TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

pingo5 Archive

View 0 posts and 134 comments by pingo5 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

sorry, your wording felt singlular. though I think it's still a bit unwise with such a small sample size.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 12:19 PM
2

Not really, the numbers are padded becuase a lot of young people think its trendy to not be straight so they claim bi do you have any studied evidence to back this claim?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 11:16 AM
2

ur basing ur whole opinionofn a demographic based off of your personal experience with one person?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 11:14 AM
2

unfortunately not :I this ones pretty rough tho lol
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 07:57 PM
9

400/1000. you're preemptively shooting yourself in the foot by trying to use statistics and online vibes to gauge and judge the individuals that you're looking to date. like listen to yourself man. you won't date a hypothetical bisexual you know nothing about because they could hypothetically not want to date bisexual men and you find that hypothetical situation hypocritical. it's fuckin silly dude. I'm not sure if you're just trying to avoid conflict while dating, but it's going to happen. dati…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 12:51 PM
2

I don't disagree completely with the difference you're drawing, I just disagree with it being the reason gay men are more readily willing to sleep with others, or most men for that matter. I think we just find people more attractive in general off the bat.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 03:44 PM
2

They are more lustful and will sleep with people they're not really attracted. bit outside of the context of the convo, but I wouldn't say that. we're just more visually attracted(see hot person -> turn on). peoples personalities and stuff play a role in attraction, but it's not a prerequisite. people's personalities and stuff could definitely turn you off of someone, but because we're more visually attracted we're fine having sex with the attractive person we're attracted to without getting to …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 12:45 PM
2

something you'll learn pretty quick when you're a part of those groups that are supportive of those ideas is how much of a media industry is built on gender/feminist controversy, and how much nutpicking is done to make the people you talk to like the normal people they are seem crazy. the people and controversy that come up exist, but It's absolutely insane the disconnect between what people expect and reality because of the media they consume and the biases they have.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 12:35 PM
2

as a bi guy, I feel attraction differently towards men than I do women. for women it's kinda a direct attraction. seeing someone hot = a turn on but with men, and partially seeking if this is relatable(as I feel I find the way women feel attraction to men oddly relatable, but have not discussed much on it), it's more about how a guy can fit into a kinda small scale "fantasy" if that makes sense. seeing a hot guy isn't a direct turn on, it's more of like hot guy > imagine makin out or something >…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 01:08 PM

*who have sex with men. doesn't change what I said, and it doesn't feel like you read it. I'm not deterred by numbers that just look scary like a simpleton
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 08:10 PM

None of this is true. men who have sex with men do not have a higher chance of contracting stds. certain sex acts do. MSM still has the most HIV cases per capita, but the idea that a big factor for it being perpetuated to women by men who whave sex with men is wildly unfounded and frankly phobic in its own right. anal sex has a 1/50 chance that the recieving partner contracts HIV from a positive partner during unprotected sex. vaginal sex is 1/1000. only about 1-2% of the MSM communify(studies d…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 01:27 PM

I think OP may be talking about self awareness about your preferences moreso. I don't know that these biases are always immutable; turn offs(as opposed to attraction) are a mixed bag in that regard, and even stuff that seems immutable can be. But I'm not here to argue that everyone needs to do that or try, it's just my opinion. but people's preferences aren't always this inherent feeling, sometimes they do have reasons or come alongside reasons that are actually problematic. If you can say that …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 01:08 PM
1

I would say you feel that way, but I wouldn't say it's true.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 11:02 AM
1

yes. someone who I know is HIV positive is probably on meds, I'd be fine having sex with them without a condom. U=U. I think more emphasis should be put that there aren't often designations for gay/bi men differentiation in these studies, but frankly trusting this kinda stuff over safe sex practices and testing is kind of ridiculous on its own. you aren't going with a fully formed view using this as your evidence. frankly unless you're recieving unprotected anal with someone you don't know has H…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 10:16 AM

yeah.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 10:09 PM

I don't think the question was whether you'd fuck the bear
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 09:13 PM

There's a show called Heated Rivalry that's about male on male sexual situations. LGBTQ people are constantly claiming that this show is mainly for straight women. When people bring up, "how is that possible when straight women aren't into bi men?" They claim, that straight women are totally into bi men. Like, people love to lie today. they could be 2 seperate groups of women too... this whole thread is rife with goomba fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 09:10 PM

yet lesbians and bisexual women often exhibit same-sex attraction in a way that mirrors the pattern typically seen in male sexuality. Can I ask where you got this notion from? This does not seem true to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 11:37 AM
0

poverty and education levels
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 05:08 PM
2

There's a lot of context crush when talking about phobia, because not everyone defines it like you do; a lot of people mean irrational aversion and phobia can be applied to a lot more things in that case. Honestly, I see the energy as different because noone actually seems to make comparable comparisons, at least the vast majority of the time. people will talk about physical characteristics, things that tangibly affect the relationship, past actions, etc. but bisexuality does not mean that someo…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 05:05 PM
1

a woman who wants to be with someone because they like unsolicited dick pics doesn't make much sense to me. it's not unsolicited if you want them, especially if it's someone you're in a relationship with? lol
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 11:59 AM
3

cool! it's good we specified behaviour and not sexuality. because that's really all there is to it. so making these assumptions about bi men is still bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 11:20 AM
1

Probability wise outside of anal the chance of a woman contracting HIV from a random bi guy are like 1/1,000,000, so frankly it's pretty irrational.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 12:31 AM
1

Yeah I think worrying about the literal 1/1,000,000 chance of getting HIV from a bi guy is ridiculous, especially when you can test these days. Just don't fuck anal raw
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 12:28 AM
2

Yeah you should be disclosing that you're seeing others. This is standard across pretty much all relationship styles. Especially before you got to ditching condoms. Sleeping with multiple people carries risks that need disclosed. It's messed that ya didn't. On a more murky note I still think if you're being nonmonogamous you should disclose. 97% of relationships are monogamous. It's far beyond an expectation I think.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 12:42 PM
3

Or it's the men they left out of the study
/r/MensRights02/10/24 07:15 PM

there was actually a pretty decent article on it! Granted the averages compared to straight people tend to be a big higher either way.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 07:35 PM

It's a notorious stereotype is what it is. Most gay men aren't notoriously thirty. There is a small percentage that are extremely thirsty tho
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 05:22 PM

I don't think so. Is the idea of bisexuality being that common really absurd? There's quite a few animals where gay sex is even more common.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 07:13 PM

The amount of people being open about being bi/lesbian and not having internal issues can increase though, no?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 04:37 PM
2

That's probably it, yea. It's made to irritate your bowels.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 07:06 PM
2

The same could be said about the prostate. You stimulate that through the rectum walls, so why don't you derive sexual pleasure from having to take a really big shit?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 01:24 PM
2

I said the prostate isn't the only pleasurable part, you said "name another", and i said anus.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 01:20 PM
2

What do you mean? It's on the end of the rectum
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 01:05 PM

The anus?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 10:45 AM

The anus has a lot of nerve endings. The prostate isn't the only pleasurable part
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 04:14 AM

Probably was an enema that has stuff in it, usually like magnesium or something. They're usually the size of a douche and usually make your body work the shit out instead of the just water™ enema that uses a ton of water.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 04:11 AM

Lmao i never thought i'd see santorum in the wild
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 04:03 AM
1

thanks for digging through my history? perhaps i was also working on shoddy data. i'll have to look into it more. it feels like a bit of deflection, as both of these points aren't super relevant. multiple studies have shown that lgbt* people are more inclined to non monogamy, as in non monogamous relationships. there are more studies on this, however, they aren't talking about cheating specifically. and yes, there are multiple studies that are more widespread that show that men cheat more often …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 08:49 PM
1

How does it negate that, exactly? Because it's 60 pulled from a good random? Sanpling in a decent way won't negate a certain level of randomness in samples. It might help with bias, but when you hit a scale where less than a handful of people's responses can drastically alter the results you aren't able to extrapolate that to millions of people. If they redid the study the same exact way with the same sampling methods, there would probably be more or less that would give wildly different results…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 06:50 PM

Does it being a nationally representative sample somehow negate the fact that it's still a remarkably low sample size? If literally 3 less bisexual people answered cheating it would've drastically changed the results. The data isn't reliable in the first place, nationally representative or not, because the sample size is so small. Basing any opinion off of it and trying to use it to make a point is frankly stupid. Just because there is a study doesn't mean it's actually accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 01:51 PM

We don't "think" or "logic" our way into what we are and aren't aroused by. Why do so many people fundamentally not understand how sexual attraction works? Because the only part of bisexuality that is able to inherently be percieved is what you think of it. Sexual attraction is not rational, neither are turn offs. But turn offs are not a part of sexual attraction and irrationalities are not inherently immutable. Sorry for pointing to you directly. But the amount of people i've seen who have had …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 06:21 AM

So how many bisexual people did they actually sample?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 06:18 AM

Can you explain to me how "I don't want to date people who like the same gender" And "I don't want to date people who like other races" Aren't fundamentally the same kinda thing? Your initial argument doesn't make much sense. It's just roundabout saying it's important without giving a clear explanation as to why. This aversion to something that has no effect on someones opinions, actions, mannerisms... Nothing. It's an aversion based on your own made up thoughts and opinions alone, not on any tr…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 05:52 AM
1

Those are not wanting to partner over physical differences. Hell even opinions arent on the same level. It only says what other people they find attractive. It's like not wanting to date someone because they like other races, or because they have dated someone who was overweight.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 05:21 AM

The study says there was 58 bisexual people with 8 reporting cheating. Do you really think that 8 people(across men and women) is actually workable evidence?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 05:06 AM
1

Kind of an off comparison. It's more comparable if a man or woman doesn't feel comfortable beingg with someone who is comfortable being with a trans person
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 04:49 AM
1

It's not semantics, and i've stated why.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 03:35 PM
1

Attraction =/= turn offs. I wish we could stop pretending they're the same. Getting turned off by something could be because of a large myriad of reasons and may or may not be a set in stone thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 01:16 PM
2

It's kinda in your question. Its just our attitude towards sex, maybe even libido will be very very different. You could talk about that. What sex means to then, that kind of stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/24 03:40 PM
1

Nah, i like the theory that evolution accounted for marriages(because that makes sense)
/r/MensRights29/04/24 09:43 PM
2

Lol got a lot of assumptions about how it goes there
/r/MensRights29/04/24 09:42 PM
1

Eh, that's not really true. Most of the same issues in poly dating as mono.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 08:19 PM
1

I'll check it out. I'm not disagreeing with you, or trying to say that most people aren't monogamous. But look at cheating rates. It's anywhere from 15-30% across most cultures. The part that doesn't make sense to me is why there seems to be a huge inbalance between people who prefer 100% monogamy and the amount of people who break that at some point. It makes something seem forced, somewhere along the lines idk. I think that rate would be much lower if there was a better spectrum of relationshi…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 04:39 PM
1

I agree to an extent. Jealousy isn't something that everyone deals with, or at the very least lots of people do to different extents. I don't really get jealous much at all. I do wonder how much of jealousy is societally engrained rather than being inherent though. I'm not even necessarily talking about polyamory, but just nonmonogamy in general. There's a ton of ground between being in multiple romantic relationships and sleeping with someone else once in a blue moon, IMO. I think if we were mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 03:15 PM
1

It's usually seperate dyadic(one on one) relationships. "Throuples" aren't super common.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 02:11 PM
2

It's like vegans. 95% of vegans are chill but all you see in conversations about veganism is meat eaters complaining about vegans. Tally up the poly people aaying that in here against the people straight up shitting on polyamory.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 02:10 PM
2

Probably would, no? Not saying everyone, but in the same way that gay acceptance leads to less gay people in straight relationships. I think cheating rates would be a lot lower if society was more accepting of nonmonogamy in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 02:03 PM
1

My power went out and dik got hard from man on underwear package :(
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 03:33 PM
1

so what if someone wants to likes someone else nonsexually and wants to use them as a tool?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 12:10 AM
1

It's not just my definition lol. People just don't bother to ever look it up it seems
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 10:48 PM
1

Cool, so everyone with a dildo is an objectophile.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 10:45 PM
1

Sexual attraction is not whether you want to have sex with someone or not, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 10:27 PM

I feel like this isn't really relevant to attraction? Sexual attraction is who you find hot. Who turns you on.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 07:43 PM

Which definition of bisexuality are you going by there? Every definition of any sexuality i've seen is based on attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 07:13 PM
1

It's who you find hot. Who turns you on. Who you get romantic feelings for if we're talking in a general sense. That's all.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 03:08 PM

Do you have the idea that if someone isn't attracted, they're repulsed? Because not everyone works that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 03:07 PM
1

It's an example. Phobias are usually associated with irrational thoughts.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 02:30 PM

I mean, yeah. Do you think of two straight people having sex every time you see a couple? Cuz i don't either way
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 02:28 PM

Which is kinda baloney. If you hear someone's sexuality and imagine them doing sex then that's kinda phobic. Plenty of people don't make that mental connection between the two. Like, arachnophobes dpn't see a spider and just get icked. They see a spider and go "ah gross what if it bites me or its got weirdass legs" or some shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 12:33 PM
1

Most people i know who are pan just grew up in a different queer circle and prefer it. I hate when people try to stir issues between us because i rarely see it within either community
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 12:29 PM
1

these kinds of tests can be iffy at times. there was one on bi men that showed that they didn't react nearly as much to gay stimuli as straight stuff. physical reactions aren't always super reliable.
/r/AllPillDebate06/09/23 01:31 PM

there's plemty ofnother things besides oral to do, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/23 10:41 AM
1

I might be missing something but the article doesn't mention gay men i don't think? as the page says i linked says, theres a lot of bias in some studies. the data they used is large scale representative sample surveys that for example polled everyone, but had questions about sexuality too. there's a couple studies that show otherwise, however if you look at the datasets there's almost always issues with their sampling methods(like going to bathhouses and gay bars for their data)
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 11:20 AM
2

gay men don't usually have much more sex, just a small minority that has a ton of sex
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 11:50 AM
13

I'd really like to hear about those "biological advantages" transwomen have in regards to... Looking like a woman?
/r/MensRights13/07/23 01:53 PM
3

ehh, not necessarily
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/23 04:42 PM
1

I just don't see how aversion/intolerance to bisexuality is rational.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 04:47 PM
1

It is if you don't believe in harmful biphobic stereotypes
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 01:51 PM
1

I reckon it hurts the partners quite a bit too when someone they trusted drops a bomb like that on them. Oh I forgot, they're just supposed to blindly trust this person who clearly didn't even have his own sexuality figured out... And it's not irrational if someone is no longer the same person on a fundamental level like sexuality. You seem to think that someone being bi has like nothing attached to it, you just come out and nothing changes. If nothing changes and you don't want anything to chan…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 11:49 AM
1

It's not the fault of the other partner who's quite literally done nothing. The fault more likely lies with the person who didn't do the necessary soul searching before entering the relationship. Whose wasting whose time here? The person who hasn't even figured out their sexuality before committing to a long term relationship or the one that has? Jeez, your bias here is outstanding. They did do something, they're letting their irrationality rule their life and hurt other people. "Soul searching"…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 12:00 AM
1

Doesn't matter what it's rooted in. It's perfectly acceptable to find it to be a deal breaker. I don't really think so. It's irrational, and it has a possibility of hurting your partner in the future, and depending as well hurting kids in the future as well. No one should be forced to pretend to be comfortable with things they aren't comfortable with. Never really said they had to. I agree people can break up over any reason. However, that doesn't mean they're not at fault or not an ass or not p…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 10:27 PM
1

What do you mean nothing changed? Finding the same sex attractive is not a small deal at all in a heterosexual relationship. Maybe something that isn't a big deal to you can be a big deal to someone else? Ever thought about that? For someone calling for understanding you're pretty close minded. Yes, i do think about that. It's what i'm talking about, biphobia. When it's a big deal It's always rooted in some untrue stereotype/idea/insecurity. Your partner being attracted to more people than they …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 07:39 PM
1

Nothing about the relationship has changed, at all, that's the thing. The only thing that's changed is one person has figured out they find more than the opposite gender attractive. This does not change the relationship at all, on its own. Theres no new relationship dynamics or changes that come from this. And comparing it to s/m is about as vague as it gets. S/m can mean anything from "i would like to try being a bit rougher in bed" to , "i want to rape roleplay". It's more like if your partner…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 06:25 PM
1

Anyone is allowed to care about anything regarding relationships. You're pretty weird and controlling if you think it's somehow not okay to care that your partner is suddenly bi and definitely is interested in something that you can never give them. People arent usually suddenly bi. It takes time to figure out. Coming out to your partner is a culmination of that. I don't think it's dumb to have feelings about that. If your partner is monogamous, and wants to be with you, then their interest matt…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 05:02 PM
1

Anyone is allowed to care about anything regarding relationships. You're pretty weird and controlling if you think it's somehow not okay to care that your partner is suddenly bi and definitely is interested in something that you can never give them. People arent usually suddenly bi. It takes time to figure out. Coming out to your partner is a culmination of that. I don't think it's dumb to have feelings about that. If your partner is monogamous, and wants to be with you, then their interest matt…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 04:59 PM
1

The only, I mean only reason to bring up that you're attracted to someone else in a relationship is because you're having some kind of thoughts. Not even a straight couple might survive one partner bringing up that they're attracted to someone else. As I've said multiple times, you bring it up to assuade the worries/fears of your partner being biphobic. We're talking about sexual attraction here. We're not talking you want to get with your coworker from work, we're talking at a baseline you get …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 04:36 PM
1

What's there to accept? Bisexuality. Kinda the point of this thread. A lot of people don't have a decent understanding of what bisexuality means, have stereotypes in their head, underlying homophobia, etc. Biphobia isn't a nonexistent issue. If you and your partner are monogamous then you can't exactly act out on anything bi curious, but if you do then you're either cheating or taking part in behavior that wasn't part of the initial understanding when entering the relationship. Sexuality is a ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 02:38 PM
4

So your saying that you should live with the fear/anxiety/worry about whether your partner will accept that part of you for the rest of your life? It only sounds like you want out if you don't know what either bisexuality means or sexual attraction means.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 11:40 AM
1

Then it's obvious things have changed as your partner admits to desiring the same sex and it's just natural for things not to continue. people don't generally lose sexual attraction to others when they're in a relationship. i don't see why bisexuality is any different in that regard. someone figuring out they're attracted to men in addition to their already existing attraction to women doesn't mean they aren't satisfied with their partner. Or why else even bring that up if not to break up. Assum…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 06:30 AM
2

Everyone without an ounce of medical knowledge loves to say this. HPV can not be tested within men under a standard screening. And when passed on to women can lead to cervical cancer. Blindly trusting a test and also not remembering which vaccines you took as a teen can lead a women down to having cancer by making one bad choice. This is why the whole sleeping around thing is stupid from the get go. But the adding of unnecessary risk factors is extra stupid. And that’s an example of a very commo…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 06:20 AM
1

i meant the bi person figuring out they're bisexual. that's not always something people begin to question/figure out early on in life. there's a lot of people who figure it out when they've been in a relationship with someone for a while.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 05:49 AM
4

The bi folk who have to deal with their homophobic partners when they realize they're bi 6 years into the relationship care
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 02:49 AM
5

You could also, yknow, have std tests done. You should be anyways. There's usually plenty of places to get tests done for free as well, including pretty quick tests for stuff like HIV. Plus, there's like multiple lines of defense against HIV these days. Condoms work, unless they break. PreP is 99% effective at preventing transmission. Non anal odds are already like 1/1000 odds per encounter. 75% or so of people with HIV have access to treatment, which when your levels are undetectable, there's n…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 02:48 AM
3

Weird, i thought we would've had something to test for stds by now.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 02:43 AM
2

And ex-gays... Conversion therapy...
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 02:40 AM
3

I was listening to gayish, appparently that study may be skewed because bi people tend to have different accounts because of different profile layout based on gender, and that won't reflect in the study. It's not a one size fits all kinds thing i guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 01:05 PM
3

A bisexual women's dating pool is straight/bi guys, and bi/gay women, but not straight women, because straight women don't date women. There's a LOT more straight guys than bi/gay women, so naturally shaking out most bisexual people end up with the opposite sex due to just it being statistically probable.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 01:23 PM
1

Cool, as long as you don't say unfounded stuff about people who have a high body count to try to cover up your insecurities then you're good.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 04:59 PM
1

I mean, it is. You and that other commenter aren't men in general. I don't know why i would have to show evidence against an idea that doesnt have good evidence for it in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 03:14 PM
0

You have amy evidence of usually? Its crazy you can mind read men tho. How do you know they all think that?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 01:55 PM
1

Its also nice to not worry about mundane shit like body count. Can just hear it and move on. No pain or worry or cares or jealousy or insecurities poked.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 11:20 AM
2

Man for how ridiculously complex humans are you sure boiled us down to basics
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 11:17 AM
1

Why would i give a shit about the past tho? Doesnt mean shit. Maybe its because my brain doesnt heavily visualize their past partners fucking them when they're mentioned.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 11:14 AM
1

They dont like tacos
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 10:21 PM
7

Why do people always think that people saying its biphobia means you have to date them? No bisexual person wants to date someone who's not comfortable with them because of their prejudices, insecurities, or phobias. But that doesn't mean people arent immune to criticism for their decisions. The guy who won't date someone because their great great grandma is black has a right to that but they're still racist.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 09:20 AM
0

Jus facts yo Ur right, teenagers are better at accepting new information. My poor moments ;(
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 08:27 AM
1

But thats true about literally everything in your life. a bi person can go through most of his life without having bi experiences, or entertaining their bisexuality. I don't see how their bisexuality shapes them at all in that scenario, but theres no unifying effects of bisexuality; everyones just as unique as they would be if they were straight. I feel the same way about those topics, less so about height since it's a physical preference. I don't know why people would avoid specific reasons, ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 07:04 PM
1

But thats going to depend on the person, not their sexuality. Some people dont label and dont care to, some just say their straight because same sex attraction is so rare, some bi people just dont bother with that side of themselves, some people do care and advocate. Saying it is a big part of who you are is generalizing bisexuality to a single thing. I know people dont have to justify their dealbreakers; but bisexuality is the only dealbreaker where people emphasize not being specific about the…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 05:57 PM
1

They probably arent completely neutral traits, though. Music, food, media tastes, all have effects on your life, for example, and aren't neutral. Someone who consumes a whole different genre of media than you do you would probably not mesh with, but thats a million preferences stacked together to equal the outcome. If one single thing like liking an album from a pop band ovverides every other thing about a potential partner, them there's a reason there, whether you can recognize it or not. What …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 04:42 PM
0

I mean, i still stand by my point. It shouldnt be on someone to disclose a trait solely because of peoples dislike of it. i agree some one whos bi should, so they can be with someone who can properly not give a shit, but i don't see it as a moral obligation. That said, the other topics you covered as examples, aside from body count, are different stories. They all have actual effects on the relationship. I see body count in the same way as bi. If it matters to you, ask up front. But this convo a…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 03:59 PM
1

Its not just a preference, though. Bisexuality is a completely neutral trait. No physical characteristics, and no effects on someones personality or the relationship. You cant have a preference against it without having an actual reason; you might not understand the reason if you don't take time to figure it out, but there still is one. Mental preferences aren't set in the same way physical ones are. People who were raised in a cannibal society, for example, are ok banging people who eat other p…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 03:48 PM
0

Prep doesn't prevent someone from spreading hiv, only getting it. Id probably have sex with someone on prep all the same as someone without, so it's a weird thing to call out. Also, condoms have an 85% practical use rate, its higher if you use them properly, and those failure rates are taken over a year average, which means over the course of a year without following perfect use theres a 15% chance of a break. You can say it's reasonable, but 3/4 people with hiv are being treated, which pretty m…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 03:39 PM
0

Yeah, i read it, you keep referring others to your other comments like there's more than 10 lol. Still, i don't think that "some people just don't like it" alone is a qualifier for having to tell your partner. The person who has a problem with it should be the one to weed it out. Same with any other weird dealbreaker.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 03:21 PM
1

For all those things though, i would still encourage someone looking into why. Its hard to face your insecurities/fears and/or aknowledge that you've got inherent phobia(even queer folk have internalized phobia, everyone should introspect on their opinions) Unless someones traits posed a possible threat to me, like someone being a murderer/sex offender, theres really no singular dealbreakers for me. Theres just too much variation within those traits that makes singling out one of them seem like …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 01:57 PM
1

What?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 01:48 PM
-1

But why is them sucking dick a problem and not u. Also, you dont have to have had sex with men to be bi
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 01:08 PM
3

Thats really going to depend heavily on the person, though, and isnt inherent to bisexuality. Most bi people are out on a relevant to conversation basis as well. But even then, we're talking more someone who finds birds cute and might mention that occasionally. I guess you have a right not to date people who think birds are cute, but you should either lead with that before dating because its so out there or work on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 01:07 PM
-1

Why is it not ok for me, a guy with 5 generations of white ancestors, to want a gal with 5 generations of white ancestors? You have a right to your preferences, but people should look at their biases/preferences and see why they exist. Bisexuality doesnt change anything about a person or your relationship with them inherently, and any dealbreakers based on bisexuality alone are gonna be irrational by nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 01:04 PM
1

That's also dumb imo
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 12:07 PM
1

Not really. -phobia means an irrational fear, intolerance, and/or aversion to something. bisexuality doesnt change a person at all, and it doesnt have any tangible effects or effects on your relationship. I'd say theres not really any rational reason to turn someone down for being bi. Seems like most reasons are either stereotypes, myths, or people not being able to seperate sexuality from sex in their mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 12:06 PM
1

Do you think both partners need to be 100% sexually compatible for the relationship to work?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 12:02 PM
0

Why is it ok for u to like dick but not them
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 12:01 PM
2

They can the test themselves Condoms work fine They can also be on prep, never had sex with men, always used condoms, get regular std testing, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 11:44 AM
1

Its not like they make tests for those or anything
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 11:34 AM
0

Why do you have to be up front about something that doesnt change a person and doesnt affect a relationship? If you've got a dealbreaker over something that doesnt affect you and isn't identifiable then you need to be the one letting people know.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 11:23 AM
3

But that is homophobic. A parent not wanting their gay kid to bring their partner around is usually for the same reason, but that's considered homophobic.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 11:21 AM
1

I think it wouldn't be a reasonable argument, because sex is usually an important part of a relationship and someone being a virgin has a direct effect on that part of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 11:18 AM
0

Phobic doesnt mean behaving indecently, it mean having an irrational fear, intolerance, or aversion to something.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 11:15 AM
7

I don't think thats comparable. Dating someone who likes birdwatching means possibly getting involved with birdwatching, as well as your partner talking about birdwatching, and taking time out of their day to birdwatch. Very real effect on the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 11:14 AM
4

That's true, but theres a very decent reason to not date someone who murdered someone?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 11:09 AM
2

The phobia part comes from hearing someones sexuality and your mind going straight to the dirty sex part of sexuality, when sexuality is so much more than just sex. Whether your intolerance/aversion comes from fear or disgust isn't super relevant. It's the same reason that homophobic parents of their gay kids don't want them to bring their partners around. Because they hear/see gay and think about the sex. I also find it odd that people cant seem to understand that just because someone says some…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 10:58 AM
10

But it's not the same, because one person won't be attracted to the other. With bisexuality both would be, until they knew they were bi. Its the knowledge of this intangible trait being a dealbreaker that makes it weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 09:11 AM
2

While that's true, It's still far from being accepted on the level that being straight is, and gay/bi men are kinda shunned a bit in that regard. Theres very likely a lot of men(and women to a lesser degree i think) that would probably fit into bisexuality, but dont actually entertain those thoughts or side of themselves at all. Dont think its the majority, but definitely more than there are now.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 07:13 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter