~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SMU found in violation of Title IX after not investigating male student's claim of sexual assaultWhat kind of proof do you want? Keep in mind only so much information was released to the public. I was not apart of any group that harassed him, I actually was with the group that was helping to prevent it. This whole thing has been immensely frustrating hence why I was commenting all over this thread. Everything we tried to do to help was accepted by him and then he would turn around and throw a fit in the media when he felt like the spotlight was moving off the case. I was probably too heated… | /r/MensRights | 14/12/14 08:03 PM |
| -4 | SMU found in violation of Title IX after not investigating male student's claim of sexual assaultPLease read my other comments in the thread. He was given the protections. He is lying about not getting them. Guy is an attention hound in the worst way. | /r/MensRights | 13/12/14 01:22 AM |
| -4 | SMU found in violation of Title IX after not investigating male student's claim of sexual assaultNot sure why you went super condescending there, but in that case the proper English would have; you aren't very good at listening are you? Good to see your education serving you well. What I am saying is he told the university of this, they had cops do rounds past room, had extra RA's pass through his residence hall etc. This kid is straight up lying about what the university did for him. I am the first to admit that they usually don't do a good job about sexual assault. But his case made natio… | /r/MensRights | 13/12/14 12:37 AM |
| -20 | SMU found in violation of Title IX after not investigating male student's claim of sexual assaultWhat more had to happen? Well for starters him telling the truth would have been good. | /r/MensRights | 12/12/14 08:32 PM |
| 3 | SMU found in violation of Title IX after not investigating male student's claim of sexual assaultQuote from the DA Office. "New information came to light after the indictment and it lead our prosecutor, ADA Cresta Garland, to dismiss the case. Garland didn't believe a prosecution was viable, because we didn't have the evidence to show that what happened was not consensual - based on this new evidence. ADA Cresta Garland does not want to talk." | /r/MensRights | 12/12/14 07:57 PM |
| 10 | SMU found in violation of Title IX after not investigating male student's claim of sexual assaulthttp://parkcitiesblog.dallasnews.com/2013/03/dallas-county-prosecutors-drop-sexual-assault-charges-against-former-smu-student-john-david-mahaffey.html/ Use google. He was charged by Dallas County Prosecutors. Then the charges were dropped. DPD took over the investigation | /r/MensRights | 12/12/14 07:55 PM |
| 7 | SMU found in violation of Title IX after not investigating male student's claim of sexual assaultExcept DPD investigated the case. Do your research first. | /r/MensRights | 12/12/14 07:48 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter