TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

pillepallepulle Archive

View 0 posts and 78 comments by pillepallepulle on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

This is actually hilarious. You are complaining about unfair discrimination of one group of people, while advocating for a unfair discrimination of a different group of people. Your cognitive dissonance is really astounding.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 11:52 PM
1

Yeah, bashing feminists is kinda the thing of this sub.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 02:36 PM
1

So this artical is just blatantly lying? I mean I would be glad if it did...
/r/MensRights18/11/16 02:23 PM
23

How can this be real. I know this is an overused phrase, but in this case i quite literally ask myself, whether these people have lost their minds. "Clearing main roads is sexist" ends in absolute chaos, who would have thought.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 07:40 AM
2

Actually Breitbart is not news at all, it is commentary. Heavily one-sided commentary.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 06:01 PM
9

"According to Breitbart..." lol
/r/MensRights06/09/16 08:39 AM
3

You just don't understand what "typographical" means. Just a hint: The word "typing" derives from it, not the other way around. Edit: ok I won't leave you hanging. Typographical means "in written form", therefore a typo, which is short for typographical error, means an error in the way something is written, which covers all spelling mistakes. If you are trying to be a smartass, at least know your shit numbnuts.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 06:50 PM
4

typo short for typographical error. a misspelling.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 02:55 PM
2

When it comes to making a fool of yourself, you seem to be a true expert.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 02:54 PM
0

Man, you sure are a moron. Cheers mate, hope you get better. Achso, wir können auch auf Deutsch weitermachen, aber ich fürchte das verstehst du dann nicht du minderbemittelter Haufen Affenkot. Ou en francais peut etre? Je vais avoir un problem avec tout les accents, parce-que mon clavier est allemand, mais je crois que ce n'est pas de importance, tu ne comprends rien de tout facon, cretin.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 06:21 PM
0

As opposed to the people, who blame refugees for anything and read up on everything all the time, right? The result of that are great articles like the one presented in the video. Sweden is going to be a third world country by 2030 because of the refugees. So much intellectuel honesty and well conducted research.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 01:36 PM
-1

Sorry that my writing is below your standard, but english is my third language and people like you are not really worth more effort. Maybe you want to go and watch more 50 second videos of people telling you to hate others, that is probably more down your ally
/r/MensRights25/06/16 12:02 PM
1

Well i can have fluent arguments in the third language i learned, you can't even imagine that is possible to speak more than one language it seems. You do not address points, but spelling mistakes. So much for your intellect you dimwit :)
/r/MensRights25/06/16 11:56 AM
–

The relative high numbers of rape in sweden are due to swedens stupid, feminist rape laws. "Fuck off and stop trying to use scaremongering and smear tactics, because that just doesn't work anymore, it didn't work with the EU referendum and it won't work here." It is funny that you would accuse me of anything like that, while defending a video that claims, Sweden will devolve to a third world country because of immigration, which is demonstrably a blatant lie. While it is probably accurate to say…
/r/MensRights25/06/16 11:11 AM
-3

She doesn't say that most immigration into first world countries is wanted and that many immigrants work, mainly manual labour that won't be done by the higher educated inhabitants. By working they are expanding the welfare programs, because they pay into them. This is a good thing. That the crime rates have risen (if they indeed have, she doesn't present a statistic or cites any other source for her claim, the statistics from wikipedia show that the number of reported crimes was stable from 199…
/r/MensRights25/06/16 10:44 AM
-2

Found an uneducated rightwing moron. Guess there are a lot of uneducated rightwing morons on this subreddit.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 10:31 AM
-6

Which points? She doesn't raise any points she just flat out lies and makes stupid assumptions. There is no argument, all she is saying is that immigrants are bad and will ruin sweden. She doesn't say why, so yeah it is indeed rightwing nationalist bullshit and there is nothing to refute. Also, it is sad that someone is attacked for her opinions, but that does not make them less stupid, sorry.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 10:12 AM
-5

What a load of crap. Rightwing nationalist bullshit. "The immigrants are taking our moneeeeeeeeeh". The best thing about the video is the sentence "Immgrants arrive with children that need to be educated". Yeah no shit. As opposed to the arian masterrace children that do not need to be educated or what? Stupid racists fucks. Also the claim that the UN predicts anything like that is absolutely laughable and scrolling over some random web page with a shitty article headline on it is hardly a credi…
/r/MensRights25/06/16 09:53 AM
3

Man this is some tinfoil hat conspiracy bullshit... yeah the evil feminists want to control Britain through the EU, you guys are really onto something here... The left were more in favour of remaining because leaving the EU was absolute idiocy and left-leaning people tend to be more educated (or the other way around), deal with it.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 09:25 PM
3

EDIT: Sorry, this is not the place to discuss Brexit and I don't really want to start a debate about it either, had enough of that today.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 11:31 PM
5

Sick comeback bro
/r/MensRights04/06/16 12:57 PM
10

You seem to like judging people for arbitrary reasons. You should try to avoid that in the future because it is a fairly stupid thing to do and makes you look like an idiot. There is no reason to dislike a person over a matter of taste and being homosexual does not mean a person is "crazier than a shit house rat". Also there is no reason to assume that shit house rats are crazy, but I'll let this one slide for now.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 06:05 AM
14

Even if she actually needed that amount to cover her "expenses"... why should her ex-husband cover that. Doesn't she have a stable income?
/r/MensRights02/06/16 05:12 PM
2

I don't understand what you are trying to say. Something can absolutely be so stupid that you find it funny, those two are not mutually exclusive.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 07:22 PM
5

"It's probably not good that the Matildas were beaten 7-0 last night by Newcastle Jet's under-15s" For some reason that made me laugh, it just sounds so stupid.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 04:50 AM
-3

Don't even try, feminism is like the boogeyman for the people of this sub. Every negative statement about feminism is always 100% true and applies to every feminist, while any positive statement is 100% false. It's pretty childish and very similar to the hypocricy that they accuse feminism of all the time, but somehow they don't see that. This is one of the main reasons, why rational discussion became basically impossible in this sub, it is just a massive circlejerk of people with a black/white …
/r/MensRights20/05/16 05:23 AM
3

Idk man, obviously what the women did was shitty, but hammering people with a leadpipe has to be worse. What did they do? A slap to the face and walking behind the counter on top of generally behaving like obnoxious assholes. But what the guy did was so over the top, he probably didn't even need the leadpipe, he could have knocked them out with his fists easy enough. No one should ever resort to such levels of violence unless the life or health of a person is at stake, and even then you would ha…
/r/MensRights02/05/16 09:29 AM
6

It's so funny that she also gives an explanation for the wage gap that has nothing to do with discrimination and she doesnt even realize it. "Ladies, you can officially not feel bad for those long lunches or that extra Facebook break." If women collectively spend more time on facebook and take longer lunch breaks, then they obviously also collectively deserve less pay for the same time spent at work. Wage gap explained, no need ot read the article.
/r/MensRights30/04/16 05:42 AM
4

While immediately after the ruling exceptions were made for religious practices, the ruling is still a step into the right direction. So far the german government does not have the guts to interfere with religious practices of jews, for obvious reasons, but it is just a matter of time I hope. Edit: Of course i hope that circumcision will be banned in Germany all together, not that the government generally interferes with jewish religion
/r/MensRights27/04/16 07:51 PM
1

Too bad that I won't click it because of the clickbait title
/r/MensRights26/04/16 04:43 PM
1

MVP
/r/MensRights22/04/16 02:28 PM
4

I like how obviously you can see that the bikini fotos are shopped when comparing them to the pictures of her in a dress. Even in a dress you can see that her stomach is nowhere near as flat as in the bikini shoot and she most likely even wears some sort of forming underwear underneath. Now when this is all about body positivity and such, why is there a need for this enormous amount of retouching/manipulating of the pictures? Doesn't make a lot of sense.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 01:53 AM
3

Also girls
/r/MensRights06/02/16 08:56 AM
2

Agreed, horrible article, Biased, generalizing and polemic. Absolute trash tier in terms of journalistic quality, and people are upvoting it because it tells them what they want to hear. Shows how this sub isn't any better than r/feminism.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 08:23 AM
0

Garbage article.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 08:21 AM
9

Yeah I don't know, that doesn't sound like something that would happen in real life. Everybody running out of class because of a single bee... two times?
/r/MensRights20/12/15 11:49 PM
3

Yeah I thought about posting this here, but didn't because it is in German. The comment section is full of sanity though, both from women and men. There are a handful of people that defend this "article", while hundreds point out the sexism and make fun of the author.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 01:30 AM
4

Yeah the thing is that you have no base of making all these assumptions about those people. You don't know them at all and you judge thousands by the bad example of a few, but you can't understand that this is wrong. So i wish you a good life and hope that you never are at the mercy of people who think like you, because that would really suck for you.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 07:25 AM
7

Ah, and how do you know that? Did you talk to a single refugee? I bet you didn't, you just sit on your ass while other people try to help, sacreficing their freetime and you still want people to listen to your unfounded, racist, stupid opinions. You have no idea what you are talking about. Probably get all your "information" from some tabloid too.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 07:10 AM
9

Yeah you know the thing is, they don't really want to come here, the place they used to stay just got bombed to rubble... It's not a "hey living in country x would be nice, lets move there dear" kind of decision, it's more of a "holy shit if the bombs don't get us those lunatics from ISIS will, we have to get the fuck out of here" kind of thing. Also it is mostly men, because many countries have a family reunification policy, so their family can just get on a plane and does not have to deal with…
/r/MensRights24/11/15 07:02 AM
8

They are not immigrants, they are refugees, numbnuts. They are fleeing from voilence and death in their country and have lost everything. There is a difference. Also nothing you mentioned gives you the right to judge an individual human being.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 06:33 AM
1

No, there is what is called an empathy gap. The death of men is simply not seen as tragic as the death of women and children. I think this is some form of coping mechanism, because men die a lot more frequently then women and children, due to their occupation and the way the military is set up in most countries, but it is still a bias that has to be challenged, because obviously the life of a man should be as valuable and its loss be mourned as much as the life of a woman or a child.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 05:48 AM
2

yeah that guy is a total walnut, next.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 09:31 PM
5

did you hit your head recently?
/r/MensRights06/09/15 05:32 AM
6

No idea why you get downvoted, this is the perfect example of a strawman.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 10:44 AM
2

It's just a suggestion and noone gives a shit. Also no businessowner in their right mind would ever ban a customer for parking in a women parking spot. Noone is checking your gender when you park somewhere yet.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 12:57 AM
–

As a German, most people don't give a shit about this parkingspot stuff. People park in family and women parking spaces all the time, it's not like anyone checks wether you are actually a woman or a family when you park there, i think it is merely a suggestion and not even legally binding at all. It is only enforces with handicapped spots, where you need to leave a special document in plain sight inside the car or else you get towed. It is obviously stupid that these parkingspots exists, but it …
/r/MensRights27/08/15 12:48 AM
5

Nice to see the interviewer is calling her out on her bullshit and basically tells her that her way of presenting men is inaccurate and polemic and that the statistics she cites are false. She was led into showing her true colors and I am especially glad to see this on zeit.de, which is a good source of news and levelheaded articles on many topics, but had a worrysome trend towards feminist viewpoints for a while now.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 05:24 PM
8

Also why start at the 6th toe. I bet 4 toes are perfectly sufficient, so why not cut off a toe on each of your feet Mr. Rabbi?
/r/MensRights17/08/15 02:51 PM
9

It's bad for us, because sexism is a real thing that happens to men as well. Trivializing it in such a way is bad for everyone that suffers from sexism. Again, that includes men.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 12:24 PM
4

Yeah i'm not going to watch this clickbait trash. Is this MR for preschoolers or what?
/r/MensRights04/08/15 06:03 AM
16

But you can easily call feminists dumb, so there goes your point.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 04:58 PM
6

I tried to understand this comment and now i have a headache.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 07:43 AM
3

Well, that would be the story to post here then.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 06:52 AM
21

I have no idea what so ever how this is related to men's rights in any way.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 06:43 AM
6

I don't have that feeling at all. Being against circumcision is the mainstream point of view on this matter in Germany, as far as i can tell. Nobody I know is circumcised and most people consider it a cruel and unnecessary practice. It's just jewish hardliners that play the antisemitism card in this discussion, but they do that with every discussion that even remotely relates to their religion, so they are not taken serious. It is more an issue of religious freedom versus bodily integrity, which…
/r/MensRights23/07/15 03:20 AM
5

I don't know how it is in other sports, but at least in football/soccer, there is no such thing as a men's event. Women are technically allowed to participate in any FIFA event, but since women are physically below the level of most 15 year old males (I watched a game once, where the U16 team of Borssia Dortmund took on the german women national team, the reigning women's world champions at that time, and the boys won 3:0 while being highly concerened not to make the women look too bad) , there …
/r/MensRights21/07/15 12:11 AM
4

The women's world champions would not be able compete against most mens amateur teams though. I remember when the german women's team was world champion a couple of years ago, they lost to the youth team of Borussia Dortmund with 0-3. It was obviously not the most serious match, but they really didn't stand a chance against 15-16 year old guys. So demanding that the women's WC earns even remotely as much as the men's WC, in an event where the competition is of a so much lower standard that it is…
/r/MensRights09/07/15 09:19 AM
5

thanks for saying that, i always cringe when i see these posts.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 06:12 PM
16

Or you could just be your own person, that is not defined by feminists at all, with the premise to keep an open mind and not to be a dick to anyone unnecessarily regardless of gender. Redpillers are like Radfems, they just parrot the opinion someone else has made for them, and because they don't think for themselves, their opinions can simply be disregarded.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 10:22 AM
1

That is where i disagree. You can easily use a "fact" like "women are naturally worse at chess" to purposely attack an individual. The problem then is not the interpretation but the intention of the statement.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 07:49 AM
-2

My kinda stupid what?
/r/MensRights20/04/15 07:30 AM
1

You won't concede that some sentences are more easily misinterpreted than others? That to misinterpret some, it needs something like willful ignorance, while other sentences will be mistaken, as an insult for example, because of context or even intention of the person said sentence originated from?
/r/MensRights20/04/15 07:28 AM
1

According to your logic, the sentences "This old handgranate you found in the forest is dangerous" and "This paperplate is dangerous" should be met with the same reaction then?
/r/MensRights20/04/15 07:20 AM
-2

Did you just get angry at my statement? Way to prove my point.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 07:16 AM
–

Still doesn't prove his point, or are you saying that male chess grandmasters lack the ability to get angry because they are so logical and rational?
/r/MensRights20/04/15 07:14 AM
-12

How does that prove his point? If someone says "Men are naturally worse at handeling children and should therefore not be allowed around them" and you get angry at that, do you also prove their point?
/r/MensRights20/04/15 07:05 AM
-2

Do you really not see the difference between "the sky is blue" and "women are bad at chess"? What a ridiculously bad argument...
/r/MensRights20/04/15 07:03 AM
-3

So if you tell a woman that "Women are naturally worse at chess", you don't think this could be missinterpreted?
/r/MensRights20/04/15 05:41 AM
–

I guess it is ok to say that women are, on average, worse at chess than men, if this claim can be supported by statistics. It is however not ok to tell an idividual woman that she is bad at chess because she is a woman and there is a very thin line between those two statements. So in oder to not appear as a dick, one might just refrain from making such statements alltogether, i really can't see the their value anyways. Just my two cents.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 04:54 AM
6

It does give them a lot of publicity, doesn't it. I mean most people would not even have heard this show happened, me included. Now I read about it from i don't know how many sources today. Pretty sure it was all planned like that and the reaction is fake as well.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 01:08 AM
21

I am not a native english speaker, but doesn't male tears mean that the tears themselves are male? shouldn't it be male's tears or men's tears?
/r/MensRights01/12/14 01:25 AM
3

Exactly, there are people that direly need Ritalin, I was one of them. I could not sit in class, I had to stand or I would go nuts. I had trouble writing a single sentence, because at the end of it I would already be thinking about something else and write that down instead. After i was treated with Ritalin my marks went from failing grades to straight As, there was no way i would have made it through school without the treatment. I could not sit and play videogames for longer than a few minutes…
/r/MensRights26/11/14 07:32 PM
1

Doesn't work for me either. I think it's my tracker blocker, do you use one?
/r/MensRights01/11/14 11:45 AM
5

Yeah well your comment was useless and insulting so you can hardly complain about it getting removed. I guess if you argued your point better the same thing would have happened, so what you should learn from this is that arguing with this kind of lunatics is fruitless, especially on their home turf. Someone so severely seperated from reality as the commenter you replied to is not worth your time.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 11:43 AM
3

there is this new thing called masturbation though...
/r/MensRights30/10/14 06:19 AM
3

Or maybe people with healthy lifestyles are more attractive to women and also have a lower risk for all kinds of cancer. I am no cancer expert but this sounds like complete bullshit. How is your prostate even supposed to detect wether you sleep with 20 different women or 20 times with the same one.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 04:44 AM
8

this is obviously a troll... are you new to the internet or something?
/r/MensRights28/10/14 02:46 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter