TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

pincer4 Archive

View 0 posts and 45 comments by pincer4 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 02:07 AM

And let me guess, you have some reason why saying 'you hate men as a concept' isn't misandry and that it doesn't exist? Women trying to use logic is always entertaining. Care to share?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 07:33 PM

I get the whole ' being a woman' thing makes logical thought difficult. But you don't think that it's a pretty simple concept to understand that there is going to be some overlap in a group of people with similar traits. To remove the emotional triggers around gender so your female mind can understand it: If not, every job is the same, do you think that there are traits and things you can do to appeal to a wide net of them and seem attractive as an candidate to a large amount of companies? Or do…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 04:10 AM
2

I know logical thought can be hard for women. I try to be understanding because if I had my brain flooded with estrogen, I'd be as emotional too. However, if you want to pretend that woman can be logical, we have to remember that words have definitions, you don't get to choose the definition of words based off of what satisfies your emotions. You don't get to pretend your gender is logical and ignore logic at the same time. When logical people want to learn what a word means, we have this thing …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 04:53 PM
-6

Your gender wants to pretend they are as capable of logic as men. So let's use logic! So men have the ability to control women into doing whatever men want as we have seen in history. If they have the ability to do so, and by your statement of them wanting to do so. What exactly is stopping them from doing it? So why hasn't it been done already? Remember, we're using logic here! Why don't you go ahead and show us the intelligence of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/26 05:24 PM
0

So you redefine logic to mean inability to look at a solution on a holistic level and inability to determine if a solution will last. The funny thing is, pipe repair is almost always done by men. So you don't have to look at it as an analogy, we can already see the processes done by men in pipe repair as men maintain nearly every system in the world. When doing any kind of repair, MEN make sure to consider the context of why the damage occurred, the long term facts about a repair, what resources…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 12:01 AM
0

Men are more submissive than women and have less ability for leadership roles So your gender likes to pretend they are as logical as men. So surely you you statistics to back this up right? Why don’t you prove the intelligence of women and share?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/26 08:12 PM
7

This isn't redpill logic because everything you said is looking at extreme or eccentric people. You listed politicians, billionaires, manosphere grifters, and 'tech-bros'? The first 3 are already <1% of the male population, the last is probably less than 5%. If what you're saying is representative of redpill logic, redpill logic would be as easily dismissable. Currently, blue pill women use the excuse: 'you're just misrepresenting data because you hate women!'... or something like that. It's abs…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/26 01:09 PM
12

So you just want no concept of accountability in any situation? You are a woman though so I guess being anti-accountability lines up. Does this apply for people that are punished who commit harm then? If a man is in jail for attacking his wife, does he get the right to complain and get sympathy because he already knows what he did and you don't need to point it out?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 08:08 PM
3

You say women are more victims of violent crime, which is a completely false statement. You then justify that false statement because women are more victims of (specific crime category). You chose a specific filter that would produce the result you want (sexual violence) and then used that to justify a broad statement, which is provably false. That is the literal definition of cherry picking. It’s not debatable, that’s exactly what you just did. Your gender wants to be able to make nonsense argu…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 03:12 PM
4

So you restrict the definition of "violence" to cherry pick exactly what you want your point to be, then use that cherry picked conclusion and apply it outside of the filter you setup. Your gender desperately wants to pretend they are aa logical and as competent as men. So why do you think you have the right to manipulate arguments in this way? Do you see why that causes people to think you are illogical?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 03:07 PM

If you feeling insulted inhibits you from understanding logic, then it just proves my point: your gender needs emotional conditioning and cuddling before you brains consider using logic. I’m trying to help you out here, so you can understand it as a woman and yet you are pushing against that help. I guess you can’t be helped then 🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 10:28 PM

My words could be seen as condescending sure, but I didn’t insult you. Women work better with emotional examples, not logical ones. Psychology already knows your brains operate more on emotion than men’s do. You can get insulted if you want, but ultimately you are a woman and you (probably) think at the level of one. Accept it or not but psychology has already determined how your gender functions.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 10:18 PM

What compassion or empathy should women have for the average Joe? The same amount that women expect from men, to average women. Though of course since your gender tends to lie about expecting empathy: The same amount that you would consider a man misogynistic, if he didn't give average women that empathy. To simply it to a woman's level of logic so you can comprehend it: If a women is assaulted, and a man says 'I don't know her so I don't care', your gender considers that man to hate women. So y…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 10:06 PM

Complaining is linked to neuroticism and women are far more neurotic. You are a woman after all though, so actual logic and data is far beyond your mind's understanding, but whether you choose to reject actual social science doesn't stop it from being true.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 09:44 PM
-2

I was kind of looking for an answer that had logical/rational thought, and you're a blue pill woman, so that's not really of any use to me. Your brain as a bluepill woman already converts anything you cant accept about women into 'they must hate women'. so you saying that is really of no value here. Thanks though I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 09:17 PM
-2

so do you think they just hate women and want to manipulate / control them, like how bluepills think? You don't see a lot of redpill women, curious how you all think.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 08:49 PM
-1

Your initial comment said In Afghanistan, women are not allowed to speak to their friends in public. You’re almost certainly not a woman in Afghanistan. So you’re bringing up an issue that you don’t face to get victim points as a woman, okay. A man does the exact same thing for men in Ukraine. You then type: You live in Ukraine? Are Ukrainian men brought home to serve from abroad? Immediately questioning him doing the exact same thing you literally did in the comment above his. Look I always try…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 02:45 PM
-1

See you’re doing the thing women do, when they can’t think of a logical argument so they use strawman arguments: I never said only men can be confident. I said it’s strongly linked to men. You changed my argument to be an absolute argument instead of what it originally was. This is like me saying “so women can’t be violent then” to an argument saying men are more prone to violence. Straight illogical bs There are different trends between different groups of people. Men are simply more assertive,…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 01:07 AM
3

It absolutely is, certain traits are strongly linked to gender, such as assertiveness and confidence, which absolutely lead to a more active mindset. Maybe now that you’re a woman, the logic is harder for you to grasp and accept but psychology remains true regardless of whether or not you choose to believe it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 12:44 AM
1

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 03:55 AM
0

No, as a man I employ logical thought, which is fundamentally incompatible with womens' thinking style. But despite that, regardless of how little your gender sense makes, from your collective point of view, you genuinely believe you're as logical as men, and even though y'all aren't, your opinions are still technically just as valid. And because of that, I'm not saying women are wrong for their opinions, I'm saying women are wrong for their lack of consistency (aka their hypocrisy). As in, it i…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 02:46 AM
-5

Well, generally the 'sisterhood' bitches and complains about any male preference. And of course does your gender's favorite move of crying misogyny. You can pretend you're "not like other girls" if you want, but who are you trying to fool to think women wont call or think a man who has preferences like height/weight/bodycount is a misogynist, your gender absolutely does. You can have your own opinion, but your gender and sisterhood generally fails at individual thought. And the collective opinio…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 01:17 AM
-3

Go to TwoX and you will see women complain about almost any kind of preference men have about women. Like seriously, you see how often women call men misogynist? Any physical preference especially, women will absolutely not be fine with men having them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 01:08 AM
8

It's always funny how your gender tries to simultaneously cry misogyny to male preferences that y'all don't like, but say 'then simply don't pick her' to any preferences women have. I mean, I know expecting logical thought from women is a stretch, but surely you see how strange that is?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 12:58 AM
7

Sure, if simply being too logical for your gender means I'm unwilling to understand an inherently flawed argument, I suppose I did! Do you find men 'prove your point' often, and that only women and children are the ones who seem to understand them?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 04:11 AM
8

Because men are logical, and your gender is less so. Perhaps that's why you can't understand it. It's extremely simple to understand: consuming or benefitting from a service does not mean you need to think working in the service is a respectable position. I'm super thankful for the people who clean public restrooms, but I would never work there, and would never want any family member of mine to work there. It's interesting that this basic chain of logic is completely too advanced for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 03:55 AM
13

It’s weird how delusional your gender is. I’ll try to dumb it down so you can understand it as a woman: saying someone was ‘taught’ something and saying it’s a observable biological reality is not the same thing and you know it. To put it in emotional terms to speak your gender’s language: the reason women are scared of men as a concept is not because of some passed down message that men are scary, it’s because of the observable reality that more men harm women than vice versa. If you as a woman…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 10:35 PM
1

Yes, and it still is 41 million, within a sea of over 4 billion. If you are wrong 99% of the time, then it makes no sense to judge men on that 1%. It's funny how judging women based on 1% is wrong, is generalizing women, and is harmful, and means you hate women, but doing the same thing with men is okay. Of course its no surprise how your gender thinks doesnt line up with logical thought at all, but still, it's entertaining to see.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 04:36 AM
2

You don’t. But the longer your gender chooses to avoid any accountability and tell themselves that men only hate women because they didn’t get sex, the longer the majority of men who that’s not the case, will continue to work against your interest. It’s genuinely entertaining how unaware your gender is. Whenever you say things like ‘the red pill or conservatives haven’t done anything for your rights’. Without realizing, they don’t need to do anything, your gender has just made themselves so unap…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 06:56 PM
-1

Your gender will keep trying to dodge accountability (though as a woman that's your default state so no shame) and will continue to suffer more and more from the consequences of it 🤷‍♂️. I'd imagine that trump winning the popular vote would kind of push your gender into logical thought but I suppose it truly is psychologically impossible. Maybe you could perhaps let the male feminists do the logical thought for you, if you want any chance of misogyny being solved?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 06:24 PM
1

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 05:54 PM
1

And what if the woman is ugly as shit?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/26 10:11 PM
-2

Your gender complains about the mere fact that a man found you attractive in that scenario. Yall get bothered whether men verbalize it or not let’s not lie to ourselves here.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/26 01:24 PM
1

If your emotions made it so you couldn’t mentally handle the second sentence, is the logical failure on me or on you?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 10:10 PM
-1

Except woman aren't honest in dating and you know this. Your gender will absolutely say: only personality matters, looks don't matter, money doesn't matter, nothing (that makes women look shallow) matters and that they just want a man that is nice. Obviously most men aren't stupid enough to believe this, but your gender does try to pretend it's true. That's not lie to ourselves here. Like I get it, you're a woman, but let's try to exist in reality for a second. Woman absolutely do not admit to c…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 05:30 PM
-2

No, I don't understand how women fuel The Red Pill. Well men have this insane ability called ‘logical thought’. It allows us to use data in sciences like psychology to look at human behaviors and deduce how they think in an objective way. Fun fact! On rare occasions, when on a non emotionally charged subject, your gender can use this ability for brief moments too! So, as a thought process, what would be the ideal reaction of women to The Red Pill? For example, some Redpill dude says "all women a…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 04:27 PM

Interesting how women will cry whataboutism, but build their own arguments on top of it. Can’t pick a side?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 06:17 AM

yes i phrased it in a patronizing way. i dont really care. but to be fair, am i wrong? is it not true that misandry makes men have reduced empathy for women, and pushes them into the manosphere like andrew tate or whatever? And trump did specifically appear on manosphere podcasts to specifically sway the young male demographic, which completely worked, and future conservatives will probably continue to do so. Yes, I know no woman wants to hear about how their actions can have consequences, but i…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 05:48 AM

You’re a woman so I know the concept of taking accountability is terrifying, but ultimately misandry being harmless only hurts your gender more, and refusing to take accountability for it doesn’t help you. Any time your gender downplays misandry, I’m sure it works for women (since your gender already doesn’t care to begin with), but there is no other scenario where bigotry becomes okay or excusable because the rates of crime perpetrated against that group isn’t high enough, that’s complete nonse…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 05:10 AM

And you're welcome to think whatever you want, you're a woman after all, so your reality, and the actual reality of the world, aren't expected to match. But if you want to pretend your gender is logical, then you have to accept logical thought and data . And The logical thought and data in psychology has concluded you all are more neurotic than men, simple as. And based off that, neurotic people handle stress worse, And there are sub studies that show that woman handles stress worse. Again for a…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 04:35 PM
-7

Are you not a woman, you don’t have two X chromosomes? You don’t think accusing men of misogyny isn’t a universal trait of your gender? Or that if I pulled up a statistic like how women are more emotional (neurotic), that every woman wouldn’t just ignore any statistics and start crying misogyny? Let’s not lie to ourselves here.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 01:52 PM
4

I love how when it comes to negative traits about men, women seem to support the 'numbers don't lie' mindset, but to any negative trait about women, y'all pull out the 'stop generalizing women', 'not all women do it so you can't attribute it to women' and of course crying misogyny. If your gender uses these tactics to reject the application of logic when it comes to anything that hurts your feelings as a woman, why do you think any negative trait about men wouldn't also be irrelevant?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 01:28 PM

Post proof of the claim you just made
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 03:27 PM
4

Causing crimes has never been the determiner for whether hate is okay or acceptable. You’re a woman so it’s fully expected that you don’t care about men’s issues, since it would require logical thought to recognize hate is bad regardless of the chance for it to turn into a crime, but if we’re pretending to be logical, when has hate ever been excusable because it doesn’t cause crimes? Give literally any example. And ultimately this reasoning only means women will be hurt more by trying to excuse …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/26 04:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter