phyzome Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Sweden Government Institutes Gender Studies in the Military I feel like there's probably more to combat than sheer lifting strength -- reaction time, group dynamics, fast tactical thinking... those are all factors that I'm reasonably sure have less correlation with sex, or sometimes in favor of women.	/r/TheRedPill	04/04/15 12:44 AM
1	Mexico City considers fixed-term marriage licences: Politicians propose bill to help newlyweds avoid pain of divorce with marriage contracts of minimum of two years (xpost from r/worldnews) Handfasting. It's a neat idea -- marriage is something that has to be renewed and maintained at an interpersonal level anyway.	/r/MensRights	28/10/11 03:44 PM
3	Parents keep child's gender secret - the hell? Trying to determine its sexuality at the tender age of two or three? No, the point is that no one should have to be forced to choose a gender identification. In an ideal world, the kid would not have to worry about it until it developed those concepts.	/r/MensRights	22/05/11 02:06 PM
3	Parents keep child's gender secret - the hell? The kid has a biological sex, but not a gender identification.	/r/MensRights	22/05/11 02:05 PM
2	Parents keep child's gender secret - the hell? Ha! Fair point. And... I guess we learned something from it. :-/	/r/MensRights	22/05/11 02:33 AM
6	Parents keep child's gender secret - the hell? Right, Reimer is the one who had a gender forced on... him. The kid in the article is being given a choice of gender. "Not having been assigned a gender" is being forced on the kid, sure. I think it may be an important experiment, though.	/r/MensRights	22/05/11 01:58 AM
8	Parents keep child's gender secret - the hell? And what better way to "leave the kid alone" than not forcing a gender on them? :-) (Playing devil's advocate; I haven't formed an opinion of the correctness of the approach yet.)	/r/MensRights	21/05/11 09:02 PM
1	Chivalry is dead in Sweden. Feminist unhappy. I don't see what feminism has to do with it. It sounds like she's just a person who is experiencing some culture shock, and discovering her learned assumptions.	/r/MensRights	23/03/11 05:33 PM
1	Husband uses wife's password to learn she's having an affair - is charged with a felony. Even then, he'd still be violating wiretap laws. Laws aside, what he did is in an ethical gray zone. I can't necessarily fault him for his actions, but she does have grounds for being quite upset.	/r/MensRights	27/12/10 04:19 PM
1	Husband uses wife's password to learn she's having an affair - is charged with a felony. I don't agree, but this is all tangential; she signed no contract giving him the right to use her passwords.	/r/MensRights	27/12/10 04:00 PM
5	Husband uses wife's password to learn she's having an affair - is charged with a felony. Doesn't matter. If I check my email on a public library computer, that doesn't give them the right to capture my credentials and log in as me.	/r/MensRights	27/12/10 01:35 AM
2	Husband uses wife's password to learn she's having an affair - is charged with a felony. People have a basic right to privacy. You don't waive that by marrying someone.	/r/MensRights	27/12/10 01:35 AM
-1	‎"retroactively revocable consent" ???? Are you Serious ? What is going on with you Canada? the goal for women in general is control men's sexuality. What kind of weird women do you know?	/r/MensRights	17/11/10 06:52 PM
1	This is a subreddit for men's rights, not for misogyny or "can't live with 'em, can't bash their heads in with a shovel, amirite???" crazy cunts Don't stick it in the crazy, remember?	/r/MensRights	05/10/10 04:05 PM
3	Why Modern Men Are Angry at Women in the Dating World Well, I must not be a modern man.	/r/MensRights	05/10/10 12:27 PM
7	Married last week... I was troll faced last night. Now what? Well, stop it now. Also, don't have sex with anyone else. Either can probably be used against you.	/r/MensRights	22/09/10 02:50 AM
3	Women's Testimony on Wikileaks/Julian Assange "rape"... broken condom I think this falls under "don't stick it in the crazy". Woman B sounds like your standard slightly unstable stalker/fan.	/r/MensRights	29/08/10 09:53 PM
3	My mother owes my dad $28,000 in child support. The courts don't care. What can my dad do to collect it? Does she care for you? Make her feel guilty.	/r/MensRights	25/07/10 03:28 PM
3	So wait a second... The girls were looking up his shorts? and he gets charged? Does this mean that men can go around looking up girls skirts and dresses and then go call the cops if they aren't wearing underwearing? I'l I think that's a poor analogy. There are several factors here: Offensiveness of material Ease of removal from sensorium Risk of accidental re-exposure Where it is on the continuum of push vs. pull delivery Number and age of those who might be exposed Personal-ness (in person, from a distance, telecast, bidirectional telecast) I believe that exposing yourself to people at the library vs. broadcasting "indecent" material on TV are different enough situations that different responses are warranted.…	/r/MensRights	23/07/10 09:19 PM
-3	So wait a second... The girls were looking up his shorts? and he gets charged? Does this mean that men can go around looking up girls skirts and dresses and then go call the cops if they aren't wearing underwearing? I'l If he was wearing short shorts and, uh, "arranged himself" intentionally, I can totally see that being grounds for an indecent exposure charge. I don't think he should get anywhere near the maximum punishment, but c'mon, it's a fucking library, people are trying to study. Edit: I just want to add that I agree that freeballing is totally legit in my book. I have a lot of friends who wear kilts! (They're mindful of flashing, though.)	/r/MensRights	23/07/10 02:52 PM
2	Dear MensRights For hysterical raisins, of course. Essentially, it was named at a time when the push for gender equality was mostly focused on how much it sucked to be a woman. The term still has that connotation, but has begun to merge with "egalitarianism".	/r/MensRights	23/07/10 02:40 PM
3	Dear MensRights Exactly: As the OP implied, sexism against women becomes sexism against men, and vice versa.	/r/MensRights	23/07/10 02:36 PM
-1	So wait a second... The girls were looking up his shorts? and he gets charged? Does this mean that men can go around looking up girls skirts and dresses and then go call the cops if they aren't wearing underwearing? I'l Not the right picture. :-P Seriously though, we don't have enough info on this story.	/r/MensRights	23/07/10 02:34 PM
1	Sometimes I feel like this. Then I get weird looks... The hover-piss!	/r/MensRights	14/06/10 03:06 AM
2	Sometimes I feel like this. Then I get weird looks... Oh! That does explain it.	/r/MensRights	14/06/10 03:06 AM
0	P.Z. Myers thinks MRAs are rape advocates. No. How can you even think that's logical? "There are many As among the Bs. I hate As." -> does not imply I hate Bs.	/r/MensRights	26/05/10 03:44 PM
-1	P.Z. Myers thinks MRAs are rape advocates. Still not the same.	/r/MensRights	26/05/10 01:34 AM
1	Dirty Old Women. (crosspost from /r/offbeat.) 12 is marginal. I believe the line is drawn at the onset of puberty, but that varies wildly (and is a gradual transition too.) Anyway, what really matters is emotional maturity, which isn't measured in years. Can't tell from the article. One of the interesting points raised in the article was how these experiences shape the boy's sexual attraction later in life. I believe that my own body type and personality preferences were strongly influenced by the teenage and young adult women I was around …	/r/MensRights	15/05/10 02:06 AM
6	Dirty Old Women. (crosspost from /r/offbeat.) I'm surprised that pedophiles are viewed with not just understanding, but sympathy when the abuser is female and the victim is a young boy. A couple comments: This article wasn't about pedophilia (with the possible exception of the 12yo boy), but rather ephebophilia. Very real difference. With ephebophilia, as the article points out, male victims are less affected on the whole. Note the bit about "what is wrong vs. what is harmful". I mean, clearly the kids are affected, and there are some power…	/r/MensRights	15/05/10 01:19 AM
1	"Why can't you be chivalrous?" - "Why cant YOU be chivalrous?" Ugh, I hate that too. It's a mob mentality.	/r/MensRights	25/04/10 10:10 PM
6	"Why can't you be chivalrous?" - "Why cant YOU be chivalrous?" Ah, I think I see your point re: "chivalrous" now -- that that particular demand could only be used by a female and of a male.	/r/MensRights	25/04/10 10:08 PM
1	After man explains how women are powerful in their ability to sexually control men, woman responds by withdrawing her sexual affection towards that man. Completely oblivious of her own power. Your title is very misleading. 1) She's just sniping at the guy, 2) There was no "sexual affection" to withdraw (unless you know something I don't), and 3) She isn't being a hypocrite in the body of the article either -- she hardly even talks about the post she is "responding to" (which is the only criticism I could find in a quick read.)	/r/MensRights	25/04/10 08:28 PM
1	"Why can't you be chivalrous?" - "Why cant YOU be chivalrous?" To me, the only relevant portion of the story is this: the kind of encounter that can only exist between a woman and a man That's a valid point. The bar is a place where women are in less danger of physical assault than men are, perhaps because of social taboos against men attacking women in a fight. (I have a friend who wore a Yankees cap into a Red Sox bar during a big game, and she made friends with everyone there, instead of getting beat up. Was that female privilege?) I know all women don't…	/r/MensRights	25/04/10 05:27 PM
-2	"Why can't you be chivalrous?" - "Why cant YOU be chivalrous?" And more power to him to share his story -- but this is an odd place to do it. /r/MensRights already has a (somewhat deserved) reputation for women-hating, and this story doesn't help. Yes, the women were the jackasses in the story, but posting it here reads (to me) as "Jeez, women are bitches, amirite?" This is Men's Rights, not Men Crying About Douchebags.	/r/MensRights	25/04/10 02:35 PM
2	"Why can't you be chivalrous?" - "Why cant YOU be chivalrous?" I'm aware of that situation (though I have never experienced it myself), but the only hint of it here was the "why can't you be chivalrous?" line. I read that as "I'm a douchebag, and I'm gonna troll you."	/r/MensRights	25/04/10 02:30 PM
10	"Why can't you be chivalrous?" - "Why cant YOU be chivalrous?" What does this have to do with gender? There are douchenozzles everywhere.	/r/MensRights	25/04/10 01:54 PM
1	We know that men (and teen boys without mothers) are denied food in disaster zones (UN World Food Program) based on gender, are men and boys also denied protection in war zones based on gender? Except when the invading forces rape and murder them.	/r/MensRights	18/04/10 04:52 AM
1	We know that men (and teen boys without mothers) are denied food in disaster zones (UN World Food Program) based on gender, are men and boys also denied protection in war zones based on gender? What's so surprising? It is usually the men who are combatants, or at least defending their homes with weapons.	/r/MensRights	18/04/10 04:51 AM
9	Would you date a feminist? Which really isn't saying much...	/r/MensRights	18/04/10 04:38 AM
1	Crosspost: A womans perspective on flirting. Yes, the bit about getting in worse physical shape was definitely disturbing. I think I misunderstood you before—we're probably more in agreement about this than I thought.	/r/seduction	23/11/09 05:13 AM
1	Crosspost: A womans perspective on flirting. I'd say that the measures she's taking seem a little extreme. Sounds like you've never had chronic anxiety, panic attacks, or PTSD. I've had a taste of this from some persistent stressors at one point in my life, and I can imagine how she feels. I'm not going to fault you for not understanding—it's something you have experience in, or not. But you should be thankful for her words of explanation.	/r/seduction	22/11/09 04:18 AM