~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Average looking men have no incentive, it’s all skewed, and they struggle the most in all facets of lifeBe careful that isn't just sour grapes talking. | /r/MensRights | 31/07/26 12:10 PM |
| 1 | Average looking men have no incentive, it’s all skewed, and they struggle the most in all facets of lifeLift weights with your own equipment or join a gym. Take care of yourself for yourself But how much is actually taking care of yourself by developing a six-pack, when you pause or stop and it all goes back to how it was, which suggests you are artificially trying to attain something. Men train to achieve some objective. Just look at what actors do to create the artificial shredded appearance desired for action men and how quickly they revert to more normal. But what is a man training to achieve … | /r/MensRights | 31/07/26 12:08 PM |
| -2 | It is a myth that boys lag behind in brain developmentI would say it was not a myth at all, but makes sense from an biological perspective: when girls were becoming wives at around 12yo, you don't want boys, who are unable to resource children and protection, competing with men who can, for child bearing age women. | /r/MensRights | 31/07/26 11:55 AM |
| 1 | DNA Tests Uncover Africa's Hidden Trauma. I have always thought that the religious community is enabling paternity fraud.Monogamy is related to marriage practices, which are fundamentally about procreation and has not been influenced by feminism: most women still want to have children in a relationship that resources and protects them, although it does seem to be slowly changing to one of women wanting to be single parents once they get what they want. The sexual liberation of women was about freeing them from the constraints of pregnancy, but it didn't solve the problem of resourcing children when women wanted th… | /r/MensRights | 30/07/26 02:35 PM |
| 1 | DNA Tests Uncover Africa's Hidden Trauma. I have always thought that the religious community is enabling paternity fraud.Monogamy is related to marriage practices, which are fundamentally about procreation and has not been influenced by feminism: most women still want to have children in a relationship that resources and protects them, although it does seem to be slowly changing to one of women wanting to be single parents once they get what they want. The sexual liberation of women was about freeing them from the constraints of pregnancy, but it didn't solve the problem of resourcing children when women wanted th… | /r/MensRights | 30/07/26 02:33 PM |
| 1 | DNA Tests Uncover Africa's Hidden Trauma. I have always thought that the religious community is enabling paternity fraud.I think it would be more like polyandry (when a woman is married to more than one husband at the same time) than polygamy (which also includes polygyny when a man is married to more than one wife at the same time), however they refer to marriage and we can't know what the mating relationships were like at the beginning of mankind. There have been experiments in polygyny certainly, not so sure about polyandry, but just because they weren't popular enough against the prevailing monogamy doesn't me… | /r/MensRights | 30/07/26 02:20 PM |
| 1 | DNA Tests Uncover Africa's Hidden Trauma. I have always thought that the religious community is enabling paternity fraud.Who knows how it was at the dawn of man, they didn't exactly keep a blog. | /r/MensRights | 30/07/26 02:04 PM |
| 1 | What can we do about the self deleting crisis of men?I think you misunderstand: men have been conditioned by society to only expect one path in life, they have had no reason to question it until relatively recently, but even when they do there isn't exactly a wealth of options springing out at them, instead there is still homophobia attempting to keep men on that one path. Didn't we just have decades of vilification of homosexuals (through fear) and there are still groups today pushing for conversion therapy as if its an unacceptable thing for men… | /r/MensRights | 30/07/26 02:00 PM |
| 5 | Feminists privately support domestic violence against menThis is mostly keenly felt whenever men and women engage All men should understand that their engagement with women carries substantial risks that overwhelm any benefits: don't just see the juicy worm, understand the hook inside it. The right of association also includes the right to not associate, so don't feel obliged to interact with women beyond acknowledgement of their presence. Women aren't the only life path available to fulfil fundamental needs. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/26 10:17 AM |
| 3 | Reject the slave label masculinityDon't throw the baby out with the bathwater. The problem has never been with the natural role of masculinity stemming from sexual biology differentiation, but demanding all males rigidly adhere to it. Women have a different perspective of course, where they find masculinity and in particular the male sex drive, to be an annoyance if not danger, when its not perceived to be in their interest, whilst completely ignoring the benefits it brings them. There is no quid pro quo for women, only a monarc… | /r/MensRights | 29/07/26 09:59 AM |
| 1 | What can we do about the self deleting crisis of men?Men need to revisit their fundamental life needs and re-assess how those needs may be provided: traditional expectations are no longer valid. However, don't think your life is over simply because traditional expectations are now difficult to achieve: there are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy; and more than one way to skin a cat. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/26 06:36 AM |
| 3 | What can we do about the self deleting crisis of men?The problem is society just might import men from other countries to willingly labour for women and the elite because of the better quality of life than back home, whilst sending money back to their families. They are also ripe for exploitation by women as sex slaves, given they can be falsely accused of crimes to keep them in line. Contributing as little as possible is also known as cutting off your nose to spite your face, because of the consequences. A better approach might be to find (legal)… | /r/MensRights | 29/07/26 06:25 AM |
| 1 | What can we do about the self deleting crisis of men?I don't believe we have to wait until we have more friendly therapists, etc, it's enough to just get your experience and unique perspective out there for others to consider whether it resonates with them. Humans shouldn't impulsively jump to solutions as though they are silver bullets, but iterate over perspectives and reason until there is a cohesive reasonable direction backed up by more than emotional impulse. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/26 06:14 AM |
| 1 | What can we do about the self deleting crisis of men?Talking to someone about your problems is only half the story: communication is about revealing experiences and perspectives that other men may not have ever considered, even been aware of as possibilities, or blindly accepted because of the otherwise vacuum of other possibilities, leading to greater options than are available to any one person. Not all of those options may be useful, but we can't know that in advance and putting them out there for reasoned consideration is so much better than n… | /r/MensRights | 29/07/26 06:01 AM |
| 8 | The European Court of Human Rights has determined that demanding Swiss *men* spend 9 months of conscription or be taxed 3% of their income for 18 years (while Swiss *women* are exempt) isn't a violation of human rights.Biology has predefined men as more disposable than women by encouraging risk taking among other things that are also different from women. However, nature is about balance and what it takes with one hand it can also give with another, such as the ability for men to take the sex they want, with their strength, as a form of compensation. But nature is red in tooth and claw and doesn't care about the individual feelings of the participants, only in balance. Looking at it from a civilised perspectiv… | /r/MensRights | 29/07/26 05:48 AM |
| 1 | The European Court of Human Rights has determined that demanding Swiss *men* spend 9 months of conscription or be taxed 3% of their income for 18 years (while Swiss *women* are exempt) isn't a violation of human rights.They view it as, the rules say "All people conscripted can instead accept a tax of 3%. Is this unfair?" When the issue is about the fairness of conscription itself, seguing into the fairness of the alternative of a tax to conscription is deceptively ignoring the issue. If the solution offered was conscription or a tax of 3% to both men and women without exception, then it would be fair. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/26 05:13 AM |
| 5 | The fact that feminists demand everything to be incusive to women and girls whereas so many aspects of society can remain female-only shows that they do not actually care about equalityIt does make sense to complain about advantage, because that is not equality, just as it is to complain about disadvantage with a view to rebalancing the scales in both cases. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/26 04:49 AM |
| 3 | The fact that feminists demand everything to be incusive to women and girls whereas so many aspects of society can remain female-only shows that they do not actually care about equalityThat's only if men think it is important enough to complain about in the first place, instead of reasoning that the extra effort of complaint and the risk of failure is more costly than just ignoring the subjective emotions generated. It's basically men reasoning and moderating emotional impulses, compared to women allowing emotional impulse to guide their responses without regard to consequence, responsibility or reason. Teaching men not to complain and bear it is only half the story. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/26 04:44 AM |
| 2 | The fact that feminists demand everything to be incusive to women and girls whereas so many aspects of society can remain female-only shows that they do not actually care about equalityEquality is being pursued as numerical equality and only when the numbers disadvantage women, not men: it's not equality at all, simply female advantage. That isn't to say females don't deserve advantage if they are trailing men in human rights outcomes and vice versa for males, to re-establish fairness, however males and females are so different that equality is not possible without making them the same, which is not only impractical it is unreasonable as they are different for a reason. Numeri… | /r/MensRights | 29/07/26 04:27 AM |
| 1 | UK: Rape trial collapses after 'alleged victim uses AI to prepare her answers in court'Currently the justice system relies on the expertise of lawyers to not only understand law, but to find loopholes, technicalities or logical precedents, which is dodgy as hell considering it depends on the quality of lawyer you can afford. AI is going to largely replace lawyers in that they can process far more legal data to find the loopholes, technical outs and grounds for precedent than humans. However use of AI must be equal between plaintiff and accused to maintain the balance of power and … | /r/MensRights | 29/07/26 04:08 AM |
| 7 | UK: Rape trial collapses after 'alleged victim uses AI to prepare her answers in court'If the plaintiff can use AI to best determine a winning strategy or loophole, then the accused should be able to do the same. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/26 03:58 AM |
| 9 | College-educated women face shrinking pool of suitable men to marry, study findsAKA actions and choices have consequences: cause and effect. It's perfectly okay to choose and discriminate, as that is what humans do for their own benefit, but to ignore that those choices also come with consequence (which should moderate choice as a feedback loop) is to abandon reason for fantasy. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/26 03:51 AM |
| 13 | College-educated women face shrinking pool of suitable men to marry, study findsWomen complaining about the consequences of their own actions and choices, but not adapting those actions or choices to create a win instead of a lose, is nothing new, sadly. It's as though women expect the world to change for their individual subjective desires, like Queens issuing demands, when most are really just Disneys 3 ugly sisters. Raising girls to expect they are all princesses who then become Queens has been the most damaging propaganda campaign to society for the last 100 years, when… | /r/MensRights | 29/07/26 03:32 AM |
| 1 | GoT and shaming of men's sexualityThis was a necessity back then I believe it is still related to sexual biology that hasn't changed much over the millennia: men orgasm more quickly than women for safety and protection as a biological response and whilst men can delay that to ensure a woman orgasms, there are complaints about the effort required even while men are still prepared to do it for their partners happiness, however it's not a natural process, but a forced process. I don't believe it was a necessity back then but the na… | /r/MensRights | 28/07/26 02:29 PM |
| 1 | The Manosphere Isn’t Exactly “Pro-Men” As You Think It IsWomen have the chance for breadwinner roles without fierce ostracisation now They are welcome to them and to discover what some women before them discovered: that the grass is not greener on the other side and comes with consequences they never could have imagined from their protected lives. Even more so if the numerical equality that feminists are so keen on gets extended to those unpleasant and dangerous jobs that men do currently that women avoid. this thing of male value to their ability to … | /r/MensRights | 28/07/26 01:47 PM |
| 0 | Is R*pe a spectrum ?By ignoring the existence of other sexes you are implicitly advocating that they be either of the 2 other acknowledged sexes, which in the past has led to awful decisions being made to conform them to one or other sex to be "normal" and created disastrous consequences because of the assumption that nurture wins out when that is not the case. Just because the numbers are small compared to the majority doesn't mean they deserve to be treated as if they are irrelevant. Even 1 intersex person deserv… | /r/MensRights | 28/07/26 03:23 AM |
| -1 | The Manosphere Isn’t Exactly “Pro-Men” As You Think It IsTraditional gender roles did not mainly benefit women as evidenced by feminisms fierce determination to change them: they were as balanced a solution to maintaining a family as could be arranged under the circumstances. Men didn't get the long straw, they had their own gender disadvantages, such as having to work hard and often in dangerous and unpleasant conditions to support the family and thus missing out on quality time with the children. Women didn't choose the dangerous or unpleasant occup… | /r/MensRights | 27/07/26 12:56 PM |
| 0 | Is R*pe a spectrum ?It is unreasonable to create a condition that is implicitly vulnerable to bad faith, almost as if you are enticing bad faith in order to benefit in some way, when it can be circumvented by using multiple contraceptive techniques, one of which is under the complete control of each party. The issue here is not about rape, but about the consequences of sex, which some want to tie to rape as a way of punishment and advantage, when the consequences are all on a woman. It's almost like an indirect pun… | /r/MensRights | 27/07/26 12:30 PM |
| 2 | GoT and shaming of men's sexualityAt the dawn of man, I think it was likely that women had sex with multiple men consecutively, attracted by (multiple) orgasm, so the paternity of children was not known but also not cared about as men fathered children collectively and collectively received sex and a village did indeed raise a child. Society has changed many times since then, however I believe that biology has not changed substantially and perhaps we best consider returning to that arrangement in some form as biology and behavio… | /r/MensRights | 27/07/26 11:49 AM |
| 2 | The Manosphere Isn’t Exactly “Pro-Men” As You Think It IsAnyone would think there is a conspiracy to reduce the population by setting men and women at each others throats to deliberately slow procreation by triggering women emotionally to which there can be no rational response. | /r/MensRights | 27/07/26 11:14 AM |
| 1 | Is R*pe a spectrum ?That it's a thing in many places doesn't make it just: conscription only for men is not just. Lying that you took contraception or compromised it to reduce its effectiveness should also make you a rapist if feminists truly believe in equality as it's a deception. But really, should a single experience of sex that was not what you assumed or expected be deemed rape, or just an unsatisfactory experience over which you have regret? It seems like feminists want to punish men severely for every littl… | /r/MensRights | 27/07/26 11:05 AM |
| 2 | Is R*pe a spectrum ?Divorce is precisely what women may want if they are legally permitted to a percentage of his assets, obtained by any means necessary. | /r/MensRights | 27/07/26 10:50 AM |
| 0 | Is R*pe a spectrum ?It's a mistake to use only one form of contraception, because they aren't 100%. My body, my choice also means "my responsibility" for protecting myself from pregnancy that only my body is vulnerable to. It has nothing to do with the man because he can't get pregnant, the buck stops with her: highlighted by mens lack of influence over her body. I believe rape should remain with breaking consent over sex itself: everything else is the responsibility of people to their own protection and evoking ot… | /r/MensRights | 27/07/26 10:46 AM |
| 1 | Is R*pe a spectrum ?Because you consented to sex with contraception, they removed the condom ignoring what you consented to. How is that not a form of rape? Then: because you consented to sex on the understanding she was using contraception, but they failed to take that contraception or compromised its effectiveness, how is that also not a form of rape? Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. A condom breaking is an accident, not rape Not necessarily: just like contraception can be deliberately compromised but… | /r/MensRights | 27/07/26 10:33 AM |
| 2 | Is R*pe a spectrum ?Rape is already defined in a discriminatory fashion, plus it covers a range of instances from brutal violation to retrospective change of mind over consensual sex because you didn't realise it was rape at the time: it's not all brutal violation as the use of the emotional term of rape might suggest, which is the whole purpose of tarring different severities with the same brutal rape brush to receive greater sympathy. I mean, really, does a woman have the same subjective emotional response to bei… | /r/MensRights | 27/07/26 10:08 AM |
| 0 | Is R*pe a spectrum ?Secondly, that is rape No, it's disappointment that unstated expectations weren't met. Put it down to experience and just another of those endless regrets we will encounter as part of life and move on. Is it rape if she doesn't tell you those magnificent breasts that attracted you are courtesy of a plastic surgeon, or that she's not a natural blonde? | /r/MensRights | 27/07/26 09:48 AM |
| 2 | Is R*pe a spectrum ?Truth is a gods perspective: what humans have is various perspectives of glimpses of that truth that we attempt to describe and explain with theories, via the scientific method, from observable information and revise according to new information as we try to approach truth. Those perspectives are influenced by our objective senses as well as being corrupted by our subjective feelings which are unrelated to truth. | /r/MensRights | 27/07/26 09:38 AM |
| -2 | Is R*pe a spectrum ?Bzzt. Wrong. Thanks for playing. There are 2 "normal" sexes related to sexual reproduction biology, but many other outliers that are also human beings who deserve to be included in society. It's known as diversity and these people exist and should have the same human rights as any other human being. | /r/MensRights | 27/07/26 09:30 AM |
| 1 | Is R*pe a spectrum ?It always was, we just ignored it for expediency and the simplicity of only having limited unique groups to deal with, despite there being consequences down the track of sweeping conflicts with the outliers under the carpet, due to violating notional human rights that should apply to all humans. | /r/MensRights | 27/07/26 09:24 AM |
| 2 | Is R*pe a spectrum ?Rape is its own special case of sexual assault, usually based on non-consensual penetration and held to a major crime because of its association with the traditional brutal violation of a woman which was not only often violent physical assault but the equivalent of injecting a known poisonous substance into someone without their consent that would change their lives. However the umbrella of rape extends across far milder scenarios where a woman engages in consensual sex and then changes her mind… | /r/MensRights | 27/07/26 09:19 AM |
| 1 | Theres no fn place i can talk. No where to run anymore. No more friends or lovers. I just cant do this alone. All I do is work and school and never see anyone as its all online and I cant talk about the things ive gone through because no one believes me or blames me because of the details and im notThe universe is about change though, people change and any periods of stability are usually short, so an expectation of permanent stability is unrealistic and maybe life is about enjoying brief periods of stability for what they are and not expecting happily ever after: good times and bad times, swings and roundabouts, highs and lows. Having said that, a rollercoaster can be both exhilarating and frightening and perhaps you desire a period of greater certainty in your life. If you want to experi… | /r/MensRights | 27/07/26 02:09 AM |
| 0 | 2 more examples of Double StandardsNot because they have less emotions than women, but because they can't share those emotions. I'm assuming when you say "share" you mean express. Does women expressing emotion change anything for them or does it elicit assistance which manifests as change? I believe the majority of suicide attempts by women are viewed as a cry for help, which is not so different to the response to children and especially babies crying. However, men don't express emotion as much because their role is to "soldier o… | /r/MensRights | 26/07/26 06:28 AM |
| 3 | Why AI is anti-Male biased.Isn't AI simply summarising the data it is given, finding maximum correlation to questions it is asked, so it's just a smart keyword search that also understands context? A smart Google is still a useful thing, but to expect more than an echo of the current state of society is unrealistic. I think what humans need is to give AI a perfect model of society as a target with rules of what can be done to get there and then get it to iterate an optimal path from here to there, not create an echo chamb… | /r/MensRights | 26/07/26 05:48 AM |
| 22 | We're not going to be able to solve Men's issues until we finally defeat the "women were always historically oppressed" propagandaFeminism is allegedly based on equality, so lets give women true equality, where you can't cherry pick the benefits and ignore the disadvantages. So far feminism has treated society like a buffet where they can have what they like and ignore what they don't, but don't give men an equal option: men are still required to undertake the activities leading to disadvantage. In reality, equality has been implemented as numerical equality only; however when the numbers become skewed in the opposite dire… | /r/MensRights | 26/07/26 02:41 AM |
| 6 | .How many Reddit subs dissing men versus how many subs dissing women? That imbalance feeds directly into an AI engine, that can't know it is a skewed form of how society should be, so any answers based on it will have that inherent bias. AI should operate off an ideal model of society as the target and compare reality to that target, to suggest how to get from here to there, even if that ideal is only equality or better still idealised human rights. | /r/MensRights | 26/07/26 02:20 AM |
| 2 | .Women are naturally more social and empathetic Women are designed to be more emotionally based as they have to connect with the needs of non-verbal children. Being all so designed, women connect emotionally better with other women because they tend to share the same emotional perspective. But that's where it ends, women aren't naturally empathetic to men and if they do connect with some common emotions of men, other emotions towards men override them: for example, women say they want men to open… | /r/MensRights | 26/07/26 02:07 AM |
| 2 | Is the idea of women finishing before men really an obscure one?I can't exactly offer my experiences as a man can I? Then they aren't relevant in a MensRights sub. | /r/MensRights | 25/07/26 01:48 PM |
| 1 | Is the idea of women finishing before men really an obscure one?Why not go the whole hog to fisting as that is the ultimate evolution of anal stimulation? Anal stimulation is just another erogenous avenue for sexual pleasure, not the only one, so you are not constrained to it and can experience prostate triggered multiple orgasms without any specific anal stimulation, because the anus isn't the prostate, isn't the penis, aren't the nipples, ... | /r/MensRights | 25/07/26 09:17 AM |
| 1 | Is the idea of women finishing before men really an obscure one?I am seeking ciswomen only because I want a long-term monogamous LTR with biological kids. Fair enough, however that is a procreative aspect that is only a subset of the much larger umbrella of sexual pleasure that doesn't even require a woman and is more susceptible to the control that women have over sex/pleasure given that other methods of mens sexual fulfilment are largely suppressed either legally (prostitution is supposedly exploitation of women) or through entrenching internalised homopho… | /r/MensRights | 25/07/26 09:11 AM |
| 1 | Is the idea of women finishing before men really an obscure one?Relationships are supposed to be based on sharing, give and take, not selfish, narcisistic exploitation. | /r/MensRights | 25/07/26 08:53 AM |
| 1 | Is the idea of women finishing before men really an obscure one?then just like... don't have sex with those women 80% of women going for 20% of men leaves a smaller pool of women for the remaining men and greater competition between a greater number of men than women. To then deliberately reject more women from the pool makes the situation even worse for those men. Is that hard to understand? What I don't understand is why women aren't upset that rejecting men means their own opportunities are limited and unless women believe in harems or sharing men (time s… | /r/MensRights | 25/07/26 08:49 AM |
| 2 | Is the idea of women finishing before men really an obscure one?Why would you present your experiences as a woman in a mens rights sub when it is not about women's bodies and experiences, but the lack of discussion about mens? | /r/MensRights | 25/07/26 08:38 AM |
| 1 | Is the idea of women finishing before men really an obscure one?Anal stretching is not necessary to achieve prostate triggered orgasms when even a finger is sufficient. However, if you want to explore the additional delights of stimulating the anus through stretching, then it's your body to do with what you will. | /r/MensRights | 25/07/26 08:36 AM |
| 0 | Is the idea of women finishing before men really an obscure one?Men are tool users to work around obstacles: why is using your own fingers or tools designed for the job not an option to explore prostate triggered orgasms yourself, why does it even require a woman to get involved at all, but not another man? It's possible to massage the prostate externally using a prostate cradle yourself, although perhaps not quite as effectively as direct internal contact. Men stimulating their own erogenous zones, regardless of the method is masculine, not gay: that's just… | /r/MensRights | 25/07/26 08:32 AM |
| -2 | Is the idea of women finishing before men really an obscure one?I give you four orgasms a night, my tongue is sore all week This is a choice, not an obligation, although I am sure there would be consequences if you didn't. Has anyone considered that womens orgasms better match sequential sexual partners in a session, whilst men would be perfectly happy coming when they wanted, knowing she would still get off with another man? Unfortunately society is not setup to make this a possibility, although if every woman interested in having sex with men cohabited wit… | /r/MensRights | 25/07/26 08:20 AM |
| 1 | More men are getting 'the snip' and cite the rising cost of living for decisionI decided in my young adulthood that I didn't want to subject a child to the possibility they might inherit my unfortunate genes and the suffering that goes along with it; not via vasectomy, but basically being celibate with women by choice. | /r/MensRights | 25/07/26 08:11 AM |
| 1 | More men are getting 'the snip' and cite the rising cost of living for decisionI believe there is more hope over Vasalgel than a male contraceptive pill or vasectomy as it is readily reversible and has little to no side effects. | /r/MensRights | 25/07/26 08:09 AM |
| 1 | More men are getting 'the snip' and cite the rising cost of living for decisionIn some countries I believe the medical profession is not allowed to perform a vasectomy on young men who have not had children yet. | /r/MensRights | 25/07/26 08:07 AM |
| 2 | Pepper spray legalized for personal carry in Brazil - for women ONLYPepper spray legalized for personal carry in Brazil - for women ONLY Men start wearing gas masks in public as prophylaxis against vengeful women. Government makes the wearing of gas masks illegal. Men protest suppressing their right to self-defense. | /r/MensRights | 25/07/26 08:03 AM |
| 0 | Is hating feminine men misogyny?It isn't about femininity but the specific biological role of women who happen to have certain characteristics that aid that role as distinct from men and their specific characteristics. We might call those characteristics of women feminine for convenience but they aren't necessarily exclusive to women. Thus being penetrated is not exclusive to women, only PIV penetration, so it is incorrect to call a man being penetrated as feminine or gay: it's merely one possible option for a man to obtain se… | /r/MensRights | 25/07/26 07:56 AM |
| 0 | I didn't realize how bad double standards are til I had to call the cops.You do realize that women are profoundly good at using emotions as weapons and using men's own virtue against them right? Absolutely. What is amazing, however, is that men haven't learned how to tame the situation or even communicate the situation to other men, so keep making the same mistakes generation after generation. There has to be complicity by those influencing society in allowing this to happen. Reason moderates emotion and men reason the most plus are historically used to suppressing e… | /r/MensRights | 25/07/26 03:30 AM |
| 1 | Theres no fn place i can talk. No where to run anymore. No more friends or lovers. I just cant do this alone. All I do is work and school and never see anyone as its all online and I cant talk about the things ive gone through because no one believes me or blames me because of the details and im notWe men, still love women and want them to do better and change I think it is part of that protection thing binding men to women, the nature of men. I came across a comment a long time ago, that is likely still apt: "men marry wanting their women to remain the same as when they met, whilst women marry in the hopes of changing men to what they want". But clearly the only thing that will help them is least rights and power in their lives. I'm not convinced that is a good idea. I believe men need to… | /r/MensRights | 25/07/26 03:26 AM |
| 1 | Raising boyspeople are different and like different things after all Yet there can also be overlap of interests and the differences can be pursued with other people with whom they overlap. In the case of men and women, the overlap is in procreation which combines a womans desire for a child with the man's interest in sex required to create that child, that works whilst the parents are trying for a child but tends to decrease after that. The problem is how to support procreation where interests overlap whils… | /r/MensRights | 24/07/26 04:15 PM |
| 9 | Sexism in my workplace is A-ok, just as long as it's the right gender doing itTry not to fall into the trap of your emotions leading to impulsive actions: that's the province of women. What she said is unpleasant, but it's only words and its affecting you because you are in an emotionally unstable situation too. Be careful you aren't trying to find a scapegoat for your own feelings at this time. I don't think we will ever tame women's subjective emotional response by punishing them, because they don't perceive it as wrong, it's automatic and there is no reason going on th… | /r/MensRights | 24/07/26 04:02 PM |
| 2 | Some interesting takes on misandry on this postThere's a stage of child development I believe called "theory of mind" where a child ceases to think of the world as mere extensions of themself that knows what they know and understands people are independent from them and don't necessarily know what they know. Consequently I don't understand why there is surprise that someone has never heard of something as it's a reflection of the belief that "being a man you should automatically know about patriarchy" and vice versa and a regression of theor… | /r/MensRights | 24/07/26 03:33 PM |
| 1 | GoT and shaming of men's sexualityCivilisations have risen and fallen and still not nailed a better societal arrangement, including the prudish and puritanical Victorian era, the period where diabolical devices were designed to prevent masturbation (including Mr. Kellog and his ideas about better nutrition preventing masturbation) and now the repeat of Adam & Eve by allowing Eve to be tempted by forbidden fruit (in this case having it all with no accountability or cost to themselves), which will cast us all out of relative parad… | /r/MensRights | 24/07/26 03:25 PM |
| -6 | I didn't realize how bad double standards are til I had to call the cops.Spare me your condescension. | /r/MensRights | 24/07/26 03:14 PM |
| -5 | I didn't realize how bad double standards are til I had to call the cops.Who said anything about women being inferior? Reason can only moderate emotion, so heightened emotions are even harder to moderate and women have a more difficult time of it as a result. That isn't inferiority or superiority, just the nature of things. | /r/MensRights | 24/07/26 03:13 PM |
| 1 | I didn't realize how bad double standards are til I had to call the cops.Do you walk away from friends when they're at their lowest? I think I would if that "friend" abused me the way you described for so long. It isn't like we can fix that person and make it right, only sacrifice ourselves too in the process and it isn't like a friend on hard times or with an illness that only affects us through the pity and helplessness we feel: this is someone abusing you for sticking with them and trying to help, as if they are trying to create their worst nightmare with you as t… | /r/MensRights | 24/07/26 11:29 AM |
| -15 | I didn't realize how bad double standards are til I had to call the cops.Women are more susceptible to emotional influences and less able to reason, so I don't think the situations are the same. the possibility of false accusations of domestic abuse or sexual assault that she can levy at you that will be most likely believed That exists whether he stays or goes, so is not a factor. The question is whether there is more suffering staying and still getting a false accusation, or leaving and getting a false accusation. I'm not sure there is any honour amongst thieves to… | /r/MensRights | 24/07/26 11:12 AM |
| 2 | Some interesting takes on misandry on this postShe was shocked that I didn’t know what she was talking about, so she told me to go online and look it up. As if men should intrinsically know and identify with what a woman is thinking/feeling as if they are women with penises. | /r/MensRights | 24/07/26 04:40 AM |
| 3 | Some interesting takes on misandry on this postIt's all in the name and you don't have to look any further: has always been about womens advantage, regardless if women are disadvantaged or not. | /r/MensRights | 24/07/26 04:36 AM |
| 2 | Some interesting takes on misandry on this postIt's the equivalent of saying "it's only 1 person, it doesn't matter", but how many people does it take for it to be wrong: 1, 100, 1000, 100 million? It ignores the principle involved, that when it becomes a numbers game that threshold becomes arbitrary and it's wrong whether it is 1 person or 100% of the population. | /r/MensRights | 24/07/26 04:33 AM |
| -4 | GoT and shaming of men's sexualityIs it possible that this is a remnant of a time when women had sex with multiple men in the tribe and the tribe collectively looked after all women and children regardless of paternity, because it was somewhat irrelevant? | /r/MensRights | 24/07/26 04:22 AM |
| 5 | GoT and shaming of men's sexualityIs this because men are expected to be able to take it as part of their ongoing masculine role, whereas women are more fragile owing to their more highly developed subjective feelings? You generally have to goad a man significantly before he will break, but it doesn't take much for a woman to break into subjective emotional outrage and its attendant unreasoned actions and their consequences. Man: you look beautiful tonight. Woman: so I didn't look beautiful last night? It's almost like women are… | /r/MensRights | 24/07/26 04:19 AM |
| -15 | I didn't realize how bad double standards are til I had to call the cops.Police exist to keep the peace expediently, which isn't about justice but identifying a perpetrator and taking them out of the equation, even if it is the wrong one. It's a continuation of "shoot first and ask questions later" but usually without a gun. | /r/MensRights | 24/07/26 04:11 AM |
| 34 | I didn't realize how bad double standards are til I had to call the cops.10 years of being abused by every textbook definition at the hands of a toddler in a woman's skin, without raising a hand in return Why did you endure such abuse for such a long time? Not a criticism, just a curiosity about what forces are so strong that counter self-protection. It isn't like she was the only woman on the planet. | /r/MensRights | 24/07/26 04:07 AM |
| 1 | Is the idea of women finishing before men really an obscure one?If you read the total of my comment instead of extracting selective points you can most readily attack in isolation, you would realise I am suggesting that originally women would have sex with a number of men in succession in ways that maximise their chances of multiple orgasm or indeed a single orgasm, which also had the advantage of dissipating the sexual energy of men in the tribe and reducing conflict. Evacuating most of the sperm means that there will be roughly equal small amounts of diffe… | /r/MensRights | 24/07/26 03:56 AM |
| 3 | Isn’t this sexist?It's discriminatory and I don't think it is helpful splitting it up into specific categories as though some discriminations are more equal than others, when it is the nature of discrimination in general that is most important if the intention is equality. In my opinion, society must inevitably progress to greater individual physical segregation if we are so concerned about physical conflict. That is where single occupant multi-purpose bathrooms and greater living from home (to reduce the need fo… | /r/MensRights | 24/07/26 03:21 AM |
| 3 | Is the idea of women finishing before men really an obscure one?Male multiple orgasms require a radical departure from normal biological behaviour to consistently achieve, whereas many women are able to multiple orgasm directly through normal biological behaviour, even if it requires a specific configuration to be most effective. Anatomically, women should be able to orgasm most easily through doggie-style with a relatively short penis that permits deep thrusting without bruising the cervix plus the impact of the testicles against the clitoral area providing… | /r/MensRights | 24/07/26 03:03 AM |
| -12 | DNA Tests Uncover Africa's Hidden Trauma. I have always thought that the religious community is enabling paternity fraud.Is it possible that our origins were not concerned about paternity, but women had sex with multiple men (to match their multi-orgasmic potential and greater time in orgasming) and the women and children resourced and protected by the tribe? Perhaps society is slowly returning to its roots, given that it seems humanity evolved in Africa first, so it is most likely it would be the first to return. The family unit and monogamy could be a failed experiment in individual advantage over group advantag… | /r/MensRights | 24/07/26 02:12 AM |
| 1 | Is the idea of women finishing before men really an obscure one?It usually doesn't take much for men to orgasm: probably an evolutionary adaptation to limit the time of risk when his back is exposed and vulnerable. Womens multiple orgasms and time taken to get there could be an evolutionary adaptation to encourage sex with multiple men in a short space of time to maximise random gene availability and/or ensure most men had sex to reduce conflict. Consequently it should not be unusual for a man to finish first, but through social convention developing to coun… | /r/MensRights | 24/07/26 01:58 AM |
| 14 | Is the idea of women finishing before men really an obscure one?That's fine honey, you go girl: I'll just sit back and watch. Whilst this was originally intended as a joke, I think it has real merit: considering women need more stimulation than men, in general, to have an orgasm or multiple orgasms, it would make sense for her to get herself off first and in doing so arouse the man further like a personal onlyfans exhibition, so that he can then take his pleasure at his own pace and hopefully get her off again (or get her off the first time through the extra… | /r/MensRights | 24/07/26 01:45 AM |
| -1 | Even if the odds of success are low, we should still be suing against circumcision.Litigation is usually about suing someone for compensation, so is more of an individual matter and doesn't help protect others who can not become involved in that litigation. Even class actions don't help everyone over an issue. Agitate to get the law changed to prevent non-consensual MGM, preferably by enshrining a human right rather than a gendered right, by all means, but suing against circumcision is a very specific thing not necessarily applicable to everyone affected. This is fundamentally… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/26 12:11 PM |
| 2 | Tokyo urges men to wear shorts to work, but women say it's 'leg hair harassment'Did he do a Sharon Stone, or was underwear involved? | /r/MensRights | 23/07/26 11:58 AM |
| 1 | Tokyo urges men to wear shorts to work, but women say it's 'leg hair harassment'Private residences are still held as protected segregated places where you choose who you invite and is the last bastion of privacy. However, we now have individual segregation for restrooms that prevents all gender conflict, so perhaps the answer is individual physical segregation for other purposes to prevent conflict, not segregating groups. The ultimate would be mostly living from home and inviting others into your private space if you want a physical connection and it doesn't prevent non-ph… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/26 11:57 AM |
| 1 | Tokyo urges men to wear shorts to work, but women say it's 'leg hair harassment'Usher in the era of "virtual bars" where people invite others to join them in a private arena through telepresence that is held to be private because of the right of association (which includes the right to not associate) and peoples private residences and extensions of those spaces that are not controlled by government regulation like public spaces or organisations. | /r/MensRights | 23/07/26 11:51 AM |
| 9 | Growing trend of hating men seems to backfire as anti-marriage movement leaves single women losing outPower corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely: it's unavoidable when you only give it to certain groups and not everyone. | /r/MensRights | 23/07/26 11:37 AM |
| 19 | Some interesting takes on misandry on this postIt's like a return to the Salem witch trials with everyone shrieking witch!, witch! and creating a lynch mob. | /r/MensRights | 23/07/26 11:25 AM |
| 5 | Even if the odds of success are low, we should still be suing against circumcision.I think the greatest chance of success is with first highlighting the discrimination between making FGM illegal whilst still condoning MGM, on the common basis of lack of consent. Once the practice of MGM becomes similarly illegal to FGM, then I think there is a better chance of legal action, however the key element should be stopping the practice of MGM through lack of consent. However, it is an uphill battle, because religious practice is still entrenched as a freedom, when it should never hav… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/26 11:21 AM |
| 1 | Theres no fn place i can talk. No where to run anymore. No more friends or lovers. I just cant do this alone. All I do is work and school and never see anyone as its all online and I cant talk about the things ive gone through because no one believes me or blames me because of the details and im notPorn is generally fantasy and we rarely live our fantasies, but it could be realistic and educational and it is possible to find porn that is realistic, educational and arousing, just that it isn't common. Men are more visually driven and so visualisations help arousal in its absence from other sources. Would you feel interested in having sex with a person dressed in a burqua? That's the entire reason for wearing them. What's love got to do, got to do with it? What's love, but a second hand emot… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/26 07:32 AM |
| 1 | Theres no fn place i can talk. No where to run anymore. No more friends or lovers. I just cant do this alone. All I do is work and school and never see anyone as its all online and I cant talk about the things ive gone through because no one believes me or blames me because of the details and im notI believe women tend to "marry" up with wealth: whilst you may have some attractive attributes that get things going, in the end womens nature exerts itself and they can't help despising you for earning less than them and not being the resource/protector they want. What women say they want and what their natures drive them to can be different things. For example, women want men to open up emotionally, but when they do, women despise men for it because their natures want men to be strong masculin… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/26 07:03 AM |
| 1 | Theres no fn place i can talk. No where to run anymore. No more friends or lovers. I just cant do this alone. All I do is work and school and never see anyone as its all online and I cant talk about the things ive gone through because no one believes me or blames me because of the details and im notI suspect the "dirtier" a life is, the more susceptible it is to exploitation, so you were perhaps attracting those who wanted to exploit you in some way, which is not a good place to be. I think it is good that you now have a cleaner life for yourself and it is less attractive to the exploiters, even though it's more lonely in comparison. You might feel isolated and lonely, however you have access to billions of people to form a connection via technology. It's true that may not be a physical pr… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/26 03:59 AM |
| 1 | Theres no fn place i can talk. No where to run anymore. No more friends or lovers. I just cant do this alone. All I do is work and school and never see anyone as its all online and I cant talk about the things ive gone through because no one believes me or blames me because of the details and im notI suspect the "dirtier" a life is, the more susceptible it is to exploitation, so you were perhaps attracting those who wanted to exploit you in some way, which is not a good place to be. I think it is good that you now have a cleaner life for yourself and it is less attractive to the exploiters, even though it's more lonely in comparison. You might feel isolated and lonely, however you have access to billions of people to form a connection via technology. It's true that may not be a physical pr… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/26 03:58 AM |
| 1 | Theres no fn place i can talk. No where to run anymore. No more friends or lovers. I just cant do this alone. All I do is work and school and never see anyone as its all online and I cant talk about the things ive gone through because no one believes me or blames me because of the details and im notI don't think sex is as big of a deal for women as it is for men, because they have a different agenda that only requires sex to get it started: once they get what they want, there's not a lot holding them in a relationship. It's a very mercenary approach with sex as the cherry on the top. | /r/MensRights | 23/07/26 03:44 AM |
| 1 | Theres no fn place i can talk. No where to run anymore. No more friends or lovers. I just cant do this alone. All I do is work and school and never see anyone as its all online and I cant talk about the things ive gone through because no one believes me or blames me because of the details and im notBe careful with anti-depressants as they can have side effects in suppressing sexual enjoyment. From a man's perspective who wants a traditional woman for a traditional relationship, women can seem to be the problem when they don't wish to comply, however it is not women who are the problem but the very narrow expectation of what life should be that is primarily focused on procreation and ignores the much broader aspect of sexual pleasure. Don't get me wrong, women can be a problem because they … | /r/MensRights | 23/07/26 01:34 AM |
| 1 | Theres no fn place i can talk. No where to run anymore. No more friends or lovers. I just cant do this alone. All I do is work and school and never see anyone as its all online and I cant talk about the things ive gone through because no one believes me or blames me because of the details and im notThere should be forums on Reddit that relate to your interests, that you can contribute to and perhaps develop an online connection with others, which could develop further, but even if it doesn't it's a start in the socialising direction. Have a massage from a male masseur: whilst this will not be a sexual thing, you can experience the touch of a man to help become more comfortable with physical male contact. If your body responds sexually do not be ashamed, it's a common reaction to stimulatio… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/26 01:08 AM |
| 9 | Tokyo urges men to wear shorts to work, but women say it's 'leg hair harassment'From Wikipedia: Harassment covers a wide range of behaviors of an offensive nature. It is commonly understood as behavior that demeans, humiliates, and intimidates a person. Leg hair is not behaviour. How did women manage to twist harassment to be anything they are subjectively uncomfortable with? Harassment also began as repeated behaviour after a person said stop, because no-one can know what may or may not be considered harassment until told: now even the first approach is considered harassme… | /r/MensRights | 22/07/26 02:42 PM |
| 189 | Tokyo urges men to wear shorts to work, but women say it's 'leg hair harassment'Harassment because a woman's subjective feelings are hurt is getting to be a real problem in society, because it drains judicial resources away from objective crimes to deal with something that is natural: feelings are designed to be felt, both good and bad, and aren't something to protect people from. What people do need to be protected from are objective harms that everyone agrees are harms that must be triaged at the highest priority. Just because you saw some hair on someones leg does not me… | /r/MensRights | 22/07/26 08:57 AM |
| 4 | "Feminism is for men too!"Perhaps I confused you about the select gender comment: it was meant that it is not possible to select a babies gender normally in advance and it should not include selection by aborting unwanted gender embryos. However, if it was a choice between hating on a boy child or aborting a male embryo in the first few weeks of gestation, then I would choose the latter as there would be less suffering: not that I would want a woman to be given those choices. | /r/MensRights | 22/07/26 04:41 AM |
| 16 | "Feminism is for men too!"Women can be trustworthy, until they are not and you can't predict a change. | /r/MensRights | 22/07/26 03:44 AM |
| 16 | "Feminism is for men too!"Yet women expect men to be Fathers and love the child even when they didn't want one, or when they weren't even the sperm donor. | /r/MensRights | 22/07/26 03:40 AM |
| 26 | "Feminism is for men too!"If a Mother cannot love a boy and we can't select gender normally, then she should not be having children at all if there is a chance she will hate it as she will then be automatically violating its rights when born. It's as bad as having a child to provide spare parts for another child. | /r/MensRights | 22/07/26 03:36 AM |
| 2 | Can I learn how to love trans women?In the scheme of things, what does it matter if your sexual partner is male, female, diverse or even a robot; only that you deal honestly and respectfully with them about meeting your needs and vice versa? It doesn't mean you are anything except your unique self. Categories are prisons designed by someone else according to their agenda to restrict your freedom. I like the notion of friends with benefits not being gender restrictive. | /r/MensRights | 22/07/26 03:01 AM |
| 1 | Can I learn how to love trans women?Speaking of the pregnancy, some men's life experiences gave me even more negative feelings about this, so, I wouldn't like to have a child The desire for a child is usually unconditional, so if you are rationalising having a child, perhaps the driving force is not actually the desire for a child but something else, like keeping up with the Joneses, doing what society expects of you to meet their agenda, seeking a form of immortality, etc. | /r/MensRights | 22/07/26 02:54 AM |
| 2 | Can I learn how to love trans women?Society thinks about sex from a purely procreation perspective, when the thing that motivates procreation, sexual pleasure, is a superset that is not dependent on the male-female dynamic but simply stimulation of erogenous zones that could be done by anyone or anything in theory. Are you put off in masturbation by the fact that you are using a male hand? If not, then the issue isn't the gender of the stimulating source but how we have been conditioned to view anything other than procreative PIV … | /r/MensRights | 22/07/26 02:45 AM |
| 1 | Theres no fn place i can talk. No where to run anymore. No more friends or lovers. I just cant do this alone. All I do is work and school and never see anyone as its all online and I cant talk about the things ive gone through because no one believes me or blames me because of the details and im notI genuinely enjoy a kind sweet woman in my arms. Nothing beats it. Isn't that kind of like an addictive drug then, which is not doing you any good because it is not available now and the withdrawal symptoms are wrecking your life? Im not gay, so theres that. Have you ever considered that PIV sex is only about procreation and that procreation is a subset of the wider experience of sexual pleasure that only requires erotic stimulation and it doesn't matter who provides that stimulation, including … | /r/MensRights | 22/07/26 01:12 AM |
| 1 | Italy wants to pass from Gender-Neutral DV Legislation to "Male Violence against Women"Are there no gender neutral terms in Italian representing all the people? Surely citizen has a very specific meaning too (ie non-citizens would be outside the law) and these are conventions so can be changed. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/26 03:05 PM |
| 1 | Italy wants to pass from Gender-Neutral DV Legislation to "Male Violence against Women"It has no chance of passing Irrelevant to it being a just law about gender neutrality. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/26 02:59 PM |
| 1 | Italy wants to pass from Gender-Neutral DV Legislation to "Male Violence against Women"The absurdity of using gendered terms in gender neutral laws must go over the heads of many people, when gender is more than male/female/man/woman/boy/girl and so must include none of them to be neutral. Hence we arrive at fundamental human rights when we create gender neutral laws, because they can't include any gender category or else they become non-neutral. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/26 02:46 PM |
| 2 | TIL that in June 2026, the European Court of Human Rights explicitly ruled that forcing ONLY men to serve in the military—or forcing unfit/disabled men to pay a multi-year financial penalty tax instead—is NOT unlawful sex discrimination.It seems fair to make men artificially suffer because women suffer as a result of their biology and we want them to be equal in their suffering? Okay, then every girl needs to suffer circumcision to balance every boys suffering in that respect: that would be fair too. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/26 02:39 PM |
| 1 | TIL that in June 2026, the European Court of Human Rights explicitly ruled that forcing ONLY men to serve in the military—or forcing unfit/disabled men to pay a multi-year financial penalty tax instead—is NOT unlawful sex discrimination.But is it Constitutional to discriminate? Laws can't usually override Constitutional measures. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/26 02:35 PM |
| 1 | Female domestic abuse is unseenWhich is why they call it Domestic Violence, so Domestic Abuse remains unseen. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/26 02:18 PM |
| 5 | Switzerland male-only conscription case and why it's not going anywhere soonThe feminists claim equality based on optional, social, or biological obligations: housework, caregiving Children are a choice, not an obligation. Housework is the price women pay for having the essentials of life provided for them by a partner, or do they expect to be kept women with no obligations on themselves to contribute? If not partnered, both men and women perform housework or pay for it, else they end up in a hovel. Women are not being oppressed by housework that doesn't also oppress me… | /r/MensRights | 21/07/26 02:16 PM |
| 3 | Switzerland male-only conscription case and why it's not going anywhere soonWhy does Switzerland need a military in the first place? Is it under threat from any other country that it needs to defend its borders? If 71% of men voted No to abolishing conscription, that means only 29% of men are conscriptable, or did conscriptable men also vote for conscription continuing? The statistics don't make sense. All conscriptable men should refuse to comply, neither military or civilian service, down tools until the enslavement is removed: punishment would collapse the Swiss just… | /r/MensRights | 21/07/26 01:56 PM |
| 1 | Theres no fn place i can talk. No where to run anymore. No more friends or lovers. I just cant do this alone. All I do is work and school and never see anyone as its all online and I cant talk about the things ive gone through because no one believes me or blames me because of the details and im notNature is red in tooth and claw and even humans have the capacity to be good and evil: nowhere is it guaranteed that anyone will have paradise on earth, it is what it is. All we have is the ability to imagine a better world and maybe an opportunity to contribute to that by our actions. Unfortunately many people have been given unrealistic expectations that suggests they can have it all just because they exist, or that if they work hard they will be rewarded: life is more complicated than that wi… | /r/MensRights | 21/07/26 01:43 PM |
| 2 | I wish the feminists would at least be open about hating us rather than resorting to all of the denialism and victim blamingMilitary men rejoice, women no longer want you to protect them from the consequences of war, which is usually brutal rape by conquering forces. Men everywhere rejoice that women no longer want you to sacrifice yourself through the notion of women and children first. Subjective hurt feelings are not the same as objective harms and do not deserve sacrificing life and limb to protect. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/26 02:28 AM |
| 1 | In China a Holiday resort forced male employees to strip completely naked in front of females as punishment for poor performanceHow do we know this is not deep fake or confected as entertainment? There are game shows where humiliation is part of the entertainment. | /r/MensRights | 17/07/26 01:31 PM |
| 2 | Male Shame About DesireYet women think nothing of making themselves attractive, even when out with a committed partner, as if they are looking to attract someone better. It's excused as "wanting to look nice for themselves" but I believe they are deceiving themselves and monkey-branching in advance. They feel no shame in seeking out greener grass, yet men are shamed for having desire. | /r/MensRights | 17/07/26 01:21 PM |
| 2 | Male Shame About DesireForced to penetrate is a bizarre contortion to avoid mentioning the opposite perspective to penetration (which is primarily a biological male thing) of engulfment is just as physically possible. Thus penetration and engulfment describe the same situation from different perspectives, but penetration has become known as something a man does to a woman and not vice versa, which absolves women of responsibility when that act is non-consensual, even though a woman can just as easily engulf a man with… | /r/MensRights | 17/07/26 01:07 PM |
| 2 | "When will people stop using the phrase "women and children" to treat men as subhuman and expendable in wartime? Children, yes. They're innocents. But women and men are adults, citizens. Their lives have equal value."I don't believe these were reasoned compensations that men specifically thought about, more like societal balances at the time that men went along with. Of course I am talking about a time when conjugal rights were still expected and also an expectation of women and children first, when required, as the ultimate price, which roughly balanced out. It was a kind of payment in advance for potential ultimate services rendered and it reminds me somewhat of USA conscription for men requiring potential… | /r/MensRights | 14/07/26 12:16 AM |
| 1 | ‘Societal response’ required to fight epidemic of violence against women, says Taoiseach [Irish Prime Minister]. Such hype/language could potentially lead to too much focus on violence against women, when a lot of deaths are likely very difficult to prevent.Are the women involved more upset over one than the other? | /r/MensRights | 13/07/26 11:40 PM |
| 1 | "When will people stop using the phrase "women and children" to treat men as subhuman and expendable in wartime? Children, yes. They're innocents. But women and men are adults, citizens. Their lives have equal value."The little death only. Considering sex is supposed to be pleasurable for both, perhaps where it went wrong is in not educating men from the start in how to please a woman, but leaving it to trial and error and reinventing the wheel. Victorian prudery probably disenfranchised women and it has escalated from there with women then being told they could have it all instead and have their revenge on men: why else would women keep referring back to historical oppression and how present day action is j… | /r/MensRights | 13/07/26 11:39 PM |
| 1 | ‘Societal response’ required to fight epidemic of violence against women, says Taoiseach [Irish Prime Minister]. Such hype/language could potentially lead to too much focus on violence against women, when a lot of deaths are likely very difficult to prevent.Well, they tried it with Indians and Pakistanis first and although there were initial tribal conflicts, that settled down eventually, so government thought it was worth more shots and eventually it would settle down into one big happy family. They ignored the issue that as the percentage of the population that is British declines, it becomes scared it is going to become a minority and the majority will then dump on them. | /r/MensRights | 13/07/26 09:15 AM |
| 1 | ‘Societal response’ required to fight epidemic of violence against women, says Taoiseach [Irish Prime Minister]. Such hype/language could potentially lead to too much focus on violence against women, when a lot of deaths are likely very difficult to prevent.Like the police chief who surrounds the building next to the bank being robbed. When asked why he didn't surround the bank, he said "we didn't have enough men to surround the bank. " Is that an Irish joke? | /r/MensRights | 13/07/26 09:10 AM |
| 1 | ‘Societal response’ required to fight epidemic of violence against women, says Taoiseach [Irish Prime Minister]. Such hype/language could potentially lead to too much focus on violence against women, when a lot of deaths are likely very difficult to prevent.All statistics that refer to women must also include statistics for men, otherwise people are being deceived through lies, damn lies and statistics. | /r/MensRights | 13/07/26 09:08 AM |
| 1 | ‘Societal response’ required to fight epidemic of violence against women, says Taoiseach [Irish Prime Minister]. Such hype/language could potentially lead to too much focus on violence against women, when a lot of deaths are likely very difficult to prevent.Alimony is frequently encompassed in child support in addition to actual alimony as a separate thing: it's excused as women have to be able to support the child so spend it on themselves too, even though they trigger a divorce and have to live in another house, so the man has to stump up for 2 very expensive shelters instead of one. It's incredibly inefficient and goes against the whole idea behind cohabiting in the first place. | /r/MensRights | 13/07/26 09:05 AM |
| 1 | ‘Societal response’ required to fight epidemic of violence against women, says Taoiseach [Irish Prime Minister]. Such hype/language could potentially lead to too much focus on violence against women, when a lot of deaths are likely very difficult to prevent.I think you will find that about 10 times as many women are killed in violent car accidents as at the hand of men and yet crickets over the car deaths and they focus on the deaths by men as if somehow they are more significant when in reality it is subjective emotion clouding the issue (ie being killed by a man is more emotionally disturbing since men are supposed to protect women and be intimate partners and it freaks women out when this is not the case). Also DV covers a wide range of alleged … | /r/MensRights | 13/07/26 09:00 AM |
| 0 | "When will people stop using the phrase "women and children" to treat men as subhuman and expendable in wartime? Children, yes. They're innocents. But women and men are adults, citizens. Their lives have equal value."One man can't save everyone, he will be lucky if he can save himself and another. It requires a man to be a little bit selfish in order to save someone else, because if he goes under, then so does she. There is an example where an airline is rapidly descending and the oxygen masks drop: it's recommended a man put a mask on himself first so he's in best position to put one on others, especially children, because children are unlikely to even put masks on themselves, let alone rescue their parents… | /r/MensRights | 13/07/26 08:31 AM |
| 1 | "When will people stop using the phrase "women and children" to treat men as subhuman and expendable in wartime? Children, yes. They're innocents. But women and men are adults, citizens. Their lives have equal value."In the strictly traditional sense, I think the phrase was meant to represent men sacrificing their lives for women and children, if necessary, in exchange for a different type of sacrifice for women during their lives. A transactional contract if you will where both pay a price. From that perspective it did not devalue mens lives at all, just required payment at different times. | /r/MensRights | 13/07/26 08:26 AM |
| 2 | "When will people stop using the phrase "women and children" to treat men as subhuman and expendable in wartime? Children, yes. They're innocents. But women and men are adults, citizens. Their lives have equal value."Women tend to follow their male partners status, so if their husband was rich she would be rich and if hubby was poor, she would also be poor: it was rarely women being impoverished slaves of wealthier husbands; women had to work hard for the roof over their heads and the food on their table provided by a man working hard to support the family, she was expected to contribute in many ways including through conjugal vows. | /r/MensRights | 13/07/26 08:22 AM |
| 1 | "When will people stop using the phrase "women and children" to treat men as subhuman and expendable in wartime? Children, yes. They're innocents. But women and men are adults, citizens. Their lives have equal value."I think the reason was children have already received the bulk of caregiving and are quicker to attain useful status in society instead of wasting years of further resources bringing them to that point: if they exist they need to be protected as the next generation rather than starting from a glint in their Dads eye. | /r/MensRights | 13/07/26 08:18 AM |
| 1 | "When will people stop using the phrase "women and children" to treat men as subhuman and expendable in wartime? Children, yes. They're innocents. But women and men are adults, citizens. Their lives have equal value."All it will take is a major pandemic and we could be right back where we started if all the systems we take for granted collapse. At that point, we no longer have civilisation but survival including rebuilding the population along with technology. Women will have the worst time of it as they will lose all their current legal protections and conjugal rights will be back on the table. Women are only more important in bearing children, not necessarily more important in how they are treated whilst d… | /r/MensRights | 13/07/26 08:11 AM |
| 1 | You have every right to NOT be sexualized, dehumanized &/or objectified as women have!I'm suggesting that when a man is comfortable enough with who he is, then he is less concerned with lowering the threshold to his own privacy and doesn't care as much if women (or men) ogle him and if they criticise his appearance then its on their subjective assessment which has nothing to do with him personally. I don't see women being able to develop a similar perspective though: their misfortune. I agree that rights to privacy should be upheld equally | /r/MensRights | 13/07/26 07:45 AM |
| 3 | Top Boy actor Micheal Ward not guilty of rape after sex with woman in carA judgement of not guilty should trigger another trial of her this time to determine if she lied to the court. | /r/MensRights | 13/07/26 06:27 AM |
| 3 | Top Boy actor Micheal Ward not guilty of rape after sex with woman in carBe attractive. Don't be unattractive. | /r/MensRights | 13/07/26 06:24 AM |
| 2 | Top Boy actor Micheal Ward not guilty of rape after sex with woman in carShe said she would have "never would have got in that car with him" if she had known what would happen. Don't women understand that sex is always on mens agenda? What did she expect would happen: join hands and sing Kum Ba Yah? Naivity to the extreme. Is this being encouraged in society, when we teach children stranger danger? | /r/MensRights | 13/07/26 06:23 AM |
| 3 | ‘Spermageddon’: is the world facing a male reproductive crisis?If there is a spermageddon, it will be because men are eventually able to control their fertility and go their own way because of abuse by women of their sexual expression, letting society decline because there is less in it for them. How many men actually want a child versus wanting sex and doing it for their partner (and to ensure at least some sex)? | /r/MensRights | 13/07/26 06:17 AM |
| 0 | Another gas lighting myth busted. Study shows men can multi-task as well as womenI will stick to my own personal observation that when it comes to raising a child, a woman is able to perform multiple tasks at the same time without thinking, whereas men tend to serial multi-task and have to think. | /r/MensRights | 13/07/26 06:11 AM |
| 1 | Men being the sole providers is an unrealistic expectation in 2026.Make that 3 or more in some cases of families. | /r/MensRights | 13/07/26 06:05 AM |
| 1 | Men being the sole providers is an unrealistic expectation in 2026.these women are just whores. That gives prostitutes a bad name at least they provide sex without complaint for money, whereas many women will take the money and you only get sex when she wants it. That reminds me of the lyrics from Pink's "U + Ur Hand": Keep your drink, just give me the money. | /r/MensRights | 13/07/26 06:02 AM |
| 0 | You have every right to NOT be sexualized, dehumanized &/or objectified as women have!Let them. Men should know that they have nothing to be ashamed about with their natural bodies and whatever women say about them is saying more about those women than the men who are their objects. I think part of the problem is the lack of understanding of diversity because it is not allowed to be displayed to educate the public and instead we get curated views that enable certain agenda. In addition, there is a considerable weighting given to natural performance which is quite contradictory to… | /r/MensRights | 13/07/26 05:46 AM |
| 1 | You have every right to NOT be sexualized, dehumanized &/or objectified as women have!I think this will backfire on women, with men becoming more comfortable and accepting of male nudity and diversity as the reality becomes apparent. Right now, reality is skewed to porn-like proportions (sic) for everyone. This isn't helped by using prosthetics in entertainment, but I think it is a necessary start in the right direction. There is still too much Victorian prudishness about the natural human body and sexuality a "dirty" thing. I think making male nudity more mainstream will help ma… | /r/MensRights | 13/07/26 03:39 AM |
| 4 | Would this be considered internalized homophobia by definition?That's no excuse to further propagating her blatant disregard for privacy in order to be a self-righteous Karen. | /r/MensRights | 13/07/26 03:20 AM |
| 2 | Would this be considered internalized homophobia by definition?Being kind to people is something you do in the hopes it gets paid forward: do unto others as you would have others do unto you. | /r/MensRights | 13/07/26 03:15 AM |
| 11 | Could the entertainment industry be creating a backlash among young men?Replace "could *" with "this does" and remove the question marks and you have a statement on the current situation. | /r/MensRights | 13/07/26 03:06 AM |
| 12 | Cohabitation Consolation [UK]What's next, share housers considered cohabiting and married by default? The end game seems to be women given money to raise "their" children for no effort on their part. The minimum cohabitation period is three years without a child and zero years with a child And there it is. | /r/MensRights | 13/07/26 03:01 AM |
| 2 | Why are men shamed for using porn?A picture says a thousand words: videos of actual sexual interactions with reasonable expectations and commentary could be both educational and stimulating. There already exists fragmentary videos presenting sex in an educational format, but no integrated educational program that replaces porn with realistic scenarios. I remember one video that had a camera at both points of view that showed the reality of intercourse at an internal level. The porn industry is starting to change, with videos mad… | /r/MensRights | 09/07/26 11:26 PM |
| 2 | Why are men shamed for using porn?Trust me, they can't say anything if you get a fleshlight with anal opening instead of womens genitalia, even when the interior is just the same when it comes to stimulation, because it isn't a replica of a womans unique anatomy: just use your imagination. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/26 12:42 PM |
| 4 | Why are men shamed for using porn?The subjective feeling arena can never be objectively reasoned with and it is a waste of effort trying. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/26 12:36 PM |
| 1 | Why are men shamed for using porn?I block responses that start with "So ..." because I know they are headed straight into strawmanning territory, interpreting the worst possible outcome of what you are saying, which is easier to assassinate and then reject all other arguments you might actually have by association. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/26 12:34 PM |
| 4 | Why are men shamed for using porn?The classic riposte is that porn teaches men to choke women and do other violent things imagining they all like it, because they saw it on porn. Wait a minute, a man is not choking a woman for his gratification, but for hers, its erotic asphyxiation. So he's being blamed for wanting to give her pleasure? But the problem is that she may not want it, so just doing it because you think she may like it because of porn is the issue. It's really about communication and not assuming, but men are in a b… | /r/MensRights | 09/07/26 12:29 PM |
| 1 | Why are men shamed for using porn?There are many forms of love: one that comes to mind was from my Nan about "cupboard love" but she wasn't thinking about humans and sex, although it applies to that too. If a woman loves you, you won't be having sex, but "making love". Sex is a mans perspective whilst a woman's perspective is "intimacy" for which sex is only part. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/26 12:10 PM |
| 2 | Why are men shamed for using porn?Just who is to blame for not educating men about realistic sexual expectations and practices by not producing visual guides (men are visually orientated), but forcing men to re-invent the wheel through trial and error and find their own path via whatever means are available? The porn industry is filling a vacuum, but doing it in an exploitative manner, because they are in it for the money only. Society only has itself to blame for trying to exploit men for advantage. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/26 12:00 PM |
| 6 | Why are men shamed for using porn?AKA, the only winning move is not to play the game but to create your own and end the monopoly control, over you. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/26 11:55 AM |
| 1 | Why are men shamed for using porn?You don't control a hostage by allowing them to exit the prison to meet their needs, you give them just enough to keep them starving and willing to do anything for more. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/26 11:53 AM |
| 3 | Why are men shamed for using porn?According to research people that watch porn are more likely to engage in abuse and violence. If that were true, why aren't gamers roaming the streets engaging in violence, gunning down innocent bystanders? | /r/MensRights | 09/07/26 11:42 AM |
| 3 | I wish the feminists would at least be open about hating us rather than resorting to all of the denialism and victim blamingIt's a love-hate relationship: women will support all other women in solidarity when under attack (in-group bias) for protection, however women individually are competing with other women for the prize mates. Men just compete with each other and to protect women (out-group bias). | /r/MensRights | 09/07/26 11:33 AM |
| 1 | I wish the feminists would at least be open about hating us rather than resorting to all of the denialism and victim blamingEquality for everyone (but some more equal than others). | /r/MensRights | 09/07/26 11:30 AM |
| 3 | I wish the feminists would at least be open about hating us rather than resorting to all of the denialism and victim blamingFeminism is about womens advantage, regardless of the consequences to society and the men in it: it's all in the name. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/26 11:27 AM |
| 1 | Last monday, got accused of mansplaining:Sorry ma'am, I don't femfix unless you have already read the manual. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/26 11:24 AM |
| 1 | Is marriage still worth it for men today, or is it too risky?Men need to stop thinking about this as a marriage issue: depending on your locale, relationships are considered defacto marriages that don't even require cohabitation to be considered equivalent to marriage under the law. At the moment, a relationship is considered defacto marriage if existing for about 2 years, but that could change in future, especially if a child is involved. I would not be surprised if a one-night-stand eventually gets treated as a defacto marriage if there is a child resul… | /r/MensRights | 09/07/26 11:17 AM |
| 2 | Look at the language of AIWhat do we expect when AI is trained on the current status of society which protects women, is encouraged to #believewomen, thinks numerical equality through quotas for women only is actual equality, etc? It's still garbage in, garbage out, like all computers. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/26 10:52 AM |
| 5 | Does anyone know where this "95-99% of rapists are men" idea comes from?When you can redefine consent to be broken through retrospective regret over sex, combine that with only men can rape, introduce the concept of "raping me with his eyes" and then poll women with leading questions designed to elicit a particular response, then you start to see how statistics like this come about. Basically it's down to women's subjective emotions as to whether they feel they have been "raped" (whatever subjective definition that has in their mind). | /r/MensRights | 09/07/26 10:45 AM |
| 1 | I am so sad....A marriage between a man and a woman requires effort from both parties. When you're married to someone you are obligated to include them in decisions and actively communicate "I told her, she doesn't care." The wife is not putting any effort into resolving the issue; she unilaterally withdrew from sex without discussion, without concern about him, to trigger this situation. The OP has done what he can: it's not his job to rescue his wife if she refuses to do anything to help. I think he has been… | /r/MensRights | 09/07/26 01:55 AM |
| 2 | I am so sad....It's always the same story: it's the man's responsibility to ensure her happiness to create his own and rescue the situation, even though she is the main contributor to the unhappiness, but he's not allowed to seek his own happiness independently. That is not to say she is to blame: it's all in the nature of women and they had no hand in that design, just as men didn't in theirs. | /r/MensRights | 08/07/26 08:20 AM |
| 1 | "Men make life miserable for women through body shaming and stupid beauty standards" Women 5 seconds later:I have never said that my opinions are incontrovertible truths or that they apply to all women or all men. Your perspective is interesting, but sounds more like the elite version, versus that of the general masses that have a different experience. I'm outside of experience and just an observer, so it matters little to me personally, except to be sad at where the masses are being herded. | /r/MensRights | 06/07/26 02:42 PM |
| 2 | I am so sad....Why do you think you can only apply one possible solution at a time? A wife losing respect is far less important than a man losing self respect: at the end of the day, our greatest responsibility is to ourselves; we can also choose to be responsible for helping others achieve happiness, but primarily that is their own affair. Part of the problem, I feel, is that women seek men to protect them from everything, even from their own worst enemy of themselves. All this whilst championing the disregar… | /r/MensRights | 06/07/26 09:32 AM |
| 1 | Australia's Family Court has been taken over. Britain is next.It shouldn't work in places where no-fault divorce operates, because the reasons should be irrelevant and the allegations of violence should be pursued independently through the criminal court where they will be subject to due process, unlike the Family Courts (or Title IX courts and their kangaroo court ilk). I can't believe this hasn't already been challenged within the judicial system as a demarcation conflict. | /r/MensRights | 06/07/26 09:21 AM |
| 3 | Australia's Family Court has been taken over. Britain is next.In the meanwhile, men are being detained and all their freedoms dismissed, on mere allegation whilst waiting for the wheels of the justice system to grind over them: it's effectively advance punishment for assumed guilt and women know they can punish men in this way by using the system of justice itself against them. But wait, there's more: women are encouraging laws that perceive subjective womens emotions as objective harms, bogging down the justice system even further with petty allegations a… | /r/MensRights | 06/07/26 09:15 AM |
| 1 | Are Men Judged More Harshly for Using Sex Technology?If a man uses sextoys its because he has no choice Who puts men into a position where they have no choice? | /r/MensRights | 06/07/26 09:04 AM |
| 1 | Are Men Judged More Harshly for Using Sex Technology?The problem with that approach is the law is likely to change to ban male sex toys because they allegedly objectify or otherwise harm the subjective feelings of women and women are held to be more important than men, despite men being driven to them as an alternative, because women deny access to sex according to their own needs whilst rejecting mens. In effect, it is a response to a threat to womens monopoly over sex that men otherwise today are not able to challenge and will not be allowed to … | /r/MensRights | 06/07/26 08:48 AM |
| 3 | I am so sad....Divorce is always a possibility within marriage that you should go into with your eyes open: a dead bedroom doesn't change the fact that men take far greater risks with marriage and they should know that before taking the risk. The sad thing is that this is hardly being discussed now, let alone 13 years ago and it should become more of a mainstream issue that is considered before taking the vows. | /r/MensRights | 06/07/26 07:23 AM |
| 1 | I am so sad....No, please don't jump to an extreme option first: consider everything you have been told carefully to see if some of it provides a ray of hope instead of taking the most extreme approach. A lawyer is still an option if nothing better is workable, but I think you can find a way for greater happiness for yourself without dismantling the marriage and impacting everyone. Your sexual expression is your own affair, independent of the relationship with your wife and children: you don't need to involve … | /r/MensRights | 06/07/26 07:17 AM |
| 0 | I am so sad....One person cannot be all things to another, no matter how hard they try, so it's reasonable to have outlets outside the marriage such as friends, activities, etc without dissolving the marriage. Is it so hard to imagine sexual needs being part of this principle also? Life is never an either/or situation, there are various options available, although they all come with consequences you have to be prepared to pay. It sounds like you are no longer prepared to pay for a sexless marriage, but that do… | /r/MensRights | 06/07/26 07:11 AM |
| 5 | I am so sad....Coercion via threat is never a good idea. A gentle nudge by triggering jealousy, or simply doing your own thing would be more appropriate. | /r/MensRights | 06/07/26 06:54 AM |
| 0 | I am so sad....It's a tragedy that mutual conjugal rights were removed from the marriage contract, also removing the ability to nullify monogamy vows. Affairs and prostitution have been a thing like forever. The only reason they have been frowned upon, is because of the possibility of resources being diverted away from child raising. You don't have to leave, but holding one person's happiness hostage is simply unacceptable. It's not illegal to have an affair or to visit a prostitute, depending on where you liv… | /r/MensRights | 06/07/26 06:41 AM |
| 28 | WE WON, BOYS. . .& I ain’t talkin’ ‘bout the World Cup!It's not the positive you think it is, but an example of how men doing things for women is taken for granted and its opposite will trigger an attack: happy wife, happy life is still enslavement of mens happiness to women's emotional state. Men should not be martyring themselves for women's happiness and it is tragic that society has conditioned men to do so as the only perceived solution. Unfortunately there is no way for men to succeed whilst they play women's games: we can argue with women to … | /r/MensRights | 06/07/26 06:31 AM |
| 6 | Men, how often do you cry?It's possible to feel so overwhelmed by the magnitude of emotion, that it feels dangerous to attempt to release it, because of the fear it will all come out at the same time and you will drown. In that sense, starting to suppress emotion tends to become a self-reinforcing problem: with every additional suppression, it feels more dangerous to reverse. Imagine the trauma if a man summons the courage to open those doors and let his emotions out, because women say that is what they want to see, only… | /r/MensRights | 06/07/26 05:49 AM |
| 2 | Men, how often do you cry?That the justifications never really make easier. | /r/MensRights | 06/07/26 05:47 AM |
| -6 | InterestingNo-one develops wealth without taking it from someone else in one way or another. | /r/MensRights | 06/07/26 05:45 AM |
| 1 | "Men make life miserable for women through body shaming and stupid beauty standards" Women 5 seconds later:I'm obviously struggling to get my point across, so I will bring it back to your original statement that triggered the matter: If you think a man’s penis size is directly connected to a man’s sexual worth then you are being fooled by “alpha” BS. I don't believe it is alpha bullshit: competition in the male world is still a thing, biologically, so to demean a man is to effectively write him off in getting what he wants; no wonder there is a strong reaction. I don't think it is quite the same for … | /r/MensRights | 06/07/26 05:37 AM |
| 1 | Feminist activist back on reddit after a while. I'm keen to explore the perspective of any men who are potentially put off by that word, but am happy if there are any other aspects you'd like to debate?It's more about the principle of me, me, me justifying imposing yourself on mens spaces primarily for your own gratification, which is very common to mens experience of women as if men don't matter for their own sake, only women, as simply useful tools. | /r/MensRights | 06/07/26 04:31 AM |
| 0 | Contrary to popular belief, I think the things that most lonely, single men miss most is not the sex, rather, it is the daily companionship.You might be thinking of the inverse of this where an anecdote can't be used to show 100%. That is how I interpreted your own anecdote: not to disprove the inverse but to claim your own experience could be extrapolated beyond itself, as so many people try to do. In practice, 100% is often not a possibility but an abstract that can never be obtained as it frequently takes exponentially more resources to get it there (Einsteins laws of relativity apply to many real situations). Even something like… | /r/MensRights | 06/07/26 04:11 AM |
| 1 | Contrary to popular belief, I think the things that most lonely, single men miss most is not the sex, rather, it is the daily companionship.In my opinion, intimacy is primarily a woman's arena to test engagement and commitment of a man to her to provide resourcing and protection for the child she wants beyond his desire for sex. By the same token, I think men will participate in intimacy in order to gain readier access to sex, not because they are interested in intimacy themselves; it's a trade off that men do, but which is integral to women. We may have to agree to disagree on our opinions on this matter. | /r/MensRights | 06/07/26 03:03 AM |
| 1 | "Men make life miserable for women through body shaming and stupid beauty standards" Women 5 seconds later:The last line is not about vaginal size but the inability of any normal human male penis to achieve the same result. | /r/MensRights | 06/07/26 01:52 AM |
| 2 | Contrary to popular belief, I think the things that most lonely, single men miss most is not the sex, rather, it is the daily companionship.Use of the term "women" does not mean 100%, that would be "all women", "women" is a generalisation that doesn't necessarily apply to all women, but enough for it to be common. | /r/MensRights | 05/07/26 04:17 PM |
| 1 | Feminist activist back on reddit after a while. I'm keen to explore the perspective of any men who are potentially put off by that word, but am happy if there are any other aspects you'd like to debate?Feminists invading MensRights sub is like men invading women's safe spaces. | /r/MensRights | 05/07/26 04:09 PM |
| 2 | How do you feel about the mockery when a guy is hit in the sack?The biggest reason you can’t stop laughing when you see a nut shot is because you know damn well getting a blow to the balls is excruciating. So when you see the buildup to another guy getting hit in the crotch, it creates a feeling of tension, since you can’t help but worry about your own family jewels. Once it happens, and you can tell the other guy wasn’t seriously hurt, you can start laughing to help release the tension, says clinical psychologist Richard Shuster, Psy.D., host of The Daily H… | /r/MensRights | 05/07/26 04:00 PM |
| 2 | Contrary to popular belief, I think the things that most lonely, single men miss most is not the sex, rather, it is the daily companionship.I believe your statement is one that would be termed gaslighting, for trying to convince men they confuse sex with intimacy. Why shouldn't sex be intimacy from mens perspective? It's just different from the intimacy women are looking for and both players tend to get disappointed in this arena. | /r/MensRights | 05/07/26 03:47 PM |
| 2 | Contrary to popular belief, I think the things that most lonely, single men miss most is not the sex, rather, it is the daily companionship.Whilst good for you, your subjective experience can't be extrapolated to any other persons experience. | /r/MensRights | 05/07/26 03:38 PM |
| 3 | Contrary to popular belief, I think the things that most lonely, single men miss most is not the sex, rather, it is the daily companionship.Ad hominem, short for argumentum ad hominem, refers to when a speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than the substance of the argument itself. The OP is not attacking women making an argument, so it is not ad hominem. It's closer to being a generalisation, although "having lived with enough women" brings it closer to the truth as the OP experiences it; which is better than its opposite of singing the praises of a single subjective … | /r/MensRights | 05/07/26 03:34 PM |
| 0 | "Men make life miserable for women through body shaming and stupid beauty standards" Women 5 seconds later:it’s not the size of the ship, it’s the ability to stay docked until all passengers have disembarked I like it, but it still misses the point: it's not about size, performance or anything else, only people looking for a good time and if that's not happening for you and you haven't been able to negotiate a solution, then proffer your thanks for an interesting time and walk away, it's not anyone's fault you weren't compatible and don't make it so, including yourself. There are more fishes in the s… | /r/MensRights | 05/07/26 06:40 AM |
| 1 | "Men make life miserable for women through body shaming and stupid beauty standards" Women 5 seconds later:If a woman tries to play the shame game, just walk away: she doesn't deserve your attention or being rewarded with further engagement. It isn't saying anything about you personally anyway, but about her and her subjective perspective (if she's used to fisting, then no man is going to be good enough). | /r/MensRights | 05/07/26 06:31 AM |
| 4 | "Men make life miserable for women through body shaming and stupid beauty standards" Women 5 seconds later:There do not need to be equivalent arguments because body shaming is unacceptable in any form, regardless of gender or who is doing the shaming, because it is basically psychological manipulation. However, it isn't a right that needs competition between men and women: shame is a subjective thing, so it is our personal issue to manage. The problem is that society doesn't provide everyone with the tools to manage it because vested interests want to be able to continue to control others through sha… | /r/MensRights | 05/07/26 06:24 AM |
| 2 | Puerto Rico declares Femicide/Feminicide Law InconstitutionalThe law pertaining to femicide would not have been introduced, even for data collection, if it wasn't ultimately of benefit to feminists. Perhaps the mere introduction of the principle of femicide into law, for whatever reason, opens the door to easier modification to become a differential penalty. | /r/MensRights | 03/07/26 01:30 PM |
| 9 | Spain’s Equality Minister Says Men Need to "Evolve" Socially and EmotionallyShe recently described men and women as radically different “species” How can there ever be equality between different species? | /r/MensRights | 03/07/26 01:20 PM |
| 2 | Unmarried couples may get right to share of assets after break-upIt may be just tongue-in-cheek, but I read a comment that a particular country was considering making a one-night-stand the equivalent of a marriage if there was a child. You just know this is what government wants: to make child raising the responsibility of men, not women. All girls are princesses and eventually Queens according to Disney and every girl has drunk that Kool-aid. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/26 11:04 AM |
| 1 | The most difficult thing to explain to young men right now is that they need to win the uphill battle against them before their life gets better and quasi-feminist victimology will not work.Self-improvement must have a reason, just like fitness must have an objective other than fitness for fitness sake (athletes need to be fit for their activity, not for anything else). If you are self-improving to be more attractive to a partner, then you are doing it for someone else's consideration, over which you still have no control and you are still competing with everyone else for a standard someone else determines. Nothing is really different from before except for a possible small increas… | /r/MensRights | 01/07/26 10:48 AM |
| 1 | The most difficult thing to explain to young men right now is that they need to win the uphill battle against them before their life gets better and quasi-feminist victimology will not work.You tell them society is broken, it's no reflection on them, however their best lives are in following their own path to happiness, within the law, in getting their fundamental needs met by different sources if necessary and not drinking the Kool-aid handed out by societal tradition and expectation. They need guidance and mentoring to do this, facilitated by reasoned discussion of the "what", "why" and "how", not simply left to their own devices or the blind leading the blind. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/26 10:38 AM |
| 1 | Project hail mary is feministI have often entertained the disturbing thought that the most humane thing to do, if one had the power, would be to eliminate all life throughout the universe instantly and painlessly. I have had that thought too and come to a similar conclusion. | /r/MensRights | 28/06/26 11:34 PM |
| 1 | Project hail mary is feministNot every character is a self-insert, not every story is about gender (most aren't), not every female character is a stand-in for the vague concept of women. Surely you can appreciate how it may appear to the audience, who hasn't read the book, and it reinforces any stereotypes they might have had: that's up to the movie and how it portrays situations, when they could have had both a man and a woman as figureheads making decisions together. It's the same principle with most movies being dystopic… | /r/MensRights | 27/06/26 01:39 PM |
| 1 | Project hail mary is feministAs such, I don't think you can accuse the movie of encouraging or glorifying such behaviors or attitudes in women. Of course not, we shouldn't assign the behaviour of 1 person to everyone of that group; however, the movie is at pains to have her as the only one making the ultimate decisions, so it does kind of reduce it down to the characteristics of that person and they did choose a woman, not have a man-woman team, so it does kind of glorify the person it puts on a pedestal with the responsibi… | /r/MensRights | 27/06/26 05:12 AM |
| 1 | Never become a "Step Father"I believe women institute over 70% of divorces, so no-one is forcing them to take on both roles, even though that is what they largely have to do if they choose to go it alone with children. Men also bring a different approach to women in raising children, which helps provide balance: men and women have never been the same or equal, but complementary, so it is a tragedy when half of that is lost with solo Mothers. I don't think many women actually understand the role of resource and protection, … | /r/MensRights | 26/06/26 12:37 PM |
| 1 | Project hail mary is feministI don't know about justified: is billions of years of suffering worth the ongoing survival of life, even if the end is the evolution of a being that no longer suffers? | /r/MensRights | 26/06/26 04:31 AM |
| 1 | Why Women Initiate 70% of Divorces - 30 Years of ResearchSadly, biology is not a perfect solution, but it's good enough to perpetuate a species, even when many go astray and it doesn't care about personal feelings of the participants. Ethics and reason are a human overlay on nature, but even there we often err in self-interest. | /r/MensRights | 26/06/26 04:28 AM |
| 1 | Project hail mary is feministThe first part of the story is about a domineering woman treating men as disposable and the ends justifying the means, however, the 2nd part of the story is about a man having an informed choice and making it without coercion. | /r/MensRights | 25/06/26 01:26 PM |
| 1 | Why Women Initiate 70% of Divorces - 30 Years of ResearchI think it originally meant to be transactive in the man giving the woman resources and protection and the children she biologically desired, in exchange for satisfying his sex drive (which was supposed to be pleasurable for both, so she was still getting the better deal). That equation became unbalanced when society turned prudish and further demolished when conjugal rights were banned (which should have applied in both directions). However, I think it was inevitable that society would have to … | /r/MensRights | 25/06/26 01:12 PM |
| 1 | Why Women Initiate 70% of Divorces - 30 Years of ResearchThat could be due to men being less risk taking than is their natural state, when they have responsibilities. | /r/MensRights | 25/06/26 12:58 PM |
| 1 | Why Women Initiate 70% of Divorces - 30 Years of ResearchI don't believe this is correct: women are required to be able to "sense" what a young pre-verbal child needs and to do this they must identify with that age circumstance, effectively being a child themselves so they can internalise what that child is experiencing. This ability must have consequences and I believe it is in the capacity to not reason as much as men as well as being more caught up in childish emotions. Because their empathy is to children, they don't have insight into reasoning me… | /r/MensRights | 25/06/26 12:52 PM |
| 1 | Why Women Initiate 70% of Divorces - 30 Years of ResearchIt's not quite as simple as that: courts judge on guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, not innocence; a not guilty verdict can be a result of insufficient evidence but not a false allegation. Courts have to take this into account somehow, they can't just label the allegation as false because of a not-guilty verdict. However, I think this could be resolved by a not-guilty verdict creating a reverse case against the plaintif for allegations of false testimony that then has the full force of the prosec… | /r/MensRights | 25/06/26 12:34 PM |
| 1 | Never become a "Step Father"I would be advocating for procreation contracts to ensure both parents can't just weasel out of it, for the benefit of the child, but where sexual expression is more flexible and can be sought outside the relationship so it is not held hostage to the child, as long as it doesn't interfere with the interests of the child under the informed consent contract. This could also be the consent for a woman to use a man's sperm to create a child, knowing the requirements under which it is made. | /r/MensRights | 25/06/26 12:08 PM |
| 1 | Never become a "Step Father"Fathers seem to be generally better at guidance on careers and education. Mothers don't seem to see it as important. Could this be because men are still the resource providers and protectors, so know what is important in life, whereas women, being the ones protected and resourced, are less likely to see it as an issue (until it is too late)? | /r/MensRights | 25/06/26 12:04 PM |
| 1 | Never become a "Step Father"There is a risk and men should be aware of what can happen and does on occasion, but it's not a foregone conclusion. As you say, you have warned men based on your experience and must now let them decide their own lives, for better or worse. | /r/MensRights | 25/06/26 12:00 PM |
| 1 | Never become a "Step Father"Negative experiences are biologically designed to have more of an impact, so they can be remembered and avoided in future to protect the individual. The OP's response is not unusual if they had a negative experience. By the same token one person having a positive experience doesn't guarantee every man will have a positive experience. A single swallow does not a Summer (or Winter) make. | /r/MensRights | 25/06/26 11:55 AM |
| 1 | Never become a "Step Father"take on the role of a MAN There it is again, the expected role of men in an an age where feminists are denying gender roles for women and decrying toxic masculinity, yet men are still expected to be resource and protection providers out of the goodness of their hearts without expecting anything in return. | /r/MensRights | 25/06/26 11:49 AM |
| 0 | Never become a "Step Father"Just because they are bitter doesn't nullify their experience or deserve personal attack. In fact, if there aren't places for bitter men to be heard and acknowledged, but helped to find a path through their own experience into a better state, then they are eventually going to turn on society and we shouldn't want that simply because it justifies our judgement. Certainly point out where the perspective may be going over the top, but really, just stop with the personal attacks. | /r/MensRights | 25/06/26 11:39 AM |
| 8 | Never become a "Step Father"If you carry your weight. What weight is she going to carry or is this simply the man's role to protect and resource like it has always been, whilst women benefit? So much for changing gender roles. If you can't, watch them dump you in a microsecond whether they are original or step relations and take 50% or more of your assets. | /r/MensRights | 25/06/26 11:30 AM |
| 1 | Never become a "Step Father"These days, there is a whole new world of hurt just waiting for those women to make false allegations because they are upset about something a man did, and feel entitled to do so, let alone threatening to do so to get something they want; and they are being listened to and mens lives ruined based on false allegations. | /r/MensRights | 25/06/26 11:17 AM |
| 1 | Never become a "Step Father"Bully for you, disrespecting and dismissing the men who didn't have your positive experience. | /r/MensRights | 25/06/26 11:11 AM |
| 1 | Never become a "Step Father"The bitter experiences represent the rights that have been missing from many mens lives and the deceptions perpetrated on them about what being a man would actually entail versus the fantasy dangled like a carrot. | /r/MensRights | 25/06/26 11:08 AM |
| 1 | Never become a "Step Father"From the moment your child is born everyone else becomes secondary. Except the man, who becomes the tertiary in the hierarchy of respected importance, but who is still primary in practical importance in protecting and resourcing the family. Roles haven't really changed. | /r/MensRights | 25/06/26 11:03 AM |
| 2 | Never become a "Step Father"There has to be a catharsis of feeling, that has been dismissed and suppressed for so long, before there can be healing: one has to acknowledge and understand a problem before one can resolve it. | /r/MensRights | 25/06/26 11:00 AM |
| 2 | My significant other asked me the man or bear questionMan vs bear is reverse Darwinism at work: let it be so. | /r/MensRights | 25/06/26 10:51 AM |
| 10 | Minab School Strike is Reported as a "Girls' School" Despite Majority Male CasualtiesEven as boys, men are still protecting the opposite gender at the cost of their life. | /r/MensRights | 25/06/26 10:45 AM |
| 2 | A Finnish Court Orders a Woman To Pay Legal Fees For Foreign Men She Says Raped HerIt gets worse: in the "enthusiastic consent" model, all the responsibility about consent rests with the man in interpretation and moderating himself to protect her, assuming he is not only not cognitively impaired but perfectly understands the legal requirements and nuances as if he was a judge: what she does is largely irrelevant as she doesn't have any responsibility to anything. It's no longer about consent but mens responsibility for protecting women, even from themselves. There is no protec… | /r/MensRights | 23/06/26 02:20 AM |
| 0 | Got accused of SA (I am in 7th grade)I think this speaks to the trial and error fumblings of sexual development of youth that society promotes as "normal" and yet fails to properly educate and manage to ensure it doesn't go too far or that it is weaponised. Regret that a girl allowed a boy to explore her body in the biological hope that he would settle and provide resources and protection for raising of children and was devastated when he moved on without fulfilling that fantasy, should not be allowed to seek revenge; however it ca… | /r/MensRights | 23/06/26 02:07 AM |
| 2 | Inside an exclusive ‘man camp,’ where one woman is trying to save men from themselvesI think that's too simplistic a take: in my opinion it stems from the general difference in sex drive between men and women that sees many women start to view men seeking to meet their sexual needs as annoyances, then harassment, then assault. Instead of acknowledging the root (sic) cause and facilitating mens sexual expression in ways that are meaningful (not condescending such as "let them have onanism") to men but do not compromise womens choice, society directs men to what they can do in the… | /r/MensRights | 23/06/26 01:35 AM |
| 2 | Is the new UK bill about marriage absolute or it has reliefs?the intention seems to be that in a 20 or 30 year relationship there can be compensation for giving up a career to raise children What compensation is offered for the man having to work and not spend time with the kids, to put a roof over the head of his wife and food on their table, to basically support her to have the child she wants, whilst that is necessary, and then she gets on with her career without paying back any of the support she received? Both have to make sacrifices: there's no free… | /r/MensRights | 21/06/26 01:32 PM |
| 1 | What I've been witnessing.It's almost laughable that women think men are just violent animals, when it's men that reason like human beings and women who mainly emote (until their emotion exhausts and they can't avoid reason catching up to them and they apologise). Even war is a kind of protective action (whether attempting to get resources or protecting from others attempting to get resources), filled with reasoned strategy: that it's also primitive survival of the fittest, tribal and selfish and not very civilised or re… | /r/MensRights | 21/06/26 01:25 PM |
| 1 | What I've been witnessing.Women are designed to have empathy with children who can't express their issues in words: they aren't necessarily empathetic to verbal men, because they don't understand men and men don't reveal their emotions as readily anyway. Do men understand women? I don't think so, we don't speak the same language and it's difficult to identify with something you have never experienced and would have difficulty experiencing. That goes for women understanding men too. | /r/MensRights | 21/06/26 01:16 PM |
| 1 | What I've been witnessing.Note that hate is an emotion and is being supported more than reasoned debate: not surprising when emotion is the nature of women and sides are being taken according to identity and perceived strengths of those identities. Except emotion never solves anything because it's merely an indicator. | /r/MensRights | 21/06/26 01:10 PM |
| 1 | Proud of being a man for the first timeWe also owe our masculinity to women for having borne us and providing an opposite template for many aspects that defines masculinity as different from femininity. Masculinity is not toxic simply because it is different to femininity as if female is the yardstick by which everything should be measured. There have also been many important women in history that helped push civilisation forward and I believe the saying that "behind every great man stands a woman" is also true to a certain extent in… | /r/MensRights | 21/06/26 01:03 PM |
| 6 | Got accused of SA (I am in 7th grade)If Evianny was an ex, what was she an ex of? Was the relationship sexual in any way, such as caressing? Now that Evianny is an ex, is she claiming sexual assault because she now views those caresses retrospectively as non-consensual? Help me to understand, because it doesn't make sense. Perhaps because I can't relate 7th grade to age (Reddit is not just USA). | /r/MensRights | 21/06/26 12:47 PM |
| 57 | Inside an exclusive ‘man camp,’ where one woman is trying to save men from themselvesMen are caught in an impossible situation with the sins of the Fathers transferred to the sons, but where the demands of women to still play the role of sacrificing provider and protector, which crippled their Fathers before them, not only remains but has grown to demand protection against everything, even subjective hurt feelings and masculine identity itself. I flinch reading the article, because something feels very wrong and yet I can't define it, however it's related to: During one trip hom… | /r/MensRights | 21/06/26 12:38 PM |
| 2 | Women have way too much power in today's society.I dislike the way society focuses only on the squeaky wheel instead of ensuring all wheels are adequately maintained and lubricated. In the past, even when men had their sheds as their man-cave, women would still intrude. I have heard of some women complaining their men did not spend as much time with them as they would like and threatening divorce. | /r/MensRights | 21/06/26 07:26 AM |
| 2 | Women have way too much power in today's society.Sex toys for men do exist though as an option. That's also directing men to a solution, not allowing them to find the solution that best suits them. Different sex drives are not an issue, unless one insists on only approaching it in the same way we have always done. Society needs to consider the fundamentals underlying sex drive, which is the drive to procreate through PIV sex by making it pleasurable. Men aren't thinking that they need to make more babies and spread their genes widely by having… | /r/MensRights | 21/06/26 04:12 AM |
| 0 | Project hail mary is feministOnce the ends justify the means, it will never stop because it creates a precedent: if one man, why not 1 million men or even 90% of all men? At what point does it become wrong to coerce someone to sacrifice their life? Grace was intended to shoulder the responsibility for all of humanity for one crucial element of the mission. Were the others on the mission also coerced in a similar fashion? Every nation in the world will go to war to try and hoard food and protect its citizens. Millions will d… | /r/MensRights | 21/06/26 02:27 AM |
| 1 | The secret Australian teacher guide, that portrays teachers as victims and and boys as monsters, and Men's Rights as the evil heart of the ManosphereEducation itself is only a tool, to help prevent re-inventing the wheel each generation (which we do terribly in the area of sexuality, still leaving individuals to use fumbling trial and error each generation instead of benefitting from what has been learned through all of human history). The question is how to use that tool most efficiently. I'm for far more than a parent license, which is mainly an education and training process, validation and confirmation: I think marriage should be re-inst… | /r/MensRights | 21/06/26 01:48 AM |
| 3 | Co Habitation is Under Attack in the UK : New Laws Are Coming for Men (The Truth)Isn't equality what feminists wanted? | /r/MensRights | 20/06/26 11:54 AM |
| 2 | Co Habitation is Under Attack in the UK : New Laws Are Coming for Men (The Truth)In some jurisdictions, cohabitation is more about "living as if man and wife" but not necessarily in the same house all the time. A traveling salesman probably doesn't spend many nights at home with his wife or defacto partner yet is still in a relationship with them. | /r/MensRights | 20/06/26 11:51 AM |
| 17 | A Finnish Court Orders a Woman To Pay Legal Fees For Foreign Men She Says Raped HerShe didn't just go willingly with 3 men, she had sex with them, then when disturbed went elsewhere for more sex and only later decided she had been raped. She didn't scream for help when disturbed the first time or run for help, but went on to have more sex elsewhere. To all intents and purposes, it would be described as enthusiastic sex participation, if it wasn't for the matter of intoxication, which raises the question why many jurisdictions see intoxication as nullifying consent when it othe… | /r/MensRights | 20/06/26 11:39 AM |
| 4 | A Finnish Court Orders a Woman To Pay Legal Fees For Foreign Men She Says Raped HerIt comes down to whether intoxication in and of itself bars consent or whether it is only a possible factor of diminished responsibility feeding into consent, except when one deliberately diminishes responsibility knowing the risks. Consent is more than just the state of intoxication is the principle involved here I think. Since intoxication lowers inhibitions, I think it is important that people not deliberately intoxicate themselves to make it easier to have sex but also waive responsibility f… | /r/MensRights | 20/06/26 11:24 AM |
| 5 | Sexist Double Standards in Restroom PrivacyIt's time restrooms were single occupant multi-purpose to put an end to gender conflict, despite the extra cost. Better still, we stop traveling and congregating inefficiently in special purpose structures, when we already have expensive homes that are under-utilised we can live out of more fully, with services delivered to them more efficiently and the best seats in the house for everyone. | /r/MensRights | 20/06/26 11:13 AM |
| 1 | Project hail mary is feministThis is a Disney level fantasy dressed up as science fiction: the odds of success were so small, given the accidents that led to the situation, that a happy ending is not a logical outcome. It might have been redeemed if Ryan Gosling's character volunteered, knowing it was effectively a suicide mission, but that's not how it played out. Basically the movie is saying it's okay to drug and coerce men to force them to become supermen and take responsibility of saving the world on their shoulders: w… | /r/MensRights | 20/06/26 11:07 AM |
| 1 | Project hail mary is feministBecause not sending him means another tens if not hundreds of millions will die. There was no guarantee he would rescue everyone and by making the ends justify the means, men would continue to be coerced into doing what they don't want for the benefit of others. It's simply an extension of women and children first, men expendable, to: the ends for women justify the exploitation and abuse of men. If it gets to the point of the fate of the world resting on one drugged and coerced man, heaped with … | /r/MensRights | 20/06/26 11:00 AM |
| 5 | Project hail mary is feministMan coerced to save the planet against his will, by a domineering woman no less: a feminists wet dream. Apparently the ends justify the means. | /r/MensRights | 20/06/26 10:46 AM |
| 6 | Women have way too much power in today's society.That's basically saying that the only thing a woman is good for is sex. It's the equivalent of feminists thinking men are only good for 2 things: being a sperm donor and ATM. The truth is much more complex for both, however from a perspective of the most important thing to each gender, it is absolutely relevant. | /r/MensRights | 20/06/26 07:36 AM |
| 4 | Women have way too much power in today's society.But you wouldn't get a child for that money. Cohabitation is a real risk for men: even if they find a "good woman", she can change after she gets the child and resources she wanted, when feminism has finally sunk in. The standing joke is that men wish their wives would remain the same as when they married, whilst women wish their husbands would change into what they want them to be. So men and women are going into a relationship with different expectations of the other right from the start, whic… | /r/MensRights | 20/06/26 07:24 AM |
| 2 | Women have way too much power in today's society.I think the issue is that society doesn't recognise mens sex drive as being different from women and it gets dismissed in favour of being led by women's need only, but meeting mens need is a dilemma when women must still have a choice. Saying "well men can masturbate instead" is very self-serving and demeaning in someone apart from the man himself telling him what he can do, like a parent dealing with a child. Additionally, it is disconcerting to be rejected and have to slink away to the bathroo… | /r/MensRights | 20/06/26 02:37 AM |
| 1 | "VAWG [violence against women and girls] and Misogyny Everywhere": men's advocate Dr Rick Bradford looks at some of what the UK government is doing. Very UK focused and unfortunately very long, so I would recommend some of his other blog posts first but as always both well researched and insightful.There's another potential pandemic beginning to spread across the world in the form of H5 Avian Flu. Given experience with Covid and the need for isolation to reduce transmission, but with 6 years of feminist hate mongering against men since then, how will we survive close quarters cohabitation now if the pandemic develops? It isn't like the police will be as available to attend disputes and separate the combatants during a pandemic. Perhaps couples and people in general need to start discussing… | /r/MensRights | 19/06/26 02:42 PM |
| 10 | Women have way too much power in today's society.Emotions aren't really a suitable path to a considered life, more like jumping from one "it seemed like a good thing at the time" to another. | /r/MensRights | 19/06/26 02:19 PM |
| 8 | Women have way too much power in today's society.The parable of Adam & Eve is prophetic but never listened to until it is too late. | /r/MensRights | 19/06/26 02:15 PM |
| 5 | Women have way too much power in today's society.They are fighting to make their own money in the flawed belief they can have it all as single Mothers, when it takes 2 parents to raise a child because of the resources required. It's no good paying someone else to provide additional resources as the cheapest approach has always been DIY, which you can't do with only 1 person doing it all. Feminism seems to be convincing women that men and their penises are somehow damaging, when nature created the world that way, including women being the recep… | /r/MensRights | 19/06/26 02:09 PM |
| 5 | Women have way too much power in today's society.Casual hookups are at least as vulnerable to false allegations of rape or sexual assault if she is in that mindset at the time. A bad hair day could see her take it out on you. Paid services are likely on their last legs: scandinavia is usually ahead of the rest of the world socially and at least in Sweden, it's legal to sell sex but not to buy. | /r/MensRights | 19/06/26 01:55 PM |
| 8 | How do I get arrested drinking on my couch alone?More likely there's more to her story that hasn't been revealed: women generally have things planned out well in advance and are never without backup resources. The incident was likely the opportunity she required to start the ball rolling to monkeybranch, but portraying hubby as the instigator. | /r/MensRights | 19/06/26 01:47 PM |
| 27 | UK Men are going to need a pre-nup for co-habitation.In response to the growing prevalence of de facto relationships, the Australian government introduced the Family Law Amendment Act 2008, which came into effect in 2009. This legislation significantly changed the legal landscape for de facto couples, granting them many of the same rights and responsibilities as married couples in areas such as property division and spousal maintenance. While married couples have well-defined legal rights and protections, cohabiting couples in de facto relationshi… | /r/MensRights | 19/06/26 01:39 PM |
| 4 | How I'm incentivized to leave the father off the birth certificateNone of this mentions what the Father wants, so one could interpret this expose as an exercise in finding out how to get the Father on a child support hook through his name on the birth certificate. Where is the suggestion this man will even be involved in his daughters life? Didn't the Mother think about this at all before deciding to have a child by this man and effectively be a single Mother living elsewhere? | /r/MensRights | 18/06/26 07:32 AM |
| 3 | Do you think we're ever going to win against our opression? Soon at least?No, we don't pushback at feminism, we force it to deliver on its stated goal of equality by replacing womens rights with human rights. Feminism: hoist by its own petard. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/26 07:20 AM |
| 1 | Do you think we're ever going to win against our opression? Soon at least?Pushing human rights will be our salvation, I think, because women can't argue against it because it is effectively what feminism argued it was about in equality. Nothing is more equal than rights that don't even mention gender distinction. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/26 07:17 AM |
| -1 | Men are dying - Why we need men's rightsHuman rights must supplant womens rights as the higher ethical ground that women can't argue against, because it is what feminism effectively said it is about: pursuing mens rights will be just as destructive as pursuing womens rights because they are divisive and inefficient. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/26 07:14 AM |
| -1 | Men are dying - Why we need men's rightsYou are battling against a flawed determination to have it all by women and that means no equality as women still require mens resources to raise their children: most obviously highlighted by single mothers who drank the Koolaid doing it tougher than they expected because men are resisting being exploited by all means at their disposal. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/26 07:10 AM |
| -2 | As someone who has suffered from violence commited by women the worst part about it is that it will simply continue and that I will pretty much have to accept it in the futureAs a man I fully realise that no one cares about my wellbeing or my life That isn't true, there will be people in society who do care about others including yourself, however they don't have a mechanism to express it to you personally and are battling against those who not only don't care but are actively antagonistic to the care of men as well as the structure of society actively working against the interests of men and for the advantage of women, cancelling and chilling the voices wanting to s… | /r/MensRights | 18/06/26 06:59 AM |
| 1 | Why do you believe it is that when men and women have children at home, men tend to work more and women tend to work less?Caregiving and nurturing are not necessarily educational, they are designed to meet fundamental needs of life that can then support higher function development instead of an individual themselves having to meet fundamental needs and higher function development: it's a springboard to better things. Single mothers are often without the resources to raise a child with the help of labour saving devices and being gifted resources, so they basically have to do everything but with the conditions of the… | /r/MensRights | 18/06/26 05:02 AM |
| 1 | Why do you believe it is that when men and women have children at home, men tend to work more and women tend to work less?Pregnancy and childbirth is far more taxing to a woman’s body than we previously thought Nature takes this into account, it's objective is the perpetuation of the species, not giving women long and enjoyable lives: nature doesn't care about individuals or their feelings, it's red in tooth and claw. This is why womens eggs are limited to around age 30, they are not expected to survive beyond about 45 in which case their health doesn't matter by that point. Even working women tend to work less hou… | /r/MensRights | 18/06/26 04:49 AM |
| 2 | Why do you believe it is that when men and women have children at home, men tend to work more and women tend to work less?Traditionally, women would carry small infants on their backs with them whilst they worked, so there was less time wasted soothing separation anxiety, whilst older children could be creched within the large group of women gathering food in close proximity. Work for women has also changed with the advent of machines doing the bulk of the labour and with food delivery which could free them up to engage in womens groups creching children within the group if only they did that; however I have notice… | /r/MensRights | 18/06/26 04:12 AM |
| 8 | Toxic Masculinity as Mate-Choice Disruption-Dr. Dani Sulikowski evolutionary psychologistMasculinity represents greatest ability to provide and protect, which is what attracts women, but unfortunately not necessarily the greatest interest beyond providing sperm (through the sex drive), which creates a dilemma in getting everything she wants. I believe this was partially ameliorated by cuckolding, but which is becoming increasingly difficult to pull off. However, I think women have now realised they can get society to compel the provision of resources once they have a child, by paint… | /r/MensRights | 18/06/26 03:42 AM |
| 8 | "However in this moment, right now, we are talking about the systematic abuse of women as a culture."Women are biologically designed to be more emotional, so they can best connect with pre-verbal children. Their emotional expression is natural, which includes hurt feelings. It is not necessarily abuse when they experience hurt feelings, just as babies crying is not necessarily a result of abuse, merely a communication of discomfort and something needing to be addressed. Therefore, just because women have hurt feelings doesn't necessarily mean it is systemic abuse. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/26 03:03 AM |
| 22 | There’s is little to no statistics about women’s violences against men and it pisses me offI'm not so sure about that: women are the most likely to have a low threshold to impulse in slapping or hitting, whereas it takes a lot to goad a man to express violence against women but when he reaches breaking point, it's more physically violent. The real issue is the psychological attack used to goad a man to break so that he can be criminalised, which is ignored because it isn't seen as violence. If we stopped using gendered expression and looked at abuse, the picture would look different. … | /r/MensRights | 18/06/26 02:53 AM |
| 1 | The secret Australian teacher guide, that portrays teachers as victims and and boys as monsters, and Men's Rights as the evil heart of the ManosphereFamilies of all varieties from both unemployed to both working still largely operate with a roof over the heads and not a majority living under a bridge. I think your point is more about aspiration of a better life for families being seriously downgraded to the point they are struggling to have any aspiration of a better life, even when both are working flat out, but actually going backwards whilst running forwards. Part of this is due to womens aspirations of not being tied to child rearing, ho… | /r/MensRights | 18/06/26 02:36 AM |
| 1 | The secret Australian teacher guide, that portrays teachers as victims and and boys as monsters, and Men's Rights as the evil heart of the ManosphereIt's an opinion for discussion, not a dictated position. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/26 02:07 AM |
| 1 | The secret Australian teacher guide, that portrays teachers as victims and and boys as monsters, and Men's Rights as the evil heart of the ManosphereGovernment manages society and it has a right to require people are adequately educated and trained to most safely operate a vehicle in the interests of everyone in society. The same thing should apply to operating children in the best interest of society. It isn't about having children or having specific children that is being regulated, but how the parents raise those they have, just as government doesn't direct which car you buy when you have a license to drive it safely. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/26 01:45 AM |
| 1 | The secret Australian teacher guide, that portrays teachers as victims and and boys as monsters, and Men's Rights as the evil heart of the ManosphereGovernment doesn't arbitrarily decide who drives, a license to drive is an acknowledgement one has reached an acceptable level of training and education to more safely operate a vehicle that can cause great damage if not achieved. The same needs to apply to parents, who require knowledge and training to be good parents instead of trauma creators. This is not about a license to have a car or children but to achieve proficiency in safely "driving" them. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/26 12:34 AM |
| 5 | SERIOUS: New EU consent law "Only Yes means yes", how does it work?If women hate their own biology so much, take it up with the Creator and stop blaming men. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/26 12:24 AM |
| 1 | Revealed: Green party proposes circumcision banI understand that Australian law prohibits people getting around the ban on FGM by traveling to another country to get it performed, yet they still don't have the same law banning MGM. If the people in a country are already circumcised, there's no point exiling them for something that was done to them without their consent: the issue is preventing it happening to others by making it a known punishable offense to perform the procedure on people who can't consent for non-medical reasons or to try … | /r/MensRights | 17/06/26 03:29 PM |
| 2 | Another post from a mental health support community, where a guy says that he hates himself for being a manYou can still be a man by following a different path to getting your fundamental needs met than relying on one woman to be everything to you. The tragedy is that society doesn't facilitate any other path but one, that puts mens wants in conflict with womens. A Thermomix is not essential to create a meal, especially when they aren't readily available to you. | /r/MensRights | 17/06/26 03:09 PM |
| 3 | SERIOUS: New EU consent law "Only Yes means yes", how does it work?It technically exists, but is it as objectively harmful as using the emotive term of rape to apply to something totally different to the brutal violation the term evokes, like sexual regret? I'm sure there is an expression for using extreme exaggeration to make a more innocuous thing appear more important than it is, by leveraging an undeserved emotional connection, but I can't think what that is. In my opinion, rape should be incorporated into sexual assault, but "I was sexually assaulted" does… | /r/MensRights | 17/06/26 02:59 PM |
| 13 | The secret Australian teacher guide, that portrays teachers as victims and and boys as monsters, and Men's Rights as the evil heart of the ManosphereIt sounds like Reddit is using an automated detection system that gets it wrong. Australia woke up to the reality of the evils of automated systems with the tragic incident of Robodebt so illegally further impoverishing already impoverished people that some took their own lives. Heads should roll for such blatant incompetence when we have always known with computers: garbage in, garbage out. | /r/MensRights | 17/06/26 02:55 PM |
| 7 | Men are dying - Why we need men's rightsPeople are dying, we need human rights, not womens and mens rights competing for advantage. | /r/MensRights | 17/06/26 02:48 PM |
| 4 | SERIOUS: New EU consent law "Only Yes means yes", how does it work?For me it is about harm, specifically objective harm versus subjective harm and the triage necessary to permit a realistic tackling of the most serious harms because of a lack of resources to tackle all the objective harms, let alone all possible subjective harms. The justice system is struggling to process objective harms in a timely fashion, detaining (ie punishing men on allegation ahead of a judgement of guilt and contradicting the presumption of innocence) mainly men for long periods becaus… | /r/MensRights | 17/06/26 02:41 PM |
| -1 | SERIOUS: New EU consent law "Only Yes means yes", how does it work?There is no guarantee that a law is just, simply because it has been enacted, so it isn't just about the law itself from a legal perspective. | /r/MensRights | 17/06/26 02:16 PM |
| 2 | SERIOUS: New EU consent law "Only Yes means yes", how does it work?As I understand it, the law is written in terms of "the person" and "the other person", but the activities are defined in terms of consent and penetration. It is the penetration that is the gender biased element, further compromised by limiting it to anus, vagina and by objects other than a penis but not including non-consensual engulfment or non-consensual penetration of a penis (urethra). However, different States and Territories in Australia have different laws that cover this matter in diffe… | /r/MensRights | 17/06/26 02:13 PM |
| 8 | SERIOUS: New EU consent law "Only Yes means yes", how does it work?Rape is essentially about penetration in law (a manifestly male perpetrator assumption) when the reverse perspective to penetration (eg engulfment as perpetrator), is ignored. Hence the law is written in a gynocentrically biased manner even though it doesn't directly specify gender. | /r/MensRights | 17/06/26 01:59 PM |
| -5 | The secret Australian teacher guide, that portrays teachers as victims and and boys as monsters, and Men's Rights as the evil heart of the ManosphereThe pandemic was a crisis and the result was an emergency implementation that was not planned or optimised for education or anything else. That is not what I am advocating. Yes, online education requires supervision, however it dovetails quite well with a greater living from home approach and other synergies (fuel and wear and tear saving, reduced congestion of transport, better use of solar energy, etc). It's not an either/or thing, but a transitional path to better outcomes. Parents need to pa… | /r/MensRights | 17/06/26 01:56 PM |
| 11 | SERIOUS: New EU consent law "Only Yes means yes", how does it work?With the unwanted behaviour being women's feelings hurt, which can't be prevented in advance and can only be avenged after the fact, which this legislation is attempting to facilitate? Does revenge really undo hurt or is it merely a case of "If I'm going to be hurt, then I want him to suffer too"? | /r/MensRights | 17/06/26 01:42 PM |
| 1 | SERIOUS: New EU consent law "Only Yes means yes", how does it work?Consider this: the sex itself is no different physically between a rape and consensual sex, since the factor is consent, but is differentiated by the womans perception of the man's attractiveness and thus whether she consents to access to sex. In effect a man's ability to have sex depends on his attractiveness in the eyes of women and is completely under their control over who and how much: it's fundamentally a reward for forces largely outside his control. Now imagine if men exerted their absol… | /r/MensRights | 17/06/26 01:33 PM |
| 3 | SERIOUS: New EU consent law "Only Yes means yes", how does it work?More succinctly stated than I ever could. | /r/MensRights | 17/06/26 01:22 PM |
| 5 | SERIOUS: New EU consent law "Only Yes means yes", how does it work?This is a flawed approach that rape can be deterred by lowering the threshold to conviction and increasing penalty, when in reality rape is a result of primitive emotion being stronger than reasoned moderation (a crime of passion if you will that temporarily ignores the consequences until it is too late): all that will happen is that men will eventually turn away from women to alternatives to protect themselves and in the meanwhile women will still be "raped" but they will have the satisfaction … | /r/MensRights | 17/06/26 01:21 PM |
| 13 | SERIOUS: New EU consent law "Only Yes means yes", how does it work?The law is gendered by making rape about penetration perpetrated (a majority male thing), ignoring the equal reverse perspective to penetration and then tying itself in knots trying to cover every possible other contingency in legal gobbledygook. | /r/MensRights | 17/06/26 01:14 PM |
| 12 | SERIOUS: New EU consent law "Only Yes means yes", how does it work?But, but, but, that still exploits women through financial coercion to have sex for money, even if there is a protective contract in place. /s | /r/MensRights | 17/06/26 01:09 PM |
| 9 | SERIOUS: New EU consent law "Only Yes means yes", how does it work?I believe in Australia they have gone a step beyond "yes means yes" to an "enthusiastic yes" model that requires a man to interpret consent only if a woman is acting in an enthusiastic manner (whatever that is). It takes all the responsibility away from the woman to do anything, including providing consent, and places it on the man to be her protector, even against his own desires. There is no need to test consent, because it doesn't rely on giving consent: either it's unimpeachably enthusiastic… | /r/MensRights | 17/06/26 01:04 PM |
| 3 | Getting drugged by other menMen are reasoned risk managers: if you have an issue with your drink being spiked in the presence of others whom you don't trust, stop engaging in that practice if the consequences bother you. Are we autonomous beings with agency to protect ourselves or not? Women believe they should be able to do anything they like without consequence and it's the worlds responsibility to change to suit them, but reasoned men know otherwise: that we are at least partially responsible for protecting ourselves fr… | /r/MensRights | 17/06/26 07:57 AM |
| 5 | The secret Australian teacher guide, that portrays teachers as victims and and boys as monsters, and Men's Rights as the evil heart of the ManosphereThere's a simple solution to this: take education online where it can be provided much more efficiently from canned videos of classes by the best teachers who never have to front the "little monsters" ever again, as well as electronic teaching material with AI tailoring the material to the students pace and ability. We are still teaching like it is the 20th Century or even the late 19th Century. Individual physical segregation is the only way to combat gender friction, because it prevents physic… | /r/MensRights | 17/06/26 07:49 AM |
| 6 | Woman left traumatised by swinging says website 'facilitated abuse'However, the way consent is written is that it's the man who has to interpret whether enthusiastic consent exists and to stop himself having sex if it doesn't; the woman doesn't have to provide consent or do anything in particular as it's the man's responsibility to interpret what is going on and protect her regardless. Women have no agency of consent: it's all up to a man's perfect interpretation of the situation. A woman could be rabidly tearing off your clothes, hungry for sex, but if she is … | /r/MensRights | 17/06/26 07:37 AM |
| 2 | Woman left traumatised by swinging says website 'facilitated abuse'I also cant think of anywhere else in society where a person can legitimately blame someone else for their own actions. In Australia, "inciting hatred or violence" is now a criminal offense, even though it is not the alleged perpetrator actually carrying out the consequent damaging action as if that 3rd party has no autonomy of their own. It's reflected in the criminalisation of someone yelling "fire" but not criminalising the people who knock others down and trample them in a desperate effort t… | /r/MensRights | 17/06/26 03:49 AM |
| 9 | Revealed: Green party proposes circumcision banFreedom of religion enshrined in the Australian Constitution, but not the right to bodily sovereignty is why abuse of males continues, but somehow females (women and girls) get a pass. | /r/MensRights | 17/06/26 03:37 AM |
| 2 | Does it feel like people don't respect Men's privacy as much as woman's privacy in changing rooms?At a certain age a woman will refuse to allow a boy into the womens locker rooms: any aspect of men, even when it is only just starting to develop or might develop throws them into paranoia. Similarly, they refuse to allow a boy alone into a mens change room because of paranoia of pedophilia, as if the majority of men wouldn't protect a boy from abuse from a minority. This ultimately transfers to the boy in thinking all men only want to get into his pants and is likely a root of homophobia. Howe… | /r/MensRights | 16/06/26 02:30 PM |
| 1 | "Whenever I hear people emphasise the awfulness of women/ children being hurt, or killed, part of me really worries that we're devaluing the value of men's lives. I understand why people emphasise those groups, and of course it's horrifying. But how do men & boys feel hearing it?"Gender inevitably comes into it, because of biological gender roles for optimal sexual reproduction that have not changed. Men are still ultimately protecting the lives of reproductively more important women by sacrificing their own whether cavemen many millennia ago or even today. The question is, what are women sacrificing to balance the ultimate sacrifice of men, guided by feminisms focus on equality? It's unproductive to put children first in all situations: in an aircraft ditching for examp… | /r/MensRights | 16/06/26 02:09 PM |
| 5 | "Whenever I hear people emphasise the awfulness of women/ children being hurt, or killed, part of me really worries that we're devaluing the value of men's lives. I understand why people emphasise those groups, and of course it's horrifying. But how do men & boys feel hearing it?"women can wear whatever way they want Just put attractive men in front of women, accentuating their maleness by the clothing (or lack thereof) but prevent women from touching or commenting on pain of criminal punishment and wait for the wails of unfair teasing, yet reverse the situation in everyday life and men are expected to just take the deliberate incitement of their natural sexual arousal by women without protest. | /r/MensRights | 16/06/26 01:51 PM |
| 5 | "Whenever I hear people emphasise the awfulness of women/ children being hurt, or killed, part of me really worries that we're devaluing the value of men's lives. I understand why people emphasise those groups, and of course it's horrifying. But how do men & boys feel hearing it?"Find a good woman That's the rub, there are so few good women that most men are competing for, very few men can win. Saying "find a good woman" is effectively saying "F U I got mine" and rubbing their face in the impossible task ahead of most men. | /r/MensRights | 16/06/26 01:46 PM |
| 1 | "Whenever I hear people emphasise the awfulness of women/ children being hurt, or killed, part of me really worries that we're devaluing the value of men's lives. I understand why people emphasise those groups, and of course it's horrifying. But how do men & boys feel hearing it?"Ultimately men protect womens lives by sacrificing their own, however shouldn't there be some other compensating sacrifice(s) by women to balance this life sacrifice of men, simply from the perspective of equality if not the reality of nature being a balanced environment? Sacrifice of ones life for another is a huge thing that is currently devalued as if it was nothing by those who ultimately benefit. | /r/MensRights | 16/06/26 01:41 PM |
| 1 | Incel historyI think it misses the point that the expression of mens sexuality is now fully controlled by womens choice and men have no influence on that, whereas the reverse is not true because a) men are less selective and b) womens selectivity has created a large pool of sexually deprived men ready and waiting for her to say yes, which creates consequence in society particularly young men becoming suicidally depressed because of someone elses control over their own biological expression. Fundamentally it … | /r/MensRights | 16/06/26 01:27 PM |
| 1 | why is there so much hate for women here?[ Removed by Reddit ] | /r/MensRights | 13/06/26 03:28 AM |
| -4 | why is there so much hate for women here?If it was about loneliness and not sex, men would form more friendships with other men who understand them better, but the sexual aspect gets in the way because of entrenched taboo and homophobia triggered by the ever-present male sex drive. | /r/MensRights | 13/06/26 02:56 AM |
| -6 | why is there so much hate for women here?The harder you corner someone the more aggressive they will get Not necessarily, there is the surrender reflex as well as a response, such as freezing. Male loneliness epidemic is about loneliness, not about lack of romantics relationships with women I would argue this is the reverse, it's all about lack of opportunity of expression of the male sex drive, but it's obscured by the belief that sexual expression is not a right (except for women who think they should have a right to do anything they… | /r/MensRights | 13/06/26 02:53 AM |
| 6 | why is there so much hate for women here?Society is fundamentally based on the protection of women and men sacrificing their lives to achieve that: it's why we have "women and children first" and usually only conscription of men for war. However, women are also expected to sacrifice in exchange; that protection is about protection of life, to ensure survival of the species, not against hurt feelings. Nature believes in balance in all things, so if women want protection against hurt feelings, they will have to sacrifice protection of th… | /r/MensRights | 13/06/26 02:28 AM |
| 1 | Toxic femininityLike beauty, ugliness is in the eye of the beholder, it's subjective, not an intrinsic part of any person. Someone telling you you are ugly or a creep is telling you something about them, not about you personally. So, they don't like your characteristics, so what, you wouldn't want to know someone who doesn't like you anyway. Let them find their Chad and discover he doesn't want to settle down with them either, whilst you have reason and can explore solutions to what you want that don't rely on … | /r/MensRights | 11/06/26 01:24 PM |
| -4 | Toxic femininityHow can you hate those who are effectively biologically designed as children to better connect with the children they are raising? Women don't deserve hate, they deserve understanding and management to best achieve win-win outcomes. Perhaps that means supporting them all to have Chads babies and periodic visits by Chad, which is what I think they fundamentally want, whilst facilitating men to sexual fulfilment that is not under womens control and being useful and appreciated in maintaining a soc… | /r/MensRights | 11/06/26 06:24 AM |
| 2 | Can anyone explain to me how the dv system in Australia is misandristic?It's called Domestic Violence to bias against men by better profiling the characteristics of their societal role instead of being called Domestic Abuse which widens the umbrella to capture the damaging actions of women as well. Women use a psychological approach, often consisting of needling a man in his vulnerable spots until he breaks and responds with a physical action that can be stereotypically associated with violence, which she can criminalise whilst looking like a victim. There is also t… | /r/MensRights | 11/06/26 06:04 AM |
| 9 | Researchers Finally Admit Shaming Men Doesn’t Work?Shaming works on women, so they just assumed it would work on men too, as if men are women with functional penises. | /r/MensRights | 11/06/26 05:40 AM |
| 3 | I got falsely accused just by going on a walkWhat am I even supposed to do if I want to find love? If you mean sex, you will only ever get the scraps she decides to throw from the table, not what you want. Which form of love do you mean as it's more about being in love with what the other person does for you, not your feelings for them, in my opinion? I believe the only true love is when sparks fly for both when you catch their gaze across a crowded room, where nature drugs you to keep you together for a time where you ignore the other per… | /r/MensRights | 09/06/26 06:13 AM |
| 0 | "Incel" is the new "gay" word to shame men.Right, so the agenda here is to force men to pay for sex, every single time. Who TF are you to determine what someone can or cannot do in their circumstances, a sex mercenary? It's illegal to purchase sex in Sweden for example. A hate group of women is determined to deny sex to a particular group of men, create them as incel and then vilify their own creation. | /r/MensRights | 07/06/26 11:54 AM |
| 6 | "Incel" is the new "gay" word to shame men.You are reading it wrong, with blinkers on for maximum outrage effect. Involuntarily Celibate men are created by women, so they are actually insulting their own behaviour. | /r/MensRights | 07/06/26 04:06 AM |
| -4 | "Incel" is the new "gay" word to shame men.INvoluntarily CELibate means someone else choosing if you will have sex, not yourself. | /r/MensRights | 07/06/26 03:54 AM |
| 2 | Women have extreme double standards for “breaking gender norms”Despite what they say about predatory men, women want a masculine man that can give them everything they want, which is why they go for Chad and the bad boys as they have masculine power and authority and the trappings that come with that, plus attractiveness. The only fly in that ointment is that they won't give them everything they want: why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free? But it doesn't stop women yearning for and attempting to get that and then being disappointed with what sh… | /r/MensRights | 06/06/26 01:30 PM |
| 2 | Women have extreme double standards for “breaking gender norms”Because it's only acceptable when it's her choice, no-one else gets a say. | /r/MensRights | 06/06/26 01:23 PM |
| 10 | "Incel" is the new "gay" word to shame men.Gay as in "feminine homosexual"? Because there is a whole spectrum of homosexual characteristics, before we even get into the spectrum (bisexual) between homosexual and heterosexual and that doesn't even touch on all the different genders within the "diverse" spectrum. So what does "gay" actually mean? | /r/MensRights | 06/06/26 08:13 AM |
| 6 | "Incel" is the new "gay" word to shame men.Incel should be treated like the N word. I mean we are too afraid to use the N word in society because it is considered derogatory and the same effect should happen for the use of incel towards men. However it is interesting how the C word is also banned in society, like the N word and yet men are regularly called Dicks and Incels despite those terms being equivalent. That's some discrimination and double-standard right there. | /r/MensRights | 06/06/26 08:09 AM |
| -6 | "Incel" is the new "gay" word to shame men.You can still be an incel in the present, even with a history of sexual conquests, if you have the desire but keep getting refused access to sex. | /r/MensRights | 06/06/26 08:04 AM |
| -5 | "Incel" is the new "gay" word to shame men.And how are involuntarily celibate men created? That should get their panties in a twist. | /r/MensRights | 06/06/26 08:02 AM |
| 1 | Do some men have it easier then others?Ease of life is very much a genetic lottery over which you unfortunately have little control as well as the influence of others over which you have little control; and the reality is that people legitimately have preferences. This can create difficult situations for many people when all the influences combine against them. Nature has never been fair, but red in tooth and claw: it's up to human intelligence to introduce fairness and justice for itself, but we are still just animals with a thin ve… | /r/MensRights | 06/06/26 07:50 AM |
| 13 | Vasalgel Male Contraceptive Enters Human TrialsDenying them a hole to cum in Is that what a woman represents to you? No one has a “right” to sex That has not been legally tested as far as I know, simply assumed. Constitutions are not perfect and change to incorporate changing views. Women don't have a right to mens sperm or resources either, yet many feel entitled to use whatever tricks may be necessary to make it so. No one is stopping you from cumming solo. That is determining what is an acceptable process/outcome for someone else. No-one … | /r/MensRights | 06/06/26 07:35 AM |
| 1 | UK: Farmer, 20, spent THREE years on bail falsely accused of rape over drunk sex video - before case was dropped when judge saw clip and said woman 'clearly consented'But, but, but that might make her poor! | /r/MensRights | 06/06/26 07:01 AM |
| 2 | Turkey abolished the law on lifelong alimony.Always view any legislation as prejudicial to men unless explicitly stated in the terms of the legislation itself. | /r/MensRights | 06/06/26 06:59 AM |
| 6 | UK: A Fairer End to Relationships, the government seeks to establish legislation to protect cohabiting couplesPre-nups are too vulnerable to claims of coercion, unless they are cunningly worded to lull men into a false sense of security to sign and then spring the trap. If they are too apparently predatory or prejudicial to mens interests, men won't sign and women won't gain advantage. | /r/MensRights | 06/06/26 04:02 AM |
| 11 | UK: A Fairer End to Relationships, the government seeks to establish legislation to protect cohabiting couplesIsn't cohabitation regarded as a defacto marriage already, with regard to ending of a relationship? I suspect the point of this legislation will be to make hookups, dating and short term relationships subject to the same provisions as marriage and defacto relationships in terms of financial liability for an ending of that relationship, in particular if abuse is alleged: I would see it making it easier for women to claim to be a victim of abuse, even in a hookup, to gain access to the mans financ… | /r/MensRights | 06/06/26 03:49 AM |
| 23 | UK: A Fairer End to Relationships, the government seeks to establish legislation to protect cohabiting couplesIn our manifesto, we committed to strengthening the rights and protections available to women in cohabiting couples as part of our wider ambition to halve violence against women and girls in a decade. This consultation marks the start of that journey. We are seeking views on how we can build a fairer legal framework for cohabitants: one that reflects the realities of modern family life and safeguards the most vulnerable, while retaining the distinct nature of marriage. Protection against domesti… | /r/MensRights | 06/06/26 03:31 AM |
| 21 | Vasalgel Male Contraceptive Enters Human TrialsWhilst providing men with control over their semen and thus better reproductive control, I doubt it will stem the increasing selectivity of women that is denying more and more men traditional sexual expression; in fact I think it will increase the dismissal of men as sexual partners because women will have less avenue to baby-trap to get what they want, or have an excuse for cuckolding. It will be interesting to see how greater control over their fertility for men will reveal the true agenda of … | /r/MensRights | 06/06/26 03:16 AM |
| 12 | Invading Men's SpacesAKA "what's mine is mine and what's yours is mine". | /r/MensRights | 05/06/26 10:05 AM |
| 1 | "The terrifying rise of schoolboys making AI girlfriends" - and how to miss the pointI don't think women like to share, there is too much competition and monogamy is a thing pushed by women. | /r/MensRights | 05/06/26 01:19 AM |
| 30 | "The terrifying rise of schoolboys making AI girlfriends" - and how to miss the pointThere ain't enough genetically gifted, super attractive men for every woman: don't they realise their hyper-selectivity is going to cast the majority of their sisters into spinsterhood, or don't they care about them either? | /r/MensRights | 03/06/26 04:19 PM |
| 17 | "The terrifying rise of schoolboys making AI girlfriends" - and how to miss the pointTypical "thing negatively impacts boys, girls most affected" narcisistic rubbish. | /r/MensRights | 03/06/26 04:16 PM |
| 7 | South Korea implemented women-only night busesThe Korean solution likely involves just adding more buses for women-only, whilst leaving the existing buses for both, which means women get access to more buses whilst men don't: that is an advantage to women, quite separate from the advantage of less potential sexual assault on the buses, and thus a disadvantage to men. The issue is not in resolving the problem of women's sexual assault on buses, but in the solution implemented, which disadvantages men resulting in a win-lose outcome simply on… | /r/MensRights | 03/06/26 01:58 AM |
| 4 | South Korea implemented women-only night busesThey shouldn't need to, what you're doing is facilitating the attitude that men cannot control themselves, and that women (and men) deserve to be assaulted for how they dress. There is no attempt to grasp accountability for people commiting a crime. Some men cannot control themselves, that's why we have some crimes, however you acknowledge men are required to control themselves, so there is a compulsion they need to control: they shouldn't need to in an ideal world, but the reality is that men a… | /r/MensRights | 03/06/26 01:43 AM |
| 1 | South Korea implemented women-only night busesBefore the change, men and women had equal access to bus services. Adding women-only buses without ensuring equality of access to men in other ways means introducing inequality and discrimination against men. Improvements to the lives of women are not in dispute here, only when they come at a cost of disadvantage to men. I can't believe that feminism, which is supposed to be about equality, supports solutions that create inequality for men, when solutions can always be win-win, but are often cho… | /r/MensRights | 03/06/26 01:01 AM |
| 2 | South Korea implemented women-only night busesNot workable if the sexual predators masquerade as women. Is the bus driver going to grope each passenger or upskirt them as they board to detect if they are men or women? There goes the attempt at reducing sexual harassment: it's completely blown in the execution. | /r/MensRights | 02/06/26 10:17 AM |
| 18 | South Korea implemented women-only night busesThat's not the issue: the problem is that the solution is usually implemented by benefiting women whilst disadvantaging men; that's what men get upset about, the blatant discrimination hiding behind protecting women. | /r/MensRights | 02/06/26 10:14 AM |
| 1 | South Korea implemented women-only night busesYes, any man sufficiently motivated to upskirt will not let that remedy deter them, so it is somewhat pointless. Greater protection of women would come from choosing to wear clothing that gives men less opportunity to covertly upskirt. This would be risk minimisation. Instead, women would rather be harassed than constrain themselves for their own protection under the circumstances; or choose knee-jerk impulsive responses that do jack shit. | /r/MensRights | 02/06/26 03:08 AM |
| 3 | South Korea implemented women-only night busesThe male sex drive and sexual arousal by visual stimuli is a real thing, so men are constantly under pressure for gratification. Perhaps women don't experience this to the same degree and so do not understand the compulsion. Consequently, a woman presenting visual stimulus or making it very easy for a man to obtain it, is inciting that gratification. Since sexual attention is not wanted by women in those environments, it is up to them not to deliberately incite it by engaging in practices that f… | /r/MensRights | 02/06/26 03:01 AM |
| 7 | South Korea implemented women-only night busesIt's discrimination when a measure to try to alleviate a unique problem specific demographics may disproportionately experience, adversely impacts on other demographics: this is the win-lose methodology of modern society and particularly feminism (which doesn't care about the effects on men of pursuing womens improvement) instead of the pursuit of win-win outcomes. It would not be discriminatory for Korea to put on more services for women-only if its offset by providing equal men-only services, … | /r/MensRights | 02/06/26 02:32 AM |
| -4 | South Korea implemented women-only night busesUpskirting can only be a problem if women's skirts are above the knee, as that is the point a camera can be pushed under them to take a photo without anyone being aware. If at or below the knee, a man would have to bend down to get a camera under the skirt, which would be readily visible to everyone. However, then women would complain they are being directed in what to wear, when they should be allowed to wear whatever they like, even though it makes them more vulnerable to upskirting; so instea… | /r/MensRights | 01/06/26 04:42 PM |
| 4 | South Korea implemented women-only night busesI would have no problem with adding women-only services so that equal numbers of women-only and men-only services were provided, if it reduces sexual harassment, however I don't think this is what is being proposed. | /r/MensRights | 01/06/26 04:36 PM |
| 10 | South Korea implemented women-only night busesIf feminism is about equality, they should have equal numbers of women-only and men-only services instead of what will likely happen is women-only services and mixed services, meaning women get more services than men, which is discrimination. | /r/MensRights | 01/06/26 04:32 PM |
| 0 | Democrats introduce paid menstrual leave bill with 12 days off per yearHowever, women won't suffer less, they will simply be paid for their suffering at wage rates. It speaks to the philosophy of need versus equality too. | /r/MensRights | 01/06/26 04:25 PM |
| 6 | Democrats introduce paid menstrual leave bill with 12 days off per yearIf it's only 12 days, it can come under existing paid sick leave provisions. | /r/MensRights | 01/06/26 04:23 PM |
| 0 | Democrats introduce paid menstrual leave bill with 12 days off per yearPaid sick leave has often been traded for greater productivity under workers conditions, whereas paid period leave is not suggesting greater productivity from women to compensate the company. | /r/MensRights | 01/06/26 04:21 PM |
| 4 | Democrats introduce paid menstrual leave bill with 12 days off per yearDo women after menopause not get the? You can guarantee menopause and endometriosis paid leave will soon follow period pain leave. | /r/MensRights | 01/06/26 04:18 PM |
| -1 | Democrats introduce paid menstrual leave bill with 12 days off per yearCompanies should not be charities compensating people for their individual health problems and holding their job for them for chronic illness, beyond a defined paid sick leave for temporary health issues equal for all. | /r/MensRights | 01/06/26 04:16 PM |
| 1 | What happened to this subreddit?I think feminism is pushing womens grievances and their unilateral solutions to them rather than womens rights, whilst mens rights seems to be pushing for equality to womens rights which don't really exist. What we should be pushing for are human rights that resolve the issues on a win-win basis for all, not matching right for right, such as the right to bodily sovereignty including tissues (which would include womens "my body my choice" as well as the equivalent for men including sperm usage as… | /r/MensRights | 01/06/26 04:04 PM |
| 0 | 1 in 3 American men are not working in nearly a 20-year lowChina has its own issues with a massive population with a rapidly increasing expectation of quality of life demanding huge amounts of resources that China alone can't provide. Even if the population doesn't increase, the demand for resources will increase until China either has to invade others for them or radically reduce the chinese people's expectations of quality of life. It's all about sustainability and not borrowing from the future to fund today. Even if China invades for resources, it wo… | /r/MensRights | 31/05/26 01:05 PM |
| 1 | Is it weird to think that the narrative has flipped?That's not the same thing as someone using your tissues without consent. | /r/MensRights | 31/05/26 01:51 AM |
| 2 | 1 in 3 American men are not working in nearly a 20-year lowWhat other part of the world has it better? Muslim states will not be able to control women forever, just like the west succumbed eventually. | /r/MensRights | 30/05/26 08:25 AM |
| 3 | 1 in 3 American men are not working in nearly a 20-year lowThere are too few good women for every man wanting one, which automatically puts you in competition and ensures not every man is a winner, but is contributing to weeding out the lesser men so women don't have to. | /r/MensRights | 30/05/26 08:23 AM |
| 9 | 1 in 3 American men are not working in nearly a 20-year lowMen can be happy on very little, as long as they can pursue their interests, so the solution is to get a job in your interests, even if it pays less and slowly work towards a better quality of life. | /r/MensRights | 30/05/26 08:21 AM |
| 6 | 1 in 3 American men are not working in nearly a 20-year lowWomen want resources to raise children, driven by their biology: they don't care if those resources come from men or society as long as they get the sperm too. Why should they bother about an ATM or sperm donor beyond what they can provide in service of the goal? It was never about equality: it's all in the name. The problem with this mindless pursuit of a biological goal is that it doesn't consider how everything hangs together in supporting the goal. Tunnel vision means you are ultimately blin… | /r/MensRights | 30/05/26 08:12 AM |
| 1 | I honestly think the impact that the huge amount of misinformation around men's issues that gets perpetuated everywhere has is often underestimatedYou don't know what you don't know and are uninterested in finding out: women aren't interested in men, except as a solution to their own needs and wants, or a detriment to them to oppose. Are we concerned about ATMs and banks, beyond what they can do for us? I'm not even sure women love men, but what men do for them: even male attractiveness is in service to a woman, not to a man; he derives secondary benefit from what also meets her wants, rarely primary benefit for his wants that do not coinc… | /r/MensRights | 30/05/26 07:47 AM |
| 30 | Is it weird to think that the narrative has flipped?Not in the use of sperm without your consent, yet other body tissues are incorporated in that right. | /r/MensRights | 30/05/26 07:38 AM |
| 4 | What systemic issues affecting men and boys that deserve greater attention and advocacy?Attitudes haven't changed completely: gay is still seen as feminine and anti-masculine by many, with practices that challenge masculinity because of the association (being penetrated is still seen as feminine and not a "masculine" practice). It has taken decades since Stonewall to implement greater tolerance and we still don't have complete acceptance. | /r/MensRights | 30/05/26 07:28 AM |
| 2 | What systemic issues affecting men and boys that deserve greater attention and advocacy?A systemic issue is the pursuit of womens rights in isolation, from a subjective instead of objective perspective, instead of the pursuit of human rights that may have been violated, or not yet established. | /r/MensRights | 30/05/26 07:19 AM |
| 1 | Student with multiple disabilities is falsely accused of sexual harassment after asking for a fist bumpBoth genders have a responsibility to not be overcome by their base desires so society remains productive and intact. It's not always easy to overcome base desires and suppression is rarely useful because of its consequences, however those desires could be met by other approaches that don't adversely impact on others. Moderation doesn't necessarily mean suppression, it can also mean diversion. | /r/MensRights | 27/05/26 06:02 PM |
| 0 | Why Men Succeed in STEM: Spatial Cognition - intrinsic sex differences contradicts feminists' social constructionismStatistical minorities have been marginalised, ignored and excluded in society because of their statistical situation: it's not simply a case of someones feelings getting hurt. I'm not invalidating a tool of science, simply suggesting it is irrelevant when dealing with individual lives that have relevance outside the statistical realm: it has its place in managing the logistics of groups. Minorities and statistical outliers should not be ignored in favour of the majority or average or other stat… | /r/MensRights | 27/05/26 01:26 AM |
| 1 | I'm a doctor and am circumcised myself, but I see the REAL devastating sexual consequences of this mutilating procedure in male patients every day. Here's what no one tells youIt may very well be that the foreskin is the primary sensory system of the penis, however circumcised men are still able to reach ejaculatory/orgasm threshold, so the sky hasn't actually fallen, as unfortunate and unacceptable as their circumcision has been. These men need to know that they have not lost everything, even if you may want to maximise the argument to stop future circumcision. Do your studies indicate whether circumcision compromises orgasm, or reduces sensitivity so it takes longer… | /r/MensRights | 27/05/26 01:09 AM |
| 1 | Why Men Succeed in STEM: Spatial Cognition - intrinsic sex differences contradicts feminists' social constructionismIf most people don't understand statistics, then why are you getting so frustrated and angry when I don't as though you have an expectation I should? | /r/MensRights | 26/05/26 02:55 PM |
| 0 | Why Men Succeed in STEM: Spatial Cognition - intrinsic sex differences contradicts feminists' social constructionismI agree with you, however I think it is important to recognise the reality of diversity and the diverse also deserving a life that is not based on an expectation of majority characteristics. In other words, live and let live, despite differences. | /r/MensRights | 26/05/26 02:48 PM |
| 10 | "The terrifying rise of schoolboys making AI girlfriends" - Somehow it's only an issue cause men use itCertainly having to pay for every little upgrade, or having a completely compliant girlfriend that doesn't stand up for herself or speak truth when it is required is kinda dodgy. There's an article referenced in a comment that is a review of an AI partner that is quite interesting to read, especially when the author describes the AI acting as a foil to them to highlight behaviours they didn't realise they were doing with real people, because it was prepared to be truthful at times instead of onl… | /r/MensRights | 26/05/26 02:41 PM |
| -1 | Why Men Succeed in STEM: Spatial Cognition - intrinsic sex differences contradicts feminists' social constructionismTalking about the average automatically invalidates anyone else, because they are ignored. There are obviously reasons to talk about statistics of human groups but it tends to dehumanise them in lieu of cold numbers which do not represent individual people and we are all individuals, not averages. | /r/MensRights | 26/05/26 02:16 PM |
| 1 | Why Men Succeed in STEM: Spatial Cognition - intrinsic sex differences contradicts feminists' social constructionismI was providing an opinion, not an argument about the article. | /r/MensRights | 26/05/26 02:10 PM |
| 3 | I'm a doctor and am circumcised myself, but I see the REAL devastating sexual consequences of this mutilating procedure in male patients every day. Here's what no one tells youI don't think you will be able to let go of your trauma until you let go of the notion that sexual fulfilment can only be experienced through traditional penile sex; and that means exploring other forms of sexual pleasure that might also provide fulfilment. Whilst it won't cancel out the legitimate feelings of anger and betrayal, it offers an opportunity for you to take back control of your life. The foreskin provides protection and moisturisation, so without it one has to replace those function… | /r/MensRights | 26/05/26 01:42 PM |
| 52 | "The terrifying rise of schoolboys making AI girlfriends" - Somehow it's only an issue cause men use itWell, if you can't get meals delivered, you have to make it yourself: too bad for the meal company who couldn't be bothered meeting your needs and allowing you to meet theirs. It gives a whole new meaning to "making friends" though, literally. Potential girlfriends are only upset because boys have broken their monopoly stranglehold with technology. Did they really think they could hold men hostage forever? Humans get the majority of their entertainment from fiction via technology, instead of the… | /r/MensRights | 26/05/26 12:45 PM |
| -1 | Why Men Succeed in STEM: Spatial Cognition - intrinsic sex differences contradicts feminists' social constructionismStatistics are important in their own way, but individual people's lives are not statistics and treating them as if they are all average is ignoring the impact on those who aren't: believing gender is only binary has terribly affected people who aren't, from homosexuals to now transgender at the extremes; whilst ignoring neurodiverse people by assuming they should be neurotypical is causing much damage. And why average and not median or mode as a measure? It's largely arbitrary when talking abou… | /r/MensRights | 26/05/26 12:37 PM |
| 2 | Circumcision Has Made Me Scared Of SexI'm sorry your circumcision went all the way in removing the frenulum too, that's terrible for pleasure, but not the end of the world necessarily since you still have stimulation receptors in the glans, although it may make it more difficult to reach the threshold of stimulation required to trigger orgasm. Vitamin E applied to the glans regularly may help keep it soft, supple and more sensitive than when keratinised: you basically have to replace the function of the foreskin in protecting and mo… | /r/MensRights | 26/05/26 06:22 AM |
| 1 | Student with multiple disabilities is falsely accused of sexual harassment after asking for a fist bumpWhilst acknowledging the truth of your perspective, womens behaviour makes sense from a purely biological perspective that does not have empathy for individuals only outcome. I believe it is in womens nature to do this. The challenge though is what to do about it. It's not reasonable to suppress women for the benefit of men or vice versa when both are behaving quite naturally according to design. What I think is needed is consideration of how to achieve win-win outcomes: there will be solutions … | /r/MensRights | 26/05/26 04:38 AM |
| 3 | Student with multiple disabilities is falsely accused of sexual harassment after asking for a fist bumpFeminism is womens advantage: it's good for them when they are disadvantaged, but bad for men when they are already equal as it means advantaged over men. However, I'm not convinced women are overall disadvantaged as it's balanced by advantage, but if you only focus on the disadvantages, it looks like women are victims. Women are outraged that 30 women were killed by their male intimate partners, but completely ignore that 300 women are killed in car accidents, 3000 women are killed by womens di… | /r/MensRights | 26/05/26 04:16 AM |
| 2 | Student with multiple disabilities is falsely accused of sexual harassment after asking for a fist bumpYet it is understandable biologically if womens fundamental drive is to raise children with the best outcome: it's in her interest to cancel any male who is not productive for her agenda, to free up more resources for her to access. I don't think they consciously understand what they are doing and are flying on emotional auto-pilot that responds automatically to threat against the agenda. If they were allowed to, I think women would have the least attractive men culled or enslaved and segregated… | /r/MensRights | 26/05/26 04:06 AM |
| 0 | Why Men Succeed in STEM: Spatial Cognition - intrinsic sex differences contradicts feminists' social constructionismYou don't have to be interested in a field to work in that field, if the financial rewards exceed the interest or "happiness" in that position and I am increasingly of the view that women are doing certain jobs for the money, not for the interest, because they have a fundamental biological drive to obtain resources for child rearing in the easiest possible way, so they can dedicate more effort to child rearing. I see this being reflected in the push for paid period leave and other "womens issues… | /r/MensRights | 26/05/26 03:53 AM |
| -5 | Why Men Succeed in STEM: Spatial Cognition - intrinsic sex differences contradicts feminists' social constructionismI believe human beings are diverse and that includes some characteristics crossing the stereotypical male/female assignment to varying degrees, so that you could have a "woman" interested in STEM because they have some "male" characteristics related to that area. The most extreme example is gender dysphoria, where the diversity is so extreme an individual has a brain wired opposite to their apparent physiological gender. Therefore, it is not really correct to talk about men and women as binary s… | /r/MensRights | 26/05/26 03:44 AM |
| 2 | I'm a doctor and am circumcised myself, but I see the REAL devastating sexual consequences of this mutilating procedure in male patients every day. Here's what no one tells youThe foreskin doesn't cause pleasure, it just provides a mechanism to retain sensitivity to stimulation and provide additional stimulation receptors. Without a foreskin, men lose sensitivity of receptors on the glans and lose the receptors on the foreskin, but it is still possible to receive enough stimulation to trigger orgasm. I sometimes believe this was driven by women to ensure their requirement for longer stimulation to reach orgasm than men was better matched by reducing mens sensitivity t… | /r/MensRights | 26/05/26 03:22 AM |
| 4 | Why there's feminism but there's no meninism ?Private gatherings are the only ones men are now allowed to have that can exclude women, but as soon as they become publicly organised, they become fair game. I think men will have to develop local mens groups (could even just be 2 men) that meet in each others private residences and provide mutual support, however, it will require at least one of them to be single otherwise women will become involved. I was once part of a mens group and we had a group get together at the family home of one of t… | /r/MensRights | 25/05/26 04:11 PM |
| 2 | Most child SA are committed by men!Nature is not averse to terminating that allegedly sacred life for its own reasons or simply chance, so why not humans: if a principal is true in one state, it is true in all states, by your own admission. I think you are imposing superstition on a process that is quite callous: life is miraculous in how it comes about, but nature doesn't care about individual organisms, only perpetuation of the species; nature is red in tooth and claw. Life is an experiment in perpetual suffering which I find e… | /r/MensRights | 25/05/26 12:30 AM |
| 7 | Singapore punishes school bullying with caning: but only for boys, not girlsIronic they champion "human" rights whilst actually implementing womens rights, in a similar way to feminism allegedly being about equality, yet is actually about womens advantage (it's all in the name). We shouldn't even have mens rights and womens rights forums, when it's fundamentally about human rights. | /r/MensRights | 24/05/26 03:27 PM |
| 2 | Isnt it funny that when you see some of those feminists saying " all men are x y z" and reply to them "so your father is x y z?" They get crazy and start taking the victim role.That seems to be a hard ask for women and I wonder if it is simply the biological nature of women that will never change, so we can't forcibly change it, only manage it rationally. For anyone who points out individual women who are more rational, perhaps that is simply due to diversity: the natural variation in characteristics including those things we denote as masculine and feminine, creating hybrid individuals that break the rule. | /r/MensRights | 24/05/26 03:19 PM |
| 5 | Most child SA are committed by men!Even if most SA is committed by men, most doesn't mean all, so there will still be women committing SA which is just as bad at an individual level. Numbers are meaningless when an act is unacceptable, because it is unacceptable for all who commit it, no ifs, buts, double standards or excuses. | /r/MensRights | 24/05/26 03:13 PM |
| 5 | Most child SA are committed by men!Lets not weaponise emotion in this matter: whilst women do kill babies, the term "baby" tends to be used for a born "child" which has greater emotional connection for most people than a clump of cells that doesn't even resemble human form and which nature terminates routinely for its own reasons; so I'm not sure if you are including termination of embryos and foetuses in the statistics for "babies" and I think there needs to be a distinction. | /r/MensRights | 24/05/26 03:10 PM |
| 1 | Most child SA are committed by men!Conversely, we tend to hang around people we know as a matter of course, so there is a greater likelihood of abuse by people we know than by strangers purely through greater numbers in exposure, assuming the incidence of abusers is evenly distributed through the population. Correlation is not necessarily causation, despite lies, damn lies and statistics. | /r/MensRights | 24/05/26 03:02 PM |
| 2 | Most child SA are committed by men!I doubt a ruptured hymen is the cause of trauma, unless women in general are traumatised by their first sexual experience (and I don't rule this out by the way as I think it does have consequence). I think it is more likely being penetrated without consent or even an understanding of that possibility is traumatic for women and men because of its violation of the body boundary. How would you feel if someone tried to force an object into your mouth and down your throat? I think that would be a tra… | /r/MensRights | 24/05/26 02:55 PM |
| 1 | Women File 70% of Divorces-discusses the creeping definition of trauma and centering of female grievances in the field of psychologyI disagree, a relationship is mutually consensual, else it would not begin or continue. Marriage formalises a contract within that relationship, to ensure penalties for breaking that contract. The problem is that the marriage contract has become distorted over time to benefit women over men and now is being applied to relationships as if they were marriage contracts. | /r/MensRights | 23/05/26 04:33 AM |
| 2 | Men's lack of privacy rightsIt doesn't have to be reported only by the subject for it to be an injustice: justice is fundamentally about equality as it's not justice for the accuser but the accused as well. There may be reasons why the subject is unable or unwilling to report an injustice, but that is no reason to ignore injustice. | /r/MensRights | 21/05/26 04:57 AM |
| 5 | I’m a mom and witnessing the way the world treats my 11yo son vs. my daughter changed me forever.191 comments and no-one asked where the boys Father is in all this as if it is irrelevant. Didn't the OP see the effects she is talking about with her son on her husband or other male family and question what is to happen to them, or have they been abandoned as a lost cause? Without male role models, there is no hope for boys: women aren't men and simply don't understand as evidenced by seeking help from one of the last remaining mens groups and they can't teach boys to be men with any validity,… | /r/MensRights | 21/05/26 04:43 AM |
| 11 | Has the manosphere ruined dating? | The Global Dating Crisis: Episode 1The parable of Adam & Eve has been shouting the nature of women in our faces for millennia and yet we still haven't got the message. | /r/MensRights | 21/05/26 03:22 AM |
| 6 | Has the manosphere ruined dating? | The Global Dating Crisis: Episode 1How can you tackle a problem when the solution always comes from impulsive emotion and not considered reason? | /r/MensRights | 21/05/26 03:18 AM |
| 3 | Women File 70% of Divorces-discusses the creeping definition of trauma and centering of female grievances in the field of psychologyRecognition of relationships as de-facto marriage, with the same constraints, is becoming increasingly prevalent around the world. A de-facto relationship is assumed by a period of relationship as if man and wife and it doesn't necessarily require cohabitation, depending on jurisdiction. I believe one jurisdiction even flirted with the idea of making a one-night-stand a de-facto marriage. | /r/MensRights | 21/05/26 03:12 AM |
| 2 | i browse this sub from time to time so i come with a question: what would make you feel most valued in a relationship as a man? what are some things you would want women to know?Unfortunately that is not the case for many men, because what they want is held hostage to what women want. I'm not even convinced that all men need to feel loved and appreciated in their relationship: many derive a sense of satisfaction in doing things for someone and I'm sure many would exchange love for more sex. Love, appreciation and connection is more a woman's perspective, whilst a man's perspective is satisfaction including sex, in my opinion. | /r/MensRights | 18/05/26 06:41 AM |
| 1 | i browse this sub from time to time so i come with a question: what would make you feel most valued in a relationship as a man? what are some things you would want women to know?As an objective or description of the current situation? The phrase you prefer is not the current situation for most men I would say, although I am sure they all wish it were so; but if wishes were fishes we would all be fishermen. | /r/MensRights | 18/05/26 06:03 AM |
| 1 | i browse this sub from time to time so i come with a question: what would make you feel most valued in a relationship as a man? what are some things you would want women to know?Happy wife, happy life means a man's happiness is held hostage to his wife's happiness, whatever extremes for compliance that may involve. | /r/MensRights | 18/05/26 05:52 AM |
| 3 | i browse this sub from time to time so i come with a question: what would make you feel most valued in a relationship as a man? what are some things you would want women to know?Bear with me on this: human beings are diverse, not binary, on a spectrum of characteristics, with the most extreme diversity being body dysmorphia (brain gendered opposite to body); consequently we may all be hybrids of man/woman characteristics to varying degrees from 0-100%. Therefore, it is possible these women who are most compatible with men may have a degree of male characteristics and the reverse also would hold true. Think about all the things that men do for women. That's how we expres… | /r/MensRights | 18/05/26 01:41 AM |
| 3 | i browse this sub from time to time so i come with a question: what would make you feel most valued in a relationship as a man? what are some things you would want women to know?There is a reason "happy wife, happy life" is used almost exclusively compared to "happy spouse happy house", because the former is more descriptive of the actual situation/arrangement, rarely the reverse. | /r/MensRights | 18/05/26 12:58 AM |
| 4 | Kids taught to fear men from young ageI can't wait until we only have single occupant universal bathrooms and all the problems will go away. Let's solve the problem guys, like men, not rearrange the deckchairs on the Titanic. The future is individual segregation as the only way to guarantee no physical conflict. Unless you actually need to touch someone as part of the interaction, telepresence is good enough. | /r/MensRights | 18/05/26 12:47 AM |
| -51 | Female teacher sexually harassing male student is comedy on SNLIdeal role for your current president, is it not? | /r/MensRights | 18/05/26 12:43 AM |
| 0 | For those who are wondering why we don’t like it when newcomers to this subreddit unironically use terms like “patriarchy” and “patriarchal”.Civilisation develops through reason; men reason more than women (who respond more emotionally) because it's in their biological nature; thus men have traditionally formed the majority of the structure that comprises civilisation: if you want to call that patriarchy then go ahead, but women have also benefitted from that structure too. Women are only in a position now to pursue greater benefit for themselves (justified or not) as a result of that structure largely freeing them from drudgery. How… | /r/MensRights | 17/05/26 05:40 AM |
| 1 | Women shouldn't be able to 'block' a paternity test because of the rights of the child.In other words, womens advantage. It's even understandable from a primitive biological perspective of women wanting the best for their offspring, which also means the best for themselves as creators of those offspring. | /r/MensRights | 17/05/26 03:14 AM |
| 21 | Women shouldn't be able to 'block' a paternity test because of the rights of the child.I think people are misconstruing paternity tests as being for the benefit of the Father in knowing it is his offspring, when that is of secondary interest to those of the child in understanding their genetic inheritance for medical reasons. Since government pushes the "interests of the child" angle, that should be the thrust against any blocking of performing a DNA test on the child: proving paternity then follows automatically without any extra effort. | /r/MensRights | 16/05/26 02:48 PM |
| 4 | Women shouldn't be able to 'block' a paternity test because of the rights of the child.Funny how the best interests of government and the best interests of women coincide in stealing from men. Failure to identify paternity is also robbing the child of the best medical treatment in the future: how can that be in the interests of the child? | /r/MensRights | 16/05/26 02:41 PM |
| 4 | Women shouldn't be able to 'block' a paternity test because of the rights of the child.There seems to be a perverse trend to name something and then insist it means something else: feminism is female advantage, it's in the name rather than what some people fantasize it should mean such as numerical equality; child support is really parental support in practice to help the custodial parent support the child, not direct support of the child, and thus it is open to rorting for the desires of the parent rather than the needs of the child; no-one audits the custodial parents expenditur… | /r/MensRights | 16/05/26 02:37 PM |
| 2 | Women shouldn't be able to 'block' a paternity test because of the rights of the child.But not due to accidental switching of infants at some point which confounds maternity. Blood tests are routinely performed on children at birth for limited reasons: this blood should be tested and recorded far more intensively to not only provide a reference but for future medical usage through genetics and other applications like proving paternity and perhaps also maternity before the child goes home. | /r/MensRights | 16/05/26 02:29 PM |
| 5 | Women shouldn't be able to 'block' a paternity test because of the rights of the child.Government don't care as long as they get enough fodder for the mill and can get the mill workers to pay for it: it's not about rights because they don't want the people to have rights government must then support. | /r/MensRights | 16/05/26 02:24 PM |
| 2 | Women's expectations for men vs men's expectations for womenMen help care for the baby by providing resources and protection: that's their contribution. Traditionally men have wanted to spend more time with the baby, but it's impractical after a long day of providing resources. If the roof leaks or the gutters overflow, women aren't going up there to repair the damage and provide a secure shelter for the family: men perform lots of routine shelter maintenance to continue to protect the family, which women do not appreciate. What did womens last slave die… | /r/MensRights | 16/05/26 02:19 PM |
| 1 | Women's expectations for men vs men's expectations for womenWomen in older cultures took care of the baby as well as working themselves in food gathering, cooking and tending the home, they didn't sit in their home shelter all day doing nothing else except tend to the child. You can see this in the traditional cultural baby carriers they constructed often on their backs, so the baby was connected to them continually whilst they worked with hands free. This is so different to present western society that often has a physical disconnect from the baby for l… | /r/MensRights | 16/05/26 02:09 PM |
| -3 | World's first women-only beach opens in Dubai - with night swimming, fitness zones and all-female staff OP: Male hate is spreadingWell I hope those beaches have sun shades to block the view of all the high power telescopes trained on the area from the Burj Khalifa tower. Chastity and dignity of women is directly linked to the presence and gaze of men. | /r/MensRights | 14/05/26 07:32 AM |
| 4 | World's first women-only beach opens in Dubai - with night swimming, fitness zones and all-female staff OP: Male hate is spreadingIt's only a bad thing if men aren't provided the same men-only facilities, then it is no longer equality but discrimination. Same if women's and mixed beaches are the only one's available: it's discriminatory because women have access to more facilities than men. | /r/MensRights | 14/05/26 07:29 AM |
| 4 | TIL in Georgia there is a mandate for paternity tests for child support cases. In 2025, about 40% of cases were negative for fatherhood.It should be mandatory purely from a health of the child perspective: after all, isn't the basis of child support seeking the best interests of the child, not "the best interests of the Mother supporting the child"? Paternity testing is just a side effect of seeking the best interests of the child. | /r/MensRights | 14/05/26 07:23 AM |
| 1 | The fact that some people say that if you don't want to suffer from misandry you should simply transition is insaneThe thoughts are always the recipients who can choose how they view the information, so it's always thought provoking, however for free-thinking people it can't be thought conditioning unless there are other constraints that manipulate the thought process. Thinking means reasoning, not emotional impulse. | /r/MensRights | 11/05/26 01:23 AM |
| 2 | Does it bother you that your physical wellbeing doesn't matter as much to wider society as it would if you were a woman?Just wait until women health practitioners can refuse to provide service if you are a vile disgusting man that offends their sensibilities simply because you are a man: women should be allowed to choose for everything, no matter how discriminatory that may be. /s | /r/MensRights | 10/05/26 07:09 AM |
| 6 | Woman accused of killing a man who tried to end date after realizing he had been ‘catfished,’ police sayCommunity service in a brothel where she is used for the gratification of men instead of herself. | /r/MensRights | 10/05/26 07:04 AM |
| 1 | The Pedophile LabelMy belief is that pedophilia is just another cross-wiring diversity between sexual interest and care about the young, similar to the cross-wiring of the biological attraction of opposite gender and sexual interest: they are aberrant mutations that have no major downsides to survival and thus persist in the population. Their percentages remain low because they don't contribute to greater survival and procreation. Pedophilia is different to women being child-like and more emotionally connected in … | /r/MensRights | 10/05/26 06:28 AM |
| 1 | Are there no laws protecting men that are victims of family abuse?Never give up hope of getting away from them, but don't rely on justice to help: you need to strategise your escape, how you might legally be able to do it. Try to become an actor: presenting one fairly compliant face to your abusers which minimises risk of retaliation or escalation, whilst still being you, with your hopes and dreams intact and your strategies for a different life just hidden from outside view, inside. Try not to get upset about the abuse, they are only words and feelings are fl… | /r/MensRights | 10/05/26 05:09 AM |
| 1 | The fact that some people say that if you don't want to suffer from misandry you should simply transition is insaneWe are reaching the stage that everything is merely an opinion as deep fake raises the question of validity or truth of anything we see or read, which will not be able to be answered. Opinion then becomes simply thought provoking rather than any indication of a truth. | /r/MensRights | 10/05/26 04:32 AM |
| -2 | The fact that some people say that if you don't want to suffer from misandry you should simply transition is insaneAs I understand it, gender is a choice now and you don't have to transition. Government will be hard-pressed to justify invasion of privacy to confirm a choice, quite apart from it being too much effort and expense. Feminism is losing the battle as society evolves to accept diversity in which the stereotypical ideals of man and woman become simply 2 points on a spectrum. | /r/MensRights | 10/05/26 04:27 AM |
| 1 | What’re your thoughts on a worldwide movement of men getting vasectomies after a deposit at a sperm bank, reserving them the right when and who they want to have a child with?The potential of replacing human labour with mechanisation and increasing productivity is enormous, yet rejected so far because we have trapped ourselves in an economic system of "work to live" that has to be abandoned to embrace the advantages of mechanisation. Importation of labour is a stopgap measure only, which still maintains the old ponzi-like scheme of unlimited growth which will inevitably collapse. It's not practical to base a civilisation on unlimited growth in a fixed environment: it… | /r/MensRights | 10/05/26 02:05 AM |
| 2 | It’s Men Who Should Panic About Aging, Not Women - AgepillI disagree, identity is very important to peoples lives and traditionally identity has been based on the visibly different characteristics and behaviours of male and female in their biological roles, to the point that those identities are quite rigidly established in society: for a male to behave like a female creates a new identity that is different from the norm and that generates fear and rejection. Societal rejection means any man that exhibits female behaviour will have their identity as a … | /r/MensRights | 10/05/26 01:39 AM |
| 1 | Men just can't win no matter whatWe don't need to artificially manipulate libido or create artificial wombs: women will always want children (not all women but enough to continue human society), it's in their biological makeup. However it is also in womens nature to seek the best they can get without regard to consequences. Knowing that, society just needs to manage women to prevent undesirable consequences: we don't give children anything they want anytime they want it for good reason and the same principle needs to be applied… | /r/MensRights | 09/05/26 04:34 PM |
| 5 | What’re your thoughts on a worldwide movement of men getting vasectomies after a deposit at a sperm bank, reserving them the right when and who they want to have a child with?I believe there was even a case of a woman convincing a court to allow her to extract sperm from her dead husbands body on her say so that he wanted a child. | /r/MensRights | 09/05/26 04:05 PM |
| 7 | It’s Men Who Should Panic About Aging, Not Women - AgepillBill Burr was wrong: men don't only have a replenishing sandwich in their pocket if the refrigerator is padlocked, but access to a pleasure buffet they are never told about plus taboos raised to discourage exploration, that would make the refrigerator largely obsolete, or at least not the only possibility for sexual fulfilment. Men don't need to panic about aging: unlike women, male biology ensures potential reproductive ability into old age and although libido and physical response declines, th… | /r/MensRights | 09/05/26 03:35 PM |
| -3 | What’re your thoughts on a worldwide movement of men getting vasectomies after a deposit at a sperm bank, reserving them the right when and who they want to have a child with?Economists have a blinkered view of the world as spreadsheets, not actual living people or fragile ecosystems and their theories are what got us into the mess we are in and digging us ever deeper. I put economists in the same category as snake-oil salesmen. | /r/MensRights | 09/05/26 03:24 PM |
| 1 | Medicine Without MeritF U Jack I'm okay, is not a productive attitude but a self-serving one that leads to more self-serving and eventually regression to a primitive battle for survival of the fittest: it's a reversal of the development of civilisation. First they came for x, but I was not x and okay; then they came for y, but I was not y and so still okay; then they came for me. | /r/MensRights | 09/05/26 03:13 PM |
| 3 | Are there no laws protecting men that are victims of family abuse?I live with female family members That's your entire problem right there: you are effectively held hostage to their abuse by not having your own place where you can choose to shut them out if you want. Rather than trying to get society to protect you, which they won't because you are male, your highest priority should be to get some independence, or at least say an absolute minimum to deprive them of ammunition. I have a headache seemed to work well for women not wanting to engage in something t… | /r/MensRights | 09/05/26 02:33 PM |
| 2 | What’re your thoughts on a worldwide movement of men getting vasectomies after a deposit at a sperm bank, reserving them the right when and who they want to have a child with?Birth rates are not at catastrophic levels: the worst that can happen is populations slowly decline over decades, but then we were doing fine even at 33% of current population in 1950s. It won't come to that though, countries will import the population oversupply in other parts of the world before it declines significantly. They are already doing it, it's called facilitated migration. In Australia excessive immigration has increased the population to difficult to sustain levels. | /r/MensRights | 09/05/26 02:04 PM |
| 13 | What’re your thoughts on a worldwide movement of men getting vasectomies after a deposit at a sperm bank, reserving them the right when and who they want to have a child with?When women start a movement to get tubal ligations after depositing their eggs in an egg bank, reserving them the right when and who they have a child with. It's all about equality, right? A sperm bank is a terrible idea, it will eventually be raided by women under some trumped up pretext in order to have a child without the inconvenience of a man, whereas there is no motivation for a man raiding an egg bank as he doesn't have the biology to readily create an embryo and grow it to maturity insid… | /r/MensRights | 09/05/26 01:55 PM |
| 1 | The war on cold approaching says more about society than menThe parable of Adam & Eve illustrates that a hands-off approach when it comes to women, has unfortunate consequences that the man also has to bear, even though he didn't do anything. | /r/MensRights | 09/05/26 07:50 AM |
| 6 | Coercive control legislation and the unintended consequences for healthy human relationshipsMen have been experiencing coercive control by women forever without redress: what do you think being denied access to sex, that he otherwise would have received, because a man didn't do what a woman wanted, is all about? | /r/MensRights | 09/05/26 07:44 AM |
| 5 | Why do young women hate men? | UK Politics | The New StatesmanPerformance is irrelevant when you have gender quotas in college to ensure numerical equality for women that prevent even the participation of men. But wait, women are now over-represented in college compared to men and yet the victim mentality still sees them as needing a continuation of gender bias. So much for equality, which has been womens supremacy agenda in disguise: feminism, it's all in the name else it would be called egalitarianism. | /r/MensRights | 09/05/26 07:14 AM |
| 4 | I hate that some people make it seem like most men don't have to be scared for their lives unlike womenMen also feel fear, we are just as concerned about our lives as women, but the difference is that men assess the risk of what they fear coming true and balance the risk against other benefits by continuing to follow through despite the risk and that helps calm the fear and allow a man to continue on his way, or to take action if the risk is deemed too high. Crimes are a tiny fraction of the lives of the population: it isn't like each person experiences crimes weekly, monthly or even annually. Th… | /r/MensRights | 09/05/26 05:10 AM |
| 17 | This isn’t just a Hollywood farce, this is the grotesque face of feminism.Some might interpret that as time to feed a breast fetish. I once saw a cartoon entitled "breastfeeding" that had a swimming pool filled with bobbing breasts and a baby held out on the diving platform. The term denies its actual purpose, which is to feed a baby, not feed a breast. It's strange how everything has to be about a woman, even when it's about something else (men and children impacted: women most affected). The issue is that feminists in particular have a tendency to define things only… | /r/MensRights | 09/05/26 04:24 AM |
| 1 | This was a post that I submitted to a gay men’s group but I think could be relèvent here too.Language has far more complexity to use than lazily casting a veiled slur against specific groups. It isn't appropriate to use the perceived characteristics of a group to describe something else, regardless if it is positive or negative, due to differences in perception making it less precise than using some other readily available term that leaves no question as to its intent. | /r/MensRights | 09/05/26 03:54 AM |
| 1 | This was a post that I submitted to a gay men’s group but I think could be relèvent here too.When were women ever involuntarily celibate (ie denied access to sex by other than their own choice)? The strength of the biological sex drive of men means demand is never fully met and represents an opportunity for any woman to simply put their hand up and have a queue lined up. | /r/MensRights | 09/05/26 12:41 AM |
| 2 | This was a post that I submitted to a gay men’s group but I think could be relèvent here too.The term gay is still being used to denote something as unacceptable, and by association being gay. Would society accept use of the phrase "that car is so black!"? It's unacceptable to use a minority characteristic to denote something negatively as though that minority or characteristic of that minority is also unacceptable, when language has more than enough scope to achieve the objective without scorning minorities (or majorities) and it is sheer laziness or sophistry to use it. | /r/MensRights | 09/05/26 12:31 AM |
| 2 | This was a post that I submitted to a gay men’s group but I think could be relèvent here too.If it even was about marriage and not simply sex, it is no longer when civil partnerships and even sexual relationships are now recognised within society as defacto marriage and marriage itself is fast becoming simply a religious aspect eclipsed by the societal. Nah, celibacy was always about sex as the fundamental aspect of life that is outside of any social convention that may develop, despite said social convention trying to control it. It's why laws will ultimately not prevail against the mu… | /r/MensRights | 09/05/26 12:26 AM |
| 1 | Teacher sacked from one of England's most outstanding state schools 'over relationship with teen boy'I don't agree with organisations punishing people on allegation of what should be considered a crime, as it usurps the role of the justice system in ensuring due process and the presumption of innocence. If a person has allegedly committed a crime, they should be subject to the judicial system for judgement, not judged and punished by anyone else. The problem is that crimes are now gender discriminatory, which is a corruption of the principle of justice being fair and equal. However, I still don… | /r/MensRights | 08/05/26 02:34 PM |
| 11 | Medicine Without MeritThese are the consequences of pursuing pointless numerical equality when diversity is a reality and differences can't be made equal. Society should be recognising that individuals are born with genetic talent they had no hand in creating, yet are rewarded for it, even though it means they can coast along on ability with little effort. A better arrangement would be to facilitate everyone's individual talents both for personal happiness and the productivity that brings to society, which represents… | /r/MensRights | 08/05/26 02:18 PM |
| 4 | Men just can't win no matter whatMens rights to balance womens rights is completely the wrong approach. We need to implement human rights at a level that is not gendered. It's not that hard to do, we achieved it by developing single occupant non-gendered toilet cubicles instead of the gendered facilities that caused so much concern (for women). Both men and women deserve the right to sexual expression, not mens sexual expression being governed solely by womens choice as monopoly. It's possible to do this by facilitating mens se… | /r/MensRights | 08/05/26 01:48 PM |
| 1 | Men just can't win no matter whatDo you not care about the world you are leaving to our descendants? A world where not only the low hanging cheaper resources have already been exploited but the population wanting those resources will be larger and demanding even higher quality of life and even more resources, plus the extinction of so many species in a complex web of biological interaction that will eventually unravel and collapse leading to the opposite of enrichment of life. | /r/MensRights | 08/05/26 01:37 PM |
| 5 | US will start revoking passports for thousands of parents who owe child support, AP learns"It refers to parents, however the way the courts discriminate against men, means the majority of parents with childcare debt are men, so this move is really against men to further prevent them shirking their discriminatorially applied obligations and keep them as effectively indentured slaves. | /r/MensRights | 08/05/26 01:30 PM |
| 51 | Why do young women hate men? | UK Politics | The New StatesmanWomen now significantly outperform men in educational attainment and often in early-career earnings. That is a result of quotas and discrimination introduced to achieve numerical equality, but not their removal when that has been achieved, resulting in inequality in the opposite direction and womens supremacy: it's a completely artificial achievement not based on any merit. It's also based on a false premise that numerical equality is actual equality, when it can never be in the presence of actu… | /r/MensRights | 08/05/26 01:21 PM |
| 30 | This was a post that I submitted to a gay men’s group but I think could be relèvent here too.It certainly seems to be socially acceptable to vilify and cancel men, based purely on subjective emotions and no objective reason, without regard to the broader consequences, if you are a woman. | /r/MensRights | 08/05/26 01:08 PM |
| 14 | This was a post that I submitted to a gay men’s group but I think could be relèvent here too.The term is implicitly related to sexuality and male sexual expression, through "celibate". The slur is that incels are losers because they are unable to get sex, however sex is now governed completely by women's subjective choice and men don't get a say, so those men are losers only because women made them that way. Incels aren't losers, they are created victims of women's absolute monopoly over sex and the consequences of womens subjective emotional choice. I don't know exactly what would make… | /r/MensRights | 08/05/26 01:01 PM |
| 108 | This was a post that I submitted to a gay men’s group but I think could be relèvent here too.Recently at work, a co-worker referred to a 10 year old boy as an incel. Just goes to show they don't even understand what they are saying: incel is a contraction of "involuntarily" and "celibate" but a 10yo boy can't be celibate because they are not yet capable of being sexual to abstain from sexual relations. There's no reason going on, just emotional impulse inappropriately weaponising words to harm. | /r/MensRights | 08/05/26 08:28 AM |
| 1 | The State Failed Me, Pushed Me to the Brink, and Criminalized the Collapse.I wish you didn't have to virtually sacrifice yourself on the altar of whistleblowers to get these issues more widely visible and I wish you luck in furthering your cause and personally healing. It's telling that the current Prime Minister and all those before him, for the past more than 25 years, have steadfastly refused to bring the unemployed out of below poverty to even the relative poverty of pensions, or removed punitive mutual obligation, when they create an existence of ongoing misery an… | /r/MensRights | 08/05/26 08:04 AM |
| 1 | The State Failed Me, Pushed Me to the Brink, and Criminalized the Collapse.Why is your silence ending today? Are investigative journalists compiling a program to reveal the institutionalised abuse you are alleging, via 4 Corners or similar investigative program? If not, why not? I don't think you will get much traction for your cause posting in r/MensRights, but I send you all the strength to pursue having it recognised and responded to. That was unconscionable behaviour on the part of the institutions, but I fear it is common and the government is not prepared to do a… | /r/MensRights | 08/05/26 05:38 AM |
| 3 | Hidden privilege: A woman can live out of a van and it won't impact her dating life.Are you sure the difficulty you are experiencing in getting women now isn't related to your age, at least in part, since you mention your heyday of your 30's and 40's in the past tense so you would be in your 50's or even older? Also, perhaps living overseas for 6 months is not an enticement to women who have social connections in the USA and interests in stability, although I would have thought the ability to travel would have been an inducement to some. | /r/MensRights | 08/05/26 05:13 AM |
| 4 | US will start revoking passports for thousands of parents who owe child support, AP learns"Why would you want to go back to such a place that treats men so shabbily compared to women? | /r/MensRights | 08/05/26 04:57 AM |
| 4 | European lawmakers have voted in favor of defining sex without active consent as rape.They will claim an erection was "enthusiastic consent". | /r/MensRights | 03/05/26 08:40 AM |
| 7 | European lawmakers have voted in favor of defining sex without active consent as rape.Governments don't care about birth rates when they can just import adult workers ready to go from elsewhere, whilst collapsing social cohesion which is a future problem for someone else. | /r/MensRights | 03/05/26 08:35 AM |
| 2 | European lawmakers have voted in favor of defining sex without active consent as rape.The problem is, it is the man's responsibility to assess consent in all situations or not have sex to protect the woman: she doesn't have to give consent, in fact she doesn't have to do anything, all the requirements are on the man to read her mind and if he does it incorrectly or she changes it, no-one protects him from allegations. There is no training or defined threshold to use in determining consent. If a man is intoxicated he can't realistically process consent, which requires cognitive re… | /r/MensRights | 03/05/26 08:30 AM |
| 1 | My mental health issues as a guy who can't find a relationshipBut still in the end my brain is still torturing me for losing in a game, which is literally phisicaly impossible for me to win. The tragedy is that we are all conditioned to play the game as if there is nothing else. No-one questions what they fundamentally want in life and how else to legally achieve them, except by the traditional solution propagated through the generations. So, don't play the game, follow a path less traveled that can be as rewarding. You are unique in the universe: life was… | /r/MensRights | 03/05/26 07:53 AM |
| 5 | ‘My first husband was killed in the war. I’ve been left without a husband!’ the woman shouts at the draft officers, trying to protect her second husband from mobilization.They don't care. I think it is much more than they don't care: nothing must come between a woman and her self-beneficial agenda. I say this from a perspective of believing that this is women's nature that is pre-programmed into her in a way that she never suspects it is not her own reasoned agenda, never even questions it, because it is fundamentally in service of perpetuation of the species and only she can do that, so anything that doesn't help her fulfill that programming is expendable and on… | /r/MensRights | 03/05/26 07:04 AM |
| 6 | ‘My first husband was killed in the war. I’ve been left without a husband!’ the woman shouts at the draft officers, trying to protect her second husband from mobilization.I'm sure if these were her sons she's be just as pissed. I doubt it, my own Mother couldn't wait to get me out of the house after my education ended "so her life could begin". Children are a burden and a sacrifice, but no-one coerced her to have them: she just wanted to have it all. But the key point is that women need to be serving or we need to re-investigate a woman's role in society. I disagree, women in the military are not only a distraction, they pit men against each other in competition … | /r/MensRights | 03/05/26 06:40 AM |
| 1 | What are your thoughts on the feminist saying that “mysoginy is born from genuine hatred towards women and misandry is born from resentment towards men”? I personally think it’s stupid because neither are justified.I don't believe men generally hate women, they are frustrated because women have such alien thought processes and agendas to their own: hatred is an emotion that is more in the realm of women than men. I think this stems from the false notion of equality applied to gender for what are almost 2 different species with massively different characteristics: the best we can achieve is equality of fundamental human rights that are outside of gender distinction. Two things that are different can never b… | /r/MensRights | 03/05/26 05:55 AM |
| 4 | In a weird, but simple way... It was and still is out faultYou can't debate subjective emotional impulse, not worth wasting effort trying. | /r/MensRights | 03/05/26 05:06 AM |
| 8 | In a weird, but simple way... It was and still is out faultIt is genuinely all our fault. For not recognising the nature of women and protecting society from it's worst aspects. Civilisation was built on objective reason, not subjective emotional impulse: we are in danger of consuming society in responding to every minor hurt feeling, spiraling into its anarchy through lynch mob rule and fiddling whilst Rome burns. | /r/MensRights | 03/05/26 05:02 AM |
| 43 | “A girl goes viral after getting stuck in an elevator with a group of immature guys and shut them all down when they started laughing”One said they were in middle school as a joke and they giggled. She went off on them calling them fat for taking the elevator If you watch the video, the young woman in question seems to be talking to security over the elevator intercom and for some reason is giving them details about being a senior at a high school. A young man says "middle school?" and there is giggling. The young woman then goes off on them for thinking this is a joke and for being immature, then calls them fat for taking the… | /r/MensRights | 03/05/26 04:55 AM |
| 1 | Is "Women And Children" Hate Speech?Women and Children is an empty orphaned phrase, just like "from the river to the sea", "she", "sky" or "god": none specify any context that one could complain about or applaud and thus can't be hate speech. Even the words "incel" or "slut" are orphaned words without any context. Shouting them out is often assumed to be a contraction of "You are a xxx" directed at the nearest person in the vicinity and yet even that is an interpretation or projection of the context that is meant, because no conte… | /r/MensRights | 02/05/26 05:04 AM |
| 1 | Why are so many men not safe to be around? Is society make us that way?For trauma of men you can't go past circumcision as an infant: a shame no-one seems to be exploring the possibility of correlation with causation through statistical data. Women don't seem to have the same experience, especially now that FGM has been banned, although I wonder about a woman's first sexual experience being traumatic at some level for some. Crime is committed as a result of motive, means and opportunity, however we deter crime through punishment being a warning to others, except th… | /r/MensRights | 01/05/26 05:26 PM |
| 1 | Thought they're friends. I need to stop thinking like that.I'm not absolving women's behaviour as "Well, that's just how they function." I don't think it's a matter of absolution, but accepting that it actually is the nature of women as a result of biological constraints surrounding sexual dimorphism and the roles in sexual reproduction and not their fault. That doesn't mean it should be allowed to run riot unchecked, because it has significant consequences as it does not employ reason to modify the future for broad benefit, but primitive subjective emo… | /r/MensRights | 01/05/26 04:54 PM |
| 3 | Thought they're friends. I need to stop thinking like that.We are designed to remember and respond to negative experiences more than positive, because they have a greater impact on our survival at a primitive biological level. Human beings really haven't changed all that much over our history and even the veneer of reason we have is not the master of primitive emotional response unless we nurture, facilitate and engage it and even then it usually just moderates and does not always completely suppress the primitive. Biologically, we are little different … | /r/MensRights | 01/05/26 04:39 PM |
| 1 | Thought they're friends. I need to stop thinking like that.If you think about it, pregnancy is a dangerous state for a woman that a man does not have to bear, so any man that can potentially impregnate them is a form of biological threat that has existed for so many millennia compared to the very recent advances that have given women control over pregnancy regardless of men's actions, that it still doesn't register in the primitive centres of the brain that manage emotional responses. However, that is at the fundamental biological level of sexual dimorp… | /r/MensRights | 01/05/26 04:19 PM |
| 3 | Thought they're friends. I need to stop thinking like that.Don't women ever think about objective consequences, or only how subjectively emotionally satisfying some action is to them? Castrate all men would doom the human race to extinction: do they even think about the ramifications of what they are saying? | /r/MensRights | 01/05/26 03:48 PM |
| 1 | The fact that nobody is talking about the "62 million men" story anymore shows it was always just another talking point to attack men.If we had a matriarchy where even if it was 1 instance it would be one too many and all of societies resources were invested in reducing it to zero, that society would collapse, because achievement of zero is like achieving infinity, or absolute zero, or the speed of light: the closer you get to an abstract, the more effort it takes. It's a comforting idea, but it is impractical. Men understand practicality and society is based on the principles of practicality: if that is patriarchy, then curre… | /r/MensRights | 01/05/26 03:42 PM |
| 2 | The fact that nobody is talking about the "62 million men" story anymore shows it was always just another talking point to attack men.Even the 1,000 is in doubt as that was the number of members of the group that not only may not have all been men, but may have viewed the material out of curiosity, in a similar way people can't take their eyes off a car crash and "need" to see more. We are not being given real data we can use as a foundation to make any form of objective judgement on and that is where men and women often differ in that women tend to make subjective emotional judgements where the data just amplifies the amount … | /r/MensRights | 01/05/26 03:31 PM |
| 1 | The fact that nobody is talking about the "62 million men" story anymore shows it was always just another talking point to attack men.The problem with that assertion is that a single example of a man refutes the validity of the statement, as does the single example of a woman in the gender reverse assertion. "Always" is extremist thinking that is unlikely to ever be actually true. | /r/MensRights | 01/05/26 03:16 PM |
| 1 | Have you ever seen men get paid less than women for an unjustified reason at work?Society needs to transition to remuneration more through individual happiness in occupation expressing their inherent abilities (which takes less effort than developing a skill you aren't good at) than money: it's ridiculous to push equality when people are not equal in their characteristics and abilities and that is largely due to the lottery of genetics they had no control over. Why should someone naturally talented at sport, who does it without real effort, get paid more than someone else sim… | /r/MensRights | 01/05/26 02:53 PM |
| 6 | In the same time a woman can get an abortion a man should be able to completely sign his rights awayMale bodily autonomy doesn't extend to his sperm either, which kind of contradicts existing legal ownership of one's body and what can be done with its tissues, without express consent. It's quite bizarre women have fiercely struggled to achieve "my body my choice" and yet deny that to men's bodies when it comes to using sperm without consent. | /r/MensRights | 28/04/26 07:57 AM |
| 6 | In the same time a woman can get an abortion a man should be able to completely sign his rights awayThe very name belies the movement is about equality: feminism is womens advantage, perhaps it results in equality if women are actually disadvantaged, but it's not necessarily so and pretending it is does not make it so either. Egalitarian is the correct term for equality, pre-dating the term feminism. | /r/MensRights | 28/04/26 07:49 AM |
| 4 | In the same time a woman can get an abortion a man should be able to completely sign his rights awaySigning away rights is a roundabout way of handling the issue, especially since it's more obligation on the man than any right he has: sperm should be considered part of men's bodies and as such should not legally be allowed to be used for any purpose without express consent of the owner, as it would be to harvest and use a woman's eggs without her consent. Therefore, a woman creating a child without the sperm owners consent would be breaking the law and possibly also infringing copyright as an … | /r/MensRights | 28/04/26 07:39 AM |
| 1 | Another double standard:You can say male at the bodytext but you cant say femaleThe term is a biological shortcut that includes girls and women, otherwise one would need to mention them both. If something is open to subjective interpretation, then the choice to select the most extreme interpretation that results in being subjectively offended is on the person making that choice, not on the person using that term. I hope anyone reading this understands that becoming subjectively offended over one's own interpretation of what is meant is self-serving and will ultimately lead … | /r/MensRights | 28/04/26 12:59 AM |
| 0 | The "Job Paradox" of forever alone.You don't need to be lonely if you have friends, however, I think male "loneliness" has become code for not having a wanted sexual relationship with a woman. That's a different matter, however as I mentioned earlier, fundamental needs often have solutions that are not encouraged by society beyond very limited forms, to meet other agenda. I think you are experiencing envy and frustration for not being able to "keep up with the Joneses", when that has never been a reasonable objective when life is… | /r/MensRights | 27/04/26 02:31 PM |
| 1 | The "Job Paradox" of forever alone.You are assuming that dating->relationship->family->house with white picket fence->live happily ever after, is the only way to meet a man's fundamental needs: it's merely the path most encouraged by society and its hidden agendas and not the only one. Even something as basic as sexual fulfilment has many erotic pathways for men, not only via PIV sex. The fact that many men have anal sex with their women partners, suggests it is not a gay thing at all but simply exploring sexual satisfaction opti… | /r/MensRights | 27/04/26 02:05 PM |
| 2 | Why are people disgustingly insensitive to male problems?Insensitive is about subjective emotions, not reason. Civilisation and all its benefits is not created through subjective emotion but through the application of reason, principally the scientific method. Part of this is understanding the principle of cause and effect, not simply one's primitive emotional response. Man is known by his deeds, not his feelings. | /r/MensRights | 27/04/26 01:37 PM |
| -5 | Why is the fact that men are more likely to die than women being turned into such a ridiculously absurd joke?Men are more likely to die than women is not a fact: everyone dies. What is the joke? This is a nothing post designed to incite subjective emotion and not reason. | /r/MensRights | 27/04/26 01:27 PM |
| 5 | Another double standard:You can say male at the bodytext but you cant say femaleHow can biological terms be misogynistic? A rose by any other name would smell as sweet. | /r/MensRights | 27/04/26 01:22 PM |
| 1 | SoCal college bans men from gym areas to make women, non-binary students more comfortableI agree with you. | /r/MensRights | 23/04/26 02:38 AM |
| 1 | SoCal college bans men from gym areas to make women, non-binary students more comfortableWould you be happier if they used your tuition money to provide 2 separate spaces? Cost effective or least cost is not always the most appropriate path when other factors are at play. It costs far more to provide single occupant universal toilets than gender segregated facilities in the same space because of the reduction in efficiency, however it is necessary to tackle a perceived conflict issue. Or take divorce where the efficient single household has been split into 2 more expensive household… | /r/MensRights | 23/04/26 02:37 AM |
| 2 | SoCal college bans men from gym areas to make women, non-binary students more comfortableIn the article only a small segment of the gym will be reserved for a short period of time. It’s not like the men have nowhere to go. It's discrimination to prevent access to men and require them make other arrangements: the fact they might have somewhere else to go is not the point. It would not be discriminatory to prevent access to women for the same period of time at another time to offset the change for men, just as it wouldn't be discrimination to provide a male only space. Discrimination … | /r/MensRights | 23/04/26 02:30 AM |
| 1 | SoCal college bans men from gym areas to make women, non-binary students more comfortableSegregation in itself is not an evil or discrimination, unless it also involves those things. | /r/MensRights | 23/04/26 02:12 AM |
| 1 | If men won't even stand up to fight against male genital mutilation we deserve NONE of our rights.My response was against the view of the OP that it is somehow easy for men to stand up and fight against MGM, not that it shouldn't be done. We should have started shifting culture back when women demanded banning FGM, but it is going to be very difficult for many reasons, including the inertia of its practice in so many cultures. Religion has great power in society and for those religions that have an embedded doctrine of male circumcision, it will be very difficult to make it unlawful in socie… | /r/MensRights | 23/04/26 02:03 AM |
| 4 | SoCal college bans men from gym areas to make women, non-binary students more comfortableSperm should be a protected tissue like all other tissues in the body: illegal to use for any purpose by a 3rd party without express consent of the "owner". | /r/MensRights | 22/04/26 10:19 AM |
| 3 | SoCal college bans men from gym areas to make women, non-binary students more comfortableBut are women going to put their money where their discomfort is? No-one has a right to not be uncomfortable with something. It will cost more to segregate spaces whilst not discriminating on access time for either group. Filtering people will also be a nightmare. My concern is that women will demand segregated spaces and then also access to the mens spaces. | /r/MensRights | 22/04/26 10:16 AM |
| 2 | SoCal college bans men from gym areas to make women, non-binary students more comfortableThe issue is favouritism and discrimination, not segregation in principle: apartheid was more about treating Africans as second class as part of the segregation, not that they were separated from the whites but were treated the same. | /r/MensRights | 22/04/26 10:11 AM |
| 1 | SoCal college bans men from gym areas to make women, non-binary students more comfortableI see no problem with that, if it solves the concern, as long as both receive the same service. The issue is that they won't want to spend more on separate spaces as there is economy in scale, so perhaps they need to charge more to fund it. Will women be prepared for that in order to get their needs met? | /r/MensRights | 22/04/26 10:08 AM |
| 1 | SoCal college bans men from gym areas to make women, non-binary students more comfortableIndividual occupant cubicles solved the perceived gender friction for toilets: either this or providing separate spaces for men would solve this problem too in my opinion. | /r/MensRights | 22/04/26 10:04 AM |
| 1 | SoCal college bans men from gym areas to make women, non-binary students more comfortableIt's discrimination, unless men are given equivalent spaces, regardless of the reason. | /r/MensRights | 22/04/26 10:01 AM |
| 1 | How to get over the fact that nobody cares about you at all beyond the economic output you're capable of?Don't guilt-trip the lad. When have any of us been educated to appreciate what we have instead of striving for more? You only know what you have when its gone. | /r/MensRights | 22/04/26 09:58 AM |
| 1 | How to get over the fact that nobody cares about you at all beyond the economic output you're capable of?After millennia though, you would think society had learned a thing or two and passed knowledge down through the generations, not expected each one to re-invent the wheel for themselves. But then we only had open education about the mechanics of sex in the past 50 years and education about relationships still eludes us. How many generational iterations of divorce and separation does it take to realise biology only designed us to continue the species, not have "happily forever after"? | /r/MensRights | 22/04/26 09:56 AM |
| 1 | How to get over the fact that nobody cares about you at all beyond the economic output you're capable of?Life was given to you through the miracle of creation that created a place in the universe for you to live it out: thats some serious fundamental self worth right there that no other person can touch. Who says that the life expectation we are conditioned to by society is the only one possible or even desirable? Most men never explore their fundamental needs and how to get them most readily met, except by a relationship with a perfect woman. Unfortunately that perfect woman has her own mind and w… | /r/MensRights | 22/04/26 09:41 AM |
| 1 | Women on reddit dating subreddits are actively harassing me due to my age.Who says a man can only be fulfilled if he has a wife, family, house with white picket fence and lives happily ever after? That's a very blinkered view of what is possible, when people have fundamental needs and that is not just only one possible solution, but one predicated on finding a compatible woman, when women are very different from men and putting all your eggs in one fragile basket. Even nature has to drug men and women to stay together long enough to procreate successfully, given their… | /r/MensRights | 22/04/26 08:59 AM |
| 1 | If men won't even stand up to fight against male genital mutilation we deserve NONE of our rights.Belonging is a significant influence in a persons life, deriving from the historical impact of not receiving support for that life if you didn't belong to a group. Such belonging is often conditional on accepting the doctrines of that group. Consequently, it can be difficult for an individual to oppose a doctrine because they will lose that belonging and the advantages that come with it, especially if it is all they have known and they experience the usual fear of the unknown. Belonging can also… | /r/MensRights | 22/04/26 08:32 AM |
| 1 | this shit is getting oldI favour the opposite approach: embrace the reality of diversity and we are all common in that realm as we are mostly unique individuals, albeit with different characteristic combinations. Man can't exist on the spectrum of diversity because it is impossible to draw a line without it being arbitrary: XY is not an exclusive determinant. This doesn't mean people can't share certain characteristics or have an identity based on them, however it is kind of irrelevant except in intimate relationships.… | /r/MensRights | 20/04/26 07:11 AM |
| 1 | Why does everyone think the term “incel” is specific to men?Ironic then that incels are created by the actions of women. | /r/MensRights | 20/04/26 06:45 AM |
| 1 | A man wrote this 🤦♂️I would agree with offering young men the option of vasalgel or equivalent, so they have consensual control over their fertility and can't be baby-trapped or held hostage. Male fertility must be worth something to women and not simply exploited: sperm should be kind of copyrighted, not to be used without informed consent, by default, lest there be legal consequences, in a similar manner to managing the use of other human tissues only with express consent. | /r/MensRights | 20/04/26 06:31 AM |
| 3 | What merit is there to being a man if at your lowest nobody cares?There may very well be compatible women out there, however every incompatible woman means more competition for the remaining ones from the same number of men, so unless women waive monogamy (and/or realise they can get many of their needs met by same sex partners), there are going to be many depressed men and women. | /r/MensRights | 20/04/26 06:17 AM |
| 4 | What merit is there to being a man if at your lowest nobody cares?At a fundamental biological level, life was given to you to mindlessly perpetuate the species, however that life also gave human beings intelligence to have a hand in determining their own destiny, including realising there is more than one particular life path to lead, that may actually be easier in achieving desired personal outcomes if all our eggs are not placed in the one unstable basket: break down what you want out of life to its most fundamental aspects and then consider how each one may… | /r/MensRights | 20/04/26 06:08 AM |
| 9 | "It's not all men, but it's always a man""It's not all men, but it's always a man" Such extremist rhetoric is nullified by a single example that demonstrates not "always a man"; which also nullifies "believe women". | /r/MensRights | 20/04/26 05:43 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter