible for everything that happe…
/r/MensRights25/04/24 12:31 AM
2

Those are classifications based on observation in order to satisfy the human need to understand where we have come from and the world around us. They are descriptive labels, not prescriptive. A male has xy chromesomes? Not always, some males have ZZ chromosomes. =P
/r/MensRights22/04/24 10:07 PM
7

There's also the idea that any criticism of a women is misogyny because people are only saying these things because she's a woman. Women can be funny, but they don't have to be. If a standup comedian with e.g. bad timing is routinely shielded from any criticism pointing that out and constantly being told how great they are, they're never going to improve. Feminists are actively making female comedians less funny. 🤣
/r/MensRights22/04/24 03:03 PM
-2

You're not really making a good point here, you should look at/compare the proportion of breadwinners within the same scope as the people who pay alimony. It could be entirely possible that relationships in which the women is the primary earner are somehow more stable (no need for alimony) or don't result in/end before marriage (no former spouse to pay alimony to) or they might even be counting single occupancy "households", etc. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Surely it would be better to point to the newfound "econ…
/r/MensRights22/04/24 02:56 PM
0

smh 👋🤡
/r/MensRights21/04/24 05:44 PM
0

If all men would follow my advice [...] And what do you think the chances of that are? Advocate for your utopia all you like, between the "chads" and the white knights, it's not going to happen. [...] they wouldn't need contraceptives, abortions, childcare and baby paraphernalia. And the food, housing, and tampons? Also, very little taxes go to those things. I don't care how much it is, I don't want to be robbed. The majority of taxes go towards wars, feeding the fucking boomers and the secret p…
/r/MensRights21/04/24 02:19 PM
2

Feminists have an ever increasing list of things that women "need", and they "need" them so much that they insist that they shouldn't have to pay for them. So men (majority of net-tax payers are men) pay for them (via taxes) instead. (free tampons, free contraception, free abortions, free housing, free childcare, free baby paraphernalia, free food, etc.) You really haven't been paying attention to politics have you? And if things aren't this bad where you are, just wait, it's only a matter of ti…
/r/MensRights21/04/24 01:31 PM
9

You pay taxes? They're not leaving you alone...
/r/MensRights21/04/24 10:10 AM
6

You could also solve all of your problems with a simple knot, you'll never have to worry about anything again after that... Just stop fighting and give up. None of men's problems are caused by these things, to claim otherwise is akin to "fixing" a broken bone with painkillers. You have missed your target. If you do this, you will have peace and prosper. You assume that they will leave you alone? Even a blind man could see that this is not the case. What they don't take from you directly will be …
/r/MensRights21/04/24 10:00 AM
42

Why do you think Feminism actually cares about helping women? 🤣 This is the "zero sum game" that they were fond of denying a few years back; Any resources directed to men are not being directed to women.
/r/MensRights21/04/24 09:49 AM
2

If by "hard jobs" you mean stuff like manual labour, then men are generally stronger and simply better suited to heavy lifting. I can't speak for anyone else, but I wouldn't say that women "shouldn't be allowed" to do these jobs, just that men are better at them, and often women just get in the way, or are so preoccupied with trying to prove that they're "just as capable as a man" that it gets in the way of the actual work and they might even end up injuring themselves trying to keep up.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 06:34 PM
19

PMS, motherhood, remorse, The Patriarchy, "he made me do it", etc. They will find a reason to support their conclusion. (and then have the nerve to still claim that women are treated worse by the legal system!) Scotland was even going on about getting rid of women's prisons entirely at one point, I can't remember if they actually went through with that though. smh
/r/MensRights20/04/24 04:55 PM
7

[...] a system set up by a man is the system that will benefit a man [...] This is what they say when women are victims, so they can attack men for it. [...] "men did it to themselves" [...] This is what they say when men are victims, so they can attack men for it. It's the same as BLM not caring at all about the young black men who get into gangs, drugs, etc. and go around stabbing each other to death because they've got fuck all better to do. They only care about black lives when they can use …
/r/MensRights20/04/24 02:39 PM
23

So I wanted to ask yall what you would have to say as a comeback for "Who set that system up" "It wasn't me." "Don't change the subject." "I'm not a collectivist." "I'm not interested in joining your cult today, thanks." "I don't believe the son should be punished for the sins of the father." "What 'system'?" "Go fuck a cactus..." Any one of these will do, depending on the circumstances. In some cases you might be able to answer with "Feminists.", that's always fun. 🤣
/r/MensRights20/04/24 02:31 PM
1

I may not be up to speed with what people consider toxic masculinity nowadays [...] Well that's obvious 🤣 [...] used to describe immature masculine behaviours that promote psychological problems, such as telling a guy to “man up” when he expresses his feelings Tell me, what exactly is "masculine" about that? Especially given that it seems to be very much primarily something said by women...
/r/MensRights20/04/24 02:16 PM
19

Why would you think this post would get you banned? Projection. Feminist/women's spaces regularly ban people for asking too many questions.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 08:27 PM
79

Why? As far as men's rights are concerned, they're no different from regular Feminists.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 06:06 PM
5

It isn't, that's why it's illegal in the UK. The problem here is that they are conflating this with any picture in general.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 02:57 PM
6

Sounds like the type of videos that were (are?) being used to advertise "Britain" to "asylum seekers" via TikTok... Of course, talking about this in that context is racist. Note: From the article: While filming people on a public street is not illegal, it becomes criminal when it constitutes harassment. This is true [1] , however, posting the images/videos of identifiable people without their consent is already illegal [2] . These women need only contact TikTok/YouTube and they will almost certa…
/r/MensRights19/04/24 02:54 PM
6

I want you to tell your sisters/wives/mothers [...] You see, the thing is, I'm not a shallow, brain dead, bigot. I'm not pulling a "all men are scum; except for my family" here. My "advice" to people is the same no matter my personal relation with them. I truly want to hear the responses to this question. I don't think you do; Most of the women that I know would probably give you a good slap and tell you to get over yourself and stop being a man-hating cunt. 🤣 (and they'd almost certainly pick t…
/r/MensRights18/04/24 01:03 PM
62

"Positive Masculinity" is just "Toxic Masculinity" re-branded after people (and psychologists) complained too much. "Toxic femininity" is often used to refer to "internalised misogyny", so there is no need for a "positive femininity" (and most of the people pushing these ideas are also the "deconstructing gender norms" type anyway, so they would probably call feminine women "pick-me's" etc., which is also partly why a lot of the "strong female characters" in modern media are just dude-bro stereo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/24 10:37 PM
1

I think when DD said if abused men don't get support they might do something stupid, he was talking about suicide not harming other people. I suppose it is possible, however, given that a large percentage of killings within abusive relationships are done by the victim after "snapping" (known since the '70s), and, this is often used by Feminists to defend women who actually murder their partners by presenting them as the victim, and, they also implicitly admit this when they talk about women who …
/r/MensRights17/04/24 10:24 PM
27

(This is your brain on Feminism.) I'm no bear expert, but, I'm pretty sure if a bear was going to kill you, it would also tear you apart and/or eat you too (and not necessarily in that order) so “a bear would just kill me” and “they’d at least find me clothed after the bear gets me” are out. And as for “a bear would hurt cause it feels threatened and not cause it wants too”, why the fuck is she threatening a bear?! I'm honestly more offended by the sheer stupidity and ignorance than I am about t…
/r/MensRights17/04/24 08:53 PM
5

The fuck is "materialistic" or "self absorbed" about this???
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/24 08:43 PM
2

the idea of toxic masculinity is rejected Was it shite. There is no substance in this programme, it's purely meant to placate people by pretending to care actually about men. It's the Feminist/menslib perspective on men's rights.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 08:34 PM
3

4:50 Danny: "but even when I cheat, the test still tells me I'm toxic." 9:20 - Two men who grew up without a father giving their opinions on what masculinity is. I wonder who they got these ideas from? 9:45 Danny: "[Andrew Tate] is tapping into something though, there's a reason why he's got so many followers [...]" It's because the media won't shut the fuck up about the guy! (Followed by a quick equating misogyny and anti-Feminism) 10:57 Danny: "[...] provocative content [...]" Why does the med…
/r/MensRights17/04/24 08:25 PM
2

Looking at the summary for each episode... Episode 1: Danny explores whether there's been a rise in toxic masculinity in society [...] Episode 2: [...] can men evolve masculinity rather than abandon it? That's two for two on red flags. The guardian would likely be all over this if it were presented by a woman instead.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 05:42 PM
7

They start at the end and work backwards. The "fact" that women are oppressed by men is simply asserted to be true, and then they find evidence to support it and ignore/dismiss anything that would say otherwise. The Feminist/collectivist response to your example of conscription would likely include any number of the following: it's men's fault (men are responsible for the draft) patriarchy hurts men too toxic masculinity / traditional gender roles (that damn patriarchy at work again!) it's actua…
/r/MensRights16/04/24 11:42 PM
34

You think privacy exists in the UK? 🤣 For real, it will be just like piracy where they just assume all torrents are piracy and use downloading/possession of certain programs as "evidence" enough to justify a search.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 04:46 PM
12

On YouTube? I haven't see anything like that since the reply girl days... Perhaps you should reconsider the kind of content you consume if YouTube keeps recommended this stuff to you. smh
/r/MensRights15/04/24 04:40 PM
30

[...] committed to a policy of equal opportunity [...] Don't be fooled by the sleight of hand, when they say "equality of opportunity" they still mean "equality of outcome" because they believe that we are all the same and any difference between men and women are the result of social conditioning, therefore, any difference in outcome must be due to a difference in opportunity.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 04:28 PM
70

And this is why this kind of thing should never be tolerated, not even in places where it doesn't really matter (like office jobs, etc.). This is where it always leads; Police, firefighters, air traffic control, soldiers, etc. incompetence will lead to deaths, all for the sake of ticking boxes.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 04:12 PM
3

Yes, I'm not supporting the UTI argument, I'm just pointing out a flaw that pro-circumcision advocates could exploit.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 10:24 AM
4

I don't know, there's no source. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I would suspect it's from a source which uses definitions specifically designed to emphasise women's victim status and reduce men's, though. ("victimised" is the give away here)
/r/MensRights15/04/24 08:11 AM
2

Plenty of people calling her out for getting drunk without a plan to get home, not pre-planning a way home, and being seemingly unaware that he had to walk back by himself... Why pick an 8th level comment that you just happened to reply to?
/r/MensRights14/04/24 08:37 PM
15

This thread seems to be the only thread in /r/mensrights that you have participated in, just to spam it with "but it's other men" and "room temperature IQ". I don't think any one here will miss you. 👋 Edit: and blocked! /u/aboowwabooww, Anyone can check you history from the past 6 years for themselves. Unless you deleted all of your comments from before the 30th of January last year, or used a different account, you're full of shit. /u/StarZax, I can't reply to you directly in this comment chain…
/r/MensRights14/04/24 07:17 PM
21

[...] unless it has to be done for medical reasons, such as an infection. One of the major "benefits" that pro-circumcision advocates make is that it reduces the risk of getting a UTI. If this is the text of your petition, I would be a little surprised if they don't reject it. As much as I agree that (genital) mutilation should not be treated differently based on the sex of the victim, I think this text is poorly written. We need a good, strong, objectively written, piece of text in order to per…
/r/MensRights14/04/24 03:23 PM
59

slide 1: generic "violence" (US) slide 2: rape and sexual assault (US) slide 3: domestic homicide (unknown) slide 4: unknown (probably homicide?) (various) slide 5: homicide (in line with slide 3) (worldwide) You're not really making a point here, apples and oranges and all that... It's entirely possible that you could have all of these slides reporting on the same dataset.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 03:03 PM
15

A 7 day old account taking the dumbest possible interpretation of my comment? sigh 👋🤡 (and tbh, I wouldn't be surprised if both of the accounts below are the same person...) My comment was clearly in response to Feminists claiming that there is a bias against victims of sexual violence (read: women). In any case... The police don't prove anything, gathering evidence is not proving your claim. Any arrests they may make are not proof of guilt. In a court of law, someone representing you uses evide…
/r/MensRights14/04/24 12:52 PM
50

If they are the ones to make the claim, then they are the ones who must provide proof. Then, you read through their "studies" and pick them apart. (sometimes they don't even support the claim that's being made! 🤣)
/r/MensRights14/04/24 09:52 AM
3

If that's true, then might be even worse than not caring about men (if they just assume that the responses are from women). Any man who says he wasn't taken seriously will become a woman who wasn't taken seriously, which will be used as "proof" that the police need to "do better" by blindly believing women and not asking questions, furthering the bias against men. I wonder if that was intentional? It seems odd not to ask for such information when damn near everyone else does.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 07:58 PM
0

So the bit about social media warping perspectives isn't important then? And the implied lack of communication (presumably due to dating apps)? That's some nice post-hoc rationalisation you got there, always makes for great advice! 🤣 Also, if you're going to reject an idea, it would be far more effective if you didn't then employ the same idea yourself immediately afterwards... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights13/04/24 06:07 PM
17

The Arizona Supreme Court’s decision to uphold an 1864 law banning elective abortions has sparked new discussions on reproductive rights and contraceptive options. As usual, men's contraceptives are only discussed as part of women's issues. (also a slight fallacy? in that they are presenting the law as bad because it's old, but the laws against murder and rape are also old, should we get rid of those too?) “Plan A” This positions men's contraceptives as an alternative to women's, not something a…
/r/MensRights13/04/24 11:45 AM
3

"Access Denied" https://archive.today/3bE5g works for some reason though
/r/MensRights13/04/24 11:21 AM
4

I don't know why you got downvoted It's probably because it's an anecdote that doesn't actually address the point that OP makes. It is a non-sequitur that adds very little, if anything, to the conversation. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights13/04/24 09:41 AM
9

More Toxic Masculinity bullshit? Do you really think this sub is the place for your essay attacking men and blaming them for everything that's wrong in the world? smh
/r/MensRights12/04/24 02:08 PM
46

Yet more reduction of women's agency. This is how we treat children and the mentally retarded, if Feminists want me to treat women like mentally retarded children then, uh, sure, I can do that... 🤣🤣🤣 Women are perfect angels, they can do no wrong and nothing is ever their fault. This is the "benevolent sexism" that Feminists were whining about years ago. Why do future Feminists always seem to fight against past Feminists?
/r/MensRights12/04/24 05:31 AM
7

Gaslighting, how typical. It's interesting how you can only describe things with labels. Have you looked in a mirror recently? They both have the same objective. Both groups act and speak in the same way on the same topics. Lets see... "not interested in marriage/romantic relationships" and "advocating for the rights of men"... Yup, exactly the same! 👋🤡
/r/MensRights11/04/24 05:54 PM
113

Not-so-ancient wisdom; Women are human beings, men are human doings. Not much you can do about that in a hurry. Would a women be called a real woman if she did something like this No, too many people would call the man a coward and take his "man card" away...
/r/MensRights11/04/24 04:58 PM
18

MGTOW/Mens rights movements You know those two things are different, right? becoming increasingly egocentric and malicious as time goes on Are they? Or is that just what gets peoples attention? It is almost equally destructive as feminism. That's "horseshoe theory" for anyone playing bingo! If you perfer to sling shit at the other side then you become hate groups, nothing more. And false equivalency too. Having both genders hate each other isn't good for anything or anybody and never will be. Ye…
/r/MensRights11/04/24 04:53 PM
1

cool, I though I'd had a stroke or something for a second there 🤣 What's the equivalent of a religion for non-believers? What do I call a widespread belief system? Why are there no words for these things? Ideology, dogmatic, cult, etc. depending on the specifics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/24 04:43 PM
1

Ok, now I'm just confused... What?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/24 04:28 PM
1

We will discuss it here. Well, we can, but I wouldn't expect many others to join in 🤣🤣 I think "postmodern religion" is a step in the wrong direction in that it's just plain old postmodernism that makes up a large part of it, they may co-opt religious institutions to further their goals but religion isn't integral to their beliefs.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/24 04:00 PM
4

I am autistic. Ah, I see. I'm not left-wing, nor am I right-wing. I think politics, etc. are too complex to boil down to a simple left/right distinction and it pretty much always leads to tribalism. There is a part of "the left" that is ever increasingly possessed by a cult. You seem to have noticed a number of thing which you're not supposed to notice and have been somewhat excommunicated from the cult as a result. There is a mighty hydra with many heads (Feminism, BLM, etc.) which all follow t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/24 03:17 PM
2

Sorry Master, please forgive me, I'll try to do better to satisfy you in the future =P OP talks about the "woke belief system", are you surprised that lefties don't care much for what else OP says? I though this smelled like a bit like a troll, tbh, just seems to be naive. Is that a coincidence or what? It shows you who's really in charge...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/24 06:09 AM
2

Ok then, every animal that eats food also breathes air. It doesn't matter if the overlap is 100%, they are still different things. I'm not denying that there is an overlap, there's also an overlap with BLM, Marxism, fat acceptance, etc. Even though the underlying ideology is pretty much the same, you won't get far discussing such ideas within "left wing" spaces. If you start talking about "woke" or ideology then people will just assume that you're some "right wing/reactionary troll". You might g…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/24 05:54 AM
1

It's hardly trolling, talk about misusing popular buzzwords...
/r/MensRights10/04/24 05:40 PM
1

🤣
/r/MensRights10/04/24 05:25 PM
1

The comment was about abortion and parental responsibility, you ignored it and decided that the commenter didn't care about people in poverty, or police violence, or school shootings (or careless accidents?), and concluded that the commenter had "misguided morals", after making one of the dumbest (yet somehow so common) arguments that I've seen. 👋🤡
/r/MensRights10/04/24 04:59 PM
1

You see the part where you ignored the actual comment (and argument) and instead pulled a bunch of stuff out of your arse in order to present the commenter as being a hypocrite because it's much easier than making an actual counter-argument? That's what we call a strawman...
/r/MensRights10/04/24 04:39 PM
9

I think that the vast majority of the people who take part in the pride parade would identify themselves as feminists, and the women in the university gender studies departments and elsewhere, they all have Pride Flags on the walls of their offices. I'd bet a lot of Feminists are also the type to eat food. Would you consider eating food to be a Feminist act? Just because there is an overlap that doesn't mean they are the same.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/24 04:21 PM
0

Nice strawman, 👍
/r/MensRights10/04/24 08:00 AM
3

Mifepristone and misoprostol are the usual combination, but there are other, albeit less safe/effective, options that have been used for hundreds of years. It's the same boat as the bathtub hrt that's being sold to children... Everyone knows that if they stand up against it that there will be a massive shit storm, so they don't.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 07:46 AM
2

In the UK, they did think of that (and did it anyway). During the lockdowns the they ("temporarily") made it so women no longer had to go and actually see a medical professional and you can just get the pills delivered after a phone "consultation". Apparently they are pretty loose when it comes to safeguarding (not surprising, given the track record) so there has been a significant increase in abortions passed the time limit (sometimes quite far, I think I read about one that was 33 weeks? the l…
/r/MensRights10/04/24 07:42 AM
3

If a guy gets his girlfriend pregnant and she insists on keeping it and the guy knows for a fact that he cannot support a child, whether that's because of finances or because he's emotionally or, psychologically incapable of doing so [...] Then he should have thought twice about having sex in the first place (or maybe even considered contraception). You know that's how babies are made, right? (And before anyone suggests otherwise, yes, I do apply the same standard to women too.)
/r/MensRights10/04/24 07:28 AM
7

The real question is why do you think women should be able to enact violence against men with impunity? Of course, that doesn't quite work for your narrative, does it? (And, if anything, your post is a good reason as to why men should be more willing to be violent towards women; you never know who's carrying a knife, and they'll kill you because feelings.)
/r/MensRights10/04/24 07:22 AM
2

It's an example of the ideological proposition. If you call someone a racist and they disagree then that's just proof that they are a racist (because "I'm not a racist" is exactly what a racist would say), and if they don't gracefully take your baseless accusations as fact and ask you for another, then they are "fragile" because they can't handle admitting the "truth" of their racism. You can put anything in place of "racist" (homophobic, sexist, fascist, etc.), OP is just trying to turn it back…
/r/MensRights08/04/24 07:30 AM
1

Ah yes, the old "decree that all white people are inherently racist and, if they disagree, call them 'fragile' and take it as proof of their racism"... This "fragility" and "toxic" narrative is bullshit, and that goes for all applications.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 07:07 AM
17

There are men who genuinely and wholeheartedly care about men and their issues, because they’re men, and that’s ok. Thanks, for a moment there, I thought that I was doing something wrong. 🤣 Feminists often say things like “well if you care about men’s issues then just be a feminist” but then they’ll mainly just focus on women’s issues, which is ok too. No it isn't. Lying, pushing your ideology onto others, and gaslighting, are all pretty shitty things to do. [...] But whenever feminists bring up…
/r/MensRights07/04/24 02:06 PM
14

You been living under a rock or something? 🤣
/r/MensRights07/04/24 01:05 PM
5

You have to understand that Feminism despises women. They see women as weak and pathetic, with no control over their own actions like some mere animal, or even a leaf on the wind. 🤣 This is also cult behaviour. Anyone outside the cult will see how ridiculous the premise is, but, for those who are already initiated it makes sense because they have already accepted lesser insanities.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 04:17 AM
-2

I think Jesus was an example of "the perfect man", according to contemporary philosophy, and that Christianity (and Christian morals/ethics) are the very foundation of "western society" to such a degree that many fail to realise. Some of it may not be particularly relevant anymore, but there is much wisdom and truth to be found, even if it only serves as a vehicle to unify and deliver prior philosophy. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ The church can go get fucked though, especially that bastard with the silly hat. The…
/r/MensRights06/04/24 03:06 AM
3

How about we stop referring to "having a preference" as "shaming"? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights05/04/24 12:02 PM
2

I disagree with this perspective on the topic because it is rooted in Feminist/woke dogma, and is getting pretty close to perpetuation "toxic masculinity". There are two major aspects to this, "control" becoming "suppression", and the positioning of women's behaviour as the correct way to do things and condemning men's deviation as some kind of defect. Men (and women!) should absolutely learn to control their emotions; The sheer strength of a man can cause significant damage under a careless los…
/r/MensRights04/04/24 07:31 PM
41

Pretty similar to my thoughts on female circumcision. 🤣
/r/MensRights04/04/24 06:55 PM
1

No, you demanded, whilst simultaneously dismissing the claim. I cannot open your eyes for you.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 05:47 PM
128

There are some for whom any discussion of the troubles that men face is considered "reactionary". They believe that the Patriarchy and Toxic Masculinity are the root causes of men's issues, and that Feminism is the one and only solution, and if you disagree then you're a misogynist. There is no convincing them otherwise, no matter what ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/24 09:44 AM
2

There are none so blind as those who will not see.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 05:49 AM
21

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0018506X19304519 There is a weak correlation between testosterone and aggression (in men) but the causal link is not significant. Most of the studies in favour of testosterone->aggression idea are flawed in one way or another; they studied animals, not humans the sample was not representative, e.g. they studied prisoners they show correlation, not causation they studied the effects of exogenous testosterone, not endogenous aggression is pain…
/r/MensRights03/04/24 08:22 PM
4

Big claims require big proof. Do you not think it prudent to share so that anyone thinking of donating to this charity might avoid doing so?, or that anyone who may be suicidal would be able to avoid any "help" such as what you describe? Names or gtfo, brother. Even a blind man could have seen Chloe Roma was insincere, I'm surprised it took you this long tbh.
/r/MensRights03/04/24 07:18 PM
45

Because when women do bad things, the majority of people either look the other way or fall over themselves trying to defend and justify her actions. (e.g. the "women are wonderful" effect, you can twist this into "benevolent sexism" quite easily) It's probably not because of testosterone, that link has been more or less disproved, not that it really stood up to scrutiny in the first place. Most of the research was done with animals, or prisoners, where "competitiveness" and "social status" usual…
/r/MensRights03/04/24 06:55 PM
20

I don't subscribe to "gender roles", "traditional" or otherwise. There are certain traits and behaviours that are typically associated with either men or women (or children). This is a value-less observation. Referring to these traits and behaviours (and many others which are not "gendered") as "roles", implies that they are some kind of requirement, or that you are "less of a man" (etc.) for not being the stereotype, and is ascribing a value (positive or negative) to these traits. This is what …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/24 09:55 PM
3

You could, just like you can stand against sin without being a christian... Some concepts are inextricably linked to the ideologies which promote them, by supporting the concepts you are implicitly supporting the ideologies and lending them legitimacy. Just because they use the same words, that does not mean that they carry the same meanings.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 06:37 PM
1

[...] I'm a blue pilled cuck [...] Well you got one thing right at least... My brother in Christ, you are lost; I hope one day you find your way back home.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 05:57 PM
3

Are you being intentionally obtuse?
/r/MensRights26/03/24 09:31 PM
4

No. It's the more effective use of limited resources. If you test some drug on women and it looks to be ineffective, you don't know if it's the drug or the hormonal fluctuations and the results are meaningless. If you test on men you can (more or less) rule out hormonal fluctuations as a factor. Reliable data on half of the population is better than unreliable data on the other half. If it turns out the difference is actually important, then you can always do more research if needed. Of course, …
/r/MensRights26/03/24 07:39 PM
53

men used as guinea pigs; women most affected. There's also the issue of women's hormonal cycle, if you're doing an experiment you want to reduce as many extraneous factors as possible, and then there's potential damage to the foetus if she's pregnant on top of that, (see: thalidomide). I do not think women were "overlooked", but rather a conscious decision was made in order to reduce potential harm and ensure the most reliable results possible. (If this was even true in the first place)
/r/MensRights26/03/24 12:17 PM
65

Instead of "male dominated," why not something that isn't so ominous-sounding? Like mostly male? Because it's supposed to sound bad. That's the point. "Male dominated" implies intent and attributes blame. This re-frames their aggression towards the situation as a justified response.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/24 10:54 AM
15

You should remove the usernames/pictures next time, reddit rules are dumb. A classic "redefine the words so support your position" with a follow up "that thing that just happened didn't actually happen", with a side of "accidental heteronormativity". It's a three year old tweet expressing an idea that is even older, this isn't particularly note worthy tbh, unless you're building a profile on the author. The original tweet does have a community note though.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 10:56 PM
6

The problem is not (only) minimalising/excluding male victims, but also minimalising/excluding the concept of female perpetrators. This distinction is important because most (all?) of these statistics are self-reported, so, if a victim of a woman does not believe that women can even be perpetrators then they may not consider themselves to be a victim and, therefore, may not report the event. The ONS data and the UK definition of rape is not why people (especially Americans) believe that only men…
/r/MensRights14/03/24 11:13 PM
24

The real definition of woke is "aware of and actively attentive to important societal facts and issues". That is what they claim it means, yes. Simple observation will refute this. And you can fuck off if you think I'm buying your snake oil. 👋 🤡
/r/MensRights14/03/24 08:41 PM
34

Men are human; woke is inherently inhuman and misanthropic. woke hurts everyone.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 06:56 PM
29

Lying? 🤣🤣🤣 I think it's more a combination of black and white thinking and zero sum game. A lot of people think that attacking men is supporting women. (and this is why they accuse us of "hating women" for supporting men's rights, gotta love that projection!)
/r/MensRights12/03/24 05:03 PM
26

I'm not sure I've ever known someone who is against prostitution for the purpose of controlling women (I've heard that they exist, ¯\_(ツ)_/¯) but, in my experience, they tend to paint prostitution as entirely sex trafficking at the hands of violent and abusive men, so they're against prostitution in order to "protect" women. (or they're the kind of people who think sex is inherently degrading to women and oppose prostitution for that reason and think it's shameful that "society" "forces" these w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/24 01:11 PM
35

So between surveys like this and the fact that we know that pro-life, anti-abortion groups are at least split evenly in terms of gender demographics, if not, skews slightly female, why is it that men always get labelled as the 'sex-negative' ones looking to control women's sexuality? That will be the spectre of The Patriarchy... (i.e. men)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/24 12:56 PM
1

The "system" in "systemic" refers to the Patriarchy (for Feminists). When they complain that the Patriarchy did something (e.g. making all of the laws) or the Patriarchy enforces something (e.g. "gender roles"), that's the "system" acting. Combine this with the idea of "benevolent" sexism and you end up in their position where everything is systemic misogyny (because that's how they have defined these terms). You can't reason your way around this. Their propositions are unfalsifiable and, as suc…
/r/MensRights29/02/24 12:42 PM
17

Is that it? 🤣 One mention of women as "people with vaginas" in a (medium-long) post about how the definition of masculinity is abused to benefit whoever is using it is hardly "throwing insults" or "hating women", even if it is crude. If your're only going to give one example, make it a good one... If you see any post that you think qualifies as "misogyny" or similar, report it to the mods because that's actually against sub rules.
/r/MensRights29/02/24 12:00 PM
1

since metoo doesn't have a gender Given the number of men who tried to speak up at the time and were told to shut up and stop making #metoo about men, I would be inclined to disagree.
/r/MensRights29/02/24 11:06 AM
24

i don't get why i am being downvoted Because this post is of (less than) zero value. If you're not at least provide a link (preferable a few) to demonstrate your point, then what do you expect people to take away from this? At this point, you're no different from the crazies that insist "men's rights" is just misogyny and we want to make rape legal or whatever other insane bullshit that's popular at the given moment. (This also appears to be the first post you've made in this subreddit, this doe…
/r/MensRights29/02/24 11:02 AM
30

It isn't different, it's still the same "prejudice + power" redefinition. If you judge people purely on their sex, race, sexuality, etc. then you are a bigot, no matter which "way" it goes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/24 12:55 PM
64

Debunking the Myth of “Lesbian Bed Death” Compared with heterosexual couples, lesbian couples have significantly less sex. A controversial term to describe this is "lesbian bed death." Almost half of the lesbian couples (43 percent) reported either no partner lovemaking at all or doing it just once a month. The figure for heterosexual women was less than half that, 16 percent. A recent study shows that what most lesbian couples miss in sexual frequency, they make up for with erotic quality. It i…
/r/MensRights27/02/24 12:44 PM
5

Ooh a two-for-one classic, "people would take this more seriously if it were said by a man..." and "now we're going to sell you the solution to the problem we created!" 🤣
/r/MensRights27/02/24 12:31 PM
1

There's a reason for that. If you have a gay character in a movie that isn't overtly flamboyant and sexually obsessed, how would you know they were gay? They need to be characterised like that for the whole "representation" thing. A "typically masculine" gay man who doesn't mention their sexuality all the damn time is contributing/benefiting from "heteronormativity", they're not "pushing boundaries". It's the false dichotomy of If you don't actively subvert social norms then you implicitly suppo…
/r/MensRights27/02/24 07:32 AM
6

Good luck ever getting anything like that. There was a time when trans activists were all about the "male-brain in a female-body" and would gladly agree that there were differences in brain structures (i.e. a mismatch of physical- and mental- was the cause of gender dysphoria), but they would always throw a hissy fit if you ever asked if they had had a brain scan...
/r/MensRights26/02/24 03:22 PM
-1

In other words, water is wet. I wonder how this "AI" will classify trans- individuals, or are we not allowed to know that? 🤣 But this new study casts doubt on the claim that male and female differences are entirely socialised. This is old news, plenty of studies have shown this for many years... We didn't need "AI" for this. Tabula rasa was built upon the sand from the start. Also, this doesn't strictly counter tabula rasa either; The brain can be altered by our experiences, of which "socialisat…
/r/MensRights26/02/24 03:13 PM
3

👋 🤡
/r/MensRights26/02/24 09:34 AM
2

You are being obtuse. Riddle me this batman; If the suspect has ran away, who are you going to employ these "dozens of other skills" on?
/r/MensRights26/02/24 09:23 AM
89

How is it unfair on women? They start from the position that gender is a social construct and that men and women are exactly the same apart from socialisation. Following on from that, if there is any disparity in the outcome (i.e. women are less capable physically) then it simply must be the result of discrimination. (This is what they mean by "indirect" discrimination.)
/r/MensRights25/02/24 01:38 PM
77

This is what equality gets you. (and they say men are entitled 🤣 🤡🌎) Note: this is not the first time that standards were lowered to accommodate women, and it's not just the police, the military have done this too. Is it any wonder that people don't feel safe any more?
/r/MensRights25/02/24 01:33 PM
1

Give me RISUG or give me death. All of this fucking around with hormones and biological pathways is completely unnecessary when RISUG is a thing that exists (or rather, could exist)... Make no mistake, the people pushing these types of drugs don't care in the slightest about men's contraceptive options.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 01:51 PM
24

Human rights would be a good start in many cases.
/r/MensRights04/02/24 01:50 PM
5

Most likely sitting still, being quiet, and doing as they're told without question.
/r/MensRights02/02/24 07:57 AM
26

red meat thrown to the dogs to keep them quiet Very few (if any) of what makes it to the mainstream will have any kind of depth, they cover surface level issues and often don't really understand the underlying arguments. They are the "tip of the iceberg", if you will (at best). (you'll see this with a lot of politically incorrect position) If I may be slightly conspiratorial here... I don't believe the rise of Tate was entirely natural, he was thrust into the public consciousness and obsessed ov…
/r/MensRights01/02/24 06:15 AM
1

My immediate impression is that these are the type of people to say something like "real men aren't afraid to show emotion", i.e. those who have barely scratched the surface of the issue and believe the issue is that men just don't talk about things (or seek help) enough. (how do you do, fellow men?) If this is your kind of thing, I dare say it may be more useful than the "professionals", but, ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Also, what the fuck is this web design??? Repeatedly switching back and forth between light- …
/r/MensRights31/01/24 07:26 AM
24

"benevolent sexism" is actually just sexism against men, but because they have defined sexism as something that only women deal with they have to re-frame it like this. You can easily apply the same fuckery to racism, etc. too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/24 12:43 PM
38

[...] intersectionality does not recognize men's issues that derive from being male [...] No shit. Along the "gender vector" of intersectionality men are the oppressors and women are victims. It doesn't matter how many others you add, you'll never reverse a vector. It was never about helping men, they've always been quite explicit about it, in my experience. (and they also bring everything back to how women are oppressed)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/24 01:23 PM
19

[...] supply and demand [...] Exactly the issue, if there is a good supply of hassle-free entertainment then what demand is there for the women who have nothing else to offer? Why do you think they never talk about a "female gaze"? (and insist that "it's not the same" whenever it's brought up?)
/r/MensRights28/01/24 07:19 AM
4

You have to understand what "systemic oppression" means; It's the same as the old "racism = prejudice + power" model. Men can't experience "systemic oppression", by definition, and oppression of "the oppressors" is justified and righteous (because they're punching up). Stop using their words. Stop playing their games. You cannot reason with the unreasonable.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 07:52 AM
10

Anyone remember The Fappening? Same thing back then ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/24 05:54 AM
54

Fantastic! I've been looking for a new mad conspiracy theory since all my old ones kept coming true... Don't be shy with the details 🤣
/r/MensRights27/01/24 05:14 AM
1

Do you have a link that isn't behind a paywall? I'm not going to pay an obscene amount of money to read something that is most likely bullshit. Why did you ignore the second half of the abstract? Is it because it actually counts against the point you're trying to make? (And it has some very politically incorrect implications, 🤣🤣🤣) Subjects who were highly arousable, insofar as they were unable to voluntarily and completely inhibit their sexual arousal, were more sexually aroused by all stimuli t…
/r/MensRights25/01/24 04:44 PM
2

I'm sure most people would in many contexts, but the problem is with the context presented here. When you take the whole phrase "child sexual offences", damn near everyone is going to read "child" as under the age of consent (especially when the rest of the article talks about 10-14 year old's) but that's not how it's being used here. It's misleading and it damages the trust. Paired with the broad definition of "sexual offence", it is entirely possible that have included perfectly legal and mora…
/r/MensRights25/01/24 04:33 PM
8

Childlight: Opening with a fantastic water is wet we move swiftly on to the largest rounding errors that the world has ever seen mixed with a hint of statistical anomaly, followed by a close that wasn't an option and a very subtle those aren't mutually exclusive options. How do they do it? This report is written to manipulate and present (some of) the data to support a narrative, and there are numerous basic errors. It is dishonest and should not be trusted. Those graphs are terrible, if you're …
/r/MensRights24/01/24 08:38 PM
16

The Times: From the mere fact that they did not include the numbers for women, it is clear that this article was written for the purpose of driving animosity towards men and to further strengthen the association between men and monsters. The claims are so vague that it is conceivable that an 18 year old kissing a 17 year old could be counted as "a man having sexual contact with a child", therefore they are worthless. [...] research has suggested [...] In a study [...] This survey shows [...] The…
/r/MensRights24/01/24 06:55 PM
20

First off, the report (not a study) you linked is not the same one that was talked about in the article. Secondly, they are both so worthless that they can be ignored (especially without the actual studies). Edit: I may have jumped the gun, having read through the linked report I now see that that is the report, it's just that they're both mentally deficient and neither of them know how statistics work (or they're doing it on purpose!), Jesus fucking Christ. And they want us to trust the media a…
/r/MensRights24/01/24 06:49 PM
8

Feminists like to count FGM using one definition and then imply all FGM is clitoridectomy for political gain. In my experience, they usually go for infibulation using rusty tools (and thorns!) in unsanitary conditions (and completely ignore the fact that boys are circumcised using the same tools in the same conditions). Many of them didn't even know that there were different forms of FGM, smh.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 11:37 PM
3

Why does "Effective Altruism" sound like such red flag? 🤣 I see. After a quick read of their site, they seem to be little more than the usual inhuman cultists that see people as little more than cold numbers in a spreadsheet... I think I'll pass on that one tbh. [...] Conduct research into the issues men and boys face around the world [...] There's already been plenty research done, no-one cares. [...] how many men and boys around the world or in specific countries have spent time in prison or h…
/r/MensRights22/01/24 04:32 PM
29

You have to understand, they don't care about democracy, only "their Democracy".
/r/MensRights21/01/24 08:25 PM
7

And there's the motte-and-bailey... The new guidelines advise educators to "actively challenge harmful and persistent myths and misconceptions" such as the notion that men are entitled to sex, that male aggression is normal, or that women often lie about sexual assault. What young child thinks that men are entitled to sex? or that "male aggression" is distinct from any other kind of aggression? or that women often lie about sexual assault? I would bet a fair amount that this "challenging" is the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/01/24 08:07 PM
-10

"children", "young people"... How young exactly? From the article (and the video especially) it would seem very fucking young, and they wonder why there's backlash? 🤣🤣🤣
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/01/24 07:39 PM
2

Oranges aren't real because apples exist. Go ahead, try and find an orange that is as green and crisp as this here apple... Even if you do find one, it doesn't prove anything because oranges don't exist! [...] misandry doesn’t, and never has existed in a patriarchy [...] So, if anyone can find one single example of misandry, by "doctor" Taylor's own admission, we do not live in a patriarchy. If you did find one example, all you have done is found an exception which proves the rule. For one, that…
/r/MensRights18/01/24 11:24 AM
83

Ancient hostility towards that which cannot be controlled. Same reason why certain women are quite hostile towards gay/bi men (and mgtow); "you have no power here"
/r/MensRights18/01/24 10:52 AM
4

[...] fundamental thinking errors [...] Yes, you just need to cleanse your brain from all of this wrong-think and then you'll be better... 🤣
/r/MensRights16/01/24 02:52 PM
1

"woke" It's kind of hard not to involve a degree of nudity for an underwear model, but she was advertising a jacket? Why is she naked? smh "double standard" https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-12944099/fka-twigs-calvin-klein-poster-banned.html So why did they not pull the Kendall Jenner ads? The notion that twigs, of all people, would agree to be part of a campaign which 'used' or exploited her sexuality, is plain ridiculous. So what's with the insta-thot level centrefold pose highligh…
/r/MensRights13/01/24 09:52 AM
22

Because men only want one thing... Some people are just more "sensitive" to any kind of positive interactions from others and may misinterpret certain things as flirting. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ The worst part is that if you change your behaviour as to not make her uncomfortable, (or maybe you just don't want to deal with the hassle), that just proves her right. 🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights11/01/24 08:36 PM
1

https://np.reddit.com/r/polycritical/comments/18rzhp6/you_guys_are_sexist_bigots_polyamory_is_the_future/kf5rzs0/?context=3 Nah, low quality troll. It's like a walking meme...
/r/MensRights09/01/24 10:38 AM
7

I just thought I would post this to reddit because I assumed most of you guys have been in this exact same situation before. Isn't the soy/cuck meme about the "left wing" types, not this "right wing" cesspool? Are you really so shallow and pathetic that you can't even make your own insults and have to fall back on "no u"? 🤣🤣🤣 0/10 troll, try harder next time
/r/MensRights09/01/24 09:01 AM
130

Note: "Healthy Masculinity" is the same narrative as "Toxic Masculinity". [...] encountering a growing discourse that associates masculinity with “toxic” traits, young men are turning to online forums where they feel more comfortable [...] [...] these forums exploit the vulnerabilities of young men by employing misogynistic ideologies, claiming that the rise of feminism is the root cause of their personal difficulties [...] You mean like insisting that they, and everything that they are and repr…
/r/MensRights08/01/24 12:05 PM
1

No evidence or investigation whether the person actually murdered the wife is needed, the person "shall be punished with imprisonment" automatically. After an investigation and evidence of recent cruelty or harassment... The standard might be low, but that is a different matter. (And, like I said, bad enough by itself.) Again, title is a shortcut. If your "shortcuts" are losing information and changing meanings, then you should start over and reword the title. Long, but accurate, is better than …
/r/MensRights08/01/24 08:35 AM
5

Try looking in /r/mensrightslinks, /r/MRRef/, and /r/MaleStudies.
/r/MensRights08/01/24 08:03 AM
1

"without evidence or investigation" It also isn't limited, or specific, to the husband, and it may be a language issue, but, I would not consider "unnatural causes" and "otherwise than under normal circumstances" to be equivalent.
/r/MensRights08/01/24 08:00 AM
2

[...] I am not depressed. I just feel empty. [...] the only exception being hatred, pure primal hate. When with my friends I prefer to fake being happy [...] As much as Feminists go on and on about the differences between symptoms of heart attacks between men and women, they always seem to ignore the differences here (despite claiming to care about men's mental health). What people think of as depression is usually typical symptoms of women, men are more likely to experience this anger and hatre…
/r/MensRights08/01/24 04:29 AM
2

[...] and it is shown that soon before her death she was subjected to cruelty or harassment [...] for, or in connection with, any demand for dowry [...] This does not support the claim in your title. Why do people feel the need to exaggerate things like this? It's bad enough that something like this is ripe for manipulation and abuse, why lie?
/r/MensRights08/01/24 03:40 AM
10

If you're talking about the one I think you are, that's not quite what happened. There was one suicide (which was investigated and deemed unrelated, but who really knows ¯\_(ツ)_/¯) and most of the severe negative side effects came from a single testing centre and was not representative of the whole. Most of the participants said they would (at least consider) continue taking it if/when it came to market. It also wasn't anywhere near as effective as female contraceptives are. For a significant nu…
/r/MensRights06/01/24 07:56 AM
3

At least you actually tried and linked to things... The first link says the comment was from 2015 in the title, and the "news" article is commenting on a recent tweet regarding "the next star wars film", which is apparently directed by the person who made the comment. The second link was even called out for being misleading, although it is clarified in the article. I'd hardly call this "fake news".
/r/MensRights05/01/24 05:58 AM
3

the left leaning subreddit As opposed to what, the centre/centre-left leaning subreddit that is constantly smeared as a "right wing cesspool" because they don't blanket dismiss people based on this stupid left/right dichotomy and instead criticise ideas e.g. chivalry, gynocentrism, etc.? And you think it is "the right wing" that is immature? 🤣🤣🤣
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/01/24 05:31 PM
4

Big difference between right leaning randomer and between right leaning politicians. And yet you would openly malign them both as "the right wing" and declare them to be incapable of supporting men for any reason other than spite... smh
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/01/24 04:17 PM
8

I think you might be wasting your time here, unfortunately. I've been away for a while, but, ever since the reddit "protest" and the change of ownership, It feels as if the "left/right; us vs. them" mentality has gotten worse here. [...] the vast majority of people supporting the MRM are right wing or centrist [...] I don't know about the wider community, or if things have changed that much, but there's been a number of studies and surveys in /r/MensRights over the years that show a fairly consi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/01/24 03:55 PM
3

Are you really comparing Feminism to the fucking Nazis!? Nazism had barely anything good at all, while Feminism has been fighting for women’s rights for centuries. A truly incomprehensible comparison; One of those groups blames all of societies problems on an all-powerful secret cabal of certain people who manipulate society and culture in order to benefit themselves over everyone else and openly (and, as far as they're concerned, justifiably) call for their genocide as they attack and demonise …
/r/MensRights02/01/24 03:44 AM
124

Thoughts? How do they define bias? How many are biased against men? Did they even bother to ask? Same bullshit as usual, it doesn't make it any more true just because the UN is saying it.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 06:02 PM
5

Plan A How cute, continuing to blame men for everything and paint women as eternal victims... It's truly remarkable how much can be said in so few words. [...] long-acting contraception [...] That's a rather strange way to say "sterilisation". Vasectomies are intended to be permanent, and the bar for "reversal" is incredibly low with no guarantee of functionality returning. At least it's actually a decent method this time (risug/vasalgel), but I'd never use it with this kind of rhetoric surround…
/r/MensRights25/12/23 09:05 AM
23

Note: "traditional gender roles" is just "toxic masculinity" with different clothes. The same arguments still apply. The lack of empathy that people have for men is not a gender role. Blaming "gender roles" for the troubles that men face is not going to help, it's just another way of attacking men for everything that they are and blaming them for everything that is bad in the world. Same shit, different name...
/r/MensRights22/12/23 12:50 PM
1

But their definition of power excludes women from having power... It's not just that they pretend that they don't have the power, they actually believe they don't (due to Patriarchy and the male hegemony) and that they're some kind of oppressed revolutionary under dog. Misandry can't be systemic because the Patriarchy wouldn't allow it, and we know that we live in a Patriarchy because there is no systemic misandry. (and all of your examples of female privilege/power can be dismissed as actually …
/r/MensRights16/10/23 03:15 PM
3

That is the blog name, not the title of the post. Anyone who uses the word "systemic" seriously is almost certain to subscribe to the "power + prejudice" model which, by (their) definition, excludes misandry. There is nothing to engage with because they have already decided that they are right, and nothing will change that. The rest of the blog post is just the usual bullshit and the bait and switch of those men over there (i.e. Islam) as a justification as to why Feminism is justified over here…
/r/MensRights16/10/23 12:08 AM
8

My thoughts on this? From the title alone, no need to read the rest. My God is the real one because my holy book says so.
/r/MensRights15/10/23 10:20 PM
1

Because there's never innocent people that get arrested, why bother with the time and expense of the court system when an arrest automatically means that you were guilty?
/r/MensRights14/10/23 09:06 PM
3

Of course, they're not real Feminists... They never are, are they?
/r/MensRights14/10/23 06:47 PM
8

Yet their solution is to blame men for it all, demonise masculinity, and suggest that men would be better off if they just behaved like women instead... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights14/10/23 01:51 PM
5

Jess Philips, Ava Evans, etc. have said very similar. Pretty sure they have both identified themselves as Feminists in the past, but I could be wrong. "That didn't happen" doesn't work for things that have been broadcast live on national television, especially in the age of sharing clips online.
/r/MensRights14/10/23 01:49 PM
14

It is the same model of collective guilt that people use to claim all white people are inherently racist, or all straight people are inherently homophobic, or all hetero sex is inherently rape. All men are misogynistic creeps, and even if they aren't, they are complicit in the system. Fact. (You know it's true because I said Fact afterwards 🤣🤣🤣) If you disagree, or say that you don't know anyone like this then you're just wrong because they have declared it to be so, and so it is, and you are su…
/r/MensRights13/10/23 03:04 PM
3

From a design perspective, there's too much (small) writing. On the off-chance that they do catch someone's attention they probably won't bother to read it. There are also a few errors/clunky wording: "Nearly every men" should be "Nearly every man", "Men deserve being protected" should be "Men deserve to be protected", "why we have" should be "why do we have", and so on. From an ideological perspective, they seem to have been made (especially after reading the website) from the viewpoint of "Fem…
/r/MensRights10/10/23 06:53 PM
4

Oof, gonna have to hard-pass on this one, you might have more luck over at menslib... 🤣
/r/MensRights10/10/23 05:15 PM
1

Like I said, I'm not interested in joining your cult. Have a nice day. 👍
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/10/23 04:43 PM
8

7 day old account, approach with caution. It all depends on what you mean by "sexual education", and this is partly why the data is inconclusive. Teaching how the baby is made and how to avoid doing so does reduce teen pregnancy rates, saying "sex is bad for you, don't do it" and calling that "sex education" does absolutely nothing. And that's not to mention the spicier reasons as to why sex ed in currently in the public discourse... 🤣🤣
/r/MensRights10/10/23 10:49 AM
-1

👋🤡 edit: and blocked 🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights09/10/23 10:14 PM
0

I have no problems with the links. https://www.aals.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Bowen-Kanin-False-Rape-Empirical.pdf What do you see here? "Not Found" for me. A college campus is a good representation of wider society. No it isn't, even a blind man could see that. Independent sources confirming the numbers. Repeating a lie does not make it any more true.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 10:09 PM
2

Both sides! Both sides! Feminism is not the same thing as women's rights, they don't care about equality, and they don't even care about women. Feminism is built upon anti-male sentiment (at the expense of women), what other reaction are you expecting? This is not a "both sides" situation, we are not equal but opposite, Feminism is not women nor their rights, Feminism has been rotten from the beginning, you are virtue signalling, nice projection/strawman, I will not join your cult.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/10/23 10:05 PM
5

It's even worse than that... For the Pearson case, the evidence was manipulated to make it appear that the incident occurred over a longer time frame that it actually had. A lot of CCTV doesn't actually capture video but a series of images at regular intervals. I can't remember the number in this case, but imagine if the images were captured at 1 second intervals and played back at 2 second intervals. And not long after the Liam Allen case, there was some new legislation passed so that the polic…
/r/MensRights09/10/23 09:34 PM
1

As far as I can see from a quick look, this (and the other link) are actually quoting the same numbers (Kanin) which I can't verify because the link to the actual study returns a 404 and it isn't even archived. Even if the study is sound (another user mentioned a potential methodological issue), a college campus is not representative of wider society.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 09:07 PM
28

[citation needed] Even if these claims were accurate, you cannot simply take something that happened under specific circumstances and conditions and apply it generally. This cherry picking is no better than Feminists claiming it's only 0.5% because they only consider false accusations which resulted in convictions...
/r/MensRights09/10/23 10:31 AM
1

The next election is coming up soon, their position will largely be whatever they think that the public wish to hear. (and what they need to say to maintain the illusion of choice in our de facto "two" party system). Personally, I think it unwise to trust anything that they say. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights08/10/23 05:11 PM
5

You assume that the people who "look to remove the discrimination of women" are telling the truth. This is a mistake.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 03:43 PM
16

They don't care about children being stabbed to death, not even the girl, they only care that it was a boy who killed her.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 09:17 PM
26

"British MP" She the bloody Home Secretary! not that you'd know it from the way she speaks... She's also wrong, rape is defined by law as penetration with a penis, there is no mention of the sex of the perpetrator... Sounds like she's late to the "only men have penises" party.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 09:14 PM
2

Can someone explain this double standard to me? Many years of history, the whole system is a bit of a mess, and it depends on when and where you ask. The King's wife is given the title of Queen because she is the King's wife, but the Queen's husband is not the King's wife, so he is not given the title of Queen, and he is not necessarily given the title Prince either, it (being given a title, and the title itself) is a courtesy afforded at the Queen's discretion (at least in England?). At one poi…
/r/MensRights07/10/23 08:49 PM
4

And what exactly does that have to do with anything that I said? Aside from confirming that you're a time waster...
/r/MensRights07/10/23 07:49 PM
5

I don't really care how you identify, or which "side" you're on, or if you want to "reclaim the label" from the bad Feminists, or if you want to play the enlightened centrist and both sides me, and I certainly don't want you to simply replace Feminism with men's rights... All I care about is the truth and honesty. You asked a question, I answered, and corrected some misinformation you had. Will you answer my question, or are you just here to waste time like all of the others? information and lit…
/r/MensRights07/10/23 06:59 PM
6

Well, they certainly claim to care, but their proposed solutions say otherwise... Feminism is not rotten [...] It is, and it relies on people like you who don't (or won't) see the rot and buy into the whole "it's just about equality" narrative to cover for it. [...] there are so many concerns that need to be addressed by society [...] Such as? All of the "concerns" that I've seen are either: old nonsense that has been debunked many times, personal (i.e. not societal) issues, wildly exaggerated /…
/r/MensRights07/10/23 04:07 PM
5

No-one identifies as a reactionary, it's a label used for "enemies of the people" that need to be purged through the cultural revolution. Do you guys believe that men’s rights issues are a direct result of feminism or did they predate the feminist movement/have no relation to feminism? Yes, all three. I ask because from the posts that are recommended to me from this sub, it’s really hard to tell what the actual agenda is. This is not an organised group, there is no agenda. If there’s a past post…
/r/MensRights07/10/23 03:55 PM
13

Is there a place where we can both meet in the middle? Not for as long as Feminism is built upon anti-male sentiment and intent on infringing upon their human rights... Was it with feminism at some point but been altered along the way to be anti-man/pro-woman? Feminism has not gone bad, it has always been rotten. And don't mistake it for some kind of women's rights movement either, they only care about women's rights for as long as it is convenient, just as they only care about men if/when it's …
/r/MensRights07/10/23 03:47 PM
3

[...] traditional understandings of masculinity [...] Toxic Masculinity! [...] cis heterosexual men [...] Author is part of the cult. I'm going to go out on a limb and say that the article is not worth reading because it will just be the usual blaming men for everything and telling them to be more like women and just do better...
/r/MensRights06/10/23 09:56 AM
2

There is no reason to countenance, legitimatize, believe, or sympathize with TradCon whiners. There are plenty of reasons, namely the same ones that apply when talking about Feminists. It is not their fault that they have been fed some distortion of reality and if you push them away then they will never open their eyes, Perhaps the time for scorched earth will come one day, but I do not wish to see that day. [..]. white-knighted for feminists [...] They white-knight for women, it's just that the…
/r/MensRights05/10/23 04:36 AM
48

If you’re looking for the solution to knife crime and gang violence, I don’t have it. Stop and search was doing OK until Sadiq Khan put an end to it. Then knife crime went up suddenly and for no reason. 🤣
/r/MensRights03/10/23 01:29 PM
41

But is she a little girl? Tell me, you see a headline "little girl stabbed to death", what approximate age range do you think of? Referring to the 15 year old as a "little girl" and the 17 year old as a "young man" is very manipulative, and this type of framing is rather common in the media (and only ever seems to be done in one direction). It is something that should be called out.
/r/MensRights03/10/23 01:11 PM
1

How many times are you going to ask these same questions over and over again? What answers are you looking for that you have not already received?
/r/MensRights02/10/23 11:48 PM
6

A self confessed extremist, account already suspended, 🤣 The vast majority of people here know and understand that there are women "on our side", the prime example being the honey badgers, missing from your list of course. Every time. And they are not "allies", they are MRA's just the same. The only purpose of this post is to associate this sub with "incels" (and continue that smear), some dickhead that no-one cares about outside of the media, and a parrot. And, if I might offer my own "extreme"…
/r/MensRights02/10/23 11:46 PM
27

You seem to be conflating two different groups, "men's liberation" who see masculinity as a prison from which men need to be liberated (e.g. challenging the status quo), and "men's advocacy" who advocate for men. As far as I understand "lipstick feminism", they seem to go way in on the "femininity" (sometimes to the point that it becomes caricature) as a response to the "un-ladylike" behaviour of other Feminists. I don't think there is an equivalent concept when it comes to men's advocacy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/10/23 04:01 PM
7

Perhaps, I'll meet you half way. (Though it's not the only flaw in your response...) I've seen the same point (or similar) used to justify circumcision many times, and given the phrasing you used it doesn't half seem like you were doing the same. I've definitely heard people claim that circumcision is done with anaesthesia these days, but it looks to be a rather small percentage. Most still seem to be under the impression that it isn't painful enough to justify the time, cost, effort and/or risk…
/r/MensRights01/10/23 09:37 PM
7

Tu quoque. The existence of one does not justify the existence of the other. It's not even a decent comparison either... There is a remarkable difference between a teenager and a week old baby, and I severely doubt that anyone is pulling wisdom teeth without anaesthesia...
/r/MensRights01/10/23 09:05 PM
10

You have fallen for the propaganda. There are many forms of FGM, some of which (some of the most common forms) could scarcely be considered anything close to mutilation, most of which have absolutely nothing to do with sexual pleasure (or a lack thereof). These are disparate practices, done for many different cultural and/or religious reasons, that have very little to do with each other and yet have all been lumped together under one label. This is done for the purpose of presenting the absolute…
/r/MensRights01/10/23 08:56 PM
16

"problematic usage patterns" concerning "cartoon pornography" which "often depicts themes or acts which are sexually deviant". Do I smell the old "violent video games cause mass shootings": hentai edition? 🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights01/10/23 12:17 PM
38

I'm interested to know what are some counterarguments to this? I would be particularly interested to hear some statistical counterarguments to this claim. No. The original position still stands; The accused should be afforded anonymity while the trial is on-going (and probably afterwards as well, in case of a not guilty verdict). Their "dismissal" of the position with "but they're rare" is invalid. It doesn't matter how many are false, even if there were exactly zero false accusations, it is com…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/23 08:41 AM
37

Apparently there's a yearly women's strike on IWD in England to prove how necessary and essential women's work is. I can't say I've noticed 🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights28/09/23 12:57 AM
42

The only group? White, male, "cis", hetero... All enemies of the people.
/r/MensRights27/09/23 11:54 PM
1

Religious men? You mean Islamic men? I wonder if she did not refer to them by name because she knows that Islam is above Woman in the progressive stack... (this is why she was lightly struggled and made to apologise)
/r/MensRights26/09/23 08:29 PM
5

"Fragility" just means not accepting/disagreeing with their rhetoric. If you can't accept that you're a misogynist patriarchal male supremacist that's actually inferior to women in every way, you have a fragile ego. Think you're not racist? White Fragility. etc. Was there ever a gender bent insult for this? Such as “fragile female ego”? Internalised misogyny is close.
/r/MensRights26/09/23 07:18 PM
1

Top down, vs. bottom up. In both ideologies {CRT | QT} there is a higher system {white supremacy | cis-hetero normativity} which is imposing the social construct {race | sex/sexuality} upon us. There are two ways to solve this "problem", top down or bottom up, and it just happens to have happened the way it has; They could have both chosen the same perspective, or they could have been swapped. With top down, the system being overthrown is what will dismantle the construct (as above, so below), b…
/r/MensRights26/09/23 06:14 PM
12

Wikipedia is edited primarily by "left wing" ideologues, so of course their definition of "left wing" is going to be all of the "good things" and the "right wing" is going to be all of the "bad things"... (according to the "left wing" perspective) All of this left/right stuff is just a distraction (including the "but actually, feminism is really a right wing idea!"), especially if you go down the false dichotomy/binary extremism route. There's a reason why there is a growing number of "political…
/r/MensRights24/09/23 04:11 PM
3

Not really, the surface rhetoric is constantly changing and talking about the underlying frameworks makes you look like a conspiracy nut. You're better off with general logical fallacies/critical thinking materials. Learn how to see and recognise bad arguments and flawed logic and teach a man to fish and all that.
/r/MensRights24/09/23 01:28 PM
3

You have to understand the position from which they are coming; Sex is a social construct so any difference in outcome between "the sexes" is proof of discrimination because we're all exactly the same, and, we live in a society which was built by "men", for "men", at the expense of non-men (i.e. the patriarchy). If you answer "disagree" to "men and women having the same rights is essential to democracy" that's because you're a misogynist who hates women. It's very simple. Q189 does mean any viol…
/r/MensRights24/09/23 12:50 AM
45

Is there a point for men when you have done enough? Not for them. We've come so far, but we still have a long way to go. Draw a line and enforce it. (And maybe don't let her wreck your credit score too?) Honestly, you sound tired. Have a snack and a nap. I’m so genuine with this. You need to rest and nourish yourself. Anyway, care for yourself. You sound really overworked and tired. Language like this serves to dismiss and belittle your complaints and get you to think that maybe you are being un…
/r/MensRights24/09/23 12:21 AM
13

They have started with the conclusion (systemic misogyny) and are "finding" (creating) evidence to prove it. This is nothing new, they know no-one reads past the headline. This one is puzzling to me.if anyone in the comments has any ideas let me know. Is Q249 not in relation to card 26, i.e. men and women having the same rights is an essential characteristic of democracy?
/r/MensRights23/09/23 11:37 PM
2

"Male domination" implies intent and purpose, if they just said "mostly male" instead it wouldn't have the same bite as it is a value-less judgement.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/23 05:39 PM
15

I just wanted to enjoy a game As did many of us. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ You clearly have much to learn.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 08:57 PM
35

Let's get all of that out of the way lest I be labeled 'fragile' "Fragility" is their rhetoric, not ours. It basically just means that you disagree with them and refuse to accept their rhetoric. By calling this "man-hate" and not blindly agreeing with it you are demonstrating your "fragility". it reframed the whole game as a 'woman's space' that I was not welcome in The "sisterhood" is a woman's space that does not welcome men? Tell me more...
/r/MensRights22/09/23 07:39 PM
5

(possibly wilfully) It is certainly wilful. The destruction of old culture, history, and traditions is the purpose, that's a good part of why they keep making remakes instead of telling new stories. Personally, I can't wait for the new race-swapped live-action remake of Tarzan. 🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights22/09/23 03:33 PM
8

Emma Raducanu Who? Also, Burgers? Cinderella, Sleeping Beauty and Rapunzel are all successful young women. If there was any proof needed that Sleeping Beauty wasn't actually about her, this would be it. No-one even knows her damn name! So in the end, the princesses didn't need a prince to save them. I'm pretty sure that Cinderella didn't need a prince to save her either. Meanwhile Rapunzel, far from being passively rescued [...] Did she not play a pretty active part in her "passive rescue"? It c…
/r/MensRights22/09/23 02:23 PM
28

Is this really the bottom line? No, it's the top line. They start with the conclusion and work backwards to "find" (i.e. create and manipulate) data and evidence to support their claims. Any proof to the contrary is dismissed as heresy because they've declared their position to be the truth and any criticism is taken as proof that their claim is correct. It's a slight simplification but a good general description of the framework for the belief system.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 02:00 PM
15

As far as I understand, the "opinion" that Feminism and men's issues are incompatible is a core reason why this sub exists. People wanted a "left wing space" to discuss men's issues that wasn't beholden to Feminism, unlike /r/menslib.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/23 10:34 PM
4

Because they can. A male character who is an idiot is an idiot; A female character who is an idiot is an act of misogyny. (galbrush paradox)
/r/MensRights21/09/23 10:02 PM
10

[...] "all men are potentially violent" (which again, I think the OP disagrees with [...] I'm not sure I agree. I read the comment as coming from the position of "men are inherently violent, except for non-whites". Seems to be a standard position amongst many these days. The stats say immigrants commit less crime. No. The stats say that they are less likely to be incarcerated. This would suggest, but does not necessarily prove, that immigrants commit less crime. The article you linked also menti…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/23 09:38 PM
10

I don't think that comment (or the sub) is anti-immigrant; OP is clearly pro-immigration and blaming underlying anti-male sentiment for the anti-immigrant sentiment which is common. Especially given this other comment from the OP: "let's eliminate the concept of borders and immigration entirely" less likely to commit violent crimes lower incarceration rate You know this is the same (fallacious) argument (in the other direction) that people used to justify the belief of men (or black people) bein…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/23 07:11 PM
40

Another fresh account with little activity making accusations without proof? yawn. The conflation of Feminism and women needs to stop, as does the collectivism.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 06:44 PM
1

Basically, he got #metoo'd. OP is almost certainly a troll. Three [removed] posts to /r/Feminism attacking this sub for not joining the witch hunt. (Does anyone outside of the UK even know who Russell Brand is?)
/r/MensRights18/09/23 09:35 PM
3

Neither should the concept of innocent until proven guilty. It is a human right after all.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 09:27 PM
36

Acknowledging misandry would get in the way of the threat narrative against men. People care about women more, to what extent it is nature vs. nurture I don't know, but it is observable. If people think women are at risk or in danger then they will fall over themselves to defend them; If a government wishes to pass legislation, they need just claim it will protect women from the current threat, whatever that may be, and anyone who disagrees will be one of them, the bad people, the threat to wome…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/23 10:28 PM
-10

Is that all you've got? It's childish and pathetic, grow up.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/23 08:25 PM
-11

And you're doing the thing where you deflect any criticism by falling back on homophobia... 🤡🤡🤡🤡
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/23 08:08 PM
-3

"Those men are a threat to our women!" A war-cry as old as time... “Gays are indoctrinating our kids!! Drag queens are grooming out children!!” Be mindful of the motte and bailey there. There most certainly are some people doing and justifying terrible things, and when people call it out they hide behind accusations of homophobia. It's not "these people are doing this because they're X" it is "these people are doing this, (and they just happen to be X)". [edit: For those who read this and think …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/23 07:55 PM
3

I wonder if they will get any complaints about the rampant "misogyny" and "transphobia" on this poster? 🤣🤣 (The logo for #herheartmatters resembling a pair of breasts is "biological essentialism" and "objectification", along with the "gendered" language and "possessive language" in the my x. Where is the "birthing unit from whence I came"? Of course, this would necessitate certain people living by their own standards, so that's never going to happen...) Empower. There's a hell of a lot of ideolo…
/r/MensRights17/09/23 01:21 PM
1

You know people can just go and look at those comments, why exaggerate what happened? A few upvotes and the person who made the comment defending it, one person disagreeing on your definition of misogyny, and a couple others telling you to stop simping and obsessing over women, is not "being upvoted as insightful comments" or "spiraling a drain of blanketed misogyny"...
/r/MensRights16/09/23 05:52 PM
1

This is a public forum, anyone can come and post here. The fact that you can find a comment here saying something (that was not received well) is not indicative of this sub, in fact it's quite the opposite. The only reason I looked through your history was to see if your claims had any merit, unsurprisingly (like usual) they did not. This place has literally become the male equivalent of feminism. It's honestly disgusting. And there's the old "you're just as bad as them!"... If you can't see the…
/r/MensRights16/09/23 04:40 PM
2

I read through your comments on the thread about the single mother marrying a man for his money, you were probably getting downvoted because you had some real dumb takes, ironically, treating the woman like a child. 🤣 You seem like the usual concern trolls, picking two comments and presenting them as if they are indicative of the whole sub, wildly re-interpreting what people say, making baseless accusations... 🤡
/r/MensRights16/09/23 09:02 AM
8

I've got the strangest deja vu with this one. Talking about the media saying stuff, asking the psychologist, parents, and sister about it, followed by a whole bunch of half sentences that should properly be in a list... And the [27F] in the title, user deleted too...
/r/MensRights15/09/23 09:13 PM
16

Weasels, strawmen, anecdotes, cherry picked data, projection, solipsistic hedonism... Overall, low-value opinion. 2/10. Do you know why people say women's standards are too high? "Where have all the good men gone?" Incles are not some mirror to the fat acceptance movement, where they demand that people find them attractive despite not making even the slightest attempt to put down the fucking pies. Nor are they trying to "subvert societal beauty standards" and demand that people just accept their…
/r/MensRights15/09/23 07:29 PM
13

Feminism ≠ women's rights. Don't make the same mistake that many others have before you.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 07:03 PM
27

A lot of this sub seems to see feminism as a enemy to men's rights That's because it is. The very foundation of Feminism is anti-male sentiment. It seems like many moderate MRAs and moderate Feminists could agree on things such as genital mutilation. Referring to circumcision as genital mutilation is an act of misogyny because it takes the spotlight away from women and asserts that the two are comparable. - Typical Feminist. Do you think we could see a future in which MRA's and Feminists could c…
/r/MensRights15/09/23 07:02 PM
70

I'll do anything to expose this "man" and to protect you girls. 🤣 If you want a guy who's gonna [...] break things up when he wants to [...] Is the man not allowed to leave??? If the above post is the same person, I can see why he didn't want to continue that relationship. The amount of crazy in that one post alone! 🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights15/09/23 06:34 PM
6

Relevant username? 🤣
/r/MensRights15/09/23 04:25 PM
5

"Healthy Masculinity" is the same narrative as "Toxic Masculinity", they just changed the name and kept the rest the same. All of the arguments against the "Toxic Masculinity" narrative still apply.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 10:18 AM
4

False consciousness, minor stockholm syndrome, the guilt of original sin... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ "Give me four years to teach the child and I shall plant a seed which you shall never uproot." There is a reason why they are so adamant about teaching this stuff in schools, and why they raise such a stink about the word "groomer". (and why they accuse us of doing such) Just because most powerful people are men. There's an old saying, Behind every powerful man stands a strong woman. There would even be some of…
/r/MensRights15/09/23 10:03 AM
4

How can we solve the education gap? First we must actually acknowledge the issues and their causes. Whenever there is a difference between men and women which we are allowed to acknowledge, the women are correct and the men just need to change. This is extended to education such that if there is a difference in the effectiveness of certain teaching methods (in favour of girls) then that is just proof that boys are defective and need to do better, but, if the methods favour boys then it is discri…
/r/MensRights15/09/23 09:58 AM
8

Projection, my friend. 🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights15/09/23 09:38 AM
14

Naturally, no counter to the arguments so you turn to petty and childish insults. I pray that you are but a young one and that this stupidity is not terminal. Have a good day.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 09:20 AM
9

Well, for one, the "manosphere" is that way 👉 men's rights is not the same as "red pill", PUA, incel, etc. Both women and men have cultural and genetic differences [...] What are the cultural differences between men and women? And don't say Toxic Masculinity or Patriarchy... [...] some of them can't be chosen [...] None of the differences between two groups can be chosen, you can only choose how you, yourself, act and behave. [...] people from one group would prefer the other not to be in some w…
/r/MensRights15/09/23 09:15 AM
17

Hate. Their chief weapon is hate. Hate, and division, their two weapons are hate, and division, and collective guilt. Their three weapons; Hate, division, and collective guilt, and an almost fanatical devotion to the narrative. United we stand; Divided we fall. Women hate men because they think they're all violent and abusive, men hate women because they're sick of being treated like monsters, and while we're all busy hating each other no-one is looking...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/09/23 08:03 PM
1

I could be wrong, but... I believe reddit doesn't actually care about your individual engagement, each post is given a score and then posts from each sub you join are sorted accordingly. So, if we both had the same sub list, we would both have the same front page even if we both engage primarily in different subs. (Well, I sort by new, so it's just chronologically for me. I have no idea what the difference between "hot", "best", and "top" are... I kind of like the lack of a recommendation algori…
/r/MensRights14/09/23 04:35 PM
26

I'm not sure they do think, that's the problem. There are many who would blindly follow such accusations instead of speaking out lest they themselves be accused of witchcraft. Others use such bludgeons as a way of proving their righteousness. Do not play their games.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 02:15 PM
7

I suppose strictly it is, but then you can call castration a method of contraception too. "Contraception" is usually taken to mean a temporary/reversible method, not permanent sterilisation (which is the intent of a vasectomy).
/r/MensRights14/09/23 09:02 AM
5

Then we need new words. Any time you go under general anaesthetic there is a chance you don't wake up again, it's one of the major "complications" that can happen. Vasectomy is done with local anaesthetic.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 08:59 AM
22

It's still a major surgery because of the general anaesthetic though, there's a significant distinction in risk. But yes, if she doesn't want any more children, let her be sterilised (or even just use contraceptives if she doesn't like the idea of sterilisation!) Vasectomy is not contraception nor a decision to be taken lightly, it's intended to be permanent and chronic pain is a common side effect (sometimes even very common depending on the study).
/r/MensRights14/09/23 08:47 AM
62

Everything is worse for women when they are finally to be affected. ☕ 🤣 If only there were people talking about this for years that could have seen this coming?
/r/MensRights13/09/23 02:20 PM
14

Not that they've been able to provide. The claim comes from cherry picked data that doesn't even support their claim, business as usual. 🤣
/r/MensRights13/09/23 09:27 AM
1

Women sleep longer and walk less? Did you link the right album? 🤣
/r/MensRights12/09/23 04:33 PM
0

From your very first interaction in this thread, you prove yourself to be a bad actor. Everything that follows is trash. no u Conveniently you forgo most of my criticisms of the content and it's presentation [...] You mean the parts where you were insulting the man instead of addressing his arguments? You also skipped most of my points, so you're one to talk... Congratulations! That's what this very movement is. It's the driving force behind the concept of democracy itself. So you are high! What…
/r/MensRights12/09/23 04:31 PM
3

Political science is totally a real sicence! You just have to redefine what "science" means, like what they did to "theory". 🤣 I don't know if it's a lie or a mistake here, but I have seen a growing number of people that don't seem to know the difference a proportion and a ratio... (i.e. 1/2 becomes 1:2) And I also can't tell if these people genuinely don't understand how etymology works, or if it's just one of those lies that gets repeated over and over again until it becomes the truth. He cert…
/r/MensRights12/09/23 10:32 AM
5

And here is an example of some woke bs; You're wrong, because I said so. [...] I actually know what feminism is [...] you don't understand, that's the only reason you disagree, you just don't have the right knowledge and understanding [...] more reputable [...] listen to the experts, they know better than you, you don't understand Just because theres evidence supporting you claim, doesn't mean it's right. you have the the wrong knowledge and understanding, you need to listen to the experts and l…
/r/MensRights12/09/23 10:16 AM
2

You going "no u" (with a switcheroo, I might add) is not a reasonable point or proof of anything... other than the fact that you have no argument and don't actually understand the point. I feel no urge to insult you Then what was this? You're just like the people you whine about, a little bratty sjw.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 10:02 AM
2

And the enlightened centrist plays "horseshoe theory", both sides are just as bad as each other and you're both just whining about nothing!
/r/MensRights12/09/23 10:00 AM
3

[...] toxic gender roles [...] Toxic Masculinity! I've moved away from these types of divisive and angry beliefs. And the sinner has found righteous salvation! He walks amongst us now to bring the good news of our Lord and Saviour, Feminism! Repent now, for the tide is high! The men on here are just hurt. Invalidation tactics, a hallmark of the kind and caring. You can take that, and your false camaraderie, and fuck off. And you have the nerve to talk about bad faith! 🤣🤣
/r/MensRights12/09/23 09:46 AM
5

Ancient wisdom: If you need to resort to childish insults then your "argument" is null and void. {walking the line of ad hominem} You cannot talk about Marxism without talking about CAPITALISM. Of course you can, what Marx meant by "capitalism" is not what we know as "capitalism" today. Words change meanings over time, or does that only count when the changes are politically correct? "Cultural Marxism" is absolutely a right-wing conspiracy dog whistle [...] "Cultural Marxists" is what they calle…
/r/MensRights12/09/23 06:38 AM
1

In case you're interesting in some of the theory behind their beliefs (which you should be, how can you cure that which you do not understand?)... None of this is limited or exclusive to Feminism, but general woke belief systems. Much of it copy/paste applied to multiple beliefs (e.g. Critical Race Theory) with the relevant words changed because they all build off of the same framework. When women run for office, they have the same odds of winning as a man. Do you suggest we force women into pol…
/r/MensRights12/09/23 04:21 AM
4

This sub is instead a really really upsetting attempt to invalidate women's struggle's for some strange reason. No it isn't. This is just what you've been told, and what you choose to believe. It should not be us Vs them because thats just going to slow progress. Tell that to the people making this an us vs. them. (e.g. Feminists) We need to work together [...] You don't work with Feminists, you work for them. [...] and all admit ways that we could personally or societally do better. Ah yes,the …
/r/MensRights12/09/23 03:28 AM
25

There has never been a leader of the USA who is Woman How do you know? Did you ask all of them how they identified? Women in Us government make up 28% of the seats whilst being 50.4% of the population. Similar story in the UK, women make up 51% of our population and are 30% of our parliament How many women ran for these positions? This comparison is meaningless because you're not actually comparing the right groups. Throughout all of history everything has been centred around the man, KINGdom, H…
/r/MensRights11/09/23 08:53 PM
55

I think it is a reasonable response; She has assumed the worst of you and it shows a paranoid, ideologically informed perspective which has very little basis in reality (or a succeptability to such influence).
/r/MensRights11/09/23 02:51 AM
35

Why don't men speak? By and large, no-one cares to listen... Since the #MeToo movement first went viral in 2017, we have become more aware sexual victimization than ever before. If you weren't paying attention, sure... While the overwhelming majority of these victims have been women, reports of men who have been sexually victimized have also come to public attention. Yes, and they were dismissed and attacked for taking the spotlight away from women. These include multiple reports of sexual victi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/09/23 06:48 AM
179

How do we stop him from becoming a monster? Stop treating him like one... If he is to be seen as a monster no matter what he says or does, then what reason does he have not to be? This is all by design of course, they attack and demonise everything that these boys are (men, masculinity, male sexualty, etc.) and then offer redemption in the form of "being a good ally"... No-one wants to be a bad person and children are too dumb to defend themselves from this abuse, which is precicely why they tar…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/09/23 03:22 AM
2

I wonder if this will include "Lesbian Nana" or only certain cases along the usual political lines...
/r/MensRights31/08/23 02:45 PM
1

Do not feed the trolls. [edit: I was talking about the commenter on the other post, 17 day old account, negative karma, post history is clearly trolling, these kinds of people do not deserve your attention...]
/r/MensRights31/08/23 11:37 AM
19

They would likely be convicted of sexual assault, grooming, and potentially kidnapping if a child. In other words, not rape. [...] sentenced to life [...] Life is not as long as people think, she could be out in 10 years. [...] for rape [...] For instigating and organising a rape, along with a whole bunch of other stuff (dozens of charges). The law is pretty clear, rape can only be done with a penis (of the person doing the rape).
/r/MensRights31/08/23 11:24 AM
23

No, it's because she helped to facilitate the rape. The law is "penetration with a penis" so, as far as the law is concerned, men can only be raped by other men, and women cannot rape anyone, not even if the victim is a woman.
/r/MensRights31/08/23 11:13 AM
18

I launched the Men Can End Violence Campaign, aiming to educate men and boys about healthy masculinity and to mobilize them against violence towards women and girls. "Healthy Masculinity" is just the same old "Toxic Masculinity" rhetoric. The implication that men are inherently violent and abusive and need to be "educated" otherwise can fuck right off. (and that it's only men too) Elevating men’s mental health in policy agendas aligns with our pursuit of global solidarity and a safer, equitable …
/r/MensRights30/08/23 03:45 PM
8

If that's the study that's usually cited and not a different one (who knows since they didn't link it, or even give a title!), it was retracted due to an error in the data classification (couples who dropped out of the study were classified as having split), There was no indication of who initiated the divorce, only that a divorce happened, The reason why divorce was more likely when the woman fell ill [could have been] due to the fact that the men were significantly more likely to die after the…
/r/MensRights27/08/23 02:22 PM
3

Abortion isn't about women, it's a question of whether or not an unborn baby deserves human rights or not (and when). The "pink tax" doesn't affect women either, if the two products are exactly the same then buy the cheaper one, if they're different then why should they have the same price? The "wage gap" is misrepresented statistics, the more extraneous factors you account for the smaller it becomes to the point of vanishing. "Slut shaming" is primarily perpetuated by women, should we dismiss t…
/r/MensRights26/08/23 07:01 PM
5

Your sources do not appear to support your claim. The first is simply a "fact" sheet with no mention of prevalence, the second refers to "A study conducted at the University of Lagos, Nigeria (N=350)" which is not necessarily representative of the wider population. There is no moral or ethical difference between MGM and FGM, the arguments in defence of one also apply to the other, and the arguments against the other also apply to the one.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 04:13 PM
9

Yup. That's why the media keeps insisting that "cultural marxism" is a "right wing conspiracy theory"...
/r/MensRights25/08/23 11:59 AM
16

This should definitely be a thing for men as well. It could do wonders for the suicide epidemic. Promote positive male social interactions. Give men a support system that so many are entirely lacking at the moment. Provide a safe environment away from harassment, false accusations, and all the other emotionally manipulative shit men have to deal with from women. Its a great idea! This is pretty much the point of "men's sheds", but without the housing. I don't think there's as much of a market fo…
/r/MensRights25/08/23 07:34 AM
5

Is it government funded? A quick skim would seem to suggest otherwise. As long as I'm not paying for it, I don't really care tbh. Freedom of association and all that. It sounds like a good idea, old people looking out for each other and socialising. And they even paid the cat tax! 🤣
/r/MensRights25/08/23 07:24 AM
19

About that time again, eh? 🤣🤣 I see all of these bad misogyny comments all the time but I'm not going to link to any of them because they're everywhere, just open your eyes and educate yourself bigot! You guys "We" need to do better! [...] major incel vibes [...] You wouldn't want to be associated with those lepers would you? [...] the sub might lose it’s potency as an activist group [...] This place is neither "activist" nor "group", so no worries there. No one will ever take this stuff serious…
/r/MensRights25/08/23 07:07 AM
5

I am in no way a feminist. I am very conservative. And yet you spread their rhetoric as if it were the truth... [...] doctors don’t take [women's] issues as seriously [...] Feminists love to deride men for not going to the doctor often enough and waiting too long and letting things get worse. The end result of this is that men's complaints are more serious on average. There's also never any mention of the sex of the doctors, but they always just blame men for it anyway... My male boss witnessed …
/r/MensRights25/08/23 06:42 AM
14

we could have all CEOs of major corporations be female, and 100% female legislators and Cabinet members, and they’d still claim we live in a “patriarchy” When they say that "patriarchy doesn't mean men", they're half right. Being a CEO or an MP requires enacting the "male system" way of thinking (hierarchy) so anyone engaging with this props up the "male system", even women (internalised misogyny). The "female system" does not behave like this but prefers a "community" of "equals". Patriarchy™ i…
/r/MensRights25/08/23 06:18 AM
38

First you have to look at things in terms of "systems" (i.e. approx. collectivism), then you proclaim the the "male system" (i.e. patriarchy [and toxic masculinity]) subjugates the "female system" (i.e. women) by perpetuating misogyny and fallacious reasoning. (you can substitute any oppressor/victim group and it still holds, e.g. white/black, systemic racism) In other words, it isn't.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 04:39 AM
5

But why are we comparing labour based solely on the length of time it takes?
/r/MensRights23/08/23 12:01 PM
3

To be fair, each partner should spend an equal number of hours paid work plus unpaid work. Why?
/r/MensRights23/08/23 09:49 AM
2

This isn't just some woman though, she's (apparently) the most prolific baby murderer in the UK. Front page new is far from "every horrible act done by a woman". And it's not just her either, management at the hospital was involved in the cover up too. This case will be remembered for a long time and it's a good example that can be pointed to as an example of several issues that are often talked about here. It's not about her, it's about the societal attitudes surrounding what happened (and, to …
/r/MensRights22/08/23 03:42 PM
14

educating others (especially other cishet men) about toxic masculinity, and providing examples of healthy masculinity. From this description alone, just another woke man-hating Feminist shill that will repeat the same old tired bullshit rhetoric that's been shat all over years ago as if it was still fresh. Not exactly selling me (as if TikTok was not enough of a turn off)...
/r/MensRights22/08/23 03:24 PM
2

There is a very important difference between the two. When Feminists highlight violence and abuse committed by men it is for the purpose of attacking men and masculinity by way of conflating them (along with the implication that women are not violent and abusive). Highlighting these cases (of women being violent and abusive) serves to disprove this narrative.
/r/MensRights22/08/23 02:59 AM
26

That's because Feminism is not "pro-woman" but "anti-man". Why do you think they always conflate being "pro-man" with "anti-woman"? Classic projection...
/r/MensRights19/08/23 08:13 PM
1

🤣🤣🤣 👋🤡
/r/MensRights19/08/23 07:33 PM
1

The purpose of "sexual liberation" is to remove any judgement, criticisms, shame, etc. (but only for women, of course)
/r/MensRights19/08/23 06:32 PM
-2

The "freedom from consequences" argument is bollocks, if there are consequences for you actions then the actions are not free. That's like saying "we live in a free-murder society; you can go out and murder as many people as you want, but actions have consequences" If you can be arrested for saying things then "free speech" does not exist; If you are judged by society for you sexual choices then you are not "sexually liberated". The purpose of "sexual liberation" is to remove any judgement, crit…
/r/MensRights19/08/23 06:16 PM
-5

i support female sexual liberation only female? i dont support the idea of brainwashing young men into thinking that bodycount doesnt matter body count not mattering is pretty much the entire point of sexual liberation
/r/MensRights19/08/23 08:09 AM
16

When suspicions were raised by doctors (including consultant paediatrician Ravi Jayaram, below) at the hospital after babies kept dying on Letby's watch, hospital managers told the doctors to apologise to Letby. I wonder, if they had listened and stopped her sooner... Would they have prevented any deaths? Are these un-named managers going to apologise to any parents if so?
/r/MensRights19/08/23 06:36 AM
1

Yeah, I could have explained that a little better... smh The first three words are him telling her to fuck off (or perhaps "fucking stop" but cut off?), he also tells here to stop talking to him, and his last words are "get the fuck off, don't t-". He sounds quite irritated, and she sounds like the bratty little sister who annoys the fuck out of you because she knows you can't do anything and she won't get into trouble. He certainly doesn't care if she wants to have sex, but it doesn't exactly s…
/r/MensRights19/08/23 05:09 AM
11

How can she slap?
/r/MensRights18/08/23 11:22 PM
3

Mixed. Here's a breakdown. https://np.reddit.com/r/lucyletby/comments/15ujtvw/verdicts_by_charge/
/r/MensRights18/08/23 08:39 PM
14

For anyone who would wonder why this is a "men's rights issue"... This stands against the gynocentric narrative that women are caring, nurturing, angels that can do no wrong. The primary focus is not the case itself but the perception of, and response to, what happened by wider society. For example, there have been all kinds of reasons thought up to defend her, justify her actions, and "prove" that she wasn't actually at fault here but just a victim of circumstance. It's quite tangential, to the…
/r/MensRights18/08/23 08:36 PM
3

There's also a subreddit that followed (is following) the case, for anyone interested. https://np.reddit.com/r/lucyletby/ [edit: np, I always forget...]
/r/MensRights18/08/23 08:15 PM
1

What about the boy scouts? The golf/sports clubs? The barbershops? The Freemasons? The men's sheds (which are a low-key suicide prevention service)? Private social circles... I suppose they were all full of "incels" too... And 4chan is not a male-only space, and it has nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 07:29 PM
15

I'm not going to say he's a saint who did no wrong, he seems to have a bit of a poor temper, but I just don't hear "he's trying to rape her" in this clip. (or even role-playing taken out of context) Given the track record of the police and the CPS manipulating and withholding evidence in order to secure a "guilty" verdict against men that they know are innocent, the fact that all of the charges were dropped...
/r/MensRights18/08/23 09:23 AM
10

Was it the same clip as above, or was there a longer source available?
/r/MensRights18/08/23 09:02 AM
9

Did you listen to the audio?
/r/MensRights18/08/23 08:51 AM
9

12 minutes into a recording and all I can make out is him: fuck off, move your legs, stop, get off her: I don't want to have sex with you him: I don't care if you want to have sex Yeah, lets lynch the ni-- wait a minute... I don't follow football and I know nothing else of this case, but listening to this audio she definitely seems to be trying to provoke/bait him and misrepresent the situation. If I had to say (from this audio alone) I would say that she was the abuser here... [edit: the tone o…
/r/MensRights18/08/23 08:21 AM
2

What sort of help do you expect? Not blaming men for everything that's wrong in the world and attacking them for not being women would be a good start... Followed up by the acknowledgement that men and women are typically quite different and that's ok, as opposed to painting women as the gold standard and treating the men who deviate as broken women who need to be fixed. Third, the insistence that any male-only space is a hotbed of patriarchal oppression via general misogyny, and using that to a…
/r/MensRights18/08/23 04:11 AM
7

Published: Oct 18, 2017, 17:52 IST The #MeToo Campaign Is Not Just Limited To Women. Tell that to the men who were told to shut up and stop taking the spotlight away from women /making everything about men.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 08:38 PM
8

The reason why it's a "men's problem" is because the solutions are usually woman-focused and many people seem to think masculinity is the root cause and men should just be more like women, or, even worse, they try to downplay and dismiss the issue.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 07:25 PM
4

there has been a lot of outreach in recent years to help men with their mental health How much of that is actual help though? A lot of what I've seen is blaming men for it and insisting that they would be better off if only they acted more like women. outdated social norms about masculinity [...] a report like this isn't necessarily meant to mitigate the issues we face as men [...] That is exactly the purpose of this. [...] between January 1 and July 31, there were 16 such deaths. Three of these…
/r/MensRights17/08/23 07:21 PM
1

Don't say "whore", say "woman" instead! - Handbook on combating gender stereotypes 🤣🤣🤣 As usual, ineffectual changes (e.g. marriageable age, transvestite, etc.) and false equivalences (e.g. layabout, removing adjectives, etc.). They also suggest "transgender" instead of "transsexual", however, on the first page they suggest "assigned male at birth" (sex) instead of "born as a boy" (gender). Different, yet the same...
/r/MensRights17/08/23 09:51 AM
23

All according to plan! only the cases most likely to result in conviction being sent to court -> only x% of rape cases end up going to court! the bar is lowered and more cases are sent -> only x% of rape cases sent to court end in a conviction! This is the end result of #believewomen and the presumption of guilt. This (manipulating or withholding evidence) is not new and it will not be stopping any time soon... (A different) Man wrongly convicted of sexual assault is freed after 17 years in jail…
/r/MensRights16/08/23 11:44 PM
8

It's a meme... 🤣
/r/MensRights16/08/23 11:11 PM
15

Apparently not, not that it would matter, vigilante justice is not justice.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 09:37 PM
95

archive link He intentionally and willingly killed a man to death but says it wasn't murder? My brother in Christ... You don't just happen to carry around a firearm and sulphuric acid in the UK. This was clearly premeditated. He said he felt strongly that “a crime as heinous as rape” should be reported to the police, but Fulstow, 37, felt she would not be believed. He said: “We decided jointly between the two of us that we would deal with the matter ourselves and seek justice ourselves and go do…
/r/MensRights16/08/23 07:58 PM
1

"we", sure... I specifically didn't comment on the meat of the post because we've only got one side of the story, but I can easily understand why others are "mad". you
/r/MensRights16/08/23 07:35 PM
7

🤣🤣🤣 Wikipedia is a politically and ideologically captured tertiary source. The only reason why wikipedia has any credibility is because the vast majority of people don't know just how bad things are behind the scenes.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 09:26 PM
5

Wikipedia should not be used as an authoritative source on anything. It's even less reliable that ChatGPT!
/r/MensRights15/08/23 08:25 PM
174

And everyone has decided, seemingly out of nowhere (she said his friend thinks he booked two tickets), that he's cheating on her in Ireland? All of the internet tough guys saying they're gonna find him and beat him 🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights15/08/23 08:17 PM
1

What specifically should they say about transmen? The same things they say about transwomen? Next time someone brings up the bathroom situation, ask them what they think about transmen (or even just women) going into the men's room. You'll quickly find out that the only reason that most of them don't want transwomen in the women's room is because they view them as men and, therefore, inherently violent and abusive predators. In my experience they believe it is a social construct but not that you…
/r/MensRights15/08/23 05:52 PM
6

The data is interesting and useful, it shows that there is a significant difference in trends between male and female homicide victims and that's it. This is not a percentage issue, just bad comparisons and ill-founded conclusions. The percentage of females murdered by an intimate partner was 5 times higher than for males. is not the same as This data reports that women are 5-6 times more likely to be killed by an intimate partner than men.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 05:00 PM
4

Not sure they would be considered "famous" but HBR are still going great and seem to be some of the few to actually care about men for their own sake. Brian often does interviews which are always worth a listen.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 04:21 PM
2

I believe that this was originally specifically about domestic violence related incidences as a way of attacking male victims for having the nerve to kill their abuser before they kill themselves... I don't think there was ever any source for it, just another claim pulled out of thin air. I'm wondering if anyone has any sources/statistics that disprove this claim. No. They made the claim, they provide the proof. It is not our responsibility to mop up the bullshit that they spew everywhere. (yet …
/r/MensRights15/08/23 04:04 PM
1

As far as I can understand... The state doesn't like rich men, so don't get involved with one woman who can stab you in the back, go for three! 🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights15/08/23 05:34 AM
18

It's not hypocrisy, it's the same thing. Notice how they never say anything about transmen but only transwomen? That's because they don't subscribe to gender as a social construct so they just see them as men (and then the "radical feminist" part of TERF takes over). They just hate men.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 04:55 AM
10

tbh, sounds like it could be some women's erotica... 🤣
/r/MensRights14/08/23 11:03 PM
70

The reason why the news articles never use the word is because it's not technically rape as far as UK law is concerned so calling her a rapist would be defamation and they could be sued... They did call her a paedophile though, so I guess that's a step forward...
/r/MensRights14/08/23 04:15 PM
10

This is, I believe, all part of the "re-integration". One must wonder though... do we really want such a nonce to be re-integrated into society?
/r/MensRights14/08/23 04:11 PM
98

He's not talking about men in general, but a very specific subset of men in a certain context. If your goal is to "get women" and you're "unsuccessful" doing so, then there is no sense in blaming the women because they are (by definition) the thing that you're trying to get... A little tone deaf, perhaps, but not entirely wrong.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 05:45 AM
150

[...] found guilty of two sex offence charges related to sending topless Snapchat pictures to a 15-year-old student And why did she have contact via snapchat? First red flag, should have been stopped there... Given the severe lack of remorse and guilt (if the article is to be believed)... wood chipper. It's bad enough to be told your wife has slept with someone else but for it to be a child... It deflates you completely. Big oof. When she was sentenced to six years in prison, he posted [...] 'I …
/r/MensRights14/08/23 03:15 AM
1

I know some auld bint brought it up in parliament, but they always do this to "spark a debate", it's never a serious suggestion.
/r/MensRights13/08/23 03:47 AM
18

It's even worse when they're doing something that can only benefit everyone (e.g. making sure streetlights are actually functional) but they only talk about it in terms of protecting women... Reminds me how in the U.K. a couple of years back it was seriously being considered to curfew all male civilians Was it? Or was it just another man hating cunt making one of those dumb Feminist "arguments" that no-one takes seriously? (curfew, vasectomy, etc.)
/r/MensRights13/08/23 03:30 AM
5

Is this some kind of new copypasta? https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/15cy9u8/is_the_online_world_distorting_my_view_of_reality/
/r/MensRights13/08/23 01:13 AM
6

Maybe when it becomes 90% men it will be recognized as a gendered issue. When bad things happen to men they are just "people", i.e. "40 people dead, including 2 women". for further reading: gamma bias
/r/MensRights12/08/23 02:16 PM
2

Sorry, I meant the hypocrisy of their arguments as to why FGM is bad but MGM is not. Pretty much every argument against FGM also applies to MGM (sometimes even more so), and likewise for the arguments in favour. They are both one and the same.
/r/MensRights12/08/23 01:30 PM
4

No worries, brother, it's been a long story and it's easy to come in halfway through.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 03:48 PM
66

FGM is completely irrelevant though. The only reason it's brought up is to minimise the harms of circumcision (MGM) and bring the focus back to women. (or to highlight the hypocrisy) Cutting off a part of someone else's body without their consent is wrong. end of discussion
/r/MensRights11/08/23 02:31 PM
1

cover with something like tar or resin in order to make it waterproof thats-my-fetish.gif
/r/MensRights11/08/23 02:27 PM
9

I never said they should be paid the same as it because they work in the same place at all. That’s a straw man. No, they're saying that, that's largely what the lawsuit is about... (at least, when it started) The point is they’re asking for more money and that money happens to be the same that warehouse staff are paid. Saying they’re “trying to treat two jobs as if they’re the same” is whataboutery. No. They want to be payed the same as the staff in the distribution centre because they both work…
/r/MensRights11/08/23 02:19 PM
11

[ edit: I don’t see how this is a gendered issue. The retail staff started this as a sex discrimination case via the Equality Act 2010. ] What’s wrong with them being paid more? The problem is that they're two different jobs and there's no reason why their pay should be compared. If people are willing to work for these wages then that is what they will get paid. Should the receptionist get paid the same as housekeeping just because they both work in the same hotel?
/r/MensRights11/08/23 01:19 PM
16

This has been going on (back and forth) for quite a while... It's all really fucking dumb. It started with ASDA but they've slowly been expanding to other retailers.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 12:58 PM
1

They can't coerce you into silence if other MRAs will hire you Feminists have spent decades breaking up "old boys clubs"...
/r/MensRights11/08/23 12:41 PM
15

Don't forget candy crush! it's totally different though... 🤣
/r/MensRights11/08/23 12:37 PM
6

Wolfenstein [...] alt-right recruitment tactics Nah mate, this is supposed to be funny joke (albeit quite dry), 🤣
/r/MensRights11/08/23 12:28 PM
299

Why did they feel so comfortable telling me how I feel? Standpoint theory. They honestly think they understand men better than men do because they're women... 🤡🌐
/r/MensRights10/08/23 09:13 PM
5

September 11, 2017, 7:02pm https://archive.is/mToyR for the article in case anyone wants it...
/r/MensRights10/08/23 09:08 PM
1

I agree with the "he-man" physique and drug abuse not being great, but you have to wonder why men think this is the kind of thing women want in the first place...
/r/MensRights10/08/23 02:06 PM
5

Gynocentrism, gamma bias, etc. People just care about women more so the appeal to emotion is far more effective. I can't tell you how many people only really started caring about men's issues after they (or someone close to them) were impacted.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/08/23 12:38 PM
14

In my experience, the differences in sexual arousal between men and women are largely overstated. People understand physiological responses when it comes to women (orgasm != consent) but completely forget this when it comes to men.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 12:30 PM
2

I didn't want to read too deeply since it's an edited (presumably by someone else) excerpt (perhaps missing some context) of the conversation (casual, informal speech). Maybe I should have anyway ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I don't think it's self reflection so much as damage control because they realise they're losing the grip on the narrative. see also: Caitlin Moran. I don't think it's mere coincidence that these two have happened in relative proximity, and I wouldn't be surprised if there are more to come. Ma…
/r/MensRights10/08/23 12:10 PM
92

Something else that's interesting is just how many people seem to believe that an erection is a conscious and willing decision. And they say people don't understand women's anatomy! 🤣🤣 Erection != Consent.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 11:13 AM
2

Is it just me or is OP's comment not showing up for anyone else? I can read it on the user page but it isn't here (even though its in the comment count). Reddit has been awfully strange lately... [Never mind, it's there now...]
/r/MensRights10/08/23 11:04 AM
7

Christine Emba Another woman who suddenly cares has always cared about "helping" men and has come to waffle bollocks and say absolutely nothing... now we have actual data showing the science has caught up, hurrah! We know that when you’re looking at deaths of despair, which is a more recent phenomenon, 3 out of 4 of those deaths are males. Suicide. The word is suicide. Do not water it down as "deaths of despair" and remove the agency of these men as if they just keeled over and died one day; The…
/r/MensRights09/08/23 11:20 PM
1

James I and VI? Charles I? Georges I-IV? Edward VII? They're not as popular with the media, and I have a hard time referring to less than a decade as an "era", but I think you might need to brush up on your history a little...
/r/MensRights09/08/23 10:31 PM
1

Of course, it's just that, in my experience, a lot of people focus far too much on the specific number (usually some generic average) and eventually run into trouble and don't understand why. Or they'll eat "empty calories" which don't satisfy their hunger or nutritional needs but they're eating "the right number" of calories so they think they're doing everything right. Good food, actual nutrition, healthy cooking, etc. is something I think should be taught more in schools (and in general), but…
/r/MensRights09/08/23 09:41 PM
1

it's always calories in, calories out. The problem is that this is pretty much impossible to measure since so many things can affect the equation. "Eat less; Exercise more" is more effective, even though it appears to be the same thing on the surface... Healthy nutritious food is also important as this can affect metabolism too.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 09:11 PM
1

I wouldn't go so far as to call it a deformity, 🤣 But it is rather entertaining watching people trying to deal with justifying "natural bodies" in some cases (i.e. women's) but attacking others (i.e. men's).
/r/MensRights09/08/23 08:59 PM
2

Have you tried the twitter? https://twitter.com/HoneyBadgerBite/ I'm pretty sure /u/typhonblue is Alison? but I don't think she's very active here.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 08:54 PM
29

Proxy violence is quite interesting when you consider domestic violence. A lot of the discussion is around "killed by a partner or former partner", and It would be interesting to know what the statistics would look like if "killed by the new or ex-partner (or a hitman)" was counted, or even if it was restricted to actual murder.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/08/23 08:47 PM
26

[...] they’d prefer you just find fat women attractive. They demand and call you a bigot if you refuse... They've also co-opted "body positivity", it was supposed to be about disfigurements and deformities.. you know, things you can't actually change... (also, they refer to these stereotypes of male beauty as a "male power fantasy" and blame men for it because women don't actually like muscles or tall, dark, and handsome... 🤣🤣)
/r/MensRights09/08/23 08:07 PM
42

Collectivism, fallacy of composition, guilt by association, etc. Also, given the number of women who have murdered men in cold blood and walked away after successfully arguing "self defence", and just how much people are willing to bend over backwards in order to defend and justify any and all violence and abuse committed by women... I'm not sure I trust the idea that that men are more violent, or the statistics that men commit the majority of violence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/08/23 07:57 PM
3

It might be that people are only focusing on race because they call themselves "anti-racists"?
/r/MensRights09/08/23 04:04 PM
3

Other politically correct stuff has been successfully challenged before, it's just that pretty much everyone understands it won't look good for them (and probably cost a lot of money) so nobody is willing to stand up. The sands may be shifting though...
/r/MensRights09/08/23 04:03 PM
14

Encouraging citizens to snitch on each other for wrongthink against the state mandated narrative? Naming and shaming prominent offenders? In Germany? There's an old saying about refusing to learn from the past...
/r/MensRights09/08/23 11:21 AM
11

The threat can be seen in the recent activity by men like Andrew Tate and many others. Many others? Name one. This is the same as when people complain about the massive surge in "incel terrorism", yet it's always the same three cases... The popularity of these figures is a backlash from the irresponsible use of the term ‘toxic masculinity’ which has been increasingly used worldwide. No, it's because of the actual purpose of the concept itself... we all know that young people enter a rebellious p…
/r/MensRights09/08/23 11:08 AM
25

[...] Inclusion and Anti-Racism Group [...] So that's why they're excluding people based on race (well, technically ethnicity, but you get the point) [...] founder of the ARISE (Anti-Racism in Schools Education) [...] Good thing they included that I in the acronym, 🤣🤣🤣 “It is simply not the business of the school to push a social justice agenda and to force kids to take a loyalty oath to a set of political beliefs.” Not to mention, it's also quite illegal too...
/r/MensRights09/08/23 10:51 AM
16

But how will they know if they're learning the right kind of science? 🤣
/r/MensRights09/08/23 10:41 AM
1

Drop in support from young boys will take decades to bite them [...] Given how much they're freaking out about people like Tate, Peterson, etc. and clamouring over how much they actually really do care about men (see: Caitlin Moran), I think it's already biting them!
/r/MensRights08/08/23 09:22 PM
2

Because some people don't actually care about the things that they are saying and are just in it for the popularity and attention. And saying that women shouldn't be allowed to vote because they're too emotional is not "wrongthink" it's just plain wrong. (and no, it's not about the draft, see: motte and bailey)
/r/MensRights08/08/23 09:18 PM
10

Most (all) of the justification for why "no-fault divorce" is needed, is complete rubbish because they all fall under "fault". Just another reason that the government should have no business in personal affairs. The UK didn't have no-fault divorce until a couple years ago.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 08:57 PM
2

Most websites don't utilise the info, but you can be damn sure that google does. A lot of tech related stuff is hilariously insecure, but most people don't know or care... There are far too many people who buy internet connected security cameras and just never set a password on them, so anyone can just open the live video feed!
/r/MensRights08/08/23 08:50 PM
-1

The "thinks" was for the "too emotional" part, I could have worded that better. I can't say I've listened to all that much of her stuff, but I've never heard her justify it with and data, so even though it is (probably) true, it is still just her opinion. But the point was that people defend her position as the "no draft, no vote" argument (inflammatory, but arguable), but then she says stuff like the above, so that isn't actually her position.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 08:09 PM
-2

Yes, even a blind man could see that, but is it any reason to suggest that women shouldn't vote? [and it's also counter to the defensive position of but the draft]
/r/MensRights08/08/23 07:42 PM
82

It is the desire to cast a wide net yet be selective of what one catches. e.g. women who go out wearing revealing clothing and do everything they can to draw attention to their bodies but get upset the the wrong men (i.e. not the one specific man she was targeting) notice. Some women wish to have the "masculine/active" role of initiation, but also the "feminine/passive" role of being approached... it's quite something to get used to for sure 🤣
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/08/23 07:26 PM
51

It does make me laugh when Feminists present kink/BDSM as some kind of male-dominated misogynist subculture when it's woke as hell! 🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights08/08/23 07:15 PM
2

I don’t think there’d be a reason to include (or why the author would [have to] know or find out anything related to) this thread/ subreddit A lot of people don't know, but when you visit a website there is a lot of information shared (in some cases it's enough to fingerprint a specific user!) this includes a "referer" [sic], which is the URL of this page. If they get some "hate" after a spike in traffic from here, pretty much anything will be blamed on this sub, regardless of if it actually was…
/r/MensRights08/08/23 05:35 PM
-1

but discussion alone will NOT change anything. Yet nothing will change without the discussion. Not everyone is a direct action kinda person, nor should they be.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 02:44 PM
11

Benevolent to women, saying that women are more e.g. empathetic (and, naturally, that men are less) is "benevolent sexism" because they always frame sexism in terms of how it affects women. It used to be a common go-to to "prove" that we live in a misogynist culture because, no matter what you did, it was always some kind of sexism (e.g. hostile vs. benevolent)
/r/MensRights08/08/23 02:34 PM
3

rationalwiki is for people who think wikipedia is a right-wing cesspool. iirc they started off as a bunch of anti-theist "skeptics" with the same holier-than-thou pseudo-intellectual attitude that one would expect.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 02:18 PM
-3

Pearl has made comments on a few occasions that show it's not about the draft... She thinks women are too emotional and would vote for security over freedom. I doubt she believes anything she says tbh, it's all about the attention.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 02:06 PM
3

I'll listen when he calls out Chloe Roma...
/r/MensRights08/08/23 02:03 PM
12

Is this not just what they call "benevolent sexism"?
/r/MensRights08/08/23 12:42 PM
20

Probably in their little corner... The recommendation algorithms have effectively fragmented platforms into many sub-platforms that have little crossover.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 12:36 PM
92

Teaching my son to write down his feelings when he's upset so your daughter won't have to deal with his impulsive outbursts. Because boys are inherently violent and abusive... Teaching my son about the importance of quality skincare so your daughter doesn't have to justify her $200 serums. She had better not complain about any spending that men do on things she doesn't care for (e.g video games, hobby related paraphernalia,etc.) Teaching my son how to clean up after himself so your daughter does…
/r/MensRights08/08/23 12:35 PM
3

There have also been cases as the above, 15yo girl with a fake ID went to a nightclub (far more common that people want to admit), the man walked free because he had a reasonable belief that she was over 18. (you know, since she got by two bouncers who's entire job it is to keep out underage people) However, in this case... He lied about his age on Facebook? And her motivation behind this? She definitely got off lightly. (And I doubt the article would have such "glamour shots" of a man...) 'Can …
/r/MensRights08/08/23 12:20 PM
2

It was only a matter of time. Falls in line with prior "arguments".
/r/MensRights08/08/23 11:00 AM
2

Gynocentrism is what enables Feminism. It has far greater explanatory power (and predictive power!) than seizing the means of reproduction. Why do you think women get away with child murder? Gynocentrism. Women are wonderful and they can do no wrong, something must have drove her to this! We should have sympathy for her because she's the real victim here, she has just lost her child, after all. Why do you think feminists overwhelmingly support abortion as the exclusive right and privilege of wom…
/r/MensRights08/08/23 10:40 AM
1

It usually does, but you have the ?amp=1 at the end and the system seems to be very basic and isn't smart enough to know that it's the same page.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 10:16 AM
3

"Misogynistic user from hateful right-wing /r/MensRights attacks woman journalist with targeted harassment via unhinged rant for speaking the truth." They will spin it in the worst light possible and yell far louder that everyone else until their story becomes the truth. see: gamergate There's a reason why non-interaction is part of this subreddits rules.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 10:04 AM
17

It does tend to get mentioned when someone claims Feminism used to be good, but other than that, there's not really much point talking about it. Some useless trivia: In 2003 there was a coin struck to celebrate the centenary of the formation of the WSPU.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 09:29 PM
20

Kinda surprised they didn't go with "White Men"...
/r/MensRights07/08/23 08:10 PM
6

re-posting at that... https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/15kjv6r/according_to_a_trans_man_to_be_a_man_is/
/r/MensRights07/08/23 07:53 PM
-2

I see, so now it is a "joke." Got it. It was always a joke. A niche and somewhat esoteric joke at your expense, but a joke nonetheless. And no, your prior comment is not enough because it doesn't address anything. It just dismisses it without evaluation. Are you sure? Why do you think [...] Gynocentrism. Why do you think [...] They're man hating cunts. Why do you think [...] Women are mentally and morally deficient. Any of these (and more!) can answer your questions and (better) explain what you…
/r/MensRights07/08/23 07:52 PM
8

You know, I wonder if she expects the men she goes on dates with to pay for her kids meals too.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 07:45 PM
15

"single mother", "relationship coach" 🤣 "cheating is essential in relationships", "confused why she is single" 🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights07/08/23 07:15 PM
8

But not what it is. That's the point, it doesn't have a concrete definition so it can be defined at runtime to mean whatever they want. But how do we know that victim was attacked because of its gender? Whether or not they were a woman, as wikipedia told you. Men are, by far, victims of the most crime [...] Look up "gamma bias". When men are victims, they are just generic people. e.g. "12 dead, including 3 women".
/r/MensRights07/08/23 07:13 PM
-8

Oh look, I used the wrong word! I guess my entire position is invalid! 🤣🤣🤣 It's an old joke, because people kept using the wrong word, and it's a mark against actually knowing what you're talking about, and you _still got it wrong..._ Why does a joke about a word mean your position is invalid instead of the comment actually regarding your position? 🤡 How about you tell me why Feminism isn't what I claim it to be? Why am I incorrect? Is my prior comment not enough of an answer? Power is used for …
/r/MensRights07/08/23 07:08 PM
-10

It's systemic dear, not "systematic" oppression, systemic. You could just as easily (and better) answer your questions with any of "gynocentrism", "they're man hating cunts", "women are mentally and morally deficient", etc. as with seizing the means of reproduction. Boiling Feminism down to one simple throwaway line is a fruitless endeavour. [edit: I do not actually think women (or even Feminists) are mentally or morally deficient, it was an intentionally inflammatory remark intending to show ho…
/r/MensRights07/08/23 06:32 PM
50

Nothing related to sex, gender or even to her! You're a man? She's a woman. Nothing more to it, 🤣
/r/MensRights07/08/23 04:47 PM
16

Norah Vincent comes to mind, she disguised herself as a man for a year and wrote a book about it, Self-Made Man.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 04:45 PM
6

That's the beauty of the propaganda though, it works both ways and covers pretty much everybody, it's just a matter of emphasising the right perspective. I'm sure this young girl would have just been your classic tomboy who bought into the narrative for whatever reason.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 04:36 PM
1

Well then they're hardly "asylum seekers" then, are they? You shouldn't trust people who dance around with euphemisms. France is a safe country (well, relatively 🤣🤣) and there's no reason why they can't go through the legal channels from there if they really must come to the UK for whatever reason. I do get the point though, most people who are against illegal immigration only seem to be so because they're mostly "fighting age" men... (do you remember when it was just "working age" men?) It's al…
/r/MensRights07/08/23 04:10 PM
8

You forgot this one. I couldn't quite word it in a way that I liked, something about over-correction and some other things... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I am wondering when exactly has this woman been trained to hate femininity. A childhood with Feminism. (/woke/etc.) Imagine you're growing up and constantly being told that you are a second-class citizen, an mere object to half of humanity, no matter what you do, you'll never break the glass ceiling and you'll have to work twice as hard to get half as far, and e…
/r/MensRights07/08/23 03:54 PM
6

it is best to observe and comment from afar and not to interact; Such criticism is not welcome and will likely be viewed as "harassment" and "misogyny".
/r/MensRights07/08/23 02:36 PM
3

"asylum seekers" 🤣🤣🤣 What's wrong with France? (or any of the other countries they've passed through on the way?)
/r/MensRights07/08/23 02:01 PM
43

"Dudes like this will complain about safe spaces for marginalised groups and then cry about needing a men's only barber as if they need it for anything other than to talk shit about women and not be called out on their misogyny," another woman wrote. A strawman and projection two-for-one special! Another commenter said they hoped the barber shop welcomed trans men, non-binary people and "folks of any gender wanting a masculine haircut". Why would this male-only barber shop not openly welcome fem…
/r/MensRights07/08/23 01:52 PM
82

Another one? Why do women think they can lecture men on what it's like to be a man when all they know are shallow stereotypes? This is the physical embodiment of the old "you'd take this more seriously if it was said by a man"... It's still the same dumb shit and if this person thinks this is what it is to be a man then they most certainly are not... There is nothing new (or of substance) in this "article", and the writing is dreadful. 10/10 would not recommend. [...] many women didn't know how …
/r/MensRights07/08/23 01:32 PM
12

Wouldn’t it be lovely if women didn’t feel worried their male mechanic might rip them off, simply because of their gender? Yes, this would be fantastic. I wonder what they're going to do to address this bigoted paranoia... [...] where they often fear being spoken down to and discriminated against. But are they though? I’ve been the girl on the other end, worried to walk into places like garages and feel anxious, and although it’s never easy, I like to think I’m an approachable, friendly female w…
/r/MensRights07/08/23 12:39 PM
4

Title: OnlyFans model [...] in the article [...] social media star [...] next sentence [...] adult content star [...] later on [...] adult site content creator [...] They can't even stick to the same euphemism 🤣🤣🤣 Also, neither of those pairs of shoes goes with that dress... can't even put together a full outfit, definitely just about seeking attention. And wearing that to a theatre? It's like wearing a bikini to a funeral, have some fucking sense...
/r/MensRights07/08/23 12:00 PM
1

They seemed in over their heads because they didn't offer any advice or help, just nodded and basically told me "that sucks, man." For many, this is the entire point of therapy; They just wan't someone to listen to their problems and acknowledge them. This is one of the reasons why therapy does not work for everyone. As much of a meme as it is, go for a walk, take up a hobby, exercise more... This can be as good as (if not better than) the typical idea of therapy for you and your mental health.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/08/23 11:50 AM
6

It's a bit far out, but... To "prove" that gender is a social construct... It's the same as when someone points out any sex differences in trends, e.g. men tend to be taller than women; There are people who will point to a really tall woman and a really short man and then claim that height differences are a social construct because not all women and shorter than all men. Grey areas [and averages] are simply non-existent to these people.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 10:20 AM
2

So a man who does not drink should pay more for insurance because some other men do (and then do dumb shit)? I wonder if anyone would defend differences in insurance rates based on race...
/r/MensRights07/08/23 10:06 AM
13

And there are also cases like this one: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/15gb1p0/onlyfans_model_27_attacks_exlover_with_a_steak/ Him recording the incident seems to have been considered an aggravating factor and justification for her actions... No context given, no idea why he was there, he could have been perfectly in the right, who knows ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ There's been many instances of abusers, well, abusing laws like these.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 09:24 AM
3

If this is what it takes for people to realise they're voluntarily living in Winston's flat... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ How many times have Amazon and Apple gotten into trouble for security issues leading to "inappropriate access"? And there was that recent story of a man who had his whole smart-device collection shut off due to a (false?) accusation of racism? Unfortunately this will be abused; How do people not understand that violent and abusive people will (often) just claim to be the victim instead... smh…
/r/MensRights07/08/23 09:15 AM
1

It's missing a letter, reddit doesn't care about capitalisation. Seems to be the reddit equivalent of typo-squatting for web domains.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 03:19 AM
3

You never had a small child start talking to you on the bus? Or ever express an interest in becoming a teacher? Nah, you go straight for the strange-danger paedo-hysteria that I was talking about... 🤣🤣🤣 👋🤡
/r/MensRights06/08/23 06:47 PM
3

Speak for yourself, brother! 🤣🤣🤣 You could also use strange-danger paedo-hysteria surrounding men interacting with children as an example of "female privilege". But you wouldn't do that, would you?
/r/MensRights06/08/23 06:39 PM
3

"standpoint theory" for anyone interested. We, as the "oppressor class" create society such that the "oppressed class" but learn our culture in order to survive. This gives them a super special perspective on the world that we don't have and that is what enables the double-think of "Privilege is invisible to those who benefit from it." and "What, me? No, I don't have privilege!". It's old rhetoric, and still bollocks.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 06:29 PM
1

Don't need your pity, princess... 🤣🤣
/r/MensRights06/08/23 06:04 PM
1

🤣 👋🤡
/r/MensRights06/08/23 02:13 PM
38

I feel sorry for her son and at the same time realize there is a good chance he will be one of those men who fight against their own rights. I'm sure you have seen recently about this "right wing" shift in young boys? I believe that to be the result of such an upbringing. Teenager's are known for being rebellious after all! 🤣 Especially if there's a figure to rally around (Trump, Tate, etc.)
/r/MensRights06/08/23 02:12 PM
1

The primary purpose of sex is procreation though. We're one of the few species that do it for fun too. It’s not even hard to deter an unwanted pregnancy. And yet most of the pro-abortion crowd seem to think women shouldn't even bother trying. It's men who cause pregnancy, after all... In fact most pro lifers support birth control. Because... the primary purpose of sex is procreation such that you need artificial intervention to circumvent this and enjoy the nice side-effects more...
/r/MensRights06/08/23 02:06 PM
243

I’m painfully aware that my son is merely six years away from having more rights in America than I do [...] He will have bodily autonomy [...] How much do you bet he's circumcised? 🤣 Undoubtedly, those who seek to uphold the current status quo in American society and applaud the SCOTUS decision will label my actions “indoctrination” and “woke.” I’ll happily admit it: They are. Fantastic. What do we call people who indoctrinate children into a belief system? To borrow an African proverb, “If the …
/r/MensRights06/08/23 02:05 PM
2

Of course men face abuse, rape, violence, etc. However, women are raped by men at higher rates than men are raped by women. It's not a zero-sum game, we can care about two things at the same time. Of course men face abuse, rape, violence, etc. However, women are raped by men at higher rates than men are raped by women. Don't forget, it's men who make everything about themselves when people try and discuss women's issues. The internet pushes sensational stories about false accusations because it …
/r/MensRights06/08/23 01:35 PM
8

You know the reason why "excluding trans-women from women-only spaces" is a thing is because of "differences in biological sex", right?
/r/MensRights06/08/23 08:10 AM
0

Abortion is actually rather much more simple; One side thinks the primary purpose of sex is to make babies with the fun part being secondary, the other has this reversed. You can't examine everything from a "neutral" perspective, you have to understand the positions and motivations of each side to understand their conclusions. If you do that then they both make perfect sense within their respective contexts. The obsession with labels and accusations is not helpful. We don't need a grand unified …
/r/MensRights06/08/23 08:04 AM
3

And "pro-life" is not the same thing as "anti-woman".
/r/MensRights06/08/23 07:47 AM
2

On a similar note: There is the argument of Equality (equality of opportunity) vs. Equity (equality of outcome), but it's the same damn thing. They come from the position of everyone being exactly the same (it's all social constructs, remember) so if there is any difference in outcome, the only possible explanation is that there's a difference in opportunity. Equality vs. Equity is just a distraction.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 07:29 AM
2

There is no data to evidence how many accusations are false, or how much rape is under-reported. There's quite a lot, actually, it's just that not all of it is as valid as some others e.g. the 2% figure was pulled out of thin air by a Feminist in order to downplay the issue, while the 8% comes from the FBI. Another problem is that they all seem to have their own definition of what they're talking about so it's hard to get any decent picture e.g. provably false mistaken identity withdrawn allegat…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/23 07:14 AM
1

06/11/2014 09:20am GMT As you read about this incident of domestic violence you're probably picturing a female victim Considering that they used weapons and poisons, nah, that's woman shit. While women are the majority gender that suffer at the hands of domestic violence [...] 38% of domestic abuse victims are male Two Feminist talking points: Victims often do not come forward due to shame/embarrassment (so statistics cannot be relied on) Men are more likely to feel shame/embarrassment for being…
/r/MensRights06/08/23 07:04 AM
1

As always, it should be viewed on a case-by-case basis. This is one of the reasons why we even have trials and juries in the first place. (I believe "mistaken identity" is also treated with more leniency that "false allegation", based on intent and culpability.) A victim in the 1st case would rarely even go to court simply because things can be resolved with proof quite easily. There have been a number of cases which went to court even though the only evidence available proved that the crime did…
/r/MensRights06/08/23 06:24 AM
0

I... do understand the justification... You've replaced probabilities with absolutes and refer to the (supposed) partner as the opponent. You've constructed a worst-case scenario where there is only one way to "win", and you're surprised at the outcome? (you also forgot about common law marriage)
/r/MensRights06/08/23 05:52 AM
2

Of course if you engineer the prompt with this specific outcome in mind you're more likely to get it... You don't need an "AI" for this, a toddler would probably reach this same conclusion with such heavy handed guidance. smh
/r/MensRights05/08/23 12:31 PM
48

But the story spread like wildfire and has caused huge controversy over the last few months, prompting some lawmakers to make an emotional appeal to men to stop putting their families and children through the trauma of tests. But... like... what if they're not actually his kids? 🤣🤣🤣 "Let's live like our forefathers lived. The child born in the house is your child," Yes, lets just ignore infidelity and adultery... Why would any man care if his wife cheated on him? #fragilemasculinity Human rights…
/r/MensRights05/08/23 08:36 AM
2

Because he is the one to bear the burden of responsibility; It's only fair that he be the one to offer. Not particularly relevant to the modern age, but customs have inertia.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 07:56 AM
5

Liberation sounds so positive That's the point. It all sounds so great until you find out what they're liberating you from; A caricature of men and masculinity create by people who hate men and masculinity. Whenever there is a difference between men and women which we are allowed to acknowledge, it is (pretty much) always the case that the women are correct, the way they do things is the one true way, and men are just broken and defective.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 07:28 AM
1

But if they say it enough times, it becomes true, right? 🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights05/08/23 04:25 AM
5

The subreddit? They're controlled opposition that operates under Feminism that they can point to when we say Feminism doesn't care about men. We acknowledge the actual reality of the situation instead of just blaming everything on men and insisting they be more like women.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 04:24 AM
1

I know the argument, it's illogical.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 03:17 PM
1

they would be convicted of lying because they can’t prove anything. Nope. They would need to prove that the person lied...
/r/MensRights04/08/23 01:28 PM
129

Same as how men are "intimidated" by "strong, independent, assertive, women"... Once you see all of the framing... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 🤣
/r/MensRights04/08/23 11:00 AM
9

I would say, why does it matter which is worse? After all, it's not a zero-sum game, we can care about more than one thing at a time! 🤣🤣🤣 I have nothing on hand, but, here are three subs dedicated to archiving links to research, studies, and such. https://www.reddit.com/r/Male_Studies/ https://www.reddit.com/r/mensrightslinks/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MRRef/ and there are a few links here too https://www.reddit.com/r/rbomi/wiki/main#wiki_1._attitudes_towards_male_victims_of_domestic_violence It'…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/23 10:04 AM
3

What exactly does an innocently accused or imprisoned man learn? Where all of the blind spots in the prison CCTV system are! Don't forget Scotland! The idea that there would be jury-less rape trials with cherry picked judges was all just some "right wing conspiracy theory" once upon a time, now Scotland is actually pushing for it (despite major backlash).
/r/MensRights04/08/23 09:03 AM
6

That's the problem though... Feminists have been fighting for decades to remove the presumption of innocence from rape trials [and are slowly succeeding, piece by piece]! Most recently they're pushing for jury-less trials and "trauma informed" (read: politically indoctrinated) judges in Scotland.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 08:18 AM
10

The presumption of innocence addresses both of those issues. If you didn't do it, how can they prove that you did it? The problems with false accusations arise from the fact that the accused is often treated as guilty from the start (and even after proven innocent, not just not-guilty, innocent). Given that we fight for the "justice" system to actually apply the standard of "innocent until proven guilty", why would this not also apply to a potential false accuser? "false accusation" != "not enou…
/r/MensRights04/08/23 08:06 AM
7

Supposedly the men being accused... You see, not being believed is something that women have to deal with and so now he will understand why Feminism is important and why we must #believewomen... It hasn't gone remotely mainstream yet, but pretty much all of this was just fringe, crazy, not-real-feminists, on the internet at one point too... 🤣🤣
/r/MensRights04/08/23 07:51 AM
16

You could also argue (and probably better) that actual victims don't feel like they will be believed because of all the liars who are blindly trusted, even after they're proven liars and that harsher (any!) punishments for false accusations will increase the number of victims coming forward due to liars being discouraged... The response to that is usually to redefine "false accusation" to mean "not enough evidence". 🤣
/r/MensRights04/08/23 07:33 AM
3

Moral of the story: Never trust anyone who won't give you the raw data. A closely related manipulation; 100 male and 10 female is ~9% female, but 80 male and 9 female is ~10% female This will be reported as an increase in the proportion of female prisoners, even though there are actually less of them. (I've seen this done with suicide numbers.)
/r/MensRights04/08/23 07:25 AM
3

Sure, but in an academic setting? It's not even just that though, it's things like "disabled" and "colour blind" too...
/r/MensRights04/08/23 07:06 AM
18

How common it is is not the point, its dismissal rhetoric. This doesn't happen Maybe it does happen, but it's rare It's more common that we though, but it's no big deal Ok, it's a big deal, but they stand to benefit and learn something from this, it's a good thing etc.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 06:25 AM
29

They don't believe in the presumption of innocence; They apply their standards to this, and not ours. 1st case, no punishment. I would say knowingly and willingly accusing the wrong person should count too (believe it or not, this has happened).
/r/MensRights04/08/23 06:18 AM
9

I remember a long time ago there were some campaigns against the use of the word "retarded" as a general usage (because of its scientific/medical origin and offensiveness to people who are actually retarded) and we were supposed to use words like "dumb" and "lame", etc. instead. Those campaigns quickly fell off for some reason... 🤣🤣🤣 It was never about their origins either, seeing as their proper technical usage has also been discouraged over the years.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 06:01 AM
167

a penalty for false allegations would stop more women from coming forward. Lets see... only women can be victims woman can do no wrong and should not be punished guilty until proven innocent There is no logical reason as to why punishing false [allegations] would stop actual victims coming forward.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 03:06 AM
6

Also consider that Feminists are forever pushing damn near everything towards "abuse", and that in many cases "child" refers to anyone under 18. This is why it's important to fully examine the definitions used for any statistics. (I'm not saying that this is the case here, just that it could be)
/r/MensRights03/08/23 06:40 PM
10

Collectivism paired with fallacy of composition, for further reference; A more generalised form of the apex fallacy.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 06:26 PM
4

I'm not all that interested in a sex-swapped Feminism, but If that's what you're into, whatever skins your goat, brother... I'm more of an advocacy for men's human rights on the grounds that they're fucking human kinda guy. I find this to be plenty disruptive as is 🤣 The problem that you fall into with equality is that we're not equal, if we were we would all be the same but we're not. Some people insist that if there's a difference that must mean that one is better than the other, but this is n…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/23 06:19 PM
6

We also can't define them based on their most hostile members. This is not hostile members, it's not extremists, it's the very foundation of Feminism itself. Even the "but muh dictionary definition, it's totally about equality" doesn't stand up to scrutiny: The advocacy of women's rights; on the grounds of social, political, and economic equality to men. The primary clause is the action taken (the advocacy of women's rights), the secondary is merely justification. The idea that men's rights need…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/23 05:40 PM
28

But, I've never understood how you can achieve equality exclusively through a movement that is named after one half of a gender binary. Because it's not about equality, it's about women's rights in the name of equality. A subtle, yet very important difference; They believe women are strictly behind men in terms of rights, so they are "focusing on the actual problem" i.e. fighting for women's rights, you know, because men already have all of the rights? compatible with feminism. You don't work wi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/23 04:42 PM
2

But epistemic privilege isn't real privilege! That's part of the beauty of the whole system, if they are the oppressed class then they are the oppressed class; if they are the oppressor class then they get to decide the criteria upon which we judge oppression and now they can just define themselves into the oppressed class! Morton's fork and the unfalsifiable seem to be quite common in Feminism too...
/r/MensRights03/08/23 03:41 PM
1

As above, suppression and repression would be to deny the hunger, in part or completely, respectively. I suppose you could describe that as "excessive control" as opposed to the "lack of control"? I would disagree that society encourages any kind of healthy emotions specifically though, but rather prioritising "expression" of certain emotions (whether controlled or not) even if it's unhealthy. This seems to be one of those things primarily taught to children by their parents, so any break in the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/23 02:37 PM
6

For those who are interested in the insanity: Standpoint theory divides the world into two classes, oppressor and oppressed. Now, since society is built by (and for) the oppressor class, the traditions and customs of the society are based on those of the oppressor class, not the oppressed class (which have their own traditions and customs). The standpoint comes from the fact that the oppressed is forced learn and enact the traditions and customs of the society in which they reside (which are the…
/r/MensRights03/08/23 02:05 PM
1

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4684-5275-4_7 These were two prominent cases, but there were many others. I don't think it's been used (successfully) for murder for a while, but definitely for lesser crimes like shoplifting and assault.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/23 06:41 AM
4

There is no doubt that by establishing such a society, women will soon find out how imaginary was her former dependence on man and that whereas he is helpless without her she can easily dispense with his assistance [...] A yes, a society where men do all of the heavy lifting and dirty work (as outlined in objects 1 and 2), that will show men how useless and unnecessary they are... Stronk woman no need man except when man needed! 🤣🤣🤣 I would imagine such a female-only utopia would crack the very …
/r/MensRights03/08/23 06:23 AM
34

I cant understand why we just stop discrimination at all Because it's not about equality (or even historical revenge), it's a shallow justification for hating men.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 05:34 AM
19

Not strictly Feminism, but... There are some who will point to the higher LGBT suicide rate as proof of rampant homophobia/transphobia, yet the higher suicide rate for men is dismissed with "toxic masculinity", "patriarchy", and "misogyny" as opposed to "androphobia".
/r/MensRights03/08/23 05:31 AM
3

🤣🤣🤣 👋🤡
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/23 05:09 AM
3

I'm well aware of this history; The suffragettes were terrorists, they set off bombs, committed arson, killed and maimed innocent people, etc. in order to create public fear (their explicitly stated goal). And then there's the many acts specifically against the rights of men. There a slight difference between the two...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/23 05:08 AM
4

It's not about blind hate, it's about the truth.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/23 05:03 AM
6

Sounds like it was just a straight up "liberal", "conservative", "other", "don't know" type survey. More outrage-bait from the mainstream media...
/r/MensRights03/08/23 04:41 AM
3

[citation needed]
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/23 04:36 AM
6

13 + 23 = 36 So boys are almost twice as likely to identify as neither?
/r/MensRights03/08/23 04:35 AM
13

Gamma bias? When men suffer, the fact that they're men is minimised, when men benefit, the fact that they're men is emphasised. The opposites are true for women.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 04:20 AM
2

I think there's a middle step in there, where the cause of this behaviour was forgotten/ignored and the behaviour was treated as innate to men/boys. (and also the "deep masculinity" which once stood in opposition to the "shallow/toxic masculinity" has since been folded into the new "toxic masculinity")
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/23 04:11 AM
3

toxic masculinity boils down to belittling or unjustly dominating over a person or people who did nothing to deserve it. Sure sounds toxic, but which part of this is the "masculinity" part?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/23 04:07 AM
5

women were barred from working Women != Married women Working != Working in specific jobs If you want to criticise it, sure, it's dumb... but you don't need to exaggerate in order for it to be worth opposing. owning property Again, married women. Also, if the man and woman become one legal entity after marriage such that the woman is not her own legal person, then surely this would also apply to the man? "Men" did have property rights, but they also came with responsibilities (the part convenien…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/23 03:37 AM
2

you need to fight against this political binary of strictly right vs. left. Unfortunately, the voting systems in most (western?) countries are what fuels this binary, the effective two-party system is by design and this trickles down into general politics; If you align yourself with a minor party then people will say that you're "throwing your vote away". From what I've seen Liberals/Libertarians seem to be more likely to discard the left/right alignment in favour of sticking up for the little g…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/23 03:23 AM
7

ricecel Holy fucking racial stereotypes, Batman! 🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights03/08/23 03:17 AM
1

This reminds me of a time where a woman tried to stab a man and he successfully defended himself and removed the knife from her possession, only to get arrested afterwards because she had some bruises but he had no injuries... No matter what you do as a man in this situation, you're wrong, they just need to figure out why! 🤣
/r/MensRights03/08/23 03:06 AM
8

It's been a while since I've seen the movies, wasn't this when the other guy died? I wouldn't say this is particularly feminine behaviour either, more of a general human trait. imo, most behaviours are neither "masculine" nor "feminine".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/23 03:03 AM
7

In the UK, the suffragettes were terrorists, they killed and maimed innocent people. Go and look up how Feminists of the '70s treated the woman who opened the first domestic violence shelter after she said DV was not a woman's issue but rather generational and that men need help too (Erin Pizzey). Read the writings of prominent "second wave" Feminists and see what they have to say about men... Feminism has never been about equality. Equality is uncomfortable. And that's why Feminists fight again…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/23 02:49 AM
2

I'm not talking about hormones, I'm talking about the significant fluctuations that happen. It's not just a case of "a bit hornier", hormones are fucking powerful. PMS has been used as a defence for murder to have the charges reduced to manslaughter, several times. And then there's postpartum depression which can be severe enough that she murders the baby, again, reduced from murder to "infanticide". Sure, these are on the extreme end, but, most women seem to experience these to some degree (to …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/23 02:39 AM
4

Part of it may be the constant dismissal and downplaying of men's issues; They may be (fully) aware of them, but believe them to not be a big deal (because the media says they aren't). Whereas women's issues are almost always the end of the world.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 03:53 PM
8

Jokes on you, brother, all rooms have been used to oppress women! Unfortunately this means the queue for the prison is a wee bit long at the moment, the current waiting time is just under 70 years.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 03:38 PM
8

For murder? I understand "assault with a deadly weapon" as a higher charge due to the increased risk of death, but surely if the person has been murdered then the weapon would, by definition, be deadly...?
/r/MensRights02/08/23 03:25 PM
8

OnlyFans model, 27 27? If you're going to pretend to be a model (as opposed to a soft-core porn "star"), at least take some decent fucking pictures... smh 'I find it very difficult to understand why a man would be in the house in the presence of his children and his partner when it's clear he's not welcome there and filming it [...] Yeah, why would a man ever wish to see his kids? For all we know, he could have been picking the kids up for the weekend and she decided to fuck around... [...] it's…
/r/MensRights02/08/23 03:21 PM
3

I get called all kinds of names, I've come to expect it at this point and I just don't care anymore... People need to stop caring so much about these labels because labels are for soup tins, maaaan they just don't mean anything any more.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/23 02:56 PM
13

Knives? Sounds like revenge for being relegated to the kitchen, you misogynist pig, how could you?! You just need to get some thicker skin, eventually you'll become stab proof! 🤣
/r/MensRights02/08/23 02:55 PM
15

Far too many people are of the mindset that if you're not 100% with them, then you're 100% against them. Even worse is when, in theory, you're actually more in line with their stated position than they are... But they care more about their labels than the actual ideas behind them. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/23 02:33 PM
49

Even if he was provoked, they would still give him shit... "He could have easily just restrained her" , or "He should have just took it like a man", etc.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 02:15 PM
437

He dead... I'd say that's pretty deadly. 🤣🤣🤣 "took place during an altercation [...] may have been provoked" Always with the best possible interpretations for a woman's actions... smh
/r/MensRights02/08/23 12:33 PM
17

government funds. Tax-payer money. The government takes a portion of our money and then gives it to bigots who would blame us for everything that's wrong in the world... And then people wonder why men lean more towards "less government; lower taxes" 🤣
/r/MensRights02/08/23 12:18 PM
25

Even more unfortunate, the same is true for many men's charities and support groups...
/r/MensRights02/08/23 11:59 AM
9

I would say that what you're describing would be suppression, not controlling. Controlling isn't not showing; It would be the difference between eating a healthy and nutritious meal that provides adequate sustenance (you control desire) and gluttony (desire control you). (or any of the other "deadly sins").
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/23 11:47 AM
1

Gotta love people re-discovering ancient knowledge... 👍
/r/MensRights02/08/23 11:13 AM
1

Actually saying things (out load, or in words) forces you to think about them a little more. You don't necessarily have to change your environment, your reaction to it can be altered too.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 11:12 AM
21

If it meant being under pressure to not show your emotions then most would call that toxic I expect. A lot of people seem to confuse "controlling" with "suppressing"; Controlling your emotions (as opposed to letting them control you) is a good thing that more people should do (women also). Suppressing (or repressing) emotions is not good, but neither is it "masculine". As the old saying goes, There's no use crying over spilt milk.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/23 10:58 AM
1

Can you read? Or observe the world around you?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/23 10:36 AM
9

I'd argue there was a patriarchy, and many (not all) of the ideals that hurt men today are traditionalist remnants from it. A lot (most) of men's issues today were created/fought for by Feminists or, at the very least, supported by Feminists. Feminism == Patriarchy; confirmed. We probably agree anyway and you just overintepret my stance and got triggered because I said the word "patriarchy" (of which I have a different definition of than feminists anyway.) Considering that this thread was (prett…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/23 10:33 AM
0

And what points would those be, exactly?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/23 09:38 AM
0

seems like projection Have you looked in a mirror recently? 🤣🤣🤣
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/23 09:31 AM
3

if/when There are those who seek revenge as justice for past wrongs, it is an easy path to walk.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/23 09:27 AM
7

idpol is good in terms of we’ve had to endure bullshit for too long and justice is deserved. I'd be careful with that collectivism there, brother, especially if/when you lean toward revenge... An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/23 09:25 AM
1

Mostly that the majority of "power-editors" are self-identified as considerably left-wing, so this biased position propagates into many of the articles and even the functioning of the site (e.g. rules not being applied equally). It's the same reason that there is a distinct "American" bias, most notably in the spelling but also certain words and phrases that are used.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/23 09:14 AM
32

In part, it's something I worry about in here; the anti-feminist rhetoric is a solid common thread, and I've seen many posts that outright ignore the valid history of feminism as a movement based on modern and current experiences. Even if we were to accept that Feminism used to be good.... As someone who is currently living today, the actions of people who call themselves Feminists today is of far greater relevance than the actions of those from 100 years ago...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/23 08:58 AM
3

It wouldn't bother me so much if there wasn't a constant insistence that, not only is this "left wing bias" a conspiracy theory, but that wikipedia actually has a right wing bias!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/23 08:54 AM
88

I just hear "I'm toxic, I'm toxic, I'm toxic". That's the point, despite what people will tell you, the primary purpose of the phrase is to attack and demonise men, masculinity, and male sexuality. Very few (if any) of the things described as "toxic masculinity" (or the damage control "healthy masculinity") have anything to do with masculinity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/23 08:39 AM
9

So I wonder what definitions are used. More or less, people that they don't like. 🤣
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/23 08:33 AM
8

It's more an emotional reaction against the recognition of aspects of the feminist worldview being false than feminism itself. Could you elaborate on how these two things differ?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/23 08:18 AM
8

As for the video, talk about internet propaganda 🤣🤣🤣 This is part of the problem, the only reason why cannabis is a "gateway drug" is because of all of the people who put it on the same level as heroin and cocaine... [edit: finished the video... strawmen, projections, fallacies abound, outright lies and conspiracies... you could change very little of this video and it would be the "alt-left" instead. I will never understand how people can be so severely lacking in self-awareness... 🤡🌐 is real]
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/23 06:41 AM
7

Forgive me for this is rather unrelated, but... This video has an epilepsy warning for ~40 minutes in (as If I'm going to remember by then), but the clip in question does not seem to be essential to the video, it is simply visual fluff. This is far from the first time I have noticed something like this (sometimes it is also "arachnophobia", also for visual fluff), and I was wondering if anyone could help to explain this. The video creator knows the content could be harmful (they added a warning)…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/23 06:26 AM
136

What specifically is driving this? I think a large contributing factor is the false dichotomy of "left" and "right", as one of the twitter replies noted. Feminism (and other related beliefs) have essentially become synonymous with "the left", so where do people go when they disagree with Feminism (because Feminism does nothing but attack and demonise them)? "the right". this is worrying to say the least. I think we all know why. As another twitter reply said, this. Many of "the left" act as if "…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/23 05:35 AM
3

Reading feminist groups and articles has a very depressing effect on me. Then perhaps you should consider not doing that. Not everyone is cut out for this kind of business (nor should they be), look after yourself first. We all suffer from Feminism when they push for anti-male legislation and fight against the human rights of men. (and that does include women too!) Those who complain about men finding attractive women to be attractive are jealous and believe themselves to be entitled to your att…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/23 05:18 AM
0

I don't think that the problem necessarily lies with (((them))), but rather that, as with women, any criticism is often met with accusations of bigotry. e.g. Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, etc.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 04:54 AM
3

This is "standpoint theory". The idea goes that because we live in a "patriarchy" women have been forced to understand this "masculine society" in order to survive, so they truly think that they do, in fact, understand what it is to be a man. This also excludes the possibility of men understanding women since men are the "dominant society".
/r/MensRights02/08/23 03:53 AM
5

So... In order to understand "black masculinity" they are specifically targeting black men who are trans? And this "research" consists of a whole bunch of therapy? I'm sure they will get an excellent understanding of masculinity from this...
/r/MensRights02/08/23 03:47 AM
4

I think this is just an alternative wording to "assigned male at birth". When they get called out for saying things that don't make any sense they just start using different words (and truly believe that this changes the underlying concept). There's nothing "spiritual" about tabula rasa or social constructionism.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 02:41 AM
2

🤣
/r/MensRights31/07/23 02:13 PM
1

👋🤡
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/23 01:06 PM
3

"If you challenge them or speak out, or don't accept their terms and conditions, your account becomes disabled," one independent UK seller told us. Where are all the people screaming "they're a private company, they can do what they want!" now? I think a lot of "online marketplaces" have been like this for a good while, this is what "buyer protection" gets you; someone has to foot the bill for this, and these large multi-national corporations will do everything they can to make sure it isn't the…
/r/MensRights31/07/23 12:12 PM
16

[...] why should we feel sorry for their male counterparts? Does anyone? I've seen far more (infinitely more, even) have sympathy for these "hoes" you speak of. Be it by lying about birth control or stealing a condom. Don't forget the women "having sex with" young boys and getting pregnant! (upon which, she gets full custody of the rape baby and he has to pay child support...)
/r/MensRights31/07/23 11:57 AM
4

Whereas if the men went to battle and very few returned [...] Might I add, if the men went to battle, it is likely that a significantly larger portion of them would return. Men are bigger, stronger, less likely to be injured, more likely to survive if they are... People call this "male disposability" and use this (ill formed and poorly thought out) hypothetical scenario (where men and women fare equally well in battle) to justify treating men like cannon fodder in the present day. In reality, it…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/23 11:47 AM
1

That's semantics to me [...] Or it could be "moving the goalposts" to others, a linguistic retreat from an indefensible claim after being called out... but whatever you have to tell yourself. [...] built on 15 year old reports. It's a lot older than that... Did you read my comment? What changed? How the fuck should I know? One of them probably mentioned it and then the others blindly repeated it, seems to happen a lot with ideological groups...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/23 11:25 AM
76

You don't; Simply observe them in their natural habitat. Questioning the narrative is not allowed because it does not stand up to scrutiny.
/r/MensRights31/07/23 07:00 AM
3

"don't want equality when it matters" I keep seeing people put forward this idea that Feminists are (and have always been) against the draft, but were they against it before people starting saying women should also be drafted, in the name of equality? Pretty sure it was just "patriarchy backfiring" back in the day... or actually "misogyny" because women were denied the "honour" of dying in the trenches. There 100 percent is inequality is places [...] but [...] Placation with a but! Drink! It's l…
/r/MensRights31/07/23 03:19 AM
1

Why yes, I do have a problem with people talking out of their arse. I'd have done the same if you had said "jewish conspiracy theory" instead. Did you read my comment? There is a stark difference between "It's a red pill claim that somehow found its way into public discourse." and "That's the red pill side of youtube that popularized the talking point."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/07/23 11:10 PM
1

It's a red pill claim that somehow found its way into public discourse. This was my contention. My "research" was not to prove the 80% statistic, but to counter this claim. The idea that women control the majority of household spending has been around for a long time, the 80% figure seems to be new, but the idea is not. Even a lot of advertisements for men's products seem to be directed towards women... Why would this be the case otherwise? The reason I call it a red pill talking point is becaus…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/07/23 10:52 AM
2

Seems to come from some old claims (~before 2009?) from some marketing firms complaining that companies don't focus enough advertising towards women... And then it spread like wildfire ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/07/23 02:44 AM
7

Ah yes, blame the "red pill"... First result on google (https://girlpowermarketing.com/statistics-purchasing-power-women/), "forbes 2019" appended (https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbescontentmarketing/2019/05/13/20-facts-and-figures-to-know-when-marketing-to-women/) archive link to their source (https://archive.is/8zwAe) another archived link to a pdf (https://web.archive.org/web/20130615154955/www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/Women_the_next_emerging_market/$FILE/WomenTheNextEmergingMarket.pdf) …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/07/23 02:35 AM
17

Just goes to show how little people care about abuse at the hands of women. And before people bring up that the age of consent is 16 in the UK, she was his teacher. This is a position of power, authority, and trust, so the age is raised to 18. (imo, I think it's still immoral no matter the age, as do many others when it comes to women in the music industry/hollywood, unsurprisingly silent in cases such as this) She then moved her young lover into her marital home - leaving his family furious. ..…
/r/MensRights30/07/23 01:57 AM
2

👋🤡
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/23 09:50 PM
3

A sample of cowards, according to the white feather movement: Boys who were too young to enlist Men who were injured in the line of duty and sent home A man on his way to receive his Victoria Cross And there are still people who would defend their actions! There were a number of suffragettes involved with this also.
/r/MensRights29/07/23 09:43 PM
1

To be fair... It's more true than many people are willing to admit. There's a lot of hormonal fluctuations going on around that time... but, of course, that's misogyny!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/23 09:07 AM
19

What else would you expect from terrorists? 🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights29/07/23 09:02 AM
20

The ear of the king. Just because the king makes the rules, that does not mean he is immune to influence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/23 09:00 AM
20

The idea that there were strict gender roles in these communities in which women were gatherers and men were hunters also doesn't stand up to scrutiny. Compare men and women physically, men are better suited to running (taller, hip rotation, greater endurance), and throwing (significantly greater upper body strength), and are more resilient and less likely to injure too. The idea is perfectly capable of holding it's own. This is the same reason why most manual labour jobs today are male-dominate…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/23 08:58 AM
29

Women and men deserve to be on equal ground, with equal rights. Pretty much everyone here agrees with this, that's why we oppose Feminism! 🤣🤣 Men have a higher rate of SUCCEEDING You can only kill yourself once, but you can try as many times as you like... A lot of women's "attempts" are actually not, but rather "para-suicidal gestures", that's why men "succeed" more. (And they also have a higher rate of "serious attempts" too, iirc) Majority of women will attempt at least once in their lives, b…
/r/MensRights29/07/23 05:12 AM
17

Have you not been paying attention to anything that's been going on? [...] they just do it towards "bad" women [...] The original charge, as per the OP, was "misogyny". Just some women is not misogyny. what does billie eilish's opinion have to do with men's issue? It's readily accepted within society. (note: the point was to discuss the idea, which is not a woman.) You seriously think the vast majority of society doesn't know that mothers rape [...] Not according to the law in a good few countri…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/23 01:19 AM
17

1. Hollywood is not women. 2. Hypocrisy is not women. 7. Misandry being socially acceptable is not women. 8. Lying about being kidnapped is not women. 9. Social attitudes are not women. Not everyone is as obsessed with women as you are, you know?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/23 12:24 AM
22

That will be the ones that aren't blind glowing praise of women, i.e. all of them. 🤣🤣 You just can't get through to some people, ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/23 12:00 AM
20

Top posts or /r/MensRights in the past week Preserved for posterity. Barbie is the most misandrist movie I have ever seen About media influence and misandry (media is, after all, one of the primary contributors to the prevalence of stereotypes). Oppenheimer is blasted for how it portrays female characters as critics claim they are no more than 'blow up dolls' OP: Feminists want to re-write history! How many years have we heard complaints that women "back then" were treating like objects? Now peo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/07/23 11:42 PM
24

And what influence do nobodies on the internet have compared to _Hollywood, pretty much every mainstream media platform, and the majority of politicians and political lobbying groups!_ I know women and Feminism are not the same thing, that was kind of half of my point... Report misogyny if/when you see it, when the mods wake up they will deal with it. The only reason that this is (was) not the case here is because the old mod set the sub up so every post had to be manually approved. Majority of …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/07/23 11:03 PM
50

Men own the media conglomerates. I hate the "collectivist" arguments. Just because two people have the same genitalia, that doesn't mean anything. Hollywood, the largest media factory (in the west), has been trashing men for years! Feminism is not women, "trashing feminism" is not misogyny.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/07/23 09:46 PM
31

Why so much misogyny? Because everything is misogyny! And you have to point it all out! 🤣 Like it or not, Feminism is the root cause of many of the issues that men face today. You can try and justify Feminism with the old "But Feminism used to be good!", but there's no use in it being good in the past, because we're not in the past! Feminism is not synonymous with women, nor with women's rights. It is not sacred and criticising (or even attacking) it is not "misogyny". [Edit: I will add, mods go…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/07/23 09:36 PM
4

Except no-one has explained anything, just declared "red pill ideas" to be harmful and some people to be toxic. Which is exactly my point. (And I wasn't talking about those specific ideas in the reply, but any hypothetical "red pill" idea as mentioned by the top of the thread) "Well if you ignore all evidence of why they are wrong, they aren't actually that bad" Did you miss the part where I said these are (potentially) bad, flawed, wrong, ideas that should be discussed and, if necessary, critic…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/07/23 05:12 AM
1

Thank you, I though I'd gone slightly mad for a moment there... Why do people seem to think that merely discussing an idea is the same as blindly endorsing it? I don't think "surplus of single men is a threat to society" is a particularly "red-pill" idea? Sounds more like something that someone who condemns/attacks incels/mgtow would say, or perhaps a tradcon...? I would say though, that if you look at all of these riots and looting going on in recent times, there does seem to be an awful lot of…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/07/23 04:57 AM
1

👋🤡
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/07/23 04:37 AM
6

A person is smart; People are dumb. - Agent K
/r/MensRights28/07/23 12:10 AM
1

Listen not to the fools, for though knowest the truth. There's nothing wrong with taking a break and getting away from all of this, hearts and minds wont be changed in a day.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 12:10 AM
1

You're really grasping at straws and taking the least likely option here, brother... not to mention making many more inferences than I... ...because they may not know enough about past forms of Feminism to form a definitive opinion about them. In other words... they did not know (or think) that the statement would not also apply to Feminism of the past. There isn't a consensus, even among anti-Feminists, that Feminism was always harmful [...] Then they are not anti-Feminists are they? They are a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/07/23 12:00 AM
1

And why would you make the distinction of "modern" if you did not know (or think) that the statement would not also apply to Feminism of the past?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/23 11:15 PM
0

Yes, I have inferred what was implied... Why else would the distinction of "modern" need to be made? Additionally, everyone that I have ever encountered who has differentiated between "old" and "modern" Feminism has done so from the perspective of Feminism used to be good but has been hijacked by "radicals".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/23 11:08 PM
0

Yes they do. The first implies that Feminist used to be good at one point (i.e. before "modern feminism").
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/23 10:52 PM
21

We often mention that many more men commit suicide than women. We are so focused on Western society to fail to realize that is not the norm everywhere. Are you sure about that? Male vs. female suicide rate Male-to-female ratio of suicide rate I say such explanations are flawed, because this suicide disparity is not universal [...] Such explanations are flawed because they're almost always based on the same manipulation of statistics and data that are typically used to downplay and dismiss men's …
/r/MensRights27/07/23 10:49 PM
6

The presumption of innocence is not supposed to present a dichotomy but rather to lay the burden of proof on the accuser, not the accused. ("It is better for 10 guilty men to walk free than for 1 innocent man to be imprisoned") Neutral until proven innocent or guilty The problem with proving innocence is that it's often very difficult to prove that something didn't happen, hence "not guilty" and also the above. I do think that maybe there should be a third verdict of "innocent" for those rare ca…
/r/MensRights27/07/23 10:23 PM
8

That's... not even close to what I said? Who's pretending negative ideas don't exist? Offering an actual criticism instead of just dismissing them is pretty much the opposite of that. There is no point discussing it [...] see above They are just plainly wrong [...] Then is should be trivial for you to explain why they are wrong, then? If you cannot (or will not) explain to someone why their belief is incorrect, then how would you ever expect them to change their mind and see the truth? [...] giv…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/23 09:26 PM
6

acting like a grieving victim. But she is a victim... her father just died, and she loved him so much! 🤣🤣
/r/MensRights27/07/23 08:05 PM
27

#bringbackourgirls nothing new, brother
/r/MensRights27/07/23 07:53 PM
0

"modern feminism is full of flaws and deserves fair dose of criticism." Feminism deserves criticism from the start. It is fairly straight forward, no?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/23 07:42 PM
2

Sure, positive social interactions are pretty fundamental, I just don't think it should be the foundation of one's self image. Just as you won't get far without money in this modern world, yet a man's worth (as a human being) is not dependent on his finances.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 07:30 PM
12

Is it not possible to examine the ideas on their own merit instead of blindly dismissing them for their origin? As the saying goes, even a broken clock is right twice a day. I think it's more beneficial that these ideas can be discussed (and criticised) in the open as opposed to being driven underground where they can flourish without opposition. After all, this is likely the reason why we're in this mess (e.g. Tate) as it is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/23 07:23 PM
23

The best part of all of this is that it relies on the old "patriarchal" idea that "women are passive/objects; men are active/subjects"; Something which I am sure many of these same people would have vehemently disagreed with in years past.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/23 07:09 PM
10

https://www.reddit.com//r/rbomi/wiki/main A bit old, but a good starting point.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 03:58 AM
21

Later, the clinic discovered a nurse had been stealing vials of fentanyl and replacing the painkiller with saline solution. The nurse pleaded guilty last year and was sentenced for tampering with the drugs. This is not misogyny. Do they really expect people to believe that this did not also effect men, or that is was done specifically to harm women? How the fuck is a doctor supposed to react when they believe they've given you a vial of fentanyl and you still want more? I can understand the IUD …
/r/MensRights27/07/23 03:15 AM
102

Need? No. Brothers, do not base your self worth on the validation of women (or anyone else, for that matter); Live for your own sake.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 01:08 AM
11

It's female approval/validation as a form of social currency. I know some will dismiss the idea due to the kind of people that usually espouse it, but it does describe both sides of this situation (and more). The man who has little approval is unworthy; the woman who gives too much approval too freely is contributing to it's devaluation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/23 11:43 PM
2

A neo-tankie from TikTok.¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Evidently there are some "creators" on TikTok pushing socialism (to a presumably younger and more impressionable audience), but without explicitly defending the soviet union.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/23 11:30 PM
2

"tankie" is a pejorative for a socialist (Leninist?). Particularly one who supported the soviet deployment of tanks to crush rebellions (hence the name), although it's become more generic over time.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/23 11:00 PM
6

🤣🤣🤣 🤡 white rose [...] ww2 Feathers, dear. And it was the first war. I am well aware of Feminism's history, unlike you, it seems.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/23 10:27 PM
9

Something to note; a number of these murders are done on behalf of women (either directly or indirectly), and women are more likely to be treated leniently (murder -> manslaughter). Yet people will look at the data and come to a rather shallow conclusion. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Either way, murderers are a rather small portion of the population and I don't see how this is any different than "13/50".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/23 10:14 PM
8

I think you're looking for menslib over there 👉 Getting trolls here now too... moderation really has gone downhill hasn't it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/23 10:04 PM
3

The "power + prejudice" model. Turns out you can come to pretty much any conclusion that you desire if you change all of the definitions! 🤣
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/23 10:00 PM
16

Given that the majority of people are straight, the majority of murders will be committed by straight people, but to say "X tend to murder more" could imply that X are more likely to murder. As for "men", there are countless instances of women murdering men in cold blood and claiming "self defence" or having the charges reduced to manslaughter. This will have an effect on the statistics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/23 09:56 PM
11

No. The conclusion of the study was that a marriage is more likely to end in divorce if the female partner develops a certain illness (iirc it was one of cancer, heart disease, or stroke), but there was no mention of which party initiated the divorce. Data from the same study showed that a marriage was about as likely to end due to a death if the male partner developed one of those same illnesses. Can't divorce a dead man!
/r/MensRights26/07/23 09:46 PM
18

straight men tend to murder more Do they? Straight men could accuse women but we don’t. Why? Same reason why men don't talk about things and keep to themselves; No-one cares to listen, so why bother speaking? There is no sympathy for male victims and they often get attacked for taking the spotlight away form women. e.g. Terry Crews, Brendan Fraser. Never heard of a straight man falsely accusing a woman or a gay man. Of course not, see above.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/23 08:54 PM
26

It is not (just) the terminology that is toxic, but the concept itself. The fact that people think you can just call it something else as if it makes a difference... There are rare exceptions, but the majority of information about masculinity we are exposed to is unreasonably negative, so you can be forgiven for thinking that men are the oppressors of women rather than the protectors of women. ...especially when masculinity is seemingly always framed in terms of women.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 06:23 AM
1

Just because there are no leaders, that does not mean that they are all equal. The though-leaders, the academics, those with power and authority in (or over) governments... These are the "real" Feminists. The ones that actually make a difference in the world.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 05:26 AM
11

Testosterone does not drive aggression, that's an old myth.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 05:09 AM
16

This is similar to "positive discrimination". If you discriminate in favour of one, you necessarily discriminate against the other. For example, the "positive sexism" of seeing women as more empathetic is the same thing as saying men are less empathetic. In a sane world this would be seen as a negative attitude towards men but, as you say, people think sexism has to be framed in terms of women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/23 05:05 AM
3

"morton's fork", I believe? You are sexist, no matter what, but the justification for that conclusion (i.e. what kind of sexist you are) will change depending on the circumstances. It's a firm belief to me that benevolent sexism is a primary feature of the current wave of feminism. The concept? Sure, but the behaviour itself is often (primarily?) displayed by "right wing", "conservative", "traditional", etc. This is why men's issues have such a hard time getting traction, one side is "pro-women"…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/23 05:00 AM
2

Crimes at their lowest. And news reporting (fear mongering) is at it's highest! It goes back to the idea of female approval and validation being a form (the form) of social currency. These "incels" have not been "approved", so they are unworthy and beneath her royal highness. They are the "other", the lepers of our time, that no-one wants to associate with. This is also why those who show kindness and compassion to them are cast aside too; It undermines the social currency of female approval, es…
/r/MensRights25/07/23 08:03 PM
6

So there are no gay men who could be impacted by this? For being men? No. If you want to talk about the criminalisation of homosexuality (which, in many regions, only applies to men), sure, that could be seen as a men's issue, but lesbians couldn't get "gay married" before either so gay marriage is not a men's issue. …did I say or imply that anywhere? Yes, in your comment history (including this one), hence the first half of the sentence. You're not the first to come here with a "progressive" vi…
/r/MensRights25/07/23 07:39 PM
6

Regardless of whether or not one supports gay marriage, it's a gay (and lesbian) issue, not a men's issue. Given a quick glance at your comment history I'm voting bad faith troll who thinks we're a bunch of "right wing" bigots.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 07:14 PM
18

Something else that I have found interesting is the "systemic racism in antagonists", in that they;- tend to have slightly darker skin, are usually bigger and taller than the protagonist, often have a deeper voice, are often louder and more violent, and this is supposedly specifically a caricature of black people, yet all of these trends also apply to men (some more so than others). Similarly, a lot of the rhetoric used by TERFs to attack trans-women is apparently quite similar to that used atta…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/23 05:42 PM
6

But what if they don't identify with "people"? I think you'll find the correct term is henchfolk. (Is "folk" still a thing? I haven't heard that one in a while, presumably because all of the hullabaloo over "students identifying as cats"... 🤣)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/23 05:39 PM
12

I would assume so base on other implementations of similar laws (but only when he does it, of course)
/r/MensRights25/07/23 11:29 AM
7

Isn't adding cyber to anything internet related a bit old now? I suppose it's better than "e-stalking"... Hold on a moment, let me just surf onto the old information super-highway and Ask Jeeves which is more boomer. It started as a documentary idea about incels - young men describing themselves as "involuntarily celibate", who hold misogynistic beliefs, with some launching violent attacks. Starting off by poisoning the well, excellent form. But this soon morphed into two more episodes on rough …
/r/MensRights25/07/23 11:26 AM
5

That's quite interesting, I just assumed it was another out-of-touch boomer thing. And the Asian comedian leading the campaign with mayor Sadiq Khan has tweeted quite a few anti white insults. I'm not even surprised at this point. 🤣
/r/MensRights25/07/23 10:50 AM
4

I'm pretty sure I've read of men being charged with this in other countries, so the bogeyman exists to some degree, it's just that they call it "stealthing" and act as if its something the man does all sneaky sneaky like and the woman won't notice...
/r/MensRights25/07/23 10:21 AM
23

Of course not, they call those "happy little accidents" 🤣 At least with a condom you can see it, how is a man supposed to know if a woman is actually using the contraceptives she claims to be? I'm sure any attempts on his part to verify would be considered "controlling", or "paranoia", and yet another form of abuse...
/r/MensRights25/07/23 10:16 AM
19

To demand a right for women (and only women) that was not afforded to many of the men they were shaming? It wasn't quite the noble goal you were likely lead to believe... It was never about equality, only the advancement of women. (To be clear, I do not think that having the vote should be based on sex or any other immutable characteristic. My complaint is the lack of equality in their campaign.)
/r/MensRights25/07/23 10:07 AM
15

Same way we "deal with" the women, no? Progressive men. Their choice is more suprising. Not when you consider that "progress", much like "equality", often only applies to women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/23 09:58 AM
35

Oh Feminism was always rotten, in fact it's actually gotten better in the UK since most (if not all) Feminists these days don't go around setting off bombs and killing people. The suffragettes were terrorists who also shamed young men (and, in some cases, boys) into going to die in the war.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 09:53 AM
49

Gaslighting. They have to maintain the purity of Feminism so whenever you call out Feminists for doing bad things, they're not real Feminists. Feminist: Feminism isn't about hating men! You: <points out all of the man-hating Feminists> Feminist: But they're not real Feminists, because Feminism isn't about hating men!
/r/MensRights25/07/23 09:48 AM
50

holistic sexual education lessons Is that anything like holistic medicine? 🤣 Ms Contos, who spoke before the senate committee today, is particularly passionate about the criminalisation of ‘stealthing’, which is the act of removing a condom without consent during sex. I do have to wonder, how the fuck do you not notice this? affirmative consent laws For those not versed in bullshit, this means that everything is rape now, despite their insistence to the contrary. And no, this isn't a slippery sl…
/r/MensRights25/07/23 08:13 AM
1

I think most people would have a problem with you taking anyone who was already in the lifeboat out of it, for whatever reason. This is one of the dumbest hypotheticals I have ever come across...
/r/MensRights25/07/23 07:46 AM
1

it's systematic Systemic, dear.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 01:43 AM
1

If you look specifically at the younger generation where women are graduating at a higher rate, they are also earning more than men too.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 01:42 AM
1

No-one gets drafted until there's a war... The draft as an issue is just as valid (even more so, actually) as when Feminists point to the 19th century.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 01:30 AM
2

You guys claim that you created the roads and built all of the plumbing and fight all the wars yet there's no patriarchy? Black people claim that they built America and made all of the money via plantations yet there's no Nigroarchy? (Look, it's from the Latin for black, ok?) Do you think men want to pave roads, lay pipes, and die in wars to the point that they fought to exclude women? For the benefit of men? This makes even less sense than blaming the billionaires!
/r/MensRights25/07/23 01:27 AM
50

More often that not, it's Feminism which is attacking the human rights of men, e.g. Feminists pushed for the Title IX kangaroo courts that deny (primarily) men's right to due process. (and are pushing for similar elsewhere, e.g. Scotland's jury-free rape trials) If you have a problem with the content of this sub after the change in moderation team (the past week or so), perhaps you should take it up with them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/23 01:01 AM
6

Chivalry was dead long before Feminism, the French killed it. It used to be about being a "good Christian" with unfettered loyalty to God and King (think; Knights Templar) until the French decided women should be the primary focus.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 12:54 AM
2

I'm criticizing them based on their actions, their inherent privilege, and how we've been harmed. You're doing exactly the same thing that Feminists do (and every other bigot); Blaming an entire group of people based on the actions of a few. [...] colonialism, capitalism, or slavery [...] Putting capitalism together with colonialism and slavery shows what a brainwashed fool you are. I doubt anyone's going to buy your commie shit just because you've put a different coat of paint on it...
/r/MensRights25/07/23 12:49 AM
2

Most men are biologically-driven to place a woman's needs above his own. I disagree. I do not think gynocentrism is biologically innate. Think about Obama or Trump...they were "elected" on the premise of "reform" and "change"...yet nothing truly ever changed. I'm not an American, but I believe obamacare was a pretty significant change, no? And everyone is blaming Trump for RvW being repealed and the mess in Afghanistan. Pretty significant if true. As one man said: That was one of Lenin's wasn't …
/r/MensRights25/07/23 12:44 AM
3

Yet gender quality conversations are focused on the billionaires and boardrooms why? What about the stuff that applies to everyone? Why isn’t that being talked about? A good number of these people are socialists (or adjacent). Just as the proletariat thinks the bourgeoisie should be dethroned and the power taken for themselves (because they would do a much better job of running the place, of course), so too do Feminists. There's a reason why people talk about "cultural marxism". It's not about e…
/r/MensRights25/07/23 12:22 AM
1

A minor correction: [...] the average American man has a 0.00053% higher chance of becoming a billionaire [...] This is incorrect, it's still ≈600% (≈7x) more likely; The difference between the two percentages is 0.00053 pp (percentage points). The actual problem is using approx. 0.0002% (≈ 700/330m) of a population to judge the population as a whole.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 08:07 PM
110

For those who would question the "male hate": This campaign is based in Feminist "rape culture" in that;- It's only men who act like this to only women, This behaviour is so common that you will be friends with someone like this, This behaviour is acceptable such that you will still be friends with someone like this, Words (e.g. misogyny) are a gateway drug to actual violence (e.g. rape), and "chivalry" in that;- It's men's responsibility to step in and put themselves in harms way to protect a w…
/r/MensRights24/07/23 07:22 PM
16

When women complain about something, is it dismissed with "but look at all of those billionaire women"? Feminists look at an incredibly small portion of society and then declare men to be privileged as a result. This is what this post is about. [...] men, generally have better health outcomes, [...] The life expectancy for men is around 5 years lower than women (depending on where you look). [...] and their concerns are generally treated and taken more seriously. I'm sure you've heard Feminists …
/r/MensRights24/07/23 07:01 PM
7

I'm pretty sure his target audience is mostly normies (i.e. "raising awareness") so he says a bunch of normie stuff as compromise. (or maybe he is a normie?) The posts are pretty good overall though, 👍
/r/MensRights24/07/23 06:49 PM
1

You know the age of consent in the UK is 16, right? So a 15 year old is unable to consent... section 1 (penile penetration without consent) covers this (in some cases, but like I said, that's a different matter) along with section 4 (sexual activity without consent). Section 9 is different in that it doesn't have the "A does not reasonably believe that B consents." line and sections 75/76 (relating to presumption of consent) do not apply. Suppose this was the other way around—an male teacher hav…
/r/MensRights24/07/23 03:11 PM
3

From the UK: Rape (1)A person (A) commits an offence if— (a)he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis, (b)B does not consent to the penetration, and (c)A does not reasonably believe that B consents. (emphasis added) Those who are under the age of consent cannot consent (by definition), therefore rape (well, when the rapist has a penis... but that's a different matter). I would be very surprised is there were laws that did not define rape as "non-c…
/r/MensRights24/07/23 02:03 PM
8

Not in the UK they can't, the law says specifically "with his penis" https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/section/1 "Causing a person to engage in sexual activity without consent" is a completely different crime (with significantly lower sentencing guidelines) https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/section/4
/r/MensRights24/07/23 01:53 PM
1

No? It's the same as when Feminists look at the top 1%, see that they're mostly men, and then conclude that all men are the top 1%. (i.e. patriarchy) The logic is not sound.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 06:41 PM
3

Yes, AND THE ENTIRE POINT OF MARXISM IS TO ELIMINATE THAT DISTINCTION! And the purpose of "gender is a social construct"? That is not at all... so, Under the labour theory of value the bourgeoisie (the factory owners) have not earned the wealth they hold (they are exploiting the factory workers and stealing from them). In other words, they do not deserve to have the wealth that they do. And you can fuck off with the "you haven't read my holy book" and blaming the devil for everything; It doesn't…
/r/MensRights23/07/23 02:27 PM
1

Lesbians are in relationships with other women. Well... You can't be so sure of that these days... 🤣 [...] the demonisation of men has no legs to stand on. Of course not, but we should not hop from one leg to the other! Back when Erin Pizzy opened the first domestic violence shelter in the UK, she noted (and, I believe, still talks about to this day) that domestic violence is not a gendered issue; These people who commit violence were quite often children who grew up in violent households and ex…
/r/MensRights23/07/23 01:55 PM
1

You've turned that upside down, brother. I didn't say that most people who were abused go on the be abusers themselves. It's only a one-way correlation.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 01:42 PM
3

Marxism opposes class distinctions Is the bourgeoisie and the proletariat not a class distinction? One is declared to be unworthy of the wealth and power that they own (and wield unfairly in their own best interests, as opposed to the interest of the greater society), the other are an oppressed minority of the real people who actually matter and the world would be a much better place if only they were in charge? #SmashTheBourgeoisie ✊
/r/MensRights23/07/23 01:33 PM
8

I don't think it's so much that "all men know each other", but rather that they think all men are like this (so you will know someone who acts like this), part of the "rape culture" narrative, i.e. this behaviour is acceptable (so you won't stop being friends with someone like this), and the old "you'd take this more seriously if it were said by a man"... Throw in "chivalry" in the form of men's duty to defend the honour of women, and I don't see where else you could go from this foundation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/23 05:29 AM
-9

For sure there's a pattern, however, I don't think it's as simple as "more women == more violence" as some would suggest. e.g. Some epidemiologists may argue that high abuse prevalence among homosexual women includes “lifetime risk”, which incorporates abuse faced in childhood. Yet, when these variables are taken into consideration, we still see alarmingly high rates of lesbian IPV. I'm fairly certain that a significant proportion of sexual abusers were themselves sexually abused as children (at…
/r/MensRights23/07/23 05:12 AM
7

National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey reported on the lifetime prevalence of rape, physical violence, or stalking by an intimate partner (emphasis added) I was speaking more to the "bisexual" aspect and an idea that I've seen a few people float—that the number of women in the relationship directly correlates to the rate of violence—along with the fact that it's a survey and that men tend to report less often than women (I'm sure there's been a few studies link here on that topic),…
/r/MensRights23/07/23 03:28 AM
28

It already is, brother! Have you not seen that air pollution is a Feminist issue because men are more likely to cause air pollution (e.g. they drive more) and women are more sensitive to poor air conditions (e.g. the "patriarchy" forces them to look after babies)? 🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights23/07/23 02:16 AM
31

I think we can see a rather clear pattern here... I wouldn't get too far ahead of yourself here, the only thing we can learn from this is that "woman" and "bisexual" are both positively correlated with (self-reported) "likelihood of victimisation". We cannot make assumptions about the perpetrators (as Feminists often do), and without knowing what definitions they are using (e.g. is "made to penetrate" included in "rape"?) the numbers aren't particularly useful either.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 02:11 AM
97

I've seen a number of Feminists blame this on Toxic Masculinity, because the butch one is supposedly attempting to take on the role of "man" in a Patriarchal society. (and this is somehow proof that "toxic masculinity" isn't just an attack on men!) Women can do no wrong, everything is men's fault.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 01:58 AM
11

This "tradition" you speak of, isn't; It is but a small slice of history.
/r/MensRights22/07/23 02:48 PM
1

are the statistics provided by NSVRC False? The problem is not whether the statistics themselves are false, it's the presentation and definitions that are the problem. if so in what way and how? For example, there are some who claim the stigma against herpes is unjustified because pretty much everyone has some kind of herpesvirus. Even if we ignore the logical flaw in the premise, the prevalence of what the vast majority of people think of when they hear "herpes" is usually single digit percenta…
/r/MensRights22/07/23 02:40 PM
3

There's three problems that I have with all of this "newspeak" a lot of these words (in general) aren't actually gendered many of the new words are not actually synonyms language police can fuck off -man is not a signifier of adult human male, it's just that the special word signifying adult human male is long lost so all we have is the generic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/23 02:23 PM
6

They weren't talking about the same thing though, they actually had an idea of "positive masculinity" that was in some way masculine, as opposed to the Feminist version of "positive masculinity" which is "be more like a woman".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/23 02:01 PM
5

In that case they would be "do-ing" the dungeon in the MMO, same as if you're helping a friend fix up an old car or something, or going fishing, there's usually some kind of activity happening underneath. And, of course, it's a generalisation so the usual caveats apply...
/r/MensRights21/07/23 08:31 PM
22

Women talk; Men do. Failing to acknowledge basic differences between men and women, along with taking women to be the standard and viewing any deviation by men to be something that needs fixing, is the root cause of many men's issues. Women's socialisation tends to be more along the lines of sitting around and gossiping, men tend to bond over some kind of activity (sports, a hobby, etc.). I've seen a number of Feminists try to blame this on the higher rates of social isolation and suicide in men…
/r/MensRights21/07/23 07:17 PM
1

longer sentences for bitter partners who murder following the end of a relationship Would this murder victim be more dead than any other? Is this not an implicit admission that some (read: women's) lives are more valuable than others? This is neither "justice" nor "equality". history of coercive and controlling behaviour to be a mitigating factor for abused victims who kill their tormentors Given that the murder victim will be dead an unable to offer a defence, combined with the many times that …
/r/MensRights21/07/23 04:57 PM
10

🤣 I think this a bit more than "ebb and flow"...
/r/MensRights20/07/23 02:21 PM
23

If encouraging his followers to leave the subreddit would have destroyed it, was there really a subreddit there to begin with? 🤣🤣 If anything it was, the head mod bailing for kbin, (and splitting the community) another mod closing the subreddit, (I didn't realise it was open again until all of this drama, there's a good chance many others may think it's still closed) and (according to the current head mod) all of the other mods not wanting to mod, (they have since been purged) that will "destroy…
/r/MensRights20/07/23 01:31 PM
9

I'm just telling you where it came from and why it is, brother. Nothing (and no-one) is inherently wrong just because it's Feminist, but being Feminist doesn't preclude it from being wrong either.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/23 01:26 PM
29

Millar returned to the dock for sentencing yesterday after previously pleading guilty to engaging in sexual activity with someone under 18 while a teacher between August 1, 2021, and February 8 last year. So she got off lightly then? Rather curious that they would go with abusing a position of authority over causing a person to engage in a sexual activity without consent given the boy was underage and, therefore, by definition, unable to consent.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 12:59 PM
1

not radical feminism which states that women are superior to men which is often misinterpreted for feminism No, no, "Radical Feminists" are Feminists who believes in the Patriarchy (and smashing it). Not off to a great start here... For example, a woman who sexual assaults someone would receive the same sentence as a man who sexually assaults someone. And what about a woman who rapes someone, will these "equal rights" Feminists allow us to even call it rape? The only reason there's a bunch of Fe…
/r/MensRights20/07/23 12:36 PM
6

These are Feminist ideas, of course they only focus on women's consent.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/23 12:11 PM
10

Even a broken clock is right twice a day. The funniest thing about all of this is, back when Feminists used to actually give quotes when they called people names, some PUA guy mentioned that some women do this, they say no but they don't actually mean it, and his solution for dealing with this was to move on to someone else who doesn't play stupid games. He was called a "misogynist" and a "rape apologist" for telling men to listen to women when they say no! 🤣🤣🤣
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/23 12:09 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter