TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

pilotlet Archive

View 1 posts and 567 comments by pilotlet on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Social Issuespilotlet/r/MensRights07/05/23 07:28 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
42

Do not have kids, do not marry, do not tie yourself to a binding legal contract with the State. Although the problem of paternity is a serious and growing problem, The problem is what that woman is going to do with your children once she wants to be impaled by another man.
/r/MensRights18/11/23 05:27 PM
3

Hava nagila and salam alaikum.
/r/MensRights15/11/23 01:52 AM
1

Do you know if women clean their pussies if they know they are not going to fuck in the following months?
/r/MensRights15/11/23 01:50 AM
4

Of course we have a choice. We have the option to take our own way. Do you hear those inner voices? That inner voice is the gynocentrism instilled almost genetically in our guts in which we seek to make men believe that without a woman, his value is null. It doesn't matter if you are always going to lose in the game, It doesn't matter if the risk can destroy your life. Of course we have the option. We have the best option and yet some fall in love with their sadomasochistic bondage.
/r/MensRights15/11/23 01:48 AM
1

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights06/11/23 02:23 AM
1

Of course it does not. But it all finishes in it. You can go round and round about wanting to ejaculate, making ejaculation "more patient" for more pleasurable ejaculations, you can even take it as a game; but in the end, that's what it's all about: ejaculating. And then, if you care about your partner, about her orgasms. But that's another story.
/r/MensRights05/11/23 02:23 PM
1

Because in the end, it is what it is. It's just freeing semen. Whether it's on your hand, a pussy, an ass, a mouth or anything that has good friction to release semen.
/r/MensRights05/11/23 09:53 AM
2

There is no broad generalization. It's the pure truth.
/r/MensRights05/11/23 09:51 AM
4

I understand the nofap movement; However, I find no harm in masturbation. That's why I disagree with your point of view. I consider masturbation, precisely, my own liberation that I can satisfy without the need for third parties or tiresome courtship games.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 12:01 PM
4

Of course I need to. At 40 years old I am already the sexual market is overwhelmingly boring and convoluted to fuck every fucking week; One masturbates, turns off instinct and does other more useful things. And life is wonderful.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 11:29 AM
2

I prefer my right hand, thanks.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 11:20 AM
2

A rather expensive form of masturbation.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 11:17 AM
5

But is it interesting to spend all your fucking internal energy focusing your life on women? The other way around. You masturbate watching porn, clean yourself, close the pornographic page and temporarily free yourself from your sexual instinct: something that women inevitably cannot tolerate because ultimately, they use your sexual instinct to take advantage of you.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 11:15 AM
8

You can lose weight, but generally you cannot gain height except with those expensive and very painful, high-risk operations. Men are judged by what they cannot change, and women by what they could change and do not want to.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 11:10 AM
1

The war of the sexes will end when it is legally imposed that women have to reach mental maturity to be considered equal to men, and not a species of animal in danger of spreading with more rights and more legal excuses than man.
/r/MensRights03/11/23 12:31 PM
1

Sexual liberation has come from both sides in legal terms. Women have always profited from sex through prostitution, men have consumed them and in the social environment, there was religious primacy. Religion dies, the woman can earn her own money and be independent; both are free in the sexual market and what a surprise: Most men are not fit by female standards. Pure natural behavior that was restricted precisely by monogamy or marital chastity. Thus, man has created contraceptive methods and s…
/r/MensRights02/11/23 02:55 PM
2

Indirect communication is shit. People have serious mental problems when they use aggressiveness as a form of social relations and friendship, fool language, perhaps a sign of immaturity, but man, No matter how much emotional intelligence we have, we cannot be 24/7 trying to guess what people think. You have to express yourself clearly and not seem Japanese with "tatemae" or social hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights02/11/23 01:15 AM
0

You are confusing concepts. The sexual market was not liberated and women did not have that monetary access and material independence that they have now; Hence the point that comes to collate about whether feminism has destroyed the dating market today. And the answer is no. The objective is to affirm that women have achieved their economic and material independence to precisely be part of a conglomerate of polygamous Chads who monopolize the sexual market while There are more and more involunta…
/r/MensRights01/11/23 04:29 PM
0

Yes, it is feminism. Believing that women had the same freedoms in the 19th century as they do now is absurd. In Spain, until 1975, with the Franco dictatorship, Divorce, apart from being illegal, kept women in a perpetual legal age minority. I do not at all agree with comparing all waves as supremacism because effectively, before the law and before society, men and women have not had the same equitable treatment, and this is something to be recognized.
/r/MensRights01/11/23 01:16 PM
-10

Feminism has not destroyed anything. We have to be honest and stop fooling around: in conditions of free choice and economic freedom, Women are neurally programmed to discard most men; and if they have their needs covered, the opportunities for many betabuxxers who in the past could marry and have families under the concept of exploitation that women did of men in exchange of sex for the man and money and stability for the woman. Feminism has freed women from their dependence on men, but apart f…
/r/MensRights31/10/23 09:53 PM
17

Brother, this is the mindset that is worth millions.
/r/MensRights31/10/23 09:40 PM
71

The gaslighting is strong.
/r/MensRights31/10/23 09:39 PM
2

Men need more women than women need men. Women are objects of tutelage and take advantage of appearances of weakness and neoteny as much as possible to be perceived as people with a mental minority. Many men buy into this version of "all women are queens without bad intentions." It is a matter of time.
/r/MensRights31/10/23 10:00 AM
2

The female personality detector with Ted Bundy was so defective that effectively, everything revolves around lookism and what's more: hybristophilia: status+looks perfect pairing of female sadomasochistic attraction.
/r/MensRights31/10/23 02:29 AM
3

I think the girl version of being an incel is not being able to get the guy they want or get married and have kids. Totally agree. This is the tenet of femceldom: a voluntary celibacy based on extremely complicated standards demanded in a sexual market where these men generally have much better options than what this woman can offer. And while men can descend into the deepest underworlds of feminine lookism, this type of women, in their abundance—because unless it is an extreme option, the major…
/r/MensRights31/10/23 02:25 AM
2

Indeed the best answer; Sex is not the epitome of inceldom, since prostitution has existed since ancient times The key, in these modern times, is that reproduction and in its accompaniment, the creation of a family and a couple is the central key to the incel's headaches: feeling accepted as a sexually favorable subject, and chosen as a breeding partner. And in a way, perhaps that is essentially what it means when a woman chooses us to have unconditional sexual relations with her: that subconsci…
/r/MensRights31/10/23 02:21 AM
2

there is at least one woman who can't find a man. This is explained because there are men who monopolize the sexual market for themselves and for practical purposes, are polygamous.
/r/MensRights31/10/23 02:14 AM
1

Good bot.
/r/MensRights31/10/23 02:11 AM
1

For legal purposes, in Islam, women have freedom of choice. This is something that is agreed by what is seen in all Islamic religious documents, including the most extremist or fanatical ones. Then, social reality is another world. A Muslim who wants to marry under all the rules of his religion is the most extreme form of betabuxxing in the hope that in exchange for money (before and during marriage) they will receive sex. For definitional purposes, it is prostitution. But a fucking expensive fo…
/r/MensRights31/10/23 02:07 AM
1

Mass abstinence enforces itself through lower birth rate, increasing number of involuntarily celibate men and increasing sexual monopolization by a small percentage of men who monopolize the sexual market. Some have experienced relationships and abstain, and others have never experienced a relationship and cannot access one. And the trend is that the Western population is actually getting older, with fewer children, and as long as machines and artificial intelligence do not compensate for the po…
/r/MensRights31/10/23 02:04 AM
17

You should have studied engineering, brother. Here in Spain the faculties of humanities and health sciences are Marxist-feminist committees. And the worst thing is that when you enter the job market is when things get really bad. Finish your studies and live in hermit mode.
/r/MensRights26/10/23 01:38 PM
4

The scientific blackpill is law. Incels have it the worst, but it affects everyone, both in reaffirming that you are a Chad and almost all women wet their panties for you or on the opposite extreme: knowing that it is over, understanding the fundamental principle of female freedom: that as an incel, no woman wants to choose you. And in the Incel-Chad spectrum, we would be the rest of the people in a kind of "normiedom" in our countries. And all at the expense of money; because what is not looks …
/r/MensRights26/10/23 01:19 PM
4

Brutal Esthervilarpill.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 11:36 AM
1

Not everyone can get laid and not only sex is the only thing that moves them, as you mention. That's the point of this whole problem, since pais sex has never been more easily accessible than now. Truly, inceldom is so complex that there are many variables that can send you there. Depression and suicidal ideation comes from failure, not inceldom forming because of them. That's the problem with many platitudes like "improve your personality, take a shower and exercise." Of course, improving yours…
/r/MensRights16/10/23 04:57 AM
5

What cave did you come from? There are men who, whether because of their height, their face or their penis, to give one among many examples, cannot get laid even if they desperately want to. Check it out: r/short r/smalldickproblems r/ugly r/foreveralone
/r/MensRights15/10/23 03:31 PM
1

The illusion comes from the same moment that you can believe that both factors intersect and where a woman will perfectly understand what the implicit exchange is, and not your exploitation as a man.in the long term. Not only are you looking for a woman who is attractive, but you are also looking for her to be intelligent, and you are also looking for her with sufficient intellectual capabilities to understand everything you establish. No, this is a contradiction.
/r/MensRights14/10/23 04:43 PM
3

Loooooooks!!!! Halo effect, man.
/r/MensRights13/10/23 11:33 PM
5

Politics is a great demagogy. The solution is not politics, the problem is instinct. Most people are retarded, and that is democracy, because the principle of democratic voting is inherently based on the emotionality of the arguments and not on what is objectively best for a nation. What is best for a nation? There is the debate. The principle of freedom governs the market; and if the market is the great regulator, it must also be through the market where what people want is determined through t…
/r/MensRights13/10/23 11:30 PM
5

Smart pretty woman... Delusional.
/r/MensRights13/10/23 11:17 PM
3

There are no women for every man. That is sociological, demographic and even elementary nonsense. A platitude, a lie. I first learned about blackpill through a woman when I was in my 20s. She was my girlfriend And it was brutal, especially hearing how when my girlfriend invited her friends over and I heard all kinds of brutal pills. And this is what I'm talking to you about in the early 2000s. The man who is not handsome is money. And to understand that a woman wants you for your money is to ass…
/r/MensRights13/10/23 11:15 PM
2

My time to post Orden Ogan: https://youtu.be/VIw4j6yzrcQ?si=ljAavpARoTKH9IZp
/r/MensRights11/10/23 12:40 AM
2

to die in
/r/MensRights10/10/23 05:14 PM
184

Water is wet. Stay hydratated gentlemen. 😎
/r/MensRights10/10/23 04:04 PM
57

The kidnapping of a woman is a tragedy, that of a man, a statistic. Probably a feminist named Stalinova.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 04:02 PM
2

Men have no hyster. Check it out.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 04:09 PM
4

You say a lot without saying anything, brother. Trying to find balance in a fierce struggle is simply idealism. Gynocentrism and feminism are bastions of this decadent society. Briffault law, Briffault law, Briffault law. It is the only law that men must understand to articulate his life with respect to the opposite sex. There's no more. It is definitely possible to find a good woman to marry. And that is the problem of many today. You want to make a woman property in a world where there are no …
/r/MensRights08/10/23 01:46 PM
11

Because they're not going on dates come Saturday night, after all. Just being honest. They could, but they don't. There is no Chad available. Another thing is a cope.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 12:36 AM
1

Yes, but what's the point of the message?
/r/MensRights07/10/23 11:52 PM
1

Tell me. What's the message of the post?
/r/MensRights07/10/23 08:27 PM
1

Most men cannot choose. Most men should not marry.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 08:27 PM
0

What's your point?
/r/MensRights07/10/23 06:32 PM
17

Yes, undoubtedly. But there is the crux of the matter: when sex is the centrality of what we call "love", We see that love increases or decreases according to sexual attraction. That's her thinking.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 04:37 PM
28

In this case, there is a problem of emotionality in discordant mentalities. To give you an idea, it is evident that sexual attraction is an undeniably instinctive fact, you have it or you don't have it and it obeys measurable variables. When this woman says: "I love/accept him regardless of his weight" it means that we don't know. Extreme insecurity about grabbing the first deluded person to offer you security despite not being the best value on the market in an act of desperation? An idealizati…
/r/MensRights07/10/23 03:19 PM
15

Here I am going to break a spear for this woman. But not for the reasons you could wonder. Every person who has reflected deeply on couple relationships and has lived them firsthand has always asked themselves the question: does this person love me for what I am and what I contribute or what fills her eyes? It's obvious. It is a perpetual halo effect, and it affects men and women. And while men, due to their biology, may want to be with the majority of women, even more so if they make up the maj…
/r/MensRights07/10/23 03:13 PM
1

Do you guys believe that men’s rights issues are a direct result of feminism or did they predate the feminist movement/have no relation to feminism? The rights of man are a concomitant fact since man is right. Since societies have been forged, since man has been man. Feminism emerged as a movement of bourgeois women who raised the need to equate men with women and vice versa in the productive process, that is, Feminism essentially arises as a push by capital to lower costs and introduce women ma…
/r/MensRights07/10/23 02:41 PM
1

(2) But men don’t seem to be able to do the same. Feminism is the majority, FDS is the epitome of many women's interests. Many men only cry in his impotence, register in forums of dubious origin to release his hatred for not being chosen to have consensual sex and emotional and feedbacked relationships. Many are young, and I, at almost 40 years old, After so many experiences, what I have done is to go own my own way. This is not about "hating women", but it goes beyond the incel who does not fuc…
/r/MensRights07/10/23 12:20 PM
1

(1) Absolute crap. Why? What gets more clicks and share? The person who is just a regular person talking about things they like? Or the extremes on both sides, women who talk about manipulating men or exterminating them, or the men who talk about women’s “true nature” and dehumanising us, how we’ll steal all your jobs and money? Because indeed that is the surrounding nature that surrounds modern dynamics. Hypergamy, in essence, is eugenics. The true nature is that women tend towards eugenics and…
/r/MensRights07/10/23 12:20 PM
1

I think you mean anecdotal evidence. I question you, because precisely what I see is that in my experience it is the other way around. The women of my country do not find Christ, nor do they become blessed, nor do they crash into an imaginary wall. They go on and on until they die in that dynamic of debauchery.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 01:08 AM
1

What is the data that supports this?
/r/MensRights07/10/23 12:23 AM
1

You place a lot of value on the intellectual capacity of the mass of men and women alienated by the optimism of being part of that dream of money, unbridled sex and being unique in a sea of ​​artificial preferences sold at hamburger prices. Do you know what will happen a century from now? This accumulation of repression towards man is going to return in such a way that there will only be violent outbreaks. We already see them, and we will continue to see them. They will happen constantly because…
/r/MensRights07/10/23 12:19 AM
1

Gotcha, mate. I was joking.
/r/MensRights06/10/23 12:49 AM
1

I'm not friendlier because I want to fuck you, Australian friend. I am joking. But the thing is that men do not understand that women do not function under the courtesy and honorability with which we treat each other among men, since we understand not only relationships as a mutual and beneficial exchange, but as a concomitant project when seriousness is sought. The woman cannot perceive that, and hence the problem of the simp strategy. Buuut, that's life.
/r/MensRights06/10/23 12:46 AM
5

The thing is that if they put a black man as president (Obama) or an Indian as Prime Minister; or a Chinese whatever, it doesn't matter. They are puppets; The fact that they put an Indian in does not mean anything, their culture does not matter, they are just scapegoats in the name of a diversity that seeks to engulf all social and socialize them. Immigration does not break the culture because the basic culture is already dead. Western culture has died from the same moment that Christianity has …
/r/MensRights05/10/23 11:19 PM
15

Saddiq Khan, Lucie Statham or James Cuckold, it is the same shit.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 08:14 PM
14

Indeed. Man can only fight with other men to defend his rights. There will be men who live connected by cable to gynocentrism or who live in a situation such that until Don't beat yourself up, you won't learn from the reality that affects the majority, but..., For women, men are an object of performance, like a racing car or an old appliance.; In the culture of contemporary capitalism, it is better to replace than repair. Even more so when you have more options or when you are rewarded for the c…
/r/MensRights05/10/23 07:59 PM
7

HeForHe or fuck off, honestly.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 05:45 PM
5

I come from gaming in the 90s, IRC, the beginnings of the TeamSpeak channels, Messenger, Half-Life in general and PC Gaming in general and truly, Wherever there is a woman among men playing, there are always problems. There is always the idiot who "falls in love" with the girl, the one who gives privileges, and one at a certain age is no longer able to put up with bullshit.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 10:30 PM
2

We agree that AI can give men more options; And indeed if a man finds pleasure and well-being in a silicone artificial intelligence, well, the better for him. Without a doubt, that is why I spoke of "I am of the opinion", rather than talking about "men should...". In the end, the transaction for sex is still big business; Jacking off watching a big ass on PornHub is still a lucrative business and, even paying for female attention on OnlyFans or Twitch is still a very lucrative business. Sex is a…
/r/MensRights04/10/23 01:05 PM
33

I only play video games with men. It is the best.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 12:51 PM
1

This answer is totally off-topic to what I said.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 12:15 PM
1

Hello, Spaniard here: If a woman decides to abort, the father has no power or anything to do. The woman will have an abortion and either her abortion is subsidized by the State or she has an abortion in a private clinic. In Spain, you can renounce paternity if and only if you do not register the baby with your name in the civil registry. If, on the other hand, you register the baby under your name, you basically become his legal guardian and you must support him until he comes of age, married or…
/r/MensRights04/10/23 12:13 PM
2

The only way I can see this happening earlier is by men saying they've had enough and start rioting, which will eventually lead to civil war. Insert "All women are Queens vs. If she breaths, she's a thot" meme.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 11:23 AM
-1

I understand your argument and I agree. However, you can't expect the guy with power not to take advantage of it. And women, forgive me for telling you, do not follow these codes of honor. What's more, honor codes apparently only apply to men and were perhaps invented by women to control men, like so many things.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 11:19 AM
4

We have all made mistakes in our inexperience. Hence, redpill and blackpill are brutal when you mature and take them on yourself. In a way, you believe that women have the capacity to associate with men for common interests, but their paths are diametrically separated from the earliest puberty.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 11:15 AM
2

that they don't think analytically and logically and instead think with their emotions Bingo.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 11:13 AM
1

I am of the pessimistic opinion; not because I don't believe that a kind of synthetic machine made of silicone cannot be an interesting substitute for the simulation of romantic-affective sex. without the virtues of being a dog who wants to lick female vaginal juices after a long effort, but for the concomitant fact of knowing that indeed, such an AI will not be able to deceive you enough to believe that you are abstracting from a machine and associating it with a human being. I think and say: t…
/r/MensRights04/10/23 12:00 AM
2

Marriage is unfixable. There is no marriage if there is no god, religious entity or whatever. And God was the cause that justified money being kept within a "gens" or family entity. Marriage is just a legal state and a fucking expensive celebration called a "wedding" that rarely focuses on you as a man.
/r/MensRights03/10/23 10:09 PM
2

They do not give a fuck about men's issues, unless their interests. And some may call me a misogynist, but the fact is that even women who supposedly care about men's rights only seek to profit from it, the vast majority. "I value man; man is necessary." Sure, bitch, you're genuine and you're hoping to soften up the man so he'll work harder for you.
/r/MensRights03/10/23 09:45 PM
9

It's something obvious. Although many women live in tutorial mode, we must understand that a woman ultimately shits, pees, makes circles with her hands on her clitoris and is a human being, despite the idealization that we usually have for that piece of meat that attracts us due to our neural programming. And in these comparisons, there are legitimate critics, there are others who are simply women who do not have the capacity for abstract thought, because they have never needed it. It is a child…
/r/MensRights03/10/23 09:43 PM
0

Nobody is guilty. So clear. Women have been liberated, and unlike the balance between their responsibility and their freedom, feminism indoctrinates that they should only have freedom and not responsibility. Modern times have created a very particular social phenomenon, where women are not tied to reproduction and have the Internet to inflate their narcissism. Women follows her nature, and 2/3 of men will not reproduce and surely of that 2/3, 1/3 will not know what it is to have a girlfriend or …
/r/MensRights02/10/23 11:15 PM
9

Contraceptive methods have freed women from being permanently pregnant. Not being pregnant permanently allows them to enjoy sex; while leading an active working life; leading an active work life gives them money, Money makes many independent and others live on their own means. Some women get tired of living on their own and look for a betabuxx; Other women have less demanding jobs and are genetically more beautiful. They all get the attention they want, but they lack that Chad with whom their pa…
/r/MensRights02/10/23 09:56 PM
1

Ah, indeed! In this modern era of enlightenment, being a "mensch" seems to translate to willingly submitting to a society that's akin to a beauty pageant on steroids. Who cares about virtues and achievements when we can dazzle the world with our carefully crafted selfies and photo filters, transforming into ethereal creatures straight out of a fantasy novel? Dating, that poetic affair, has transformed into a contemporary ballad of swipes, winks, and precisely curated profiles. Forget meaningful …
/r/MensRights02/10/23 09:07 PM
2

It all depends on what you define by "strong." and "good man". However, being successful in dating is a requirement to start a family. I do not whine, I see it everyday. I have lived for almost four decades now and I know from a lot of my own experience how the same dynamics are repeated over and over and over again. I've had girlfriends, and I was about to get married if it weren't for life, karma, god, or some cosmic force definitively enlightening me on how screwed things are for the average …
/r/MensRights02/10/23 07:28 PM
1

Just make sure you don't burn down the kitchen in the self-improvement process.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 06:01 PM
-9

Inkwells of the world, come here. There you have your solution to your dry penis.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 05:49 PM
24

That's how it works. When you learn to do NOTHING, you'll learn the real purpose and meaning of life. Just do nothing. Most chase Chad, but Chad can't fuck them all. A broken dream, right?
/r/MensRights02/10/23 05:46 PM
3

I did not downvote you, mate.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 11:36 AM
2

You can be strong, you can be hardworking and you can cultivate yourself emotionally. But being successful doesn't depend on you. Being a father does not depend on you, because, in intrasexual competition, many men are left behind because of their looks, because of all that they lack. And..., You can't be a father if you don't have sexual options. Even more so, when you are understood as an ATM, and not as an object of genuine sexual-romantic desire: hence the vast majority of divorces, initiate…
/r/MensRights02/10/23 11:34 AM
0

Men should be ashamed if they aren't proper men, just like women should be ashamed if they can't keep themselves in good looking shape. What is a proper man? Man, define things before you elaborate your arguments.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 11:13 AM
3

I have read your text several times, but I don't really understand what kind of community you are looking for.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 10:55 AM
1

Indeed.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 09:13 AM
1

Indeed.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 09:13 AM
1

to get you Don't.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 09:11 AM
2

Yes. Removing Christian theology, Islam is the religion that comes closest to "the different." I have visited Morocco for two decades, and it is a country that I know quite well, as well as its culture and religion, however, Islamic theology, like that of so many religions, seems absurd to me; They do not respond, they only magnify the silence of God, the silence of a perhaps non-existent god. But this is already off-topic. good-woman atheist for now. Women are neither good nor bad. They follow …
/r/MensRights01/10/23 10:49 PM
2

I must tell you that precisely this type of behavior is only part of a very ancient feminine tactic of keeping men castrated and impotent of their sexuality. Obviously, you can do whatever you want, however, that is courtship: a marketing tactic, selling yourself in a harsh and insistently absurd way..
/r/MensRights01/10/23 10:44 PM
-1

Formerly it was called "courtship". It is now called "PhD in sexual marketing." Nothing genuine about this. We compete, we compete, we compete, some are excluded, some take the entire average, others are left with the leftovers. Genuine, genuine. There is nothing genuine about fucking or having a partner. There is the one who has privilege and ignores his privilege, the one who has none and the one who has taken his path after seeing the same shit over and over and over again. If the average man…
/r/MensRights01/10/23 07:59 PM
3

They believe that the attractive men will naturally know when to approach or won't be "creepy", and won't listen to that noise because he's confident. This summarizes this all. Más claro, agua.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 07:56 PM
7

No, it's even easier: if they had their way, 80% of men would have to be eugenized and the remaining 20% ​​would be left in a kind of rotating sex.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 07:55 PM
2

Such accurate words are rarely said. Some fortunately understand it when they are young, others, when they are divorced after 20 years of marriage, and sometimes, not even with that shock.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 07:53 PM
10

No money, no survey.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 11:29 AM
10

Define "conservative values", please. I ask you because in Spain (my country), being conservative is possibly very different from being conservative in the United States or in the Anglo-Saxon sphere in general.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 11:26 AM
26

Let them hook-up. Our job is to warn men of the danger of being with women bounced by the "Alpha widow" and that they can really screw up your life because of the resources you can give them. Each one deceives himself to the extent that he himself wants.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 11:25 AM
132

It's just as Esther Vilar predicted about half a century ago: that were it not for the vagina, man, with his intellect, could just build a female robot that would be superior to most women... Truly Esther Vilar, a great intellectual. The more I read her works, the more I realize the dilemma that feminism was in those years and how it is difficult to find analyzes as sagacious, sharp and accurate as hers nowadays. Truly, man not only lives manipulated, but his manipulation is self-imposed. And if…
/r/MensRights01/10/23 11:23 AM
5

In part, it doesn't make sense. If feminism has been initiated by women who were ugly and who did not receive attention or good treatment, what would be enhanced is precisely that there would be a more "predatory" attitude towards them. Feminism emerged from bourgeois women who wanted to be men, with the imminent advantage of being women, because they are conditioned more than their counterpart. That's it. Everything is sexual.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 05:27 PM
131

The premise is that you only interact with women who have previously established that they can use you as a source of semen, money, or both.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 05:24 PM
22

Water is wet.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 05:23 PM
7

One scientific blackpill a day makes you understand the best way.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 05:20 PM
2

This is like trying to define a woman if we don't start from solid foundations. We will have to define first "what masculinity is" and secondly, how this phenomenon can (or cannot) be toxic. And this problem of lack of solid definitions is what makes the problem of masculinity, as a definition, a leftist problem and generated by the left. One is a man or a woman, biologically; "femininity or masculinity" requires following a biological line of definition, or not being defined directly.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 08:14 AM
3

twoxchromosomes 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights26/09/23 12:10 PM
10

Let me tell you even if you think I'm trolling, feminists don't deny science. They simply deny its applicability based on their interests. And although reality is stubborn, feminism seeks to impose itself as a gynocentric movement. It's obvious, it's water is wet; but that's how they work. They deceive with feelings in order to impose themselves and gain power over men. It's a fight of the sexes.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 04:05 AM
6

Indeed. The market needs to incorporate more and more women into the world of video games to make a profit. It is self-evident.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 04:03 AM
21

Those things require some level of IQ. Historical knowledge, rather. People are ignorant and it is intended that they remain ignorant in a hive mind.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 04:02 AM
4

Of course. Men who placed trust in their partners and were violated in the divorce are going to lose. Men who are not allowed to have paternity tests are going to lose. Men who are vilified for not being preferred objects of exploitation are going to lose. You yourself are the clear example of that gynocentric thinking: your value is given to you by a woman; you are just a slave.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 09:19 PM
1

Most sexless men are incels, few are sexless by choice. It makes sense, however you can't use a statistic that doesn't correlate the evidence with the underlying thing. It would be a fallacy. I am 5'6 and was fat [...] correlation between looks and sucess. If we assume that you are from a first world country or from the Anglo-Saxon sphere, You would be the first example that you have not belonged nor do you belong to the statistical normality, that is, in the majority of first world countries th…
/r/AllPillDebate19/09/23 12:30 PM
5

Aha, I see, I see. I guess your looks have nothing to do with it, right? Women love personality and are lovers of oratory even if you are an orc from the Lord of the Rings, isn't It?
/r/AllPillDebate19/09/23 12:18 PM
1

One thing is to be sexless and another thing is to be an incel. Every man, if he wishes, can go to a prostitute if he so wishes, but it is different from receiving acceptance from a woman. I understand your point, but I continue to qualify and elaborate on your arguments, rather than being a retort. Likewise, statistics on sexless people do not make a correlation between looks and actual success, for example. There are variables that cannot be related because they were not studied. Even if we ta…
/r/AllPillDebate19/09/23 12:14 PM
7

Rope-related words. 🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights19/09/23 11:31 AM
-2

Incel just means you can't get laid dude This definition can be misleading, because this celibacy can be multifactorial; such as Muslims who want to get married and have no money, for example, something very common even in other countries not necessarily Muslim, for example. For practical purposes, I consider it best to define the incel as a man below average in looks, beyond the larping evident in incel communities. It is, have you not seen the stats ? The point I wanted to make to you is that …
/r/AllPillDebate19/09/23 11:28 AM
78

Women who love to watch and imagine being brutally fucked and men who wish they were those men who fuck. Welcome to pornography 101. With the difference that the majority of women will be able to fuck, if they wish, although not the majority of men.
/r/MensRights19/09/23 08:54 AM
2

Redpill coper, aren't you?
/r/AllPillDebate19/09/23 08:47 AM
-1

Incels. Perfectly normal. Choose one. Unless you're suggesting that being normal and being an incel is an increasing dynamic.
/r/AllPillDebate19/09/23 08:46 AM
12

There is a reason nobody is fucking them Looks. You are welcome.
/r/AllPillDebate19/09/23 08:45 AM
5

I would like to read your arguments.
/r/MensRights19/09/23 08:38 AM
10

It never began, thankfully. Imagine getting kidnapped by a whore weaponizing your own kids to bleed you.
/r/MensRights19/09/23 08:37 AM
1

He belongs to a sect that eats babies. I wouldn't expect anything less.
/r/MensRights19/09/23 08:36 AM
1

This thought you have occurs because we believe that technological advance will always be related to social, ideological and intellectual advance; But the truth is that in such emotionally powerful topics, such as the exploitation of women towards men or their use as a dildo-bank, it seems inconceivable in these beings of light. And even more so, it is surprising that from the most enlightened defenders of man at a literary level is a woman. A genuine defense, for her entire life, and without de…
/r/MensRights19/09/23 08:35 AM
2

It is a myth, a statistical deviation so tiny that the only plausible thing is to think that this girl has very high standards for what she can offer. "Femcelism" is basically a "standardcelism"
/r/AllPillDebate19/09/23 08:31 AM
5

Gynocentrism is easy to understand: Men will be used to sustain society and as a direct or indirect provider, of financial assets or material progress Men will be used as a meat dildo and breeder. Those that are not valid for point 2 will be used primarily for point 1, until point 2 is given.
/r/MensRights19/09/23 06:17 AM
9

Passport bros should stop coping. I understand the dynamics of geomaxxing, but this idolatry is excessive.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 01:59 AM
3

Well, Imagine that you are 5.5, 4 inches tall, you are brown, and you have eyes bigger than a radiation helmet; The dual nature of feminine mating is there, no doubt, but without a physical basis, you are going nowhere.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 02:40 PM
2

There is no solution, if we respect women's freedom.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 02:38 PM
8

Wáter is wet, ngl. Thank you for your female contribution on this matter.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 02:36 PM
7

Unironically, the best contribution in this post.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 02:34 PM
15

I'd rather cut off my balls than be a social parasite. This is personal preference.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 02:26 PM
3

The truth is that no. Reproductive age is being delayed due to many factors, from work to socioeconomic to sexual dynamics where there is no longer a need to institutionalize sex through marriage. Women have all the possibilities; The man navigates between being subjected to a woman so as not to lose her, those who have experience and go their own way or the incels who have been left aside for being too ugly, too short, with below average penises, or by anything you can imagine and that represen…
/r/MensRights15/09/23 02:23 PM
11

We live in a time that reminds us more of the anarchism of natural selection than of the understanding that theocracy has given in the last 2000 years. Every concept of sexual relationship between a man and a woman has been based on chastity and marriage as the only way to maintain the relationship between men and women. Marriage, apart from "socializing the sexual market", what it did was create a structure of economic centralization within a family. Thus, money was the epicenter of marriage ba…
/r/MensRights15/09/23 02:15 PM
3

Truly, these dynamics are the same dynamics as always, with the specific difference that now the sexual market is global, easily accessible, and where mating opportunities are múltiplied. Attractiveness and money, money and attractiveness. He provides himself with the most erotic fantasies, with a parasitic life at the expense of another's work or both at the same time. There is no change; The difference now is that now that the woman is more economically independent, she will centralize expecta…
/r/MensRights15/09/23 12:17 PM
7

The spectrum of bisexuality is one thing, and another is the ability to have children through spontaneous generation, something that biology does not yet allow and I doubt it will allow due to our evolution. Precisely, the term "useless" does not correspond to this desire and goal, which is that of reproduction, even if you decide to live with a woman, for obvious and technical reasons. The day in which the woman rises above herself and does not have a parasitic and taming behavior, will be a gr…
/r/MensRights15/09/23 11:13 AM
15

The truth is that free choice is false. I understand your point of view, which is to appeal to absolute freedom (ending where someone else's begins) to choose you want to be with. But the truth is that most men do not have a choice. Thus, only statistical peaks in men and a broad base of women possess this freedom of choice, not men, as a general rule. Man is selected, as a general rule, and does not select.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 11:05 AM
10

Well, "alone" perhaps is not the correct term, unless you are hermaphrodite.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 11:03 AM
6

And curiously, the majority of users that populate dating applications and platforms are men.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 10:57 AM
4

Porn is independent of tastes and preferences. The fact that a woman can have attraction - I also include certain gays - for certain characteristics exemplifies that they naturally They are neurally programmed to be attracted to certain characteristics, such as the inherent arousal due to penis size, height as an exemplification of protection-domination and a fairly basic outline of sexual appetites. Is there everything in this world? Evidently, not every passive gay woman and man can achieve a …
/r/MensRights15/09/23 04:43 AM
7

What the actual fuck is incel agenda? 🤣
/r/MensRights15/09/23 04:39 AM
111

I am an older man and I must say that only the man who lives through the end of a relationship knows how screwed everything is.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 03:21 AM
409

The blackpill comes to tell us that the woman in freedom is the sexual selector, The fact that women can ask for a 6ft man is because they have enough candidates to filter. 80% of women can claim 20% of men, but curiously, only 1/3 of the population will reproduce.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 03:20 AM
24

It is possible to play with fire without harm, until you burn yourself.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 04:23 AM
2

Yes. The blackpill applies to men and women. However, women start with an infinite SMV.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 04:18 AM
1

I understand your point of view, especially because of the "hive mind" phenomenon in the world where Twitter (I refuse to call it X), and other social networks seek to capture subjectivities to shape human consumption trends. However, I see, precisely, what I see is that people do not live in real life, and it is contradictory for me to say this when debating with you on Reddit, but rather they live in a virtual world where material life becomes an extension only of what we do on social networks…
/r/MensRights13/09/23 03:49 AM
1

The other way around. The greater the promiscuity, the greater the monopolization of sex by a few men and the increase in single men. The nature of the majority monotheistic religions understood chastity and female virginity (factual or metaphorical) like the socialization of women for men. And this can only be justified based on the globalization of information through new technologies, where, Promiscuity has occurred precisely because sex is more accessible than ever. The man doesn't fuck anym…
/r/MensRights13/09/23 03:23 AM
1

Every religion seeks to govern from an absolute. Every religion, in short, appeals to the one, and to the absolute, despite the redundancy, to impose that model that is believed to be "beneficial" and "useful" in the face of the eternal debate between "security" and "freedom" or what is the same: ""solves problems by eliminating people's will." Thus, it is not surprising that for every solution to systematic problems, new systems are sought to be imposed that seek to subvert previous problems wi…
/r/MensRights13/09/23 03:19 AM
4

Religions make you a slave of women, of an imaginary friend, of the State with abusive taxes, and passivity for another life, the fruit of the most simplistic imagination. Islamic paradise? Islamic paradise is virgin whores and wine, for example. Tradcons cope with the idea of ​​a theocracy; but the world is indeed moving towards anarcho-capitalism governed by an AI.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 03:11 AM
2

No solutions.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 10:42 PM
3

Sexual liberation is hypergamy enforcement. Only a fool would believe that free love would not be monopolized by a few men. 🤣
/r/MensRights12/09/23 02:50 PM
4

I don't suffer, I get bored by the cyclical nature of things.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 02:49 PM
1

As real as it gets.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 02:46 PM
4

You need to read A. Kollontai.
/r/MensRights10/09/23 10:12 PM
22

Checks out.
/r/MensRights31/08/23 03:01 AM
81

It's not that we're worried, it's that this whining is imposed on us with hammering propaganda.
/r/MensRights31/08/23 03:00 AM
1

Women are educated and, at the same time, understand much more quickly that their maximum value lies in their own commercialization to achieve their goals. Some will say that this is something inherent to both sexes; However, the feminine quality regarding this is that their survival strategy is eminently passive. This is a theory that Ester Vilar defended quite firmly in her work "The manipulated man."
/r/MensRights31/08/23 02:56 AM
3

It's an infinite loop, brother.
/r/MensRights29/08/23 11:40 PM
10

No gf/wife, no betray. You have given yourself the solution.
/r/MensRights29/08/23 02:47 PM
28

Women control the sexual market chapter 191817. Water is wet.
/r/MensRights29/08/23 02:47 PM
2

I am going to take a long shot and say that misandry is more than systematic, it is natural. Calm down and read before you downvote. There is no misandry unless certain prejudices are naturally assumed that certain men must comply with and on the other hand, the survival capacity of many social parasites with a vagina who use their cucks for something very simple and fundamental: the weakness-empowerment dichotomy to screw up your life in laws and social protocols of male replacement (because th…
/r/MensRights27/08/23 10:53 PM
14

That's how it is. Looks are everything.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 01:25 AM
2

There is not enough hypergamous material to go around. This is not feminism, but natural selection.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 01:49 PM
1

It is a market, a market of people. Compete fiercely or get out of it. There's no more; many times we focus on incels, And truly, any man with sexual experiences can be overwhelmed by the fact that they have not had a sexual and/or romantic experience, but, This loneliness is only a result of the postmodern and technologically advanced society in which we live. Loneliness with friends, loneliness with a partner, loneliness at work, loneliness..., people come and go and yet we remain despite life…
/r/MensRights24/08/23 01:40 PM
72

she thinks it's a bad omen as it's practically expecting a divorce. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Brother, you are playing with fire. Take care. Seriously.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 01:28 PM
42

Well, well. A dodged bullet.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 06:58 AM
7

Love is a decision; people call the uncontrollable love and therefore call love something non-existent. There are those who say that a woman does not love unconditionally, and it is true: You love beauty, good sex, company, but love a person? I have rarely seen that love, because no one understands what it is to love, despite the fact that curiously everyone uses that word. Biochemical impulses, compassion, whatever it is, what is not a decision is a rationalization of the sexual instinct.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 05:20 AM
14

As the Chinese saying goes: "Desire your enemy's wishes come true." The only anti-MGTOW and anti-MM are incels ideologized in perpetual hate sects in their echochambers and fiery feminist; although also deluded people living in a parallel and idealistic reality. You have to experience relationships to know what you are talking about. I am grateful every of my life for my freedom as a man and not having fallen into the probabilistic clutches of a parasite with a vagina. Many dream of "children, f…
/r/MensRights23/08/23 05:09 AM
11

Poor physics videos, even poorer science and society videos.
/r/MensRights22/08/23 04:12 AM
2

There are things that come naturally to us more than others. Some of those things are amazing. There are things that we can marvel that and be proud of, not because it makes us better, but because it makes us an important and useful puzzle to society. Don't you think precisely that this is the tenet of a much bigger contradiction? In the sea of ​​people that inhabit world societies, many do not have talents, they only subsist as a working mass in jobs that are only required of them, and excuse m…
/r/MensRights22/08/23 03:53 AM
2

So, I understand that feeling proud of oneself, is it a feeling of having it and that others don't have it or that others have it and feeling lucky because there are other people who don't? I'm sorry if my questions seem like a personal attack, but, It is something that I do not conceive of connecting with what a man himself is beyond being a human being.
/r/MensRights22/08/23 03:27 AM
2

Could we guys just merge these posts into a megathread? I fully understand that you have to justify having such a movie instead of watching Oppenheimer's artwork on a loop, but it would be even more optimal if you used the Reddit search engine for this subreddit and you saw the amount of debate that has been created about the film. Having said that; the film in the end is a call to the void: a pseudo-intellectual and poor critique of how balance would solve all problems in a framework of acid cr…
/r/MensRights22/08/23 02:48 AM
5

Keanu Reeves is only the result of what he appears to be and his circumstances. There are hundreds of thousands of men around the world who do more commendable work than donating, yet no one will know about their actions and they will die as true anonymous heroes. We associate the model with a halo effect; we associate by halo effect the good that we perceive as a model for something. I don't know Keanu Reeves and possibly most who theorize about him don't either. My role models are anonymous pe…
/r/MensRights22/08/23 02:40 AM
5

It is not surprising that the rights of man are considered as "misogynistic movements and men with mental problems" because at the base, It is believed that MRM is related to the resentment of men who do not fuck and these people believe that MRM is just that: a fight against the freedom of women to do what they want. Stupid! And yet it is the continuous gaslight. This gaslight is reaffirmed from the ground up because it is assumed that man not only has nothing to worry about, but that the injus…
/r/MensRights22/08/23 02:31 AM
5

Being a man is what I am. Anything I love about being a man? It is a very curious question, really, because in this case, one seeks to love in comparison, that is to say, in contrast with something that I possess and that a non-man, that is, a woman, does not possess. It is not selfish or conceited to recognize your value. And concatenating with what I said above, this phrase is inconsistent and illogical. In the end, in the common of average men, there will be men who have as something to be pr…
/r/MensRights22/08/23 02:18 AM
12

We live in gynocentrism, where the pussy rules and there are pussy idolaters who will defend the immaculateness of this system of injustice and exploitation. The problem is that for everyone, being MRM or championing MRM is a very fragmented issue. There are those who believe that MRM is for couple dynamics and problems; others who have an almost autistic obsession with tradcons and others that approach the problem from a pill or the purest evolutionary biology. Nothing can be brought to real li…
/r/MensRights21/08/23 12:33 PM
6

I'm from Spain and I am old enough to have lived part of my adulthood without internet, because it did not exist. And now seriously: If you want to do statistical sampling, you can start paying us all.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 12:25 PM
8

An incel is not a man who is not chasing women, but a man who has understood that his chasing is useless after countless attempts. Important distinction between MGTOW and incel.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 01:13 PM
8

We have the man who decides to go his own way and the man who is forced to go the way of being alone. Men who got tired of sociosexual dynamics and men who avidly desire to be slaves. We are only born and we only die. It is clear that happiness and peace of mind arise from within, but as the wise man would say: "live, and realize."
/r/MensRights17/08/23 01:10 PM
25

People debate this very insistently and it's all very easy to understand. The death of religious morality has meant that the old dynamics of family institution relationships have fallen into individual and atomized anarchy. The woman, as a natural sexual selector, has received the freedom to be part of the productive fabric and not be tied to the restrictions of chastity or "virginity". Not only is a woman economically and sexually free, but also that her own body represents a large percentage o…
/r/MensRights17/08/23 01:06 PM
1

Take the averages of all the races, and cross the data; you will see that the white race has a higher incidence of success than the rest.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 06:01 PM
1

I have not said at any time that men of other races cannot be picked up. I have highlighted the correlation between race and success in the sex market. In the end, the most attractive men of each race will represent the veiled oligopoly of the sex market. I do not defend the JBW, but it is a statistical fact, even more so in the fetishization of Asian women by the white man, not only in populations residing in countries such as the United States, but also in the countries of the Far East. The od…
/r/MensRights16/08/23 05:59 PM
1

The other way around. I do not deny that there are white men who are technically incels; unlike some blackpillers and their "just be white theory" I understand this fact. However, as I repeat as I have done in other responses to you, the statistical trend is that white men are perceived as more sexually attractive than other races.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 02:09 PM
1

Geomaxxing has been talked about at length throughout the manosphere. However, the fact that you have to fly thousands of miles to have a partner exemplifies that you are an outcast to society. I understand the Asian man as I understand the ugliest man you can see. Many Asian men suffer, and they are only the product of localization problems. Imagine calling "whim" the most elemental and basic act of the human being, which is wanting to reproduce and have the neurally programmed validation of fe…
/r/MensRights16/08/23 02:02 PM
2

This alone says that you don't actually know much about incels and blackpillers outside of what media shows you The other way around. I have lived through the emergence of these communities since that IRC chats became massive. The blackpill has emerged as what it is as a reaction from many people who have taken scientific evidence and evolutionary psychology to criticize the eternal hope of the redpill. The debate has always been present and the continuous growth against the most fatalistic dete…
/r/MensRights16/08/23 01:56 PM
6

And I disagree. The term incel is something that has exploded just a few years ago while this conception of "foreveralone", "virgin" "short" "smalldickproblems" are communities that have always been there, in the manosphere. What is intended to be denied with genuine astonishment is what the organized incels have called "blackpill", that is, the epitome of the denial of the dominant tendency of the manosphere: the practical redpill (solutions, in the style of looksmaxxing or moneymaxxing) and an…
/r/MensRights16/08/23 02:27 AM
6

Are you saying incels are not men? What is this? The incels have been expelled from all hegemonic media and have had to hide in obscure forums hosted by remote countries to have their echochamber conversations. And many have sought such luck. However, one thing does not take away another.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 02:04 AM
9

We look forward to your mathematical rebuttal.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 02:03 AM
5

Before you engage in hate filled rants to feminists first arm yourself with evidence and help those that don’t have access to the research find it, redress the balance this shouldn’t be a power struggle. Not only must men be filled with hatred against their oppressors, but they must also be quite stubborn when their rights are violated and are beaten like dirt. There is no balance, nor can there be.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 02:01 AM
1

The bosses of the president dictate the present. Man, woman, Martian, whatever.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 01:55 AM
6

Most teenagers are so retarded that I wouldn't be surprised if it was real.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 01:57 AM
2

Whoever kills with iron, dies with iron. Good luck in life.
/r/MensRights13/08/23 12:50 AM
95

Man, Titanic is the biggest cuck film I have ever watched. Woah! You fucked with Di Caprio in a boat and then married a man, had kids with him but deep down, several decades after, this woman vividly remembers the sex she had on a boat with another man. 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Who's gonna cry for this shit but mentally weak people that are decieved? It's like the movie The Bridges of Madison County. An ode to cuckoldry
/r/MensRights12/08/23 02:58 PM
10

We are all vulnerable. The fundamental difference is: who benefits from man's vulnerability and strength likewise?
/r/MensRights12/08/23 02:56 PM
377

It is within the chapter of misandry: "men do not cry"; "a man stays tough and strong in the face of adversity" and "only women can show weakness" theory.
/r/MensRights12/08/23 01:24 PM
1

While I agree that women can have it way easier, I cannot agree that all women are vocel and none are incels. The fact that this phenomenon is not reported among women explains that every woman today can have access through any means she considers and will always have men behind her. The phenomenon of "I'm a woman and nobody even wants to fuck me" is so unusual that it even seems funny. The majority of women who call themselves "femcels" are still women who have standards that do not correspond …
/r/MensRights10/08/23 12:32 AM
1

Elaborate.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 05:47 PM
2

I still think you overvalue women. I know for a fact that many have issues getting laid. So you haven't understood since I gave birth to thesis. Value is independent of subjective considerations of value, especially when we talk about sexual success and failure, both measurable through quantifiable values, and in this case, through sex. There is no such thing as "femceldom" that is not voluntary. Do I understand correctly that he said involuntary celibacy? So, melding them together into incel fo…
/r/MensRights09/08/23 05:46 PM
1

What?
/r/MensRights09/08/23 05:41 PM
3

I disagree. It is one thing to pay a prostitute and another is to literally pay to have a person there. The difference between "get laid" and the classic "betabuxxing" is that in one you have the fantasy that the woman wants you in the other, there is the concept of keeping a woman parasitically to redeem feelings of loneliness. The blackpill is one thing (in its scientific and statistical terms) and another thing is the reaction to that blackpill, for example: Women prefer men with a height gre…
/r/MensRights09/08/23 05:27 PM
1

The fact is that the female willingness to exchange sex for money would effectively make this person technically stop being celibate, but not necessarily because of their ability to be selected without exchanges, except the elementary concept of mutual attraction itself.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 05:21 PM
1

It's false. The first person to use the term "involuntary celibate" was Antoine Banier In XVII century, precisely, a French clergyman regarding the conditions of involuntary celibacy of many women who lived under the yoke of the marriage conditions of that time (where it was the man, the money, and the marriage formalism who prevailed in the sexual market) The custom of the Ancients in their marriages was quite different from that of the age wherein we live: large gratifications were given to th…
/r/MensRights09/08/23 01:23 PM
2

The statistical deviation in the female sex is so small that we cannot really speak of "involuntarily celibate women" except in such extreme cases that they represent a very small percentage number, like women with complicated vaginismus. And still, they find a way. The opposite case would be in r/smalldickproblems. Feminism ultimately needs to accuse the incel of being an evil and perverse being when in a certain way, under an internal and unsaid logic, it is that feminists would ardently wish …
/r/MensRights09/08/23 12:02 PM
1

The term "incel" is based on voluntariness. Wanting sex and not being able to get it by consensual means and without paying, effectively turns you etymologically into an incel. If you refuse for a time to have sexual relations, then your will is, worth the redundancy, voluntary, and the incel categorization would be fundamentally wrong.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 11:57 AM
2

male friends as a male myself because true friendship and brotherhood between heterosexual men cannot possibly exist I totally disagree. The tendency that has always occurred is that friendships between men have always had an eminently sexist character. And it is true, the company of a man with whom to share joys, pains, vital experiences can never be equal to a temporary relationship that will always have a kind of Oedipus complex associated to it: a maternal love that is intertwined with sexua…
/r/MensRights08/08/23 01:28 PM
1

Are you saying that the movie is communist propaganda? I do not agree.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 04:23 AM
1

You can read my Reddit history. Regardless, it is my honest opinion. People use this subreddit for a lot of things unrelated to what it should be.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 04:18 AM
3

Oppenheimer was a communist. I don't sympathize with communism, but, the movie is a work of art.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 04:15 AM
6

I do not know what the fuck I am talking about.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 04:46 PM
-27

This is the most random shit I have read this month, I swear. And Reddit is full of larpers and varied idiots likewise. Well...
/r/MensRights07/08/23 04:44 PM
2

There is always a train for people who watched it later.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 04:27 PM
3

Trash film. Imagine the polemics. Go watch Oppenheimer, gentlemen.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 04:26 PM
6

Yeah, yeah. Shut the fuck up.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 07:48 PM
7

White male privilege. 🤣🤣🤣🤣.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 06:21 PM
2

Well, good luck. In the West its fucked up.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 05:13 PM
11

I want pretty woman. I don't care she is poor. Women prefer the rich. Your loophole to get divorceraped.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 03:58 PM
37

Do not marry; kindly, do not be a fool.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 01:37 PM
4

The trend is evident in the Western world: people are getting married less, divorced more and have fewer children at alarming levels. The only way to win for most is not to play. Welcome to postmodernism. Zero-sum game.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 05:03 AM
28

I'm still waiting for my heteropatriarchal privileges, but they don't reach me yet. I'm going to die and I'm not going to know what the hell "men's privilege" means and where is it.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 04:41 AM
1

Cope, man. If you are happy, everything will be fine.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 03:47 PM
1

Right now, if you don't hear it, visit your otolaryngologist. 4chan nonsense. The same guy using "cumskin", term created on 4chan and incel echochambers. 🤣🤣🤣.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 03:43 PM
1

There is no need. It is self-evident. Many Asian men and HAPAS have their communities complaining about the same thing.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 02:49 PM
2

I do not speak ill of Asians, the statistics and the women themselves confirm it.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 02:48 PM
1

If that is a way to cope for you, yes. Do not be me theory. 🤣
/r/MensRights03/08/23 02:46 PM
2

Geomaxxing you saying?
/r/MensRights03/08/23 02:39 PM
5

I don't believe in blackpill, I see blackpill every day. I see short men without partners, ugly men who have died virgins, extremely attractive men who dominate the sexual market and in general, a racial tendency that has always been there on the part of the Asian population with respect to whites: a racial fetish. Therefore, the blackpill, in its scientific variant and not anecdotal It serves us as a tool to describe the reality of the sexual market, where the woman is ultimately the sexual sel…
/r/MensRights03/08/23 04:47 AM
8

Once a year does not hurt.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 04:39 AM
28

Water is wet post. But it is always good to drink water daily.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 01:55 AM
14

Stay safe.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 01:53 AM
3

The fundamental difference is that yes: Asian men tend to be shorter than white men, on average. The fundamental difference is that all media is not the totality of what is real and there will be Asian men with many characteristics, but not necessarily common ones. These are data, not opinions. And height alone is a given, it all revolves around facial structures, neoteny, and prevailing genetics. Genetic potential is given by natural selection, mutations, and in the case of many populations, by…
/r/MensRights03/08/23 01:44 AM
1

It is a biological problem, you have spoken of inherences. Inherently there is no beauty or your perception of beauty without a sensory mind. For this reason, we cannot speak of inherence, but of neural programming. And indeed, they combine the fact that Asian men tend to be shorter, with facial neoteny and certain obvious effeminate traits.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 08:34 PM
3

There is nothing inherently more or less attractive because there is no attractiveness without sensory perception. What I want to say is that women, as sexual selectors, through statistics and studies, they determine that the least attractive race for them is the Asian.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 05:43 PM
4

It is not a social problem, it is an eminently biological problem. It's going back over and over again about the blackpill. There is no solution either for inceldom or for the free choice of women to choose who they want to be with. Asian men are eminently considered the least attractive of all races and the excuse of misogyny will be used to reject most of them who are perceived as unattractive. Why? Asian women statistically prefer white men. What can be done? Nothing. It's pure fatalism. Of c…
/r/MensRights02/08/23 05:29 PM
2

You can be alone and you can be accompanied. The thing is that you never sell your life through contracts whose intermediary is the State and that tend to be a ruin with great odds. It's a legal issue, It's a social problem, and it is a psychological problem as well.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 05:18 PM
28

I won't get tired of saying it; our legal rights are irrelevant to the ability of different men to access the sexual market. These types of discussions are typical of other subreddits, forums, and varied echochambers. I fully understand the thousand and one gaslights that a woman can give to reject a man and that one of them is unfair and discriminatory, but that's how it is: excuses most of the times not to say things clearly: men who will monopolize the market and men who will not be able to h…
/r/MensRights02/08/23 05:13 PM
20

Bookmarked. Briffault's law strikes again.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 03:25 AM
1

Totally agree. The best approach for pills is to ultimately understand the consequences of certain actions and precisely the consequences of not being and being at the same time,
/r/MensRights29/07/23 02:17 PM
1

Hence the redpill and blackpill have analytic lines and then praxology lines. It is evident that many men live deceived and continue to believe in fairy tales and in the instruction quite possibly given by their mothers and some fathers. who live in a delusion "because that's how I met your mother" without analyzing precisely where this comes from and what are the variables that circumcise these aspects. If you want to tell me that the redpill seeks to encompass itself in an ideology that seeks …
/r/MensRights29/07/23 02:12 PM
0

Every pill focuses on what a woman wants, how a woman behaves, and exactly what you can do/should be to be successful with a woman or different women. If you think that the redpill is just analysis, then we strongly disagree. The eternal platitudes of "just be X, bro" They are the quintessence of all pills put into practice in terms of their supposed solutions; from the most nihilistic determinism of the blackpill to delusion of some redpill who take the looks as something of negligible percenta…
/r/MensRights29/07/23 12:19 PM
2

I am entitled to MGTOWism. How dare you assume that I give a shit about being enough for a slut like you? /s, but not really.
/r/MensRights29/07/23 03:00 AM
3

Or famous "Red pill" content creator who gets into podcast debates is a bad example. Most redpill channels are just PUAs looking to get money from you with stupidities and irrelevant generalities that are given from an "alpha male" position where average men are sold impossible things. No wonder the redpill has been prostituted by the old PUAs whose selling maxims is to be everything that cannot be changed with attitude or with the entire gym on the planet: phenotypic determinism. Thus, it is no…
/r/MensRights29/07/23 02:39 AM
43

Man, I have no words.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 12:02 PM
13

100%. The problem is that young men and virgins idealize women as a divine entity without blemish when the truth is that they only deceive themselves looking for a mother: a fuckable mother who sacrifices herself as they pretend to do like simps.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 02:14 AM
2

The problem lies mainly in the experiences. I am not a Chad, damn, with the age that I am, I keep reminiscence of my past; and the truth is that the majority of men thirsty for pussies are men who have not lived with a woman and do not know what a relationship is. It's like the incel that has never had a partner and is called MGTOW; he is nonsense. Just living with a woman, having a partner, and seeing women's patterns repeat themselves over and over again, you realize how screwed things are. An…
/r/MensRights27/07/23 02:11 AM
6

I understand that these issues arise every day but in the end it is an eternal repetition. Sex is a human need; many men will either replace it with sex dosed by less and less proactive wives, with prostitutes or masturbating. The handsome man will have the continuous and constant care of women. From sex to candidates for more stable relationships. Even opting for marriages in a time where marriage is economic suicide. The unattractive man does not have much to do. And no matter what you do, the…
/r/MensRights27/07/23 02:00 AM
1

I got your point. Thanks for the correction, buddy boyo.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 01:45 AM
2

A knowledge that religions saw thousands of years ago. Most men can't decide, they just take what's left lying around.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 01:04 PM
1

I am certain that the term I have been meaning to use is sociosexual dynamics.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 12:53 PM
2

With my age, it's probably what will happen with my retirement.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 03:24 AM
8

Enjoy the sex and be careful. Other than that, it's a waste of time.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 03:16 AM
7

The blackpill is crystal clear water.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 03:14 AM
8

It is logical that whoever is lower in the intrasexual competition realizes the invisible bars that surround him.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 03:13 AM
7

My fear is when you say something like "want to get dinner sometime" that basically just translates to " I think your attractive, let's fuck" I don't even need to get romantic but anything I ask is going to get interpreted that way. What is a woman going to want from you if you are not her tear cloth or her biological dildo? You complicate your life. Never ask a girl out at work; always through third-party platforms —Instagram, WhatsApp— and always if there is a feeling or correspondence. If you…
/r/MensRights26/07/23 01:56 AM
42

Salute the fallen soldiers by the female gaslight.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 01:50 AM
41

Water is wet. Sociosexual dynamics 101.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 12:59 AM
17

Men are hated for being useful and for being useless; for being unique and for being replaceable; for having everything and having nothing. Ultimately, misandry is the mercantile use of men.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 12:58 AM
2

Does the law interfere in private association affairs in democratic countries? Obviously not. These cases often fall under the realm of "gender-based affirmative action", child custody and visitation laws, and some areas of areas of family, like alimony...; selective service, workplace discrimination (both because you are assumed "male" roles and jobs almost fully populated by women), domestic violence against men (In many countries, violence by a woman against a man is not considered sexual or …
/r/MensRights25/07/23 02:49 PM
7

Equity before the law. And I say equity, because equality is irrelevant and impossible for practical purposes.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 12:55 PM
9

Many times, asking a woman to understand our problems, both legal and social, is like asking a man to get pregnant or have painful periods. Women should support equity, however, would they really want to when they have privileges?
/r/MensRights25/07/23 12:27 PM
1

The masculine is cast as utilitarian for the woman and the feminine is inherently useless except for competition among other women.
/r/MensRights22/07/23 11:42 PM
3

Every gender role is created by and for women in essence.
/r/MensRights22/07/23 06:33 PM
6

Let's not forget that women live in tutorial mode. On the one hand, they are assumed to be empowered and, on the other hand, defenseless subjects devoid of all defects. And it is obvious that feminists want to profit from this contradiction. Expecting from feminists and their minions values ​​such as moral loyalty, accountability and rational and abstract sense of equity is like wanting to be a millionaire throwing money away.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 08:54 PM
6

☕.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 01:45 PM
2

Each one is either deceived about his possibilities or focus your search on statistical peaks. It is a statistical problem, not a problem of sexism. Over the years, you realize that there are many types of women physically; mentally most circumcise the very nature which no man should ever experience in marriage or the LTR.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 01:43 PM
1

“If it can’t be absolutely proven then I won’t believe it”-another person; “We agree on this point”. Neither can a woman's case be dismissed before the authorities nor can a statement be taken as a regulatory basis without further evidence. Without evidence, there is no sui generis value in proving a crime. Why should I believe any crime that has no evidence? Makes no sense. You think false accusations are more of a problem than the number of real rapists that roam free. Thus, the legal justific…
/r/MensRights20/07/23 03:33 AM
1

Logically neither one nor the other; however in these dual cases, The legal system is based on evidence. You cannot arrest someone based on the word of a woman without further evidence such as evidence of physical violence or legit witnesses, for example. Morality is wrong, and statistically, it would be necessary to see the calculation of well-founded complaints and false complaints and create a statistical correlation. Without evidence, there is no criminal process. And the presumption of inno…
/r/MensRights20/07/23 01:43 AM
1

Therefore, your argument is that the man should be imprisoned regardless of the evidence. Without proof, there is nothing. We cannot legislate based on emotions, because then the legal feature would have no basis.
/r/MensRights19/07/23 07:32 PM
1

"Common" doesn't mean high. Societies that discourage divorce tend to have lower divorce rates I expected a paper demonstrating the points in favor of this argument, but what I find is simply a statistic. Yes, these data as I have reviewed correspond to demographic studies, however, your argument of "societies that do not promote divorce" It has no basic foundation, and many other reasons that make up reality are ignored and that in the case of India, a priori, is an interrelation between materi…
/r/MensRights19/07/23 02:00 PM
1

No environment. Divorces remain common even in countries with more traditional values ​​like many Muslim countries. And most are still divorces requested by women. Divorces have increased as women have had the ability to support themselves financially because if once the man was a figure of economic stability and birth control was less or non-existent; now the woman uses the man as an object of sexual-economic exploitation because not only does she have the option to work as a man, but she also …
/r/MensRights19/07/23 01:13 PM
5

There's nothing wrong being a blackpiller. The scientific blackpill is an undeniable truth.
/r/MensRights19/07/23 02:43 AM
3

Who fears wins, buddy boyo.
/r/MensRights19/07/23 02:42 AM
5

Bread of every day. Out of ten rejections, I get a hook-up with two. And every time I am getting older and dating is more difficult and burdensome. Young people today live in hell.
/r/MensRights19/07/23 02:37 AM
2

Looks help but there not everything a guy who’s a 9 and nothing else is going to get old. Brother, a man who is a 9 in attractiveness is gonna mog to 99% of men with their eyes closed and you will maintain the genetic base for years if you do the minimum of exercise and lead a healthy life. Don't inspire this cope to people. And don’t say not an incel makes you look like an incel regardless of the content little homie. An incel is objectively an incel, it is not something that is dedicated to be…
/r/MensRights19/07/23 02:32 AM
3

Just be a 6/10 theory. Do not gaslight other men, mate. Being above average makes you a base, whether you are a claim.
/r/MensRights19/07/23 02:28 AM
9

For people unknowingly, elementary biology is considered "Incelism", an incorrect slang to describe the blackpill.
/r/MensRights19/07/23 02:27 AM
0

The ABC's of pair bonding: Female virginity. Just be the first theory.
/r/MensRights19/07/23 02:22 AM
2

Beauty is not indicative of anything; youth. However, neither one nor the other mark femininity unless we take for femininity youth and beauty; something that finds its counterpart in the biological frame of men. So masculine and feminine cannot be attitudes but genetic heredities or temporary states.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 11:11 PM
18

They are the ten paradoxes a Moroccan incel formulated and which I think answer this: The paradox of desperation: When it comes to seeking romantic relationships, the more desperate someone appears, the less likely they are to find a partner. This paradox arises because desperation can often lead to behaviors that are unattractive or off-putting, potentially repelling potential partners. Yet, the desperation itself stems from a genuine longing for connection and intimacy. The paradox of confiden…
/r/MensRights18/07/23 03:15 PM
14

Two fundamental things apply: Briffault's law and intrasexual competition. The concept of masculinity revolves around, most of the time, the ability to surpass other shoulders in status (physical and economic) and be considered as a favorite breeding object. Ultimately, we understand masculinity as an object of female exploitation, since they are the sexual selectors and we understand other men, as the frame of reference by which we compare who we can dominate and who dominates us, Returning to …
/r/MensRights18/07/23 03:09 PM
62

In short: Be attractive, be tall, have money, be a tireless sex machine = masculine. Be unattractive, be short, don't have money, be a dicklet = incel. Stay in the middle of looks and money: normie cuck. You are naive if you believe that masculinity is something that is defined by men, but not by women in most of the population. It is the same wheel that turns and turns and turns and does not stop turning: traditionalism is not going to return unless there is a population collapse that will hard…
/r/MensRights18/07/23 01:00 PM
1

Firstly, I never use the term manlet because I've only ever seen it used derogatorily. The truth is that here is the crux of the matter. We cannot derive effective models of masculinity when we are given to understand that there is an indubitable biological component and it seems, deterministic. manlet, dicklet, whateverlet, it always revolves around a value as masculine as genetics, and not a relevant attitude. Second, I still don't necessarily agree with your three points. Let me explain why. …
/r/MensRights16/07/23 03:04 PM
2

Brutal. So fucking brutal.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 02:38 PM
8

The eternal paradox between "earn more money for a good life for your family" and "I need to be there while I earn the same money". These whores belong to the streets, because it's never the "oh honey, it doesn't matter if you earn less, I love you even if we have to reduce our standard of living." 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣. ☕.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 02:34 PM
5

Rope? Hah! Never. Do not marry, boyos.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 02:32 PM
1

Would you establish then that a "manlet" is therefore less of a man? And if so, isn't masculinity to use an object of change? Of course, we have a biological component that contrasts with the female sex, this is undeniable and I will not be the one to bring Queer theory and other nonsense here. Thus, if we take the biological as a reference, not only is man hierarchical based on the three points that we have exposed above, but also if we base his value as a man under competition on a market of l…
/r/MensRights15/07/23 02:21 PM
11

On the internet you can buy t-shirts that literally have a screen print on them, from misandry to a photo of a Japanese female cartoon celebrating the genocide at Auschwitz.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 09:04 PM
12

You should justify your arguments with much more solid and developed propositions. The idea that the patriarchy has a base of exchange between men and women in which the woman benefits and has benefited is based on the analysis of Esther Vilar and other analyses.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 09:02 PM
1

However, you have not defined what you understand by masculinity, much less have you characterized this model that you have in the trident of possibilities that have been exposed: Masculinity/maleness as something society expects from us, Masculinity/maleness that the preferred sex for romantic-sexual experiences expects from us and, Masculinity/maleness that other close men expect of us in an intrasexual competition that is based on the two previous points. Attitudes generally have a surroundin…
/r/MensRights14/07/23 06:03 PM
9

Can you explain to me what frame of reference we are talking about "male role models"? And for what purposes? The problem is that this is what the supposed assumptions of what should be a "male" is dead by definition, and we only have what society expects of us, what the preferred sex for romantic-sexual experiences expects of us and what other close men expect of us. I only see subjectivism.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 10:18 PM
8

Imagine taking Twitter seriously.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 10:40 PM
8

Every woman can have someone, no matter their beauty; the problem is always who and not how much.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 01:12 PM
8

Paradoxically, it is the other way around. The more beautiful the girl is, the more audience she will have and the more echo her ideas will have on social networks.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 12:55 PM
1

Most men are criticized based on their ineffectiveness as objects of exploitation; intersex comparisons cannot be proportional because both sexes have different interests.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 11:27 AM
42

There are those who are happy alone; there are those who live alienated by the postmodern society in which we live and there are people who lament day and night for their lonely life. This phenomenon goes beyond "blackpills" and "you're ugly and therefore nobody likes you" as many simplistic want to defend. It is the world we have built, where each person is an atom, devoid of the social cohesion of a small but solid community. Not only did we walk towards more loneliness, but we also had more m…
/r/MensRights11/07/23 12:57 AM
5

Thanks it never began.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 04:05 PM
1

It's hard
/r/MensRights09/07/23 04:00 PM
3

Makes sense.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 03:57 PM
4

This is obviously an exaggeration based on what is being stated in the article posted by OP. Marriage only benefits the woman, always. On the one hand, the pills talk about stoic, tough men: machines trained to be objects of exploitation for women and then, we have the sweetened and absurd version of the one who seeks to be a submissive provider of women who are waiting for someone better. And the truth is that in the long term, everything tends to collapse; That's why I don't get married or go …
/r/MensRights09/07/23 02:10 PM
65

Just be a rich, handsome, tall,... man theory. 🤷🏻‍♂️
/r/MensRights09/07/23 02:23 AM
1

Of course, your anecdotal evidence and that of your friends and acquaintances does not represent a statistical majority. It is fine as data, but it is not relevant in the sexual market; firstly because it is a competitive market and secondly because whatever a man does, he will not be able to change this characteristic with which he is born, just like other characteristics that are considered relevant for men in this sexual market. Therefore, it is concluded that indeed the size is statistically…
/r/MensRights08/07/23 10:26 PM
1

if you're going to discuss the vagina I mention vagina size because it's a biological fact that it's proportional to the variety of penis sizes out there. There are smaller and narrower vaginas and others that are larger and wider; however, we always talk about the size of a man's penis because men are indeed expected to have larger than average sizes according to statistical evidence because it is the active subject who must offer, and it is the passive subject, generally the woman, who expects…
/r/MensRights08/07/23 08:47 PM
1

More experienced, that's all.
/r/MensRights08/07/23 06:32 PM
18

Indian feminist. This is pure psychopathy; an evil of brutal levels. Not only should this have legal consequences, but these, literally, frauds should be punished with a sharp eye. This shit is only getting worse when even publicly feminists have no qualms about proclaiming this evil so openly.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 03:40 AM
107

It's something that I think is widespread in most of the Western world. Here in Spain something similar happens; however here in Spain marriage is becoming more and more rare.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 03:10 AM
10

I know that it is difficult to comfort you in the face of this difficult situation, but I want to tell you that truly your story, like that of many men around the world, illustrates to many how marriage it can destroy a man's life for aspects that cannot be controlled, that depend on the veiled or emotional decision of someone who suddenly ends an entire life project and abandons you after a very hard job. And that's how things go... almost half of the marriages end in failure and the great majo…
/r/MensRights07/07/23 03:08 AM
4

Masculinity is defined by how you behave mot by what you are. Masculinity for the purposes of sexual market value is defined as what is essentially useful, whether it be heterosexual women or gays. The penis has an instrumental value both in copulation between homosexual men and between a heterosexual couple. Not everything is the penis, this is obvious; however, the objective is that masculinity is nothing more than wanting to meet the expectations of women about what you should represent. And …
/r/MensRights07/07/23 02:55 AM
3

All of this revolves around intrasexual competition between men, rather than men's right: Biological facts, genetic facts and why aspects like the "dickpill" are shown to be, to say the least, one of the most elementary factors in this intrasexual competition. There are men with very large penises, others small; short men and very tall men; men with a genetically formidable frame and other men who, due to genetic disagreements, seem to hardly be able to hold on themselves. This superiority or pe…
/r/MensRights07/07/23 02:45 AM
4

So fucking brutal.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 10:57 AM
1

Traditional Heels.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 09:01 PM
12

Current feminism cannot be understood if it is not from the perspective of the Marxist analysis of reality. Understanding that feminism was a movement started by men is the most correct vision if we understand that most feminists drink from Marxist works. Highlighting: · Origin of the Family, Private Property and State, by F. Engels. However, it is absurd to try to monopolize current feminism from a fully Marxist vision in its most subjectivist and emotional circles, because everything revolves …
/r/MensRights04/07/23 03:38 PM
46

And what does all this tell you? In effect, it tells you that man is intrinsically an economic-sexual object of exploitation, replaceable at will and in essence.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 03:26 PM
9

For more technical purposes, the "mahr" is understood as a payment in compensation for sex, which is usually paid before or during marriage ceremonies. Money or economic-material compensation that a man can recover if he does not have sex with his wife. In Gulf countries, such as Saudi Arabia, it is incredible how getting married is more expensive than buying a house, depending on the tribe, and the self-masturbatory family castes.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 01:49 PM
145

No, because to call a man incel is to tell him that he has no sexual value, because for women, sex is the most they can offer.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 01:45 PM
-5

Extremes always meet. This is an old law. In both echochambers you will find immeasurable hatred for ending the life of the other sex based on diametrically opposed reasons: On the one hand we have the echochamber incel in Discord forums and communities jealously guarded by "inceldom champs" who use hatred of women for its intrinsic nature and fantasize about "taking revenge" precisely on their object of hatred: an object of hate that is characterized in this way because they cannot access any w…
/r/MensRights04/07/23 01:30 PM
3

There is no insecurity if there is no competition. There is no competition but there are intersubjectively outstanding values ​​over others. There is no power if you do not have the ability to decide and whoever decides is the one who has the sexual power. So, let me tell you, most men are replaceable, and that at the end of the day going your own way as a man is basically stating that the chances of success are nil proportionally to the time you spend with a person who only understands you as a…
/r/MensRights03/07/23 02:16 PM
2

The man-woman dialectic can only be understood through economic-reproductive interests in both sexes. Masculine and feminine are just two definitions created by women to differentiate two fundamental aspects: the useful from the useless. This is the central idea of ​​feminism: an empowerment, as you have expressed in the broadest sense of the word of the wishes of absolute gynocentrism, with extremely deep manipulations, and the use of the majority of men as pack mules and a minority of men as s…
/r/MensRights03/07/23 01:49 AM
4

Appearances to the mind are of four kinds. Things either are what they appear to be; or they neither are, nor appear to be; or they are, and do not appear to be; or they are not, and yet appear to be. Rightly to aim in all these cases is the wise man's task. — Epictetus. Do not get carried away by instinct and have a cool head, analyze everything well. The best of successes.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 05:00 PM
4

You said it yourself: the sexual market is, worth the redundancy, a physical and digital place where men compete with each other to see who receives the approval of accepting you as a sexual-economic object of exploitation. The idealizations in your mind are masculine ideals, not a continuum in feminine strategies. I can marry this girl one day bc dating is fucked. It actually makes me mad when Isee females say shit like all men are trash when they don't even give most men a chance. Maybe I'm bi…
/r/MensRights01/07/23 04:29 PM
13

Good. Let's abolish marriage. Useless shit papercleaner.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 02:56 PM
5

Are you trolling?
/r/MensRights01/07/23 02:53 PM
7

I don't even know this woman. Why would anyone hate her on the basis that she dates men and makes music? I do not get this nonsense.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 02:48 PM
3

I have no idea what I am seeing except a woman posing and a an appreciation of the qualities of this woman in the subtitles.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 02:47 PM
2

This.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 02:46 PM
6

May you explain what is this and how it is related to this subreddit? I genuinely ask. I have no idea.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 02:45 PM
4

I agree with you, there are much more relevant problems at a legal level than, for example, thinking endlessly about the superstructure of this society, which is eminently gynocentric, and In that female power, the conflict of interests arises because ultimately, the biological interests of men and women come into contradiction. And the truth is that social problems have no solution because they assume that they are based on inherent freedom. Thus, inceldom cannot be solved because apart from th…
/r/MensRights01/07/23 01:00 PM
1

Yes, that's right.
/r/MensRights30/06/23 01:55 PM
8

Marriage has a connotation that is never considered enough and it is the entire superstructure that surrounds the entire marriage is based on a tacit covenant in the inherent slavery of a man in this institution that today lacks foundation because everything that structures it is based on a deception that does not sustain itself. To the religious believer, it is totally understandable how marriage can represent such an ideology of chastity but, removing religion from the equation, Marriage canno…
/r/MensRights30/06/23 01:30 PM
7

The only way to win at the marriage game is not to play.
/r/MensRights30/06/23 12:21 PM
2

Absolutely brutal.
/r/MensRights30/06/23 12:11 PM
2

We can't assume most women love most men.
/r/MensRights30/06/23 12:10 PM
-1

merely said both genders at points attempt to use things such as these differences to try and escape being regarded by others for their past behaviour. It is totally false. The analysis of the behaviors of both sexes has a large amount of statistical and conductive evidence to determine that the strategies and interests of both sexes, apart from being different, neither are comparable. Women do it with Onlyfans - "But times were hard, what's a girl to do?" - Who cares? Men are still within their…
/r/MensRights29/06/23 01:41 PM
2

People can do what they want in my opinion but I think both sexes are guilty of trying to escape naturally reasoned consequences from their past behaviour. The problem with this bullshit equalizer on all the posts on this subreddit is that this is clearly false. Most men won't reproduce, most men actually have a hard time even having a partner, either because he is ugly, or short, or because he does not have money to be exploited or because absolutely no woman is interested in him while a woman …
/r/MensRights29/06/23 11:07 AM
0

As each one interprets the purpose of the date as he wants, it is not appropriate to talk about how we would act before a date. Women and men are not the same nor do they have the same strategies, intentions and procedures. Both must be under the same legal and regulatory umbrella for fair relations and to avoid abuse and other unfortunate acts. It is absurd to think that a woman can take the active role in a relationship when indeed, every relationship revolves around passively receiving everyt…
/r/MensRights28/06/23 05:08 PM
0

What do men actually need from women though? To reproduce in most cases. Added to an Oedipus complex that is difficult to resolve, which seeks in women a kind of mother and, at the same time, an object of tutelage.
/r/MensRights27/06/23 01:21 PM
2

Clearer, water.
/r/MensRights27/06/23 11:24 AM
5

It's not possible. There is an inherently biological and material conflict of interest.
/r/MensRights27/06/23 11:22 AM
1

Yes, it is so on point that there are women here saying that they are better than men. Shut this shit down.
/r/MensRights27/06/23 11:16 AM
1

I understand what you are saying, however, I think the cultural analysis goes further.
/r/MensRights27/06/23 08:15 AM
3

Comfortable or not, why do not you proceed in such a way that your actions become an universal law? Is a man who doesn't make you feel comfortable a stock for momentary consumption? This behavior is not a common female trait because a woman ultimately only negotiates these types of relationships as if they were equals when she understands that the desired object of domination in short supply in an intrasexual market. while it is the man who offers himself as a good that seeks to replace the psyc…
/r/MensRights27/06/23 02:09 AM
1

Absolutely agreed.
/r/MensRights27/06/23 01:29 AM
3

It is naive that people under 30 years of age seek or understand what the concept of a couple is at deeper levels other than "we fuck and then we see".
/r/MensRights27/06/23 12:53 AM
12

This is the current behavior. When a woman wants to respond to the statistical study on her social and biological behavior, she usually responds with: "but the man also does X". What man? Which men? Just that select minority that she finds interesting and either don't fucking care about her or have polygamous behavior. And it is logical, the woman in her solipsistic behavior cannot understand reality as a whole except in a fraction of her preferred object of exploitation: call him Chad, Alpha, t…
/r/MensRights27/06/23 12:27 AM
3

Patriarchy Yes. However, we are talking about the perspective in which patriarchy exists in other societies outside the bubble of the West, to highlight many Islamic countries and extremely gregarious Asian societies. Rape Culture No. Male Domination/Dominance Half. When a feminist alludes to male domination, she refers to a tiny minority of men who are extremely desired for their physical attractiveness and their monopolization of resources. Most men do not dominate or exploit, but are dominate…
/r/MensRights27/06/23 12:04 AM
2

And since most men are considered not attractive by women, for practical purposes, lookism represents the totality of these relationships. Thus, personality, as we have both commented, is indeed what maintains the relationship in the long term, but not the most relevant thing in dating, at all. In dating, everything revolves around the self-assimilated delusion of appearances and sexual attraction.
/r/MensRights26/06/23 10:49 PM
8

What matters most is the lookism as an achievement for these dating to be based. Personality matters how much longer this relationship extends over time. Thus, people, through the halo effect, have the tendency to superimpose lookism on personality and imply that personality is no longer an extension of lookism for practical purposes. And it's more. Isn't it logical to think that an attractive person will have a better social behavior compared to another who has been beaten by society for their …
/r/MensRights26/06/23 10:15 PM
2

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights26/06/23 09:36 PM
2

We must understand "collapse" in its etymological term and under the reproductive interests of man. Human societies for centuries have been structured in a kind of theocratic monogamy. This has socialized the access to the sexual market of the majority of men. Before and after societies dominated by this religious morality we have these severe variances in the sexual market, with the fundamental difference that now, thanks to access to birth control, fewer and fewer couples reproduce. For practi…
/r/MensRights26/06/23 09:36 PM
2

Where you got this post advocating the degrading treatment of women. Nowhere. It is a parallel analysis Voted down. Your right.
/r/MensRights26/06/23 09:18 PM
1

The masculine is by definition what a woman considers useful or what is supposed to be used to compete with other men: a differentiation from the feminine, that is, from what is intrinsically useless. based on a concise social-historical analysis.
/r/MensRights26/06/23 07:39 PM
2

Only sporadic sexual relations. Neither courtship, nor romance, nor cohabitation, nor plans for the future.
/r/MensRights26/06/23 07:34 PM
3

And this is why you never marry, gentlemen. There is no benefit in marriage in these times.
/r/MensRights26/06/23 07:30 PM
1

The exception does not make the rule, chapter 1292.
/r/MensRights26/06/23 07:29 PM
7

People lack their own thinking. They simply follow a current that they don't understand but in which they find themselves comfortably swept away. But in a way I understand it; their system of thought is shaken and they consider that everything that attacks the root of daily and highly subjected impressions represents the totality of the real, when the totality of reality is, in essence, a fierce competition. 😅
/r/MensRights26/06/23 06:34 PM
3

They do: 20% of the distribution of this Pareto distribution in the sexual market possess the ability to choose and filter indiscriminately at will. For this reason, these tops of the hierarchy of the sexual market have polygamous tendencies while the women who associate with them try to retain them as long as they can or if they belong to to the higher sexual hierarchy of women, they will opt for a similar behavior of indiscriminate polyandry. Since the man needs more from the woman than she fr…
/r/MensRights26/06/23 06:28 PM
11

"everythingisincel.txt".
/r/MensRights26/06/23 06:06 PM
11

This is a rational, masculine line of thought. This attitude of exchange among men is based on the scarcity that men possess; Thus, a woman cannot have this line of thought because she is the one who discriminates and chooses based on her interests. So, you can't expect this from a woman unless she sees the best match slipping away.
/r/MensRights26/06/23 06:06 PM
99

It is ironic that women complain about being sexually objectified, even though in most cases they objectify themselves It's not ironic. In fact, it is hypocritical. When a woman complains that she is sexualized, she is clearly telling you, leaving out the most important variable, that the men she is most interested in have very high standards and that this X woman is overwhelmed by intrasexual competition between women. You must understand that when a woman complains about anything regarding the…
/r/MensRights26/06/23 12:37 PM
5

It is very possible that I am older than you; however this is irrelevant. You must define what you understand as cope. If you define it correctly and based on definitive evidence, I'll have no problem accepting your assumption that MGTOW is a cope.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 02:38 PM
8

Define it, come on. You use the term a lot but you don't define the linguistic object that you use so much.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 02:28 PM
8

You define "cope" wrong, so I don't agree that you equate MGTOW with a cope.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 02:24 PM
8

You talk about cope as if being divorced, having half of your assets taken from you and even custody of your future children in view of the probability of a divorce, was a "cope." From the philosophy of pills, to what is understood as risk forecasting, a "cope" is considered. What's more, when you are one of those who are sent to jail for a false accusation, you can also call him "coper" as well. If protecting yourself is a cope, you know. Kill your survival instinct.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 01:47 PM
11

For technical purposes, they are telling you that you must be an object of exploitation for a woman to be interested in.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 01:43 PM
7

Alrighty. I was only trying to help bridge the gap. The problem with these throwaway accounts like yours is that they always play into the dichotomy of supposedly wanting to narrow the gap while wanting to create some kind of layer of protection against social judgment. For this reason, and although this seems like a witch hunt, guys like you have always come to this subreddit to make an eternal gaslight of our problems. ​ Highlighting that men need to actually talk about their problems. But ok …
/r/MensRights24/06/23 04:15 PM
10

It is always the throwaway accounts that supposedly come here to release the permanent gaslight on us. Not only does the woman know the manipulation that revolves around the taming of the man, but this learning to which you allude is a false learning. This is a direct contradiction to your entire argument. You're admitted that people don't know 🤣 No, it is not. It is feminine nature. The woman assumes in her particular solipsism that everything revolves around her like a solar system of orbiting…
/r/MensRights24/06/23 02:43 PM
7

I'm not ignoring what you're saying. I am criticizing the supposed ignorance you assume women possess about men's problems. These problems are understood as a natural part of what man must suffer. In fact, it is assumed that men have no rights because a small percentage of men are associated with the social mass and they are told: do you see that attractive and successful man? I do not see that this man suffers at all! Who has ever said that? I'm not talking about feminist. I mean normal, regula…
/r/MensRights24/06/23 02:33 PM
10

Yes, we agree because a man's problems don't matter a shit to a woman as long as it's not a problem for herself. And those who know, inherently either tell us that "a man's suffering is part of his attractive masculinity", that is, what is useful for a woman; or we are aligned within the Marxist analysis within feminism that we are inherent exploiters. The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the ma…
/r/MensRights24/06/23 02:20 PM
25

The same reason womens issues are invisible to men As ignored as the daily sun on a summer day: like a yoke on our heads that man has inherently become the slave of your problems.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 02:12 PM
2

Therefore, it is concluded that either 90% will be the object of casual sex by men in the highest percentiles and then cry over men, or that we are moving towards stages of polygamy in the face of the death of the religious and social institutions that previously governed us. And herein lies the problem regarding our rights beyond self-bashing from the redpill, blackpill and other pills: the inherent economic exploitation to which the rest of the men are led.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 01:48 PM
290

Be the motherfucker you always wanted to be and report that woman. Always equality, mate.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 01:21 PM
51

Nice username. 🤣 It is the repetition of the same, always. Women need not to care except for themselves. From the moment they are born until they die, they are understood as the idealization of the divine, of what is demanded, of the infinite sexual and labor options that they have today. Man works to exhaustion for this systematic manipulation and will continue to do so as long as social manipulation techniques remain in force against him. What's the blackpill except a well-crafted wishlist of …
/r/MensRights24/06/23 01:08 PM
3

He had. A deadly personality.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 12:59 PM
2

It is more than obvious that personality detectors have become a very funny meme nowadays.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 12:58 PM
1

While you can't trade someone who isn't attracted to you into actually being attracted to you, women have a double mating strategy, in which they are looking for the extraction of resources and the semen of the fittest man they can find.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 12:56 PM
2

You can negotiate how cuckold you want to become classic betabuxxing.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 12:53 PM
1

It is a proven fact that the choice of sexual partner is inversely proportional in statistical terms between men and women. Only, really, 20% of men can have this ability to choose, like 80% of women; However, the remaining 80% of men simply live in the flow of what I can choose. Taking into account that the reproductive interests between men and women are inversely proportional, you can't talk about your socialization of shallowness in objective, intersex terms.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 12:51 PM
1

It is a proven fact that the choice of sexual partner is inversely proportional in statistical terms between men and women. Only, really, 20% of men can have this ability to choose, like 80% of women; However, the remaining 80% of men simply live in the flow of what I can choose. Taking into account that the reproductive interests between men and women are inversely proportional, you can't talk about your socialization of shallowness in objective, intersex terms.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 12:51 PM
2

Only men in the top percentiles and most women have this "shallowness" behavior. A woman chooses among potential competitors, a man, from the few options he has.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 12:47 PM
5

Only men in the top percentiles and most women have this "shallowness" behavior. A woman chooses among potential competitors, a man, from the few options he has.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 12:47 PM
2

Why do women not make use of their intellectual potential? For the simple reason that they do not need to. It is not essential for their survival. Theoretically it is possible for a beautiful woman to have less intelligence than a chimpanzee and still be considered an acceptable member of society. By the age of twelve at the latest, most women have decided to become prostitutes. Or, to put it another way they have planned a future for themselves which consists of choosing a man and letting him d…
/r/MensRights05/06/23 02:02 AM
1

So in these kinds of circumstances, the woman in this story would be right. For practical purposes, the man has breached his ability to provide or keep up while he is visibly supported by his girlfriend, with a more stable job and putting up the house. That is why in these modern times, it is up to each couple to determine what they consider and how they consider it in their relational dynamics. The fight for men's rights it will be determined by the struggle in legal issues, which are incumbent…
/r/MensRights05/06/23 01:10 AM
0

It is that it continues to be irrelevant to the rights of man. These types of relational dynamics are facts that must be given in private and that each couple decide how they want to shape their life. That is why this has more to do with debates closer to the redpill where couples' dynamics are discussed than the fight for human rights itself through effective legislation taking the State as a legal arbitrary. In many Western countries, adultery is not legally punishable, but it can give benefit…
/r/MensRights04/06/23 11:14 PM
-6

It remains irrelevant to this couple's situation.
/r/MensRights04/06/23 10:16 PM
-4

Yes, we can talk about reversed, juxtaposed and passive roles, however it is something that falls within the private sphere.
/r/MensRights04/06/23 10:04 PM
4

This is something that falls within the public realm and I doubt that it can have any legal and mandatory applicability. This is something that couples must decide on their own freedom.
/r/MensRights04/06/23 10:01 PM
2

The redpill, like other colored pills, are a metaphor for the movie "The Matrix" in which the red pill is an illumination regarding the workings of real life and the bluepill, mirages of the socialization process that seeks to calm the masses. In the case of interpersonal and sexual dynamics, these pills, through statistical studies and evolutionary psychology, seek to understand female behavior and her natural preferences. They are generally analytical, but they also have debatable prescriptive…
/r/MensRights04/06/23 06:39 PM
1

There are toys and other extensions for men with small penises. However, r/smalldickproblems It is clear evidence that this type of thing adds very negative points to contemporary dynamics. Literally a turn-off showing up on the first date with a plastic penis or a strapoon as reported. Regarding the bionic penis, we are out of the equation again. A lot of money, for what? Should a man mutilate himself for female satisfaction? It's stupid. Attraction is what it is, yes, and it has objectively me…
/r/MensRights04/06/23 06:28 PM
47

I work full-time and have my own place. He lives at home and has no regular income. After five years, I don’t want to hurt him, but our goals seem incompatible We don’t face the same challenges or routines. I work nine-to-five, while he drifts around on whims and vague projects, and spends the few pounds that come his way on records. He will not accept that I find our different lifestyles difficult to reconcile. as well as my fear of giving up on us and finding someone new – a daunting prospect.…
/r/MensRights04/06/23 04:52 PM
2

May I help you?
/r/MensRights04/06/23 04:43 PM
2

Everything that a woman physically desires are things that are generally genetic and that hardly or impossibly change, except for the body mass index. The redpill stupidly always come with the idea that women want to assume a masochistic role under the concept of "scarcity" of alpha males as Rollo Tomassi would tell us in his work The Rational Male, but the truth is that this masochism is non-existent. All these qualities that a woman biologically pursues are all beneficial forms of male slavery…
/r/MensRights04/06/23 04:25 PM
2

The statistical trend of men who practice geomaxxing in Southeast Asian countries are predominantly men from the most industrialized countries in Asia, such as Chineses, Koreans, and less frequently, Japaneses, who are then followed by whites. While the fetishization of white men by Asian women is undeniable (and the whiter these Asians are, the more the Nordic traits will be relevant) the truth is that much of this "geomaxxing" revolves around economic imbalance.
/r/MensRights03/06/23 03:31 PM
1

It would be necessary to define what "dating" is and around what objectives. Dating, hook-up, one-night-stand...; I understand that dating has a deeper value and that it seeks to extend itself over time. Taking into account that the distribution of the looks can be represented in a Gaussian curve, and if we take that above-average is 6-7 in terms of looks, 70% of men have no cause for a dating-relationship. What's more, the blackpill deterministically assumes that if you are a "high tier normie"…
/r/MensRights03/06/23 03:23 PM
1

They have been blinded by the stereotyped image of woman as victim of male exploitation to such an extent that they do not realize that they themselves are, in fact, the sufferers. They maintain that women's naivety and their gullible, i.e., `stupid' natures are exploited by advertisers for the purpose of increasing sales. One day these men will get around to asking themselves who is really being exploited. Is it the creature whose innermost wishes are sought out. coddled, and fulfilled, or is i…
/r/MensRights03/06/23 02:45 PM
14

In broad strokes, an absurd market strategy. If this cafe sells me 20% more expensive coffee, it means that the price of the drink will be more expensive than in practically any other place in the area. I don't pay for the coffee and I go to the nearest one. Over time, they will either lose potential male clients or become a venue for the local feminist movement to stay afloat. Anyway... ☕
/r/MensRights03/06/23 02:31 PM
38

Unlike the eternal debate of whether there are good women, or if all women have the same point of behavior, or the demonization and the war of the sexes, you have the freedom to educate yourself, understand the problems that affect the majority of men who are enslaved and manipulated. Humanity in the social and sexual dynamics of the market are totally dynamited by the eternal lack of sincerity. You represent an exceptional case, like many reported on Reddit, but you are not even remotely the do…
/r/MensRights02/06/23 08:00 PM
8

And in all of them we conclude that women have sexual control of the market and are the ones who train men from their earliest childhood, perhaps with religious or moral imperatives, so that men become an intrinsically replaceable part of the social fabric, that , for hierarchical purposes, benefits this large minority, ironically, of privileged men. Biological reasons explain reproductive-sexual tastes and preferences, man's sacrifice is only the result of rationalization. And from there, it is…
/r/MensRights02/06/23 04:42 PM
11

The reasons are due to what is expected of man as an exploitable and easily replaceable labor force. Children are the future, women are the ones who carry and supposedly take care of these children, and dogs are companions who are considered sentient and who receive more social attention than a bum on the street. These types of attitudes are constant and visible in each place. The woman cannot make mistakes, it is not in her nature, and if she makes them, then she will tell you that it is your f…
/r/MensRights02/06/23 04:38 PM
119

Only women, children, and dogs are loved unconditionally. A man is only loved under the condition that he provide something [...] are women really that numb to men's feelings and how life-changing events like losing a job can affect them or are these women outliers? If you cant be vulnerable with your woman in your home, what's the point in having a woman in your life? You will be able to understand that in this individualized and extremely competitive world, your ills are nobody's concern unles…
/r/MensRights02/06/23 04:34 PM
1

Irrelevant.
/r/MensRights31/05/23 06:07 PM
2

The battle of the sexes for inherent pains that are exclusive between the sexes and then claiming that "my sex is worse-suffering" is simply an artificial and childish battle of the sexes. A battle for equality is to accept this reality and stop fooling around (no pun intended).
/r/MensRights31/05/23 03:44 AM
1

It is Reddit after all. People think that Reddit is representative of something, and it isn't at all. Removing the same recycled and infected slop from children's speeches, Reddit it is just that: the sadism of anonymous people in most cases.
/r/MensRights31/05/23 03:42 AM
2

I agree with you that MGTOW at soft levels (avoid marriage and legally dangerous commitments) It is the safest option for men today.
/r/MensRights31/05/23 03:39 AM
1

The answer is due to the defense against a trampling of our rights. Dating strategies, colored pills, and even beautiful echochambers with beautiful and bombastic studies of the female mind. All of this is fantastic for aspiring evolutionary psychologists and those looking for certain references in standardized patterns of human behavior, and especially female behavior. However, turning the fight for our rights and this subreddit into a speaker for all of this is simply irrelevant to those of us…
/r/MensRights31/05/23 03:37 AM
5

My experiences with several girlfriends that I had is that indeed the period is something brutal for many women. One of them was bleeding a lot and had terrible cramps in her lower abdomen that always proceeded with screaming and manifest weakness. These lists of pains are just another stupidity. Things and determined illness hurt. Period. Neither man knows the intersubjective experience of the period nor will women feel a brutal kick to the balls in their lives. And in both sexes, heart attacks…
/r/MensRights31/05/23 03:10 AM
3

If a young man gets married, starts a family, and spends the rest of his life working at a soul-destroying job, he is held up as an example of virtue and responsibility. The other type of man, living only for himself, working only for himself, doing first one thing and then another simply because he enjoys it and because he has to keep only himself, sleeping where and when he wants, and facing woman when he meets her, on equal terms and not as one of a million slaves, is rejected by society. The…
/r/MensRights30/05/23 03:48 PM
7

Brutal.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 03:26 AM
1

The prison which bars I cannot touch or feel...
/r/MensRights30/05/23 01:55 AM
12

It is assumed that the woman cannot lie because the woman is weak; it is assumed that women cannot lie because it is believed that manipulation is typical of men. It is believed that lying is a variable in men as a vice and for women as a necessity. Ultimately, it is believed that it is the man who manipulates the woman to get her submission. It is assumed, it is assumed. Everything is assumed. The beautiful is assumed to be more intelligent, the woman is assumed to be a being of light devoid of…
/r/MensRights30/05/23 12:48 AM
1

I do not understand your question. Probably that's why I am being dissed and played by whatever system you claim to ask.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 12:40 AM
1

They have cited it and have shown their empathy from what i can read. However, you can't expect much deeper analysis from people who generally haven't thought about these concepts as deeply as someone who has experienced it or is attentive to the problem of men.
/r/MensRights13/05/23 02:58 PM
6

It is evident that the concept of hypergamy is widely studied and has many appearances both in the scientific literature and in individual observation.However, you don't specifically define what for. Relationships today tend to casual encounters, without substance, of sexual catharsis, rotating and eminently liquid. Faced with a liberation of the sexual market, it is not surprising that sexual dynamics follow eminently primitive habits (the best specimen, supposedly); where the reproductive inst…
/r/MensRights13/05/23 02:55 PM
-3

I am from Spain, and it is a good parallelism still.
/r/MensRights13/05/23 08:03 AM
6

The joke turns precisely to that concept of "stone-age". When the user I have cited talks about "height and being buffed" there is talk of the elementary concept of intrasexual competition between men for their height and one of the great attractions for heterosexual women. In both, dominance, either as a fetish or against men, contrasts with the uselessness of this physical strength before the ingenuity of a short man, perhaps 5'2'' carrying a shotgun against this perfect man prototype. Primiti…
/r/MensRights13/05/23 12:08 AM
7

Or failing that, own a shotgun. What 6'2'' gym-loving chad can resist a 12-gauge?
/r/MensRights12/05/23 11:32 PM
6

As a lay user and reading the opinion of both. Indeed, I am more of outdoor exercises, preferably cycling and running and my experience in the world of the gym is little or none. Taking into account that you both have convergent points of view. Could you provide examples of natural men with such a muscular predisposition and who have undergone anti-dopping/other tests? I'm asking all this because I've always seen the 'cycled' versus 'natural' person debate and the controversy doesn't have an eas…
/r/MensRights12/05/23 11:28 PM
6

Once I almost made the mistake of marrying. Being an atheist, the Virgin Mary appeared to me and said: "if you walk alone, they will call you incel, but you will live better".
/r/MensRights12/05/23 04:24 PM
5

Thank you very much for sharing this intervention of yours. We have reached very similar conclusions when deducing that many postulates of feminism stem from a Marxist analysis of society. This is illustrated in a more nusitized way in many classic works of feminism: The second sex, by Simon de Beauvoir. Gender Trouble, by Judith Butler. Sister outsider, by Audre Lorde. The dialectic of sex: the case for feminist revolution, by Shulamith Firestone. Marxism and the oppression of women: Toward a U…
/r/MensRights12/05/23 11:35 AM
3

Your worth is not defined by societal expectations. Nothing else can be affirmed in these times than the absolute demoralization of man for what he cannot change, cannot reach or whom he cannot satisfy.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 12:50 AM
1

I have a t-shirt that says: "Your wife wants you to throw out the garbage" (Tu mujer quiere que tires la basura) while the Java logo is on fire. Effectively I am the master of garbage in my code.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 12:39 AM
5

This contrasts with leadership competition in positions of a dubious technical and manual labor nature. In the nature of scientific work, engineering, technical, construction and high technology, This leadership that seeks feminism through a Marxist perspective of the class struggle (patriarchy-men vs. oppressed-women) it is precisely to enslave the productive and essential majority of the productive fabric, which is the primary and secondary sector, which is raised by men and by whom the world …
/r/MensRights12/05/23 12:28 AM
8

I will never get tired of repeating that feminism starts its entire base and analysis from a Marxist concept of reality. Beyond the misandry inherent in many small groups of the movement, feminism is a movement of sexual supremacy that seeks to make men a necessary spacegoat in the false dichotomy: "women-are-weak-and-must-be-protected" and "women-must-empower-theirselves". This gives as a dialectically necessary conclusion (and it's quite ironic) to the most rapacious and forceful gynocentrism,…
/r/MensRights12/05/23 12:19 AM
1

If it can't be absolutely proven then I won't believe it. Of course, we agree on this point. Conclusive evidence is needed for this matter. I'm simply going to take the opposite stance because being reasonable has not helped in any of my discussions. In the end, it is not the discussion itself, but the procedural method of the security forces and bodies, the medical forensics and the investigative courts. This is the core key. Advocating for this is the most sensible thing to do. You can wish fo…
/r/MensRights10/05/23 10:14 PM
0

However, the move to consider all rape accusations false is as absurd as the opposite. I understand your frustration, but this is excessive childishness that does not benefit anything. This dichotomy, precisely, benefits misandry. That is why we must advocate for fairer and more impartial procedural systems.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 09:10 PM
2

The issue of rape is complicated. I believe that any complaint of rape should be dealt with by all the forces of law under rigorous controls and where the presumption of innocence is prioritized until proven otherwise. The problem lies when, just because of the word of the woman, a man must be imprisoned for hours or days arbitrarily without the greatest proof that the word of a woman without proof. In Spain, for you to get up to speed, the single accusation of violence will lead you to be locke…
/r/MensRights10/05/23 08:30 PM
22

In the end it is the training that they have given to the bot. For our part, it remains for us to give feedback so that from now on the bot is more impartial.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 08:18 PM
11

Expected
/r/MensRights10/05/23 08:16 PM
9

Fino, señores. 😎
/r/MensRights10/05/23 07:50 PM
5

Perhaps the simplicity is what gives it difficulty. The curious thing is that in Spanish we have the same construction as in English to say "quitting smoking" or "quitting women" ("dejar a una mujer; dejar el tabaco). Then the idioms and the set phrases, it's another story. The truth expands through everyone's experiences, as Ortega y Gasset said. Perhaps what cannot be verbalized cannot be thought and what cannot be thought does not exist. 😅
/r/MensRights10/05/23 02:27 AM
6

Undoubtedly, what is understood as falling in love at the brain level is similar to a good dose of cocaine or paranoid schizophrenia. Chemical rush is unquestionably and extremely addictive. Nature plays its cards hard.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 01:42 AM
1

It is normal that live less on average. We do the hard jobs, we die in wars, we support most technical jobs related to manual labor, we drown our sorrows much more in tobacco, alcohol and other drugs...; many men's lives are centered around being the dehumanized workforce. And suicide..., oh suicide...; talking about suicide breaks my heart because I know a good friend of mine who committed suicide due to some pretty screwed-up life circumstances: an atrocious diabetes, an obesity that barely al…
/r/MensRights10/05/23 12:31 AM
12

As a non-native speaker of English, I have always found the use of the term "quitting" curious. Saying "quitting women" sounds to me like saying "quitting smoking" or "quitting drugs." 🤣🤣 Sorry for the off-topic, I just wanted to laugh a little after watching the video.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 12:24 AM
83

Awesome! (/s) Now we will have more psychopathic and controlling women, false accusations, made-up stories and a witch hunt without control or measure. before a fundamental right of each person: the right to privacy. What will this bring? Indeed, revengeful men who will start with the same dynamic of slut-shaming, women-hunting, feminists responding that they have the right to be sluts, and turning the flour to the wheat.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 12:22 AM
51

Man, this is disgusting. My condolences to his loved ones...
/r/MensRights09/05/23 08:23 PM
18

Can someone from the United States explain to me why there are so many cases like this?
/r/MensRights09/05/23 01:17 PM
104

never thought I would go on dating apps and talk to men online and now I'm doing it pretty much daily. My only regret is not doing it sooner Inside the black/redpill debate there has always been the question of whether a woman can fall within the spectrum of involuntary celibacy; some think that it depends, others are more emphatic and consider that a woman will always have possibilities in the sexual market (considering most women volcels)...; Be that as it may, it seems to have a ring that "th…
/r/MensRights09/05/23 11:26 AM
2

You're right. I must simplify my phrases. It happens to me a lot that I want to express a lot and I condense too much without explaining more clearly what I want to say. Thank you very much for your words.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 01:24 AM
1

I think that conditioning to a new society causes these values ​​to be lost in the West, or else the family forces the girl to marry or have endogamous relationships with her own culture, and what seems to have greater relevance in the subcontinent, from "desis" Muslims to Indians of many ethnicities and creeds in general. Regarding this description of the brown girl with a British accent... everyone has their tastes, I guess. 🤷‍♂️
/r/MensRights09/05/23 01:07 AM
3

I thank you for your answer. It seems its gonna be intellectually enriching. Let me dissect your answer into concrete quotes. status symbol The essential nature of marriage throughout its history has not, based on the analysis of most religious and social systems, greater inherent meaning than that of a social regulator. Of course, society has been divided into castes, classes and estates, but there is no higher level of concomitance in marriage than regulating the problems of an open sexual mar…
/r/MensRights09/05/23 01:03 AM
1

Geomaxxing or "passports bros" are both things that have their own debate.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 12:31 AM
4

Sounds like an incel and speaks like an incel You confuse involuntary celibacy with a misogynistic and infantilistic interpretation of evolutionary psychology. Uses incel terminology There is no incel terminology "per se". There are forums of incels that incite echochamber and misogyny along with apology for inhumanity and other atrocities. The "incel" has no basis due to the monopolization of what it is: an extreme minority. Upvoted in the “men’s rights sub” However, you have not sought to coun…
/r/MensRights09/05/23 12:28 AM
4

What he is telling you is that there are masochistic tendencies in the female selection process based on a mental rooting that is expected of the most dominant man in terms of protection of the woman le the offspring; this finds evidence in evolutionary psychology. Hating women is one of the most infantilistic aspects of the interpretation of the blackpill; taking control of our lives is precisely understanding, with great intelligence, that long-term relationships require planning and an intell…
/r/MensRights09/05/23 12:19 AM
8

The dark triad obeys masochistic and self-destructive instincts; selection of the dominant man as opposed to a stable mentality. This only works in mating and in the long term it only creates self-destructive sequelae. That there is a kind of marital self-sabotage indicates that either marriage and long-term relationships are not natural, and therefore are rationalized, or that these long-term relationships require the assimilation of superior rationalizations. Ask yourself the reason why two pe…
/r/MensRights09/05/23 12:15 AM
1

Kinda it is, but it goes beyond the role of a wife and the role of a husbsnd. It is understanding what you expect from marriage, what you both expect from life projects and building based on that. Relationships and marriages can be set up in many ways, from rules, concessions, aspirations, dreams, red lines...; but people (I am not talking about you) live the world as if they knew what the words they often use mean, for example: "love", "falling in love", "marriage", "coexisting". All absolutely…
/r/MensRights09/05/23 12:09 AM
7

The problem with the halo effect is that there is a tendency in the inexperienced masochistic instinct to hope to change what enters our eyes, but not necessarily through our brains. In the naturalness of things, long-term relationships obey the dichotomy of reproducing with the best but also being protected and long-term cities by the best provider. We are well aware of the dual mating strategy, However, in the natural state, neither marriage nor long-term relationships obey natural facts in ma…
/r/MensRights08/05/23 11:54 PM
2

If the world were ideal, esteemed user, we would all deserve love and all would be fair, faithful and sincere. But the world doesn't work that way. We want to have it all, and at the same time we want to have the best when the best is not what we like the most; we fight against odds looking for the ideal in our life, and in truth..., life is balances of priorities. You can't expect to change a person, but we fall in love with what our senses read, not our reason. It's natural, but the natural, f…
/r/MensRights08/05/23 11:44 PM
11

Do you want a commited relationship I neither want nor look for it. Too many risks, as other men have said. why are so many men into hookups The number of heterosexual men in hookups will always be proportional to the numer of heterosexual women in hookups; there being a tendency to polygamy by a minuscule part of the male population. What has completely destroyed modern day dating. The very thing that has destroyed the ability of human beings to maintain relationships of any kind with mankind: …
/r/MensRights08/05/23 11:41 PM
2

These types of platforms are like The Inquisition or the KGB. You never know for sure why someone would show up there, or with intentions those images are published. It is better to fight against that scourge, whether perpetrated by men or by women.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 10:48 PM
4

Just conquer them, my Sultan.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 05:24 PM
11

trying to convince my girl to leave me my girl praises her for being so “independent”
/r/MensRights07/05/23 03:55 PM
3

So definitely the quadruple 6 ideal could be calculated around the 6 figures of men available in the entire market. 🗿 And I would say even less.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 01:54 PM
6

6/6/6/6 standards 6' implies the 82th percentil, that is, in a Gaussian distribution, only 18% of men in the United States that reach that height, from a population of 165 million of men, Which is equivalent to 29.7 million men. Taking into account that it is more optimistically estimated that only 14% earn more than 6 figures in the United States, and assuming that the number of women can reduce this statistic at the same time that there is a certain accumulation of capital in this population g…
/r/MensRights07/05/23 01:04 PM
2

Of course, a woman can be told to lower her standards, and this can be done on a probabilistic basis based on what objective characteristics they look for in a man so that their mating chances increase at the same time, the sexual market value of this woman is analyzed. The high standards of a common population of women will lead to there not being enough ideal men on the market to go around. Since everyone is free to do what they want, the absence of physical and social standards leads to volun…
/r/MensRights07/05/23 12:29 PM
5

unsafe sexual health practices Which ones? sexual violence and violence against their partners. Which kind of porn is this? Any BDSM fetish? If I remember correctly, there is a tendency in both sexes and specifically, in women, for rape-abuse fantasies, or extremely rough sex. Of course, this type of content would need to be nuanced and seek interpretations according to why this desire occurs (need to be desired, domination, lack of attention..., sadomasochistic instincts...), but it is still th…
/r/MensRights07/05/23 02:49 AM
4

Yes, this is a proven fact: pornography can cause dependency and it can affect addicts psychologically when interacting with their partners. However, do we have data that can shed light on the statistical incidence of pornography addiction in married people? Then there is the case of men who either seek to get married or cannot get it due to physical characteristics, social anxiety, non-neurotypicality...
/r/MensRights07/05/23 02:34 AM
4

Since faith is a personal matter, I consider it irrelevant to enter into that debate, however, I still don't see the reasoning why you consider that sex itself is not an objectification of both parties and neither do I understand how a good or bad reason, from a moral point of view, can determine if the act is objectification or not.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 02:32 AM
3

It degrades both men and women because by useing porn to masterbate you turn the actors into a tool for your pleasure therefore objectifying them and dehumanising them. I find a rather delicious —understood by its meaning of intellectually pleasurable, whether we agree or not— parallel with Kantian ethics and the categorical imperative that seeks to establish treating people always as an end and not as a mean. This makes me reflect, since it makes me think that this argument can be extrapolated …
/r/MensRights07/05/23 01:32 AM
6

It follows the core logic that FDS remains as an allowed community here on Reddit based on blatant apology for murder celebration, eugenics, active discrimination or misandry —this last term, not recognized as something existing by Reddit in its regulations—. Not only these types of communities on Facebook can be used as weapons of smear by totally anonymous people, spiteful women or by hatred in general, rather, it seeks to become a witch hunt to assess how beneficial a man can be as sexual and…
/r/MensRights07/05/23 01:00 AM
4

u/ThoughtPoliice; A lot of people here have chosen porn over women because they aren’t Intimidated by porn. I would like to read your arguments in this regard and how you would define "intimidation" for the purposes that concern us.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 12:28 AM
8

Be patient with me because my questions are not intended to be an interrogation nor do I seek to gaslight your possible arguments. I just want to understand your points. It degrades men and women Why? Are we talking about certain types of pornography or all of it itself? decreases men’s ability to perform I interpret that you mean that pornography associated with masturbation can cause problems such as premature ejaculation or a certain impotence in the absence of pornographic stimuli? gives boy…
/r/MensRights06/05/23 11:22 PM
13

I've been doing this at my job and since I was in college for years. It's kind of hard when most of the dissenting voices are women who can't be debated under the influence of a prefabricated feminist mantra, white knights who consider our exploitation as a form of manhood or the general public self-censoring so as not to become a social outcast. Of course, you find that in private there are many men who recognize that they must advance their rights, but many remain silent because of everything …
/r/MensRights06/05/23 10:47 PM
16

What are your arguments against pornography?
/r/MensRights06/05/23 10:39 PM
70

Tell your wife what has happened and initiate legal action, including denouncing this group for defamation of such social networks.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 10:13 PM
18

There are incels, misogynists and pedophiles men. It is a statistical data. Just like there are misandric, resentful and pedophilic women too. Now, the key to generalization lies in associating something you don't like with something else that is socially aberrant and there you have your perpetual echochamber to say that belonging to the MRA is to be an enemy of humanity, women, female kittens, BBC-blacks or any other bullshit that can occur to them. They live in a perpetual gaslight.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 01:01 PM
4

I think that the wall is the biggest cope that some redpillers have established to calculate their probabilities to get betabuxxed by grown women.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 01:28 AM
5

Welcome, I hope you find wise answers. which tbh made me a little scared that my bf will think that way or get second thoughts for said reasons (we've discussed it and we both would like to get married in the future). Remember that fear does not exist if you are not afraid of losing something. You are both rational people and marriage is a decision, a life project that is taken by the full will of both people. The most sensible thing here would be to ask your boyfriend what he thinks about it, r…
/r/MensRights06/05/23 12:11 AM
10

r/femcels has been banned from Reddit. I can't feed my curiosity now.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 11:19 PM
9

I remember this as a constant in high school and college. When it is detected that someone has exploitable qualities, it will therefore be sought to approach that person to extract such benefit. From notes, homework, various exercises...; in my experience this is something done by both men and women. In heterosexual men, it is clear that there are some women who use their attractiveness in order to make a profit. But this is like everything, you have to learn that basically, everything that is n…
/r/MensRights05/05/23 04:00 PM
2

I read all this and only see a dog biting his own tail. You indicate the failure of marriage as our culture is right now, and indicate some of the reasons leading to this outcome Because the direct correlation between marital failure, the decline in marriages, and the increase in divorces follow an exponential line the further away we go from decades before. The causes are many, and range from the new social stage in which we live (postmodernism) which in turn associates under itself many concep…
/r/MensRights05/05/23 03:37 PM
2

Of course, under conditions of equality, unions between people through formalities and rituals can be noble enterprises that benefit both parties, assuming rationality and responsibility as an essential value in these relationships that seek to expand over time. However, the debate is based on the intrinsic idea that current marriage relationships and under current laws do not even grant this benefit. nor is the man interested in entering into this type of relationships, because in the long run,…
/r/MensRights05/05/23 02:35 PM
-1

The problem with DSM-V and CIE-11, is that its evaluation criteria in many controversial aspects are removed, added or edited by vote. The highest criteria for this It is a collegiate council of psychiatrists, psychologists and health experts in general deciding mental disorders and illnesses based on interested criteria or where science stands before polítical correctness. A very characteristic case was when it came out of the DSM that homosexuality was not a mental disorder. Don't get me wrong…
/r/MensRights05/05/23 01:07 PM
16

All of these terms, if you look closely, revolve around the criticism that you are not sexually competent. And more than looking for a correct and direct criticism to the jugular, they (determined women) simply seek to establish that if you were a sex machine, you wouldn't complain as much when certain people make your life miserable. Whereas when a man does it, he simply does it as a white knight or to get the attention of a woman in the intrasexual competition that governs us. It's like the te…
/r/MensRights05/05/23 12:56 PM
6

Quantum physics seems easier to me.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 12:48 PM
1

The standards are set when it is expected to "deserve" a personal counterpart. That is, it is valued positively that the person who makes these demands can give an equivalent. Taking into account that a 6'4'' man who earns good money and has great everything are derisory statistical variables, the only way to supply this demand is through the polygamy of this subject in casual and rotating sex environments. Asking, like dreaming, is free. And I am quite compassionate: I hope they find what they …
/r/MensRights05/05/23 02:04 AM
1

You have brought to the fore an interesting reflection. Couples today, from what I see, they tend more to cohabitation than to marriage itself; This is something that is common in Western countries as divorce and marriage rates become quite equal to such an extent that it seems that for every marriage there is a divorce and successively.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 01:53 AM
7

She'd run. RUN! 🗿
/r/MensRights04/05/23 10:36 PM
22

So, if a man cannot take "no" for an answer and insults a woman calling her "a lesbo or something" for not having sex with him, is it the fault of "the matriarchy" for programming men to say that? No. It would be called hypergamy and we average men (most men, basicly) know that rejection is something we have to take as a base when approaching a girl.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 09:58 PM
76

If you want to fuck, it is a problem. If you do not want to fuck it is a problem too. Damnit, lady! P. S. The best thing in this situation after having told the person that they do not want to have sex, is to block contact. You could report sexual harassment, but as the laws stand, they might even laugh at you (sadly).
/r/MensRights04/05/23 09:24 PM
6

It may not financially benefit but from the general perspective it never has. Taking into account that in the past marital relations followed a regime of balance of interests, we could say that years ago it compensated the general purpose of marriage for a man: ensure that the offspring is yours (with cheating stories aside), that the economic resources remained in the "gens" and with the purpose of forming a family nucleus, raise the progeny and have a married life based on values ​​that today …
/r/MensRights04/05/23 07:45 PM
2

So wtf am I supposed to do? Your chances of sexual-affective success will depend proportionally on your SMV. Dating apps are not only difficult for you or your neighbor, but rather it is a global constant where the statistical ratio of men and women is extremely uneven, apart from the well-known operant hypergamy. People were suggesting to MOVE overseas rather than just travel but honestly I do not feel ready yet to be completely moving to a completely different country and culture. This seems t…
/r/MensRights04/05/23 07:34 PM
4

The sexual market value (SMV): you must know what you're worth in fierce competition. It is important to know where you are starting from and what options you have. You must ask yourself a serious question: why do you want to "get laid". Of course, it is a human need to have sexual relations, affection,... but you must be rational and understand that elemental instinct is one thing and the human institution of coexistence is another thing. What is love? What is marriage? What do I look for from …
/r/MensRights04/05/23 07:07 PM
3

Regardless of the moral value that we grant to the sale of pornography of different kinds through different platforms, the generality of the talent-attractive-hard work trichotomy revolves around the fundamental variable: demand. As Frank Cuesta would say: "sin demanda, no hay negocio" (without demand, there is no business).
/r/MensRights04/05/23 05:09 PM
6

All the best, mate.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 03:08 PM
2

All the best, mate.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 03:06 PM
3

All the best.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 03:06 PM
3

In psychological terms, a cognitive bias.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 03:04 PM
8

The psychological term for this is the halo effect, and it is a cognitive bias against a brain that seeks information as quickly as possible based on precisely scarce information. Therefore, attractive people will be considered kinder, more intelligent and more trustworthy than an intersubjectively ugly person. Of course, being treated like a trashy outcast for being ugly doesn't help much in forging more social personalities.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 03:02 PM
2

Taking into account that many famous people mentioned in this video (apart from the thumbnail) have a clear religious connection: islam; for them to deny marriage would be something contrary to their faith, which precisely encourages young people to marry (considering fornication a great sin) and have children. To answer the question of why fewer and fewer men get married, one must ask what marriage itself is, what is its purpose and what are the religious-social factors that influence it or do …
/r/MensRights04/05/23 02:45 PM
5

Apart from the fact that marriage does not benefit contemporary man, It is difficult to think of how the working class can support a home without two wages today: even more so if you have offspring.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 02:31 PM
6

The term "self-confidence" or "confidence" only revolves around the social construct in which you are expected to be an exploitable value in a society of extreme competition among its members, and between sexes. I am glad that you have built your life and improve your material conditions day by day, However, let me tell you that this "status-calling" as a way to overcome social gaslighting only perpetuates the creation of outcasts because, basically, it continues to be perpetuated that respect i…
/r/MensRights01/05/23 09:24 AM
13

If already trusting someone in these times is fucking difficult, Imagine how ineffective it is to seek to create a family today, where, whatever you do, you always end up losing as a man by the ravings of certain women who not only do not want to assume the consequences of their actions, but this society seeks to make a man an unconscious cuckold, that he must pay for the children of others while in this schizophrenic society, the woman is considered the weak part of all this, because her lover,…
/r/MensRights01/05/23 09:13 AM
1

That's not gaslighting, that is just someone disagreeing with them. I don't agree with incels about dating. I don't think society can help incels because dating is an individual thing. However society should stop demonizing them. Under any regulated definition of what is gaslighting (a form of psychological manipulation in which a person makes someone else doubt their own perception of reality or memory. This is often done by repeatedly lying, denying facts or events, and questioning the other p…
/r/MensRights29/04/23 11:56 PM
1

In fact, there are people who, because of their looks, Statistically they have it quite complicated, and in turn, they subdivide themselves among concrete categorizations of their inceldom (shortcel, ricecel, HAPAS...). In its more specific divisions is what the SMV is and ultimately, people who are at the absolute base of the social pyramid with respect to looks. Since the sexual market is fiercely competitive, the incel would be the lowest percentage percentile and their chances of sexual or a…
/r/MensRights29/04/23 08:45 PM
2

Which causes the involuntary celibate to be blamed for his condition at the same time that he is associated with a social outcast who inevitably hates women at the same time that the stereotype continues to be created that the incel is, once again, a person who does nothing to get out of his celibacy. It is the term to denominate the heretic in ideological terms of gender.
/r/MensRights29/04/23 12:39 PM
1

It is important to keep the concepts clear.
/r/MensRights28/04/23 05:14 PM
1

Yeah, I just said it because we went off-topic. Cheers.
/r/MensRights28/04/23 04:06 PM
1

There is no creation of babies without each one doing their part. That is the essential. The character of the woman is effectively that of a pregnant woman and during her pregnancy, since logically she will enjoy the pertinent protection. But that's the way it is, as you say, man is required to die in wars, while the woman does not have that obligation. I agree with you that pregnancy can often cut women's careers short, and this has been noticed in recent decades precisely with the lengthening …
/r/MensRights28/04/23 03:47 PM
2

where do you think the children and women first proposition comes from? Which proposition? Maybe it's because English is not my native language, but I don't understand what you mean, genuinely. Why mainly men fight in wars and mainly men are working for the police or fire service? Two simple reasons: physical-biological reasons that in turn became social reasons. These jobs are physically demanding and require strength that is naturally more found in men than women. As the selection processes no…
/r/MensRights28/04/23 02:07 PM
7

Could you rephrase your question? I did not get you. Are you talking about abortion?
/r/MensRights28/04/23 11:17 AM
17

You mean actual misogynists. The right of men shields all men under itself and will go against any violation of the individual rights of other people, including misogyny or violence against unfuckable men. Being an incel is not synonymous with being a misogynist.
/r/MensRights28/04/23 05:59 AM
1

Then how you know it is not that much painful. It is indeed.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 06:41 PM
2

So you tried it?
/r/MensRights27/04/23 04:57 PM
1

There has not been enough media force on our side. That's the truth.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 02:22 AM
3

Elaborate.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 09:25 PM
2

Rituals imposed from an absolute. Which is the basic problem.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 03:44 PM
12

It does not make it better, but it makes circumcision much less painful around the madness of such mutilation.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 08:36 AM
19

People are bold to assume that only a woman would try to rape a man.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 06:54 AM
9

I've always said adding or removing religion from anything doesn't or shouldn't change its morality, anyway. Therefore, it is concluded that morality starts from the subjective or intersubjective centrality that is wanted to be given to these actions; in the case of Islam or Judaism, a divine command in imitation of a prophet. It is, the justification of torture through metaphysical means.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 04:45 AM
-20

The thing is that Jews and Muslims justify that all moral good revolves around performing actions for the cause of Yahweh or Allah.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 03:23 AM
269

Sadistic pieces of shit. Without anesthesia. No matter how much religion is behind it, this is pure torture.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 03:16 AM
1

I am deeply sorry to disagree with you in your analysis regarding the misandry in this case. They just play with the dichotomy between what is attractive and what is not. The tall man and certain traits associated with a good mobile phone offer and the plot twist of a man who is not attractive and who is the result of a mistake when the other man approaches. It's the joke. What would have happened if the store clerk was also attractive? It would not make sense with the line of the ad and I do no…
/r/MensRights25/04/23 07:29 PM
-1

That's the art of geomaxxing: be more competitive in a racial sexual market where, he returns to the clichés of being taller, or, not surprisingly, whiter than the local population. The most extreme case of fetishism for white skin would be in South East Asia. The behavior of men and women who may even want to deny their own race and use skin bleach is truly sadomasochistic. It sucks, yeah. In countries like countries like Japan you can always see in international bars and restaurants that when …
/r/MensRights25/04/23 07:13 PM
-1

That's the art of geomaxxing: be more competitive in a racial sexual market where, he returns to the clichés of being taller, or, not surprisingly, whiter than the local population. The most extreme case of fetishism for white skin would be in South East Asia. The behavior of men and women who may even want to deny their own race and use skin bleach is truly sadomasochistic. It sucks, yeah. In countries like countries like Japan you can always see in international bars and restaurants that when …
/r/MensRights25/04/23 07:13 PM
1

Btw, I found this post before what do you think of it? I totally agree with it, complements the conversation we've had quite well.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 07:58 AM
2

You say this but then state that you see religion fixing this mess. It is not that I see it as a solution, but that I see it as a logical consequence of what can happen in the face of a great problem that looms over Western societies, and that is the low birth rate, that in the medium-long term, it can only be solved with a kind of moral social regulator (call it religion) or the gradual replacement of the population by immigrants or some kind of hybridization between immigrants and local popula…
/r/MensRights24/04/23 07:39 AM
2

The interpretation that convinces me the most is the explanation given by the blackpill about it, and it is that the sexual market is being monopolized by a Pareto distribution of polygamous men (or your typical chad). In the most developed countries and where religion has died, religion is no longer a value that contains a more widespread distribution of access to the sexual market through the institution of marriage, rather, hypergamy is intensifying to levels of true sexual anarchism, opening…
/r/MensRights24/04/23 07:23 AM
1

What you say makes sense, although I would like to clarify. The incel who died in wars actually shared the fate with men of all kinds. It would be necessary to nitpick quite finely in this aspect. We can well assume that either the incel took women from looting, or through unions for their worth in combat, both would make this man no longer an incel, but a sexhaver. The fact that there are men who are celibate involuntarily is that his condition makes women not want to have sexual relations with…
/r/MensRights24/04/23 06:50 AM
1

I think that it is just one more product of a new spectrum of consumption, which benefits us and harms us at the same time, and it is, the marketing of the rights of the rights of man or "women who criticize other women" while their target audience is mostly men and these causes or criticisms are still the monetization of a niche that did not exist in the past or that by being a woman, you will have a stronger pull for something that is new and revolutionary in itself. Although I have been able …
/r/MensRights24/04/23 06:21 AM
1

The incel etymologically speaking and in terms of looks is essentially the lowest percentile in terms of percentage of sexual success. That is to say, if having a partner and having sex is naturally a competition, the incel is the necessary position that defines the extreme of extreme failure as opposed to extreme success. For this reason, within human freedom, they are the most unfortunate part and by natural proceeding, they will be "eugenicized". This is how it has worked, and it will continu…
/r/MensRights24/04/23 06:16 AM
1

It is the basic dichotomy between: The man has many possibilities and continues to be with his wife despite being able to be with other women. (compassionate, what is expected of man) And: The man deteriorates and the woman is expected to have endless other possibilities and that man should be replaced by a better one (base, it is assumed that the woman suffers for deserving something better). People are stupid, and more stupid are the people who listen to other people without their own criteria…
/r/MensRights24/04/23 05:43 AM
6

My opinion, which can be widely criticized, is that they don't feel the same way. They are different interests and there are different strategies. Both because of the role of each one, and because of the passive-active dichotomy. I think that talking about love is talking about a fully human concept, more than an animal one. Love is a social construct that has evolved for centuries and that does not stop being, essentially, a project of vital continuity, and within its different organizational f…
/r/MensRights24/04/23 05:07 AM
14

The man once again faces the great vicissitudes in his life: intersexual competition. Height stands out as one of the great attractions, not only sexual, but also one of domination over other human beings. Height, in short, stands as an objective value for measuring power in many fields, although it is not necessarily a generality, but it is a generality on the cusp of many labor or social aspects. Operations are makeup, nothing more. It is like those people who graft hair. Their looks will impr…
/r/MensRights24/04/23 04:56 AM
20

Dual mating strategy. Interest in resources versus genuine attraction; an understanding of love as resources against the reproductive instinct. Personally, the most sensible thing for a man is that if he knows that he is not attractive, he does not enter into these types of relationships., not only because of the possible monetary bleeding and possible cuckoldry, but because everything revolves around a great falsehood.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 04:47 AM
2

Everything has certain limits. Do not fall into blackpill fatalism or redpill optimism regarding looksmaxxing. If in the past women were criticized for their paranoia and madness regarding looksmaxxing, today men have to understand that there are limits that they should not exceed due to their mental and physical health. And this of the operations, apart from being very expensive, can be fucking disappointing.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 04:44 AM
1

Just be white theory.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 01:30 PM
1

Another chapter of Games of Blackpills /s. This phenomenon is a halo effect phenomenon that is intermingled with the cycles of violence, marginality, stereotypes and real and ideological ghettos. They pay righteous for sinners, it is the untrained human mind that creates the bias in generalization.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 02:27 AM
1

At the most elementary features, man is still expected to be stoic: don't complain, don't show your weakness, don't cry, don't be diligent with what you don't like. It is the double standard of masculinity, both constructed and wanted. It's a pun from 1984: If you complain of what you don't like, you cry. If you openly talk about the risks of marriage, you are an unfuckable incel. If you criticize the foundations of modern feminism, you are a misogynist If you don't like being discriminated agai…
/r/MensRights21/04/23 02:19 AM
0

A feminist is essentially a woman; a man cannot be a feminist in contemporary ideology, but an ally to such a movement. The woman who has that restlessness for extrapolating the debate to her comfort zone and raising the intellectual level of things she doesn't know is an Outsider; Don't get me wrong, I'm not calling women stupid, but rather the reigning constant is that Confronting ideological antagonisms in such a belligerent way in other people's spaces is typical of men. Reddit in the end is…
/r/MensRights21/04/23 02:11 AM
16

Far from falling into rainbow topics and the world of lollipops, the truth is that this is part of human nature. Of course, we know that a large majority of divorces are initiated by women, we also know that divorce is a great financial gain for many women and we know that marriage has lost its essential value In cases where humans face these types of situations and have the possibility of taking advantage, they will do so: we can talk about peer pressure, but there is something concomitant in t…
/r/MensRights21/04/23 02:03 AM
1

I would like to gently disagree with you specifically, with the second paragraph. The traditional roles in general in most of the world population have been supported by religions that have had an influence on the material development of societies. Precisely, religions and these "traditional" values ​​have arisen due to the instability and conflict that sexual freedom has given rise to, or more specifically, the polygamy of the tribal chief, monopolizing and even extrapolating the women who woul…
/r/MensRights19/04/23 02:26 PM
1

This subreddit enjoys critical thinking precisely because it can put both arguments on the table and reach a synthesis, even if we have members who are more fanatical or ideologically contaminated when seeking debate. Sadly though, Reddit is not the ideal place for free speech discussions as many topics are relentlessly censored or there is a double yardstick for depending on what issues, communities and interests. Many subreddit of incels were banned and many with good reason, allowing only tho…
/r/MensRights19/04/23 04:07 AM
18

I have always said that teachers are often guilty of many school conflicts and issues that escalate to despicable crimes, either by active participation or by omission. Many abuse their power and boast of their ineptitude.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 03:48 AM
1

but I will also admit the eventuality of a hate incel mob speaking on behalf of our sub and movement to harass rape victim It's hard to know what's going on. In the most famous forum of incels that I am not going to name, there has been and is the particular case of certain people with a great lack of mental stability who have effectively not only defended rape, rather they go into the theory that rape is only rape if it is not from a Chad. However, neither this content comes from here nor can y…
/r/MensRights19/04/23 03:38 AM
2

The debate on Reddit is eminently emotional; For this reason, more than considering fragility as a point where this type of attitude pivots, It is the attitude of cloistering a community in an ideological line or agenda that does not admit criticism, especially when emotionality rises with textual cries like "incel bullshit"; "misogynistic content" or "heteropatriarchal macho". It is, in short, the natural atomization of Reddit, in keeping with a postmodern world where you can choose your set of…
/r/MensRights19/04/23 03:30 AM
2

It is not a question of fragility, but precisely of isolating the discordant voice that may arise in the group to create an echochamber as u/FreeSpeechFFSOK noted. Reddit encourages this bullshit by giving mods the power to sanction members who haven't even weighed in on their subreddits and creates crystal minded people with the karma system, because everything that comes out of the mainstream is a massive sheep downvote. Read, spread the word and fight for our rights. On Reddit people love dra…
/r/MensRights19/04/23 03:03 AM
8

Goddamit, I paid for his meal on the first date and this is what I get? Fucking hell, online dating is such a shitshow. You're not entitled to sex nor relationships even paying. TeeHee... Jokes aside, what we see is what is expected: women who from the base believe that deserve or are entitled to have relationships because they not only exist, but also take a certain initiative that is expected of every man, while the man, from the base, is not consoled for his love failures, but is constantly h…
/r/MensRights18/04/23 12:24 PM
25

Feminism began as something that sought to give dignity and equal opportunities between men and women; in short, equality before the law. But this initial ideal of feminism has degenerated into an emotional, idealistic, postmodern, supremacist and hypocritical movement. They blame the patriarchy for their problems and even for the problems of man from a Marxist perspective and analysis, since the patriarchy for them today is what prevents them, supposedly being free and supposedly being like a m…
/r/MensRights18/04/23 11:30 AM
14

They castrate a feminine man to make him an excellent impersonator of the female sex in a society where the will wants to become a material reality, but we all know that it is an illusion. An illusion that is imposed by the State and every time again, the social pressure of having to accept a delirium, a Machiavellian biological mechanism perhaps that explains the reason for transsexuals or, an extreme conditioning, wet dream of behaviorists of the last century. Be that as it may, people who wan…
/r/MensRights17/04/23 12:55 PM
0

I would like to know along these lines, who came up with the "wonderful idea" of ​​decriminalizing adultery.
/r/MensRights15/04/23 02:49 PM
2

Kinda the best decision, man.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 12:36 PM
2

Neither geomaxxing nor MGTOW. Casual encounters and little else. There is no reward in having a stable partner in these times.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 11:39 AM
3

It is the only preventative measure,.even if there are measures that protect cuckoldry like in France; the man has the right and the duty to investigate if his progeny is actually his or not.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 09:54 AM
4

Absolutely. Total retardness.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 09:49 AM
3

The blackpill is not prescriptive, but analytical. That's why the two conclusions that their theoreticians reach, the most staunch of the blackpill, are the looksmaxxing or the rope that some incels precook in their echochambers-suicidalcult at some of their forums. As the blackpill does not indicate any form of life or effective solution, the most sensible thing to do is to continue maintaining it as analytical while advancing in the fight for the rights of man and a claim of our fundamental ri…
/r/MensRights13/04/23 09:48 AM
3

I would like to thank you for this post that you have made because, apart from presenting the dichotomies and intersex dynamics, it confirms to me that indeed the range of action for the rights of man is to fight against the prevailing gynocentrism through power relations and expectations. The manosphere has sought solutions to its problems based on this problem of domination and submission to which many men are subjected. Man is valued in three variants that determine his social value: looks, m…
/r/MensRights12/04/23 10:05 AM
11

It's crystal-clear that this bot took the feedback from Reddit.
/r/MensRights12/04/23 09:43 AM
2

It is difficult to enter the subjectivity of other people. Especially when depression is expressed differently in different people based on different circumstances, different training, use of different words and even the tracing of clichés about different depression.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 11:43 PM
7

Personally, I don't like to hide the reasons why I don't like a person because my tastes are the ultimate reason my decisions and who I am. To this day, as a man, I have not met any woman who, due to her mere physical appearance, has wanted to stop knowing her. However, stupidity, lack of critical thinking, bipolarity, lies, and lack of personal judgment are things that for me are detestable in what I consider attractive in a woman. With my age, one realizes that people really enjoy nonsense.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 11:27 PM
1

I have laughed a lot; a very peculiar and original humor for themes as well as the great insecurities of man and the performance that is asked of a part of his body that cannot change, because in the end a man is expected to have a kilometric penis that just by inserting it will make the most passive starfish in the entire ocean cry with orgasms. But I must say that although this type of humor contrasts with the fierce criticism of the small penis, It has always been a monotheme of pills because…
/r/MensRights09/04/23 09:49 PM
3

Only the top percentiles in intrasexual competition between men can afford to have practical preferences. Thats the reality. Fat, thin...? Give me a wonderful human being, because it is more difficult to know yourself than to know that person in these troubled times in which only emptiness remains.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 09:31 PM
4

What applies in the female case is the law of least interest, as opposed to the man, who is the one who offers himself in the market to be able to access one. While the common woman is requested by many men, only a small percentage of men have this circumstance, and the common man has great difficulties to find a woman; and if you find her, he should be extremely cautious, because what is not a genuine sexual attraction is the beginning of ATMization of man. We all know the theory. The main stum…
/r/MensRights09/04/23 10:40 AM
1

Ideally.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 07:25 AM
1

Hmmmm. I feel like this needs to be nuanced. We cannot fall for the extremist argument made by some blackpillers that if it's a chad, it can't be called rape, for example or that a person cannot feel uncomfortable by the stares of another; or when we get a little stupid in sex and we want to force the circumstances a bit and there are men who have a hard time stopping; such as anal penetration, to say a case that I have lived in one of my relationships with a girlifriend I had.
/r/MensRights08/04/23 10:42 PM
1

Hmmmm. I feel like this needs to be nuanced.
/r/MensRights08/04/23 10:34 PM
3

Disgusting, man. How are you now?
/r/MensRights08/04/23 10:30 PM
7

Debating with feminists is an emotional debate. The fight for the rights of man is answered with "but we women suffer more! You just have to read all the interventions made about it in this subreddit. The epitome and uniqueness, as you can see, is being called an incel. Curious, we all know that being a misogynist has never been a problem for many men to have partners, but as always, it's the word crutch, like calling a man manlet or dicklet to make him a social outcast. It's Reddit, dude. Do no…
/r/MensRights08/04/23 09:42 PM
3

Thank you very much for your insights. Good material for thought.
/r/MensRights08/04/23 09:20 PM
11

The truth is that I do not see the priviliges anywhere. What's more, I would tell you that men are more exploited than women. What's more, I would tell you that women have more work and social options than men, including the sale of one's own body virtually or physically for their interests.
/r/MensRights08/04/23 09:17 PM
4

You have spoken in your first answer of "aggressiveness" and I understood also "strength". Is it then, according to your criteria, that this type of man is a man inherently possessing characteristics that are given naturally and not so much by his own choice? Like for example, the man who is 5'0 in a world in which the vast majority of women will be taller than him and that by natural order, women will perceive him as "less of a man" I appreciate the advice, I really walk on lead feet even for c…
/r/MensRights08/04/23 08:58 PM
11

Don't you think that this type of woman is inevitably a woman who has ceased to exist at the very moment that religion has died as a social engine in Western countries?
/r/MensRights08/04/23 08:45 PM
4

What is a traditional woman?
/r/MensRights08/04/23 08:36 PM
1

There is something suspicious in this type of act and thinking. Suspiciously it reminds me of the work of Esther Vilar and her work The Manipulated Man, especially if it is done just to please a woman.
/r/MensRights08/04/23 07:51 PM
1

Ya te digo, tío.
/r/MensRights08/04/23 02:56 PM
8

As a Spanish Redditor I can confirm it. Not so much because it is not a good country to live and do tourism, but because if you want to have relationships or simply have contact of any kind with a woman, you are forced to walk in glass shoes. Everything is very convulsed and dangerous. For example, it is typical that with the single complaint from the woman you spend 1 or 2 days in a police cell just for a mere accusation, even if it is unsubstantiated.
/r/MensRights07/04/23 07:48 AM
2

Four words: subtle dual mating strategy. The dichotomy of the submissive man, with resources and easily exploitable against the primitive sadomasochistic desire for great physical attractiveness combined with certain sexual aggressiveness. If it's sweet, it's cloying; if it is rough, it hurts. If it's boring, you'll want the spicy, and if the spicy burns you, you'll want to go back to the boing one. People don't think enough, I mean that seriously.
/r/MensRights07/04/23 06:49 AM
2

Indeed, the term incel is the singularity. Feminists use the doublethink of 1984 with unusual and often unconscious effectiveness. The argumentative idea of ​​these people is that if you are a man and you complain about something unfair, it is because you do not fuck, If you don't fuck you are resentful, if you are resentful you become a misogynist, and if you are a misogynist you validate feminism. The plot line is a double yardstick between "you are not man enough" and "you are man enough to g…
/r/MensRights07/04/23 06:24 AM
9

In the end feminism is like a religion. Anything that goes against manipulation and establishes the debate is synonymous with heresy, including gaslighters who will want to relativize everything so as not to get anywhere, just arguing for the sake of arguing.
/r/MensRights07/04/23 02:41 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter