phoenix335 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
5	ChatGPT : Black Women > White Men Open.ai is a company owned by the same group that owns and operates nearly every other billionaire internet company. And whose representatives front all the major media companies. Of course they are against white men. Try the same check with "black man" and you will see it working well. That group only disparages some men, depending on their ethnicity.	/r/MensRights	02/02/23 12:52 PM
6	In case anyone was wondering what they teach in our schools today. Taught that men don’t experience sexism today. You know what group is not on the list of oppressors despite literally half of all the world's billionaires and 8 of 10 of the Forbes top 10 are from this particular group? And one gets banned for pointing that out?	/r/MensRights	23/09/22 11:13 AM
35	An honest wish of a Dad. He's wrong, tho. We do not like it, but at this state of affairs, playing the victim or gambling for luck with partnership is far far more lucrative than honest work.	/r/MensRights	23/08/22 05:34 PM
15	Spoiler alert: More women are single now because more men have stopped tolerating their bullshit Both formulations of the title are divisive, biased and omit the other half of the problem. An accurate headline could be "society has (been) degraded to a point where men and women refuse or fear to enter relationships and rather deny their basic kinship desires than risk getting hurt, because the risk of being hurt has increased a hundredfold AND people are less tolerant of the slightest insult or injury in the first place"	/r/MensRights	17/08/22 07:16 AM
6	Was called misogynist at work this week for keeping my door open when alone with girls and women. "you are making unfounded accusations against you harder, that is a disadvantage to some who might want to do this to you, that means it is bad"	/r/MensRights	16/06/22 10:22 AM
7	Johnny Depp Wins On All Counts and 15 Million Dollars The BPD is easily visible in her testimony even to a semi-informed layperson, ie someone who intimately knows or knew someone with BPD. In a sense, she really is the victim, but to her own psyche. And since all cluster B disorders are so destructive, and most of its sufferers so smart and keenly aware of what they are doing, despite being unable to not do it, it is very difficult to properly place them in a moral value coordinate system, especially since most of them stubbornly refuse to be trea…	/r/MensRights	02/06/22 10:00 AM
7	Double standards Let's see how long it will take for the postings accusing this of antisemitism.	/r/MensRights	16/05/22 08:21 PM
1	Ah yes, completely necessary in a game where women already make as much as men. Playing Monopoly is divisive enough as it is. Can I change my gender identification every time I pass the go square?	/r/MensRights	06/05/22 07:24 AM
1	Transgender underwear designer accused of child abuse for selling pants that seek to "flatten" the genitals of boys as young as four No child of four years has a sexual thought or sexual orientation or has any credibility in any of their statements, and no capacity to make informed decisions about literally anything. That's why the age of consent is more than a decade later, literally four or five times their current lifetime until that point. Nobody who knows any number of children that young would trust them with any decision at all, not even choosing their own food, friends or interests. Any child who is supposedly express…	/r/MensRights	27/04/22 01:07 PM
3	Been seeing sponsored ads for this all day, makes me sick thinking of all the gloating, glorification of discrimination, and thinly veiled hate speech that’ll go totally uncriticised in the mainstream if this event goes ahead Who will buy all the drinks then? The MTFs?	/r/MensRights	19/04/22 08:31 PM
4	Why isn’t Male Infantile Circumcision illegal? Because it is called antisemitism and the media is owned by you know who.	/r/MensRights	06/04/22 07:32 AM
3	Why don't the rich women buy tampons in bulk to distribute to poor women instead of bitching about it on international women's day? It is a lever to implement socialism. Nothing more. Enticing one group with free stuff and a politically unassailable demand. If that goes through, widen and open that breach more and more. Nobody's rights have to do with free stuff, but with access to and affordability of stuff and rights. If women's rights are compromised by the low cost of female hygiene products, the real problem would be income, taxes, cost of living and housing. As this has become impossible to afford for many, women are h…	/r/MensRights	09/03/22 12:32 PM
5	It's unfair and depressing watching a 40 year old perfectly healthy woman leave the country while im 18 and male and because im male im forced to stay behind and die - my ukraine friend Notice how people are divided into hard gender categories all of a sudden.	/r/MensRights	03/03/22 11:56 AM
2	Rant: The fact that the "gender pay gap" gets more media coverage than male suicide and male homelessness proves that society does not give a shit about men. Society and the media's portrayal of it are not the same.	/r/MensRights	20/11/21 07:12 PM
1	Why is it illegal in the U.S. to circumcise a women before 18 but perfectly legal to do it to a man when he is a baby? My primary post is about the observation that it is absolutely, totally, completely impossible to publicly talk about wanting to end circumcision without people like you barging in and telling everyone that ending circumcision is somehow antisemitic. And here I argue with a person who says absolutely nothing, zero, none at all about circumcision and is only concerned about antisemitism. My super simplified question is to get to know about the person I am talking to and if they argue in good fait…	/r/MensRights	14/08/21 03:45 PM
1	Why is it illegal in the U.S. to circumcise a women before 18 but perfectly legal to do it to a man when he is a baby? You're continuing to evade the primary question: Is circumcision done to a male newborn, out of purely religious beliefs, "child abuse" yes, no or maybe? And the secondary question: should there be a law banning this practice nationwide, unless absolutely medically necessary?	/r/MensRights	13/08/21 12:01 PM
1	Why is it illegal in the U.S. to circumcise a women before 18 but perfectly legal to do it to a man when he is a baby? Retroactively editing in another argument into your post and then claiming I didn't relate to it. Really classy. I can't help but notice you never said anything for or against circumcision. I bet you are in favor of it, aren't you? Like really, really, really in support of this.	/r/MensRights	12/08/21 07:49 PM
1	Why is it illegal in the U.S. to circumcise a women before 18 but perfectly legal to do it to a man when he is a baby? Circumcision is child abuse, no matter of who does it except for clear, strong medical reasons. What happens is that every bill and attempt at correctly forbidding this practice is labeled antisemitic and with that label, dismissed. If the only argument for mutilating of babies' penises is that opposing is "antisemitic", then you have to ask if the health of several million babies a year is worth it.	/r/MensRights	12/08/21 10:11 AM
-7	Why is it illegal in the U.S. to circumcise a women before 18 but perfectly legal to do it to a man when he is a baby? This question is antisemitic or will be regarded as such. If it wasn't for that one group, it would be outlawed and anyone who did it jailed for decades for child abuse. And then one day we stumbled upon the fact that this terrible practice is oftentimes done with, pardon me, the mouth. Yes. You read that. It's true. https://www.haaretz.com/jewish/.premium-what-is-oral-suction-circumcision-1.5311796	/r/MensRights	11/08/21 11:11 AM
3	Men can now be sued for child support if they are part of a child's life, but not biologically related. And yet, men continue to vote and vote and vote for more of the same, abdicating more and more of the supposed "patriarchy" and getting worse and worse deals handed to them year after year. It's masochism at this point.	/r/MensRights	27/06/21 03:51 PM
2	[Facebook] The Misandry of the Canadian Government (Statistics Canada) During #PinkShirtDay Being bullied online includes a broad spectrum, from stalking, doxxing and targeted threats to being called an overweight female dog after someone lost in an online game. Without a clear distinction, the statistics of "x percent were bullied" have no tangible meaning.	/r/MensRights	25/02/21 11:32 AM
2	Facebook will no longer flag posts saying “Men are Trash” or other insults towards men as a group as hate speech. This should be all the warnings needed to know what a good idea it was to give up any institutional power. Next time, dont.	/r/MensRights	04/12/20 09:23 AM
1	When did not wanting to wear female clothing become toxic masculinity? This clown world material will increase forever until people stop it. Men are the only group of people able to stop an out-of-control regime, and without men in the general population, a regime can rule forever.	/r/MensRights	13/10/20 06:58 PM
3	Shaming and condemning men who are strong and powerful as representations of "toxic masculinity" while promoting the exact same traits for women is not equality. People who claim there's something as "toxic masculinity" have no viable, consistent definitions of masculinity, femininity or what makes a woman a woman, or a man a man, either. Think about it, what the current leftist idea of a woman is. They always proclaim that a person with a penis is a woman if they identify as such. Personal preference is all it takes. Woman are chastised if they behave or exhibit feminine features and traditionally female roles and outfits. Consequently, they have no ide…	/r/MensRights	26/09/20 12:40 PM
3	Body shaming is okay, as long as its towards men. The Cult has determined that white and male and white males in particular have no rights, no grievances, nothing to say or do, that's why. If you actually believe the Cult adheres and reasonably, logically applies what they're saying about racism, sexism, etc, you have not been paying any attention at all or you are unfortunately too naive to deal with them yet. Please try to accept the possibility that whatever they say is nothing but a pretext and excuse to pursue far more sinister goals.	/r/MensRights	14/08/20 02:28 PM
4	Violence is the end game for many feminists. Equality achieved.	/r/MensRights	11/08/20 02:09 PM
9	Hawaii proposes "A Feminist Economic Recovery Plan for COVID-19". Contains dozens of women only benefits, including a higher minimum wage (only for women) and better healthcare (only for women). They're not braindead, but actually pretty smart. Twisted, evil, but smart. Dividing people along the lines formed at birth is a pretty solid divide and conquer strategy and the people who are doing this have been doing this for thousands of years. Bring in foreigners, divide everyone along their ethnicity, sex and faith and then reign upon the rabble.	/r/MensRights	06/08/20 06:51 AM
3	That discusting subreddit still exist. credit: u/memelantern on r/dankmemes All rules of all social media are stacked against white people, male people and especially white males. Anything that threatens this group is rarely enforced or not at all. Everything made by that group is usually banned, with or without actual reference to any rule breaking. The desired goal of them is not equality, not fairness and no peaceful resolution of conflicts, but either retribution, vengeance, sheer suppression or worse.	/r/MensRights	29/07/20 01:25 PM
1	400 Million and Spousal Support?!? Ridiculous... I'm not avoiding risks by jumping off a cliff and I won't stop living like a human being because some people make normalcy dangerous.	/r/MensRights	09/07/20 06:03 PM
3	400 Million and Spousal Support?!? Ridiculous... Look up "common law / civil union" and weep, my friend. In some jurisdictions, simple cohabitation for a while is enough to be regarded legally married. And you can bet they will lobby for more jurisdictions to follow that. Some elites want to rule and they cannot if any man other than them holds any power over their own life.	/r/MensRights	09/07/20 06:17 AM
10	Guilty until proven innocent Reverse Shariah is what they want. Two male witnesses have the same weight as one female. Only way to avoid the crime is to never interact with the other sex or be alone with them, ever.	/r/MensRights	07/07/20 04:35 AM
2	An interesting find on Twitter, it's like Chris Rock said "Only Women, Children, and Dogs are loved unconditionally, A man is loved under the condition that he provides something" That is the normal state of human love. It is never unconditional except between very young children and their parents. Men are valued for what they can provide. That is not nice, but it is the way of things in a society where people can end their relationships and marriages and take up new ones. If anyone of us were in a relationship with person X and that person did not satisfy basic needs for a long time and others would, then that relationship is toast. So if a man doesn't and can't provide,…	/r/MensRights	10/06/20 09:54 AM
4	We are up there with racists apparently... Everything is racist now if you're white and breathing. You may reject this as hyperbole, but you will soon notice that anything you do, unless it is bowing down and handing over resources, is frowned upon. If we are not physically attacked, it is because they need our labor, our resources and have not yet proven to be impossible to convert into troops fighting for them.	/r/MensRights	06/06/20 07:52 AM
0	Stupidest thing I have ever read So all men go to prison at the drop of a hat and the whim of everyone forever. Great idea. Why have a justice system in the first place that punishes the guilty? If guilt is now irrelevant, just select some dudes from the respective demographic at random and punish them instead. Saves a lot of money. Slavery? Send a thousand white guys in the meat grinder. Holocaust? Kill a million Germans. "Justice"	/r/MensRights	30/05/20 02:44 PM
0	Do you guys think this is true? Not much different for women. The sexual and relationship market value for them is about the likelihood of having healthy children. It's more of a potential, not a demonstrated value, though.	/r/MensRights	27/05/20 06:43 PM
10	It could be you or your son one day Plot twist: they have no sons, they have "theybies" who just so happen to "decide to become trans" a week after they are born.	/r/MensRights	08/05/20 07:26 AM
3	Reminder that there are dozens of countries where retirement age for Women is lower, even though men often work more demanding jobs. Crazy how this never gets brought up by media. They do mention it, just in a different way: comparing lifetime earnings and complaining men earn more. a retirement age five years later will do that, of course.	/r/MensRights	06/05/20 10:17 AM
3	Unsurprising to see comments like this at this point Early sexuality of children is what this society wants and produces. And this is the result. I wonder if that's the planned effect it'll have.	/r/MensRights	27/04/20 11:10 AM
4	If I get pregnant while you’re gone it’s your responsibility 🥴 Feminism is basically the same as the patriarchy, just with all responsibility and zero benefits to men.	/r/MensRights	22/04/20 11:24 AM
9	The Joe Biden sexual assault allegation has made Alyssa Milano backtrack on "believing all women." She now supports due process. #MeToo Without double standards, these people would have none.	/r/MensRights	08/04/20 05:53 AM
1	A round of applause for the government of Ontario for displaying the correct definition and statistics about rape (sexual violence) on their website. Adding 1/3 of women affected to 1/6 of men affected yields 1/4 of all people affected. Somehow, I doubt that both of the statements leading to this are correct: a) a quarter of the population is affected by sexual violence according to the definition and b) that definition of "affected by sexual violence" is correct. The numbers seems much too high or the definition too broad, or both. But still, it is highly commendable that they at least included men in their awareness campaign. It is very imp…	/r/MensRights	05/04/20 09:53 AM
1	Men are the worst virus of them all It's the opposite of the Coronavirus, though. Most women above 45 with no kids and more then two cats are pretty safe from men already. Become overweight and the men virus simply passes by without even noticing.	/r/MensRights	28/03/20 11:51 AM
4	If the pay gap is largely accounted for by women's tendency to choose careers that pay less and take time off work due to pregnancy, and women are the only member in a heterosexual couple that is allowed to determine if a pregnancy goes to term...then why is the pay gap considered the doing of men? "Fairness of anything is determined if I have an advantage from it" That's the reason.	/r/MensRights	26/02/20 01:27 PM
113	Woman asked to leave barber shop b/c it has a 'no girlfriend or wives policy.' Owner tells ABC news, "We want guys to be able to come in here and be guys and not have to worry what they say or what they talk about because there's a lady present." 1900s feminism: "You must allow women into schools and universities, it is unbearable to exclude half the population from education and opportunities of society. If this exclusion would be continued, the impact on the lives, rights and wealth of women would be enormous" 2020s feminism: "You must allow women into the last tiny men's only space that exist, the barbershop, despite women not being the customers and the impact on the lives, rights, wealth of women is non-existent."	/r/MensRights	17/02/20 01:22 PM
47	Mainstream media all but ignored the recent evidence, no sponsor has dropped her, and now the Metoo movement doubled down in support of Amber Heard. CCTV and audio recordings of everything, literal confessions of her on file. "Misinformation".	/r/MensRights	11/02/20 11:11 AM
1	Quebec government to re-evaluate the $120,000 annual public funding given to province’s biggest women’s federation after its president suggested that heterosexual relationships should be banned Sure, but why would anyone complain about the thing that is literally indispensably required for humans to continue their existence? Childbirth is not optional for human survival and neither is rearing at least 2 children per human pair.	/r/MensRights	31/01/20 06:09 AM
1	Quebec government to re-evaluate the $120,000 annual public funding given to province’s biggest women’s federation after its president suggested that heterosexual relationships should be banned Since the 1990s, mostly yes. This was a real issue for the West when human rights and voting were in question, or when women needed the consent of their husbands to take up a job. For the West now, not so much. Most of them now complain about actual, objectively measurable physiological and biologically unavoidable differences like upper body strength and childbirth and the effects this has on careers and interpersonal conflicts.	/r/MensRights	31/01/20 06:07 AM
11	Quebec government to re-evaluate the $120,000 annual public funding given to province’s biggest women’s federation after its president suggested that heterosexual relationships should be banned Who the hell wants to ban relationships between consenting adults?!	/r/MensRights	30/01/20 02:53 PM
2	Karen DeCrow gets it. It was a choice of words for "putting down" to equal "abortion", because it is kind of similar. How is "abortion" connected to a description as a "strong woman"? What takes more strength, is more difficult to manage, aborting one's child or raising it right for 18+ years? If abortion takes more strength, then would a woman who is strong enough for an abortion not be strong enough for raising a child? But if it's the other way, if raising a child takes more strength than aborting it, would the wo…	/r/MensRights	17/01/20 07:22 AM
3	My body my choice The rule is that someone is not a piece of shit until proven otherwise beyond reasonable doubt. That usually requires bad deeds with irreversible consequences. Words, unless explicit kill orders, rarely have that power. Can words and drawings make someone a piece of shit? How many drawings and words are needed? Is it necessary that these words and drawings are factually wrong or is that not required? How long will the piece of shit status last after publishing the mean item? And most of all, how…	/r/MensRights	10/01/20 03:08 PM
46	My body my choice So we must disagree with someone because of what they are, not because of what they say this moment? That sounds like ideology with a new name. If you believe the mainstream media will ever accept someone going against their narrative, you're horribly naïve. You will be painted into a right-wing corner for merely disagreeing with even just one leftist talking point. When you complain about circumcision, you will be called antisemitic. There is no way in Earth you and me and people that talk abou…	/r/MensRights	10/01/20 10:30 AM
8	My body my choice You're not enjoying literally Hitler's postcards here, but a more talented guy that is many times less Nazi. He's spot on in this comic, and I've seen others where he's uncomfortably spot on. If people who are spot on sometimes, how do you know they are NOT spot on in one or two areas, too? How do you know someone's "actually racist" and not just disagreeing with you?	/r/MensRights	10/01/20 07:43 AM
8	Why is male sexual desire always demonized? All male behavior is demonized, because the enemy is trying to conquer the West. It's simple, once you start assuming that, most actions we see happening make sense as battles in that war.	/r/MensRights	01/01/20 12:46 AM
7	Why this total disregard for boys and their right to genital integrity? Infant boy lost his penis head during circumcision, but apparently its no big deal because they created a fake penis out from his scrotum and he can urinate just fine. Wtf? Well, it is because of the religious reasons behind the procedure. That will explain why the media will forever be absolutely hell-bent on keeping this topic out of the debate.	/r/MensRights	23/12/19 12:46 PM
12	Doctor shares her thoughts on infant circumcision If men want to become circumcised, no one is stopping them from going to the nearest doctor and ask them to perform the procedure. The keyword here is "ask for", as in "consent". A ton of things are illegal without consent and BABIES CANNOT CONSENT. So anything done to a baby must be of immediate, objective benefit to the baby right now or something that cannot be done later. Circumcision for enhanced sexual pleasure, if that even works, can be done much later in life. The rest of the benefits a…	/r/MensRights	21/12/19 11:15 PM
18	That's right Fellas, fossil fuel consumption has always been a tool for patriarchy. Who controls the majority of household purchases? What groups buys the most items of clothing, encourages bigger housing, spends exceptionally much on vacations?	/r/MensRights	19/12/19 10:42 AM
37	How Feminism Is Driving The Growing Trend Of Anti-Women Subcultures When men refuse the goal of having a family, a huge need for increased income breaks away. A single man can live a very frugal life with few problems up until a certain age, when illness and reduced ability to work begin and even then, most could live at a very low cost. A few shiny toys, a few expensive hobbies and vacations and that's it for single men, mostly. The real expenses roll in with a woman, a bigger, more nicely furnished home, safe surrounding area, a car or a bigger one, clothes, s…	/r/MensRights	17/12/19 11:33 AM
1	That moment when the invention of rubber boots is more important than International Mens' Day 85-95% of inventions were invented by	/r/MensRights	06/12/19 07:02 AM
1	Article claims joker's problems caused by toxic masculinity Since men built almost all the institutions of the world and even more of the physical infrastructure, it's easy to blame them for everything.	/r/MensRights	01/12/19 07:20 AM
3	Swap the gender roles around and see what happens. Is there a link to the article? I want to know who writes family-destroying stuff like that and I sincerely hope it's not someone the curious coincidence again. Edit: found the article and it confirmed my depressing suspicion https://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/sex/men-should-give-wives-permission-infidelity-christmas/ Author's name is Rosa Silverman. I find it seriously depressing any time one sees the stereotypes pushed by the most evil people on the Chan's unfortunately hit spot-on.	/r/MensRights	30/10/19 03:26 PM
2	Dying wife? Drug addiction? No empathy. This is what struggling men face when they open up I can live with people disagreeing with him. But he could be called anything but not stupid. That man is smarter than about 95% of the people on the planet. That doesn't mean everything he says is right or one had to agree with it, but he is one smart man if there ever was one.	/r/MensRights	24/10/19 03:25 PM
1	They've gone to far this time. As a member of a military family, this enrages me. My family was put through the Hell of thinking we may lose someone everyday of our lives. You thank soldiers, God damn it! These feminists need to have an extended vacation in Paris or Malmo, Sweden.	/r/MensRights	17/09/19 02:48 PM
11	A great analogy for the earnings gap So you're saying that people have two distinct roles to play in accordance with whatever set of biological organs they are born with? And that these biological organs kind of enforce two different lifestyles on their owners, if the species were to procreate and survive into the future? And consequentially, the group of people whose biological organs don't force them to dial down their workloads for about 1 year for 2-3 times in their lives (if the species were to survive long-term) and at the re…	/r/MensRights	25/08/19 11:11 AM
3	Crypto is sexist. If men and women were equally competent in all regards, it makes no difference if men or women sign up. If men and women were not equally competent in all regards, it may be a better outcome to hire one over the other. Case closed.	/r/MensRights	08/08/19 04:30 PM
1	Fragile Femininity Star Trek brought half the scientists to science in the first place.	/r/MensRights	06/08/19 05:15 AM
3	Women are being asked to record ‘consent videos’ before sex by men who are afraid they’ll be accused of rape or assault Better do this for all the fifty years of marriage or be accused later for a rape three days before the statute of limitations.	/r/MensRights	01/12/18 01:08 PM
43	Men are afraid to revive women because of the epidemic of false sexual assault accusations Because feminists have made sexual harassment accusations a daily and life destroying occurrence for many men, men are now hesitant to hire women, have business meetings with women without a chaperone and now CPR resuscitation. And who wants to bet this, too, will of course be blamed on men?	/r/MensRights	11/11/18 05:15 PM
2	A 2nd Kavanaugh accuser admits to fabricating story Thank you! OP should have degoogled and archived that link in the first place, but glad someone did it now.	/r/MensRights	04/11/18 06:38 AM
10	Oh really? Sure it can put a dent in their career, however they get paid maternity leave and legally are protected if they are laid off due to a pregnancy that won’t effect their work life. False allegations mean that even if you don’t get prosecuted your name is undesirable forever. No, because dey ebil toxic males didn't pay for abortion and contraception and internalized patriarchy made her accept penetrative intercourse. Sheesh. Men are always responsible for everything. Go to college to learn how.	/r/MensRights	16/10/18 10:16 AM
4	The Australian government implemented merit-based hiring by hiding the gender of the applicants: men were hired at higher rates than women Shut. It. Down. 😶	/r/MensRights	12/10/18 09:38 PM
10	The Power Of Understatement. No, no, it would be like this: Videocameras are a tool of the patriarchy. Invented by men and used by men to stalk and abuse women and invade their privacy. The dentists recording video of their patient is a clear example of stalking. Why did they record that? What nefarious purpose did that have? Their character is not to be trusted and the tape should not be permitted as evidence in court, the case be pressed forward. See, you can never win against the arguments of a cult. Go to college. /s	/r/MensRights	03/10/18 05:38 AM
2	Cry me a river A curfew for men? Are they serious? And who's gonna enforce that, female police? Female Gestapo?	/r/MensRights	02/10/18 06:10 AM
27	This is the sort of violence and fascism feminism will escalate to. The only thing that protects women from perpetual rape by bad men are good men. Women should not disenfranchise good men or make everyone into a bad guy. If as feminists claim, all men really were rapists, the existence as a woman would be pretty bleak, because no matter what they do, the majority of women could not prevent that against a majority of men.	/r/MensRights	01/10/18 12:56 PM
-5	Finally some sense from tumblr Thinly veiled version of "speak and do exactly as we want you to, or else". Don't believe me? Try to state that there is a teensy bit of difference between most people's male and female physique, hormones and behavior. Next, try to say that the inhabitants of a country are collectively the owners of that country who can decide about a thing or two that happens to it. Notice the words they now call you instead of responding. It is a bit similar to this satire: https://i.redd.it/h2s3yrs6vmm11.jpg	/r/MensRights	17/09/18 05:45 AM
12	Instead of hopelessly trying to figure out a girl's n-count, look out for the negative symptoms instead! Red flag means it's over. Not every bit of negative symptom means that. Unless we have zero flaws, it's unreasonable to expect someone else to have zero flaws. Also, expecting everything to be A okay kinda narrows it down to about 2 or 3 girls in a Western city of a million inhabitants, and they're all married with children already.	/r/TheRedPill	15/09/18 01:28 PM
110	The Umpires Strike Back - Serena Williams, a petulant crybully who thinks she stands above the law, with the full backing of the social justice machine, but is the Force With Her? You cannot be racist against white people, you cannot be sexist against men, you cannot be classist against rich people. If the accused belongs to one of these classes, all accusations are always true, all verdicts final. If they aren't, these accusations are always false unless they supported one of the evil classes. "Support" means everything that is not joining the outrage. Everyone from the evil classes who does that is also guilty. Case closed for the SJW brigade. You cannot win with logic …	/r/MensRights	12/09/18 04:15 PM
1	Mother, 43, who groomed boy, 15, over Facebook by showing him her breasts is jailed for 16 months as judge says female sex offenders should be treated as seriously as males A fifteen year old boy was shown breasts. It's illegal, yes. A serious and debilitating crime? A boy scarred for life never again able to live a normal life? A crime so hideous that months of jail time are required? I'm ok with a lot of MRA positions, but a young man was shown boobs is not a reason to jail people. Sorry. Source: I was a fifteen year old boy once and I know a lot of friends who once were, too. And I'm a taxpayer now and I know what jail time costs the taxpayers.	/r/MensRights	06/09/18 03:18 PM
16	"Why Do Girls Dump Their Boyfriends?" An introduction to Generation-Z and whats to come And one day, one has the startling realization that there is indeed a connection between those who promote this lifestyle (the media, especially the porn media), those who profit from debt (the banks) and those politicians who aid and abet this process, with fighting every inch of conservatism left with ever increasing taxes. There are individual people responsible for this development. Individuals who do so out of monetary gain. It's hard to dispute that. Dare to ask if there are individuals, g…	/r/TheRedPill	05/09/18 01:19 AM
3	This is what modern feminism has come to. Most of the things it stands for is seemingly petty and trivial. It is true, women don't have to do that. Nobody ever has to do anything. This is what freedom is all about. Still, no one's an island and people choose partners to complete and complement. And someone has to fulfill the masculine role, and someone the feminine. Relationships where one role is missing can't be stable. Even stable homosexual relationships need these two roles.	/r/MensRights	06/08/18 12:17 PM
3	She's Bored, Evoking Emotion in Her Why would you spend a lot of time and effort and money into something that will be in vain? I get it, we're all going to die eventually, and nothing lasts forever and all that. "Have fun while you're alive and fun is the only reward in life, yay hedonism. Fun fun fun fun fun fun fun die". That is pure black pill material and the recipe for absolute disaster once you're 40. Your youth is the time to build a life worth living. A career you can live with, a partner you can tolerate and a family so …	/r/TheRedPill	02/08/18 04:56 PM
5	All-male Shakespeare cast causes sexism row. New Zealand. Regularly in "western society" there are all female productions and no one bats an eyelid! Just do a web search of "all female productions". That depends on if they hold conservative opinions. Then they're called the worst things ever by SJWs, just like they attack conservative black people.	/r/MensRights	23/07/18 10:20 PM
60	All-male Shakespeare cast causes sexism row. New Zealand. Regularly in "western society" there are all female productions and no one bats an eyelid! Just do a web search of "all female productions". Diversity means "no white males".	/r/MensRights	23/07/18 05:17 PM
3	HPV vaccination for boys in the UK. Government announcement for or against due Wed 18th July. Can I vote for or against a vaccine you then have to inject? What kangaroo country is this?	/r/MensRights	16/07/18 04:21 PM
12	Analysis of story: “My girlfriend got beaten up and raped. I broke up with her right after she told me. This is what happened:” DGAF is not a viable option for longer and well-matched relationships where emotional investment is unavoidable. The only alternatives would be to never have any long relationships or not having a relationship with a good match or not ever have more emotions towards even the best matches. Neither of those is an option for long-term survival of society of the species, because at some point in the game there must be a stable environment for about 2 or 3 kids for about 10 years at the very least or…	/r/TheRedPill	11/07/18 03:09 PM
9	What She Says She Wants, What Actually Works The main problem is, the attraction even changes within the menstrual cycle. That is supported by a dozen studies already and it doesn't make things any easier.	/r/TheRedPill	10/07/18 05:14 PM
18	UK: Wolf-whistling at women could soon be a hate crime, as police 'consider the case' for monitoring sexist abuse and harassment. Abuse against men will not be treated as a crime though. So much for equality. So any two women can then have the police arrest any one man by pretending they both heard him whistle? A crime perpetrated by some short noise is a bit easy to exploit... Does anyone ever consider that women are humans like men and it shouldn't be possible for them or anyone else to powertrip and abuse the law? Do lawmakers simply pretend women are all innocent little angels?	/r/MensRights	09/07/18 02:55 PM
11	TRP is a response to feminism, not Jordan Peterson Both are complementary to one another. TRP is offering a way out of male frustration, fulfilling the relationship and sexual desires of young men, peeling away the layers of current-day indoctrination, structuring and improving the inner world, indispensable for the stability needed to achieve anything outside of that. JBP is offering a way to structure the outer world, a way to do something useful with oneself after having the desires met. So one is a map to navigate the chaos, the other is a w…	/r/TheRedPill	05/07/18 12:27 PM
51	On Jordan Peterson : The ultimate TRP meta conflict brought into the mainstream. Why you're here, is why he's wrong. Uncomfortably long text that conflates what is with what should be. One is orthodox TRP as it was originally developed, as the antidote to sexual frustration and relationship worries of the man in a Disney and feminism influenced egalitarian and promiscuous West. It was and it is an indispensable set of information to young men who, raised in femist and egalitarian values, struggle hard to reconcile these with the failures they experience in acquiring a suitable mate or holding their position in…	/r/TheRedPill	05/07/18 06:09 AM
2	18 Red Flags When It Comes to Dating Females Why would you run away from zero red flags? You mean you'd be sure you'd miss something or they're exceptionally good at hiding it proving exceptional pathology?	/r/TheRedPill	03/07/18 05:50 AM
12	18 Red Flags When It Comes to Dating Females Then think of it as a risk assessment score. Zero red flags would be good, a few progressively worse and a lot the sore reminder to bail out ASAP. These kind of lists simplify a more complex reality by abstraction, which introduces a generalization error in favor of being easier to understand. Not all the things OP listed are equally bad, but all should raise the risk score.	/r/TheRedPill	02/07/18 06:54 PM
8	Is MeToo turning into NotYou at small companies? What you're describing, if the calculation is right, is a low probability, high damage situation. "X happens rarely, but if X happens, it wipes out the farm." This is akin to fire, tornados etc., except against this risk, there's no insurance. Imagine one in ten thousand m&m's were poisoned by a terrorist. Or one in a million, it doesn't matter. How many of them would you leisurely snack?	/r/TheRedPill	28/06/18 05:52 AM
6	Be careful of subconscious programming-unplugging from the Matrix That's what they want you to believe. Susceptibility to ads may be linked to emotional susceptibility, but I wouldn't be so sure about that. They have a century of research behind it now, with thousands highly intelligent psychology PhDs spending all their lives to create the perfect influence on the masses. Maybe everyone has a different level of susceptibility, but no one is really safe. Seriously, why do companies spend millions for a short commercial during Superbowl? And remember the media …	/r/TheRedPill	24/06/18 06:01 AM
2	Male politician labelled 'pervert' in national paper-Because he disagreed with feminists who demand a new law SPECIFICALLY giving automatic prison sentences for men taking 'Upskirting' photos. Today, they hung panties on his home "to shame him". The reality of free speech under feminism This is actually worse than fascism, because fascism at least had some internal order and a hint of rationality. Their goals were insane, their methods brutal and it's hard to describe them not as the ultimate evil, yet it was calculating rational scarily efficient and well-ordered evil. Modern femism is in contrast utterly insane, their goals are ill-defined and contradicting and their ideologues have very little structure. Considering the endgame of feminism, zero people having a stable family…	/r/MensRights	19/06/18 12:22 PM
9	Male politician labelled 'pervert' in national paper-Because he disagreed with feminists who demand a new law SPECIFICALLY giving automatic prison sentences for men taking 'Upskirting' photos. Today, they hung panties on his home "to shame him". The reality of free speech under feminism Feminism in some of its current interpretation closely resembles a "cluster B" personality disorder. This is not only obvious where it is regarded as never wrong, everyone disagreeing to be evil and every measure is deemed acceptable against even the faintest hint of opposition. It is most prominently visible in the tendency of modern femism to be utterly fixated in generating responses, limitless provocation and the swift reversal of blame once the first person reacts in any shape or form to th…	/r/MensRights	19/06/18 05:10 AM
1	Feminist Bookstore Closes From Lack of Sales, Blames White Men You're spot on. This is how many "bad" religions work, especially those we consider to be cults. Some aspects are of course present in many major religions, right. It's not the entirety of religion, though. Other religions work through the mechanism of guilt, unavoidable guilt mostly and its subsequent absolving. (Christianity does that). Different religions work through self-improvement, focussing on seeking some kind of personal perfection (Nirvana), that can never be fully attained of course …	/r/MensRights	13/06/18 05:53 AM
2	Feminist Bookstore Closes From Lack of Sales, Blames White Men The unchangeable course of a victimhood ideology mind virus. Be infected with a mind virus, do something following that ideology. If you're successful, be convinced the mind virus is actually right. If you're unsuccessful, be convinced the mind virus is actually right as well. Reinforce behavior aligned with the ideology until sufficiently deranged.	/r/MensRights	13/06/18 04:49 AM
1	Go Out and Test It. This is one of the best write-ups I've read in the last weeks. I only have one upvote to give. All the points are valid and this is great advice for practically all the fields we are engaged in.	/r/TheRedPill	10/06/18 06:11 PM
2	Melinda Gates Bashes ‘White Guys,’ Says She’ll Discriminate Against Them That depends on the definition. Once you look at this, you will notice a larger volume of attacks solely based on race and sex, namely against "white males" from people of that group in Hollywood and the general media. I can't make any more sense of this, and have no idea about why that is.	/r/MensRights	07/06/18 05:05 AM
2	Train Your Woman Do they like to text a lot? Go to an activity where texting back is inappropriate and let them know. Reduce texting responses in speed and length, end the conversation. Be honest, brief, firm but cool when asked why and how. That's not butthurt, it's being disappointed. They will try to paint it otherwise of course, that's where firmness and actually having something else to do is good. Do you have a lot of shared activity? Reduce them temporarily, cancel some and do something else, but always b…	/r/TheRedPill	05/06/18 04:45 AM
11	BBC news just called out the Monetary Policy Committee for hiring 'On Merit', instead of "picking a Woman". Anyone surprised about blatant and unopologetic propaganda from the BBC hasn't been paying attention. If you started noticing this, you will notice it in each and ever major media outlet. No exceptions. A slow motion cultural war is underway.	/r/MensRights	04/06/18 04:07 PM
51	Stuff has Changed That question is the ultimate deep red pill on the political side. If the offer is free, you are the product. Nobody in the whole world has that many subscriptions to offset the cost of running YouPorn et al. They have to get their revenue from other sources.	/r/TheRedPill	30/05/18 08:18 PM
31	Hardline feminist Clementine Ford's Lifeline speech is cancelled after thousands demanded the charity remove her as keynote speaker for tweeting 'all men must die' Sigmund Freud would like to have a word with her. And Charles Darwin, too. "All men must die" is probably to be interpreted as "the human race must die out, I'm just rephrasing it so people can't immediately see my genocidal motives"	/r/MensRights	15/05/18 12:46 PM
3	When 61% of young doctors are female, the lack of professional commitment has become a big problem in Britain If you choose to be a doctor in a modern day "diversity city" center, it's a bit hard to say it mildly.	/r/MensRights	08/05/18 10:33 AM
5	Here is a good flowchart which can be used to determinine if a rape case was handled correctly (taken from lawcomic.net) Rape is a legal definition of a legally prohibited sexual contact, an act that carries one of the greatest fears, stigma, gravity. Except for cases where age and obvious signs of violence make it clear, there a lot of instances where evidence is temporary or hard to obtain (both under the influence of alcohol etc) So the legal definition is pretty important in defining what is rape. And again, barring obvious traumatizing events, it is unreasonable to assume sexual contact happened without conse…	/r/MensRights	17/04/18 03:24 PM
-9	Suggestion: whenever you meet someone who believes the gender pay gap myth, i.e. that women get 23% less for the exact same work, show them this chart. This chart is bogus because it perpetuates the weaponized term that is the pay gap. The pay gap is the result of millions of women and men freely entering contracts as employee or as employers. Not a few select ones, millions. In thousands of companies and all industries. Are we supposed to believe that all employers in all companies and all industries are all making the same mistake and not choose the cheapest employees they can that get their job done? Are we supposed to believe that the "filt…	/r/MensRights	11/04/18 10:40 AM
1	Aussie Barber facing human rights court for not cutting a young girl's hair Even if they hadn't specialized in one particular thing, it is still a valid question concerning how much free will can one person have concerning their work and association with other people. Can one human being really be forced to work against their wishes to serve the interests of another? It doesn't matter if that work is forced upon them because of anti discrimination laws or the stubborn will of an absolutist king. It only matters if one human being can be forced under threat of violence a…	/r/MensRights	09/04/18 07:20 PM
2	Aussie Barber facing human rights court for not cutting a young girl's hair True. And that is precisely why courts should never be involved unless people are injured, their property stolen / damaged or freely entered contracts broken. Not feelings hurt, not religious rules ignored, not "not giving them their way". Courts should only in very limited and life and death related cases be able to force people to do something. In almost all cases, courts should only have the power to force to not do or cease doing something. (And the result should be a blacklist, ie things th…	/r/MensRights	09/04/18 07:02 PM
1	Aussie Barber facing human rights court for not cutting a young girl's hair If the courts can force people to engage in contracts and perform work they absolutely don't want to perform, the result is a less free society. There can be no human right to not be discriminated against unless freedom of association is removed as a human right. And since the first requires the forced cooperation of an unwilling part while the latter does not, the latter is preferable. This is the difference between negative and positive rights. This article explains these distinctions that bet…	/r/MensRights	09/04/18 04:54 PM
5	Aussie Barber facing human rights court for not cutting a young girl's hair That argument is correct and one could organize a society to achieve the goal of eradicating discrimination. The result is just the polar opposite of a free society. People cannot be free and be forced to not discriminate at the same time. If everyone freely transcends their human nature and chooses to not discriminate, all is well. But a free society cannot force it's people to enter contracts and perform work they don't want to. We can always pretend that this wasn't the case, that we could fi…	/r/MensRights	09/04/18 04:29 PM
3	Why you should NEVER get divorced! Britain's top female lawyers reveal their eye-watering charges and couples' shocking demands. It should state: "Why a man should never get married". How to destroy a society: just add lawyers and bankers, mix and wait.	/r/MensRights	09/04/18 09:56 AM
98	Aussie Barber facing human rights court for not cutting a young girl's hair The human right to force other people to work for you against their will? What human right is that?	/r/MensRights	09/04/18 09:52 AM
20	When all hope seems lost and then you find a feminist that isn’t a man hater. There will never be genuine equality between different people. That may be classified as hate speech in the UK by now, but it is an indisputable fact. People are not equal in traits, strengths and weaknesses. Some even exhibit all the strengths, some have all the weaknesses. That is life, chance and biology. What we strive for is equal rights. Equal rights do not guarantee equal outcomes. In fact, equal rights prohibit equal outcomes, or otherwise unequal people couldn't achieve their maximum po…	/r/MensRights	28/03/18 11:51 AM
4	Feminist explains in detail why "all penis-in-vagina sex is always rape". Yes, they really believe that Nobody who is a breathing human can coherently claim that sex even in the missionary position with the sole purpose of procreation is rape. That is not a coherent position for any mammalian species that has ever lived on this planet. Mammalian sexual reproduction can't be rape because that is the normal state of being for every mammal since the beginning of time. If people find that disgusting or don't or can't partake in that, fine. That's the Darwinian method to the end of their genetic line. …	/r/MensRights	19/03/18 03:11 AM
4	A clear example of how feminism infantilizes women and excuses sexism faced by men If a power difference would be required to make behavior illegal or immoral, it would present a very very difficult question to solve: Who determines if a power difference really exists? That question is impossible to solve and it will be forever unsolvable since human society and social behavior are the most complex interactions of any system that we know. It is impossible to determine the degree of oppression, and it is perfectly possible for one individual to be oppressed on one issue and be …	/r/MensRights	12/03/18 04:21 PM
-4	Something I made after seeing the article about seats where only women are allowed to sit there. "Why do you need to sit in front of the bus?" is going to be the defining question for civil rights. Because having a need has no connection to having and using a right, and people tend to remove people's rights by denying the need exists.	/r/MensRights	09/03/18 03:52 PM
2	“I would like to share my opinion without it being critiqued by a male who has never faced any discrimination” Yeah we all want to voice our opinion without criticism. Sadly, that's a dream, not a right. There is no right to spout off whatever stuff one wants without having to live with a counterargument. "I want all rights, no responsibilities and if you contradict me, you're a bigot" the left	/r/MensRights	05/03/18 03:29 PM
17	I've been seeing a lot of sponsored "men are to blame for acid attacks" idiocy being pushed on my feed lately. This is one of the ones that came up. The left: Blame toxic masculinity. Also the left: Import toxic masculine males.	/r/MensRights	03/03/18 10:37 AM
11	What Makes a Man? Their narrative breaks apart when looking at the fact that almost all school shooters grew up without a real father figure. Looking at the ghettos, with 70+% of kids growing up there without a father in the home, gun violence is beginning to sound like a terrible consequence of fatherlessness.	/r/TheRedPill	27/02/18 08:32 AM
2	What I found today on Twitter Strange how boys in the 1950s were somehow growing up to be the manliest men compared to today and not shot up a school despite being allowed to be masculine as hell and bring guns to school. Something happened since then and it's not men getting more masculine.	/r/MensRights	23/02/18 08:07 AM
1	ban all men, replace them all with women of... You and what army? Remember what Admiral Yamamoto said about conquering the US?	/r/MensRights	30/01/18 06:40 AM
5	Good news men, we can't experience trauma. Maybe that's why our gender is the one with power? How do they verify that 1 in 4 or 1 in 6 statistic? It would mean that more than 20% of all humans have experienced sexual abuse. Something a quarter of all women, a sixth of all men experienced would mean the number of perpetrators is insanely huge and the number of survivors even higher. One out of every five people randomly selected from the street would have suffered abuse. We would have to reevaluate "childhood" as a concept and the definition of "abuse" if said abuse would be more common t…	/r/MensRights	24/01/18 05:03 PM
20	App creates contracts for one night stands to ‘prove’ sex is consensual "I was drunk when I clicked that button therefore it doesn't count" "The consent was given for 'just the tip'" "I consented under the false assumption that this guy really was a dolphin trainer and he really wanted to begin a relationship"	/r/MensRights	16/01/18 01:26 PM
4	Woman are superior, because patriarchy Julie Bindel: "women are superior to men" How would poor Julie react if we agreed with her on that one. With a minor addition. What if someone said "yes, women are superior to men especially in raising children, cooking and cleaning the house". The Reeeeeeeing could he heard in an airplane passing by in the stratosphere.	/r/MensRights	12/01/18 11:56 PM
1	Foreskin Is The Active Ingredient In Oprah's Favorite Skin Cream Or an organ donation? Or surviving a major plane accident weeks away from help lost in the frozen Andes mountains? (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uruguayan_Air_Force_Flight_571) Sure. It's about survival and protection of human lives. What is the relative importance of having good skin through skin cream compared to surviving cancer, accidents, trauma, kidney failure and other life threatening situations? Is there any substitute available for organs and blood? Are there substitutes available f…	/r/MensRights	12/01/18 05:56 PM
-9	Foreskin Is The Active Ingredient In Oprah's Favorite Skin Cream Are human skin cells suddenly not human flesh? Is putting something on your skin so it is absorbed suddenly not consuming it? I'm aware they use cloned cells. That doesn't make them any less human cells and with it, human flesh. I'm also aware of therapeutic use of human stem cells and cancer research cell lines and I'm okay with using them for treating cancer, saving lives, like with organ donations. But for skin cream? Ewww.	/r/MensRights	12/01/18 10:03 AM
10	Foreskin Is The Active Ingredient In Oprah's Favorite Skin Cream They're saying that it somehow stops being cannibalism if the human flesh is merely ground fine and chemically broken down enough. How that fits into the ethics of not consuming human flesh or deriving benefits from it is out of my possibilities to reason with. I doubt they would drink a protein shake made of proteins extracted from very finely ground human flesh, nevermind it's the same thing that's in the cream. It's disgusting to know human products are in consumer goods.	/r/MensRights	12/01/18 07:08 AM
25	Foreskin Is The Active Ingredient In Oprah's Favorite Skin Cream So human flesh can be used in consumer goods production on an industrial scale and that's okay because it's not in the finished product? Where in the process of grinding down human flesh and extracting something from it does it stop being cannibalism?	/r/MensRights	12/01/18 07:01 AM
3	19 Year old girl who made up false rape claims has charges raised to a felony. She Now faces up to 32 years compared to the original 6 months. It's insane, I know. Especially after many cities removed their public facilities around the bar scene because drug use. Stupid as hell...	/r/MensRights	15/12/17 02:37 PM
31	19 Year old girl who made up false rape claims has charges raised to a felony. She Now faces up to 32 years compared to the original 6 months. A false accusation is not a sex crime because it involves words only, no sex. It should carry a sentence close to the sentence that the accused would've gotten. The sex crime registration should be abolished, though. It doesn't solve anything, it doesn't prevent anything and it is way too easy to get on that. (Drunken peeing gets a lifelong scar on the registration, is that appropriate?) Also, sex crimes are mostly pursued against men, so the registration is probably mostly full of men. It's not…	/r/MensRights	15/12/17 06:23 AM
-2	Anon is right Honest question: Does that tactic work as intended? It feels like mirroring the "being offended" tactic that was and is employed to the hilt by every feminist under the sun. I suspect even if it was successful, it leads to more walking on eggshells for everyone involved. Getting offended feels to me like it gives others unearned and undeserved powers over myself, and I refuse to give them a victory. But judging on the response this thread drew, "man up" is something that many people hear or are …	/r/MensRights	14/12/17 04:00 PM
-3	Anon is right If personal attacks by name and tag are not talking shit in the very literal sense, I would be surprised. If "you too" or shouting back someone's words to them whether they apply or not still sounds like an intelligent argument, there's lots of room to man up.	/r/MensRights	14/12/17 03:18 PM
-15	Anon is right Most often that is indeed the intended effect, which is terribly evil. The only answer to that is standing tall and walking, if things get worse.	/r/MensRights	14/12/17 03:07 PM
-22	Anon is right I don't know and I don't care, because I care about men's rights. Treat others as good as you want, not my primary concern (but don't oppress them either). If women need to "man up" is a whole different ballgame and to do that "fairly" entails a million different opinions on what is fair and what isn't. I can't do that and I suspect most individual humans cannot judge fairness for everyone all by themselves. If men "man up" and don't let themselves be walked over pushed over pushed back marginal…	/r/MensRights	14/12/17 02:41 PM
-9	Anon is right No it doesn't. Men can be victims. I said men should try to stop being one and that is very different. Others can embrace their victimhood and wrap their lives and identities around it. Men don't. Hold your head high and stop taking shit. Not fighting, raging - just shrugging many things off is very often enough. That is a traditional gender role. True. You can't fight SJWism and dissolve traditional gender roles, like you can't have your cake and eat it. Trying to stop being a victim entails a …	/r/MensRights	14/12/17 02:03 PM
-39	Anon is right Nope. Often times it is, but not everywhere and by everyone. Not everyone is out to get you and if you're a man, you still need to man up, at least a little, no matter how much you'd rather not. Manning up means at least trying to stop being a victim, improving your situation, then the situation of the ones you care for. It is not being a servant to others. The alternative is keep being Peter Pan. Edit: there's that professor from Toronto who can explain that stuff wayyyyy better than I ever can…	/r/MensRights	14/12/17 11:51 AM
2	Over 4,850 upvotes on 2XChromosomes cancer sub: "All men should have curfews" In Japan and for example Poland, one can do roam around at night pretty safely.	/r/MensRights	11/12/17 07:01 AM
9	Surprised there isn't a new trendy hashtag such as #killallmen Does that include illegal immigrant men and male refugees? Just asking, because I suspect it doesn't.	/r/MensRights	01/12/17 03:43 PM
16	Apparently to Vice news talking about men’s rights is comparable to white supremacy and the Nazi’s Your opinion is understandable, but illustrates perfectly why there is either free speech or not. There is already speech that is illegal. You can't do much about that except voting or oversight of the courts deciding on that. And there is speech that is immoral. And since everyone has a different view on morals, everyone has a different opinion on what speech is immoral. Banning speech on grounds of immorality is therefore the road to banning a huge amount of it. So by accepting the notion that…	/r/MensRights	01/12/17 03:30 PM
2	Watch out for this. Now A woman can just 'claim' you did something and you'll lose your job. Well the guy supposedly had a button in his office to lock the doors. That's easy to verify. Also, the story is that he raped one intern so much she passed out and had to be helped by his assistant to get to a doctor. So there are a few people who can corroborate the story and physical evidence to inspect. They won't fire their top executives and staff for rumors, handing over another major victory to the Conservatives and Trumpians just for the fun of it. NBC is hardcore anti Trump, they'll do …	/r/MensRights	30/11/17 01:53 PM
7	Successful Feminist Tactic: Butt Pat = Harassment = Sexual Assault = Rape = Murder No you don't need to be perfect. No one is. Everyone is a real human and most if not all human beings have done mistakes in the past, hopefully learned their lessons from them and improved. It is harmful to expect human beings to conform to an impossibly high standard because it creates a huge incentive to lie and cheat. Going back twenty years in the past, no sane person hasn't had one lapse of judgement. We're not talking about murder, rape and robbery here, but a pat on the back, on the knee …	/r/MensRights	23/11/17 02:38 PM
5	After browsing this subreddit for a while, I've decided on my stance on Men's Rights. The problem is not (only) catcalling made of different importance between the genders, but more that catcalling is made into an offense only slightly below the most violent of rapes. Trivializing one of the worst crimes known to man by equating a mere whistle with a hurt that last a lifetime is sickening.	/r/MensRights	16/11/17 03:21 PM
2	After browsing this subreddit for a while, I've decided on my stance on Men's Rights. Not only do they claim criticism of feminism was "male supremacy", but actual criticism of individual women. Criticize a woman, no matter why and for whatever reason, be misogynist.	/r/MensRights	16/11/17 03:16 PM
2	Feminism as a supremacist movement - a devastating condemnation Thanks	/r/MensRights	11/11/17 06:21 PM
6	MRA Interchangeable With Incels According to This Tweeting Standup Comedian There is a connection. Incels are to MRA what hardcore feminazis are to WMA. Incels are the opposite side of the same coin blue haired tunnel eared feminazis are on. One more of the self-hating but majorly projecting victim groups produced by identity politics. Needless misery created by encouraging people to completely reject all of their traditional gender roles, in the name of "equality".	/r/MensRights	10/11/17 01:02 PM
7	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings Wot? For real? Why?	/r/MensRights	06/11/17 01:55 PM
20	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings So the negative effects of a legal action cannot be examined, scrutinized or criticized?? That's going to be a relief for alcohol , tobacco and firearms.	/r/MensRights	06/11/17 01:27 PM
1	More cancer from the feminist media Being less or more selfish doesn't mean a worse or better person. They are both indispensable aspects of human interaction, psychology and social life. A society with either of them missing is a society not worth living in or unable to exist for any length of time. There's a very good reason ancient Asian mythology has developed the concepts of yin and yang.	/r/MensRights	11/10/17 08:51 AM
2	I find it so cruel that men are forced to initiate romantic relationships but are then vilified and shamed for doing so. How would romantic interactions between people start otherwise? All initiated contact outside of tinder and single parties is rape?	/r/MensRights	06/10/17 03:00 PM
129	Dont forget men are the ones shielding women with their bodies Construction. Construction of any kind of structure doesn't happen without men. Buildings, streets, bridges.	/r/MensRights	05/10/17 06:29 PM
13	I'm done with this bull shit Pretty much "It's so bad that not all movies are enjoyable for all people. We should unify everyone's lives so much that everyone enjoys the same things." Modern feminism or Stone age communism, you decide.	/r/MensRights	05/10/17 08:50 AM
4	Ladies And Gentlemen - Feminism, The Circus That Never Ends. P¬)) Feminism has little to do with rights of women, and much about either supremacy or entitlement. PS: Have you seen a feminine feminist?	/r/MensRights	27/08/17 11:27 AM
1	Slate Equates Men's Rights Activism with Nazism and White Supremacy It seems more and more an "us vs them"scenario every day. SJWism doesn't tolerate anything but the full package of their beliefs, and they hate and combat everyone else. Even the moderate SJWs are routinely compared to Nazis by the harder SJWs. There is no winning with them, and they will never stop until they have eradicated every male and white and cisgendered person completely. Anyone who thinks a little SJWism can persist is deluding themselves.	/r/MensRights	18/08/17 10:18 PM
2	The full Google Ideas team, responsible for what is and isn't shown in Google products. A picture speaks a thousand words. That's a lot of problem glasses they wear.	/r/MensRights	11/08/17 12:15 AM
3	Women at Google were so upset over memo citing biological differences that they skipped work, ironically confirming the stereotype by getting super-emotional and calling in sick over a man saying something they didn't like. 🤦🤦 🤷¯\_(ツ)_/¯🤷 I stand behind the statement that people skipping work out of mental distress because one of 70,000 other employees wrote a mean text don't have the mental capabilities of working in a multinational company. We're not talking systematic mobbing here, but a memo. One. From one guy complaining to be in a minority. Yes, if you can't stomach words from one mean guy out of seventy thousand friendlies, you are in fact mentally unstable. That lies in the word "unstable". On a totally not unrelated ques…	/r/MensRights	09/08/17 10:50 PM
5	Women at Google were so upset over memo citing biological differences that they skipped work, ironically confirming the stereotype by getting super-emotional and calling in sick over a man saying something they didn't like. 🤦🤦 🤷¯\_(ツ)_/¯🤷 The Holy Roman Catholic Church at the top of their might was undermined and subsequently split by a single memo. That one memo caused countless religious wars and lead to the formation of several sects of Christianity. The Catholic Church never recovered from that memo by Martin Luther. This lone engineer at Google could very well be a new Martin Luther that brings down the Church of SJW.	/r/MensRights	09/08/17 07:58 PM
-2	Women at Google were so upset over memo citing biological differences that they skipped work, ironically confirming the stereotype by getting super-emotional and calling in sick over a man saying something they didn't like. 🤦🤦 🤷¯\_(ツ)_/¯🤷 Women's rights movements like the suffragettes weren't about supremacy, it was real human rights. Up until that point, women had been some kind of property in a legal sense, couldn't vote, were barred from higher education, couldn't operate a business and similar things. (NB this is how women are treated until this day under strict Shariah, as living property, like valuable livestock) Anyway, the women's rights movement ceded to not female supremacy, but regression of competent strong and equal …	/r/MensRights	09/08/17 06:06 PM
27	Women at Google were so upset over memo citing biological differences that they skipped work, ironically confirming the stereotype by getting super-emotional and calling in sick over a man saying something they didn't like. 🤦🤦 🤷¯\_(ツ)_/¯🤷 If skipping work is admissible when someone writes mean things, I should start working at Google. Then subscribe to as many Twitter accounts of co-workers as possible and if any one of them ever writes something negative about men in general, I skip work the next day. With 70,000 employees at Google, I am guaranteed to be able to skip every day until the day I retire.	/r/MensRights	09/08/17 04:15 PM
403	Women at Google were so upset over memo citing biological differences that they skipped work, ironically confirming the stereotype by getting super-emotional and calling in sick over a man saying something they didn't like. 🤦🤦 🤷¯\_(ツ)_/¯🤷 This is modern feminism, yes. The exact polar opposite of actual feminism. The goal of feminism was empowering women and equal rights. Current day feminism is turning empowered women back into weak little girls literally cowering with fear from every male behavior, crying for Daddy and Authority every time anything bad happens. Modern day feminism leaves women completely helpless and fully dependent on external authority. We're not talking about physical violence where of course the physical str…	/r/MensRights	09/08/17 04:10 PM
2508	Women at Google were so upset over memo citing biological differences that they skipped work, ironically confirming the stereotype by getting super-emotional and calling in sick over a man saying something they didn't like. 🤦🤦 🤷¯\_(ツ)_/¯🤷 People not showing up for work because one of several thousand regular employees wrote something on the Internet? Are these regular, competent and mentally stable adults we're talking about? Insane. Ironically, no one who skipped work will be fired for that.	/r/MensRights	09/08/17 01:55 PM
1	Artificial Wombs Reveal an Ugly Truth about the Abortion-Rights Movement... "giving her back control of her own body but still forcing her into parenthood." It can be demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt that the introduction of abortion is the primary and in many cases only factor in reducing the massive crime epidemics of the past. Murder rates have dropped dramatically since then, even if they're still too high. Human suffering cannot be entirely avoided, we can only chose who and where. It would be nice if it wasn't, but it is. Murder rate or abortion rate. There's no way around at least one of these scourges.	/r/MensRights	02/08/17 07:55 AM
2	“Dear men’s rights activists, stop pretending you care about my pain.” \| An anonymous guy's life is ruined by divorce & losing access to his daughter, but he insists the most important thing is to blame patriarchy, not feminism Haha nice find! Telltale sign, of course. Thanks. That article is done for.	/r/MensRights	29/07/17 10:58 PM
81	“Dear men’s rights activists, stop pretending you care about my pain.” \| An anonymous guy's life is ruined by divorce & losing access to his daughter, but he insists the most important thing is to blame patriarchy, not feminism It probably requires significant psychological expertise to make a good prediction if that text was written by a male feminist or female feminist, but it was definitely a feminist trying to lure in divorced dads and sympathetic ears. It follows the classical order of a marketing piece: attraction, interest, desire, action. Attraction: "hear me out what I have to say as a suffering person", interest: "hear this long sob story about an utterly completely devastating personal experience", desire: "…	/r/MensRights	29/07/17 03:58 PM
1	Warning to all Australians: It looks like a large scale rape hysteria may be hitting your country next week How to determine if one is affected by the backfire effect and how to counter it? Logic and evidence, yes, but is it enough?	/r/MensRights	28/07/17 11:10 PM
8	r/feminism on male suicide rate They're comparing completed suicides with suicide attempts.	/r/MensRights	28/07/17 10:59 PM
66	Male employee banned from using the office's UNISEX toilet. The loo loonies of America. What is driving these people so crazy to make this weird social experiment with simple bathrooms? People have used bathrooms for centuries now and suddenly everything about them is so important that the president of the United States of America has to write executive orders about them, several States made large tracts of legislation to decide who goes to pee where. I'm not mocking the men's rights issue on this, on the contrary. It is absolutely ridiculous to regulate…	/r/MensRights	28/07/17 10:26 PM
0	Sexual Harassment of men should be treated the same as the sexual harassment of women It's not. A fist touching the face isn't, either. That's common sense. Sorry to not have included a long catalogue of do's and don'ts in my post. You would be surprised what kind of touches already count as sexual harassment in today's workplace environment and to what important incidents the cops get called.	/r/MensRights	27/07/17 06:01 AM
10	Sexual Harassment of men should be treated the same as the sexual harassment of women Involving the police and the legal system in interpersonal affairs should be the last resort to prevent violence. It should not be the general course of action for petty issues, hurt feelings and minor infractions of social norms. If the social norms are so that a mere touch warrants jail time and years through the courts, there's something wrong. A healthy dose of deal with it may be a better solution for some things than the ever increasing escalation of legalese.	/r/MensRights	26/07/17 10:20 PM
141	Stalinist-like propaganda, 2017 The privilege of working in the mines, the sewers, the garbage dumps.	/r/MensRights	19/07/17 10:36 AM
1	TrollXChromosomes normalising female on male violence Noo that's art or a joke. Now reverse the roles...	/r/MensRights	03/07/17 06:15 AM
15	Bigger brains put men ahead of women in the IQ stakes - This will be controversial 2 Source is logical reasoning and fundamentals of genetics. Difference between male and female of all mammalian species is the Y chromosome. The Y chromosome contains very little generic material compared to an X chromosome. That has several implications: first, it's lighter, therefore a sperm carrying an XY set has a slightly greater chance of reaching the ovum than one carrying an XX set, resulting in the slight surplus of males born. Second, the lack of generic material means recessive alleles …	/r/MensRights	02/07/17 05:25 PM
2	'My son was circumcised without my consent' Nah, killing people is worse than genital mutilation and people will always have religion, even some atheists (they often believe in the power, benevolence and infallibility of the state, but that's another topic). But taking a knife to a baby's penis? Wtf?! That is where "religious freedom" must end. There can be no freedom in the world that gives one person the right to cut into the penis of another person. It's unbelievably insane that there are people who argue otherwise. Cutting into the pe…	/r/MensRights	29/06/17 03:04 PM
7	'My son was circumcised without my consent' Unbelievable, isn't it? Cutting into body parts of a baby, cutting off parts of babies for no medical reason whatsoever, and people defend it, as if the parents have some kind of ownership of the body of their child. That's where "religious freedom" must be curtailed. Baby penises are not a free for all where everyone can come cutting just because a millennia old book says so. It's disgusting.	/r/MensRights	29/06/17 10:40 AM
25	Reminder: prenups are MEANINGLESS. If the amount of money you would get with a prenup is different than the amount you would get without one, than that is a reason to invalidate the prenup. That's right; the entire fucking reason prenups exist... is a legitimate reason to invalidate prenups. So, the basic premise of two parties entering a contract is that the contract is null and void if one side doesn't like the contract even if they dilligently followed it for twenty years? Why conclude contracts then? Just make it indentured servitude and be done with it.	/r/MensRights	20/06/17 11:32 AM