phungus420 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	Promiscuity & Civilization The premise is inaccurate. Monogamous pair bonding is a natural behavior for many types of animals. Most corvids (possibly all, does anyone know of a non monogamous corvid species?), many birds of prey, many song birds, and a few other non human mammals all form life long breeding pairs. All these species share in common the fact they invest a massive amount of resources in their young when compared to their lifespan, humans fit right along with these other animals in that regard. Evolution is a…	/r/TheRedPill	27/08/15 06:58 AM
12	'Average Looking Woman' wonders why 'perfect' guy didn't want to see her again after she slept with him on the first date. Women are the guardians of sex, men are the guardians of commitment. You need to examine the dualistic mating behaviors of men and women, especially in an evolutionary context. In a nutshell: Men are attracted to multiple highly fertile females that can be easily discarded or a high value female that would make a good mother for their progeny and is worth long term resource investment in. Women look for a beta with lots of resources to help them and potential offspring by sharing those resources…	/r/TheRedPill	22/08/15 07:22 PM
4	‘Get back in': Teen charged with pressuring boyfriend to commit suicide. Detective Scott Gordon suggested that Carter encouraged Roy to kill himself while simultaneously putting together “a plan to get sympathy from her friends.” I assume it would be dependent on the specific case, and what specific crime the prosecutor thinks they can get a jury to convict. In this case the DA thinks they can get an involuntary manslaughter conviction. For most mothers who kill their children, I wager they get a full murder 1 conviction: A jury will have no sympathy for a woman who murders her child (a breach of the mother-child relationship is one of the few areas where a pussy pass won't exist).	/r/TheRedPill	18/08/15 08:11 PM
1	Surprised about Shit Tests Like I said, you and I have a fundamental disagreement about what humans are. This doesn't mean you are wrong and I am right, perhaps I am in total error, and your interpretation has more efficacy. However to me it seems that the process of evolution is effective at creating working mechanics for an organism (and by extension that organisms social order if appropriate). I do know that for me learning about shit tests has been the most useful thing from red pill phillosophy. And I apply that idea…	/r/TheRedPill	13/08/15 07:01 AM
1	Surprised about Shit Tests If they nonchalantly swatted down the challenge verbally while making you laugh, your opinion of them would go up; ie they would pass your shit test. Like I said the shit test is an instinctual social interaction utilized by humans to establish and reinforce social hierarchies, they also serve as tests to demonstrate competence under stress (something that is necessary for survival in a leader). You can't avoid them, they are part of how we interact; shit tests are hard wired behaviors that have…	/r/TheRedPill	09/08/15 11:23 PM
7	Surprised about Shit Tests You're looking at shit tests all wrong: They are in instinctual part of social interactions for humans, and are imperative to building friendships. Males shit test each other constantly, you might call it "joking around" or "giving your friends shit" but it's all the same. Once you realize what shit tests are you should be having fun with shit tests; they are almost always designed as setups for jokes and should be handled accordingly. If you "ain't got time for that bullshit" than you're going …	/r/TheRedPill	09/08/15 09:01 PM
6	[VIDEO] When a feminist/SJW takes their internet logic into the real world. Alot of it is random gibberish, but some of the "laws" she is quoting are from the Articles of Confederation, the articles were superseded by the Constitution when it was adopted. It's pure idiocy really, they just ignore the historical fact that the Constitution was ratified and not only that they are ignoring the fact the States under the articles maintained sovereignty so even if they were still existent law, then the cop being an officer of the State would still have the authority to enforce…	/r/TheRedPill	03/08/15 02:33 AM
3	US Army COL's hamster is STRONG Well that would be stupid. I bet it wasn't even the physical tests that failed them, they probably couldn't handle the harsh grind a program like ranger school is. There aren't many men, let alone women who can work there buts off while only sleeping 1 hour a day for a couple of weeks, all on 1 meal a day. But the school needs to be that way because rangers are expected to be able to operate effectively under those conditions.	/r/TheRedPill	10/07/15 06:02 AM
6	US Army COL's hamster is STRONG Honestly what's the harm with letting women try? Most will fail, or be peered out, but if a couple do pass Ranger school, then didn't they earn it? The only real harm I can possibly see is a slippery slope fallacy, whereby the rigorousness of ranger school is eroded or changed for females. I highly doubt that would happen, and it wouldn't make any sense since the point of being a ranger is proving you are elite.	/r/TheRedPill	10/07/15 12:36 AM
2	Red Pill Video Compilation Nuke: Required Viewing for All Even a broken clock is twice a day, I'm not discounting his specific argument in this case. It's just absurd he's the one making it. The whole throw up an emotional wall to discount reason and logic to reinforce your preconcieved biases is Steven's modus opperandi! The hypocrisy of this video is awesome in it's own way...	/r/TheRedPill	08/07/15 07:21 PM
7	Red Pill Video Compilation Nuke: Required Viewing for All The hypocrisy of Steven Molyneux talking about rational thinking and logical debate makes my head explode. The man is a walking example of how people throw up a wall of emotion to block concepts they disagree with, he outright advocates excluding people who disagree with his worldview from any form of interaction (including family members). He isn't a man confident in his worldview, and he's one of the biggest examples to show just how people can't engage in rational debate since he's never been…	/r/TheRedPill	08/07/15 04:55 PM
4	What is the psychology behind being mean, brutally honest, and indecent to women and them wanting to be with me? The way to pass most shit tests is to fail to comply, without getting angry. Compliance or snapping demonstrates low social value. A person with high social value will fail to comply with a witty response. So no, you should never be holding the purse in that example to begin with.	/r/seduction	09/06/15 04:34 PM
3	What is the psychology behind being mean, brutally honest, and indecent to women and them wanting to be with me? Humans are primates. All primates instinctively form and enforce social hierarchies. Humans are no different. I did specifically state the alpha/beta dichotomy is overly simplified; in reality human social structures are more complex and nuanced. But it's a simplified model that does have decent utility, especially in seduction, which is why it's so widely used.	/r/seduction	09/06/15 04:33 PM
5	What is the psychology behind being mean, brutally honest, and indecent to women and them wanting to be with me? This is the simplest way I can describe shit testing while being accurate: Shit tests are instinctual reactions humans make to test a person in order to determine a person's social status and competency. There are many types of shit tests, ranging from lower status individuals testing a leader's ability to maintain focus under stress, to women testing men they have an initial attraction toward to see if they demonstrate high social value and are worthwhile to engage with. Humans instinctively sh…	/r/seduction	09/06/15 06:10 AM
48	On the front page: "Girls of Reddit, what are common mannerisms for a guy that screams low self confidence?" "Hamstering" is red pill jargon, it's called "rationalizing" outside of TRP. If you think men don't rationalize, or hamster themselves, you need to pay more attention. People don't like cognitive dissonance, and it's much easier for the mind to stick with it's preconcieved biases and create rationalizations out of thin air to maintain them than actually challenge their world views. Women are just more likely to rationalize things and have much stronger biases because they are more emotional in g…	/r/TheRedPill	02/06/15 10:03 PM
8	Successful Men Are Warriors. Intellect is a tool, if leveraged correctly it can be used to project power and can be masculine. It should be at tool in your arsenal, but not your only tool.	/r/TheRedPill	30/05/15 07:55 PM
4	3 months, 3 years, or 30 – There is no cure. Not understanding that women love their children is basically discounting evolutionary biology... We are mammals, a female mammal's love for it's offspring is intense, and human females are not exempt from this biological reality. Modern feminism may ruin women by teaching them to be self centered narcisits, and I'll grant you that probably does harm alot of women's ability to be good mothers. But a woman's love for her offspring is instinctual, it's a trait she's shared with her mother, and gre…	/r/TheRedPill	24/05/15 08:52 PM
4	3 months, 3 years, or 30 – There is no cure. Don't think you're impervious to the ravages of time. Our sperm do get effected, and children become significantly more likely to get genetic disorders from older fathers. A woman's biological clock starts ticking down after 30 (her egg quality starts to decline) and it becomes serious in her late 30s, early 40s, then she hit's menopause and she simply can't reproduce. We never hit menopause but our sperm do start declining in our 40s, and it becomes a serious issue in our 60s and later.	/r/TheRedPill	24/05/15 08:43 PM
5	Dear Moderate Feminists: You Don't Exist I've never understood how you can care if another man wants to fuck another man in the first place. What I find even more bizzare is wanting the state to enforce your view and use taxpayer money to supress, harrass, and encarcerate homosexuals. Why did you believe this to begin with? But even stranger is what in the world did feminism have to do with changing your opinion? How and in what way did feminism effect you to be more tolerant of gays, or at least concede that it's stupid for the state …	/r/TheRedPill	24/05/15 08:26 PM
1	The realization that women are more interested in looks than men? Looks are important, but they are not the most important thing to a woman. To a woman the most important quality she evaluates (read what gives her tingles) is social status. I've known 2 men in my life who were not physically attractive (one was chubby and short, the other was athletic but had a fucked up face with a bird nose) but both of them were very good at game (and hilarious and fun individuals to be around), they always handled themselves well in social situations; these men never had a…	/r/TheRedPill	04/05/15 03:01 AM
29	Lecturer to sue his ex-wife over claims she swapped his sperm for a former lover's while undergoing IVF and then led him on to believe the child was his It's in the UK, so who knows. In the US though, it doesn't matter, when it comes to Paternity, men have no rights in the US, only financial obligations. A woman can litterally steal a man's sperm from a discarded condom in a garbage can, and then get paid for the rest of her life. A woman can also litterally knowingly lie about paternity, and the courts will still force the named man to pay child support even after it is clear beyond a shadow of a doubt the woman lied. Again, men have no parenta…	/r/TheRedPill	08/03/15 08:59 PM
-2	Butch-dyke feminist takes high T, and it shatters her worldview Not always. Pre wall women can fall back on their inherent value. After a woman hits the wall, her inherent value is gone. This is why the wall is such devastating emotionally to women and why they get desperate to settle down in their early 30s late 20s, because once they see the wall approaching they know they have to lock down a BB soon or be SOL.	/r/TheRedPill	17/02/15 09:09 PM
0	Why Patriarchy Theory isn't a theory Anarchy simply isn't practical in a primate society. Primates instinctual act on and form social hierarchies. In the real world anarchy is asking for feudalism, because you can be damn sure some man will take charge, and he will impose a law and your anarchy is dead. Show me a case where anarchy lasted for more than a day without a Warlord taking over and imposing law and order by their mandate.	/r/TheRedPill	14/02/15 03:27 AM
3	Why Patriarchy Theory isn't a theory I often enjoy arguing with people, and the concept of "The Patriarchy" is one of my favorite things to deconstruct when debating. Ask a feminist to define Patriarchy. Ask a feminist a way to observe or detect "the Patriarchy". Ask a feminist to use the Patriarchy to make a falsifiable prediction. Hell have them explain any predictive value of "The Patriarchy" at all. As far as I can tell the Patriarchy is a supernatural construct, and has the same value and uses the type of arguments as any othe…	/r/TheRedPill	14/02/15 03:21 AM
19	GOP Lawmaker Wants a Woman to Get Permission From the Father Before Having an Abortion. Ultimately if you look at the legality of abortion (and not it's emotionally charged arguments) you come down to the argument that the supreme court in Roe vs Wade actually tackled: This is argument is about a citizen's rights vs the government's domain. What the supreme court decided in Roe v Wade was that the government's domain only extended as far as the fetus was practically viable outside the womb (at which point the state had a right to protect the fetus). Before this point the citizen's …	/r/TheRedPill	18/12/14 07:39 AM