TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

pinner52 Archive

View 5 posts and 140 comments by pinner52 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Yeah that’s true, you are all just having weird causal sex from what I hear. Regardless the marriage rate is down and the divorce rate is increasing there.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 03:36 PM
4

Your argument makes no sense. If you settle down young you atleast have a chance. If you wait till you’re 50 you’re most likely dying alone. If you have a man’s kids he is much less likely to divorce you. Also most women file for divorce over men. Finally you have about a decade to find a good man (somewhere between 15 and 25) and if you can’t in a decade in your prime then sure go be a cat mom. Edit can’t reply so here: We didn’t. First you only expire around your 40’s. Second only one part of …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 03:35 PM
5

Given the current divorce rates good luck. You need to find a guy that checks all the right boxes, and there is over a 50% chance you’ll still divorce him.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 03:31 PM
1

Look up the number of wars queens start vs kings. The result is kind of surprising.
/r/MensRights16/11/24 10:17 PM
1

I will just say this. If a girl finds you attractive enough, she will let you get away with a lot of shit when she swouldn’t put up with 10% of it from another man
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 03:28 PM
1

Ask if is she is on medication. They tend to be and really hate it and can’t seem to just hold a straight face and deny it.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 04:43 PM
–

This is not a good look…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 10:55 PM
1

Nope. You factually wrong on two things but it is ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 09:52 PM
1

Should have used many rather then all.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 09:31 PM
2

All in the group. All.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 08:15 PM
10

“I find it hard to believe all the bi women who are dating bi men would agree.” lol do you think the rest somehow fixes your mistake?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 07:56 PM
12

You said I find it hard to believe all
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 07:50 PM
18

He didn’t say all but nice try.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 07:43 PM
1

Nah the media doesn’t speak for the red pill or feminists. It speaks for itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 05:48 AM
1

lol you have set up barriers you don't even understand and rely upon the media to tell you what is truth.... That is great maybe look a little harder.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 03:46 AM
1

I can, gave you some already you ignored them lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 02:46 AM
1

They must be the kings of the red pill in your mind lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 01:31 AM
1

Yeah. But sex did lol. And now you have a massive issue on your hand, just like the red pill, that they need to figure out. Furthermore it funny you just googled it. If you are unable to answer it yourself that is fine. I will just end this conversation since it is going no where. It funny because they do not agree on the same stated purpose. Furthermore, half the country doesn’t believe you when you say it is about equality between the sexes, including a bunch of a women. The irony in the argum…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 12:40 AM
1

and what is that stated purpose? and on top of that you don't think being unable to define the very thing that movement is named after is kind of important?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 11:38 PM
1

And terfs disagree with 3rd wave feminists. Who is right?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 11:30 PM
1

That’s great you didn’t get the point. Have a great day.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 10:33 PM
1

Lol if you think amoralism is a central tenant of red pill, I am not sure what else can be done, other then to say, “that’s not real feminism”. Hopefully you figure out why. Have a good day.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 09:16 PM
1

One has to be right or wrong? Are terfs right or third wave feminists? There is no right. It depends on what you consider to be more red pilled. They both might be red pilled for different reasons, but one might be more red pilled. Personally I would say it was considered red pilled to take advantage of the situation at first, but now it has developed into a situation where those men where probably short sighted, and the real red pill is the rejection of hoedom in all forms. Another issue is som…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 09:02 PM
1

No I did not but nice try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 07:30 PM
1

I think you might have the manosphere confused with conservative Islam.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 05:41 AM
1

Yeah except no one has made the claim everything is red pill lol. Nice try though.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 03:07 AM
1

Not sure what you are talking about. Not everyone on the podcast agrees on everything lol. What is based and red pilled, there are disagreements like any group.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 02:41 AM
1

Yep. I would suggest you watch the whatever podcast whenever Andrew or chase is on.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 12:55 AM
0

Ten years ago maybe. These days bro it’s insane the stuff they will get mad at you for. I had one women get mad at me cause I was outside talking to her brother in law for to Long during a wedding. I can give you so many stories from me and all my friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 10:15 PM
1

And I just told you there are red pilled men who say you are wrong. Do you need me to cite them. I wouldn’t need to us you understood the difference between fresh and fit and the whatever podcast.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 10:02 PM
1

Yeah. That sounds like someone with a mental illness who should be on drugs.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 10:01 PM
1

lol then why are so many of them on drugs and depressed?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 09:51 PM
1

Jesus Christ. Do you understand that you can’t “sleep with easy women” and “not sleep with easy women at the same time.”
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 09:49 PM
1

Because one is talking about a specific fight and the other is a broad generalization… do I have to explain which is which? You are implying he thinks all conflict between the sexes is unnatural when he never said that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 09:40 PM
1

That ain’t what he said try rereading the quote again. Do you need me to break it down. We can go work by work if you want. Do you know the difference between a “unnatural fight” and “calling conflict between the sexes ridiculous and unnatural, before I waste my time?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 09:35 PM
1

If you think slavery was profitable for the nation able a whole, you need to go back and look at the costs of owning slaves. There is a reason global poverty levels stayed the same until it’s abolishment. Lol the soviet union collapsed or again is that not real socialism?
/r/MensRights21/01/24 09:34 PM
1

I never said morality. I mean practicality. If one side is always losing you have to ask yourself why.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 09:23 PM
1

And so I would suggest you read some more if you think it is limited to just that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 09:23 PM
1

He said unnatural fight. Why you you feel the need to say something he didn’t say. You are literally strawmanning even though I copy send pasted the quote.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 09:22 PM
1

Sleep with easy women. Don’t sleep with easy women. Those views are diametrically opposed to one another. If you would like to use the term mutually exclusive that works too.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 09:20 PM
1

Yeah the French lost but their allies won. Kind of important not to leave that out. I would disagree democracy has beaten the cia countless times.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 08:52 PM
2

Yes it does because what does that sexual strategy entail if there are two diametrically opposite ideas. Just cause some people make a category mistakes doesn’t mean you have to.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 08:50 PM
1

lol its always the cias fault. Socialism can’t beat the cia… then it’s probally not something we should support.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 08:48 PM
1

So if I was to say it’s red pilled to take advantage of all the free sex these days. And my friend was to say no it’s red pilled to turn all the hoes down and be a chad and find a faithful women, who is correct?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 08:44 PM
1

And why do you think that?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 08:38 PM
1

How come every time a socialist country goes full loony bin all of a sudden it’s not real socialism, but no one ever does this with capitalism and fascism?
/r/MensRights21/01/24 08:38 PM
1

I think you have set up a box around your definition that is unwarranted.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 08:36 PM
1

Then what’s going on in China? Or is this another example that socialism doesn’t act silly work?
/r/MensRights21/01/24 08:28 PM
1

I don’t think you know what science or economics is….
/r/MensRights21/01/24 08:27 PM
2

Why’s that?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 08:22 PM
2

Waiting for a lie…. At best these are overstated.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 08:22 PM
2

You understand he can be something and still challenge it? Did you watch the speech?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 08:20 PM
1

Yes. Saying there is a unnecessary conflict between the sexes is the same as saying, hopefully my wife learns con talking points…. I am curious why you think we are incels, rather then people who had wives and gfs and watched them start insulting everyone like you just did and using broad generalizations while ignoring by what was actually said.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 08:19 PM
2

And if we don’t. People here don’t seem to agree on a definition anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 08:16 PM
1

Those are necessary to be red pilled? Do you also believe you have to be anti-Israel like some other people here?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 08:15 PM
1

If you think the red pill is all about getting laid, you are massively misinformed. They don’t even agree on wether you should sleep around lol. You know women do not all agree or vote the same way….
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 07:08 PM
19

Anyone who denies their existence when they literally televise it for you has been manipulated by propaganda.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 09:21 AM
1

Prob true. Thanks for responding.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 07:51 AM
2

lol nah. Thanks for explaining.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 07:48 AM
1

So is there literally no one once they become famous enough?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 07:46 AM
1

I agree but that is much harder to ban. People will just post shorter video to reg YouTube.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 07:45 AM
1

Ok, thanks for the response.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 07:44 AM
14

…. You got an example of the meme?
/r/MensRights21/01/24 07:41 AM
2

Agreed. That stuff is literal mind control.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 07:40 AM
17

The meme about patriarchy?
/r/MensRights21/01/24 07:36 AM
1

Is there anyone in the movement you think isn’t doing it for their own gains?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 07:34 AM
-1

Why is he a grifter?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 05:21 AM
-3

So they don’t want political change, even if they think it is in their self interest?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 05:20 AM
1

Thank you for letting me know about that. Just saw it and think it is hilarious. What does "weird little guy stuff" mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 04:34 AM
3

Calling him a weird little guy seems like an insult, especially when you talk about his height which feminists love to throw in men’s faces if they are short.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 04:24 AM
3

So just insults?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 04:20 AM
5

I agree we should wait and see but I am cautiously optimistic after he said this to their faces.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 04:15 AM
19

He said this in his speech "given the dismal failure of collectivist models and the undeniable advances in the Free World socialists were forced to chase their agenda they left behind the class struggle based on the economic system and replaced this with other supposed social conflicts which are just as harmful to life as a community and to economic growth, the first of these new battles was the ridiculous and unnatural fight between man and woman."
/r/MensRights21/01/24 04:09 AM
1

The biggest threat is not who the government says it is if you even look at their own fbi numbers for violent crime lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 03:08 AM
1

lol so have the Muslim, so have the leftists. They bombed a bunch of shit in the past and acted like terrorists but everyone forgets. It’s ok. We clearly have the learn this lesson again.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 12:33 AM
1

lol and how did you think it started. I do love how you also ignored all of the things done to Americans that violated their rights that they could get away with. You think they still aren’t doing thing like this. Go have a discussion with Julian Assange or ask Snowden why he ran.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 12:10 AM
1

If you were Muslim and not American. You went to Guantanamo bay, 30 still there without charges. There they were tortured including being rehydrated by dumping water into there ass, called rectal rehydration. If you were Muslim and American or an anti war white, anything from being harassed, to put on a no fly list, to having almost an entire country demonize you, including more than half the democrats and the media. Hate crimes increased as a result. There were other things but those were proba…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 07:45 PM
2

No. That is what we argued after 9/11 and look at what happened to muslims and anti war activists. I think the problem is they have already shown benign things like body count gets you put on the same list as someone who calls for violence, and grouping people together like that is dangerous for everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 07:23 PM
2

I would be curious to hear your answers once you do your research.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 04:03 AM
7

Did you know there is currently a case going on where the government is being sued for telling companies what to do, and in the lower courts the government lost?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 03:07 AM
3

Do you know how many misogynists have committed murder last year as a result of their misogyny?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 02:21 AM
1

Is it a legitimate theory in your opinion? Was it considered a conspiracy theory? Furthermore was it one that could get you banned?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 02:00 AM
1

Question. What is the accepted narrative right now: that covid escaped in a lab or 700 miles away in a bat?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 01:54 AM
4

So they applied for the funding for this report. https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/2023-02/EMW-GR-APP-00047%20Arizona%20State%20University.pdf Its public. We got the report. It said thing as crazy as, if you think a high body count might be an issue you are a misogynist and need to be investigated, including if you are a women saying it. Furthermore, they deliberately left out every time someone on the podcast spoke against a male body count and deliberately framed it as they only call out…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 01:51 AM
10

Is talking about men's and women's high body count as being a bad thing misogynistic extremism?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 01:30 AM
3

Well we know the got funding. I have the dhs document for when they applied. The question now is did they spend all the money, are they getting more, and are the continuing this given the lawsuits going on right now, and are they ever going to share the data publicly like this again. I think DHS should have to come out right now and explain themselves to congress, at least behind closed doors.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 01:27 AM
2

I logged onto mobile and found it and made and edit.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 01:18 AM
2

Is it suppose to be under the ... button cause I don't see edit there. ​ I have Share, Save, Hide ... then hide, delete, mark, mark and send replies.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 01:12 AM
8

But the released the report, got negative feedback, and then limited who can access it. A copy of it was posted to scibd. This wasn't like an accident. they created a whole public page for people to access it, then removed access but kept the page up.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 01:11 AM
5

How do I do that? Any edit?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 01:06 AM
6

So why didn’t they cite it. What has the whatever podcast said that was worse and was endorsed by the podcast? Cause there are some women who go into there that say some pretty messed up shit but they do not endorse it, if you want to talk about starting investigations.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 12:55 AM
2

So do you think they should watch men when their only evidence is they made fun of men and women with high body counts. And if no are you going to speak out against it happening?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 12:46 AM
3

I acted in collusion with the government? When?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 12:45 AM
4

So we should monitor all Muslims because some of them do bad things, like we did after 911. Or do you think they are only investigating the ones who have made threats or something similar?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 12:32 AM
2

I actually tend to agree. Most people seem to need something to fill there life with meaning. To many people come to the wrong conclusion that hedonism is fine if a god doesn’t exist, when I don’t believe that is true.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 12:18 AM
5

Do you really think that is true given McCarthyism, the red scare, the gay scare, the Muslim scare and the actions taken against anti war people during the bush era, etc?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 12:17 AM
5

Seriously do I need to start citing posts calling for violence Reddit allows?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 12:14 AM
1

lol true.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 12:10 AM
5

I guess the claim I have heard so far over and over from people who support this is that some of these people do bad things, so we have to stop everyone from talking about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 12:09 AM
2

That might be why they want this - Senator Dick Durbin Wants Illegal Immigrants To Serve in The US Military https://youtu.be/GZycAvs1ckE
/r/MensRights19/01/24 11:30 PM
2

I never said most where lol. Many men love the access to free-and cheap sex. A high body count is a red flag for a number of reasons and it is dangerous for the people partaking in it now that we have created things like super ghonneria that are drug resistant. In 20 years when a large portion of men start dying from bleeding from this penis please tell me how this was a good idea.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 11:26 PM
3

The majority do. The two groups that don’t lie are the few women who actually think it is ok and have hit an age they don’t care anymore, and women with low counts.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 11:21 PM
1

I do find most non religious people do have to replace it with something else they treat with the same sort of reverence. It so bad even as an atheist I don’t try to convince Christian’s anymore that they are wrong.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 11:12 PM
1

I hate to agree but yeah. This seem to be McCarthyism and the red scare all over again. When will we learn?
/r/MensRights19/01/24 10:58 PM
3

We have just switched Muslims, anti-war activists, and anti abortionists with the manospehere and men who are anti-promiscuity. Last time we didn't stop this they violated thousands of peoples rights and got non-citizens killed through torture, even though they had never called for violence or committed it. The video actually goes into more detail on this issue.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 09:05 PM
7

Agreed. If you watch the podcast a large amount of women do not care what men want, but want men to care about what they want. They also think we want the same things.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 08:55 PM
4

When we put Muslims, anti-war activists, and anti abortionist on no fly lists and decaled that were at highest risk for domestic terror, were spied on, were openly mocked and demeaned by the government, and even then they even sent non-Americans to Guantanamo bay for 20+ years, with 30 still there who have been constantly tortured while never being charged with a crime.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 08:51 PM
1

Women are deff known more for poisoning their husbands rather then the other way around so I wouldn’t be surprised if you are right op but would like to see more data.
/r/MensRights22/12/23 11:28 PM
2

lol tell me you don’t know what a comparison is some more.
/r/MensRights30/11/23 03:22 PM
40

If you are one of the “party” you can get away with just about anything in that movie. But if you speak out like Stephen fry’s character did and make fun of the leader or party it was off to the gulag. We just have this weird fucked up social justice version of it where we put “minorities” at the top of the “party”.
/r/MensRights29/11/23 07:20 PM
90

The uk is starting to look more and more like the UK from V from Vendetta. A failed state where if you stab someone and your brown you get citizenship and if you are white and call someone names you are off to the gulag.
/r/MensRights29/11/23 05:57 PM
1

Bro, just ended a 3 year relationship after she cheated and gaslighted me after I caught her. She would gaslight me all the time and I put up with it. The new rule is the second they do that we are done if they do not apologize immediately after I point it out and it ceases.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 11:08 PM
1

Not enough. That school should be bankrupt after this.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 07:57 PM
1

Did he lose or settle? I am not familiar with the case.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 05:50 PM
4

Ask every women who has ever lied about a man raping her. I don’t really care why they did it. Plus motivation isn’t required, only intent. The fact that they won’t bring a civil case makes it even more sus imo. I haven’t downvoted you. I actually thought you made a decent point about reasonable doubt vs balance of probabilities. I just hope you know that most people aren’t lawyers who went to law school and when they win a case the person who lost is usually seen as a liar in the court of publi…
/r/MensRights14/07/23 05:47 PM
8

So if they lose a civil case we then agree these women are lying or have some fucked up memory.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 05:37 PM
48

Then how was he found not guilty? The women were just mistaken and forgot the sex was consensual?
/r/MensRights14/07/23 05:07 PM
6

And exactly what are you trying to show? What is your message? If a bunch of women killed themselves and I walked in and said, well actually men die more often, how do you think they would react when I say, I am just giving the full story with facts.
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 11:56 AM
1

Says the person who decides to throw a whataboutism when it comes to male suicide to make women look like the victims, again. You remind me of those articles that go “Men kill themselves more often, click to find out why women are most affected.”
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 11:46 AM
1

So women can’t follow through. What else is new?
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 10:43 AM
1

Have you tried to talk to a specialist in person. One not focused on suicide maybe. Bro, I was in a bad place in 2020. Never been like that before. Going online and googling and talking on the phone didn’t help. I had to talk to someone in person. I ain’t saying it will help for you. I didn’t even tell you not to kill your self. I just hope you don’t. I ain’t even telling you to get off Reddit I am just recommending it because of how cancerous snd toxic and wrong this place can be. Maybe there a…
/r/MenSupportMen28/07/22 12:12 AM
1

I really hope you don’t kill yourself and you talk to someone that can not only help you get better mentally but can help you get to where you want to be with financially. I would get off Reddit though as much as you can.
/r/MenSupportMen28/07/22 12:01 AM
4

I am in the same boat as you and had to pick none of above.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 06:48 PM
1

First, it isn’t semantics. Not according the the law at least. There is a very substantial difference between double homicide and an aggravating factor to a single homicide. It doesn’t matter if they are tried as adults they are considered persons under the law with rights. Second, uhh you said it wasn’t a person multiple times . I even cited it for you. You said abortion doesn’t kill anything because it wasn’t a human life in the first place. Third, so then I can assume you believe there should…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 07:13 PM
7

Well three issues. First, it’s not just a worse punishment. It’s double homicide, which indicates two humans were killed. Second, why does the choice matter if it’s not a human? Exactly what value do you place on this fetus? Should it be a double homicide or should it be a few extra months? Third, that still doesn’t answer the question. Why should taking that choice away be considered either aggravating or a separate offences, when taking away the mothers other choices are not. Especially when n…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 06:14 PM
4

“I'm inclined to agree but we need to stop using this anti science language. We don't talk about tumors and amputation in the same way and yet they have just as much conscienceness. Abortions don't kill anything because it wasn't a human life in the first place. Do I really need to sit here and explain the common sense notion killing a pregnant women should incur more punishments than killing anyone else? Not only that but at the time of most abortions the bundle of cells has more in common with…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 06:03 PM
12

If that is your response then no, you don’t see the contradiction. Maybe most of the people disagree with you and see the issue with your argument but whatever maybe we are all bots.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 05:53 PM
16

How can you not see the clear contradiction you are spewing that the other person is pointing out? Are you a bot?
/r/MensRights24/06/22 05:47 PM
8

The prime Minister did not elaborate whether the laws applied solely for women and children, or whether they could be applied to male victims as well. Lololol of course no because women would be fucked if they had to follow these rules.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/06/21 10:27 AM
1

I am not being paid for this so I ain’t bothering to look up the case cause that costs me money. You do you bro and always seek out a lawyer before you sign any contract.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 10:24 PM
1

lol https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law You are thinking of a common law marriage, which happens in the common law. If we apply your earlier argument to common law marriages when they were new we can see how silly your earlier argument was trying to rely on irrelevant stats. It would be the same as trying to apply the lack of negligence cases before donoghue v stevenson.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 07:37 PM
1

Bro you don’t understand how the common law works. Once you get a ruling like this it is much easier to get a similar result with similar circumstances. I ain’t saying the vast majority ain’t holding up now. I am saying as lawyers learn of this they will become more and more common whether they win or lose on that motion your going to be dealing with it. The direction it is going down is not one anyone smart should want to risk going down if you are a guy. Maybe over the long run they will hold …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 05:27 PM
1

https://youtu.be/N4vIBijzg4w
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 05:21 PM
1

Yeah but thank you capitalism you can buy them on the market now.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 05:19 PM
0

Burn that thing bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 05:12 PM
2

I think your confusing something. Many men want a low body count but they realize in this day and age that is few and far between. However, if the body count is already ridiculous they feel that more then likely you have given it up to someone really easy like on the first couple of dates. So, whether all this is reasonable or not you have them then the question, what did that person have they dont? Now they have to work for something someone else didn’t, and people don’t like paying more for so…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 05:07 PM
1

My issue with this is beauty is so subjective. If they are close they can easily go up or down based on who is looking at them.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 04:55 PM
1

Sorry but even these days they ain’t safe. For example, one women has now claimed she was pressured into signing it and might get it throw out. Another guy have to pay tens of thousands a month to a women he had a relationship with even though they never lived together and maintained separate properties. If you live in a common law country you are now actually in a better position to break of with your s/o just before your two year anniversary. And never live together.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 04:53 PM
1

lolol she just locked her tweets
/r/PussyPassDenied24/06/20 04:50 AM
2

I love equality
/r/PussyPassDenied09/01/20 11:08 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter